WO2022018584A1 - Diagnostic system of leaks between seat and shutter of a valve - Google Patents

Diagnostic system of leaks between seat and shutter of a valve Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022018584A1
WO2022018584A1 PCT/IB2021/056396 IB2021056396W WO2022018584A1 WO 2022018584 A1 WO2022018584 A1 WO 2022018584A1 IB 2021056396 W IB2021056396 W IB 2021056396W WO 2022018584 A1 WO2022018584 A1 WO 2022018584A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
valve
actuator
seat
sensor
leakage
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2021/056396
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Flavio Tondolo
Nicola Zenoni
Original Assignee
Sti S.R.L.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sti S.R.L. filed Critical Sti S.R.L.
Publication of WO2022018584A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022018584A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M3/00Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
    • G01M3/02Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum
    • G01M3/26Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors
    • G01M3/28Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors for pipes, cables or tubes; for pipe joints or seals; for valves ; for welds
    • G01M3/2876Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors for pipes, cables or tubes; for pipe joints or seals; for valves ; for welds for valves
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16KVALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING
    • F16K37/00Special means in or on valves or other cut-off apparatus for indicating or recording operation thereof, or for enabling an alarm to be given
    • F16K37/0075For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment
    • F16K37/0091For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment by measuring fluid parameters
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M13/00Testing of machine parts
    • G01M13/003Machine valves
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M3/00Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
    • G01M3/002Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using thermal means
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M3/00Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
    • G01M3/02Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum
    • G01M3/04Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by detecting the presence of fluid at the leakage point
    • G01M3/24Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by detecting the presence of fluid at the leakage point using infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic vibrations

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a system and a respective method for diagnosing leaks between the seat and the shutter of a valve, with reference to the unavoidable leakage existing between the two components.
  • the system and the method according to the present invention also allow the predictive analysis of the leakage of a valve.
  • the leakage is an internal loss to a valve that originates from the interface between seat and shutter.
  • a valve is closed there is a perfect seal, i.e., the flow rate of the process fluid between the seat and the shutter valve is equal to zero.
  • This leakage is divided into classes according to norm ANSI B16.104. The extent of the leakage depends on a multiplicity of parameters such as, for example, the design of the valve, the materials that make up the seat/shutter assembly, the quality of the surfaces, the force with which the shutter is pressed onto the seat, a force that is typically provided by an actuator mounted on the valve.
  • the leakage of the process fluid may increase over time.
  • the increase in leakage is due to many factors, for example, the progressive degradation of the shutter and the seat following phenomena of cavitation, wear, deformation, presence of particulate matter in the process fluid, etc.
  • the increase in leakage can thus entail the loss of efficiency of a plant, and consequently, economic losses, security issues (e.g., in the event of leakage of toxic and/or flammable fluids), as well as greater degradation of the seat and shutter.
  • Subject of the present invention is therefore a system applied to a valve for the execution of a real-time and predictive diagnostics of losses due to leakage of the valve, comprising an actuator, a positioner mounted on the actuator, at least one sensor mounted on the valve and a controller.
  • the valve which can be of any type, comprises, as is known, a shutter and a sealing seat and is not part of the present invention, but represents its natural application.
  • the actuator determines with the force generated the position of the valve shutter and, in closed valve conditions, the force exerted by the valve shutter on its seat.
  • the actuator can be double-acting (with a balance between two pressure chambers) as in the embodiment of the invention presented below. With the appropriate considerations on pressures and forces, this description can also be extended to a single-acting actuator (with a balance between a force linked to a pressure in a chamber and a resisting force, for example an elastic force).
  • the positioner is a component which, connected to the actuator through a mechanical feedback of the position, is able to vary the pressure in the actuator chambers, in order to position the valve shutter where required. In the case of a closed valve, therefore in the case in which the shutter is in contact with the seat, the positioner can modulate the contact force seat/shutter by varying the pressure in the chambers.
  • a first sensor which is a normal feedback sensor according to the known art, is capable of detecting the extent of the leakage directly or indirectly by means of a quantity dependent on the leakage of the valve seat itself. This size may vary according to the type of sensor used.
  • the controller through the use of a software that implements a suitable control algorithm, correlates the data provided by the sensor with those provided by the positioner, that is, respectively, the quantity measured on the valve (as a function of the valve seat seal) and the contact force seat/shutter normally derived from one or more the pressures in the actuator chambers.
  • the controller can be integrated in the positioner itself.
  • the seat/shutter pair is not stressed unnecessarily, but the force is limited to that generated by the positioner and is sufficient to guarantee the seal, i.e., an acceptable leakage threshold, therefore the seat/shutter pair is subjected to less stress in the span of its operational life, probably resulting in an extension of the operational life itself.
  • valve closed as the actuator generates a force which is lower than its maximum capacity, it is possible to open the valve in a shorter time, i.e., with times shorter than those required according to the prior art, as there is a benefit of a lower dead time (the time required for detachment between shutter and seat).
  • an object of the present invention is a system applied to a valve for the execution of a real-time diagnostic and prediction of losses due to leakage of the valve itself, as specified in the attached independent claim of the system.
  • the present invention also consists of a method for carrying out the predictive diagnostics of the leakage losses of a valve, as specified in the attached independent claim of the method.
  • Figure 1 shows a diagram of the system object of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a graph relating to the 'trend over time of the force F act exerted by the actuator to ensure the seal between the shutter and valve seat, during normal operation, compared to a reference force F set necessary to ensure an optimal seal of a valve and its tolerance range;
  • Figure 3 is a graph equal to that of Figure 2 and also shows a future projection of values of the actuator force Fact, even outside of the tolerance range considered;
  • FIG. 4 shows a graph over time of the seal test in order to obtain a correlation between the parameter measured by the sensor and the actuator force F act .
  • a system 100 applied to a valve 1 is shown, of the known type and comprising a shutter and a sealing seat.
  • the system 100 includes an actuator 2, a positioner 3, at least one sensor 4 and a controller 5 provided with an analysis software.
  • the controller 5 can be a "stand alone" component, as well as it can be integrated into the positioner 3.
  • the actuator 2 by way of example and in a non-limiting way, is double-acting. As is known, this means that the control stem of the actuator, the organ which applies a force to the valve shutter, is immersed between two chambers in which the relative pressures are balanced and a net force acts on the control stem, which is transmitted to the valve shutter.
  • the invention can also be implemented with a single-action actuator, having a single pressure chamber and where the balance of the forces occurs between a force linked to the pressure in the pressure chamber and a resisting force, for example an elastic force.
  • the positioner 3 is a component which determines the "behavior" of the actuator 2 as it regulates the pressure acting in the pressure chambers of the actuator 2 itself.
  • the logical connection with the actuator 2 is made by means of mechanical feedback of the position of the actuator itself. Based on the feedback on the position of the actuator 2, the positioner 3 is able to vary the pressure in the chambers of the actuator 2 in order to position the valve shutter 1 where required. In the case in which the valve 1 is closed, therefore in the case in which the shutter is in contact with the seat, the positioner 3 can modulate the contact force of the seat/shutter by varying the pressure in the chambers of the actuator 2.
  • the positioner 3 is, therefore, a positioner of the latest generation, the so-called “smart” one, which is able to read the values of the position of the shutter and of the pressure acting on the seat seal, in order to derive the value of the force exerted by the actuator 2.
  • a first sensor 4 is a normal feedback sensor capable of detecting the extent of the leakage directly or indirectly by means of a quantity dependent on the leakage of the seat of the valve 1 itself. This size may vary according to the type of sensor used.
  • the sensors used can be, purely by way of a non-limiting example, a temperature detector (for example, an infrared thermometer), a flow detector (for example, a flow meter), an acoustic detector (for example, an ultrasonic microphone) or a combination of them.
  • a temperature detector for example, an infrared thermometer
  • a flow detector for example, a flow meter
  • an acoustic detector for example, an ultrasonic microphone
  • the modulation of the seat/shutter contact force by varying the pressure in the chambers of the actuator 2 is achieved through the controller 5 which implements a control in closed loop (leakage -> pressure -> force -> leakage), wherein the controlled variable is the loss due to leakage through the valve seat, which is directly or indirectly derived from the first sensor 4 and the controlling variable is the pressure acting in one or both of the pressure chambers of the actuator 2.
  • the controller 5 implements a control in closed loop (leakage -> pressure -> force -> leakage), wherein the controlled variable is the loss due to leakage through the valve seat, which is directly or indirectly derived from the first sensor 4 and the controlling variable is the pressure acting in one or both of the pressure chambers of the actuator 2.
  • the seat/shutter pair is subjected to less stress during its operating life. This result is obtained due to the fact that the applied force is equal to that generated by the positioner (i.e., the only force required plus a freely configurable safety margin).
  • the fact that when the valve is closed the actuator generates a force lower than its maximum capacity allows the valve to be opened in a shorter time and with less dead times.
  • the reference force F set is known, which is useful to ensure a tight seal.
  • the controller 5 can deduct from a historical analysis (by comparing the force and the leakage over time) the degradation curve of the seat/shutter seal, so allowing a predictive diagnostic by means of extrapolation of the curve itself.
  • the sensor 4 can also be used to define the tolerance range of the F set force, as it can be useful as an acknowledgment and verification of the leakage on the seat during the evaluation of the allowable limit forces UCL (upper control limit) and LCL (lower control limit), which are shown both in Figure 2 and in Figure 3.
  • UCL upper control limit
  • LCL lower control limit
  • the lower limit value LCL is the value below which the valve does not hold, that is its leakage becomes sensible
  • the UCL limit value is that above which the mechanical resistance of the components in contact (shutter and seat) is put at risk;
  • the system 100 object of the present invention can be used to carry out periodic tightness tests.
  • the succession of tightness tests over time leads to obtaining a relationship between the parameter measured by the sensor 4 and the force F act of the actuator 2, by identifying a tolerance range of such parameter within which the seal of the valve seat 1 is considered acceptable (the tolerance range in addition to that associated with F act is therefore obtained as a reference) .
  • the integrated system 100 can be designed in more complex configurations, capable of recording multiple quantities through the use of a plurality of sensors. In this way, it is therefore possible to increase the diagnostic level of the integrated system and to predict the valve seat seal trend with more precision. When one of the measured quantities will tend to go out of the respective tolerance range defined during the test, it will therefore be necessary to intervene with preventive maintenance actions.
  • Such tests can be useful for different purposes, such as the control of a valve assembly through a statistical analysis of the data collected on a plant or on multiple plants. Furthermore, the remote monitoring of such data can be useful to generate a database concerning the useful life of the investigated valves.

Abstract

System (100) for executing a real-time diagnostics of leakage losses of a valve (1), wherein the valve (1) is provided with a shutter and a sealing seat,the system (100) having an actuator (2), a positioner (3) for regulating the pressure acting in at least one pressure chamber of the actuator (2), at least one sensor (4) capable of detecting a value depending on a leak due to leakage of the seat valve (1) and a controller (5) equipped with an analysis software, the controller (5) being configured to perform, through the analysis software, a closed-loop control and predictive diagnostics, wherein the value regulated is the leakage loss through the valve seat (1) and the controlling value is the pressure acting in said at least one pressure chamber of the actuator (2).

Description

DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM OF LEAKS BETWEEN SEAT AND SHUTTER OF A
VALVE
DESCRIPTION
Technical field of the invention
The present invention relates to a system and a respective method for diagnosing leaks between the seat and the shutter of a valve, with reference to the unavoidable leakage existing between the two components. In particular, the system and the method according to the present invention also allow the predictive analysis of the leakage of a valve.
Background art
As is known, the leakage is an internal loss to a valve that originates from the interface between seat and shutter. In particular, when a valve is closed there is a perfect seal, i.e., the flow rate of the process fluid between the seat and the shutter valve is equal to zero. In reality, a leak is always existing and the valves are classified according to the maximum acceptable leakage in the closed valve condition. This leakage is divided into classes according to norm ANSI B16.104. The extent of the leakage depends on a multiplicity of parameters such as, for example, the design of the valve, the materials that make up the seat/shutter assembly, the quality of the surfaces, the force with which the shutter is pressed onto the seat, a force that is typically provided by an actuator mounted on the valve. In addition, during the useful life of a valve, then even in the case of specific interest of a control valve, the leakage of the process fluid may increase over time. The increase in leakage is due to many factors, for example, the progressive degradation of the shutter and the seat following phenomena of cavitation, wear, deformation, presence of particulate matter in the process fluid, etc. The increase in leakage can thus entail the loss of efficiency of a plant, and consequently, economic losses, security issues (e.g., in the event of leakage of toxic and/or flammable fluids), as well as greater degradation of the seat and shutter.
According to the known art, maintenance interventions are carried out only following the malfunctioning of the system, for example when there is a marked loss of efficiency of the plant due to the leakage of a valve. In these cases, when the loss due to a leakage becomes detectable, already important leaks exist which are not predictable enough in advance.
Furthermore, still according to the known art, it is common to generate on the closed valve the maximum force that can be achieved by the actuator, or in any case a high and constant force value, for a greater tightening of the valve seat and the shutter. This procedure, if made on one hand at the beginning of the valves operating life, avoids situations of incipient leakage, and on the other hand it creates a contact pressure between the seat and the shutter that stresses the mechanical resistance of the components more than necessary, causing premature wear of the two components themselves.
However, systems and related methods are not known to the state of the art, which allow to carry out a diagnostic in real time, as well as a predictive diagnostic of the losses due to leakage of a valve, i.e., in order to be able to calculate in advance the operating trend over the time of the losses due to leakage of the valve, in order to intervene promptly with appropriate maintenance. In this way, it would also be possible not to oversize the force delivered by the actuator and therefore with a lower stressing of the seat and shutter of the valve.
There is therefore a need to define a system and a relative method for real-time and predictive diagnostics of losses due to leakage between seat and shutter of a valve that allows to achieve the advantages cited above.
Summary of the invention Subject of the present invention is therefore a system applied to a valve for the execution of a real-time and predictive diagnostics of losses due to leakage of the valve, comprising an actuator, a positioner mounted on the actuator, at least one sensor mounted on the valve and a controller. The valve, which can be of any type, comprises, as is known, a shutter and a sealing seat and is not part of the present invention, but represents its natural application.
The actuator determines with the force generated the position of the valve shutter and, in closed valve conditions, the force exerted by the valve shutter on its seat. The actuator, by way of example, can be double-acting (with a balance between two pressure chambers) as in the embodiment of the invention presented below. With the appropriate considerations on pressures and forces, this description can also be extended to a single-acting actuator (with a balance between a force linked to a pressure in a chamber and a resisting force, for example an elastic force).
The positioner, as also known, is a component which, connected to the actuator through a mechanical feedback of the position, is able to vary the pressure in the actuator chambers, in order to position the valve shutter where required. In the case of a closed valve, therefore in the case in which the shutter is in contact with the seat, the positioner can modulate the contact force seat/shutter by varying the pressure in the chambers.
A first sensor, which is a normal feedback sensor according to the known art, is capable of detecting the extent of the leakage directly or indirectly by means of a quantity dependent on the leakage of the valve seat itself. This size may vary according to the type of sensor used.
The controller, through the use of a software that implements a suitable control algorithm, correlates the data provided by the sensor with those provided by the positioner, that is, respectively, the quantity measured on the valve (as a function of the valve seat seal) and the contact force seat/shutter normally derived from one or more the pressures in the actuator chambers. In other words, it is therefore possible to relate the degree of tightness or leakage of the valve seat to the force exerted by the actuator on the seat itself. Advantageously, the controller can be integrated in the positioner itself. Advantageously, the seat/shutter pair is not stressed unnecessarily, but the force is limited to that generated by the positioner and is sufficient to guarantee the seal, i.e., an acceptable leakage threshold, therefore the seat/shutter pair is subjected to less stress in the span of its operational life, probably resulting in an extension of the operational life itself.
Advantageously, with the valve closed, as the actuator generates a force which is lower than its maximum capacity, it is possible to open the valve in a shorter time, i.e., with times shorter than those required according to the prior art, as there is a benefit of a lower dead time (the time required for detachment between shutter and seat).
Therefore, an object of the present invention is a system applied to a valve for the execution of a real-time diagnostic and prediction of losses due to leakage of the valve itself, as specified in the attached independent claim of the system.
According to another object, the present invention also consists of a method for carrying out the predictive diagnostics of the leakage losses of a valve, as specified in the attached independent claim of the method.
The dependent claims outline particular and further advantageous aspects of the invention. Brief description of the drawings
These and other advantages of the invention will now be described in detail, with reference to attached Figures, which represent an exemplary embodiment of the invention, in which: Figure 1 shows a diagram of the system object of the present invention;
- Figure 2 is a graph relating to the 'trend over time of the force Fact exerted by the actuator to ensure the seal between the shutter and valve seat, during normal operation, compared to a reference force Fset necessary to ensure an optimal seal of a valve and its tolerance range;
- Figure 3 is a graph equal to that of Figure 2 and also shows a future projection of values of the actuator force Fact, even outside of the tolerance range considered;
- Figure 4 shows a graph over time of the seal test in order to obtain a correlation between the parameter measured by the sensor and the actuator force Fact.
Detailed description
With reference to attached Figure 1 ANNEX, according to an absolutely non-limiting embodiment of the present invention, a system 100 applied to a valve 1 is shown, of the known type and comprising a shutter and a sealing seat. The system 100 includes an actuator 2, a positioner 3, at least one sensor 4 and a controller 5 provided with an analysis software. The controller 5 can be a "stand alone" component, as well as it can be integrated into the positioner 3. The actuator 2, by way of example and in a non-limiting way, is double-acting. As is known, this means that the control stem of the actuator, the organ which applies a force to the valve shutter, is immersed between two chambers in which the relative pressures are balanced and a net force acts on the control stem, which is transmitted to the valve shutter. Of course, with appropriate considerations on pressures and forces, the invention can also be implemented with a single-action actuator, having a single pressure chamber and where the balance of the forces occurs between a force linked to the pressure in the pressure chamber and a resisting force, for example an elastic force.
The positioner 3 is a component which determines the "behavior" of the actuator 2 as it regulates the pressure acting in the pressure chambers of the actuator 2 itself. The logical connection with the actuator 2 is made by means of mechanical feedback of the position of the actuator itself. Based on the feedback on the position of the actuator 2, the positioner 3 is able to vary the pressure in the chambers of the actuator 2 in order to position the valve shutter 1 where required. In the case in which the valve 1 is closed, therefore in the case in which the shutter is in contact with the seat, the positioner 3 can modulate the contact force of the seat/shutter by varying the pressure in the chambers of the actuator 2. The positioner 3 is, therefore, a positioner of the latest generation, the so-called "smart" one, which is able to read the values of the position of the shutter and of the pressure acting on the seat seal, in order to derive the value of the force exerted by the actuator 2.
A first sensor 4 is a normal feedback sensor capable of detecting the extent of the leakage directly or indirectly by means of a quantity dependent on the leakage of the seat of the valve 1 itself. This size may vary according to the type of sensor used.
The sensors used can be, purely by way of a non-limiting example, a temperature detector (for example, an infrared thermometer), a flow detector (for example, a flow meter), an acoustic detector (for example, an ultrasonic microphone) or a combination of them.
The modulation of the seat/shutter contact force by varying the pressure in the chambers of the actuator 2 is achieved through the controller 5 which implements a control in closed loop (leakage -> pressure -> force -> leakage), wherein the controlled variable is the loss due to leakage through the valve seat, which is directly or indirectly derived from the first sensor 4 and the controlling variable is the pressure acting in one or both of the pressure chambers of the actuator 2. In other words, the controller
5 (or directly the positioner 3, if it integrates the controller 5) is able to relate the seat/shutter force of the valve 1 and the degree of leakage of the valve 1 over time.
The availability of such data therefore allows to obtain:
- an immediate value which can be easily compared with the design values: the value of the force necessary for the seat/shutter contact (with such value it is therefore possible to immediately check whether the valve 1 is operating within the design limits);
- a value deriving by historical analysis (relationship between force and leakage over time), namely the degradation curve of the seat/shutter sealing, which allows then a predictive diagnostic through extrapolation of the curve itself.
Furthermore, when working in a closed loop (leakage -> pressure -> force -> leakage), it is possible to adjust the positioner 3 in order to generate the only force necessary to obtain the desired seal between the seat and the shutter, plus a desired margin.
Advantageously, therefore, according to the disclosed method, the seat/shutter pair is subjected to less stress during its operating life. This result is obtained due to the fact that the applied force is equal to that generated by the positioner (i.e., the only force required plus a freely configurable safety margin).
Advantageously, the fact that when the valve is closed the actuator generates a force lower than its maximum capacity, allows the valve to be opened in a shorter time and with less dead times.
When such system is used various tests can be carried out. Those considered to be of greater importance for the investigation of the seal on the valve seat are:
- the on-line test: for any valve the reference force Fset is known, which is useful to ensure a tight seal). During the normal operation of the valve 1, whenever it reaches the closed position, it is possible to record the force Fact exerted by the actuator 2 in order to ensure the tightness of the seat. As shown in Figure 2, the data supplied by the positioner 3 can be collected in a graph. In particular, the controller 5, by means of the analysis software, can deduct from a historical analysis (by comparing the force and the leakage over time) the degradation curve of the seat/shutter seal, so allowing a predictive diagnostic by means of extrapolation of the curve itself.
In this way it is possible to obtain, as shown in Figure 3, a graphical projection of future values of Fact outside of the tolerance range considered. The sensor 4 can also be used to define the tolerance range of the Fset force, as it can be useful as an acknowledgment and verification of the leakage on the seat during the evaluation of the allowable limit forces UCL (upper control limit) and LCL (lower control limit), which are shown both in Figure 2 and in Figure 3. Obviously, the lower limit value LCL is the value below which the valve does not hold, that is its leakage becomes sensible; the UCL limit value is that above which the mechanical resistance of the components in contact (shutter and seat) is put at risk;
- the tightness test: in some systems the valves must work to close for most of the time. It is therefore difficult to perform tests during their useful life and analyze the degree of sealing of the seat over time. In this regard, the system 100 object of the present invention can be used to carry out periodic tightness tests.
During the normal operation of the valve 1, through a control signal to the positioner 3, it is possible to vary the force Fact of the actuator 2 until the appearance of a leakage of the valve seat 1, thereby effecting in such circumstances multiple measurements by means of a second sensor, suitable for measuring a force, for example a load cell (not shown in the Figure). The recording of the data obtained by the second sensor and by the positioner 3 is carried out by the controller 5 by means of the analysis software. At the end of this phase, the initial value of the force Fact is restored in order to guarantee again the optimal seal on the seat (the leakage of the working fluid generated during the test is used exclusively for data collection and although it does not compromise the closing function of the valve itself, it can lead to alteration of the state of the system: it is therefore necessary to carry out such test with due precautions, depending on the type of valve investigated).
As shown in Figure 4, the succession of tightness tests over time leads to obtaining a relationship between the parameter measured by the sensor 4 and the force Fact of the actuator 2, by identifying a tolerance range of such parameter within which the seal of the valve seat 1 is considered acceptable (the tolerance range in addition to that associated with Fact is therefore obtained as a reference) .
Ultimately, due to the system 100 and the associated method, it will always be possible to identify the minimum value of the force necessary to guarantee an absence of perceptible leakage. In this way, excessive force values will not be used and consequently the valve, being subjected to less wear, will have a longer useful life. Advantageously, the integrated system 100 can be designed in more complex configurations, capable of recording multiple quantities through the use of a plurality of sensors. In this way, it is therefore possible to increase the diagnostic level of the integrated system and to predict the valve seat seal trend with more precision. When one of the measured quantities will tend to go out of the respective tolerance range defined during the test, it will therefore be necessary to intervene with preventive maintenance actions.
Such tests can be useful for different purposes, such as the control of a valve assembly through a statistical analysis of the data collected on a plant or on multiple plants. Furthermore, the remote monitoring of such data can be useful to generate a database concerning the useful life of the investigated valves.
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the summary and the detailed description, it is to be understood that there are a large number of variants within the scope of the invention. Furthermore, it must be understood that the one or more presented embodiments are only examples which are not intended to limit in any way the scope of protection of the invention or its application or configurations. Rather, the brief and detailed description provides the technician skilled in the art with a convenient guide for implementing at least one exemplary embodiment, being it clear that numerous variations can be made in the function and assembly of the elements described herein, without departing from the scope of protection of the invention, as established by the attached claims and by their technical-legal equivalents.

Claims

1. System (100) for the execution of a real-time diagnostic and/or predictive losses due to leakage of a valve (1), wherein the valve (1) is provided with a shutter and the a sealing seat, the system (100) comprising an actuator (2), a positioner (3) for regulating the pressure acting in at least one pressure chamber of the actuator (2), at least one sensor (4) capable of detecting a value dependent on a leak due to leakage of the valve seat (1) and a controller (5) provided with an analysis software, said system (100) being characterized in that the controller (5) is configured to perform, through the analysis software, a closed-loop control and a predictive diagnostic, wherein the controlled value is the loss due to leakage through the valve seat (1) and the regulating value is the pressure acting in said at least one pressure chamber of the actuator (2).
2. System (100) according to claim 1, wherein the controller (5) is integrated within the positioner (3).
3. System (100) according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the actuator (2) is double-acting.
4. System (100) according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the actuator (2) is single-acting.
5. System (100) according to one of preceding claims, wherein a first sensor (4) is a temperature detector.
6. System (100) according to one of claims 1 to 4, wherein a first sensor (4) is a flow rate detector.
7. System (100) according to one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the first sensor (4) is an acoustic detector.
8. System (100) according to one of claims 5 to 7, wherein the first sensor (4) is a combination between a temperature detector, a flow rate sensor and an acoustic detector.
9. System (100) according to one of the preceding claims, wherein a second sensor is a force sensor.
10. Method of implementation of the system (100) according to one of the preceding claims, the method comprising the steps of: a. defining the tolerance range of a reference force
(Fset) which is predetermined and suitable to ensure the optimal tight seal between the seat and the shutter of a valve (1) by means of a sensor (4), b. recording, with the valve (1) closed, by means of a second sensor, a force (Fact) exerted by an actuator (2) to ensure the seal of the seat, c. recording the data by means of a controller (5) and an analysis software implemented on the controller (5), d. obtaining the degradation curve of the force (Fact) exerted by the actuator (2) so allowing a predictive diagnostic of the leakage losses of the valve (1) by extrapolating the curve itself.
11. Method according to claim 10, wherein after the step a. as an alternative to step b. the following step is present of: b.l varying the force (Fact) exerted by the actuator (2) until the appearance of a loss due to the leakage of the valve seat (1) through a control signal up to a positioner (3).
PCT/IB2021/056396 2020-07-22 2021-07-15 Diagnostic system of leaks between seat and shutter of a valve WO2022018584A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IT102020000017689 2020-07-22
IT102020000017689A IT202000017689A1 (en) 2020-07-22 2020-07-22 SYSTEM FOR DIAGNOSTICS OF LEAKAGE LEAKS BETWEEN THE SEAT AND PLUG OF A VALVE

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022018584A1 true WO2022018584A1 (en) 2022-01-27

Family

ID=72709696

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2021/056396 WO2022018584A1 (en) 2020-07-22 2021-07-15 Diagnostic system of leaks between seat and shutter of a valve

Country Status (2)

Country Link
IT (1) IT202000017689A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2022018584A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115841398A (en) * 2023-01-03 2023-03-24 成都同飞科技有限责任公司 Water supply pipe network leakage analysis method and system based on Internet of things

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995006276A1 (en) * 1993-08-25 1995-03-02 Rosemount Inc. Valve positioner with pressure feedback, dynamic correction and diagnostics
US20070068225A1 (en) * 2005-09-29 2007-03-29 Brown Gregory C Leak detector for process valve
WO2014032812A1 (en) * 2012-09-03 2014-03-06 Siepmann-Werke Gmbh & Co. Kg Device and method for monitoring control valves or shut-off valves
DE102018111010B3 (en) * 2018-05-08 2019-07-25 WESA-Control GmbH & Co. KG Method for setting a closing force of a fitting and fitting measurement method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995006276A1 (en) * 1993-08-25 1995-03-02 Rosemount Inc. Valve positioner with pressure feedback, dynamic correction and diagnostics
US20070068225A1 (en) * 2005-09-29 2007-03-29 Brown Gregory C Leak detector for process valve
WO2014032812A1 (en) * 2012-09-03 2014-03-06 Siepmann-Werke Gmbh & Co. Kg Device and method for monitoring control valves or shut-off valves
DE102018111010B3 (en) * 2018-05-08 2019-07-25 WESA-Control GmbH & Co. KG Method for setting a closing force of a fitting and fitting measurement method

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115841398A (en) * 2023-01-03 2023-03-24 成都同飞科技有限责任公司 Water supply pipe network leakage analysis method and system based on Internet of things
CN115841398B (en) * 2023-01-03 2023-05-09 成都同飞科技有限责任公司 Water supply network leakage analysis method and system based on Internet of things

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IT202000017689A1 (en) 2022-01-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10851814B2 (en) Valve signature diagnosis and leak test device
US8417468B2 (en) Diagnostic method for detecting control valve component failure
RU2378678C2 (en) Method and device for controlling regulating valve using control loop, as well as for detecting faults in said loop
EP1931962B1 (en) Leak detector for process valve
EP2041635B1 (en) Computerized evaluation of process control device signature graphs
JP4880622B2 (en) Safety valve test
JP2008532031A5 (en)
KR100713621B1 (en) Method for testing performance of current air driven type control valve
KR101532843B1 (en) 0nline monitoring system of nuclear power generation hydraulic valve using smart sensor
WO2022018584A1 (en) Diagnostic system of leaks between seat and shutter of a valve
KR101094074B1 (en) Producing Method of Diagnostic Algorithm Model for Online Early Fault Detection
JP7356267B2 (en) Anomaly detection device, anomaly detection method and program
US20240044420A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Autonomous Pressure Relief Valve Testing
US20220260177A1 (en) Diagnostic System for a Valve that can be Actuated by a Control Pressure
KR20190019369A (en) Pneumatic control valve failure diagnosis method
US11852248B2 (en) Packing system and diagnostic method for a packing system of a valve assembly
JPH036323B2 (en)
CN116457597A (en) System and method for autonomous testing of pressure relief valves
Kiesbauer et al. Modern control valves with failure diagnostics
JPH01142204A (en) Valve rod gap abnormality detecting device of steam governing valve
Li et al. A review of recent valve health monitoring and diagnosis methods
JPS60116806A (en) Abnormality diagnosing device of hydraulic type valve driving device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21749702

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21749702

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1