WO2022195264A1 - Procédé de surveillance de la progression d'un apprentissage en réalité mixte - Google Patents

Procédé de surveillance de la progression d'un apprentissage en réalité mixte Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022195264A1
WO2022195264A1 PCT/GB2022/050651 GB2022050651W WO2022195264A1 WO 2022195264 A1 WO2022195264 A1 WO 2022195264A1 GB 2022050651 W GB2022050651 W GB 2022050651W WO 2022195264 A1 WO2022195264 A1 WO 2022195264A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
mixed reality
user
training session
reality training
training
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2022/050651
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Allar AHTMANN
Keano CHANG
Original Assignee
Ibuildpro Holdings Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ibuildpro Holdings Limited filed Critical Ibuildpro Holdings Limited
Publication of WO2022195264A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022195264A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • G06Q10/06311—Scheduling, planning or task assignment for a person or group
    • G06Q10/063112—Skill-based matching of a person or a group to a task
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a computer implemented method for monitoring progress of mixed reality training.
  • the present invention further relates to a data processing apparatus for carrying out the computer implemented method.
  • the present invention also relates to a computer program for causing a computer to carry out the computer implemented method.
  • the present invention further relates to a computer-readable medium for causing a computer to carry out the computer implemented method.
  • Embodiments and aspects of the present invention seek to address at least the above problems of the prior art. Summary of the Invention
  • a computer implemented method for monitoring progress of mixed reality training comprising the method steps of: allowing a user to create a user profile comprising user data; recording the user profile to a central resource; providing a mixed reality training session; associating the mixed reality training session with the user profile; initiating the mixed reality training session; monitoring the progress of the mixed reality training session; and recording the completion of the mixed reality training session to the central resource.
  • a method for reliable recording and monitoring of a user’s training progress to a central resource Not only is an up-to- date data profile regarding the user built, but an accurate log of the user’s training progress is also recorded to the central resource and can be used as proof in the user’s professional progression.
  • Such a resource is also advantageous when considering persons and professionals already in the work force looking to improve their skills and knowledge.
  • allocation of the mixed reality training session can be determined based on the data provided by the user in the user profile, a training session tailored to the user can be provided and an improved user experience gained.
  • the method further comprises the steps of; imaging the mixed reality training session for review by a third party; and recording the imaging of the mixed reality training session to the central resource.
  • the method further comprises the steps of; retrieving the imaging of the mixed reality training session from the central resource for review by a third party; and recording data regarding a third party review to the central resource. In this way, remote and non-simultaneous review of the training session can be undertaken.
  • the imaging can be retrieved from the central resource at any time by the user or a third party, both during training progress and upon completion of training. In this way, the imaging of the mixed reality training session can be utilised in future training sessions as an education resource.
  • the central resource comprises an educational resource.
  • the mixed reality training session comprises a plurality of distinct stages.
  • the mixed reality training session is divided into manageable stages that can be undertaken and repeated by the user, if required.
  • Each stage can comprise separate goals or challenges to break the learning into clearly defined areas or tasks. As such, deeper learning and greater training personalisation to fit the user can be achieved.
  • the training session can be divided into, for example, a tutorial stage, a practice stage and an assessment stage, allowing the user to develop, reinforce and then assess their knowledge and skills. Additionally, the number of stages and/or content of each stage of the plurality of distinct stages can be personalised to the user, improving user experience.
  • the step of monitoring the progress of the mixed reality training session comprises monitoring the completion of each distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages.
  • close monitoring of the user’s training progression can be undertaken by the user and/or a third party.
  • the plurality of distinct stages are ranked and initiation of a distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages requires completion of at least one other distinct stage.
  • the training session is structured such that stages are completed in a predefined order and a foundation of knowledge and skills is developed accordingly.
  • the step of providing a mixed reality training session comprises providing a plurality of mixed reality training activities.
  • the user selects a mixed reality training activity from the plurality of mixed reality training activities. In this way, the user has freedom to personalise the training session to their preferences.
  • the method further comprises the steps of; issuing an outcome of the mixed reality training session; and recording the outcome of the mixed reality training session to the central resource.
  • the outcome may be a grade, a pass/fail outcome or a ranked outcome such as poor/good/outstanding.
  • the outcome may comprise data from the training session, such as the time for completion or the number of errors made during a training session.
  • the method further comprises the step of; communicating the outcome of the mixed reality training session to at least one third party.
  • a third party For example, a trainer, tutor, employer, examination board or another appropriate third party is notified of the training progress of the user.
  • a third party can monitor the user’s training progress and, upon receipt of the outcome, can intervene to provide additional support if required.
  • the user is motivated to strive for a positive outcome of the training session, as the third party can make the user accountable for the outcome.
  • the method further comprises the step of; associating a second mixed reality training session with the user profile.
  • the second mixed reality training session is selected by the central resource.
  • the central resource tailors the user’s training.
  • data provided by the user in the user profile and/or data regarding the first mixed reality training session can educate the selection of the second mixed reality training session.
  • the second mixed reality training session is selected by a third party. In this way, a third party, such as a trainer, tutor or employer, can tailor the user’s training to ensure the training is both appropriate and beneficial for the user.
  • the method comprises prompting the user to complete the mixed reality training session. In this way, the user is encouraged to undertake the mixed reality training session in a timely manner.
  • the method further comprises issuing an alert if the mixed reality training session is not completed within at least one predetermined time period. In this way, the user is warned when they have fallen behind schedule and their training progression and skill development is stalling such that they can address this.
  • the at least one predetermined time period is retrieved from the central resource.
  • the mixed reality training session comprises the at least one predetermined time period.
  • the method further comprises the steps of; identifying at least one incomplete mixed reality training session; and communicating the mixed reality training session and its status to at least one third party.
  • a third party such as a trainer, tutor or employer, can monitor the training progress of the user and intervene or provide additional support if the user is falling behind. Additionally, a third party can hold the user accountable for their training progression such that the user is motivated to complete the training session in a timely manner and to the best of their ability.
  • the method further comprises the steps of; allowing a second user to create a user profile; recording the second user profile to the central resource; associating the mixed reality training session with the second user profile; and initiating the mixed reality training session for the first user and the second user simultaneously.
  • the method further comprises recording the association between the user and the second user in the central resource.
  • the central resource comprises a log of associations and users or third parties can use the log of associations for reference, such as to identify successful associations.
  • a data processing apparatus comprising means for carrying out the method according to the first aspect of the invention.
  • a computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method according to the first aspect of the present invention.
  • a computer- readable medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method of the first aspect of the present invention.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic view of a computer implemented method according to the first aspect of the present invention
  • Figure 2 is a schematic view of a second embodiment of the computer implemented method of Figure 1 , according to the first aspect of the present invention
  • Figure 3 is a schematic view of a second embodiment of the monitor session step of Figure 2.
  • a mixed reality (MR) training session is a training session wherein the real world and digital objects interact, such as a user interacting with a digital environment.
  • MR training session may additionally comprise elements of only augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR) and/or other pre-recorded or responsive media.
  • FIG. 1 there is shown a schematic view of a computer implemented method 100.
  • the method 100 allows a user to create a data profile and associates a MR training session with this data such that the mixed reality training progress of the user can be monitored. This allows a central resource of verified data to be built such that accurate information regarding the user’s training progress can be recorded and monitored.
  • the first step of the method 100 is a USER PROFILE step 101.
  • the user is allowed to create a profile containing user data.
  • this data can be in the form of; personal data, such a name, age and contact details; data regarding the user’s interests, such as areas of desired specialism or training skills which are of greatest interest; data regarding a previous or current educational facility, trainer, teacher or mentor; data regarding a training programme, such as a training course start date; data regarding the user’s location; data regarding the user’s professional or personal portfolio; username and password data; and data concerning others, such as data concerning a second user.
  • the data contained in the user profile may be provided in the form of documentation, such as ID or certificates, hyperlinks to websites and images or other media.
  • the user data is a username, the user location, a user portfolio and the user’s interests, namely that the user is interested in training to become a plumber.
  • the next step of the method 100 is a RECORD USER PROFILE step 102, wherein the user profile is recorded to a central resource, such as a central database or central ledger. The user’s data is recorded onto the central resource.
  • the USER PROFILE step 101 and RECORD USER PROFILE step 102 form the PROFILE phase 108 of the method 100.
  • a PROVIDE SESSION step 103 wherein a MR training session is provided.
  • the MR training session comprises a plumbing training session, wherein a skill required in the plumbing profession is taught.
  • the plumbing training session is selected based on the level of experience of the user, as provided in the user data recorded to the central resource.
  • the next step of the method 100 is an ASSOCIATE SESSION step 104, where the MR training session is associated with the user profile.
  • INITIATE SESSION step 105 wherein the MR training session is initiated and the user commences training progression.
  • the user undertakes the training session, developing their skills for the plumbing profession.
  • the next step of the method 100 is a MONITOR SESSION step 106, wherein the progress of the MR training session is monitored.
  • An MR training session may be considered complete, for example, when a virtual task set is completed, when the user has undertaken the full duration of the session or when other predetermined criteria have been met.
  • RECORD COMPLETION step 107 wherein the completion of the mixed reality training session is recorded to the central resource.
  • the benefit of storing all data regarding user training on a central resource is that both the user and third parties can monitor the training progression of the user. This is of particular benefit to present or future employers of the user and also to training providers, as problems with training or user input are highlighted when they arise.
  • the central resource additionally provides the user with proof of skills and qualifications achieved during training. Additionally, when a plurality of third parties are involved with or invested in user training, all parties can monitor the progression of the training.
  • each step of the method 100 can be automated, time and resource savings can be achieved and an improved training experience is provided for both the user and any third parties involved in training, such as the trainer or an employer.
  • the method 200 comprises a PROFILE phase 201 in accordance with the PROFILE phase 108 of Figure 1. Additionally, similar steps of the method 200 of Figure 2 incorporate some or all of the features of the steps of the method 100 of Figure 1.
  • the user data provided in the PROFILE stage 201 is that the user is a part-qualified plumber but has a further interest in ‘Electrical’ training.
  • a PROVIDE SESSION step 202 is initiated.
  • a first MR training session is provided.
  • the choice of the MR training session is determined using data recorded on the central resource in the PROFILE stage 201. For example, as the user has selected an interest in ‘Electrical’ training but has no prior training in the electrical field, a foundation level electrical training session is provided. Alternatively, as the user is a part-qualified plumber, an advanced level plumbing training session may be provided. In this way, the user profile educates the choice of training session and a personalised training course is provided.
  • the MR training session provided in the PROVIDE SESSION step 202 comprises a plurality of distinct stages.
  • training can be divided in stages based on a number of characteristics, such as the nature of the tasks, type of learning style, level of difficulty, learning progression or by individual skill.
  • the stages are ranked and initiation of a distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages requires completion of at least one other distinct stage.
  • the training provided is structured to improve the rate of learning of the user.
  • Each MR training session comprises a plurality of mixed reality training activities.
  • each distinct stage may comprise a plurality of MR training activities or each MR training activity may comprise a plurality of distinct stages.
  • the user selects a MR training activity from the plurality of mixed reality training activities. This provides user choice and flexibility in the training process.
  • data recorded to the central resource can educate and the central resource selects one or more MR training activities for the user.
  • the ASSOCIATE SESSION step 203 is initiated.
  • the personalised MR training session is associated with the user profile.
  • INITIATE SESSION step 204 wherein the MR training session is initiated.
  • the INITIATE SESSION step 204 comprises imaging the MR training session for review by a third party and recording the imaging of the MR training session to the central resource. In this way, a portion or all of the MR training session is imaged and recorded on the central resource for review by the user or a third party. As such, data which may previously have been missed in real world training sessions can be recorded to the central resource for review. This is of benefit to the user as they may remotely review a historical training session to highlight areas of strength and weakness and to refresh their memory or understanding of the skills taught in the session. Additionally, a third party such as a trainer, employer or examiner may review the MR training session, allowing close monitoring of the user’s training progression.
  • the MONITOR SESSION step 205 comprises prompting the user to complete the MR training session, for example, if completion is not detected within a predetermined time period. Following the prompt, if the user subsequently fails to complete the MR training session, an ALERT step 210 is initiated.
  • an alert is issued if the mixed reality training session is not completed within at least one predetermined time period.
  • the predetermined time period may be retrieved from the central resource, such that, for example, the expected deadline for the MR training session completion is based on the user data or on data regarding the standard training pathway.
  • the ALERT step 210 comprises identifying at least one incomplete mixed reality training session and communicating the mixed reality training session and its status to at least one third party, such as a trainer or employer. In this way, the third party can respond accordingly. If the user requires training assistance or is unable to keep up with the level of training, the method 200 allows a dialogue to be created between the user and a third party such that action can be taken to address any problems. Additionally, automated notification of the user’s training progress is provided such that manual checking of the data on the central resource is not required. Additionally or alternatively, the ALERT step 210 comprises identifying at least one incomplete mixed reality training session and communicating the mixed reality training session and its status to the user. In this way, the user is notified that their training progression is stalling and they have fallen behind such that they can take action to address this.
  • the MONITOR SESSION step 205 also comprises monitoring the completion of each distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages. In this way, if a user has failed to complete a distinct stage, the at least one incomplete stage can be identified and the stage and its status can be communicated to at least one third party. This provides a number of intermediate checkpoints from which the training progress can be monitored, highlighting when the user is falling behind at the time of occurrence. Additionally, the period or ease of progression through the distinct stages can be monitored and used to assess the training progression and educate future training choices and pathways.
  • a REVIEW SESSION step 206 comprising retrieving the imaging of the MR training session from the central resource for review by a third party and recording data regarding a third party review to the central resource.
  • a third party may undertake the review remotely and the third party is also able to review the MR training session with the user or another third party.
  • an ISSUE OUTCOME step 207 is initiated, comprising issuing an outcome of the mixed reality training session and recording the outcome of the mixed reality training session to the central resource.
  • the outcome comprises a ‘Pass’ or ‘Fail’ grade.
  • the outcome may be determined by one or more factors, for example, the outcome may be determined by data recorded to the central resource, such as a third party review, or by predetermined assessment criteria.
  • a NOTIFICATION step 211 wherein the outcome of the MR training session is communicated to at least one third party. In this way, third parties can monitor the progress and the outcome of each MR training session.
  • a RECORD COMPLETION step 208 follows, wherein completion of the mixed reality training session is recorded to the central resource.
  • the SECOND SESSION step 209 comprises associating a second mixed reality training session with the user profile.
  • the second MR training session may be selected by either the central resource, a third party or the user. In this way, the MR training is personalised to the user and an improved learning experience is provided.
  • data recorded on the central resource can educate the selection of the second MR training session using, such as, the user’s interests, the user’s previous training experience or data regarding the first MR training session such as the time for completion, the grade outcome or the ease of completion.
  • a third party such as a trainer or employer
  • the user may select the second training session to match their interests and preferences.
  • a second iteration of the method 200 can be undertaken from the PROVIDE SESSION step 202, wherein the second MR training session is provided.
  • a plurality of iterations of the method 200 can be undertaken in training of the user.
  • a training portfolio is built as the user’s level of expertise increases such that higher level and difficulty MR training sessions can be accessed.
  • the second MR training session may be an advanced plumbing training session.
  • Third parties such as external regulating bodies, can access the user’s data profile recorded on the central resource and monitor the user’s training progress.
  • an improved learning experience can be provided.
  • Learning preferences, speed and level of required challenge vary between users, with a personalised training pathway improving user experience and allowing for more comprehensive and deeper understanding of the training content to be achieved.
  • the training pathway can be tailored to the user’s goals and there is flexibility on the environment and level of difficulty undertaken in each MR training session. Additionally, variable and continuously changing MR environments provide further opportunity for educational growth by allowing unpredictable scenarios to be simulated. Additionally, gamified training pathways can be provided with difficulty increasing as the user progresses, incentivising the user and ensuring motivation is maintained. Personalised and tailored environments for artificial and theoretical learning and training skills are created specifically for the user, increasing flexibility regarding space or resources, as well as providing a safe environment to train complex or dangerous tasks.
  • MONITOR SESSION step 205 of Figure 2 wherein the method 200 further comprises the steps of; issuing an outcome of each distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages; and recording the outcome of the mixed reality training session to the central resource.
  • the mixed reality training session comprises a plurality of distinct stages.
  • the plurality of distinct stages are ranked and initiation of a distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages requires completion of at least one other distinct stage.
  • STAGE A 301 is a tutorial stage, wherein the user learns the skill which is the focus of the session, and OUTCOME A 302 comprises using an outcome of STAGE A 301. If the user has participated in STAGE A 301 for the full duration, the stage is considered complete.
  • STAGE A 301 the user is provided with a MR learning environment wherein training is provided to improve the user’s theoretical understanding and to demonstrate the skill or concept to be achieved.
  • STAGE B 303 follows, wherein the user is provided with a MR sandbox environment.
  • the user is provided with ‘hands on’ learning such that they can practice the skill taught in STAGE A 301.
  • any mistakes made in a real world training session may be both costly and dangerous.
  • a practical training session which mitigates risks may be unfeasible or may not accurately represent a real world scenario.
  • MR training allows a realistic training environment to be provided without the physical risks.
  • the sandboxed environment allows the user to practice skills that they may be unable or unqualified to undertake in the real world. Further, as the competency of the user improves, the MR training session may comprise test scenarios to train the user in unexpected or emergency situations. For example, the user can be trained in response to a burst water pipe during the MR training session.
  • STAGE B 303 allows the user to immediately reinforce the skills and knowledge gained in STAGE A 301 , allowing skills to be developed over shorter periods.
  • STAGE B 303 may comprise an open room or group activity such that a second user or a plurality of additional users participate and interact in the MR training session simultaneously and as a team.
  • group participation in training can occur when users are located both proximate and remote to each other.
  • OUTCOME B 204 comprises issuing the outcome of STAGE B 203 and the outcome is determined by both the duration of time the user has spent participating in STAGE B 303 and on the user’s confidence in the skill that is being taught.
  • the user may decide at the end of SAGE B 303 to re-enter STAGE A 301 to improve their understanding, if this is required, or the user may choose to participate in STAGE B 303 again to further practice the skill.
  • the user can choose that they are ready to progress to STAGE C 305.
  • the central resource can also comprise a predetermined period for STAGE B 303, such that a minimum time participating is required before the user can progress to STAGE C 305. This can be set by a third party or be determined by the central resource using data stored on the central resource. For example, the user portfolio data of the user profile or the number of completed MR training sessions in the field can educate the minimum training time required in STAGE B 303.
  • STAGE C 305 comprises an assessment stage wherein the user is tested or assessed on the skill they have learnt and practiced in STAGE A 301 and STAGE B 303.
  • OUTCOME C 306 may be determined by assessment criteria, such as a predetermined pass mark or weighted criteria. Alternatively, OUTCOME C 306 may be determined by one or more third party assessors during STAGE C 305 or afterwards using the imaging of the MR training session recorded to the central resource.
  • the user can undertake STAGE C 305 a second time if successful completion of the stage is not achieved, effectively resitting the assessment, before the user must instead re-enter STAGE A 301 or STAGE B 303. In this way, if the user cannot successfully complete STAGE C 305, the user is guided to go back and reinforce their learning in STAGE A 301 or STAGE B 303.
  • OUTCOME A 302, OUTCOME B 304 and OUTCOME C 306 are recorded to the central resource.
  • OUTCOME C 306 may be considered as the outcome of the MR training session, such that OUTCOME C 306 comprises issuing the outcome of the MR training session.
  • a training portfolio is built on the central resource which can be used to supplement real world training and work completed by the user. Additionally, the central resource can be used as a reference resource to cross check and verify user credentials on future work and projects undertaken.
  • OUTCOME C 306 can be used by the user in their progression towards accreditation or certification. As such, clear training goals can be set and achievements can be quantified. Additionally, the method facilitates continued professional development and encourages user learning and development.
  • the MONITOR SESSION 205 step comprises allowing a second user to create a user profile, recording the second user profile to the central resource, associating the mixed reality training session with the second user profile, initiating the mixed reality training session for the first user and the second user simultaneously and recording the association between the user and the second user in the central resource.
  • the second user may comprise a trainer or teacher such that the user can undertake a MR training session alongside a third party provided training.
  • both successful and unsuccessful associations can be identified and a reference source of associations is created.
  • the MR training session may additionally comprise elements of real world training or non-MR scenarios.
  • a distinct stage may comprise a real world task following on training from a MR task completed in a preceding stage.
  • both mixed reality and real world training is provided in the MR training session.
  • STAGE A 301 may comprise theoretical learning
  • STAGE B 303 may comprise a MR training task
  • STAGE C 305 may comprise the same task but in a real world setting. In this way, resource requirements are reduced and confidence is built in a virtual environment before the real world task is undertaken.
  • Mixed reality training sessions allows a user to participate in training scenarios which are too dangerous, expensive or too resource or time intensive to be undertaken in the real world.
  • MR training sessions provide realistic and responsive environments, without the risks of physical simulation and with a reduced time and resource demand required by the user’s trainer or employer. Extensive health and safety training and risk assessments are not required before training sessions are initiated, allowing the user a wider scope of learning from the onset of training.
  • MR training sessions provide creative and problem solving tasks and challenges to deepen user interaction with the session and provide a visual tool for learning. Further, the user can build confidence and experience in a MR environment before undertaking tasks in the real world.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé mis en œuvre par ordinateur pour surveiller la progression d'un apprentissage en réalité mixte comprenant les étapes de procédé consistant à : permettre qu'un utilisateur crée un profil d'utilisateur comprenant des données d'utilisateur ; enregistrer le profil d'utilisateur sur une ressource centrale ; fournir une session d'apprentissage en réalité mixte ; associer la session d'apprentissage en réalité mixte au profil d'utilisateur ; débuter la session d'apprentissage en réalité mixte ; surveiller la progression de la session d'apprentissage en réalité mixte ; et enregistrer l'achèvement de la session d'apprentissage en réalité mixte sur la ressource centrale. La présente invention concerne en outre un appareil de traitement de données pour la réalisation du procédé mis en œuvre par ordinateur. La présente invention concerne également un programme informatique pour amener un ordinateur à réaliser le procédé mis en œuvre par ordinateur. La présente invention concerne en outre un support lisible par ordinateur pour amener un ordinateur à réaliser le procédé mis en œuvre par ordinateur.
PCT/GB2022/050651 2021-03-19 2022-03-14 Procédé de surveillance de la progression d'un apprentissage en réalité mixte WO2022195264A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB2103833.6 2021-03-19
GB2103833.6A GB2604916A (en) 2021-03-19 2021-03-19 A method for monitoring progress of mixed reality training

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022195264A1 true WO2022195264A1 (fr) 2022-09-22

Family

ID=75690005

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2022/050651 WO2022195264A1 (fr) 2021-03-19 2022-03-14 Procédé de surveillance de la progression d'un apprentissage en réalité mixte

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2604916A (fr)
WO (1) WO2022195264A1 (fr)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160267808A1 (en) * 2015-03-09 2016-09-15 Alchemy Systems, L.P. Augmented Reality
US20190089701A1 (en) * 2017-09-15 2019-03-21 Pearson Education, Inc. Digital credentials based on personality and health-based evaluation
DE202020103047U1 (de) * 2020-05-27 2020-06-08 brainchild GmbH Trainingsvorrichtung

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160267808A1 (en) * 2015-03-09 2016-09-15 Alchemy Systems, L.P. Augmented Reality
US20190089701A1 (en) * 2017-09-15 2019-03-21 Pearson Education, Inc. Digital credentials based on personality and health-based evaluation
DE202020103047U1 (de) * 2020-05-27 2020-06-08 brainchild GmbH Trainingsvorrichtung

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DALING LEA M ET AL: "A Comparison of Augmented and Virtual Reality Features in Industrial Trainings", 10 July 2020, COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2020 : 16TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE, GLASGOW, UK, AUGUST 23-28, 2020 : PROCEEDINGS; [LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE ; ISSN 0302-9743], SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, CHAM, PAGE(S) 47 - 65, ISBN: 978-3-030-58594-5, XP047557883 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB202103833D0 (en) 2021-05-05
GB2604916A (en) 2022-09-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Marcano et al. Review of simulator training practices for industrial operators: How can individual simulator training be enabled?
Amin et al. PME learning model: The conceptual theoretical study of metacognition learning in mathematics problem solving based on constructivism
Woods PBL: An evaluation of the effectiveness of authentic problem-based learning (aPBL)
US11922826B2 (en) Learning management system, method, and teaching aid for enabling all students who are willing to be able to achieve mastery of learning content and a system for efficiently systematically increasing the level that defines mastery
Mayer The role of metacognition in STEM games and simulations
Riese Teaching assistants’ experiences of lab sessions in introductory computer science courses
Chahine et al. Using Robotics and Engineering Design Inquiries to Optimize Mathematics Learning for Middle Level Teachers: A Case Study.
Higgins et al. Professional Learning Opportunities in the Classroom: Implications for Scaling up System-Level Professional Development in Mathematics.
Johns et al. Planning and Facilitating Debriefs of Experiential Learning Activities in Skills-Based Health Education.
Huggins et al. Implementing the self-management threshold learning outcome for law: Some intentional design strategies from the current curriculum toolbox
Wriston The importance of a strong mathematical foundation
WO2022195264A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance de la progression d'un apprentissage en réalité mixte
Artaliawan et al. Self-Directed Learning in EFL During Covid-19 Pandemic: Teacher's Perception and Students' Learning Autonomy
Corliss et al. Student and teacher regulation of learning in technology-enhanced science instruction
Rosen et al. Computer agent technologies in collaborative assessments
Gropper Are Individual Differences Undertreated in Instructional Design?
D Erlam et al. Navigating the storm of deteriorating patients: Seven scaffolds for simulation design
Yankovskaya et al. Cognitive tool for the representation of test results of the blended education
Marshall et al. Innovative teaching and learning strategies
Lathleiff Imagining an authentic workplace using simulation: exploring simulation pedagogy in auditing education.
Chafik Chahine et al. Using Robotics and Engineering Design Inquiries to Optimize Learning for Middle Level Teachers: a case study
Farmer et al. Re-engineering success: Year two of a cross-course assignment to develop critical thinking and communication skills in a lab setting
Jomtharak et al. The Development of Information Systems to Enhance Students' Punctuality and Responsibility
Everley et al. Beginning physical education teachers’ expectations of their mentors
Barszcz Morningside Model of Generative Instruction

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22712613

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 22712613

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1