WO2022197770A1 - Methods for tailoring analgesic regimen in lung or colon cancer patients based on tumor genomics - Google Patents

Methods for tailoring analgesic regimen in lung or colon cancer patients based on tumor genomics Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022197770A1
WO2022197770A1 PCT/US2022/020502 US2022020502W WO2022197770A1 WO 2022197770 A1 WO2022197770 A1 WO 2022197770A1 US 2022020502 W US2022020502 W US 2022020502W WO 2022197770 A1 WO2022197770 A1 WO 2022197770A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
cancer patient
intraoperative
effective amount
opioid
opioid analgesic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2022/020502
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Joshua MINCER
Gregory Fischer
Patrick Mccormick
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Original Assignee
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center filed Critical Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Publication of WO2022197770A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022197770A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P35/00Antineoplastic agents
    • A61P35/04Antineoplastic agents specific for metastasis
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/16Amides, e.g. hydroxamic acids
    • A61K31/165Amides, e.g. hydroxamic acids having aromatic rings, e.g. colchicine, atenolol, progabide
    • A61K31/167Amides, e.g. hydroxamic acids having aromatic rings, e.g. colchicine, atenolol, progabide having the nitrogen of a carboxamide group directly attached to the aromatic ring, e.g. lidocaine, paracetamol
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/185Acids; Anhydrides, halides or salts thereof, e.g. sulfur acids, imidic, hydrazonic or hydroximic acids
    • A61K31/19Carboxylic acids, e.g. valproic acid
    • A61K31/192Carboxylic acids, e.g. valproic acid having aromatic groups, e.g. sulindac, 2-aryl-propionic acids, ethacrynic acid 
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/21Esters, e.g. nitroglycerine, selenocyanates
    • A61K31/215Esters, e.g. nitroglycerine, selenocyanates of carboxylic acids
    • A61K31/235Esters, e.g. nitroglycerine, selenocyanates of carboxylic acids having an aromatic ring attached to a carboxyl group
    • A61K31/24Esters, e.g. nitroglycerine, selenocyanates of carboxylic acids having an aromatic ring attached to a carboxyl group having an amino or nitro group
    • A61K31/245Amino benzoic acid types, e.g. procaine, novocaine
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/395Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
    • A61K31/40Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having five-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom, e.g. sulpiride, succinimide, tolmetin, buflomedil
    • A61K31/403Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having five-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom, e.g. sulpiride, succinimide, tolmetin, buflomedil condensed with carbocyclic rings, e.g. carbazole
    • A61K31/404Indoles, e.g. pindolol
    • A61K31/405Indole-alkanecarboxylic acids; Derivatives thereof, e.g. tryptophan, indomethacin
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/395Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
    • A61K31/40Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having five-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom, e.g. sulpiride, succinimide, tolmetin, buflomedil
    • A61K31/407Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having five-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom, e.g. sulpiride, succinimide, tolmetin, buflomedil condensed with other heterocyclic ring systems, e.g. ketorolac, physostigmine
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/395Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
    • A61K31/435Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom
    • A61K31/44Non condensed pyridines; Hydrogenated derivatives thereof
    • A61K31/445Non condensed piperidines, e.g. piperocaine
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/395Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
    • A61K31/435Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom
    • A61K31/44Non condensed pyridines; Hydrogenated derivatives thereof
    • A61K31/445Non condensed piperidines, e.g. piperocaine
    • A61K31/4468Non condensed piperidines, e.g. piperocaine having a nitrogen directly attached in position 4, e.g. clebopride, fentanyl
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/395Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
    • A61K31/435Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom
    • A61K31/47Quinolines; Isoquinolines
    • A61K31/485Morphinan derivatives, e.g. morphine, codeine
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6876Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
    • C12Q1/6883Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
    • C12Q1/6886Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material for cancer
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/575Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer
    • G01N33/5752Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer of the lungs
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/575Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer
    • G01N33/57535Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer of the large intestine, e.g. colon, rectum or anus
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/106Pharmacogenomics, i.e. genetic variability in individual responses to drugs and drug metabolism
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/156Polymorphic or mutational markers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2800/00Detection or diagnosis of diseases
    • G01N2800/52Predicting or monitoring the response to treatment, e.g. for selection of therapy based on assay results in personalised medicine; Prognosis

Definitions

  • the present technology relates to methods for determining whether a patient diagnosed with lung or colon cancer and undergoing tumor resection surgery will benefit from treatment with intraoperative opioid analgesics or opioid-free intraoperative analgesics (e.g ., intraoperative ester-type or amide-type local anesthetics).
  • intraoperative opioid analgesics or opioid-free intraoperative analgesics e.g ., intraoperative ester-type or amide-type local anesthetics.
  • the methods disclosed herein are based on screening a lung cancer patient for elevated FGA, mutations in CDKN2A and/or mutations in the Wnt or Hippo signaling pathways.
  • the methods disclosed herein are based on screening the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) subtype of a colon cancer patient.
  • MMR DNA mismatch repair
  • opioids are a necessary component in the perioperative analgesic regimen.
  • opioids augment tumor growth and metastasis, possibly through reduction of natural killer (NK) cell activity, T-lymphocyte proliferation, and cytokine secretion (Cata JP, Gottumukkala V, Sessler DI, European Journal of Pain Supplements. 5(2):345-355 (2011)).
  • NK natural killer
  • T-lymphocyte proliferation T-lymphocyte proliferation
  • cytokine secretion cytokine secretion
  • tumor resection itself can induce systemic dissemination of cancer cells despite optimal surgical technique (Bar-Yosef S et al ., Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 94(6): 1066-1073 (2001)).
  • the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) detecting the presence of at least one mutation in one or more genes that results (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of the Hippo pathway in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery.
  • the one or more genes may be selected from the group consisting of NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, CTNNB1, AXIN2, APC and AMER1.
  • the at least one mutation is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation.
  • the at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
  • the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of one or more of NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, AXIN2, APC and AMER1 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of CTNNBl in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
  • mRNA expression levels are detected via real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
  • qPCR real-time quantitative PCR
  • dPCR digital PCR
  • RT-PCR Reverse transcriptase-PCR
  • Northern blotting microarray
  • dot or slot blots in situ hybridization
  • FISH fluorescent in situ hybridization
  • polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunopre
  • the intraoperative opioid analgesic is fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
  • the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic may range from about 1 MME to about 200 MMEs. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs, about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs, or about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs.
  • the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME, about 2 MMEs, about 3 MMEs, about 4 MMEs, about 5 MMEs, about 6 MMEs, about 7 MMEs, about 8 MMEs, about 9 MMEs, about 10 MMEs, about 11 MMEs, about 12 MMEs, about 13 MMEs, about 14 MMEs, about 15 MMEs, about 16 MMEs, about 17 MMEs, about 18 MMEs, about 19 MMEs, about 20 MMEs, about 21 MMEs, about 22 MMEs, about 23 MMEs, about 24 MMEs, about 25 MMEs, about 26 MMEs, about 27 MMEs, about 28 MMEs, about 29 MMEs, about 30 MMEs, about 31 MMEs, about 32 MMEs, about 33 MMEs, about 34 MMEs, about 35 MMEs, about 36 MMEs, about 37 MMEs, about 38 MMEs, about 39 MMEs, about 40-45
  • the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously.
  • the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a local anesthetic solution via an epidural catheter before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery.
  • the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%- 4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter.
  • the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is administered as a single injection, a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery.
  • the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may be administered before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery using any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall (e.g ., via serratus plane nerve block, intercostal nerve block, or paravertebral block).
  • the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered using any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall (e.g., via serratus plane nerve block, intercostal nerve block, or paravertebral block).
  • suitable local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
  • the local anesthetic solution may further comprise an opioid (e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil).
  • the local anesthetic solution may comprise 0.5 mcg/ml- 50 mcg/ml opioid.
  • the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post- operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery.
  • post-operative opioid analgesics include, but are not limited to, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
  • the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same opioid analgesic or different opioid analgesics.
  • the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg to about 100 mg.
  • the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg, about 0.006 mg, about 0.007 mg, about 0.008 mg, about 0.009 mg, about 0.01 mg, about 0.02 mg, about 0.03 mg, about 0.04 mg, about 0.05 mg, about 0.06 mg, about 0.07 mg, about 0.08 mg, about 0.09 mg, about 0.1 mg, about 0.2 mg, about 0.3 mg, about 0.4 mg, about 0.5 mg, about 0.6 mg, about 0.7 mg, about 0.8 mg, about 0.9 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1- 5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 10-15 mg, about 15-20 mg, about 20-25 mg, about 25-30 mg, about 30-35 mg, about 35-40 mg, about 40-45 mg, about 45-50 mg, about 50-55 mg, about 55-60 mg, about 60-65 mg, about 65-70 mg, about 70
  • the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic may be continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr to about 10 mg/hr. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr, about 0.02 mg/hr, about 0.03 mg/hr, about 0.04 mg/hr, about 0.05 mg/hr, about 0.06 mg/hr, about 0.07 mg/hr, about 0.08 mg/hr, about 0.09 mg/hr, about 0.1 mg/hr, about 0.2 mg/hr, about 0.3 mg/hr, about 0.4 mg/hr, about 0.5 mg/hr, about 0.6 mg/hr, about 0.7 mg/hr, about 0.8 mg/hr, about 0.9 mg/hr, about 1 mg/hr, about 1.5 mg/hr, about 2 mg/hr, about 2.5 mg/hr, about 3 mg
  • the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer for treatment with an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic comprising (a) (i) detecting the presence of at least one mutation in CDKN2A in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient, wherein the at least one mutation reduces CDKN2A expression and/or activity levels, and/or (ii) detecting elevated FGA in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient compared to a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery.
  • the at least one mutation in CDKN2A may be a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation.
  • the at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
  • the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, FGA is detected via next-generation sequencing.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of CDKN2A in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
  • mRNA expression levels are detected via real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase- PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
  • qPCR real-time quantitative PCR
  • dPCR digital PCR
  • RT-PCR Reverse transcriptase- PCR
  • Northern blotting microarray
  • dot or slot blots in situ hybridization
  • FISH fluorescent in situ hybridization
  • polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence,
  • the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein FGA in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient is elevated compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
  • FGA is detected via next-generation sequencing.
  • the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is an amide-type local anesthetic or an ester- type local anesthetic.
  • amide-type local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, or !evobupivacaine.
  • ester-type local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chioroprocaine, or benzocaine.
  • the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic may be administered via an epidural catheter.
  • the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is about 0.05%-4% amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter.
  • the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic may be administered as a single injection, a series of bolus doses, or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery.
  • the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic may be administered via any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall, such as via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block, or via a paravertebral block.
  • the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is about 0.05%-4% amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered via any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall, such as via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block, or via a paravertebral block.
  • the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free post-operative analgesic after the tumor resection surgery.
  • opioid-free post-operative analgesics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
  • the opioid-free post operative analgesic and the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic are the same analgesic or different analgesics.
  • the effective amount of the opioid-free post operative analgesic and the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic are the same or different.
  • the effective amount of the opioid-free post operative analgesic is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8
  • amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 10 ml, about 12.5 ml, about 15 ml, about 17.5 ml, about 20 ml, about 22.5 ml, about 25 ml, about 27.5 ml, about 30 ml, about 32.5 ml, about 35 ml, about 37.5 ml, or about 40 ml when administered via any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall, such as via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block, or via a paravertebral block.
  • the cancer patient exhibits stage I, stage II or stage III lung cancer. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient has been diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).
  • the histologic subtype of the lung adenocarcinoma may be lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, solid or unknown.
  • the cancer patient may or may not have received an adjuvant therapy.
  • the adjuvant therapy may be chemotherapy, lobectomy, radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy.
  • the patient is human.
  • the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient comprises biopsied tumor tissue, whole blood, plasma, or serum.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced or undetectable compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
  • expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and/or PMS2 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
  • the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, IL1RN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery,
  • expression levels of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRB1, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 are assayed via next- generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (EL
  • the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPY1R, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective
  • the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient relative to a predetermined threshold; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery.
  • the cancer patient comprises at least one mutation that results in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature.
  • the at least one mutation is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation.
  • the at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
  • the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
  • the reduced activity of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNBl, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEYl, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAML1, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6.
  • genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNBl, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC
  • the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNBl, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEYl, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAML1, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6 are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting,
  • the hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB.
  • genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB.
  • the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiment
  • the present disclosure provides a method for reducing the risk of tumor recurrence in a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the cancer patient comprises at least one alteration in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system (e.g., MMR deficiency).
  • MMR DNA mismatch repair
  • mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of one or more of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced or undetectable compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
  • MSS microsatellite stable
  • MSS microsatellite stable
  • the cancer patient comprises at least one genetic mutation or altered expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature.
  • the reduced activity of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNB1, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6.
  • the hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3,
  • genetic mutations or mRNA expression levels are detected via next generation sequencing, RNA-seq, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase- PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
  • polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, Immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
  • the intraoperative opioid analgesic is fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
  • the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic may range from about 1 MME to about 200 MMEs. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs, about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs, or about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs.
  • the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME, about 2 MMEs, about 3 MMEs, about 4 MMEs, about 5 MMEs, about 6 MMEs, about 7 MMEs, about 8 MMEs, about 9 MMEs, about 10 MMEs, about 11 MMEs, about 12 MMEs, about 13 MMEs, about 14 MMEs, about 15 MMEs, about 16 MMEs, about 17 MMEs, about 18 MMEs, about 19 MMEs, about 20 MMEs, about 21 MMEs, about 22 MMEs, about 23 MMEs, about 24 MMEs, about 25 MMEs, about 26 MMEs, about 27 MMEs, about 28 MMEs, about 29 MMEs, about 30 MMEs, about 31 MMEs, about 32 MMEs, about 33 MMEs, about 34 MMEs, about 35 MMEs, about 36 MMEs, about 37 MMEs, about 38 MMEs, about 39 MMEs, about 40-45
  • the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously.
  • the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability -high (MSI-H) tumors.
  • the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a local anesthetic solution via an epidural catheter before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery.
  • the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%- 4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter.
  • the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about
  • the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is administered as a single injection, series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery.
  • suitable local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
  • the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may be administered before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g ., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks).
  • TEP transversus abdominis plane
  • II Ilioinguinal
  • IH iliohypogastric
  • the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks).
  • TEP transversus abdominis plane
  • II Ilioinguinal
  • IH iliohypogastric
  • the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about
  • the local anesthetic solution may further comprise an opioid (e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil).
  • opioid e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
  • the local anesthetic solution may comprise 0.5 mcg/ml-50 mcg/ml opioid. In certain embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may comprise about 0.5 mcg/ml, about 0.6 mcg/ml, about 0.7 mcg/ml, about 0.8 mcg/ml, about 0.9 mcg/ml, about 1.0 mcg/ml, about 1.5 mcg/ml, about 2.0 mcg/ml, about 2.5 mcg/ml, about 3.0 mcg/ml, about 3.5 mcg/ml, about 4.0 mcg/ml, about 4.5 mcg/ml, about 5.0 mcg/ml, about 5.5 mcg/ml, about 6.0 mcg/ml, about 6.5 mcg/ml, about 7.0 mcg/ml, about 7.5 mcg/ml, about
  • the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery.
  • post-operative opioid analgesics include, but are not limited to, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
  • the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same opioid analgesic or different opioid analgesics.
  • the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg to about 100 mg.
  • the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg, about 0.006 mg, about 0.007 mg, about 0.008 mg, about 0.009 mg, about 0.01 mg, about 0.02 mg, about 0.03 mg, about 0.04 mg, about 0.05 mg, about 0.06 mg, about 0.07 mg, about 0.08 mg, about 0.09 mg, about 0.1 mg, about 0.2 mg, about 0.3 mg, about 0.4 mg, about 0.5 mg, about 0.6 mg, about 0.7 mg, about 0.8 mg, about 0.9 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1- 5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 10-15 mg, about 15-20 mg, about 20-25 mg, about 25-30 mg, about 30-35 mg, about 35-40 mg, about 40-45 mg, about 45-50 mg, about 50-55 mg, about 55-60 mg, about 60-65 mg, about 65-70 mg, about 70
  • the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic may be continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr to about 10 mg/hr. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr, about 0.02 mg/hr, about 0.03 mg/hr, about 0.04 mg/hr, about 0.05 mg/hr, about 0.06 mg/hr, about 0.07 mg/hr, about 0.08 mg/hr, about 0.09 mg/hr, about 0.1 mg/hr, about 0.2 mg/hr, about 0.3 mg/hr, about 0.4 mg/hr, about 0.5 mg/hr, about 0.6 mg/hr, about 0.7 mg/hr, about 0.8 mg/hr, about 0.9 mg/hr, about 1 mg/hr, about 1.5 mg/hr, about 2 mg/hr, about 2.5 mg/hr, about 3 mg
  • the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of one or more non-opioid analgesics selected from among ketamine, dexmedetomidine, a carboxylic acid derivative NS AID, or acetaminophen.
  • one or more non-opioid analgesics selected from among ketamine, dexmedetomidine, a carboxylic acid derivative NS AID, or acetaminophen.
  • the ketamine is administered intravenously.
  • the effective amount of ketamine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively.
  • the ketamine is infused at a rate of 0.04 mg/kg/hr-2.5 mg/kg/hr.
  • the ketamine is infused at a rate of about 0.04 mg/kg/hr, about 0.05 mg/kg/hr, about 0.06 mg/kg/hr, about 0.07 mg/kg/hr, about 0.08 mg/kg/hr, about 0.09 mg/kg/hr, about 0.1 mg/kg/hr, about 0.2 mg/kg/hr, about 0.3 mg/kg/hr, about 0.4 mg/kg/hr, about 0.5 mg/kg/hr, about 0.6 mg/kg/hr, about 0.7 mg/kg/hr, about 0.8 mg/kg/hr, about 0.9 mg/kg/hr, about 1.0 mg/kg/hr, about 1.1 mg/kg/hr, about 1.2 mg/kg/hr, about 1.3 mg/kg/hr, about 1.4 mg/kg/hr, about 1.5 mg/kg/hr, about 1.6 mg/kg/hr, about 1.7 mg/kg/hr, about 1.8
  • the ketamine is administered as a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg -4.5 mg/kg.
  • the ketamine is administered as a bolus of about 0.04 mg/kg, about 0.05 mg/kg, about 0.06 mg/kg, about 0.07 mg/kg, about 0.08 mg/kg, about 0.09 mg/kg, about 0.1 mg/kg, about 0.2 mg/kg, about 0.3 mg/kg, about 0.4 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.6 mg/kg, about 0.7 mg/kg, about 0.8 mg/kg, about 0.9 mg/kg, about 1.0 mg/kg, about 1.1 mg/kg, about 1.2 mg/kg, about 1.3 mg/kg, about 1.4 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 1.6 mg/kg, about 1.7 mg/kg, about 1.8 mg/kg, about 1.9 mg/kg, about 2.0 mg/kg, about 2.1 mg/kg, about 2.2 mg/
  • the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of about 4-13 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of 4 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 11 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, or 13 mg/kg. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of about 6-10 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg.
  • the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is an acetic acid NSAID or a propionic acid NSAID.
  • the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID include, but are not limited to, ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, naproxen, fenoprofen, ketoprofen, dexketoprofen, flurbiprofen, oxaprozin, loxoprofen, pelubiprofen, zaltoprofen, indomethacin, tolmetin, sulindac, etodolac, ketorolac, diclofenac, aceclofenac, bromfenac, or nabumeton.
  • the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered orally, intravenously, or intramuscularly. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. The effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID may be administered to the cancer patient during closing of an incision.
  • the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg-1500 mg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg, about 15 mg, about 20 mg, about 25 mg, about 30 mg, about 35 mg, about 40 mg, about 45 mg, about 50 mg, about 55 mg, about 60 mg, about 65 mg, about 70 mg, about 75 mg, about 80 mg, about 85 mg, about 90 mg, about 95 mg, about 100 mg, about 150 mg, about 200 mg, about 250 mg, about 300 mg, about 350 mg, about 400 mg, about 450 mg, about 500 mg, about 550 mg, about 600 mg, about 650 mg, about 700 mg, about 750 mg, about 800 mg, about 850 mg, about 900 mg, about 950 mg, about 1000 mg, about 1050 mg, about 1100 mg, about 1150 mg, about 1200 mg, about 1250 mg, about 1300 mg, about 1350 mg
  • the NSAID is administered as a bolus dose during the tumor resection surgery.
  • the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of 0.25 mg/kg- 10 mg/kg.
  • the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of about 0.25 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.75 mg/kg, about 1 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 2 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg, about 3 mg/kg, about 3.5 mg/kg, about 4 mg/kg, about 4.5 mg/kg, about 5 mg/kg, about 5.5 mg/kg, about 6 mg/kg, about 6.5 mg/kg, about 7 mg/kg, about 7.5 mg/kg, about 8 mg/kg, about 8.5 mg/kg, about 9 mg/kg, about 9.5 mg/kg, or about 10 mg/kg.
  • the effective amount of the acetaminophen is administered preoperatively, intraoperatively and/or postoperatively.
  • the effective amount of the acetaminophen may range from about 80 mg to about 1000 mg.
  • the effective amount of the acetaminophen is about 80 mg, about 90 mg, about 100 mg, about 110 mg, about 120 mg, about 130 mg, about 140 mg, about 150 mg, about 160 mg, about 170 mg, about 180 mg, about 190 mg, about 200 mg, about 210 mg, about 220 mg, about 230 mg, about 240 mg, about 250 mg, about 260 mg, about 270 mg, about 280 mg, about 290 mg, about 300 mg, about 310 mg, about 320 mg, about 330 mg, about 340 mg, about 350 mg, about 360 mg, about 370 mg, about 380 mg, about 390 mg, about 400 mg, about 410 mg, about 420 mg, about 430 mg, about 440 mg, about 450 mg, about 460 mg, about 470 mg, about 480 mg, about 490 mg, about 500 mg, about 510 mg, about 520 mg, about 530 mg, about 540 mg, about 550 mg, about 560 mg, about 570 mg, about 580 mg
  • the effective amount of the acetaminophen may be administered as a series of bolus doses, or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery.
  • the acetaminophen is administered intravenously, or orally.
  • the effective amount of dexmedetomidine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively.
  • the dexmedetomidine is administered intravenously, transdermally, intramuscularly, orally, buccally, or intranasally.
  • the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of 0.05 pg/kg/hr to 0.7 pg /kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of about 0.05 pg/kg/hr, about 0.06 pg/kg/hr, about 0.07 pg/kg/hr, about 0.08 pg/kg/hr, about 0.09 pg/kg/hr, about 0.1 pg/kg/hr, 0.15 pg/kg/hr, about 0.2 pg/kg/hr, about 0.25 pg/kg/hr, about 0.3 pg/kg/hr, about 0.35 pg/kg/hr, about 0.4 pg/kg/hr, about 0.45 pg/kg/hr, about 0.5 pg/kg/hr, about 0.55 pg/kg
  • the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of 0.05 pg/kg - 1 pg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of about 0.05 pg/kg, about 0.06 pg/kg, about 0.07 pg/kg, about 0.08 pg/kg, about 0.09 pg/kg, about 0.1 pg/kg, about 0.15 gg/kg, about 0.2 gg/kg, about 0.25 gg/kg, about 0.3 gg/kg, about 0.35 gg/kg, about 0.4 gg/kg, about 0.45 gg/kg, about 0.5 gg/kg, about 0.55 gg/kg, about 0.6 gg/kg, about 0.65 gg/kg, about 0.7 gg/kg, about 0.75 gg/kg, about 0.8 gg/kg, about 0.85 gg/kg, about 0.9 gg/
  • the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
  • expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
  • the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
  • the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, IL1RN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAMl, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or
  • expression levels of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (
  • the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
  • MSI-L microsatellite instability-low
  • the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient;
  • RT-PCR Reverse transcriptase-PCR
  • FISH fluorescent in situ hybridization
  • RNA-seq Western blotting
  • enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays ELISA
  • dot blotting immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
  • the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
  • the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient relative to a predetermined threshold; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery.
  • the cancer patient comprises at least one mutation that results in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature.
  • the at least one mutation is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation.
  • the at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
  • the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
  • the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability- low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
  • the hyperactivation of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNKIE, CTNNB1, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAML1, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKDl, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6.
  • the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNKIE, CTNNBl, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKDl, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6 are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting,
  • the reduced activity of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB.
  • genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB.
  • the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, Immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some aspects of IF
  • the present disclosure provides a method for reducing the risk of tumor recurrence in a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the cancer patient does not comprise any alterations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system.
  • MMR DNA mismatch repair
  • mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
  • MSS microsatellite stable
  • the mRNA or polypeptide levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold.
  • MSS microsatellite stable
  • the cancer patient comprises at least one genetic mutation or altered expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature.
  • the hyperactivation of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM 17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNB1, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HD AC 5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6.
  • the reduced activity of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB.
  • the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
  • genetic mutations or mRNA expression levels are detected via next generation sequencing, RNA-seq, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase- PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
  • qPCR real-time quantitative PCR
  • dPCR digital PCR
  • RT-PCR Reverse transcriptase- PCR
  • Northern blotting microarray
  • dot or slot blots in situ hybridization
  • FISH fluorescent in situ hybridization
  • polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), do
  • the intraoperative opioid analgesic may be fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
  • the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic may range from about 1 MME to about 200 MMEs. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs, about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs, or about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs.
  • the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME, about 2 MMEs, about 3 MMEs, about 4 MMEs, about 5 MMEs, about 6 MMEs, about 7 MMEs, about 8 MMEs, about 9 MMEs, about 10 MMEs, about 11 MMEs, about 12 MMEs, about 13 MMEs, about 14 MMEs, about 15 MMEs, about 16 MMEs, about 17 MMEs, about 18 MMEs, about 19 MMEs, about 20 MMEs, about 21 MMEs, about 22 MMEs, about 23 MMEs, about 24 MMEs, about 25 MMEs, about 26 MMEs, about 27 MMEs, about 28 MMEs, about 29 MMEs, about 30 MMEs, about 31 MMEs, about 32 MMEs, about 33 MMEs, about 34 MMEs, about 35 MMEs, about 36 MMEs, about 37 MMEs, about 38 MMEs, about 39 MMEs, about 40-45
  • the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously.
  • non-opioid analgesics include regional anesthetics, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, a carboxylic acid derivative NS AID, or acetaminophen.
  • the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a regional anesthetic solution via an epidural catheter before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery.
  • the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% regional anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter.
  • the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about
  • the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution is administered as a single injection, series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery.
  • suitable regional anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
  • the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution may be administered before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g ., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks).
  • TEP transversus abdominis plane
  • II Ilioinguinal
  • IH iliohypogastric
  • the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% regional anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks).
  • TEP transversus abdominis plane
  • II Ilioinguinal
  • IH iliohypogastric
  • the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about
  • TEP transversus abdominis plane
  • II Ilioinguinal
  • IH iliohypogastric
  • suitable regional anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
  • the regional anesthetic solution may further comprise an opioid (e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil).
  • an opioid e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
  • the regional anesthetic solution may comprise 0.5 mcg/ml-50 mcg/ml opioid.
  • the regional anesthetic solution may comprise about 0.5 mcg/ml, about 0.6 mcg/ml, about 0.7 mcg/ml, about 0.8 mcg/ml, about 0.9 mcg/ml, about 1.0 mcg/ml, about 1.5 mcg/ml, about 2.0 mcg/ml, about 2.5 mcg/ml, about 3.0 mcg/ml, about 3.5 mcg/ml, about 4.0 mcg/ml, about 4.5 mcg/ml, about 5.0 mcg/ml, about 5.5 mcg/ml, about 6.0 mcg/ml, about 6.5 mcg/ml, about 7.0 mcg/ml, about 7.5 mcg/ml, about 8.0 mcg/ml, about 8.5 mcg/ml, about 9.0 mcg/ml, about 10
  • the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery.
  • post-operative opioid analgesics include, but are not limited to, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
  • the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same opioid analgesic or different opioid analgesics.
  • the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg to about 100 mg.
  • the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg, about 0.006 mg, about 0.007 mg, about 0.008 mg, about 0.009 mg, about 0.01 mg, about 0.02 mg, about 0.03 mg, about 0.04 mg, about 0.05 mg, about 0.06 mg, about 0.07 mg, about 0.08 mg, about 0.09 mg, about 0.1 mg, about 0.2 mg, about 0.3 mg, about 0.4 mg, about 0.5 mg, about 0.6 mg, about 0.7 mg, about 0.8 mg, about 0.9 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1- 5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 10-15 mg, about 15-20 mg, about 20-25 mg, about 25-30 mg, about 30-35 mg, about 35-40 mg, about 40-45 mg, about 45-50 mg, about 50-55 mg, about 55-60 mg, about 60-65 mg, about 65-70 mg, about 70
  • the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic may be continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr to about 10 mg/hr. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr, about 0.02 mg/hr, about 0.03 mg/hr, about 0.04 mg/hr, about 0.05 mg/hr, about 0.06 mg/hr, about 0.07 mg/hr, about 0.08 mg/hr, about 0.09 mg/hr, about 0.1 mg/hr, about 0.2 mg/hr, about 0.3 mg/hr, about 0.4 mg/hr, about 0.5 mg/hr, about 0.6 mg/hr, about 0.7 mg/hr, about 0.8 mg/hr, about 0.9 mg/hr, about 1 mg/hr, about 1.5 mg/hr, about 2 mg/hr, about 2.5 mg/hr, about 3 mg
  • the ketamine is administered intravenously.
  • the effective amount of ketamine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively.
  • the ketamine is infused at a rate of 0.04 mg/kg/hr-2.5 mg/kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is infused at a rate of about 0.04 mg/kg/hr, about 0.05 mg/kg/hr, about 0.06 mg/kg/hr, about 0.07 mg/kg/hr, about 0.08 mg/kg/hr, about 0.09 mg/kg/hr, about 0.1 mg/kg/hr, about 0.2 mg/kg/hr, about 0.3 mg/kg/hr, about 0.4 mg/kg/hr, about 0.5 mg/kg/hr, about 0.6 mg/kg/hr, about 0.7 mg/kg/hr, about 0.8 mg/kg/hr, about 0.9 mg/kg/hr, about 1.0 mg/kg/hr, about 1.1 mg/kg/hr, about 1.2 mg/kg/hr, about 1.3 mg/kg/hr
  • the ketamine is administered as a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg -4.5 mg/kg.
  • the ketamine is administered as a bolus of about 0.04 mg/kg, about 0.05 mg/kg, about 0.06 mg/kg, about 0.07 mg/kg, about 0.08 mg/kg, about 0.09 mg/kg, about 0.1 mg/kg, about 0.2 mg/kg, about 0.3 mg/kg, about 0.4 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.6 mg/kg, about 0.7 mg/kg, about 0.8 mg/kg, about 0.9 mg/kg, about 1.0 mg/kg, about 1.1 mg/kg, about 1.2 mg/kg, about 1.3 mg/kg, about 1.4 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 1.6 mg/kg, about 1.7 mg/kg, about 1.8 mg/kg, about 1.9 mg/kg, about 2.0 mg/kg, about 2.1 mg/kg, about 2.2 mg/
  • the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of about 4-13 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of 4 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 11 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, or 13 mg/kg. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of about 6-10 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg.
  • the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is an acetic acid NSAID or a propionic acid NSAID.
  • the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID include, but are not limited to, ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, naproxen, fenoprofen, ketoprofen, dexketoprofen, flurbiprofen, oxaprozin, loxoprofen, pelubiprofen, zaltoprofen, indomethacin, tolmetin, sulindac, etodolac, ketorolac, diclofenac, aceclofenac, bromfenac, or nabumeton.
  • the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered orally, intravenously, or intramuscularly. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. The effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID may be administered to the cancer patient during closing of an incision.
  • the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg-1500 mg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg, about 15 mg, about 20 mg, about 25 mg, about 30 mg, about 35 mg, about 40 mg, about 45 mg, about 50 mg, about 55 mg, about 60 mg, about 65 mg, about 70 mg, about 75 mg, about 80 mg, about 85 mg, about 90 mg, about 95 mg, about 100 mg, about 150 mg, about 200 mg, about 250 mg, about 300 mg, about 350 mg, about 400 mg, about 450 mg, about 500 mg, about 550 mg, about 600 mg, about 650 mg, about 700 mg, about 750 mg, about 800 mg, about 850 mg, about 900 mg, about 950 mg, about 1000 mg, about 1050 mg, about 1100 mg, about 1150 mg, about 1200 mg, about 1250 mg, about 1300 mg, about 1350 mg
  • the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus dose during the tumor resection surgery.
  • the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of 0.25 mg/kg- 10 mg/kg.
  • the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of about 0.25 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.75 mg/kg, about 1 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 2 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg, about 3 mg/kg, about 3.5 mg/kg, about 4 mg/kg, about 4.5 mg/kg, about 5 mg/kg, about 5.5 mg/kg, about 6 mg/kg, about 6.5 mg/kg, about 7 mg/kg, about 7.5 mg/kg, about 8 mg/kg, about 8.5 mg/kg, about 9 mg/kg, about 9.5 mg/kg, or about 10 mg/kg.
  • the effective amount of the acetaminophen is administered preoperatively, intraoperatively and/or postoperatively.
  • the effective amount of the acetaminophen may range from about 80 mg to about 1000 mg.
  • the effective amount of the acetaminophen is about 80 mg, about 90 mg, about 100 mg, about 110 mg, about 120 mg, about 130 mg, about 140 mg, about 150 mg, about 160 mg, about 170 mg, about 180 mg, about 190 mg, about 200 mg, about 210 mg, about 220 mg, about 230 mg, about 240 mg, about 250 mg, about 260 mg, about 270 mg, about 280 mg, about 290 mg, about 300 mg, about 310 mg, about 320 mg, about 330 mg, about 340 mg, about 350 mg, about 360 mg, about 370 mg, about 380 mg, about 390 mg, about 400 mg, about 410 mg, about 420 mg, about 430 mg, about 440 mg, about 450 mg, about 460 mg, about 470 mg, about 480 mg, about 490 mg, about 500 mg, about 510 mg, about 520 mg, about 530 mg, about 540 mg, about 550 mg, about 560 mg, about 570 mg, about 580 mg
  • the effective amount of the acetaminophen may be administered as a series of bolus doses, or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In some embodiments, the acetaminophen is administered intravenously, or orally. [0070] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of dexmedetomidine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively. In some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is administered intravenously, transdermally, intramuscularly, orally, buccally, or intranasally.
  • the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of 0.05 pg/kg/hr to 0.7 pg /kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of about 0.05 pg/kg/hr, about 0.06 pg/kg/hr, about 0.07 pg/kg/hr, about 0.08 pg/kg/hr, about 0.09 pg/kg/hr, about 0.1 pg/kg/hr, 0.15 pg/kg/hr, about 0.2 pg/kg/hr, about 0.25 pg/kg/hr, about 0.3 pg/kg/hr, about 0.35 pg/kg/hr, about 0.4 pg/kg/hr, about 0.45 pg/kg/hr, about 0.5 pg/kg/hr, about 0.55 pg/kg
  • the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of 0.05 pg/kg - 1 pg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of about 0.05 pg/kg, about 0.06 pg/kg, about 0.07 pg/kg, about 0.08 pg/kg, about 0.09 pg/kg, about 0.1 pg/kg, about
  • 0.15 pg/kg about 0.2 pg/kg, about 0.25 pg/kg, about 0.3 pg/kg, about 0.35 pg/kg, about 0.4 pg/kg, about 0.45 pg/kg, about 0.5 pg/kg, about 0.55 pg/kg, about 0.6 pg/kg, about 0.65 pg/kg, about 0.7 pg/kg, about 0.75 pg/kg, about 0.8 pg/kg, about 0.85 pg/kg, about 0.9 pg/kg, about 0.95 pg/kg, or about 1.0 pg/kg.
  • the cancer patient exhibits stage I, stage II or stage III colon cancer. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient has been diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma (COAD).
  • COAD colon adenocarcinoma
  • the colon adenocarcinoma may be synchronous or non-synchronous.
  • the tumor surgery may be laparoscopic, robotic or open. In certain embodiments, the tumor surgery is segmental or extended.
  • the cancer patient has received/is receiving an adjuvant therapy.
  • the adjuvant therapy may be chemotherapy, radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy.
  • the cancer patient has not received an adjuvant therapy. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the patient is human.
  • the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient comprises biopsied tumor tissue, whole blood, plasma, or serum.
  • FIGs. 1A-1D show association of intraoperative opioid dose and genetic alterations in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients.
  • FIG. 1A shows oncoprint of alteration frequencies of all genes altered >5% for the overall study cohort. Patients are subdivided by pathologic tumor stage.
  • FIG. IB shows five-year predicted overall survival for patients with high and low FGA and altered and wild-type CDKN2A with increasing intraoperative MME.
  • FIG. 1C shows comparative bar graphs representing alteration rate for each genomic factor by stage.
  • FIG. ID shows co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity between genes across all tumors.
  • FGA fraction genome altered
  • WT wildtype
  • MME oral morphine milligram equivalents.
  • FIGs. 2A-2D show association of intraoperative MMEs and oncogenic pathway alterations in lung adenocarcinoma patients.
  • FIG. 2A shows oncoprint of alteration frequencies of ten canonical oncogenic pathways for the overall study cohort. Patients are subdivided by pathologic tumor stage.
  • FIG. 2B shows five-year predicted recurrence- specific survival for patients with altered and unaltered Wnt and Hippo pathways.
  • FIG. 2C shows comparative bar graphs representing alteration rate for each oncologic signaling pathway by stage.
  • FIG. 2D shows co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity between oncogenic pathways across all tumors.
  • OS overall survival
  • RSS recurrence-specific survival
  • MME oral morphine milligram equivalents.
  • FIG. 3 shows Mu-opioid receptor concentrations in patient-matched lung adenocarcinoma and adjacent non-tumor lung tissue. Concentrations are based on optical density measurements derived from enzyme linked immunosorbent assay analysis. Lines signify individual patient matched samples with blue lines indicating those patients with elevated tumor concentrations of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) compared with adjacent lung tissue and yellow lines indicating patients with elevated normal lung tissue MOR concentrations compared to tumor.
  • MOR mu-opioid receptor
  • FIG. 4 shows CONSORT diagram describing the exclusion criteria for the patient cohort.
  • MSK-IMPACTTM Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets.
  • FIGs. 5A-5B show analysis of total intraoperative MME in terms of specific opioids received.
  • FIG. 5A shows breakdown by patient of specific opioid type (fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine) as a contribution to total intraoperative MME.
  • FIG. 5B shows cumulative percentage of fentanyl fraction of total intraoperative MME (fentanyl dose divided by total dose).
  • FIG. 6 shows estimates of interaction effects between genomic factors and intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents in the multivariable Cox models for overall survival and recurrence-specific survival*.
  • FIG. 7 shows genes altered in oncogenic pathways stratified by pathologic stage.
  • FIG. 8 shows a distribution of the FGA within the cohort.
  • FIG. 9 shows a loss of function/gain of function plot of the altered oncogenic pathways.
  • FIG. 10 shows the frequency of the different loss of function/gain of function gene mutations identified in the LEI AD patient cohort.
  • FIG. 11 shows the frequency of the different loss of function/gain of function oncogenic pathway mutations identified in the LEI AD patient cohort.
  • FIGs. 13A-13C show associations between intraoperative opioid dose, tumour- infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and recurrence. (FIG.
  • FIG. 13A Distribution of absent versus present increased TILs by DNA mismatch repair (MMR) subtype. Cumulative incidence function of recurrence (FIG. 13B) stratified by absent versus present increased TILs. Shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals.
  • MMR mismatch repair
  • dMMR MMR deficient
  • pMMR MMR proficient
  • TIL tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes
  • MME intraoperative oral morphine milligram equivalents
  • A absent
  • P present.
  • FIGs. 14A-14D show differential expression of opioid-related genes in TCGA- COAD.
  • FIG. 14B SSGSEA analysis correlation plot highlighting major pathways and cell types correlated with MSI upregulated and downregulated opioid genes. For each pairwise correlation the colour and the size of the circle denote the Spearman correlation.
  • FIG. 15 shows CONSORT diagram. Abbreviations: COAD, colon adenocarcinoma; MMR, mismatch repair.
  • FIGs. 16A-16B show cumulative incidence of recurrence stratified by MME (below/above median) for patients (FIG. 16A) without increased TILs and (FIG. 16B) with increased TILs for the subset of patients with TILs data. Shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals.
  • TILs tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes
  • MME oral morphine milligram equivalents.
  • FIGs. 17A-17B show Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival stratified by MME (below vs above median) for patients (FIG. 17A) without increased TILs and (FIG. 17B) with increased TILs for the subset of patients with TILs data. Shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals.
  • TILs tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes
  • MME oral morphine milligram equivalents.
  • TCGA-COAD The Cancer Genome Atlas Colon Adenocarcinoma
  • MSS microsatellite stability
  • MSI microsatellite instability
  • pMMR mismatch repair proficient
  • dMMR mismatch repair deficient.
  • FIG. 19 shows SSGSEA analysis correlation plot showing pairwise correlations between MSI upregulated opioid gene list, MSI downregulated opioid gene list (both in purple), 50 Hallmark pathways (in red), and 25 immune cell type signatures (in blue). For each pairwise correlation, the colour and the size of the circle denote the Spearman correlation. All comparisons shown are adjusted ⁇ 0.05.
  • MSS microsatellite stability
  • MSI microsatellite instability
  • SSGSEA single-sample gene set enrichment analysis.
  • FIG. 20 shows clinicopathologic characteristics for the entire cohort and for MMR subtypes.
  • FIG. 21 shows multivariable Competing Risk Regression Analysis for Recurrence. Estimates are pooled from 10 imputed datasets. Model includes clinical factors of interest (intraoperative MMEs, MMR subtype, adjunct, and ketorolac) and statistically significant factors from the univariable analysis for adjusting baseline factors, followed by backwards selection on the adjusting factors.
  • clinical factors of interest intraoperative MMEs, MMR subtype, adjunct, and ketorolac
  • FIG. 22 shows univariable competing risk regression analysis for recurrence. Estimates are pooled from 10 imputed datasets.
  • FIG. 23 shows univariable Cox regression analysis for overall survival (OS). Estimates are pooled from 10 imputed datasets.
  • FIG. 24 shows multivariable Cox regression analysis for overall survival (OS).
  • Model includes clinical factors of interest (MMR subtype, intraoperative MME, adjunct, and ketorolac) and statistically significant factors from the univariable analysis for adjusting baseline factors, followed by backwards selection on the adjusting factors.
  • MMR subtype clinical factors of interest
  • intraoperative MME intraoperative MME
  • adjunct adjunct
  • ketorolac ketorolac
  • FIG. 25 shows opioid*MSI and Opioid*MSS gene lists. Log2 (fold change) is for expression in MSI versus MSS. [00101] FIG. 26 shows an analysis of total intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents
  • FIG. 26A Breakdown by patient of specific opioid type (fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine) as a contribution to total intraoperative MMEs, with patients ordered from highest to lowest MMEs (inset features the top 100 patients).
  • FIG. 26B Cumulative percentage of patients with each fentanyl fraction of total intraoperative MMEs (fentanyl dose divided by total dose); fentanyl constituted at least 90% of total MMEs for more than 50% of patients and at least 80% of total MMEs for 75% of patients.
  • FIG. 27 shows a summary of regional anaesthesia and opioid dose.
  • the use of intraoperative opioids have been linked to worse oncologic outcomes in cancer patients.
  • the present disclosure demonstrates that lung cancer patients with alterations that disrupt the Hippo signaling pathway as well as alterations that hyperactivate Wnt signaling pathway were associated with improved recurrence-specific survival (RSS) at higher morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) compared to unaltered pathways. Accordingly, such tumorigenic mutations may be useful as biomarkers to predict whether a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer would benefit from treatment with intraoperative opioid analgesics.
  • the present disclosure also demonstrates that higher FGA and CDKN2A loss of function mutations in lung cancer patients were correlated with worse overall survival (OS) with increasing intraoperative MMEs.
  • OS overall survival
  • the present disclosure also demonstrates that colon cancer patients harboring deficiencies in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system (i.e., dMMR) show reduced risk of tumor recurrence when treated with intraoperative opioid analgesics, whereas colon cancer patients with wild- type/proficient DNA mismatch repair system (pMMR) benefit from either opioid or non opioid intraoperative analgesics.
  • MMR DNA mismatch repair
  • pMMR wild- type/proficient DNA mismatch repair system
  • the term “about” in reference to a number is generally taken to include numbers that fall within a range of 1%, 5%, or 10% in either direction (greater than or less than) of the number unless otherwise stated or otherwise evident from the context (except where such number would be less than 0% or exceed 100% of a possible value).
  • adapter refers to a short, chemically synthesized, nucleic acid sequence which can be used to ligate to the end of a nucleic acid sequence in order to facilitate attachment to another molecule.
  • the adapter can be single-stranded or double-stranded.
  • An adapter can incorporate a short (typically less than 50 base pairs) sequence useful for PCR amplification or sequencing.
  • the “administration” of an agent or drug to a subject includes any route of introducing or delivering to a subject a compound to perform its intended function. Administration can be carried out by any suitable route, including but not limited to, orally, intranasally, parenterally (intravenously, intramuscularly, intraperitoneally, or subcutaneously), rectally, intrathecally, intratumorally or topically. Administration includes self-administration and the administration by another.
  • an “alteration” of a gene or gene product refers to the presence of a mutation or mutations within the gene or gene product, e.g., a mutation, which affects the quantity or activity of the gene or gene product, as compared to the normal or wild-type gene.
  • the genetic alteration can result in changes in the quantity, structure, and/or activity of the gene or gene product in a cancer tissue or cancer cell, as compared to its quantity, structure, and/or activity, in a normal or healthy tissue or cell (e.g., a control).
  • an alteration which is associated with cancer, or predictive of responsiveness to intraoperative analgesics can have an altered nucleotide sequence (e.g., a mutation), amino acid sequence, chromosomal translocation, intra-chromosomal inversion, copy number, expression level, protein level, protein activity, in a cancer tissue or cancer cell, as compared to a normal, healthy tissue or cell.
  • exemplary mutations include, but are not limited to, point mutations (e.g., silent, missense, or nonsense), deletions, insertions, inversions, linking mutations, duplications, translocations, inter- and intra-chromosomal rearrangements. Mutations can be present in the coding or non-coding region of the gene.
  • nucleic acid amplification methods are well known to the skilled artisan and include ligase chain reaction (LCR), ligase detection reaction (LDR), ligation followed by Q-replicase amplification, PCR, primer extension, strand displacement amplification (SDA), hyperbranched strand displacement amplification, multiple displacement amplification (MDA), nucleic acid strand-based amplification (NASBA), two- step multiplexed amplifications, rolling circle amplification (RCA), recombinase- polymerase amplification (RPA)(TwistDx, Cambridge, UK), transcription mediated amplification, signal mediated amplification of RNA technology, loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA, helicase-dependent amplification, single primer isothermal amplification, and self
  • amplicons Copies of a particular nucleic acid sequence generated in vitro in an amplification reaction are called “amplicons” or “amplification products.”
  • amplicons Copies of a particular nucleic acid sequence generated in vitro in an amplification reaction are called “amplicons” or “amplification products.”
  • cancer or “tumor” are used interchangeably and refer to the presence of cells possessing characteristics typical of cancer-causing cells, such as uncontrolled proliferation, immortality, metastatic potential, rapid growth and proliferation rate, and certain characteristic morphological features. Cancer cells are often in the form of a tumor, but such cells can exist alone within an animal, or can be a non-tumorigenic cancer cell.
  • cancer includes premalignant, as well as malignant cancers.
  • complementarity refers to the base-pairing rules.
  • nucleic acid sequence refers to an oligonucleotide which, when aligned with the nucleic acid sequence such that the 5' end of one sequence is paired with the 3’ end of the other, is in “antiparallel association.”
  • sequence “5'-A-G-T-3”’ is complementary to the sequence “3’-T-C-A-5.”
  • Certain bases not commonly found in naturally-occurring nucleic acids may be included in the nucleic acids described herein. These include, for example, inosine, 7- deazaguanine, Locked Nucleic Acids (LNA), and Peptide Nucleic Acids (PNA).
  • Complementarity need not be perfect; stable duplexes may contain mismatched base pairs, degenerative, or unmatched bases.
  • Those skilled in the art of nucleic acid technology can determine duplex stability empirically considering a number of variables including, for example, the length of the oligonucleotide, base composition and sequence of the oligonucleotide, ionic strength and incidence of mismatched base pairs.
  • a complement sequence can also be an RNA sequence complementary to the DNA sequence or its complement sequence, and can also be a cDNA.
  • control is an alternative sample used in an experiment for comparison purpose.
  • a control can be "positive” or “negative.”
  • a positive control a compound or composition known to exhibit the desired therapeutic effect
  • a negative control a subject or a sample that does not receive the therapy or receives a placebo
  • the reference or control nucleic acid sample is a wild type or a non-mutated DNA or RNA sequence.
  • the reference nucleic acid sample is purified or isolated ( e.g ., it is removed from its natural state).
  • the reference nucleic acid sample is from a non-tumor sample, e.g., a blood control, a normal adjacent tumor (NAT), or any other non-cancerous sample from the same or a different subject.
  • NAT normal adjacent tumor
  • Detecting refers to determining the presence of a mutation or alteration in a nucleic acid of interest in a sample. Detection does not require the method to provide 100% sensitivity. Analysis of nucleic acid markers can be performed using techniques known in the art including, but not limited to, sequence analysis, and electrophoretic analysis. Non-limiting examples of sequence analysis include Maxam- Gilbert sequencing, Sanger sequencing, capillary array DNA sequencing, thermal cycle sequencing (Sears et al, Biotechniques, 13:626-633 (1992)), solid-phase sequencing (Zimmerman et al, Methods Mol.
  • sequencing with mass spectrometry such as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS; Fu et al, Nat. Biotechnol, 16:381-384 (1998)), and sequencing by hybridization.
  • MALDI-TOF/MS matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
  • Non limiting examples of electrophoretic analysis include slab gel electrophoresis such as agarose or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, capillary electrophoresis, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Additionally, next generation sequencing methods can be performed using commercially available kits and instruments from companies such as the Life Technologies/Ion Torrent PGM or Proton, the Illumina HiSEQ or MiSEQ, and the Roche/454 next generation sequencing system.
  • Detectable label refers to a molecule or a compound or a group of molecules or a group of compounds used to identify a nucleic acid or protein of interest. In some embodiments, the detectable label may be detected directly.
  • the detectable label may be a part of a binding pair, which can then be subsequently detected. Signals from the detectable label may be detected by various means and will depend on the nature of the detectable label. Detectable labels may be isotopes, fluorescent moieties, colored substances, and the like. Examples of means to detect detectable labels include but are not limited to spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, electromagnetic, radiochemical, or chemical means, such as fluorescence, chemifluorescence, or chemiluminescence, or any other appropriate means.
  • DNA mismatch repair or “MMR” system refers to a gene pathway that is integral in the maintenance of genomic stability. MMR functions in postreplicative repair by correcting DNA polymerase errors including base-base or insertion/deletion mismatches that form during DNA replication.
  • the term “effective amount” refers to a quantity sufficient to achieve a desired therapeutic and/or prophylactic effect, e.g ., an amount which results in the prevention of, or a decrease in a disease or condition described herein or one or more signs or symptoms associated with a disease or condition described herein.
  • the amount of a composition administered to the subject will vary depending on the composition, the degree, type, and severity of the disease and on the characteristics of the individual, such as general health, age, sex, body weight and tolerance to drugs. The skilled artisan will be able to determine appropriate dosages depending on these and other factors.
  • the compositions can also be administered in combination with one or more additional therapeutic compounds.
  • the therapeutic compositions may be administered to a subject having one or more signs or symptoms of a disease or condition described herein.
  • a "therapeutically effective amount" of a composition refers to composition levels in which the physiological effects of a disease or condition are ameliorated or eliminated.
  • a therapeutically effective amount can be given in one or more administrations.
  • FGA fraction of the genome altered
  • FGA may be defined as the number of bases in sequenced genomic segments with log2 copy number fold change >0.2 or ⁇ -0.2 over the total number of bases in all sequenced segments.
  • Gene refers to a DNA sequence that comprises regulatory and coding sequences necessary for the production of an RNA, which may have a non-coding function (e.g., a ribosomal or transfer RNA) or which may include a polypeptide or a polypeptide precursor.
  • RNA or polypeptide may be encoded by a full length coding sequence or by any portion of the coding sequence so long as the desired activity or function is retained.
  • a sequence of the nucleic acids may be shown in the form of DNA, a person of ordinary skill in the art recognizes that the corresponding RNA sequence will have a similar sequence with the thymine being replaced by uracil, i.e., "T" is replaced with "U.”
  • hybridize refers to a process where two substantially complementary nucleic acid strands (at least about 65% complementary over a stretch of at least 14 to 25 nucleotides, at least about 75%, or at least about 90% complementary) anneal to each other under appropriately stringent conditions to form a duplex or heteroduplex through formation of hydrogen bonds between complementary base pairs.
  • Hybridizations are typically and preferably conducted with probe-length nucleic acid molecules, preferably 15- 100 nucleotides in length, more preferably 18-50 nucleotides in length. Nucleic acid hybridization techniques are well known in the art.
  • Hybridization and the strength of hybridization is influenced by such factors as the degree of complementarity between the nucleic acids, stringency of the conditions involved, and the thermal melting point (T m ) of the formed hybrid.
  • T m thermal melting point
  • hybridization conditions and parameters see, e.g., Sambrook, et al., 1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Plainview, N.Y.; Ausubel, F. M. et al. 1994, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, Secaucus, N.J.
  • specific hybridization occurs under stringent hybridization conditions.
  • An oligonucleotide or polynucleotide ⁇ e.g., a probe or a primer) that is specific for a target nucleic acid will “hybridize” to the target nucleic acid under suitable conditions.
  • the term “library” refers to a collection of nucleic acid sequences, e.g., a collection of nucleic acids derived from whole genomic, subgenomic fragments, cDNA, cDNA fragments, RNA, RNA fragments, or a combination thereof.
  • a portion or all of the library nucleic acid sequences comprises an adapter sequence.
  • the adapter sequence can be located at one or both ends.
  • the adapter sequence can be useful, e.g., for a sequencing method (e.g., an NGS method), for amplification, for reverse transcription, or for cloning into a vector.
  • the library can comprise a collection of nucleic acid sequences, e.g., a target nucleic acid sequence (e.g., a tumor nucleic acid sequence), a reference nucleic acid sequence, or a combination thereof.
  • the nucleic acid sequences of the library can be derived from a single subject.
  • a library can comprise nucleic acid sequences from more than one subject (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30 or more subjects).
  • two or more libraries from different subjects can be combined to form a library having nucleic acid sequences from more than one subject.
  • a “library nucleic acid sequence” refers to a nucleic acid molecule, e.g., a DNA, RNA, or a combination thereof, that is a member of a library.
  • a library nucleic acid sequence is a DNA molecule, e.g., genomic DNA or cDNA.
  • a library nucleic acid sequence is fragmented, e.g., sheared or enzymatically prepared, genomic DNA.
  • the library nucleic acid sequences comprise sequence from a subject and sequence not derived from the subject, e.g., adapter sequence, a primer sequence, or other sequences that allow for identification, e.g., “barcode” sequences.
  • MSI mitochondrial chromosome
  • microsatellite instability refers to a hypermutable phenotype caused by the loss of DNA mismatch repair activity and is implicated in the development of CRC and endometrial cancer. MSI is detected in about 15% of all CRCs; 3% are of which are associated with Lynch syndrome and the other 12% are caused by sporadic, acquired hypermethylation of the promoter of the MLH1 gene, which occurs in tumors with the CpG island methylator phenotype. Colorectal tumors with MSI have distinctive features, including a tendency to arise in the proximal colon, lymphocytic infiltrate, and a poorly differentiated, mucinous or signet ring appearance.
  • MMR-deficient refers to a defect in DNA mismatch repair or to cells exhibiting epigenetic inactivation of a gene in the MMR pathway, or loss of protein function of a MMR gene.
  • genes in the MMR pathway are MSH2, MLHl, MSH6, PMS1 or PMS2.
  • Mutations in MMR genes are often associated with an increase in the frequency of spontaneous mutation and carcinogenesis. Defects in MMR are often characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI) caused by expansion or contraction of short nucleotide repeats in the absence of efficient MMR and, as such, MSI is detectable in the majority of colorectal cancers arising in carriers of germ-line MMR mutations.
  • MSI microsatellite instability
  • MMR-proficient or “pMMR” refers to cells comprising wild-type MMR genes. MMR-proficient cancers are characterized by microsatellite stability (MSS).
  • MSS microsatellite stability
  • PCR products or amplicons which are each primed using a distinct primer pair.
  • next-generation sequencing or NGS refers to any sequencing method that determines the nucleotide sequence of either individual nucleic acid molecules (e.g ., in single molecule sequencing) or clonally expanded proxies for individual nucleic acid molecules in a high throughput parallel fashion (e.g., greater than 10 3 , 10 4 , 10 5 or more molecules are sequenced simultaneously).
  • the relative abundance of the nucleic acid species in the library can be estimated by counting the relative number of occurrences of their cognate sequences in the data generated by the sequencing experiment.
  • Next generation sequencing methods are known in the art, and are described, e.g., in Metzker, M. Nature Biotechnology Reviews 11 : 31 -46 (2010) .
  • oligonucleotide refers to a molecule that has a sequence of nucleic acid bases on a backbone comprised mainly of identical monomer units at defined intervals. The bases are arranged on the backbone in such a way that they can bind with a nucleic acid having a sequence of bases that are complementary to the bases of the oligonucleotide.
  • the most common oligonucleotides have a backbone of sugar phosphate units. A distinction may be made between oligodeoxyribonucleotides that do not have a hydroxyl group at the 2' position and oligoribonucleotides that have a hydroxyl group at the 2' position.
  • Oligonucleotides may also include derivatives, in which the hydrogen of the hydroxyl group is replaced with organic groups, e.g., an allyl group.
  • Oligonucleotides of the method which function as primers or probes are generally at least about 10-15 nucleotides long and more preferably at least about 15 to 25 nucleotides long, although shorter or longer oligonucleotides may be used in the method. The exact size will depend on many factors, which in turn depend on the ultimate function or use of the oligonucleotide.
  • the oligonucleotide may be generated in any manner, including, for example, chemical synthesis, DNA replication, restriction endonuclease digestion of plasmids or phage DNA, reverse transcription, PCR, or a combination thereof.
  • the oligonucleotide may be modified e.g., by addition of a methyl group, a biotin or digoxigenin moiety, a fluorescent tag or by using radioactive nucleotides.
  • all survival means the observed length of life from the start of treatment to death or the date of last contact.
  • perioperative refers to the time period of a patient's surgical procedure. It commonly includes ward admission, anesthesia, surgery, and recovery.
  • the perioperative period is characterized by a sequence including the time preceding an operation when a patient is being prepared for surgery (“the preoperative period”), followed by the time spent in surgery (“the intraoperative period”), and by the time following an operation when the patient is closely monitored for complications while recovering from the effects of anesthesia (“the postoperative period”).
  • the term “primer” refers to an oligonucleotide, which is capable of acting as a point of initiation of nucleic acid sequence synthesis when placed under conditions in which synthesis of a primer extension product which is complementary to a target nucleic acid strand is induced, i.e., in the presence of different nucleotide triphosphates and a polymerase in an appropriate buffer (“buffer” includes pH, ionic strength, cofactors etc.) and at a suitable temperature.
  • buffer includes pH, ionic strength, cofactors etc.
  • One or more of the nucleotides of the primer can be modified for instance by addition of a methyl group, a biotin or digoxigenin moiety, a fluorescent tag or by using radioactive nucleotides.
  • a primer sequence need not reflect the exact sequence of the template.
  • a non-complementary nucleotide fragment may be attached to the 5' end of the primer, with the remainder of the primer sequence being substantially complementary to the strand.
  • primer as used herein includes all forms of primers that may be synthesized including peptide nucleic acid primers, locked nucleic acid primers, phosphorothioate modified primers, labeled primers, and the like.
  • the term “forward primer” as used herein means a primer that anneals to the anti-sense strand of dsDNA.
  • a “reverse primer” anneals to the sense-strand of dsDNA.
  • primer pair refers to a forward and reverse primer pair (i.e., a left and right primer pair) that can be used together to amplify a given region of a nucleic acid of interest.
  • Probe refers to nucleic acid that interacts with a target nucleic acid via hybridization.
  • a probe may be fully complementary to a target nucleic acid sequence or partially complementary. The level of complementarity will depend on many factors based, in general, on the function of the probe.
  • a probe or probes can be used, for example to detect the presence or absence of a mutation in a nucleic acid sequence by virtue of the sequence characteristics of the target. Probes can be labeled or unlabeled, or modified in any of a number of ways well known in the art.
  • a probe may specifically hybridize to a target nucleic acid. Probes may be DNA, RNA or a RNA/DNA hybrid.
  • Probes may be oligonucleotides, artificial chromosomes, fragmented artificial chromosome, genomic nucleic acid, fragmented genomic nucleic acid, RNA, recombinant nucleic acid, fragmented recombinant nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid (PNA), locked nucleic acid, oligomer of cyclic heterocycles, or conjugates of nucleic acid. Probes may comprise modified nucleobases, modified sugar moieties, and modified intemucleotide linkages. A probe may be used to detect the presence or absence of a target nucleic acid. Probes are typically at least about 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 100 nucleotides or more in length.
  • recurrence-specific survival means the observed length of life from the time of surgical resection to the time of first recurrence of the cancer, otherwise censored at the time of last follow-up. In RSS, deaths not involving recurrence of cancer are excluded.
  • a “sample” refers to a substance that is being assayed for the presence of a mutation in a nucleic acid of interest. Processing methods to release or otherwise make available a nucleic acid for detection are well known in the art and may include steps of nucleic acid manipulation.
  • a biological sample may be a body fluid or a tissue sample.
  • a biological sample may consist of or comprise blood, plasma, sera, urine, feces, epidermal sample, vaginal sample, skin sample, cheek swab, sperm, amniotic fluid, cultured cells, bone marrow sample, tumor biopsies, aspirate and/or chorionic villi, cultured cells, and the like.
  • the sample is preserved as a frozen sample or as formaldehyde- or paraformaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue preparation.
  • FFPE paraffin-embedded
  • the sample can be embedded in a matrix, e.g., an FFPE block or a frozen sample.
  • Whole blood samples of about 0.5 to 5 ml collected with EDTA, ACD or heparin as anti-coagulant are suitable.
  • the term “sensitivity,” as used herein in reference to the methods of the present technology is a measure of the ability of a method to detect a preselected sequence variant in a heterogeneous population of sequences.
  • a method has a sensitivity of S % for variants of F % if, given a sample in which the preselected sequence variant is present as at least F % of the sequences in the sample, the method can detect the preselected sequence at a preselected confidence of C %, S % of the time.
  • the term “separate” therapeutic use refers to an administration of at least two active ingredients at the same time or at substantially the same time by different routes.
  • sequential therapeutic use refers to administration of at least two active ingredients at different times, the administration route being identical or different. More particularly, sequential use refers to the whole administration of one of the active ingredients before administration of the other or others commences. It is thus possible to administer one of the active ingredients over several minutes, hours, or days before administering the other active ingredient or ingredients. There is no simultaneous treatment in this case.
  • the term “simultaneous” therapeutic use refers to the administration of at least two active ingredients by the same route and at the same time or at substantially the same time.
  • oligonucleotide primer means that the nucleotide sequence of the primer has at least 12 bases of sequence identity with a portion of the nucleic acid to be amplified when the oligonucleotide and the nucleic acid are aligned.
  • An oligonucleotide primer that is specific for a nucleic acid is one that, under the stringent hybridization or washing conditions, is capable of hybridizing to the target of interest and not substantially hybridizing to nucleic acids which are not of interest. Higher levels of sequence identity are preferred and include at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% and more preferably at least 98% sequence identity.
  • “Specificity,” as used herein, is a measure of the ability of a method to distinguish a truly occurring preselected sequence variant from sequencing artifacts or other closely related sequences. It is the ability to avoid false positive detections. False positive detections can arise from errors introduced into the sequence of interest during sample preparation, sequencing error, or inadvertent sequencing of closely related sequences like pseudo-genes or members of a gene family.
  • a method has a specificity of X % if, when applied to a sample set of NTotai sequences, in which Xime sequences are truly variant and CN ⁇ * true are not truly variant, the method selects at least X % of the not truly variant as not variant.
  • a method has a specificity of 90% if, when applied to a sample set of 1,000 sequences, in which 500 sequences are truly variant and 500 are not truly variant, the method selects 90% of the 500 not truly variant sequences as not variant.
  • Exemplary specificities include 90, 95, 98, and 99%.
  • stringent hybridization conditions refers to hybridization conditions at least as stringent as the following: hybridization in 50% formamide, 5xSSC, 50 mM NaEhPCri, pH 6.8, 0.5% SDS, 0.1 mg/mL sonicated salmon sperm DNA, and 5x Denharf s solution at 42° C. overnight; washing with 2x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 45° C; and washing with 0.2x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 45° C.
  • stringent hybridization conditions should not allow for hybridization of two nucleic acids which differ over a stretch of 20 contiguous nucleotides by more than two bases.
  • the terms “subject”, “patient”, or “individual” can be an individual organism, a vertebrate, a mammal, or a human. In some embodiments, the subject, patient or individual is a human.
  • target sequence and “target nucleic acid sequence” refer to a specific nucleic acid sequence to be detected and/or quantified in the sample to be analyzed.
  • “Treating” or “treatment” as used herein covers the treatment of a disease or disorder described herein, in a subject, such as a human, and includes: (i) inhibiting a disease or disorder, i.e., arresting its development; (ii) relieving a disease or disorder, i.e., causing regression of the disorder; (iii) slowing progression of the disorder; and/or (iv) inhibiting, relieving, or slowing progression of one or more symptoms of the disease or disorder.
  • treatment means that the symptoms associated with the disease are, e.g., alleviated, reduced, cured, or placed in a state of remission.
  • the various modes of treatment of disorders as described herein are intended to mean “substantial,” which includes total but also less than total treatment, and wherein some biologically or medically relevant result is achieved.
  • the treatment may be a continuous prolonged treatment for a chronic disease or a single, or few time administrations for the treatment of an acute condition.
  • Polynucleotides associated with responsiveness to intraoperative opioid analgesics may be detected by a variety of methods known in the art. Non-limiting examples of detection methods are described below.
  • the detection assays in the methods of the present technology may include purified or isolated DNA (genomic or cDNA), RNA or protein or the detection step may be performed directly from a biological sample without the need for further DNA, RNA or protein purification/isolation.
  • Nucleic Acid Amplification and/or Detection Polynucleotides associated with responsiveness to intraoperative opioid analgesics can be detected by the use of nucleic acid amplification techniques that are well known in the art.
  • the starting material may be genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA or mRNA.
  • Nucleic acid amplification can be linear or exponential.
  • Specific variants or mutations may be detected by the use of amplification methods with the aid of oligonucleotide primers or probes designed to interact with or hybridize to a particular target sequence in a specific manner, thus amplifying only the target variant.
  • Non-limiting examples of nucleic acid amplification techniques include polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), nested PCR, ligase chain reaction (see Abravaya, K. et al., Nucleic Acids Res. (1995), 23:675-682), branched DNA signal amplification (see Urdea, M. S.
  • RNA reporters et al., AIDS (1993), 7(suppl 2):S11- S14
  • amplifiable RNA reporters Q-beta replication
  • transcription-based amplification boomerang DNA amplification
  • strand displacement activation cycling probe technology
  • isothermal nucleic acid sequence based amplification NASBA
  • NASBA isothermal nucleic acid sequence based amplification
  • Oligonucleotide primers for use in amplification methods can be designed according to general guidance well known in the art as described herein, as well as with specific requirements as described herein for each step of the particular methods described.
  • oligonucleotide primers for cDNA synthesis and PCR are 10 to 100 nucleotides in length, preferably between about 15 and about 60 nucleotides in length, more preferably 25 and about 50 nucleotides in length, and most preferably between about 25 and about 40 nucleotides in length.
  • Tm of a polynucleotide affects its hybridization to another polynucleotide (e.g ., the annealing of an oligonucleotide primer to a template polynucleotide).
  • the oligonucleotide primer used in various steps selectively hybridizes to a target template or polynucleotides derived from the target template ⁇ i.e., first and second strand cDNAs and amplified products).
  • selective hybridization occurs when two polynucleotide sequences are substantially complementary (at least about 65% complementary over a stretch of at least 14 to 25 nucleotides, preferably at least about 75%, more preferably at least about 90% complementary).
  • a certain degree of mismatch at the priming site is tolerated.
  • Such mismatch may be small, such as a mono-, di- or tri -nucleotide. In certain embodiments, 100% complementarity exists.
  • Probes are capable of hybridizing to at least a portion of the nucleic acid of interest or a reference nucleic acid ⁇ i.e., wild-type sequence). Probes may be an oligonucleotide, artificial chromosome, fragmented artificial chromosome, genomic nucleic acid, fragmented genomic nucleic acid, RNA, recombinant nucleic acid, fragmented recombinant nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid (PNA), locked nucleic acid, oligomer of cyclic heterocycles, or conjugates of nucleic acid. Probes may be used for detecting and/or capturing/purifying a nucleic acid of interest.
  • probes can be about 10 nucleotides, about 20 nucleotides, about 25 nucleotides, about 30 nucleotides, about 35 nucleotides, about 40 nucleotides, about 50 nucleotides, about 60 nucleotides, about 75 nucleotides, or about 100 nucleotides long. However, longer probes are possible.
  • Longer probes can be about 200 nucleotides, about 300 nucleotides, about 400 nucleotides, about 500 nucleotides, about 750 nucleotides, about 1,000 nucleotides, about 1,500 nucleotides, about 2,000 nucleotides, about 2,500 nucleotides, about 3,000 nucleotides, about 3,500 nucleotides, about 4,000 nucleotides, about 5,000 nucleotides, about 7,500 nucleotides, or about 10,000 nucleotides long.
  • Probes may also include a detectable label or a plurality of detectable labels.
  • the detectable label associated with the probe can generate a detectable signal directly. Additionally, the detectable label associated with the probe can be detected indirectly using a reagent, wherein the reagent includes a detectable label, and binds to the label associated with the probe.
  • detectably labeled probes can be used in hybridization assays including, but not limited to Northern blots, Southern blots, microarray, dot or slot blots, and in situ hybridization assays such as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect a target nucleic acid sequence within a biological sample.
  • FISH fluorescent in situ hybridization
  • Certain embodiments may employ hybridization methods for measuring expression of a polynucleotide gene product, such as mRNA.
  • Methods for conducting polynucleotide hybridization assays have been well developed in the art. Hybridization assay procedures and conditions will vary depending on the application and are selected in accordance with the general binding methods known including those referred to in: Maniatis etal. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2nd Ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989); Berger and Kimmel Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 152, Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques (Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif, 1987); Young and Davis, PNAS. 80: 1194 (1983).
  • Detectably labeled probes can also be used to monitor the amplification of a target nucleic acid sequence.
  • detectably labeled probes present in an amplification reaction are suitable for monitoring the amount of amplicon(s) produced as a function of time.
  • probes include, but are not limited to, the 5'- exonuclease assay (TAQMAN® probes described herein (see also U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,848) various stem- loop molecular beacons (see for example, U.S. Pat. Nos.
  • the detectable label is a fluorophore.
  • Suitable fluorescent moieties include but are not limited to the following fluorophores working individually or in combination: 4-acetamido-4'-isothiocyanatostilbene- 2,2'disulfonic acid; acridine and derivatives: acridine, acridine isothiocyanate; Alexa Fluors: Alexa Fluor® 350, Alexa Fluor® 488, Alexa Fluor® 546, Alexa Fluor® 555, Alexa Fluor® 568, Alexa Fluor® 594, Alexa Fluor® 647 (Molecular Probes); 5-(2- aminoethyl)aminonaphthalene-l -sulfonic acid (EDANS); 4-amino-N-[3- vinylsulfonyl)phenyl]naphthalimide-3,5 disulfonate (Lucifer Yellow VS); N-(4-anilino-l- naphthy
  • eosin and derivatives eosin, eosin isothiocyanate; erythrosin and derivatives: erythrosin B, erythrosin isothiocyanate; ethidium; fluorescein and derivatives: 5- carboxyfluorescein (FAM), 5-(4,6-dichlorotriazin-2- yl)amino fluorescein (DTAF), 2', 7'- dimethoxy-4'5'-dichloro-6-carboxyfluorescein (JOE), fluorescein, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), hexachloro-6-carboxyfluorescein (HEX), QFITC (XRITC), tetrachlorofluorescem (TET); fiuorescamine; IR144; IR1446; lanthamide phosphors; Malachite Green isothiocyanate; 4-methylumbelliferone; ortho cresolphthalein
  • Detector probes can also comprise sulfonate derivatives of fluorescenin dyes with S03 instead of the carboxylate group, phosphoramidite forms of fluorescein, phosphoramidite forms of CY 5 (commercially available for example from Amersham).
  • Detectably labeled probes can also include quenchers, including without limitation black hole quenchers (Biosearch), Iowa Black (IDT), QSY quencher (Molecular Probes), and Dabsyl and Dabcel sulfonate/carboxylate Quenchers (Epoch).
  • quenchers including without limitation black hole quenchers (Biosearch), Iowa Black (IDT), QSY quencher (Molecular Probes), and Dabsyl and Dabcel sulfonate/carboxylate Quenchers (Epoch).
  • Detectably labeled probes can also include two probes, wherein for example a fluorophore is on one probe, and a quencher is on the other probe, wherein hybridization of the two probes together on a target quenches the signal, or wherein hybridization on the target alters the signal signature via a change in fluorescence.
  • interchelating labels such as ethidium bromide, SYBR® Green I (Molecular Probes), and PicoGreen® (Molecular Probes) are used, thereby allowing visualization in real-time, or at the end point, of an amplification product in the absence of a detector probe.
  • real-time visualization may involve the use of both an intercalating detector probe and a sequence-based detector probe.
  • the detector probe is at least partially quenched when not hybridized to a complementary sequence in the amplification reaction, and is at least partially unquenched when hybridized to a complementary sequence in the amplification reaction.
  • the amount of probe that gives a fluorescent signal in response to an excited light typically relates to the amount of nucleic acid produced in the amplification reaction.
  • the amount of fluorescent signal is related to the amount of product created in the amplification reaction. In such embodiments, one can therefore measure the amount of amplification product by measuring the intensity of the fluorescent signal from the fluorescent indicator.
  • Primers or probes may be designed to selectively hybridize to any portion of a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide selected from among CDKN2A, NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, CTNNB1, AXIN2, APC and AMERl. Exemplary nucleic acid sequences of the human orthologs of these genes are provided below: [00166] Homo sapiens cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), transcript variant
  • CDKN2A Homo sapiens cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), transcript variant
  • FAT1 Homo sapiens FAT atypical cadherin 1 (FAT1), mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_005245.4) (SEQ ID NO: 3)
  • 11401 actgaatgta ttccagaaac tctgcgcggg actggactgc ccctggaagt tctgcgatga
  • NF2 neurofibromin 2
  • transcript variant 1 mRNA
  • SEQ ID NO: 4 1 gtgaccctag tcggccgctg agaggcgcgc ggagtctggg ccgctgccgt ctaggggtcc

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Emergency Medicine (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Pain & Pain Management (AREA)

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to methods for determining whether a patient diagnosed with lung or colon cancer and undergoing tumor resection surgery will benefit from treatment with intraoperative opioid analgesics or opioid-free intraoperative analgesics. The present disclosure relates to methods for determining whether a patient diagnosed with lung or colon cancer and undergoing tumor resection surgery will benefit from treatment with intraoperative opioid analgesics or opioid-free intraoperative analgesics. In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein are based on screening a lung cancer patient for elevated FGA, mutations in CDKN2A and/o mutations in the Wnt or Hippo signaling pathways.

Description

METHODS FOR TAILORING ANALGESIC REGIMEN IN LUNG OR COLON CANCER PATIENTS BASED ON TUMOR GENOMICS
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/162,265, filed March 17, 2021, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The present technology relates to methods for determining whether a patient diagnosed with lung or colon cancer and undergoing tumor resection surgery will benefit from treatment with intraoperative opioid analgesics or opioid-free intraoperative analgesics ( e.g ., intraoperative ester-type or amide-type local anesthetics). In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein are based on screening a lung cancer patient for elevated FGA, mutations in CDKN2A and/or mutations in the Wnt or Hippo signaling pathways. In certain embodiments, the methods disclosed herein are based on screening the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) subtype of a colon cancer patient.
STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT
[0003] This invention was made with government support under grant number CA008748 awarded by the National Cancer Institute. The government has certain rights in the invention.
BACKGROUND [0004] The following description of the background of the present technology is provided simply as an aid in understanding the present technology and is not admitted to describe or constitute prior art to the present technology.
[0005] In spite of the dependence risk, opioids are a necessary component in the perioperative analgesic regimen. Studies suggest that opioids augment tumor growth and metastasis, possibly through reduction of natural killer (NK) cell activity, T-lymphocyte proliferation, and cytokine secretion (Cata JP, Gottumukkala V, Sessler DI, European Journal of Pain Supplements. 5(2):345-355 (2011)). And while surgery remains the primary and most effective treatment option for most resectable cancers, tumor resection itself can induce systemic dissemination of cancer cells despite optimal surgical technique (Bar-Yosef S et al ., Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 94(6): 1066-1073 (2001)). By combining the immunosuppressive effects of opioids administered intraoperatively with the surgical stress response, the surgical environment has been hypothesized to magnify the proliferation of minimal residual disease (Looney et al., Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 113(5): 1118-1125 (2010); Retsky M et al., International Journal of Surgery. 3(3): 179-187 (2005)). [0006] The relationship between opioid exposure and oncologic outcomes may vary according to cancer type or subtype. While opioids may support tumor pathogenesis in some solid cancers (Maher DP et al, Br J Anaesth. 113 Suppl l:i88-94 (2014); Cata JP et al. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 27(8):672-679 (2015); Cata JP et al, Cancer medicine. 3(4):900-908 (2014); Silagy et al. British journal of anaesthesia. S0007-0912 (0020) 30496- 30497 (2020)), in others they may be neutral or even protective (Du KN et al, Anesthesia &
Analgesia. 127(1):210-216 (2018)).
[0007] Accordingly, there is an urgent need for developing reliable and accurate methods for predicting whether a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung or colon cancer will benefit from treatment with intraoperative opioid analgesics. SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT TECHNOLOGY
[0008] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) detecting the presence of at least one mutation in one or more genes that results (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of the Hippo pathway in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery. The one or more genes may be selected from the group consisting of NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, CTNNB1, AXIN2, APC and AMER1. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the at least one mutation is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation. The at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. [0009] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of one or more of NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, AXIN2, APC and AMER1 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of CTNNBl in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, mRNA expression levels are detected via real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
[0010] In any of the preceding embodiments of methods disclosed herein, the intraoperative opioid analgesic is fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. The effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic may range from about 1 MME to about 200 MMEs. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs, about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs, or about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME, about 2 MMEs, about 3 MMEs, about 4 MMEs, about 5 MMEs, about 6 MMEs, about 7 MMEs, about 8 MMEs, about 9 MMEs, about 10 MMEs, about 11 MMEs, about 12 MMEs, about 13 MMEs, about 14 MMEs, about 15 MMEs, about 16 MMEs, about 17 MMEs, about 18 MMEs, about 19 MMEs, about 20 MMEs, about 21 MMEs, about 22 MMEs, about 23 MMEs, about 24 MMEs, about 25 MMEs, about 26 MMEs, about 27 MMEs, about 28 MMEs, about 29 MMEs, about 30 MMEs, about 31 MMEs, about 32 MMEs, about 33 MMEs, about 34 MMEs, about 35 MMEs, about 36 MMEs, about 37 MMEs, about 38 MMEs, about 39 MMEs, about 40-45 MMEs, about 45-50 MMEs, about 50-55 MMEs, about 55-60 MMEs, about 60-65 MMEs, about 65-70 MMEs, about 70-75 MMEs, about 75-80 MMEs, about 80-85 MMEs, about 85-90 MMEs, about 90-95 MMEs, about 95-100 MMEs, about 100-110 MMEs, about 110-120 MMEs, about 120-130 MMEs, about 130-140 MMEs, about 140-150 MMEs, about 150-160 MMEs, about 160-170 MMEs, about 170-180 MMEs, about 180-190 MMEs, or about 190-200 MMEs. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously.
[0011] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a local anesthetic solution via an epidural catheter before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery. The effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%- 4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is administered as a single injection, a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may be administered before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery using any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall ( e.g ., via serratus plane nerve block, intercostal nerve block, or paravertebral block). The effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered using any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall (e.g., via serratus plane nerve block, intercostal nerve block, or paravertebral block). Examples of suitable local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine. Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may further comprise an opioid (e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil). In some embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may comprise 0.5 mcg/ml- 50 mcg/ml opioid.
[0012] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post- operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery. Examples of post-operative opioid analgesics include, but are not limited to, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. In some embodiments, the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same opioid analgesic or different opioid analgesics. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg to about 100 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg, about 0.006 mg, about 0.007 mg, about 0.008 mg, about 0.009 mg, about 0.01 mg, about 0.02 mg, about 0.03 mg, about 0.04 mg, about 0.05 mg, about 0.06 mg, about 0.07 mg, about 0.08 mg, about 0.09 mg, about 0.1 mg, about 0.2 mg, about 0.3 mg, about 0.4 mg, about 0.5 mg, about 0.6 mg, about 0.7 mg, about 0.8 mg, about 0.9 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1- 5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 10-15 mg, about 15-20 mg, about 20-25 mg, about 25-30 mg, about 30-35 mg, about 35-40 mg, about 40-45 mg, about 45-50 mg, about 50-55 mg, about 55-60 mg, about 60-65 mg, about 65-70 mg, about 70-75 mg, about 75-80 mg, about 80-85 mg, about 85-90 mg, about 90-95 mg, or about 95-100 mg. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic may be continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr to about 10 mg/hr. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr, about 0.02 mg/hr, about 0.03 mg/hr, about 0.04 mg/hr, about 0.05 mg/hr, about 0.06 mg/hr, about 0.07 mg/hr, about 0.08 mg/hr, about 0.09 mg/hr, about 0.1 mg/hr, about 0.2 mg/hr, about 0.3 mg/hr, about 0.4 mg/hr, about 0.5 mg/hr, about 0.6 mg/hr, about 0.7 mg/hr, about 0.8 mg/hr, about 0.9 mg/hr, about 1 mg/hr, about 1.5 mg/hr, about 2 mg/hr, about 2.5 mg/hr, about 3 mg/hr, about 3.5 mg/hr, about 4 mg/hr, about 4.5 mg/hr, about 5 mg/hr, about 5.5 mg/hr, about 6 mg/hr, about 6.5 mg/hr, about 7 mg/hr, about 7.5 mg/hr, about 8 mg/hr, about 8.5 mg/hr, about 9 mg/hr, about 9.5 mg/hr, or about 10 mg/hr. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously, orally, or transdermally.
[0013] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer for treatment with an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic comprising (a) (i) detecting the presence of at least one mutation in CDKN2A in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient, wherein the at least one mutation reduces CDKN2A expression and/or activity levels, and/or (ii) detecting elevated FGA in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient compared to a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery. The at least one mutation in CDKN2A may be a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation. The at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, FGA is detected via next-generation sequencing.
[0014] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of CDKN2A in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, mRNA expression levels are detected via real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase- PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein FGA in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient is elevated compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, FGA is detected via next-generation sequencing.
[0015] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is an amide-type local anesthetic or an ester- type local anesthetic. Examples of amide-type local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, or !evobupivacaine. Examples of ester-type local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chioroprocaine, or benzocaine. The opioid-free intraoperative analgesic may be administered via an epidural catheter. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is about 0.05%-4% amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic may be administered as a single injection, a series of bolus doses, or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery.
[0016] In certain embodiments, the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic may be administered via any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall, such as via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block, or via a paravertebral block. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is about 0.05%-4% amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered via any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall, such as via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block, or via a paravertebral block.
[0017] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free post-operative analgesic after the tumor resection surgery. Examples of suitable opioid-free post-operative analgesics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine. In some embodiments, the opioid-free post operative analgesic and the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic are the same analgesic or different analgesics. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the opioid-free post operative analgesic and the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic are the same or different. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the opioid-free post operative analgesic is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8
%, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5
%, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about 3.2
%, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about 3.9
%, or about 4.0 % amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 10 ml, about 12.5 ml, about 15 ml, about 17.5 ml, about 20 ml, about 22.5 ml, about 25 ml, about 27.5 ml, about 30 ml, about 32.5 ml, about 35 ml, about 37.5 ml, or about 40 ml when administered via any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall, such as via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block, or via a paravertebral block.
[0018] In any and all embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient exhibits stage I, stage II or stage III lung cancer. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient has been diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The histologic subtype of the lung adenocarcinoma may be lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, solid or unknown.
[0019] In any of the preceding embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient may or may not have received an adjuvant therapy. The adjuvant therapy may be chemotherapy, lobectomy, radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy.
[0020] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the patient is human.
[0021] In any and all embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient comprises biopsied tumor tissue, whole blood, plasma, or serum. [0022] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced or undetectable compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and/or PMS2 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[0023] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, IL1RN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, IL1RN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRB1, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 are assayed via next- generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[0024] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPY1R, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[0025] In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient relative to a predetermined threshold; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises at least one mutation that results in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the at least one mutation is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation. The at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[0026] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the reduced activity of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNBl, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEYl, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAML1, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6. In certain embodiments, the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNBl, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEYl, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAML1, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6 are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[0027] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB. In certain embodiments, the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[0028] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for reducing the risk of tumor recurrence in a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the cancer patient comprises at least one alteration in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system (e.g., MMR deficiency). In some embodiments, mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of one or more of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced or undetectable compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRB1, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the mRNA or polypeptide levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPY1R, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFR1, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises at least one genetic mutation or altered expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature. In some embodiments, the reduced activity of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNB1, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6. In other embodiments, the hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3,
ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB.
[0029] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the preceding embodiments, genetic mutations or mRNA expression levels are detected via next generation sequencing, RNA-seq, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase- PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, Immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
[0030] In any of the preceding embodiments of methods disclosed herein, the intraoperative opioid analgesic is fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. The effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic may range from about 1 MME to about 200 MMEs. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs, about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs, or about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME, about 2 MMEs, about 3 MMEs, about 4 MMEs, about 5 MMEs, about 6 MMEs, about 7 MMEs, about 8 MMEs, about 9 MMEs, about 10 MMEs, about 11 MMEs, about 12 MMEs, about 13 MMEs, about 14 MMEs, about 15 MMEs, about 16 MMEs, about 17 MMEs, about 18 MMEs, about 19 MMEs, about 20 MMEs, about 21 MMEs, about 22 MMEs, about 23 MMEs, about 24 MMEs, about 25 MMEs, about 26 MMEs, about 27 MMEs, about 28 MMEs, about 29 MMEs, about 30 MMEs, about 31 MMEs, about 32 MMEs, about 33 MMEs, about 34 MMEs, about 35 MMEs, about 36 MMEs, about 37 MMEs, about 38 MMEs, about 39 MMEs, about 40-45 MMEs, about 45-50 MMEs, about 50-55 MMEs, about 55-60 MMEs, about 60-65 MMEs, about 65-70 MMEs, about 70-75 MMEs, about 75-80 MMEs, about 80- 85 MMEs, about 85-90 MMEs, about 90-95 MMEs, about 95-100 MMEs, about 100-110 MMEs, about 110-120 MMEs, about 120-130 MMEs, about 130-140 MMEs, about 140-150 MMEs, about 150-160 MMEs, about 160-170 MMEs, about 170-180 MMEs, about 180-190 MMEs, or about 190-200 MMEs. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously.
[0031] In any and all of the preceding embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability -high (MSI-H) tumors. [0032] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a local anesthetic solution via an epidural catheter before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery. The effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%- 4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about
1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about
2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about
2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about 3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about 3.9 %, or about 4.0 % local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 1 ml per hour, about 1.5 ml per hour, about 2 ml per hour, about 2.5 ml per hour, about 3 ml per hour, about 3.5 ml per hour, about 4 ml per hour, about 4.5 ml per hour, about 5 ml per hour, about 5.5 ml per hour, about 6 ml per hour, about 6.5 ml per hour, about 7 ml per hour, about 7.5 ml per hour, about 8 ml per hour, about 8.5 ml per hour, about 9 ml per hour, about 9.5 ml per hour, or about 10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is administered as a single injection, series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. Examples of suitable local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
[0033] In other embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may be administered before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer ( e.g ., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). The effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). In some embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about 3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about 3.9 %, or about 4.0 % local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 10 ml, about 12.5 ml, about 15 ml, about 17.5 ml, about 20 ml, about 22.5 ml, about 25 ml, about 27.5 ml, about 30 ml, about 32.5 ml, about 35 ml, about 37.5 ml, or about 40 ml when administered using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). Examples of suitable local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine. [0034] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may further comprise an opioid (e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil). In some embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may comprise 0.5 mcg/ml-50 mcg/ml opioid. In certain embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may comprise about 0.5 mcg/ml, about 0.6 mcg/ml, about 0.7 mcg/ml, about 0.8 mcg/ml, about 0.9 mcg/ml, about 1.0 mcg/ml, about 1.5 mcg/ml, about 2.0 mcg/ml, about 2.5 mcg/ml, about 3.0 mcg/ml, about 3.5 mcg/ml, about 4.0 mcg/ml, about 4.5 mcg/ml, about 5.0 mcg/ml, about 5.5 mcg/ml, about 6.0 mcg/ml, about 6.5 mcg/ml, about 7.0 mcg/ml, about 7.5 mcg/ml, about 8.0 mcg/ml, about 8.5 mcg/ml, about 9.0 mcg/ml, about 10 mcg/ml, about 15 mcg/ml, about 20 mcg/ml, about 25 mcg/ml, about 30 mcg/ml, about 35 mcg/ml, about 40 mcg/ml, about 45 mcg/ml, or about 50 mcg/ml.
[0035] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery. Examples of post-operative opioid analgesics include, but are not limited to, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. In some embodiments, the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same opioid analgesic or different opioid analgesics. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg to about 100 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg, about 0.006 mg, about 0.007 mg, about 0.008 mg, about 0.009 mg, about 0.01 mg, about 0.02 mg, about 0.03 mg, about 0.04 mg, about 0.05 mg, about 0.06 mg, about 0.07 mg, about 0.08 mg, about 0.09 mg, about 0.1 mg, about 0.2 mg, about 0.3 mg, about 0.4 mg, about 0.5 mg, about 0.6 mg, about 0.7 mg, about 0.8 mg, about 0.9 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1- 5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 10-15 mg, about 15-20 mg, about 20-25 mg, about 25-30 mg, about 30-35 mg, about 35-40 mg, about 40-45 mg, about 45-50 mg, about 50-55 mg, about 55-60 mg, about 60-65 mg, about 65-70 mg, about 70-75 mg, about 75-80 mg, about 80-85 mg, about 85-90 mg, about 90-95 mg, or about 95-100 mg. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic may be continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr to about 10 mg/hr. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr, about 0.02 mg/hr, about 0.03 mg/hr, about 0.04 mg/hr, about 0.05 mg/hr, about 0.06 mg/hr, about 0.07 mg/hr, about 0.08 mg/hr, about 0.09 mg/hr, about 0.1 mg/hr, about 0.2 mg/hr, about 0.3 mg/hr, about 0.4 mg/hr, about 0.5 mg/hr, about 0.6 mg/hr, about 0.7 mg/hr, about 0.8 mg/hr, about 0.9 mg/hr, about 1 mg/hr, about 1.5 mg/hr, about 2 mg/hr, about 2.5 mg/hr, about 3 mg/hr, about 3.5 mg/hr, about 4 mg/hr, about 4.5 mg/hr, about 5 mg/hr, about 5.5 mg/hr, about 6 mg/hr, about 6.5 mg/hr, about 7 mg/hr, about 7.5 mg/hr, about 8 mg/hr, about 8.5 mg/hr, about 9 mg/hr, about 9.5 mg/hr, or about 10 mg/hr. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously, orally, or transdermally.
[0036] Additionally or alternatively, in any and all embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of one or more non-opioid analgesics selected from among ketamine, dexmedetomidine, a carboxylic acid derivative NS AID, or acetaminophen.
[0037] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered intravenously. The effective amount of ketamine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively. [0038] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is infused at a rate of 0.04 mg/kg/hr-2.5 mg/kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is infused at a rate of about 0.04 mg/kg/hr, about 0.05 mg/kg/hr, about 0.06 mg/kg/hr, about 0.07 mg/kg/hr, about 0.08 mg/kg/hr, about 0.09 mg/kg/hr, about 0.1 mg/kg/hr, about 0.2 mg/kg/hr, about 0.3 mg/kg/hr, about 0.4 mg/kg/hr, about 0.5 mg/kg/hr, about 0.6 mg/kg/hr, about 0.7 mg/kg/hr, about 0.8 mg/kg/hr, about 0.9 mg/kg/hr, about 1.0 mg/kg/hr, about 1.1 mg/kg/hr, about 1.2 mg/kg/hr, about 1.3 mg/kg/hr, about 1.4 mg/kg/hr, about 1.5 mg/kg/hr, about 1.6 mg/kg/hr, about 1.7 mg/kg/hr, about 1.8 mg/kg/hr, about 1.9 mg/kg/hr, about 2.0 mg/kg/hr, about 2.1 mg/kg/hr, about 2.2 mg/kg/hr, about 2.3 mg/kg/hr, about 2.4 mg/kg/hr, or about 2.5 mg/kg/hr.
[0039] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered as a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg -4.5 mg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered as a bolus of about 0.04 mg/kg, about 0.05 mg/kg, about 0.06 mg/kg, about 0.07 mg/kg, about 0.08 mg/kg, about 0.09 mg/kg, about 0.1 mg/kg, about 0.2 mg/kg, about 0.3 mg/kg, about 0.4 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.6 mg/kg, about 0.7 mg/kg, about 0.8 mg/kg, about 0.9 mg/kg, about 1.0 mg/kg, about 1.1 mg/kg, about 1.2 mg/kg, about 1.3 mg/kg, about 1.4 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 1.6 mg/kg, about 1.7 mg/kg, about 1.8 mg/kg, about 1.9 mg/kg, about 2.0 mg/kg, about 2.1 mg/kg, about 2.2 mg/kg, about 2.3 mg/kg, about 2.4 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg, about 2.6 mg/kg, about 2.7 mg/kg, about 2.8 mg/kg, about 2.9 mg/kg, about 3.0 mg/kg, about 3.1 mg/kg, about 3.2 mg/kg, about 3.3 mg/kg, about 3.4 mg/kg, about 3.5 mg/kg, about 3.6 mg/kg, about 3.7 mg/kg, about 3.8 mg/kg, about 3.9 mg/kg, about 4.0 mg/kg, about 4.1 mg/kg, about 4.2 mg/kg, about 4.3 mg/kg, about 4.4 mg/kg, or about 4.5 mg/kg.
[0040] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of about 4-13 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of 4 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 11 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, or 13 mg/kg. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of about 6-10 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg.
[0041] In any and all of the preceding embodiments of methods disclosed herein, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is an acetic acid NSAID or a propionic acid NSAID. Examples of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID include, but are not limited to, ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, naproxen, fenoprofen, ketoprofen, dexketoprofen, flurbiprofen, oxaprozin, loxoprofen, pelubiprofen, zaltoprofen, indomethacin, tolmetin, sulindac, etodolac, ketorolac, diclofenac, aceclofenac, bromfenac, or nabumeton. In some embodiments, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered orally, intravenously, or intramuscularly. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. The effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID may be administered to the cancer patient during closing of an incision.
[0042] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg-1500 mg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg, about 15 mg, about 20 mg, about 25 mg, about 30 mg, about 35 mg, about 40 mg, about 45 mg, about 50 mg, about 55 mg, about 60 mg, about 65 mg, about 70 mg, about 75 mg, about 80 mg, about 85 mg, about 90 mg, about 95 mg, about 100 mg, about 150 mg, about 200 mg, about 250 mg, about 300 mg, about 350 mg, about 400 mg, about 450 mg, about 500 mg, about 550 mg, about 600 mg, about 650 mg, about 700 mg, about 750 mg, about 800 mg, about 850 mg, about 900 mg, about 950 mg, about 1000 mg, about 1050 mg, about 1100 mg, about 1150 mg, about 1200 mg, about 1250 mg, about 1300 mg, about 1350 mg, about 1400 mg, about 1450 mg, or about 1500 mg. [0043] In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative
NSAID is administered as a bolus dose during the tumor resection surgery. In a further embodiment, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of 0.25 mg/kg- 10 mg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of about 0.25 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.75 mg/kg, about 1 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 2 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg, about 3 mg/kg, about 3.5 mg/kg, about 4 mg/kg, about 4.5 mg/kg, about 5 mg/kg, about 5.5 mg/kg, about 6 mg/kg, about 6.5 mg/kg, about 7 mg/kg, about 7.5 mg/kg, about 8 mg/kg, about 8.5 mg/kg, about 9 mg/kg, about 9.5 mg/kg, or about 10 mg/kg.
[0044] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen is administered preoperatively, intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen may range from about 80 mg to about 1000 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen is about 80 mg, about 90 mg, about 100 mg, about 110 mg, about 120 mg, about 130 mg, about 140 mg, about 150 mg, about 160 mg, about 170 mg, about 180 mg, about 190 mg, about 200 mg, about 210 mg, about 220 mg, about 230 mg, about 240 mg, about 250 mg, about 260 mg, about 270 mg, about 280 mg, about 290 mg, about 300 mg, about 310 mg, about 320 mg, about 330 mg, about 340 mg, about 350 mg, about 360 mg, about 370 mg, about 380 mg, about 390 mg, about 400 mg, about 410 mg, about 420 mg, about 430 mg, about 440 mg, about 450 mg, about 460 mg, about 470 mg, about 480 mg, about 490 mg, about 500 mg, about 510 mg, about 520 mg, about 530 mg, about 540 mg, about 550 mg, about 560 mg, about 570 mg, about 580 mg, about 590 mg, about 600 mg, about 610 mg, about 620 mg, about 630 mg, about 640 mg, about 650 mg, about 660 mg, about 670 mg, about 680 mg, about 690 mg, about 700 mg, about 710 mg, about 720 mg, about 730 mg, about 740 mg, about 750 mg, about 760 mg, about 770 mg, about 780 mg, about 790 mg, about 800 mg, about 810 mg, about 820 mg, about 830 mg, about 840 mg, about 850 mg, about 860 mg, about 870 mg, about 880 mg, about 890 mg, about 900 mg, about 910 mg, about 920 mg, about 930 mg, about 940 mg, about 950 mg, about 960 mg, about 970 mg, about 980 mg, about 990 mg, or about 1000 mg. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen may be administered as a series of bolus doses, or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In some embodiments, the acetaminophen is administered intravenously, or orally.
[0045] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of dexmedetomidine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively. In some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is administered intravenously, transdermally, intramuscularly, orally, buccally, or intranasally.
[0046] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of 0.05 pg/kg/hr to 0.7 pg /kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of about 0.05 pg/kg/hr, about 0.06 pg/kg/hr, about 0.07 pg/kg/hr, about 0.08 pg/kg/hr, about 0.09 pg/kg/hr, about 0.1 pg/kg/hr, 0.15 pg/kg/hr, about 0.2 pg/kg/hr, about 0.25 pg/kg/hr, about 0.3 pg/kg/hr, about 0.35 pg/kg/hr, about 0.4 pg/kg/hr, about 0.45 pg/kg/hr, about 0.5 pg/kg/hr, about 0.55 pg/kg/hr, about 0.6 pg/kg/hr, about 0.65 pg/kg/hr, or about 0.7 pg/kg/hr. [0047] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of 0.05 pg/kg - 1 pg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of about 0.05 pg/kg, about 0.06 pg/kg, about 0.07 pg/kg, about 0.08 pg/kg, about 0.09 pg/kg, about 0.1 pg/kg, about 0.15 gg/kg, about 0.2 gg/kg, about 0.25 gg/kg, about 0.3 gg/kg, about 0.35 gg/kg, about 0.4 gg/kg, about 0.45 gg/kg, about 0.5 gg/kg, about 0.55 gg/kg, about 0.6 gg/kg, about 0.65 gg/kg, about 0.7 gg/kg, about 0.75 gg/kg, about 0.8 gg/kg, about 0.85 gg/kg, about 0.9 gg/kg, about 0.95 gg/kg, or about 1.0 gg/kg. [0048] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
[0049] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, IL1RN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAMl, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
[0050] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRD1, ABCB1, SCT, NTS, NPFFR1, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1 A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRD1, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR),
Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
[0051] In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient relative to a predetermined threshold; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises at least one mutation that results in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the at least one mutation is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation. The at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability- low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
[0052] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the hyperactivation of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNKIE, CTNNB1, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAML1, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKDl, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6. In certain embodiments, the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNKIE, CTNNBl, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKDl, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6 are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[0053] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the reduced activity of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB. In certain embodiments, the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, Immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[0054] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for reducing the risk of tumor recurrence in a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the cancer patient does not comprise any alterations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. In some embodiments, mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the mRNA or polypeptide levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises at least one genetic mutation or altered expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature. In some embodiments, the hyperactivation of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM 17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNB1, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HD AC 5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6. In other embodiments, the reduced activity of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
[0055] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the preceding embodiments, genetic mutations or mRNA expression levels are detected via next generation sequencing, RNA-seq, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase- PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
[0056] The intraoperative opioid analgesic may be fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. The effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic may range from about 1 MME to about 200 MMEs. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs, about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs, or about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME, about 2 MMEs, about 3 MMEs, about 4 MMEs, about 5 MMEs, about 6 MMEs, about 7 MMEs, about 8 MMEs, about 9 MMEs, about 10 MMEs, about 11 MMEs, about 12 MMEs, about 13 MMEs, about 14 MMEs, about 15 MMEs, about 16 MMEs, about 17 MMEs, about 18 MMEs, about 19 MMEs, about 20 MMEs, about 21 MMEs, about 22 MMEs, about 23 MMEs, about 24 MMEs, about 25 MMEs, about 26 MMEs, about 27 MMEs, about 28 MMEs, about 29 MMEs, about 30 MMEs, about 31 MMEs, about 32 MMEs, about 33 MMEs, about 34 MMEs, about 35 MMEs, about 36 MMEs, about 37 MMEs, about 38 MMEs, about 39 MMEs, about 40-45 MMEs, about 45-50 MMEs, about 50-55 MMEs, about 55-60 MMEs, about 60-65 MMEs, about 65-70 MMEs, about 70-75 MMEs, about 75- 80 MMEs, about 80-85 MMEs, about 85-90 MMEs, about 90-95 MMEs, about 95-100 MMEs, about 100-110 MMEs, about 110-120 MMEs, about 120-130 MMEs, about 130-140 MMEs, about 140-150 MMEs, about 150-160 MMEs, about 160-170 MMEs, about 170-180 MMEs, about 180-190 MMEs, or about 190-200 MMEs. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously.
[0057] Examples of non-opioid analgesics include regional anesthetics, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, a carboxylic acid derivative NS AID, or acetaminophen.
[0058] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a regional anesthetic solution via an epidural catheter before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery. The effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% regional anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about
1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about
1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about
3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about
3.9 %, or about 4.0 % regional anesthetic solution in a volume of about 1 ml per hour, about 1.5 ml per hour, about 2 ml per hour, about 2.5 ml per hour, about 3 ml per hour, about 3.5 ml per hour, about 4 ml per hour, about 4.5 ml per hour, about 5 ml per hour, about 5.5 ml per hour, about 6 ml per hour, about 6.5 ml per hour, about 7 ml per hour, about 7.5 ml per hour, about 8 ml per hour, about 8.5 ml per hour, about 9 ml per hour, about 9.5 ml per hour, or about 10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution is administered as a single injection, series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. Examples of suitable regional anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine. [0059] In other embodiments, the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution may be administered before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer ( e.g ., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). The effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% regional anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). In some embodiments, the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about
1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about
2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about
3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about
3.9 %, or about 4.0 % regional anesthetic solution in a volume of about 10 ml, about 12.5 ml, about 15 ml, about 17.5 ml, about 20 ml, about 22.5 ml, about 25 ml, about 27.5 ml, about 30 ml, about 32.5 ml, about 35 ml, about 37.5 ml, or about 40 ml when administered using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). Examples of suitable regional anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
[0060] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the regional anesthetic solution may further comprise an opioid (e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil). In some embodiments, the regional anesthetic solution may comprise 0.5 mcg/ml-50 mcg/ml opioid. In certain embodiments, the regional anesthetic solution may comprise about 0.5 mcg/ml, about 0.6 mcg/ml, about 0.7 mcg/ml, about 0.8 mcg/ml, about 0.9 mcg/ml, about 1.0 mcg/ml, about 1.5 mcg/ml, about 2.0 mcg/ml, about 2.5 mcg/ml, about 3.0 mcg/ml, about 3.5 mcg/ml, about 4.0 mcg/ml, about 4.5 mcg/ml, about 5.0 mcg/ml, about 5.5 mcg/ml, about 6.0 mcg/ml, about 6.5 mcg/ml, about 7.0 mcg/ml, about 7.5 mcg/ml, about 8.0 mcg/ml, about 8.5 mcg/ml, about 9.0 mcg/ml, about 10 mcg/ml, about 15 mcg/ml, about 20 mcg/ml, about 25 mcg/ml, about 30 mcg/ml, about 35 mcg/ml, about 40 mcg/ml, about 45 mcg/ml, or about 50 mcg/ml. [0061] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery. Examples of post-operative opioid analgesics include, but are not limited to, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. In some embodiments, the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same opioid analgesic or different opioid analgesics. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg to about 100 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg, about 0.006 mg, about 0.007 mg, about 0.008 mg, about 0.009 mg, about 0.01 mg, about 0.02 mg, about 0.03 mg, about 0.04 mg, about 0.05 mg, about 0.06 mg, about 0.07 mg, about 0.08 mg, about 0.09 mg, about 0.1 mg, about 0.2 mg, about 0.3 mg, about 0.4 mg, about 0.5 mg, about 0.6 mg, about 0.7 mg, about 0.8 mg, about 0.9 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1- 5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 10-15 mg, about 15-20 mg, about 20-25 mg, about 25-30 mg, about 30-35 mg, about 35-40 mg, about 40-45 mg, about 45-50 mg, about 50-55 mg, about 55-60 mg, about 60-65 mg, about 65-70 mg, about 70-75 mg, about 75-80 mg, about 80-85 mg, about 85-90 mg, about 90-95 mg, or about 95-100 mg. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic may be continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr to about 10 mg/hr. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr, about 0.02 mg/hr, about 0.03 mg/hr, about 0.04 mg/hr, about 0.05 mg/hr, about 0.06 mg/hr, about 0.07 mg/hr, about 0.08 mg/hr, about 0.09 mg/hr, about 0.1 mg/hr, about 0.2 mg/hr, about 0.3 mg/hr, about 0.4 mg/hr, about 0.5 mg/hr, about 0.6 mg/hr, about 0.7 mg/hr, about 0.8 mg/hr, about 0.9 mg/hr, about 1 mg/hr, about 1.5 mg/hr, about 2 mg/hr, about 2.5 mg/hr, about 3 mg/hr, about 3.5 mg/hr, about 4 mg/hr, about 4.5 mg/hr, about 5 mg/hr, about 5.5 mg/hr, about 6 mg/hr, about 6.5 mg/hr, about 7 mg/hr, about 7.5 mg/hr, about 8 mg/hr, about 8.5 mg/hr, about 9 mg/hr, about 9.5 mg/hr, or about 10 mg/hr. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously, orally, or transdermally.
[0062] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered intravenously. The effective amount of ketamine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively.
[0063] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is infused at a rate of 0.04 mg/kg/hr-2.5 mg/kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is infused at a rate of about 0.04 mg/kg/hr, about 0.05 mg/kg/hr, about 0.06 mg/kg/hr, about 0.07 mg/kg/hr, about 0.08 mg/kg/hr, about 0.09 mg/kg/hr, about 0.1 mg/kg/hr, about 0.2 mg/kg/hr, about 0.3 mg/kg/hr, about 0.4 mg/kg/hr, about 0.5 mg/kg/hr, about 0.6 mg/kg/hr, about 0.7 mg/kg/hr, about 0.8 mg/kg/hr, about 0.9 mg/kg/hr, about 1.0 mg/kg/hr, about 1.1 mg/kg/hr, about 1.2 mg/kg/hr, about 1.3 mg/kg/hr, about 1.4 mg/kg/hr, about 1.5 mg/kg/hr, about 1.6 mg/kg/hr, about 1.7 mg/kg/hr, about 1.8 mg/kg/hr, about 1.9 mg/kg/hr, about 2.0 mg/kg/hr, about 2.1 mg/kg/hr, about 2.2 mg/kg/hr, about 2.3 mg/kg/hr, about 2.4 mg/kg/hr, or about 2.5 mg/kg/hr.
[0064] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered as a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg -4.5 mg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered as a bolus of about 0.04 mg/kg, about 0.05 mg/kg, about 0.06 mg/kg, about 0.07 mg/kg, about 0.08 mg/kg, about 0.09 mg/kg, about 0.1 mg/kg, about 0.2 mg/kg, about 0.3 mg/kg, about 0.4 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.6 mg/kg, about 0.7 mg/kg, about 0.8 mg/kg, about 0.9 mg/kg, about 1.0 mg/kg, about 1.1 mg/kg, about 1.2 mg/kg, about 1.3 mg/kg, about 1.4 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 1.6 mg/kg, about 1.7 mg/kg, about 1.8 mg/kg, about 1.9 mg/kg, about 2.0 mg/kg, about 2.1 mg/kg, about 2.2 mg/kg, about 2.3 mg/kg, about 2.4 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg, about 2.6 mg/kg, about 2.7 mg/kg, about 2.8 mg/kg, about 2.9 mg/kg, about 3.0 mg/kg, about 3.1 mg/kg, about 3.2 mg/kg, about 3.3 mg/kg, about 3.4 mg/kg, about 3.5 mg/kg, about 3.6 mg/kg, about 3.7 mg/kg, about 3.8 mg/kg, about 3.9 mg/kg, about 4.0 mg/kg, about 4.1 mg/kg, about 4.2 mg/kg, about 4.3 mg/kg, about 4.4 mg/kg, or about 4.5 mg/kg.
[0065] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of about 4-13 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of 4 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 11 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, or 13 mg/kg. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of about 6-10 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg.
[0066] In any and all of the preceding embodiments of methods disclosed herein, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is an acetic acid NSAID or a propionic acid NSAID. Examples of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID include, but are not limited to, ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, naproxen, fenoprofen, ketoprofen, dexketoprofen, flurbiprofen, oxaprozin, loxoprofen, pelubiprofen, zaltoprofen, indomethacin, tolmetin, sulindac, etodolac, ketorolac, diclofenac, aceclofenac, bromfenac, or nabumeton. In some embodiments, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered orally, intravenously, or intramuscularly. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. The effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID may be administered to the cancer patient during closing of an incision.
[0067] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg-1500 mg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg, about 15 mg, about 20 mg, about 25 mg, about 30 mg, about 35 mg, about 40 mg, about 45 mg, about 50 mg, about 55 mg, about 60 mg, about 65 mg, about 70 mg, about 75 mg, about 80 mg, about 85 mg, about 90 mg, about 95 mg, about 100 mg, about 150 mg, about 200 mg, about 250 mg, about 300 mg, about 350 mg, about 400 mg, about 450 mg, about 500 mg, about 550 mg, about 600 mg, about 650 mg, about 700 mg, about 750 mg, about 800 mg, about 850 mg, about 900 mg, about 950 mg, about 1000 mg, about 1050 mg, about 1100 mg, about 1150 mg, about 1200 mg, about 1250 mg, about 1300 mg, about 1350 mg, about 1400 mg, about 1450 mg, or about 1500 mg. [0068] In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus dose during the tumor resection surgery. In a further embodiment, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of 0.25 mg/kg- 10 mg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of about 0.25 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.75 mg/kg, about 1 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 2 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg, about 3 mg/kg, about 3.5 mg/kg, about 4 mg/kg, about 4.5 mg/kg, about 5 mg/kg, about 5.5 mg/kg, about 6 mg/kg, about 6.5 mg/kg, about 7 mg/kg, about 7.5 mg/kg, about 8 mg/kg, about 8.5 mg/kg, about 9 mg/kg, about 9.5 mg/kg, or about 10 mg/kg.
[0069] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen is administered preoperatively, intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen may range from about 80 mg to about 1000 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen is about 80 mg, about 90 mg, about 100 mg, about 110 mg, about 120 mg, about 130 mg, about 140 mg, about 150 mg, about 160 mg, about 170 mg, about 180 mg, about 190 mg, about 200 mg, about 210 mg, about 220 mg, about 230 mg, about 240 mg, about 250 mg, about 260 mg, about 270 mg, about 280 mg, about 290 mg, about 300 mg, about 310 mg, about 320 mg, about 330 mg, about 340 mg, about 350 mg, about 360 mg, about 370 mg, about 380 mg, about 390 mg, about 400 mg, about 410 mg, about 420 mg, about 430 mg, about 440 mg, about 450 mg, about 460 mg, about 470 mg, about 480 mg, about 490 mg, about 500 mg, about 510 mg, about 520 mg, about 530 mg, about 540 mg, about 550 mg, about 560 mg, about 570 mg, about 580 mg, about 590 mg, about 600 mg, about 610 mg, about 620 mg, about 630 mg, about 640 mg, about 650 mg, about 660 mg, about 670 mg, about 680 mg, about 690 mg, about 700 mg, about 710 mg, about 720 mg, about 730 mg, about 740 mg, about 750 mg, about 760 mg, about 770 mg, about 780 mg, about 790 mg, about 800 mg, about 810 mg, about 820 mg, about 830 mg, about 840 mg, about 850 mg, about 860 mg, about 870 mg, about 880 mg, about 890 mg, about 900 mg, about 910 mg, about 920 mg, about 930 mg, about 940 mg, about 950 mg, about 960 mg, about 970 mg, about 980 mg, about 990 mg, or about 1000 mg. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen may be administered as a series of bolus doses, or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In some embodiments, the acetaminophen is administered intravenously, or orally. [0070] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of dexmedetomidine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively. In some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is administered intravenously, transdermally, intramuscularly, orally, buccally, or intranasally. [0071] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of 0.05 pg/kg/hr to 0.7 pg /kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of about 0.05 pg/kg/hr, about 0.06 pg/kg/hr, about 0.07 pg/kg/hr, about 0.08 pg/kg/hr, about 0.09 pg/kg/hr, about 0.1 pg/kg/hr, 0.15 pg/kg/hr, about 0.2 pg/kg/hr, about 0.25 pg/kg/hr, about 0.3 pg/kg/hr, about 0.35 pg/kg/hr, about 0.4 pg/kg/hr, about 0.45 pg/kg/hr, about 0.5 pg/kg/hr, about 0.55 pg/kg/hr, about 0.6 pg/kg/hr, about 0.65 pg/kg/hr, or about 0.7 pg/kg/hr.
[0072] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of 0.05 pg/kg - 1 pg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of about 0.05 pg/kg, about 0.06 pg/kg, about 0.07 pg/kg, about 0.08 pg/kg, about 0.09 pg/kg, about 0.1 pg/kg, about
0.15 pg/kg, about 0.2 pg/kg, about 0.25 pg/kg, about 0.3 pg/kg, about 0.35 pg/kg, about 0.4 pg/kg, about 0.45 pg/kg, about 0.5 pg/kg, about 0.55 pg/kg, about 0.6 pg/kg, about 0.65 pg/kg, about 0.7 pg/kg, about 0.75 pg/kg, about 0.8 pg/kg, about 0.85 pg/kg, about 0.9 pg/kg, about 0.95 pg/kg, or about 1.0 pg/kg. [0073] In any and all embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient exhibits stage I, stage II or stage III colon cancer. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient has been diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). The colon adenocarcinoma may be synchronous or non-synchronous. The tumor surgery may be laparoscopic, robotic or open. In certain embodiments, the tumor surgery is segmental or extended.
[0074] In any of the preceding embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient has received/is receiving an adjuvant therapy. The adjuvant therapy may be chemotherapy, radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy. In any of the preceding embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient has not received an adjuvant therapy. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the patient is human. [0075] In any and all embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient comprises biopsied tumor tissue, whole blood, plasma, or serum.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0076] FIGs. 1A-1D show association of intraoperative opioid dose and genetic alterations in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients. FIG. 1A shows oncoprint of alteration frequencies of all genes altered >5% for the overall study cohort. Patients are subdivided by pathologic tumor stage. FIG. IB shows five-year predicted overall survival for patients with high and low FGA and altered and wild-type CDKN2A with increasing intraoperative MME. FIG. 1C shows comparative bar graphs representing alteration rate for each genomic factor by stage. FIG. ID shows co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity between genes across all tumors. FGA: fraction genome altered; WT: wildtype; MME: oral morphine milligram equivalents.
[0077] FIGs. 2A-2D show association of intraoperative MMEs and oncogenic pathway alterations in lung adenocarcinoma patients. FIG. 2A shows oncoprint of alteration frequencies of ten canonical oncogenic pathways for the overall study cohort. Patients are subdivided by pathologic tumor stage. FIG. 2B shows five-year predicted recurrence- specific survival for patients with altered and unaltered Wnt and Hippo pathways. FIG. 2C shows comparative bar graphs representing alteration rate for each oncologic signaling pathway by stage. FIG. 2D shows co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity between oncogenic pathways across all tumors. OS: overall survival; RSS: recurrence-specific survival; MME: oral morphine milligram equivalents.
[0078] FIG. 3 shows Mu-opioid receptor concentrations in patient-matched lung adenocarcinoma and adjacent non-tumor lung tissue. Concentrations are based on optical density measurements derived from enzyme linked immunosorbent assay analysis. Lines signify individual patient matched samples with blue lines indicating those patients with elevated tumor concentrations of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) compared with adjacent lung tissue and yellow lines indicating patients with elevated normal lung tissue MOR concentrations compared to tumor.
[0079] FIG. 4 shows CONSORT diagram describing the exclusion criteria for the patient cohort. MSK-IMPACT™: Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. [0080] FIGs. 5A-5B show analysis of total intraoperative MME in terms of specific opioids received. FIG. 5A shows breakdown by patient of specific opioid type (fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine) as a contribution to total intraoperative MME. FIG. 5B shows cumulative percentage of fentanyl fraction of total intraoperative MME (fentanyl dose divided by total dose).
[0081] FIG. 6 shows estimates of interaction effects between genomic factors and intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents in the multivariable Cox models for overall survival and recurrence-specific survival*. Genomic factors include tumor mutation burden (TMB), fraction genome altered (FGA), all genes altered in >5% of the study cohort, canonical oncogenic pathways (N=10), and number of pathways altered.
[0082] FIG. 7 shows genes altered in oncogenic pathways stratified by pathologic stage.
[0083] FIG. 8 shows a distribution of the FGA within the cohort.
[0084] FIG. 9 shows a loss of function/gain of function plot of the altered oncogenic pathways. [0085] FIG. 10 shows the frequency of the different loss of function/gain of function gene mutations identified in the LEI AD patient cohort.
[0086] FIG. 11 shows the frequency of the different loss of function/gain of function oncogenic pathway mutations identified in the LEI AD patient cohort.
[0087] FIGs. 12A-12C show associations between intraoperative opioid dose, DNA mismatch repair subtype and recurrence. Cumulative incidence functions of recurrence for (FIG. 12A) all patients, (inset) stratified by MMR subtype, and (FIG. 12B) stratified by intraoperative opioid dose (< median: below vs >= median: above median) for (1) dMMR and (r) pMMR patients separately. (FIG. 12C) Model-estimated probability of recurrence at 5 years following surgery over a range of intraoperative MME values based on MMR subtype (for a hypothetical patient with these MVA factor values: T stage=3, N stage=0, BMI=27.5, no adjuvant chemotherapy, no adjunct, and no ketorolac). Shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals for all panels. Abbreviations: MVA, multivariable analysis; MMR, mismatch repair; dMMR, MMR deficient; pMMR, MMR proficient; MME, intraoperative oral morphine milligram equivalents. [0088] FIGs. 13A-13C show associations between intraoperative opioid dose, tumour- infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and recurrence. (FIG. 13A) Distribution of absent versus present increased TILs by DNA mismatch repair (MMR) subtype. Cumulative incidence function of recurrence (FIG. 13B) stratified by absent versus present increased TILs. Shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals. (FIG. 13C) Cumulative incidence function of recurrence stratified by increased TILs (A: absent vs P: present) and intraoperative opioid dose (< med: below vs >= med: above median) for (1) dMMR and (r) pMMR patients separately. Abbreviations: MMR, mismatch repair; dMMR, MMR deficient; pMMR, MMR proficient; TIL, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes; MME, intraoperative oral morphine milligram equivalents; A, absent; P, present.
[0089] FIGs. 14A-14D show differential expression of opioid-related genes in TCGA- COAD. (FIG. 14A) Volcano plot showing differential expression of opioid genes for MSI (dMMR) versus MSS (pMMR) tumours. -LoglO C- value (adjusted for multiple testing) is plotted against log2 (fold change). The horizontal dotted line represents P=0.05. Vertical lines dotted at an absolute fold change of 2. Genes with absolute fold change higher than 2 and P- value<0.05 are coloured in red. (FIG. 14B) SSGSEA analysis correlation plot highlighting major pathways and cell types correlated with MSI upregulated and downregulated opioid genes. For each pairwise correlation the colour and the size of the circle denote the Spearman correlation. (FIG. 14C) SSGSEA correlation of MSI upregulated opioid genes and Thl immune signature and (FIG. 14D) MSI downregulated opioid genes and Wnt beta-catenin pathway; each patient sample is labelled as MSI (blue) or MSS (yellow) and is plotted by normalized SSGSEA scores for the relevant gene sets on the x- and y-axes. Shaded area represents the 95% confidence interval around the best fit line. Abbreviations: TCGA-COAD, The Cancer Genome Atlas Colon Adenocarcinoma; MSI, microsatellite instability; MSS, microsatellite stability; SSGSEA, single-sample gene set enrichment analysis.
[0090] FIG. 15 shows CONSORT diagram. Abbreviations: COAD, colon adenocarcinoma; MMR, mismatch repair.
[0091] FIGs. 16A-16B show cumulative incidence of recurrence stratified by MME (below/above median) for patients (FIG. 16A) without increased TILs and (FIG. 16B) with increased TILs for the subset of patients with TILs data. Shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals. Abbreviations: TILs, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes; MME, oral morphine milligram equivalents.
[0092] FIGs. 17A-17B show Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival stratified by MME (below vs above median) for patients (FIG. 17A) without increased TILs and (FIG. 17B) with increased TILs for the subset of patients with TILs data. Shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals. Abbreviations: TILs, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes; MME, oral morphine milligram equivalents.
[0093] FIGs. 18A-18B show differential expression of opioid receptor genes in TCGA- COAD. Volcano plots showing differential expression of opioid receptor genes for (FIG. 18A) tumour versus normal and (FIG. 18B) MSI (dMMR) versus MSS (pMMR). -LoglO P- value (adjusted for multiple testing) is plotted against log2 (fold change). The horizontal dotted line represents =0.05. Vertical lines dotted at an absolute fold change of 2. Genes with absolute fold change higher than 2 and /J-value<0 05 are coloured in red. Abbreviations: TCGA-COAD, The Cancer Genome Atlas Colon Adenocarcinoma; MSS, microsatellite stability; MSI, microsatellite instability; pMMR, mismatch repair proficient; dMMR, mismatch repair deficient.
[0094] FIG. 19 shows SSGSEA analysis correlation plot showing pairwise correlations between MSI upregulated opioid gene list, MSI downregulated opioid gene list (both in purple), 50 Hallmark pathways (in red), and 25 immune cell type signatures (in blue). For each pairwise correlation, the colour and the size of the circle denote the Spearman correlation. All comparisons shown are adjusted <0.05. Abbreviations: MSS, microsatellite stability; MSI, microsatellite instability; SSGSEA, single-sample gene set enrichment analysis.
[0095] FIG. 20 shows clinicopathologic characteristics for the entire cohort and for MMR subtypes.
[0096] FIG. 21 shows multivariable Competing Risk Regression Analysis for Recurrence. Estimates are pooled from 10 imputed datasets. Model includes clinical factors of interest (intraoperative MMEs, MMR subtype, adjunct, and ketorolac) and statistically significant factors from the univariable analysis for adjusting baseline factors, followed by backwards selection on the adjusting factors.
[0097] FIG. 22 shows univariable competing risk regression analysis for recurrence. Estimates are pooled from 10 imputed datasets.
[0098] FIG. 23 shows univariable Cox regression analysis for overall survival (OS). Estimates are pooled from 10 imputed datasets. [0099] FIG. 24 shows multivariable Cox regression analysis for overall survival (OS).
Estimates are pooled from 10 imputed datasets. Model includes clinical factors of interest (MMR subtype, intraoperative MME, adjunct, and ketorolac) and statistically significant factors from the univariable analysis for adjusting baseline factors, followed by backwards selection on the adjusting factors.
[00100] FIG. 25 shows opioid*MSI and Opioid*MSS gene lists. Log2 (fold change) is for expression in MSI versus MSS. [00101] FIG. 26 shows an analysis of total intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents
(MMEs) in terms of specific opioids received. FIG. 26A: Breakdown by patient of specific opioid type (fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine) as a contribution to total intraoperative MMEs, with patients ordered from highest to lowest MMEs (inset features the top 100 patients). FIG. 26B: Cumulative percentage of patients with each fentanyl fraction of total intraoperative MMEs (fentanyl dose divided by total dose); fentanyl constituted at least 90% of total MMEs for more than 50% of patients and at least 80% of total MMEs for 75% of patients.
[00102] FIG. 27 shows a summary of regional anaesthesia and opioid dose.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION [00103] It is to be appreciated that certain aspects, modes, embodiments, variations and features of the present methods are described below in various levels of detail in order to provide a substantial understanding of the present technology. It is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to particular uses, methods, reagents, compounds, compositions or biological systems, which can, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting.
[00104] In practicing the present methods, many conventional techniques in molecular biology, protein biochemistry, cell biology, microbiology and recombinant DNA are used. See, e.g., Sambrook and Russell eds. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edition; the series Ausubel et al., eds. (2007) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, the series Methods inEnzymology (Academic Press, Inc., N.Y.); MacPherson etal., (1991) PCR 1: A Practical Approach (IRL Press at Oxford University Press); MacPherson et al., (1995) PCR 2: A Practical Approach, Harlow and Lane eds. (1999) Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual, Freshney (2005) Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique, 5th edition; Gait ed. (1984) Oligonucleotide Synthesis, U.S. Patent No. 4,683,195; Hames and Higgins eds. (1984) Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Anderson (1999) Nucleic Acid Hybridization ; Hames and Higgins eds. (1984) Transcription and Translation; Immobilized Cells and Enzymes (IRL Press (1986)); Perbal (1984) A Practical Guide to Molecular Cloning ; Miller and Calos eds. (1987) Gene Transfer Vectors for Mammalian Cells (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory); Makrides ed. (2003) Gene Transfer and Expression in Mammalian Cells ; Mayer and Walker eds. (1987) Immunochemical Methods in Cell and Molecular Biology (Academic Press, London); and Herzenberg et al., eds (1996) Weir’s Handbook of Experimental Immunology.
[00105] The use of intraoperative opioids have been linked to worse oncologic outcomes in cancer patients. The present disclosure demonstrates that lung cancer patients with alterations that disrupt the Hippo signaling pathway as well as alterations that hyperactivate Wnt signaling pathway were associated with improved recurrence-specific survival (RSS) at higher morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) compared to unaltered pathways. Accordingly, such tumorigenic mutations may be useful as biomarkers to predict whether a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer would benefit from treatment with intraoperative opioid analgesics. The present disclosure also demonstrates that higher FGA and CDKN2A loss of function mutations in lung cancer patients were correlated with worse overall survival (OS) with increasing intraoperative MMEs. The present disclosure also demonstrates that colon cancer patients harboring deficiencies in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system (i.e., dMMR) show reduced risk of tumor recurrence when treated with intraoperative opioid analgesics, whereas colon cancer patients with wild- type/proficient DNA mismatch repair system (pMMR) benefit from either opioid or non opioid intraoperative analgesics.
Definitions
[00106] Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein generally have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this technology belongs. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. For example, reference to “a cell” includes a combination of two or more cells, and the like. Generally, the nomenclature used herein and the laboratory procedures in cell culture, molecular genetics, organic chemistry, analytical chemistry and nucleic acid chemistry and hybridization described below are those well-known and commonly employed in the art.
[00107] As used herein, the term “about” in reference to a number is generally taken to include numbers that fall within a range of 1%, 5%, or 10% in either direction (greater than or less than) of the number unless otherwise stated or otherwise evident from the context (except where such number would be less than 0% or exceed 100% of a possible value).
[00108] The term “adapter” refers to a short, chemically synthesized, nucleic acid sequence which can be used to ligate to the end of a nucleic acid sequence in order to facilitate attachment to another molecule. The adapter can be single-stranded or double-stranded. An adapter can incorporate a short (typically less than 50 base pairs) sequence useful for PCR amplification or sequencing.
[00109] As used herein, the “administration” of an agent or drug to a subject includes any route of introducing or delivering to a subject a compound to perform its intended function. Administration can be carried out by any suitable route, including but not limited to, orally, intranasally, parenterally (intravenously, intramuscularly, intraperitoneally, or subcutaneously), rectally, intrathecally, intratumorally or topically. Administration includes self-administration and the administration by another.
[00110] As used herein, an “alteration” of a gene or gene product ( e.g ., a marker gene or gene product) refers to the presence of a mutation or mutations within the gene or gene product, e.g., a mutation, which affects the quantity or activity of the gene or gene product, as compared to the normal or wild-type gene. The genetic alteration can result in changes in the quantity, structure, and/or activity of the gene or gene product in a cancer tissue or cancer cell, as compared to its quantity, structure, and/or activity, in a normal or healthy tissue or cell (e.g., a control). For example, an alteration which is associated with cancer, or predictive of responsiveness to intraoperative analgesics, can have an altered nucleotide sequence (e.g., a mutation), amino acid sequence, chromosomal translocation, intra-chromosomal inversion, copy number, expression level, protein level, protein activity, in a cancer tissue or cancer cell, as compared to a normal, healthy tissue or cell. Exemplary mutations include, but are not limited to, point mutations (e.g., silent, missense, or nonsense), deletions, insertions, inversions, linking mutations, duplications, translocations, inter- and intra-chromosomal rearrangements. Mutations can be present in the coding or non-coding region of the gene.
[00111] As used herein, the terms “amplify” or “amplification” with respect to nucleic acid sequences, refer to methods that increase the representation of a population of nucleic acid sequences in a sample. Nucleic acid amplification methods are well known to the skilled artisan and include ligase chain reaction (LCR), ligase detection reaction (LDR), ligation followed by Q-replicase amplification, PCR, primer extension, strand displacement amplification (SDA), hyperbranched strand displacement amplification, multiple displacement amplification (MDA), nucleic acid strand-based amplification (NASBA), two- step multiplexed amplifications, rolling circle amplification (RCA), recombinase- polymerase amplification (RPA)(TwistDx, Cambridge, UK), transcription mediated amplification, signal mediated amplification of RNA technology, loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA, helicase-dependent amplification, single primer isothermal amplification, and self- sustained sequence replication (3 SR), including multiplex versions or combinations thereof. Copies of a particular nucleic acid sequence generated in vitro in an amplification reaction are called “amplicons” or “amplification products.” [00112] The terms “cancer” or “tumor” are used interchangeably and refer to the presence of cells possessing characteristics typical of cancer-causing cells, such as uncontrolled proliferation, immortality, metastatic potential, rapid growth and proliferation rate, and certain characteristic morphological features. Cancer cells are often in the form of a tumor, but such cells can exist alone within an animal, or can be a non-tumorigenic cancer cell. As used herein, the term “cancer” includes premalignant, as well as malignant cancers.
[00113] The terms “complementary” or “complementarity” as used herein with reference to polynucleotides (i.e., a sequence of nucleotides such as an oligonucleotide or a target nucleic acid) refer to the base-pairing rules. The complement of a nucleic acid sequence as used herein refers to an oligonucleotide which, when aligned with the nucleic acid sequence such that the 5' end of one sequence is paired with the 3’ end of the other, is in “antiparallel association.” For example, the sequence “5'-A-G-T-3”’ is complementary to the sequence “3’-T-C-A-5.” Certain bases not commonly found in naturally-occurring nucleic acids may be included in the nucleic acids described herein. These include, for example, inosine, 7- deazaguanine, Locked Nucleic Acids (LNA), and Peptide Nucleic Acids (PNA). Complementarity need not be perfect; stable duplexes may contain mismatched base pairs, degenerative, or unmatched bases. Those skilled in the art of nucleic acid technology can determine duplex stability empirically considering a number of variables including, for example, the length of the oligonucleotide, base composition and sequence of the oligonucleotide, ionic strength and incidence of mismatched base pairs. A complement sequence can also be an RNA sequence complementary to the DNA sequence or its complement sequence, and can also be a cDNA.
[00114] As used herein, a "control" is an alternative sample used in an experiment for comparison purpose. A control can be "positive" or "negative." For example, where the purpose of the experiment is to determine a correlation of the efficacy of a therapeutic agent for the treatment for a particular type of disease, a positive control (a compound or composition known to exhibit the desired therapeutic effect) and a negative control (a subject or a sample that does not receive the therapy or receives a placebo) are typically employed. [00115] A “control nucleic acid sample” or “reference nucleic acid sample” as used herein, refers to nucleic acid molecules from a control or reference sample. In certain embodiments, the reference or control nucleic acid sample is a wild type or a non-mutated DNA or RNA sequence. In certain embodiments, the reference nucleic acid sample is purified or isolated ( e.g ., it is removed from its natural state). In other embodiments, the reference nucleic acid sample is from a non-tumor sample, e.g., a blood control, a normal adjacent tumor (NAT), or any other non-cancerous sample from the same or a different subject.
[00116] “Detecting” as used herein refers to determining the presence of a mutation or alteration in a nucleic acid of interest in a sample. Detection does not require the method to provide 100% sensitivity. Analysis of nucleic acid markers can be performed using techniques known in the art including, but not limited to, sequence analysis, and electrophoretic analysis. Non-limiting examples of sequence analysis include Maxam- Gilbert sequencing, Sanger sequencing, capillary array DNA sequencing, thermal cycle sequencing (Sears et al, Biotechniques, 13:626-633 (1992)), solid-phase sequencing (Zimmerman et al, Methods Mol. Cell Biol, 3:39-42 (1992)), sequencing with mass spectrometry such as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS; Fu et al, Nat. Biotechnol, 16:381-384 (1998)), and sequencing by hybridization. Chee et al, Science, 274:610-614 (1996); Drmanac et al, Science, 260:1649-1652 (1993); Drmanac et al, Nat. Biotechnol, 16:54-58 (1998). Non limiting examples of electrophoretic analysis include slab gel electrophoresis such as agarose or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, capillary electrophoresis, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Additionally, next generation sequencing methods can be performed using commercially available kits and instruments from companies such as the Life Technologies/Ion Torrent PGM or Proton, the Illumina HiSEQ or MiSEQ, and the Roche/454 next generation sequencing system. [00117] “Detectable label” as used herein refers to a molecule or a compound or a group of molecules or a group of compounds used to identify a nucleic acid or protein of interest. In some embodiments, the detectable label may be detected directly. In other embodiments, the detectable label may be a part of a binding pair, which can then be subsequently detected. Signals from the detectable label may be detected by various means and will depend on the nature of the detectable label. Detectable labels may be isotopes, fluorescent moieties, colored substances, and the like. Examples of means to detect detectable labels include but are not limited to spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, electromagnetic, radiochemical, or chemical means, such as fluorescence, chemifluorescence, or chemiluminescence, or any other appropriate means.
[00118] As used herein, “DNA mismatch repair” or “MMR” system refers to a gene pathway that is integral in the maintenance of genomic stability. MMR functions in postreplicative repair by correcting DNA polymerase errors including base-base or insertion/deletion mismatches that form during DNA replication.
[00119] As used herein, the term “effective amount” refers to a quantity sufficient to achieve a desired therapeutic and/or prophylactic effect, e.g ., an amount which results in the prevention of, or a decrease in a disease or condition described herein or one or more signs or symptoms associated with a disease or condition described herein. In the context of therapeutic or prophylactic applications, the amount of a composition administered to the subject will vary depending on the composition, the degree, type, and severity of the disease and on the characteristics of the individual, such as general health, age, sex, body weight and tolerance to drugs. The skilled artisan will be able to determine appropriate dosages depending on these and other factors. The compositions can also be administered in combination with one or more additional therapeutic compounds. In the methods described herein, the therapeutic compositions may be administered to a subject having one or more signs or symptoms of a disease or condition described herein. As used herein, a "therapeutically effective amount" of a composition refers to composition levels in which the physiological effects of a disease or condition are ameliorated or eliminated. A therapeutically effective amount can be given in one or more administrations.
[00120] As used herein, “fraction of the genome altered” or “FGA” refers to the percentage of copy number altered regions out of all sequenced regions. In some embodiments, FGA may be defined as the number of bases in sequenced genomic segments with log2 copy number fold change >0.2 or <-0.2 over the total number of bases in all sequenced segments. [00121] “Gene” as used herein refers to a DNA sequence that comprises regulatory and coding sequences necessary for the production of an RNA, which may have a non-coding function (e.g., a ribosomal or transfer RNA) or which may include a polypeptide or a polypeptide precursor. The RNA or polypeptide may be encoded by a full length coding sequence or by any portion of the coding sequence so long as the desired activity or function is retained. Although a sequence of the nucleic acids may be shown in the form of DNA, a person of ordinary skill in the art recognizes that the corresponding RNA sequence will have a similar sequence with the thymine being replaced by uracil, i.e., "T" is replaced with "U."
[00122] The term “hybridize” as used herein refers to a process where two substantially complementary nucleic acid strands (at least about 65% complementary over a stretch of at least 14 to 25 nucleotides, at least about 75%, or at least about 90% complementary) anneal to each other under appropriately stringent conditions to form a duplex or heteroduplex through formation of hydrogen bonds between complementary base pairs. Hybridizations are typically and preferably conducted with probe-length nucleic acid molecules, preferably 15- 100 nucleotides in length, more preferably 18-50 nucleotides in length. Nucleic acid hybridization techniques are well known in the art. See, e.g., Sambrook, el al ., 1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Plainview, N.Y. Hybridization and the strength of hybridization {i.e., the strength of the association between the nucleic acids) is influenced by such factors as the degree of complementarity between the nucleic acids, stringency of the conditions involved, and the thermal melting point (Tm) of the formed hybrid. Those skilled in the art understand how to estimate and adjust the stringency of hybridization conditions such that sequences having at least a desired level of complementarity will stably hybridize, while those having lower complementarity will not. For examples of hybridization conditions and parameters, see, e.g., Sambrook, et al., 1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Plainview, N.Y.; Ausubel, F. M. et al. 1994, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, Secaucus, N.J. In some embodiments, specific hybridization occurs under stringent hybridization conditions. An oligonucleotide or polynucleotide {e.g., a probe or a primer) that is specific for a target nucleic acid will “hybridize” to the target nucleic acid under suitable conditions.
[00123] As used herein, the term “library” refers to a collection of nucleic acid sequences, e.g., a collection of nucleic acids derived from whole genomic, subgenomic fragments, cDNA, cDNA fragments, RNA, RNA fragments, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, a portion or all of the library nucleic acid sequences comprises an adapter sequence. The adapter sequence can be located at one or both ends. The adapter sequence can be useful, e.g., for a sequencing method (e.g., an NGS method), for amplification, for reverse transcription, or for cloning into a vector.
[00124] The library can comprise a collection of nucleic acid sequences, e.g., a target nucleic acid sequence (e.g., a tumor nucleic acid sequence), a reference nucleic acid sequence, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid sequences of the library can be derived from a single subject. In other embodiments, a library can comprise nucleic acid sequences from more than one subject (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30 or more subjects). In some embodiments, two or more libraries from different subjects can be combined to form a library having nucleic acid sequences from more than one subject.
[00125] A “library nucleic acid sequence” refers to a nucleic acid molecule, e.g., a DNA, RNA, or a combination thereof, that is a member of a library. Typically, a library nucleic acid sequence is a DNA molecule, e.g., genomic DNA or cDNA. In some embodiments, a library nucleic acid sequence is fragmented, e.g., sheared or enzymatically prepared, genomic DNA. In certain embodiments, the library nucleic acid sequences comprise sequence from a subject and sequence not derived from the subject, e.g., adapter sequence, a primer sequence, or other sequences that allow for identification, e.g., “barcode” sequences.
[00126] “Microsatellites” are repeated DNA sequences that occur approximately every 50-100 Kb base pairs throughout the human genome. “MSI” or “microsatellite instability” refers to a hypermutable phenotype caused by the loss of DNA mismatch repair activity and is implicated in the development of CRC and endometrial cancer. MSI is detected in about 15% of all CRCs; 3% are of which are associated with Lynch syndrome and the other 12% are caused by sporadic, acquired hypermethylation of the promoter of the MLH1 gene, which occurs in tumors with the CpG island methylator phenotype. Colorectal tumors with MSI have distinctive features, including a tendency to arise in the proximal colon, lymphocytic infiltrate, and a poorly differentiated, mucinous or signet ring appearance.
[00127] “MMR-deficient” or “dMMR” refers to a defect in DNA mismatch repair or to cells exhibiting epigenetic inactivation of a gene in the MMR pathway, or loss of protein function of a MMR gene. Examples of genes in the MMR pathway are MSH2, MLHl, MSH6, PMS1 or PMS2. Mutations in MMR genes are often associated with an increase in the frequency of spontaneous mutation and carcinogenesis. Defects in MMR are often characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI) caused by expansion or contraction of short nucleotide repeats in the absence of efficient MMR and, as such, MSI is detectable in the majority of colorectal cancers arising in carriers of germ-line MMR mutations.
[00128] “MMR-proficient” or “pMMR” refers to cells comprising wild-type MMR genes. MMR-proficient cancers are characterized by microsatellite stability (MSS). [00129] The term “multiplex PCR” as used herein refers to amplification of two or more
PCR products or amplicons which are each primed using a distinct primer pair.
[00130] “Next-generation sequencing or NGS” as used herein, refers to any sequencing method that determines the nucleotide sequence of either individual nucleic acid molecules ( e.g ., in single molecule sequencing) or clonally expanded proxies for individual nucleic acid molecules in a high throughput parallel fashion (e.g., greater than 103, 104, 105 or more molecules are sequenced simultaneously). In one embodiment, the relative abundance of the nucleic acid species in the library can be estimated by counting the relative number of occurrences of their cognate sequences in the data generated by the sequencing experiment. Next generation sequencing methods are known in the art, and are described, e.g., in Metzker, M. Nature Biotechnology Reviews 11 : 31 -46 (2010) .
[00131] As used herein, “oligonucleotide” refers to a molecule that has a sequence of nucleic acid bases on a backbone comprised mainly of identical monomer units at defined intervals. The bases are arranged on the backbone in such a way that they can bind with a nucleic acid having a sequence of bases that are complementary to the bases of the oligonucleotide. The most common oligonucleotides have a backbone of sugar phosphate units. A distinction may be made between oligodeoxyribonucleotides that do not have a hydroxyl group at the 2' position and oligoribonucleotides that have a hydroxyl group at the 2' position. Oligonucleotides may also include derivatives, in which the hydrogen of the hydroxyl group is replaced with organic groups, e.g., an allyl group. Oligonucleotides of the method which function as primers or probes are generally at least about 10-15 nucleotides long and more preferably at least about 15 to 25 nucleotides long, although shorter or longer oligonucleotides may be used in the method. The exact size will depend on many factors, which in turn depend on the ultimate function or use of the oligonucleotide. The oligonucleotide may be generated in any manner, including, for example, chemical synthesis, DNA replication, restriction endonuclease digestion of plasmids or phage DNA, reverse transcription, PCR, or a combination thereof. The oligonucleotide may be modified e.g., by addition of a methyl group, a biotin or digoxigenin moiety, a fluorescent tag or by using radioactive nucleotides.
[00132] As used herein, the term “overall survival” or “OS” means the observed length of life from the start of treatment to death or the date of last contact.
[00133] As used herein, the term “perioperative” refers to the time period of a patient's surgical procedure. It commonly includes ward admission, anesthesia, surgery, and recovery. The perioperative period is characterized by a sequence including the time preceding an operation when a patient is being prepared for surgery (“the preoperative period”), followed by the time spent in surgery (“the intraoperative period”), and by the time following an operation when the patient is closely monitored for complications while recovering from the effects of anesthesia (“the postoperative period”).
[00134] As used herein, the term “primer” refers to an oligonucleotide, which is capable of acting as a point of initiation of nucleic acid sequence synthesis when placed under conditions in which synthesis of a primer extension product which is complementary to a target nucleic acid strand is induced, i.e., in the presence of different nucleotide triphosphates and a polymerase in an appropriate buffer (“buffer” includes pH, ionic strength, cofactors etc.) and at a suitable temperature. One or more of the nucleotides of the primer can be modified for instance by addition of a methyl group, a biotin or digoxigenin moiety, a fluorescent tag or by using radioactive nucleotides. A primer sequence need not reflect the exact sequence of the template. For example, a non-complementary nucleotide fragment may be attached to the 5' end of the primer, with the remainder of the primer sequence being substantially complementary to the strand. The term primer as used herein includes all forms of primers that may be synthesized including peptide nucleic acid primers, locked nucleic acid primers, phosphorothioate modified primers, labeled primers, and the like. The term “forward primer” as used herein means a primer that anneals to the anti-sense strand of dsDNA. A “reverse primer” anneals to the sense-strand of dsDNA.
[00135] As used herein, “primer pair” refers to a forward and reverse primer pair (i.e., a left and right primer pair) that can be used together to amplify a given region of a nucleic acid of interest.
[00136] “Probe” as used herein refers to nucleic acid that interacts with a target nucleic acid via hybridization. A probe may be fully complementary to a target nucleic acid sequence or partially complementary. The level of complementarity will depend on many factors based, in general, on the function of the probe. A probe or probes can be used, for example to detect the presence or absence of a mutation in a nucleic acid sequence by virtue of the sequence characteristics of the target. Probes can be labeled or unlabeled, or modified in any of a number of ways well known in the art. A probe may specifically hybridize to a target nucleic acid. Probes may be DNA, RNA or a RNA/DNA hybrid. Probes may be oligonucleotides, artificial chromosomes, fragmented artificial chromosome, genomic nucleic acid, fragmented genomic nucleic acid, RNA, recombinant nucleic acid, fragmented recombinant nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid (PNA), locked nucleic acid, oligomer of cyclic heterocycles, or conjugates of nucleic acid. Probes may comprise modified nucleobases, modified sugar moieties, and modified intemucleotide linkages. A probe may be used to detect the presence or absence of a target nucleic acid. Probes are typically at least about 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 75, 100 nucleotides or more in length.
[00137] As used herein, “recurrence-specific survival” or “RSS” means the observed length of life from the time of surgical resection to the time of first recurrence of the cancer, otherwise censored at the time of last follow-up. In RSS, deaths not involving recurrence of cancer are excluded.
[00138] As used herein, a “sample” refers to a substance that is being assayed for the presence of a mutation in a nucleic acid of interest. Processing methods to release or otherwise make available a nucleic acid for detection are well known in the art and may include steps of nucleic acid manipulation. A biological sample may be a body fluid or a tissue sample. In some cases, a biological sample may consist of or comprise blood, plasma, sera, urine, feces, epidermal sample, vaginal sample, skin sample, cheek swab, sperm, amniotic fluid, cultured cells, bone marrow sample, tumor biopsies, aspirate and/or chorionic villi, cultured cells, and the like. Fresh, fixed or frozen tissues may also be used. In one embodiment, the sample is preserved as a frozen sample or as formaldehyde- or paraformaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue preparation. For example, the sample can be embedded in a matrix, e.g., an FFPE block or a frozen sample. Whole blood samples of about 0.5 to 5 ml collected with EDTA, ACD or heparin as anti-coagulant are suitable. [00139] The term “sensitivity,” as used herein in reference to the methods of the present technology, is a measure of the ability of a method to detect a preselected sequence variant in a heterogeneous population of sequences. A method has a sensitivity of S % for variants of F % if, given a sample in which the preselected sequence variant is present as at least F % of the sequences in the sample, the method can detect the preselected sequence at a preselected confidence of C %, S % of the time. By way of example, a method has a sensitivity of 90% for variants of 5% if, given a sample in which the preselected variant sequence is present as at least 5% of the sequences in the sample, the method can detect the preselected sequence at a preselected confidence of 99%, 9 out of 10 times (F=5%; C=99%; S=90%).
[00140] As used herein, the term “separate” therapeutic use refers to an administration of at least two active ingredients at the same time or at substantially the same time by different routes.
[00141] As used herein, the term “sequential” therapeutic use refers to administration of at least two active ingredients at different times, the administration route being identical or different. More particularly, sequential use refers to the whole administration of one of the active ingredients before administration of the other or others commences. It is thus possible to administer one of the active ingredients over several minutes, hours, or days before administering the other active ingredient or ingredients. There is no simultaneous treatment in this case.
[00142] As used herein, the term “simultaneous” therapeutic use refers to the administration of at least two active ingredients by the same route and at the same time or at substantially the same time.
[00143] The term “specific” as used herein in reference to an oligonucleotide primer means that the nucleotide sequence of the primer has at least 12 bases of sequence identity with a portion of the nucleic acid to be amplified when the oligonucleotide and the nucleic acid are aligned. An oligonucleotide primer that is specific for a nucleic acid is one that, under the stringent hybridization or washing conditions, is capable of hybridizing to the target of interest and not substantially hybridizing to nucleic acids which are not of interest. Higher levels of sequence identity are preferred and include at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% and more preferably at least 98% sequence identity.
[00144] “Specificity,” as used herein, is a measure of the ability of a method to distinguish a truly occurring preselected sequence variant from sequencing artifacts or other closely related sequences. It is the ability to avoid false positive detections. False positive detections can arise from errors introduced into the sequence of interest during sample preparation, sequencing error, or inadvertent sequencing of closely related sequences like pseudo-genes or members of a gene family. A method has a specificity of X % if, when applied to a sample set of NTotai sequences, in which Xime sequences are truly variant and CN<* true are not truly variant, the method selects at least X % of the not truly variant as not variant. E.g ., a method has a specificity of 90% if, when applied to a sample set of 1,000 sequences, in which 500 sequences are truly variant and 500 are not truly variant, the method selects 90% of the 500 not truly variant sequences as not variant. Exemplary specificities include 90, 95, 98, and 99%.
[00145] The term “stringent hybridization conditions” as used herein refers to hybridization conditions at least as stringent as the following: hybridization in 50% formamide, 5xSSC, 50 mM NaEhPCri, pH 6.8, 0.5% SDS, 0.1 mg/mL sonicated salmon sperm DNA, and 5x Denharf s solution at 42° C. overnight; washing with 2x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 45° C; and washing with 0.2x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 45° C. In another example, stringent hybridization conditions should not allow for hybridization of two nucleic acids which differ over a stretch of 20 contiguous nucleotides by more than two bases.
[00146] As used herein, the terms “subject”, “patient”, or “individual” can be an individual organism, a vertebrate, a mammal, or a human. In some embodiments, the subject, patient or individual is a human.
[00147] As used herein, the terms “target sequence” and “target nucleic acid sequence” refer to a specific nucleic acid sequence to be detected and/or quantified in the sample to be analyzed. [00148] “Treating” or “treatment” as used herein covers the treatment of a disease or disorder described herein, in a subject, such as a human, and includes: (i) inhibiting a disease or disorder, i.e., arresting its development; (ii) relieving a disease or disorder, i.e., causing regression of the disorder; (iii) slowing progression of the disorder; and/or (iv) inhibiting, relieving, or slowing progression of one or more symptoms of the disease or disorder. In some embodiments, treatment means that the symptoms associated with the disease are, e.g., alleviated, reduced, cured, or placed in a state of remission.
[00149] It is also to be appreciated that the various modes of treatment of disorders as described herein are intended to mean “substantial,” which includes total but also less than total treatment, and wherein some biologically or medically relevant result is achieved. The treatment may be a continuous prolonged treatment for a chronic disease or a single, or few time administrations for the treatment of an acute condition. Methods for Detecting Polynucleotides Associated with Positive or Negative Responsiveness to Intraoperative Opioid Analgesics in Lung Cancer
[00150] Polynucleotides associated with responsiveness to intraoperative opioid analgesics may be detected by a variety of methods known in the art. Non-limiting examples of detection methods are described below. The detection assays in the methods of the present technology may include purified or isolated DNA (genomic or cDNA), RNA or protein or the detection step may be performed directly from a biological sample without the need for further DNA, RNA or protein purification/isolation.
Nucleic Acid Amplification and/or Detection [00151] Polynucleotides associated with responsiveness to intraoperative opioid analgesics can be detected by the use of nucleic acid amplification techniques that are well known in the art. The starting material may be genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA or mRNA. Nucleic acid amplification can be linear or exponential. Specific variants or mutations may be detected by the use of amplification methods with the aid of oligonucleotide primers or probes designed to interact with or hybridize to a particular target sequence in a specific manner, thus amplifying only the target variant.
[00152] Non-limiting examples of nucleic acid amplification techniques include polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), nested PCR, ligase chain reaction (see Abravaya, K. et al., Nucleic Acids Res. (1995), 23:675-682), branched DNA signal amplification (see Urdea, M. S. et al., AIDS (1993), 7(suppl 2):S11- S14), amplifiable RNA reporters, Q-beta replication, transcription-based amplification, boomerang DNA amplification, strand displacement activation, cycling probe technology, isothermal nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA) (see Kievits, T. et al., J Virological Methods (1991), 35:273-286), Invader Technology, next-generation sequencing technology or other sequence replication assays or signal amplification assays.
[00153] Primers. Oligonucleotide primers for use in amplification methods can be designed according to general guidance well known in the art as described herein, as well as with specific requirements as described herein for each step of the particular methods described. In some embodiments, oligonucleotide primers for cDNA synthesis and PCR are 10 to 100 nucleotides in length, preferably between about 15 and about 60 nucleotides in length, more preferably 25 and about 50 nucleotides in length, and most preferably between about 25 and about 40 nucleotides in length. [00154] Tm of a polynucleotide affects its hybridization to another polynucleotide ( e.g ., the annealing of an oligonucleotide primer to a template polynucleotide). In certain embodiments of the disclosed methods, the oligonucleotide primer used in various steps selectively hybridizes to a target template or polynucleotides derived from the target template {i.e., first and second strand cDNAs and amplified products). Typically, selective hybridization occurs when two polynucleotide sequences are substantially complementary (at least about 65% complementary over a stretch of at least 14 to 25 nucleotides, preferably at least about 75%, more preferably at least about 90% complementary). See Kanehisa, M., Polynucleotides Res. (1984), 12:203, incorporated herein by reference. As a result, it is expected that a certain degree of mismatch at the priming site is tolerated. Such mismatch may be small, such as a mono-, di- or tri -nucleotide. In certain embodiments, 100% complementarity exists.
[00155] Probes. Probes are capable of hybridizing to at least a portion of the nucleic acid of interest or a reference nucleic acid {i.e., wild-type sequence). Probes may be an oligonucleotide, artificial chromosome, fragmented artificial chromosome, genomic nucleic acid, fragmented genomic nucleic acid, RNA, recombinant nucleic acid, fragmented recombinant nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid (PNA), locked nucleic acid, oligomer of cyclic heterocycles, or conjugates of nucleic acid. Probes may be used for detecting and/or capturing/purifying a nucleic acid of interest.
[00156] Typically, probes can be about 10 nucleotides, about 20 nucleotides, about 25 nucleotides, about 30 nucleotides, about 35 nucleotides, about 40 nucleotides, about 50 nucleotides, about 60 nucleotides, about 75 nucleotides, or about 100 nucleotides long. However, longer probes are possible. Longer probes can be about 200 nucleotides, about 300 nucleotides, about 400 nucleotides, about 500 nucleotides, about 750 nucleotides, about 1,000 nucleotides, about 1,500 nucleotides, about 2,000 nucleotides, about 2,500 nucleotides, about 3,000 nucleotides, about 3,500 nucleotides, about 4,000 nucleotides, about 5,000 nucleotides, about 7,500 nucleotides, or about 10,000 nucleotides long.
[00157] Probes may also include a detectable label or a plurality of detectable labels. The detectable label associated with the probe can generate a detectable signal directly. Additionally, the detectable label associated with the probe can be detected indirectly using a reagent, wherein the reagent includes a detectable label, and binds to the label associated with the probe. [00158] In some embodiments, detectably labeled probes can be used in hybridization assays including, but not limited to Northern blots, Southern blots, microarray, dot or slot blots, and in situ hybridization assays such as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect a target nucleic acid sequence within a biological sample. Certain embodiments may employ hybridization methods for measuring expression of a polynucleotide gene product, such as mRNA. Methods for conducting polynucleotide hybridization assays have been well developed in the art. Hybridization assay procedures and conditions will vary depending on the application and are selected in accordance with the general binding methods known including those referred to in: Maniatis etal. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2nd Ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989); Berger and Kimmel Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 152, Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques (Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif, 1987); Young and Davis, PNAS. 80: 1194 (1983).
[00159] Detectably labeled probes can also be used to monitor the amplification of a target nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, detectably labeled probes present in an amplification reaction are suitable for monitoring the amount of amplicon(s) produced as a function of time. Examples of such probes include, but are not limited to, the 5'- exonuclease assay (TAQMAN® probes described herein (see also U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,848) various stem- loop molecular beacons (see for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,103,476 and 5,925,517 and Tyagi and Kramer, 1996, Nature Biotechnology 14:303- 308), stemless or linear beacons (see, e.g., WO 99/21881), PNA Molecular Beacons™ (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,355,421 and 6,593,091), linear PNA beacons (see, for example, Kubista et al., 2001, SPIE 4264:53-58), non-FRET probes (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,150,097), Sunrise®/ Amplifluor™ probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,548,250), stem-loop and duplex Scorpion probes (Solinas etal., 2001, Nucleic Acids Research 29:E96 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,743), bulge loop probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,590,091), pseudo knot probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,250), cyclicons (U.S. Pat. No. 6,383,752), MGB Eclipse™ probe (Epoch Biosciences), hairpin probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,596,490), peptide nucleic acid (PNA) light-up probes, self-assembled nanoparticle probes, and ferrocene-modified probes described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,485,901 ; Mhlanga et al., 2001, Methods 25:463-471 ; Whitcombe et al., 1999, Nature Biotechnology. 17:804- 807; Isacsson et al, 2000, Molecular Cell Probes. 14:321-328; Svanvik et al, 2000, Anal
Biochem. 281 :26-35; Wolffs etal, 2001, Biotechniques 766:769-771 ; Tsourkas etal, 2002, Nucleic Acids Research. 30:4208-4215; Riccelli et al, 2002, Nucleic Acids Research 30:4088-4093; Zhang et al, 2002 Shanghai. 34:329-332; Maxwell etal, 2002, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:9606-9612; Broude et al., 2002, Trends Biotechnol. 20:249-56; Huang et al, 2002, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 15:118- 126; and Yu et al., 2001, J. Am. Chem. Soc 14:11155-11161.
[00160] In some embodiments, the detectable label is a fluorophore. Suitable fluorescent moieties include but are not limited to the following fluorophores working individually or in combination: 4-acetamido-4'-isothiocyanatostilbene- 2,2'disulfonic acid; acridine and derivatives: acridine, acridine isothiocyanate; Alexa Fluors: Alexa Fluor® 350, Alexa Fluor® 488, Alexa Fluor® 546, Alexa Fluor® 555, Alexa Fluor® 568, Alexa Fluor® 594, Alexa Fluor® 647 (Molecular Probes); 5-(2- aminoethyl)aminonaphthalene-l -sulfonic acid (EDANS); 4-amino-N-[3- vinylsulfonyl)phenyl]naphthalimide-3,5 disulfonate (Lucifer Yellow VS); N-(4-anilino-l- naphthyl)maleimide; anthranilamide; Black Hole Quencher™ (BHQ™) dyes (biosearch Technologies); BODIPY dyes: BODIPY® R-6G, BOPIPY® 530/550, BODIPY® FL; Brilliant Yellow; coumarin and derivatives: coumarin, 7-amino-4- methylcoumarin (AMC, Coumarin 120),7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcouluarin (Coumarin 151); Cy2®, Cy3®, Cy3.5®, Cy5®, Cy5.5®; cyanosine; 4',6-diaminidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI); 5', 5"-dibromopyrogallol- sulfonephthalein (Bromopyrogallol Red); 7-diethylamino-3-(4'- isothiocyanatophenyl)-4- methylcoumarin; diethylenetriamine pentaacetate; 4,4'- diisothiocyanatodihydro-stilbene-2,2'- disulfonic acid; 4,4'-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'- disulfonic acid; 5- [dimethylamino]naphthalene-l -sulfonyl chloride (DNS, dansyl chloride); 4-(4'- dimethylaminophenylazo)benzoic acid (DABCYL); 4- dimethylaminophenylazophenyl-4'- isothiocyanate (DABITC); Eclipse™ (Epoch
Biosciences Inc.); eosin and derivatives: eosin, eosin isothiocyanate; erythrosin and derivatives: erythrosin B, erythrosin isothiocyanate; ethidium; fluorescein and derivatives: 5- carboxyfluorescein (FAM), 5-(4,6-dichlorotriazin-2- yl)amino fluorescein (DTAF), 2', 7'- dimethoxy-4'5'-dichloro-6-carboxyfluorescein (JOE), fluorescein, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), hexachloro-6-carboxyfluorescein (HEX), QFITC (XRITC), tetrachlorofluorescem (TET); fiuorescamine; IR144; IR1446; lanthamide phosphors; Malachite Green isothiocyanate; 4-methylumbelliferone; ortho cresolphthalein; nitrotyrosine; pararosaniline; Phenol Red; B-phycoerythrin, R-phycoerythrin; allophycocyanin; o-phthaldialdehyde; Oregon Green®; propidium iodide; pyrene and derivatives: pyrene, pyrene butyrate, succinimidyl 1 -pyrene butyrate; QSY® 7; QSY® 9; QSY® 21; QSY® 35 (Molecular Probes); Reactive Red 4 (Cibacron®Brilliant Red 3B-A); rhodamine and derivatives: 6- carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX), 6-carboxyrhodamine (R6G), lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl chloride, rhodamine (Rhod), rhodamine B, rhodamine 123, rhodamine green, rhodamine X isothiocyanate, riboflavin, rosolic acid, sulforhodamine B, sulforhodamine 101, sulfonyl chloride derivative of sulforhodamine 101 (Texas Red); terbium chelate derivatives; N,N,N',N'-tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine (TAMRA); tetramethyl rhodamine; tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC); and VIC®. Detector probes can also comprise sulfonate derivatives of fluorescenin dyes with S03 instead of the carboxylate group, phosphoramidite forms of fluorescein, phosphoramidite forms of CY 5 (commercially available for example from Amersham).
[00161] Detectably labeled probes can also include quenchers, including without limitation black hole quenchers (Biosearch), Iowa Black (IDT), QSY quencher (Molecular Probes), and Dabsyl and Dabcel sulfonate/carboxylate Quenchers (Epoch).
[00162] Detectably labeled probes can also include two probes, wherein for example a fluorophore is on one probe, and a quencher is on the other probe, wherein hybridization of the two probes together on a target quenches the signal, or wherein hybridization on the target alters the signal signature via a change in fluorescence.
[00163] In some embodiments, interchelating labels such as ethidium bromide, SYBR® Green I (Molecular Probes), and PicoGreen® (Molecular Probes) are used, thereby allowing visualization in real-time, or at the end point, of an amplification product in the absence of a detector probe. In some embodiments, real-time visualization may involve the use of both an intercalating detector probe and a sequence-based detector probe. In some embodiments, the detector probe is at least partially quenched when not hybridized to a complementary sequence in the amplification reaction, and is at least partially unquenched when hybridized to a complementary sequence in the amplification reaction.
[00164] In some embodiments, the amount of probe that gives a fluorescent signal in response to an excited light typically relates to the amount of nucleic acid produced in the amplification reaction. Thus, in some embodiments, the amount of fluorescent signal is related to the amount of product created in the amplification reaction. In such embodiments, one can therefore measure the amount of amplification product by measuring the intensity of the fluorescent signal from the fluorescent indicator.
[00165] Primers or probes may be designed to selectively hybridize to any portion of a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide selected from among CDKN2A, NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, CTNNB1, AXIN2, APC and AMERl. Exemplary nucleic acid sequences of the human orthologs of these genes are provided below: [00166] Homo sapiens cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), transcript variant
1, mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_000077.5) (SEQ ID NO: 1)
1 gagagcaggc agcgggcggc ggggagcagc atggagccgg cggcggggag cagcatggag
61 ccttcggctg actggctggc cacggccgcg gcccggggtc gggtagagga ggtgcgggcg
121 ctgctggagg cgggggcgct gcccaacgca ccgaatagtt acggtcggag gccgatccag
181 gtcatgatga tgggcagcgc ccgagtggcg gagctgctgc tgctccacgg cgcggagccc
241 aactgcgccg accccgccac tctcacccga cccgtgcacg acgctgcccg ggagggcttc
301 ctggacacgc tggtggtgct gcaccgggcc ggggcgcggc tggacgtgcg cgatgcctgg
361 ggccgtctgc ccgtggacct ggctgaggag ctgggccatc gcgatgtcgc acggtacctg
421 cgcgcggctg cggggggcac cagaggcagt aaccatgccc gcatagatgc cgcggaaggt
481 ccctcagaca tccccgattg aaagaaccag agaggctctg agaaacctcg ggaaacttag
541 atcatcagtc accgaaggtc ctacagggcc acaactgccc ccgccacaac ccaccccgct
601 ttcgtagttt tcatttagaa aatagagctt ttaaaaatgt cctgcctttt aacgtagata
661 tatgccttcc cccactaccg taaatgtcca tttatatcat tttttatata ttcttataaa
721 aatgtaaaaa agaaaaacac cgcttctgcc ttttcactgt gttggagttt tctggagtga
781 gcactcacgc cctaagcgca cattcatgtg ggcatttctt gcgagcctcg cagcctccgg
841 aagctgtcga cttcatgaca agcattttgt gaactaggga agctcagggg ggttactggc
901 ttctcttgag tcacactgct agcaaatggc agaaccaaag ctcaaataaa aataaaataa
961 ttttcattca ttcactca
[00167] Homo sapiens cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), transcript variant
4, mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_058195.4) (SEQ ID NO: 2)
1 acctctggtg ccaaagggcg gcgcagcggc tgccgagctc ggccctggag gcggcgagaa
61 catggtgcgc aggttcttgg tgaccctccg gattcggcgc gcgtgcggcc cgccgcgagt
121 gagggttttc gtggttcaca tcccgcggct cacgggggag tgggcagcgc caggggcgcc
181 cgccgctgtg gccctcgtgc tgatgctact gaggagccag cgtctagggc agcagccgct
241 tcctagaaga ccaggtcatg atgatgggca gcgcccgagt ggcggagctg ctgctgctcc
301 acggcgcgga gcccaactgc gccgaccccg ccactctcac ccgacccgtg cacgacgctg
361 cccgggaggg cttcctggac acgctggtgg tgctgcaccg ggccggggcg cggctggacg
421 tgcgcgatgc ctggggccgt ctgcccgtgg acctggctga ggagctgggc catcgcgatg
481 tcgcacggta cctgcgcgcg gctgcggggg gcaccagagg cagtaaccat gcccgcatag
541 atgccgcgga aggtccctca gacatccccg attgaaagaa ccagagaggc tctgagaaac
601 ctcgggaaac ttagatcatc agtcaccgaa ggtcctacag ggccacaact gcccccgcca
661 caacccaccc cgctttcgta gttttcattt agaaaataga gcttttaaaa atgtcctgcc
721 ttttaacgta gatatatgcc ttcccccact accgtaaatg tccatttata tcatttttta
781 tatattctta taaaaatgta aaaaagaaaa acaccgcttc tgccttttca ctgtgttgga
841 gttttctgga gtgagcactc acgccctaag cgcacattca tgtgggcatt tcttgcgagc
901 ctcgcagcct ccggaagctg tcgacttcat gacaagcatt ttgtgaacta gggaagctca
961 ggggggttac tggcttctct tgagtcacac tgctagcaaa tggcagaacc aaagctcaaa
1021 taaaaataaa ataattttca ttcattcact ca
[00168] Homo sapiens FAT atypical cadherin 1 (FAT1), mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_005245.4) (SEQ ID NO: 3)
1 gagcgtgagg cgccggcgcc gagctgggcg gccgggcgcg gggagagggc gcgggagcgg 61 ctcgtgcggc aggtaccatg cggacgcgcg agcccggcga gggccccggc aggcccggtc 121 cctgctcggg ggcgcgctga gacggcgggt gagctccacg agagcgccgt cgccacttcg 181 ggccaacttt gcgattcccg acagttaagc aatggggaga catttggctt tgctcctgct 241 tctgctcctt ctcttccaac attttggaga cagtgatggc agccaacgac ttgaacagac 301 tcctctgcag tttacacacc tcgagtacaa cgtcaccgtg caggagaact ctgcagctaa 361 gacttatgtg gggcatcctg tcaagatggg tgtttacatt acacatccag cgtgggaagt 421 aaggtacaaa attgtttccg gagacagtga aaacctgttc aaagctgaag agtacattct 481 cggagacttt tgctttctaa gaataaggac caaaggagga aatacagcta ttcttaatag 541 agaagtgaag gatcactaca cattgatagt gaaagcactt gaaaaaaata ctaatgtgga
601 ggcgcgaaca aaggtcaggg tgcaggtgct ggatacaaat gacttgagac cgttattctc
661 acccacctca tacagcgttt ctttacctga aaacacagct ataaggacca gtatcgcaag
721 agtcagcgcc acggatgcag acataggaac caacggggaa ttttactaca gttttaaaga
781 tcgaacagat atgtttgcta ttcacccaac cagtggtgtg atagtgttaa ctggtagact
841 tgattaccta gagaccaagc tctatgagat ggaaatcctc gctgcggacc gtggcatgaa
901 gttgtatggg agcagtggca tcagcagcat ggccaagcta acggtgcaca tcgaacaggc
961 caatgaatgt gctccggtga taacagcagt gacattgtca ccatcagaac tggacaggga
1021 cccagcatat gcaattgtga cagtggatga ctgcgatcag ggtgccaatg gtgacatagc
1081 atctttaagc atcgtggcag gtgaccttct ccagcagttt agaacagtga ggtcctttcc
1141 agggagtaag gagtataaag tcaaagccat cggtggcatt gattgggaca gtcatccttt
1201 cggctacaat ctcacactac aggctaaaga taaaggaact ccgccccagt tctcttctgt
1261 taaagtcatt cacgtgactt ctccacagtt caaagccggg ccagtcaagt ttgaaaagga
1321 tgtttacaga gcagaaataa gtgaatttgc tcctcccaac acacctgtgg tcatggtaaa
1381 ggccattcct gcttattccc atttgaggta tgtttttaaa agtacacctg gaaaagctaa
1441 attcagttta aattacaaca ctggtctcat ttctatttta gaaccagtta aaagacagca
1501 ggcagcccat tttgaacttg aagtaacaac aagtgacaga aaagcgtcca ccaaggtctt
1561 ggtgaaagtc ttaggtgcaa atagcaatcc ccctgaattt acccagacag cgtacaaagc
1621 tgcttttgat gagaacgtgc ccattggtac tactgtcatg agcctgagtg ccgtagaccc
1681 tgatgagggt gagaacgggt acgtgacata cagtatcgca aatttaaatc atgtgccgtt
1741 tgcgattgac catttcactg gtgccgtgag tacgtcagaa aacctggact acgaactgat
1801 gcctcgggtt tatactctga ggattcgtgc atcagactgg ggcttgccgt accgccggga
1861 agtcgaagtc cttgctacaa ttactctcaa taacttgaat gacaacacac ctttgtttga
1921 gaaaataaat tgtgaaggga caattcccag agatctaggc gtgggagagc aaataaccac
1981 tgtttctgct attgatgcag atgaacttca gttggtacag tatcagattg aagctggaaa
2041 tgaactggat ttctttagtt taaaccccaa ctcgggggta ttgtcattaa agcgatcgct
2101 aatggatggc ttaggtgcaa aggtgtcttt ccacagtctg agaatcacag ctacagatgg
2161 agaaaatttt gccacaccat tatatatcaa cataacagtg gctgccagtc acaagctggt
2221 aaacttgcag tgtgaagaga ctggtgttgc caaaatgctg gcagagaagc tcctgcaggc
2281 aaataaatta cacaaccagg gagaggtgga ggatattttc ttcgattctc actctgtcaa
2341 tgctcacata ccgcagttta gaagcactct tccgactggt attcaggtaa aggaaaacca
2401 gcctgtgggt tccagtgtaa ttttcatgaa ctccactgac cttgacactg gcttcaatgg
2461 aaaactggtc tatgctgttt ctggaggaaa tgaggatagt tgcttcatga ttgatatgga
2521 aacaggaatg ctgaaaattt tatctcctct tgaccgtgaa acaacagaca aatacaccct
2581 gaatattacc gtctatgacc ttgggatacc ccagaaggct gcgtggcgtc ttctacatgt
2641 cgtggttgtc gatgccaatg ataatccacc cgagttttta caggagagct attttgtgga
2701 agtgagtgaa gacaaggagg tacatagtga aatcatccag gttgaagcca cagataaaga
2761 cctggggccc aacggacacg tgacgtactc aattgttaca gacacagaca cattttcaat
2821 tgacagcgtg acgggtgttg ttaacatcgc acgccctctg gatcgagagc tgcagcatga
2881 gcactcctta aagattgagg ccagggacca agccagagaa gagcctcagc tgttctccac
2941 tgtcgttgtg aaagtatcac tagaagatgt taatgacaac ccacctacat ttattccacc
3001 taattatcgt gtgaaagtcc gagaggatct tccagaagga accgtcatca tgtggttaga
3061 agcccacgat cctgatttag gtcagtctgg tcaggtgaga tacagccttc tggaccacgg
3121 agaaggaaac ttcgatgtgg ataaactcag tggagcagtt aggatcgtcc agcagttgga
3181 ctttgagaag aagcaagtgt ataatctcac tgtgagggcc aaagacaagg gaaagccagt
3241 ttctctgtct tctacttgct atgttgaagt tgaggtggtt gatgtgaatg agaacctgca
3301 cccacccgtg ttttccagct ttgtggaaaa ggggacagtg aaagaagatg cacctgttgg
3361 ttcattggta atgacggtgt cggctcatga tgaggacgcc agaagagatg gggagatccg
3421 atactccatt agagatggct ctggcgttgg tgttttcaaa ataggtgaag agacaggtgt
3481 catagagacg tcagatcgac tggaccgtga atcgacctcc cattattggc taacagtctt
3541 tgcaaccgat cagggtgtcg tgcctctttc atcgttcata gagatctaca tagaggttga
3601 ggatgtcaat gacaatgcac cacagacatc agagcctgtt tattacccag aaatcatgga
3661 aaattctcct aaagatgtat ctgtggtcca gatcgaggca tttgatccag attcgagctc
3721 taatgacaag ctcatgtaca aaattacaag tggaaatcca caaggattct tttcaataca
3781 tcctaaaaca ggtctcatca caactacgtc aaggaagcta gaccgagaac agcaagatga
3841 acacatatta gaggttactg tgacagacaa tggtagtccc cccaaatcaa ccattgcaag
3901 agtcattgtg aaaatccttg atgaaaatga caacaaacct cagtttctgc aaaagttcta
3961 caaaatcaga ctccctgagc gggaaaagcc agaccgagaa agaaatgcca gacgggagcc
4021 gctctatcac gtcatagcca ccgacaagga tgagggcccc aatgcagaaa tctcctacag
4081 catcgaagac gggaatgagc atggcaaatt tttcatcgaa ccgaaaactg gagtggtttc
4141 gtccaagagg ttttcagcag ctggagaata tgatattctt tcaattaagg cagttgacaa 4201 tggtcgccct caaaagtcat caaccaccag actccatatt gaatggatct ccaagcccaa
4261 accgtccctg gagcccattt catttgaaga atcatttttt acctttactg tgatggaaag
4321 tgaccccgtt gctcacatga ttggagtaat atctgtggag cctcctggca tacccctttg
4381 gtttgacatc actggtggca actacgacag tcacttcgat gtggacaagg gaactggaac
4441 catcattgtt gccaaacctc ttgatgcaga acagaagtca aactacaacc tcacagtcga
4501 ggctacagat ggaaccacca ctatcctcac tcaggtattc atcaaagtaa tagacacaaa
4561 tgaccatcgt cctcagtttt ctacatcaaa gtatgaagtt gttattcctg aagatacagc
4621 gccagaaaca gaaattttgc aaatcagtgc tgtggatcag gatgagaaaa acaaactaat
4681 ctacactctg cagagcagta gagatccact gagtctcaag aaatttcgtc ttgatcctgc
4741 aaccggctct ctctatactt ctgagaaact ggatcatgaa gctgttcacc agcacaccct
4801 cacggtcatg gtacgagatc aagatgtgcc tgtaaaacgc aactttgcaa ggattgtggt
4861 caatgtcagc gacacgaatg accacgcccc gtggttcacc gcttcctcct acaaagggcg
4921 ggtttatgaa tcggcagccg ttggctcagt tgtgttgcag gtgacggctc tggacaagga
4981 caaagggaaa aatgctgaag tgctgtactc gatcgagtca ggaaatattg gaaattcttt
5041 tatgattgat cctgtcttgg gctctattaa aactgccaaa gaattagatc gaagtaacca
5101 agcggagtat gatttaatgg taaaagctac agataagggc agtccaccaa tgagtgaaat
5161 aacttctgtg cgtatctttg tcacaattgc tgacaacgcc tctccgaagt ttacatcaaa
5221 agaatattct gttgaactta gtgaaactgt cagcattggg agtttcgttg ggatggttac
5281 agcccatagt caatcatcag tggtgtatga aataaaagat ggaaatacag gtgatgcttt
5341 tgatattaat ccacattctg gaactatcat cactcagaaa gccctggact ttgaaacttt
5401 gcccatttac acattgataa tacaaggaac taacatggct ggtttgtcca ctaatacaac
5461 ggttctagtt cacttgcagg atgagaatga caacgcgcca gtttttatgc aggcagaata
5521 tacaggactc attagtgaat cagcctcaat taacagcgtg gtcctaacag acaggaatgt
5581 cccactggtg attcgagcag ctgatgctga taaagactca aatgctttgc ttgtatatca
5641 cattgttgaa ccatctgtac acacatattt tgctattgat tctagcactg gtgctattca
5701 tacagtacta agtctggact atgaagaaac aagtattttt cactttaccg tccaagtgca
5761 tgacatggga accccacgtt tatttgctga gtatgcagcg aatgtaacag tacatgtaat
5821 tgacattaat gactgccccc ctgtgtttgc caagccatta tatgaagcat ctcttttgtt
5881 accaacatac aaaggagtaa aagtcatcac agtaaatgct acagatgctg attcaagtgc
5941 attctcacag ttgatttact ccatcaccga aggcaacatc ggggagaagt tttctatgga
6001 ctacaagact ggtgctctca ctgtccaaaa cacaactcag ttaagaagcc gctacgagct
6061 aaccgttaga gcttccgatg gcagatttgc cggccttacc tctgtcaaaa ttaatgtgaa
6121 agaaagcaaa gaaagtcacc taaagtttac ccaggatgtc tactctgcgg tagtgaaaga
6181 gaattccacc gaggccgaaa cattagctgt cattactgct attgggaatc caatcaatga
6241 gcctttgttt tatcacatcc tcaacccaga tcgcagattt aaaataagcc gcacttcagg
6301 agttctgtca accactggca cgcccttcga tcgtgagcag caggaggcgt ttgatgtggt
6361 tgtagaagtg acagaggaac ataagccttc tgcagtggcc cacgttgtcg tgaaggtcat
6421 tgtagaagac caaaatgata atgcgccggt gtttgtcaac cttccctact acgccgttgt
6481 taaagtggac actgaggtgg gccatgtcat tcgctatgtc actgctgtag acagagacag
6541 tggcagaaac ggggaagtgc attactacct caaggaacat catgaacact ttcaaattgg
6601 acccttgggt gaaatttcac tgaaaaagca atttgagctt gacaccttaa ataaagaata
6661 tcttgttaca gtggttgcaa aagatggagg gaacccggcc ttttcagcgg aagttatcgt
6721 tccgatcact gtcatgaata aagccatgcc tgtgtttgaa aaacctttct acagtgcaga
6781 gattgcagag agcatccagg tgcacagccc tgtggtccac gtgcaggcta acagcccgga
6841 aggcctgaaa gtgttctaca gcatcacaga cggagaccct ttcagccagt tcactattaa
6901 cttcaatact ggagttatca atgtcatagc tcctctggac tttgaggccc acccggcata
6961 taagctgagc atacgcgcaa ctgactcctt gacgggcgct catgctgaag tatttgtgga
7021 catcatagta gacgacatca atgataaccc tcctgtgttt gctcagcagt cttatgcggt
7081 gaccctgtct gaggcatctg taattggaac gtctgttgtt caagttagag ccaccgattc
7141 tgattcagaa ccaaatagag gaatctcata ccagatgttt gggaatcaca gcaagagtca
7201 tgatcatttt catgtagaca gcagcactgg cctcatctca ctactcagaa ccctggatta
7261 cgagcagtcc cggcagcaca cgatttttgt gagggcagtt gatggtggta tgcccacgct
7321 gagcagtgat gtgattgtca cggtggacgt taccgacctc aatgataatc caccactctt
7381 tgaacaacag atttatgaag ccagaattag cgagcacgcc cctcatgggc atttcgtgac
7441 ctgtgtaaaa gcctatgatg cagacagttc agacatagac aagttgcagt attccattct
7501 gtctggcaat gatcataaac attttgtcat tgacagtgca acagggatta tcaccctctc
7561 aaacctgcac cggcacgccc tgaagccatt ttacagtctt aacctgtcag tgtctgatgg
7621 agtttttaga agttccaccc aggttcatgt aactgtaatt ggaggcaatt tgcacagtcc
7681 tgctttcctt cagaacgaat atgaagtgga actagctgaa aacgctcccc tacataccct
7741 ggtgatggag gtgaaaacta cggatgggga ttctggtatt tatggtcacg ttacttacca
7801 tattgtaaat gactttgcca aagacagatt ttacataaat gagagaggac agatatttac 7861 tttggaaaaa cttgatcgag aaaccccggc ggagaaagtg atctcagtcc gtttaatggc
7921 taaggatgct ggaggaaaag ttgctttctg caccgtgaat gtcatcctta cagatgacaa
7981 tgacaatgca ccacaatttc gagcaaccaa atacgaagtg aatatcgggt ccagtgctgc
8041 taaagggact tcagtcgtta aagttcttgc aagtgatgcc gatgagggct ccaatgccga
8101 catcacctat gccattgaag cagactctga aagtgtaaaa gagaatttgg aaattaacaa
8161 actgtccggc gtaatcacta caaaggagag cctcattggc ttggaaaatg aattcttcac
8221 tttctttgtt agagctgtgg ataatgggtc tccatcaaaa gaatctgttg ttcttgtcta
8281 tgttaaaatc cttccaccgg aaatgcagct tccaaaattt tcagaacctt tctatacctt
8341 tacagtgtca gaggacgtgc ctattggaac agagatagat ctcatccgag cagaacatag
8401 tgggactgtt ctttacagcc tggtcaaagg gaatactcca gaaagcaata gggatgagtc
8461 ctttgtgatt gacagacaga gcgggagact gaagttggag aagagtcttg atcatgagac
8521 aactaagtgg tatcagtttt ccatactggc caggtgcact caagatgacc atgagatggt
8581 ggcttctgta gatgttagta tccaagtgaa agatgcaaat gacaacagcc cggtctttga
8641 atctagtcca tatgaggcat tcattgttga aaacctgcca gggggaagta gagtaattca
8701 gatcagggca tctgatgctg actcaggaac caacggccaa gttatgtata gcctggatca
8761 gtcacaaagt gtggaagtca ttgaatcctt tgccattaac atggaaacag gctggattac
8821 aactttaaag gaacttgacc atgaaaagag agacaattac cagattaaag tggttgcatc
8881 agatcatggt gaaaagatcc agctatcctc cacagccatt gtggatgtta ccgtcaccga
8941 tgtcaacgat agtccaccac gattcacggc cgagatctat aaagggactg tgagtgagga
9001 tgacccccaa ggtggggtga ttgccatctt aagtaccacg gatgctgatt ctgaagagat
9061 caacagacaa gttacatatt tcataacagg aggggatcct ttaggacagt ttgccgttga
9121 aactatacag aatgaatgga aggtatatgt gaagaaacct ctagacaggg aaaaaaggga
9181 caattacctt cttactatca cggcaactga tggcaccttc tcatcaaaag cgatagttga
9241 agtgaaagtt ctggatgcaa atgacaacag tccagtttgt gaaaagactt tatattcaga
9301 cactattcct gaagacgtcc ttcctggaaa attgatcatg cagatctctg ctacagacgc
9361 agacatccgc tctaacgctg aaattactta cacgttattg ggttcaggtg cagaaaaatt
9421 caaactaaat ccagacacag gtgaactgaa aacgtcaacc ccccttgatc gtgaggagca
9481 agctgtttat catcttctcg tcagggccac agatggagga ggaagattct gccaagccag
9541 tattgtgctc acgctagaag atgtgaacga taacgccccc gaattctctg ccgatcctta
9601 tgccatcacc gtgtttgaaa acacagagcc gggaacgctg ctgacaagag tgcaggccac
9661 agatgccgac gcaggattaa atcggaagat tttatactca ctgattgact ctgctgatgg
9721 gcagttctcc attaacgaat tatctggaat tattcagtta gaaaaacctt tggacagaga
9781 actccaggca gtatacaccc tctctttgaa agctgtggat caaggcttgc caaggaggct
9841 gactgccact ggcactgtga ttgtatcagt tcttgacata aatgacaacc cccctgtgtt
9901 tgagtaccgt gaatatggtg ccaccgtgtc tgaggacatt cttgttggaa ctgaagttct
9961 tcaagtgtat gcagcaagtc gggatattga agcaaatgca gaaatcacct actcaataat
10021 aagtggaaat gaacatggga aattcagcat agattctaaa acaggggccg tatttatcat
10081 tgagaatctg gattatgaga gctctcatga gtattaccta acagtagagg ccactgatgg
10141 aggcacgcct tcactgagcg acgttgccac tgtgaacgtt aatgtaacag atatcaacga
10201 taatacccct gtgttcagcc aagacaccta cacgacagtc atcagtgaag atgccgttct
10261 tgagcagtct gtcatcacgg ttatggccga tgatgccgat ggaccttcca acagccacat
10321 ccactactca attatagatg gcaaccaagg aagctcgttc acaattgacc ccgtcagggg
10381 agaagtcaaa gtgaccaaac ttctcgaccg agaaacgatt tcaggttaca cgctcacggt
10441 tcaagcttct gataatggca gtccacccag agtcaacacg acgaccgtga acatcgatgt
10501 gtccgatgtc aatgacaacg cgcccgtctt ctccagggga aactacagtg tcattatcca
10561 ggaaaataag ccagtgggct tcagcgtgct gcagctggta gtaacagatg aggattcttc
10621 ccataacggt ccacccttct tctttactat tgtaactgga aatgatgaga aggcttttga
10681 agttaacccg caaggagtcc tcctgacatc atctgccatc aagaggaagg agaaagatca
10741 ttacttactg caggtgaagg tggcagataa tggaaagcct cagttgtcat ctttgacata
10801 cattgacatt agggtaattg aggagagcat ctatccgcct gcgattttgc ccctggagat
10861 tttcatcacc tcttctggag aagaatactc aggtggcgtc attgggaaga tccatgccac
10921 agaccaggac gtgtatgata ctctaaccta cagtctcgac cctcagatgg acaacctgtt
10981 ctctgtttcc agcacagggg gcaagctgat agcacacaaa aagctagaca tagggcaata
11041 ccttctcaat gtcagcgtaa cagatgggaa gttcacgacg gtggccgaca tcacagtgca
11101 tatcagacaa gtcacacagg agatgttgaa ccacaccatc gcgatccgct ttgccaacct
11161 cactccggaa gaattcgttg gtgactactg gcgcaacttc cagcgagctt tacggaacat
11221 cctgggtgtg aggaggaacg acatacagat tgttagtttg cagtcctctg aacctcaccc
11281 acatctggac gtcttacttt ttgtagagaa accaggtagt gctcagatct caacaaaaca
11341 acttctgcac aagattaact cttccgtgac tgacattgag gaaatcattg gagttaggat
11401 actgaatgta ttccagaaac tctgcgcggg actggactgc ccctggaagt tctgcgatga
11461 aaaggtgtct gtggatgaaa gtgtgatgtc aacacacagc acagccagac tgagttttgt 11521 gactccccgc caccacaggg cagcggtgtg tctctgcaaa gagggaaggt gcccacctgt
11581 ccaccatggc tgtgaagatg atccgtgccc tgagggatcc gaatgtgtgt ctgatccctg
11641 ggaggagaaa cacacctgtg tctgtcccag cggcaggttt ggtcagtgcc cagggagttc
11701 atctatgaca ctgactggaa acagctacgt gaaataccgt ctgacggaaa atgaaaacaa
11761 attagagatg aaactgacca tgaggctcag aacatattcc acgcatgcgg ttgtcatgta
11821 tgctcgagga actgactata gcatcttgga gattcatcat ggaaggctgc agtacaagtt
11881 tgactgtgga agtggccctg gaattgtctc tgttcagagc attcaggtca atgatgggca
11941 gtggcacgca gtggccctgg aagtgaatgg aaactatgct cgcttggttc tagaccaagt
12001 tcatactgca tcgggcacag ccccagggac tctgaaaacc ctgaacctgg ataactatgt
12061 gttttttggt ggccacatcc gtcagcaggg aacaaggcat ggaagaagtc ctcaagttgg
12121 taatggtttc aggggttgta tggactccat ttatttgaat gggcaggagc tccctttaaa
12181 cagcaaaccc agaagctatg cacacatcga agagtcggtg gatgtatctc caggctgctt
12241 cctgacggcc acggaagact gcgccagcaa cccttgccag aatggaggcg tttgcaatcc
12301 gtcacctgct ggaggttatt actgcaaatg cagtgccttg tacataggga cccactgtga
12361 gataagcgtc aatccgtgtt cctccaagcc atgcctctat gggggeaegt gtgttgtcga
12421 caacggaggc tttgtttgcc agtgtagagg attatatact ggtcagaggt gtcagcttag
12481 tccatactgc aaagatgaac cctgtaagaa tggcggaaca tgctttgaca gtttggatgg
12541 cgccgtttgt cagtgtgatt cgggttttag gggagaaagg tgtcagagtg atatcgacga
12601 gtgctctgga aacccttgcc tgcacggggc cctctgtgag aacacgcacg gctcctatca
12661 ctgcaactgc agccacgagt acaggggacg tcactgcgag gatgctgcgc ccaaccagta
12721 tgtgtccacg ccgtggaaca ttgggttggc ggaaggaatt ggaatcgttg tgtttgttgc
12781 agggatattt ttactggtgg tggtgtttgt tctctgccgt aagatgatta gtcggaaaaa
12841 gaagcatcag gctgaaccta aagacaagca cctgggaccc gctacggctt tcttgcaaag
12901 accgtatttt gattccaagc taaataagaa catttactca gacataccac cccaggtgcc
12961 tgtccggcct atttcctaca ccccgagtat tccaagtgac tcaagaaaca atctggaccg
13021 aaattccttc gaaggatctg ctatcccaga gcatcccgaa ttcagcactt ttaaccccga
13081 gtctgtgcac gggcaccgaa aagcagtggc ggtctgcagc gtggcgccaa acctgcctcc
13141 cccaccccct tcaaactccc cttctgacag cgactccatc cagaagccta gctgggactt
13201 tgactatgac acaaaagtgg tggatcttga tccctgtctt tccaagaagc ctctagagga
13261 aaagccttcc cagccataca gtgcccggga aagcctgtct gaagtgcagt ctctgagctc
13321 cttccagtcc gaatcgtgcg atgacaatgg gtatcactgg gatacatcag attggatgcc
13381 aagcgttcct ctgccggaca tacaagagtt ccccaactat gaggtgattg atgagcagac
13441 acccctgtac tcagcagatc caaacgccat cgatacggac tattaccctg gaggctacga
13501 catcgaaagt gattttcctc cacccccaga agacttcccc gcagctgatg agctaccacc
13561 gttaccgccc gaattcagca atcagtttga atccatccac cctcctagag acatgcctgc
13621 cgcgggtagc ttgggttctt catcaagaaa ccggcagagg ttcaacttga atcagtattt
13681 gcccaatttt tatcccctcg atatgtctga acctcaaaca aaaggcactg gtgagaatag
13741 tacttgtaga gaaccccatg ccccttaccc gccagggtat caaagacact tcgaggcgcc
13801 cgctgtcgag agcatgccca tgtctgtgta cgcctccacc gcctcctgct ctgacgtgtc
13861 agcctgctgc gaagtggagt ccgaggtcat gatgagtgac tatgagagcg gggacgacgg
13921 ccacttcgaa gaggtgacga tcccgcccct ggattcccag cagcacacgg aagtctgact
13981 ctcaactccc cccaaagtgc ctgactttag tgaacctaga ggtgatgtga gtaatccgcg
14041 ctgttctttg cagcagtgct tccaagcttt ttttggtgag ccgaatgggc atggctgcgc
14101 tggatcctgc gcctctggac gtgctagcca tttccagtgt cccaactact gtcatcgtga
14161 ggttttcatc ggctgtgcca tttcccaacg tcttttggga tttacatctg tctgtgttaa
14221 aataatcaaa cgaaaaatca gtcctgtgtt gtcagcatga ttcatgtatt tatatagatt
14281 tgattatttt aattttcctg tctctttttt ttgtaaattt tatgtacaga tttgattttt
14341 catagtttta actagatttc caagatattt tgtgcatttg tttcaactga attttggtgg
14401 tgtcagtgcc attatctagc accctgattt tttttttttt actataacca gggtttcatt
14461 ctgtcttttt ccactgaagt gtgacatttt gttagtacat ttcagtgtag tcattcattt
14521 ctagctgtac ataggatgaa ggagagatca gatacatgaa catgtcttac atgggttgct
14581 gtatttagaa ttataaacat ttttcattat tggaaagtgt aacggggacc ttctgcatac
14641 ctgtttagaa ccaaaaccac catgacacag tttttatagt gtctgtatat ttgtgatgca
14701 atggtcttgt aaaggttttt aatgaaaact accattagcc agtctttctt actgacaata
14761 aattattaat aaaata
[00169] Homo sapiens neurofibromin 2 (NF2), transcript variant 1, mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_000268.4) (SEQ ID NO: 4) 1 gtgaccctag tcggccgctg agaggcgcgc ggagtctggg ccgctgccgt ctaggggtcc
61 cgtcccgagg cgtccccggc atctccggcc cgaatcccgg agtgccgggt cgcgcctgca
121 ccgaaggtcc cggctcctgt gccctccctg cagccgtcag ggcccgtccc ccaactcccc
181 tttccgctca ggcagggtcc tcgcggccca tgctggccgc tggggacccg cgcagcccag
241 accgttcccg ggccgggcag ccggccacca tggtggccct gaggcctgtg cagcaactcc
301 aggggggeta aagggctcag agtgcaggcc gtggggcgcg agggtcccgg gcctgagccc
361 cgcgccatgg ccggggccat cgcttcccgc atgagcttca gctctctcaa gaggaagcaa
421 cccaagacgt tcaccgtgag gatcgtcacc atggacgccg agatggagtt caattgcgag
481 atgaagtgga aagggaagga cctctttgat ttggtgtgcc ggactctggg gctccgagaa
541 acctggttct ttggactgca gtacacaatc aaggacacag tggcctggct caaaatggac
601 aagaaggtac tggatcatga tgtttcaaag gaagaaccag tcacctttca cttcttggcc
661 aaattttatc ctgagaatgc tgaagaggag ctggttcagg agatcacaca acatttattc
721 ttcttacagg taaagaagca gattttagat gaaaagatct actgccctcc tgaggcttct
781 gtgctcctgg cttcttacgc cgtccaggcc aagtatggtg actacgaccc cagtgttcac
841 aagcggggat ttttggccca agaggaattg cttccaaaaa gggtaataaa tctgtatcag
901 atgactccgg aaatgtggga ggagagaatt actgcttggt acgcagagca ccgaggccga
961 gccagggatg aagctgaaat ggaatatctg aagatagctc aggacctgga gatgtacggt
1021 gtgaactact ttgcaatccg gaataaaaag ggcacagagc tgctgcttgg agtggatgcc
1081 ctggggcttc acatttatga ccctgagaac agactgaccc ccaagatctc cttcccgtgg
1141 aatgaaatcc gaaacatctc gtacagtgac aaggagttta ctattaaacc actggataag
1201 aaaattgatg tcttcaagtt taactcctca aagcttcgtg ttaataagct gattctccag
1261 ctatgtatcg ggaaccatga tctatttatg aggagaagga aagccgattc tttggaagtt
1321 cagcagatga aagcccaggc cagggaggag aaggctagaa agcagatgga gcggcagcgc
1381 ctcgctcgag agaagcagat gagggaggag gctgaacgca cgagggatga gttggagagg
1441 aggctgctgc agatgaaaga agaagcaaca atggccaacg aagcactgat gcggtctgag
1501 gagacagctg acctgttggc tgaaaaggcc cagatcaccg aggaggaggc aaaacttctg
1561 gcccagaagg ccgcagaggc tgagcaggaa atgcagcgca tcaaggccac agcgattcgc
1621 acggaggagg agaagcgcct gatggagcag aaggtgctgg aagccgaggt gctggcactg
1681 aagatggctg aggagtcaga gaggagggcc aaagaggcag atcagctgaa gcaggacctg
1741 caggaagcac gcgaggcgga gcgaagagcc aagcagaagc tcctggagat tgccaccaag
1801 cccacgtacc cgcccatgaa cccaattcca gcaccgttgc ctcctgacat accaagcttc
1861 aacctcattg gtgacagcct gtctttcgac ttcaaagata ctgacatgaa gcggctttcc
1921 atggagatag agaaagaaaa agtggaatac atggaaaaga gcaagcatct gcaggagcag
1981 ctcaatgaac tcaagacaga aatcgaggcc ttgaaactga aagagaggga gacagctctg
2041 gatattctgc acaatgagaa ctccgacagg ggtggcagca gcaagcacaa taccattaaa
2101 aagctcacct tgcagagcgc caagtcccga gtggccttct ttgaagagct ctagcaggtg
2161 acccagccac cccaggacct gccacttctc ctgctaccgg gaccgcggga tggaccagat
2221 atcaagagag ccatccatag ggagctggct gggggtttcc gtgggagctc cagaactttc
2281 cccagctgag tgaagagccc agcccctctt atgtgcaatt gccttgaact acgaccctgt
2341 agagatttct ctcatggcgt tctagttctc tgacctgagt ctttgtttta agaagtattt
2401 gtcttccttt gtctaatgtg ggattcctga ctcccttcgt ccaaggcacc ggtgtgtgtg
2461 tgtcttgcac tccagagctg acctccaccg cccagcctgg gaagtcattg tagggagtga
2521 gacactgaag ccctgagaag ccagtgccat catccccacc ccgcccaggg ttccggaaca
2581 ttcattcccc caccggtgag gacctggcat gcagcgaagc agcccagccc ggcggatccc
2641 aggccagcac gcctgccggc ttctcatcgt cagggagccc gcccagagct cgtgacgagc
2701 aagtgctggg tccccgccag gcaccccgag gcggcgctct ggctggcagc tggtggggaa
2761 taggcagggc agctgtggct ggggagagac tttaggcaga agctgtgatg caggctgact
2821 gccagccgag gggctgggta gtgccgtgcg ggagctgatg gtacagggca ctcgctgtcc
2881 ccctccggcc accctagacc agggtccgag aggcaggcag gagccactca tgtcttcccc
2941 attgcccgac gcccatagac gctccttcct gtgtggggct ggggtactcc ctggtcgtac
3001 tgcagtcagc acccgtaacc cggctatgac cagggatctg taagccctgt ggctccacag
3061 gtgctgcttc tcactggccc agactctgag ctccaccggc ccagtctgca cggcccatct
3121 gcttcacctt ccctcccagc cacgtgccag tggccacagc ccacttccca acccactgtt
3181 gtacccaggc ctcactttgc tgttgccctt gtccctcttc gggccctgaa ttttctgttc
3241 cctgggggcc agccagggcc ctttgtgccc ctcccagcac aggcctgatg caggtgtcca
3301 ctcacaggtg gcgctcacct aggctgtcac aggacccacc tccatgccag gcaacagagg
3361 gccacagaac cacccccacg gctcactcct tggtctgggg ccaccttctt gccctttctt
3421 tttttttttt tttttttttt tccgagatgg agtctctctc tgtcacccag gtgggagtgt
3481 ggtggcacaa tctcggctca ctgcaacctc cacctcctga gttcaagcaa ttctcctgcc
3541 tcagcctccc aagtagctgg gactacaggc atgcaccacc acacttggcc aatgttctgt
3601 atttttaata gggacggggt tttgccatgt tagctaggct ggtctcaaac tcacacctgg 3661 gattacaggc atgagccact gcacccagcc ccttcttgcc ctttcttttc tccatggctg
3721 atgctgctgt ggccagccag ggcccttgag atccttccag tttggctgtt atgcaaagca
3781 ggtgatttgt cttaatcaga taaaagatag aggctatggg ggcctcaaga tttttggaga
3841 gcagaggtgg tctctggcaa ttccatctgg ttttgagaaa cttagcagct cacagagcac
3901 agagatcctg ccttcttcct actatcaggc tgacctaatg gggttgggct gctcggcaac
3961 tgcttgggtc accttgcccc aaggaaacca gccctgggtg ccacccagcc acttagggtc
4021 tacagggtgg gactccagac ctagagcgta agtatggatg ttgtggccct gtgtcttcct
4081 agtgtgaccc agccaggagc ggaagcttca ggcgtttgta aagtgaggtc tggctctgcc
4141 tcctccgttt tttttttttt tctgtttctg tttctgtttt ttttttgaga tggagtctcg
4201 ctctgtcgcc caggctggag tgcagtgtca cgatctcagc tcactgcaac ctccgcctcc
4261 caggtacaag agattctcct gcctcagcct cccgagtagc tgggactaca ggcgtgtgcc
4321 accatgcctg gctaattttt gtatttttag tagagatggg gtttcgccat gttagccaga
4381 ctggtctcga actcctgacc tcaggtgatc ctcccacccc ggcttcccaa agttctggga
4441 ttataggcgt gagccaccat gcccggtctc ttctcagtct tgaagcccat ccctggattt
4501 ccaccaggag ttactttcct cctgacctgt aaatttgttc tttaacaatg gctgcaggtg
4561 ggagcatatg gtggtttata aaaacgctgt cgggctttgt ttccttcttt agctgccgtg
4621 tctacttctg aagtctggga agtgccaagc cacgcggcct caagggagct ggctggtgtt
4681 tgagctgtgg cagaagcacc tggggctcca gggagcaggc tgggaactgc aggaccttgc
4741 tcagccagga gcacttcccc ctccttgagg caggaatact gaggtgcctc cccacagatg
4801 gagaaggtgg agaggaggat gggcctcagg agcatctcaa gccccagtag caggagaaag
4861 aaagaaagag atgcctggtt ttcacagact ggttcctgtg gctgggatga ctgcatcctt
4921 tttttttttt ttttgagacg gagtttttgc ctttgtcgcc caggctggag tgcaatggcg
4981 tgatctcggc tcaccgcaac ctccgcctcc cggattcaag caattctcct gcctcagcct
5041 cccgagtagc tgggattaca ggcacgcacc tccacgtccg gctaattttg tatttttagt
5101 ggagacgggg tttctccatg tcggtcaggc tggtctcgaa ctcccgacct caggtgatct
5161 gcccacctcg gcctcccaaa gtgctgggat tacaggcatg agccaccgcg cttggccaga
5221 ctgcgtcctt tttaagcgaa cattttaggg cctgggagtt tgtcaagtaa ggaagtctca
5281 agcccaaaga gcagcgtcct gaccatggtg gtttcattac gagcccttct gctggctctc
5341 aggcagaagc cccacagcac cgggaccatt catgaggtca ctgcccagct catgatgtcc
5401 gtgaggctgt ccttttggcc agtagccgtg tgcagctgtg tggcacagat ggcttcgttc
5461 atcctgatca aggccccacc tcagccacag cagtcccccc aacctgtgtt gtccacccta
5521 ttattcatgt acctgccagg ccctgctaga tagcaccccg tggcattaca taacacttca
5581 tgagtggctg tgtcttgtaa ttttggggac aggtttctct ctttccctct cttttttttg
5641 tcaaaagccc agagactgac aaccagctgc agtgtctaag tgttcctcac tgacagggtg
5701 gggcctcacc acccctggag ggagcagcgt tggcagggag acagcctggc ccagtgaccc
5761 tgggcccaag ccagcccctc cagggctttc agggaagcgc catccatttt caaagatgtc
5821 aaacgtcact tcttcctgta gggcccgagt cctgcctcct atcagggcca gatcatagaa
5881 ggctattttc tattctgggg aacgattata acttaaatga ttgttttaat aaaaattcta
5941 agctggaaaa
[00170] Homo sapiens large tumor suppressor kinase 1 (LATS1), transcript variant 1, mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_004690.4) (SEQ ID NO: 5)
1 agcggagtgc ggcggcggcg acactgagtg gaaggcaaaa tggcggcggc ggcggcggtg
61 gcctggtgtt aaggggagag ccaggtcctc acgacccctg ggacgggccg cgctggcccg
121 cggcagcccc cccgttcgtc tccccgctct gccccaccag ggatacttgg ggttgctggg
181 acggactctg gccgcctcag cgtccgccct caggcccgtg gccgctgtcc aggagctctg
241 ctctcccctc cagagttaat tatttatatt gtaaagaatt ttaacagtcc tggggacttc
301 cttgaaggat cattttcact tttgctcaga agaaagctct ggatctatca aataaagaag
361 tccttcgtgt gggctacata tatagatgtt ttcatgaaga ggagtgaaaa gccagaagga
421 tatagacaaa tgaggcctaa gacctttcct gccagtaact atactgtcag tagccggcaa
481 atgttacaag aaattcggga atcccttagg aatttatcta aaccatctga tgctgctaag
541 gctgagcata acatgagtaa aatgtcaacc gaagatcctc gacaagtcag aaatccaccc
601 aaatttggga cgcatcataa agccttgcag gaaattcgaa actctctgct tccatttgca
661 aatgaaacaa attcttctcg gagtacttca gaagttaatc cacaaatgct tcaagacttg
721 caagctgctg gatttgatga ggatatggtt atacaagctc ttcagaaaac taacaacaga
781 agtatagaag cagcaattga attcattagt aaaatgagtt accaagatcc tcgacgagag
841 cagatggctg cagcagctgc cagacctatt aatgccagca tgaaaccagg gaatgtgcag 901 caatcagtta accgcaaaca gagctggaaa ggttctaaag aatccttagt tcctcagagg
961 catggcccgc cactaggaga aagtgtggcc tatcattctg agagtcccaa ctcacagaca
1021 gatgtaggaa gacctttgtc tggatctggt atatcagcat ttgttcaagc tcaccctagc
1081 aacggacaga gagtgaaccc cccaccacca cctcaagtaa ggagtgttac tcctccacca
1141 cctccaagag gccagactcc ccctccaaga ggtacaactc cacctccccc ttcatgggaa
1201 ccaaactctc aaacaaagcg ctattctgga aacatggaat acgtaatctc ccgaatctct
1261 cctgtcccac ctggggcatg gcaagagggc tatcctccac cacctctcaa cacttccccc
1321 atgaatcctc ctaatcaagg acagagaggc attagttctg ttcctgttgg cagacaacca
1381 atcatcatgc agagttctag caaatttaac tttccatcag ggagacctgg aatgcagaat
1441 ggtactggac aaactgattt catgatacac caaaatgttg tccctgctgg cactgtgaat
1501 cggcagccac cacctccata tcctctgaca gcagctaatg gacaaagccc ttctgcttta
1561 caaacagggg gatctgctgc tccttcgtca tatacaaatg gaagtattcc tcagtctatg
1621 atggtgccaa acagaaatag tcataacatg gaactatata acattagtgt acctggactg
1681 caaacaaatt ggcctcagtc atcttctgct ccagcccagt catccccgag cagtgggcat
1741 gaaatcccta catggcaacc taacatacca gtgaggtcaa attcttttaa taacccatta
1801 ggaaatagag caagtcactc tgctaattct cagccttctg ctacaacagt cactgcaatt
1861 acaccagctc ctattcaaca gcctgtgaaa agtatgcgtg tattaaaacc agagctacag
1921 actgctttag cacctacaca cccttcttgg ataccacagc caattcaaac tgttcaaccc
1981 agtccttttc ctgagggaac cgcttcaaat gtgactgtga tgccacctgt tgctgaagct
2041 ccaaactatc aaggaccacc accaccctac ccaaaacatc tgctgcacca aaacccatct
2101 gttcctccat acgagtcaat cagtaagcct agcaaagagg atcagccaag cttgcccaag
2161 gaagatgaga gtgaaaagag ttatgaaaat gttgatagtg gggataaaga aaagaaacag
2221 attacaactt cacctattac tgttaggaaa aacaagaaag atgaagagcg aagggaatct
2281 cgtattcaaa gttattctcc tcaagcattt aaattcttta tggagcaaca tgtagaaaat
2341 gtactcaaat ctcatcagca gcgtctacat cgtaaaaaac aattagagaa tgaaatgatg
2401 cgggttggat tatctcaaga tgcccaggat caaatgagaa agatgctttg ccaaaaagaa
2461 tctaattaca tccgtcttaa aagggctaaa atggacaagt ctatgtttgt gaagataaag
2521 acactaggaa taggagcatt tggtgaagtc tgtctagcaa gaaaagtaga tactaaggct
2581 ttgtatgcaa caaaaactct tcgaaagaaa gatgttcttc ttcgaaatca agtcgctcat
2641 gttaaggctg agagagatat cctggctgaa gctgacaatg aatgggtagt tcgtctatat
2701 tattcattcc aagataagga caatttatac tttgtaatgg actacattcc tgggggtgat
2761 atgatgagcc tattaattag aatgggcatc tttccagaaa gtctggcacg attctacata
2821 gcagaactta cctgtgcagt tgaaagtgtt cataaaatgg gttttattca tagagatatt
2881 aaacctgata atattttgat tgatcgtgat ggtcatatta aattgactga ctttggcctc
2941 tgcactggct tcagatggac acacgattct aagtactatc agagtggtga ccatccacgg
3001 caagatagca tggatttcag taatgaatgg ggggatccct caagctgtcg atgtggagac
3061 agactgaagc cattagagcg gagagctgca cgccagcacc agcgatgtct agcacattct
3121 ttggttggga ctcccaatta tattgcacct gaagtgttgc tacgaacagg atacacacag
3181 ttgtgtgatt ggtggagtgt tggtgttatt ctttttgaaa tgttggtggg acaacctcct
3241 ttcttggcac aaacaccatt agaaacacaa atgaaggtta tcaactggca aacatctctt
3301 cacattccac cacaagctaa actcagtcct gaagcttctg atcttattat taaactttgc
3361 cgaggacccg aagatcgctt aggcaagaat ggtgctgatg aaataaaagc tcatccattt
3421 tttaaaacaa ttgacttctc cagtgacctg agacagcagt ctgcttcata cattcctaaa
3481 atcacacacc caacagatac atcaaatttt gatcctgttg atcctgataa attatggagt
3541 gatgataacg aggaagaaaa tgtaaatgac actctcaatg gatggtataa aaatggaaag
3601 catcctgaac atgcattcta tgaatttacc ttccgaaggt tttttgatga caatggctac
3661 ccatataatt atccgaagcc tattgaatat gaatacatta attcacaagg ctcagagcag
3721 cagtcggatg aagatgatca aaacacaggc tcagagatta aaaatcgcga tctagtatat
3781 gtttaacaca ctagtaaata aatgtaatga ggatttgtaa aagggcctga aatgcgaggt
3841 gttttgaggt tctgagagta aaattatgca aatatgacag agctatatat gtgtgctctg
3901 tgtacaatat tttattttcc taaattatgg gaaatccttt taaaatgtta atttattcca
3961 gccgtttaaa tcagtattta gaaaaaaatt gttataagga aagtaaatta tgaactgaat
4021 attatagtca gttcttggta cttaaagtac ttaaaataag tagtgctttg tttaaaagga
4081 gaaacctggt atctatttgt atatatgcta aataatttta aaatacaaga gtttttgaaa
4141 tttttttgaa agacagtttt agttttatct tgctttaacc aaatatgaaa cataccccct
4201 attttacaga gctctttttt cccctcataa ccttgttttt ggtagaaaat aagctagaga
4261 aattaagcca tcgtgttggt gagtgttcct aggctaatga taatctgtat aattcacatc
4321 ctgaaactaa ggaatacagg gttgaaaaaa tattaatatg tttgtcagaa ggaaaaataa
4381 tgcatttatc ttccccccca ccccccgccc catggaatat ttaatctatt taatcttctt
4441 gcatttattt ctcaagaatt actggcttta aaagaagcca aagcactact agcttttttt
4501 ccatattggt atttttgatg ctgcttccaa ttttaaaagg gaacaaagct gccataaatc 4561 gaaatgttca atactaaaag ctaaaatatt tctcaccatc ctaagcagat aattatttta
4621 attttcatat acttttcctg tatagtaact attttgatta tatcatcaat gttacctgtt
4681 tcctctttca gaacagtgct gcatatacag attgttattg gcaaaggaaa atctggctat
4741 ctggcaatat tttacctaag cgcagattaa ttggtgaaaa aattaactct taagatggcc
4801 attaataatt aggaaagttt acagagtggt cttagtagaa aattcaagtc ctcctaattt
4861 atttaaggtt caataatgcg ttcaacatgc ctgttatgta taacgcttag gttctaagga
4921 agattaaggt ttcataccaa aatacatgta gcttatcttt taggaagggg aaaaaggctc
4981 cattttgacc atagtaaaat ttgtgttgtg ttttatttcc ttttcttaag ctccactgat
5041 aagggattgt ttttatcaaa agttactatt tgtagattgg aggcataatt ttagtgattt
5101 tcatactttt agctttcttc gcataaaagc taattgaaac cgtatatgta gtaaaattaa
5161 aggcagagct gttgcagttg aattggagag ttagggcaaa gaacacttat tagcccacac
5221 ttcccacctt tctacaggtg gtcctttcag agctcagcct gaaaacccac tactgtgtta
5281 tcgtgcgtct tttggggtta gtggttcttt tgagaatctg aaggaagctg tggactcttc
5341 ctagaaaaaa aaaccacaca tacacataca atgttgcatg cagtttcaag ggattttgga
5401 catattgaaa cctatcacag gctgtaggtt atggacctct gtgccatgag aaaattgata
5461 cattaaacta agaactttgt ttttaactta ccaatcacta ctcagcacat cttatataag
5521 ctgataattt gtgatggaaa aggtctgtag catgtgatat aaggtgacct tatgaatgcc
5581 tctcttgctg gtacattaag ttgttttaat atatcatttg gaggggactg aaatgttagg
5641 ctcattacaa gcttgataca gaaatatttc tgaaggattt ctaatcagaa ttgtaaaaca
5701 atgtgctatc atgaaatcgc agtcttcacc tcatggttca tggaacattt ggttagtccc
5761 ataaaatcct atgcaaaaca aagtagttca agaattttta ggtgggtagt cacatttata
5821 aggtattcct cttactcttt gggctttttc agtctgattt atttaaattt tcatttagtt
5881 gttttacttt tggactaagg tgcaatacag tagaagataa ctttgttaca tttatgttgt
5941 aggaaaacta aggtgctgtc tcctccccct tcccttccca caaaatctgt attcccccta
6001 ttgctgaaat gtaacagaca ctacaaattt tgtattcttt ttttgttttt tgttttgaga
6061 cagggtctca ctctgtcacc caggctggag ggcagtggcg cttcacagct cactgcatcc
6121 tcaaccttgg gggctcacgc agtcctcccg cctcagcctc ccaagtagct gggcatgcgc
6181 caccaagccc agctaatttt tgtatcttta gtagagatgg ggtttcgcca tgttgcccag
6241 gttggtgtgg aattcctggg ctccagttat atgcccacct cagcctccca aagtgctggg
6301 attacagacg tgacccaccg cgcctggcgc aaatatgtat tcttttaaaa tttcctctga
6361 tactataagc tttttgcatt tatctgaagc agtatacatg cctttggtat cagcaatttt
6421 aacagtttgg atatacttat cagctatctt attccaaaac tacatctact tcttccagta
6481 tagaatctgg tgcttcctga ccaaaaagat gagaaaaaca atgttaaaaa tatagatgct
6541 ttccattgaa atggagtgaa aacattggtt ctatatgttt tcttttaaaa taattttctt
6601 attaaaaact tgctgtcttt attatactta ccctttttat gcatatcaat agtatttata
6661 agatgtgttc tataattatg taattgtaga tactgttatg cattgtccag tgacatcata
6721 aggcaggccc tactgctgta tcttttctac cttcttattt gtaatagaaa ctatagaatg
6781 tatgactaaa aagtcacttt gagattgact tttttaaaaa gttattacct tctgctgttg
6841 caaagtgcaa aactgtgagt ggaattgttt tattctgact taatgtgtta gaaattagag
6901 aatacagtgg gaggattttt agacattgct gctgctgtta cccaaggtat tttagataaa
6961 aaatttttaa taaacatccc tttggtattt aaagtggaac atttagcctg ttcattttaa
7021 tctaaagcaa aaagtaattt gggtcaaaat attggtatat ttgtaaagcg ccttaatata
7081 tccctttgtg gaaggcacta cacagtttac ttttatattg tattgtgtat ataagtattt
7141 tgtattaaaa ttgaatcagt ggcaacatta aagttttata aaatcatgct ttgttagaaa
7201 aagaattaca gctttgcaat ataactaatt gtttcgcata attctgaatg taatagatat
7261 gaataatcag cctgtgtttt taatgaactt atttgtattt tcccaatcat tttctctagt
7321 gtaatgtttg ctgggataat aaaaaaaatt aa
[00171] Homo sapiens ring finger protein 43 (RNF43), transcript variant 1, mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_017763.6) (SEQ ID NO: 6)
1 gggagttgat ccagaattgt ctttctgaaa ggaagcactc ggaatccttc cgaactttcc 61 aagtccatcc atgattcaga gatactgcct tctctctctc tgggatttta tgtgtttctg 121 atagtgaatt gttgatgtat ttgctacttt gcttcttttc tctttcaaga cttgatcatt 181 ttatatgctg tttggagaaa aaaagaactt ttgttagcaa ggaggtttca gaaatgattt 241 tggattttct gtaagtgttt aatttagttc taggggacag catctctcat cccggagtaa 301 atttctgcct ttgacctgca tggattattt tttcaggctg cggaatttct cggcacctac 361 ctgtagtatg gggcacttgg tttggttgca gagtaagaag gtggaagaat gagctgtact 421 tggttaagca gttgaaacct tttttgagca ggatctgtaa aagcataatt gaatttgttt 481 cacccccgtg gattccagtg ggcccgacag cgcaacagtg cctggcaact tgatgcatat
541 ggaagagcaa tgccaagtga tctgacataa tacaaattca cgaagtgaca ttcaatcaca
601 agcaaagttg gaaattccaa agagaagtgg tgagatcttt actagtcaca gtgaagatgg
661 gagaaaatga catacctgca gcagatgtgg gctgaaaata tcctcttctc tgcccaatca
721 ggaatgctac ctgtttttgg gaataaactt tagagaaagg aagggccaaa actacgactt
781 ggctttctga aacggaagca taaatgttct tttcctccat ttgtctggat ctgagaacct
841 gcatttggta ttagctagtg gaagcagtat gtatggttga agtgcattgc tgcagctggt
901 agcatgagtg gtggccacca gctgcagctg gctgccctct ggccctggct gctgatggct
961 accctgcagg caggctttgg acgcacagga ctggtactgg cagcagcggt ggagtctgaa
1021 agatcagcag aacagaaagc tattatcaga gtgatcccct tgaaaatgga ccccacagga
1081 aaactgaatc tcactttgga aggtgtgttt gctggtgttg ctgaaataac tccagcagaa
1141 ggaaaattaa tgcagtccca cccgctgtac ctgtgcaatg ccagtgatga cgacaatctg
1201 gagcctggat tcatcagcat cgtcaagctg gagagtcctc gacgggcccc ccgcccctgc
1261 ctgtcactgg ctagcaaggc tcggatggcg ggtgagcgag gagccagtgc tgtcctcttt
1321 gacatcactg aggatcgagc tgctgctgag cagctgcagc agccgctggg gctgacctgg
1381 ccagtggtgt tgatctgggg taatgacgct gagaagctga tggagtttgt gtacaagaac
1441 caaaaggccc atgtgaggat tgagctgaag gagcccccgg cctggccaga ttatgatgtg
1501 tggatcctaa tgacagtggt gggcaccatc tttgtgatca tcctggcttc ggtgctgcgc
1561 atccggtgcc gcccccgcca cagcaggccg gatccgcttc agcagagaac agcctgggcc
1621 atcagccagc tggccaccag gaggtaccag gccagctgca ggcaggcccg gggtgagtgg
1681 ccagactcag ggagcagctg cagctcagcc cctgtgtgtg ccatctgtct ggaggagttc
1741 tctgaggggc aggagctacg ggtcatttcc tgcctccatg agttccatcg taactgtgtg
1801 gacccctggt tacatcagca tcggacttgc cccctctgca tgttcaacat cacagaggga
1861 gattcatttt cccagtccct gggaccctct cgatcttacc aagaaccagg tcgaagactc
1921 cacctcattc gccagcatcc cggccatgcc cactaccacc tccctgctgc ctacctgttg
1981 ggcccttccc ggagtgcagt ggctcggccc ccacgacctg gtcccttcct gccatcccag
2041 gagccaggca tgggccctcg gcatcaccgc ttccccagag ctgcacatcc ccgggctcca
2101 ggagagcagc agcgcctggc aggagcccag cacccctatg cacaaggctg gggactgagc
2161 cacctccaat ccacctcaca gcaccctgct gcttgcccag tgcccctacg ccgggccagg
2221 ccccctgaca gcagtggatc tggagaaagc tattgcacag aacgcagtgg gtacctggca
2281 gatgggccag ccagtgactc cagctcaggg ccctgtcatg gctcttccag tgactctgtg
2341 gtcaactgca cggacatcag cctacagggg gtccatggca gcagttctac tttctgcagc
2401 tccctaagca gtgactttga ccccctagtg tactgcagcc ctaaagggga tccccagcga
2461 gtggacatgc agcctagtgt gacctctcgg cctcgttcct tggactcggt ggtgcccaca
2521 ggggaaaccc aggtttccag ccatgtccac taccaccgcc accggcacca ccactacaaa
2581 aagcggttcc agtggcatgg caggaagcct ggcccagaaa ccggagtccc ccagtccagg
2641 cctcctattc ctcggacaca gccccagcca gagccacctt ctcctgatca gcaagtcacc
2701 agatccaact cagcagcccc ttcggggcgg ctctctaacc cacagtgccc cagggccctc
2761 cctgagccag cccctggccc agttgacgcc tccagcatct gccccagtac cagcagtctg
2821 ttcaacttgc aaaaatccag cctctctgcc cgacacccac agaggaaaag gcgggggggt
2881 ccctccgagc ccacccctgg ctctcggccc caggatgcaa ctgtgcaccc agcttgccag
2941 atttttcccc attacacccc cagtgtggca tatccttggt ccccagaggc acaccccttg
3001 atctgtggac ctccaggcct ggacaagagg ctgctaccag aaaccccagg cccctgttac
3061 tcaaattcac agccagtgtg gttgtgcctg actcctcgcc agcccctgga accacatcca
3121 cctggggagg ggccttctga atggagttct gacaccgcag agggcaggcc atgcccttat
3181 ccgcactgcc aggtgctgtc ggcccagcct ggctcagagg aggaactcga ggagctgtgt
3241 gaacaggctg tgtgagatgt tcaggcctag ctccaaccaa gagtgtgctc cagatgtgtt
3301 tgggccctac ctggcacaga gtcctgctcc tgggaaagga aaggaccaca gcaaacacca
3361 ttctttttgc cgtacttcct agaagcactg gaagaggact ggtgatggtg gagggtgaga
3421 gggtgccgtt tcctgctcca gctccagacc ttgtctgcag aaaacatctg cagtgcagca
3481 aatccatgtc cagccaggca accagctgct gcctgtggcg tgtgtgggct ggatcccttg
3541 aaggctgagt ttttgagggc agaaagctag ctatgggtag ccaggtgtta caaaggtgct
3601 gctccttctc caacccctac ttggtttccc tcaccccaag cctcatgttc ataccagcca
3661 gtgggttcag cagaacgcat gacaccttat cacctccctc cttgggtgag ctctgaacac
3721 cagctttggc ccctccacag taaggctgct acatcagggg caaccctggc tctatcattt
3781 tccttttttg ccaaaaggac cagtagcata ggtgagccct gagcactaaa aggaggggtc
3841 cctgaagctt tcccactata gtgtggagtt ctgtccctga ggtgggtaca gcagccttgg
3901 ttcctctggg ggttgagaat aagaatagtg gggagggaaa aactcctcct tgaagatttc
3961 ctgtctcaga gtcccagaga ggtagaaagg aggaatttct gctggacttt atctgggcag
4021 aggaaggatg gaatgaaggt agaaaaggca gaattacagc tgagcgggga caacaaagag
4081 ttcttctctg ggaaaagttt tgtcttagag caaggatgga aaatggggac aacaaaggaa 4141 aagcaaagtg tgacccttgg gtttggacag cccagaggcc cagctcccca gtataagcca
4201 tacaggccag ggacccacag gagagtggat tagagcacaa gtctggcctc actgagtgga
4261 caagagctga tgggcctcat cagggtgaca ttcaccccag ggcagcctga ccactcttgg
4321 cccctcaggc attatcccat ttggaatgtg aatgtggtgg caaagtgggc agaggacccc
4381 acctgggaac ctttttccct cagttagtgg ggagactagc acctaggtac ccacatgggt
4441 atttatatct gaaccagaca gacgcttgaa tcaggcacta tgttaagaaa tatatttatt
4501 tgctaatata tttatccaca aa
[00172] Homo sapiens catenin beta 1 (CTNNB1), transcript variant 1, mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_001904.4) (SEQ ID NO: 7)
1 aagcctctcg gtctgtggca gcagcgttgg cccggccccg ggagcggaga gcgaggggag
61 gcggagacgg aggaaggtct gaggagcagc ttcagtcccc gccgagccgc caccgcaggt
121 cgaggacggt cggactcccg cggcgggagg agcctgttcc cctgagggta tttgaagtat
181 accatacaac tgttttgaaa atccagcgtg gacaatggct actcaagctg atttgatgga
241 gttggacatg gccatggaac cagacagaaa agcggctgtt agtcactggc agcaacagtc
301 ttacctggac tctggaatcc attctggtgc cactaccaca gctccttctc tgagtggtaa
361 aggcaatcct gaggaagagg atgtggatac ctcccaagtc ctgtatgagt gggaacaggg
421 attttctcag tccttcactc aagaacaagt agctgatatt gatggacagt atgcaatgac
481 tcgagctcag agggtacgag ctgctatgtt ccctgagaca ttagatgagg gcatgcagat
541 cccatctaca cagtttgatg ctgctcatcc cactaatgtc cagcgtttgg ctgaaccatc
601 acagatgctg aaacatgcag ttgtaaactt gattaactat caagatgatg cagaacttgc
661 cacacgtgca atccctgaac tgacaaaact gctaaatgac gaggaccagg tggtggttaa
721 taaggctgca gttatggtcc atcagctttc taaaaaggaa gcttccagac acgctatcat
781 gcgttctcct cagatggtgt ctgctattgt acgtaccatg cagaatacaa atgatgtaga
841 aacagctcgt tgtaccgctg ggaccttgca taacctttcc catcatcgtg agggcttact
901 ggccatcttt aagtctggag gcattcctgc cctggtgaaa atgcttggtt caccagtgga
961 ttctgtgttg ttttatgcca ttacaactct ccacaacctt ttattacatc aagaaggagc
1021 taaaatggca gtgcgtttag ctggtgggct gcagaaaatg gttgccttgc tcaacaaaac
1081 aaatgttaaa ttcttggcta ttacgacaga ctgccttcaa attttagctt atggcaacca
1141 agaaagcaag ctcatcatac tggctagtgg tggaccccaa gctttagtaa atataatgag
1201 gacctatact tacgaaaaac tactgtggac cacaagcaga gtgctgaagg tgctatctgt
1261 ctgctctagt aataagccgg ctattgtaga agctggtgga atgcaagctt taggacttca
1321 cctgacagat ccaagtcaac gtcttgttca gaactgtctt tggactctca ggaatctttc
1381 agatgctgca actaaacagg aagggatgga aggtctcctt gggactcttg ttcagcttct
1441 gggttcagat gatataaatg tggtcacctg tgcagctgga attctttcta acctcacttg
1501 caataattat aagaacaaga tgatggtctg ccaagtgggt ggtatagagg ctcttgtgcg
1561 tactgtcctt cgggctggtg acagggaaga catcactgag cctgccatct gtgctcttcg
1621 tcatctgacc agccgacacc aagaagcaga gatggcccag aatgcagttc gccttcacta
1681 tggactacca gttgtggtta agctcttaca cccaccatcc cactggcctc tgataaaggc
1741 tactgttgga ttgattcgaa atcttgccct ttgtcccgca aatcatgcac ctttgcgtga
1801 gcagggtgcc attccacgac tagttcagtt gcttgttcgt gcacatcagg atacccagcg
1861 ccgtacgtcc atgggtggga cacagcagca atttgtggag ggggtccgca tggaagaaat
1921 agttgaaggt tgtaccggag cccttcacat cctagctcgg gatgttcaca accgaattgt
1981 tatcagagga ctaaatacca ttccattgtt tgtgcagctg ctttattctc ccattgaaaa
2041 catccaaaga gtagctgcag gggtcctctg tgaacttgct caggacaagg aagctgcaga
2101 agctattgaa gctgagggag ccacagctcc tctgacagag ttacttcact ctaggaatga
2161 aggtgtggcg acatatgcag ctgctgtttt gttccgaatg tctgaggaca agccacaaga
2221 ttacaagaaa cggctttcag ttgagctgac cagctctctc ttcagaacag agccaatggc
2281 ttggaatgag actgctgatc ttggacttga tattggtgcc cagggagaac cccttggata
2341 tcgccaggat gatcctagct atcgttcttt tcactctggt ggatatggcc aggatgcctt
2401 gggtatggac cccatgatgg aacatgagat gggtggccac caccctggtg ctgactatcc
2461 agttgatggg ctgccagatc tggggcatgc ccaggacctc atggatgggc tgcctccagg
2521 tgacagcaat cagctggcct ggtttgatac tgacctgtaa atcatccttt aggtaagaag
2581 ttttaaaaag ccagtttggg taaaatactt ttactctgcc tacagaactt cagaaagact
2641 tggttggtag ggtgggagtg gtttaggcta tttgtaaatc tgccacaaaa acaggtatat
2701 actttgaaag gagatgtctt ggaacattgg aatgttctca gatttctggt tgttatgtga
2761 tcatgtgtgg aagttattaa ctttaatgtt ttttgccaca gcttttgcaa cttaatactc
2821 aaatgagtaa catttgctgt tttaaacatt aatagcagcc tttctctctt tatacagctg 2881 tattgtctga acttgcattg tgattggcct gtagagttgc tgagagggct cgaggggtgg
2941 gctggtatct cagaaagtgc ctgacacact aaccaagctg agtttcctat gggaacaatt
3001 gaagtaaact ttttgttctg gtcctttttg gtcgaggagt aacaatacaa atggattttg
3061 ggagtgactc aagaagtgaa gaatgcacaa gaatggatca caagatggaa tttatcaaac
3121 cctagccttg cttgttaaat tttttttttt ttttttttaa gaatatctgt aatggtactg
3181 actttgcttg ctttgaagta gctctttttt tttttttttt tttttttttg cagtaactgt
3241 tttttaagtc tctcgtagtg ttaagttata gtgaatactg ctacagcaat ttctaatttt
3301 taagaattga gtaatggtgt agaacactaa ttcataatca ctctaattaa ttgtaatctg
3361 aataaagtgt aacaattgtg tagccttttt gtataaaata gacaaataga aaatggtcca
3421 attagtttcc tttttaatat gcttaaaata agcaggtgga tctatttcat gtttttgatc
3481 aaaaactatt tgggatatgt atgggtaggg taaatcagta agaggtgtta tttggaacct
3541 tgttttggac agtttaccag ttgcctttta tcccaaagtt gttgtaacct gctgtgatac
3601 gatgcttcaa gagaaaatgc ggttataaaa aatggttcag aattaaactt ttaattcatt
3661 c
[00173] Homo sapiens axin 2 (AXIN2), mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_004655.4) (SEQ ID NO: 8)
1 gcggctgtga ttggcgcggc gggatcactg gctccgcgag cctggcccgg gggagtcggc 61 tggagccggc tgcgctttga taaggtcctg gcaactcagt aacagcccga gagccgggaa 121 ataaaaataa cccctcagag cgatggattt cggggccgcc cggcggccga ggcgcccgcc 181 gaaggccctg ctgtaaaaga gaggaggttc agatgagccc ctgctgactt gagagagaca 241 gagagaccac gccgattgct gagaggaact ggaagaagaa aaattcccag actcagtggg 301 aagagctccc tcaccatgag tagcgctatg ttggtgactt gcctcccgga ccccagcagc 361 agcttccgtg aggatgcccc gcggccccca gtgccagggg aagaagggga gaccccaccg 421 tgtcagccag gggtgggcaa gggccaggtc accaaaccca tgcctgtctc ttccaacacc 481 aggcggaacg aagatgggtt gggggageeg gaggggcggg catctccgga ttcccctctg 541 acccggtgga ccaagtcctt acactcctta ttgggcgatc aagacggtgc ttacctgttc 601 cgaactttcc tggagaggga gaaatgcgtg gataccttag acttctggtt tgcctgcaat 661 ggattcaggc agatgaacct gaaggatacc aaaactttac gagtagccaa agcgatctac 721 aaaaggtaca ttgagaacaa cagcattgtc tccaagcagc tgaagcctgc caccaagacc 781 tacataagag atggcatcaa gaagcagcag attgattcca tcatgtttga ccaggcgcag 841 accgagatcc agtcggtgat ggaggaaaat gcctaccaga tgtttttgac ttctgatata 901 tacctcgaat atgtgaggag tgggggagaa aacacagctt acatgagtaa tgggggactc 961 gggagcctaa aggtcgtgtg tggctatctc cccaccttga atgaagaaga ggagtggact 1021 tgtgccgact tcaagtgcaa actttcgcca accgtggttg gcttgtccag caaaactctg 1081 agggccacgg cgagtgtgag gtccacggaa actgttgaca gtggatacag gtccttcaag 1141 aggagcgatc ctgttaatcc ttatcacata ggttctggct atgtctttgc accagccacc 1201 agcgccaacg acagtgagat atccagtgat gcgctgacgg atgattccat gtccatgacg 1261 gacagcagtg tagatggaat tcctccttat cgtgtgggca gtaagaaaca gctccagaga 1321 gaaatgcatc gcagtgtgaa ggccaatggc caagtgtctc tacctcattt cccgagaacc 1381 caccgcctgc ccaaggagat gacccccgtg gaacccgcca cctttgcagc tgagctgatc 1441 tcgaggctgg aaaagctgaa gctggagttg gagagccgcc acagcctgga ggagcgcctg 1501 cagcagatcc gagaggatga agagagagag ggctccgagc tcacactcaa ttcgcgggag 1561 ggggcgccca cgcagcaccc cctctcccta ctgccctccg gcagctacga ggaagacccg 1621 cagacgatac tggacgatca cctgtccagg gtcctcaaga cccctggctg ccagtctcca 1681 ggcgtaggcc gctatagccc ccgctcccgc tccccggacc accaccacca ccaccattcg 1741 cagtaccact ccctgctccc gcccggtggc aagctgcctc ccgcggccgc ctcgccgggc 1801 gcctgccccc tcctcggggg caaaggcttt gtgaccaagc agacgacgaa gcatgtccac 1861 caccactaca tccaccacca tgccgtcccc aagaccaagg aggagatcga ggcggaggcc 1921 acgcagcggg tgcactgctt ctgccctggg ggcagcgagt attactgcta ctcgaaatgc 1981 aaaagccact ccaaggctcc ggaaaccatg cccagcgagc agtttggcgg cagcagaggc 2041 agtaccttgc ccaaacgcaa tgggaaaggc acggagccgg gcctggccct gcccgccagg 2101 gaaggagggg cccccggcgg agctggggcc ctgcagcttc cccgggagga aggagacagg 2161 tcgcaggatg tctggcagtg gatgctggag agtgagcggc agagcaagcc caagccccat 2221 agtgcccaaa gcacaaaaaa ggcctacccc ttggagtctg cccgctcgtc tccaggcgaa 2281 cgagccagcc ggcaccatct gtgggggggc aacagcgggc acccccgcac caccccccgt 2341 gcccacctgt tcacccagga ccctgcgatg cctcccctga ccccacccaa cacgctggct 2401 cagctggagg aggcctgtcg caggctagct gaggtgtcga agcccccaaa gcagcggtgc 2461 tgtgtggcca gtcagcagag ggacaggaat cattcggcca ctgttcagac gggagccaca
2521 cccttctcca atccaagcct ggctccagaa gatcacaaag agccaaagaa actggcaggt
2581 gtccacgcgc tccaggccag tgagttggtt gtcacttact ttttctgtgg ggaagaaatt
2641 ccataccgga ggatgctgaa ggctcagagc ttgaccctgg gccactttaa agagcagctc
2701 agcaaaaagg gaaattatag gtattacttc aaaaaagcaa gcgatgagtt tgcctgtgga
2761 gcggtgtttg aggagatctg ggaggatgag acggtgctcc cgatgtatga aggccggatt
2821 ctgggcaaag tggagcggat cgattgagcc ctggggtctg gctttggtga actgttggag
2881 cccgaagctc ttgtgaactg tcttggctgt gagcaactgc gacaaaacat tttgaaggaa
2941 aattaaacca atgaagaaga caaagtctaa ggaagaatcg gccagtgggc cttcgggagg
3001 gcggggggag gttgattttc atgattcatg agctgggtac tgactgagat aagaaaagcc
3061 tgaactattt attaaaaaca tgaccactct tggctattga agatgctgcc tgtatttgag
3121 agactgccat acataatata tgacttccta gggatctgaa atccataaac taagagaaac
3181 tgtgtatagc ttacctgaac aggaatcctt actgatattt atagaacagt tgatttcccc
3241 catccccagt ttatggatat gctgctttaa acttggaagg gggagacagg aagttttaat
3301 tgttctgact aaacttagga gttgagctag gagtgcgttc atggtttctt cactaacaga
3361 ggaattatgc tttgcactac gtccctccaa gtgaagacag actgttttag acagactttt
3421 taaaatggtg ccctaccatt gacacatgca gaaattggtg cgttttgttt ttttttttcc
3481 tatgctgctc tgttttgtct taaaggtctt gagggttgac catgttgcgt catcatcaac
3541 attttggggg ttgtgttgga tgggatgatc tgttgcagag ggagaggcag ggaaccctgc
3601 tccttcgggc cccaggttga tcctgtgact gaggctcccc ctcatgtagc ctccccaggc
3661 ccagggccct gaggcctgct agaatcactg ccgctgtgct ttcgtggaaa tgacagttcc
3721 ttgttttttt tgtttctgtt tttgttttac attagtcatt ggaccacagc cattcaggaa
3781 ctaccccctg ccccacaaag aaatgaacag ttgtagggag acccagcagc acctttcctc
3841 cacacacctt cattttgatg ttcgggtttt tgtgttaagt taatctgtac attctgtttg
3901 ccattgttac ttgtactata catctgtata tagtgtacgg caaaagagta ttaatccact
3961 atctctagtg cttgacttta aatcagtaca gtacctgtac ctgcacggtc acccgctccg
4021 tgtgtcgccc tatattgagg gctcaagctt tcccttgttt tttgaaaggg gtttatgtat
4081 aaatatattt tatgcctttt tattacaagt cttgtactca atgacttttg tcatgacatt
4141 ttgttctact tatactgtaa attatgcatt ataaagagtt catttaagga aaattacttg
4201 gtacaataat tattgtaatt aagagatgta gcctttatta aaattttata tttttcaaaa
[00174] Homo sapiens APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway (APC), transcript variant 3, mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_000038.6) (SEQ ID NO: 9)
1 actggagaca gaatggaggt gctgccggac tcggaaatgg ggtccaaggg tagccaagga
61 tggctgcagc ttcatatgat cagttgttaa agcaagttga ggcactgaag atggagaact
121 caaatcttcg acaagagcta gaagataatt ccaatcatct tacaaaactg gaaactgagg
181 catctaatat gaaggaagta cttaaacaac tacaaggaag tattgaagat gaagctatgg
241 cttcttctgg acagattgat ttattagagc gtcttaaaga gcttaactta gatagcagta
301 atttccctgg agtaaaactg cggtcaaaaa tgtccctccg ttcttatgga agccgggaag
361 gatctgtatc aagccgttct ggagagtgca gtcctgttcc tatgggttca tttccaagaa
421 gagggtttgt aaatggaagc agagaaagta ctggatattt agaagaactt gagaaagaga
481 ggtcattgct tcttgctgat cttgacaaag aagaaaagga aaaagactgg tattacgctc
541 aacttcagaa tctcactaaa agaatagata gtcttccttt aactgaaaat ttttccttac
601 aaacagatat gaccagaagg caattggaat atgaagcaag gcaaatcaga gttgcgatgg
661 aagaacaact aggtacctgc caggatatgg aaaaacgagc acagcgaaga atagccagaa
721 ttcagcaaat cgaaaaggac atacttcgta tacgacagct tttacagtcc caagcaacag
781 aagcagagag gtcatctcag aacaagcatg aaaccggctc acatgatgct gagcggcaga
841 atgaaggtca aggagtggga gaaatcaaca tggcaacttc tggtaatggt cagggttcaa
901 ctacacgaat ggaccatgaa acagccagtg ttttgagttc tagtagcaca cactctgcac
961 ctcgaaggct gacaagtcat ctgggaacca aggtggaaat ggtgtattca ttgttgtcaa
1021 tgcttggtac tcatgataag gatgatatgt cgcgaacttt gctagctatg tctagctccc
1081 aagacagctg tatatccatg cgacagtctg gatgtcttcc tctcctcatc cagcttttac
1141 atggcaatga caaagactct gtattgttgg gaaattcccg gggcagtaaa gaggctcggg
1201 ccagggccag tgcagcactc cacaacatca ttcactcaca gcctgatgac aagagaggca
1261 ggcgtgaaat ccgagtcctt catcttttgg aacagatacg cgcttactgt gaaacctgtt
1321 gggagtggca ggaagctcat gaaccaggca tggaccagga caaaaatcca atgccagctc
1381 ctgttgaaca tcagatctgt cctgctgtgt gtgttctaat gaaactttca tttgatgaag
1441 agcatagaca tgcaatgaat gaactagggg gactacaggc cattgcagaa ttattgcaag 1501 tggactgtga aatgtatggg cttactaatg accactacag tattacacta agacgatatg
1561 ctggaatggc tttgacaaac ttgacttttg gagatgtagc caacaaggct acgctatgct
1621 ctatgaaagg ctgcatgaga gcacttgtgg cccaactaaa atctgaaagt gaagacttac
1681 agcaggttat tgcgagtgtt ttgaggaatt tgtcttggcg agcagatgta aatagtaaaa
1741 agacgttgcg agaagttgga agtgtgaaag cattgatgga atgtgcttta gaagttaaaa
1801 aggaatcaac cctcaaaagc gtattgagtg ccttatggaa tttgtcagca cattgcactg
1861 agaataaagc tgatatatgt gctgtagatg gtgcacttgc atttttggtt ggcactctta
1921 cttaccggag ccagacaaac actttagcca ttattgaaag tggaggtggg atattacgga
1981 atgtgtccag cttgatagct acaaatgagg accacaggca aatcctaaga gagaacaact
2041 gtctacaaac tttattacaa cacttaaaat ctcatagttt gacaatagtc agtaatgcat
2101 gtggaacttt gtggaatctc tcagcaagaa atcctaaaga ccaggaagca ttatgggaca
2161 tgggggcagt tagcatgctc aagaacctca ttcattcaaa gcacaaaatg attgctatgg
2221 gaagtgctgc agctttaagg aatctcatgg caaataggcc tgcgaagtac aaggatgcca
2281 atattatgtc tcctggctca agcttgccat ctcttcatgt taggaaacaa aaagccctag
2341 aagcagaatt agatgctcag cacttatcag aaacttttga caatatagac aatttaagtc
2401 ccaaggcatc tcatcgtagt aagcagagac acaagcaaag tctctatggt gattatgttt
2461 ttgacaccaa tcgacatgat gataataggt cagacaattt taatactggc aacatgactg
2521 tcctttcacc atatttgaat actacagtgt tacccagctc ctcttcatca agaggaagct
2581 tagatagttc tcgttctgaa aaagatagaa gtttggagag agaacgcgga attggtctag
2641 gcaactacca tccagcaaca gaaaatccag gaacttcttc aaagcgaggt ttgcagatct
2701 ccaccactgc agcccagatt gccaaagtca tggaagaagt gtcagccatt catacctctc
2761 aggaagacag aagttctggg tctaccactg aattacattg tgtgacagat gagagaaatg
2821 cacttagaag aagctctgct gcccatacac attcaaacac ttacaatttc actaagtcgg
2881 aaaattcaaa taggacatgt tctatgcctt atgccaaatt agaatacaag agatcttcaa
2941 atgatagttt aaatagtgtc agtagtagtg atggttatgg taaaagaggt caaatgaaac
3001 cctcgattga atcctattct gaagatgatg aaagtaagtt ttgcagttat ggtcaatacc
3061 cagccgacct agcccataaa atacatagtg caaatcatat ggatgataat gatggagaac
3121 tagatacacc aataaattat agtcttaaat attcagatga gcagttgaac tctggaaggc
3181 aaagtccttc acagaatgaa agatgggcaa gacccaaaca cataatagaa gatgaaataa
3241 aacaaagtga gcaaagacaa tcaaggaatc aaagtacaac ttatcctgtt tatactgaga
3301 gcactgatga taaacacctc aagttccaac cacattttgg acagcaggaa tgtgtttctc
3361 catacaggtc acggggagcc aatggttcag aaacaaatcg agtgggttct aatcatggaa
3421 ttaatcaaaa tgtaagccag tctttgtgtc aagaagatga ctatgaagat gataagccta
3481 ccaattatag tgaacgttac tctgaagaag aacagcatga agaagaagag agaccaacaa
3541 attatagcat aaaatataat gaagagaaac gtcatgtgga tcagcctatt gattatagtt
3601 taaaatatgc cacagatatt ccttcatcac agaaacagtc attttcattc tcaaagagtt
3661 catctggaca aagcagtaaa accgaacata tgtcttcaag cagtgagaat acgtccacac
3721 cttcatctaa tgccaagagg cagaatcagc tccatccaag ttctgcacag agtagaagtg
3781 gtcagcctca aaaggctgcc acttgcaaag tttcttctat taaccaagaa acaatacaga
3841 cttattgtgt agaagatact ccaatatgtt tttcaagatg tagttcatta tcatctttgt
3901 catcagctga agatgaaata ggatgtaatc agacgacaca ggaagcagat tctgctaata
3961 ccctgcaaat agcagaaata aaagaaaaga ttggaactag gtcagctgaa gatcctgtga
4021 gcgaagttcc agcagtgtca cagcacccta gaaccaaatc cagcagactg cagggttcta
4081 gtttatcttc agaatcagcc aggcacaaag ctgttgaatt ttcttcagga gcgaaatctc
4141 cctccaaaag tggtgctcag acacccaaaa gtccacctga acactatgtt caggagaccc
4201 cactcatgtt tagcagatgt acttctgtca gttcacttga tagttttgag agtcgttcga
4261 ttgccagctc cgttcagagt gaaccatgca gtggaatggt aagtggcatt ataagcccca
4321 gtgatcttcc agatagccct ggacaaacca tgccaccaag cagaagtaaa acacctccac
4381 cacctcctca aacagctcaa accaagcgag aagtacctaa aaataaagca cctactgctg
4441 aaaagagaga gagtggacct aagcaagctg cagtaaatgc tgcagttcag agggtccagg
4501 ttcttccaga tgctgatact ttattacatt ttgccacgga aagtactcca gatggatttt
4561 cttgttcatc cagcctgagt gctctgagcc tcgatgagcc atttatacag aaagatgtgg
4621 aattaagaat aatgcctcca gttcaggaaa atgacaatgg gaatgaaaca gaatcagagc
4681 agcctaaaga atcaaatgaa aaccaagaga aagaggcaga aaaaactatt gattctgaaa
4741 aggacctatt agatgattca gatgatgatg atattgaaat actagaagaa tgtattattt
4801 ctgccatgcc aacaaagtca tcacgtaaag caaaaaagcc agcccagact gcttcaaaat
4861 tacctccacc tgtggcaagg aaaccaagtc agctgcctgt gtacaaactt ctaccatcac
4921 aaaacaggtt gcaaccccaa aagcatgtta gttttacacc gggggatgat atgccacggg
4981 tgtattgtgt tgaagggaca cctataaact tttccacagc tacatctcta agtgatctaa
5041 caatcgaatc ccctccaaat gagttagctg ctggagaagg agttagagga ggggcacagt
5101 caggtgaatt tgaaaaacga gataccattc ctacagaagg cagaagtaca gatgaggctc 5161 aaggaggaaa aacctcatct gtaaccatac ctgaattgga tgacaataaa gcagaggaag
5221 gtgatattct tgcagaatgc attaattctg ctatgcccaa agggaaaagt cacaagcctt
5281 tccgtgtgaa aaagataatg gaccaggtcc agcaagcatc tgcgtcttct tctgcaccca
5341 acaaaaatca gttagatggt aagaaaaaga aaccaacttc accagtaaaa cctataccac
5401 aaaatactga atataggaca cgtgtaagaa aaaatgcaga ctcaaaaaat aatttaaatg
5461 ctgagagagt tttctcagac aacaaagatt caaagaaaca gaatttgaaa aataattcca
5521 aggtcttcaa tgataagctc ccaaataatg aagatagagt cagaggaagt tttgcttttg
5581 attcacctca tcattacacg cctattgaag gaactcctta ctgtttttca cgaaatgatt
5641 ctttgagttc tctagatttt gatgatgatg atgttgacct ttccagggaa aaggctgaat
5701 taagaaaggc aaaagaaaat aaggaatcag aggctaaagt taccagccac acagaactaa
5761 cctccaacca acaatcagct aataagacac aagctattgc aaagcagcca ataaatcgag
5821 gtcagcctaa acccatactt cagaaacaat ccacttttcc ccagtcatcc aaagacatac
5881 cagacagagg ggcagcaact gatgaaaagt tacagaattt tgctattgaa aatactccgg
5941 tttgcttttc tcataattcc tctctgagtt ctctcagtga cattgaccaa gaaaacaaca
6001 ataaagaaaa tgaacctatc aaagagactg agccccctga ctcacaggga gaaccaagta
6061 aacctcaagc atcaggctat gctcctaaat catttcatgt tgaagatacc ccagtttgtt
6121 tctcaagaaa cagttctctc agttctctta gtattgactc tgaagatgac ctgttgcagg
6181 aatgtataag ctccgcaatg ccaaaaaaga aaaagccttc aagactcaag ggtgataatg
6241 aaaaacatag tcccagaaat atgggtggca tattaggtga agatctgaca cttgatttga
6301 aagatataca gagaccagat tcagaacatg gtctatcccc tgattcagaa aattttgatt
6361 ggaaagctat tcaggaaggt gcaaattcca tagtaagtag tttacatcaa gctgctgctg
6421 ctgcatgttt atctagacaa gcttcgtctg attcagattc catcctttcc ctgaaatcag
6481 gaatctctct gggatcacca tttcatctta cacctgatca agaagaaaaa ccctttacaa
6541 gtaataaagg cccacgaatt ctaaaaccag gggagaaaag tacattggaa actaaaaaga
6601 tagaatctga aagtaaagga atcaaaggag gaaaaaaagt ttataaaagt ttgattactg
6661 gaaaagttcg atctaattca gaaatttcag gccaaatgaa acagcccctt caagcaaaca
6721 tgccttcaat ctctcgaggc aggacaatga ttcatattcc aggagttcga aatagctcct
6781 caagtacaag tcctgtttct aaaaaaggcc caccccttaa gactccagcc tccaaaagcc
6841 ctagtgaagg tcaaacagcc accacttctc ctagaggagc caagccatct gtgaaatcag
6901 aattaagccc tgttgccagg cagacatccc aaataggtgg gtcaagtaaa gcaccttcta
6961 gatcaggatc tagagattcg accccttcaa gacctgccca gcaaccatta agtagaccta
7021 tacagtctcc tggccgaaac tcaatttccc ctggtagaaa tggaataagt cctcctaaca
7081 aattatctca acttccaagg acatcatccc ctagtactgc ttcaactaag tcctcaggtt
7141 ctggaaaaat gtcatataca tctccaggta gacagatgag ccaacagaac cttaccaaac
7201 aaacaggttt atccaagaat gccagtagta ttccaagaag tgagtctgcc tccaaaggac
7261 taaatcagat gaataatggt aatggagcca ataaaaaggt agaactttct agaatgtctt
7321 caactaaatc aagtggaagt gaatctgata gatcagaaag acctgtatta gtacgccagt
7381 caactttcat caaagaagct ccaagcccaa ccttaagaag aaaattggag gaatctgctt
7441 catttgaatc tctttctcca tcatctagac cagcttctcc cactaggtcc caggcacaaa
7501 ctccagtttt aagtccttcc cttcctgata tgtctctatc cacacattcg tctgttcagg
7561 ctggtggatg gcgaaaactc ccacctaatc tcagtcccac tatagagtat aatgatggaa
7621 gaccagcaaa gcgccatgat attgcacggt ctcattctga aagtccttct agacttccaa
7681 tcaataggtc aggaacctgg aaacgtgagc acagcaaaca ttcatcatcc cttcctcgag
7741 taagcacttg gagaagaact ggaagttcat cttcaattct ttctgcttca tcagaatcca
7801 gtgaaaaagc aaaaagtgag gatgaaaaac atgtgaactc tatttcagga accaaacaaa
7861 gtaaagaaaa ccaagtatcc gcaaaaggaa catggagaaa aataaaagaa aatgaatttt
7921 ctcccacaaa tagtacttct cagaccgttt cctcaggtgc tacaaatggt gctgaatcaa
7981 agactctaat ttatcaaatg gcacctgctg tttctaaaac agaggatgtt tgggtgagaa
8041 ttgaggactg tcccattaac aatcctagat ctggaagatc tcccacaggt aatactcccc
8101 cggtgattga cagtgtttca gaaaaggcaa atccaaacat taaagattca aaagataatc
8161 aggcaaaaca aaatgtgggt aatggcagtg ttcccatgcg taccgtgggt ttggaaaatc
8221 gcctgaactc ctttattcag gtggatgccc ctgaccaaaa aggaactgag ataaaaccag
8281 gacaaaataa tcctgtccct gtatcagaga ctaatgaaag ttctatagtg gaacgtaccc
8341 cattcagttc tagcagctca agcaaacaca gttcacctag tgggactgtt gctgccagag
8401 tgactccttt taattacaac ccaagcccta ggaaaagcag cgcagatagc acttcagctc
8461 ggccatctca gatcccaact ccagtgaata acaacacaaa gaagcgagat tccaaaactg
8521 acagcacaga atccagtgga acccaaagtc ctaagcgcca ttctgggtct taccttgtga
8581 catctgttta aaagagagga agaatgaaac taagaaaatt ctatgttaat tacaactgct
8641 atatagacat tttgtttcaa atgaaacttt aaaagactga aaaattttgt aaataggttt
8701 gattcttgtt agagggtttt tgttctggaa gccatatttg atagtatact ttgtcttcac
8761 tggtcttatt ttgggaggca ctcttgatgg ttaggaaaaa aatagtaaag ccaagtatgt 8821 ttgtacagta tgttttacat gtatttaaag tagcatccca tcccaacttc ctttaattat
8881 tgcttgtctt aaaataatga acactacaga tagaaaatat gatatattgc tgttatcaat
8941 catttctaga ttataaactg actaaactta catcagggaa aaattggtat ttatgcaaaa
9001 aaaaatgttt ttgtccttgt gagtccatct aacatcataa ttaatcatgt ggctgtgaaa
9061 ttcacagtaa tatggttccc gatgaacaag tttacccagc ctgctttgct ttactgcatg
9121 aatgaaactg atggttcaat ttcagaagta atgattaaca gttatgtggt cacatgatgt
9181 gcatagagat agctacagtg taataattta cactattttg tgctccaaac aaaacaaaaa
9241 tctgtgtaac tgtaaaacat tgaatgaaac tattttacct gaactagatt ttatctgaaa
9301 gtaggtagaa tttttgctat gctgtaattt gttgtatatt ctggtatttg aggtgagatg
9361 gctgctcttt tattaatgag acatgaattg tgtctcaaca gaaactaaat gaacatttca
9421 gaataaatta ttgctgtatg taaactgtta ctgaaattgg tatttgtttg aagggtcttg
9481 tttcacattt gtattaataa ttgtttaaaa tgcctctttt aaaagcttat ataaattttt
9541 ttcttcagct tctatgcatt aagagtaaaa ttcctcttac tgtaataaaa acaattgaag
9601 aagactgttg ccacttaacc attccatgcg ttggcactta tctattcctg aaatttcttt
9661 tatgtgatta gctcatcttg atttttaata tttttccact taaacttttt tttcttactc
9721 cactggagct cagtaaaagt aaattcatgt aatagcaatg caagcagcct agcacagact
9781 aagcattgag cataataggc ccacataatt tcctctttct taatattata gaattctgta
9841 cttgaaattg attcttagac attgcagtct cttcgaggct ttacagtgta aactgtcttg
9901 ccccttcatc ttcttgttgc aactgggtct gacatgaaca ctttttatca ccctgtatgt
9961 tagggcaaga tctcagcagt gaagtataat cagcactttg ccatgctcag aaaattcaaa
10021 tcacatggaa ctttagaggt agatttaata cgattaagat attcagaagt atattttaga
10081 atccctgcct gttaaggaaa ctttatttgt ggtaggtaca gttctggggt acatgttaag
10141 tgtcccctta tacagtggag ggaagtcttc cttcctgaag gaaaataaac tgacacttat
10201 taactaagat aatttactta atatatcttc cctgatttgt tttaaaagat cagagggtga
10261 ctgatgatac atgcatacat atttgttgaa taaatgaaaa tttattttta gtgataagat
10321 tcatacactc tgtatttggg gagggaaaac ctttttaagc atggtggggc actcagatag
10381 gagtgaatac acctacctgg tgccttgaaa atcacatcaa gtagttaatt atctacccct
10441 tacctgtgtt tataacttcc aggtaatgag aatgattttt tttaaagcta aaatgccagt
10501 aaataaaagt gctatgactt gagctaagat atttgactcc aatgcctgta ctgtgtctac
10561 tgcaccactt tgtaaacact tcaatttact atctttgaaa tgattgacct ttaaattttt
10621 gccaaatgtt atctgaaatt gtctatgaat accatctact tctgttgttt tcccaggctt
10681 ccataaacaa tggagataca tgca
[00175] Homo sapiens APC membrane recruitment protein 1 (AMER1), mRNA (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_152424.4) (SEQ ID NO: 10)
1 agtgctggag gtgactggag ccgcggcgac ggcggcagca gctgcggtgg cggcgctctc
61 agccgtggca gccgaggctg cagcccggcc cagggcggct cagcggacaa taaccgggct
121 aggaacctga ccgggctgga ccccactgtg atgcttcctg actgataatg ttataacagt
181 gcctggaagc ctgaggctgc atttccagct ggacgtacct cagttgtccc catcatcatg
241 gagacccaaa aggatgaagc tgctcaggcc aagggagctg cagcctctgg gagtacccgt
301 gaacaaacag cagaaaaagg agccaagaac aaggcagctg aggcgacaga aggaccaacc
361 tcagagccat cctcatccgg cccaggtagg ctgaagaaaa ctgccatgaa actctttggt
421 ggcaagaagg gtatctgtac tctgcctagt ttctttggag ggggacggag caaaggttct
481 gggaaaggca gctccaagaa aggtctcagc aagagcaaga cccacgatgg cctgagtgaa
541 gcagcccatg gccctgaaga tgttgtcagt gaaggaactg gcttctccct gcctttgcct
601 gagttaccct gccaatttcc cagctctcag agtgcccatg gggctttgga gacaggctcc
661 agatgtaaga catctgtggc tggagccaca gagaaagctg tggctgagaa gtttccctct
721 atgcccaagc caaagaaagg cctaaaaggc ttttttagca gtatccgccg tcaccggaag
781 agcaaggtca ctggggctga gcaaagtgag ccaggggcca aggggeetga gagggtcaga
841 gccaggcctc atgagcacgt gagctcagcc cctcaggtgc cctgctttga ggagaccttc
901 caagccccta gaaaggaaaa tgctaacccc caagatgccc ctgggccaaa agtttctcca
961 acaccagaac cttctccacc agctactgag aaaatggcct gtaaagatcc agaaaaaccc
1021 atggaggcct gtgcctcagc acatgtgcaa cccaagcctg cccctgaagc cagtagccta
1081 gaggagcccc atagcccaga aacaggggag aaggtagtag caggagaggt aaacccaccc
1141 aatggccctg tgggggaccc actgagcctc ttgtttgggg atgtgacatc cctgaaaagc
1201 tttgattcat tgacaggttg tggtgacata atagcagaac aggacatgga cagtatgaca
1261 gacagcatgg cctctggggg ccagagagca aaccgagatg ggaccaagcg aagttcctgc
1321 ctggtgacct accaaggagg tggggaggag atggccttgc cagatgatga tgacgaggag
1381 gaagaagagg aagaagaggt ggaattagag gaggaagaag aggaggttaa ggaggaggaa 1441 gaagatgatg acttagaata tctgtgggaa actgcccaaa tgtatccacg gcccaatatg
1501 aacctgggct accatcccac cacatcccca ggccaccacg gctacatgct ccttgaccca
1561 gttaggtctt atcctggcct agcccctggg gaacttttga ctcctcagag tgaccagcaa
1621 gaatccgccc ccaatagtga tgaaggttat tatgactcca ccacacctgg atttgaggat
1681 gattcaggtg aggccctggg gcttgtccgc agggattgtc taccccgaga cagctacagt
1741 ggagatgccc tatatgagtt ctatgagcca gatgacagcc ttgagaactc tccacctgga
1801 gatgactgcc tttatgacct ccatggtcga agctctgaga tgtttgaccc cttcttaaac
1861 tttgagccct ttttgtcctc ccggccacct ggggcaatgg agacagagga agaacggcta
1921 gtgaccatcc agaaacagtt gttgtattgg gagcttcggc gggagcagct tgaggcccag
1981 gaggcacgtg cccgagaagc tcatgccagg gaggcccacg ccagggaggc ctatactcga
2041 gaggcttatg gcagggaagc ctatgccagg gaggcccaca cttgggaagc tcatggcagg
2101 gaggccagaa cccgagaagc ccaggcccga gaggttcgtt gtagagagac tcaagtccga
2161 gagacccagg cccggcagga gaagcccgtc ttagagtatc agatgaggcc cttaggccca
2221 tcagtgatgg gcctggcagc aggggtatca gggacctctc agatttccca ccggggaatt
2281 acctcagctt tccccaccac tgcaagcagc gagccagact ggagggactt ccgtcctctg
2341 gagaagcgtt atgaaggaac ctgctccaag aaagatcaaa gtacctgcct gatgcagctc
2401 ttccagagtg atgccatgtt tgagccagac atgcaagaag caaattttgg aggatctccc
2461 aggagggcct accctactta ttcaccccct gaagatccag aggaagagga ggttgagaag
2521 gaagggaatg ccactgtgag tttctcacag gccctggtag agttcaccag caatgggaac
2581 ctcttttcca gcatgtcctg cagctctgac tctgactcat ctttcactca aaacctccct
2641 gagctgcctc ccatggtgac ctttgacatc gctgatgtgg aacgggatgg ggaaggcaag
2701 tgtgaagaga atcctgagtt ccacaatgat gaagatcttg cagcctcctt ggaagccttt
2761 gagctgggct actatcacaa acatgccttc aacaactacc atagtcgatt ctaccaaggc
2821 ctgccctggg gtgtgagcag cctccctcga tacttgggac tgcctggcct gcaccctcga
2881 cctccacctg ctgctatggc cctcaacagg agaagccgct ctctcgacac tgcagagacc
2941 ctggagatgg agctctccaa ttcccacttg gtccagggct acctcgagtc tgatgagctg
3001 caggcccagc aggaagattc agatgaggag gacgaagagg aggaagaagg agaatggagc
3061 cgagacagtc ccctttccct ctatactgaa cccccagggg cctatgattg gcctgcttgg
3121 gctccctgtc ctcttccagt ggggccaggt cctgcctgga taagccccaa ccagttggac
3181 aggccttcca gccagtctcc atataggcag gcaacctgtt gcatacctcc tatgaccatg
3241 tcaatatcac tatcagtgcc agagtcaagg gcacctgggg aatctgggcc tcaactagct
3301 cgtccctcac acctacacct gcccatgggc ccttgctata acctccagcc acaggcctcc
3361 cagagcatga gggccaggcc tcgagatgtg ctgctgcctg ttgatgagcc cagttgctct
3421 tccagttctg gaggcttcag ccccagccct ctaccacagg ccaagcctgt gggcatcacc
3481 catggcattc ctcagctgcc cagggtccgg cctgagcacc cccagcctca gcccactcac
3541 tatgggcctt ccagccttga cctgtcaaag gagagggctg agcaaggtgc ctctcttgcc
3601 accagctact cctccactgc catgaatgga aacctagcca agtagttatt atcaattctg
3661 gagtagggac acggggcctg agcatgtgaa tggggatcag gggttgggca gaagggtggg
3721 ggggtggggg ttgttgttta acttgaaaac cctttgggcc aaggaaaact cctgtgagtt
3781 ttcaccttgg ttttcccact tgcctcttct gccatctatg gccacgttca actcaagtgc
3841 atctgcccag ggaggctgct gctgctactg cactccagtt tttgctttcg aggtttcttc
3901 ttgtgaccca cgctgggttt gggatgctgt aattttgtgc ctattccagt tgccaagtta
3961 gtgattatat atatatatat atatatatat atatatatat atatatatac acacacacac
4021 acacacacac acacacacat acatacacac acacacacaa acacacatgc acacacatat
4081 atagcatgca tccttgacac aggctaaacc tttagtgccc cctgcccctt tcccccaatg
4141 aatgatgaac cactgattag cagccaagtc tgcattgcct cccgcttggg gaagtggggc
4201 ttatttgcta ttagcaatgt gaaattatgg tacagatcct ccccacccct attccttttg
4261 gcctggcata gctgccatca ttatatcaga tgactataag ctattcatcc cagctagctg
4321 tccttagaga ggatcaagta gcgtgtgtct cacagcctat cgctgtggac tttggcatca
4381 tgaccagatg ggggcctttt aactgtcctg ccatagcttg ggttaaagac aaaaatgcta
4441 atccccttga tggagtgata aaattcatcc atttgcaaac agaagacaaa acaaggttct
4501 gttgtggaca ctgccataga gtgttgagct ccggaatgat aggatttttt ttccttcttt
4561 taagcttgtg actacctgag ttgcagatgc ttttgaattt ttgttctttt ttcctctaaa
4621 ggaaattttc ataatctcat cacaaggaac acggtctttt aattgagata agggaagaga
4681 agcaacctaa attaggcttg actatagggg ctggggtttt tgtggagtgt aggggaaaga
4741 tagaaaatga gggtccattt atcacagcca gcaagaaagg ggatttcaga ccatgcagag
4801 cttaaggtat ctcagtttct taaaagggaa aactcccttc tcaagcctcc caacacaaaa
4861 tgttccttaa gccttgccca tcccatcatt tggactctgt aataaggccc caggtttgca
4921 ctcccaagac aggataccaa aggcatctca gctgctgttc tgggcccttt aaagagcttt
4981 tatcttccaa ttagccgagt ccttagcatc atcaaatgac agggcttctt ggcagttgca
5041 gccctttatg gaatgaatgg caccctccct tctcctgcat ccatgcagtt ttcatgttaa 5101 actaggttgg aaatactggt ggggaagagc ttgctgtcag gaagacattg gaacaggcta
5161 atcttgccaa gctcaacctc tcattaatca cctgtaggag agggttcctt ttacatgtct
5221 ttattggaaa tggcatatgg aacatttttt gcttggctgt gttcactcaa attatgatta
5281 ttgcaccctc gccctcacat cccaccatct ccatgcctgt tgagagaaga agtcaacagg
5341 gttcttgcca ttcctgagat atggcaattt agcttgggaa cagatgctgt ttgcccccta
5401 agtcaaggtg actttgtggg caaactgttt cttggccagg ggatgtgtcc atgctggtct
5461 ttgtcaccat ttctcagatt ggggttggcc cagtgccctt actcacaaat agcagacctg
5521 gctggtagaa gctgcacccc tggaagcacc acatgaattt gcatggcact aacaccacca
5581 ctcaagggac ccagaccagc tcttcaggct gactttggct acagatacat tgtgaagaaa
5641 tgtatctgtt gtggagctgg agaatgaaag agggtgagga aggccctcct taccccaagc
5701 acagcattcc aagagagaag tgcccaaatt ccaactttct ggcctcttac caaagctgct
5761 ctgggatggt ggggctgaaa ttggcctggc tatttggcag gaagtaaaca ctcaccaaat
5821 gcctttacaa cagggaagaa cccacctctt gcctcttctt tcagggcagc ttgagctcct
5881 gtctacatgt ggactgtgcc agccacagca ggcggtagag ccatcaccag cctccagacc
5941 ctgctggaga agggccacca gcctatctgg gaagagaaaa aggaggtggc caacctttgg
6001 ctaagggctg agagctgccc tcaggatcag gaaggcagca tgaggcattg tctctgaggg
6061 gcactggcat agccctgaca cactttgttg ggctttggaa ggtcacacac cacagagtag
6121 ggcctggggc tgagtgagag ttcatggttt ggacagcctt gctgcctgca agtcccttca
6181 ctgccctagc cagcccagga ataggatcct taccacctga agtggggcag ccaggatatg
6241 tggctgcaga agcaggttcc tttgaatttc tagagctaag cagtttgtgg ctgaaaccca
6301 atggcagcct aggggaggaa ggaagacctg tctggggacc catggtgttg acagcacagg
6361 gtgacattgg gagagccagc caagcttcag gcctgtttcc aaacacagac tagtgctggc
6421 ttgggtggca gcaaatacac cccagaccac taaaactgtt gatatcatgt ccacacctcc
6481 aagagtacta ctagatgaac aacatgtctc cattgcaagg tcctggaata atgcttttgg
6541 atgtgatttt aagggaaaat gggacttagt ggaagtagct gccttcatct tattacccaa
6601 taggcctagt gccagacagc tgtgatcctg agaattccca gatgagactg gtccttggag
6661 gaccagtgaa tgtggataga gaaggccacc tagtaggcct ctcccagggc caggatgcca
6721 gtttcttggt gctttagagt ctccaaggaa gcactgcctt ggggcccagt tcaagccagc
6781 cctacctatc tggcctcagc ttgggtacca ggccacaaga ctgcccggat aatgggttca
6841 gtaaacacca gtctctctcc ctccttagtc ctatgccaag aagggaagta gcttcacaca
6901 ctcaggaggc tgggtgtgta cccttcatcc tgctgccagc agctttcctt acctgtgcca
6961 gtgccaccac cccacctgcc ctcagccccc aggcccagtt gctagaggga ggcatggggt
7021 ttagcaggga gacttcaagt ttacccatgt gtatgttgca ttcaagttgt ttttaatata
7081 tatatatata tatatcaaaa gtcaattatc tatttttata ttgtttgcat tttatattca
7141 tggaaaacaa tgtttatcaa ttgttctttt ctgatttatt tttaagcggt gctgtttaca
7201 gttttaaaca aaacaaagat gacacaaaaa ttgctgctgc ttgtgcagag ggctggcatc
7261 tcaactgcct agggccctcc ctctttcccc tctccctacc ttagctgtac cacactgtcc
7321 gttccctccc cccatgatag ggacagcaga agatgcccag gtactgaaga caaacgccaa
7381 gtgactcagg cgtgtgggac ctggtagaca gcttgtcatt ttctggcttt attttatgtt
7441 tttctttctt ttgaaccctt cttccccatg tctagaccct ctgagagtac tcatgtgtct
7501 tatttttttt cctcgttatg ttttgtgctt tagttttgaa atcagagtgc ccatgttgtg
7561 ctatttgtct tgttgagttt ctccaaagga gcattttggg aacattctcc acccaatggg
7621 gaaggaaggg ggtttcaacc atgtcccctt tccccaagaa gctgtgggag acagatgaca
7681 atgatgcttg cactatcagg aatttaccat ctcgttgagg aaacccttgc ataggacttc
7741 ctaggagctc agttgattgt gacattttcc cagaagagag gctttgggga actccttcac
7801 ccctcttgct gctttggggg aatctcctcc cctaccacca ttccccctcc cctgccctgc
7861 tccagctcac acgtggatgg tactttgggg aacagtgact ttcagggtga tggcttgctg
7921 gcctgatccc tgactttcca atcctatagt cactccaaag aagaaaatcc acatggtatg
7981 tatatgtgtg agggttgggt ctattgagag gtgggacttt aattattgtt attattattg
8041 gtgcttattt ttcctgctgt atatgggggt gggggtgggg gggaataaaa caggaatgta
8101 tatttaggtc atgttaaata aaatggctgg aggaaggagg gaagaaatta ggaactgcag
8161 tacatcatca ccccaggtgt aagagttatt tctctcccag tgcagaaagg ggagtgtggc
8221 ccctggctgt acctgagctt cctcttctcc atccctgaga catcacagaa tcacccgggt
8281 tctgacctct ccacttctag ctctcactga catctggata tcttgatgca ctgcctgttt
8341 gtaacaacat atacttcttt gctgaatgct aataaacttc tgggttcaag agggaacccc
8401 tcagtca
[00176] Primers or probes can be designed so that they hybridize under stringent conditions to mutant nucleotide sequences of at least one of CDKN2A, NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, CTNNB1, AXIN2, APC and AMER1, but not to the respective wild-type nucleotide sequences. Primers or probes can also be prepared that are complementary and specific for the wild-type nucleotide sequence of at least one of CDKN2A, NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, CTNNB1, AXIN2, APC and AMER1, but not to any one of the corresponding mutant nucleotide sequences. In some embodiments, the mutant nucleotide sequences of at least one of CDKN2A, NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, AXIN2, APC and AMER1 may be a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation, that results in the loss of expression and/or activity of at least one of CDKN2A, NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, AXIN2, APC and AMER1 (i.e., loss of function mutations). Alternatively, primers or probes can be designed so that they selectively hybridize to CTNNB1. In some embodiments, the mutant nucleotide sequences of CTNNB1 include mutations in the N-terminal b-TrCP binding motif of CTNNB1 that results in constitutive translocation of b-catenin to the nucleus (i.e., gain of function mutations).
[00177] In some embodiments, detection can occur through any of a variety of mobility dependent analytical techniques based on the differential rates of migration between different nucleic acid sequences. Exemplary mobility-dependent analysis techniques include electrophoresis, chromatography, mass spectroscopy, sedimentation, gradient centrifugation, field-flow fractionation, multi-stage extraction techniques, and the like. In some embodiments, mobility probes can be hybridized to amplification products, and the identity of the target nucleic acid sequence determined via a mobility dependent analysis technique of the eluted mobility probes, as described in Published PCT Applications WO04/46344 and WOO 1/92579. In some embodiments, detection can be achieved by various microarrays and related software such as the Applied Biosystems Array System with the Applied Biosystems 1700 Chemiluminescent Microarray Analyzer and other commercially available array systems available from Affymetrix, Agilent, Illumina, and Amersham Biosciences, among others (see also Gerry etal, ./. Mol. Biol. 292:251-62, 1999; De Beilis etal, Minerva Biotec 14:247-52, 2002; and Stears etal, Nat. Med. 9:14045, including supplements, 2003).
[00178] It is also understood that detection can comprise reporter groups that are incorporated into the reaction products, either as part of labeled primers or due to the incorporation of labeled dNTPs during an amplification, or attached to reaction products, for example but not limited to, via hybridization tag complements comprising reporter groups or via linker arms that are integral or attached to reaction products. In some embodiments, unlabeled reaction products may be detected using mass spectrometry. NGS Platforms
[00179] In some embodiments, high throughput, massively parallel sequencing employs sequencing-by-synthesis with reversible dye terminators. In other embodiments, sequencing is performed via sequencing-by-ligation. In yet other embodiments, sequencing is single molecule sequencing. Examples of Next Generation Sequencing techniques include, but are not limited to pyrosequencing, Reversible dye-terminator sequencing, SOLiD sequencing, Ion semiconductor sequencing, Helioscope single molecule sequencing etc.
[00180] The Ion Torrent™ (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) amplicon sequencing system employs a flow-based approach that detects pH changes caused by the release of hydrogen ions during incorporation of unmodified nucleotides in DNA replication. For use with this system, a sequencing library is initially produced by generating DNA fragments flanked by sequencing adapters. In some embodiments, these fragments can be clonally amplified on particles by emulsion PCR. The particles with the amplified template are then placed in a silicon semiconductor sequencing chip. During replication, the chip is flooded with one nucleotide after another, and if a nucleotide complements the DNA molecule in a particular microwell of the chip, then it will be incorporated. A proton is naturally released when a nucleotide is incorporated by the polymerase in the DNA molecule, resulting in a detectable local change of pH. The pH of the solution then changes in that well and is detected by the ion sensor. If homopolymer repeats are present in the template sequence, multiple nucleotides will be incorporated in a single cycle. This leads to a corresponding number of released hydrogens and a proportionally higher electronic signal.
[00181] The 454TM GS FLX ™ sequencing system (Roche, Germany), employs a light- based detection methodology in a large-scale parallel pyrosequencing system. Pyrosequencing uses DNA polymerization, adding one nucleotide species at a time and detecting and quantifying the number of nucleotides added to a given location through the light emitted by the release of attached pyrophosphates. For use with the 454™ system, adapter-ligated DNA fragments are fixed to small DNA-capture beads in a water-in-oil emulsion and amplified by PCR (emulsion PCR). Each DNA-bound bead is placed into a well on a picotiter plate and sequencing reagents are delivered across the wells of the plate. The four DNA nucleotides are added sequentially in a fixed order across the picotiter plate device during a sequencing run. During the nucleotide flow, millions of copies of DNA bound to each of the beads are sequenced in parallel. When a nucleotide complementary to the template strand is added to a well, the nucleotide is incorporated onto the existing DNA strand, generating a light signal that is recorded by a CCD camera in the instrument.
[00182] Sequencing technology based on reversible dye-terminators: DNA molecules are first attached to primers on a slide and amplified so that local clonal colonies are formed. Four types of reversible terminator bases (RT-bases) are added, and non-incorporated nucleotides are washed away. Unlike pyrosequencing, the DNA can only be extended one nucleotide at a time. A camera takes images of the fluorescently labeled nucleotides, then the dye along with the terminal 3' blocker is chemically removed from the DNA, allowing the next cycle. [00183] Helicos's single-molecule sequencing uses DNA fragments with added polyA tail adapters, which are attached to the flow cell surface. At each cycle, DNA polymerase and a single species of fluorescently labeled nucleotide are added, resulting in template-dependent extension of the surface-immobilized primer-template duplexes. The reads are performed by the Helioscope sequencer. After acquisition of images tiling the full array, chemical cleavage and release of the fluorescent label permits the subsequent cycle of extension and imaging.
[00184] Sequencing by synthesis (SBS), like the "old style" dye-termination electrophoretic sequencing, relies on incorporation of nucleotides by a DNA polymerase to determine the base sequence. A DNA library with affixed adapters is denatured into single strands and grafted to a flow cell, followed by bridge amplification to form a high-density array of spots onto a glass chip. Reversible terminator methods use reversible versions of dye-terminators, adding one nucleotide at a time, detecting fluorescence at each position by repeated removal of the blocking group to allow polymerization of another nucleotide. The signal of nucleotide incorporation can vary with fluorescently labeled nucleotides, phosphate- driven light reactions and hydrogen ion sensing having all been used. Examples of SBS platforms include Illumina GA and HiSeq 2000. The MiSeq® personal sequencing system (Alumina, Inc.) also employs sequencing by synthesis with reversible terminator chemistry.
[00185] In contrast to the sequencing by synthesis method, the sequencing by ligation method uses a DNA ligase to determine the target sequence. This sequencing method relies on enzymatic ligation of oligonucleotides that are adjacent through local complementarity on a template DNA strand. This technology employs a partition of all possible oligonucleotides of a fixed length, labeled according to the sequenced position. Oligonucleotides are annealed and ligated and the preferential ligation by DNA ligase for matching sequences results in a dinucleotide encoded color space signal at that position (through the release of a fluorescently labeled probe that corresponds to a known nucleotide at a known position along the oligo). This method is primarily used by Life Technologies’ SOLiD™ sequencers. Before sequencing, the DNA is amplified by emulsion PCR. The resulting beads, each containing only copies of the same DNA molecule, are deposited on a solid planar substrate.
[00186] SMRT™ sequencing is based on the sequencing by synthesis approach. The DNA is synthesized in zero-mode wave-guides (ZMWs)-small well-like containers with the capturing tools located at the bottom of the well. The sequencing is performed with use of unmodified polymerase (attached to the ZMW bottom) and fluorescently labeled nucleotides flowing freely in the solution. The wells are constructed in a way that only the fluorescence occurring at the bottom of the well is detected. The fluorescent label is detached from the nucleotide at its incorporation into the DNA strand, leaving an unmodified DNA strand.
Methods for Selecting Intraoperative Analgesic Regimen in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Tumor Resection Surgery [00187] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) detecting the presence of at least one mutation in one or more genes that results (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of the Hippo pathway in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery. The one or more genes may be selected from the group consisting of NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, CTNNBl, AXIN2, APC and AMER1. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the at least one mutation is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation. The at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[00188] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of one or more of NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, AXIN2, APC and AMER1 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of CTNNBl in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, mRNA expression levels are detected via real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
[00189] In any of the preceding embodiments of methods disclosed herein, the intraoperative opioid analgesic is fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. The effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic may range from about 1 MME to about 200 MMEs. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs, about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs, or about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME, about 2 MMEs, about 3 MMEs, about 4 MMEs, about 5 MMEs, about 6 MMEs, about 7 MMEs, about 8 MMEs, about 9 MMEs, about 10 MMEs, about 11 MMEs, about 12 MMEs, about 13 MMEs, about 14 MMEs, about 15 MMEs, about 16 MMEs, about 17 MMEs, about 18 MMEs, about 19 MMEs, about 20 MMEs, about 21 MMEs, about 22 MMEs, about 23 MMEs, about 24 MMEs, about 25 MMEs, about 26 MMEs, about 27 MMEs, about 28
MMEs, about 29 MMEs, about 30 MMEs, about 31 MMEs, about 32 MMEs, about 33
MMEs, about 34 MMEs, about 35 MMEs, about 36 MMEs, about 37 MMEs, about 38
MMEs, about 39 MMEs, about 40-45 MMEs, about 45-50 MMEs, about 50-55 MMEs, about 55-60 MMEs, about 60-65 MMEs, about 65-70 MMEs, about 70-75 MMEs, about 75-80 MMEs, about 80-85 MMEs, about 85-90 MMEs, about 90-95 MMEs, about 95-100 MMEs, about 100-110 MMEs, about 110-120 MMEs, about 120-130 MMEs, about 130-140 MMEs, about 140-150 MMEs, about 150-160 MMEs, about 160-170 MMEs, about 170-180 MMEs, about 180-190 MMEs, or about 190-200 MMEs. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously.
[00190] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a local anesthetic solution via an epidural catheter before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery. The effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%- 4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about 3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about 3.9 %, or about 4.0 % local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 1 ml per hour, about 1.5 ml per hour, about 2 ml per hour, about 2.5 ml per hour, about 3 ml per hour, about 3.5 ml per hour, about 4 ml per hour, about 4.5 ml per hour, about 5 ml per hour, about 5.5 ml per hour, about 6 ml per hour, about 6.5 ml per hour, about 7 ml per hour, about 7.5 ml per hour, about 8 ml per hour, about 8.5 ml per hour, about 9 ml per hour, about 9.5 ml per hour, or about 10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is administered as a single injection, a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. Examples of suitable local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
[00191] In other embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may be administered before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery using any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall ( e.g ., via serratus plane nerve block, intercostal nerve block, or paravertebral block). The effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered using any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall (e.g., via serratus plane nerve block, intercostal nerve block, or paravertebral block). In some embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about
1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about
1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about
2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about
3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about 3.9 %, or about 4.0 % local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 10 ml, about 12.5 ml, about 15 ml, about 17.5 ml, about 20 ml, about 22.5 ml, about 25 ml, about 27.5 ml, about 30 ml, about 32.5 ml, about 35 ml, about 37.5 ml, or about 40 ml when administered using any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall (e.g., via serratus plane nerve block, intercostal nerve block, or paravertebral block). Examples of suitable local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
[00192] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may further comprise an opioid (e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil). In some embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may comprise 0.5 mcg/ml-50 mcg/ml opioid. In certain embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may comprise about 0.5 mcg/ml, about 0.6 mcg/ml, about 0.7 mcg/ml, about 0.8 mcg/ml, about 0.9 mcg/ml, about 1.0 mcg/ml, about 1.5 mcg/ml, about 2.0 mcg/ml, about 2.5 mcg/ml, about 3.0 mcg/ml, about 3.5 mcg/ml, about 4.0 mcg/ml, about 4.5 mcg/ml, about 5.0 mcg/ml, about 5.5 mcg/ml, about 6.0 mcg/ml, about 6.5 mcg/ml, about 7.0 mcg/ml, about 7.5 mcg/ml, about 8.0 mcg/ml, about 8.5 mcg/ml, about 9.0 mcg/ml, about 10 mcg/ml, about 15 mcg/ml, about 20 mcg/ml, about 25 mcg/ml, about 30 mcg/ml, about 35 mcg/ml, about 40 mcg/ml, about 45 mcg/ml, or about 50 mcg/ml.
[00193] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery. Examples of post-operative opioid analgesics include, but are not limited to, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. In some embodiments, the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same opioid analgesic or different opioid analgesics. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg to about 100 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg, about 0.006 mg, about 0.007 mg, about 0.008 mg, about 0.009 mg, about 0.01 mg, about 0.02 mg, about 0.03 mg, about 0.04 mg, about 0.05 mg, about 0.06 mg, about 0.07 mg, about 0.08 mg, about 0.09 mg, about 0.1 mg, about 0.2 mg, about 0.3 mg, about 0.4 mg, about 0.5 mg, about 0.6 mg, about 0.7 mg, about 0.8 mg, about 0.9 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1- 5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 10-15 mg, about 15-20 mg, about 20-25 mg, about 25-30 mg, about 30-35 mg, about 35-40 mg, about 40-45 mg, about 45-50 mg, about 50-55 mg, about 55-60 mg, about 60-65 mg, about 65-70 mg, about 70-75 mg, about 75-80 mg, about 80-85 mg, about 85-90 mg, about 90-95 mg, or about 95-100 mg. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic may be continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr to about 10 mg/hr. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr, about 0.02 mg/hr, about 0.03 mg/hr, about 0.04 mg/hr, about 0.05 mg/hr, about 0.06 mg/hr, about 0.07 mg/hr, about 0.08 mg/hr, about 0.09 mg/hr, about 0.1 mg/hr, about 0.2 mg/hr, about 0.3 mg/hr, about 0.4 mg/hr, about 0.5 mg/hr, about 0.6 mg/hr, about 0.7 mg/hr, about 0.8 mg/hr, about 0.9 mg/hr, about 1 mg/hr, about 1.5 mg/hr, about 2 mg/hr, about 2.5 mg/hr, about 3 mg/hr, about 3.5 mg/hr, about 4 mg/hr, about 4.5 mg/hr, about 5 mg/hr, about 5.5 mg/hr, about 6 mg/hr, about 6.5 mg/hr, about 7 mg/hr, about 7.5 mg/hr, about 8 mg/hr, about 8.5 mg/hr, about 9 mg/hr, about 9.5 mg/hr, or about 10 mg/hr. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously, orally, or transdermally.
[00194] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer for treatment with an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic comprising (a) (i) detecting the presence of at least one mutation in CDKN2A in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient, wherein the at least one mutation reduces CDKN2A expression and/or activity levels, and/or (ii) detecting elevated FGA in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient compared to a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery. The at least one mutation in CDKN2A may be a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation. The at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, FGA is detected via next-generation sequencing.
[00195] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of CDKN2A in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, mRNA expression levels are detected via real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase- PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein FGA in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient is elevated compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, FGA is detected via next-generation sequencing.
[00196] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is an amide-type local anesthetic or an ester- type local anesthetic. Examples of amide-type local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidoeaine, ropivacaine, or levobupivaeaine. Examples of ester-type local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, or benzocaine. The opioid-free intraoperative analgesic may be administered via an epidural catheter. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is about 0.05%-4% amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about 3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about 3.9 %, or about 4.0 % amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 1 ml per hour, about 1.5 ml per hour, about 2 ml per hour, about 2.5 ml per hour, about 3 ml per hour, about 3.5 ml per hour, about 4 ml per hour, about 4.5 ml per hour, about 5 ml per hour, about 5.5 ml per hour, about 6 ml per hour, about 6.5 ml per hour, about 7 ml per hour, about 7.5 ml per hour, about 8 ml per hour, about 8.5 ml per hour, about 9 ml per hour, about 9.5 ml per hour, or about 10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic may be administered as a single injection, a series of bolus doses, or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery.
[00197] In certain embodiments, the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic may be administered via any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall, such as via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block, or via a paravertebral block. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is about 0.05%-4% amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered via any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall, such as via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block, or via a paravertebral block. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about 3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about 3.9 %, or about 4.0 % amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 10 ml, about 12.5 ml, about 15 ml, about 17.5 ml, about 20 ml, about 22.5 ml, about 25 ml, about 27.5 ml, about 30 ml, about 32.5 ml, about 35 ml, about 37.5 ml, or about 40 ml when administered via any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall, such as via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block, or via a paravertebral block.
[00198] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free post-operative analgesic after the tumor resection surgery. Examples of suitable opioid-free post-operative analgesics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine. In some embodiments, the opioid-free post operative analgesic and the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic are the same analgesic or different analgesics. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the opioid-free post operative analgesic and the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic are the same or different. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the opioid-free post operative analgesic is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8
%, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5
%, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about 3.2
%, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about 3.9
%, or about 4.0 % amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 10 ml, about 12.5 ml, about 15 ml, about 17.5 ml, about 20 ml, about 22.5 ml, about 25 ml, about 27.5 ml, about 30 ml, about 32.5 ml, about 35 ml, about 37.5 ml, or about 40 ml when administered via any regional anesthesia technique directed at nerves innervating the thorax and chest wall, such as via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block, or via a paravertebral block.
[00199] In any and all embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient exhibits stage I, stage II or stage III lung cancer. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient has been diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The histologic subtype of the lung adenocarcinoma may be lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, solid or unknown.
[00200] In any of the preceding embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient has received an adjuvant therapy. The adjuvant therapy may be chemotherapy, lobectomy, radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the patient is human.
[00201] In any and all embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient comprises biopsied tumor tissue, whole blood, plasma, or serum.
[00202] Administration of any of the intraoperative or postoperative analgesics disclosed herein can be carried out by any suitable route, including but not limited to, orally, intranasally, parenterally (intravenously, intramuscularly, intraperitoneally, or subcutaneously), rectally, intrathecally, intratumorally or topically.
Methods for Selecting Intraoperative Analgesic Regimen in Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Tumor Resection Surgery [00203] Administration of any of the intraoperative or postoperative analgesics disclosed herein can be carried out by any suitable route, including but not limited to, orally, intranasally, parenterally (intravenously, intramuscularly, intraperitoneally, or subcutaneously), rectally, intrathecally, intratumorally or topically.
[00204] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced or undetectable compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and/or PMS2 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. [00205] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, IL1RN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, IL1RN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, the gene expression levels of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, at least 24, at least 25, at least 26, at least 27, at least 28, at least 29, at least 30, at least 31, at least 32, at least 33, at least 34, at least 35, at least 36, at least 37, at least 38, at least 39, or 40 genes selected from among CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, IL1RN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[00206] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPY1R, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCB1, SCT, NTS, NPFFR1, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, the gene expression levels of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, at least 24, at least 25, at least 26, at least 27, at least 28, at least 29, at least 30, at least 31, at least 32, at least 33, at least 34, at least 35, at least 36, at least 37, at least 38, at least 39, at least 40, at least 41, at least 42, or
43 genes selected from among GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[00207] In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising (a) detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient relative to a predetermined threshold; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises at least one mutation that results in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the at least one mutation is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation. The at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[00208] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the reduced activity of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNBl, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAML1, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6. In certain embodiments, the reduced activity of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, at least 24, at least 25, at least 26, at least 27, at least 28, at least 29, at least 30, at least 31, at least 32, at least 33, at least 34, at least 35, at least 36, at least 37, at least 38, at least 39, at least 40, at least 41, or 42 genes selected from among ADAM 17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNKIE, CTNNB1, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HD AC 5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKDl, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6. In certain embodiments, the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among ADAM 17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNKIE, CTNNB1, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HD AC 5, HEYl, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKDl, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6 are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, Immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[00209] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB. In certain embodiments, the hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, at least 24, at least 25, at least 26, or 27 genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB. In certain embodiments, the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[00210] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for reducing the risk of tumor recurrence in a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the cancer patient comprises at least one alteration in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system (e.g., MMR deficiency). In some embodiments, mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of one or more of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced or undetectable compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the mRNA or polypeptide levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises at least one genetic mutation or altered expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature. In some embodiments, the reduced activity of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNB1, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAML1, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6. In other embodiments, the hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB.
[00211] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the preceding embodiments, genetic mutations or mRNA expression levels are detected via next generation sequencing, RNA-seq, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase- PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
[00212] In any of the preceding embodiments of methods disclosed herein, the intraoperative opioid analgesic is fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. The effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic may range from about 1 MME to about 200 MMEs. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs, about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs, or about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME, about 2 MMEs, about 3 MMEs, about 4 MMEs, about 5 MMEs, about 6 MMEs, about 7 MMEs, about 8 MMEs, about 9 MMEs, about 10 MMEs, about 11 MMEs, about 12 MMEs, about 13 MMEs, about 14 MMEs, about 15 MMEs, about 16 MMEs, about 17 MMEs, about 18 MMEs, about 19 MMEs, about 20 MMEs, about 21 MMEs, about 22 MMEs, about 23 MMEs, about 24 MMEs, about 25 MMEs, about 26 MMEs, about 27 MMEs, about 28 MMEs, about 29 MMEs, about 30 MMEs, about 31 MMEs, about 32 MMEs, about 33 MMEs, about 34 MMEs, about 35 MMEs, about 36 MMEs, about 37 MMEs, about 38 MMEs, about 39 MMEs, about 40-45 MMEs, about 45-50 MMEs, about 50-55 MMEs, about 55-60 MMEs, about 60-65 MMEs, about 65-70 MMEs, about 70-75 MMEs, about 75-80 MMEs, about 80- 85 MMEs, about 85-90 MMEs, about 90-95 MMEs, about 95-100 MMEs, about 100-110 MMEs, about 110-120 MMEs, about 120-130 MMEs, about 130-140 MMEs, about 140-150 MMEs, about 150-160 MMEs, about 160-170 MMEs, about 170-180 MMEs, about 180-190 MMEs, or about 190-200 MMEs. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously.
[00213] In any and all of the preceding embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability -high (MSI-H) tumors.
[00214] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a local anesthetic solution via an epidural catheter before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery. The effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%- 4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about
1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about
2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about 3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about
3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about 3.9 %, or about 4.0 % local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 1 ml per hour, about 1.5 ml per hour, about 2 ml per hour, about 2.5 ml per hour, about 3 ml per hour, about 3.5 ml per hour, about 4 ml per hour, about 4.5 ml per hour, about 5 ml per hour, about 5.5 ml per hour, about 6 ml per hour, about 6.5 ml per hour, about 7 ml per hour, about 7.5 ml per hour, about 8 ml per hour, about 8.5 ml per hour, about 9 ml per hour, about 9.5 ml per hour, or about 10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is administered as a single injection, series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. Examples of suitable local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine. [00215] In other embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may be administered before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer ( e.g ., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). The effective amount of the local anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% local anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). In some embodiments, the effective amount of the local anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about 1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about 3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about 3.9 %, or about 4.0 % local anesthetic solution in a volume of about 10 ml, about 12.5 ml, about 15 ml, about 17.5 ml, about 20 ml, about 22.5 ml, about 25 ml, about 27.5 ml, about 30 ml, about 32.5 ml, about 35 ml, about 37.5 ml, or about 40 ml when administered using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). Examples of suitable local anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
[00216] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may further comprise an opioid (e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil). In some embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may comprise 0.5 mcg/ml-50 mcg/ml opioid. In certain embodiments, the local anesthetic solution may comprise about 0.5 mcg/ml, about 0.6 mcg/ml, about 0.7 mcg/ml, about 0.8 mcg/ml, about 0.9 mcg/ml, about 1.0 mcg/ml, about 1.5 mcg/ml, about 2.0 mcg/ml, about 2.5 mcg/ml, about 3.0 mcg/ml, about 3.5 mcg/ml, about 4.0 mcg/ml, about 4.5 mcg/ml, about 5.0 mcg/ml, about 5.5 mcg/ml, about 6.0 mcg/ml, about 6.5 mcg/ml, about 7.0 mcg/ml, about 7.5 mcg/ml, about 8.0 mcg/ml, about 8.5 mcg/ml, about 9.0 mcg/ml, about 10 mcg/ml, about 15 mcg/ml, about 20 mcg/ml, about 25 mcg/ml, about 30 mcg/ml, about 35 mcg/ml, about 40 mcg/ml, about 45 mcg/ml, or about 50 mcg/ml.
[00217] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery. Examples of post-operative opioid analgesics include, but are not limited to, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. In some embodiments, the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same opioid analgesic or different opioid analgesics. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg to about 100 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg, about 0.006 mg, about 0.007 mg, about 0.008 mg, about 0.009 mg, about 0.01 mg, about 0.02 mg, about 0.03 mg, about 0.04 mg, about 0.05 mg, about 0.06 mg, about 0.07 mg, about 0.08 mg, about 0.09 mg, about 0.1 mg, about 0.2 mg, about 0.3 mg, about 0.4 mg, about 0.5 mg, about 0.6 mg, about 0.7 mg, about 0.8 mg, about 0.9 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-
5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 10-15 mg, about 15-20 mg, about 20-25 mg, about 25-30 mg, about 30-35 mg, about 35-40 mg, about 40-45 mg, about 45-50 mg, about 50-55 mg, about 55-60 mg, about 60-65 mg, about 65-70 mg, about 70-75 mg, about 75-80 mg, about 80-85 mg, about 85-90 mg, about 90-95 mg, or about 95-100 mg. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic may be continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr to about 10 mg/hr. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr, about 0.02 mg/hr, about 0.03 mg/hr, about 0.04 mg/hr, about 0.05 mg/hr, about 0.06 mg/hr, about 0.07 mg/hr, about 0.08 mg/hr, about 0.09 mg/hr, about 0.1 mg/hr, about 0.2 mg/hr, about 0.3 mg/hr, about 0.4 mg/hr, about 0.5 mg/hr, about 0.6 mg/hr, about 0.7 mg/hr, about 0.8 mg/hr, about 0.9 mg/hr, about 1 mg/hr, about 1.5 mg/hr, about 2 mg/hr, about 2.5 mg/hr, about 3 mg/hr, about 3.5 mg/hr, about 4 mg/hr, about 4.5 mg/hr, about 5 mg/hr, about 5.5 mg/hr, about 6 mg/hr, about 6.5 mg/hr, about 7 mg/hr, about 7.5 mg/hr, about 8 mg/hr, about 8.5 mg/hr, about 9 mg/hr, about 9.5 mg/hr, or about 10 mg/hr. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously, orally, or transdermally. [00218] Additionally or alternatively, in any and all embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of one or more non-opioid analgesics selected from among ketamine, dexmedetomidine, a carboxylic acid derivative NS AID, or acetaminophen.
[00219] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered intravenously. The effective amount of ketamine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively.
[00220] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is infused at a rate of 0.04 mg/kg/hr-2.5 mg/kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is infused at a rate of about 0.04 mg/kg/hr, about 0.05 mg/kg/hr, about 0.06 mg/kg/hr, about 0.07 mg/kg/hr, about 0.08 mg/kg/hr, about 0.09 mg/kg/hr, about 0.1 mg/kg/hr, about 0.2 mg/kg/hr, about 0.3 mg/kg/hr, about 0.4 mg/kg/hr, about 0.5 mg/kg/hr, about 0.6 mg/kg/hr, about 0.7 mg/kg/hr, about 0.8 mg/kg/hr, about 0.9 mg/kg/hr, about 1.0 mg/kg/hr, about 1.1 mg/kg/hr, about 1.2 mg/kg/hr, about 1.3 mg/kg/hr, about 1.4 mg/kg/hr, about 1.5 mg/kg/hr, about 1.6 mg/kg/hr, about 1.7 mg/kg/hr, about 1.8 mg/kg/hr, about 1.9 mg/kg/hr, about 2.0 mg/kg/hr, about 2.1 mg/kg/hr, about 2.2 mg/kg/hr, about 2.3 mg/kg/hr, about 2.4 mg/kg/hr, or about 2.5 mg/kg/hr.
[00221] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered as a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg -4.5 mg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered as a bolus of about 0.04 mg/kg, about 0.05 mg/kg, about 0.06 mg/kg, about 0.07 mg/kg, about 0.08 mg/kg, about 0.09 mg/kg, about 0.1 mg/kg, about 0.2 mg/kg, about 0.3 mg/kg, about 0.4 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.6 mg/kg, about 0.7 mg/kg, about 0.8 mg/kg, about 0.9 mg/kg, about 1.0 mg/kg, about 1.1 mg/kg, about 1.2 mg/kg, about 1.3 mg/kg, about 1.4 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 1.6 mg/kg, about 1.7 mg/kg, about 1.8 mg/kg, about 1.9 mg/kg, about 2.0 mg/kg, about 2.1 mg/kg, about 2.2 mg/kg, about 2.3 mg/kg, about 2.4 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg, about 2.6 mg/kg, about 2.7 mg/kg, about 2.8 mg/kg, about 2.9 mg/kg, about 3.0 mg/kg, about 3.1 mg/kg, about 3.2 mg/kg, about 3.3 mg/kg, about 3.4 mg/kg, ab out 3.5 mg/kg, ab out 3.6 mg/kg, ab out 3.7 mg/kg, ab out 3.8 mg/kg, ab out 3.9 mg/kg, about 4.0 mg/kg, about 4.1 mg/kg, about 4.2 mg/kg, about 4.3 mg/kg, about 4.4 mg/kg, or about 4.5 mg/kg.
[00222] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of about 4-13 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of 4 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 11 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, or 13 mg/kg. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of about 6-10 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg. [00223] In any and all of the preceding embodiments of methods disclosed herein, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is an acetic acid NSAID or a propionic acid NSAID. Examples of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID include, but are not limited to, ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, naproxen, fenoprofen, ketoprofen, dexketoprofen, flurbiprofen, oxaprozin, loxoprofen, pelubiprofen, zaltoprofen, indomethacin, tolmetin, sulindac, etodolac, ketorolac, diclofenac, aceclofenac, bromfenac, or nabumeton. In some embodiments, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered orally, intravenously, or intramuscularly. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. The effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID may be administered to the cancer patient during closing of an incision.
[00224] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg-1500 mg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg, about 15 mg, about 20 mg, about 25 mg, about 30 mg, about 35 mg, about 40 mg, about 45 mg, about 50 mg, about 55 mg, about 60 mg, about 65 mg, about 70 mg, about 75 mg, about 80 mg, about 85 mg, about 90 mg, about 95 mg, about 100 mg, about 150 mg, about 200 mg, about 250 mg, about 300 mg, about 350 mg, about 400 mg, about 450 mg, about 500 mg, about 550 mg, about 600 mg, about 650 mg, about 700 mg, about 750 mg, about 800 mg, about 850 mg, about 900 mg, about 950 mg, about 1000 mg, about 1050 mg, about 1100 mg, about 1150 mg, about 1200 mg, about 1250 mg, about 1300 mg, about 1350 mg, about 1400 mg, about 1450 mg, or about 1500 mg.
[00225] In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus dose during the tumor resection surgery. In a further embodiment, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of 0.25 mg/kg- 10 mg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of about 0.25 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.75 mg/kg, about 1 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 2 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg, about 3 mg/kg, about 3.5 mg/kg, about 4 mg/kg, about 4.5 mg/kg, about 5 mg/kg, about 5.5 mg/kg, about 6 mg/kg, about 6.5 mg/kg, about 7 mg/kg, about 7.5 mg/kg, about 8 mg/kg, about 8.5 mg/kg, about 9 mg/kg, about 9.5 mg/kg, or about 10 mg/kg.
[00226] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen is administered preoperatively, intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen may range from about 80 mg to about 1000 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen is about 80 mg, about 90 mg, about 100 mg, about 110 mg, about 120 mg, about 130 mg, about 140 mg, about 150 mg, about 160 mg, about 170 mg, about 180 mg, about 190 mg, about 200 mg, about 210 mg, about 220 mg, about 230 mg, about 240 mg, about 250 mg, about 260 mg, about 270 mg, about 280 mg, about 290 mg, about 300 mg, about 310 mg, about 320 mg, about 330 mg, about 340 mg, about 350 mg, about 360 mg, about 370 mg, about 380 mg, about 390 mg, about 400 mg, about 410 mg, about 420 mg, about 430 mg, about 440 mg, about 450 mg, about 460 mg, about 470 mg, about 480 mg, about 490 mg, about 500 mg, about 510 mg, about 520 mg, about 530 mg, about 540 mg, about 550 mg, about 560 mg, about 570 mg, about 580 mg, about 590 mg, about 600 mg, about 610 mg, about 620 mg, about 630 mg, about 640 mg, about 650 mg, about 660 mg, about 670 mg, about 680 mg, about 690 mg, about 700 mg, about 710 mg, about 720 mg, about 730 mg, about 740 mg, about 750 mg, about 760 mg, about 770 mg, about 780 mg, about 790 mg, about 800 mg, about 810 mg, about 820 mg, about 830 mg, about 840 mg, about 850 mg, about 860 mg, about 870 mg, about 880 mg, about 890 mg, about 900 mg, about 910 mg, about 920 mg, about 930 mg, about 940 mg, about 950 mg, about 960 mg, about 970 mg, about 980 mg, about 990 mg, or about 1000 mg. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen may be administered as a series of bolus doses, or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In some embodiments, the acetaminophen is administered intravenously, or orally.
[00227] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of dexmedetomidine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively. In some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is administered intravenously, transdermally, intramuscularly, orally, buccally, or intranasally.
[00228] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of 0.05 pg/kg/hr to 0.7 pg /kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of about 0.05 pg/kg/hr, about 0.06 pg/kg/hr, about 0.07 pg/kg/hr, about 0.08 pg/kg/hr, about 0.09 pg/kg/hr, about 0.1 pg/kg/hr, 0.15 pg/kg/hr, about 0.2 pg/kg/hr, about 0.25 pg/kg/hr, about 0.3 pg/kg/hr, about 0.35 pg/kg/hr, about 0.4 pg/kg/hr, about 0.45 pg/kg/hr, about 0.5 pg/kg/hr, about 0.55 pg/kg/hr, about 0.6 pg/kg/hr, about 0.65 pg/kg/hr, or about 0.7 pg/kg/hr.
[00229] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of 0.05 pg/kg - 1 pg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of about 0.05 pg/kg, about 0.06 pg/kg, about 0.07 pg/kg, about 0.08 pg/kg, about 0.09 pg/kg, about 0.1 pg/kg, about 0.15 pg/kg, about 0.2 pg/kg, about 0.25 pg/kg, about 0.3 pg/kg, about 0.35 pg/kg, about 0.4 pg/kg, about 0.45 pg/kg, about 0.5 pg/kg, about 0.55 pg/kg, about 0.6 pg/kg, about 0.65 pg/kg, about 0.7 pg/kg, about 0.75 pg/kg, about 0.8 pg/kg, about 0.85 pg/kg, about 0.9 pg/kg, about 0.95 pg/kg, or about 1.0 pg/kg.
[00230] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
[00231] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, IL1RN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, the gene expression levels of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, at least 24, at least 25, at least 26, at least 27, at least 28, at least 29, at least 30, at least 31, at least 32, at least 33, at least 34, at least 35, at least 36, at least 37, at least 38, at least 39, or 40 genes selected from among CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, ILIB, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GADl, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
[00232] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPY1R, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, the gene expression levels of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, at least 24, at least 25, at least 26, at least 27, at least 28, at least 29, at least 30, at least 31, at least 32, at least 33, at least 34, at least 35, at least 36, at least 37, at least 38, at least 39, at least 40, at least 41, at least 42, or 43 genes selected from among GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPY1R, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCB1, SCT, NTS, NPFFR1, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. In certain embodiments, expression levels of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 are assayed via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability -low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
[00233] In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising (a) detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient relative to a predetermined threshold; and (b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises at least one mutation that results in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the at least one mutation is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation. The at least one mutation may be detected using any nucleic acid detection assay known in the art such as next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability- low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors.
[00234] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the hyperactivation of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNB1, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HDAC5, HEY1, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAML1, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6. In certain embodiments, the hyperactivation of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, at least 24, at least 25, at least 26, at least 27, at least 28, at least 29, at least 30, at least 31, at least 32, at least 33, at least 34, at least 35, at least 36, at least 37, at least 38, at least 39, at least 40, at least 41, or 42 genes selected from among ADAM 17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNBl, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HD AC 5, HEYl, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6. In certain embodiments, the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among ADAM 17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNBl, CULl, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAIl, HDAC11, HDAC2, HD AC 5, HEYl, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKDl, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6 are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA.
[00235] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the reduced activity of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB. In certain embodiments, the reduced activity of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, at least 24, at least 25, at least 26, or 27 genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB. In certain embodiments, the expression levels of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB are detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-seq, Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the biological sample comprises genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, and/or mRNA. [00236] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for reducing the risk of tumor recurrence in a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the cancer patient does not comprise any alterations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. In some embodiments, mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the mRNA or polypeptide levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises at least one genetic mutation or altered expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature. In some embodiments, the hyperactivation of Wnt pathway is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among ADAM 17, AXIN1, AXIN2, CCND2, CSNK1E, CTNNBl, CUL1, DKK1, DKK4, DLL1, DVL2, FRAT1, FZD1, FZD8, GNAI1, HDAC11, HDAC2, HD AC 5, HEYl, HEY2, JAG1, JAG2, KAT2A, LEF1, MAMLl, MYC, NCOR2, NCSTN, NKD1, NOTCH1, NOTCH4, NUMB, PPARD, PSEN2, PTCH1, RBPJ, SKP2, TCF7, TP53, WNT1, WNT5B, and WNT6. In other embodiments, the reduced activity of Thl immune response signature is determined by detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes selected from among IFNG, LTA, APBB2, DOK5, IL12RB2, APOD, ZBTB32, CD38, CSF2, CTLA4, CD70, DPP4, EGFL6, BST2, DUSP5, LRP8, IL22, DGKI, CCL4, GGT1, LRRN3, SYNGR3, ATP9A, BTG3, CMAHP, HBEGF, and SGCB. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient comprises microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or MSS tumors. [00237] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the preceding embodiments, genetic mutations or mRNA expression levels are detected via next generation sequencing, RNA-seq, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase- PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
[00238] The intraoperative opioid analgesic may be fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. The effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic may range from about 1 MME to about 200 MMEs. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs, about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs, or about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME, about 2 MMEs, about 3 MMEs, about 4 MMEs, about 5 MMEs, about 6 MMEs, about 7 MMEs, about 8 MMEs, about 9 MMEs, about 10 MMEs, about 11 MMEs, about 12 MMEs, about 13 MMEs, about 14 MMEs, about 15 MMEs, about 16 MMEs, about 17 MMEs, about 18 MMEs, about 19 MMEs, about 20 MMEs, about 21 MMEs, about 22 MMEs, about 23 MMEs, about 24 MMEs, about 25 MMEs, about 26 MMEs, about 27 MMEs, about 28 MMEs, about 29 MMEs, about 30 MMEs, about 31 MMEs, about 32 MMEs, about 33 MMEs, about 34 MMEs, about 35 MMEs, about 36 MMEs, about 37 MMEs, about 38 MMEs, about 39 MMEs, about 40-45 MMEs, about 45-50 MMEs, about 50-55 MMEs, about 55-60 MMEs, about 60-65 MMEs, about 65-70 MMEs, about 70-75 MMEs, about 75- 80 MMEs, about 80-85 MMEs, about 85-90 MMEs, about 90-95 MMEs, about 95-100 MMEs, about 100-110 MMEs, about 110-120 MMEs, about 120-130 MMEs, about 130-140 MMEs, about 140-150 MMEs, about 150-160 MMEs, about 160-170 MMEs, about 170-180 MMEs, about 180-190 MMEs, or about 190-200 MMEs. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously. [00239] Examples of non-opioid analgesics include regional anesthetics, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, a carboxylic acid derivative NS AID, or acetaminophen.
[00240] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a regional anesthetic solution via an epidural catheter before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery. The effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% regional anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about 1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about
1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about
2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about 3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about
3.9 %, or about 4.0 % regional anesthetic solution in a volume of about 1 ml per hour, about
1.5 ml per hour, about 2 ml per hour, about 2.5 ml per hour, about 3 ml per hour, about 3.5 ml per hour, about 4 ml per hour, about 4.5 ml per hour, about 5 ml per hour, about 5.5 ml per hour, about 6 ml per hour, about 6.5 ml per hour, about 7 ml per hour, about 7.5 ml per hour, about 8 ml per hour, about 8.5 ml per hour, about 9 ml per hour, about 9.5 ml per hour, or about 10 ml per hour when administered via an epidural catheter. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution is administered as a single injection, series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. Examples of suitable regional anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
[00241] In other embodiments, the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution may be administered before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer ( e.g ., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). The effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution may range from about 0.05%-4% regional anesthetic solution in a volume of 10-40 ml when administered using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). In some embodiments, the effective amount of the regional anesthetic solution is about 0.05 %, about 0.06 %, about 0.07 %, about 0.08 %, about 0.09 %, about 0.1 %, about 0.15 %, about 0.2 %, about 0.25 %, about 0.3 %, about 0.35 %, about 0.4 %, about 0.45 %, about 0.5 %, about 0.55 %, about 0.6 %, about 0.65 %, about 0.7 %, about 0.75 %, about 0.8 %, about 0.85 %, about 0.9 %, about 0.95 %, about 1.0 %, about
1.1 %, about 1.2 %, about 1.3 %, about 1.4 %, about 1.5 %, about 1.6 %, about 1.7 %, about
1.8 %, about 1.9 %, about 2.0 %, about 2.1 %, about 2.2 %, about 2.3 %, about 2.4 %, about 2.5 %, about 2.6 %, about 2.7 %, about 2.8 %, about 2.9 %, about 3.0 %, about 3.1 %, about
3.2 %, about 3.3 %, about 3.4 %, about 3.5 %, about 3.6 %, about 3.7 %, about 3.8 %, about
3.9 %, or about 4.0 % regional anesthetic solution in a volume of about 10 ml, about 12.5 ml, about 15 ml, about 17.5 ml, about 20 ml, about 22.5 ml, about 25 ml, about 27.5 ml, about 30 ml, about 32.5 ml, about 35 ml, about 37.5 ml, or about 40 ml when administered using any suitable regional anesthesia technique for colon cancer (e.g., transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) blocks, Rectus sheath blocks, Transversalis fascia plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks). Examples of suitable regional anesthetics include, but are not limited to, lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
[00242] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the regional anesthetic solution may further comprise an opioid (e.g., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil). In some embodiments, the regional anesthetic solution may comprise 0.5 mcg/ml-50 mcg/ml opioid. In certain embodiments, the regional anesthetic solution may comprise about 0.5 mcg/ml, about 0.6 mcg/ml, about 0.7 mcg/ml, about 0.8 mcg/ml, about 0.9 mcg/ml, about 1.0 mcg/ml, about 1.5 mcg/ml, about 2.0 mcg/ml, about 2.5 mcg/ml, about 3.0 mcg/ml, about 3.5 mcg/ml, about 4.0 mcg/ml, about 4.5 mcg/ml, about 5.0 mcg/ml, about 5.5 mcg/ml, about 6.0 mcg/ml, about 6.5 mcg/ml, about 7.0 mcg/ml, about 7.5 mcg/ml, about 8.0 mcg/ml, about 8.5 mcg/ml, about 9.0 mcg/ml, about 10 mcg/ml, about 15 mcg/ml, about 20 mcg/ml, about 25 mcg/ml, about 30 mcg/ml, about 35 mcg/ml, about 40 mcg/ml, about 45 mcg/ml, or about 50 mcg/ml.
[00243] Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the methods of the present technology further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery. Examples of post-operative opioid analgesics include, but are not limited to, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil. In some embodiments, the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same opioid analgesic or different opioid analgesics. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg to about 100 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient as a bolus of about 0.005 mg, about 0.006 mg, about 0.007 mg, about 0.008 mg, about 0.009 mg, about 0.01 mg, about 0.02 mg, about 0.03 mg, about 0.04 mg, about 0.05 mg, about 0.06 mg, about 0.07 mg, about 0.08 mg, about 0.09 mg, about 0.1 mg, about 0.2 mg, about 0.3 mg, about 0.4 mg, about 0.5 mg, about 0.6 mg, about 0.7 mg, about 0.8 mg, about 0.9 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 1-
5 mg, about 5-10 mg, about 10-15 mg, about 15-20 mg, about 20-25 mg, about 25-30 mg, about 30-35 mg, about 35-40 mg, about 40-45 mg, about 45-50 mg, about 50-55 mg, about 55-60 mg, about 60-65 mg, about 65-70 mg, about 70-75 mg, about 75-80 mg, about 80-85 mg, about 85-90 mg, about 90-95 mg, or about 95-100 mg. In other embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic may be continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr to about 10 mg/hr. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is continuously delivered to the cancer patient at a per hour rate of about 0.01 mg/hr, about 0.02 mg/hr, about 0.03 mg/hr, about 0.04 mg/hr, about 0.05 mg/hr, about 0.06 mg/hr, about 0.07 mg/hr, about 0.08 mg/hr, about 0.09 mg/hr, about 0.1 mg/hr, about 0.2 mg/hr, about 0.3 mg/hr, about 0.4 mg/hr, about 0.5 mg/hr, about 0.6 mg/hr, about 0.7 mg/hr, about 0.8 mg/hr, about 0.9 mg/hr, about 1 mg/hr, about 1.5 mg/hr, about 2 mg/hr, about 2.5 mg/hr, about 3 mg/hr, about 3.5 mg/hr, about 4 mg/hr, about 4.5 mg/hr, about 5 mg/hr, about 5.5 mg/hr, about 6 mg/hr, about 6.5 mg/hr, about 7 mg/hr, about 7.5 mg/hr, about 8 mg/hr, about 8.5 mg/hr, about 9 mg/hr, about 9.5 mg/hr, or about 10 mg/hr. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the post-operative opioid analgesic is administered intravenously, orally, or transdermally. [00244] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered intravenously. The effective amount of ketamine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively.
[00245] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is infused at a rate of 0.04 mg/kg/hr-2.5 mg/kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is infused at a rate of about 0.04 mg/kg/hr, about 0.05 mg/kg/hr, about 0.06 mg/kg/hr, about 0.07 mg/kg/hr, about 0.08 mg/kg/hr, about 0.09 mg/kg/hr, about 0.1 mg/kg/hr, about 0.2 mg/kg/hr, about 0.3 mg/kg/hr, about 0.4 mg/kg/hr, about 0.5 mg/kg/hr, about 0.6 mg/kg/hr, about 0.7 mg/kg/hr, about 0.8 mg/kg/hr, about 0.9 mg/kg/hr, about 1.0 mg/kg/hr, about 1.1 mg/kg/hr, about 1.2 mg/kg/hr, about 1.3 mg/kg/hr, about 1.4 mg/kg/hr, about 1.5 mg/kg/hr, about 1.6 mg/kg/hr, about 1.7 mg/kg/hr, about 1.8 mg/kg/hr, about 1.9 mg/kg/hr, about 2.0 mg/kg/hr, about 2.1 mg/kg/hr, about 2.2 mg/kg/hr, about 2.3 mg/kg/hr, about 2.4 mg/kg/hr, or about 2.5 mg/kg/hr.
[00246] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered as a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg -4.5 mg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered as a bolus of about 0.04 mg/kg, about 0.05 mg/kg, about 0.06 mg/kg, about 0.07 mg/kg, about 0.08 mg/kg, about 0.09 mg/kg, about 0.1 mg/kg, about 0.2 mg/kg, about 0.3 mg/kg, about 0.4 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.6 mg/kg, about 0.7 mg/kg, about 0.8 mg/kg, about 0.9 mg/kg, about 1.0 mg/kg, about 1.1 mg/kg, about 1.2 mg/kg, about 1.3 mg/kg, about 1.4 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 1.6 mg/kg, about 1.7 mg/kg, about 1.8 mg/kg, about 1.9 mg/kg, about 2.0 mg/kg, about 2.1 mg/kg, about 2.2 mg/kg, about 2.3 mg/kg, about 2.4 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg, about 2.6 mg/kg, about 2.7 mg/kg, about 2.8 mg/kg, about 2.9 mg/kg, about 3.0 mg/kg, about 3.1 mg/kg, about 3.2 mg/kg, about 3.3 mg/kg, about 3.4 mg/kg, about 3.5 mg/kg, about 3.6 mg/kg, about 3.7 mg/kg, about 3.8 mg/kg, about 3.9 mg/kg, about 4.0 mg/kg, about 4.1 mg/kg, about 4.2 mg/kg, about 4.3 mg/kg, about 4.4 mg/kg, or about 4.5 mg/kg.
[00247] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of about 4-13 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered intramuscularly at a dose of 4 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 11 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, or 13 mg/kg. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of about 6-10 mg/kg. In certain embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the ketamine is administered orally at a dose of 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg.
[00248] In any and all of the preceding embodiments of methods disclosed herein, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is an acetic acid NSAID or a propionic acid NSAID. Examples of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID include, but are not limited to, ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, naproxen, fenoprofen, ketoprofen, dexketoprofen, flurbiprofen, oxaprozin, loxoprofen, pelubiprofen, zaltoprofen, indomethacin, tolmetin, sulindac, etodolac, ketorolac, diclofenac, aceclofenac, bromfenac, or nabumeton. In some embodiments, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered orally, intravenously, or intramuscularly. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. The effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID may be administered to the cancer patient during closing of an incision.
[00249] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg-1500 mg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is about 10 mg, about 15 mg, about 20 mg, about 25 mg, about 30 mg, about 35 mg, about 40 mg, about 45 mg, about 50 mg, about 55 mg, about 60 mg, about 65 mg, about 70 mg, about 75 mg, about 80 mg, about 85 mg, about 90 mg, about 95 mg, about 100 mg, about 150 mg, about 200 mg, about 250 mg, about 300 mg, about 350 mg, about 400 mg, about 450 mg, about 500 mg, about 550 mg, about 600 mg, about 650 mg, about 700 mg, about 750 mg, about 800 mg, about 850 mg, about 900 mg, about 950 mg, about 1000 mg, about 1050 mg, about 1100 mg, about 1150 mg, about 1200 mg, about 1250 mg, about 1300 mg, about 1350 mg, about 1400 mg, about 1450 mg, or about 1500 mg.
[00250] In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus dose during the tumor resection surgery. In a further embodiment, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of 0.25 mg/kg- 10 mg/kg. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is administered as a bolus of about 0.25 mg/kg, about 0.5 mg/kg, about 0.75 mg/kg, about 1 mg/kg, about 1.5 mg/kg, about 2 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg, about 3 mg/kg, about 3.5 mg/kg, about 4 mg/kg, about 4.5 mg/kg, about 5 mg/kg, about 5.5 mg/kg, about 6 mg/kg, about 6.5 mg/kg, about 7 mg/kg, about 7.5 mg/kg, about 8 mg/kg, about 8.5 mg/kg, about 9 mg/kg, about 9.5 mg/kg, or about 10 mg/kg.
[00251] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen is administered preoperatively, intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen may range from about 80 mg to about 1000 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen is about 80 mg, about 90 mg, about 100 mg, about 110 mg, about 120 mg, about 130 mg, about 140 mg, about 150 mg, about 160 mg, about 170 mg, about 180 mg, about 190 mg, about 200 mg, about 210 mg, about 220 mg, about 230 mg, about 240 mg, about 250 mg, about 260 mg, about 270 mg, about 280 mg, about 290 mg, about 300 mg, about 310 mg, about 320 mg, about 330 mg, about 340 mg, about 350 mg, about 360 mg, about 370 mg, about 380 mg, about 390 mg, about 400 mg, about 410 mg, about 420 mg, about 430 mg, about 440 mg, about 450 mg, about 460 mg, about 470 mg, about 480 mg, about 490 mg, about 500 mg, about 510 mg, about 520 mg, about 530 mg, about 540 mg, about 550 mg, about 560 mg, about 570 mg, about 580 mg, about 590 mg, about 600 mg, about 610 mg, about 620 mg, about 630 mg, about 640 mg, about 650 mg, about 660 mg, about 670 mg, about 680 mg, about 690 mg, about 700 mg, about 710 mg, about 720 mg, about 730 mg, about 740 mg, about 750 mg, about 760 mg, about 770 mg, about 780 mg, about 790 mg, about 800 mg, about 810 mg, about 820 mg, about 830 mg, about 840 mg, about 850 mg, about 860 mg, about 870 mg, about 880 mg, about 890 mg, about 900 mg, about 910 mg, about 920 mg, about 930 mg, about 940 mg, about 950 mg, about 960 mg, about 970 mg, about 980 mg, about 990 mg, or about 1000 mg. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of the acetaminophen may be administered as a series of bolus doses, or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery. In some embodiments, the acetaminophen is administered intravenously, or orally.
[00252] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the effective amount of dexmedetomidine may be administered intraoperatively, preoperatively, and/or postoperatively. In some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is administered intravenously, transdermally, intramuscularly, orally, buccally, or intranasally.
[00253] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of 0.05 pg/kg/hr to 0.7 pg /kg/hr. In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is infused at a rate of about 0.05 pg/kg/hr, about 0.06 gg/kg/hr, about 0.07 gg/kg/hr, about 0.08 gg/kg/hr, about 0.09 gg/kg/h r, about 0.1 gg/kg/hr, 0.15 gg/kg/hr, about 0.2 gg/kg/hr, about 0.25 gg/kg/hr, about 0.3 gg/kg/hr, about 0.35 gg/kg/h r, about 0.4 gg/kg/hr, about 0.45 gg/kg/hr, about 0.5 gg/kg/hr, about 0.55 gg/kg/hr, about 0.6 gg/kg/hr, about 0.65 gg/kg/hr, or about 0.7 gg/kg/hr [00254] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of 0.05 gg/kg - 1 gg/kg In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the dexmedetomidine is administered as a bolus of about 0.05 gg/kg, about 0.06 gg/kg, about 0.07 gg/kg, about 0.08 gg/kg, about 0.09 gg/kg, about 0.1 gg/kg, about 0.15 gg/kg, about 0.2 gg/kg, about 0.25 gg/kg, about 0.3 gg/kg, about 0.35 gg/kg, about 0.4 gg/kg, about 0.45 gg/kg, about 0.5 gg/kg, about 0.55 gg/kg, about 0.6 gg/kg, about 0.65 gg/kg, about 0.7 gg/kg, about 0.75 gg/kg, about 0.8 gg/kg, about 0.85 gg/kg, about 0.9 gg/kg, about 0.95 gg/kg, or about 1.0 gg/kg.
[00255] In any and all embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient exhibits stage I, stage II or stage III colon cancer. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the cancer patient has been diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). The colon adenocarcinoma may be synchronous or non-synchronous. The tumor surgery may be laparoscopic, robotic or open. In certain embodiments, the tumor surgery is segmental or extended.
[00256] In any of the preceding embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient has received/is receiving an adjuvant therapy. The adjuvant therapy may be chemotherapy, radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy.
[00257] In any of the preceding embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the cancer patient has not received an adjuvant therapy.
[00258] Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the patient is human.
[00259] In any and all embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient comprises biopsied tumor tissue, whole blood, plasma, or serum.
EXAMPLES [00260] The present technology is further illustrated by the following Examples, which should not be construed as limiting in any way. The examples herein are provided to illustrate advantages of the present technology and to further assist a person of ordinary skill in the art with preparing or using the methods of the present technology. The examples should in no way be construed as limiting the scope of the present technology, as defined by the appended claims. The examples can include or incorporate any of the variations, aspects, or embodiments of the present technology described above. The variations, aspects, or embodiments described above may also further each include or incorporate the variations of any or all other variations, aspects or embodiments of the present technology.
Example 1: Methods for Profiling Luns Cancer Tumors
Patients [00261] After institutional review board approval, a prospectively maintained database of 740 patients with primary pathological stage I-III LUAD who underwent a complete (R0) resection from 2010 to 2019 was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, radiographic, pathologic, genomic and follow-up patient data were reviewed. Predominant invasive LUAD histologic subtype was designated as either lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, solid or unknown. The Elixhauser-van Walraven (EvW) score, a well-validated co-morbidity index, was used to quantify patient comorbid status.
[00262] All patients consented to next generation sequencing (NGS; MSK-IMPACT) on their primary tumor. The CONSORT diagram shows exclusion criteria for the patient cohort (FIG. 4). Metachronous and synchronous tumors were excluded with metachronous tumors differentiated from recurrent tumors in accordance with the Martini and Melamed criteria, as previously described in Martini N, Melamed MR. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 70(4):606-612 (1975).
MSK-IMPACT Sequencins
[00263] Tumor genomic profiling was performed on all 740 LUAD samples using the MSK-IMPACT platform (described in Cheng DT, et al., J Mol Diagn. 17: 251-264 (2015)). Genomic factors of interest were selected for further analysis, including tumor mutational burden (TMB), fraction genome altered (FGA), and all genes altered at >5% frequency in the cohort. Also included were the ten canonical oncologic signaling pathways (cell cycle, Hippo, Myc, Notch, Nrf2, Pi3K, RTK/RAS, TGFp, p53, and Wnt). [00264] Sequencing breadth of the MSK-IMPACT panel has increased over time resulting in 16, 201, and 583 patients from this cohort sequenced with 341-, 410-, and 468-gene panels, respectively (Cheng DT, et al., J Mol Diagn. 17: 251-264 (2015)). Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was defined as the total number of nonsynonymous coding variants per megabase (Mb) and was normalized by each panel size (0.98, 1.06, 1.22 Mb in the 341-, 410-, 468-gene panels, respectively). The total number of mutations by length of coding region was divided by the total number of panels. Fraction genome altered (FGA) was defined as the number of bases in sequenced genomic segments with log2 copy number fold change >0.2 or <-0.2 over the total number of bases in all sequenced segments. Known mutations and copy number alterations which have been described to activate oncogenes or inactivate tumor suppressor genes were identified using the proprietary OncoKB Knowledge Base. This system was necessary to distinguish between those mutations and alterations with known or presumed functional implications against benign variants or those with unknown clinical significance (Chakravarty D etal, JCO Precision Oncology. 1:1-84 6 (2017)).
[00265] A total of 121 genes were identified a priori in the 10 oncogenic signaling pathways. Zhou J et al, Clinical Cancer Research. 25(24):7475-7484 (2019). A pathway was considered altered in a tumor if at least one gene within the corresponding pathway template was altered. For analysis of co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity, all genes known to be drivers in LUAD were assessed (Chakravarty D et ah, JCO Precision Oncology. 1 : 1-84 6 (2017)). Mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence alterations in genes and oncogenic signaling pathways was assessed using Fisher’s exact test and P values were adjusted to correct for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Intraoperative Analsesic Asents
[00266] Doses of fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine administered intraoperatively were extracted from electronic anesthesia records, converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and summed to give total intraoperative dose, where 10 MMEs is equal to 50 meg fentanyl IV (a standard intraoperative bolus dose) (FIG. 5A). Intraoperative analgesic agents included hydromorphone, fentanyl, and morphine, with the majority of patients receiving fentanyl (FIG. 5A). Total intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were evaluated in a continuous dose-dependent manner.
Immunohistochemistry on LUAD Samples
[00267] Immunohistochemical staining was performed on ten patient samples using a hydrogen peroxidase method. Frozen tissue samples were chosen based on tissue availability from a subset of available tissue in this patient cohort. [00268] The LUAD samples were run in duplicate against matched adjacent non-tumor lung tissue samples to detect expression levels of the MOR. Tissue samples were homogenized in PBS (lOmg in IOOmI PBS) and samples were centrifuged at 3000rpm for 15 minutes at which point, the supernatant was removed and run on quantitative sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for the mu opioid receptor (MOR) purchased from MyBioSource, Inc. (San Diego, CA). A preliminary bicinchoninic acid protein assay was performed to quantify total protein in each sample and normalize all samples prior to MOR ELISA analysis. ELISA sensitivities were <7.81pg/ml with intra assay coefficient of variability (CV) <8% and inter-assay CV <10% precision. Median optical density (OD) levels for all tumor samples were obtained and compared against non tumor matched controls. Standard OD levels were analyzed on a logistic regression and median sample concentrations were estimated for both the tumor and non-tumor specimens. Standard error of the mean was estimated for tumor and non-tumor MOR sample composite concentrations. Statistical Analysis
[00269] The primary objective of the study was to quantify the association between intraoperative opioid dose and oncologic outcomes. The primary outcome was recurrence- specific survival (RSS). Time to event was determined from the time of surgical resection to the time of first recurrence, otherwise censored at the time of last follow-up. RSS was chosen in place of the alternative recurrence-free survival (RFS), time to recurrence or death from any cause, in order to determine whether opioids and the adjuncts were associated with disease progression in stage I-III LUAD. The secondary outcome was cancer specific survival (OS), which was defined as time to death from any cause.
[00270] To estimate the association between intraoperative opioids and oncologic outcomes, univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), treating intraoperative MME as a continuous variable and adjunct administration as a categorical variable. For each endpoint (RFS and OS), variables with a p-value of < 0.1 were included in the multivariable model, while retaining some clinically relevant variables. In the case of RSS analysis, patients who died without recurrence were considered censored using a cause-specific hazard model rather than a sub-distribution hazard model; in this etiological framework, the cause- specific hazard is more appropriate as it directly quantifies the hazard among subjects that are actually at risk of developing the event of interest, whereas in the sub -distribution hazard model individuals that experienced the competing event remain in the risk set. Each model was designed for the OS and RSS outcomes and were adjusted for relevant clinicopathological features. An additional multivariable model was constructed for each genomic factor of interest, for each outcome, by adding to the multivariable model a term for presence of factor alteration and a term for interaction between the factor and opioid dose.
[00271] To better visualize the impact of incremental increases in intraoperative MMEs on outcomes, predicted 5-year OS and RSS estimates, corresponding to a range of MMEs, were generated based on the final Multivariable Cox regression analyses (MVAs) for a representative patient. Survival endpoints were measured from the time of surgery and patients were censored at the time of last follow-up. OS and CSS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) approach by MME and compared using log-rank tests. Median follow up duration was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method.
[00272] All univariable models were stratified by pathologic stage. Multivariable Cox regression analyses (MV A) against each outcome were constructed in a backward elimination procedure. The set of factors for each MVA were confirmed by LASSO variable selection procedure. Because of their clinical relevance to oncologic outcomes, pathologic stage and procedure type were included in the MVAs regardless of statistical significance. Intraoperative MMEs, and procedure type were included in the MVA for both survival outcomes. The proportional hazards assumptions were assessed using scaled Schoenfeld residuals. The linearity assumption of continuous variables was assessed using restricted cubic splines in the models for both outcomes. All statistical tests were two-sided with p<0.05 indicating statistical significance. R 3.6.2 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria) was used for statistical analyses.
[00273] Genomic factors were selected for further analysis, including tumor mutational burden (TMB), fraction genome altered (FGA), and all genes altered at >5% frequency in the cohort (further adjusted by background genomic variability (TMB, FGA)). Also included were the ten canonical oncologic signaling pathways (cell cycle, Hippo, Myc, Notch, Nrf2, PI3K, RTK/RAS, TGFp, p53, and Wnt). P-values from all interaction models were adjusted for multiple testing using false discovery rate (FDR) corrections. Predicted MME Curves
[00274] The predicted 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-specific survival (RSS) estimate curves were generated based on the most frequently observed characteristics or median value for each continuous variable in the MVA (papillary/acinar histologic subtype, median Exlihauser-van Walraven score, lobectomy procedure, median age, and pathologic stage I). These predicted OS and RSS estimates by MME curve were generated for the MVAs without genomic factors as well as for the MVAs with statistically significant effects between genomic factors and intraoperative MMEs. In the case of FGA, the predicted 5-year curves represent 25th and 75th percentile for the overall cohort.
[00275] Lung Cancer Patient Demographics. Seven hundred forty patients were included in the study. The majority were female (N=489, 66%) and most were former or current smokers (N=543, 73%). The median age at surgery was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR], 61-73 years) and median Elixhauser-van Walraven (EvW) comorbidity score was 12 (IQR,
7-15).
[00276] Clinicopathologic and Analgesic Variables. Median intraoperative MMEs received by the overall cohort was 42 (IQR, 30-60 MMEs). Patients who received dexmedetomidine as a surgical adjunct received significantly less intraoperative MMEs (median 40, 30-57) compared to the no adjunct cohort (median 50, IQR 30-61). All patients had pathologically diagnosed LUAD which were differentiated into groups based on histologic subtype: lepidic (N=136, 18%), acinar/papillary (N=441, 60%), micropapillary/solid (N=153, 21%), and unknown (N=10, 1.4%). Four hundred fifty-six patients were pathologic stage I (62%), 157 patients (21%) were stage II and 127 patients (17%) were stage III. Thirteen percent of the cohort (N=96) received induction chemotherapy and most patients received a lobectomy (N=610, 82%). Almost a third (N=227, 31%) received adjuvant therapy, 31 patients (4.2%) received combination chemoradiation, 153 patients (21%) received chemotherapy alone, and 29 patients (3.9%) received radiation therapy. Median follow-up duration was 2.74 years (IQR, 1.76 - 3.82). Example 2: Association between Intraoperative Analgesics and Outcomes in Luns Cancer Patients
[00277] Five-year RSS was 61.8% (95% Cl, 54.7 - 69.7%) and OS was 74.4% (95% Cl, 68.6 - 80.6%). There were 95 deaths and 160 locoregional or distant recurrence events in this observation window. The linearity assumptions for intraoperative MME were not violated for both RSS (p=0.32) and OS (p=0.35), hence this primary exposure factor was treated as a continuous variable in the analyses. Intraoperative opioid dose was not significantly associated with RSS on either univariable or multivariable analysis. Example 3: Interaction of Gene Alterations with Opioid Dose
[00278] An exploratory analysis was performed to assess any modifying effect of tumor specific genomic alterations, delineated by stage in the oncoprint, on the opioid- survival relationship (FIG. 1A). FIG. 9 shows a loss of function/gain of function plot of the altered oncogenic pathways.
[00279] The fraction of the genome altered (FGA) refers to the percentage of copy number altered regions out of all sequenced regions. FGA may be defined as the number of bases in sequenced genomic segments with log2 copy number fold change >0.2 or <-0.2 over the total number of bases in all sequenced segments. FIG. 8 shows a distribution of the FGA within the cohort.
[00280] Higher TMB (p=0.026) and FGA (p=0.044), treated as continuous variables, resulted in even worse OS with increasing opioid dose, though the actual size of the TMB effect estimate was small (FIG. IB and FIG. 6).
[00281] When FGA was broke down into 25th and 75th percentiles for the predicted model curves, higher FGA had a profound interaction with the opioid-OS relationship (FIG. IB). Exemplary minimum, maximum, median, 25th and 75th percentile values of FGA are provided below:
Figure imgf000121_0001
[00282] CDKN2A alteration (9% alteration rate (N=64); loss or reduction of function) resulted in worse OS with increasing opioid dose compared to wildtype (p=0.052; FIG. IB). CDKN2A alteration rates were significantly higher in pathologic stage II (16%) and stage III (10%) compared to stage I (6%, p=0.002; FIG. 1C). Over half of the total driver alterations (33 of 61) were homozygous deletions (FIG. 1A).
[00283] These results demonstrate that the methods of the present technology are useful for determining whether a patient diagnosed with lung cancer and undergoing tumor resection surgery will benefit from treatment with intraoperative opioid analgesics or opioid-free intraoperative analgesics. Example 4: Interaction of Canonical Pathway Alterations with Opioid Dose
[00284] Alterations in the ten canonical oncogenic pathways as well as the sum total number of pathways altered were also investigated (FIG. 2A). FIG. 7 shows genes altered in oncogenic pathways stratified by pathologic stage. [00285] Alterations in the Wnt pathway (6.2% alteration rate (N=46)) were associated with improved 5-year RSS with increasing opioid exposure (p=0.029) as compared to an unaltered pathway. A similar result was found for the Hippo pathway (1.8% alteration rate (N=13), p=0.040) (FIG. 2B). Notably, Wnt and Hippo pathway alteration rates increased with higher pathologic stage but were not significantly different (p=0.114 and p=0.306, respectively; FIG. 2C).
[00286] These results demonstrate that the methods of the present technology are useful for determining whether a patient diagnosed with lung cancer and undergoing tumor resection surgery will benefit from treatment with intraoperative opioid analgesics or opioid-free intraoperative analgesics. Example 5: Co-occurrence and Mutual Exclusivity of Genes and Pathways
[00287] Co-occurrences and mutual exclusivity between altered genes and pathways were assessed (FIG. ID and FIG. 2D). Wnt pathway was found to significantly co-occur with the PI3K pathway (p=0.020), though PI3K interaction with opioid dose was not significantly associated with either RSS or OS outcomes (p=0.127 and p=0.119; FIG. 6). FIGs. 10 and 11 show the frequency of the different loss of function/gain of function gene mutations and pathway mutations identified in the LUAD patient cohort, respectively.
[00288] MOR Expression in Patient LUAD Samples. Mean MOR concentrations for the selected LUAD samples, as determined by ELISA, were found to be not significantly different from non-tumor matched controls (113.454 pg/ml ± 21.66473 versus 79.718 pg/ml ±8.527698; p=0.18), though seven of the ten patients had significantly higher MOR concentration levels in the tumor sample as compared to the matched adjacent lung sample (FIG. 3). The ELISA results reported here demonstrate that MOR is present on both tumor and normal lung tissue in LUAD, with increased concentrations in tumor specimen - represented in 7 of 10 of the 266 patient samples - consistent with previous results in NSCLC40. These results demonstrate that the expression and variation of MOR on tumor is not in itself sufficient to explain opioid effects. In contrast, FIGs. 1A-1D and 2A-2D show that alteration of other genes and pathways interact with opioid exposure to affect the predicted opioid dose-outcome response curve.
[00289] These results demonstrate that the methods of the present technology are useful for determining whether a patient diagnosed with lung cancer and undergoing tumor resection surgery will benefit from treatment with intraoperative opioid analgesics or opioid-free intraoperative analgesics.
Example 6: Methods for Profiling Colon Cancer Tumors
Study population
[00290] Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients with stage I— III CO AD who underwent curative resection at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between March 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018 (follow-up updated in July 2020). Patients were excluded if their MMR subtype was unknown, received neoadjuvant treatment, had a rare histological subtype, or another invasive cancer within 5 years prior to colectomy (FIG. 15). MMR subtype was determined proficient if immunohistochemical staining (IHC) identified that the proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were present in the pretreatment biopsy or the resected specimen (see Vilar E, Gruber SB. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7: 153-162 (2010), which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety). If one or more of these were absent in IHC, the patient was considered dMMR. Intraoperative analgesic agents
[00291] Doses of fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine administered intraoperatively were extracted from the electronic anaesthesia records, converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and summed to give the total intraoperative dose. For reference, 10 MMEs equals 50 meg IV fentanyl (a common intraoperative bolus dose). Intraoperative administration of ketorolac, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine was also captured. Fentanyl accounted for the overwhelming majority of opioids received (FIG. 26).
Statistical Analysis of clinical outcomes
[00292] The primary outcome was recurrence, either local or distant; death without recurrence was treated as a competing event. Recurrence was calculated from time of surgery to recurrence if a patient experienced the event, until death if a patient experienced the competing event, or it was censored at last follow-up. The relationship between intraoperative opioids and MMR subtype on recurrence was summarised using cumulative incidence functions and quantified using competing risk regression models. The secondary outcome was overall survival (OS), calculated from time of surgery to death from any cause. The relationship between intraoperative opioids and MMR subtype on OS was summarised using the Kaplan-Meier approach and quantified using Cox proportional hazards regression models. In all models, intraoperative MMEs were treated as a continuous variable, and administration of adjuncts and ketorolac as categorical variables. For multivariable analyses, a set of factors selected a-priori (intraoperative opioid, MMR subtype, adjunct, and ketorolac) were included. Backward regression was used to determine additional adjusting baseline factors, starting with a model including all factors with P < 0.1 in the univariable models for each endpoint. Associations quantified via regression modeling, were presented as hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (Cl).
[00293] Missing covariate data were addressed using multiple imputation by chained equations with 10 imputed datasets as described by van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. J Stat Softw 45: 1-67 (2011), which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This method is a fully conditional specification, where each factor with missingness is independently modelled using the remaining factors and outcome variables as covariates. The imputation method was polytomous logistic regression for patient race (4% missing), logistic regression for patient ethnicity (1% missing) and any adjuvant chemotherapy (3% missing), proportion odds regression for smoking status (0.7% missing), and predictive mean matching for CEA (12% missing), BMI (0.3% missing), and albumin (0.5% missing). All regression models were fit to each imputed dataset for each outcome, and estimates were pooled using Rubin’s rule as described by Rubin DB . Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, Wiley (1987), which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. [00294] To explore the potential interaction between MMR subtype and MMEs on oncological outcomes, the Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence functions were calculated separately for dMMR and pMMR patients, stratified by MME at the median. For each endpoint, the interaction of MMR subtype and continuous MMEs was first considered in a three-factor model (MMR, MMEs and interaction between the two). If P < 0.05 for the interaction term, it was then added to the multivariable model obtained from backward regression to estimate its effect after adjusting for baseline factors. To illustrate the impact of the interaction in the multivariable model, the 5-year predicted probability of an event was estimated across a range of MME values for dMMR and pMMR patients. Each set of predicted probabilities was calculated for a hypothetical patient with no adjunct and ketorolac use, pT3N0, BMI of 27.5 (median of cohort), and no adjuvant chemotherapy. Interaction was similarly explored for the adjuncts and ketorolac.
[00295] Statistical tests were two-sided with P<0.05 indicating statistical significance. All analyses were performed using R software version 4.1.1 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria) with the mice v3.13.0 package for multiple imputation as described by van Buuren S, Groothuis- Oudshoom K. J Slat Sqf!w 45: 1-67 (2011).
Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes
[00296] For 1010 (87%) of the 1157 patients in the cohort, surgical pathology reports explicitly noted the presence or absence of increased numbers of TILs. A tumour was classified as having increased TILs if the mean number of lymphocytes per high-powered field was > 4, averaged from five consecutive high-powered fields in an area determined to have the highest concentration of TILs by examination of the entire tumour. The relationships of TILs, intraoperative opioids, and recurrence and OS outcomes were explored using cumulative incidence functions and Kaplan-Meier estimates, respectively.
Tumour transcriptomics
[00297] The TCGA-COAD cohort (see Cancer Genome Atlas Network, Nature 487: 330- 337(2012)) was used to study gene expression in tumour versus normal tissue as well as specifically in dMMR (MSI-H) versus pMMR tumours (MSS and MSI-L). For the comparison of tumour versus normal tissue, bulk RNA-sequencing data from 358 patients was employed. Of these, 338 patients in the cohort were further classified based on MSI (61 MSI-H, 60 MSI-L; 217 were MSS).
[00298] Transcriptomics analyses focused on differential expression of opioid receptors and genes broadly related to opioid signalling and function. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using the R package DESeq2 as described by Love MI, et ai., Genome Biol 15: 550 (2014), which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. P- values were adjusted using Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple hypothesis testing. An absolute fold change of 2 and an adjusted p-value cut-off of 0.05 were used to assess statistical significance. Gene annotation was performed using the R package biomaRt as described by Durinck S, et ai., Nat Protoc 4; 1184-1191 (2009), which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The R package EnhancedVolcano (available from github.com/kevinblighe/EnhancedVolcano) was used to illustrate differential gene expression. The opioid receptors included the canonical receptors mu ( OPRM1 ), delta ( OPRD1 ), and kappa ( OPRK1 ) as well as receptors known to bind opioids and independently associated with oncological outcomes, i.e. opioid growth factor receptor ( OGFR ) and toll like receptor 4 ( TLR4 ). In the absence of well-defined opioid signalling pathways, a list of 430 genes broadly related to opioid signalling and function was generated using Geneshot, a search engine for locating genes related to defined search terms (in this case “opioids”), as described by Lachmann A, et al. Nucleic Acids Res 47: W571-W577 (2019), which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. For dMMR and pMMR comparison, this list was subsequently refined to only include those genes determined to be differentially expressed between MSI and MSS tumours, representing genes at the intersection of opioid and MMR signalling. This was further divided into lists of up- and downregulated genes, where up and down are in reference to expression in MSI versus MSS, and referred to as “Opioid*MSI” and “Opioid*MSS”, respectively.
[00299] Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (SSGSEA) was used to identify pathways and immune cell types with expression correlated with the Opioid*MSI and Opioid*MSS lists. Pathways included the 50 “Hallmark” gene lists (representing well- defined biological processes; see Liberzon A, et al., Cell Syst 1: 417-425 (2015)), while 25 immune cell types were represented by specific gene signatures (Bindea G, et al., Immunity 39: 782-795 (2013)). [00300] Patient, clinicopathologic, and analgesic variables. During the study period,
1157 patients met the inclusion criteria (FIG. 15). From this group, 875 patients (76%) had pMMR tumours while 282 patients (24%) had dMMR tumours. Clinicopathologic data for the entire cohort and for MMR subtypes are summarised in FIG. 20. Median age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR] 51-70). Most tumours were pT3 (61%) and pNO (61%). Most surgeries were segmental (94%), lasting a median length of 183 minutes (IQR 137— 232), with more than half (58%) performed by robotic approach. Patients received general anaesthesia, which generally involved induction with propofol and maintenance with sevoflurane. Median opioid dose was 60 MMEs (IQR 44-90). A total of 366 patients (32%) received ketamine while 161 (14%) received dexmedetomidine; 227 patients (20%) received ketorolac. Half of the patients (583) did not receive regional anaesthesia, while 269 (23%) received an epidural, 303 (26%) received a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, and 2 received both. Patients who received regional anaesthesia also had lower intraoperative MMEs (FIG. 27): median opioid dose was 75 MMEs (IQR 53-105) without regional anaesthesia and 50 MMEs with either epidural (IQR 39-71) or TAP block (IQR 37-68). Median follow-up duration was 3.0 years (95% Cl 2.8-3.2), estimated using Reverse Kaplan- Meier.
Example 7: Associations between Intraoperative Analgesics and Outcomes in Colon Cancer Patients
Recurrence
[00301] Recurrence was diagnosed in 126 patients (19 local and 107 distant). The cumulative incidence of recurrence at 3 years and 5 years were 12% (95% Cl, 10-14%) and 16% (95% Cl, 13—18%), respectively (FIG. 12A). This corresponded to 14% (95% Cl, 12- 17%) and 18% (95% Cl, 15-22%) for pMMR patients, and 4.9% (95% Cl, 2.4-8.6%) and
7.5% (95% Cl, 4.0-12%) for dMMR patients.
[00302] Higher intraoperative opioid dose was associated with lower hazard of recurrence on both univariable [HR, 0.93 per 10 MME [95% Cl, 0.88-0.98], =0.008) and multivariable (HR, 0.92 per 10 MME [95% Cl, 0.87-0.98]; =0.007) analyses. The dMMR tumour subtype was associated with lower hazard of recurrence on both univariable (reference pMMR: HR, 0.34 [95% Cl, 0.19-0.61], 0.001) and multivariable analyses (HR, 0.38 [95% Cl, 0.21- 0.68], =0.001) (FIG. 12A, inset). Ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and ketorolac were not associated with recurrence in either univariable or multivariable analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with lower hazard of recurrence (HR 0.49 [95% Cl, 0.27-0.90], =0.022), and factors associated with greater hazard of recurrence were pT3 stage (reference pTl: HR, 4.62, [95% Cl, 1.43-14.88], =0.010), pT4 stage (reference pTl: HR, 10.0 [95% Cl, 2.94-34.21], <0.001 ), positive nodal stage (reference pNO: pNl HR, 2.96 [95% Cl, 1.62-5.40], O.OOl; pN2 HR 4.34 [95% Cl, 2.23-8.44], O.OOl), and higher BMI (HR, 1.03 [95% Cl, 1.01-1.06], =0.009). Full univariable analysis is found in FIG. 22 and multivariable analysis in FIG. 21.
[00303] Initial exploratory analysis on interaction between MMR subtype and MMEs (stratified by below vs. above median) is illustrated in FIG. 12B. An 8-fold greater decrease of recurrence was seen at high vs. low opioid dose for dMMR compared with pMMR. This interaction was significant on multivariable analysis ( =0.016), illustrated by the predicted 5-year recurrence probability (FIG. 12C).
Overall survival [00304] Seventy-six patients died during follow-up, 37 of whom experienced a recurrence before death. Estimated 3-year and 5-year OS probability was 95% (95% Cl, 93-96%) and 90% (95% Cl, 88-93%), respectively, similar for pMMR and dMMR patients. Intraoperative opioid dose was not associated with OS in either univariable (FIG. 23) or multivariable (FIG. 24) analysis. Compared with no adjunct, intraoperative ketamine was associated with improved OS on univariable (HR, 0.43 [95% Cl, 0.21-0.89], P=0.023) but not multivariable analysis. Neither dexmedetomidine nor ketorolac were associated with OS. Other factors associated with worse OS on multivariable analysis were age (HR, 1.09 [95% Cl, 1.07-1.12], LO.OOl), Black race (reference White race: HR, 2.4 [95% Cl, 1.09-5.27], .P=0.030), positive nodal stage (reference pNO: pNl HR, 1.94 [95% Cl, 1.14-3.30], L=0.016; pN2 HR, 2.05 [95% Cl, 1.05-4.00], L=0.035), pT4 stage (reference pTl : HR, 2.92 [95% Cl, 1.14-7.48], P= 0.026), and ASA P3/P4 (reference P1/P2: HR, 2.08 [95% Cl, 1.01-4.28], L=0.046).
Example 8: Exploratory Analyses
TILs, MMR subtype, and opioid dose
[00305] The presence or absence of increased TILs was reported in 1010 of 1157 patients (87%); of this group, 360 (36%) had increased TILs. Increased TILs were present in 71% of dMMR tumours but only in 24% of pMMR tumours ( <0.001) (FIG. 13A).
[00306] Consistent with existing literature, increased TILs were associated with a lower risk of recurrence (FIG. 13B). After stratifying by below- vs above-median opioid dose, it was found that patients with increased TILs showed an improved cumulative incidence of recurrence and OS with increased opioids (FIGs. 16A-16B and 17A-17B). Stratification of dMMR and pMMR patients by increased TILs and MMEs showed that dMMR featured greater decrease in recurrence at high vs. low MMEs compared with pMMR, regardless of whether increased TILs were present (FIG. 13C) in either.
Differential expression of opioid receptor genes
[00307] Further exploratory analysis focused on differences in gene expression between dMMR and pMMR tumours. In the TCGA-COAD cohort, opioid receptors were differentially expressed between tumour and normal tissue (FIG. 18A: OPRM1 was downregulated in tumour versus normal, while OGFR and OPRD1 were upregulated; OPRK1 and TLR4 were not significantly different). Opioid receptors were not, however, differentially expressed between dMMR (MSI) and pMMR (MSS) tumours (FIG. 18B). Differential expression of opioid-related genes
[00308] Of 430 genes broadly related to opioid signalling and function, 83 were differentially expressed (greater than two-fold change with adjusted <0.05) between dMMR (MSI) and pMMR (MSS) tumours (FIG. 14Aand FIG. 25), representing genes at the intersection of opioid and MMR signalling. These were subdivided into 40 upregulated genes (Opioid*MSI) and 43 downregulated genes (Opioid*MSS) in MSI versus MSS tumours. SSGSEA uncovered pathways and cell types with expression correlated with these gene lists (FIG. 19). Many of the pathways (and immune cell types) correlated with Opioid*MSI and with each other were related to Thl -mediated immune responses, while Opioid*MSS gene expression was correlated with the Wnt signalling pathway (FIGs. 14B-14D).
EQUIVALENTS
[00309] The present technology is not to be limited in terms of the particular embodiments described in this application, which are intended as single illustrations of individual aspects of the present technology. Many modifications and variations of this present technology can be made without departing from its spirit and scope, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Functionally equivalent methods and apparatuses within the scope of the present technology, in addition to those enumerated herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing descriptions. Such modifications and variations are intended to fall within the scope of the present technology. It is to be understood that this present technology is not limited to particular methods, reagents, compounds compositions or biological systems, which can, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting.
[00310] In addition, where features or aspects of the disclosure are described in terms of Markush groups, those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosure is also thereby described in terms of any individual member or subgroup of members of the Markush group.
[00311] As will be understood by one skilled in the art, for any and all purposes, particularly in terms of providing a written description, all ranges disclosed herein also encompass any and all possible subranges and combinations of subranges thereof. Any listed range can be easily recognized as sufficiently describing and enabling the same range being broken down into at least equal halves, thirds, quarters, fifths, tenths, etc. As a non-limiting example, each range discussed herein can be readily broken down into a lower third, middle third and upper third, etc. As will also be understood by one skilled in the art all language such as “up to,” “at least,” “greater than,” “less than,” and the like, include the number recited and refer to ranges which can be subsequently broken down into subranges as discussed above. Finally, as will be understood by one skilled in the art, a range includes each individual member. Thus, for example, a group having 1-3 cells refers to groups having 1, 2, or 3 cells. Similarly, a group having 1-5 cells refers to groups having 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 cells, and so forth.
[00312] All patents, patent applications, provisional applications, and publications referred to or cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety, including all FIGs. and tables, to the extent they are not inconsistent with the explicit teachings of this specification.

Claims

Claims
1. A method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising
(a) detecting the presence of at least one mutation in one or more genes that results (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of the Hippo pathway in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and
(b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more genes are selected from the group consisting of NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, CTNNB1, AXIN2, APC and AMER1.
3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the at least one mutation is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation.
4. The method of any one of claims 1-3, wherein the at least one mutation is detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
5. A method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of one or more of NF2, LATS1, FAT1, RNF43, AXIN2, APC and AMER1 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
6. A method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of CTNNB1 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
7. The method of claim 5 or 6, wherein mRNA expression levels are detected via real- time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR),
Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
8. The method of claim 5 or 6, wherein polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
9. The method of any one of claims 1-8, wherein the intraoperative opioid analgesic is fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
10. The method of any one of claims 1-9, wherein the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs.
11. The method of any one of claims 1-9, wherein the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs.
12. The method of any one of claims 1-9, wherein the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs.
13. The method of any one of claims 1-12, wherein the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery.
14. The method of any one of claims 1-13, wherein the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision.
15. The method of any one of claims 1-14, further comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a local anesthetic solution that comprises one or more of lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, or benzocaine, and optionally an opioid.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the local anesthetic solution is administered via an epidural catheter, via a serratus plane nerve block or via an intercostal nerve block before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery.
17. The method of any one of claims 1-16, further comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post-operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the post-operative opioid analgesic is fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
19. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different.
20. The method of any one of claims 17-19, wherein the effective amount of the post operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different.
21. A method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer for treatment with an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic comprising
(a) (i) detecting the presence of at least one mutation in CDKN2A in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient, wherein the at least one mutation reduces CDKN2A expression and/or activity levels, and/or (ii) detecting elevated FGA in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient compared to a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold; and
(b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery.
22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the at least one mutation in CDKN2A is a frameshift mutation, a missense mutation, a deletion, an insertion, a nonsense mutation, an inversion, or a translocation.
23. The method of any one of claims 21-22, wherein the at least one mutation is detected via next-generation sequencing, PCR, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Southern blotting, Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
24. A method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression and/or activity levels of CDKN2A in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein mRNA expression levels are detected via real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
26. The method of claim 24 or 25, wherein polypeptide expression levels are detected via Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
27. A method for prolonging survival of a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for lung cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free intraoperative analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein FGA in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient is elevated compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
28. The method of any one of claims 21-23 or 27, wherein FGA is detected via next- generation sequencing.
29. The method of any one of claims 21-28, wherein the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is an amide-type local anesthetic or an ester-type local anesthetic.
30. The method of claim 29, wherein the amide-type local anesthetic is lidocaine, mepivacaine, priloeaine, bupivacaine, etklocaine, ropivacaine, or levobupivacaine.
31. The method of claim 29, wherein the ester-type local anesthetic is cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroproeaine, or benzoeaine.
32. The method of any one of claims 21-31, wherein the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is administered via an epidural catheter.
33. The method of claim 32, wherein the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is about 0.05%-4% amide-type or ester-type local anesthetic solution in a volume of 1-10 ml per hour when administered via the epidural catheter.
34. The method of any one of claims 21-33, wherein the effective amount of the opioid- free intraoperative analgesic is administered as a single injection, series of bolus doses, or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery.
35. The method of any one of claims 21-31, wherein the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic is administered via a serratus plane nerve block, or via an intercostal nerve block.
36. The method of any one of claims 21-35, further comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an opioid-free post-operative analgesic after the tumor resection surgery.
37. The method of claim 36, wherein the opioid-free post-operative analgesic is selected from the group consisting of lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, and benzocaine.
38. The method of claim 36 or 37, wherein the opioid-free post-operative analgesic and the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic are the same or different.
39. The method of any one of claims 36-38, wherein the effective amount of the opioid- free post-operative analgesic and the effective amount of the opioid-free intraoperative analgesic are the same or different.
40. The method of any one of claims 1-39, wherein the cancer patient exhibits stage I, stage II or stage III lung cancer.
41. The method of any one of claims 1-40, wherein the cancer patient has been diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).
42. The method of claim 41, wherein the lung adenocarcinoma has a histologic subtype selected from among lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, solid or unknown.
43. The method of any one of claims 1-42, wherein the cancer patient has received an adjuvant therapy.
44. The method of claim 43, wherein the adjuvant therapy is chemotherapy, lobectomy, radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy.
45. The method of any one of claims 1-44, wherein the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient comprises biopsied tumor tissue, whole blood, plasma, or serum.
46. A method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising
(a) assaying gene expression levels of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient and
(b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced or undetectable compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
47. A method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising
(a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, ILIB, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and
(b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, ILIB, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold.
48. A method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising
(a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPY1R, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1 A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCB1, SCT, NTS, NPFFR1, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and
(b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold.
49. A method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic comprising
(a) detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient relative to a predetermined threshold; and
(b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery.
50. The method of claim 49, wherein the cancer patient comprises at least one mutation that results in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature.
51. A method for reducing the risk of tumor recurrence in a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the cancer patient comprises at least one alteration in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system.
52. The method of claim 51, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of one or more of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced or undetectable compared to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold; and/or wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are elevated relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold; and/or wherein mRNA or polypeptide levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are reduced relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold; and/or wherein the cancer patient comprises at least one genetic mutation or altered expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in reduced activity of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) hyperactivation of Thl immune response signature.
53. A method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising
(a) assaying gene expression levels of MLHl, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient and
(b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold.
54. A method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising
(a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, ILIB, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and
(b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, ILIB, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold.
55. A method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising
(a) assaying gene expression levels of one or more genes selected from among GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPYIR, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1 A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCBl, SCT, NTS, NPFFRl, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALCA, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient; and
(b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the gene expression levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPY1R, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCB1, SCT, NTS, NPFFR1, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold.
56. A method for selecting a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer for treatment with an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic comprising
(a) detecting the expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient relative to a predetermined threshold; and
(b) administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery.
57. The method of claim 56, wherein the cancer patient comprises at least one mutation that results in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature.
58. A method for reducing the risk of tumor recurrence in a cancer patient undergoing tumor resection surgery for colon cancer comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of an intraoperative opioid analgesic or intraoperative non-opioid analgesic during the tumor resection surgery, wherein the cancer patient does not comprise any alterations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system.
59. The method of claim 58, wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to that observed in a control sample obtained from a healthy subject or a predetermined threshold; and/or wherein mRNA or polypeptide expression levels of one or more of CCK, NTSR2, IFNG, NTSR1, MLN, LIPN, CXCL8, FCGR3B, PTGS2, CALB2, CXCL10, ILIRN, CCL5, CCL4, IL1B, CCL4L2, FCGR3A, ITIH4, GAD1, CD8A, HTR3A, SLC1A3, LHB, ADRBl, CXCR2, HRH2, CCL3, ESR2, CSF2, EN02, GRM5, CXCR4, PRKCG, CD68, IL10, TLR2, ICAM1, RGS2, CX3CL1 and KCNJ3 in a biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold; and/or wherein mRNA or polypeptide levels of one or more of GHRH, RBFOX3, NOS1, KISS1, NPFFR2, GRIA2, SLC6A2, ADCY5, HCRT, OPCML, NPY1R, PPP1R14C, NTRK2, CHAT, LEP, CPB1, NR1I2, ADCY8, EGF, F2, UGT1A8, PLG, GRPR, PYY, DRDl, ABCB1, SCT, NTS, NPFFR1, TH, CYP2B6, HTR2C, TAC1, CCKBR, CALC A, ATP 12 A, LINC01411, P2RX3, ALB, REN, SLC6A4, KNG1 and DRD2 in the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient are comparable relative to a reference sample obtained from a colon cancer subject having microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors or a predetermined threshold; and/or wherein the cancer patient comprises at least one genetic mutation or altered expression levels or activity of one or more genes that result (i) in hyperactivation of Wnt pathway and/or (ii) reduced activity of Thl immune response signature.
60. The method of any one of claims 53-59, wherein the non-opioid analgesics is a regional anesthetic, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, a carboxylic acid derivative NS AID, or acetaminophen.
61. The method of claim 60, wherein the regional anesthetic is lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, or benzocaine.
62. The method of claim 60, wherein the carboxylic acid derivative NSAID is ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, naproxen, fenoprofen, ketoprofen, dexketoprofen, flurbiprofen, oxaprozin, loxoprofen, pelubiprofen, zaltoprofen, indomethacin, tolmetin, sulindac, etodolac, ketorolac, diclofenac, aceclofenac, bromfenac, or nabumeton.
63. The method of any one of claims 46-50, 52-57, or 59-62, wherein the at least one genetic mutation or gene expression levels are detected via next generation sequencing, RNA- seq, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), Northern blotting, microarray, dot or slot blots, in situ hybridization, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), dot blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, Immunoelectrophoresis, or mass-spectrometry.
64. The method of any one of claims 46-63, wherein the intraoperative opioid analgesic is fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
65. The method of any one of claims 46-64, wherein the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 1 MME to about 20 MMEs.
66. The method of any one of claims 46-64, wherein the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 20 MMEs to about 45 MMEs.
67. The method of any one of claims 46-64, wherein the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is about 45 MMEs to about 200 MMEs.
68. The method of any one of claims 46-67, wherein the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered as a series of bolus doses or as a continuous infusion during the tumor resection surgery.
69. The method of any one of claims 46-68, wherein the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic is administered to the cancer patient prior to incision.
70. The method of any one of claims 46-52, further comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a local anesthetic solution that comprises one or more of lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, cocaine, procaine, tetracaine, chloroprocaine, or benzocaine, and optionally an opioid.
71. The method of claim 70, wherein the local anesthetic solution is administered via an epidural catheter, via a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, via an Ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) block, via a rectus sheath block, via a transversalis fascia plane block, or via a quadratus lumborum block before, during and/or after the tumor resection surgery.
72. The method of any one of claims 46-71, further comprising administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of a post-operative opioid analgesic after the tumor resection surgery.
73. The method of claim 72, wherein the post-operative opioid analgesic is fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, meperidine, remifentanil, or sufentanil.
74. The method of claim 72 or 73, wherein the post-operative opioid analgesic and the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different.
75. The method of any one of claims 72-74, wherein the effective amount of the post operative opioid analgesic and the effective amount of the intraoperative opioid analgesic are the same or different.
76. The method of any one of claims 46-52, further comprise administering to the cancer patient an effective amount of one or more non-opioid analgesics selected from among ketamine, dexmedetomidine, a carboxylic acid derivative NS AID, or acetaminophen.
77. The method of any one of claims 46-76, wherein the cancer patient exhibits stage I, stage II or stage III colon cancer.
78. The method of any one of claims 46-77, wherein the cancer patient has been diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma (COAD).
79. The method of any one of claims 46-78, wherein the cancer patient has received an adjuvant therapy.
80. The method of claim 79, wherein the adjuvant therapy is chemotherapy, radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy.
81. The method of any one of claims 46-50, 52-57, or 59-80, wherein the biological sample obtained from the cancer patient comprises biopsied tumor tissue, whole blood, plasma, or serum.
82. The method of any one of claims 46-81, wherein the tumor surgery is laparoscopic, robotic or open.
PCT/US2022/020502 2021-03-17 2022-03-16 Methods for tailoring analgesic regimen in lung or colon cancer patients based on tumor genomics Ceased WO2022197770A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US202163162265P 2021-03-17 2021-03-17
US63/162,265 2021-03-17

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022197770A1 true WO2022197770A1 (en) 2022-09-22

Family

ID=83321108

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2022/020502 Ceased WO2022197770A1 (en) 2021-03-17 2022-03-16 Methods for tailoring analgesic regimen in lung or colon cancer patients based on tumor genomics

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2022197770A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115547513A (en) * 2022-11-22 2022-12-30 中日友好医院(中日友好临床医学研究所) Method for predicting using dosage of intrathecal opioid analgesic
CN115976190A (en) * 2022-11-15 2023-04-18 苏州吉赛基因测序科技有限公司 Products and applications of genotyping detection related to postoperative analgesic medication for cesarean section patients

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019055234A1 (en) * 2017-09-13 2019-03-21 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Genotype-directed local delivery of targeted therapeutics
US20210008048A1 (en) * 2018-03-20 2021-01-14 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Compositions and methods for cancer treatment

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019055234A1 (en) * 2017-09-13 2019-03-21 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Genotype-directed local delivery of targeted therapeutics
US20210008048A1 (en) * 2018-03-20 2021-01-14 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Compositions and methods for cancer treatment

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CATA JUAN P., KEERTY VISESH, KEERTY DINESH, FENG LEI, NORMAN PETER H., GOTTUMUKKALA VIJAYA, MEHRAN JOHN R., ENGLE MITCHEL: "A retrospective analysis of the effect of intraoperative opioid dose on cancer recurrence after non‐small cell lung cancer resection", CANCER MEDICINE, JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD., GB, vol. 3, no. 4, 1 August 2014 (2014-08-01), GB , pages 900 - 908, XP055972155, ISSN: 2045-7634, DOI: 10.1002/cam4.236 *
KING, T. VARDANYAN, A. MAJUTA, L. MELEMEDJIAN, O. NAGLE, R. CRESS, A.E. VANDERAH, T.W. LAI, J. PORRECA, F.: "Morphine treatment accelerates sarcoma-induced bone pain, bone loss, and spontaneous fracture in a murine model of bone cancer", PAIN, ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS, AMSTERDAM., NL, vol. 132, no. 1-2, 3 October 2007 (2007-10-03), NL , pages 154 - 168, XP022283619, ISSN: 0304-3959, DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.026 *
MACKLER S A, EBERWINE J H: "Cellular adaptation to opiates alters ion-channel mRNA levels.", PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, vol. 91, no. 1, 4 January 1994 (1994-01-04), pages 385 - 389, XP055972170, ISSN: 0027-8424, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.385 *
MONTAGNA GIACOMO, GUPTA HERSH V., HANNUM MARGARET, TAN KAY SEE, LEE JASME, SCARPA JOSEPH R., PLITAS GEORGE, IRIE TAKESHI, MCCORMIC: "Intraoperative opioids are associated with improved recurrence-free survival in triple-negative breast cancer", BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, vol. 126, no. 2, 1 February 2021 (2021-02-01), pages 367 - 376, XP055972177, ISSN: 0007-0912, DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.021 *
OHGAKI H: "APC mutations are infrequent but present in human lung cancer", CANCER LETTERS, NEW YORK, NY, US, vol. 207, no. 2, 1 April 2004 (2004-04-01), US , pages 197 - 203, XP055972162, ISSN: 0304-3835, DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2003.10.020 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115976190A (en) * 2022-11-15 2023-04-18 苏州吉赛基因测序科技有限公司 Products and applications of genotyping detection related to postoperative analgesic medication for cesarean section patients
CN115547513A (en) * 2022-11-22 2022-12-30 中日友好医院(中日友好临床医学研究所) Method for predicting using dosage of intrathecal opioid analgesic

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6673562B2 (en) Epigenetic marker for colorectal cancer and diagnostic method using the marker
CN113557308B (en) Detection of endometrial cancer
KR102945867B1 (en) Characterization of methylated DNA, RNA, and proteins in the detection of lung neoplasms
KR102839621B1 (en) Breast cancer detection methods
AU2017260630B2 (en) Detection of lung neoplasia by analysis of methylated DNA
AU2021265861B2 (en) Diagnostic gene marker panel for colorectal cancer
KR20220092561A (en) Ovarian Cancer Detection
BR112019018272A2 (en) methylation markers to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma and cancer
WO2010123625A1 (en) Cd133 polymorphisms predict clinical outcome in patients with cancer
EP3322823A1 (en) Methods for diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of breast cancer and reagents therefor
WO2022197770A1 (en) Methods for tailoring analgesic regimen in lung or colon cancer patients based on tumor genomics
US20190032143A1 (en) Kits and methods for diagnosis, screening, treatment and disease monitoring
US20120108445A1 (en) Vegf and vegfr1 gene expression useful for cancer prognosis
US20190352704A1 (en) Benign thyroid nodule-specific gene
WO2023278826A2 (en) Methods for selecting lung cancer patients for treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
US20130023430A1 (en) Cancer stem cell gene variants are associated with tumor recurrence
Roy-Chowdhuri et al. Diagnostic Molecular Pathology
US20120288861A1 (en) Germline polymorphisms in the sparc gene associated with clinical outcome in gastric cancer
HK40075279B (en) Diagnostic gene marker panel
HK40075279A (en) Diagnostic gene marker panel
HK40019592B (en) Diagnostic gene marker panel
HK40019592A (en) Diagnostic gene marker panel
HK1208058B (en) Diagnostic gene marker panel for colorectal cancer
WO2011146406A1 (en) Germline polymorphisms in vegf predict clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated with sorafenib
WO2011146411A1 (en) Grp78 gene polymorphism rs391957 is associated with tumor recurrence and survival in gastrointestinal cancer patients

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22772108

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 22772108

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1