WO2023178630A1

WO2023178630A1 - Academic blockchain platform and operation method therefor

Info

Publication number: WO2023178630A1
Application number: PCT/CN2022/082913
Authority: WO
Inventors: 廖佑铭; 陈映滕; 刘又宁; 李若宁
Original assignee: 廖佑铭
Priority date: 2022-03-25
Filing date: 2022-03-25
Publication date: 2023-09-28

Abstract

An academic blockchain and an operation method therefor. The academic blockchain platform comprises a user authentication module, an article rating module, and a non-fungible token module. The user authentication module receives user information sent by a user, generates a personal private key according to the user information after an authentication check passes, and uploads a thesis after performing signing and linkage with the academic blockchain platform by means of the personal private key. The article rating module provides at least one examiner for rating the thesis. The non-fungible token module provides a first non-fungible token parameter to the user uploading the thesis, provides a second non-fungible token parameter to the examiner of the thesis, and provides a third non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform. The academic blockchain platform provided by the present invention provides non-fungible token parameters to each of the user, the examiner and the platform, and provides optimized thesis examination mechanism, improving the user experience.

Description

Academic Blockchain Platform and How It Works

Technical field

The present invention relates to a blockchain platform, and in particular to an academic blockchain platform and its operation method.

Background technique

Generally speaking, the review time for articles in traditional academic journals is too long, and the review fees, publication fees, and copyright fees are too high. One of the reasons is that there is no complete review mechanism for academic articles between contributors, reviewers and academic platforms.

Contents of the invention

In order to solve the above-mentioned shortcomings of the previous technology in the article review mechanism, this application provides an academic blockchain platform and its operation method. The academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module. The user authentication module accepts the user information sent by the user. After authentication and verification, it generates a personal private key based on the user information. The personal private key is linked with the academic blockchain platform for signature and then the paper is uploaded. The article rating module provides at least one reviewer with The paper is rated, and the non-fungible token module provides the first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploads the paper, the second non-fungible token parameter to the reviewer who reviews the paper, and the second non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform. Providing third non-fungible token parameters, through the above functions, the present invention can provide non-fungible token parameters to users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provide a complete paper review mechanism to improve user experience. Additionally, academic blockchain platforms provide a fair and systematic non-fungible proportional distribution of token parameters among users, reviewers, and platforms.

An academic blockchain platform provided by the present invention includes: a user authentication module, used to accept at least one user information sent by the user, and generate a personal private key based on the at least one user information after authentication and verification. The user uses the personal private key and The academic blockchain platform further uploads or downloads papers after linking signatures; the article rating module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module, and the article rating module is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper; and non-homogeneous communication The certificate module is electrically coupled to the article rating module. The non-fungible token module is used to provide the first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploads the paper, and to provide the second non-fungible token parameter to at least one reviewer who reviews the paper. ized token parameters and provide third non-fungible token parameters for academic blockchain platforms.

In an embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned academic blockchain platform further includes: a document comparison module, electrically coupled to a user authentication module, and the document comparison module is used to conduct academic plagiarism review of papers based on pre-stored historical documents. or error citation review; the paper revision module is electrically coupled to the literature comparison module and the article rating module. The paper revision module is used to revise the grammatical or semantic fluency of the paper uploaded by the user.

In an embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned academic blockchain platform further includes: a review matching module, electrically coupled to an article rating module, and the review matching module is used to invite papers with research topics based on pre-stored historical documents. Highly relevant scholars assist in reviewing papers; the opinion rating module is electrically coupled to the article rating module. The opinion rating module is used to evaluate reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for papers uploaded by users.

An operating method provided by the invention is suitable for an academic blockchain platform. The academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module. The article rating module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module. and a non-fungible token module. The operation method includes: the user authentication module accepts at least one user information sent by the user, and after authentication and verification, generates a personal private key based on at least one user information. The user uses the personal private key to communicate with the academic blockchain The platform further uploads or downloads papers after linking signatures; the article rating module is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper; and the non-fungible token module provides the first non-fungible to users who upload papers. a token parameter, a second non-fungible token parameter to at least one reviewer of the review paper and a third non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform.

In an embodiment of the present invention, the academic blockchain platform to which the above-mentioned operating method is applicable further includes a document comparison module and a paper revision module. The document comparison module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module, and the paper revision module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module. Coupling the literature comparison module and the article rating module, the operation method further includes: the literature comparison module conducts academic plagiarism review or miscitation review of papers based on pre-stored historical documents; the paper revision module conducts refined papers uploaded by users. Revise the thesis for grammar or semantic fluency.

In an embodiment of the present invention, the academic blockchain platform applicable to the above operation method further includes a review matching module and an opinion rating module. The review matching module is electrically coupled to the article rating module, and the opinion rating module is electrically coupled. Connected to the article rating module, the operation method further includes: the review matching module invites scholars who are highly related to the research topic of the paper to assist in reviewing the paper based on pre-stored historical documents; the opinion rating module evaluates the papers uploaded by the user, and the reviewer's remuneration or Reviewer credibility rating.

In an embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned operating method and the first non-fungible token parameter of the academic blockchain platform are greater than the third non-fungible token parameter, and the third non-fungible token parameter Greater than the second non-fungible token parameter.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned operating method and the user authentication module of the academic blockchain platform accept at least one user information sent by the user, including email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information or other combination.

To sum up, the present invention proposes an academic blockchain platform and its operation method. The academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module. The user authentication module accepts the information sent by the user. User information, after authentication and verification, a personal private key is generated based on the user information. The personal private key is linked to the academic blockchain platform for signature and then the paper is uploaded. The article rating module provides at least one reviewer to rate the paper, which is non-homogeneous. The token module provides the first non-fungible token parameter to users who upload papers, the second non-fungible token parameter to reviewers who review papers, and the third non-fungible token parameter to academic blockchain platforms. Token parameters, through the above functions, the present invention can provide non-homogeneous token parameters to users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provide a complete paper review mechanism to improve user experience. Additionally, academic blockchain platforms provide a fair and systematic non-fungible proportional distribution of token parameters among users, reviewers, and platforms.

In order to make the above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention more clearly understood, embodiments are given below and described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

Description of the drawings

Figure 1 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

Figure 2 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by another embodiment of the present invention;

Figure 3 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by another embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 4 is a schematic flowchart of an operation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed ways

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail by illustrating various embodiments of the invention in the drawings. The inventive concepts may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the illustrative embodiments set forth herein. Additionally, the same reference numbers may be used to refer to similar components in the drawings.

Please refer to Figure 1, which is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by an embodiment of the present invention. The academic blockchain platform 100 provided by an embodiment of the present invention includes a user authentication module 110, an article rating module 120, and a non-fungible token module 130. In one embodiment, the user authentication module 110, the article rating module 120 and the non-fungible token module 130 can be implemented by one or more functional circuits (such as processing circuits, comparison circuits, storage circuits or communication circuits). The article rating module 120 is electrically coupled to the user authentication module 110 . The non-fungible token module 130 is electrically coupled to the article rating module 120. The user authentication module 110 is used to accept at least one user information sent by the user. After the authentication check, the user authentication module 110 generates a personal private key based on at least one user information. The user uses the personal private key to sign and connect with the academic blockchain platform 100. Further upload or download the paper after the operation. Furthermore, the academic blockchain platform 100 proposed in this application is mainly used to rate academic papers. The user authentication module 110 accepts at least one user information sent by the user, which may include email information, Mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information or a combination thereof. In other embodiments, the at least one user information received by the user authentication module 110 may also include fingerprint identification information, palmprint identification information, voice identification information, etc. This application is not limited to the type of user information.

In one embodiment, the article rating module 120 is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper, and then uses the user authentication module 110 to evaluate email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information, fingerprint recognition information, After at least one of the palmprint recognition information and the voice recognition information is authenticated, the academic paper can be uploaded to the academic blockchain platform 100 for at least one reviewer to rate the academic paper. In addition, the academic blockchain platform 100 will use the weight ratio of the reviewer's past experience, such as the institution and title he works for, past academic publication ratings, patent certificates, award records, etc., to review and rate the reviewer, such as whether he is qualified as editor-in-chief. , weighting factors related to review opinions. It is worth noting that the Academic Blockchain Platform 100 will provide each user with a set of personal private keys for verification and verification, providing important signatures for users to participate in the Academic Blockchain Platform 100 community, such as opening an encrypted wallet and participating in a double-blind Review (the reviewer and the user who uploaded the paper do not know each other's identity), so that both users and reviewers can join the academic blockchain platform 100 for discussion and participate in this signature linkage. In other words, Academic Blockchain Platform 100 will adopt a bilateral blind review system. Reviewers only need to publish all review records of their user signatures and disclosure signatures. Academic Blockchain Platform 100 will not publish the entity name of the reviewer. At the same time, Reviewers are also unable to obtain the user information and signatures of the reviewed manuscripts during the review period.

In one embodiment, the non-fungible token module 130 is configured to provide a first non-fungible token parameter to a user who uploads a paper, and to provide a second non-fungible token parameter to at least one reviewer who reviews the paper. And provide third non-fungible token parameters for academic blockchain platform 100. For example, if the first non-fungible token parameter is greater than the third non-fungible token parameter, and the third non-fungible token parameter is greater than the second non-fungible token parameter, the single action of uploading a paper to the user is As 100%, the non-fungible token module 130 may provide the first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploaded the paper, such as 62.5%, and the non-fungible token module 130 may provide the reviewer with The second non-fungible token parameter is divided into 12.5%, for example, and the non-fungible token module 130 can provide the third non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform 100 with the single action of uploading a paper, such as 12.5%. 25%. The above values are not used to limit the scope of this application, but are merely examples. The academic blockchain platform 100 proposed in this application provides non-fungible token parameters for users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provides complete papers. Review mechanism to improve user experience. The academic blockchain platform 100 will use the non-fungible token module 130 to provide users with the ability to bid for transactions and donate sponsorship-related research results on the academic blockchain platform 100 . The non-fungible token is the only certificate for the subsequent payment of royalties for manuscripts, increasing user experience. In addition, the academic blockchain platform 100 provides a fair and systematic proportional distribution of non-homogeneous token parameters among users, reviewers and platforms, which is used to improve the shortcomings of traditional academic article review costs and lengthy review times. In addition, the data communication method of this application can use the Advanced Encryption Standard AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) encryption algorithm to perform encoding and decoding to randomly generate an unlocking key, and then send and receive data through a secure channel.

In one embodiment, please refer to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 simultaneously. FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by another embodiment of the present invention. The academic blockchain platform 200 further includes a document comparison module 213 and a paper revision module 215. The document comparison module 213 is electrically coupled to the user authentication module 110, and the paper revision module 215 is electrically coupled to the document comparison module 213 and the article rating module 120. The document comparison module 213 and the paper revision module 215 can be implemented by one or more functional circuits (such as processing circuits, comparison circuits, storage circuits or communication circuits). The literature comparison module 213 is used to conduct academic plagiarism review or miscitation review on papers based on pre-stored historical documents. In other words, the literature comparison module 213 is used to screen papers and check whether there are academic plagiarism, miscitations and other major academic issues in the documents. Ethical violations. The paper revision module 215 is used to revise the paper uploaded by the user to improve its grammar or semantic fluency. Academic Blockchain Platform 200 will encrypt the private key for each academic article submitted to the platform and record it on the blockchain to facilitate the storage circuit to permanently record key data such as document version, document timestamp or document author ranking. .

In one embodiment, please refer to FIG. 1 and FIG. 3 simultaneously. FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by yet another embodiment of the present invention. The academic blockchain platform 300 further includes a review matching module 321 and an opinion rating module 325. The review matching module 321 and the opinion rating module 325 may be implemented by one or more functional circuits (eg, processing circuits, comparison circuits, storage circuits, or communication circuits). The review matching module 321 is electrically coupled to the article rating module 120. The opinion rating module 325 is electrically coupled to the article rating module 120. The review matching module 321 is used to invite scholars who are highly relevant to the research topic of the paper to assist in reviewing the paper based on pre-stored historical documents. The opinion rating module 325 is used to rate reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for papers uploaded by users. In other words, the academic blockchain platform 300 invites scholars highly related to the research topic of the article through the review and matching module 321 to assist in reviewing the manuscript, and screens and excludes relevant scholars who need to avoid interests, such as long-term cooperative scholars, former teacher-student relationships, etc. Intervening factors, the article rating module 120 rates papers based on relevant review records such as the number of reviewers' endorsements, reviewer credibility, article citations, etc. In addition, the academic blockchain platform 300 will use the opinion rating module 325 to assess relevant contributions such as Reviewers review remuneration or review credibility ratings. The academic blockchain platform 300 uses a free value-added business model to provide users with free access including online reading of the full text, all manuscript version records, all review opinions and author responses, etc., and also provides Various subscription services such as ad removal, high-resolution data or various types of file output increase user experience. The academic blockchain platform 300 also includes a push matchmaking module, a knowledge consensus mechanism module and a token fundraising module (not shown). The push matchmaking module is used to accurately place articles on academic blockchains with highly relevant research topics. For users of Platform 300, the knowledge consensus mechanism module is used to provide operating guidelines for platform knowledge mining, and the token fundraising module is used to assist research projects in raising research funds, effectively increasing applicability.

Please refer to FIG. 4 , which is a schematic flowchart of an operation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention. The present invention proposes an operation method, which is suitable for an academic blockchain platform. The academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-homogeneous token module. The article rating module is electrically coupled to the user. The operation method of the authentication module and the non-homogeneous certificate module includes: S410. The user authentication module accepts at least one user information sent by a user. After authentication and verification, a personal private key is generated based on the at least one user information. The user passes the personal private key The key is linked with the academic blockchain platform for signature and then a paper is further uploaded or downloaded; S420, the article rating module is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper; and S430, the non-fungible token module The user uploading the paper provides a first non-fungible token parameter, a second non-fungible token parameter is provided to at least one reviewer of the paper and the academic blockchain platform is provided a third non-fungible token parameter. Token parameters. In addition, steps S410 to S430 proposed in this application are interchangeable, and the order of the steps is not limited here.

In one embodiment, the academic blockchain platform further includes a document comparison module and a paper revision module. The document comparison module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module, and the paper revision module is electrically coupled to the document comparison module and Article rating module, the operation method includes: the literature comparison module conducts academic plagiarism review or miscitation review of the paper based on pre-stored historical documents; the paper revision module refines the paper uploaded by the user to revise the paper grammar or semantic fluency Revise.

In one embodiment, the first non-fungible token parameter is greater than the third non-fungible token parameter, and the third non-fungible token parameter is greater than the second non-fungible token parameter.

In one embodiment, the user authentication module accepts at least one user information sent by the user, including email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information, or a combination thereof.

In one embodiment, the academic blockchain platform further includes a review matching module and an opinion rating module. The review matching module is electrically coupled to the article rating module. The opinion rating module is electrically coupled to the article rating module. The operation method includes : The review matching module invites scholars highly related to the research topic of the paper to assist in reviewing the paper based on pre-stored historical documents; the opinion rating module evaluates the reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for the paper uploaded by the user.

The above are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, and do not limit the present invention in any form. Although the present invention has been disclosed above in preferred embodiments, it is not intended to limit the present invention. Anyone familiar with this field will Skilled personnel, without departing from the scope of the technical solution of the present invention, can use the methods and technical contents disclosed above to make slight changes or modifications to equivalent embodiments with equivalent changes. However, as long as they do not depart from the content of the technical solution of the present invention, Any simple modifications, equivalent changes and modifications made to the above embodiments based on the technical essence of the present invention still fall within the scope of the technical solution of the present invention.

Claims

An academic blockchain platform, characterized by:

A user authentication module, used to accept at least one user information sent by a user, and generate a personal private key based on the at least one user information after authentication and verification. The user signs with the academic blockchain platform through the personal private key. After linking, you can further upload or download a paper;

An article rating module, electrically coupled to the user authentication module, the article rating module is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper; and

A non-fungible token module, electrically coupled to the article rating module, the non-fungible token module is used to provide a first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploaded the paper, and to review the article The at least one reviewer of the paper provides a second non-fungible token parameter and a third non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform.
The academic blockchain platform as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the academic blockchain platform further includes:

A document comparison module, electrically coupled to the user authentication module, the document comparison module is used to conduct academic plagiarism review or miscitation review of the paper based on pre-stored historical documents;

A paper revision module is electrically coupled to the literature comparison module and the article rating module. The paper revision module is used to revise the paper uploaded by the user to improve the grammar or semantic fluency of the paper.
The academic blockchain platform of claim 1, wherein the first non-fungible token parameter is greater than the third non-fungible token parameter, and the third non-fungible token parameter is greater than the second non-fungible token parameter.
The academic blockchain platform of claim 1, wherein the user authentication module accepts the at least one user information sent by the user including email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information or other information. combination.
The academic blockchain platform as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the academic blockchain platform further includes:

A review matching module, electrically coupled to the article rating module, the review matching module is used to invite scholars who are highly relevant to the research topic of the paper to assist in reviewing the paper based on pre-stored historical documents;

An opinion rating module is electrically coupled to the article rating module. The opinion rating module is used to rate reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for the paper uploaded by the user.
An operation method suitable for an academic blockchain platform. The academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module. The article rating module is electrically coupled to the user. The authentication module and the non-fungible token module are characterized in that the operation method includes:

The user authentication module receives at least one user information sent by a user, and after authentication and verification, a personal private key is generated based on the at least one user information. The user uses the personal private key to perform signature linkage with the academic blockchain platform. Further upload or download a paper;

used by the article rating module to provide at least one reviewer with a rating for the article; and

The non-fungible token module provides a first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploaded the paper, and provides a second non-fungible token parameter to the at least one reviewer who reviewed the paper. Provide a third non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform.
The operating method of claim 6, wherein the academic blockchain platform further includes a document comparison module and a paper revision module, the document comparison module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module, and the paper The revision module is electrically coupled to the literature comparison module and the article rating module. The operation method includes:

The document comparison module conducts academic plagiarism or miscitation review on the paper based on pre-stored historical documents;

The paper revision module will revise the paper uploaded by the user to improve its grammar or semantic fluency.
The operating method of claim 6, wherein the first non-fungible token parameter is greater than the third non-fungible token parameter, and the third non-fungible token parameter is greater than the third non-fungible token parameter. 2. Non-fungible token parameters.
The operating method of claim 6, wherein the user authentication module accepts the at least one user information sent by the user including email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information or a combination thereof.
The operating method of claim 6, wherein the academic blockchain platform further includes a review matching module and an opinion rating module, the review matching module is electrically coupled to the article rating module, and the opinion rating module The module is electrically coupled to the article rating module, and the operation method includes:

The review matching module invites scholars highly relevant to the research topic of the paper based on pre-stored historical documents to assist in reviewing the paper;

The opinion rating module evaluates the reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for the paper uploaded by the user.