WO2023017930A1 - Method and device for inferring behavioral intention on basis of user feedback - Google Patents

Method and device for inferring behavioral intention on basis of user feedback Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023017930A1
WO2023017930A1 PCT/KR2022/000299 KR2022000299W WO2023017930A1 WO 2023017930 A1 WO2023017930 A1 WO 2023017930A1 KR 2022000299 W KR2022000299 W KR 2022000299W WO 2023017930 A1 WO2023017930 A1 WO 2023017930A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
action
intention
intentions
probability
action intention
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/KR2022/000299
Other languages
French (fr)
Korean (ko)
Inventor
박영택
김제민
박현규
신원철
Original Assignee
숭실대학교산학협력단
명지대학교 산학협력단
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 숭실대학교산학협력단, 명지대학교 산학협력단 filed Critical 숭실대학교산학협력단
Publication of WO2023017930A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023017930A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/36Creation of semantic tools, e.g. ontology or thesauri
    • G06F16/367Ontology
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/242Query formulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/242Query formulation
    • G06F16/2433Query languages
    • G06F16/2448Query languages for particular applications; for extensibility, e.g. user defined types
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/245Query processing
    • G06F16/2453Query optimisation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/245Query processing
    • G06F16/2453Query optimisation
    • G06F16/24534Query rewriting; Transformation
    • G06F16/24542Plan optimisation
    • G06F16/24545Selectivity estimation or determination
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/28Databases characterised by their database models, e.g. relational or object models
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/28Databases characterised by their database models, e.g. relational or object models
    • G06F16/284Relational databases
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/29Geographical information databases
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/36Creation of semantic tools, e.g. ontology or thesauri
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/10Complex mathematical operations
    • G06F17/18Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for inferring action intention based on user feedback.
  • Services according to the situation by identifying the behavioral intentions of users, especially the elderly, are expected to contribute to improving the quality of life, such as supplementing the abilities of the elderly, and are being studied by many companies and universities.
  • the behavior and posture information that changes according to the time of occurrence and end of the user's action and pose are used to determine the user's behavior intention by using an inference engine based on event calculation rules.
  • a representative example is a study that infers .
  • an event operation rule is constructed based on the action intent ontology that specifies the action intention, behavior, posture, and relationship with surrounding objects and places.
  • the user's current location is inferred based on surrounding objects and heuristics are applied.
  • This action recognition method has the advantage of not requiring learning data to build a model used for inference compared to the method applying machine learning.
  • the present invention proposes a user feedback-based action intention inference method and apparatus that can reflect each individual's habit.
  • an action intention inference device based on user feedback includes a processor; and a memory connected to the processor, wherein the memory constitutes a plurality of event operation rules composed of a precondition corresponding to perception information and a conclusion corresponding to an action intention, and at least some of the plurality of event operation rules Include an event operation rule consisting of a plurality of conclusions for the same precondition, each of the plurality of conclusions at an initial time point has the same probability value, and includes at least one of behavior, posture, object, and sound from the user's living environment Perceptual information is sequentially collected according to time, and when there are multiple action intentions inferred through the perception information collected at a first point in time, one of the plurality of action intentions is selected according to a probability distribution of each of the plurality of action intentions;
  • An action intention inference apparatus including program instructions executable by the processor is provided to adjust a probability value of each of the plurality of action intentions based on a feedback received from a user for the selected
  • the program instructions may adjust a probability value of each of a plurality of action intentions through the following equation.
  • P(x) is an existing probability value applied to a predetermined action intention
  • P(x)' is a new probability value adjusted
  • the probability adjustment value may be determined according to the number of action intentions having the same precondition and the number of feedbacks.
  • the first action intention is inferred through the perception information collected at the first point in time, and positive feedback is obtained from the user. If delivered, the probability of the first action intent At this time, the probability of the second action intention having the same precondition is can be reduced as much as
  • the program instructions identify a plurality of places corresponding to the sequentially collected perception information using an object place mapper that stores information corresponding to a plurality of objects and places where each of the plurality of objects can be located, and , each of the plurality of action intentions using at least one of the action intention collision information defining a relationship between action intentions that cannot be simultaneously generated, the average maintenance time for each of the inferred plurality of action intentions, and the identified plurality of places end point can be determined.
  • the program instructions count places corresponding to each of a plurality of objects included in perception information collected at a first time point based on the object place mapper, and determine a place having the highest association score according to the counting at the first time point. can be identified by its place in
  • the program instructions may include an action intention inferred in a first period using at least one of the action intent collision information, the average maintenance time, and the identified plurality of places, and an action intent inferred in a second period subsequent to the first period.
  • An action intent can be determined as a composite action intent that can occur simultaneously.
  • a method of inferring an action intention in a device including a processor and a memory, comprising the steps of constructing a plurality of event operation rules composed of preconditions corresponding to perceptual information and conclusions corresponding to the action intention.
  • the plurality of event calculation rules include event calculation rules composed of a plurality of conclusions for the same precondition, and each of the plurality of conclusions has the same probability value at an initial time point -; sequentially collecting perceptual information including at least one of behavior, posture, object, and sound from a user's living environment according to time; selecting one of the plurality of action intentions according to a probability distribution of each of the plurality of action intentions when there are multiple action intentions inferred through the perception information collected at the first point in time; and adjusting a probability value of each of the plurality of action intentions based on a feedback received from a user for the selected action intention.
  • a computer readable program for performing the method described above is provided.
  • the case operation rule-based inference method since the case operation rule-based inference method is used, learning data for learning the model required for reasoning is not required, probability is applied to the case operation rule for action intention inference, and inference probability is calculated based on feedback. Because it is adjustable, it has the advantage of being able to reflect the habits of each individual to some extent.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of an action intention inference device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of an ontology expressing the relationship between perception information and action intention.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating action intention conflict information in the form of a graph.
  • 4 is a diagram illustrating behavior patterns of the elderly.
  • the present embodiment relates to a method of gradually reinforcing an event caculus for inferring an action intention through feedback from a user in order to reflect an individual's habit in inferring an action intention based on the event caculus.
  • the event operation rule is a form of reasoning for action and change, and is a rule for inferring change in intention fluent according to events that occur over time.
  • the event operation rule infers a change in action intention by using information of actions, postures, surrounding objects, and sound occurring in chronological order as events.
  • the fluent is defined as a first-order logical term or predicate whose value changes with time.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of an action intention inference device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the device may include a processor 100 and a memory 102 .
  • the processor 100 may include a central processing unit (CPU) capable of executing a computer program or other virtual machines.
  • CPU central processing unit
  • Memory 102 may include a non-volatile storage device such as a non-removable hard drive or a removable storage device.
  • the removable storage device may include a compact flash unit, a USB memory stick, and the like.
  • Memory 102 may also include volatile memory, such as various random access memories.
  • Program instructions executable by the processor 100 are stored in such a memory 102 .
  • the action intention inference apparatus sequentially collects perception information including actions, postures, objects, and sounds from the user's living environment through program commands, and applies the collected perception information to predefined event operation rules. to infer the intent of the action.
  • the device stores in advance a plurality of event operation rules composed of preconditions corresponding to perception information and conclusions corresponding to action intentions.
  • an event operation rule is composed of one or more preconditions and conclusions, and the conclusion when one or more preconditions are satisfied is defined as one.
  • individual habits cannot be reflected through these event operation rules.
  • At least some of the plurality of event calculation rules include event calculation rules composed of a plurality of conclusions for the same precondition, and each of the plurality of conclusions is set to have the same probability value at an initial point in time.
  • cleaning and "preparing a meal” may be included as action intentions that are conclusions of preconditions such as picking up food with a spoon/fork and washing dishes, and the same probability value for these user's action intentions is granted
  • the action intention inference device selects one of a plurality of action intentions according to a probability distribution of each of the plurality of action intentions and informs the user of the action intention. output, and receives feedback from the user to adjust a probability value of each of a plurality of action intentions.
  • the action intention inference device outputs a plurality of action intentions inferred through the event operation rule to the user at an initial point in time, receives feedback from the user, and adjusts the probability value of each of the plurality of conclusions for the same precondition as follows.
  • P(x) is the original probability value applied to the conclusion
  • P(x)' is the adjusted new probability value
  • P(x)' is the adjusted new probability value
  • the probabilities of the first and second action intentions have the same value (eg, 50).
  • the first action intention is inferred through the perception information collected at a specific point in time and the probability of the first action intention is determined when positive feedback is received from the user. At this time, the probability of the second action intention having the same precondition is reduce as much
  • the present embodiment may have a fixed value determined experimentally and may be preferably set to a value of 5 (0.05 as a percentage).
  • Perceptual information is information collected from the user's living environment, and actions collected from the user's living environment refer to various movements that the user can perform in the living environment, such as lifting a spoon/chopsticks, opening and closing the refrigerator, and cutting a knife. This means using, drinking water, sitting/getting up from a chair (sofa), washing the floor, making a phone call, etc.
  • the posture refers to a pose that the user takes, such as standing, lying down, sitting, squatting, and the like.
  • Objects refer to various living tools, home appliances and furniture provided in the user's living environment, such as TVs, refrigerators, gas ranges, remote controls, mobile phones, vacuum cleaners, sofas, dining tables, wardrobes, beds, chairs, sticks, chopsticks, books, It may contain objects such as newspapers.
  • Sound is a variety of sounds generated in a living environment, and may include TV sound, vacuum cleaner sound, dishwashing sound, and the like.
  • Perceptual information may include not only information on behavior, posture, object, and sound, but also information on time and on/off of the object when the object is a home appliance.
  • the action intention inference device infers the user's action intention corresponding to the sequentially collected perception information using an ontology defining the relationship between the user's action intention and the perception information.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of an ontology expressing the relationship between perception information and action intention.
  • the ontology defines a data relationship between an action intention and actions, postures, objects, and sounds in a form that can be shared.
  • Inference of an action intention using an ontology may mean that an event generated from perceptual information such as actions, postures, objects, and sounds is a prerequisite, and action intention is a result of a rule.
  • the action intention inference apparatus uses a plurality of objects corresponding to perceptual information sequentially collected by using an object place mapper that stores information in which a plurality of objects and places where each of the plurality of objects can be located are stored. identify a place
  • the place identification may be identifying a place as a kitchen when a refrigerator is included in the perception information, a living room when a sofa is included, and a multipurpose room when a washing machine is included.
  • the identification of the place can be performed through the following correlation score calculation formula, and based on the object place mapper, the place corresponding to each of the plurality of objects included in the perception information collected at the current time is counted and each The association score (counting score) for the place is calculated, and the place with the highest association score is determined as the place at the current time.
  • the device for inferring action intentions determines each of the plurality of action intentions by using the action intention collision information defining the relationship between action intentions that cannot occur simultaneously. determine the end point.
  • Action intention collision information is information stored by matching one action intention with one or more other action intentions that are difficult to occur simultaneously.
  • one or more action intentions such as cleaning, washing dishes, and taking a bath may be stored as being in conflict with the action intention of “eating”.
  • the action intention conflict information may have a graph form
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the action intention conflict information in a graph form.
  • various action intentions may be expressed in a vector space, and whether or not action intentions collide may be determined based on a Euclidean distance in the vector space.
  • the action intention inference apparatus may use the average maintenance time of each action intention to determine the end of each of a plurality of action intentions.
  • the average maintenance time may be the maintenance time of each action determined using perception information collected from a specific user.
  • the average maintenance time of an act of eating may be determined to be 60 minutes, watching TV to 50 minutes, and reading to be 30 minutes.
  • the average maintenance time may be a time obtained from a user's action as a current inference target, but is not limited thereto and may be a time obtained from a specific age or older, that is, a general elderly person.
  • the action intention inference apparatus may determine whether or not the previous action intention has ended by using whether or not the place moves over time.
  • a user who was sitting at the table and holding chopsticks for a time from t 1 to t 2 moves to a room at t 2 and sits down until t 3 (t 2 to t 3 : second period) and turns on the TV
  • the action intention inference device infers the action intention of eating for the first period and sleeping (or resting) for the second period, the consecutive action intentions conflict with each other, and the first period is eating. It is within the average holding time of the action of doing, and the intention of the action to eat at time t 2 is completed by using the fact that the places identified as objects included in the perception information in the first period and the second period are identified as a kitchen and a room. can be determined as
  • a first action intention inferred in a first period using at least one of the action intention collision information, the average maintenance time, and the identified plurality of locations and a second action intention inferred in a second period consecutive to the first period An action intent can be determined as a composite action intent that can occur simultaneously.
  • the device is an action intention in which eating and watching TV do not conflict with each other, the first period is within the average holding time of eating, and the location has not moved, so that the previous action intention does not end at t 2 and multiple It detects that there is a compound action intent in which user actions occur simultaneously.
  • the present invention through the determination of the end point of a plurality of action intentions and the detection of complex action intentions as described above, it is possible to accurately grasp action intentions continuously appearing over time.
  • the elderly By checking the daily life pattern of the elderly, it is possible to detect abnormal signs that occur in the elderly in advance.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Algebra (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

Disclosed in the present invention are a method and a device for inferring a behavioral intention on the basis of user feedback. According to the present invention, provided is a device for inferring a behavioral intention comprising: a processor; and a memory coupled to the processor, wherein the memory includes program instructions executable by the processor that are configured to: constitute a plurality of event operation rules consisting of a precondition corresponding to perceptual information and a conclusion corresponding to a behavioral intention, wherein at least some of the plurality of event operation rules include an event operation rule consisting of a plurality of conclusions for the same precondition, each of the plurality of conclusions at an initial time point having the same probability value; sequentially collect perceptual information including at least one of behavior, posture, object, and sound from a user's living environment over time; when there are a plurality of behavioral intentions inferred through the perceptual information collected at a first time point, select one of the plurality of behavioral intentions according to a probability distribution of each of the plurality of behavioral intentions; and adjust the probability value of each of the plurality of behavioral intentions on the basis of feedback received from the user with respect to the selected behavioral intention.

Description

사용자 피드백 기반 행위 의도 추론 방법 및 장치Method and apparatus for inferring action intention based on user feedback
본 발명은 사용자 피드백 기반 행위 의도 추론 방법 및 장치에 관한 것이다. The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for inferring action intention based on user feedback.
사용자, 특히 고령자의 행위 의도를 파악하여 상황에 따른 서비스는 고령자의 능력 보완 등 삶의 질 개선에 기여할 것으로 예상 되어 많은 기업과 대학에서 연구되고 있다. Services according to the situation by identifying the behavioral intentions of users, especially the elderly, are expected to contribute to improving the quality of life, such as supplementing the abilities of the elderly, and are being studied by many companies and universities.
그 중에서 사용자의 행동(action) 및 자세(pose)에 대하여 발생한 시간과 종료한 시간에 따라 변하는 행동과 자세 정보를 사건연산규칙(Event Calculus) 기반 추론 엔진을 사용하여 사용자의 행위 의도(behavior intention)를 추론하는 연구가 대표적이다. Among them, the behavior and posture information that changes according to the time of occurrence and end of the user's action and pose are used to determine the user's behavior intention by using an inference engine based on event calculation rules. A representative example is a study that infers .
사용자의 행위 의도를 추론하기 위해 행위 의도와 행동, 자세, 주변 물체 및 장소와의 관계를 명시한 행위 의도 온톨로지를 바탕으로 사건연산규칙을 구성한다. In order to infer the user's action intention, an event operation rule is constructed based on the action intent ontology that specifies the action intention, behavior, posture, and relationship with surrounding objects and places.
또한, 행위 의도의 종료 시점을 명확하게 추론하기 위해 주변 물체를 바탕으로 사용자가 현재 있는 장소를 추론하고 휴리스틱을 적용한다. In addition, in order to clearly infer the end point of action intention, the user's current location is inferred based on surrounding objects and heuristics are applied.
이러한 기술을 바탕으로 행동, 자세, 주변 물체가 정의된 지각(percept) 정보가 입력되면 현재 사용자의 행위 의도를 사건연산규칙을 통해 추론한다. Based on this technology, when percept information defined by behavior, posture, and surrounding objects is input, the intention of the current user's action is inferred through event operation rules.
이러한 행위 인지 방식은 기계학습을 적용한 방식과 비교하여 추론에 사용되는 모델을 구축하기 위한 학습데이터를 요구하지 않는다는 장점이 있다. This action recognition method has the advantage of not requiring learning data to build a model used for inference compared to the method applying machine learning.
그러나, 종래에는 명시된 지식에 의해 생성된 고정적인 사건연산규칙을 활용하여 행위 의도를 추론하기 때문에 의도에 반영되는 각 개인의 습성을 반영하기는 매우 어렵다. 또한, 행위 의도가 잘못 인식되었을 때 추후 올바르게 추론될 수 있도록 최적화되지 않기 때문에 같은 인식 오류가 계속될 수 있다. However, in the prior art, it is very difficult to reflect each individual's habits reflected in the intention because the intention of the action is inferred using a fixed event operation rule generated by specified knowledge. In addition, when an action intention is misrecognized, the same recognition error may continue because it is not optimized so that it can be correctly inferred later.
이 때문에 행위 의도 인식 오류를 높이는 문제가 발생하므로 제품에 적용했을 때 불량률이 높아지는 원인이 된다.Because of this, the problem of increasing the error of recognizing the intention of the action occurs, which causes the defect rate to increase when applied to the product.
상기한 종래기술의 문제점을 해결하기 위해, 본 발명은 각 개인의 습성을 반영할 수 있는 사용자 피드백 기반 행위 의도 추론 방법 및 장치를 제안하고자 한다. In order to solve the problems of the prior art, the present invention proposes a user feedback-based action intention inference method and apparatus that can reflect each individual's habit.
상기한 바와 같은 목적을 달성하기 위하여, 본 발명의 일 실시예에 따르면, 사용자 피드백 기반 행위 의도 추론 장치로서, 프로세서; 및 상기 프로세서에 연결되는 메모리를 포함하되, 상기 메모리는, 지각 정보에 상응하는 전제 조건 및 행위 의도에 상응하는 결론으로 구성되는 복수의 사건연산규칙을 구성하고, 복수의 사건연산규칙 중 적어도 일부는 동일한 전제 조건에 대해 복수의 결론으로 구성되는 사건연산규칙을 포함하고, 초기 시점에 상기 복수의 결론 각각은 동일한 확률값을 가지며, 사용자의 생활환경으로부터 행동, 자세, 물체 및 음향 중 적어도 하나를 포함하는 지각 정보를 시간에 따라 순차적으로 수집하고, 제1 시점에 수집된 지각 정보를 통해 추론되는 행위 의도가 복수인 경우, 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률분포에 따라 복수의 행위 의도 중 하나를 선택하고, 상기 선택된 행위 의도에 대해 사용자로부터 수신된 피드백을 기반으로 상기 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률값을 조절하도록, 상기 프로세서에 의해 실행 가능한 프로그램 명령어들을 포함하는 행위 의도 추론 장치가 제공된다.In order to achieve the above object, according to an embodiment of the present invention, an action intention inference device based on user feedback includes a processor; and a memory connected to the processor, wherein the memory constitutes a plurality of event operation rules composed of a precondition corresponding to perception information and a conclusion corresponding to an action intention, and at least some of the plurality of event operation rules Include an event operation rule consisting of a plurality of conclusions for the same precondition, each of the plurality of conclusions at an initial time point has the same probability value, and includes at least one of behavior, posture, object, and sound from the user's living environment Perceptual information is sequentially collected according to time, and when there are multiple action intentions inferred through the perception information collected at a first point in time, one of the plurality of action intentions is selected according to a probability distribution of each of the plurality of action intentions; An action intention inference apparatus including program instructions executable by the processor is provided to adjust a probability value of each of the plurality of action intentions based on a feedback received from a user for the selected action intention.
상기 프로그램 명령어들은 아래의 수학식을 통해 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률값을 조절할 수 있다.The program instructions may adjust a probability value of each of a plurality of action intentions through the following equation.
[수학식][mathematical expression]
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000001
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000001
여기서, P(x)는 소정 행위 의도에 적용된 기존 확률값이며, P(x)'는 조절된 새로운 확률값이고,
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000002
는 확률 조절값임
Here, P(x) is an existing probability value applied to a predetermined action intention, P(x)' is a new probability value adjusted,
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000002
is the probability control value
상기 확률 조절값은 동일한 전제 조건을 갖는 행위 의도의 개수 및 피드백 횟수에 따라 결정될 수 있다. The probability adjustment value may be determined according to the number of action intentions having the same precondition and the number of feedbacks.
초기에 설정된 사건연산규칙에서 동일한 전제 조건을 갖는 제1 행위 의도와 제2 행위 의도가 존재하는 경우, 상기 제1 시점에 수집된 지각 정보를 통해 제1 행위 의도가 추론되고 사용자로부터 긍정적인 피드백을 전달 받을 경우 상기 제1 행위 의도에 대한 확률을
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000003
만큼 증가시키며, 이때 동일한 전제 조건을 갖는 제2 행위 의도의 확률은
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000004
만큼 감소시킬 수 있다.
If there is a first action intention and a second action intention having the same precondition in the initially set event operation rule, the first action intention is inferred through the perception information collected at the first point in time, and positive feedback is obtained from the user. If delivered, the probability of the first action intent
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000003
At this time, the probability of the second action intention having the same precondition is
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000004
can be reduced as much as
상기 프로그램 명령어들은, 복수의 물체와, 상기 복수의 물체 각각이 위치할 수 있는 장소를 대응시킨 정보를 저장하는 물체장소 맵퍼를 이용하여 상기 순차적으로 수집된 지각 정보에 대응되는 복수의 장소를 식별하고, 동시에 발생될 수 없는 행위 의도간의 관계를 정의하는 행위 의도 충돌 정보, 상기 추론된 복수의 행위 의도 각각에 대한 평균 유지 시간 및 상기 식별된 복수의 장소 중 적어도 하나를 이용하여 상기 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 종료 시점을 결정할 수 있다.The program instructions identify a plurality of places corresponding to the sequentially collected perception information using an object place mapper that stores information corresponding to a plurality of objects and places where each of the plurality of objects can be located, and , each of the plurality of action intentions using at least one of the action intention collision information defining a relationship between action intentions that cannot be simultaneously generated, the average maintenance time for each of the inferred plurality of action intentions, and the identified plurality of places end point can be determined.
상기 프로그램 명령어들은, 상기 물체장소 맵퍼를 기반으로 제1 시점에 수집된 지각 정보에 포함된 복수의 물체에 각각에 대응되는 장소를 카운팅하고, 카운팅에 따른 연관점수가 가장 높은 장소를 상기 제1 시점에서의 장소로 식별할 수 있다.The program instructions count places corresponding to each of a plurality of objects included in perception information collected at a first time point based on the object place mapper, and determine a place having the highest association score according to the counting at the first time point. can be identified by its place in
상기 프로그램 명령어들은, 상기 행위 의도 충돌 정보, 상기 평균 유지 시간 및 상기 식별된 복수의 장소 중 적어도 하나를 이용하여 제1 기간에 추론된 행위 의도와 상기 제1 기간에서 연속되는 제2 기간에 추론된 행위 의도를 동시에 일어날 수 있는 복합 행위 의도로 결정할 수 있다.The program instructions may include an action intention inferred in a first period using at least one of the action intent collision information, the average maintenance time, and the identified plurality of places, and an action intent inferred in a second period subsequent to the first period. An action intent can be determined as a composite action intent that can occur simultaneously.
본 발명의 다른 측면에 따르면, 프로세서 및 메모리를 포함하는 장치에서 행위 의도를 추론하는 방법으로서, 지각 정보에 상응하는 전제 조건 및 행위 의도에 상응하는 결론으로 구성되는 복수의 사건연산규칙을 구성하는 단계-복수의 사건연산규칙 중 적어도 일부는 동일한 전제 조건에 대해 복수의 결론으로 구성되는 사건연산규칙을 포함하고, 초기 시점에 상기 복수의 결론 각각은 동일한 확률값을 가짐-; 사용자의 생활환경으로부터 행동, 자세, 물체 및 음향 중 적어도 하나를 포함하는 지각 정보를 시간에 따라 순차적으로 수집하는 단계; 제1 시점에 수집된 지각 정보를 통해 추론되는 행위 의도가 복수인 경우, 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률분포에 따라 복수의 행위 의도 중 하나를 선택하는 단계; 및 상기 선택된 행위 의도에 대해 사용자로부터 수신된 피드백을 기반으로 상기 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률값을 조절하는 단계를 포함하는 행위 의도 추론 방법이 제공된다. According to another aspect of the present invention, a method of inferring an action intention in a device including a processor and a memory, comprising the steps of constructing a plurality of event operation rules composed of preconditions corresponding to perceptual information and conclusions corresponding to the action intention. - at least some of the plurality of event calculation rules include event calculation rules composed of a plurality of conclusions for the same precondition, and each of the plurality of conclusions has the same probability value at an initial time point -; sequentially collecting perceptual information including at least one of behavior, posture, object, and sound from a user's living environment according to time; selecting one of the plurality of action intentions according to a probability distribution of each of the plurality of action intentions when there are multiple action intentions inferred through the perception information collected at the first point in time; and adjusting a probability value of each of the plurality of action intentions based on a feedback received from a user for the selected action intention.
본 발명의 또 다른 측면에 따르면, 상기한 방법을 수행하는 컴퓨터 판독 가능한 프로그램이 제공된다.According to another aspect of the present invention, a computer readable program for performing the method described above is provided.
본 발명에 따르면, 사건연산규칙 기반 추론 방식을 활용하기 때문에 추론에 필요한 모형을 학습하기 위한 학습 데이터가 필요하지 않으며, 행위 의도 추론을 위한 사건연산규칙에 확률을 적용하고 피드백을 기반으로 추론 확률을 조절하기 때문에 각 개인의 습성을 어느 정도 반영할 수 있는 장점이 있다. According to the present invention, since the case operation rule-based inference method is used, learning data for learning the model required for reasoning is not required, probability is applied to the case operation rule for action intention inference, and inference probability is calculated based on feedback. Because it is adjustable, it has the advantage of being able to reflect the habits of each individual to some extent.
도 1은 본 발명의 바람직한 일 실시예에 따른 행위 의도 추론 장치의 구성을 도시한 도면이다. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of an action intention inference device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
도 2는 지각 정보와 행위 의도와의 관계를 표현한 온톨로지의 예를 도시한 도면이다. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of an ontology expressing the relationship between perception information and action intention.
도 3은 그래프 형태의 행위 의도 충돌 정보를 도시한 도면이다. 3 is a diagram illustrating action intention conflict information in the form of a graph.
도 4는 고령자의 행위 패턴을 도시한 도면이다. 4 is a diagram illustrating behavior patterns of the elderly.
본 발명은 다양한 변경을 가할 수 있고 여러 가지 실시예를 가질 수 있는 바, 특정 실시예들을 도면에 예시하고 상세하게 설명하고자 한다.Since the present invention can make various changes and have various embodiments, specific embodiments are illustrated in the drawings and described in detail.
그러나, 이는 본 발명을 특정한 실시 형태에 대해 한정하려는 것이 아니며, 본 발명의 사상 및 기술 범위에 포함되는 모든 변경, 균등물 내지 대체물을 포함하는 것으로 이해되어야 한다. However, this is not intended to limit the present invention to specific embodiments, and should be understood to include all modifications, equivalents, and substitutes included in the spirit and scope of the present invention.
본 실시예는 사건연산규칙(Event Caculus) 기반으로 행위 의도를 추론함에 있어 개인의 습성을 반영하기 위해 사용자의 피드백을 통해 행위 의도 추론을 위한 사건연산규칙을 점진적으로 강화하는 방법에 관한 것이다. The present embodiment relates to a method of gradually reinforcing an event caculus for inferring an action intention through feedback from a user in order to reflect an individual's habit in inferring an action intention based on the event caculus.
여기서, 사건연산규칙은 Action과 Change에 대한 추론 형식으로서, 시간별로 발생하는 이벤트에 따라 의도 플루언트(Fluent)의 변화를 추론하기 위한 규칙이다. Here, the event operation rule is a form of reasoning for action and change, and is a rule for inferring change in intention fluent according to events that occur over time.
본 실시예에 따르면 사건연산규칙은 시간 순으로 발생하는 행동, 자세, 주변 물체 및 음향 정보를 이벤트로 하여 행위 의도의 변화를 추론한다. According to the present embodiment, the event operation rule infers a change in action intention by using information of actions, postures, surrounding objects, and sound occurring in chronological order as events.
여기서, 플루언트는 시간에 따라 값이 변화하는 1계 논리항(term) 또는 술어로 정의된다.Here, the fluent is defined as a first-order logical term or predicate whose value changes with time.
도 1은 본 발명의 바람직한 일 실시예에 따른 행위 의도 추론 장치의 구성을 도시한 도면이다. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of an action intention inference device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
도 1에 도시된 바와 같이, 본 실시예에 따른 장치는 프로세서(100) 및 메모리(102)를 포함할 수 있다. As shown in FIG. 1 , the device according to the present embodiment may include a processor 100 and a memory 102 .
프로세서(100)는 컴퓨터 프로그램을 실행할 수 있는 CPU(central processing unit)나 그밖에 가상 머신 등을 포함할 수 있다. The processor 100 may include a central processing unit (CPU) capable of executing a computer program or other virtual machines.
메모리(102)는 고정식 하드 드라이브나 착탈식 저장 장치와 같은 불휘발성 저장 장치를 포함할 수 있다. 착탈식 저장 장치는 컴팩트 플래시 유닛, USB 메모리 스틱 등을 포함할 수 있다. 메모리(102)는 각종 랜덤 액세스 메모리와 같은 휘발성 메모리도 포함할 수 있다. Memory 102 may include a non-volatile storage device such as a non-removable hard drive or a removable storage device. The removable storage device may include a compact flash unit, a USB memory stick, and the like. Memory 102 may also include volatile memory, such as various random access memories.
이와 같은 메모리(102)에는 프로세서(100)에 의해 실행 가능한 프로그램 명령어들이 저장된다. Program instructions executable by the processor 100 are stored in such a memory 102 .
본 실시예에 따른 행위 의도 추론 장치는 프로그램 명령어들을 통해 사용자의 생활환경으로부터 행동, 자세, 물체 및 음향을 포함하는 지각 정보를 순차적으로 수집하고, 수집된 지각 정보를 미리 정의된 사건연산규칙에 적용하여 행위 의도를 추론한다. The action intention inference apparatus according to the present embodiment sequentially collects perception information including actions, postures, objects, and sounds from the user's living environment through program commands, and applies the collected perception information to predefined event operation rules. to infer the intent of the action.
이를 위해, 본 실시예에 따른 장치는 지각 정보에 상응하는 전제 조건 및 행위 의도에 상응하는 결론으로 구성되는 복수의 사건연산규칙을 미리 저장한다. To this end, the device according to the present embodiment stores in advance a plurality of event operation rules composed of preconditions corresponding to perception information and conclusions corresponding to action intentions.
일반적으로 사건연산규칙은 하나 이상의 전제 조건과 결론으로 구성되며, 하나 이상의 전제 조건을 만족하는 경우의 결론은 하나로 정의되었다. 그러나, 이러한 사건연산규칙을 통해서는 개인의 습성을 반영할 수 없다. In general, an event operation rule is composed of one or more preconditions and conclusions, and the conclusion when one or more preconditions are satisfied is defined as one. However, individual habits cannot be reflected through these event operation rules.
본 실시예에 따르면, 복수의 사건연산규칙 중 적어도 일부는 동일한 전제 조건에 대해 복수의 결론으로 구성되는 사건연산규칙을 포함하고, 초기 시점에 상기 복수의 결론 각각은 동일한 확률값을 가지도록 설정된다. According to this embodiment, at least some of the plurality of event calculation rules include event calculation rules composed of a plurality of conclusions for the same precondition, and each of the plurality of conclusions is set to have the same probability value at an initial point in time.
예를 들어, 수저/포크로 음식 집어먹기와 그릇 설거지하기와 같은 전제 조건에 대한 결론인 행위 의도로서 "청소하기"와 "식사준비"가 포함될 수 있고, 이들 사용자의 행위 의도에 대해 동일한 확률값이 부여된다. For example, "cleaning" and "preparing a meal" may be included as action intentions that are conclusions of preconditions such as picking up food with a spoon/fork and washing dishes, and the same probability value for these user's action intentions is granted
본 실시예에 따른 행위 의도 추론 장치는 제1 시점에 수집된 지각 정보를 통해 추론되는 행위 의도가 복수인 경우, 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률분포에 따라 복수의 행위 의도 중 하나를 선택하여 사용자에게 출력하고, 사용자로부터 피드백을 수신하여 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률값을 조절한다. When there are a plurality of action intentions inferred through the perception information collected at the first point in time, the action intention inference device according to the present embodiment selects one of a plurality of action intentions according to a probability distribution of each of the plurality of action intentions and informs the user of the action intention. output, and receives feedback from the user to adjust a probability value of each of a plurality of action intentions.
행위 의도 추론 장치는 초기 시점에 사건연산규칙을 통해 추론된 복수의 행위 의도를 사용자에게 출력하고, 사용자의 피드백을 수신하여 다음과 같이 동일 전제 조건에 대한 복수의 결론 각각의 확률값을 조절한다. The action intention inference device outputs a plurality of action intentions inferred through the event operation rule to the user at an initial point in time, receives feedback from the user, and adjusts the probability value of each of the plurality of conclusions for the same precondition as follows.
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-M000001
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-M000001
여기서, P(x)는 결론에 적용된 기존 확률값이며, P(x)'는 조절된 새로운 확률값이고,
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000005
는 확률 조절값이다.
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000006
가 클수록 최적화 속도는 높아지지만, 최적의 확률을 찾을 가능성이 감소한다.
Here, P(x) is the original probability value applied to the conclusion, P(x)' is the adjusted new probability value,
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000005
is a probability adjustment value.
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000006
The larger , the higher the optimization speed, but the lower the probability of finding the optimal probability.
예를 들어, 초기에 설정된 사건연산규칙에서 동일한 전제 조건을 갖는 제1 행위 의도와 제2 행위 의도가 존재하는 경우, 제1 및 제2 행위 의도의 확률은 동일한 값(예를 들어, 50)을 가지며, 특정 시점에 수집된 지각 정보를 통해 제1 행위 의도가 추론되고 사용자로부터 긍정적인 피드백을 전달 받을 경우 제1 행위 의도에 대한 확률을
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000007
만큼 증가시키며, 이때 동일한 전제 조건을 갖는 제2 행위 의도의 확률은
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000008
만큼 감소시킨다.
For example, when a first action intention and a second action intention having the same precondition exist in an initially set event operation rule, the probabilities of the first and second action intentions have the same value (eg, 50). The first action intention is inferred through the perception information collected at a specific point in time and the probability of the first action intention is determined when positive feedback is received from the user.
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000007
At this time, the probability of the second action intention having the same precondition is
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000008
reduce as much
반대로 부정적인 피드백을 전달 받을 경우 제1 행위 의도에 대한 확률을
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000009
만큼 감소시키고, 제2 행위 의도에 대한 확률은
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000010
만큼 증가시킨다.
Conversely, when receiving negative feedback, the probability of the first action intention
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000009
and the probability for the second action intention is
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000010
increase as much
본 실시예에 따르면,
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000011
는 실험적으로 결정되어 고정된 값을 가질 수 있으며 바람직하게는 5(백분율로는 0.05)의 값으로 설정될 수 있다.
According to this embodiment,
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000011
may have a fixed value determined experimentally and may be preferably set to a value of 5 (0.05 as a percentage).
그러나 이에 한정됨이 없이 피드백을 받는 횟수 및 전제 조건이 동일한 결론의 수에 따라
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000012
가 동적으로 결정될 수도 있다.
However, depending on the number of feedback received and the number of conclusions with the same precondition, without being limited thereto
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000012
may be dynamically determined.
지각 정보는 사용자의 생활환경에서 수집되는 정보이며, 사용자의 생활환경에서 수집되는 행동은 사용자가 생활환경에서 할 수 있는 다양한 움직임을 의미하며, 예를 들어, 숟가락/젓가락 들기, 냉장고 열고 닫기, 칼 사용, 물마시기, 의자(소파)에 앉기/일어나지, 바닥 닦기, 전화하기 등을 의미한다. Perceptual information is information collected from the user's living environment, and actions collected from the user's living environment refer to various movements that the user can perform in the living environment, such as lifting a spoon/chopsticks, opening and closing the refrigerator, and cutting a knife. This means using, drinking water, sitting/getting up from a chair (sofa), washing the floor, making a phone call, etc.
자세는 서있기, 누워있기, 앉아있기, 쪼그려있기 등과 같이 사용자가 취하는 포즈를 의미한다. The posture refers to a pose that the user takes, such as standing, lying down, sitting, squatting, and the like.
물체는 사용자 생활환경에 구비된 다양한 생활도구, 가전기기 및 가구 등을 의미하며, TV, 냉장고, 가스레인지, 리모콘, 휴대폰, 청소기, 소파, 식탁, 장롱, 침대, 의자, 가락, 젓가락, 책, 신문 등과 같은 객체를 포함할 수 있다. Objects refer to various living tools, home appliances and furniture provided in the user's living environment, such as TVs, refrigerators, gas ranges, remote controls, mobile phones, vacuum cleaners, sofas, dining tables, wardrobes, beds, chairs, sticks, chopsticks, books, It may contain objects such as newspapers.
음향은 생활환경에서 발생하는 다양한 소리로서, TV 소리, 청소기 소리, 설겆이 소리 등을 포함할 수 있다. Sound is a variety of sounds generated in a living environment, and may include TV sound, vacuum cleaner sound, dishwashing sound, and the like.
본 실시예에 따른 지각 정보는 행동, 자세, 물체 및 음향에 관한 정보뿐만 아니라, 시간 및 물체가 가전기기인 경우 이의 온/오프에 대한 정보도 포함할 수 있다. Perceptual information according to the present embodiment may include not only information on behavior, posture, object, and sound, but also information on time and on/off of the object when the object is a home appliance.
다음으로, 행위 의도 추론 장치는 사용자의 행위 의도 및 지각 정보의 관계를 정의하는 온톨로지를 이용하여 순차적으로 수집된 지각 정보에 대응되는 사용자의 행위 의도를 추론한다. Next, the action intention inference device infers the user's action intention corresponding to the sequentially collected perception information using an ontology defining the relationship between the user's action intention and the perception information.
도 2는 지각 정보와 행위 의도와의 관계를 표현한 온톨로지의 예를 도시한 도면이다. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of an ontology expressing the relationship between perception information and action intention.
도 2에 도시된 바와 같이, 온톨로지는 행위 의도와 행동, 자세, 물체 및 음향과의 데이터 관계를 공유 가능한 형식으로 정의한다. As shown in FIG. 2, the ontology defines a data relationship between an action intention and actions, postures, objects, and sounds in a form that can be shared.
온톨로지를 이용하여 행위 의도를 추론하는 것은, 행동, 자세, 물체 및 음향과 같은 지각 정보로부터 생성되는 이벤트를 전제 조건으로 하고, 행위 의도를 결과로 하는 규칙에 의해 이루어지는 것을 의미할 수 있다. Inference of an action intention using an ontology may mean that an event generated from perceptual information such as actions, postures, objects, and sounds is a prerequisite, and action intention is a result of a rule.
본 실시예에 따른 행위 의도 추론 장치는 복수의 물체와, 상기 복수의 물체 각각이 위치할 수 있는 장소를 대응시킨 정보를 저장하는 물체장소 맵퍼를 이용하여 순차적으로 수집된 지각 정보에 대응되는 복수의 장소를 식별한다. The action intention inference apparatus according to the present embodiment uses a plurality of objects corresponding to perceptual information sequentially collected by using an object place mapper that stores information in which a plurality of objects and places where each of the plurality of objects can be located are stored. identify a place
예를 들어, 장소 식별은 지각 정보에 냉장고가 포함되는 경우에는 주방으로, 소파가 포함되는 경우에는 거실로, 세탁기가 포함되는 경우에는 다용도실로 장소를 식별하는 것일 수 있다. For example, the place identification may be identifying a place as a kitchen when a refrigerator is included in the perception information, a living room when a sofa is included, and a multipurpose room when a washing machine is included.
본 실시예에 따르면, 장소의 식별은 아래의 연관점수 계산식을 통해 수행될 수 있으며, 물체장소 맵퍼를 기반으로 현재 시점에 수집된 지각 정보에 포함된 복수의 물체 각각에 대응되는 장소를 카운팅하여 각 장소에 대한 연관점수(카운팅 점수)를 계산하고, 연관점수가 가장 높은 장소를 현재 시점에서의 장소로 결정한다. According to the present embodiment, the identification of the place can be performed through the following correlation score calculation formula, and based on the object place mapper, the place corresponding to each of the plurality of objects included in the perception information collected at the current time is counted and each The association score (counting score) for the place is calculated, and the place with the highest association score is determined as the place at the current time.
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-M000002
Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-M000002
시간의 경과에 따른 복수의 행위 의도 추론과 복수의 장소가 식별된 이후, 행위 의도 추론 장치는, 동시에 발생될 수 없는 행위 의도간의 관계를 정의하는 행위 의도 충돌 정보를 이용하여 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 종료 시점을 결정한다. After inferring a plurality of action intentions over time and identifying a plurality of places, the device for inferring action intentions determines each of the plurality of action intentions by using the action intention collision information defining the relationship between action intentions that cannot occur simultaneously. determine the end point.
행위 의도 충돌 정보는, 하나의 행위 의도와 동시에 발생되기 어려운 하나 이상의 다른 행위 의도를 대응시켜 저장한 정보이다. Action intention collision information is information stored by matching one action intention with one or more other action intentions that are difficult to occur simultaneously.
예를 들어, "식사하기"라는 행위 의도에 대해 청소하기, 설거지하기, 목욕하기와 같은 하나 이상의 행위 의도가 서로 충돌하는 것으로 대응되어 저장될 수 있다. For example, one or more action intentions such as cleaning, washing dishes, and taking a bath may be stored as being in conflict with the action intention of “eating”.
또한, 행위 의도 충돌 정보는 그래프 형태를 가질 수 있으며, 도 3은 그래프 형태의 행위 의도 충돌 정보를 도시한 도면이다. In addition, the action intention conflict information may have a graph form, and FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the action intention conflict information in a graph form.
도 3을 참조하면, 다양한 행위 의도가 벡터 공간에 표현될 수 있고, 벡터 공간에서의 유클리디언 거리로 행위 의도 간 충돌 여부가 결정될 수도 있다. Referring to FIG. 3 , various action intentions may be expressed in a vector space, and whether or not action intentions collide may be determined based on a Euclidean distance in the vector space.
본 실시예에 따른 행위 의도 추론 장치는 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 종료를 판단하기 위해 각 행위 의도의 평균 유지 시간을 이용할 수 있다. The action intention inference apparatus according to the present embodiment may use the average maintenance time of each action intention to determine the end of each of a plurality of action intentions.
여기서, 평균 유지 시간은 특정 사용자로부터 수집된 지각 정보를 이용하여 결정된 각 행위의 유지 시간일 수 있다. Here, the average maintenance time may be the maintenance time of each action determined using perception information collected from a specific user.
예를 들어, 식사하기라는 행위의 평균 유지 시간은 60분, TV 시청은 50분, 독서하기는 30분으로 결정될 수 있다. For example, the average maintenance time of an act of eating may be determined to be 60 minutes, watching TV to 50 minutes, and reading to be 30 minutes.
평균 유지 시간은 현재 추론 대상이 되는 사용자의 행위로부터 얻어진 시간일 수 있으나, 이에 한정되지 않고 특정 연령 이상, 즉 일반적인 고령자로부터 얻어지는 시간일 수도 있다. The average maintenance time may be a time obtained from a user's action as a current inference target, but is not limited thereto and may be a time obtained from a specific age or older, that is, a general elderly person.
또한, 본 실시예에 따른 행위 의도 추론 장치는 시간의 경과에 따른 장소의 이동 여부를 이용하여 이전 행위 의도의 종료 여부를 결정할 수 있다. In addition, the action intention inference apparatus according to the present embodiment may determine whether or not the previous action intention has ended by using whether or not the place moves over time.
예를 들어, t1에서 t2(제1 기간)시간 동안 식탁에 앉아서 젓가락을 들고 있던 사용자가 t2에 방으로 이동하여 t3(t2 ~ t3: 제2 기간)까지 앉아서 TV를 켜고 앉아있는 경우, 행위 의도 추론 장치는 제1 기간에 대해 식사하기, 제2 기간에 대해 잠자기(또는 휴식하기)기라는 행위 의도를 추론하고, 연속되는 행위 의도가 서로 충돌하며, 제1 기간이 식사하기라는 행위의 평균 유지 시간 이내이며, 제1 기간과 제2 기간에 지각 정보에 포함된 물체로 식별된 장소가 주방과 방인 것으로 식별되는 것을 이용하여 t2 시간에 식사하기라는 행위 의도가 종료된 것으로 결정할 수 있다. For example, a user who was sitting at the table and holding chopsticks for a time from t 1 to t 2 (first period) moves to a room at t 2 and sits down until t 3 (t 2 to t 3 : second period) and turns on the TV When sitting, the action intention inference device infers the action intention of eating for the first period and sleeping (or resting) for the second period, the consecutive action intentions conflict with each other, and the first period is eating. It is within the average holding time of the action of doing, and the intention of the action to eat at time t 2 is completed by using the fact that the places identified as objects included in the perception information in the first period and the second period are identified as a kitchen and a room. can be determined as
또한, 행위 의도 충돌 정보, 상기 평균 유지 시간 및 상기 식별된 복수의 장소 중 적어도 하나를 이용하여 제1 기간에 추론된 제1 행위 의도와 상기 제1 기간에서 연속되는 제2 기간에 추론된 제2 행위 의도를 동시에 일어날 수 있는 복합 행위 의도로 결정할 수 있다. In addition, a first action intention inferred in a first period using at least one of the action intention collision information, the average maintenance time, and the identified plurality of locations and a second action intention inferred in a second period consecutive to the first period An action intent can be determined as a composite action intent that can occur simultaneously.
예를 들어, 사용자가 t1에서 t2까지(제1 기간) 거실에서 식사를 하고 있다가 t2에서 t3까지(제2 기간) 거실에 있는 TV를 켜서 시청하는 경우, 본 실시예에 따른 장치는 식사하기와 TV 시청이 서로 충돌하지 않는 행위 의도이며, 제1 기간이 식사하기라는 평균 유지 시간 이내이고, 장소가 이동하지 않았음을 이용하여 t2에 이전 행위 의도가 종료되지 않고 복수의 사용자 행위가 동시에 일어나는 복합 행위 의도가 있음을 감지하게 된다. For example, when a user eats a meal in the living room from t 1 to t 2 (the first period) and then turns on and watches a TV in the living room from t 2 to t 3 (the second period), according to the present embodiment The device is an action intention in which eating and watching TV do not conflict with each other, the first period is within the average holding time of eating, and the location has not moved, so that the previous action intention does not end at t 2 and multiple It detects that there is a compound action intent in which user actions occur simultaneously.
본원발명에 따르면, 상기와 같은 복수의 행위 의도 종료 시점의 결정 및 복합 행위 의도 감지를 통해 시간의 경과에 따라 연속적으로 나타나는 행위 의도를 정확하게 파악할 수 있고, 특히, 도 4에 도시된 바와 같이, 고령자의 일자별 생활 패턴을 확인하여 고령자에게 발생하는 이상 징후를 미리 감지할 수 있게 된다. According to the present invention, through the determination of the end point of a plurality of action intentions and the detection of complex action intentions as described above, it is possible to accurately grasp action intentions continuously appearing over time. In particular, as shown in FIG. 4, the elderly By checking the daily life pattern of the elderly, it is possible to detect abnormal signs that occur in the elderly in advance.
상기한 본 발명의 실시예는 예시의 목적을 위해 개시된 것이고, 본 발명에 대한 통상의 지식을 가지는 당업자라면 본 발명의 사상과 범위 안에서 다양한 수정, 변경, 부가가 가능할 것이며, 이러한 수정, 변경 및 부가는 하기의 특허청구범위에 속하는 것으로 보아야 할 것이다.The embodiments of the present invention described above have been disclosed for illustrative purposes, and those skilled in the art having ordinary knowledge of the present invention will be able to make various modifications, changes, and additions within the spirit and scope of the present invention, and such modifications, changes, and additions will be considered to fall within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (10)

  1. 사용자 피드백 기반 행위 의도 추론 장치로서, As an action intention inference device based on user feedback,
    프로세서; 및processor; and
    상기 프로세서에 연결되는 메모리를 포함하되, Including a memory coupled to the processor,
    상기 메모리는, the memory,
    지각 정보에 상응하는 전제 조건 및 행위 의도에 상응하는 결론으로 구성되는 복수의 사건연산규칙을 구성하고, Constituting a plurality of event operation rules composed of preconditions corresponding to perceptual information and conclusions corresponding to action intentions;
    복수의 사건연산규칙 중 적어도 일부는 동일한 전제 조건에 대해 복수의 결론으로 구성되는 사건연산규칙을 포함하고, 초기 시점에 상기 복수의 결론 각각은 동일한 확률값을 가지며, At least some of the plurality of event operation rules include event operation rules consisting of a plurality of conclusions for the same precondition, each of the plurality of conclusions having the same probability value at an initial time point,
    사용자의 생활환경으로부터 행동, 자세, 물체 및 음향 중 적어도 하나를 포함하는 지각 정보를 시간에 따라 순차적으로 수집하고, Sequentially collecting perceptual information including at least one of behavior, posture, object, and sound from the user's living environment over time;
    제1 시점에 수집된 지각 정보를 통해 추론되는 행위 의도가 복수인 경우, 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률분포에 따라 복수의 행위 의도 중 하나를 선택하고, When there are a plurality of action intentions inferred through the perception information collected at the first point in time, selecting one of the plurality of action intentions according to a probability distribution of each of the plurality of action intentions;
    상기 선택된 행위 의도에 대해 사용자로부터 수신된 피드백을 기반으로 상기 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률값을 조절하도록, To adjust a probability value of each of the plurality of action intentions based on feedback received from a user for the selected action intention,
    상기 프로세서에 의해 실행 가능한 프로그램 명령어들을 포함하는 행위 의도 추론 장치.An action intention inference device comprising program instructions executable by the processor.
  2. 제1항에 있어서, According to claim 1,
    상기 프로그램 명령어들은 아래의 수학식을 통해 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률값을 조절하는 행위 의도 추론 장치.The program instructions control the probability value of each of a plurality of action intentions through the following equation.
    [수학식][mathematical expression]
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000013
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000013
    여기서, P(x)는 소정 행위 의도에 적용된 기존 확률값이며, P(x)'는 조절된 새로운 확률값이고,
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000014
    는 확률 조절값임
    Here, P(x) is an existing probability value applied to a predetermined action intention, P(x)' is a new probability value adjusted,
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000014
    is the probability control value
  3. 제2항에 있어서, According to claim 2,
    상기 확률 조절값은 동일한 전제 조건을 갖는 행위 의도의 개수 및 피드백 횟수에 따라 결정되는 행위 의도 추론 장치.The probability adjustment value is determined according to the number of action intentions having the same precondition and the number of feedbacks.
  4. 제2항에 있어서, According to claim 2,
    상기 프로그램 명령어들은, The program instructions are
    초기에 설정된 사건연산규칙에서 동일한 전제 조건을 갖는 제1 행위 의도와 제2 행위 의도가 존재하는 경우, 상기 제1 시점에 수집된 지각 정보를 통해 제1 행위 의도가 추론되고 사용자로부터 긍정적인 피드백을 전달 받을 경우 상기 제1 행위 의도에 대한 확률을
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000015
    만큼 증가시키며, 이때 동일한 전제 조건을 갖는 제2 행위 의도의 확률은
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000016
    만큼 감소시키는 행위 의도 추론 장치.
    If there is a first action intention and a second action intention having the same precondition in the initially set event operation rule, the first action intention is inferred through the perception information collected at the first point in time, and positive feedback is obtained from the user. If delivered, the probability of the first action intent
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000015
    At this time, the probability of the second action intention having the same precondition is
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000016
    An action intention inference device that reduces as much as
  5. 제1항에 있어서, According to claim 1,
    상기 프로그램 명령어들은, The program instructions are
    복수의 물체와, 상기 복수의 물체 각각이 위치할 수 있는 장소를 대응시킨 정보를 저장하는 물체장소 맵퍼를 이용하여 상기 순차적으로 수집된 지각 정보에 대응되는 복수의 장소를 식별하고, Identifying a plurality of places corresponding to the sequentially collected perception information using an object place mapper that stores information in which a plurality of objects and places where each of the plurality of objects can be located correspond to each other;
    동시에 발생될 수 없는 행위 의도간의 관계를 정의하는 행위 의도 충돌 정보, 상기 추론된 복수의 행위 의도 각각에 대한 평균 유지 시간 및 상기 식별된 복수의 장소 중 적어도 하나를 이용하여 상기 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 종료 시점을 결정하는 행위 의도 추론 장치.Each of the plurality of action intentions is determined by using at least one of action intention collision information defining a relationship between action intentions that cannot be simultaneously generated, an average maintenance time for each of the inferred plurality of action intentions, and the identified plurality of locations. An action intention inference device that determines when to end.
  6. 제1항에 있어서, According to claim 1,
    상기 프로그램 명령어들은, The program instructions are
    상기 물체장소 맵퍼를 기반으로 제1 시점에 수집된 지각 정보에 포함된 복수의 물체에 각각에 대응되는 장소를 카운팅하고, Counting the places corresponding to each of the plurality of objects included in the perception information collected at a first point in time based on the object place mapper,
    카운팅에 따른 연관점수가 가장 높은 장소를 상기 제1 시점에서의 장소로 식별하는 행위 의도 추론 장치.An action intention inference device for identifying a place having the highest association score according to counting as a place at the first point in time.
  7. 제1항에 있어서, According to claim 1,
    상기 프로그램 명령어들은, The program instructions are
    상기 행위 의도 충돌 정보, 상기 평균 유지 시간 및 상기 식별된 복수의 장소 중 적어도 하나를 이용하여 제1 기간에 추론된 행위 의도와 상기 제1 기간에서 연속되는 제2 기간에 추론된 행위 의도를 동시에 일어날 수 있는 복합 행위 의도로 결정하는 행위 의도 추론 장치.An action intention inferred in a first period using at least one of the action intention collision information, the average maintenance time, and the identified plurality of locations may occur simultaneously with an action intention inferred in a second period subsequent to the first period. An action intention inference device that determines a complex action intent that can be performed.
  8. 프로세서 및 메모리를 포함하는 장치에서 행위 의도를 추론하는 방법으로서, A method of inferring an action intention in a device including a processor and a memory,
    지각 정보에 상응하는 전제 조건 및 행위 의도에 상응하는 결론으로 구성되는 복수의 사건연산규칙을 구성하는 단계-복수의 사건연산규칙 중 적어도 일부는 동일한 전제 조건에 대해 복수의 결론으로 구성되는 사건연산규칙을 포함하고, 초기 시점에 상기 복수의 결론 각각은 동일한 확률값을 가짐-; A step of constructing a plurality of event operation rules consisting of preconditions corresponding to perceptual information and conclusions corresponding to action intentions - at least some of the plurality of event operation rules are composed of a plurality of conclusions for the same precondition. Including, each of the plurality of conclusions at an initial time point has the same probability value;
    사용자의 생활환경으로부터 행동, 자세, 물체 및 음향 중 적어도 하나를 포함하는 지각 정보를 시간에 따라 순차적으로 수집하는 단계; sequentially collecting perceptual information including at least one of behavior, posture, object, and sound from a user's living environment according to time;
    제1 시점에 수집된 지각 정보를 통해 추론되는 행위 의도가 복수인 경우, 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률분포에 따라 복수의 행위 의도 중 하나를 선택하는 단계; 및selecting one of the plurality of action intentions according to a probability distribution of each of the plurality of action intentions when there are multiple action intentions inferred through the perception information collected at the first point in time; and
    상기 선택된 행위 의도에 대해 사용자로부터 수신된 피드백을 기반으로 상기 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률값을 조절하는 단계를 포함하는 행위 의도 추론 방법.and adjusting a probability value of each of the plurality of action intentions based on a feedback received from a user for the selected action intention.
  9. 제8항에 있어서, According to claim 8,
    상기 확률값을 조절하는 단계는, 아래의 수학식을 통해 복수의 행위 의도 각각의 확률값을 조절하는 행위 의도 추론 방법.In the step of adjusting the probability value, the action intention inference method of adjusting the probability value of each of the plurality of action intentions through the following equation.
    [수학식][mathematical expression]
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000017
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000017
    여기서, P(x)는 소정 행위 의도에 적용된 기존 확률값이며, P(x)'는 조절된 새로운 확률값이고,
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000018
    는 확률 조절값임
    Here, P(x) is an existing probability value applied to a predetermined action intention, P(x)' is a new probability value adjusted,
    Figure PCTKR2022000299-appb-I000018
    is the probability control value
  10. 제8항에 따른 방법을 수행하는 컴퓨터 판독 가능한 프로그램. A computer readable program for performing the method according to claim 8 .
PCT/KR2022/000299 2021-08-13 2022-01-07 Method and device for inferring behavioral intention on basis of user feedback WO2023017930A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR10-2021-0107276 2021-08-13
KR1020210107276A KR20230025141A (en) 2021-08-13 2021-08-13 User feedback-based behavior intention inferences method and apparatus

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023017930A1 true WO2023017930A1 (en) 2023-02-16

Family

ID=85200759

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/KR2022/000299 WO2023017930A1 (en) 2021-08-13 2022-01-07 Method and device for inferring behavioral intention on basis of user feedback

Country Status (2)

Country Link
KR (1) KR20230025141A (en)
WO (1) WO2023017930A1 (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20110104165A (en) * 2010-03-16 2011-09-22 삼성전자주식회사 Incremental cognition and reasoning apparatus and methods
KR20190052752A (en) * 2017-11-09 2019-05-17 숭실대학교산학협력단 Terminal device for generating user behavior data, Method for generating user behavior data and recording medium
KR20190090738A (en) * 2019-07-01 2019-08-02 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for predicting user behavior
KR20200064534A (en) * 2018-11-29 2020-06-08 숭실대학교산학협력단 Apparatus for generating rules of event calculus based on ontoloby for activity intension recognition and method thereof
KR102197660B1 (en) * 2019-10-23 2021-01-04 숭실대학교산학협력단 Eldery living pattern recognition system and method

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20110104165A (en) * 2010-03-16 2011-09-22 삼성전자주식회사 Incremental cognition and reasoning apparatus and methods
KR20190052752A (en) * 2017-11-09 2019-05-17 숭실대학교산학협력단 Terminal device for generating user behavior data, Method for generating user behavior data and recording medium
KR20200064534A (en) * 2018-11-29 2020-06-08 숭실대학교산학협력단 Apparatus for generating rules of event calculus based on ontoloby for activity intension recognition and method thereof
KR20190090738A (en) * 2019-07-01 2019-08-02 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for predicting user behavior
KR102197660B1 (en) * 2019-10-23 2021-01-04 숭실대학교산학협력단 Eldery living pattern recognition system and method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20230025141A (en) 2023-02-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106709254B (en) A kind of medical diagnosis robot system
US10789458B2 (en) Human behavior recognition apparatus and method
Bhattacharjee et al. Is more autonomy always better? exploring preferences of users with mobility impairments in robot-assisted feeding
US7370022B2 (en) Building plans for household tasks from distributed knowledge
Hauser et al. Ontogeny of tool use in cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus: innate recognition of functionally relevant features
CN105468278B (en) Contact action identification, response, game control method and the device of virtual key
JP2008529163A (en) Responding to situations using knowledge representation and reasoning
CN102016765A (en) Method and system of identifying a user of a handheld device
CN113592345A (en) Medical triage method, system, equipment and storage medium based on clustering model
Sgorbissa et al. Encoding guidelines for a culturally competent robot for elderly care
WO2023017930A1 (en) Method and device for inferring behavioral intention on basis of user feedback
CN109416941A (en) Central processing unit, central processing method and the monitored person's monitoring system of monitored person's monitoring system
Ondras et al. Human-robot commensality: Bite timing prediction for robot-assisted feeding in groups
JP2002352352A (en) System and method for determining degree of abnormality of life behavior pattern
KR101399199B1 (en) Method for configuring genetic code in software robot
CN106293443B (en) Information processing method and equipment
JP7225659B2 (en) Information processing device, information processing method and information processing program
Azmi et al. Gesture Interfacing for People with Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Dash) for Smart Door Control: Goms Analysis
Gushi et al. A mobile robotic arm for people with severe disabilities: Evaluation of scooping foods
KR102445996B1 (en) User behavior intention inference method and apparatus
Chiu et al. Intelligent visual acuity estimation system with hand motion recognition
JP6854543B1 (en) Display devices, display systems and programs
JP2020177447A (en) Housekeeping allotment system
CN112788822B (en) Intelligent lamp control method and intelligent lamp
US20230317273A1 (en) Information processing device and information processing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22855932

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE