WO2023016190A1 - Forest resource one-graph outcome quality inspection method, system and cloud platform - Google Patents

Abstract

Provided are a forest resource one-graph outcome quality inspection method, system and cloud platform. Submission and inspection are performed according to a data processing process. A county level performs submission at any time, a provincial level performs summarization at any time for inspection, and the inspection work is performed in stages according to a workflow. The work of the next step is performed on the basis of ensuring that the work of the previous stage is correct. County-level outcomes are summarized in a centralized manner and input into a provincial-level summary database, and the provincial level summarizes the outcomes of the whole province in a centralized manner into a one-graph outcome for centralized inspection, such that inspection of the whole province can be completed by means of one instance of inspection, and submission of all parts is converted into submission of key parts.

Description

A method, system, and cloud platform for quality inspection of results in one map of forest resources technical field

The invention belongs to the technical field of geospatial data calculation, identification, and processing, and specifically relates to a method, system, and cloud platform for quality inspection of forest resource one-map results.

Background technique

At present, the annual update of one map of forest resources is done at the provincial and county levels. After the county-level units complete the results of the forest resource change database, they will be submitted to the provincial inspection department. When the county-level results are reported to the provincial level, it will be completed by hard disk copy. Since the update results of a map of forest resources are all geospatial databases, the number of geospatial data calculations and storage is large, and the county-level desktop software is independently deployed with a C/S architecture to complete spatial editing, attribute quality inspection, and topology for county-level data. Analysis and geospatial processing. Provincial-level inspections also use the same desktop software. The results submitted by the county level are re-imported into the software to repeat the inspection steps, and the unqualified results are repeatedly reviewed until they are qualified. Finally, a map of the province's forest resources is finally summarized.

The above scheme has the following defects: 1. The timeliness is poor. You must wait until the county completes the entire work and submits the results before you can check the data. project results database and inspection module, early mistakes caused the entire job to be redone. 2. Focus on work. The provincial level needs to build a database and check the data of each county separately. When there are many counties or the amount of data is large, the provincial work pressure is huge. 3. The work is repeated. The county level has completed all the inspection work and passed it, but the provincial level does not trust the results submitted by the county level from the inspection point of view, and still needs to repeat all the inspection processes, resulting in inefficient work duplication. 4. The inspection effect is poor. Due to the concentrated inspection time and heavy workload, the provincial inspection mainly focuses on basic data normative inspections such as data space topology inspection and attribute logic inspection. Although it conforms to logical rules, it does not meet actual work requirements. Mutations and abnormal changes are weakly checked. And because only after the data of all districts and counties have been checked, the data of the whole province can be summarized, and the changes of the resource data of the whole province can be counted and analyzed, and it is very easy for the overall changes at the provincial level to be unpredictable. 5. The user experience is poor, and all data needs to be handed in. Due to the long inspection process, users need to wait for a long time for the inspection results.

To sum up, there is an urgent need to provide a quality inspection method, system and cloud platform for forest resource one-map results with high timeliness, high inspection efficiency, and greatly improved inspection quality.

Contents of the invention

The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method, system and cloud platform for quality inspection of forest resource one-map results with high timeliness, high inspection efficiency, and greatly improved inspection quality.

The above purpose is achieved through the following technical solution: a method for quality inspection of results of a map of forest resources, including the following steps:

(1) Establish a provincial summary database, which at least includes the administrative division database, forest supervision database, forest resource change data and forest resource archive database;

(2) County-level users form an administrative division database, and self-check the formed administrative division database to ensure that there are neither spatial topology errors nor attribute logic errors locally;

(3) County-level users submit the administrative division database to the provincial summary database;

(4) The provincial user checks the administrative division database in the provincial summary database to determine whether there is an error. If there is an error, output the list of county-level units with errors and the error content, and require the wrong county-level units to perform step (2) )～(3), until there is no error, the administrative division data of the whole province forms a map;

(5) County-level users form a forest inspection database, and self-check the formed forest inspection database to ensure that there are neither spatial topology errors nor attribute logic errors locally;

(6) County-level users submit the forest inspection database to the provincial summary database;

(7) The provincial user checks the forest supervision database in the provincial summary database to determine whether there is an error. If there is an error, output the list of county-level units with errors and the error content, and require the wrong county-level units to perform the steps ( 5)～(6), until there is no error, the forest inspection data of the whole province forms a map;

(8) County-level users form a forest resource status database and a forest resource change database, and self-check the formed forest resource status database and forest resource change database to ensure that there are neither spatial topology errors nor attribute logic errors locally;

(9) County-level users submit change patterns in the forest resource change database with non-zero change causes to the provincial summary database;

(10) The provincial user checks the forest resource change database in the provincial summary database to determine whether there is an error. If there is an error, the output has a list of wrong county-level units and the wrong content, and requires the wrong county-level unit to perform the step (8 )～(9), until there is no error, the forest resource change data of the whole province forms a map;

(11) Provincial-level user statistical forest resource change database, compare the changes in the data of each county before and after, output the comparative analysis results, analyze the comparative analysis results of the county data in the forest resource change database of the whole province, and judge whether there is any abnormal change, if yes, output There are abnormal changes in the list of county-level units and the content of abnormal changes, and the abnormally changed county-level units are required to perform steps (8) to (10) until there are no abnormal changes and the quality inspection is completed;

(12) County-level users export all achievement databases and report to the provincial level.

A further technical solution is that in the step (3), step (6) and step (9), the county-level user accesses the administrative division database, the forest supervision database or the forest resources change database in the provincial summary database through the network, Determine whether the current county code data already exists in the administrative division database, forest supervision database or forest resources change database in the provincial summary database, and if so, clear it and then insert the county-level administrative division database, forest supervision database or forest resources All the data in the change database, if not, directly insert all the data in the county-level administrative division database, forest inspection database or forest resources change database.

Further technical scheme is, in the described step (4), check in the county-level unit in the administrative division database of the whole province and exist between the county-level unit and the county-level unit and the spatial topology error and attribute logic error, described step (7) Check the spatial topology errors and attribute logic errors in the county-level units and between the county-level units and the county-level units in the province's forest supervision database, check the data in the province's forest resources change database in the step (10) Attribute logic error.

A further technical solution is, in the step (11), analyze the comparative analysis results of the data of each county in the forest resources change database of the whole province, and judge whether there is an abnormal change, and the above abnormal change is an unfounded adjustment including land type, rights Factor values including genus, origin, forest category, authority level, public welfare forest level, and forest land level.

A further technical solution is that the logical structure of the administrative division database includes OBJECTID, shape, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, and forest class; the logical structure of the forest resource status database includes OBJECETID, shape, county, Township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest class, small class, small class, small place name, forest land ownership, forest land use right, forest tree ownership, forest tree use right, owner's name, forest right certificate number, land type, land use Current land type, land management type, vegetation coverage type, forest species, area, origin, forest category, authority level, whether it is a public welfare forest in Tianbao District, national public welfare forest level, project category, ecological location, location, location name, location description , natural degree, community structure, regeneration level, health level, pests, disaster types, damage degree, degradation type, degradation degree, wetland type, site type, site level, afforestation type, management type, management opinion, landform, slope aspect , slope position, slope, altitude, accessibility, soil, soil layer thickness, humus thickness, texture, parent material, gravel content, soil structure, soil moisture, pH, compactness, drainage status, erosion status, dominant tree species, tree species Composition, canopy density, age, age group, average diameter at breast height, average tree height, hectare volume, number of hectares, tree species structure, forest land quality grade, whether it is supplementary forest land, forest land protection grade, forest land functional division, main functional area; The logical structure of the forest inspection database includes OBJECTID, shape, interpretation change map number, supplementary map number, province, county, township, village, forestry bureau, forest farm, forest shift, abscissa, ordinate, area of interpretation map, interpretation Reason for change, detailed shift number for verification, forest resource change library map spot, forest land management unit, reason for change, change period, project name, project use, audit document number, audit year, audit area, actual change of forest land use area, actual change of forest land In the area of use, the area of nature protection land, the name of nature protection area, the level and type of nature protection area, the land type of "one map" of forest resource management in the early stage, the type of land before identification, the area of forest land in the three national land adjustments, and the "one map" of forest resource management in the early stage Zhangtu" forest category, previous forest resource management "one map" level of authority, previous forest resource management "one map" national public welfare forest level, nature of forest land used, previous forest resource management "one map" origin, forest harvesting license License issuance, forest harvesting license number, actual felling area, actual harvesting stock, actual number of felled trees, over-licensed felling area, over-licensed harvesting stock, over-licensed harvested tree number, unlicensed felling area, unlicensed harvested stock, unlicensed The number of felling plants, remarks, investigation level, investigation unit, investigator, and current land type; the logical structure of the forest resource change database includes OBJECETID, shape, QQ_OBJECTID, XZ_OBJECTID, DC_OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation District, Forest Class, Q_Small Class, Q_Land Type, Q_Forest Land Ownership, Q_Forest Land Use Right, Q_Origin, Q_ Forest species, Q_dominant tree species, Q_age group, Q_canopy density, Q_number of hectares, Q_hectare volume, Q_forest category, Q_public welfare forest rights, Q_public welfare forest grade, Q_forest land protection Grade, Q_land management type, XZ_small class, XZ_land type, XZ_forest land ownership, XZ_forest land use right, XZ_origin, XZ_forest species, XZ_dominant tree species, XZ_age group, XZ_forest Density, XZ_number of trees per hectare, XZ_stock per hectare, XZ_forest category, XZ_public welfare forest right, XZ_public welfare forest grade, XZ_forest land protection grade, XZ_land management type, DC_interpretation map spot number, DC _Supplementary map spot number, DC_interpretation change reason, DC_current land type, DC_change reason, DC_former land type, DC_recognized former land type, DC_former origin, DC_former forest type, DC_former Authority level, DC_former public welfare forest level, DC_used forest land nature, DC_licensing status, change area, change reason, change time, change basis, change note; the forest resources archive database includes the construction project use forest land database, Logging database, afforestation renewal database, natural disaster database, forestry case database; among them, OBJECTID represents the unique identifier of the object, and shape represents the graphic.

In order to achieve the above purpose, the present invention also provides a quality inspection system for one map of forest resources, which is used to implement any of the methods for quality inspection of results for one map of forest resources described above, including county-level client application systems and provincial-level The server-side application system, the county-level client application system includes:

Project creation and data import module: used for county-level users to import local data according to requirements. Local data at least include forest resource database, administrative division database, forest resource status database, forest supervision database, forest resource archive database, and establish county-level Forest resources annual renewal project documents;

Administrative division database check module: used to perform spatial topology check and attribute logic check on the edited and imported administrative division database, wherein the spatial topology check includes at least overlapping and gap checks, and the attribute logic check includes at least dictionary check, required and non-filled Item checks and factor logical relationships;

Forest supervision database inspection module: used to perform spatial topology inspection and attribute logic inspection on the edited and imported forest inspection database, wherein the spatial topology inspection includes at least overlapping and multi-part inspection, and the attribute logic inspection includes at least dictionary inspection, mandatory and Non-fill item check and factor logic relationship;

Forest resource status database inspection module: used to check the spatial topology and attribute logic of the forest resource status database completed in this period, where the spatial topology inspection includes at least overlapping, gaps, open air, multi-parts, fine fragmentation, out-of-boundary, and cross-forest classes Boundary check, attribute logic check at least includes dictionary domain check, division factor check, basic factor check, management factor check, forest ecology check, terrain soil factor check, forest stand factor check;

Forest resource change database check module: used to check the attribute logic of the forest resource change database, at least including forest supervision factor check, change cause check and abnormal change check;

One map of forest resources results reporting module: It is used to submit the administrative division database, forest supervision database, forest resource resource change data and forest resource archive database in the annual update project of local county-level forest resources into the provincial summary through online reporting Administrative division database, forest inspection database, forest resource change data and forest resource archive database;

The provincial server-side application system includes:

Provincial-level summary database creation module: used to provide provincial-level users with the function of creating provincial-level summary databases, set provincial-level and county-level access groups or users for provincial-level summary databases, and authorize access groups and users to use permissions;

Provincial-level summary database summary module: used to judge the data submitted by the county level for reporting applications, check whether the provincial-level summary database already has the application unit achievement data, if it exists, delete it and then insert the summary, otherwise, directly insert the summary ;

Provincial summary database inspection module: used to provide provincial users with administrative division database, forest supervision database, forest resource resource change data and forest resource archive database inspection functions;

Provincial summary database comparative analysis module: used to provide provincial users with the comparative statistical analysis function of forest resource change data, counting county-level units before and after the change, including land types, ownership, origin, forest categories, authority levels, and public welfare forest levels , the change area of factors including forest land grade.

In order to achieve the above purpose, the present invention also provides a cloud platform for the quality inspection of forest resource one-map results, which is deployed with the forest resource one-map result quality inspection system, including

County-level client: Equipped with a county-level client application system;

Provincial cloud server: Equipped with a provincial server application system;

Basic cloud platform: used to provide computing, storage, network communication and system operation capability support for county-level client application systems and provincial-level server application systems.

A further technical solution is that the county-level client includes various PCs, notebooks, mobile workstations, and tablet computers equipped with county-level client application systems, providing county-level users with project creation and data import functions, and administrative division databases. Inspection function, inspection function of forest supervision database, inspection function of forest resource status database, inspection function of forest resource change database, and report function of forest resources one map result.

A further technical solution is that the provincial cloud server includes servers, workstations or virtual machines that provide computing, storage and network capabilities for the operation of the provincial server application system, and provide users with the function of creating a provincial summary database and provincial summary database. Database inspection function, provincial summary database summary function and provincial summary database comparative analysis function, in which servers, workstations or virtual machines are deployed with operating systems, database platforms, GIS platforms, and networks necessary to support the operation of provincial server application systems An application platform including middleware, the platform capability of the virtual machine is provided by the basic cloud platform.

A further technical solution is that the basic cloud platform includes, but is not limited to, X86 computing servers for building computing resource pools, storage servers for building storage resource pools, network servers and gateways for building network resource pools, and virtual cloud computing servers for resource virtualization management. Virtualization platform software, and application platforms including operating systems, database platforms, GIS platforms, and network middleware are deployed on virtualization platforms.

Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following advantages:

1. From result inspection to process inspection, the timeliness of submission is greatly improved. The present invention changes the way that the provincial departments can start centralized inspection only after all submissions are completed at the original county level, submit and check according to the data processing process, submit at the county level at any time, and check at the provincial level at any time, and the inspection work follows the workflow It is carried out in stages, and the next step is carried out on the basis of ensuring the correctness of the previous stage of work, correcting errors in the bud, avoiding repeated county-level operations and provincial-level inspections, and greatly improving timeliness.

2. From one-by-one decentralized review to centralized and unified review, the inspection efficiency is greatly improved. The invention of this method changes the process of checking each county-level achievement one by one by using the desktop GIS software again at the original provincial level, and collects the county-level achievements into the provincial summary database, and the provincial level aggregates the whole province into a map The inspection results are centralized, and the inspection of the whole province can be completed in one inspection, and the inspection efficiency is greatly improved.

3. The user experience has been greatly improved by changing from submission to online declaration. The present invention changes the way that the original county-level units need to submit the data in person, and only needs to submit the data in the local network to increase the price and enter the provincial summary database. In addition, the inspection efficiency can be improved, and the report can be reviewed immediately. The experience is greatly improved.

4. From partial inspection to global inspection, the inspection quality has been greatly improved. The present invention changes the original inspection work that only focuses on basic data normative inspections such as data space topology inspections and attribute logic inspections, and transforms it into a real-time provincial summary database as the basis, and analyzes the changes and changes of forest resources in the whole province from an overall and global perspective Using the forest resource change database as a starting point, focus on inspections of mutations and abnormal changes that appear to conform to the data inspection rules but do not meet the actual work requirements, greatly improving the height and depth of the inspection work, thereby improving the quality of inspection.

5. Change from all submissions to key partial submissions, greatly reducing system storage and network pressure. Since the number of elements in the county-level forest resource status database and forest resource change database is generally 100,000 to 400,000, and the data storage capacity is 1 to 3 GB, for provincial summary, if the forest resources status database and forest resource change database are submitted at the same time , will have extremely high requirements on county-level and provincial-level data storage and network capacity, and there will be data security issues in all submissions to the forest resource status database. The present invention submits by changing all submissions as key parts, only requires the user to submit the changed part (change reason is not 0) in the forest resources resource change database, and does not submit the unchanged part of the forest resource status database and the forest resource change database (the change reason is 0 ), only checking the changed part can control the changes in the whole county, greatly reducing the pressure of data storage and network transmission during system checking.

Description of drawings

The drawings constituting a part of the present invention are used to provide a further understanding of the present invention, and the schematic embodiments and descriptions of the present invention are used to explain the present invention, and do not constitute an improper limitation of the present invention.

Fig. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of a method for quality inspection of results of a map of forest resources involved in an embodiment of the present invention;

Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 are respectively the structural block diagrams of the county-level client application system and the provincial-level server application system involved in an embodiment of the present invention;

Fig. 4 is the implementation flow chart of each module of the forest resources one map achievement quality inspection system involved in an embodiment of the present invention;

Fig. 5 is a structural block diagram of a cloud platform for forest resource one-map result quality inspection related to an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed ways

The present invention will be described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The description in this part is only exemplary and explanatory, and should not have any limiting effect on the protection scope of the present invention. In addition, those skilled in the art can make corresponding combinations of features in the embodiments in this document and in different embodiments according to the descriptions in this document.

Embodiments of the present invention are as follows, with reference to Fig. 1, the flow process of forest resources one map achievement quality inspection method is as follows:

1) Establish a provincial summary database and set access users and permissions. Provincial administrators shall establish a provincial summary database, set up provincial and county-level access groups or users for the provincial summary database, and authorize each access group and user to use it. Here, the provincial summary database includes but not limited to administrative division database, forest supervision database, forest resource change data, and forest resource archive database.

The logical structure of the administrative division database is (OBJECTID, shape, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest shift);

The logical structure of the forest resource status database is (OBJECETID, shape, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest shift, small shift, small shift, small place name, forest land ownership, forest land use right, forest tree ownership, forest use right, Owner's name, forest tenure certificate number, land type, land use status, land management type, vegetation coverage type, forest type, area, origin, forest type, authority level, whether it is a public welfare forest in a natural protection zone, the level of a national public welfare forest, Project category, ecological location, location, location name, location description, degree of naturalness, community structure, renewal level, health level, harmful organisms, disaster type, hazard degree, degradation type, degradation degree, wetland type, site type, site level , afforestation type, management type, management opinion, landform, slope aspect, slope position, slope, altitude, accessibility, soil, soil layer thickness, humus thickness, texture, parent material, gravel content, soil structure, soil moisture, pH , density, drainage status, erosion status, dominant tree species, tree species composition, canopy density, age, age group, average diameter at breast height, average tree height, hectare volume, number of trees per hectare, tree species structure, forest land quality grade, whether it is supplementary forest land, Forest land protection level, forest land functional zoning, main functional area);

The logical structure of the forest inspection database is (OBJECETID, shape, interpreting change map spot number, supplementary map spot number, province, county, township, village, forestry bureau, forest farm, forest shift, abscissa, ordinate, interpreting map spot area, Interpret the reason for the change, verify the detailed shift number, forest resource change library map spot, forest land management unit, change reason, change period, project name, project use, audit document number, audit year, audit area, actual change of forest land use area, actual change The area of natural protection land in the area of forest land use, the name of natural protection area, the level and type of natural protection area, the land type of "one map" of forest resource management in the early stage, the type of land before identification, the area of forest land in the three national land adjustments, the forest resource management in the early stage" "One map" forest category, "one map" level of authority for early forest resource management, "one map" for early stage forest resource management, national public welfare forest level, nature of forest land used, origin of "one map" for early stage forest resource management, forest harvesting Issuance of licenses, forest harvesting license number, actual felling area, actual harvesting stock, actual number of trees felled, area of over-licensed felling, stock of over-licensed felling, number of trees over-licensed, area of unlicensed felling, unlicensed harvested stock, none The number of trees to be harvested, remarks, investigation level, investigation unit, investigators, current land category);

The logical structure of the forest resource change database is (OBJECETID, shape, QQ_OBJECTID, XZ_OBJECTID, DC_OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest class, Q_small class, Q_land category, Q_forest land ownership, Q_forest land use rights, Q_origin, Q_forest species, Q_dominant tree species, Q_age group, Q_canopy density, Q_number of plants per hectare, Q_stock per hectare, Q_forest category, Q_public welfare forest Authority, Q_Public welfare forest level, Q_Forest land protection level, Q_Land management type, XZ_Small class, XZ_Land type, XZ_Forest land ownership, XZ_Forest land use right, XZ_Origin, XZ_Forest species, XZ _Dominant tree species, XZ_age group, XZ_canopy density, XZ_number of trees per hectare, XZ_stock volume per hectare, XZ_forest category, XZ_public welfare forest rights, XZ_public welfare forest grade, XZ_forest land protection grade, XZ_ Land management type, DC_interpretation map spot number, DC_supplementary map spot number, DC_interpretation change reason, DC_current land type, DC_change reason, DC_former land type, DC_recognized former land type, DC_ Former origin, DC_former forest category, DC_former right level, DC_former public welfare forest level, DC_used forest land nature, DC_licensing situation, change area, change reason, change time, change basis, change notes);

Among them, OBJECTID represents the unique identifier of the object, and shape represents the graphic.

The forest resource archives database is not limited to construction projects using forest land databases, tree harvesting databases, afforestation renewal databases, natural disaster databases, and forestry case databases. The database logic is formulated according to actual needs.

2) County-level users form an administrative division database and self-check to ensure that there are no spatial topology errors or attribute logic errors locally.

3) County-level users submit the administrative division database to the provincial summary database. Here, county-level users access the administrative division database in the provincial summary database through the network to determine whether the current county code data already exists in the administrative division database in the provincial summary database. If so, clear it and insert it into the county-level administrative division database. All data, if otherwise directly insert all data in the county-level administrative division database.

4) The provincial user checks the administrative division database in the provincial summary database and outputs the check results. Check the spatial topology errors and attribute logic errors in the county-level units and between county-level units and county-level units in the provincial administrative division database, and judge whether there are errors. If so, output the list of error county-level units and the error content. And perform step 2 until there are no errors, and the administrative division layers of the whole province form a seamlessly stitched map.

5) County-level users form a forest inspection database and perform self-inspection to ensure that there are no spatial topology errors or attribute logic errors locally.

6) County-level users submit the forest inspection database to the provincial summary database. Here, county-level users access the forest inspection database in the provincial summary database through the network, and judge whether the forest inspection database in the provincial summary database already has the data of the current county code. If so, clear it and insert the county-level forest inspection database Check all the data in the database, otherwise directly insert all the data in the county-level forest inspection database.

7) Provincial users check the forest inspection database in the provincial summary database and output the inspection results. Check the spatial topology errors and attribute logic errors in the county-level units and between county-level units in the provincial forest inspection database to determine whether there are errors. If so, output the list of county-level units and error content. , and require the wrong county-level units to perform step 5 until there is no error, and the forest inspection data of the whole province forms a map.

8) County-level users form a forest resource status database and a forest resource change database and perform self-checks to ensure that there are no spatial topology errors or attribute logic errors locally.

9) County-level users submit change patterns in the forest resources change database whose cause of change is not zero to the provincial summary database. Here, county-level users access the forest resource change database in the provincial summary database through the network, and judge whether the forest resource change database in the provincial summary database already has the data of the current county code. If so, clear it and insert the county-level forest resources All data in the change database, if otherwise, directly insert all data in the county-level forest resource change database.

10) Provincial-level users check the forest resources change database in the provincial-level summary database, and output the check results. Check the attribute logic error of the data in the province's forest resource change database to determine whether there is an error. If so, output the list of error county-level units and error content, and require the error county-level unit to perform step 8 until there is no error, the province's forest Resource change data forms a graph.

11) Provincial-level user statistical forest resources change database, compare the data changes of each county before and after, and output the comparative analysis results. Analyze the results of comparative analysis of county data in the province's forest resources change database to determine whether there are abnormal changes, that is, to adjust factors such as land type, ownership, origin, forest category, authority level, public welfare forest level, and forest land level without basis. , output the list of county-level units with abnormal changes and the content of abnormal changes, and require the county-level units with abnormal changes to perform step 8 until there are no abnormal changes.

12) County-level users export all achievement databases, and hard disk copies are reported to the provincial level.

An embodiment of the structure of the quality inspection system for the results of a map of forest resources provided by the present invention is as follows, including a county-level client application system and a provincial server-side application system, as shown in Figure 2. The county-level client application system includes:

Project creation and data import module: used for county-level users to import local data according to requirements. Local data at least include forest resource database, administrative division database, forest resource status database, forest supervision database, forest resource archive database, and establish county-level Forest resources annual renewal project documents;

Administrative division database check module: used to perform spatial topology check and attribute logic check on the edited and imported administrative division database, wherein the spatial topology check includes at least overlapping and gap checks, and the attribute logic check includes at least dictionary check, required and non-filled Item checks and factor logical relationships;

Forest supervision database inspection module: used to perform spatial topology inspection and attribute logic inspection on the edited and imported forest inspection database, wherein the spatial topology inspection includes at least overlapping and multi-part inspection, and the attribute logic inspection includes at least dictionary inspection, mandatory and Non-fill item check and factor logic relationship;

Forest resource status database inspection module: used to check the spatial topology and attribute logic of the forest resource status database completed in this period, where the spatial topology inspection includes at least overlapping, gaps, open air, multi-parts, fine fragmentation, out-of-boundary, and cross-forest classes Boundary check, attribute logic check at least includes dictionary domain check, division factor check, basic factor check, management factor check, forest ecology check, terrain soil factor check, forest stand factor check;

Forest resource change database check module: used to check the attribute logic of the forest resource change database, at least including forest supervision factor check, change cause check and abnormal change check;

One map of forest resources results reporting module: It is used to submit the administrative division database, forest supervision database, forest resource resource change data and forest resource archive database in the annual update project of local county-level forest resources into the provincial summary through online reporting Administrative division database, forest inspection database, forest resource change data and forest resource archive database;

As shown in Figure 3, the provincial server-side application system includes:

Provincial-level summary database creation module: used to provide provincial-level users with the function of creating provincial-level summary databases, set provincial-level and county-level access groups or users for provincial-level summary databases, and authorize access groups and users to use permissions;

Provincial-level summary database summary module: used to judge the data submitted by the county level for reporting applications, check whether the provincial-level summary database already has the application unit achievement data, if it exists, delete it and then insert the summary, otherwise, directly insert the summary ;

Provincial summary database inspection module: used to provide provincial users with administrative division database, forest supervision database, forest resource resource change data and forest resource archive database inspection functions;

Provincial summary database comparative analysis module: used to provide provincial users with the comparative statistical analysis function of forest resource change data, counting county-level units before and after the change, including land types, ownership, origin, forest categories, authority levels, and public welfare forest levels , the change area of factors including forest land grade.

The implementation process of the quality inspection system for a map of forest resources provided by the present invention is as follows, as shown in Figure 4, including the following steps:

1. Implement the provincial summary database establishment module. In the application system of the provincial cloud server side, the provincial administrator establishes the provincial summary database, sets the provincial and county level access groups or users of the provincial summary database, and authorizes each access group and user to use the authority.

2. Execute the project creation and data import modules. County-level users import local data as required, including but not limited to forest resource database, administrative division database, forest resource status database, forest inspection database, and forest resource archive database.

3. Execute the administrative division database inspection module. County-level users form an administrative division database on the county-level client device and perform self-inspection to ensure that there is no spatial topology error or attribute logic error in the local administrative division database.

4. Implement the module of reporting the results of a map of forest resources. County-level users submit a map of all local forest resources on the county-level client device, which only includes the results of the administrative division database.

5. Execute the summary module of the provincial summary database. The provincial cloud server-side application system judges the data reporting application submitted by the county, and checks whether the provincial summary database already has the application unit achievement data. If it exists, it will be deleted and then inserted into the summary, otherwise it will be directly inserted into the summary.

6. Execute the provincial summary database inspection module. The provincial-level cloud server-side application system checks the provincial summary database data formed after county-level collection and submission. At this time, it only checks the provincial administrative division database, and its checking items and methods are consistent with step 3.

7. Execute the forest inspection database inspection module. County-level users form a forest inspection database on the county-level client device and perform self-inspection to ensure that there is no spatial topology error or attribute logic error in the local administrative division database.

8. Implement the module of reporting the results of a map of forest resources. County-level users submit a map of all local forest resources on the county-level client device, which includes the results of the administrative division database and the forest inspection database.

9. Execute the summary module of the provincial summary database. The provincial cloud server-side application system judges the data reporting application submitted by the county, checks whether the provincial summary database already has the application unit achievement data, if it exists, delete it and then insert the summary, otherwise insert the summary directly.

10. Execute the provincial summary database check module. The provincial-level cloud server-side application system checks the provincial summary database data formed after county-level collection and submission. At this time, only the provincial forest inspection database is checked, and the inspection items and methods are consistent with the content of step 7.

11. Execute the inspection module of the forest resource status database. County-level users form a forest resource status database on the county-level client device and perform self-inspection to ensure that there is neither spatial topology error nor attribute logic error in the forest resource status database.

12. Execute the forest resources change database inspection module. County-level users form a forest resource change database on the county-level client device and perform self-inspection to ensure that there is no spatial topology error or attribute logic error in the forest resource change database.

13. Implement the module for reporting the results of a map of forest resources. County-level users submit a map of all local forest resources on the county-level client device, which includes the results of the administrative division database, forest inspection database, and forest resource change database.

14. Execute the summary module of the provincial summary database. The provincial cloud server-side application system judges the data reporting application submitted by the county, checks whether the provincial summary database already has the application unit achievement data, if it exists, delete it and then insert the summary, otherwise insert the summary directly.

15. Execute the provincial summary database check module. The provincial-level cloud server-side application system checks the provincial summary database data formed after the county-level collection and submission. At this time, it only checks the province’s forest resource change database. The inspection items and methods are consistent with the content of step 12.

16. Implement the comparative analysis module of the provincial summary database. The provincial-level cloud server-side application system compares and analyzes the provincial summary database data formed after the county-level collection, and counts the county-level units before and after the change. The area of change of factors such as rank.

The embodiment of the cloud platform structure of the result quality inspection of one map of forest resources provided by the present invention is as follows, and the above-mentioned quality inspection system of the result of one map of forest resources is deployed, as shown in Figure 5, including:

County-level client: including all kinds of PCs, notebooks, mobile workstations, tablet computers and other equipment equipped with county-level client application systems, providing county-level users with functions of project creation and data import, administrative division database inspection function, forest supervision Database check function, forest resource status database check function, forest resource change database check function and forest resource one map result reporting function.

Provincial cloud server: including servers, workstations or virtual machines that provide computing, storage and network capabilities for the operation of provincial server application systems, providing users with the function of creating provincial summary databases, checking functions of provincial summary databases, and provincial The summary function of the level summary database and the comparative analysis function of the provincial summary database. Among them, servers, workstations and other equipment are deployed with application platforms such as operating systems, database platforms, GIS platforms, and network middleware necessary to support the operation of provincial server application systems. The platform capabilities of virtual machines are provided by the basic cloud platform.

Basic cloud platform: including but not limited to X86 computing servers for building computing resource pools, storage servers for building storage resource pools, network servers and gateways for building network resource pools, virtualization platform software for resource virtualization management, and Deploy operating systems, database platforms, GIS platforms, network middleware and other application platforms on the modernization platform.

The above is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it should be pointed out that, for those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the principle of the present invention, some improvements and modifications can also be made, and these improvements and modifications can also be made. It should be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. A method for quality inspection of a map of forest resources, characterized in that it comprises the following steps:

   (1) Establish a provincial summary database, which at least includes the administrative division database, forest supervision database, forest resource change data and forest resource archive database;

   (2) County-level users form an administrative division database, and self-check the formed administrative division database to ensure that there are neither spatial topology errors nor attribute logic errors locally;

   (3) County-level users submit the administrative division database to the provincial summary database;

   (4) The provincial user checks the administrative division database in the provincial summary database to determine whether there is an error. If there is an error, output the list of county-level units with errors and the error content, and require the wrong county-level units to perform step (2) )～(3), until there is no error, the administrative division data of the whole province forms a map;

   (5) County-level users form a forest inspection database, and self-check the formed forest inspection database to ensure that there are neither spatial topology errors nor attribute logic errors locally;

   (6) County-level users submit the forest inspection database to the provincial summary database;

   (7) The provincial user checks the forest supervision database in the provincial summary database to determine whether there is an error. If there is an error, output the list of county-level units with errors and the error content, and require the wrong county-level units to perform the steps ( 5)～(6), until there is no error, the forest inspection data of the whole province forms a map;

   (8) County-level users form a forest resource status database and a forest resource change database, and self-check the formed forest resource status database and forest resource change database to ensure that there are neither spatial topology errors nor attribute logic errors locally;

   (9) County-level users submit change patterns in the forest resource change database with non-zero change causes to the provincial summary database;

   (10) The provincial user checks the forest resource change database in the provincial summary database to determine whether there is an error. If there is an error, the output has a list of wrong county-level units and the wrong content, and requires the wrong county-level unit to perform the step (8 )～(9), until there is no error, the forest resource change data of the whole province forms a map;

   (11) Provincial-level user statistical forest resource change database, compare the changes in the data of each county before and after, output the comparative analysis results, analyze the comparative analysis results of the county data in the forest resource change database of the whole province, and judge whether there is any abnormal change, if yes, output There are abnormal changes in the list of county-level units and the content of abnormal changes, and the abnormally changed county-level units are required to perform steps (8) to (10) until there are no abnormal changes and the quality inspection is completed;

   (12) County-level users export all achievement databases and report to the provincial level.
2. A method for quality inspection of results of a map of forest resources according to claim 1, characterized in that, in the steps (3), (6) and (9), county-level users access the provincial summary through the network The administrative division database, forest supervision database or forest resource change database in the database determines whether the current county code data already exists in the administrative division database, forest supervision database or forest resource change database in the provincial summary database, and if so, then After clearing it, insert all the data in the county-level administrative division database, forest supervision database or forest resource change database, if not, directly insert all the data in the county-level administrative division database, forest supervision database or forest resource change database.
3. According to claim 2, a method for quality inspection of results of a map of forest resources, it is characterized in that, in the step (4), check in the county-level unit in the provincial administrative division database and between the county-level unit and the county-level unit Spatial topology errors and attribute logic errors that exist between, check the spatial topology errors and attribute logic errors that exist in the county-level units and between county-level units and county-level units in the forest supervision database of the whole province in the described step (7), In the step (10), check the attribute logic error of the data in the forest resource change database of the whole province.
4. A method for quality inspection of results of one map of forest resources according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that, in the step (11), the comparative analysis results of the data of each county in the forest resources change database of the whole province are analyzed , to judge whether there is an abnormal change, and the above abnormal change is an unfounded adjustment of factor values including land type, ownership, origin, forest category, authority level, public welfare forest level, and forest land level.
5. According to any one of claims 1 to 3, the method for quality inspection of forest resource one-map results is characterized in that the logical structure of the administrative division database includes OBJECTID, shape, province, county, township, village, bureau, field , operation area, forest shift; the logical structure of the forest resource status database includes OBJECETID, shape, county, township, village, bureau, field, operation area, forest shift, small shift, small shift, small place name, forest land ownership, and forest land use right , forest ownership, forest use right, owner's name, forest tenure certificate number, land type, land use status, land management type, vegetation coverage type, forest type, area, origin, forest type, authority level, whether it is a natural protection area Public welfare forest, national public welfare forest level, project category, ecological location, location, location name, location description, natural degree, community structure, renewal level, health level, harmful organisms, disaster type, damage degree, degradation type, degradation degree, Wetland type, site type, site grade, afforestation type, management type, management opinion, landform, slope aspect, slope position, slope, altitude, accessibility, soil, soil layer thickness, humus thickness, texture, parent material, gravel content , soil structure, soil moisture, pH, compactness, drainage status, erosion status, dominant tree species, tree species composition, canopy density, age, age group, average diameter at breast height, average tree height, hectare volume, number of hectares, tree species structure, forest land Quality level, whether it is a supplementary forest land, forest land protection level, forest land functional division, main functional area; the logical structure of the forest supervision database includes OBJECTID, shape, interpretation change map spot number, supplementary map spot number, province, county, township, Village, forestry bureau, forest farm, forest class, abscissa, ordinate, area of interpretation map, reason of interpretation change, verification class number, forest resource change database map spot, forest land management unit, reason of change, change period, project name, Project use, audit document number, audit year, audit area, area of actually changed forest land use, area of natural protected area in the area of actually changed forest land use, name of natural protected area, level and type of natural protected area, forest resources management in the early stage "one map" "Land type, pre-recognized land type, forest land area in the third national land survey, forest category in the "one map" of forest resource management in the early stage, level of authority in the "one map" of forest resource management in the early stage, and country in the "one map" of forest resource management in the early stage The level of public welfare forests, the nature of forest land used, the origin of the "one map" of forest resources management in the early stage, the status of forest harvesting permits, the number of forest harvesting permits, the actual harvesting area, the actual harvesting stock, the actual number of trees harvested, the area of over-licensed harvesting, Unlicensed harvesting volume, number of unlicensed harvested plants, unlicensed harvested area, unlicensed harvested volume, number of unlicensed harvested plants, remarks, investigation level, investigation unit, investigator, current land type; the logical structure of the forest resource change database includes OBJECETID , shape, QQ_OBJECTID, XZ_OBJECTID, DC_OBJECTID, province, county, township, village, bureau, field, work area, forest class, Q_small class, Q_land type, Q_forest land ownership, Q_forest land use right, Q_origin, Q_forest species, Q_dominant tree species, Q_age group, Q_canopy density, Q_number of plants per hectare, Q_accumulation per hectare . XZ_Origin, XZ_Forest species, XZ_Dominant tree species, XZ_Age group, XZ_Canopy density, XZ_Number of plants per hectare, XZ_Hectare stock, XZ_Forest category, XZ_Public welfare forest rights, XZ_Public welfare forest Grade, XZ_Forest land protection level, XZ_Land management type, DC_interpretation map spot number, DC_supplementary map spot number, DC_interpretation change reason, DC_current land type, DC_change reason, DC_former land type , DC_Recognized former land type, DC_Previous origin, DC_Previous forest category, DC_Previous right level, DC_Previous public welfare forest level, DC_Used forest land nature, DC_Certificate status, change area, change reason, Change time, change basis, change notes; the forest resources archives database includes the construction project use forest land database, tree felling database, afforestation update database, natural disaster database, forestry case database; wherein, OBJECTID represents the object unique identifier, and shape represents the graphic .
6. A quality inspection system for a map of forest resources, characterized in that it is used to implement the quality inspection method for a map of forest resources described in any one of claims 1 to 5, including a county-level client application system and a provincial-level The server-side application system, the county-level client application system includes:

   Project creation and data import module: used for county-level users to import local data according to requirements. Local data at least include forest resource database, administrative division database, forest resource status database, forest supervision database, forest resource archive database, and establish county-level Forest resources annual renewal project documents;

   Administrative division database check module: used to perform spatial topology check and attribute logic check on the edited and imported administrative division database, wherein the spatial topology check includes at least overlapping and gap checks, and the attribute logic check includes at least dictionary check, required and non-filled Item checks and factor logical relationships;

   Forest supervision database inspection module: used to perform spatial topology inspection and attribute logic inspection on the edited and imported forest inspection database, wherein the spatial topology inspection includes at least overlapping and multi-part inspection, and the attribute logic inspection includes at least dictionary inspection, mandatory and Non-fill item check and factor logic relationship;

   Forest resource status database inspection module: used to check the spatial topology and attribute logic of the forest resource status database completed in this period, where the spatial topology inspection includes at least overlapping, gaps, open air, multi-parts, fine fragmentation, out-of-boundary, and cross-forest classes Boundary check, attribute logic check at least includes dictionary domain check, division factor check, basic factor check, management factor check, forest ecology check, terrain soil factor check, forest stand factor check;

   Forest resource change database check module: used to check the attribute logic of the forest resource change database, at least including forest supervision factor check, change cause check and abnormal change check;

   One map of forest resources results reporting module: It is used to submit the administrative division database, forest supervision database, forest resource resource change data and forest resource archive database in the annual update project of local county-level forest resources into the provincial summary through online reporting Administrative division database, forest inspection database, forest resource change data and forest resource archive database;

   The provincial server-side application system includes:

   Provincial-level summary database creation module: used to provide provincial-level users with the function of creating provincial-level summary databases, set provincial-level and county-level access groups or users for provincial-level summary databases, and authorize access groups and users to use permissions;

   Provincial-level summary database summary module: used to judge the data submitted by the county level for reporting applications, check whether the provincial-level summary database already has the application unit achievement data, if it exists, delete it and then insert the summary, otherwise, directly insert the summary ;

   Provincial summary database inspection module: used to provide provincial users with administrative division database, forest supervision database, forest resource resource change data and forest resource archive database inspection functions;

   Provincial summary database comparative analysis module: used to provide provincial users with the comparative statistical analysis function of forest resource change data, counting county-level units before and after the change, including land types, ownership, origin, forest categories, authority levels, and public welfare forest levels , the change area of factors including forest land grade.
7. A cloud platform for quality inspection of forest resource one-map results, characterized in that the forest resource one-map result quality inspection system described in claim 6 is deployed, including:

   County-level client: Equipped with a county-level client application system;

   Provincial cloud server: Equipped with a provincial server application system;

   Basic cloud platform: used to provide computing, storage, network communication and system operation capability support for county-level client application systems and provincial-level server application systems.
8. According to claim 7, the cloud platform for the quality inspection of a picture of forest resources, is characterized in that, the county-level client includes all kinds of PCs, notebooks, mobile workstations, and tablet computers equipped with county-level client application systems , providing project creation and data import functions, administrative division database inspection functions, forest supervision database inspection functions, forest resource status database inspection functions, forest resource change database inspection functions, and forest resource one-map results reporting functions for county-level users.
9. According to claim 8, the cloud platform for the quality inspection of forest resource one-map results is characterized in that, the provincial cloud server includes a server, a workstation or a server that provides computing, storage and network capabilities for the operation of the provincial server application system. Virtual machine, providing users with the function of creating provincial summary database, checking function of provincial summary database, summarizing function of provincial summary database and comparative analysis function of provincial summary database, among which servers, workstations or virtual machines are deployed to support provincial server applications The application platform including the operating system, database platform, GIS platform, and network middleware necessary for system operation, and the platform capabilities of the virtual machine are provided by the basic cloud platform.
10. According to claim 9, the cloud platform for the quality inspection of forest resource one-map results is characterized in that, the basic cloud platform includes and is not limited to include X86 computing servers for constructing computing resource pools, storage servers for constructing storage resource pools, and The network server and gateway of the network resource pool, the virtualization platform software for resource virtualization management, and the application platform including operating system, database platform, GIS platform and network middleware deployed on the virtualization platform.

Images