WO2023114839A1 - Compositions de catalyseur cobalt-molybdène en vrac et procédés de synthèse - Google Patents

Compositions de catalyseur cobalt-molybdène en vrac et procédés de synthèse Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023114839A1
WO2023114839A1 PCT/US2022/081549 US2022081549W WO2023114839A1 WO 2023114839 A1 WO2023114839 A1 WO 2023114839A1 US 2022081549 W US2022081549 W US 2022081549W WO 2023114839 A1 WO2023114839 A1 WO 2023114839A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
catalyst precursor
catalyst
precursor composition
sulfided
composition
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2022/081549
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Yi Du
Bradley D. WOOLER
Stuart L. Soled
Sabato Miseo
Christine E. Kliewer
Wenyih F. Lai
Original Assignee
ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company filed Critical ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company
Publication of WO2023114839A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023114839A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/76—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/84—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36 with arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/85—Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • B01J23/888—Tungsten
    • B01J23/8885—Tungsten containing also molybdenum
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/76—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/84—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36 with arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/85—Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • B01J23/88—Molybdenum
    • B01J23/882—Molybdenum and cobalt
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/30—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their physical properties
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/61—Surface area
    • B01J35/613—10-100 m2/g
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/61—Surface area
    • B01J35/615—100-500 m2/g
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00—Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/02—Impregnation, coating or precipitation
    • B01J37/03—Precipitation; Co-precipitation
    • B01J37/031—Precipitation
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00—Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/08—Heat treatment
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00—Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/08—Heat treatment
    • B01J37/082—Decomposition and pyrolysis
    • B01J37/088—Decomposition of a metal salt
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00—Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/20—Sulfiding

Definitions

  • This application relates to bulk catalyst compositions, methods of making these bulk catalyst compositions, and use of bulk catalyst compositions for hydroprocessing of a hydrocarbon feedstock, which can include hydrodesulfurization and/or hydrodenitrogenation.
  • Hydroprocessing involves the treatment of hydrocarbons with hydrogen in the presence of catalysts, and is a conventional method for heteroatom (e.g., sulfur and nitrogen) removal.
  • heteroatom e.g., sulfur and nitrogen
  • Many existing hydroprocessing facilities such as those using relatively low pressure hydrotreaters, were constructed before these more stringent sulfur reduction requirements were enacted and represent a substantial prior investment. Upgrading of these existing hydrotreating reactors presents a variety of fiscal and logistical difficulties. Hydrotreaters constrained to operate at low hydrogen partial pressure and with limited hydrogen availability may require large amounts of catalysts to lower the sulfur content and meet regulations or downstream process. As such, refineries are often operating at the top of their capacity, both with respect to temperature and pressure.
  • such refineries may process feeds containing hindered sulfur and nitrogen within multi-ring aromatics.
  • processes such as hydrodesulfurization (HDS) or hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) may be used where hydrogenation is followed by hydrogenolysis before sulfur or nitrogen removal.
  • HDS hydrodesulfurization
  • HDN hydrodenitrogenation
  • these processes require high pressures
  • direct sulfur removal mechanism direct desulfurization or DDS
  • DDS direct desulfurization
  • This mechanism is not as sensitive to hydrogen partial pressure and may be used at lower pressures, with a low treat gas ratio, but is prone to H2S poisoning of the catalyst.
  • these units are limited in the amount of and quality of feed that can be processed.
  • U.S. Patent 7,951,746 describes bulk Group VIII / Group VIB metal catalyst precursors that also include carbon, as well as corresponding catalysts.
  • an organic acid is included in the synthesis mixture.
  • at least a portion of the carbon from the organic acid is retained in the bulk catalyst precursor.
  • the precursor can then be sulfided to form a catalyst. Due to the presence of roughly 10 wt% to 25 wt% of carbon in the catalyst precursor, the weight of Group VIII and Group VIB metals in the catalyst can be 60 wt% or less.
  • the balance of the catalyst precursor weight is oxygen, as the metals in the precursor are present in the form of metal oxides.
  • This application relates to bulk catalyst compositions, methods of making these bulk catalyst compositions, and use of bulk catalyst compositions for hydroprocessing of a hydrocarbon feedstock, which can include hydrodesulfurization and/or hydrodenitrogenation.
  • a catalyst precursor composition in an aspect, includes cobalt oxide and molybdenum oxide, a molar ratio of cobalt to molybdenum in the catalyst precursor composition being between 1.5 and 4.0.
  • the composition can have an X-ray powder diffraction pattern comprising characteristic diffraction peaks having d-spacing values of a) about O O O O O O
  • the catalyst precursor composition can have a stoichiometry of CO X MOO 3+X - y(H2O) wherein 1.5 ⁇ x ⁇ 4.0 and 0 ⁇ y ⁇ 2.0.
  • the catalyst precursor composition can have a surface area between 50 m 2 /g and 190 m 2 /g, or 75 m 2 /g to 175 m 2 /g.
  • the bump feature at a 20 value between 20° and 30° in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern is believed to correspond to a disordered structure.
  • a sulfided catalyst can be formed by sulfiding a catalyst precursor composition.
  • Methods of forming a catalyst precursor composition such as by reacting CoCOa and MoOa, are also provided.
  • FIG. 1 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns for a Co2MoO x catalyst precursor composition according to the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 2 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns for a Co2MoO x catalyst precursor composition according to the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 3 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns for a C02M0.5W.5 catalyst precursor composition.
  • FIG. 4 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns for a COI.2MOO X catalyst precursor composition.
  • FIG. 5 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns for two COI.2MOO X products according to the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 6 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns for a Co2VO x catalyst precursor composition.
  • FIG. 7 shows X-ray diffraction patterns for catalyst precursor compositions including varying ratios of Co to Mo.
  • FIG. 8 shows X-ray diffraction patterns for catalyst precursor compositions formed using various reaction times and reaction temperatures.
  • FIG. 9 shows X-ray diffraction patterns of catalyst precursor compositions formed using various metal precursor reagents.
  • This application relates to bulk catalyst compositions, methods of making these bulk catalyst compositions, and use of bulk catalyst compositions for hydroprocessing of a hydrocarbon feedstock, which can include hydrodesulfurization and/or hydrodenitrogenation.
  • the term “bulk catalyst composition” includes catalyst compositions formed through precipitation and/or solid-solid reactions.
  • the bulk catalyst composition can be free of binder additives (“unsupported”), or composited with a binder to aid formulation of the materials into particles, such as for fixed bed applications.
  • Bulk catalyst compositions disclosed herein can also include dispersing-type catalyst (“slurry catalyst”) for use as dispersed catalyst particles in mixture of liquid (e.g., hydrocarbon oil), which similarly can be formulated with or without a binder.
  • Binders for bulk catalyst compositions include any suitable binder for hydroprocessing applications, such as silica, silica-alumina, alumina such as (pseudo)boehmite, gibbsite, titania, zirconia, cationic clays or anionic clays such as bentonite, kaoline, sepiolite or hydrotalcite, or mixtures thereof.
  • Preferred binders are silica, silica-alumina, alumina, titanic, zirconia, or mixtures thereof.
  • Binders can also include binder precursors such as alkali metal aluminates (to obtain an alumina binder), water glass (to obtain a silica binder), a mixture of alkali metal aluminates and water glass (to obtain a silica alumina binder), a mixture of sources of a di-, tri-, and/or tetravalent metal such as a mixture of water-soluble salts of magnesium, aluminum and/or silicon (to prepare a cationic clay and/or anionic clay), chlorohydrol, aluminum sulfate, or mixtures thereof. Binders can be added to a bulk catalyst composition in amounts from 0-95 wt. % of the total composition, depending on the envisaged catalytic application.
  • binder precursors such as alkali metal aluminates (to obtain an alumina binder), water glass (to obtain a silica binder), a mixture of alkali metal aluminates and water glass (to obtain a silica alumina binder
  • treatment when used in conjunction with a heavy oil feedstock, describes a heavy oil feedstock that is being or has been subjected to hydroprocessing, or a resulting material or crude product, having a reduction in the molecular weight of the heavy oil feedstock, a reduction in the boiling point range of the heavy oil feedstock, a reduction in the concentration of asphaltenes, a reduction in the concentration of hydrocarbon free radicals, and/or a reduction in the quantity of impurities, such as sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, halides, and metals.
  • impurities such as sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, halides, and metals.
  • Hydroprocessing means any oil feed upgrading or treatment process carried out in the presence of hydrogen, including, but not limited to, hydroconversion, hydrocracking, hydrogenation, hydrotreating, hydrodesulfurization, hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodemetallation, hydrodearomatization, hydroisomerization, hydrodewaxing, and hydrocracking, including selective hydrocracking.
  • the products of hydroprocessing may show improved viscosities, viscosity indices, saturates content, low temperature properties, volatilities and depolarization, etc.
  • catalyst precursor refers to a compound containing one or more catalytically active metals, from which compound the catalyst of the inventive catalyst comprising cobalt and molybdenum is eventually formed, and which compound may be catalytically active as a hydroprocessing catalyst.
  • the phrase “one or more of’ or “at least one of’ when used to preface several elements or classes of elements such as X, Y and Z or Xi-X n , Y i-Y n and Zi-Z n is intended to refer to a single element selected from X or Y or Z, a combination of elements selected from the same common class (such as Xi and X2), as well as a combination of elements selected from different classes (such as Xi, Y2and Z n ).
  • novel bulk catalyst precursor compositions can be formed based on cobalt oxide and molybdenum oxide.
  • the sulfided forms of the novel bulk catalyst precursor compositions can provide unexpectedly high activity relative to the volume and/or weight of the catalyst I catalyst precursor. Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that the unexpectedly high activity is due in part to an unexpectedly high molar ratio of Co relative to Mo in the catalyst precursor I the sulfided catalyst. Additionally or alternately, it is believed that the unexpectedly high activity is due in part to an unexpectedly high surface area for the catalyst precursor composition.
  • catalyst precursor compositions described herein can have an X- ray powder diffraction pattern comprising characteristic diffraction peaks having first set of d- spacing values of about 3.19 A, 2.67 A, and 1.57 A. It is noted that the peak corresponding to a d- spacing value of 3.19 A corresponds to a peak at a 20 value between 20° and 30° in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern. Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that the catalyst precursor composition can have an at least partially disordered structure in the crystal direction corresponding to the d-spacing value of 3.19 A.
  • the X-ray powder diffraction pattern can include a broader spectral feature corresponding to a bump in the pattern. This bump can be present at a 20 value between 20° and 30° in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern.
  • the beneficial catalyst activity provided by catalysts formed from such a structure is maintained when a peak is present at a d-spacing value of 3.19 A, or when a bump feature is present between 20° and 30°, or when both a peak at 3.19 A and a bump between 20° and 30° are present.
  • catalyst precursor compositions described herein can have an X- ray powder diffraction pattern comprising characteristic diffraction peaks having a second set of d-spacing values of about 3.32 A, 3.03 A, and 2.64 A.
  • This catalyst precursor composition does not appear to be susceptible to having disorder along any of the crystallographic directions, so this catalyst precursor composition is indicated by the presence of all three of the d-spacing values.
  • catalyst precursor compositions described herein can correspond to a mixture of the composition having the first set of d-spacing values and the composition having the second set of d-spacing values.
  • a catalyst composition can have an X-ray powder diffraction pattern comprising characteristic diffraction peaks having a third set of d-spacing values of about 3.32 A, 3.03 A, 2.67 A, 2.64 A, 1.57 A, and at least one of a d- spacing value of 3.19 A and a bump at a 20 value between 20° and 30° in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern.
  • a catalyst precursor composition having the first set of d-spacing values, the second set of d-spacing values, or the third set of d-spacing values can correspond to a precursor composition that includes an unexpectedly high ratio of Co to Mo.
  • the bulk catalyst precursor compositions can have a stoichiometry of Co x MoO3+x, where 1.5 ⁇ x ⁇ 4.0.
  • waters of hydration can also be included in the catalyst precursor composition.
  • the composition can optionally include 0 to 2 molar equivalents of waters of hydration, so that the stoichiometry of the catalyst precursor composition, including waters of hydration, can be CO X MOO 3+X - y(H2O), where y is between 0 to 2.
  • a catalyst precursor composition can have a surface area between 50 m 2 /g and 190 m 2 /g, as measured by Brunauer-Ernett-Teller method, or BET. It is noted that the stoichiometry of the catalyst precursor composition may not match the stoichiometry of the corresponding sulfided catalyst. For example, for a catalyst precursor composition having a molar ratio of Co to Mo of 2 : 1, sulfidation of the catalyst precursor can result in formation of a sulfided catalyst having a Co to Mo ratio of between 1.5 to 2.0.
  • the catalyst precursor compositions can have an unexpectedly high activity relative to the expected hydroprocessing activity based on conventional understanding of activity for bulk hydroprocessing catalysts. Conventionally, it is understood that for bulk catalysts including Ni as a Group VIII metal, addition of tungsten to a catalyst can provide improved hydroprocessing activity. This can correspond to having a catalyst where the active metals are NiW, or this can correspond to a mixed-metal catalyst where the active metals are NiMoW.
  • hydroprocessing catalysts including Co as a Group VIII metal
  • improved hydroprocessing activity can be realized for molar ratios of Co to Mo of 1.0 or less, such as around 0.5.
  • catalysts with improved activity can be formed by sulfiding bulk catalyst precursors that are based on Co and Mo as catalytic metals, and that have molar ratios of Co to Mo of 1.5 or higher.
  • the unexpectedly high hydroprocessing activity is achieved in part by accessing an unexpected crystalline phase for the bulk catalyst precursors, as indicated by the d-spacings for the characteristic peaks in the powder XRD spectra of the bulk catalyst precursors.
  • the crystal structure of these unexpected crystalline phases may be similar to the structure of clays.
  • the bulk catalyst precursor compositions (and the corresponding sulfided catalysts) can be substantially free of tungsten. Additionally, it is believed that the unexpected crystalline phases are not available when forming bulk catalysts at molar ratios of Co to Mo of 1.0 or less. Thus, in various aspects, the bulk catalyst precursor compositions (and corresponding sulfided catalysts) can have a molar ratio of Co to Mo of between 1.5 to 4.0, or 2.0 to 4.0, or 1.5 to 3.0, or 2.0 to 3.0, or 1.5 to 2.5.
  • Disclosed bulk catalyst precursor compositions may have a relatively high surface area (measured by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method, or BET).
  • the bulk catalyst precursor composition may have a surface area of about 50 m 2 /g or more, about 75 m 2 /g or more, about 100 m 2 /g or more, about 125 m 2 /g or more, about 150 m 2 /g or more, about 175 m 2 /g or more, or about 190 m 2 /g or more.
  • the bulk catalyst precursor composition may have surface area (as measured by BET) of at most about 190 m 2 /g, at most about 175 m 2 /g, or at most about 150 m 2 /g.
  • Each of the above lower limits for the bulk catalyst precursor composition surface area is explicitly contemplated to be used in conjunction with each of the above upper limits as boundary limitations.
  • the catalyst precursor compositions can be synthesized by combining a cobalt- containing precursor reagent with a molybdenum-containing precursor reagent.
  • Cobalt carbonate (CoCO ) and molybdenum oxide (MoO ) are examples of suitable reagents for forming the catalyst precursor composition.
  • the precursor reagents can be dissolved in, for example, water.
  • the solution of precursor reagents is then heated to a reaction temperature for a reaction time period.
  • the reaction temperature can be between 70°C and 180°C.
  • the reaction time can range from 20 minutes to 24 hours. Higher reactions times and/or higher temperatures can tend to result in formation of the crystalline phase having an XRD pattern with d-spacings of 3.19 A, 2.67 A, and 1.57 A (and/or d-spacing values of 2.67 A and 1.57 A, with a bump at a 20 value between 20° and 30° in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern).
  • heating the reaction mixture to 150°C or more for a reaction time of 6 hours or more can result in a crystalline phase with such an XRD pattern.
  • Shorter reaction times and/or shorter temperatures can tend to result in formation of the crystalline phase having an XRD pattern with d-spacings of 3.32 A, 3.03 A, and 2.64 A.
  • heating to a temperature of 75°C for 30 minutes can result in a crystalline phase with such an XRD pattern.
  • lower reaction temperature and/or shorter reaction time can result in a catalyst precursor composition with a higher surface area.
  • An aging step can correspond to maintaining the catalyst precursor composition at a temperature of 50°C to 120°C for a period of 0.5 hours to 48 hours.
  • the catalyst precursor composition can be arranged in a manner that increases the external surface area of the composition during aging, such as by spreading the catalyst composition in a thin layer during the aging.
  • the bulk catalyst composition may also include a binder.
  • suitable binders may be mixed with the precursor composition and extruded to form particles.
  • suitable binders include, but are not limited to, organo-siloxane polymers as described herein, organo-alumoxane polymers as described herein, organo-titanoxane polymers as described herein, a silica polymer, silica resin, hydrosol, polyethylene glycol, and combinations thereof.
  • Sulfiding processes for treating bulk catalyst compositions disclosed herein can be carried out at a temperature that ranges from about 300°C to about 400°C, about 310°C to about 350°C, or about 315°C to about 345°C.
  • sulfiding processes can be conducted for a period of time ranging from about 30 minutes to about 96 hours, from about 1 hour to about 48 hours, or from about 4 hours to about 24 hours.
  • sulfidation can be performed under typical gas phase sulfidation conditions, such as using a mixture of H2S and H2 as a gas flow to provide sulfur during the sulfidation.
  • Hydrocarbon feed streams can include streams obtained or derived from crude petroleum oil, tar sands, coal liquefaction, shale oil, and hydrocarbon synthesis. Hydrocarbon feeds also include feeds boiling from the naphtha boiling range to heavy feedstocks, such as gas oils and resids, and feeds derived from Fischer- Tropsch processes. In some embodiments, hydrocarbon feed streams include streams having a boiling range from about 40°C to about 1000°C.
  • suitable feedstreams include vacuum gas oils; distillates including naphtha, diesel, kerosene, and jet fuel; heavy gas oils, raffinates, lube oils, cycle oils, waxy oils, and the like.
  • hydrocarbon feeds can contain contaminants such as nitrogen and sulfur.
  • Feed nitrogen content based on the weight of the feed can range from about 50 wppm to about 5000 wppm, about 75 wppm to about 800 wppm, or about 100 wppm to about 700 wppm.
  • Nitrogen-based contaminants can appear both as basic and non-basic nitrogen species, and can be free or in an organically-bound form. Examples of basic nitrogen species include quinolines and substituted quinolines, and examples of non-basic nitrogen species may include carbazoles and substituted carbazoles.
  • Feed sulfur content based on the weight of the feed can range from about 50 wppm to about 7000 wppm, from about 100 wppm to about 5000 wppm, or from about 100 wppm to about 3000 wppm. Feeds subjected to prior processing, such as separation, extraction, hydroprocessing, and the like, may have less sulfur, for example in the range of 75 wppm to 500 wppm.
  • Feed sulfur can include free or organically-bound sulfur.
  • Organically-bound sulfur can include simple aliphatic, naphthenic, and aromatic mercaptans, sulfides, di- and polysulfides, and heterocyclic sulfur compounds, such as thiophene, tetrahydrothiophene, benzothiophene and their higher homologs and analogs.
  • the feed can also contain olefinic and aromatic hydrocarbon, with aromatic hydrocarbons being present in an amount based on the weight of the feed ranging from about 0.05 wt% to about 50 wt%.
  • hydroprocessing means a catalytic process conducted in the presence of hydrogen, which may be in the form of a hydrogen-containing treat gas.
  • Hydroprocessing processes can include the treatment of various feed streams, such as the hydroconversion of heavy petroleum feedstocks to lower boiling products; the hydrocracking of distillate boiling range feedstocks; the hydrotreating of various petroleum feedstocks to remove heteroatoms, such as sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen; the hydrogenation of unsaturated hydrocarbon; the hydroisomerization and/or catalytic dewaxing of waxes, such as Fischer-Tropsch waxes; demetallation of heavy hydrocarbons; and ring-opening reactions.
  • Effective hydroprocessing conditions can be considered those conditions that achieve the desired result of the hydroprocessing process. For example, effective hydroisomerization and/or catalytic dewaxing conditions are to be considered those conditions that achieve the desired degree of dewaxing to produce the desired product.
  • Hydroprocessing conditions also include conditions effective for hydrotreating feed streams in some embodiments.
  • Hydrotreating reactions can include, e.g., (i) hydrogenation and/or (ii) hydrogenolysis.
  • hydrotreating conditions will result in removing at least a portion of the heteroatoms in the feed and hydrogenating at least a portion of the aromatics in the feed.
  • Methods of hydroprocessing disclosed herein can be performed at temperatures within a range of about 100°C to about 450°C, about 200°C to about 370°C, or about 230°C to about 350°C.
  • Methods of hydroprocessing can be conducted at weight hourly space velocities (“WHSV”) that range from about 0.05 to about 20 hr -1 , or about 0.5 to about 5 hr -1 .
  • Hydrotreating methods can be performed at any effective pressure, which can include pressures ranging from about 5 to about 250 bar.
  • Treat gas can contain substantially pure hydrogen or can be mixtures of other components typically found in refinery hydrogen streams.
  • treat gas contains substantially no sulfur-based compounds such as hydrogen sulfide.
  • treat gas can include at least about 50% by volume hydrogen, at least about 75% by volume hydrogen, or at least about 90% by volume hydrogen.
  • the hydrogen (H2) to oil ratio can range from about 5 NL/L to about 2000 NL/L.
  • Process conditions may vary, as is known to those skilled in the art, depending on the feed boiling range and speciation. For example, as the boiling point of the feed increases, the severity of the conditions will also increase.
  • hydroprocessing reactions occur in a reaction stage that incorporates at least one bulk catalyst composition.
  • the reaction stage can include one or more reactors, or reaction zones that include one or more catalyst beds of the same or different catalyst. Any suitable catalyst bed/reactor can be used, including fixed beds, fluidized beds, ebullating beds, slurry beds, and moving beds. Interstage cooling or heating between reactors, reaction zones, or between catalyst beds in the same reactor, can be employed. A portion of the heat generated during hydroprocessing can be recovered in some embodiments, or conventional cooling to maintain temperature may be performed through cooling utilities such as cooling water or air, or a hydrogen quench stream.
  • a new structure phase of Co2MoO x was made by adding 3.006 g of 99.0% grade CoCO and 1.815 g of MoO to 150 ml water. The mixture was heated to 150°C and aged for 6 hours. The product was filtered and spread in a thin layer and dried overnight at 100°C. The process yielded 3.594 g of a brown powder as product, with a very light pink filtrate. The final elemental analysis on solid powder indicated a Co to Mo ratio as C01.62M01.
  • the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra for the Co2MoO x material exhibited d-spacing values of about 3.19 A, 2.67 A, and 1.57 A as shown in FIG. 1.
  • Phase 2 Synthesis of Co2MoO x Catalyst Precursor (Phase 2) A new phase of Co2MoO x was made by adding 10.020 g of 99.0% grade CoCO and 6.050 g of MoO to 170 ml water. The mixture was heated to 75°C and aged for 30 minutes. The product was filtered and spread in a thin layer to dry at 100 °C overnight. The final elemental analysis on solid powder indicated Co to Mo ratio as C01.71M01 with a BET surface area analysis of 183.9 m 2 /g. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra for the Co2MoO x material exhibited d-spacing values of about 3.32 A, 3.03 A, and 2.64 A as shown in FIG. 2.
  • XRD X-ray diffraction
  • FIG. 7 shows XRD spectra for catalyst precursor compositions made with varying molar ratios of Co to Mo.
  • Line 710 corresponds to the composition from Example 1, where the Co to Mo ratio was near 2 ( ⁇ 1.7).
  • Line 720 corresponds to a composition made with a Co to Mo ratio near 3
  • line 730 corresponds to a composition with a Co to Mo ratio near 4.
  • a cobalt tungsten catalyst precursor composition (Co to W molar ratio near 4) made in a manner similar to Example 1 is also shown as line 733.
  • lines 710, 720, and 730 show characteristic peaks at d-spacings of 2.67 A and 1.57 A.
  • Line 710 also shows a small peak corresponding to the d-spacing at 3.19 A.
  • lines 720 and 730 do not have such a peak. Instead, lines 720 and 730 have a broad bump feature at a 20 value between 20° and 30°. This bump feature is also visible in line 710.
  • cobalt tungsten catalyst precursor composition (line 733) shows characteristic peaks corresponding to a different type of structure. Line 733 is believed to correspond to a hexagonal phase.
  • This example demonstrates that by modifying the reaction time and/or reaction temperature used to form a catalyst precursor composition, the resulting surface area of the composition can be modified.
  • a lower reaction temperature and/or shorter reaction time can be used to produce a higher surface area catalyst precursor composition.
  • catalyst precursor compositions with higher surface area can provide still higher catalyst activity for desulfurization and/or denitrogenation under hydroprocessing conditions.
  • Example 3 The general method of Example 3 was used to make a series of catalyst precursor compositions using various reaction times and reaction temperatures. All of the compositions had a Co to Mo ratio near 2.
  • FIG. 8 shows XRD spectra for the resulting catalyst precursor compositions.
  • Line 835 corresponds to a composition made according to Example 3, with a reaction temperature of 100°C and a reaction time of 4 hours.
  • Line 815 corresponds to a composition made with a reaction temperature of 150°C and a reaction time of 18 hours.
  • Line 825 corresponds to a composition made with a reaction temperature of 100°C and a reaction time of 24 hours.
  • Line 845 corresponds to a composition made with a reaction temperature of 100°C and a reaction time of 1 hour.
  • Line 855 corresponds to a composition made with a reaction temperature of 75 °C and a reaction time of 1 hour.
  • a new phase of C02M0.5W.5 was made by adding 10.020 g of 99.0% grade CoCO and 5.041g of MoO , and 10.52g H2WO4 to 170 ml water. The mixture was heated to 75°C and aged for four hours. The product was filtered and spread in a thin layer and dried overnight at 100°C.
  • the final elemental analysis on solid powder indicated Co to Mo to W ratio as C02M0.48W.48 with a BET surface area analysis of 154 m 2 /g and a pore volume of 0.40 cc/g.
  • the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra for the C02M0.5W.5 material exhibited d-spacing values of about 3.46 A, 2.58 A, and 1.73 A as shown in FIG. 3.
  • Example 4 The above synthesis method is similar to the synthesis method used in Example 4 to make the composition corresponding to line 855, although with a longer aging time.
  • Co and Mo precursor reagents had been used as in Example 4, a structure with the d-spacings shown in FIG. 1 would be expected.
  • replacing half of the Mo with W in the initial synthesis mixture resulted in formation of a different crystalline phase than either Example 1 or Example 2.
  • Co2MoO x precursor composition was made by adding 6.012 g of 99.0% grade CoCO3 and 6.050 g of MoO3 to 100 ml water. The mixture was stirred for one day at room temperature, followed by heating to 75°C for 30 minutes. In other embodiments, the mixture was heated to 50°C for four hours. The product was filtered and spread in a thin layer and dried overnight at 100°C. The final elemental analysis on solid powder indicated Co to Mo ratio as C01.2M01.2 with a BET surface area analysis of 72.6 m 2 /g and a pore volume of 0.62 cc/g.
  • This new phase exists in a Ricol structure and exhibited the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra d-spacing values displayed in FIG. 4.
  • XRD X-ray diffraction
  • the resulting Ricol phase did have a higher surface area than a conventional Ricol phase.
  • the new Ricol phase COI.2MOOX material was measured in XRD (line 585) alongside a low surface area (e.g., ⁇ 15 m 2 /g) COI.2MOOX phase (line 591), shown in FIG. 5. Since peak width may be used to estimate to particle size, the six strongest diffractions were selected and compared for changes in full width at half maximum (FWHM) value. As shown in FIG. 5, the novel techniques described herein significantly reduced crystallite size.
  • Table 1 illustrates the relationship between a no-aging, low surface area COI. 2 MOOX phase and a high surface area COI.2MOOX phase prepared with aging according to the disclosed techniques.
  • a new phase of Co2VO x was made by as made by adding 13.333 g of 99.0% grade CoCO and 5.160 g of V2O5 to 500 ml water. The solution pH was adjusted to 10.1 using diluted NH4OH. The total amount of NH4OH added was 50.11g. The combination was heat refluxed to around 100°C and aged for 4 days. The product was filtered and spread in a thin layer and dried overnight at 100°C. This obtained 13.862 g of brown powder as product, with a filtrate appearing transparent light yellow in color.
  • the product was filtered and spread in a thin layer and dried Co to V ratio as C02.3V1 and BET surface area analysis gives 129.3 m 2 /g and a pore volume of 0.32 cc/g.
  • the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra for the Co2VO x material exhibited d-spacing values of about 2.99 A, 2.58 A, and 1.50 A as shown in FIG. 6.
  • a CoWOx catalyst precursor composition was also synthesized, in order to further illustrate the unexpected nature of the new catalyst precursor composition phases described herein.
  • the CoWOx composition made by adding 10.02 g of 99.0% grade CoCO and 21.05 g of H2WO4 to 500 ml of water. The combination was heated to 100°C and maintained at that temperature for five days. The combination was then filtered and spread into a thin layer and dried overnight at 100°C. The process obtained 25.297g of a purple powder product with a very light blue filtrate. A final elemental analysis on solid powder indicate Co to W ratio as C01W1.2, and BET analysis gives a surface area of 113 m 2 /g.
  • low pressure hydroprocessing was performed using catalysts formed from the precursor compositions.
  • Several other types of hydroprocessing catalysts were also tested to provide a comparison.
  • Table 2 Feed Properties Various catalyst precursor compositions were sulfided to form sulfided catalysts.
  • the sulfided catalysts that were tested corresponded to catalysts formed from the CoW catalyst precursor from Example C8; the C02M00.5W0.5 catalyst precursor from Example C5; The C02M0 catalyst precursor from Example 1, referred to herein as having Phase 1; A higher surface area Phase 1 C02M0 catalyst precursor corresponding to line 835 from FIG. 8 (see Example 4); The C02M0 catalyst precursor from Example 2, referred to herein as having Phase 2; A higher bulk catalyst density Phase 2 C02M0 catalyst formed according to the method described below; and a Ricol phase C1.2M0 catalyst made according to Example C6.
  • the catalyst precursor Prior to placing the catalyst precursor into the test reactor, the catalyst precursor was formed into particles. The particles had a diameter of roughly 1/16 of an inch. The particles were formed by pressing the catalyst precursor composition powder. For most of the catalyst precursor compositions, the catalyst precursor composition powder was pressed at 15,000 psig (-100 MPa-g) for 3 minutes to form the particles. However, a higher bulk catalyst density Phase 2 C02M0 catalyst precursor composition was formed by pressing the powder at 24,000 psig (-165 MPa-g) for 20 minutes.
  • the catalyst precursors were sulfided using the following procedure:A charged reactor was pressure-tested with N2, and with H2 at 600 psig (4.1 MPa-g) at 25°C to reach ⁇ 1 psi I day ( ⁇ ⁇ 7 kPa I day) pressure drop. With H2 flowing at 50 cc/min, the temperature was raised to 100 °C. At 100 °C, the pressure was maintained at 100 psig, H2 flow was stopped, and the sulfiding feed (7.5 wt.% of dimethyl disulfide dissolved in a diesel feed) flowing at 8 ml/h was passed over each catalyst for 4 hours for a complete wetting.
  • samples of the resulting sulfided catalysts were used to hydroprocess the feedstock in Table 1 under two different types of low pressure hydroprocessing conditions.
  • a first hydroprocessing condition the feedstock was exposed to the catalysts at a temperature of 335°C, a pressure of 300 psig (-2.1 MPa-g), a hydrogen treat gas rate of 1000 SCF/bbl (-170 Nm 3 /m 3 ), and a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 0.5 hr 1 .
  • the feedstock was exposed to the catalysts at a temperature of 335°C, a pressure of 600 psig (-4.1 MPa-g), a hydrogen treat gas rate of 1000 SCF/bbl (-170 Nm 3 /m 3 ), and a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 1.0 hr 1 .
  • Table 3 shows results from performing hydroprocessing at the condition including a pressure of -2.1 MPa-g.
  • hydroprocessing activity values are shown for both hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and hydrodenitrogenation (HDN).
  • the order of reaction for HDN is assumed to be 1.0.
  • HDS the correct reaction order is less clear, due to the multiple desulfurization mechanisms that can be present.
  • activity values are shown for values of order of reaction of both 1.3 and 1.5.
  • the activity values are shown as relative activity values, either based on weight of the catalyst (RWA) or based on the volume of the catalyst (RVA).
  • RWA weight of the catalyst
  • RVA volume of the catalyst
  • Table 3 Low Pressure Hydroprocessing at -2.1 MPa-g
  • the C02M0 catalysts provided higher relative volume activity than the C02M00.5W0.5 catalyst, while providing comparable relative weight activity. This is unexpected, as conventionally it would be expected that catalysts incorporating tungsten would provide superior activity. Additionally, due to the higher cost for catalysts including tungsten, the higher volume activities provided by the C02M0 catalysts represent an activity benefit for a lower cost catalyst.
  • Table 4 shows the results from hydroprocessing with the same types of catalysts, but at ⁇ 4.1 MPa-g and a higher space velocity. Again, the relative activities were normalized based on the activity of the comparative CoW catalyst. Table 4 - Low Pressure Hydroprocessing at ⁇ 4.1 MPa-g
  • the relative activity benefit of the C02M0 catalysts is more pronounced at ⁇ 4.1 MPa-g and a space velocity of 1.0 hr 1 . It is noted that for many types of catalysts, such as the CoW and the C02M00.5W0.5 catalysts, doubling the space velocity while also doubling the pressure would be expected to result in “split” behavior for HDS and HDN. In particular, for many types of catalysts, HDN would be expected to improve based on the increased pressure. However, due to the different types of mechanisms involved in HDS, the activity for sulfur removal can actually decrease under a combination of increased pressure and increased space velocity. By contrast, the C02M0 catalysts shown in Table 3 and Table 4 maintained comparable HDS activity under the increased pressure, increased space velocity conditions while still providing a substantial HDN activity benefit.
  • HDS order to pressure should be higher than one but DDS should be lower than one. In the 300 psig region, DDS generally dominates, meaning that when conditions switch S will increase. However, in the analysis, C02M0 showed a lower S at 600 psig LHSV 1.0 condition, thereby indicating a higher HDS function. Upon further scrutiny of S distribution using 2D S-GC, C02M0 displayed a more active DDS component, thereby confirming its potential hydrogen savings in low pressure hydroprocessing via DDS removal of S.
  • Example 1 The synthesis procedure of Example 1 was used to make additional catalyst precursors, but using different starting metal precursor reagents.
  • the Co metal precursor reagent was changed from CoCO to Co3(PO4)2, while maintaining the same overall number of moles of Co.
  • the Mo metal precursor reagent was changed from MoO3 to MoO2.
  • FIG. 9 shows XRD patterns of the resulting catalyst precursor compositions.
  • the precursor composition formed from the alternative Co reagent corresponds to line 961, while the precursor composition corresponding to the alternative Mo reagent corresponds to line 971.
  • the sample from FIG. 1 is shown as line 910.
  • the samples made using the alternative reagents show substantially sharper peaks in the XRD pattern. These sharp peaks are indicative of crystalline phases with low surface areas (possibly less than 1 m 2 /g), and therefore phases that are likely to have relatively low catalyst activity.
  • the XRD patterns in FIG. 9 show that formation of the unexpected crystalline phases does not inherently occur simply by combining any combination of metal precursor reagents in the appropriate ratios.
  • Embodiment 1 A catalyst precursor composition comprising: cobalt oxide; and molybdenum oxide, a molar ratio of cobalt to molybdenum in the catalyst precursor composition being between 1.5 and 4.0, wherein the catalyst precursor composition has an X-ray powder diffraction pattern comprising characteristic diffraction peaks having d-spacing values of a) about
  • Embodiment 2 The catalyst precursor composition of Embodiment 1, wherein the catalyst precursor composition has a stoichiometry of Co x MoOux- y(H2O) wherein 1.5 ⁇ x ⁇ 4.0 and 0 ⁇ y ⁇ 2.0.
  • Embodiment 3 The catalyst precursor composition of any of the above embodiments, wherein the surface area of the catalyst precursor composition is between 50 m 2 /g and 190 m 2 /g.
  • Embodiment 4 The catalyst precursor composition of any of the above embodiments, wherein the bump feature at a 20 value between 20° and 30° in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern corresponds to a disordered structure.
  • Embodiment 5 The catalyst precursor composition of any of the above embodiments, wherein the surface area of the catalyst precursor composition is 75 m 2 /g to 175 m 2 /g.
  • Embodiment 6 The catalyst precursor composition of any of the above embodiments, wherein the molar ratio of cobalt to molybdenum in the catalyst precursor composition is between 1.5 and 3.0.
  • Embodiment 7 A method of making a catalyst precursor composition according to any of Embodiments 1 - 6, the method comprising: combining cobalt carbonate and molybdenum trioxide, and reacting the combination of cobalt carbonate and molybdenum trioxide to form the catalyst precursor composition.
  • Embodiment 8 The method of Embodiment 7, wherein the reacting comprises heating the combination of cobalt carbonate and molybdenum trioxide to at least 75 °C for at least thirty minutes.
  • Embodiment 9 A sulfided catalyst comprising a sulfided form of the catalyst precursor composition of any of Embodiments 1 - 6 or a sulfided form of the catalyst precursor composition made according to Embodiment 7 or 8.
  • Embodiment 10 The sulfided catalyst of claim 9, wherein the sulfided catalyst is prepared by combining a first precursor reagent comprising molybdenum and a second precursor reagent comprising cobalt to create a combination; heating the combination to at least 75°C for at least thirty minutes to form the catalyst precursor composition; and sulfiding the catalyst precursor composition, wherein sulfiding comprises raising the temperature of the catalyst precursor composition to about 300°C to about 400°C for a period of time ranging from about 30 minutes to about 96 hours in the presence of a sulfiding compound.
  • Embodiment 11 The sulfided catalyst of Embodiment 10, wherein the catalyst precursor composition is aged for at least one hour at a temperature below 50°C after the heating of the combination and before the sulfiding.
  • Embodiment 12 The sulfided catalyst of Embodiment 10 or 11, wherein sulfiding the catalyst precursor composition further comprises heating the catalyst precursor composition to about 150°C for about six hours prior to the raising the temperature to about 300°C to about 400°C.
  • Embodiment 13 The sulfided catalyst of any of Embodiments 10 to 12, wherein the first precursor reagent comprises CoCO and wherein the second precursor reagent comprises MoO .
  • compositions described herein may be free of any component, or composition not expressly recited or disclosed herein. Any method may lack any step not recited or disclosed herein.
  • compositions, element or group of elements are preceded with the transitional phrase “comprising,” it is understood that we also contemplate the same composition or group of elements with transitional phrases “consisting essentially of,” “consisting of,” “selected from the group of consisting of,” or “is” preceding the recitation of the composition, element, or elements and vice versa.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne de nouvelles compositions de précurseur de catalyseur en vrac qui peuvent être formées à base d'oxyde de cobalt et d'oxyde de molybdène. Les formes sulfurées des nouvelles compositions de précurseur de catalyseur en vrac peuvent fournir une activité étonnamment élevée par rapport au volume et/ou au poids du catalyseur/précurseur de catalyseur. L'activité étonnamment élevée peut être due en partie à un rapport molaire étonnamment élevé de Co par rapport au Mo dans le précurseur de catalyseur/le catalyseur sulfuré et/ou une surface étonnamment élevée pour la composition de précurseur de catalyseur.
PCT/US2022/081549 2021-12-15 2022-12-14 Compositions de catalyseur cobalt-molybdène en vrac et procédés de synthèse WO2023114839A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US202163265428P 2021-12-15 2021-12-15
US63/265,428 2021-12-15

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023114839A1 true WO2023114839A1 (fr) 2023-06-22

Family

ID=85157424

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2022/081549 WO2023114839A1 (fr) 2021-12-15 2022-12-14 Compositions de catalyseur cobalt-molybdène en vrac et procédés de synthèse

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2023114839A1 (fr)

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6162350A (en) 1997-07-15 2000-12-19 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk Group VIII/Group VIB catalysts (HEN-9901)
US20020010088A1 (en) 1999-01-15 2002-01-24 Sonja Eijsbouts Process for preparing a mixed metal catalyst composition
US20060060502A1 (en) * 2004-09-22 2006-03-23 Soled Stuart L Bulk bi-metallic catalysts made from precursors containing an organic agent
US20070084754A1 (en) 2004-09-22 2007-04-19 Soled Stuart L Bulk bimetallic catalysts, method of making bulk bimetallic catalysts and hydroprocessing using bulk bimetallic catalysts
US20070090024A1 (en) 2005-10-26 2007-04-26 Soled Stuart L Hydroprocessing using bulk bimetallic catalysts
US7288182B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2007-10-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk Group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
US7951746B2 (en) 2006-10-11 2011-05-31 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Bulk group VIII/group VIB metal catalysts and method of preparing same
US20110294656A1 (en) * 2010-06-01 2011-12-01 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing catalysts and their production
WO2012059523A1 (fr) 2010-11-03 2012-05-10 Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique (Cnrs) Précurseurs de catalyseur massique et procédé d'obtention de tels précurseurs de catalyseur massique
WO2022039730A1 (fr) * 2020-08-19 2022-02-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Catalyseurs en vrac contenant du tungstène, leur procédé de fabrication et leur utilisation dans l'hydrotraitement de diesel à basse pression

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6162350A (en) 1997-07-15 2000-12-19 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk Group VIII/Group VIB catalysts (HEN-9901)
US7288182B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2007-10-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk Group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
US20020010088A1 (en) 1999-01-15 2002-01-24 Sonja Eijsbouts Process for preparing a mixed metal catalyst composition
US20060060502A1 (en) * 2004-09-22 2006-03-23 Soled Stuart L Bulk bi-metallic catalysts made from precursors containing an organic agent
US20070084754A1 (en) 2004-09-22 2007-04-19 Soled Stuart L Bulk bimetallic catalysts, method of making bulk bimetallic catalysts and hydroprocessing using bulk bimetallic catalysts
US20070090024A1 (en) 2005-10-26 2007-04-26 Soled Stuart L Hydroprocessing using bulk bimetallic catalysts
US7951746B2 (en) 2006-10-11 2011-05-31 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Bulk group VIII/group VIB metal catalysts and method of preparing same
US20110294656A1 (en) * 2010-06-01 2011-12-01 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing catalysts and their production
WO2012059523A1 (fr) 2010-11-03 2012-05-10 Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique (Cnrs) Précurseurs de catalyseur massique et procédé d'obtention de tels précurseurs de catalyseur massique
WO2022039730A1 (fr) * 2020-08-19 2022-02-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Catalyseurs en vrac contenant du tungstène, leur procédé de fabrication et leur utilisation dans l'hydrotraitement de diesel à basse pression

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7947623B2 (en) Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and uses thereof
US7754645B2 (en) Process for preparing hydroprocessing bulk catalysts
US7737072B2 (en) Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and uses thereof
US8702970B2 (en) Hydroconversion multi-metallic catalyst and method for making thereof
US7678730B2 (en) Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and uses thereof
US7678731B2 (en) Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and uses thereof
WO2023114839A1 (fr) Compositions de catalyseur cobalt-molybdène en vrac et procédés de synthèse
US20230398528A1 (en) Tungsten-containing bulk catalysts, method of making the same, and their use in low pressure diesel hydroprocessing
US11577235B1 (en) Layered catalyst reactor systems and processes for hydrotreatment of hydrocarbon feedstocks

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22851300

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE