WO2022214847A1 - New formula for predicting people's chances of success - Google Patents
New formula for predicting people's chances of success Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2022214847A1 WO2022214847A1 PCT/IB2021/052850 IB2021052850W WO2022214847A1 WO 2022214847 A1 WO2022214847 A1 WO 2022214847A1 IB 2021052850 W IB2021052850 W IB 2021052850W WO 2022214847 A1 WO2022214847 A1 WO 2022214847A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- formula
- success
- person
- effort
- people
- Prior art date
Links
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 4
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000034826 Genetic Predisposition to Disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
Definitions
- Types of genetic susceptibility as potential candidates with significant thresholds in the general population.
- APG is the amount of a person's aptitude genes that are determined by SEQUENCING analyzes or depending on the field in question by special tests.
- Inheritance is any trait whose numbers quickly become more accurate. These numbers are the result of QTL studies and tools and methods such as GWA analysis that examine different variants of genes affecting traits.
- DOS means the degree of success that is equal to the current position of the person plus the coefficient of subtraction of the coefficient of variation of the ultimate possibility of success in that field per year.
- This formula can be used in all educational environments. In this way, by performing an experiment and determining the percentages of the desired trait and characteristic in that person's genetics and then putting those percentages in the claimed formula, the right path for the person's progress and development can be determined and reported. Such as choosing a field of study and university, etc. Also in team work environments can be effective in such a way that according to the talent of each person is assigned a task commensurate with the talent of the person.
- This formula can be used in educational levels in schools and educational centers, and in this way, a new step is taken for the growth and development of people as correctly as possible, and to prevent the waste of youth and adolescents' time.
- This formula can use a person's genetics to help a person choose a career path and ultimately help them succeed.
- This formula can be used in all educational environments. In this way, by performing an experiment and determining the percentages of the desired trait and characteristic in that person's genetics and then putting those percentages in the claimed formula, the right path for the person's progress and development can be determined and reported. Such as choosing a field of study and university, etc. Also in team work environments can be effective in such a way that according to the talent of each person is assigned a task commensurate with the talent of the person.
- each person's position is a function of their genetics.
- the number (EU) at the highest level that is, the number one in this case is the score of the first person is 98 and the second person is 75. Also, your efforts and genes are not enough, in addition to that, the inheritance of each trait must be considered separately. So you cannot do whatever you want with effort.
- the number one person with 3% of the talent genes and low training will have this position, i.e. 43, and an ordinary person who has 4% of the talent gene.
- This formula can be used in the lower levels of education in schools and training centers, and through this, a new step is taken for the growth and development of people as correctly as possible, and to prevent the waste of youth and adolescents' time in vain.
Abstract
Design a formula called the genetic formula for success, which provides a link between genes and success that can be used as an overview of the issue. In this formula, by placing a series of data, you can see the approximate position of your future. This formula can be used in educational levels in schools and educational centers, and in this way, a new step is taken for the growth and development of people as correctly as possible, and to prevent the waste of youth and adolescents' time.
Description
Design a formula called the genetic formula for success, which provides a link between genes and success that can be used as an overview of the issue. In this formula, by placing a series of data, you can see the approximate position of your future.
human necessities (A) - medical or veterinary science (A61)
Due to the uniqueness of the present invention and the innovative nature of the formula in question, to date, natural or legal persons have not claimed to provide a new formula to predict the probability of success of the individual.
This design was first submitted by me to the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) and has been accepted as the first and most recent formula for predicting a person's chances of success.
Have you ever thought that if we could know what the future holds for us in a particular field given our talent and the amount of effort we could have, we could have chosen a better path and spent our time and lives in many ways? Do not waste? This has to do with the genetics of success. Every trait in humans has a component as a genetic component known as heredity. In short, the heritability of any particular trait determines the role of genetics in that trait. The answers to these questions will be provided by a formula and equilibrium called the genetic formula for success. See. This formula is the first genetic formula for success that can be used as an overview of the issue and provides a general understanding of the relationship between genes and success.
Have you ever wondered if we could know what the future holds for us in a particular field given our talent and the amount of effort we put into it? And we could choose a better route and not waste our time and lives on many routes. We all know that genetics is related to success, but to what extent? If genes are effective in success, then what is the role of effort? The answers to these questions will be provided by designing a formula and equilibrium called the genetic formula for success. In this formula, by placing a series of data, you can see the approximate position of your future. But what is the basis of this formula?
Every trait in humans has a component as a genetic component known as heredity. In short, the heritability of any particular trait determines the extent of the genetic role in that trait. This means that the higher the inheritance of a trait, the more meaningless your efforts will be! Yes, you may ask, does it mean that effort is ineffective in success?! So what is the meaning of the phrase "What do you get with effort with what you want ?!"
Do you think this sentence is not true?
Answer: Definitely not, they are all just motivational sentences and can ruin the lives of many people.
If you are not prone to a trait that is highly heritable, the effort will do nothing for you.
Question: So where does effort work?
Your efforts will only affect areas and traits that are less heritable. The fact that genes have an effect on success, which scientists knew, and that it is better for you to enter a field where you have the talent gene, which everyone knew? What new meaning does this formula convey? Your talent is more effective when the heritability is high in that trait and then the role of effort is less and someone with less talent cannot reach you in the field even with more effort, but if you are in a trait that is heritability Few other people can easily eliminate the effect of your talent with more practice.
An example: Suppose a person in a trait called A, like reading, has a talent of zero to 100 percent of the gene, and in a trait called B (for example, mathematics), he has a talent of 3 percent of the gene.
In which field do you think he has a better chance of success?
He may say singing, but no?! This is the distinguishing point of this formula. According to this formula, with the same effort in both disciplines, a person will be more successful in B because his inheritance is less and the effort can show its effect more.
Genes can predict the likelihood of success in life to some extent.
In this project, the contribution of genetics to success has been widely studied in the analysis of several traits, which was the most extensive study in this case.
Indicators are involved in personal success. We formulated the genetics of success with several considerations
Types of genetic susceptibility as potential candidates with significant thresholds in the general population.
Our assessment of more than 150 people showed a significant correlation between the six variables of the proposed formula. This formula can use a person's genetics to help him choose a career, education, etc. and finally help them to succeed.
first present the formula for the probability of success:
COE, effort coefficient including EU (unit of effort) multiplied by the role of environment and coefficient of change is equal to the coefficient of effort plus the product of the genes of susceptibility to heredity. Remember that the role of heritability and environment is also inverse.
APG is the amount of a person's aptitude genes that are determined by SEQUENCING analyzes or depending on the field in question by special tests.
Inheritance is any trait whose numbers quickly become more accurate. These numbers are the result of QTL studies and tools and methods such as GWA analysis that examine different variants of genes affecting traits.
DOS means the degree of success that is equal to the current position of the person plus the coefficient of subtraction of the coefficient of variation of the ultimate possibility of success in that field per year.
This formula can be used in all educational environments. In this way, by performing an experiment and determining the percentages of the desired trait and characteristic in that person's genetics and then putting those percentages in the claimed formula, the right path for the person's progress and development can be determined and reported. Such as choosing a field of study and university, etc. Also in team work environments can be effective in such a way that according to the talent of each person is assigned a task commensurate with the talent of the person.
This formula can be used in educational levels in schools and educational centers, and in this way, a new step is taken for the growth and development of people as correctly as possible, and to prevent the waste of youth and adolescents' time.
Can provide a link between genetics and success.
You will be able to have a clearer picture of your future position.
You will realize where your efforts can be considered a factor of success.
The time of millions and billions of other people is not wasted.
People choose the right path for themselves.
This formula can use a person's genetics to help a person choose a career path and ultimately help them succeed.
This formula can be used in all educational environments. In this way, by performing an experiment and determining the percentages of the desired trait and characteristic in that person's genetics and then putting those percentages in the claimed formula, the right path for the person's progress and development can be determined and reported. Such as choosing a field of study and university, etc. Also in team work environments can be effective in such a way that according to the talent of each person is assigned a task commensurate with the talent of the person.
Suppose a particular trait, such as singing, has 90% heritability (these numbers are approximate). In this case, the role of the environment is 10%. A person has 3% of reading genes and does not have much practice. The unit of effort (0.1) and the output of this formula for him is 96. It is difficult to compete with this person for an ordinary person who has 3% of genes. He reaches 0.5 with the same amount of effort. He may say that he can reach that person with more effort. In this example, each person's position (CS) is a function of their genetics.
If we imagine the number (EU) at the highest level. That is, the number one in this case is the score of the first person is 98 and the second person is 75. Also, your efforts and genes are not enough, in addition to that, the inheritance of each trait must be considered separately. So you cannot do whatever you want with effort.
Consider another example
If the inheritance of the trait is low, i.e. 3%, then the number one person with 3% of the talent genes and low training will have this position, i.e. 43, and an ordinary person who has 4% of the talent gene.
With the same amount of training, it reaches 28. Now suppose the training of these two people is maximized, in which case the first person gets 93 points and the second person becomes 81.
We see that effort can make a noticeable difference, so if the number one person does not try, person 2 can overtake him with effort. And he can make up for his lack of genetic talent with more practice.
Soon you will be able to have a clearer picture of your future position and you will realize where your efforts can be the key to success.
The time of millions and billions of people is no longer wasted and people choose the right path for themselves. This was a simple and understandable explanation of this formula.
To make the function of this formula clearer to you, we give an example of a single-gene trait in which the environment has no involvement and you will always be who you are.
This formula can be used in the lower levels of education in schools and training centers, and through this, a new step is taken for the growth and development of people as correctly as possible, and to prevent the waste of youth and adolescents' time in vain.
Claims (1)
- Design a formula called the genetic formula for success, which provides a link between genes and success that can be used as an overview of the issue. In this formula, by placing a series of data, you can see the approximate position of your future.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2021/052850 WO2022214847A1 (en) | 2021-04-06 | 2021-04-06 | New formula for predicting people's chances of success |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2021/052850 WO2022214847A1 (en) | 2021-04-06 | 2021-04-06 | New formula for predicting people's chances of success |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2022214847A1 true WO2022214847A1 (en) | 2022-10-13 |
Family
ID=83546033
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2021/052850 WO2022214847A1 (en) | 2021-04-06 | 2021-04-06 | New formula for predicting people's chances of success |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
WO (1) | WO2022214847A1 (en) |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110137838A1 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-09 | Yoshiyuki Kobayashi | Information processing apparatus, observation value prediction method, and program |
-
2021
- 2021-04-06 WO PCT/IB2021/052850 patent/WO2022214847A1/en unknown
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110137838A1 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-09 | Yoshiyuki Kobayashi | Information processing apparatus, observation value prediction method, and program |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
MORRIS TIM T, DAVIES NEIL M, DAVEY SMITH GEORGE: "Can education be personalised using pupils’ genetic data?", ELIFE, vol. 9, XP055978183, DOI: 10.7554/eLife.49962 * |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Pickett et al. | Assimilation and differentiation needs as motivational determinants of perceived in-group and out-group homogeneity | |
McBride et al. | Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military setting | |
Elvers et al. | Procrastination in online courses: Performance and attitudinal differences | |
Schein et al. | Personal and organizational change through group methods: The laboratory approach. New York: JohnWiley and Sons | |
Noël et al. | The relationship of personality traits and self-monitoring behavior to choice of business major | |
LaCaille et al. | Refuting mental health misconceptions: A quasi-experiment with abnormal psychology courses | |
Hart et al. | Teacher evaluation as a function of student and instructor personality | |
Luttikhuizen | Teaching evolution using a card game: negative frequency-dependent selection | |
Haryono et al. | Teams' Games Tournaments with Cognitive Conflict Instruction (CCI) Model to Unveil Students' Misconceptions. | |
WO2022214847A1 (en) | New formula for predicting people's chances of success | |
Koulianou et al. | Greek teachers’ metacognitive awareness on reading strategies | |
Evans | Weliness and Coping Activities of African American Counselors | |
Fatemi et al. | The Relationship between EFL learners' self-regulation and their listening comprehension | |
Rajasekaran et al. | Emotional intelligence of physical education teachers in Coimbatore district | |
Winterbottom | Taking a quantitative approach | |
Zammit et al. | Mathematics and science achievement of junior secondary school students in Australia | |
Magzoub et al. | Assessing students in community settings: the role of peer evaluation | |
Greenberger | Faculty Attitudes toward Students with Disabilities at an Israeli Leading Technology Institute. | |
Tartaro et al. | Criminal justice professionals’ knowledge of institutional review boards (IRBs) and compliance with IRB protocol | |
Sztejnberg et al. | Measurement of the tolerance general level in the higher education students | |
Cuhadar | Sample Size Requirements for Parameter Recovery in the 4-Parameter Logistic Model | |
Dwyer et al. | Perceptual learning and acquired face familiarity: Evidence from inversion, use of internal features, and generalization between viewpoints | |
Sideridis | On establishing non‐significance | |
Cook | Professional qualifications of religion teachers in Catholic high schools in the United States | |
Enwezor | RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRINCIPALS’AREAS OF WORKLIFE AND THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE EFFECTIVENESS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN ANAMBRA STATE |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 21935903 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |