WO2022169893A1 - Porous copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst - Google Patents
Porous copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2022169893A1 WO2022169893A1 PCT/US2022/014968 US2022014968W WO2022169893A1 WO 2022169893 A1 WO2022169893 A1 WO 2022169893A1 US 2022014968 W US2022014968 W US 2022014968W WO 2022169893 A1 WO2022169893 A1 WO 2022169893A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- copper
- xerogel
- catalyst
- electrocatalytic
- water solution
- Prior art date
Links
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 161
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 98
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 72
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 71
- 229910000431 copper oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims description 48
- QPLDLSVMHZLSFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper oxide Chemical compound [Cu]=O QPLDLSVMHZLSFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims description 46
- 239000005751 Copper oxide Substances 0.000 title claims description 45
- BERDEBHAJNAUOM-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper(i) oxide Chemical compound [Cu]O[Cu] BERDEBHAJNAUOM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 75
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 46
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 33
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 18
- VMQMZMRVKUZKQL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Cu+ Chemical compound [Cu+] VMQMZMRVKUZKQL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000003638 chemical reducing agent Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000012279 sodium borohydride Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 229910000033 sodium borohydride Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000012298 atmosphere Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 150000001879 copper Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920000554 ionomer Polymers 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920001343 polytetrafluoroethylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004810 polytetrafluoroethylene Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- ARUVKPQLZAKDPS-UHFFFAOYSA-L copper(II) sulfate Chemical compound [Cu+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] ARUVKPQLZAKDPS-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 4
- -1 polytetrafluoroethylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910000365 copper sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- BFKJFAAPBSQJPD-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetrafluoroethene Chemical group FC(F)=C(F)F BFKJFAAPBSQJPD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 94
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 47
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 47
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 36
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 24
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 18
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 13
- 238000005868 electrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 12
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000002484 cyclic voltammetry Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 9
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000002173 high-resolution transmission electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000003917 TEM image Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002441 X-ray diffraction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000006471 dimerization reaction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000000840 electrochemical analysis Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000001878 scanning electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004833 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000010411 electrocatalyst Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000004502 linear sweep voltammetry Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 5
- KRFJLUBVMFXRPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N cuprous oxide Chemical compound [O-2].[Cu+].[Cu+] KRFJLUBVMFXRPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 4
- IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dimethylsulphoxide Chemical compound CS(C)=O IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229920000557 Nafion® Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 229910021607 Silver chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 3
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000002105 nanoparticle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 3
- HKZLPVFGJNLROG-UHFFFAOYSA-M silver monochloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Ag+] HKZLPVFGJNLROG-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- JPVYNHNXODAKFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Cu2+ Chemical compound [Cu+2] JPVYNHNXODAKFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethene Chemical compound C=C VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000005977 Ethylene Substances 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-ZSJDYOACSA-N Heavy water Chemical compound [2H]O[2H] XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-ZSJDYOACSA-N 0.000 description 2
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isopropanol Chemical compound CC(C)O KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphoric acid Chemical compound OP(O)(O)=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004696 Poly ether ether ketone Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000007806 chemical reaction intermediate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910001431 copper ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003487 electrochemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011229 interlayer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000543 intermediate Substances 0.000 description 2
- JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N lactic acid Chemical compound CC(O)C(O)=O JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002530 polyetherether ketone Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009919 sequestration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920000049 Carbon (fiber) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000012448 Lithium borohydride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 206010024769 Local reaction Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000005481 NMR spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phenol Chemical compound OC1=CC=CC=C1 ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000003158 alcohol group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910000147 aluminium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical group [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004177 carbon cycle Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004917 carbon fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035425 carbon utilization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013068 control sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012084 conversion product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011889 copper foil Substances 0.000 description 1
- ORTQZVOHEJQUHG-UHFFFAOYSA-L copper(II) chloride Chemical compound Cl[Cu]Cl ORTQZVOHEJQUHG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- XTVVROIMIGLXTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper(II) nitrate Chemical compound [Cu+2].[O-][N+]([O-])=O.[O-][N+]([O-])=O XTVVROIMIGLXTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000366 copper(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- OPQARKPSCNTWTJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L copper(ii) acetate Chemical compound [Cu+2].CC([O-])=O.CC([O-])=O OPQARKPSCNTWTJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002848 electrochemical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004070 electrodeposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004310 lactic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000014655 lactic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011244 liquid electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012263 liquid product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000386 microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004660 morphological change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002086 nanomaterial Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012299 nitrogen atmosphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009832 plasma treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001296 polysiloxane Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004321 preservation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009790 rate-determining step (RDS) Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000027756 respiratory electron transport chain Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005245 sintering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002195 synergetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009827 uniform distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007704 wet chemistry method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B3/00—Electrolytic production of organic compounds
- C25B3/01—Products
- C25B3/07—Oxygen containing compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/02—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by shape or form
- C25B11/03—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by shape or form perforated or foraminous
- C25B11/031—Porous electrodes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/02—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by shape or form
- C25B11/03—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by shape or form perforated or foraminous
- C25B11/031—Porous electrodes
- C25B11/032—Gas diffusion electrodes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/04—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by the material
- C25B11/051—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier
- C25B11/052—Electrodes comprising one or more electrocatalytic coatings on a substrate
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/04—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by the material
- C25B11/051—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier
- C25B11/055—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier characterised by the substrate or carrier material
- C25B11/057—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier characterised by the substrate or carrier material consisting of a single element or compound
- C25B11/065—Carbon
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/04—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by the material
- C25B11/051—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier
- C25B11/073—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier characterised by the electrocatalyst material
- C25B11/091—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier characterised by the electrocatalyst material consisting of at least one catalytic element and at least one catalytic compound; consisting of two or more catalytic elements or catalytic compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B3/00—Electrolytic production of organic compounds
- C25B3/20—Processes
- C25B3/25—Reduction
- C25B3/26—Reduction of carbon dioxide
Definitions
- the present disclosure is directed to the electrocatalytic synthesis of liquid fuels from carbon dioxide.
- Copper-based catalysts have a potential to synthesis C2+ chemicals, providing high energy density fuels that may help in providing a sustainable carbon cycle. Accordingly, as a promising technology for carbon utilization, electrocatalytic CO2 conversion is becoming a significant area for research.
- the Faradaic efficiency (FE) for a C2 product on a flat copper surface is limited to about 20% due to the high-energy barrier of the reaction and the competitive hydrogen evolution reaction (HER).
- the partial current densityJproduct) is still too small for commercial usage because of the low surface area and unfavorable reaction mechanics.
- nano-structuring of copper-based alloy and surface engineering is commonly used to improve reaction intermediate binding energy and local reaction environment control.
- oxide-derived Cu is of particular interest as it promotes CO binding and the following C-C coupling in the reaction step.
- Copper catalysts prepared from copper oxides could improve selectivity for C2 production by residual oxygen or Cu atoms and under-coordinated surface Cu atom.
- C112O formed by electrochemically deposition, O2 plasma treatment, thermal annealing, and chemical synthesis achieved faradaic efficiency (FE) for C2H4 (FEC2H4) of up to about 60%.
- FE faradaic efficiency
- J partial current density
- no reported catalysts have FE and J for ethanol production above 35% and 20 mA/cm 2 in H-cell reactor.
- An embodiment described in examples herein provides an electrocatalytic catalyst.
- the electrocatalytic catalyst includes a xerogel formed from copper oxide and copper.
- Another embodiment described herein provides a method for making an electrocatalytic catalyst.
- the method includes dissolving a copper salt in a water solution, adjusting the pH of the water solution to be basic, adding a reducing agent to the water solution, and separating a product powder from the water solution, wherein the product powder is a copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- Figure 1 is a drawing showing the morphology of a copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- Figure 2 is a transmission electron micrograph image of the copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- Figure 3 is an inverse FFT image of the transmission electron micrograph showing the composition of the xerogel.
- Figure 4 is a plot of the XRD analysis of the copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- Figure 5 is a plot of the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) Auger copper LMM peak of the copper/copper oxide xerogel for a number of different compositions.
- XPS X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
- Figure 6 is a scanning electron micrograph image of the copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- Figures 7A to 7D are cyclic voltammetry scans used for electrochemical surface area measurements of different copper surfaces.
- Figures 8A to 8F are XPS Auger copper LMM peaks of copper/copper oxide xerogels (samples 1 to 5, as described herein) at different concentrations of copper using a copper oxide xerogel ( Figure 8F) as a reference.
- Figure 9 is a HR-TEM inverse-FFT mapping images of copper oxide xerogel.
- Figures 10A to 10C are XRD spectra of copper/copper oxide xerogel and copper oxide xerogel.
- Figures 11A and 1 IB are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a planar copper surface catalyst.
- Figures 12A and 12B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a planar copper oxide surface catalyst.
- Figures 13A and 13B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a copper oxide xerogel catalyst.
- Figures 14A and 14B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst.
- Figure 15 is a plot comparing the Faraday efficiency of each of the catalysts for the production of ethanol at FEEIOH and C2/C1 ratio at -1.14 V vs RHE.
- Figure 16 is a plot comparing the current density profile of copper/copper oxide xerogel to the other catalysts.
- Figures 17A and 17B are plots comparing the electrocatalytic CO2 conversion performance of the control catalyst with the various Cu/CmO xerogel samples.
- Figures 18 is a plot comparing the xerogel Cu/Cu2O catalyst (sample 3) with other types of catalysts.
- Figure 19 is a plot of the stability of a copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- Figures 20A and 20B are transmission electron micrographs of a xerogel catalyst before and after 5 hours of electrolysis.
- Figures 21A and 21B are HR-TEM inverse-FFT mapping images of the xerogel catalyst before and after 5 hours electrolysis.
- Figures 22A and 22B are XPS Auger copper LMM spectra of the xerogel catalyst before and after 5 hours of electrolysis.
- Figure 23 is an LSV plot comparing the electrochemical analysis results of four types of copper catalysts.
- Figure 24 is a Tafel plot from the electrochemical analysis of the four types of copper catalysts, including the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3).
- Figure 25 is a schematic diagram of a proposed mechanism of electrochemical CO2 conversion on a copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- Figure 26 shows Arrhenius 2600 of the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) and control samples from LSV.
- Figures 27A and 27B are a schematic diagram showing the flow of material in the reactor in comparison to scanning electron micrograph of the Cu/Cu2O xerogel (sample 3) catalyst.
- Figures 28A and 28B are plots showing the electrocatalytic performance of the copper/copper oxide xerogel in comparison to other copper materials.
- Figure 29 is a process flow diagram of a method for forming a copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst for electrocatalytic production of ethanol from atmospheric CO2.
- a copper/copper oxide (Cu/CmO) xerogel is synthesized by wet-chemistry.
- a xerogel is a solid formed from a gel by drying with unhindered shrinkage. Xerogels generally have high porosity (15-50%) and high surface area (150-900 m2/g), as well as a very small pore size (1-10 nm).
- the synthesized xerogel was drop-casted on carbon paper.
- the Cu/CmO xerogel exhibited FEC2H4 and FEEIOH up to 40%, one of the highest values for EtOH among catalyst tested.
- the partial current density of the production of ethanol reached 31.2mA/cm2, which is which is higher than any value noted in tests of comparative copper electrocatalysts or in previous research on copper electrocatalysts.
- the Cu/CmO xerogel was used in a flow cell reactor as a gas diffusion electrode (GDE)
- the ./EIOI I was increased to 72.1 mA/cm2.
- a high selectivity to C2 product was provided by a high interface region between Cu° and Cu + interfaces, which facilitated CO2 activation and C-C dimerization.
- FIG. 1 is a drawing 100 showing the morphology of a copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- Cu/CmO xerogel was made by a wet chemical synthesis method using a CuCh precursor, NaOH, and controlled amounts of NaBFU as a reducing agent to form the Cu°.
- the product was collected by centrifugation with water and ethanol and dried at room temperature, forming the xerogel structure.
- Figure 2 is a transmission electron micrograph image 200 of the copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- the Cu/CmO xerogel network is composed of densely interconnected nanoparticles with a size under about 50nm.
- Figure 3 is an inverse FFT image 300 of the transmission electron micrograph showing the composition of the xerogel.
- HR-TEM high-resolution transmission electron microscopy
- inverse- FFT inverse-fast Fourier transformation
- a nanoparticle in the Cu/CmO xerogel shows a mixed crystal structure of 0.179 nm, 0.209 nm, and 0.245 nm interlayer spacing of the lattice fringes, which corresponds to Cu (200), (111) and C112O (111) domains, respectively.
- the domains have a size of about 10 nm.
- the inverse FFT image 300 shows a high density of Cu°-Cu + interfaces, which are the active sites for the production of C2 from the conversion of CO2.
- Figure 4 is a plot 400 of the XRD analysis of the copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum also confirms crystalline formation of (111) dominant Cu and (111), (200) dominant C112O in Cu/CmO xerogel. This is in agreement with the interlayer spacing and plane observed in the HR-TEM image in Figure 3.
- Figure 5 is a plot 500 of the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) Auger copper LMM peak of the copper/ copper oxide xerogel for a number of different compositions.
- the compositions labeled as 1 to 5 correspond to samples 1 to 5, herein.
- the ratio indicated along the y-axis is the ratio between Cu + and Cu.
- the Cu 2p and Auger Cu LMM peaks in the XPS further verify the surface chemical state, which has mixture of 22.3% Cu + and dominant Cu° species located at 916 eV and 919.9 eV.
- Figure 6 is a scanning electron micrograph image 600 of the copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image 600 shows the highly porous, 3-dimensional nanostructure of the Cu/CmO xerogel.
- Figures 7A to 7D are cyclic voltammetry (CV) scans used for electrochemical surface area (ECSA) measurements of different copper surfaces.
- Figure 7A is a CV scan of a planar Cu surface.
- Figure 7B is a CV scan of a planar Cu 2 O surface.
- Figure 7C is a CV scan of a C112O xerogel.
- Figure 7D is a CV scan of a C11/CU2O xerogel (sample 3, as described herein). The measurements were performed between -0.4 and -0.25 V versus an Ag/AgCl (KC1 saturated) electrode in a 0.1 molar KC1 solution between 25 and 300 mV/s.
- Ag/AgCl KC1 saturated
- the corresponding capacitance (Cdl) was determined by using cyclic voltammetry (CV) with a changing scan rate.
- the Cdl of the Cu/CmO xerogel was measured as 5.21 mF/cm2, which is 28 times higher than that of planar Cu (0.224 mF/cm2). Accordingly, the high surface area and porous structure will form catalyst with efficient electrocatalytic CO2 conversion performance.
- Figures 8A to 8F are XPS Auger copper LMM peaks of copper/copper oxide xerogels (samples 1 to 5, as described herein) at different concentrations of copper using a copper oxide xerogel ( Figure 8F) as a reference.
- the ratio of C112O to Cu can be controlled by changing the amount of reducing agent in the synthesis procedure, as noted with respect to the examples.
- the Cu/CmO xerogels (samples 1 to 5) in Figures 8A to 8E show mixed compositions of Cu and C112O with increasing portion of C112O.
- Figure 9 are HR-TEM inverse-FFT mapping images 900 of copper oxide xerogel. With an excess amount of reducing agent, excess amount of C112O will fully covered by C112O over a Cu core. This is shown by the surface exhibiting a strong Cu peak in the Auger LMM spectrum.
- Figures 10A to IOC are XRD spectra of copper/copper oxide xerogel and copper oxide xerogel. Mean domain size was also investigated by using the values of the XRD peaks in the Scherrer equation. The results are shown in Table 1. Despite the CU2O to Cu ratio changing in Cu/CmO xerogel samples 1 to 5 and C112O xerogel, the mean domain size of dominant C112O (111) and Cu (111) were maintained at about 5 nm and about 8 nm, respectively.
- Figures 11 A, 1 IB, 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 14A, and 14B show FE to CO2 conversion products with applied potential between -0.84 and -1.34 V vs RHE for Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) and planar Cu, planar C112O. C112O xerogel as a control sample.
- Figures 11 A and 1 IB are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a planar copper surface catalyst.
- Figures 12A and 12B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a planar copper oxide surface catalyst.
- Figures 13A and 13B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a copper oxide xerogel catalyst.
- Figures 14A and 14B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst.
- planar Cu and planar CmO are shown in Figures 11 A, 1 IB, 12A, and 12B, respectively.
- planar CtuO showed lower methane formation and higher C2 product formation at potentials more negative than -1.04 V vs RHE, which is explained as an effect of oxide-derived copper.
- the Cu/CmO xerogel sample (using sample 3 as described with respect to Table 1), provided the results shown in Figures 14A and 14B.
- the Cu/CmO xerogel sample gave the highest C2 production among the other catalysts, especially for the production of ethanol.
- the high count of Cu°-Cu + interfaces on the highly porous xerogel structure substantially suppressed HER and Ci production, and facilitated CO2 activation and C-C dimerization. Accordingly, the highest FE for ethanol and ethylene reached 41.2% and 39.6% at -1.14 V vs RHE.
- Figure 15 is a plot 1500 comparing the Faraday efficiency of each of the catalysts for the production of ethanol at FEEIOH and C2/C1 ratio at -1.14 V vs RHE. This comparison illustrates the difference in electrocatalytic CO2 conversion activity of the samples.
- the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) achieves a 7.49-fold and 5.5-fold enhancement in FEEIOH over planar Cu and planar C112O. respectively.
- the ratio of C2/C1 reached about 10, which is a 10.9-fold enhancement over planar Cu.
- the xerogel structure significantly improved selectivity to ethanol, which increased FEEIOH from 7.5% (for planar CmO) to 18.5% (C112O xerogel). Furthermore, introduction of greater numbers of Cu°-Cu + interfaces dramatically lifted C2/C1 ratio and achieved the highest ethanol selectivity of the catalysts.
- Figure 16 is a plot 1600 comparing the current density profile of copper/copper oxide xerogel to the other catalysts. Partial current density reveals actual productivity of an electrocatalyst.
- the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) shows high productivity, as measured by current density (JEIOH), versus other catalysts.
- a current density (JEIOH) of 31.2 mA/cm 2 was achieved with the C11/C112O xerogel (sample 3) at - 1.14 V vs RHE. This value is 45.6 and 38.7 times higher than the current densities of planar Cu and planar CmO, respectively.
- Figures 17A and 17B are plots comparing the electrocatalytic CO2 conversion performance of the control catalyst with the various Cu/CmO xerogel samples.
- the performance of samples 1 to 5 of the Cu/CmO xerogel were measured to determine which ratio of Cu and CtrO gave the best results.
- sample 3 provided the best results, it was used for other tests described herein, such as those described with respect to 14A and 14B, among others.
- Figures 18 is a plot comparing the xerogel Cu/CmO catalyst (sample 3) with other types of catalysts.
- the xerogel catalysts described herein provide the highest productivity of electrocatalytic CO2 conversion to ethanol in H-cell of the currently tested catalyst, as well as other types of copper catalysts from the literature.
- the high productivity and selectivity to ethanol are believed to be to the large surface area provided by the xerogel, which increases active reaction sites over other types of catalysts.
- Figure 19 is a plot 1900 of the stability of a copper/copper oxide xerogel.
- the plot 1700 shows that the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) exhibits relatively stable FE and partial current density during ethanol production.
- the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) retained 80.1% of its FEEIOH with a stable total current density following 5 h electrolysis.
- FIG. 20A, 20B, 21A, 21B, 22A, and 22B are transmission electron micrographs of the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) catalyst before and after 5 hours of electrolysis.
- Figures 21 A and 21B are HR-TEM inverse-FFT mapping images of the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) catalyst before and after 5 hours electrolysis.
- Figures 22A and 22B are XPS Auger copper LMM spectra of the xerogel catalyst before and after 5 hours of electrolysis.
- FIG. 23 is an LSV plot 2300 comparing the electrochemical analysis results of four types of copper catalysts. The electrochemical analysis was performed to explain the high performance of the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3). Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) displays much higher current density with the Cu/CmO xerogel compared to the control samples during the overall potential range.
- LSV Linear sweep voltammetry
- the onset potential was -0.398 V vs RHE for Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3), which is less negative than those of other catalysts (-0.488 V, -0.623 V, -0.658 V vs RHE for C112O xerogel, planar C112O and planar Cu, respectively).
- Figure 24 is a Tafel plot 2400 from the electrochemical analysis of the four types of copper catalysts, including the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3).
- the Tafel plot 2400 is based on the relationship of the rate of an electrochemical reaction to the overpotential for the electrochemical reaction.
- the Tafel plot 2400 for ethanol production was determined to provide kinetic insight from current density for ethanol at various overpotentials.
- the slopes of the lines in the Tafel plot were 68.9 and 132 mV per decade (dec 1 ) for Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) and planar Cu, respectively, indicating that the overall rate-determining step has changed by introducing the xerogel structure and the Cu°-Cu + interfaces.
- FIG. 25 is a schematic diagram of a proposed mechanism 2500 of the electrochemical conversion of CO2 to ethanol on the Cu/CmO xerogel.
- the porous structure of the Cu/CmO xerogel may improve CO2 reduction selectivity by a high local pH generated via the accumulation of hydroxide ions from CO2 reduction and HER by-products.
- the high local pH improves the kinetics of proton adsorption, which may help to suppress HER.
- the high concentration of the local intermediates in the confined structure promotes C-C dimerization for C2 production.
- FIG. 26 shows Arrhenius plots 2600 of the Cu/Cu2O xerogel (sample 3) and control samples from LSV.
- the Arrhenius plot 2600 can be used to provide the overall activation energy from the absolute value of the slope.
- the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) shows and absolute value of the slope of 2.61, which is 1.65 times lower than planar Cu. This helps to explain the high intrinsic electrochemical activity.
- Figures 27A and 27B are a schematic diagram showing the flow of material in the reactor in comparison to scanning electron micrograph of the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) catalyst.
- the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) was tested in a flow cell reactor as a gas diffusion electrode (GDE).
- GDE gas diffusion electrode
- the C11/CU2O xerogel (sample 3) deposited on hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coated carbon paper was investigated in flow cell reactor composed of one CO2 gas and two liquid electrolytes (catholyte and anolyte) compartments.
- PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene
- Cross-sectional SEM image in Figure 27B shows a GDE which is composed of carbon fiber and microporous layer with the highly porous Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) catalyst.
- Figures 28A and 28B are plots showing the electrocatalytic performance of the copper/copper oxide xerogel in comparison to other copper materials.
- Figure 28A shows FE to ethanol using planar Cu and Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) in the H-cell reactor and the flow cell reactor. Both the planar Cu and the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) exhibit less negative onset potential for ethanol production in flow cell.
- FIG. 29 is a process flow diagram of a method 2900 for forming a copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst for electrocatalytic production of ethanol from atmospheric CO2.
- the copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst is an electrocatalytic catalyst that may be used as a solid electrode catalyst, a gas diffusion electrode, or in other forms.
- the method 2900 begins at block 2902 with the dissolution of copper ions in water.
- the copper ions can be in the form of copper chloride, or other copper salts, such as copper nitrate, copper sulfate, or copper acetate, among others.
- the pH is adjusted to be basic, for example, by the addition of sodium hydroxide.
- the pH may be adjusted to be less than about 7.0, less than about 6.5, less than about 6.0, or lower.
- the adjustment of the pH may trigger the precipitation of copper salts, and the formation of a gel.
- a reducing agent is added.
- the reducing agent may be sodium borohydride (NaBH4).
- Other reducing agents that may be used in embodiments include, LiBH4, NaH, or LiH, among others.
- the resulting product is separated from the solution and dried to form a powder. In some embodiments, this may be performed by centrifugation, or filtration, among other techniques.
- the separated product can be rinsed, for example, with water, alcohols, or both.
- a catalyst ink can be formed by suspending the powder in a solvent.
- the solvent is an alcohol, such as methanol, ethanol, or isopropanol.
- a material is added to the solvent to assist the dissolution, such as an ionomer.
- the material is a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene, such as a Nafion® type available polymer from Chemours of Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
- the catalyst ink can be dropped cast on a substrate to form an electrode.
- the substrate is conductive allowing its use as an electrode.
- the substrate is a carbon film, a carbon rod, a carbon block, and the like.
- the drop casted catalyst ink is allowed to dry on the substrate.
- the drying is performed under an inert atmosphere at ambient conditions. In other embodiments, the drying is performed at an elevated temperature.
- the catalyst is not limited to being formed on a conductive substrate, but may be used as a gas diffusion electrode (GDE) deposited on a hydrophilic PTFE paper.
- GDE gas diffusion electrode
- Planar Cu was prepared by electropolishing copper foil in phosphoric acid (85% in water) potentiostatically at 2.1 V vs counter electrode.
- the planar C112O electrode were fabricated using electrodeposition method at 0.25 V vs RHE in 0.5 M CuSO4 with lactic acid and 5 M NaOH.
- the catalyst ink was prepared by dispersion of lOmg of the sample powder with 20 pL Nafion solution (5%) in ImL methanol which was ultrasonicated for 1 h. 71 pL of catalyst ink was drop-casted on the 1 cm 2 carbon paper and dried for 6 h. [0087] Electrochemical measurements
- Electrochemical tests were performed in an H-cell reactor, which is composed of two compartments separated by a proton exchange membrane. 50 mL of 0.1 M KC1 electrolyte was injected for each compartment and purged with CO2 gas for 30 min before CO2 reduction test. Pt coil and Ag/AgCl (3 M KC1 saturated) electrode was used as a counter and reference, respectively. First, working electrode was electrochemically reduced using the cyclic voltammetry (CV) method in the range of - 0.5 ⁇ -2.0 V vs RHE at the rate of 0.1 V s for 5 cycle.
- CV cyclic voltammetry
- Carbon paper with a microporous layer (Sigracet 39 BC, Fuel cell store) was used as a gas diffusion electrode (GDE).
- GDE gas diffusion electrode
- the E-beam evaporated Pt on GDE was used as the counter electrode and Ag/AgCl as a working electrode.
- CO2 electrolysis was tested in flow cell reactor, which is made of poly etheretherketone (PEEK) and silicone gasket for sealing. Gas flow rate was controlled to 10 seem via a mass flow controller. CO2 gas flowing at the backside of cathode GDE was connected to GC and backside of anode GDE was opened to air. The catholyte and anolyte were separated and flow rate was 2 mL min 4 .
- a IM KC1 solution was used as an electrolyte with Nafion proton exchange membrane.
- the prepared samples were characterized using scanning microscope (FEI Magellan 400), a transmission electron microscope (Tecnai G2 F30), an X-Ray diffractometer (Rigaku SmartLab), and an X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (Axis- Supra). Inverse-fast Fourier transformation (Inverse-FFT) mapping was conducted from FFT data by Gatan Digital Microscopy 3.
- the double-layer capacitance measurement for ECSA was conducted by CV in a 0.1 M KC1 electrolyte. The doublelayer capacitance was determined by the value of the slope of the linear fits, and it was considered to be proportional to the ECSA.
- An embodiment described in examples herein provides an electrocatalytic catalyst.
- the electrocatalytic catalyst includes a xerogel including copper (I) oxide and copper.
- the xerogel includes a ratio of copper (I) to copper (0) of between 10% and 40% copper (I). In an aspect, the xerogel includes a ratio of copper (I) to copper (0) of 20% copper oxide.
- the xerogel is cast on a conductive substrate to form a catalytic electrode.
- the conductive substrate includes carbon.
- the electrocatalytic catalyst includes a partial current density for production of ethanol of greater than about 30 mA/cm2.
- the xerogel is drop casted on a nonconductive substrate.
- the xerogel includes a gas diffusion electrode.
- the electrolytic catalyst includes a partial current density for production of ethanol of greater than about 70 mA/cm2.
- the xerogel includes a main domain size for domains of copper of between 8 nm and 8.6 nm. in an aspect, the xerogel includes a main domain size for domains of the copper oxide of between 5 nm and 6 nm.
- Another embodiment described herein provides a method for making an electrocatalytic catalyst.
- the method includes dissolving a copper salt in a water solution, adjusting the pH of the water solution to be basic, adding a reducing agent to the water solution, and separating a product powder from the water solution, wherein the product powder is a xerogel including copper and copper (I) oxide.
- the method includes dissolving copper sulfate in the water solution.
- the method includes adding sodium hydroxide to the water solution.
- the method includes, after adjusting the pH, stirring the water solution under an inert atmosphere for greater than 30 minutes.
- the method includes adding the reducing agent by adding ethanol to the water solution, and adding sodium borohydride to the water solution.
- an amount of the sodium borohydride is adjusted to control a ratio of copper (I) to copper (0).
- the method includes separating the product powder from the water solution by centrifugation. In an aspect, the method includes rinsing the product powder with water and ethanol.
- the method includes forming a catalyst ink from the product powder.
- the method includes forming the catalyst ink by dispersing the product powder in methanol, and ultrasonicating the dispersion for about 1 hour.
- the method includes adding an ionomer to the methanol with the product powder. In an aspect, the method includes adding a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene as the ionomer. In an aspect, the method includes casting the catalyst ink on a substrate. In an aspect, the method includes placing droplets of the catalyst ink on a conductive carbon surface. In an aspect, the method includes placing droplets of the catalyst ink on a polytetrafluoroethylene paper. In an aspect, the method includes drying the catalyst ink on the substrate.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Catalysts (AREA)
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
An electrocatalytic catalyst is provided. The electrocatalytic catalyst includes a xerogel including copper (I) oxide and copper.
Description
POROUS COPPER/COPPER OXIDE XEROGEL CATALYST
Claim of Priority
[0001 ] This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/144,778, filed on February 2, 2021, and U.S. Patent Application No. 17/580,388, filed on January 20, 2022, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Technical Field
[0002] The present disclosure is directed to the electrocatalytic synthesis of liquid fuels from carbon dioxide.
Background
[0003] The removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere, followed by its sequestration is being explored. Most sequestration techniques isolate the CO2, and then injected it into underground formations for storage. Utilization of the CO2 for fuel generation would lower the cost of the CO2 removal, as well as lower the total amount of CO2 released in the atmosphere. The electrosynthesis of liquid fuels from CO2 is a promising technology for performing this function.
[0004] Copper-based catalysts have a potential to synthesis C2+ chemicals, providing high energy density fuels that may help in providing a sustainable carbon cycle. Accordingly, as a promising technology for carbon utilization, electrocatalytic CO2 conversion is becoming a significant area for research.
[0005] However, the Faradaic efficiency (FE) for a C2 product on a flat copper surface is limited to about 20% due to the high-energy barrier of the reaction and the competitive hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Further, the partial current densityJproduct) is still too small for commercial usage because of the low surface area and unfavorable reaction mechanics. To overcome this, nano-structuring of copper-based alloy and surface engineering is commonly used to improve reaction intermediate binding energy and local reaction environment control.
[0006] Among the various attempts to enhance C2 product selectivity and productivity of CO2 conversion electrocatalyst, oxide-derived Cu is of particular interest as it promotes CO binding and the following C-C coupling in the reaction step. Copper catalysts prepared from copper oxides could improve selectivity for C2
production by residual oxygen or Cu atoms and under-coordinated surface Cu atom. For instance, C112O formed by electrochemically deposition, O2 plasma treatment, thermal annealing, and chemical synthesis achieved faradaic efficiency (FE) for C2H4 (FEC2H4) of up to about 60%. However, partial current density (J), which correlates with actual production rate, is too small. Further, no reported catalysts have FE and J for ethanol production above 35% and 20 mA/cm2 in H-cell reactor.
Summary
[0007] An embodiment described in examples herein provides an electrocatalytic catalyst. The electrocatalytic catalyst includes a xerogel formed from copper oxide and copper.
[0008] Another embodiment described herein provides a method for making an electrocatalytic catalyst. The method includes dissolving a copper salt in a water solution, adjusting the pH of the water solution to be basic, adding a reducing agent to the water solution, and separating a product powder from the water solution, wherein the product powder is a copper/copper oxide xerogel.
Brief Description of Drawings
[ 0009 j Figure 1 is a drawing showing the morphology of a copper/copper oxide xerogel.
[0010] Figure 2 is a transmission electron micrograph image of the copper/copper oxide xerogel.
[001 1 ] Figure 3 is an inverse FFT image of the transmission electron micrograph showing the composition of the xerogel.
[0012] Figure 4 is a plot of the XRD analysis of the copper/copper oxide xerogel.
[0013] Figure 5 is a plot of the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) Auger copper LMM peak of the copper/copper oxide xerogel for a number of different compositions.
[0014] Figure 6 is a scanning electron micrograph image of the copper/copper oxide xerogel.
[0015] Figures 7A to 7D are cyclic voltammetry scans used for electrochemical surface area measurements of different copper surfaces.
[0016] Figures 8A to 8F are XPS Auger copper LMM peaks of copper/copper oxide xerogels (samples 1 to 5, as described herein) at different concentrations of copper using a copper oxide xerogel (Figure 8F) as a reference.
[0017] Figure 9 is a HR-TEM inverse-FFT mapping images of copper oxide xerogel.
[0018] Figures 10A to 10C are XRD spectra of copper/copper oxide xerogel and copper oxide xerogel.
[0019] Figures 11A and 1 IB are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a planar copper surface catalyst.
[0020] Figures 12A and 12B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a planar copper oxide surface catalyst.
[0021 ] Figures 13A and 13B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a copper oxide xerogel catalyst.
[0022] Figures 14A and 14B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst.
[0023] Figure 15 is a plot comparing the Faraday efficiency of each of the catalysts for the production of ethanol at FEEIOH and C2/C1 ratio at -1.14 V vs RHE.
[0024] Figure 16 is a plot comparing the current density profile of copper/copper oxide xerogel to the other catalysts.
[0025] Figures 17A and 17B are plots comparing the electrocatalytic CO2 conversion performance of the control catalyst with the various Cu/CmO xerogel samples.
[0026] Figures 18 is a plot comparing the xerogel Cu/Cu2O catalyst (sample 3) with other types of catalysts.
[0027] Figure 19 is a plot of the stability of a copper/copper oxide xerogel.
[0028] Figures 20A and 20B are transmission electron micrographs of a xerogel catalyst before and after 5 hours of electrolysis.
[0029] Figures 21A and 21B are HR-TEM inverse-FFT mapping images of the xerogel catalyst before and after 5 hours electrolysis.
[0030] Figures 22A and 22B are XPS Auger copper LMM spectra of the xerogel catalyst before and after 5 hours of electrolysis.
[00 1 ] Figure 23 is an LSV plot comparing the electrochemical analysis results of four types of copper catalysts.
[0032] Figure 24 is a Tafel plot from the electrochemical analysis of the four types of copper catalysts, including the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3).
[0033] Figure 25 is a schematic diagram of a proposed mechanism of electrochemical CO2 conversion on a copper/copper oxide xerogel.
[0034] Figure 26 shows Arrhenius 2600 of the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) and control samples from LSV.
[0035] Figures 27A and 27B are a schematic diagram showing the flow of material in the reactor in comparison to scanning electron micrograph of the Cu/Cu2O xerogel (sample 3) catalyst.
[0036] Figures 28A and 28B are plots showing the electrocatalytic performance of the copper/copper oxide xerogel in comparison to other copper materials.
[00.37] Figure 29 is a process flow diagram of a method for forming a copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst for electrocatalytic production of ethanol from atmospheric CO2.
Detailed Description
[0038] Experimental and theoretical reports suggest catalysts with partial oxidation states of Cu, for example, having both Cu+ and Cu° regions, may make effective electrocatalysts. From computational studies, CO2 activation and CO dimerization energy barrier will be significantly lower on the interface between Cu+ and Cu° region while impeding the Ci product pathway. Therefore, catalyst design for maximizing Cu+ and Cu° interfaces may be important for efficient and selective C2 production.
[0039] In examples provided herein, a copper/copper oxide (Cu/CmO) xerogel is synthesized by wet-chemistry. As used herein, a xerogel is a solid formed from a gel by drying with unhindered shrinkage. Xerogels generally have high porosity (15-50%) and high surface area (150-900 m2/g), as well as a very small pore size (1-10 nm). To form an electrode for the CO2 conversion, the synthesized xerogel was drop-casted on carbon paper. The Cu/CmO xerogel exhibited FEC2H4 and FEEIOH up to 40%, one of the highest values for EtOH among catalyst tested.
[0040] Furthermore, the partial current density of the production of ethanol (JEIOH) reached 31.2mA/cm2, which is which is higher than any value noted in tests of comparative copper electrocatalysts or in previous research on copper electrocatalysts. When the Cu/CmO xerogel was used in a flow cell reactor as a gas diffusion electrode
(GDE), the ./EIOI I was increased to 72.1 mA/cm2. A high selectivity to C2 product was provided by a high interface region between Cu° and Cu+ interfaces, which facilitated CO2 activation and C-C dimerization.
[0041 ] It is believed that the morphology of the porous xerogel structure, which has a high surface area and confined spaces, confines the reaction intermediates in close proximity to the active interface regions, contributing to the high productivity. The increase of ethanol productivity over other catalyst may be ascribed to densely located Cu°-Cu+ interfaces, which facilitate CO2 activation and C-C dimerization. As these are the reactions, which control the production of C2+ chemicals over hydrogen and Ci chemicals, the production of ethanol is higher than the competing chemicals. [0042] Figure 1 is a drawing 100 showing the morphology of a copper/copper oxide xerogel. Cu/CmO xerogel was made by a wet chemical synthesis method using a CuCh precursor, NaOH, and controlled amounts of NaBFU as a reducing agent to form the Cu°. The product was collected by centrifugation with water and ethanol and dried at room temperature, forming the xerogel structure.
[0043] Figure 2 is a transmission electron micrograph image 200 of the copper/copper oxide xerogel. The Cu/CmO xerogel network is composed of densely interconnected nanoparticles with a size under about 50nm.
[0044] Figure 3 is an inverse FFT image 300 of the transmission electron micrograph showing the composition of the xerogel. In order to identify and visualize the uniform distribution of Cu and C112O on the surface, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) with inverse-fast Fourier transformation (inverse- FFT) mapping was conducted. As shown, a nanoparticle in the Cu/CmO xerogel shows a mixed crystal structure of 0.179 nm, 0.209 nm, and 0.245 nm interlayer spacing of the lattice fringes, which corresponds to Cu (200), (111) and C112O (111) domains, respectively. The domains have a size of about 10 nm. The nanoparticles and domains are randomly distributed on the overall surface of the Cu/CmO xerogel. Thus, the inverse FFT image 300 shows a high density of Cu°-Cu+ interfaces, which are the active sites for the production of C2 from the conversion of CO2.
[0045] Figure 4 is a plot 400 of the XRD analysis of the copper/copper oxide xerogel. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum also confirms crystalline formation of (111) dominant Cu and (111), (200) dominant C112O in Cu/CmO xerogel. This is in
agreement with the interlayer spacing and plane observed in the HR-TEM image in Figure 3.
[0046] Figure 5 is a plot 500 of the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) Auger copper LMM peak of the copper/ copper oxide xerogel for a number of different compositions. The compositions labeled as 1 to 5 correspond to samples 1 to 5, herein. The ratio indicated along the y-axis is the ratio between Cu+ and Cu. The Cu 2p and Auger Cu LMM peaks in the XPS further verify the surface chemical state, which has mixture of 22.3% Cu+ and dominant Cu° species located at 916 eV and 919.9 eV.
[0047] Figure 6 is a scanning electron micrograph image 600 of the copper/copper oxide xerogel. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image 600 shows the highly porous, 3-dimensional nanostructure of the Cu/CmO xerogel.
[0048] Figures 7A to 7D are cyclic voltammetry (CV) scans used for electrochemical surface area (ECSA) measurements of different copper surfaces. Figure 7A is a CV scan of a planar Cu surface. Figure 7B is a CV scan of a planar Cu2O surface. Figure 7C is a CV scan of a C112O xerogel. Figure 7D is a CV scan of a C11/CU2O xerogel (sample 3, as described herein). The measurements were performed between -0.4 and -0.25 V versus an Ag/AgCl (KC1 saturated) electrode in a 0.1 molar KC1 solution between 25 and 300 mV/s.
[0049] The corresponding capacitance (Cdl) was determined by using cyclic voltammetry (CV) with a changing scan rate. The Cdl of the Cu/CmO xerogel was measured as 5.21 mF/cm2, which is 28 times higher than that of planar Cu (0.224 mF/cm2). Accordingly, the high surface area and porous structure will form catalyst with efficient electrocatalytic CO2 conversion performance.
[0050] Figures 8A to 8F are XPS Auger copper LMM peaks of copper/copper oxide xerogels (samples 1 to 5, as described herein) at different concentrations of copper using a copper oxide xerogel (Figure 8F) as a reference. As shown in Figures 8A to 8E, the ratio of C112O to Cu can be controlled by changing the amount of reducing agent in the synthesis procedure, as noted with respect to the examples. As seen in these figures, the Cu/CmO xerogels (samples 1 to 5) in Figures 8A to 8E show mixed compositions of Cu and C112O with increasing portion of C112O.
[00 1] Figure 9 are HR-TEM inverse-FFT mapping images 900 of copper oxide xerogel. With an excess amount of reducing agent, excess amount of C112O will fully
covered by C112O over a Cu core. This is shown by the surface exhibiting a strong Cu peak in the Auger LMM spectrum.
[0052] Figures 10A to IOC are XRD spectra of copper/copper oxide xerogel and copper oxide xerogel. Mean domain size was also investigated by using the values of the XRD peaks in the Scherrer equation. The results are shown in Table 1. Despite the CU2O to Cu ratio changing in Cu/CmO xerogel samples 1 to 5 and C112O xerogel, the mean domain size of dominant C112O (111) and Cu (111) were maintained at about 5 nm and about 8 nm, respectively.
[0054 j Figures 11 A, 1 IB, 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 14A, and 14B show FE to CO2 conversion products with applied potential between -0.84 and -1.34 V vs RHE for Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) and planar Cu, planar C112O. C112O xerogel as a control sample. Figures 11 A and 1 IB are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a planar copper surface catalyst. Figures 12A and 12B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a planar copper oxide surface catalyst. Figures 13A and 13B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a copper oxide xerogel catalyst. Figures 14A and 14B are plots of the CO2 electroconversion performance of a copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst.
[0055] The evaluation in Figures 11 A, 11B, 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 14A, and 14B was performed by drop casting the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) with a mixture of Nation® in methanol solvent. The xerogel structures on the carbon paper electrode maintained the porous structure and the selectivity and productivity toward various products was analyzed under different applied potential with IR correction. An H-cell reactor was used with a CCh-saturated 0.1 M KC1 electrolyte for stable preservation of CU2O phase during electrolysis and better suppression of the undesired HER.
[0056] The control samples, planar Cu and planar CmO, are shown in Figures 11 A, 1 IB, 12A, and 12B, respectively. Compared to the planar Cu, the planar CtuO showed lower methane formation and higher C2 product formation at potentials more negative than -1.04 V vs RHE, which is explained as an effect of oxide-derived copper.
[0057] The effect of the xerogel structure on C2 product selectivity was observed in the C112O xerogel, shown in Figures 13A and 13B. The HER and Ci product selectivity were significantly suppressed over the entire potential range with enhanced C2 selectivity. The CO2 reduction overpotential was also lower. These changes may be attributed to the confinement of the intermediates in proximity to the catalytically active sites and the change of local pH environment in the highly porous xerogel structure.
[0058] The Cu/CmO xerogel sample (using sample 3 as described with respect to Table 1), provided the results shown in Figures 14A and 14B. The Cu/CmO xerogel sample gave the highest C2 production among the other catalysts, especially for the production of ethanol. The high count of Cu°-Cu+ interfaces on the highly porous xerogel structure substantially suppressed HER and Ci production, and facilitated CO2 activation and C-C dimerization. Accordingly, the highest FE for ethanol and ethylene reached 41.2% and 39.6% at -1.14 V vs RHE.
[0059] Figure 15 is a plot 1500 comparing the Faraday efficiency of each of the catalysts for the production of ethanol at FEEIOH and C2/C1 ratio at -1.14 V vs RHE. This comparison illustrates the difference in electrocatalytic CO2 conversion activity of the samples. The Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) achieves a 7.49-fold and 5.5-fold enhancement in FEEIOH over planar Cu and planar C112O. respectively. In addition, the ratio of C2/C1 reached about 10, which is a 10.9-fold enhancement over planar Cu. [0060] The xerogel structure significantly improved selectivity to ethanol, which increased FEEIOH from 7.5% (for planar CmO) to 18.5% (C112O xerogel). Furthermore, introduction of greater numbers of Cu°-Cu+ interfaces dramatically lifted C2/C1 ratio and achieved the highest ethanol selectivity of the catalysts.
[0061] Figure 16 is a plot 1600 comparing the current density profile of copper/copper oxide xerogel to the other catalysts. Partial current density reveals actual productivity of an electrocatalyst. The Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) shows high productivity, as measured by current density (JEIOH), versus other catalysts. A current
density (JEIOH) of 31.2 mA/cm2 was achieved with the C11/C112O xerogel (sample 3) at - 1.14 V vs RHE. This value is 45.6 and 38.7 times higher than the current densities of planar Cu and planar CmO, respectively.
[0062] Figures 17A and 17B are plots comparing the electrocatalytic CO2 conversion performance of the control catalyst with the various Cu/CmO xerogel samples. The performance of samples 1 to 5 of the Cu/CmO xerogel were measured to determine which ratio of Cu and CtrO gave the best results. As sample 3 provided the best results, it was used for other tests described herein, such as those described with respect to 14A and 14B, among others.
[0063] Figures 18 is a plot comparing the xerogel Cu/CmO catalyst (sample 3) with other types of catalysts. The xerogel catalysts described herein provide the highest productivity of electrocatalytic CO2 conversion to ethanol in H-cell of the currently tested catalyst, as well as other types of copper catalysts from the literature. The high productivity and selectivity to ethanol are believed to be to the large surface area provided by the xerogel, which increases active reaction sites over other types of catalysts.
[0064] Figure 19 is a plot 1900 of the stability of a copper/copper oxide xerogel. The plot 1700 shows that the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) exhibits relatively stable FE and partial current density during ethanol production. The Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) retained 80.1% of its FEEIOH with a stable total current density following 5 h electrolysis.
[0065] The stability was further explored by imaging the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) catalyst before and after five hours of operation as shown in Figures 20A, 20B, 21A, 21B, 22A, and 22B. Figures 20A and 20B are transmission electron micrographs of the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) catalyst before and after 5 hours of electrolysis. Figures 21 A and 21B are HR-TEM inverse-FFT mapping images of the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) catalyst before and after 5 hours electrolysis. Figures 22A and 22B are XPS Auger copper LMM spectra of the xerogel catalyst before and after 5 hours of electrolysis. After five hours of electrolysis, the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) maintained a nearly uniform mixture of Cu° and Cut Some morphological changes were seen due to aggregation and sintering. The stability is likely due to the stabilizing effect of the KC1 electrolyte on the C112O.
[0066] Figure 23 is an LSV plot 2300 comparing the electrochemical analysis results of four types of copper catalysts. The electrochemical analysis was performed to explain the high performance of the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3). Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) displays much higher current density with the Cu/CmO xerogel compared to the control samples during the overall potential range. In addition, the onset potential was -0.398 V vs RHE for Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3), which is less negative than those of other catalysts (-0.488 V, -0.623 V, -0.658 V vs RHE for C112O xerogel, planar C112O and planar Cu, respectively).
[0067] Figure 24 is a Tafel plot 2400 from the electrochemical analysis of the four types of copper catalysts, including the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3). The Tafel plot 2400 is based on the relationship of the rate of an electrochemical reaction to the overpotential for the electrochemical reaction. The Tafel plot 2400 for ethanol production was determined to provide kinetic insight from current density for ethanol at various overpotentials. The slopes of the lines in the Tafel plot were 68.9 and 132 mV per decade (dec1) for Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) and planar Cu, respectively, indicating that the overall rate-determining step has changed by introducing the xerogel structure and the Cu°-Cu+ interfaces. Other studies have indicated that these slopes are similarly observed in CO reduction (CO to C2 products, 68.9 mV dec1) and the first electron transfer step in CO2 reduction (CO2 + e — > CO2 ", 132mV dec1). This implies that the Cu/CmO xerogel exhibits faster kinetics than other catalysts.
[0068 ] Figure 25 is a schematic diagram of a proposed mechanism 2500 of the electrochemical conversion of CO2 to ethanol on the Cu/CmO xerogel. The porous structure of the Cu/CmO xerogel may improve CO2 reduction selectivity by a high local pH generated via the accumulation of hydroxide ions from CO2 reduction and HER by-products. The high local pH improves the kinetics of proton adsorption, which may help to suppress HER. In addition, the high concentration of the local intermediates in the confined structure promotes C-C dimerization for C2 production. Further, the increase in the Cu°-Cu+ interfaces improves the C-C dimerization kinetics and thermodynamics by a combination of positively and negatively charged CO binding on Cu+ and Cu°, respectively. Finally, introduction of the increased Cu°-Cu+ interfaces on xerogel structure exhibits substantial increases in C2 (ethanol, ethylene) production.
[0069] Figure 26 shows Arrhenius plots 2600 of the Cu/Cu2O xerogel (sample 3) and control samples from LSV. The Arrhenius plot 2600 can be used to provide the overall activation energy from the absolute value of the slope. The Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) shows and absolute value of the slope of 2.61, which is 1.65 times lower than planar Cu. This helps to explain the high intrinsic electrochemical activity.
[0070] Figures 27A and 27B are a schematic diagram showing the flow of material in the reactor in comparison to scanning electron micrograph of the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) catalyst. To further enhance current density to ethanol, the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) was tested in a flow cell reactor as a gas diffusion electrode (GDE). The C11/CU2O xerogel (sample 3) deposited on hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coated carbon paper was investigated in flow cell reactor composed of one CO2 gas and two liquid electrolytes (catholyte and anolyte) compartments. At the boundary of catalyst, CO2 gas and electrolyte, three-phase reaction occurs which can overcome serious limitation of H-cell reactor. High current density could be obtained by removing limitation on gaseous CO2 solubility on electrolyte. Also, high porosity of C11/CU2O xerogel 3 will gives advantage of exiting the gaseous product rapidly without blocking of bubble while achieving high current density. Cross-sectional SEM image in Figure 27B shows a GDE which is composed of carbon fiber and microporous layer with the highly porous Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) catalyst.
[0071 ] Figures 28A and 28B are plots showing the electrocatalytic performance of the copper/copper oxide xerogel in comparison to other copper materials. Figure 28A shows FE to ethanol using planar Cu and Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) in the H-cell reactor and the flow cell reactor. Both the planar Cu and the Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) exhibit less negative onset potential for ethanol production in flow cell.
[0072] However, selectivity to ethanol reached to about 45% in flow cell with C11/CU2O xerogel (sample 3) under -0.74 V vs RHE. As shown in Figure 28B, at this potential, the highest ./r.ton of 72.1 mA/cm2 was achieved, which is a 2.31-fold enhancement over the case of H-cell reactor. This high productivity to ethanol is attributed to the synergetic effects of the efficient Cu/CmO xerogel (sample 3) catalyst and the systematic advantages of a flow cell reactor.
[0073] Figure 29 is a process flow diagram of a method 2900 for forming a copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst for electrocatalytic production of ethanol from atmospheric CO2. As used herein the copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst is an
electrocatalytic catalyst that may be used as a solid electrode catalyst, a gas diffusion electrode, or in other forms. The method 2900 begins at block 2902 with the dissolution of copper ions in water. The copper ions can be in the form of copper chloride, or other copper salts, such as copper nitrate, copper sulfate, or copper acetate, among others.
[0074] At block 2904, the pH is adjusted to be basic, for example, by the addition of sodium hydroxide. In various embodiments, the pH may be adjusted to be less than about 7.0, less than about 6.5, less than about 6.0, or lower. The adjustment of the pH may trigger the precipitation of copper salts, and the formation of a gel.
[0075] At block 2906, a reducing agent is added. In some embodiments, the reducing agent may be sodium borohydride (NaBH4). Other reducing agents that may be used in embodiments include, LiBH4, NaH, or LiH, among others.
[0076] At block 2908, the resulting product is separated from the solution and dried to form a powder. In some embodiments, this may be performed by centrifugation, or filtration, among other techniques. The separated product can be rinsed, for example, with water, alcohols, or both.
[0077] At block 2910, a catalyst ink can be formed by suspending the powder in a solvent. In some embodiments, the solvent is an alcohol, such as methanol, ethanol, or isopropanol. In some embodiments, a material is added to the solvent to assist the dissolution, such as an ionomer. In some embodiments, the material is a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene, such as a Nafion® type available polymer from Chemours of Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
[0078] At block 2912, the catalyst ink can be dropped cast on a substrate to form an electrode. In various examples, the substrate is conductive allowing its use as an electrode. In some examples, the substrate is a carbon film, a carbon rod, a carbon block, and the like. The drop casted catalyst ink is allowed to dry on the substrate. In some embodiments, the drying is performed under an inert atmosphere at ambient conditions. In other embodiments, the drying is performed at an elevated temperature. [0079] The catalyst is not limited to being formed on a conductive substrate, but may be used as a gas diffusion electrode (GDE) deposited on a hydrophilic PTFE paper.
[0080] Methods
[0081] Synthesis of Cu/CmO xerogel and CU2O xerogel
[0082] 15 mL of CuCh (0.1 M) and 15 mL of NaOH (0.2 M) were added into 150 mL of distilled (DI) water with vigorous stirring under nitrogen atmosphere for 30min. 150 pL of ethanol and controlled amount of NaBH4 in 25 mL of DI water were quickly added into above solution. Amount of NaBFL was 12.5 milligrams (mg), 25 mg, 37.5 mg, 50 mg, 62.5 mg, 70 mg for samples 1 to 5 of the Cu/CmO (copper/copper (I) oxide) xerogel and C112O (copper (I) oxide) xerogel, respectively. After 30min, the black colored powder was obtained by centrifugation and rinsing with water and ethanol.
[0083] Preparation of planar Cu and planar C112O
[0084] Planar Cu was prepared by electropolishing copper foil in phosphoric acid (85% in water) potentiostatically at 2.1 V vs counter electrode. The planar C112O electrode were fabricated using electrodeposition method at 0.25 V vs RHE in 0.5 M CuSO4 with lactic acid and 5 M NaOH.
[0085] Preparation working electrode
[0086] The catalyst ink was prepared by dispersion of lOmg of the sample powder with 20 pL Nafion solution (5%) in ImL methanol which was ultrasonicated for 1 h. 71 pL of catalyst ink was drop-casted on the 1 cm2 carbon paper and dried for 6 h. [0087] Electrochemical measurements
[0088] Electrochemical tests were performed in an H-cell reactor, which is composed of two compartments separated by a proton exchange membrane. 50 mL of 0.1 M KC1 electrolyte was injected for each compartment and purged with CO2 gas for 30 min before CO2 reduction test. Pt coil and Ag/AgCl (3 M KC1 saturated) electrode was used as a counter and reference, respectively. First, working electrode was electrochemically reduced using the cyclic voltammetry (CV) method in the range of - 0.5 ~ -2.0 V vs RHE at the rate of 0.1 V s for 5 cycle. During the constant potential with iR-correction, the gas products were detected by gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890 GC) which is connected to reactor. Liquid products were quantified with 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR Bruker AVANCE III HD). 630 pL of electrolyte after electrolysis mixed with 70 pL of deuterated water (D2O), 35 pL of 50 mM phenol and 10 mM DMSO for reference.
[0089] The potential was converted to RHE using following equation: ERHE = EAgCi + 0.059 pH + 0.209 V
The FE for products was calculated using the following equation: FE (%) = nFxV * 100 /Tot [0090] Flow cell reactor electrolysis
[0091 ] Carbon paper with a microporous layer (Sigracet 39 BC, Fuel cell store) was used as a gas diffusion electrode (GDE). The E-beam evaporated Pt on GDE was used as the counter electrode and Ag/AgCl as a working electrode. CO2 electrolysis was tested in flow cell reactor, which is made of poly etheretherketone (PEEK) and silicone gasket for sealing. Gas flow rate was controlled to 10 seem via a mass flow controller. CO2 gas flowing at the backside of cathode GDE was connected to GC and backside of anode GDE was opened to air. The catholyte and anolyte were separated and flow rate was 2 mL min4. A IM KC1 solution was used as an electrolyte with Nafion proton exchange membrane.
[0092] Characterization
[0093] The prepared samples were characterized using scanning microscope (FEI Magellan 400), a transmission electron microscope (Tecnai G2 F30), an X-Ray diffractometer (Rigaku SmartLab), and an X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (Axis- Supra). Inverse-fast Fourier transformation (Inverse-FFT) mapping was conducted from FFT data by Gatan Digital Microscopy 3. The double-layer capacitance measurement for ECSA was conducted by CV in a 0.1 M KC1 electrolyte. The doublelayer capacitance was determined by the value of the slope of the linear fits, and it was considered to be proportional to the ECSA.
[0094] Embodiments
[0095] An embodiment described in examples herein provides an electrocatalytic catalyst. The electrocatalytic catalyst includes a xerogel including copper (I) oxide and copper.
[0096] In an aspect, the xerogel includes a ratio of copper (I) to copper (0) of between 10% and 40% copper (I). In an aspect, the xerogel includes a ratio of copper (I) to copper (0) of 20% copper oxide.
[0097] In an aspect, the xerogel is cast on a conductive substrate to form a catalytic electrode. In an aspect, the conductive substrate includes carbon. In an aspect, the
electrocatalytic catalyst includes a partial current density for production of ethanol of greater than about 30 mA/cm2.
[0098] In an aspect, the xerogel is drop casted on a nonconductive substrate. In an aspect, the xerogel includes a gas diffusion electrode. In an aspect, the electrolytic catalyst includes a partial current density for production of ethanol of greater than about 70 mA/cm2.
[0099] In an aspect, the xerogel includes a main domain size for domains of copper of between 8 nm and 8.6 nm. in an aspect, the xerogel includes a main domain size for domains of the copper oxide of between 5 nm and 6 nm.
[0100] Another embodiment described herein provides a method for making an electrocatalytic catalyst. The method includes dissolving a copper salt in a water solution, adjusting the pH of the water solution to be basic, adding a reducing agent to the water solution, and separating a product powder from the water solution, wherein the product powder is a xerogel including copper and copper (I) oxide.
[010 I j In an aspect, the method includes dissolving copper sulfate in the water solution. In an aspect, the method includes adding sodium hydroxide to the water solution. In an aspect, the method includes, after adjusting the pH, stirring the water solution under an inert atmosphere for greater than 30 minutes.
[0102] In an aspect, the method includes adding the reducing agent by adding ethanol to the water solution, and adding sodium borohydride to the water solution. In an aspect, an amount of the sodium borohydride is adjusted to control a ratio of copper (I) to copper (0).
[0.103] In an aspect, the method includes separating the product powder from the water solution by centrifugation. In an aspect, the method includes rinsing the product powder with water and ethanol.
[0104] In an aspect, the method includes forming a catalyst ink from the product powder. In an aspect, the method includes forming the catalyst ink by dispersing the product powder in methanol, and ultrasonicating the dispersion for about 1 hour.
[0105 ] In an aspect, the method includes adding an ionomer to the methanol with the product powder. In an aspect, the method includes adding a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene as the ionomer. In an aspect, the method includes casting the catalyst ink on a substrate. In an aspect, the method includes placing droplets of the catalyst ink on a conductive carbon surface. In an aspect, the method includes placing
droplets of the catalyst ink on a polytetrafluoroethylene paper. In an aspect, the method includes drying the catalyst ink on the substrate.
[0106] Other implementations are also within the scope of the following claims.
Claims
1. An electrocatalytic catalyst, comprising a xerogel comprising copper (I) oxide and copper.
2. The electrocatalytic catalyst of claim 1, wherein the xerogel comprises a ratio of copper (I) to copper (0) of between 10% and 40% copper (I).
3. The electrocatalytic catalyst of claim 1, wherein the xerogel comprises a ratio of copper (I) to copper (0) of 20% copper oxide.
4. The electrocatalytic catalyst of claim 1, wherein the xerogel is cast on a conductive substrate to form a catalytic electrode.
5. The electrocatalytic catalyst of claim 4, wherein the conductive substrate comprises carbon.
6. The electrocatalytic catalyst of claim 1, comprising a partial current density for production of ethanol of greater than about 30 mA/cm2.
7. The electrocatalytic catalyst of claim 1, wherein the xerogel is drop casted on a nonconductive substrate.
8. The electrocatalytic catalyst of claim 7, comprising a gas diffusion electrode.
9. The electrocatalytic catalyst of claim 7, comprising a partial current density for production of ethanol of greater than about 70 mA/cm2.
10. The electrocatalytic catalyst of claim 1, wherein the xerogel comprises a main domain size for domains of copper of between 8 nm and 8.6 nm.
11. The electrocatalytic catalyst of claim 1, wherein the xerogel comprises a main domain size for domains of the copper oxide of between 5 nm and 6 nm.
12. A method for making an electrocatalytic catalyst, comprising: dissolving a copper salt in a water solution; adjusting the pH of the water solution to be basic; adding a reducing agent to the water solution; and separating a product powder from the water solution, wherein the product powder is a xerogel comprising copper and copper (I) oxide.
13. The method of claim 12, comprising dissolving copper sulfate in the water solution.
14. The method of claim 12, comprising adding sodium hydroxide to the water solution.
15. The method of claim 12, comprising, after adjusting the pH, stirring the water solution under an inert atmosphere for greater than 30 minutes.
16. The method of claim 12, comprising adding the reducing agent by: adding ethanol to the water solution; and adding sodium borohydride to the water solution.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein an amount of the sodium borohydride is adjusted to control a ratio of copper (I) to copper (0).
18. The method of claim 12, comprising separating the product powder from the water solution by centrifugation.
19. The method of claim 12, comprising rinsing the product powder with water and ethanol.
20. The method of claim 12, comprising forming a catalyst ink from the product powder.
21. The method of claim 20, comprising forming the catalyst ink by: dispersing the product powder in methanol; and ultrasonicating the dispersion for about 1 hour.
22. The method of claim 21, comprising adding an ionomer to the methanol with the product powder.
23. The method of claim 22, comprising adding a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene as the ionomer.
24. The method of claim 20, comprising casting the catalyst ink on a substrate.
25. The method of claim 24, comprising placing droplets of the catalyst ink on a conductive carbon surface.
26. The method of claim 24, comprising placing droplets of the catalyst ink on a polytetrafluoroethylene paper.
27. The method of claim 24, comprising drying the catalyst ink on the substrate.
19
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US202163144778P | 2021-02-02 | 2021-02-02 | |
US63/144,778 | 2021-02-02 | ||
US17/580,388 | 2022-01-20 | ||
US17/580,388 US20220243342A1 (en) | 2021-02-02 | 2022-01-20 | Porous copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2022169893A1 true WO2022169893A1 (en) | 2022-08-11 |
Family
ID=80461857
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2022/014968 WO2022169893A1 (en) | 2021-02-02 | 2022-02-02 | Porous copper/copper oxide xerogel catalyst |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
WO (1) | WO2022169893A1 (en) |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106140161B (en) * | 2016-07-06 | 2018-08-21 | 江苏大学 | A kind of preparation method and application of the rodlike xerogel catalyst of copper/zirconium oxide |
-
2022
- 2022-02-02 WO PCT/US2022/014968 patent/WO2022169893A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106140161B (en) * | 2016-07-06 | 2018-08-21 | 江苏大学 | A kind of preparation method and application of the rodlike xerogel catalyst of copper/zirconium oxide |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
COUSTIER FABRICE ET AL: "PERFORMANCE OF COPPER -DOPED V2O5 XEROGEL IN COIN CELL ASSEMBLY", JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 83, no. 1-2, 1 January 1999 (1999-01-01), pages 9 - 14, XP008069400, ISSN: 0378-7753, DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00243-8 * |
TOHIDI S H ET AL: "COMPARISION NANOSTRUCTURE BEHAVIOR OF COPPER SPECIES ON THE SILICA MATRIX XEROGELS", IJE TRANSACTIONS B: APPLICATIONS, vol. 24, 1 July 2011 (2011-07-01), pages 147, XP055937597, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.ije.ir/article_71903_583244d6576273f1219e4feab11a5b4b.pdf> [retrieved on 20220701] * |
WANG FEI ET AL: "Selective synthesis of CuO/C nanocomposites and porous CuO based on polyacrylic acid hydrogel system as high-performance anode for lithium-ion batteries", CHEMICAL PHYSICS, vol. 518, 27 July 2018 (2018-07-27), pages 1 - 7, XP085565323, ISSN: 0301-0104, DOI: 10.1016/J.CHEMPHYS.2018.11.004 * |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Wei et al. | High-index faceted porous Co3O4 nanosheets with oxygen vacancies for highly efficient water oxidation | |
Wang et al. | Holey platinum nanotubes for ethanol electrochemical reforming in aqueous solution | |
Xie et al. | Ultrathin platinum nanowire based electrodes for high-efficiency hydrogen generation in practical electrolyzer cells | |
Chen et al. | Controllable design of nanoworm-like nickel sulfides for efficient electrochemical water splitting in alkaline media | |
Darband et al. | Hydrazine-assisted electrochemical hydrogen production by efficient and self-supported electrodeposited Ni-Cu-P@ Ni-Cu nano-micro dendrite catalyst | |
Wang et al. | Polyaniline-coated Ru/Ni (OH) 2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution reaction over a wide pH range | |
Hong et al. | Nano-engineering of Ru-based hierarchical porous nanoreactors for highly efficient pH-universal overall water splitting | |
Jiang et al. | Auto-programmed synthesis of metallic aerogels: Core-shell Cu@ Fe@ Ni aerogels for efficient oxygen evolution reaction | |
Zhou et al. | Fabrication of 3D microporous amorphous metallic phosphides for high-efficiency hydrogen evolution reaction | |
Ojani et al. | Hydrogen evolution assisted electrodeposition of bimetallic 3D nano/micro-porous PtPd films and their electrocatalytic performance | |
Sun et al. | One-step construction of a transition-metal surface decorated with metal sulfide nanoparticles: A high-efficiency electrocatalyst for hydrogen generation | |
Sorsa et al. | Co-electrodeposited mesoporous PtM (M= Co, Ni, Cu) as an active catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell | |
Yang et al. | Microwave-assisted microemulsion synthesis of carbon supported Pt-WO3 nanoparticles as an electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation | |
Bu et al. | More than physical support: The effect of nickel foam corrosion on electrocatalytic performance | |
Yin et al. | Amorphous NiB alloy decorated by Cu as the anode catalyst for a direct borohydride fuel cell | |
Zhang et al. | Ionic liquid modified Pt/C electrocatalysts for cathode application in proton exchange membrane fuel cells | |
Guo et al. | Cu–Co–P electrodeposited on carbon paper as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction in anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers | |
KR20220111791A (en) | Electrocatalyst for water electrolysis and preparing method of the same | |
Nugraha et al. | Block copolymer-templated electrodeposition of mesoporous Au-Ni alloy films with tunable composition | |
Guo et al. | Highly stable and active PtNiFe dandelion-like alloys for methanol electrooxidation | |
Ganci et al. | Ni alloy nanowires as high efficiency electrode materials for alkaline electrolysers | |
Kong et al. | Interface engineering of N-doped Ni3S2/CoS2 heterostructures as efficient bifunctional catalysts for overall water splitting | |
US20210340683A1 (en) | Development of ruthenium-copper nano-sponge electrodes for ambient electrochemical reduction of nitrogen to ammonia | |
Wang et al. | Regulating the electronic structure of Ni3S2 nanorods by heteroatom vanadium doping for high electrocatalytic performance | |
Wu et al. | Grain boundary and interface interaction Co-regulation promotes SnO2 quantum dots for efficient CO2 reduction |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 22706444 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 523450119 Country of ref document: SA |
|
32PN | Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established |
Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205A DATED 14/11/2023) |