WO2023030882A1 - Machine dishwash detergent - Google Patents

Machine dishwash detergent Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023030882A1
WO2023030882A1 PCT/EP2022/072914 EP2022072914W WO2023030882A1 WO 2023030882 A1 WO2023030882 A1 WO 2023030882A1 EP 2022072914 W EP2022072914 W EP 2022072914W WO 2023030882 A1 WO2023030882 A1 WO 2023030882A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
detergent composition
composition according
acid
bleach
cations
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2022/072914
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Katherine Mary Thompson
Original Assignee
Unilever Ip Holdings B.V.
Unilever Global Ip Limited
Conopco, Inc., D/B/A Unilever
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Unilever Ip Holdings B.V., Unilever Global Ip Limited, Conopco, Inc., D/B/A Unilever filed Critical Unilever Ip Holdings B.V.
Publication of WO2023030882A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023030882A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/39Organic or inorganic per-compounds
    • C11D3/3902Organic or inorganic per-compounds combined with specific additives
    • C11D3/3905Bleach activators or bleach catalysts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0047Detergents in the form of bars or tablets
    • C11D17/0065Solid detergents containing builders
    • C11D17/0073Tablets
    • C11D17/0091Dishwashing tablets
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/26Organic compounds containing nitrogen
    • C11D3/33Amino carboxylic acids

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a machine dishwash detergent composition
  • a machine dishwash detergent composition comprising aminopolycarboxylic acid coordination complexes comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound iron-, cobalt- and/or manganese-cations.
  • Machine dishwash detergent compositions typically contain several different active components, including builders, surfactants, enzymes and bleaching agents.
  • Surfactants are employed to remove stains and soil and to disperse the released components into the cleaning liquid.
  • Enzymes help to remove stubborn stains of proteins, starch and lipids by hydrolyzing these components.
  • Bleach is used to remove stains by oxidizing the components that make up these stains.
  • 'builders' complexing agents
  • Phosphate based builders have been used for many years in machine dishwash detergent compositions, such as trisodium phosphate and sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP). Although having excellent performance in dishwasher detergents their presence in the wastewater can lead to environmental problems such as eutrophication. As such there has been a need for more environmentally friendly alternative builders with on-par effectiveness. Examples of such alternative builders are aminopolycarboxylates, such as glutamic acid N,N-diacetic acid (GLDA), methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA) and are ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).
  • GLDA glutamic acid N,N-diacetic acid
  • MGDA methylglycinediacetic acid
  • EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
  • a machine dishwash detergent composition comprising:
  • composition • from 0.002 to 20 wt. % of free acid equivalent of aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound iron- (Fe), Manganese- (Mn) and/or cobalt- (Co) cations; wherein the composition comprises at most 1 wt. % of phosphate; and wherein the pH of a solution of 1 wt.% of the detergent composition in water as measured at 25 degrees Celsius is from 6.0 to 10.8.
  • aminopolycarboxylic acid or ‘organic acid’ are used these encompass their corresponding salts (and vice versa).
  • aminopolycarboxylate comprising coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations can be effective in promoting bleaching stains in solution and on surfaces by having bleach catalyst activity. This is quite relevant since aminopolycarboxylates tend to be biodegradable and some, such as GLDA, are even made from renewable sources.
  • the invention relates to the use of aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations to provide a machine dishwash detergent composition with a bleach system having improved biodegradability.
  • Weight percentage is based on the total weight of the detergent composition unless otherwise indicated or as made clear from the context. It will be appreciated that the total weight amount of ingredients will not exceed 100 wt. %. Whenever an amount or concentration of a component is quantified herein, unless indicated otherwise, the quantified amount or quantified concentration relates to said component per se, even though it may be common practice to add such a component in the form of a solution or of a blend with one or more other ingredients. It is furthermore to be understood that the verb "to comprise” and its conjugations is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded.
  • indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the elements is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements.
  • the indefinite article “a” or “an” thus usually means “at least one”. Unless otherwise specified all measurements are taken at standard conditions. Whenever a parameter, such as a concentration or a ratio, is said to be less than a certain upper limit it should be understood that in the absence of a specified lower limit the lower limit for said parameter is 0.
  • Concentrations expressed in wt. % of ‘free acid equivalent’ refer to the concentration of the compound expressed as wt. %, assuming it would be in fully protonated from.
  • the following table shows how the free acid equivalent concentrations can be calculated for some (anhydrous) aminopolycarboxylates and (anhydrous) acid salts.
  • Suitable non-ionic surfactants which may be used include preferably the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide.
  • Preferably low-foaming nonionic surfactants are used particularly from the group of alkoxylated alcohols.
  • EO ethylene oxide
  • alcohol ethoxylates with linear residues prepared from alcohols of natural origin with 12 to 18 C atoms for example from coconut, palm, tallow fat or oleyl alcohol, and on average 2 to 8 mol of EO per mol of alcohol are preferred.
  • the preferred ethoxylated alcohols include for example C12-14 alcohols with 3 EO to 4 EO, C9-12 alcohol with 7 EO, C13-15 alcohols with 3 EO, 5 EO, 7 EO or 8 EO, C12-18 alcohols with 3 EO, 5 EO or 7 EO and mixtures of these, such as mixtures of C12-14 alcohol with 3 EO and C12-19 alcohol with 5 EO.
  • Preferred tallow fatty alcohols with more than 12 EO have from 60 to 100 EO, and more preferably from 70 to 90 EO.
  • Particularly preferred tallow fatty alcohols with more than 12 EO are tallow fatty alcohols with 80 EO.
  • Nonionic surfactants from the group of alkoxylated alcohols are likewise particularly preferentially used.
  • Preferably used nonionic surfactants originate from the groups comprising alkoxylated nonionic surfactants, in particular ethoxylated primary alcohols and mixtures of these surfactants with structurally complex surfactants such as polyoxypropylene/ polyoxyethylene/ polyoxypropylene (PO/EO/PO).
  • Such (PO/EO/PO) nonionic surfactants are furthermore distinguished by good foam control.
  • nonionic surfactants are according to the formula: wherein n is from 0 to 5 and m from 10 to 50, more preferably wherein n is from 0 to 3 and m is from 15 to 40, and even more preferably wherein n is 0 and m is from 18 to 25.
  • Surfactants according to this formula were particularly useful in reducing spotting of dishware treated in a machine dish washer.
  • at least 50 wt. % of the nonionic surfactant comprised by the detergent composition of the invention is nonionic surfactant according to this formula.
  • Such nonionic surfactants are commercially available, for example under the tradename Dehypon WET (Supplier: BASF) and Genapol EC50 (Supplier Clariant).
  • the detergent composition of the invention comprises from 0.1 to 20 wt. % of a nonionic surfactant or a mixture of two or more nonionic surfactants.
  • the preferred amount of total non-ionic surfactant if from 1 to 18 wt. %, more preferably from 4 to 16 wt. % and even more preferably from 6 to 12 wt.%. Such levels are considered optimal.
  • the nonionic surfactant is preferably present in amounts of 25 to 90 wt. % based on the total weight of the surfactant system.
  • Anionic surfactants can be present for example in amounts in the range from 5 to 40 wt. % of the surfactant system.
  • Aminopolycarboxylates are well known in the detergent industry and sometimes referred to as aminopolycarboxylic acids chelants. They are generally appreciated as being strong builders. Suitable aminopolycarboxylic acids include glutamic acid N,N- diacetic acid (GLDA), methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA), ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS), iminodisuccinic acid (IDS), iminodimalic acid (IDM), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), iminodiacetic acid (IDA), hydroxyethyliminodiacetic acid (HEIDA) aspartic acid diethoxysuccinic acid (AES) aspartic acid-N,N-diacetic acid (ASDA) , hydroxyethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (HEDTA), hydroxyethylethylene-diaminetriacetic acid (HEEDTA) , iminodifumaric (IDF), iminod
  • Preferred aminopolycarboxylates are GLDA, MGDA, EDDS, IDS, IDM or a mixture thereof, more preferred are GLDA, MGDA, EDDS or a mixture thereof and even more preferred are GLDA and MGDA or a mixture thereof.
  • GLDA is especially preferred as it can be made from bio-based materials (e.g. monosodium glutamate, which itself can be made as by-product from corn fermentation).
  • GLDA itself is highly biodegradable.
  • MGDA is more preferred in view of it being somewhat less hygroscopic, which improves detergent stability during storage.
  • Preferred salts are alkali-based salts and more preferred are sodium-based salts.
  • a coordinate covalent bond also known as a dative bond, dipolar bond, or coordinate bond is a type of two-centre, two-electron covalent bond in which the two electrons derive from the same atom.
  • the bonding of metal ions to ligands generally involves this type of bond.
  • the preferred method of manufacture aminopolycarboxylate coordination complexes comprising one or more iron- (Fe), Manganese- (Mn) and/or cobalt- (Co) cations comprises the following steps: a) providing an aqueous solution comprising aminopolycarboxylate and Fe, Mn and/or Co cations, wherein the molar ratio of the aminopolycarboxylate and the cations is from 100:1 to 1 :3; and b) optionally adjusting the pH of the aqueous solution to the range of from 6 to 11 ; and c) removing water from the aqueous solution to provide a composition comprising aminopolycarboxylate with coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations and the composition having water content of at most 60 wt.% and/or precipitating the complexes from aqueous solution by adding a non-aqueous solvent (preferably an organic solvent such as ethanol).
  • a non-aqueous solvent preferably an organic solvent such
  • step c) water is removed until a solid is provided or a precipitated solid formed on addition of an organic solvent is separated from the supernatant solution by filtration and then air dried.
  • the aminopolycarboxylates comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound iron- (Fe), Manganese- (Mn) and/or cobalt- (Co) cations is part of the ingredients to make a tablet or powder detergent.
  • Suitable examples of such water-soluble salts are the chloride, sulphate or carbonate salts of Fe, Mn and/or Co.
  • the Fe 2+ , Fe 3+ , Mn 2+ , Mn 3+ , Mn 4+ , Mn 5+ , Mn 6+ , Mn 7+ and Co 2+ , Co 3+ are the preferred cations.
  • the cation is a Fe 2+ , Fe 3+ , Mn 2+ and/or Mn 4+ cation and particularly preferred are the Fe 3+ , Fe 2+ and Mn 2+ oxidation states.
  • Preferred aminopolycarboxylate coordination complexes comprising a bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cation are MGDA, GLDA, EDDS and IDS, whereof MGDA and GLDA are the more preferred.
  • the molar ratio of aminopolycarboxylate and the cations can be from 100:1 to 1 :3. Lower ratios will lead to only a part of the aminopolycarboxyate comprising coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co ions. This can be beneficial since such an aminopolycarboxylate mixture can both contribute to effective bleaching as well as providing strong builder and chelating functionality in one go. Higher ratios are beneficial to provide a more targeted bleach catalyst activity and can allow for more than one Fe, Mn and/or Co cation to be coordinate covalent bound to the aminopolycarboxylate. In this respect it is noted that many aminopolycarboxylates are capable of coordinate covalent binding more than one Fe, Mn and/or Co cations.
  • Preferred coordination complexes include Mn" (GLDA) 2- , Mn” 2 (GLDA), Fe IH (GLDA)", Fe IH (GLDA) (OH) 2 ; Fe IH (GLDA) (OH) 2 3 Co” (GLDA) 2 ", Co” 2 (GLDA), Co 1 " (GLDA)", Co 1 " (GLDA) (OH) 2 ; Co 1 " (GLDA) (OH) 2 3 ’ Mn” (MGDA)", Fe 1 " (MGDA), Co” (MGDA)", Co 1 " (MGDA), Mn” (EDDS) 2 ; Fe 1 " (EDDS)”, Co” (EDDS) 2 ; Co 1 " (EDDS).
  • the negatively charged complexes may be isolated as the acid, sodium, potassium or ammonium salts depending on the identity of the base used in the synthesis.
  • the positively charged complexes may be preferably isolated as sulphate, carbonate or halide salts, preferably chloride salts. All complexed may be isolated as their respective hydrates.
  • the machine dishwash detergent composition comprises from 0.002 to 20 wt.% of free acid equivalent of one or more aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations.
  • a further beneficial amount is from 0.005 to 20 wt.%, more preferably from 0.015 to 20 wt.%, even more preferably from 0.05 to 20 wt.%, still even more preferably from 0.1 to 20 wt. %, still even more preferably from 0.2 to 10 wt. %, still even more preferably from 0.3 to 5 wt. % and still even more preferably from 0.4 to 4 wt. %.
  • the detergent composition according to the invention preferably comprises from 0.5 to 40 wt. % free acid equivalent of total aminopolycarboxylate which does not comprise coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations.
  • a particularly preferred amount of free acid equivalent of aminopolycarboxylate which does not comprise coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations is from 0.5 to 20 wt. %, more preferably from 1.0 to 15 wt. %, even more preferably from 2.0 to 10 wt. % and still even more preferably from 3.0 to 8 wt.%.
  • aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn or Co cations versus aminopolycarboxylate not comprising such, is considered to be from 1:4000 to 100:1, more preferably from 1 :100 to 20:1 , even more preferably from 1:50 to 1 :1 and still even more preferably from 1:20 to 1:10.
  • Such ratios provide a balanced bleach catalyst activity and a builder activity.
  • the detergent composition of the invention does not comprise further poorly biodegradable bleach catalyst and beneficially comprises essentially no further bleach catalyst (biodegradable or not). pH profile
  • the detergent composition of the invention preferably provides a pH of a solution of 1 wt.% of the detergent composition in water as measured at 25 degrees Celsius of from 6.0 to 10.8, more preferably from 6.5 to 10.6, even more preferably 7.0 to 10.5, still even more preferably from 7.5 to 10.2, still even more preferably from 8.5 to 10.0 and still even more preferably from 9.0 to 10.0.
  • the detergent composition of the invention preferably comprises from 0.1 to 25 wt. % of bleach.
  • Inorganic and/or organic bleaches can be used.
  • Bleach may be selected from peroxides, organic peracids, salts of organic peracids and combinations thereof.
  • the bleach is selected from peroxides (including peroxide salts such as sodium percarbonate), organic peracids, salts of organic peracids and combinations thereof. More preferably, the bleach is a peroxide.
  • the bleach is a percarbonate.
  • the bleach is a coated percarbonate. More preferred amounts of bleach are from 1.0 to 25 wt.%, even more preferably at from 2.0 to 20 wt. % and still even more preferably from 5 to 15 wt.%.
  • the detergent composition of the invention may comprise further ingredients, such as further detergent active components.
  • the detergent composition of the invention preferably comprises one or more bleach activators such as peroxyacid bleach precursors.
  • Peroxyacid bleach precursors are well known in the art. As non-limiting examples can be named N, N, N', N '-tetraacetyl ethylene diamine (TAED), sodium nonanoyloxybenzene sulphonate (SNOBS), sodium benzoyloxybenzene sul phonate (SBOBS) and the cationic peroxyacid precursor (SPCC) as described in US-A-4, 751,015.
  • a beneficial amount of bleach activator is from 0.1 to 10 wt.%, more preferably from 0.5 to 5 wt.% and even more preferably from 1.0 to 4 wt. %.
  • organic acids and/or their corresponding salts are beneficial in providing improved detergency whilst capable of being made from renewable materials (e.g. plant-based) and readily biodegradable.
  • Said further organic acid used in the detergent composition of the invention can be any organic acid. Particularly good results were achieved with organic acids being polyacids (i.e. acids having more than one carboxylic acid group), and more particularly with di- or tricarboxylic organic acids.
  • the organic acids used in the invention have an average molecular mass of at most 500 Dalton, more preferably of at most 400 Dalton and most preferably of at most 300 Dalton, the molecular mass being based on the free acid equivalent. In any case, preferably the organic acid is not a polymer-based acid.
  • the organic acid employed in accordance with the invention preferably comprises 3 to 25 carbon atoms, more preferably 4 to 15 carbon atoms.
  • the organic acids preferably are those which are also found naturally occurring, such as in plants.
  • organic acids of note are acetic acid, citric acid, aspartic acid, lactic acid, adipic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, saccharic acids, their salts, or mixtures thereof.
  • Citric acid was found highly advantageous. Citric acid is naturally occurring, highly biodegradable as well as providing added builder activity and disintegration properties.
  • the detergent composition of the invention comprises a free acid equivalent of organic acid of from 1 to 30 wt. %, more preferably of from 5 to 20 wt. % and even more preferably from 8.0 to 15 wt.%.
  • Preferred salt forms of the further organic acid are alkali metal salts and beneficially their sodium salts.
  • Further builder materials may be selected from 1) calcium sequestrant materials, 2) precipitating materials, 3) calcium ion-exchange materials and 4) mixtures thereof.
  • Examples of calcium ion-exchange builder materials include the various types of waterinsoluble crystalline or amorphous aluminosilicates, of which zeolites are known representatives, e.g. zeolite A, zeolite B (also known as zeolite P), zeolite C, zeolite X, zeolite Y and also the zeolite P-type as described in EP-A-0,384,070. Zeolite and carbonate (carbonate (including bicarbonate and sesquicarbonate) are preferred further builders.
  • the builder may be crystalline aluminosilicate, preferably an alkali metal aluminosilicate, more preferably a sodium aluminosilicate.
  • Aluminosilicates are materials having the general formula: 0.8-1.5 M2O. AI2O3. 0.8-6 SiC>2, where M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium. These materials contain some bound water and are required to have a calcium ion exchange capacity of at least 50 mg CaO/g.
  • the preferred sodium aluminosilicates contain 1.5-3.5 SiC>2 units in the formula above. They can be prepared readily by reaction between sodium silicate and sodium aluminate, as amply described in the literature.
  • the ratio of surfactants to alumuminosilicate (where present) is preferably greater than 5:2, more preferably greater than 3:1 .
  • Alkali carbonate is appreciated in view of its double function as builder and buffer and is preferably present in the detergent composition.
  • the preferred amount of alkali carbonate in the detergent composition is from 2 to 75 wt.%, more preferably from 10 to 50 wt.% and even more preferably from 20 to 40 wt.%.
  • Such level of alkali carbonate provides good Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ion scavenging for most types of water hardness levels, as well as other builder effects, such as providing good buffering capacity.
  • the preferred alkali carbonates are sodium- and/or potassium carbonate of which sodium carbonate is particularly preferred.
  • the alkali carbonate present in the detergent composition of the invention can be present as such or as part of a more complex ingredient (e.g. sodium carbonate in sodium percarbonate).
  • the detergent composition is phosphate-free, i.e., contains at most 1.0 wt. %, preferably at most 0.8 wt.%, more preferably at most 0.5 wt. %, even more preferably at most 0.2 wt.% of phosphate and still even more preferably contains essentially no phosphate.
  • the detergent composition is preferably also phosphonate-free i.e., contains at most 1 .0 wt. % of phosphonate, preferably at most 0.8 wt. %, more preferably at most 0.5 wt. %, even more preferably at most 0.2 wt. % of phosphonate and still even more preferably contains essentially no phosphonate.
  • phosphonates and phosphates are 1-hydroxyethane-1 ,1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP), diethylenetriamine-penta (methylenephosphonic acid) (DTPMP), ethylenediaminetetra- methylenephosphonate (EDTMP), tripolyphosphate and pyrophosphate.
  • HEDP 1-hydroxyethane-1 ,1-diphosphonic acid
  • DTPMP diethylenetriamine-penta
  • ETMP ethylenediaminetetra- methylenephosphonate
  • tripolyphosphate and pyrophosphate.
  • phosphonates such as HEDP tend to be poorly biodegradable. It is also considered that phosphonates can reduce the efficiency of the bleach catalysts of the invention by scavenging the coordinate covalent bound iron- (Fe), Manganese- (Mn) and/or cobalt- (Co) cations.
  • the detergent composition of the invention may comprise one or more further surfactants.
  • Anionic surfactants may be chosen from the anionic surfactants described "Surface Active Agents” Vol. 1 , by Schwartz & Perry, Interscience 1949, Vol. 2 by Schwartz, Perry & Berch, Interscience 1958, in the current edition of "McCutcheon’s Emulsifiers and Detergents” published by Manufacturing Confectioners Company or in "Tenside-Taschenbuch", H. Stache, 2nd Edn., Carl Hauser Verlag, 1981.
  • the surfactants used are saturated.
  • Amine oxide surfactants may also be used in the present invention as anti-redeposition surfactant.
  • suitable amine oxide surfactants are C10-C18 alkyl dimethylamine oxide and C10-C18 acylamido alkyl dimethylamine oxide.
  • the amount of anionic surfactant is preferably at most 5 wt. %, and more preferably at most 2 wt. % and even more preferably at most 1 .5 wt. %.
  • suitable anionic surfactants are methylester sulphonates or sodium lauryl sulphate.
  • the detergent according to the invention comprises essentially no anionic surfactant.
  • Anionic surfactants are nowadays usually derived (in part) from nonrenewable carbon sources and often are poorly biodegradable. Hence having essentially no anionic surfactants shortens the ingredient list and reduces the environmental impact of the detergent composition.
  • the detergent composition of the invention preferably comprises enzyme.
  • enzymes suitable for use in the cleaning compositions of this invention include lipases, cellulases, peroxidases, proteases (proteolytic enzymes), amylases (amylolytic enzymes) and others.
  • proteases proteases
  • amylases amylases
  • these enzymes are proteases, amylases, cellulases, peroxidases, mannanases, pectate lyases and lipases and combinations thereof, of which proteolytic and amylolytic enzymes are the more preferred.
  • Enzymes may be added in liquid, granular or in encapsulated form to the composition, but preferably are not encapsulated. If enzymes are present the composition preferably also contains enzyme stabilizers such as polyalcohols/borax, calcium, formate or protease inhibitors like 4-formylphenyl boronic acid.
  • Preferred levels of protease are from 0.1 to 10 mg, more preferably from 0.2 to 5 mg, most preferably 0.4 to about 4 mg active protease per gram of the detergent composition.
  • Preferred levels of amylase are from 0.01 to 5, more preferably from 0.02 to 2, most preferably from 0.05 to about 1 mg active amylase per gram of the detergent composition.
  • the detergent composition of the invention beneficially comprises dispersing polymer.
  • Dispersing polymers can be chosen from the group of anti-spotting agents and/or antiscaling agents.
  • suitable anti-spotting polymeric agents include hydrophobically modified polycarboxylic acids such as AcusolTM460 ND (ex Dow) and AlcosperseTM747 by Nouryon, whereas also synthetic clays, and preferably those synthetic clays which have a high surface area can be useful to reduce spotting, in particular those formed where soil and dispersed remnants are present at places where the water collects on the floor when the water subsequently evaporates.
  • Suitable anti-scaling agents are water soluble dispersing polymers prepared from an allyloxybenzenesulfonic acid monomer, a methallyl sulfonic acid monomer, a copolymerizable nonionic monomer and a copolymerizable olefinically unsaturated carboxylic acid monomer as described in US5547612 or known as acrylic sulphonated polymers as described in EP851022.
  • Polymers of this type include polyacrylate with methyl methacrylate, sodium methallyl sulphonate and sulphophenol methallyl ether such as AlcosperseTM240 supplied (Nouryon).
  • terpolymer containing polyacrylate with 2-acrylamido-2 methylpropane sulphonic acid such as Acumer 3100 supplied by Dow.
  • polymers and co-polymers of acrylic acid having a molecular weight between 500 and 20,000 can also be used, such as homo-polymeric polycarboxylic acid compounds with acrylic acid as the monomeric unit.
  • the average weight of such homo-polymers in the acid form preferably ranges from 1 ,000 to 100,000 particularly from 3,000 to 10,000 e.g. Sokolan TM PA 25 from BASF or AcusolTM425 from Dow.
  • polycarboxylates co-polymers derived from monomers of acrylic acid and maleic acid such as CP5 from BASF.
  • the average molecular weight of these polymers in the acid form preferably ranges from 4,000 to 70,000.
  • Modified polycarboxylates like SokalanTM CP50 from BASF or AlcoguardTM4160 from Nouryon may also be used.
  • Mixture of anti-scaling agents may also be used. Particularly useful is a mixture of organic phosphonates and polymers of acrylic acid.
  • the preferred amount of dispersing polymer is from 0.1 to 6 wt. %, more preferably from 0.2 to 4 wt. %, and even more preferably from 0.3 to 2 wt. %.
  • the detergent composition preferably comprises one or more colorants, one or more perfumes and more advantageously a mixture of at least one colorant and at least one perfume.
  • Colorants are beneficially present in an amount of from 0.0001 to 8 wt. %, more preferably from 0.001 to 4 wt. % and even more preferably from 0.001 to 1.5 wt. %.
  • Perfume may be present in the range from 0.1 to 1 wt. %.
  • Many suitable examples of perfumes are provided in the CTFA (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association) 1992 International Buyers Guide, published by CFTA Publications and OPD 1993 Chemicals Buyers Directory 80th Annual Edition, published by Schnell Publishing Co.
  • CTFA Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association
  • top notes are defined by Poucher (Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 6(2):80 [1955]).
  • Preferred topnotes are selected from citrus oils, linalool, linalyl acetate, lavender, dihydromyrcenol, rose oxide and cis-3-hexanol.
  • the detergent composition of the invention may be in any suitable form, such as in the form of a liquid (e.g. gel), powder or a mixture thereof (e.g. a multi-compartmental capsule). They may be in unit-dose or non-unit dose form. Examples of unit-dose forms are tablets and capsules.
  • the detergent composition is preferably provided as a water-soluble or water- dispersible unit dose.
  • Particularly preferred unit doses are in the form of pouches, which comprise at least one further non-shape stable ingredient, such as a liquid and/or powder; or in the form of tablets.
  • the unit dose is sized and shaped as to fit in the detergent cup of a conventional domestic machine dishwasher.
  • the unit-dose detergent composition has a unit weight of 5 to 50 grams, more preferably a unit weight of 10 to 30 grams, even more preferably a unit weight of 12 to 25 grams.
  • Advantageous unit dose pouches preferably have more than one compartment.
  • Advantageous unit dose tablets are those which have more than one visually distinct tablet region. Such regions can be formed by e.g.
  • multi-compartmental pouches/ multi-region tablets it can be used to reduce/prevent undesired chemical reactions between two or more ingredients during storage by physical segregation.
  • the unit dose detergent composition is wrapped to improve hygiene and consumer safety.
  • the wrapper advantageously is based on water-soluble film which preferably a polyvinylalcohol (PVA) based film.
  • PVA polyvinylalcohol
  • Such wrapping prevents direct contact of the detergent composition with the skin of the consumer when placing the unit dose in the detergent cup/holder of a e.g. machine dishwasher.
  • a further benefit of course is that the consumer also does not need to remove a water-soluble wrapping before use.
  • the detergent compositions according to the invention can be made using known methods and equipment in the field of detergent composition manufacturing.
  • a base solution was made by dissolving 0.02% of naphthol blue black dye (available from Sigma-Aldrich) in water and adjusting the pH to 10 (using 0.1 M bicarbonate). To 1 ml of this solution was added 1 ml water, 1 ml of 80 mM hydrogen peroxide and optionally 1 ml of a 100ppm stock solution of bleach catalyst (or water in the case of a catalyst free control).
  • the final composition of the reaction mixtures contained 0.005 wt. % of naphthol blue black dye, hydrogen peroxide at a level of 20 mM and optionally 25ppm of bleach catalyst according to the invention, or (not according to the invention) bare Mn 2+ (as water soluble MnSOt) as control.
  • the final solution was incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for 20 hours after which the light absorbance was measured at 629nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The results are given in the Table 1 below.
  • aminopolycarboxylate complexes of the invention can substantially improve dye bleaching at 20 degrees Celsius and a pH of 7 or 10, where complexes with GLDA and MGDA perform best. These conditions are relevant for machine dishwash wash liquor conditions when operating at low temperatures.
  • Table 3 compositions of solutions used in tea stained melamine bleaching experiments
  • the solutions were placed in a shallow glass bowl and a 10 cm x 12 cm tea-stained melamine tile (CFT DM11) was placed flat on the bottom of the bowl with the melamine side upwards so that the tile was completely immersed in the solution.
  • the bowl and its contents were covered with a glass lid and placed in an oven at 50 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes. The tile was then removed from the solution and rinsed under a tap before air drying at ambient temperature.
  • Tea stain removal was measured by making diffuse reflectance measurements using an X-Rite Color i7 spectrometer fitted with the Medium Area View port (0.1 cm diameter). The sampling mode was set to Reflectance - specular included. The spectrometer was standardized using a two-point calibration on a white (non-stained) tile and light trap supplied with the instrument using unstained cotton as a control. Data were exported as the CIE L*, a* and b* values. Three replicate swatches were measured for each combination of sequestrant and metal ion solution.
  • SRI Stain Removal Index

Abstract

A machine dishwash detergent composition comprising from 0.1 to 20 wt. % non-ionic surfactant; and bleach; and from 0.002 to 20 wt.% of free acid equivalent of aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound iron- (Fe), Manganese- (Mn) and/or cobalt- (Co) cations; and wherein the composition comprises at most 1 wt. % of phosphate.

Description

MACHINE DISHWASH DETERGENT
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a machine dishwash detergent composition comprising aminopolycarboxylic acid coordination complexes comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound iron-, cobalt- and/or manganese-cations.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Machine dishwash detergent compositions typically contain several different active components, including builders, surfactants, enzymes and bleaching agents. Surfactants are employed to remove stains and soil and to disperse the released components into the cleaning liquid. Enzymes help to remove stubborn stains of proteins, starch and lipids by hydrolyzing these components. Bleach is used to remove stains by oxidizing the components that make up these stains. To reduce the negative effects of calcium and magnesium ions on stain/soil removal so called 'builders' (complexing agents) are commonly applied in detergent compositions.
Phosphate based builders have been used for many years in machine dishwash detergent compositions, such as trisodium phosphate and sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP). Although having excellent performance in dishwasher detergents their presence in the wastewater can lead to environmental problems such as eutrophication. As such there has been a need for more environmentally friendly alternative builders with on-par effectiveness. Examples of such alternative builders are aminopolycarboxylates, such as glutamic acid N,N-diacetic acid (GLDA), methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA) and are ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).
Current machine dishwash compositions typically contain a bleach system to tackle difficult to remove colored stains, such as tea-stains. Bleach systems, beside a source of bleach, typically contain bleach activator and bleach catalyst to provide effective bleaching also at low wash temperatures. One known effective bleach catalyst is based on a manganese complex of the formula [LnMnmXP]zYq, as described in EP0458397A2. However, such bleach catalysts have fallen in disfavor as they have poor biodegradability and hence tend to persist in the environment. There is a constant desire to make machine dishwash detergents more environmentally friendly and for machine dishwash detergent compositions to be more fully biodegradable. A prime requisite for consumer acceptance however is that more fully biodegradable detergents still need to perform well in cleaning dishware.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a machine dishwash detergent composition which has effective bleaching activity with improved biodegradability and furthermore to provide such a composition while using commonly known ingredients in machine dishwashing and while keeping the ingredient list as short as possible for effective cleaning, in particular for effective tea-stain cleaning.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One or more objects of the invention have been achieved by a machine dishwash detergent composition comprising:
• from 0.1 to 20 wt. % non-ionic surfactant; and
• bleach; and
• from 0.002 to 20 wt. % of free acid equivalent of aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound iron- (Fe), Manganese- (Mn) and/or cobalt- (Co) cations; wherein the composition comprises at most 1 wt. % of phosphate; and wherein the pH of a solution of 1 wt.% of the detergent composition in water as measured at 25 degrees Celsius is from 6.0 to 10.8.
Unless otherwise made clear from the context, where the terms ‘aminopolycarboxylic acid’ or ‘organic acid’ are used these encompass their corresponding salts (and vice versa).
Surprisingly it was observed that aminopolycarboxylate comprising coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations can be effective in promoting bleaching stains in solution and on surfaces by having bleach catalyst activity. This is quite relevant since aminopolycarboxylates tend to be biodegradable and some, such as GLDA, are even made from renewable sources.
Therefore, in another aspect the invention relates to the use of aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations to provide a machine dishwash detergent composition with a bleach system having improved biodegradability.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Definitions
Weight percentage (wt.%) is based on the total weight of the detergent composition unless otherwise indicated or as made clear from the context. It will be appreciated that the total weight amount of ingredients will not exceed 100 wt. %. Whenever an amount or concentration of a component is quantified herein, unless indicated otherwise, the quantified amount or quantified concentration relates to said component per se, even though it may be common practice to add such a component in the form of a solution or of a blend with one or more other ingredients. It is furthermore to be understood that the verb "to comprise" and its conjugations is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. Finally, reference to an element by the indefinite article "a" or "an" does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the elements is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements. The indefinite article "a" or "an" thus usually means "at least one". Unless otherwise specified all measurements are taken at standard conditions. Whenever a parameter, such as a concentration or a ratio, is said to be less than a certain upper limit it should be understood that in the absence of a specified lower limit the lower limit for said parameter is 0.
Concentrations expressed in wt. % of ‘free acid equivalent’ refer to the concentration of the compound expressed as wt. %, assuming it would be in fully protonated from. The following table shows how the free acid equivalent concentrations can be calculated for some (anhydrous) aminopolycarboxylates and (anhydrous) acid salts.
Figure imgf000005_0001
Non-ionic surfactants
Suitable non-ionic surfactants which may be used include preferably the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide.
Preferably low-foaming nonionic surfactants are used particularly from the group of alkoxylated alcohols. Alkoxylated, advantageously ethoxylated, in particular primary alcohols with preferably 8 to 18 C atoms and on average 1 to 12 mol of ethylene oxide (EO) per mol of alcohol, in which the alcohol residue may be linear or preferably methyl-branched in position 2 or may contain linear and methyl-branched residues in the mixture, as are usually present in oxo alcohol residues, are preferably used as nonionic surfactants. In particular, however, alcohol ethoxylates with linear residues prepared from alcohols of natural origin with 12 to 18 C atoms, for example from coconut, palm, tallow fat or oleyl alcohol, and on average 2 to 8 mol of EO per mol of alcohol are preferred. The preferred ethoxylated alcohols include for example C12-14 alcohols with 3 EO to 4 EO, C9-12 alcohol with 7 EO, C13-15 alcohols with 3 EO, 5 EO, 7 EO or 8 EO, C12-18 alcohols with 3 EO, 5 EO or 7 EO and mixtures of these, such as mixtures of C12-14 alcohol with 3 EO and C12-19 alcohol with 5 EO. Preferred tallow fatty alcohols with more than 12 EO have from 60 to 100 EO, and more preferably from 70 to 90 EO. Particularly preferred tallow fatty alcohols with more than 12 EO are tallow fatty alcohols with 80 EO.
Nonionic surfactants from the group of alkoxylated alcohols, particularly preferably from the group of mixed alkoxylated alcohols and in particular from the group of EO-AO-EO nonionic surfactants, are likewise particularly preferentially used. Preferably used nonionic surfactants originate from the groups comprising alkoxylated nonionic surfactants, in particular ethoxylated primary alcohols and mixtures of these surfactants with structurally complex surfactants such as polyoxypropylene/ polyoxyethylene/ polyoxypropylene (PO/EO/PO). Such (PO/EO/PO) nonionic surfactants are furthermore distinguished by good foam control.
The most preferred nonionic surfactants are according to the formula:
Figure imgf000006_0001
wherein n is from 0 to 5 and m from 10 to 50, more preferably wherein n is from 0 to 3 and m is from 15 to 40, and even more preferably wherein n is 0 and m is from 18 to 25. Surfactants according to this formula were particularly useful in reducing spotting of dishware treated in a machine dish washer. Preferably at least 50 wt. % of the nonionic surfactant comprised by the detergent composition of the invention is nonionic surfactant according to this formula. Such nonionic surfactants are commercially available, for example under the tradename Dehypon WET (Supplier: BASF) and Genapol EC50 (Supplier Clariant).
The detergent composition of the invention comprises from 0.1 to 20 wt. % of a nonionic surfactant or a mixture of two or more nonionic surfactants. The preferred amount of total non-ionic surfactant if from 1 to 18 wt. %, more preferably from 4 to 16 wt. % and even more preferably from 6 to 12 wt.%. Such levels are considered optimal. The nonionic surfactant is preferably present in amounts of 25 to 90 wt. % based on the total weight of the surfactant system. Anionic surfactants can be present for example in amounts in the range from 5 to 40 wt. % of the surfactant system.
Aminopolycarboxylate
Aminopolycarboxylates are well known in the detergent industry and sometimes referred to as aminopolycarboxylic acids chelants. They are generally appreciated as being strong builders. Suitable aminopolycarboxylic acids include glutamic acid N,N- diacetic acid (GLDA), methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA), ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS), iminodisuccinic acid (IDS), iminodimalic acid (IDM), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), iminodiacetic acid (IDA), hydroxyethyliminodiacetic acid (HEIDA) aspartic acid diethoxysuccinic acid (AES) aspartic acid-N,N-diacetic acid (ASDA) , hydroxyethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (HEDTA), hydroxyethylethylene-diaminetriacetic acid (HEEDTA) , iminodifumaric (IDF), iminoditartaric acid (IDT), iminodimaleic acid (IDMAL), ethylenediaminedifumaric acid (EDDF), ethylenediaminedimalic acid (EDDM), ethylenediamineditartaric acid (EDDT), ethylenediaminedimaleic acid and (EDDMAL).
Preferred aminopolycarboxylates are GLDA, MGDA, EDDS, IDS, IDM or a mixture thereof, more preferred are GLDA, MGDA, EDDS or a mixture thereof and even more preferred are GLDA and MGDA or a mixture thereof. Of these GLDA is especially preferred as it can be made from bio-based materials (e.g. monosodium glutamate, which itself can be made as by-product from corn fermentation). Also, GLDA itself is highly biodegradable. MGDA is more preferred in view of it being somewhat less hygroscopic, which improves detergent stability during storage. Preferred salts are alkali-based salts and more preferred are sodium-based salts.
Aminopolycarboxylate with coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations A coordinate covalent bond, also known as a dative bond, dipolar bond, or coordinate bond is a type of two-centre, two-electron covalent bond in which the two electrons derive from the same atom. The bonding of metal ions to ligands generally involves this type of bond. The preferred complexes have the following formula: [MmLn]pYq.rH2O where, M is iron, manganese or cobalt, L is an aminopolycarboxylate ligand, m = 1-3, n = 1-3, p = 0-3, q = 0-3, r = 0-3. If p <1 >, Y is counterion.
General methods to prepare aminopolycarboxylate metal ion complexes are known in the art (e.g. V. Springer et. al. Preparation and study of the solid complexes of the racemic ethylenediamine-N,N'-disuccinic acid with iron(lll), cobalt(lll), and bismuth(lll) ions. Chem. Zvesti 34(2), pages 184-189, 1980; US5,559,261).
The preferred method of manufacture aminopolycarboxylate coordination complexes comprising one or more iron- (Fe), Manganese- (Mn) and/or cobalt- (Co) cations comprises the following steps: a) providing an aqueous solution comprising aminopolycarboxylate and Fe, Mn and/or Co cations, wherein the molar ratio of the aminopolycarboxylate and the cations is from 100:1 to 1 :3; and b) optionally adjusting the pH of the aqueous solution to the range of from 6 to 11 ; and c) removing water from the aqueous solution to provide a composition comprising aminopolycarboxylate with coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations and the composition having water content of at most 60 wt.% and/or precipitating the complexes from aqueous solution by adding a non-aqueous solvent (preferably an organic solvent such as ethanol).
Preferably at step c) water is removed until a solid is provided or a precipitated solid formed on addition of an organic solvent is separated from the supernatant solution by filtration and then air dried. This is especially advantageous when the aminopolycarboxylates comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound iron- (Fe), Manganese- (Mn) and/or cobalt- (Co) cations is part of the ingredients to make a tablet or powder detergent.
Suitable examples of such water-soluble salts are the chloride, sulphate or carbonate salts of Fe, Mn and/or Co. The Fe2+, Fe3+, Mn2+, Mn3+, Mn4+, Mn5+, Mn6+, Mn7+ and Co2+, Co3+ are the preferred cations. Advantageously the cation is a Fe2+, Fe3+, Mn2+ and/or Mn4+ cation and particularly preferred are the Fe3+, Fe2+ and Mn2+ oxidation states.
Preferred aminopolycarboxylate coordination complexes comprising a bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cation are MGDA, GLDA, EDDS and IDS, whereof MGDA and GLDA are the more preferred.
As indicated in the method, the molar ratio of aminopolycarboxylate and the cations can be from 100:1 to 1 :3. Lower ratios will lead to only a part of the aminopolycarboxyate comprising coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co ions. This can be beneficial since such an aminopolycarboxylate mixture can both contribute to effective bleaching as well as providing strong builder and chelating functionality in one go. Higher ratios are beneficial to provide a more targeted bleach catalyst activity and can allow for more than one Fe, Mn and/or Co cation to be coordinate covalent bound to the aminopolycarboxylate. In this respect it is noted that many aminopolycarboxylates are capable of coordinate covalent binding more than one Fe, Mn and/or Co cations.
Preferred coordination complexes include Mn" (GLDA)2-, Mn"2 (GLDA), FeIH (GLDA)", FeIH (GLDA) (OH)2; FeIH (GLDA) (OH)2 3 Co" (GLDA)2", Co"2 (GLDA), Co1" (GLDA)", Co1" (GLDA) (OH)2; Co1" (GLDA) (OH)2 3’ Mn" (MGDA)", Fe1" (MGDA), Co" (MGDA)", Co1" (MGDA), Mn" (EDDS)2; Fe1" (EDDS)", Co" (EDDS)2; Co1" (EDDS). The negatively charged complexes may be isolated as the acid, sodium, potassium or ammonium salts depending on the identity of the base used in the synthesis. The positively charged complexes may be preferably isolated as sulphate, carbonate or halide salts, preferably chloride salts. All complexed may be isolated as their respective hydrates.
The machine dishwash detergent composition comprises from 0.002 to 20 wt.% of free acid equivalent of one or more aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations. A further beneficial amount is from 0.005 to 20 wt.%, more preferably from 0.015 to 20 wt.%, even more preferably from 0.05 to 20 wt.%, still even more preferably from 0.1 to 20 wt. %, still even more preferably from 0.2 to 10 wt. %, still even more preferably from 0.3 to 5 wt. % and still even more preferably from 0.4 to 4 wt. %.
Besides the aminopolycarboylate coordinate covalent bound to one or more Fe, Mn and/or Co cations, further aminopolycarboxylate may be present which does not comprise such coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations. The detergent composition according to the invention preferably comprises from 0.5 to 40 wt. % free acid equivalent of total aminopolycarboxylate which does not comprise coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations. A particularly preferred amount of free acid equivalent of aminopolycarboxylate which does not comprise coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations is from 0.5 to 20 wt. %, more preferably from 1.0 to 15 wt. %, even more preferably from 2.0 to 10 wt. % and still even more preferably from 3.0 to 8 wt.%.
An optimal balance of aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn or Co cations versus aminopolycarboxylate not comprising such, is considered to be from 1:4000 to 100:1, more preferably from 1 :100 to 20:1 , even more preferably from 1:50 to 1 :1 and still even more preferably from 1:20 to 1:10. Such ratios provide a balanced bleach catalyst activity and a builder activity.
Preferably the detergent composition of the invention does not comprise further poorly biodegradable bleach catalyst and beneficially comprises essentially no further bleach catalyst (biodegradable or not). pH profile
The detergent composition of the invention preferably provides a pH of a solution of 1 wt.% of the detergent composition in water as measured at 25 degrees Celsius of from 6.0 to 10.8, more preferably from 6.5 to 10.6, even more preferably 7.0 to 10.5, still even more preferably from 7.5 to 10.2, still even more preferably from 8.5 to 10.0 and still even more preferably from 9.0 to 10.0.
Bleach The detergent composition of the invention preferably comprises from 0.1 to 25 wt. % of bleach. Inorganic and/or organic bleaches can be used. Bleach may be selected from peroxides, organic peracids, salts of organic peracids and combinations thereof. Advantageously the bleach is selected from peroxides (including peroxide salts such as sodium percarbonate), organic peracids, salts of organic peracids and combinations thereof. More preferably, the bleach is a peroxide. Most preferably, the bleach is a percarbonate. Further preferred, the bleach is a coated percarbonate. More preferred amounts of bleach are from 1.0 to 25 wt.%, even more preferably at from 2.0 to 20 wt. % and still even more preferably from 5 to 15 wt.%.
Further ingredients
The detergent composition of the invention may comprise further ingredients, such as further detergent active components.
Bleach Activators
The detergent composition of the invention preferably comprises one or more bleach activators such as peroxyacid bleach precursors. Peroxyacid bleach precursors are well known in the art. As non-limiting examples can be named N, N, N', N '-tetraacetyl ethylene diamine (TAED), sodium nonanoyloxybenzene sulphonate (SNOBS), sodium benzoyloxybenzene sul phonate (SBOBS) and the cationic peroxyacid precursor (SPCC) as described in US-A-4, 751,015. A beneficial amount of bleach activator is from 0.1 to 10 wt.%, more preferably from 0.5 to 5 wt.% and even more preferably from 1.0 to 4 wt. %.
Organic Acid
Inclusion of further organic acids and/or their corresponding salts (not being aminopolycarboxylic acids or hydroxamic acids) is beneficial in providing improved detergency whilst capable of being made from renewable materials (e.g. plant-based) and readily biodegradable.
Said further organic acid used in the detergent composition of the invention can be any organic acid. Particularly good results were achieved with organic acids being polyacids (i.e. acids having more than one carboxylic acid group), and more particularly with di- or tricarboxylic organic acids. The organic acids used in the invention have an average molecular mass of at most 500 Dalton, more preferably of at most 400 Dalton and most preferably of at most 300 Dalton, the molecular mass being based on the free acid equivalent. In any case, preferably the organic acid is not a polymer-based acid. The organic acid employed in accordance with the invention preferably comprises 3 to 25 carbon atoms, more preferably 4 to 15 carbon atoms.
In view of consumer acceptance and reducing environmental impact, the organic acids preferably are those which are also found naturally occurring, such as in plants. As such, organic acids of note are acetic acid, citric acid, aspartic acid, lactic acid, adipic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, saccharic acids, their salts, or mixtures thereof. Of these, of particular interest are citric acid, aspartic acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, gluconic acid, their salts, or mixtures thereof. Citric acid was found highly advantageous. Citric acid is naturally occurring, highly biodegradable as well as providing added builder activity and disintegration properties.
Advantageously the detergent composition of the invention comprises a free acid equivalent of organic acid of from 1 to 30 wt. %, more preferably of from 5 to 20 wt. % and even more preferably from 8.0 to 15 wt.%.
Preferred salt forms of the further organic acid are alkali metal salts and beneficially their sodium salts.
Further builders
Further builder materials may be selected from 1) calcium sequestrant materials, 2) precipitating materials, 3) calcium ion-exchange materials and 4) mixtures thereof.
Examples of calcium ion-exchange builder materials include the various types of waterinsoluble crystalline or amorphous aluminosilicates, of which zeolites are known representatives, e.g. zeolite A, zeolite B (also known as zeolite P), zeolite C, zeolite X, zeolite Y and also the zeolite P-type as described in EP-A-0,384,070. Zeolite and carbonate (carbonate (including bicarbonate and sesquicarbonate) are preferred further builders. The builder may be crystalline aluminosilicate, preferably an alkali metal aluminosilicate, more preferably a sodium aluminosilicate. This is typically present at a level of less than 15 wt. %. Aluminosilicates are materials having the general formula: 0.8-1.5 M2O. AI2O3. 0.8-6 SiC>2, where M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium. These materials contain some bound water and are required to have a calcium ion exchange capacity of at least 50 mg CaO/g. The preferred sodium aluminosilicates contain 1.5-3.5 SiC>2 units in the formula above. They can be prepared readily by reaction between sodium silicate and sodium aluminate, as amply described in the literature. The ratio of surfactants to alumuminosilicate (where present) is preferably greater than 5:2, more preferably greater than 3:1 .
Alkali carbonate is appreciated in view of its double function as builder and buffer and is preferably present in the detergent composition. The preferred amount of alkali carbonate in the detergent composition is from 2 to 75 wt.%, more preferably from 10 to 50 wt.% and even more preferably from 20 to 40 wt.%. Such level of alkali carbonate provides good Ca2+ and Mg2+ ion scavenging for most types of water hardness levels, as well as other builder effects, such as providing good buffering capacity. The preferred alkali carbonates are sodium- and/or potassium carbonate of which sodium carbonate is particularly preferred. The alkali carbonate present in the detergent composition of the invention can be present as such or as part of a more complex ingredient (e.g. sodium carbonate in sodium percarbonate).
The detergent composition is phosphate-free, i.e., contains at most 1.0 wt. %, preferably at most 0.8 wt.%, more preferably at most 0.5 wt. %, even more preferably at most 0.2 wt.% of phosphate and still even more preferably contains essentially no phosphate. The detergent composition is preferably also phosphonate-free i.e., contains at most 1 .0 wt. % of phosphonate, preferably at most 0.8 wt. %, more preferably at most 0.5 wt. %, even more preferably at most 0.2 wt. % of phosphonate and still even more preferably contains essentially no phosphonate. Examples of phosphonates and phosphates are 1-hydroxyethane-1 ,1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP), diethylenetriamine-penta (methylenephosphonic acid) (DTPMP), ethylenediaminetetra- methylenephosphonate (EDTMP), tripolyphosphate and pyrophosphate. In particular phosphonates such as HEDP tend to be poorly biodegradable. It is also considered that phosphonates can reduce the efficiency of the bleach catalysts of the invention by scavenging the coordinate covalent bound iron- (Fe), Manganese- (Mn) and/or cobalt- (Co) cations.
Surfactant
In addition to the nonionic surfactant the detergent composition of the invention may comprise one or more further surfactants. Anionic surfactants may be chosen from the anionic surfactants described "Surface Active Agents" Vol. 1 , by Schwartz & Perry, Interscience 1949, Vol. 2 by Schwartz, Perry & Berch, Interscience 1958, in the current edition of "McCutcheon’s Emulsifiers and Detergents" published by Manufacturing Confectioners Company or in "Tenside-Taschenbuch", H. Stache, 2nd Edn., Carl Hauser Verlag, 1981. Preferably the surfactants used are saturated.
Amine oxide surfactants may also be used in the present invention as anti-redeposition surfactant. Examples of suitable amine oxide surfactants are C10-C18 alkyl dimethylamine oxide and C10-C18 acylamido alkyl dimethylamine oxide.
Anionic surfactants
If present the amount of anionic surfactant is preferably at most 5 wt. %, and more preferably at most 2 wt. % and even more preferably at most 1 .5 wt. %. Examples of suitable anionic surfactants are methylester sulphonates or sodium lauryl sulphate.
Advantageously the detergent according to the invention comprises essentially no anionic surfactant. Anionic surfactants are nowadays usually derived (in part) from nonrenewable carbon sources and often are poorly biodegradable. Hence having essentially no anionic surfactants shortens the ingredient list and reduces the environmental impact of the detergent composition.
Enzymes
The detergent composition of the invention preferably comprises enzyme. Examples of enzymes suitable for use in the cleaning compositions of this invention include lipases, cellulases, peroxidases, proteases (proteolytic enzymes), amylases (amylolytic enzymes) and others. Well-known and preferred examples of these enzymes are proteases, amylases, cellulases, peroxidases, mannanases, pectate lyases and lipases and combinations thereof, of which proteolytic and amylolytic enzymes are the more preferred. Enzymes may be added in liquid, granular or in encapsulated form to the composition, but preferably are not encapsulated. If enzymes are present the composition preferably also contains enzyme stabilizers such as polyalcohols/borax, calcium, formate or protease inhibitors like 4-formylphenyl boronic acid.
Preferred levels of protease are from 0.1 to 10 mg, more preferably from 0.2 to 5 mg, most preferably 0.4 to about 4 mg active protease per gram of the detergent composition. Preferred levels of amylase are from 0.01 to 5, more preferably from 0.02 to 2, most preferably from 0.05 to about 1 mg active amylase per gram of the detergent composition.
Dispersing polymers
The detergent composition of the invention beneficially comprises dispersing polymer. Dispersing polymers can be chosen from the group of anti-spotting agents and/or antiscaling agents. Examples of suitable anti-spotting polymeric agents include hydrophobically modified polycarboxylic acids such as Acusol™460 ND (ex Dow) and Alcosperse™747 by Nouryon, whereas also synthetic clays, and preferably those synthetic clays which have a high surface area can be useful to reduce spotting, in particular those formed where soil and dispersed remnants are present at places where the water collects on the floor when the water subsequently evaporates.
Suitable anti-scaling agents are water soluble dispersing polymers prepared from an allyloxybenzenesulfonic acid monomer, a methallyl sulfonic acid monomer, a copolymerizable nonionic monomer and a copolymerizable olefinically unsaturated carboxylic acid monomer as described in US5547612 or known as acrylic sulphonated polymers as described in EP851022. Polymers of this type include polyacrylate with methyl methacrylate, sodium methallyl sulphonate and sulphophenol methallyl ether such as Alcosperse™240 supplied (Nouryon). Also suitable is a terpolymer containing polyacrylate with 2-acrylamido-2 methylpropane sulphonic acid such as Acumer 3100 supplied by Dow. As an alternative, polymers and co-polymers of acrylic acid having a molecular weight between 500 and 20,000 can also be used, such as homo-polymeric polycarboxylic acid compounds with acrylic acid as the monomeric unit. The average weight of such homo-polymers in the acid form preferably ranges from 1 ,000 to 100,000 particularly from 3,000 to 10,000 e.g. Sokolan ™ PA 25 from BASF or Acusol™425 from Dow. Also suitable are polycarboxylates co-polymers derived from monomers of acrylic acid and maleic acid, such as CP5 from BASF. The average molecular weight of these polymers in the acid form preferably ranges from 4,000 to 70,000. Modified polycarboxylates like Sokalan™ CP50 from BASF or Alcoguard™4160 from Nouryon may also be used. Mixture of anti-scaling agents may also be used. Particularly useful is a mixture of organic phosphonates and polymers of acrylic acid.
If present, the preferred amount of dispersing polymer is from 0.1 to 6 wt. %, more preferably from 0.2 to 4 wt. %, and even more preferably from 0.3 to 2 wt. %.
Perfume and colorants
The detergent composition preferably comprises one or more colorants, one or more perfumes and more advantageously a mixture of at least one colorant and at least one perfume. Colorants are beneficially present in an amount of from 0.0001 to 8 wt. %, more preferably from 0.001 to 4 wt. % and even more preferably from 0.001 to 1.5 wt. %.
Perfume may be present in the range from 0.1 to 1 wt. %. Many suitable examples of perfumes are provided in the CTFA (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association) 1992 International Buyers Guide, published by CFTA Publications and OPD 1993 Chemicals Buyers Directory 80th Annual Edition, published by Schnell Publishing Co. In perfume mixtures preferably 15 to 25 wt. % are top notes. Top notes are defined by Poucher (Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 6(2):80 [1955]). Preferred topnotes are selected from citrus oils, linalool, linalyl acetate, lavender, dihydromyrcenol, rose oxide and cis-3-hexanol.
Form of the detergent composition
The detergent composition of the invention may be in any suitable form, such as in the form of a liquid (e.g. gel), powder or a mixture thereof (e.g. a multi-compartmental capsule). They may be in unit-dose or non-unit dose form. Examples of unit-dose forms are tablets and capsules.
The detergent composition is preferably provided as a water-soluble or water- dispersible unit dose. Particularly preferred unit doses are in the form of pouches, which comprise at least one further non-shape stable ingredient, such as a liquid and/or powder; or in the form of tablets. For ease of use, the unit dose is sized and shaped as to fit in the detergent cup of a conventional domestic machine dishwasher. In a preferred embodiment, the unit-dose detergent composition has a unit weight of 5 to 50 grams, more preferably a unit weight of 10 to 30 grams, even more preferably a unit weight of 12 to 25 grams. Advantageous unit dose pouches preferably have more than one compartment. Advantageous unit dose tablets are those which have more than one visually distinct tablet region. Such regions can be formed by e.g. two distinct (colored) layers or a tablet having a main body and a distinct insert, such as forming a nested-egg. However oriented, one benefit of using multi-compartmental pouches/ multi-region tablets is that it can be used to reduce/prevent undesired chemical reactions between two or more ingredients during storage by physical segregation.
Preferably the unit dose detergent composition is wrapped to improve hygiene and consumer safety. The wrapper advantageously is based on water-soluble film which preferably a polyvinylalcohol (PVA) based film. Such wrapping prevents direct contact of the detergent composition with the skin of the consumer when placing the unit dose in the detergent cup/holder of a e.g. machine dishwasher. A further benefit of course is that the consumer also does not need to remove a water-soluble wrapping before use.
The detergent compositions according to the invention can be made using known methods and equipment in the field of detergent composition manufacturing.
Unless stated otherwise or is apparent from the context of the description, preferred embodiments mentioned for one aspect of the invention applies mutated mutandis to the other aspects of the invention as well. The below examples are meant to be illustrative and not limiting. EXAMPLES
Example 1
A base solution was made by dissolving 0.02% of naphthol blue black dye (available from Sigma-Aldrich) in water and adjusting the pH to 10 (using 0.1 M bicarbonate). To 1 ml of this solution was added 1 ml water, 1 ml of 80 mM hydrogen peroxide and optionally 1 ml of a 100ppm stock solution of bleach catalyst (or water in the case of a catalyst free control). The final composition of the reaction mixtures contained 0.005 wt. % of naphthol blue black dye, hydrogen peroxide at a level of 20 mM and optionally 25ppm of bleach catalyst according to the invention, or (not according to the invention) bare Mn2+ (as water soluble MnSOt) as control. The final solution was incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for 20 hours after which the light absorbance was measured at 629nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The results are given in the Table 1 below.
Tablel : dye-bleaching results at pH 10 at 20 degrees Celsius
Figure imgf000018_0001
The experiment was repeated, at pH of 7.0 by adjusting the pH with phosphate in place of the bicarbonate. The results are shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2: dye-bleaching results at pH 7.0 at 20 degrees Celsius
Figure imgf000018_0002
Figure imgf000019_0002
The results show that aminopolycarboxylate complexes of the invention can substantially improve dye bleaching at 20 degrees Celsius and a pH of 7 or 10, where complexes with GLDA and MGDA perform best. These conditions are relevant for machine dishwash wash liquor conditions when operating at low temperatures.
Example 2
The bleaching of a model tea stain on melamine was assessed as follows.
Stock solutions of the bleach catalysts (1000 ppm) and sodium percarbonate (4.5 g/l) were prepared in Milli Q high purity water. Fresh catalyst stock solutions were prepared daily. Reaction mixtures (100 ml) were prepared by adding 10 ml of the sodium percarbonate solution to 80 ml water and then adding varying volumes (0, 0.02, 0.1 1, 10 ml) of the 1000 ppm catalyst stock solution before adjusting the final volume with additional water. Catalyst-free control solutions were prepared by adding 20 ml water instead of catalyst stock solution. The pH values of the solutions were 10.5 +/- 0.1 units. The compositions of the reaction mixtures are shown in Table 3.
Table 3: compositions of solutions used in tea stained melamine bleaching experiments
Figure imgf000019_0001
The solutions were placed in a shallow glass bowl and a 10 cm x 12 cm tea-stained melamine tile (CFT DM11) was placed flat on the bottom of the bowl with the melamine side upwards so that the tile was completely immersed in the solution. The bowl and its contents were covered with a glass lid and placed in an oven at 50 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes. The tile was then removed from the solution and rinsed under a tap before air drying at ambient temperature.
Tea stain removal was measured by making diffuse reflectance measurements using an X-Rite Color i7 spectrometer fitted with the Medium Area View port (0.1 cm diameter). The sampling mode was set to Reflectance - specular included. The spectrometer was standardized using a two-point calibration on a white (non-stained) tile and light trap supplied with the instrument using unstained cotton as a control. Data were exported as the CIE L*, a* and b* values. Three replicate swatches were measured for each combination of sequestrant and metal ion solution.
The extent of stain removal is calculated as the Stain Removal Index (SRI), defined as:
SRI = 100 -AE where
AE* = [(L* cleaned tea stained tile - L*unstained tile ) + (a* cleaned tea stained tile - a * unstained tile) “I" (b* cleaned tea stained tile - b* unstained tile)2]1/2
Three replicate tiles were used for each measurement. The results are shown in Table 4.
Table 4: stain removal index values for tea stained melamine (mean +/- standard deviation, n = 3), pH 10.5 at 50 degrees Celsius.
Figure imgf000020_0001
Figure imgf000021_0001
The results show that GLDA acid complex of Mn2+ substantially improves stain bleaching at 50 degrees Celsius whereas addition of the free manganese ion at the same levels provide statistically equivalent or reduced bleaching relative to the hydrogen peroxide/TAED bleach system alone.

Claims

Claims
1. A machine dishwash detergent composition comprising:
• from 0.1 to 20 wt. % non-ionic surfactant; and
• bleach; and
• from 0.002 to 20 wt. % of free acid equivalent of aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound iron- (Fe), Manganese- (Mn) and/or cobalt- (Co) cations; and wherein the composition comprises at most 1 wt. % of phosphate; and wherein the pH of a solution of 1 wt.% of the detergent composition in water as measured at 25 degrees Celsius is from 6.0 to 10.8; and wherein the aminopolycarboxylate comprises GLDA, MGDA or a combination thereof.
2. A detergent composition according to claim 1 , preferably comprises GLDA.
3. A detergent composition according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the cation comprises Fe2+, Fe3 or mixtures thereof.
4. A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the composition comprises from 0.1 to 20 wt. % free acid equivalent of aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations, preferably from 0.2 to 10 wt. %, more preferably from 0.3 to 5 wt. %, even more preferably from 0.4 to 4 wt. %.
5. A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the composition comprises further aminopolycarboxylate not comprising coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn or Co cations, wherein the ratio of aminopolycaroboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations to aminopolycaroboxylates not comprising coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn or Co cations is from 1 :4000 to 100:1 , preferably from 1 :100 to 20:1 , more preferably from 1 :50 to 1 :1 and even more preferably from 1 :20 to 1 :10.
6. A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the pH of a solution of 1 wt. % of the detergent composition in water as measured at 25 degrees Celsius is from 6.0 to 10.6, preferably 6.5 to 10.6, more preferably 7.0 to 10.5, even more preferably from 7.5 to 10.2 and still even more preferably from 9.0 to 10.0. A detergent composition according to claim 6, wherein the amount of bleach is from 0.1 to 25 wt. %, preferably from 1.0 to 25 wt. %, more preferably from 2.0 to 20 wt. % and even more preferably is from 5 to 15 wt. %. A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the total amount of non-ionic surfactant is from 1 to 18 wt. %, preferably from 4 to 16 wt. % and more preferably from 6 to 12 wt.%. A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the composition further comprises bleach activator in an amount of from 0.1 to 10 wt. %, preferably from 0.5 to 5 wt. % and more preferably from 1.0 to 4 wt. %. A detergent composition according to any preceding claims, wherein the composition does not comprise further poorly biodegradable bleach catalyst and preferably comprises essentially no further bleach catalyst. A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the composition comprises at most 0.5 wt. % phosphate, preferably at most 0.2 wt. % phosphate and more preferably comprises essentially no phosphate. A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the composition comprises at most 1.0 wt. % of phosphonate, preferably at most 0.8 wt. %, more preferably at most 0.5 wt. %, even more preferably at most 0.2 wt. % phosphonate and still even more preferably comprises essentially no phosphonate. A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the composition comprises one or more colorants, one or more perfumes or a combination thereof and preferably comprises a combination of at least one colorant and at least one perfume. A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the detergent composition is in the form of a unit dose composition, preferably a tablet, more preferably a multi-region tablet and even more preferably a multi-region tablet having a water-soluble film. Use of aminopolycarboxylate comprising one or more coordinate covalent bound Fe, Mn and/or Co cations to provide a machine dishwash detergent composition with a bleach system having improved biodegradability.
PCT/EP2022/072914 2021-09-01 2022-08-17 Machine dishwash detergent WO2023030882A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP21194211 2021-09-01
EP21194212.3 2021-09-01
EP21194211.5 2021-09-01
EP21194213 2021-09-01
EP21194213.1 2021-09-01
EP21194212 2021-09-01

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023030882A1 true WO2023030882A1 (en) 2023-03-09

Family

ID=83228668

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2022/072914 WO2023030882A1 (en) 2021-09-01 2022-08-17 Machine dishwash detergent
PCT/EP2022/073455 WO2023030965A1 (en) 2021-09-01 2022-08-23 Machine dishwash detergent
PCT/EP2022/073952 WO2023031119A1 (en) 2021-09-01 2022-08-29 Machine dishwash detergent

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2022/073455 WO2023030965A1 (en) 2021-09-01 2022-08-23 Machine dishwash detergent
PCT/EP2022/073952 WO2023031119A1 (en) 2021-09-01 2022-08-29 Machine dishwash detergent

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (3) WO2023030882A1 (en)

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4751015A (en) 1987-03-17 1988-06-14 Lever Brothers Company Quaternary ammonium or phosphonium substituted peroxy carbonic acid precursors and their use in detergent bleach compositions
EP0384070A2 (en) 1988-11-03 1990-08-29 Unilever Plc Zeolite P, process for its preparation and its use in detergent compositions
EP0458397A2 (en) 1990-05-21 1991-11-27 Unilever N.V. Bleach activation
GB2283494A (en) * 1993-11-03 1995-05-10 Procter & Gamble Machine dishwashing
US5547612A (en) 1995-02-17 1996-08-20 National Starch And Chemical Investment Holding Corporation Compositions of water soluble polymers containing allyloxybenzenesulfonic acid monomer and methallyl sulfonic acid monomer and methods for use in aqueous systems
US5559261A (en) 1995-07-27 1996-09-24 The Procter & Gamble Company Method for manufacturing cobalt catalysts
EP0850293A1 (en) * 1995-08-30 1998-07-01 The Dow Chemical Company Succinic acid derivative degradable chelants, uses and compositions thereof
EP0851022A2 (en) 1996-12-23 1998-07-01 Unilever N.V. Rinse aid compositions containing scale inhibiting polymers
EP0967175A1 (en) * 1998-06-26 1999-12-29 Kemira Chemicals Oy Stabilized sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate
JP2009149777A (en) * 2007-12-20 2009-07-09 Lion Corp Detergent composition for dish washer and method for producing the same
WO2018197249A1 (en) * 2017-04-27 2018-11-01 Basf Se Container comprising a detergent composition containing salts of mgda and glda

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB8316761D0 (en) * 1983-06-20 1983-07-20 Unilever Plc Detergent bleach compositions
US4728455A (en) * 1986-03-07 1988-03-01 Lever Brothers Company Detergent bleach compositions, bleaching agents and bleach activators
WO1995025159A1 (en) * 1994-03-17 1995-09-21 The Procter & Gamble Company Bleach improvement with manganese ethylenediamine-n,n'-disuccinate
DE69504645T2 (en) * 1994-04-07 1999-05-06 Procter & Gamble FIXED COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING BLEACH ACTIVATORS AND BLEACH CATALYSTS
KR100516489B1 (en) * 1998-06-05 2005-12-28 주식회사 엘지생활건강 Bipyridine Manganese Complexes Activating Peroxide Bleach
DE10304131A1 (en) * 2003-02-03 2004-08-05 Clariant Gmbh Transition metal complexes with nitrogen-containing ligands are used as catalysts for peroxy compounds, especially in detergent, bleaching and cleansing agents
JP2008037885A (en) * 2006-08-01 2008-02-21 Lion Corp Detergent composition for dish washer
JP5401034B2 (en) * 2007-12-19 2014-01-29 ライオン株式会社 Bleaching aid and bleaching aid particles containing the bleaching aid
US8536106B2 (en) * 2010-04-14 2013-09-17 Ecolab Usa Inc. Ferric hydroxycarboxylate as a builder

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4751015A (en) 1987-03-17 1988-06-14 Lever Brothers Company Quaternary ammonium or phosphonium substituted peroxy carbonic acid precursors and their use in detergent bleach compositions
EP0384070A2 (en) 1988-11-03 1990-08-29 Unilever Plc Zeolite P, process for its preparation and its use in detergent compositions
EP0458397A2 (en) 1990-05-21 1991-11-27 Unilever N.V. Bleach activation
GB2283494A (en) * 1993-11-03 1995-05-10 Procter & Gamble Machine dishwashing
US5547612A (en) 1995-02-17 1996-08-20 National Starch And Chemical Investment Holding Corporation Compositions of water soluble polymers containing allyloxybenzenesulfonic acid monomer and methallyl sulfonic acid monomer and methods for use in aqueous systems
US5559261A (en) 1995-07-27 1996-09-24 The Procter & Gamble Company Method for manufacturing cobalt catalysts
EP0850293A1 (en) * 1995-08-30 1998-07-01 The Dow Chemical Company Succinic acid derivative degradable chelants, uses and compositions thereof
EP0851022A2 (en) 1996-12-23 1998-07-01 Unilever N.V. Rinse aid compositions containing scale inhibiting polymers
EP0967175A1 (en) * 1998-06-26 1999-12-29 Kemira Chemicals Oy Stabilized sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate
JP2009149777A (en) * 2007-12-20 2009-07-09 Lion Corp Detergent composition for dish washer and method for producing the same
WO2018197249A1 (en) * 2017-04-27 2018-11-01 Basf Se Container comprising a detergent composition containing salts of mgda and glda

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
UNKNOWN: "AkzoNobel Functional Chemicals Chelates", 1 January 2011 (2011-01-01), pages 1 - 16, XP055982909, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.coastsouthwest.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/GL_technical_brochure.pdf> [retrieved on 20221118] *
V. SPRINGER: "Preparation and study of the solid complexes of the racemic ethylenediamine-N,N'-disuccinic acid with iron(III), cobalt(III), and bismuth(III) ions", CHEM. ZVESTI, vol. 34, no. 2, 1980, pages 184 - 189

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2023031119A1 (en) 2023-03-09
WO2023030965A1 (en) 2023-03-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8709990B2 (en) Formulations, their use as or for producing dishwashing detergents and their production
JP6055480B2 (en) Compositions, methods for their use as dishwashing detergents, or methods for their use for the production of dishwashing detergents, and methods for their production
AU2017286154B2 (en) Automatic dishwashing compositions with spot prevention surfactant
US20130284211A1 (en) Formulations, their use as or for producing dishwashing detergents and their production
CA2871210A1 (en) Formulations, their use as or for producing dishwashing detergents and their production
US10696925B2 (en) Automatic dishwashing compositions with dispersant blend
JP6235120B2 (en) Formulations, their use as dishwashing detergents, or their use for the production of dishwashing detergents, and their production
EP3619288B1 (en) Detergent composition
WO2023030882A1 (en) Machine dishwash detergent
EP4017955B1 (en) Detergent solid composition
WO2021170398A1 (en) Dishwash detergent product
JP2023532688A (en) Mixed hydroxy ether compounds, methods of making such compounds and uses thereof
WO2022253565A1 (en) Machine dishwash detergent
EP4347767A1 (en) Machine dishwash detergent
WO2022161793A1 (en) Professional machine dishwash detergent liquid
WO2023072826A1 (en) Compositions
EP4110891A1 (en) Dishwash detergent product

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22765535

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2022765535

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2022765535

Country of ref document: EP

Effective date: 20240402