WO2022153236A1 - Use of semiconductors to control the selectivity of eletrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide - Google Patents
Use of semiconductors to control the selectivity of eletrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2022153236A1 WO2022153236A1 PCT/IB2022/050300 IB2022050300W WO2022153236A1 WO 2022153236 A1 WO2022153236 A1 WO 2022153236A1 IB 2022050300 W IB2022050300 W IB 2022050300W WO 2022153236 A1 WO2022153236 A1 WO 2022153236A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- semiconductor material
- electrolyser
- cathode
- previous
- semiconductor
- Prior art date
Links
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 90
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 81
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 67
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 13
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 claims description 47
- 239000010411 electrocatalyst Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- -1 BiVO4 Chemical class 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000003011 anion exchange membrane Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 15
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 8
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000002105 nanoparticle Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 229910052723 transition metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005341 cation exchange Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052733 gallium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910044991 metal oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 150000004706 metal oxides Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- 150000003624 transition metals Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910002929 BaSnO3 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910003071 TaON Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910003090 WSe2 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910001308 Zinc ferrite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052980 cadmium sulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000004770 chalcogenides Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- UBEWDCMIDFGDOO-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt(II,III) oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Co+2].[Co+3].[Co+3] UBEWDCMIDFGDOO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000004679 hydroxides Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- NNGHIEIYUJKFQS-UHFFFAOYSA-L hydroxy(oxo)iron;zinc Chemical compound [Zn].O[Fe]=O.O[Fe]=O NNGHIEIYUJKFQS-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 3
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052961 molybdenite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- CWQXQMHSOZUFJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N molybdenum disulfide Chemical compound S=[Mo]=S CWQXQMHSOZUFJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052982 molybdenum disulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- GNRSAWUEBMWBQH-UHFFFAOYSA-N nickel(II) oxide Inorganic materials [Ni]=O GNRSAWUEBMWBQH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052763 palladium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052718 tin Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910000314 transition metal oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910002915 BiVO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910021508 nickel(II) hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910016514 CuFeO2 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 1
- FJEKYHHLGZLYAT-FKUIBCNASA-N galp Chemical compound C([C@@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N1CCC[C@H]1C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCSC)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)CC)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1N=CNC=1)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(O)=O)[C@@H](C)CC)[C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)NC(=O)CNC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1N=CNC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@H](C)N)[C@@H](C)O)C(C)C)C1=CNC=N1 FJEKYHHLGZLYAT-FKUIBCNASA-N 0.000 claims 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 abstract description 11
- 230000003071 parasitic effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 description 35
- 238000006722 reduction reaction Methods 0.000 description 24
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 23
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 22
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 22
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 22
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 21
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 21
- 229910001868 water Inorganic materials 0.000 description 21
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 19
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 18
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 17
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 16
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 14
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 13
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 13
- BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Formic acid Chemical compound OC=O BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 239000003014 ion exchange membrane Substances 0.000 description 11
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 9
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Substances [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 7
- 235000019253 formic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000032258 transport Effects 0.000 description 7
- KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M Potassium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[K+] KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 5
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 5
- 239000002800 charge carrier Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000002047 photoemission electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229920001483 poly(ethyl methacrylate) polymer Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 5
- OSWFIVFLDKOXQC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-(3-methoxyphenyl)aniline Chemical compound COC1=CC=CC(C=2C=CC(N)=CC=2)=C1 OSWFIVFLDKOXQC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000543 intermediate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920000554 ionomer Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 239000011244 liquid electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000116 mitigating effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 4
- 229920000557 Nafion® Polymers 0.000 description 3
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 150000001450 anions Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000003139 buffering effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001351 cycling effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000000376 reactant Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000003115 supporting electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 3
- UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon monoxide Chemical compound [O+]#[C-] UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Formaldehyde Chemical compound O=C WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- KJTLSVCANCCWHF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ruthenium Chemical compound [Ru] KJTLSVCANCCWHF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910021607 Silver chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000006096 absorbing agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008346 aqueous phase Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001354 calcination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910002091 carbon monoxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007772 electrode material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005868 electrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000015497 potassium bicarbonate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229910000028 potassium bicarbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011736 potassium bicarbonate Substances 0.000 description 2
- BWHMMNNQKKPAPP-UHFFFAOYSA-L potassium carbonate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[O-]C([O-])=O BWHMMNNQKKPAPP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 239000012429 reaction media Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052707 ruthenium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- HKZLPVFGJNLROG-UHFFFAOYSA-M silver monochloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Ag+] HKZLPVFGJNLROG-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000707825 Argyrosomus regius Species 0.000 description 1
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M Bicarbonate Chemical compound OC([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- GYHNNYVSQQEPJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Gallium Chemical compound [Ga] GYHNNYVSQQEPJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910002668 Pd-Cu Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910019897 RuOx Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000003929 acidic solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005275 alloying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007853 buffer solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003426 co-catalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009849 deactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003487 electrochemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000000524 functional group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- QZQVBEXLDFYHSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N gallium(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Ga]O[Ga]=O QZQVBEXLDFYHSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052738 indium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037427 ion transport Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052741 iridium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- GKOZUEZYRPOHIO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iridium atom Chemical compound [Ir] GKOZUEZYRPOHIO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000012263 liquid product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006193 liquid solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002073 nanorod Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002077 nanosphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002071 nanotube Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 125000004433 nitrogen atom Chemical group N* 0.000 description 1
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000006174 pH buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002572 peristaltic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012466 permeate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011941 photocatalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000005518 polymer electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000027 potassium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229940093956 potassium carbonate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000011181 potassium carbonates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- TYJJADVDDVDEDZ-UHFFFAOYSA-M potassium hydrogencarbonate Chemical compound [K+].OC([O-])=O TYJJADVDDVDEDZ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000003254 radicals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000009257 reactivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005215 recombination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006798 recombination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009738 saturating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000030 sodium bicarbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000017557 sodium bicarbonate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium bicarbonate Substances [Na+].OC([O-])=O UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005118 spray pyrolysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000007723 transport mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B1/00—Electrolytic production of inorganic compounds or non-metals
- C25B1/01—Products
- C25B1/23—Carbon monoxide or syngas
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B1/00—Electrolytic production of inorganic compounds or non-metals
- C25B1/50—Processes
- C25B1/55—Photoelectrolysis
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/02—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by shape or form
- C25B11/03—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by shape or form perforated or foraminous
- C25B11/031—Porous electrodes
- C25B11/032—Gas diffusion electrodes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/04—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by the material
- C25B11/042—Electrodes formed of a single material
- C25B11/049—Photocatalysts
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/04—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by the material
- C25B11/051—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier
- C25B11/052—Electrodes comprising one or more electrocatalytic coatings on a substrate
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/04—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by the material
- C25B11/051—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier
- C25B11/054—Electrodes comprising electrocatalysts supported on a carrier
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/04—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by the material
- C25B11/051—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier
- C25B11/055—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier characterised by the substrate or carrier material
- C25B11/057—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier characterised by the substrate or carrier material consisting of a single element or compound
- C25B11/067—Inorganic compound e.g. ITO, silica or titania
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/04—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by the material
- C25B11/051—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier
- C25B11/073—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier characterised by the electrocatalyst material
- C25B11/075—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier characterised by the electrocatalyst material consisting of a single catalytic element or catalytic compound
- C25B11/081—Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier characterised by the electrocatalyst material consisting of a single catalytic element or catalytic compound the element being a noble metal
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B3/00—Electrolytic production of organic compounds
- C25B3/01—Products
- C25B3/03—Acyclic or carbocyclic hydrocarbons
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B3/00—Electrolytic production of organic compounds
- C25B3/01—Products
- C25B3/07—Oxygen containing compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B3/00—Electrolytic production of organic compounds
- C25B3/20—Processes
- C25B3/21—Photoelectrolysis
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B3/00—Electrolytic production of organic compounds
- C25B3/20—Processes
- C25B3/25—Reduction
- C25B3/26—Reduction of carbon dioxide
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B9/00—Cells or assemblies of cells; Constructional parts of cells; Assemblies of constructional parts, e.g. electrode-diaphragm assemblies; Process-related cell features
- C25B9/17—Cells comprising dimensionally-stable non-movable electrodes; Assemblies of constructional parts thereof
- C25B9/19—Cells comprising dimensionally-stable non-movable electrodes; Assemblies of constructional parts thereof with diaphragms
- C25B9/23—Cells comprising dimensionally-stable non-movable electrodes; Assemblies of constructional parts thereof with diaphragms comprising ion-exchange membranes in or on which electrode material is embedded
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B9/00—Cells or assemblies of cells; Constructional parts of cells; Assemblies of constructional parts, e.g. electrode-diaphragm assemblies; Process-related cell features
- C25B9/50—Cells or assemblies of cells comprising photoelectrodes; Assemblies of constructional parts thereof
Definitions
- the present invention reports the use of at least one semiconductor to control the selectivity of electrochemical reduction of CO 2 at high current densities in gas- and liquid-phase electrolysers for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (ERCO 2 ) to organic molecules (e.g. CH 4 , CH 3 OH, HCOOH, etc.) and CO.
- ERCO 2 carbon dioxide
- organic molecules e.g. CH 4 , CH 3 OH, HCOOH, etc.
- the present invention addresses the mitigation of the competing hydrogen evolution reaction at the cathode side by delivering electrons at a higher energy level. This is achieved by tailoring the energy level needed for the electroreduction of CO 2 , at the catalyst surface, with protons transported from the anode to the cathode; the disclosed invention hinders/mitigates the proton recombination to molecular hydrogen and increases ERCO 2 faradaic efficiency.
- ERCO 2 The electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (ERCO 2 ) is considered as the most promising strategy for CO 2 conversion into valuable chemical products (Power-to-X) using the surplus from renewable electricity sources.
- ERCO 2 is a process controllable by electrochemical potentials, pH, pressure and temperature.
- the system is compact, modular, on-demand and easily scalable.
- the ERCO 2 to organic molecules is a reaction that requires intricate electron/proton coupling steps leading to low current densities, poor selectivities and large overpotentials.
- Most of the advances in the last few years were on fundamental and mechanistic studies of ERCO 2 . Others were on reducing the overpotential of the ERCO 2 through the development of electrocatalysts.
- Rd, Pt, Pd-Cu, Ru/Ti bimetallic oxide, Mo complexes and copper-based catalysts have shown to be promising for ERCO 2 to produce organic molecules. However, most of them are not realistic for industrial applications due to high cost and poor abundance.
- copper-based is the most used electrocatalyst to reduce CO 2 to chemical feedstock and organic substances due to its good activity to produce value-added chemicals while mitigating the opportunistic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER).
- a semiconductor can catalyze ERCO 2 with water if it possesses the conduction-band more negative than that the ERCO 2 redox potential and, at the same time, if the valence-band edge is more positive than the redox potential for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER).
- OER oxygen evolution reaction
- Figure 1 shows the band-edge positions of some semiconductors as well as the redox potentials of HER, OER and ERCO 2 to produce carbon monoxide, methane, methanol, formic acid and formic aldehyde.
- electrode acts as the photoabsorber material
- three different photo-electrochemical configurations can be envisioned: i) photocathode and dark anode, ii) photoanode and dark cathode, and iii) photocathode-photoanode.
- each photoelectrode can combine multiple absorber layers, for making more efficient use of the solar spectrum, complicates the process.
- ERCO 2 electrolysers Two major types have been reported, depending on reaction media: liquid-phase and gas-phase configurations. Regardless of the reaction media, an electrolyser is composed by an ion-exchange membrane between two electrodes in a zero-gap configuration, composing a membrane electrodes assembly (MEA). Porous liquid/gas diffusion layers and bipolar plates are the remaining components. The electrons flow from cathode to anode, through the external circuit while ions are conducted through the membrane. Both types of ERCO 2 electrolysers can be arranged in a zero-gap cell configuration.
- MEA membrane electrodes assembly
- Zero-gap cell configuration has great potential to increase the energy efficiency of the process due to its lower electrical resistances at the interfaces and higher volumetric power density due to the compact design.
- the use of materials already developed for fuel cells and water electrolysers is expected to accelerate ERCO 2 market adoption.
- What determines the type of ERCO 2 phase is how the CO 2 is fed to the cathode, i.e., in the form of CO 2 saturated aqueous/non-aqueous catholyte - liquid-phase electrolyser configuration or gaseous CO 2 stream - gas-phase electrolyser.
- Gas-gas and liquid-gas are other more thorough configurations that depend on the anode feed; hydrogen/steam or liquid electrolytes are fed, respectively, and they will generate ions to compensate the charge for CO 2 reduction.
- Liquid-phase type ERCO 2 electrolysers are like redox flow batteries with recirculation of liquid electrolytes on both sides. CO 2 is absorbed into aqueous electrolytes supplied to the cathode side (CC>2-saturated catholyte).
- buffer electrolytes such as potassium carbonate (KHCO3) and hydroxide potassium (KOH) are used to maintain the pH at the electrodes.
- KHCO3 potassium carbonate
- KOH hydroxide potassium
- a similar electrolyte is typically pumped to avoid pH unbalance that would require permanent electrolyte replacement.
- the electrolyser In gas-phase configuration, the electrolyser is fed with gaseous CO 2 and uses a MEA separating the anodic and cathodic compartments in a similar way to the ones used in proton exchange membrane (REM) fuel cells.
- the membrane acts as a barrier for electrons and gases involved in the ERCO 2 .
- PEMs generates high proton concentrations at the cathode leading to a highly acidic environment. This promotes the parasitic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and low ERCO 2 selectivity.
- the ERCO 2 to organic molecules and/or CO requires H 2 O electrolysis or hydrogen oxidation followed by proton conduction from the anode to the cathode side through a proton exchange membrane (REM).
- REM proton exchange membrane
- protons and electrons react with CO 2 at the catalyst surface such as a copper-based catalyst that favors the reaction.
- ERCO 2 kinetics is slower than water or hydrogen oxidation using state-of-the-art catalysts. This generates high proton concentrations at the cathode, promoting HER. For this reason and impossibility to maintain a moderate proton concentration, the highest faradaic efficiency reported so far in gas-phase ERCO 2 using a PEM is 2 % and using an anion exchange membrane (AEM) is 12 % of CO. 2
- AEM anion exchange membrane
- bipolar membranes have also been used since their composition serves itself as a buffer; the alkaline- acidic ionomer junction fundamental behavior can be seen as an ionic analogue of an electronic semiconductor p-n junction: the cation conductive "acidic” ionomer provides positive mobile charge carriers, such as protons; and, the anion conductive "alkaline” ionomer provides negative mobile charge carriers, such as hydroxyl ions.
- the faradaic efficiency of ERCO 2 is affected by several parameters. Regarding the catalyst itself, it is important to consider the chemical composition, microstructure, morphology and particle size. In the case of composite catalysts, the composition, microstructure and morphology of the support, and the concentration and dispersion of the active phase are important; if the active phase of the composite catalysts is made of crystals, their crystallinity and crystal orientation are also critical.All these features should be optimized for maximizing the protons reduction overpotential and to decrease the CO 2 reduction overpotential .
- the most common electrolyser configuration used for the ERCO 2 is the liquid-phase configuration ( Figure 2).
- liquid electrolytes are circulated over both electrodes, separated by a polymer electrolyte membrane; the electrodes may be covered by a gas-liquid diffusion layer.
- gas-phase configuration Figure 3
- CO 2 is supplied in gas phase and the electrodes are also separated by an ion exchange membrane.
- the electrodes and membrane form a MEA, which is then sandwiched between two gas diffusion layers (GDLs) that serve also as current collectors .
- GDLs gas diffusion layers
- PEM proton exchange membrane
- AEM anion exchange membrane
- BPM bipolar membrane
- PEM can transport protons (H + ) and other cations from the anode to the cathode side, while prevent anions and other reactants to cross.
- AEM hydroxide ions
- HCO3- bicarbonate ions
- a BPM combines the chemistry and ion conduction of both PEM and AEM, delivering simultaneously H + to the cathode and OH- (or HCO3-) to the anode, respectively.
- Liquid-phase electrolysers operate with both liquid anolyte and catholyte, where the catholyte contains dissolved CO 2 .
- CO 2 solubility in water and reactivity towards the electroreduction that is highly dependent on the pH.
- the optimal pH of the catholyte is normally slightly alkaline.
- the local pH, nearby the surface of the electrode may differ from the bulk pH as the CO 2 reduction reaction progresses. This effect can be mitigated by using buffering electrolytes.
- CO 2 forms the following buffer, especially in non-acidic solutions:
- the bicarbonate buffer can produce at the electrode surface CO 3 2 :-
- the local pH nearby the electrode surface depends on different parameters namely, current density, side-products, electrolyte buffering and mass-transport of OH ⁇ , CO 2 , HCO3- and CO 3 2- . 4
- the mitigation of HER, in liquid-phase electrolysers, is critical to increase the energy efficiency.
- the local pH besides affecting the CO 2 electroreduction reaction kinetics and selectivity, also affects the competing HER.
- the choice of pH buffers in the catholyte e.g., potassium/sodium bicarbonate salts
- the pH also conditions the majority ionic charge carriers in the electrolyser. This charge carrier can be H + for acid to neutral medium and OH ⁇ for neutral to alkaline medium. Accordingly, PEM or AEM membranes should be considered.
- the BPM should be used for acidic to neutral conditions .
- liquid-phase electrolysers strategies such as buffering the catholyte besides using a suitable catalyst and membrane allow to achieve high ERCO 2 selectivities. Nevertheless, these electrolysers operate at low current densities that hinder the volumetric power density and high production rates needed for industrial applications. Moreover, it requires complex separation units when methanol or formic acid are produced and need to be separated from aqueous electrolyte. These highly valuable products are liquid at normal conditions of pressure and temperature.
- ERCO 2 in a gas-phase electrolyser includes two electrodes (anode and cathode), separated by an ion-exchange membrane preferably in a zero-gap configuration.
- the cathode is typically fed with humidified CO 2 , essential for the electrode and the membrane humidification.
- the electrode humidification allows that a thin water film coats the electrocatalyst particles allowing the mobility of protons, dissolved carbon dioxide and other ionic species, some of them intermediates in CO 2 electroreduction.
- the membrane humidification is needed for improving the ion conductivity. 5
- different feed streams are used to supply electrons and H2 to reduce CO 2 at the cathode side.
- Water and H2 may be fed to deliver protons and electrons to the cathode when using PEMs and acidic ionomer (equations (5) and (6), respectively) .
- Hydroxyl ions are the source of electrons in alkaline medium provided by the AEM. In this case, hydroxyl ions are generated by the reduction of CO 2 with water at the cathode and conducted through the AEM to the anode to be oxidized (equation (9)).
- gas-phase electrolysers such as catalyst, GDLs and bipolar plates must be carefully chosen.
- the pH character of these electrolysers is given by the ion-exchange membrane.
- Proton exchange membranes provide an acid character; the hydrogen oxidation at the anode side should be catalysed by a platinum-based catalyst, while iridium- based catalysts are used to oxidize water.
- catalyst support, GDL and bipolar plate must be corrosion resistant; typically, titanium is used due to its resistance to corrosion and sufficient electronic conductivity.
- transition metals Ni, Fe, Co, etc.
- GDLs and bipolar plates are normally carbon-based.
- Gas-phase configuration enables to operate at high current densities due to easier removal of liquid products of the CO 2 electroreduction (such as methanol and formic acid) and avoids the need of pumps to make the liquid electrolytes to circulate.
- liquid products of the CO 2 electroreduction such as methanol and formic acid
- the portfolio of products obtained in the gas-phase configuration is much more limited than that using a liquid-phase electrolyser.
- the highest ever reported faradaic efficiency to produce CO of a gas-phase ERCO 2 was 2 % when the electrolyser is equipped with a PEM, and 12 % when equipped with an AEM.
- ERCO 2 can produce a wide portfolio of organic molecules (e.g., CH4, CH3OH, HCOOH) and CO, since they can be formed by reducing CO 2 with H + (e.g., equation (4)) or with H2O (e.g., equation (7)).
- H + e.g., equation (4)
- H2O e.g., equation (7)
- the species that are formed on the electrodes surface, in the gas-phase electrolyser configuration, depend on several operating and design parameters such as temperature, relative humidity, electrode materials and pH.
- the flux of protons (or other ions) impact on the pH at the electrode surface and on the reactions that are taking place.
- Thermodynamic reduction potential of CO 2 to relevant products is close to zero V versus standard hydrogen electrode (V vs SHE) and then close to the HER reduction potential, in alkaline or acidic media - cf. equations (10), (12) and (14).
- V vs SHE standard hydrogen electrode
- the overpotentials of the CO 2 electroreduction are considerably high.
- a commonly intermediate species in the electroreduction of CO 2 is free radical CO 2 ⁇ *, which is formed at -1.9 V vs SHE.
- electrocatalysts allows to decrease this overpotential, but it stills too high (the absolute value) compared with the parasitic electroreduction of H + to molecular hydrogen.
- the present invention relates to a method to control the selectivity of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to organic molecules and CO in gas- or liquid-phase in an electrolyser, comprising the use of at least one semiconductor material on the electrode of the cathode or anode side of the electrolyser that is suitable to increase the faradaic efficiency of the reaction.
- At least one semiconductor material acts as an electrocatalyst.
- At least one semiconductor material further comprises particles of metals selected from Cu, Sn, Ag, Ru, Bi, Pt and Pd.
- the semiconductor material is selected from binary transition metal-oxides cP such as TiO 2 , ZnO and
- WO 3 materials based on transition metal cations with d n electronic configurations such as CU 2 O, Fe 2 O 3 , Co 3 O 4 and NiO; ternary metal-oxides such as BiVO 4 , CuWO 4 , CuFeCO 2 , CaFeO 2 ,
- transition metal hydroxides such as
- LDH LDH, CuCr-LDH, ZnTi-LDH; the family of (oxy) nitritrides such as TaON and Ta 3 N 5 ; the family of metal chalcogenide such as
- At least one semiconductor material is in the form of a thin film or nanoparticulated structures.
- the semiconductor material is in the form of a porous layer of nanoparticulated structures with a thickness between 1 ⁇ m and 50 pm.
- the semiconductor material in nanoparticulated structures are spherical nanoparticles with a size distribution between 2 nm and 1.5 ⁇ m.
- the semiconductor material is in the form of a thin film with a thickness between 2 nm and 200 nm.
- At least one semiconductor material is in at least one diode mounted in series or parallel configuration in the external electrical circuit of the electrolyser .
- at least one diode is selected from a 0.4 V diode or a 0.7 V diode.
- the membranes used in the electrolyser are selected from cation exchange membranes, anion exchange membranes, proton exchange membrane, or bipolar membranes.
- reaction temperature is between 0 °C and 100 °C.
- reaction pressure is between 1x10 5 Pa and 1x10 7 Pa.
- the present invention also relates to the use of a semiconductor material suitable to increase the faradaic efficiency on a method for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide as disclosed in any of the preceding claims.
- the principles of the present innovation are focused on the use of semiconductors to control the selectivity of electrochemical reduction of CO 2 to organic molecules at high current densities in gas- and liquid-phase electrolysers.
- Figure 1 shows the band-edge positions of some typical semiconductor photocatalysts relative to the energy levels of the redox couples involved in the reduction of CO 2 ;
- Figure 2 shows the schematic representation of the ERCO 2 electrolyser configuration in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- Figure 3 shows the electrolyser configuration considering the use of semiconductor nanoparticles as catalyst support in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- Figure 4 shows the electrolyser configuration considering the semiconductor film coated on the current collector/gas diffusion layer in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- Figure 5 shows the electrolyser configuration considering the semiconductor film coated on the catalyst layer in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- Figures 6 and 7 show the production rates of methane and methanol as a function relative humidity and cell potential, respectively.
- the anode loaded with a Pt/C electrocatalyst, was fed with hydrogen and loaded with a Pt/C electrode.
- the cathode composed by Ru/C electrocatalyst, was fed with carbon dioxide.
- the cell was operated at 80 °C and 10 5 Pa.
- Figure 8 shows the faradaic efficiencies and current density at -0.8 V of cell potential.
- a copper foam with and without a 5 nm TiCt film was used as cathode, fed with gaseous CO 2 .
- the anode was composed by Pt/C electrode and fed with hydrogen. Nafion 117 was used as membrane.
- the cell was operated at 80 °C and 10 5 Pa.
- Figure 9 shows the faradaic efficiencies and current density of CuZnGa-based gas diffusion electrodes tested in aqueous- phase. Dependences on sequential post-treatments namely untreated (CZG_U), calcinated (CZG_C) and calcinated reduced (CZG_CR) are displayed. The cell was operated at room conditions and -1.8 V vs Ag/AgCl.
- Figure 10 shows the faradaic efficiencies and current density of CuZnGa-based gas diffusion electrodes tested in aqueous- phase.
- Dependences on in-situ activation with potential cycling, namely untreated activated (CZG_UA), calcinated activated (CZG_CA) and calcinated reduced activated (CZG_CRA) are displayed.
- the cell was operated at room conditions and -1.8 V vs Ag/AgCl.
- the objective of the present invention is using at least one semiconductor material to increase the faradaic efficiency of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (ERCO 2 ) in gas- and liquid-phase electrolysers as well as mitigate the evolution of hydrogen in the reaction.
- These semiconductor materials can be used in the form of thin films, nanoparticulated structures or in an independent device like a diode. Considering the bandgap and the position of conduction and valence bands, the energy of electrons that will reduce the CO 2 molecule can be controlled to promote a reaction mechanism that could be more difficult and produce desired products. Additionally, impedance ascribed to the semiconductor limits protonic conduction through the membrane that can generate a highly acidic environment at the cathode; hydrogen evolution is hindered when there is a shortage of protons.
- the most typical ERCO 2 electrolyser shown in Figure 2, is similar to a redox flow battery where two liquids are recirculated both at the negative and positive electrode of an electrochemical cell or stack.
- peristaltic pumps provide energy to the liquids which are water at the negative electrode and an aqueous electrolyte containing absorbed CO 2 .
- External electric power needs to be ensured to drive the process using a typical power supply.
- the electrolyser is composed by two bipolar plates (1, 7) that are compressed with bolts. They contain flowfields provide a better liquid distribution through the complete active area of the diffusion layers (2, 6). Both components typically are carbon based or made of metals to withstand corrosion when using acidic liquids or high potentials.
- the MEA is composed by an ion-exchange membrane (4) and two catalyst layers (12, 3, 11, 5).
- iridium is typically the choice to oxidize water in acidic media.
- Ni-based electrodes are used to oxidize hydroxyl anions.
- a wide portfolio of metals can be used to reduce CO 2 to produce valuable products. Copper is widely used metal to produce methanol and other light alcohols.
- a method to control the selectivity of the ERCO 2 to organic molecules and CO in gas- and liquid-phase electrolysers comprising the use of at least one semiconductor material on the electrode of the cathode or anode side, the semiconductor material being suitable to increase the faradaic efficiency of the reaction.
- the semiconductor can be present in the form or electrocatalyst support ( Figure 3), in a thin film deposited on the gas diffusion layer ( Figure 4) and in thin film deposited directly over the catalyst layer.
- the semiconductor can be deposited as a thin and planar film or as a nanoparticulated structures. Thin films are advantageous for carrier collection, but nanostructured morphologies with controlled hickness, porous layers with 1 and 50 ⁇ m of thickness, play a crucial role in improving the surface area to facilitate electron transport for higher performances.
- Nanoparticles of semiconductors can be also used as electrocatalyst support to stabilize small particles of active metals, the semiconductor further comprising a metal selected from Cu, Sn, Ag, Ru, Bi, Pt and Pd, while serving as the function of controlling the energy of electrons that reach the cathode.
- At least one diode is another way to include and benefit from using semiconductors with an independent component that does not interfere with the structure of the cell or stack.
- the semiconductor material is used in the form of a thin film, nanoparticulated structures or in at least one diode in the external electrical circuit of the electrolyser.
- the semiconductor thin film has a thickness between 2 and 200 nm.
- the semiconductor material is selected from the classic binary transition metal-oxides (cP oxides), such as TiO 2 , ZnO and WO 3 to the ones based on transition metal cations with cP electronic configurations, such as CU 2 O, Fe 2 O 3 , Co 3 O 4 and NiO.
- cP oxides binary transition metal-oxides
- Ternary metal-oxides are also promising due to the rationally engineer of the bandgap through cation combination (e.g. Sn 2+ , Bi 3+ , V 5+ , Ti 4+ , Nb 5+ , etc.); BiVCy, CUWO4, CuFeCO 2 , CaFeO 2 , ZnFe 2 O 4 and BaSnO 3 are good examples.
- Transition metal hydroxides such as Mg (OH)2 and Ni(OH)2
- layered double hydroxides such as NiFe-LDH, CuCr-LDH, ZnTi-LDH, etc.
- substituting a nitrogen atom for oxygen is also a possible strategy; therefore, the family of (oxy)nitritrides, such as TaON and Ta 3 N5 are potential semiconductor materials.
- the family of metal chalcogenide e.g.
- the semiconductor material is in the form of spherical nanoparticles with size distribution between 2 nm and 1.5 pm, more preferably between 30 and 200 nm.
- the membranes can be selected from the membranes used in the electrolyser are selected from cation exchange membranes, anion exchange membranes, proton exchange membrane, or bipolar membranes.
- the expected impact from this method using at least one semiconductor is considerably higher in gas-phase than in liquid phase.
- Copper-based catalysts proved to be of interest for ERCO 2 to CO, hydrocarbons and alcohols.
- CU 2 O a non-toxic p-type metal-oxide semiconductor with a high Hall mobility (90 cm 2 V -1 ) and a direct bandgap of 1.90 - 2.17 eV.
- the CU 2 O photocathode reached almost 90% of its theoretical photocurrent density limit (14.7 mA cm -1 ).
- This patent application discloses a method strategy for controlling the ion flowrate through the ion-exchange membrane and the electron energy in an independent and efficient way.
- the energy of the electrons reaching the cathode can be also controlled, independently of the flowrate of ions through the membrane. This is achieved by introducing a diode or combination of diodes mounted in series or a parallel configuration in the external the electrical circuit of the electrolyser .
- a semiconductor material in at least one diode with a given bandgap (potential) in the external circuit makes that only electrons above this bandgap threshold reach the cathode.
- the flowrate of protons - electrolyser equipped with PEM - or of hydroxyl ions - electrolyser equipped with AEM - can then be controlled increasing the potential difference above the diode bandgap. This fine tune allows to increase the electrolyser current density but also affects the selectivity to CO 2 electroreduction products and products flowrate.
- the use of a diode, with a selected bandgap allows to maximize productivity and selectivity in an independent way.
- at least one diode is selected from a 0.4 V diode or a 0.7 V diode. Other diodes can also be considered for the present invention.
- the semiconductor material is deposited over the current collector.
- This semiconductor material supplies electrons to the electrocatalyst deposited over it with a minimum energy level.
- the use of CU 2 O as the semiconductor material allows that only electrons with a potential of ca. -1.20 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (V vs RHE) or above (in absolute terms) are supplied to the electrocatalyst.
- This semiconductor may, itself, be an electrocatalyst.
- the advantage of this approach is when photoelectrochemical cells are used and the photoelectrode is a p-type semiconductor, i.e. a photocathode.
- the electron potential at the cathode side catalyst can also be regulated increasing the resistance to the ion transport through the ion exchange membrane. As the ion exchange membrane resistance increases, for a given ionic transport rate, the electron is delivered with more energy.
- the membrane resistivity can be tuned, tuning the membrane thickness and/or the concentration of the membrane ionic functional groups.
- the above strategies can be used separately or combined.
- the following critical variables must be optimized: a) electrocatalyst, which should minimize the overpotential and maximize the exchange current density to the target product and increase the overpotentials to other products and to the HER; b) the energy of the delivered electron; c) the membrane type, by choosing for example REM, AEM, BPM; d) the pH at the catalyst surface (between 3 and 8) and; e) the temperature (0 - 100 °C).
- the CO 2 partial pressure must also be optimized.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Electrolytic Production Of Non-Metals, Compounds, Apparatuses Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
The present disclosure describes a method to control the selectivity of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (ERCO2) and mitigate parasitic reactions by using semiconductor materials. The ERCO2, mainly in gas-phase, faces critical challenges such as poor faradaic efficiency and low current density. This can be achieved by introducing a semiconductor, for example as a thin film or a nanoparticuled structure, to tune the energy of the electrons that are conducted from the anode to the cathode. The semiconductor, chosen according to suitable band-edge positions will deliver electrons to the cathode active sites with the correct energy to favor a certain product while reducing energy losses associated with parasitic reactions. Moreover, this increased ohmic overpotential will indirectly control the concentration of ions at the cathode side, which also has a high impact in the selectivity of ERCO2.
Description
DESCRIPTION
"USE OF SEMICONDUCTORS TO CONTROL THE SELECTIVITY OF ELETROCHEMICAL REDUCTION OF CARBON DIOXIDE"
Technical field
The present invention reports the use of at least one semiconductor to control the selectivity of electrochemical reduction of CO2 at high current densities in gas- and liquid-phase electrolysers for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (ERCO2) to organic molecules (e.g. CH4, CH3OH, HCOOH, etc.) and CO.
Particularly, the present invention addresses the mitigation of the competing hydrogen evolution reaction at the cathode side by delivering electrons at a higher energy level. This is achieved by tailoring the energy level needed for the electroreduction of CO2, at the catalyst surface, with protons transported from the anode to the cathode; the disclosed invention hinders/mitigates the proton recombination to molecular hydrogen and increases ERCO2 faradaic efficiency.
Background art
The electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (ERCO2) is considered as the most promising strategy for CO2 conversion into valuable chemical products (Power-to-X) using the surplus from renewable electricity sources. Compared to other CO2 conversion approaches, ERCO2 is a process controllable by electrochemical potentials, pH, pressure and temperature. The system is compact, modular, on-demand and easily scalable.
The ERCO2 to organic molecules is a reaction that requires intricate electron/proton coupling steps leading to low current densities, poor selectivities and large overpotentials. Most of the advances in the last few years were on fundamental and mechanistic studies of ERCO2 . Others were on reducing the overpotential of the ERCO2 through the development of electrocatalysts. Rd, Pt, Pd-Cu, Ru/Ti bimetallic oxide, Mo complexes and copper-based catalysts, have shown to be promising for ERCO2 to produce organic molecules. However, most of them are not realistic for industrial applications due to high cost and poor abundance. Until now, copper-based is the most used electrocatalyst to reduce CO2 to chemical feedstock and organic substances due to its good activity to produce value-added chemicals while mitigating the opportunistic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Despite its ability to convert CO2 electrocatalytically at relatively low overpotentials, several attempts have been made to increase overall efficiency and copper selectivity to high-value products by: a) alloying copper with other metals to shift the binding energy with the reactants, b) modifying copper structure, oxidation state and surface area. However, copper and other commonly used metal-based catalysts still suffer from limitations such as meagre selectivity, short-term stability, deactivation and restructuring during long-term electrolysis .
The use of semiconductors for CO2 reduction is very important in photo-electrochemical systems to serve either as photo- electrocatalyst or promoter (alloys and co-catalyst). Thermodynamically, a semiconductor can catalyze ERCO2 with water if it possesses the conduction-band more negative than that the ERCO2 redox potential and, at the same time, if the valence-band edge is more positive than the redox potential
for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Thus, the photogenerated electrons are used to reduce CO2 and the holes are used to oxidize H2O to O2. Figure 1 shows the band-edge positions of some semiconductors as well as the redox potentials of HER, OER and ERCO2 to produce carbon monoxide, methane, methanol, formic acid and formic aldehyde.1 Based on which electrode acts as the photoabsorber material, three different photo-electrochemical configurations can be envisioned: i) photocathode and dark anode, ii) photoanode and dark cathode, and iii) photocathode-photoanode. The fact that each photoelectrode can combine multiple absorber layers, for making more efficient use of the solar spectrum, complicates the process. The use of a diode or a solar cell, based on a buried junction concept, covered by one or more electrocatalyst (s) that is contact with the electrolyte acts as a semiconductor, being considered as a promising integrated solution.
Two major types of ERCO2 electrolysers have been reported, depending on reaction media: liquid-phase and gas-phase configurations. Regardless of the reaction media, an electrolyser is composed by an ion-exchange membrane between two electrodes in a zero-gap configuration, composing a membrane electrodes assembly (MEA). Porous liquid/gas diffusion layers and bipolar plates are the remaining components. The electrons flow from cathode to anode, through the external circuit while ions are conducted through the membrane. Both types of ERCO2 electrolysers can be arranged in a zero-gap cell configuration.
Zero-gap cell configuration has great potential to increase the energy efficiency of the process due to its lower electrical resistances at the interfaces and higher volumetric power density due to the compact design. Moreover, the use of materials already developed for fuel cells and
water electrolysers is expected to accelerate ERCO2 market adoption. What determines the type of ERCO2 phase is how the CO2 is fed to the cathode, i.e., in the form of CO2 saturated aqueous/non-aqueous catholyte - liquid-phase electrolyser configuration or gaseous CO2 stream - gas-phase electrolyser. Gas-gas and liquid-gas are other more thorough configurations that depend on the anode feed; hydrogen/steam or liquid electrolytes are fed, respectively, and they will generate ions to compensate the charge for CO2 reduction. Liquid-phase type ERCO2 electrolysers are like redox flow batteries with recirculation of liquid electrolytes on both sides. CO2 is absorbed into aqueous electrolytes supplied to the cathode side (CC>2-saturated catholyte). Generally, buffer electrolytes such as potassium carbonate (KHCO3) and hydroxide potassium (KOH) are used to maintain the pH at the electrodes. In the anodic chamber, a similar electrolyte is typically pumped to avoid pH unbalance that would require permanent electrolyte replacement. In liquid-phase electrolysers, apart from requiring pumps and periodical electrolyte replacement, the operation at high current densities is hindered by excessive mass diffusion overpotentials; the solubility of CO2 in water solutions is limited and the separation of products is also complex. Finally, the alkalis react with the pumped protons at the cathode side requiring a continuous pH correction.
In gas-phase configuration, the electrolyser is fed with gaseous CO2 and uses a MEA separating the anodic and cathodic compartments in a similar way to the ones used in proton exchange membrane (REM) fuel cells. The membrane acts as a barrier for electrons and gases involved in the ERCO2 . Nevertheless, in gas-phase configuration the use of PEMs generates high proton concentrations at the cathode leading
to a highly acidic environment. This promotes the parasitic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and low ERCO2 selectivity. In gas-phase electroliser configurations, the ERCO2 to organic molecules and/or CO requires H2O electrolysis or hydrogen oxidation followed by proton conduction from the anode to the cathode side through a proton exchange membrane (REM). At the cathode, protons and electrons react with CO2 at the catalyst surface such as a copper-based catalyst that favors the reaction. ERCO2 kinetics is slower than water or hydrogen oxidation using state-of-the-art catalysts. This generates high proton concentrations at the cathode, promoting HER. For this reason and impossibility to maintain a moderate proton concentration, the highest faradaic efficiency reported so far in gas-phase ERCO2 using a PEM is 2 % and using an anion exchange membrane (AEM) is 12 % of CO.2
Other chemistries have been used to achieve similar efficiencies for gas-phase as those of liquid-phase. By feeding aqueous KOH or NaOH solutions to the anode, PEMs may also permeate other cations that allow to decrease proton concentration at the cathode side; however, the ionic conductivity of these cations in PEMs is lower than that of protons, thus generating ohmic losses. Another strategy is replacing PEMs by anion exchange membranes (AEMs). Instead of protons, anions that may be a result of water reduction (OH-) are transported from the cathode to the anode side to be oxidized and generate oxygen, water and electrons. More recently, bipolar membranes (BPM) have also been used since their composition serves itself as a buffer; the alkaline- acidic ionomer junction fundamental behavior can be seen as an ionic analogue of an electronic semiconductor p-n junction: the cation conductive "acidic" ionomer provides positive mobile charge carriers, such as protons; and, the
anion conductive "alkaline" ionomer provides negative mobile charge carriers, such as hydroxyl ions.
The faradaic efficiency of ERCO2 is affected by several parameters. Regarding the catalyst itself, it is important to consider the chemical composition, microstructure, morphology and particle size. In the case of composite catalysts, the composition, microstructure and morphology of the support, and the concentration and dispersion of the active phase are important; if the active phase of the composite catalysts is made of crystals, their crystallinity and crystal orientation are also critical.All these features should be optimized for maximizing the protons reduction overpotential and to decrease the CO2 reduction overpotential .
On the other hand, the faradaic efficiency is also highly influenced by operating conditions. If the cathode is submersed in a liquid solution, the relevant operating conditions are temperature, solvent composition, pH, CO2 dissolved concentration and electrode potential. In the case of the cathode being fed with gaseous CO2, the relevant operating conditions are temperature, CO2 partial pressure, relative humidity and electrode potential. CO2 is a quite stable linear molecule with a strong C=O bond (750 kJ mol-1). Its electrochemical conversion is difficult and intricate requiring a high activation barrier, that leads to substantial overpotentials. Moreover, the ERCO2 involves multi-electron/proton transfer processes, which together with intermediate reactions and the wide portfolio of possible products makes the process highly complex.
The most common electrolyser configuration used for the ERCO2 is the liquid-phase configuration (Figure 2). In this type of electrolyser, liquid electrolytes are circulated over
both electrodes, separated by a polymer electrolyte membrane; the electrodes may be covered by a gas-liquid diffusion layer. In gas-phase configuration (Figure 3), CO2 is supplied in gas phase and the electrodes are also separated by an ion exchange membrane. The electrodes and membrane form a MEA, which is then sandwiched between two gas diffusion layers (GDLs) that serve also as current collectors .
For liquid- and gas-phase electrolyser configurations (Figures 2 and 3), three types of membranes can be considered: proton exchange membrane (PEM), anion exchange membrane (AEM) and bipolar membrane (BPM). PEM can transport protons (H+) and other cations from the anode to the cathode side, while prevent anions and other reactants to cross. If using an AEM, hydroxide ions (OH-), which are produced from the water reduction, or bicarbonate ions (HCO3-), from the reaction equilibrium between carbon dioxide and hydroxyl ions, are transported from the cathode to the anode. A BPM combines the chemistry and ion conduction of both PEM and AEM, delivering simultaneously H+ to the cathode and OH- (or HCO3-) to the anode, respectively.3
In the liquid-phase electrolyser configuration, ion conduction is made across the membrane and the supporting electrolyte. Ionic transport through the membrane occurs by vehicular mechanism where ions are solvated and bonded to groups to the membrane with opposite charge. At the supporting electrolyte, proton and hydroxyl ions transport is made by Grotthuss mechanism in which ions diffuse through hydrogen bonds with water due to concentration gradients; migration and molecular diffusing transport mechanisms apply to all charged species at the support electrolyte. Thus, both membrane and supporting electrolyte are responsible for
ohmic losses related to the charge transport, which depends on several factors such as membrane composition and thickness and, electrolyte molarity and composition.
Liquid-phase electrolysers operate with both liquid anolyte and catholyte, where the catholyte contains dissolved CO2 . CO2 solubility in water and reactivity towards the electroreduction that is highly dependent on the pH. The optimal pH of the catholyte is normally slightly alkaline. The local pH, nearby the surface of the electrode, may differ from the bulk pH as the CO2 reduction reaction progresses. This effect can be mitigated by using buffering electrolytes. In aqueous electrolytes, CO2 forms the following buffer, especially in non-acidic solutions:
Furthermore, for more alkaline medium, the bicarbonate buffer can produce at the electrode surface CO3 2:-
The local pH nearby the electrode surface depends on different parameters namely, current density, side-products, electrolyte buffering and mass-transport of OH~, CO2, HCO3- and CO3 2-.4
The mitigation of HER, in liquid-phase electrolysers, is critical to increase the energy efficiency. The local pH, besides affecting the CO2 electroreduction reaction kinetics and selectivity, also affects the competing HER. As such, the choice of pH buffers in the catholyte (e.g.,
potassium/sodium bicarbonate salts) is of utmost importance. On the other hand, the pH also conditions the majority ionic charge carriers in the electrolyser. This charge carrier can be H+ for acid to neutral medium and OH~ for neutral to alkaline medium. Accordingly, PEM or AEM membranes should be considered. The BPM should be used for acidic to neutral conditions .
In liquid-phase electrolysers, strategies such as buffering the catholyte besides using a suitable catalyst and membrane allow to achieve high ERCO2 selectivities. Nevertheless, these electrolysers operate at low current densities that hinder the volumetric power density and high production rates needed for industrial applications. Moreover, it requires complex separation units when methanol or formic acid are produced and need to be separated from aqueous electrolyte. These highly valuable products are liquid at normal conditions of pressure and temperature.
ERCO2 in a gas-phase electrolyser (Figure 3), includes two electrodes (anode and cathode), separated by an ion-exchange membrane preferably in a zero-gap configuration. The cathode is typically fed with humidified CO2, essential for the electrode and the membrane humidification. The electrode humidification allows that a thin water film coats the electrocatalyst particles allowing the mobility of protons, dissolved carbon dioxide and other ionic species, some of them intermediates in CO2 electroreduction. The membrane humidification is needed for improving the ion conductivity.5 At the anode side, different feed streams are used to supply electrons and H2 to reduce CO2 at the cathode side. Water and H2 may be fed to deliver protons and electrons to the cathode when using PEMs and acidic ionomer (equations (5) and (6), respectively) . Hydroxyl ions are the source of electrons in
alkaline medium provided by the AEM. In this case, hydroxyl ions are generated by the reduction of CO2 with water at the cathode and conducted through the AEM to the anode to be oxidized (equation (9)).
The components of gas-phase electrolysers, such as catalyst, GDLs and bipolar plates must be carefully chosen. The pH character of these electrolysers is given by the ion-exchange membrane. Proton exchange membranes provide an acid character; the hydrogen oxidation at the anode side should be catalysed by a platinum-based catalyst, while iridium- based catalysts are used to oxidize water. In the case of water oxidation, catalyst support, GDL and bipolar plate must be corrosion resistant; typically, titanium is used due to its resistance to corrosion and sufficient electronic conductivity. In alkaline medium (using AEMs) corrosion is not that critical; transition metals (Ni, Fe, Co, etc.) are used to catalyze the reduction of the hydroxyl ions - equation (9). The remaining components, GDLs and bipolar plates, are normally carbon-based.
Gas-phase configuration enables to operate at high current densities due to easier removal of liquid products of the CO2 electroreduction (such as methanol and formic acid) and avoids the need of pumps to make the liquid electrolytes to circulate. Until now, the portfolio of products obtained in the gas-phase configuration is much more limited than that using a liquid-phase electrolyser. The highest ever reported faradaic efficiency to produce CO of a gas-phase ERCO2 was 2 % when the electrolyser is equipped with a PEM, and 12 % when equipped with an AEM.2
In general, ERCO2 can produce a wide portfolio of organic molecules (e.g., CH4, CH3OH, HCOOH) and CO, since they can be formed by reducing CO2 with H+ (e.g., equation (4)) or with H2O (e.g., equation (7)). The species that are formed on the electrodes surface, in the gas-phase electrolyser configuration, depend on several operating and design parameters such as temperature, relative humidity, electrode materials and pH. The flux of protons (or other ions) impact on the pH at the electrode surface and on the reactions that are taking place.
In the case of acidic environment, when CO is produced from the ERCO2 the following reactions occur:3'6
In the case of alkaline environment, when CO is produced from the ERCO2, the following reactions occur: 3'6
The half-electrochemical reactions and electrode potentials for the evolution of CH4, CH3OH and HCOOH by ERCO2 are listed below :7
Thermodynamic reduction potential of CO2 to relevant products is close to zero V versus standard hydrogen electrode (V vs SHE) and then close to the HER reduction potential, in alkaline or acidic media - cf. equations (10), (12) and (14). However, the overpotentials of the CO2 electroreduction are considerably high. For example, a commonly intermediate species in the electroreduction of CO2 is free radical CO2~ *, which is formed at -1.9 V vs SHE. The use of electrocatalysts allows to decrease this overpotential, but it stills too high (the absolute value) compared with the parasitic electroreduction of H+ to molecular hydrogen.
Summary
The present invention relates to a method to control the selectivity of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to organic molecules and CO in gas- or liquid-phase in an electrolyser, comprising the use of at least one semiconductor material on the electrode of the cathode or anode side of the electrolyser that is suitable to increase the faradaic efficiency of the reaction.
In one embodiment at least one semiconductor material acts as an electrocatalyst.
In one embodiment at least one semiconductor material further comprises particles of metals selected from Cu, Sn, Ag, Ru, Bi, Pt and Pd.
In one embodiment the semiconductor material is selected from binary transition metal-oxides cP such as TiO2, ZnO and
WO3; materials based on transition metal cations with dn electronic configurations such as CU2O, Fe2O3 , Co3O4 and NiO; ternary metal-oxides such as BiVO4, CuWO4, CuFeCO2, CaFeO2,
ZnFe2O4 and BaSnO3; transition metal hydroxides such as
Mg (OH) 2 and Ni (OH)2) ; layered double hydroxides such as NiFe-
LDH, CuCr-LDH, ZnTi-LDH; the family of (oxy) nitritrides such as TaON and Ta3N5; the family of metal chalcogenide such as
Cu (In, Ga) Se2, CdS, MoS2, WSe2; carbon-based semiconductors such as g-C3N4; silicon-based semiconductors; and III-V class of semiconductors such as GaP, GaInP2, InP.
In one embodiment at least one semiconductor material is in the form of a thin film or nanoparticulated structures.
In one embodiment the semiconductor material is in the form of a porous layer of nanoparticulated structures with a thickness between 1 μm and 50 pm.
In one embodiment the semiconductor material in nanoparticulated structures are spherical nanoparticles with a size distribution between 2 nm and 1.5 μm.
In one embodiment the semiconductor material is in the form of a thin film with a thickness between 2 nm and 200 nm.
In one embodiment at least one semiconductor material is in at least one diode mounted in series or parallel configuration in the external electrical circuit of the electrolyser .
In one embodiment at least one diode is selected from a 0.4 V diode or a 0.7 V diode.
In one embodiment the membranes used in the electrolyser are selected from cation exchange membranes, anion exchange membranes, proton exchange membrane, or bipolar membranes.
In one embodiment the reaction temperature is between 0 °C and 100 °C.
In one embodiment the reaction pressure is between 1x105 Pa and 1x107 Pa.
The present invention also relates to the use of a semiconductor material suitable to increase the faradaic efficiency on a method for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide as disclosed in any of the preceding claims.
General description
The principles of the present innovation are focused on the use of semiconductors to control the selectivity of electrochemical reduction of CO2 to organic molecules at high current densities in gas- and liquid-phase electrolysers.
Brief description of drawings
Understanding the main advantages of the present invention may be achieved by those skilled in the art by reference to the accompanying figures. The following figures provide preferred embodiments for illustrating the description and should not be seen as limiting the scope of present disclosure .
Figure 1 shows the band-edge positions of some typical semiconductor photocatalysts relative to the energy levels of the redox couples involved in the reduction of CO2;1
Figure 2 shows the schematic representation of the ERCO2 electrolyser configuration in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
Reference numbers:
(1) - Stands for the ERCO2 electrolyser containing the semiconductor;
(2) - Stands for the Pumps;
(3) - Stands for the Reservoirs;
(4) - Stands for the Power supply.
(5) - Stands for the Diode.
Figure 3 shows the electrolyser configuration considering the use of semiconductor nanoparticles as catalyst support in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; Reference numbers:
(1) - Stands for the cathode bipolar plate;
(2) - Stands for the cathode current collector/gas diffusion layer;
(12) - Stands for the cathode catalyst layer with semiconductor nanoparticles as catalyst support;
(4) - Stands for the ion exchange membrane;
(5) - Stands for the anode catalyst layer;
(6) - Stands for the anode current collector/gas diffusion layer;
(7) - Stands for the anode bipolar plate.
Figure 4 shows the electrolyser configuration considering the semiconductor film coated on the current collector/gas
diffusion layer in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
Reference numbers:
(I) - Stands for the cathode bipolar plate;
(10) - Stands for the cathode current collector/gas diffusion layer coated with a semiconductor film;
(II) - Stands for the cathode catalyst layer;
(4) - Stands the ion exchange membrane;
(5) - Stands for the anode catalyst layer;
(6) - Stands for the anode current collector/gas diffusion layer;
(7) - Stands for the anode bipolar plate.
Figure 5 shows the electrolyser configuration considering the semiconductor film coated on the catalyst layer in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; Reference numbers:
(1) - Stands for the cathode bipolar plate;
(2) - Stands for the cathode current collector/gas diffusion layer;
(3) - Stands the cathode catalyst layer coated with a semiconductor film;
(4) - Stands for the ion exchange membrane;
(5) - Stands for the anode catalyst layer;
(6) - Stands for the anode current collector/gas diffusion layer;
(7) - Stands for the anode bipolar plate.
Figures 6 and 7 show the production rates of methane and methanol as a function relative humidity and cell potential, respectively. The anode, loaded with a Pt/C electrocatalyst, was fed with hydrogen and loaded with a Pt/C electrode. The
cathode, composed by Ru/C electrocatalyst, was fed with carbon dioxide. The cell was operated at 80 °C and 105 Pa.
Figure 8 shows the faradaic efficiencies and current density at -0.8 V of cell potential. A copper foam with and without a 5 nm TiCt film was used as cathode, fed with gaseous CO2 . The anode was composed by Pt/C electrode and fed with hydrogen. Nafion 117 was used as membrane. The cell was operated at 80 °C and 105 Pa.
Figure 9 shows the faradaic efficiencies and current density of CuZnGa-based gas diffusion electrodes tested in aqueous- phase. Dependences on sequential post-treatments namely untreated (CZG_U), calcinated (CZG_C) and calcinated reduced (CZG_CR) are displayed. The cell was operated at room conditions and -1.8 V vs Ag/AgCl.
Figure 10 shows the faradaic efficiencies and current density of CuZnGa-based gas diffusion electrodes tested in aqueous- phase. Dependences on in-situ activation with potential cycling, namely untreated activated (CZG_UA), calcinated activated (CZG_CA) and calcinated reduced activated (CZG_CRA) are displayed. The cell was operated at room conditions and -1.8 V vs Ag/AgCl.
Detailed description of the embodiments
Before any embodiments of the present invention are detailed, it should be comprehended that the embodiments may not be limited in application per the details nor of the structure or the function as set forth in the following descriptions or illustrated within the figures. Different embodiments may be capable of being practiced or conducted in different ways.
Moreover, it is to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of terms such as "including", "comprising, " or "having" and variations thereof herein are meant to encompass the item listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Further, unless otherwise noted, technical terms may be used according to conventional usage. It is further contemplated that the reference numbers describe similar components and the equivalents thereof.
The objective of the present invention is using at least one semiconductor material to increase the faradaic efficiency of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (ERCO2) in gas- and liquid-phase electrolysers as well as mitigate the evolution of hydrogen in the reaction. These semiconductor materials can be used in the form of thin films, nanoparticulated structures or in an independent device like a diode. Considering the bandgap and the position of conduction and valence bands, the energy of electrons that will reduce the CO2 molecule can be controlled to promote a reaction mechanism that could be more difficult and produce desired products. Additionally, impedance ascribed to the semiconductor limits protonic conduction through the membrane that can generate a highly acidic environment at the cathode; hydrogen evolution is hindered when there is a shortage of protons.
The most typical ERCO2 electrolyser, shown in Figure 2, is similar to a redox flow battery where two liquids are recirculated both at the negative and positive electrode of an electrochemical cell or stack. Typically, peristaltic pumps provide energy to the liquids which are water at the
negative electrode and an aqueous electrolyte containing absorbed CO2 . External electric power needs to be ensured to drive the process using a typical power supply. According to Figures 3, 4 and 5 the electrolyser is composed by two bipolar plates (1, 7) that are compressed with bolts. They contain flowfields provide a better liquid distribution through the complete active area of the diffusion layers (2, 6). Both components typically are carbon based or made of metals to withstand corrosion when using acidic liquids or high potentials. In the center, the MEA is composed by an ion-exchange membrane (4) and two catalyst layers (12, 3, 11, 5). At the negative electrode, iridium is typically the choice to oxidize water in acidic media. In alkaline conditions, mostly Ni-based electrodes are used to oxidize hydroxyl anions. Whereas for the positive electrode, a wide portfolio of metals can be used to reduce CO2 to produce valuable products. Copper is widely used metal to produce methanol and other light alcohols.
To solve the existing technical problems, it is proposed a method to control the selectivity of the ERCO2 to organic molecules and CO in gas- and liquid-phase electrolysers, comprising the use of at least one semiconductor material on the electrode of the cathode or anode side, the semiconductor material being suitable to increase the faradaic efficiency of the reaction. The semiconductor can be present in the form or electrocatalyst support (Figure 3), in a thin film deposited on the gas diffusion layer (Figure 4) and in thin film deposited directly over the catalyst layer.
The selectivity towards a given product is highly affected by the electrode material and the cell conditions, rather than the product itself. Therefore, the introduction of a
semiconductor layer combined with the electrocatalyst, whose alignment of the band-edges is suitable for the reduction of CO2, will better tune the energy of the electrons that are conducted from the anode to the cathode active sites. This arrangement favors the correct energy to generate a certain product while mitigating the parasitic reactions.
To ensure proper functionality from the semiconductor it just needs to be connected in series in the electrical circuit of the system. But its function will be dependent on the composition of it as a component (multiple semiconductors can be used at the same time) and its morphology such as thin-film or nanoparticles, and crystalline structure such as nanospheres, nanotubes or nanorods.
Once the electron possesses the correct energy and reached the electrocatalyst, the function of the semiconductor is done despite of it generating some additional ohmic losses. The semiconductor morphology and crystalline structure effects are also important since they affect charge carriers transport and transfer processes. The semiconductor can be deposited as a thin and planar film or as a nanoparticulated structures. Thin films are advantageous for carrier collection, but nanostructured morphologies with controlled hickness, porous layers with 1 and 50 μm of thickness, play a crucial role in improving the surface area to facilitate electron transport for higher performances.
Nanoparticles of semiconductors can be also used as electrocatalyst support to stabilize small particles of active metals, the semiconductor further comprising a metal selected from Cu, Sn, Ag, Ru, Bi, Pt and Pd, while serving
as the function of controlling the energy of electrons that reach the cathode.
The use of at least one diode is another way to include and benefit from using semiconductors with an independent component that does not interfere with the structure of the cell or stack.
In one embodiment, the semiconductor material is used in the form of a thin film, nanoparticulated structures or in at least one diode in the external electrical circuit of the electrolyser.
In one embodiment, the semiconductor thin film has a thickness between 2 and 200 nm.
In another embodiment, the semiconductor material is selected from the classic binary transition metal-oxides (cP oxides), such as TiO2, ZnO and WO3 to the ones based on transition metal cations with cP electronic configurations, such as CU2O, Fe2O3, Co3O4 and NiO. Ternary metal-oxides are also promising due to the rationally engineer of the bandgap through cation combination (e.g. Sn2+, Bi3+, V5+, Ti4+, Nb5+, etc.); BiVCy, CUWO4, CuFeCO2, CaFeO2, ZnFe2O4 and BaSnO3 are good examples. Transition metal hydroxides (such as Mg (OH)2 and Ni(OH)2) or layered double hydroxides (such as NiFe-LDH, CuCr-LDH, ZnTi-LDH, etc.) can be suitable. In addition to tuning the bandgap of oxides using metal-cation orbitals, substituting a nitrogen atom for oxygen is also a possible strategy; therefore, the family of (oxy)nitritrides, such as TaON and Ta3N5 are potential semiconductor materials. The family of metal chalcogenide (e.g. Cu (In,Ga)Se2, CdS, MoS2, WSe2), carbon-based semiconductors such as g-C3N4, silicon-
based semiconductors and III-V class of semiconductors (such as GaP, GaInP2, InP) also offer tunability and exceptional charge-transport characteristics for CO2 reduction.
In one embodiment, the semiconductor material is in the form of spherical nanoparticles with size distribution between 2 nm and 1.5 pm, more preferably between 30 and 200 nm.
With this method it is possible to perform the ERCO2 to organic molecules and CO in gas- and liquid-phase at temperatures between 0 °C and 100 °C, and pressures between 1x105 Pa and 1x107 Pa, if water is in the reaction remains in liquid state.
In one embodiment the membranes can be selected from the membranes used in the electrolyser are selected from cation exchange membranes, anion exchange membranes, proton exchange membrane, or bipolar membranes.
The expected impact from this method using at least one semiconductor is considerably higher in gas-phase than in liquid phase.
Supplying gaseous CO2 to the electrolyser brings advantages like higher power densities and more compact systems but it poses difficulties with kinetics. Since the pH nearby the electrocatalyst cannot be easily controlled like in aqueous systems, the use of semiconductors is a breakthrough to overcome the easier hydrogen evolution when compared to more demanding reaction mechanisms.
The depletion of protonic concentration at the cathode deeply impacts on the magnitude of hydrogen evolution and thus the faradaic efficiency of the electrolyser.
In Figure 1, the band-edge positions of some semiconductors as well as the redox potentials of HER, OER and ERCO2 for the production of carbon monoxide, methane, methanol, formic acid and formic aldehyde. The ideal semiconductor to catalyze ERCO2 should display its conduction-band edge more negative than that the ERCO2 redox potential and, at the same time, the valence-band edge should be more positive than the OER redox potential. If so, photogenerated electrons will reduce CO2 and holes will oxidize H2O to O2. However, ERCO2 also uses an electrocatalyst that can display better performance if the coming electrons have their energy tuned by the semiconductor. In this regard, several other semiconductors and arrangements of semiconductors may result in beneficial.
Experimental results in Figure 7 indicate that applying a small potential difference to run the ERCO2 in gas-phase with an electrolyser equipped with a PEM and hydrogen at the anode side, produces nothing but molecular hydrogen. Increasing the potential difference up to 1.8 V does not increase the CO2 electroreduction selectivity, which is still zero. However, using thicker membranes or saturating the cation exchange membrane with K+, makes the electrolyser to display a measurable selectivity towards CH4 and CH3OH at ca. 1.8 V. The potassium exchanged membrane presents a much lower proton conductivity. The cathode electrocatalyst is then lean in protons, loaded with CO2, and receiving high energy of electrons. It is then the balanced presence of CO2, H+ and high energy electrons that allows high selectivities. Such experiments were carried out feeding hydrogen to a gas
diffusion electrode loaded with platinum at the anode and another gas diffusion electrode loaded with ruthenium at the cathode. The cell was kept at 80 °C and 1x105 Pa under varying relative humidity. Nafion membranes with different thicknesses were used (50 pm, 135 pm and 170 pm).
Another experiment (Figure 8), using a copper foam coated with a thin film deposited by spray pyrolysis of TiCh (thickness of ca. 50 nm). Compared with the same cell without the semiconductor at the cathode, ERCO2 faradaic efficiency increased from 0 % to 70 % (light alcohols). The semiconductor caused a small drop in the current density at -0.8 V of cell potential, but hydrogen evolution was unprecedently mitigated in a gas-phase electrolyser. Nafion 117 was used as membrane without ionic exchange.
In liquid-phase electrolysers equipped with PEM membranes, the balance between these species is reached since the catholyte is normally slightly alkaline, which allows to control the catalyst concentration on H+ despite the proton flowrate to the cathode; this imposed by the required high potential differences to have available electrons with sufficient energy to allow the electroreduction of CO2 . This approach, however, consumes alkaline reactants. A semiconductor was used in an electrocatalyst composed by copper, zinc and gallium. The catalyst was loaded in a gas diffusion electrode and assembled in a cathode of an electrolyser, as shown in Figure 2. The main difference from the catalysts used in Figures 9 and 10 is assigned to posttreatments after the synthesis. These treatments included calcination, reduction, and in-situ potential cycling. Without any of the treatments, the catalyst does not display sufficient stability and there is no interaction between the
three metals to enhance ERCO2 kinetics. After calcination, the catalyst is fully oxidized and the most important metal, copper, has very little ERCO2 activity in its most oxidized form. Upon reduction with hydrogen the catalyst surface is reduced, and metallic sub-oxides (semiconductors) become dominant. The faradaic efficiency is greatly increased since hydrogen evolution occurs with lower extent. Additionally, in-situ potential cycling stabilizes the metallic sub-oxides and promotes reversible re-dox cycles that activate and generate more semiconductor sites deeper in the microstructure. As such, hydrogen evolution drops to less than 20 % of the faradaic efficiency while generating higher current density. In conclusion, the use of semiconductors not only is able to increase ERCO2 efficiency but also increase the power density of the electrolyser.
Copper-based catalysts, proved to be of interest for ERCO2 to CO, hydrocarbons and alcohols. On the other hand, it has been used as a photoelectrocatalyst in its oxidized form of CU2O, a non-toxic p-type metal-oxide semiconductor with a high Hall mobility (90 cm2 V-1) and a direct bandgap of 1.90 - 2.17 eV. For photoelectrochemical applications, the CU2O photocathode reached almost 90% of its theoretical photocurrent density limit (14.7 mA cm-1). Moreover, it delivered a photovoltage of 1 V and stability beyond 100 h using a nanostructured CU2O absorber layer covered with a Ga2O3 intermediate layer, a TiO2 protection layer and a RuOx HER catalyst.8
This patent application discloses a method strategy for controlling the ion flowrate through the ion-exchange membrane and the electron energy in an independent and efficient way.
The energy of the electrons reaching the cathode can be also controlled, independently of the flowrate of ions through the membrane. This is achieved by introducing a diode or combination of diodes mounted in series or a parallel configuration in the external the electrical circuit of the electrolyser .
The use of a semiconductor material in at least one diode with a given bandgap (potential) in the external circuit makes that only electrons above this bandgap threshold reach the cathode. The flowrate of protons - electrolyser equipped with PEM - or of hydroxyl ions - electrolyser equipped with AEM - can then be controlled increasing the potential difference above the diode bandgap. This fine tune allows to increase the electrolyser current density but also affects the selectivity to CO2 electroreduction products and products flowrate. The use of a diode, with a selected bandgap, allows to maximize productivity and selectivity in an independent way. In one embodiment, at least one diode is selected from a 0.4 V diode or a 0.7 V diode. Other diodes can also be considered for the present invention.
The use of at least one semiconductor material at the electrode of the cathode or anode side, preferably in the cathode side, has the same effect of the diode described above.
In one embodiment, the semiconductor material is deposited over the current collector. This semiconductor material supplies electrons to the electrocatalyst deposited over it with a minimum energy level. The use of CU2O as the semiconductor material allows that only electrons with a
potential of ca. -1.20 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (V vs RHE) or above (in absolute terms) are supplied to the electrocatalyst. This semiconductor may, itself, be an electrocatalyst. The advantage of this approach is when photoelectrochemical cells are used and the photoelectrode is a p-type semiconductor, i.e. a photocathode.
The electron potential at the cathode side catalyst can also be regulated increasing the resistance to the ion transport through the ion exchange membrane. As the ion exchange membrane resistance increases, for a given ionic transport rate, the electron is delivered with more energy. The membrane resistivity can be tuned, tuning the membrane thickness and/or the concentration of the membrane ionic functional groups.
The above strategies can be used separately or combined. For optimizing the selectivity and the current density to a given product of the CO2 electroreduction, the following critical variables must be optimized: a) electrocatalyst, which should minimize the overpotential and maximize the exchange current density to the target product and increase the overpotentials to other products and to the HER; b) the energy of the delivered electron; c) the membrane type, by choosing for example REM, AEM, BPM; d) the pH at the catalyst surface (between 3 and 8) and; e) the temperature (0 - 100 °C). For gas-phase electrolysers, the CO2 partial pressure must also be optimized.
References
(1) Xie, S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y. Photocatalytic and Photoelectrocatalytic Reduction of CO 2 Using Heterogeneous Catalysts with Controlled Nanostructures.
Chem. Commun . 2016, 52 35-59. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC07613G.
(2) Patru, A.; Binninger, T.; Pribyl, B.; Schmidt, T. J.
Design Principles of Bipolar Electrochemical Co-Electrolysis
Cells for Efficient Reduction of Carbon Dioxide from Gas
Phase at Low Temperature. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166
(2), F34-F43. https://doi.Org/10.1149/2.1221816jes.
(3) Delacourt, C.; Ridgway, P. L.; Kerr, J. B.; Newman, J.
Design of an Electrochemical Cell Making Syngas ( CO + H2 ) from C02 and H20 Reduction at Room Temperature. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2007, 155 (1), B42. https://doi .org/10.1149/1.2801871.
(4) Pupo, M. M. de S.; Kortlever, R. Electrolyte Effects on the Electrochemical Reduction of C02. ChemPhysChem 2019, 20 (22), 2926-2935. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201900680.
(5) BINNINGER, T.; PATRU, A.; PRIBYL, B.; Schmidt, T. J.
Co-Electrolysis Cell Design for Efficient Co2 Reduction from Gas Phase at Low Temperature. EP3434810A1, January 30, 2019.
(6) Larrazabal, G. 0.; Martin, A. J.; Perez-Ramirez, J. Building Blocks for High Performance in Electrocatalytic C02 Reduction: Materials, Optimization Strategies, and Device Engineering. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8 (16), 3933-3944. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01380.
(7) Bard, A. J.; Parsons, R.; Jordan, J. Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution; CRC Press, 1985.
(8) Pan, L.; Kim, J. H.; Mayer, M. T.; Son, M.-K.; Ummadisingu, A.; Lee, J. S.; Hagfeldt, A.; Luo, J.; Gratzel, M. Boosting the Performance of Cu 2 0 Photocathodes for Unassisted Solar Water Splitting Devices. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1 (6), 412-420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0077-6.
This description is of course not in any way restricted to the forms of implementation presented herein and any person
with an average knowledge of the area can provide many possibilities for modification thereof without departing from the general idea as defined by the claims. The preferred forms of implementation described above can obviously be combined with each other. The following claims further define the preferred forms of implementation.
Claims
1. A method to control the selectivity of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to organic molecules and CO in gas- or liquid-phase in an electrolyser, comprising the use of at least one semiconductor material on the electrode of the cathode or anode side of the electrolyser that is suitable to increase the faradaic efficiency of the reaction.
2. Method according to the previous claim, wherein the at least one semiconductor material acts as an electrocatalyst.
3. Method according to the previous claim, wherein at least one semiconductor material further comprises particles of metals selected from Cu, Sn, Ag, Ru, Bi, Pt and Pd.
4. Method according to any of the previous claims, wherein the semiconductor material is selected from binary transition metal-oxides cP such as TiO2, ZnO, WO3, CU2O, Fe2O3, Co3O4 and NiO; ternary metal-oxides such as BiVO4, CuWO4, CuFeO2, CaFeO2, ZnFe2O4 and BaSnO3; transition metal hydroxides such as Mg (OH)2 and Ni(OH)2); layered double hydroxides such as NiFe-LDH, CuCr-LDH, ZnTi-LDH; (oxy)nitritrides such as TaON and Ta3N5; metal chalcogenides such as Cu (In,Ga)Se2, CdS, MoS2, WSe2,- carbon-based semiconductors such as g-CsN4; silicon-based semiconductors and III-V class of semiconductors such as GaP, GalP 2, InP.
5. Method according to any of the previous claims, wherein the at least one semiconductor material is in the form of a thin film or nanoparticulated structures.
6. Method according to any of the claims 1 to 5, wherein the semiconductor material is in the form of a porous layer of nanoparticulated structures with a thickness between 1 and 50 pm.
7. Method according to any of the claims 1 to 6, wherein the semiconductor material in nanoparticulated structures are spherical nanoparticles with a size distribution between
2 nm and 1.5 pm .
8. Method according to any of the claims 1 to 5, wherein the semiconductor material is in the form of a thin film with a thickness between 2 and 200 nm.
9. Method according to any of the claims 1 to 5, wherein the at least one semiconductor material is in at least one diode mounted in series or a parallel configuration in the external electrical circuit of the electrolyser.
10. Method according to the previous claim, wherein the at least one diode is selected from a 0.4 V diode or a 0.7 V diode.
11. Method according to any of the previous claims, wherein the membranes used in the electrolyser are selected from cation exchange membranes, anion exchange membranes, proton exchange membrane, or bipolar membranes.
12. Method according to any of the previous claims, wherein the reaction temperature is between 0 °C and 100 °C.
13. Method according to any of the previous claims, wherein the reaction pressure is between 1x105 Pa and 1x107 Pa.
14. Use of a semiconductor material suitable to increase the faradaic efficiency on a method for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide as disclosed in any of the preceding claims.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PT117008 | 2021-01-14 | ||
PT11700821 | 2021-01-14 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2022153236A1 true WO2022153236A1 (en) | 2022-07-21 |
Family
ID=80682413
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2022/050300 WO2022153236A1 (en) | 2021-01-14 | 2022-01-14 | Use of semiconductors to control the selectivity of eletrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
WO (1) | WO2022153236A1 (en) |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS6197324A (en) * | 1984-10-17 | 1986-05-15 | Noboru Koyama | Electrolytic oxidation polymer |
CA2812031A1 (en) * | 2010-09-10 | 2012-03-15 | Geoffrey A. Ozin | Photoactive material |
EP3434810A1 (en) | 2017-07-24 | 2019-01-30 | Paul Scherrer Institut | Co-electrolysis cell design for efficient co2 reduction from gas phase at low temperature |
JP6767202B2 (en) * | 2016-08-23 | 2020-10-14 | 古河電気工業株式会社 | Metal-containing nanoparticles-supported electrode and carbon dioxide reduction device |
-
2022
- 2022-01-14 WO PCT/IB2022/050300 patent/WO2022153236A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS6197324A (en) * | 1984-10-17 | 1986-05-15 | Noboru Koyama | Electrolytic oxidation polymer |
CA2812031A1 (en) * | 2010-09-10 | 2012-03-15 | Geoffrey A. Ozin | Photoactive material |
JP6767202B2 (en) * | 2016-08-23 | 2020-10-14 | 古河電気工業株式会社 | Metal-containing nanoparticles-supported electrode and carbon dioxide reduction device |
EP3434810A1 (en) | 2017-07-24 | 2019-01-30 | Paul Scherrer Institut | Co-electrolysis cell design for efficient co2 reduction from gas phase at low temperature |
Non-Patent Citations (7)
Title |
---|
BARD, A. J.PARSONS, R.JORDAN, J.: "Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution", 1985, CRC PRESS |
DELACOURT, C.RIDGWAY, P. L.KERR, J. B.NEWMAN, J.: "Design of an Electrochemical Cell Making Syngas ( CO + H2 ) from C02 and H20 Reduction at Room Temperature", J. ELECTROCHEM. SOC., vol. 155, no. 1, 2007, pages B42, XP055124598, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2801871> DOI: 10.1149/1.2801871 |
LARRAZABAL, G. 0.MARTIN, A. J.PEREZ-RAMIREZ, J.: "Building Blocks for High Performance in Electrocatalytic C02 Reduction: Materials, Optimization Strategies, and Device Engineering", J. PHYS. CHEM. LETT., vol. 8, no. 16, 2017, pages 3933 - 3944, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01380> |
PAN, L.; KIM, J. H.; MAYER, M. T.; SON, M.-K.; UMMADISINGU, A.; LEE, J. S.; HAGFELDT, A.; LUO, J.; GRATZEL, M.: "Boosting the Performance of Cu 2 0 Photocathodes for Unassisted Solar Water Splitting Devices", NAT. CATAL., vol. 1, no. 6, 2018, pages 412 - 420, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0077-6> |
PATRU, A.BINNINGER, T.PRIBYL, B.SCHMIDT, T. J.: "Design Principles of Bipolar Electrochemical Co-Electrolysis Cells for Efficient Reduction of Carbon Dioxide from Gas Phase at Low Temperature", J. ELECTROCHEM. SOC., vol. 166, no. 2, 2019, pages F34 - F43, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1221816jes> |
PUPO, M. M. DE S.KORTLEVER, R.: "Electrolyte Effects on the Electrochemical Reduction of C02", CHEMPHYSCHEM, vol. 20, no. 22, 2019, pages 2926 - 2935, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201900680> |
XIE, S.ZHANG, Q.LIU, G.WANG, Y.: "Photocatalytic and Photoelectrocatalytic Reduction of CO 2 Using Heterogeneous Catalysts with Controlled Nanostructures", CHEM. COMMUN., vol. 52, no. 1, 2016, pages 35 - 59, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC07613G> |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3320576B1 (en) | Redox flow battery with carbon dioxide based redox couple | |
EP3234224B1 (en) | Filter-press photoelectrochemical water oxidation and co2 reduction cell | |
Park et al. | High-performance anion exchange membrane water electrolyzer enabled by highly active oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts: Synergistic effect of doping and heterostructure | |
WO2018092496A1 (en) | Apparatus for producing organic hydride and method for producing organic hydride | |
US10494725B2 (en) | Electrochemical reaction device | |
WO2013018843A1 (en) | Oxygen gas diffusion electrode and method of making the same | |
Kumar et al. | Recent advances in hydrogen production through proton exchange membrane water electrolysis–a review | |
JP5679639B2 (en) | Gas diffusion electrode and manufacturing method thereof | |
WO2018037774A1 (en) | Cathode, electrolysis cell for producing organic hydride, and organic hydride production method | |
Pushkarev et al. | Supported Ir-based oxygen evolution catalysts for polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis: a minireview | |
KR20190083546A (en) | Electrochemical hydrogenation reactor and method of hydrogenation using the same | |
Park et al. | Heterostructured nanocatalysts to boost the hydrogen evolution reaction in neutral electrolyte | |
JP4868394B2 (en) | Gas diffusion electrode and manufacturing method thereof, and fuel cell and salt electrolysis cell using the gas diffusion electrode | |
Mehrabi et al. | Modular Solar-to-Fuel Electrolysis at Low Cell Potentials Enabled by Glycerol Electrooxidation and a Bipolar Membrane Separator | |
WO2019224811A1 (en) | Electrochemical oxidation of methane to methanol | |
WO2022153236A1 (en) | Use of semiconductors to control the selectivity of eletrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide | |
JP5123565B2 (en) | Gas diffusion electrode and manufacturing method thereof, and fuel cell and salt electrolysis cell using the gas diffusion electrode | |
Wan et al. | CO2 Electrochemical Reduction to CO: From Catalysts, Electrodes to Electrolytic Cells and Effect of Operating Conditions | |
EP4350045A2 (en) | Electrode, membrane electrode assembly, electrochemical cell, stack, and electrolyzer | |
Gupta | Electrocatalytic Water Splitting | |
Shahazi et al. | Advancements in water splitting for sustainable energy generation: A review | |
Cabot et al. | Advanced Supports for Noble Metal Catalysts in Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysers: A Review: Improving the performance, stability, durability and cost of iridium-and platinum-based catalytic materials | |
JP2023162774A (en) | Electrode for electrochemical reactor and method for manufacturing electrode for electrochemical reactor | |
Chaiwarit | Novel electrochemical packed-bed reactor for carbon dioxide reduction | |
AU2023226658A1 (en) | Electrode, membrane electrode assembly, electrochemical cell, stack, and electrolyzer |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 22708596 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 22708596 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |