WO2022056643A1 - Processes for the preparation of expanded graphite and exfoliated graphene oxide - Google Patents
Processes for the preparation of expanded graphite and exfoliated graphene oxide Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2022056643A1 WO2022056643A1 PCT/CA2021/051305 CA2021051305W WO2022056643A1 WO 2022056643 A1 WO2022056643 A1 WO 2022056643A1 CA 2021051305 W CA2021051305 W CA 2021051305W WO 2022056643 A1 WO2022056643 A1 WO 2022056643A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- graphite
- graphene oxide
- foil
- mixture
- voltage
- Prior art date
Links
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 390
- 229910002804 graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 273
- 239000010439 graphite Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 273
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 177
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 150
- 229910021389 graphene Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 97
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 title abstract description 7
- 239000011888 foil Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 92
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphoric acid Chemical compound OP(O)(O)=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 235000011149 sulphuric acid Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 235000011007 phosphoric acid Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 150000008044 alkali metal hydroxides Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 239000012286 potassium permanganate Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 claims description 43
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical group [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 30
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 27
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 claims description 27
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 22
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000002086 nanomaterial Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M Potassium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[K+] KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- WMFOQBRAJBCJND-UHFFFAOYSA-M Lithium hydroxide Chemical compound [Li+].[OH-] WMFOQBRAJBCJND-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 10
- MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen peroxide Chemical compound OO MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- GNFTZDOKVXKIBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-(2-methoxyethoxy)benzohydrazide Chemical compound COCCOC1=CC=CC(C(=O)NN)=C1 GNFTZDOKVXKIBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004146 energy storage Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 150000004677 hydrates Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000011232 storage material Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000011540 sensing material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910000360 iron(III) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 3
- 229910021578 Iron(III) chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 1
- RBTARNINKXHZNM-UHFFFAOYSA-K iron trichloride Chemical group Cl[Fe](Cl)Cl RBTARNINKXHZNM-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 claims 1
- VTLYFUHAOXGGBS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe3+ Chemical class [Fe+3] VTLYFUHAOXGGBS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000004299 exfoliation Methods 0.000 description 34
- 206010040844 Skin exfoliation Diseases 0.000 description 33
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 20
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 15
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron Substances [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 12
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000011229 interlayer Substances 0.000 description 8
- 125000000524 functional group Chemical group 0.000 description 7
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000001157 Fourier transform infrared spectrum Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000001237 Raman spectrum Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002441 X-ray diffraction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 229910021382 natural graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Substances [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- -1 EGO Chemical compound 0.000 description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000002484 cyclic voltammetry Methods 0.000 description 5
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 5
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000002894 chemical waste Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000002687 intercalation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009830 intercalation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000011541 reaction mixture Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000027756 respiratory electron transport chain Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000002356 single layer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910000147 aluminium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002149 energy-dispersive X-ray emission spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000007770 graphite material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 3
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrochloric acid Chemical compound Cl VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000005411 Van der Waals force Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000026 X-ray photoelectron spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011149 active material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 125000004429 atom Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 125000004432 carbon atom Chemical group C* 0.000 description 2
- 125000002915 carbonyl group Chemical group [*:2]C([*:1])=O 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002848 electrochemical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006056 electrooxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000349 field-emission scanning electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 2
- NQXWGWZJXJUMQB-UHFFFAOYSA-K iron trichloride hexahydrate Chemical compound O.O.O.O.O.O.[Cl-].Cl[Fe+]Cl NQXWGWZJXJUMQB-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 2
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 240000001492 Carallia brachiata Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910002483 Cu Ka Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910016874 Fe(NO3) Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910017358 Fe2(SO4) Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000005033 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004566 IR spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002033 PVDF binder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001069 Raman spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002083 X-ray spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000001450 anions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000012736 aqueous medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001311 chemical methods and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010411 electrocatalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000724 energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- YAGKRVSRTSUGEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N ferricyanide Chemical compound [Fe+3].N#[C-].N#[C-].N#[C-].N#[C-].N#[C-].N#[C-] YAGKRVSRTSUGEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000000445 field-emission scanning electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007306 functionalization reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007429 general method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910021397 glassy carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 125000002887 hydroxy group Chemical group [H]O* 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002329 infrared spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011031 large-scale manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910000372 mercury(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012457 nonaqueous media Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920002981 polyvinylidene fluoride Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229910052573 porcelain Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000276 potassium ferrocyanide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002203 pretreatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001878 scanning electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001308 synthesis method Methods 0.000 description 1
- YBRBMKDOPFTVDT-UHFFFAOYSA-N tert-butylamine Chemical class CC(C)(C)N YBRBMKDOPFTVDT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XOGGUFAVLNCTRS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetrapotassium;iron(2+);hexacyanide Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[K+].[K+].[Fe+2].N#[C-].N#[C-].N#[C-].N#[C-].N#[C-].N#[C-] XOGGUFAVLNCTRS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C30—CRYSTAL GROWTH
- C30B—SINGLE-CRYSTAL GROWTH; UNIDIRECTIONAL SOLIDIFICATION OF EUTECTIC MATERIAL OR UNIDIRECTIONAL DEMIXING OF EUTECTOID MATERIAL; REFINING BY ZONE-MELTING OF MATERIAL; PRODUCTION OF A HOMOGENEOUS POLYCRYSTALLINE MATERIAL WITH DEFINED STRUCTURE; SINGLE CRYSTALS OR HOMOGENEOUS POLYCRYSTALLINE MATERIAL WITH DEFINED STRUCTURE; AFTER-TREATMENT OF SINGLE CRYSTALS OR A HOMOGENEOUS POLYCRYSTALLINE MATERIAL WITH DEFINED STRUCTURE; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C30B29/00—Single crystals or homogeneous polycrystalline material with defined structure characterised by the material or by their shape
- C30B29/10—Inorganic compounds or compositions
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B32/00—Carbon; Compounds thereof
- C01B32/15—Nano-sized carbon materials
- C01B32/182—Graphene
- C01B32/184—Preparation
- C01B32/19—Preparation by exfoliation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B32/00—Carbon; Compounds thereof
- C01B32/15—Nano-sized carbon materials
- C01B32/182—Graphene
- C01B32/198—Graphene oxide
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B32/00—Carbon; Compounds thereof
- C01B32/20—Graphite
- C01B32/21—After-treatment
- C01B32/22—Intercalation
- C01B32/225—Expansion; Exfoliation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C30—CRYSTAL GROWTH
- C30B—SINGLE-CRYSTAL GROWTH; UNIDIRECTIONAL SOLIDIFICATION OF EUTECTIC MATERIAL OR UNIDIRECTIONAL DEMIXING OF EUTECTOID MATERIAL; REFINING BY ZONE-MELTING OF MATERIAL; PRODUCTION OF A HOMOGENEOUS POLYCRYSTALLINE MATERIAL WITH DEFINED STRUCTURE; SINGLE CRYSTALS OR HOMOGENEOUS POLYCRYSTALLINE MATERIAL WITH DEFINED STRUCTURE; AFTER-TREATMENT OF SINGLE CRYSTALS OR A HOMOGENEOUS POLYCRYSTALLINE MATERIAL WITH DEFINED STRUCTURE; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C30B7/00—Single-crystal growth from solutions using solvents which are liquid at normal temperature, e.g. aqueous solutions
- C30B7/12—Single-crystal growth from solutions using solvents which are liquid at normal temperature, e.g. aqueous solutions by electrolysis
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
- Y02E60/10—Energy storage using batteries
Definitions
- the present application is in the field of expanded graphite and exfoliated graphene oxide. More specifically, the present application relates to process for their preparation and uses thereof.
- Graphene materials have the potential to catalyze the green energy revolution finding many important applications including, but not limited to, energy conversion and energy storage 111 .
- graphene’s implementation into applications has been largely limited to lab scale as current methods are associated with a high cost and/or a large quantity of chemical waste generated.
- energy storage materials associated with the rise in demand for portable electronics, electric vehicles, and increasing use of renewable energy 121 , it is important to consider the environmental implications associated with the production of these energy materials.
- Electrochemical exfoliation has emerged as a promising method for the potential large-scale production of graphene-based nanomaterials from graphite without the necessity for vast quantities of chemical and solvents and high temperatures and with much higher yield 1341 .
- ECE is a top-down synthesis method that is continuing to garner attention in the field of two-dimensional nanomaterials. ECE methods are largely limited to conducting or semiconducting layered materials with relatively weak interlayer forces 131 .
- ECE has been successfully employed to exfoliate M0S2 crystals into monolayers 151 .
- the physical structure of graphite lends itself to be an excellent candidate for ECE methods with its’ high conductivity and relatively large interplanar distance.
- ECE methods utilize electrochemical processes to overcome interlayer forces, such as Van der Waals forces, to facilitate the production of monolayers of the desired material 14 ’ 51 .
- ionic species in the electrolyte are driven by the applied voltage to intercalate between the graphite sheets 131 .
- the electrolyte species are also reduced to their respective gas within the graphite material, further increasing the interlayer spacing through gas expansion, resulting in an electrochemically exfoliated graphene 13 ’ 781 .
- the ECE is often achieved through the application of a set potential for a given time 191 , though this voltage is sometimes reached in a ramp up or in several steps 181 .
- Alternating currents have also been used for the exfoliation of graphene with a reduced oxygen content 171 .
- the applied voltage to the graphite material can serve to either electrochemically intercalate or electrochemically exfoliate the graphite 110 ’ 111 .
- the choice of electrolyte and solvent has also been shown to largely influence the properties of the resultant material 1691 .
- Most exfoliation methods aim to produce either graphene with minimal defects or a highly oxidized graphene.
- exfoliations In the case of defect free graphene, exfoliations often take steps to prevent the introduction of oxygen functional groups through oxygen evolution reaction (OER) related pathways, either by using non-aqueous solutions and/or utilizing graphite as a cathode 19 121 .
- OER oxygen evolution reaction
- the introduction of oxygen is often facilitated through the use of oxidative electrolyte species such OH O 2 ' and SO4 2 ' [4 ’ 6 ’ 101 .
- the exfoliation of graphite as the anode has been performed in both acidic and alkaline media 16 ’ 131 .
- the graphite should be in a form that can withstand the conditions of ECE.
- Graphite rods, graphite foils, and graphite powder have all been used in ECE methods 14 ’ 13 ’ 141 .
- the most commonly used form of graphite is the graphite rods.
- Pre-treatments are sometimes employed to graphite materials in order to facilitate the ECE such as the generation of surface defects as such defects have been found to play a role in certain exfoliation methods 1151 .
- There is also a large energy cost associated with the use of graphite rods as they are produced from graphitized carbonaceous compounds at temperatures around 2500°C [161 .
- Expanded graphite is a material that is often studied due to its high thermal conductivity and large surface area, and is often used in the fabrication of materials for automotive and high temperature applications due to its’ high thermal conductivity 118 ’ 191 .
- graphite’s structure allows for molecules and atoms to be easily inserted between graphene sheets, known as intercalation 131 .
- This intercalation of species forms the graphite intercalation compound (GIC) and subsequent expansion of the GIC by subjection to thermal energy can result in expanded graphite 119201 .
- GIC graphite intercalation compound
- the expanded graphite can be formed into a variety of shapes which are strong and conductive enough to withstand the exfoliation conditions without the use of binders and avoiding the energy costs associated with the production of graphite rods 116 ⁇ 18 1.
- the processes of the present application provide for the production of expanded graphite from natural graphite powder without the use of any binding material.
- the processes of the present application further provide for expanded graphite foils to be electrochemically exfoliated into graphene oxide in an aqueous electrolyte, without the use of additional organic compounds. Comparable processes did not display the same properties, highlighting the surprising results obtained with the processes of the application.
- the present application includes a process for preparing expanded graphite comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnCU to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite- intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; and e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide the expanded graphite.
- the present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: f) compressing expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a first voltage; h) removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution; i) re-immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
- the present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnCM to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide expanded graphite; f) compressing the expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a first voltage; h) removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution; i) re-immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage
- the present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: f) compressing expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; and g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
- the present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnCU to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide expanded graphite; f) compressing the expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; and g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
- the present application also includes exfoliated graphene oxide prepared using the process of the application. [0018] The present application also includes use of an exfoliated graphene oxide prepared by the process of the application, for the manufacture of graphenebased nanomaterials.
- Figure 1 shows schematic representations of a process known in the art.
- Figure 2 shows schematic representations of a process known in the art.
- Figure 3 shows a schematic representation and corresponding photographs of the formation of expanded graphite and subsequent electrochemical exfoliation, according to exemplary embodiments of the present application.
- Figure 4 shows FE-SEM images of natural graphite before expansion (A) 5000x, after expansion (EPG) (B) 5000x, along with electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide (EGO) at 5000x (C) and 50,000x (D), and chemically produced graphene oxide (CGO) at 5000x (E) and 50,000x (F), all prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
- Figure 5 shows Raman spectra of graphite, EPG, EGO, and CGO all prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
- Figure 6 shows infrared spectra of graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO all prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
- Figure 7 shows XRD spectra of graphite, EPG, EGO, rGO, and CGO all prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
- Figure 8 shows cyclic voltammograms of graphite, EPG and EGO in 0.5 M H2SO4, each prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
- Figure 9 shows cyclic voltammograms of graphite, EPG, CGO and EGO in 0.1 M KOI + 5 mM K3[Fe(CN)e] each prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
- Figure 10 shows spectra for CGO and EGO each prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application: (A) energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra of CGO and EGO; (B) survey X-ray photoelectron spectra of CGO and EGO.
- the star (*) in Figure 10A indicates the peak was derived from the Si substrate.
- FIG 11 shows an automatic electrochemical exfoliation (ECE) system according to exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application: (A) before ECE; (B) immersion of a fraction of the electrode; (C) the immersed portion was exfoliated; (D) immersion of a fraction of the electrode again.
- ECE electrochemical exfoliation
- Figure 12 shows current and time plots recorded in 1.0 M NaOH during the electrochemical exfoliations at the applied voltage of: (A) 3.0 V, (B) 4.0 V, and (C) 5.0 V, according to exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
- the second component as used herein is chemically different from the other components or first component.
- a “third” component is different from the other, first, and second components, and further enumerated or “additional” components are similarly different.
- suitable means that the selection of the particular composition or conditions would depend on the specific steps to be performed, the identity of the components to be transformed and/or the specific use for the compositions, but the selection would be well within the skill of a person trained in the art.
- graphite refers to the crystalline form of the element carbon with its atoms arranged in a hexagonal layered structure.
- expanded graphite refers to graphite with an increase of its interlayer space.
- graphene oxide refers to the oxidized form of graphene. It is a single-atomic-layered material that is formed by the oxidation of graphite, and typically has a thickness of approximately 1 nm.
- exfoliation or “exfoliated” as used herein refer to a process to convert layered material into a monolayer material or the monolayer material obtained therefrom.
- electrochemical exfoliation or “electrochemically exfoliated” as used herein refer to an electrochemical process to convert layered material into a monolayer material by applying a voltage to drive ionic species to intercalate between the layers and cause them to dissociate into individual layers, or the monolayer material obtained therefrom.
- nanomaterials refers to materials having a single unit sized (in at least one dimension) between 1 and 100 nm (nanoscale).
- binder refers to any suitable substance known in the art to produce or promote cohesion in loosely assembled substances.
- the anode was placed in the porous bag wrapped basket as shown in Figure 1 B. However, there was no significant improvement in the process.
- the anode was kept in the bottom of the cell and cathode placed on top of the cell as illustrated in Figure 1 C. The idea of this approach is to maintain the electrical contact of disintegrated graphite particles with the anode. However, the smaller graphite particles’ electrical contact could not be retained to a significant degree due to the gas evolution reaction on the anode surface.
- solid graphite electrodes have been used as an anode in electrochemical synthesis of graphene oxide. Binding agents and various pretreatment process are involved in order to make solid graphite rod or foil. Experiments were performed wherein graphite powder was packed in the expandable porous membrane bag without any binding agents and used as an anode as shown in Figure 2A. Solid graphite rod was used as a cathode and DC potential was applied between anode and cathode in presence of electrolyte (H2SO4 or NaOH). This approach only partially oxidized the graphite powder and it was not efficient due to high resistance of the membrane.
- electrolyte H2SO4 or NaOH
- the graphite powder was packed in the bottom of the vertical model electrochemical cell without membrane and binding agents, as shown in Figure 2B.
- Pt wire used as contact lead to the anode.
- DC potential was then applied between anode and cathode for the electrochemical oxidation of graphite. This approach was also not efficient and produced a small amount of partially oxidized graphite and graphene.
- the processes of the present application provide for the production of expanded graphite from natural graphite powder without the use of any binding material.
- the processes of the present application further provide for expanded graphite foils to be electrochemically exfoliated into graphene oxide in an aqueous electrolyte, without the use of additional organic compounds. Comparable processes did not display the same properties, as described above, highlighting the surprising results obtained with the processes of the application.
- the present application includes a process for preparing expanded graphite comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnO4 to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite- intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; and e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide the expanded graphite.
- the mixing of graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture in a) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C.
- the temperature is about 0 °C to about 30 °C, or about 0 °C to about 20 °C, or about 0 °C to about 10 °C.
- the mixing is carried out for an appropriate time to achieve suitable mixing, for example for about 1 to about 5 minutes.
- the mixing is carried out for about 1 to about 4 minutes, or about 1 to about 3 minutes, or about 2 to about 4 minutes, or about 3 to about 5 minutes.
- the H2SO4/H3PO4 is present in a ratio of at least 10:1 mL:grams of graphite.
- the step includes mixing n grams of graphite with about 10*n to about 20*n mL of H2SO4/H3PO4.
- the H2SO4/H3PO4 is present in a volume ratio of H2SO4:H3PO4 of 10-x:x, where x is equal to 0.1 to 4.
- the adding of KMnO4 to the first mixture to form a second mixture in b) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C.
- the temperature is about 0 °C to about 30 °C, or about 0 °C to about 20 °C, or about 0 °C to about 10 °C.
- the KMnO4 is mixed with the first mixture for an appropriate time to achieve suitable mixing, for example about 30 minutes to 3 hours. In some embodiments, the KMnO4 is mixed for about 30 minutes to about 2 hours, or about 30 minutes to about 1 hour.
- the KMnO4 is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 1 :1 to about 4:1 KMnC graphite. In some embodiments, the KMnO4 is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 1 :1 to about 3:1 , or about 1.5:1 to about 2.5:1 , or about 2:1 KMnC graphite.
- the adding of at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound in c) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C.
- the temperature is about 0 °C to about 30 °C, or about 0 °C to about 20 °C, or about 0 °C to about 10 °C.
- the conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound comprise a time suitable to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound, for example about 30 minutes to about 3 hours.
- the time suitable to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound is about 30 minutes to about 2 hours, or about 45 minutes to about 1 .5 hours, or about 1 hour.
- the at least one Fe(lll) salt is selected from FeCh, Fe(NO3)sand Fe2(SO4)s and their hydrates.
- the Fe(lll) salt is FeCl3-6H2O.
- the at least one Fe(lll) salt is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 0.25:1 to about 2:1 , Fe(lll) salt:graphite.
- the at least one Fe(lll) salt is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 0.25:1 to about 1.5:1 , or about 0.5:1 to about 1 :1 , Fe(lll) salt:graphite.
- the solid graphite-intercalated compound is separated from the second mixture in d) using centrifugation or filtration. Any suitable separation methods known in the art may be used.
- the process further comprises rinsing and/or drying the graphite-intercalated compound prior to the heating in e).
- the drying is carried out at a temperature of about 30 °C to about 70 °C, or about 40 °C to about 60 °C, or about 45 °C to about 55 °C.
- the drying is carried out for a time suitable to dry the graphite- intercalated compound, for example from about 12 hours to about 48 hours, or about 18 hours to about 36 hours, or about 24 hours.
- the heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide the expanded graphite in e) is carried out at a temperature of about 350 °C to about 800 °C. In some embodiments, the heating is carried out at a temperature of about 400 °C to about 750 °C, or about 450 °C to about 700 °C, or about 500 °C to about 700 °C, or about 550 °C to about 700 °C, or about 600 °C to about 650 °C. In some embodiments, the heating is carried out for a time suitable to provide the expanded graphite, for example about 30 seconds to about 3 hours. In some embodiments, the heating is carried out for is about 1 minute to about 2 hours, or about 3 minutes to about 1 hour, or about 3 minutes to about 30 minutes. A skilled person in the art would appreciate that the time of the heating step will depend on the applied temperature.
- the graphite is powder graphite. In some embodiments, the graphite is natural powder graphite.
- the expanded graphite has an about 20 to about 100 times expansion volume from the graphite. In some embodiments, the expanded graphite has an about 30 to about 80 times expansion volume from the graphite.
- the expanded graphite is prepared in the absence of binder.
- the process of the application avoids the use of large quantity of chemicals and thus reduces associated chemical wastes generated. Consequently, in some embodiments, the process of the application is an energy efficient and more environmentally-friendly process, especially for wide-scale implementation. Stable expanded graphite is thus efficiently prepared.
- the present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: f) compressing expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
- step g) comprises immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution, and applying a first voltage; removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution; reimmersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
- the compressing of the expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil in f) is done through conventional methods, such as by application of pressure through hydraulic press in a mold or using a rolling press.
- any suitable method within the purview of the skilled person may be used for compressing the expanded graphite.
- the graphite foil serves as the anode in the electrochemical process.
- a suitable cathode is selected, for example, from platinum, titanium and graphite, but may be of any material known to those skilled in the art.
- an external power supply is provided to apply suitable voltage to the anode.
- the at least one alkali metal hydroxide is selected from NaOH, LiOH, KOH and mixtures thereof.
- the optional oxidizing agent is selected from H2O2. In some embodiments, the oxidizing agent is present.
- the first voltage when used, is about +0.1 to about +3 V. In some embodiments, the first voltage is about +0.2 to about +2.8 V, or about +0.5 to about +2.5 V, about +1 to about +2 V. In some embodiments, applying the first voltage is carried out for a period of time of about 5 to about 30 minutes. In some embodiments, applying the first voltage is carried out for a period of time of about 5 to about 20 minutes, or about 5 to about 10 minutes, or about 10 to about 20 minutes.
- the removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution when used, is carried to completely remove the flexible graphite foil. In some embodiments, removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution is carried to retain a portion of the flexible graphite foil in the solution. In some embodiments, the portion of the flexible graphite foil retained in the solution is from about 0.1 % to about 50% of the total length of the flexible graphite foil. In some embodiments, the retained portion of the flexible graphite foil is from about 0.2% to about 40%, or from 0.3% to about 30%, or about 0.4% to about 20%, or about 0.5% to about 10% of the total length of the flexible graphite foil. A skilled person in the art would appreciate that the portion retained will depend on the electrolyte, the applied voltage, and the speed of the exfoliation and this would be well within the purview of the skilled person.
- the second voltage or the voltage to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide is greater than +3 V. In some embodiments, the immersing or reimmersing is carried out gradually. In some embodiments, the second voltage or the voltage to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide is greater than +3 V to about +100 V, or greater than +3 V to about +10 V, greater than +3 V to about +8 V, or greater than +3 V to about +5 V.
- the applied voltage will depend on the concentration of the electrolyte and the rate of the exfoliation. For example, the lower the concentration of the at least one alkali metal hydroxide, the higher the voltage that is needed.
- the electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide has an oxygen content of about 15% to about 30%. In some embodiments, the electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide has an oxygen content of about 15% to about 28%, or about 18% to about 25%, or about 20% to about 25%.
- the electrochemical exfoliation is carried out in aqueous solution, without the use of an organic media.
- the process of the application avoids the use of large quantities of chemicals and thus reduces associated chemical wastes generated. Consequently, in some embodiments, the process of the application represents a greener and more environmentally-friendly process, especially for wide-scale implementation.
- the present application further includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnCU to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; and e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide the expanded graphite; f) compressing the expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
- step g) comprises immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution, and applying a first voltage; removing the flexible graphite foil from the solution; re-immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
- the process of the present application allows for the preparation of stable graphite foils using a unique electrochemical protocol.
- the graphite is first intercalated by a chemical process and subsequently thermally expanded to form expanded graphite (EPG).
- EPG expanded graphite
- the EPG is then compressed to a thin foil and electrochemically exfoliated to form electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide (EGO).
- EGO electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide
- graphite powder is treated with fewer chemicals and a heat treatment to prepare expanded graphite with about 20-100, or about 30-80 times expansion volume.
- the present application thus provides expanded graphite pressed without any binders/additives to prepare stable electrodes and a facile protocol to conduct efficient electrochemical oxidation to produce graphene oxide.
- Prior art methods use energy intensive processes and binders to prepare and process stable electrodes for electrochemical exfoliation.
- uncontrollable chemical oxidation uses vast quantity of harsh chemicals.
- the present application thus provides facile preparation of electrodes as well as controllable electrochemical processes to produce graphene oxide.
- any of the steps described herein may be automated such that the reaction parameters are monitored, and actions are controlled according to predetermined settings.
- step of immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide is automated.
- the immersion can be controlled by a computer, the computer controlling movement of the graphite foil by sensing whether or not there is a current.
- the computer can be connected to a movement mechanism to adjust the position of the graphite foil in the solution to allow all of the foil to be exfoliated and finally removed. Any methods known in the art for automation, controlling, monitoring, etc. may be used and this would be well within the purview of a skilled person.
- the present application also includes graphene oxide as described in any aspect or embodiment herein.
- the graphene oxide is as prepared according to any process of any previous aspect and embodiment herein.
- the graphene oxide is as characterized according to any one of the figures.
- the present application includes use of the expanded graphite in a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide.
- the present application further provides use of the exfoliated graphene oxide for the manufacture of nanomaterials.
- the nanomaterials are used as energy storage materials such as in portable electronic devices, electric vehicle, etc., sensing materials, such as fluorinated derivatives that can be used for heavy metal sensing, energy conversion materials, such as an electrocatalyst in water splitting applications, etc.
- High-purity graphite powder (Albany graphite deposit) is provided by ZEN Graphene Solutions Ltd. Sulfuric acid (98%), iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (99.9%), sodium hydroxide (99%) and hydrogen peroxide (30%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Canada) and used as received. Analytical grade reagents (phosphoric acid (85%), potassium permanganate (>99.0%)) are used as received without further purification. Pure water (18.2 MQ cm, Nanopure® diamondTM UV water purification system) is used for aqueous solution preparation. The source graphite is a highly crystalline igneous-hosted graphite from the Albany graphite deposit in northeastern Ontario.
- the dark grey, dry, and crumbly graphite intercalated compound is then loaded into a crucible (alumina, porcelain, etc.) and is placed into a muffle furnace set to 640 °C for 3 minutes. After the rapid heat treatment, the graphitic material appears as a light, fluffy, black powder called expanded graphite.
- the expanded graphite from Example 1 is then compressed into thin 5.0 cm x 1.0 cm foils with varying thickness, by application of pressure through a hydraulic press in a stainless-steel mold.
- the resultant graphite foils appear as shiny metallic strips.
- the newly formed graphite foils are used as an anode through connection to an external power supply with a platinum mesh being used as a cathode.
- a voltage of ⁇ +3 V is applied to the graphite anode for a period.
- the graphite foil anode is then partially removed from the electrolyte, and while a voltage of +>3 V is applied, it is slowly lowered into the electrolyte, consuming the electrode and resulting in electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide (EGO).
- EGO electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide
- the introduction of the expanded graphite foils to the electrolyte can be controlled automatically.
- the system is built upon the PC architecture, with a dedicated hull-effect sensor providing signal to the main microcontroller overseeing the reaction parameters.
- a custom elevator is designed and fabricated using a leadscrew and stepper motor to translate rotational motion of the motor into linear translation of the anode platform.
- the anode is aligned with the cell, and the experiment is initiated through software.
- the elevator continuously lowers the electrode until the circuit is established and a specified minimum current is obtained.
- the exfoliation begins as soon as a connection between the electrode and the electrolyte is made.
- the current decreases proportionally to the lowered electrode area, and therefore generates a signal to lower the elevator and expose fresh electrode into the electrolyte.
- the length of the fabricated electrode can be used as the program termination condition, where if the length of the accessible area of the electrode is reached, the elevator would raise to a safe level and hold until the next process.
- the surface morphology and elemental composition were probed by field emission - scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEMO (Hitachi SU-70) with attached EDX detector with ⁇ 0.1 at.%.
- Infrared spectroscopy was performed with a Thermo Scientific FTIR spectrometer.
- Electrochemical studies were performed by cyclic voltammetry with a CHI 660E potentiostat with a three-electrode cell and 0.5 M H2SO4 was used as the electrolyte.
- Active materials were dispersed in 675pl pure water, 300pl ethanol and 25 pl of NationalTM perfluorinated resin solution (20 wt.%), and 3.0pl was drop-cast onto a clean GCE. The prepared GCEs were then allowed to dry overnight before performing the electrochemical studies.
- Figure 3 shows a schematic representation and corresponding photographs of the formation of expanded graphite and subsequent electrochemical exfoliation, according to exemplary embodiments of the present application.
- Figure 4 A&B shows the FE-SEM image of the graphite before and after the expansion procedure displaying the drastic changes to the morphology of the material during the expansion process.
- Figure 4A shows the flaky structure of graphite.
- Figure 4B shows the worm-like structure. This confirms the increased interlayer-distance of graphite.
- Figure 4 C&D shows the SEM images of EGO after the electrochemical process appears as a collection of thin crumpled sheets. The crumpled sheet morphology suggesting that the exfoliation process introduced oxygen-containing functional groups caused the crumple morphology of the material.
- Figure 4 E&F shows the morphology of CGO at same magnification as EGO looks similar.
- Table 1 displays the results of the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO.
- EDS energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
- Figure 5 shows the Raman spectra of Graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO.
- Raman spectra shows three characteristic bands D, G and 2D at -1360, -1560 and -2700 cm' 1 , respectively.
- the appearance of D band is from the disorder triggered scattering arising from imperfections in the hexagonal structure of graphite.
- G band is originated from vibration of sp 2 -carbon or E2g mode of graphite 1221 .
- the relative intensities of D and G band can give useful information about the surface defects present in the graphene material with a higher ratio of ID/IG being indicative of a higher defect density 1221 .
- the ID/IG increases significantly after the expansion process and increases even further after the ECE process.
- the ID/IG is indicative of surface defects, this can be explained by the introduction of defects during the expansion process and exfoliation process 1231 .
- the reduction of 2D band intensity can be explained as the introduction of defects suppressing the lattice vibration mode associated with the 2D peak 1241 .
- decrease in intensity of 2D band indicates the exfoliation of graphite.
- the expanded graphite’s reduced 2D band indicates its expansion and graphitic nature. Further, the EGO shows a broadened, small hump-like 2D band that indicates the functionalization of graphite and it is characteristic of graphene oxide. Raman spectra of the EGO are well aligned with CGO.
- FT-IR Fourier transform infra-red spectra
- Figure 6 presents the FT-IR spectra of graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO.
- FT- IR spectra of graphite and EPG looks similar. The increase in the intensity of the functional groups in not noticeable in EPG.
- the FT-IR spectra of EGO suggests the introduction of oxygen-containing functionalities are introduced after the ECE process.
- the presence of the large broad peak around -3300 cm' 1 is characteristic of -OH stretching, while the presence of the peak around -1700 cm -1 is characteristic of carbonyl stretching 1251 .
- Figure 7 presents the X-ray diffraction pattern of graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO.
- XRD spectra of graphite shows typical diffraction pattern with two distinct peaks corresponding to hexagonal 0 0 2 plane and 1 0 0 basal plane at 20 -26.6° and -42.0°.
- the inter-layer distance (d spacing) is estimated to be 0.337, 0.341 , 0.356, 0.347 and 0.807 nm for graphite, EPG, EGO, rGO and CGO, respectively.
- the crystallite size in c axis (Lc) is estimated from the FWHM to be 24.0, 3.48, 2.73, 2.14 and 4.48 nm for graphite, EPG, EGO, rGO and CGO, respectively.
- the number of layers present is estimated using L c and d spacing to be 72, 11 , 9, 7 and 7 for graphite, EPG, EGO, rGO and CGO, respectively.
- FIG. 8 displays the electrochemical capacitance cyclic voltammograms of graphite, EPG and EGO conducted in 0.5 M H2SO4 at 50.0 mV s' 1 . Area of the cyclic voltammogram can be related to the electrochemical capacitance. Capacitance of graphite is too small; this can correspond to its low surface area. After expansion EPG showed a significantly greater capacitance compared to graphite and EGO, this may be attributed to increased surface area due to the increased inter-layer spacing.
- AE P oxidation and reduction peak potentials
- the difference between the oxidation and reduction peak potentials (AE P ) is an indicator of electron transfer - as the difference increases, the rate of electron transfer is slower and vice versa.
- the AE P of graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO found to be 182, 104, 450 and 347 mV, respectively.
- EPG exhibits faster HET compared to graphite, EGO and CGO. This can be attributed to its high conductivity and larger surface area.
- Graphite exhibits faster HET compared to EGO and CGO. This may be due to the high conductivity of graphite compared to EGO and CGO.
- FIGS. 10A and 10B display the EDX spectra and the XPS spectra of the electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide (EGO) and the chemically derived analogue (CGO), showing that both EGO and CGO have the similar composition of carbon and oxygen.
- EGO electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide
- CGO chemically derived analogue
- Figure 11 illustrates the working principle of an automatic ECE system of Example 3. Whereby the circuit is open, and the device is lowered until it completes the circuit by touching the electrolyte. A fraction of the electrode is immersed in the electrolyte and the current for the electrochemical exfoliation is monitored. When the exfoliation consumes the immersed portion of the electrode, the current is rapidly decreased to the set onset of current and triggers the device to lower a specified portion into the electrolyte. This process is repeated until the electrode is fully exfoliated.
- Figure 12 displays the typical current vs. time plots of an expanded graphite foil which was electrochemically exfoliated using the automatic ECE device of Example 3. With the increase of the applied voltage from 3.0 V to 5.0 V, the current was increased. As a result, the overall exfoliation time was decreased accordingly.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Nanotechnology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Carbon And Carbon Compounds (AREA)
- Battery Electrode And Active Subsutance (AREA)
Abstract
The present application relates to expanded graphite and exfoliated graphene oxide. More specifically, the present application relates to process for their preparation and uses thereof. The present application includes a process for preparing expanded graphite comprising: mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; adding KMnO4 to the first mixture to form a second mixture; adding at least one Fe(III) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound; separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; and heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide the expanded graphite. The present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: compressing expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
Description
TITLE: PROCESSES FOR THE PREPARATION OF EXPANDED GRAPHITE AND EXFOLIATED GRAPHENE OXIDE
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001 ] The present application claims priority to US patent application No. 63/080,238, which was filed on September 18, 2020, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
FIELD
[0002] The present application is in the field of expanded graphite and exfoliated graphene oxide. More specifically, the present application relates to process for their preparation and uses thereof.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Graphene materials have the potential to catalyze the green energy revolution finding many important applications including, but not limited to, energy conversion and energy storage111. However, graphene’s implementation into applications has been largely limited to lab scale as current methods are associated with a high cost and/or a large quantity of chemical waste generated. With the increasing demand for energy storage materials associated with the rise in demand for portable electronics, electric vehicles, and increasing use of renewable energy121, it is important to consider the environmental implications associated with the production of these energy materials.
[0004] Carbon exists in nature in many different forms, with one particularly interesting form being the naturally abundant allotrope of graphite. Because of a conductive three-dimensional layer structure of two-dimensional sheets of sp2 hybridized carbon atoms, graphite is an excellent candidate for electrochemical exfoliation (ECE) methods131. The electrochemical exfoliation of graphite has attracted considerable attention in recent years due the possibility of it being a scalable method to produce graphene-based nanomaterials from graphite. As such, there is a need for alternative methods to produce graphene-based nanomaterials from graphite.
[0005] Electrochemical exfoliation has emerged as a promising method for the potential large-scale production of graphene-based nanomaterials from graphite without the necessity for vast quantities of chemical and solvents and high
temperatures and with much higher yield1341. ECE is a top-down synthesis method that is continuing to garner attention in the field of two-dimensional nanomaterials. ECE methods are largely limited to conducting or semiconducting layered materials with relatively weak interlayer forces131. Along with graphite, ECE has been successfully employed to exfoliate M0S2 crystals into monolayers151. The physical structure of graphite lends itself to be an excellent candidate for ECE methods with its’ high conductivity and relatively large interplanar distance.
[0006] Generally, ECE methods utilize electrochemical processes to overcome interlayer forces, such as Van der Waals forces, to facilitate the production of monolayers of the desired material14’51. In general, ionic species in the electrolyte are driven by the applied voltage to intercalate between the graphite sheets131. In some methods, the electrolyte species are also reduced to their respective gas within the graphite material, further increasing the interlayer spacing through gas expansion, resulting in an electrochemically exfoliated graphene13’781. In literature, the ECE of graphite has been reported as a cathode, typically by the insertion of physically large cations such as tert-butyl ammonium salts to increase the interplanar distance and produce graphene-based nanomaterials with a low oxygen content191. In anodic ECE methods, anions are attracted to and inserted between graphite layers and are often performed in aqueous media which inevitably introduce oxygen functional groups1461. In both cases, electrochemical processes are used to overcome the Van der Waals forces between the layers of the material while leaving the covalently bound sp2 carbon atoms largely intact.
[0007] The ECE is often achieved through the application of a set potential for a given time191, though this voltage is sometimes reached in a ramp up or in several steps181. Alternating currents have also been used for the exfoliation of graphene with a reduced oxygen content171. The applied voltage to the graphite material can serve to either electrochemically intercalate or electrochemically exfoliate the graphite110’111. The choice of electrolyte and solvent has also been shown to largely influence the properties of the resultant material1691. Most exfoliation methods aim to produce either graphene with minimal defects or a highly oxidized graphene. In the case of defect free graphene, exfoliations often take steps to prevent the introduction of oxygen functional groups through oxygen evolution reaction (OER) related pathways, either by using non-aqueous solutions and/or
utilizing graphite as a cathode19 121. In the ECE of graphene oxide, the introduction of oxygen is often facilitated through the use of oxidative electrolyte species such OH O2' and SO42' [4’6’101. The exfoliation of graphite as the anode has been performed in both acidic and alkaline media16’131.
[0008] One consideration is the form of the starting material in ECE methods. The graphite should be in a form that can withstand the conditions of ECE. Graphite rods, graphite foils, and graphite powder have all been used in ECE methods14’13’141. The most commonly used form of graphite is the graphite rods. Pre-treatments are sometimes employed to graphite materials in order to facilitate the ECE such as the generation of surface defects as such defects have been found to play a role in certain exfoliation methods1151. There is also a large energy cost associated with the use of graphite rods as they are produced from graphitized carbonaceous compounds at temperatures around 2500°C[161.
[0009] In the case of graphite powder, extra steps are undertaken to ensure that adequate current is supplied uniformly. This has been achieved through the inclusion of polymeric binders such as polyvinylidene fluoride to form an electrode, which is often used in the battery industry to form a graphite anode1171. However, the introduction of polymeric binders will inevitably reduce conductivity and likely introduce impurities1171. Engineering solutions such as the use of compressed porous bags that keep the graphite particles in contact with one another has also been demonstrated1141. An alternative method to convert graphite powder to a form which can undergo exfoliation is through the expansion of graphite, which can be used to create graphite foils1181. Expanded graphite is a material that is often studied due to its high thermal conductivity and large surface area, and is often used in the fabrication of materials for automotive and high temperature applications due to its’ high thermal conductivity118’191. With the relatively large interplanar distance of 0.354 nm, graphite’s structure allows for molecules and atoms to be easily inserted between graphene sheets, known as intercalation131. This intercalation of species forms the graphite intercalation compound (GIC) and subsequent expansion of the GIC by subjection to thermal energy can result in expanded graphite119201. Through the application of pressure, the expanded graphite can be formed into a variety of shapes which are strong and conductive enough to withstand the exfoliation
conditions without the use of binders and avoiding the energy costs associated with the production of graphite rods116 ■181.
[0010] There is need to provide improved methods for electrochemically converting graphite powder to graphene oxide, being energy efficient, environment friendly, and able to prepare stable graphite foil electrodes without the use of binding agents and with lower chemical consumption.
SUMMARY
[0011] It has been surprisingly shown herein that the processes of the present application provide for the production of expanded graphite from natural graphite powder without the use of any binding material. The processes of the present application further provide for expanded graphite foils to be electrochemically exfoliated into graphene oxide in an aqueous electrolyte, without the use of additional organic compounds. Comparable processes did not display the same properties, highlighting the surprising results obtained with the processes of the application.
[0012] Accordingly, the present application includes a process for preparing expanded graphite comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnCU to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite- intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; and e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide the expanded graphite.
[0013] The present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: f) compressing expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a first voltage; h) removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution; i) re-immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
[0014] The present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form
a first mixture; b) adding KMnCM to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide expanded graphite; f) compressing the expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a first voltage; h) removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution; i) re-immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
[0015] The present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: f) compressing expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; and g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
[0016] The present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnCU to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide expanded graphite; f) compressing the expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; and g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
[0017] The present application also includes exfoliated graphene oxide prepared using the process of the application.
[0018] The present application also includes use of an exfoliated graphene oxide prepared by the process of the application, for the manufacture of graphenebased nanomaterials.
[0019] Other features and advantages of the present application will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and the specific examples, while indicating embodiments of the application, are given by way of illustration only and the scope of the claims should not be limited by these embodiments, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0020] The embodiments of the application will now be described in greater detail with reference to the attached drawings in which:
[0021] Figure 1 shows schematic representations of a process known in the art. A) & B) Parallel plate model electrochemical (EC) cell setup with and without basket. C) Vertical model EC cell.
[0022] Figure 2 shows schematic representations of a process known in the art. A) Parallel plate model EC cell setup with graphite powder bag. B) Vertical model EC cell setup with graphite powder.
[0023] Figure 3 shows a schematic representation and corresponding photographs of the formation of expanded graphite and subsequent electrochemical exfoliation, according to exemplary embodiments of the present application.
[0024] Figure 4 shows FE-SEM images of natural graphite before expansion (A) 5000x, after expansion (EPG) (B) 5000x, along with electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide (EGO) at 5000x (C) and 50,000x (D), and chemically produced graphene oxide (CGO) at 5000x (E) and 50,000x (F), all prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
[0025] Figure 5 shows Raman spectra of graphite, EPG, EGO, and CGO all prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
[0026] Figure 6 shows infrared spectra of graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO all prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
[0027] Figure 7 shows XRD spectra of graphite, EPG, EGO, rGO, and CGO all prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
[0028] Figure 8 shows cyclic voltammograms of graphite, EPG and EGO in 0.5 M H2SO4, each prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
[0029] Figure 9 shows cyclic voltammograms of graphite, EPG, CGO and EGO in 0.1 M KOI + 5 mM K3[Fe(CN)e] each prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
[0030] Figure 10 shows spectra for CGO and EGO each prepared using exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application: (A) energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra of CGO and EGO; (B) survey X-ray photoelectron spectra of CGO and EGO. The star (*) in Figure 10A indicates the peak was derived from the Si substrate.
[0031] Figure 11 shows an automatic electrochemical exfoliation (ECE) system according to exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application: (A) before ECE; (B) immersion of a fraction of the electrode; (C) the immersed portion was exfoliated; (D) immersion of a fraction of the electrode again.
[0032] Figure 12 shows current and time plots recorded in 1.0 M NaOH during the electrochemical exfoliations at the applied voltage of: (A) 3.0 V, (B) 4.0 V, and (C) 5.0 V, according to exemplary embodiments of the processes of the application.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
I. Definitions
[0033] Unless otherwise indicated, the definitions and embodiments described in this and other sections are intended to be applicable to all embodiments and aspects of the present application herein described for which they are suitable as would be understood by a person skilled in the art.
[0034] The term “and/or” as used herein means that the listed items are present, or used, individually or in combination. In effect, this term means that “at least one of” or “one or more” of the listed items is used or present.
[0035] As used in the present application, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural references unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
[0036] In embodiments comprising an “additional” or “second” component, such as an additional or second compound, the second component as used herein is chemically different from the other components or first component. A “third” component is different from the other, first, and second components, and further enumerated or “additional” components are similarly different.
[0037] As used in this application and claim(s), the words "comprising" (and any form of comprising, such as "comprise" and "comprises"), "having" (and any form of having, such as "have" and "has"), "including" (and any form of including, such as "include" and "includes") or "containing" (and any form of containing, such as "contain" and "contains"), are inclusive or open-ended and do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or process steps.
[0038] The term “consisting” and its derivatives as used herein are intended to be closed terms that specify the presence of the stated features, elements, components, groups, integers, and/or steps, and also exclude the presence of other unstated features, elements, components, groups, integers and/or steps.
[0039] The term “consisting essentially of”, as used herein, is intended to specify the presence of the stated features, elements, components, groups, integers, and/or steps as well as those that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s) of these features, elements, components, groups, integers, and/or steps.
[0040] The term “suitable” as used herein means that the selection of the particular composition or conditions would depend on the specific steps to be performed, the identity of the components to be transformed and/or the specific use for the compositions, but the selection would be well within the skill of a person trained in the art.
[0041] The present description refers to a number of chemical terms and abbreviations used by those skilled in the art. Nevertheless, definitions of selected terms are provided for clarity and consistency.
[0042] The terms "about", “substantially” and “approximately” as used herein mean a reasonable amount of deviation of the modified term such that the end result
is not significantly changed. These terms of degree should be construed as including a deviation of at least ±5% of the modified term if this deviation would not negate the meaning of the word it modifies or unless the context suggests otherwise to a person skilled in the art.
[0043] The term “aq.” as used herein refers to aqueous.
[0044] The term “graphite” as used herein refers to the crystalline form of the element carbon with its atoms arranged in a hexagonal layered structure.
[0045] The term “expanded graphite” as used herein refers to graphite with an increase of its interlayer space.
[0046] The term “graphene oxide” as used herein refers to the oxidized form of graphene. It is a single-atomic-layered material that is formed by the oxidation of graphite, and typically has a thickness of approximately 1 nm.
[0047] The terms “exfoliation” or “exfoliated” as used herein refer to a process to convert layered material into a monolayer material or the monolayer material obtained therefrom.
[0048] The terms “electrochemical exfoliation” or “electrochemically exfoliated” as used herein refer to an electrochemical process to convert layered material into a monolayer material by applying a voltage to drive ionic species to intercalate between the layers and cause them to dissociate into individual layers, or the monolayer material obtained therefrom.
[0049] The term “nanomaterials” as used herein refers to materials having a single unit sized (in at least one dimension) between 1 and 100 nm (nanoscale).
[0050] The term “binder” as used herein refers to any suitable substance known in the art to produce or promote cohesion in loosely assembled substances.
II. Processes of the Application
[0051] Attempts to efficiently electrochemically exfoliate natural graphite powder to a graphene nanomaterial proved non-trivial. A variety of reported methods and modified methods were employed to electrochemically exfoliate natural graphite to no avail.
[0052] Synthesis of graphene oxide (GO) was attempted using an electrochemical approach with a parallel plate and vertical model electrochemical
(EC) cell. As shown in Figure 1A, anode was kept parallel to cathode at a known distance in presence of electrolyte (H2SO4 or NaOH). In this approach, graphite rod or graphite foil was used as an anode and graphite rod was used as a cathode. For the oxidation of graphite electrode, the DC potential was applied. During the oxidation process, the graphite rod disintegrated into small pieces and fell apart from the solid graphite due to gravity. In the process, very little amount of graphite oxide and majorly graphite particles were produced due to this issue. In order to overcome this issue, the anode was placed in the porous bag wrapped basket as shown in Figure 1 B. However, there was no significant improvement in the process. In the next step, in the vertical model, the anode was kept in the bottom of the cell and cathode placed on top of the cell as illustrated in Figure 1 C. The idea of this approach is to maintain the electrical contact of disintegrated graphite particles with the anode. However, the smaller graphite particles’ electrical contact could not be retained to a significant degree due to the gas evolution reaction on the anode surface.
[0053] In general, solid graphite electrodes have been used as an anode in electrochemical synthesis of graphene oxide. Binding agents and various pretreatment process are involved in order to make solid graphite rod or foil. Experiments were performed wherein graphite powder was packed in the expandable porous membrane bag without any binding agents and used as an anode as shown in Figure 2A. Solid graphite rod was used as a cathode and DC potential was applied between anode and cathode in presence of electrolyte (H2SO4 or NaOH). This approach only partially oxidized the graphite powder and it was not efficient due to high resistance of the membrane. As a next step, the graphite powder was packed in the bottom of the vertical model electrochemical cell without membrane and binding agents, as shown in Figure 2B. In which, Pt wire used as contact lead to the anode. DC potential was then applied between anode and cathode for the electrochemical oxidation of graphite. This approach was also not efficient and produced a small amount of partially oxidized graphite and graphene.
[0054] It has now been surprisingly shown herein that the processes of the present application provide for the production of expanded graphite from natural graphite powder without the use of any binding material. The processes of the present application further provide for expanded graphite foils to be
electrochemically exfoliated into graphene oxide in an aqueous electrolyte, without the use of additional organic compounds. Comparable processes did not display the same properties, as described above, highlighting the surprising results obtained with the processes of the application.
Processes for preparing expanded graphite
[0055] Accordingly, the present application includes a process for preparing expanded graphite comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnO4 to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite- intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; and e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide the expanded graphite.
[0056] In some embodiments, the mixing of graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture in a) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is about 0 °C to about 30 °C, or about 0 °C to about 20 °C, or about 0 °C to about 10 °C. In some embodiments, the mixing is carried out for an appropriate time to achieve suitable mixing, for example for about 1 to about 5 minutes. In some embodiments, the mixing is carried out for about 1 to about 4 minutes, or about 1 to about 3 minutes, or about 2 to about 4 minutes, or about 3 to about 5 minutes.
[0057] In some embodiments, the H2SO4/H3PO4 is present in a ratio of at least 10:1 mL:grams of graphite. For example, the step includes mixing n grams of graphite with about 10*n to about 20*n mL of H2SO4/H3PO4. In some embodiments, the H2SO4/H3PO4 is present in a volume ratio of H2SO4:H3PO4 of 10-x:x, where x is equal to 0.1 to 4.
[0058] In some embodiments, the adding of KMnO4 to the first mixture to form a second mixture in b) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is about 0 °C to about 30 °C, or about 0 °C to about 20 °C, or about 0 °C to about 10 °C. In some embodiments, the KMnO4 is mixed with the first mixture for an appropriate time to achieve suitable mixing, for example about 30 minutes to 3 hours. In some embodiments, the KMnO4 is mixed for about 30 minutes to about 2 hours, or about 30 minutes to about 1 hour.
[0059] In some embodiments, the KMnO4 is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 1 :1 to about 4:1 KMnC graphite. In some embodiments, the KMnO4 is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 1 :1 to about 3:1 , or about 1.5:1 to about 2.5:1 , or about 2:1 KMnC graphite.
[0060] In some embodiments, the adding of at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound in c) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is about 0 °C to about 30 °C, or about 0 °C to about 20 °C, or about 0 °C to about 10 °C. In some embodiments, the conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound comprise a time suitable to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound, for example about 30 minutes to about 3 hours. In some embodiments, the time suitable to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound is about 30 minutes to about 2 hours, or about 45 minutes to about 1 .5 hours, or about 1 hour.
[0061] In some embodiments, the at least one Fe(lll) salt is selected from FeCh, Fe(NO3)sand Fe2(SO4)s and their hydrates. In some embodiments, the Fe(lll) salt is FeCl3-6H2O. In some embodiments, the at least one Fe(lll) salt is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 0.25:1 to about 2:1 , Fe(lll) salt:graphite. In some embodiments, the at least one Fe(lll) salt is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 0.25:1 to about 1.5:1 , or about 0.5:1 to about 1 :1 , Fe(lll) salt:graphite.
[0062] In some embodiments, the solid graphite-intercalated compound is separated from the second mixture in d) using centrifugation or filtration. Any suitable separation methods known in the art may be used.
[0063] In some embodiment, the process further comprises rinsing and/or drying the graphite-intercalated compound prior to the heating in e). In some embodiments, the drying is carried out at a temperature of about 30 °C to about 70 °C, or about 40 °C to about 60 °C, or about 45 °C to about 55 °C. In some embodiments, the drying is carried out for a time suitable to dry the graphite- intercalated compound, for example from about 12 hours to about 48 hours, or about 18 hours to about 36 hours, or about 24 hours.
[0064] In some embodiments, the heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide the expanded graphite in e) is carried out at
a temperature of about 350 °C to about 800 °C. In some embodiments, the heating is carried out at a temperature of about 400 °C to about 750 °C, or about 450 °C to about 700 °C, or about 500 °C to about 700 °C, or about 550 °C to about 700 °C, or about 600 °C to about 650 °C. In some embodiments, the heating is carried out for a time suitable to provide the expanded graphite, for example about 30 seconds to about 3 hours. In some embodiments, the heating is carried out for is about 1 minute to about 2 hours, or about 3 minutes to about 1 hour, or about 3 minutes to about 30 minutes. A skilled person in the art would appreciate that the time of the heating step will depend on the applied temperature.
[0065] In some embodiments, the graphite is powder graphite. In some embodiments, the graphite is natural powder graphite.
[0066] In some embodiments, the expanded graphite has an about 20 to about 100 times expansion volume from the graphite. In some embodiments, the expanded graphite has an about 30 to about 80 times expansion volume from the graphite.
[0067] In some embodiments, the expanded graphite is prepared in the absence of binder. As such, in some embodiments, the process of the application avoids the use of large quantity of chemicals and thus reduces associated chemical wastes generated. Consequently, in some embodiments, the process of the application is an energy efficient and more environmentally-friendly process, especially for wide-scale implementation. Stable expanded graphite is thus efficiently prepared.
Processes for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide
[0068] The present application also includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: f) compressing expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide. In some embodiments, step g) comprises immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution, and applying a first voltage; removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution; reimmersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage
under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
[0069] In some embodiments, the compressing of the expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil in f) is done through conventional methods, such as by application of pressure through hydraulic press in a mold or using a rolling press. However, any suitable method within the purview of the skilled person may be used for compressing the expanded graphite.
[0070] In some embodiments, the graphite foil serves as the anode in the electrochemical process. In some embodiments, a suitable cathode is selected, for example, from platinum, titanium and graphite, but may be of any material known to those skilled in the art. In some embodiments, an external power supply is provided to apply suitable voltage to the anode.
[0071] In some embodiments, the at least one alkali metal hydroxide is selected from NaOH, LiOH, KOH and mixtures thereof.
[0072] In some embodiments, the optional oxidizing agent is selected from H2O2. In some embodiments, the oxidizing agent is present.
[0073] In some embodiments, the first voltage, when used, is about +0.1 to about +3 V. In some embodiments, the first voltage is about +0.2 to about +2.8 V, or about +0.5 to about +2.5 V, about +1 to about +2 V. In some embodiments, applying the first voltage is carried out for a period of time of about 5 to about 30 minutes. In some embodiments, applying the first voltage is carried out for a period of time of about 5 to about 20 minutes, or about 5 to about 10 minutes, or about 10 to about 20 minutes.
[0074] In some embodiments, the removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution, when used, is carried to completely remove the flexible graphite foil. In some embodiments, removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution is carried to retain a portion of the flexible graphite foil in the solution. In some embodiments, the portion of the flexible graphite foil retained in the solution is from about 0.1 % to about 50% of the total length of the flexible graphite foil. In some embodiments, the retained portion of the flexible graphite foil is from about 0.2% to about 40%, or from 0.3% to about 30%, or about 0.4% to about 20%, or about 0.5% to about 10% of the total length of the
flexible graphite foil. A skilled person in the art would appreciate that the portion retained will depend on the electrolyte, the applied voltage, and the speed of the exfoliation and this would be well within the purview of the skilled person.
[0075] In some embodiments, the second voltage or the voltage to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide is greater than +3 V. In some embodiments, the immersing or reimmersing is carried out gradually. In some embodiments, the second voltage or the voltage to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide is greater than +3 V to about +100 V, or greater than +3 V to about +10 V, greater than +3 V to about +8 V, or greater than +3 V to about +5 V. A skilled person would appreciate that the applied voltage will depend on the concentration of the electrolyte and the rate of the exfoliation. For example, the lower the concentration of the at least one alkali metal hydroxide, the higher the voltage that is needed.
[0076] In some embodiments, the electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide has an oxygen content of about 15% to about 30%. In some embodiments, the electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide has an oxygen content of about 15% to about 28%, or about 18% to about 25%, or about 20% to about 25%.
[0077] In some embodiments, the electrochemical exfoliation is carried out in aqueous solution, without the use of an organic media. As such, in some embodiments, the process of the application avoids the use of large quantities of chemicals and thus reduces associated chemical wastes generated. Consequently, in some embodiments, the process of the application represents a greener and more environmentally-friendly process, especially for wide-scale implementation.
[0078] The present application further includes a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnCU to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; and e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide the expanded graphite; f) compressing the expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite
foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide. In some embodiments, step g) comprises immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution, and applying a first voltage; removing the flexible graphite foil from the solution; re-immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide.
[0079] In some embodiments, the process of the present application allows for the preparation of stable graphite foils using a unique electrochemical protocol. Briefly, the graphite is first intercalated by a chemical process and subsequently thermally expanded to form expanded graphite (EPG). The EPG is then compressed to a thin foil and electrochemically exfoliated to form electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide (EGO).
[0080] In other electrochemical methods, reported in literature, binding agents or energy intensive process are used to prepare electrodes to conduct electrochemical exfoliation1161. Furthermore, electrochemical methods utilizing powder graphite as an electrode have not been scalable due to the smaller yield, longer process, poor electrical contact etc.[17]. The fabrication of graphene oxide is typically achieved through the chemical oxidation of graphite which can be further processed to for variety of graphene-based nanomaterials. Methods such as the Hummers and Marcano methods suffer the generation of vast quantities of chemical waste and uncontrollable oxidation/defect generation1211.
[0081] In some embodiments of the process of the present application, graphite powder is treated with fewer chemicals and a heat treatment to prepare expanded graphite with about 20-100, or about 30-80 times expansion volume. The present application thus provides expanded graphite pressed without any binders/additives to prepare stable electrodes and a facile protocol to conduct efficient electrochemical oxidation to produce graphene oxide. Prior art methods use energy intensive processes and binders to prepare and process stable electrodes for electrochemical exfoliation. Also, uncontrollable chemical oxidation uses vast quantity of harsh chemicals. The present application thus provides facile
preparation of electrodes as well as controllable electrochemical processes to produce graphene oxide.
[0082] In some embodiments, any of the steps described herein may be automated such that the reaction parameters are monitored, and actions are controlled according to predetermined settings. In some embodiments, step of immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide is automated. For example, the immersion can be controlled by a computer, the computer controlling movement of the graphite foil by sensing whether or not there is a current. Further the computer can be connected to a movement mechanism to adjust the position of the graphite foil in the solution to allow all of the foil to be exfoliated and finally removed. Any methods known in the art for automation, controlling, monitoring, etc. may be used and this would be well within the purview of a skilled person.
[0083] The present application also includes graphene oxide as described in any aspect or embodiment herein. In some embodiments, the graphene oxide is as prepared according to any process of any previous aspect and embodiment herein. In embodiments, the graphene oxide is as characterized according to any one of the figures.
III. Uses of the Application
[0084] The processes of the application have been shown to provide stable expanded graphite.
[0085] Accordingly, the present application includes use of the expanded graphite in a process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide.
[0086] The present application further provides use of the exfoliated graphene oxide for the manufacture of nanomaterials. In some embodiments, the nanomaterials are used as energy storage materials such as in portable electronic devices, electric vehicle, etc., sensing materials, such as fluorinated derivatives that can be used for heavy metal sensing, energy conversion materials, such as an electrocatalyst in water splitting applications, etc.
EXAMPLES
[0087] The following non-limiting examples are illustrative of the present application.
General Methods
[0088] High-purity graphite powder (Albany graphite deposit) is provided by ZEN Graphene Solutions Ltd. Sulfuric acid (98%), iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (99.9%), sodium hydroxide (99%) and hydrogen peroxide (30%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Canada) and used as received. Analytical grade reagents (phosphoric acid (85%), potassium permanganate (>99.0%)) are used as received without further purification. Pure water (18.2 MQ cm, Nanopure® diamond™ UV water purification system) is used for aqueous solution preparation. The source graphite is a highly crystalline igneous-hosted graphite from the Albany graphite deposit in northeastern Ontario.
Example 1 - Expanded graphite (EPG)
[0089] Graphite (1.00g) is combined with sulfuric acid (15ml, 98% w/w) and phosphoric acid (4ml, 85% w/w), and the resultant reaction mixture is magnetically stirred at 0 °C with an ice bath. Potassium permanganate (2.00g) is then added to the reaction mixture, which is subsequently stirred for ~30 min, after which iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (0.50g) is added with the reaction mixture then being stirred for an additional 1 h. The reaction mixture is then separated by successive centrifugation, with the sedimented material being collected and dried in an oven at 50 °C for ~24h. The dark grey, dry, and crumbly graphite intercalated compound is then loaded into a crucible (alumina, porcelain, etc.) and is placed into a muffle furnace set to 640 °C for 3 minutes. After the rapid heat treatment, the graphitic material appears as a light, fluffy, black powder called expanded graphite.
Example 2 - Electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide (EGO)
[0090] The expanded graphite from Example 1 is then compressed into thin 5.0 cm x 1.0 cm foils with varying thickness, by application of pressure through a hydraulic press in a stainless-steel mold. The resultant graphite foils appear as shiny metallic strips. In a typical electrochemical exfoliation, the newly formed graphite foils are used as an anode through connection to an external power supply with a platinum mesh being used as a cathode. With the electrodes submersed in
an electrolyte containing sodium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide, a voltage of <+3 V is applied to the graphite anode for a period. The graphite foil anode is then partially removed from the electrolyte, and while a voltage of +>3 V is applied, it is slowly lowered into the electrolyte, consuming the electrode and resulting in electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide (EGO).
Example 3 - Automatic electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide (auto-EGO)
[0091 ] Following the compression of the expanded graphite to thin foils from Example 1 , the introduction of the expanded graphite foils to the electrolyte can be controlled automatically. In one embodiment, the system is built upon the Arduino architecture, with a dedicated hull-effect sensor providing signal to the main microcontroller overseeing the reaction parameters. A custom elevator is designed and fabricated using a leadscrew and stepper motor to translate rotational motion of the motor into linear translation of the anode platform. In a typical experiment, the anode is aligned with the cell, and the experiment is initiated through software. The elevator continuously lowers the electrode until the circuit is established and a specified minimum current is obtained. The exfoliation begins as soon as a connection between the electrode and the electrolyte is made. With the electrode area degrading as the graphite layers are liberated, the current decreases proportionally to the lowered electrode area, and therefore generates a signal to lower the elevator and expose fresh electrode into the electrolyte. The length of the fabricated electrode can be used as the program termination condition, where if the length of the accessible area of the electrode is reached, the elevator would raise to a safe level and hold until the next process.
Comparative example - Chemically produced graphene oxide (CGO)
[0092] To compare characteristics of the EGO, chemically produced graphene oxide (CGO) is synthesized using a variant of the Hummers method1271, in which natural graphite (2.00g) is combined with 200 ml of 9:1 sulfuric acid/phosphoric acid (v/v) and stirred for 2 h, after which and potassium permanganate (9.00g) is added. The mixture was then further stirred for 15 h and subsequently placed in an ice bath, followed by the addition of 30% H2O2 (2.5 ml). The CGO is then washed with hydrochloric acid and ethanol and collected by centrifugation.
Results
[0093] The surface morphology and elemental composition were probed by field emission - scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEMO (Hitachi SU-70) with attached EDX detector with ±0.1 at.%. Raman spectra were obtained by use of Renishaw™ Raman spectrometer at 50X magnification with a A = 532 nm laser source. X-ray spectra were obtained by use of a Panalytical™ PW1050-3710 diffractometer with Cu Ka (A = 1 .5405 A) as an X-ray source. Infrared spectroscopy was performed with a Thermo Scientific FTIR spectrometer. Electrochemical studies were performed by cyclic voltammetry with a CHI 660E potentiostat with a three-electrode cell and 0.5 M H2SO4 was used as the electrolyte. A glassy carbon electrode (GCE; surface area = 0.07 cm2) was modified with the active materials and utilized as the working electrode with a Hg/HgSO4 and polycrystalline platinum wire being used as the reference and counter electrodes respectively for capacitance studies. Active materials were dispersed in 675pl pure water, 300pl ethanol and 25 pl of Nation™ perfluorinated resin solution (20 wt.%), and 3.0pl was drop-cast onto a clean GCE. The prepared GCEs were then allowed to dry overnight before performing the electrochemical studies.
Discussion
[0094] Figure 3 shows a schematic representation and corresponding photographs of the formation of expanded graphite and subsequent electrochemical exfoliation, according to exemplary embodiments of the present application.
[0095] Figure 4 A&B shows the FE-SEM image of the graphite before and after the expansion procedure displaying the drastic changes to the morphology of the material during the expansion process. Figure 4A shows the flaky structure of graphite. After expansion Figure 4B shows the worm-like structure. This confirms the increased interlayer-distance of graphite. Figure 4 C&D shows the SEM images of EGO after the electrochemical process appears as a collection of thin crumpled sheets. The crumpled sheet morphology suggesting that the exfoliation process introduced oxygen-containing functional groups caused the crumple morphology of the material. Further, Figure 4 E&F shows the morphology of CGO at same magnification as EGO looks similar.
[0096] Table 1 displays the results of the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO. The oxygen present in the expanded graphite is 7.4 at. %, and suggests that expansion process did not oxidize the graphite extensively. The main role of the expansion process is to increase the interlayer distance without affecting the graphite’s chemical nature. From the composition of EPG it is evident that the chemical nature of graphite was not significantly altered after expansion. After the electrochemical exfoliation process, the oxygen content is increased to 26.7%, suggesting the introduction of more oxygen-containing functionalities introduced. The CGO’s EDS chemical composition has slightly higher oxygen percent than the EGO.
[0097] Figure 5 shows the Raman spectra of Graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO. Raman spectra shows three characteristic bands D, G and 2D at -1360, -1560 and -2700 cm'1, respectively. The appearance of D band is from the disorder triggered scattering arising from imperfections in the hexagonal structure of graphite. Further it is well known that G band is originated from vibration of sp2-carbon or E2g mode of graphite1221. The relative intensities of D and G band can give useful information about the surface defects present in the graphene material with a higher ratio of ID/IG being indicative of a higher defect density1221. When comparing the Raman spectra of the produced EGO to the graphite and EPG in Figure 5, there are some key differences. Notably, the ID/IG increases significantly after the expansion process and increases even further after the ECE process. As the ID/IG is indicative of surface defects, this can be explained by the introduction of defects during the expansion process and exfoliation process1231. Also, there is change in the 2D band (2700 cm-1) that is the intensity of 2D band is reduced after expansion and further reduced after electrochemical exfoliation process. The reduction of 2D band intensity can be explained as the introduction of defects suppressing the lattice vibration mode associated with the 2D peak1241. In addition, decrease in intensity of
2D band indicates the exfoliation of graphite. The expanded graphite’s reduced 2D band indicates its expansion and graphitic nature. Further, the EGO shows a broadened, small hump-like 2D band that indicates the functionalization of graphite and it is characteristic of graphene oxide. Raman spectra of the EGO are well aligned with CGO.
[0098] Fourier transform infra-red spectra (FT-IR) is used to confirm the type of oxygen-containing functional groups that are introduced at different stages of the process. Figure 6 presents the FT-IR spectra of graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO. FT- IR spectra of graphite and EPG looks similar. The increase in the intensity of the functional groups in not noticeable in EPG. The FT-IR spectra of EGO suggests the introduction of oxygen-containing functionalities are introduced after the ECE process. The presence of the large broad peak around -3300 cm'1 is characteristic of -OH stretching, while the presence of the peak around -1700 cm-1 is characteristic of carbonyl stretching1251. The introduction of hydroxyl and carbonyl stretching after the exfoliation process suggests that many of these functionalities were generated in the exfoliation process. For comparison FT-IR spectra of CGO is included, which shows slightly increased in variety and proportion of functional groups in contrast to EGO.
[0099] Figure 7 presents the X-ray diffraction pattern of graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO. XRD spectra of graphite shows typical diffraction pattern with two distinct peaks corresponding to hexagonal 0 0 2 plane and 1 0 0 basal plane at 20 -26.6° and -42.0°. In comparison, EPG shows broad diffraction peak at lower 20 = 26.0°, this is as a result of increased inter-layer spacing due to the intercalation and thermal exfoliation. After the chemical oxidation of graphite to CGO, this typically results in the shifting of the (002) plane peak in the XRD spectra to shift to -10° 20 from -26° 20 [26], In contrast, the XRD pattern of EGO shows a weak and broader 0 0 2 peak at 25.0° which indicates there are clear differences in peak position. In the electrochemical process, the 0 0 2 is peak becomes weaker and broader, and indicates the oxidation. Since the XRD pattern of EGO is featureless or very weak like graphene, so the expected (002) peak around -10° was not noticeable. The peak position of EGO can be comparable to the reduced graphene oxide (rGO) (20 = 25.7°). From the peak position, the inter-layer distance (d spacing) is estimated to be 0.337, 0.341 , 0.356, 0.347 and 0.807 nm for graphite, EPG, EGO, rGO and
CGO, respectively. Further, the crystallite size in c axis (Lc) is estimated from the FWHM to be 24.0, 3.48, 2.73, 2.14 and 4.48 nm for graphite, EPG, EGO, rGO and CGO, respectively. The number of layers present is estimated using Lc and d spacing to be 72, 11 , 9, 7 and 7 for graphite, EPG, EGO, rGO and CGO, respectively.
[00100] Electrochemical properties such as electrochemical capacitance and heterogenous electron transfer (HET) ability using potassium ferrocyanide redox probe were investigated. Figures 8 displays the electrochemical capacitance cyclic voltammograms of graphite, EPG and EGO conducted in 0.5 M H2SO4 at 50.0 mV s'1. Area of the cyclic voltammogram can be related to the electrochemical capacitance. Capacitance of graphite is too small; this can correspond to its low surface area. After expansion EPG showed a significantly greater capacitance compared to graphite and EGO, this may be attributed to increased surface area due to the increased inter-layer spacing. One possible reason for the high capacitance of the expanded graphite is the large, conductive surface area. Further, EGO has exhibited small capacitance this may be attributed to its poor conductivity due to the introduction of oxygen-containing functional groups. This can be explained through the reduced conductivity due to the introduction of defects in the form of oxygen-containing functional groups and is comparable to chemically produced graphene oxide1271.
[00101] After that, HET studies were performed in 0.1 M KCI with 5 mM
K3[Fe(CN)e] and the potential measured with respect to Ag/AgCI reference electrode, as shown in Figure 9. The difference between the oxidation and reduction peak potentials (AEP) is an indicator of electron transfer - as the difference increases, the rate of electron transfer is slower and vice versa. The AEP of graphite, EPG, EGO and CGO found to be 182, 104, 450 and 347 mV, respectively. EPG exhibits faster HET compared to graphite, EGO and CGO. This can be attributed to its high conductivity and larger surface area. Graphite exhibits faster HET compared to EGO and CGO. This may be due to the high conductivity of graphite compared to EGO and CGO. The reduced conductivity in the EGO and the CGO is also likely responsible for the blocking of the ferricyanide response, as the introduction of functional groups and defects slows the rate of electron transfer.
[00102] Figure 10A and 10B display the EDX spectra and the XPS spectra of the electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide (EGO) and the chemically derived analogue (CGO), showing that both EGO and CGO have the similar composition of carbon and oxygen.
[00103] Figure 11 illustrates the working principle of an automatic ECE system of Example 3. Whereby the circuit is open, and the device is lowered until it completes the circuit by touching the electrolyte. A fraction of the electrode is immersed in the electrolyte and the current for the electrochemical exfoliation is monitored. When the exfoliation consumes the immersed portion of the electrode, the current is rapidly decreased to the set onset of current and triggers the device to lower a specified portion into the electrolyte. This process is repeated until the electrode is fully exfoliated.
[00104] Figure 12 displays the typical current vs. time plots of an expanded graphite foil which was electrochemically exfoliated using the automatic ECE device of Example 3. With the increase of the applied voltage from 3.0 V to 5.0 V, the current was increased. As a result, the overall exfoliation time was decreased accordingly.
[00105] While the applicant's teachings described herein are in conjunction with various embodiments for illustrative purposes, it is not intended that the applicant's teachings be limited to such embodiments as the embodiments described herein are intended to be examples. On the contrary, the applicant's teachings described and illustrated herein encompass various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, without departing from the embodiments described herein, the general scope of which is defined in the appended claims.
REFERENCES
[00106] [1] A. T. Smith, A. M. LaChance, S. Zeng, B. Liu, L. Sun, Nano
Mater. Sci. 2019, 7, 31.
[00107] [2] S. Isah, Asian J. Nanosci. Mater. 2018, 2, 90.
[00108] [3] A. M. Abdelkader, A. J. Cooper, R. A. W. Dryfe, I. A. Kinloch,
Nanoscale 2015, 7, 6944.
[00109] [4] S. Pei, Q. Wei, K. Huang, H.-M. Cheng, W. Ren, Nat. Commun.
2018, 9, 145.
[00110] [5] A. Ambrosi, M. Pumera, Chem. - A Eur. J. 2018, 24, 18551.
[00111] [6] K. S. Rao, J. Senthilnathan, Y.-F. Liu, M. Yoshimura, Sci. Rep.
2015, 4, 4237.
[00112] [7] S. Yang, A. G. Ricciardulli, S. Liu, R. Dong, M. R. Lohe, A.
Becker, M. A. Squillaci, P. Samori, K. Mullen, X. Feng, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6669.
[00113] [8] F. Pogacean, M. Coros, L. Magerusan, V. Mirel, A. Turza, G.
Katona, R.-l. Stefan-van Staden, S. Pruneanu, Taianta 2019, 196, 182.
[00114] [9] Y. Yang, F. Lu, Z. Zhou, W. Song, Q. Chen, X. Ji, Electrochim.
Acta 2013, 113, 9.
[00115] [10] J. Liu, H. Yang, S. G. Zhen, C. K. Poh, A. Chaurasia, J. Luo,
X. Wu, E. K. L. Yeow, N. G. Sahoo, J. Lin, Z. Shen, RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 11745.
[00116] [11] M. Armand, P. Touzain, Mater. Sci. Eng. 1977, 31, 319.
[00117] [12] J. Stafford, A. Patapas, N. Uzo, O. K. Matar, C. Petit, AIChE J.
2018, 64, 3246.
[00118] [13] M. Coro§, F. Pogacean, M.-C. Ro§u, C. Socaci, G. Borodi, L.
Mageru§an, A. R. Biri§, S. Pruneanu, RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 2651.
[00119] [14] T. C. Achee, W. Sun, J. T. Hope, S. G. Quitzau, C. B. Sweeney,
S. A. Shah, T. Habib, M. J. Green, Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14525.
[00120] [15] C.-T. Hsieh, J.-H. Hsueh, RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 64826.
[00121] [16] S.-M. Lee, D.-S. Kang, J.-S. Roh, Carbon Lett. 2015, 16, 135.
[00122] [17] X. Zhao, S. Niketic, C. H. Yim, J. Zhou, J. Wang, Y. Abu-
Lebdeh, ACS Omega 2018, 3, 11684.
[00123] [18] A. Celzard, S. Schneider, J. F. Mareche, Carbon N. Y. 2002,
40, 2185.
[00124] [19] Y. F. Yang, X. J. Zhang, X. Xu, in Adv. Mater. Res., 2011 , pp.
2695-2698.
[00125] [20] J. Li, L. Feng, Z. Jia, Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 746.
[00126] [21] D. C. Marcano, D. V. Kosynkin, J. M. Berlin, A. Sinitskii, Z. Sun,
A. Slesarev, L. B. Alemany, W. Lu, J. M. Tour, ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4806.
[00127] [22] J.-B. Wu, M.-L. Lin, X. Cong, H.-N. Liu, P.-H. Tan, Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2018, 47, 1822.
[00128] [23] I. Childres, L. A. Jauregui, W. Park, H. Caoa, Y. P. Chena, in
New Dev. Phot. Mater. Res., 2013.
[00129] [24] I. Childres, L. A. Jauregui, W. Park, H. Caoa, Y. P. Chena, in
New Dev. Phot. Mater. Res., 2013, pp. 403-418.
[00130] [25] F. T. Thema, M. J. Moloto, E. D. Dikio, N. N. Nyangiwe, L.
Kotsedi, M. Maaza, M. Khenfouch, J. Chem. 2013, 2013, 1.
[00131] [26] L. Stobinski, B. Lesiak, A. Malolepszy, M. Mazurkiewicz, B.
Mierzwa, J. Zemek, P. Jiricek, I. Bieloshapka, J. Electron Spectros. Relat. Phenomena 2014, 195, 145.
[00132] [27] A. R. Thiruppathi, B. Sidhureddy, M. Salverda, P. C. Wood, A.
Chen, J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 113911.
Claims
1 . A process for preparing expanded graphite comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnO4 to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; and e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide the expanded graphite.
2. The process of claim 1 , wherein a) is carried out at a temperature from about 0 °C to about 40 °C.
3. The process of claim 1 or 2, wherein the H2SO4/H3PO4 is present in a ratio of at least 10:1 m L:grams of graphite.
4. The process of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the H2SO4/H3PO4 is present in a volume ratio of H2SO4:H3PO4 of 10-x:x, where x is equal to 0.1 to 4.
5. The process of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein b) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C.
6. The process of any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the KMnCU is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 1 :1 to about 4:1 KMnC : graphite.
7. The process of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein c) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C.
8. The process of any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the at least one Fe(lll) salt is selected from the group consisting of FeC , Fe(NOs)3 and Fe2(SO4)3 and their hydrates.
9. The process of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the at least one Fe(lll) salt is FeCl3'6H2O.
27
The process of any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the at least one Fe(lll) salt is in a ratio (w/w) of about 0.25:1 to about 2:1 , Fe(lll) salt: graphite. The process of any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the graphite is graphite powder. The process of any one of claims 1 to 11 , further comprising rinsing and/or drying the graphite-intercalated compound prior to e). The process of any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein e) is carried out at a temperature of about 350 °C to about 800 °C. The process of any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the expanded graphite is prepared in the absence of binder. The process of any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the expanded graphite has an about 20 to about 100 times volume expansion from the graphite. A process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: f) compressing expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a first voltage; h) removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution; i) re-immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide. The process of claim 16, wherein the at least one alkali metal hydroxide is selected from NaOH, LiOH, KOH, or mixtures thereof. The process of claim 16 or 17, wherein the solution is an aqueous solution. The process of any one of claims 16 to 18, wherein the at least one oxidizing agent, when present, is H2O2. The process of any one of claims 16 to 19, wherein the first voltage is about +0.1 to about +3 V.
The process of any one of claims 16 to 20, wherein the second voltage is greater than +3 V. The process of any one of claims 16 to 21 , wherein the exfoliated graphene oxide has an oxygen content of about 15% to about 30%. The process of any one of claims 16 to 22, wherein at least step i) is carried out by an automated system. The process of any one of claims 16 to 23, wherein at steps g), h) and i) are carried out by an automated system. A process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnO4 to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide expanded graphite; f) compressing the expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a first voltage; h) removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution; i) re-immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide. The process of claim 25, wherein a) is carried out at a temperature from about 0 °C to about 40 °C. The process of claim 25 or 26, wherein the H2SO4/H3PO4 is present in a ratio of at least 10:1 m L:grams of graphite.
The process of any one of claims 25 to 27, wherein the H2SO4/H3PO4 is present in a volume ratio of H2SO4:H3PO4 of 10-x:x, where x is equal to 0.1 to 4. The process of any one of claims 25 to 28, wherein b) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C. The process of any one of claims 25 to 29, wherein the KMnO4 is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 1 :1 to about 4:1 KMnO4: graphite. The process of any one of claims 25 to 30, wherein c) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C. The process of any one of claims 25 to 31 , wherein the at least one Fe(lll) salt is selected from the group consisting of FeCh, Fe(NOs)3 and Fe2(SO4)3 and their hydrates. The process of any one of claims 25 to 32, wherein the at least one Fe(lll) salt is FeCl3-6H2O. The process of any one of claims 25 to 33, wherein the at least one Fe(lll) salt is in a ratio (w/w) of about 0.25:1 to about 2:1 , Fe(lll) salt : graphite. The process of any one of claims 25 to 34, wherein the graphite is graphite powder. The process of any one of claims 25 to 35, further comprising rinsing and/or drying the graphite-intercalated compound prior to e). The process of any one of claims 25 to 36, wherein e) is carried out at a temperature of about 350 °C to about 800 °C. The process of any one of claims 25 to 37, wherein the expanded graphite is prepared in the absence of binder. The process of any one of claims 25 to 38, wherein the expanded graphite has about 20 to about 100 times volume expansion from the graphite. The process of any one of claims 25 to 39, wherein the at least one alkali metal hydroxide is selected from NaOH, LiOH, KOH, or mixtures thereof. The process of any one of claims 25 to 40, wherein the at least one oxidizing agent, when present, is H2O2.
The process of any one of claims 25 to 41 , wherein the first voltage is about +0.1 to about +3 V. The process of any one of claims 25 to 42, wherein the second voltage is greater than +3 V. The process of any one of claims 25 to 43, wherein the exfoliated graphene oxide has an oxygen content of about 15% to about 30%. The process of any one of claims 25 to 44, further comprising forming the exfoliated graphene oxide into graphene-based nanomaterials. The process of claim 45, wherein the graphene-based nanomaterials are selected from energy storage materials, sensing materials, and energy conversion materials. The process of any one of claims 25 to 46, wherein at least step i) is carried out by an automated system. The process of any one of claims 25 to 47, wherein at steps g), h) and i) are carried out by an automated system. A process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: f) compressing expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide. The process of claim 49, wherein the step g) of immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution comprises immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a first voltage, followed by removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution and re-immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide. The process of claim 50, wherein the first voltage is about +0.1 to about +3 V.
31
The process of claim 50 or 51 , wherein the second voltage is greater than +3 V. The process of claim 49, wherein the voltage is greater than +3 V. The process of any one of claims 49 to 53, wherein the at least one alkali metal hydroxide is selected from NaOH, LiOH, KOH, or mixtures thereof. The process of any one of claims 49 to 54, wherein the solution is an aqueous solution. The process of any one of claims 49 to 55, wherein the at least one oxidizing agent, when present, is H2O2. The process of any one of claims 49 to 56, wherein the exfoliated graphene oxide has an oxygen content of about 15% to about 30%. The process of any one of claims 49 to 57, wherein step g) is carried out by an automated system. A process for preparing exfoliated graphene oxide comprising: a) mixing graphite with H2SO4/H3PO4 to form a first mixture; b) adding KMnO4 to the first mixture to form a second mixture; c) adding at least one Fe(lll) salt to the second mixture under conditions to form a solid graphite-intercalated compound; d) separating the solid graphite-intercalated compound from the second mixture; e) heating the solid graphite-intercalated compound under conditions to provide expanded graphite; f) compressing the expanded graphite to form a flexible graphite foil; g) immersing the flexible graphite foil in a solution comprising at least one alkali metal hydroxide and optionally at least one oxidizing agent, and applying a voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide. The process of claim 59, wherein the step g) of immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution comprises immersing the flexible graphite foil in
32
the solution and applying a first voltage, followed by removing at least a portion of the flexible graphite foil from the solution and re-immersing the flexible graphite foil in the solution and applying a second voltage under conditions to electrochemically exfoliate the flexible graphite foil to provide the exfoliated graphene oxide. The process of claim 60, wherein the first voltage is about +0.1 to about +3 V. The process of claim 60 or 61 , wherein the second voltage is greater than +3 V. The process of claim 59, wherein the voltage is greater than +3 V. The process of any one of claims 59 to 63, wherein a) is carried out at a temperature from about 0 °C to about 40 °C. The process of any one of claims 59 to 64, wherein the H2SO4/H3PO4 is present in a ratio of at least 10:1 mL:grams of graphite. The process of any one of claims 59 to 65, wherein the H2SO4/H3PO4 is present in a volume ratio of H2SO4:H3PO4 of 10-x:x, where x is equal to 0.1 to 4. The process of any one of claims 59 to 66, wherein b) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C. The process of any one of claims 59 to 67, wherein the KMnO4 is present in a ratio (w/w) of about 1 :1 to about 4:1 KMnC : graphite. The process of any one of claims 59 to 68, wherein c) is carried out at a temperature of about 0 °C to about 40 °C. The process of any one of claims 59 to 69, wherein the at least one Fe(lll) salt is selected from the group consisting of FeCh, Fe(NOs)3 and Fe2(SO4)3 and their hydrates. The process of any one of claims 59 to 70, wherein the at least one Fe(lll) salt is FeCl3-6H2O. The process of any one of claims 59 to 71 , wherein the at least one Fe(lll) salt is in a ratio (w/w) of about 0.25:1 to about 2:1 , Fe(lll) salt : graphite.
33
The process of any one of claims 59 to 72, wherein the graphite is graphite powder. The process of any one of claims 59 to 73, further comprising rinsing and/or drying the graphite-intercalated compound prior to e). The process of any one of claims 59 to 74, wherein e) is carried out at a temperature of about 350 °C to about 800 °C. The process of any one of claims 59 to 75, wherein the expanded graphite is prepared in the absence of binder. The process of any one of claims 59 to 76, wherein the expanded graphite has about 20 to about 100 times volume expansion from the graphite. The process of any one of claims 59 to 77, wherein the at least one alkali metal hydroxide is selected from NaOH, LiOH, KOH, or mixtures thereof. The process of any one of claims 59 to 78, wherein the at least one oxidizing agent, when present, is H2O2. The process of any one of claims 59 to 79, wherein the exfoliated graphene oxide has an oxygen content of about 15% to about 30%. The process of any one of claims 59 to 80, further comprising forming the exfoliated graphene oxide into graphene-based nanomaterials. The process of claim 81 , wherein the graphene-based nanomaterials are selected from energy storage materials, sensing materials, and energy conversion materials. The process of any one of claims 59 to 82, wherein at least step g) is carried out by an automated system. Exfoliated graphene oxide prepared using the process of any one of claims 16 to 80. Use of an exfoliated graphene oxide prepared by the process of any one of claims 16 to 80, for the manufacture of graphene-based nanomaterials.
34
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA3155463A CA3155463C (en) | 2020-09-18 | 2021-09-20 | Processes for the preparation of expanded graphite and exfoliated graphene oxide |
US18/026,167 US20230357020A1 (en) | 2020-09-18 | 2021-09-20 | Processes for the preparation of expanded graphite and exfoliated graphene oxide |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US202063080239P | 2020-09-18 | 2020-09-18 | |
US63/080,239 | 2020-09-18 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2022056643A1 true WO2022056643A1 (en) | 2022-03-24 |
Family
ID=80777246
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2021/051305 WO2022056643A1 (en) | 2020-09-18 | 2021-09-20 | Processes for the preparation of expanded graphite and exfoliated graphene oxide |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20230357020A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA3155463C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2022056643A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN115536014A (en) * | 2022-09-21 | 2022-12-30 | 石家庄铁道大学 | Method for electrochemically preparing graphene |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20240036115A (en) * | 2021-05-04 | 2024-03-19 | 티엠티피 랩스, 아이엔씨. | Apparatus and method for exfoliating graphite |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101327926A (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2008-12-24 | 华东理工大学 | Preparation of low temperature expandable graphite |
CN104591174A (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2015-05-06 | 西安理工大学 | Preparation method of silver nanocrystal-multilayer graphene composite material |
-
2021
- 2021-09-20 US US18/026,167 patent/US20230357020A1/en active Pending
- 2021-09-20 CA CA3155463A patent/CA3155463C/en active Active
- 2021-09-20 WO PCT/CA2021/051305 patent/WO2022056643A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101327926A (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2008-12-24 | 华东理工大学 | Preparation of low temperature expandable graphite |
CN104591174A (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2015-05-06 | 西安理工大学 | Preparation method of silver nanocrystal-multilayer graphene composite material |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN115536014A (en) * | 2022-09-21 | 2022-12-30 | 石家庄铁道大学 | Method for electrochemically preparing graphene |
CN115536014B (en) * | 2022-09-21 | 2023-11-21 | 石家庄铁道大学 | Method for electrochemically preparing graphene |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA3155463C (en) | 2024-01-23 |
CA3155463A1 (en) | 2022-03-24 |
US20230357020A1 (en) | 2023-11-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Zhang et al. | Surfactant-intercalated, chemically reduced graphene oxide for high performance supercapacitor electrodes | |
US10415144B2 (en) | Production of graphene oxide | |
Zhang et al. | Electrochemically exfoliated high-yield graphene in ambient temperature molten salts and its application for flexible solid-state supercapacitors | |
Aghamohammadi et al. | Recent advances in one-pot functionalization of graphene using electrochemical exfoliation of graphite: A review study | |
Zhang et al. | Surface modified MXene film as flexible electrode with ultrahigh volumetric capacitance | |
CA3155463C (en) | Processes for the preparation of expanded graphite and exfoliated graphene oxide | |
CN115676813B (en) | Manufacture of graphene | |
Lu et al. | Controlled electrochemical intercalation, exfoliation and in situ nitrogen doping of graphite in nitrate-based protic ionic liquids | |
Tsai et al. | Activation of hierarchically ordered mesoporous carbons for enhanced capacitive deionization application | |
US20110206932A1 (en) | Surface-modified carbon nanotube and production method thereof | |
Liu et al. | Taking full advantage of KMnO4 in simplified Hummers method: A green and one pot process for the fabrication of alpha MnO2 nanorods on graphene oxide | |
JP2019505462A (en) | Graphene oxide and method for producing the same | |
Natarajan et al. | Effective regeneration of mixed composition of spent lithium-ion batteries electrodes towards building supercapacitor | |
US11735719B2 (en) | Reduced graphene oxide/manganese(IV) oxide nanocomposite and electrode comprising same, method of manufacture of various graphene material/metal oxide nanocomposites | |
JP2021513750A (en) | Methods for Manufacture of Functionalized Semiconductor-or Conductor Materials and Their Use | |
Li et al. | Recycling and second life of MXene electrodes for lithium-ion batteries and sodium-ion batteries | |
Abdillah et al. | Effect of H 2 SO 4/H 2 O 2 pre-treatment on electrochemical properties of exfoliated graphite prepared by an electro-exfoliation method | |
Chang et al. | Preparation of Ti3C2Tx quantum dots/activated semi-coke composite and its electrocatalytic performance | |
Delfani et al. | A 3D binder-free rGO/NiMnCo nanosheet for highly efficient hybrid supercapacitors and ion-selective capacitive deionization | |
Li et al. | Three-dimensional macroporous graphene/TiO2 nanocomposite as anode material for lithium ion batteries | |
Zeng et al. | Al-based metal organic framework derived self-assembled carbon nanosheets as innovative anodes for Li-and Na-ion batteries | |
Kovalenko et al. | Synthesis of Ni (OH) 2 by template homogeneous precipitation for application in the binder-free electrode of supercapacitor | |
CN113666366A (en) | Method for preparing graphene through electrochemical anode stripping | |
Xu et al. | Stepwise rapid electrolytic synthesis of graphene oxide for efficient adsorption of organic pollutants | |
Vallem et al. | Designing a Se-intercalated MOF/MXene-derived nanoarchitecture for advancing the performance and durability of lithium-selenium batteries |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 3155463 Country of ref document: CA |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 21867997 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 21867997 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |