WO2021184981A1 - 基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备 - Google Patents

基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备 Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2021184981A1
WO2021184981A1 PCT/CN2021/074487 CN2021074487W WO2021184981A1 WO 2021184981 A1 WO2021184981 A1 WO 2021184981A1 CN 2021074487 W CN2021074487 W CN 2021074487W WO 2021184981 A1 WO2021184981 A1 WO 2021184981A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
review
audit
node
work
nodes
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/CN2021/074487
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
韩喆
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Alipay Hangzhou Information Technology Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Alipay Hangzhou Information Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Alipay Hangzhou Information Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Alipay Hangzhou Information Technology Co Ltd
Publication of WO2021184981A1 publication Critical patent/WO2021184981A1/zh
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/10—Protecting distributed programs or content, e.g. vending or licensing of copyrighted material ; Digital rights management [DRM]
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/27—Replication, distribution or synchronisation of data between databases or within a distributed database system; Distributed database system architectures therefor
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/60—Protecting data
    • G06F21/62—Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules
    • G06F21/6218—Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database

Definitions

  • This application relates to the field of blockchain technology, and in particular to a method, device and equipment for reviewing original works based on blockchain.
  • Blockchain technology also known as distributed ledger technology, is an emerging technology in which several computing devices participate in "bookkeeping" and jointly maintain a complete distributed database. Because the blockchain technology has the characteristics of decentralization, openness and transparency, each computing device can participate in database records, and the rapid data synchronization between computing devices, the blockchain technology has been widely used in many fields. To apply.
  • This application proposes a blockchain-based work original review method, including: interacting with other node devices in the blockchain to elect a number of work review nodes; in response to a transaction initiated by a user, the transaction
  • the work to be reviewed carried in it is distributed to the review nodes, and each review node conducts original review of the work to be reviewed; responds to the review results submitted by each review node, and returns based on the review nodes
  • the result of the review determines the final review result for the work to be reviewed.
  • This application proposes a block chain-based work original review device, including: an election module, which interacts with other node devices in the block chain to elect a number of work review nodes; and a sending module, which responds to user-initiated Transaction, the work to be reviewed carried in the transaction is distributed to each review node, and each review node conducts an original review of the work to be reviewed; the determination module responds to the review result submitted by each review node , And determine the final review result for the work to be reviewed based on the review results returned by the review nodes.
  • Figure 1 is a flowchart of a method for reviewing original works based on blockchain shown in this application;
  • Figure 3 is a structural diagram of a blockchain-based work original review device shown in this application.
  • Figure 4 is a hardware structure diagram of a blockchain-based work original review device shown in the application.
  • the above-mentioned original review specifically refers to the process in which the work reviewer arranges professionals to review the work uploaded by the user through a special review method (for example, search and comparison method). After the above-mentioned original review is passed, the work uploaded by the user can be considered to be an original work; otherwise, it is considered that the above-mentioned work may involve plagiarism.
  • a special review method for example, search and comparison method
  • the work reviewer reviews the original work uploaded by the user, it usually arranges a dedicated reviewer (or team) to conduct the original review work.
  • the above-mentioned reviewers will usually read the above-mentioned work of the user first and determine a number of keywords. Then the reviewer will search the database for works carrying the above keywords based on the above keywords. After finding the above works, the reviewer compares the retrieved works with the works uploaded by users. If the expression and meaning of the work uploaded by the user and the work retrieved are almost the same, it can be determined that the work uploaded by the user may be suspected of plagiarism. If the work uploaded by the user is inconsistent with the expression or meaning of the work retrieved, it can be determined that the work uploaded by the user is an original work, and the original work is allowed to be uploaded to the Internet.
  • this application proposes a blockchain-based review method for original works.
  • This method can select a number of review nodes in the blockchain system, and determine the final review results based on the review results of the above-mentioned review nodes for the user-initiated works to be reviewed, so that the original review can be decentralized and avoid single review An error review occurred.
  • the nodes in the above-mentioned blockchain system can interact with other node devices in the above-mentioned blockchain to elect several work review nodes. Then, after receiving the audit transaction initiated by the user, the node in the above-mentioned blockchain system can respond to the user-initiated transaction by distributing the work to be audited in the above-mentioned transaction to the above-mentioned auditing nodes, and the above-mentioned auditing nodes will target The above-mentioned works to be reviewed are subject to original review.
  • the node in the above-mentioned blockchain system can also respond to the review result submitted by each review node, and determine the final review result for the above-mentioned work to be reviewed based on the review result returned by each review node. .
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for reviewing original works based on blockchain shown in this application. As shown in Fig. 1, the above method includes steps S101 to S103.
  • the above-mentioned blockchain system may specifically be a public blockchain (Public Blockchain), a private blockchain (Private Blockchain), a consortium blockchain (Consortium Blockchain) constructed based on a server or a server cluster, or any combination of the foregoing.
  • the above-mentioned blockchain system may include several nodes.
  • the aforementioned nodes may be terminal devices such as mobile phones and IPADs.
  • the aforementioned nodes may include audit nodes and non-audit nodes.
  • the above-mentioned review node is elected after each node included in the above-mentioned blockchain system interacts with each other through a preset election algorithm.
  • the review results uploaded by the aforementioned review nodes are usually referred to.
  • the aforementioned non-review nodes can also conduct original review, but when the original review of the work to be reviewed is performed, the review results uploaded by the aforementioned non-review nodes are usually not referred to.
  • the above-mentioned audit node and the above-mentioned non-audit node may undergo mutual conversion.
  • the audit status of the above nodes can be maintained in the above-mentioned blockchain.
  • the above-mentioned audit node often does not participate in the audit or the audit result is always inconsistent with the final audit result, it can indicate that the audit node is not "working" seriously. Need to be converted to a non-auditing node. After the audit node is converted to a non-audit node, the non-audit nodes that actively participate in the audit and whose audit results are always consistent with the final audit results among the above non-audit nodes can be converted to audit nodes.
  • each of the above-mentioned nodes can independently review the works uploaded by the user, and agree on the review results to the blockchain.
  • the nodes in the above-mentioned blockchain receive the audit results agreed by the audit nodes, they can determine the final audit results for the above-mentioned works to be reviewed based on the audit results returned by the above-mentioned audit nodes.
  • a mechanism in which the minority obeys the majority may be adopted. Specifically, if the number of audit nodes that have passed the audit result is greater than the number of audit nodes that have failed the audit result, the final audit result for the above-mentioned work to be reviewed is determined to be approved; otherwise, it is determined that the audit failed.
  • the absolute threshold method may be used when determining the final review result for the above-mentioned work to be reviewed based on the review results returned by the above-mentioned review nodes. Specifically, the number of audit nodes that have passed the audit result can be counted, and the foregoing number can be compared with a preset threshold. If the above-mentioned quantity reaches the above-mentioned preset threshold, the final audit result of the above-mentioned work to be examined can be determined as approved; otherwise, it can be determined as rejected.
  • the aforementioned preset threshold may be set by the developer based on experience; or calculated based on a neural network model.
  • the original review can be decentralized, avoiding erroneous review due to a single review.
  • the aforementioned election algorithm may be an election algorithm based on the DPOS consensus mechanism.
  • the above-mentioned DPOS (Delegated Proof of Stake) consensus mechanism is a consensus algorithm based on voting (refer to voting for shareholders). Specifically, among the nodes that make up the blockchain, based on the voting results submitted by each node, a number of nodes with accounting rights can be determined by using a statistical method.
  • the above-mentioned original work review platform builder (the above-mentioned original work review platform builder can be a node in the above blockchain) can first determine the number of review nodes Q (usually Q can be 21 Or 101). After determining the number of audit nodes, the above-mentioned construction party can notify each node in the above-mentioned blockchain to vote, and summarize the voting results of each node. After the above-mentioned construction party obtains the voting summary results, based on the mathematical statistical analysis method, the number of votes obtained by each node is sorted from the highest to the bottom, and the node in the top Q position is regarded as the above-mentioned audit node.
  • the final review result for the work to be reviewed can be determined based on the review results submitted by each review node.
  • the original work review platform builder may sort the review accuracy rates corresponding to each node device maintained in the block chain in descending order of numerical value. Then, the above-mentioned builder can select the first N nodes from the sorted nodes as the above-mentioned review nodes; wherein, the above-mentioned review accuracy rate indicates the probability that the corresponding node's review result for a certain work is consistent with the final review result of the work ;
  • the above N is a natural number.
  • the above-mentioned review accuracy rate specifically refers to the probability that the corresponding node's review result for a certain work is consistent with the final review result of the work.
  • each node in the above-mentioned blockchain is usually a publicly-known or official reviewer who has participated in the review of Internet original works, and there is usually an assessment for its review ability in related fields.
  • the original work audit platform builder can sort the audit accuracy rate corresponding to each node device maintained in the blockchain in descending order of numerical value.
  • the above-mentioned original work review platform builder can select the first N nodes from the sorted nodes as the above-mentioned review nodes; wherein, the above-mentioned N is a natural number.
  • the above-mentioned original work review platform builder can select the first N nodes from the sorted nodes as the above-mentioned review nodes.
  • the node corresponding to the external account may distribute the work to be reviewed carried in the transaction to the review nodes, and the review nodes will perform original review of the work to be reviewed.
  • the above-mentioned original review smart contract may be created by an external account and stored in the block. At this point, when the above smart contract is called, the nodes in the blockchain can be called directly.
  • the above-mentioned original review smart contract may be created by an external account and stored locally on the node.
  • the smart contract can be executed by calling the block header corresponding to the original audit smart contract in the blockchain.
  • each review node Before each review node conducts original review, it is usually necessary to randomly determine the review order of each review node. After determining the above review sequence, each review node must return its own review results to the smart contract storage in accordance with the review sequence.
  • any audit node does not return the audit result in the above-mentioned audit order randomly determined, or does not return the audit result within a preset time period, it can be determined that the audit result of the audit node is a failure, and It is deemed that the above-mentioned audit node is "not serious" in performing the audit work.
  • a search and comparison method can be used in one embodiment (not described in detail here). If the expression and meaning of the work uploaded by the user and the work retrieved are almost the same, it can be determined that the work uploaded by the user may be suspected of plagiarism. If the work uploaded by the user is inconsistent with the expression or meaning of the work retrieved, it can be determined that the work uploaded by the user is an original work, and the original work is allowed to be uploaded to the Internet.
  • the deployment in the above blockchain may be called first
  • the verification logic in the contract code of the original review smart contract is initially verified for the above-mentioned pending works. If the above-mentioned preliminary verification is passed, the sending logic in the contract code of the original audit smart contract deployed in the above-mentioned blockchain is further called.
  • each node of the above-mentioned blockchain can be agreed in advance with an original audit smart contract including verification logic.
  • the above verification logic has multiple verification methods, which can correspond to different types of works.
  • the above verification logic may be a picture similarity verification.
  • the above verification logic may be hash verification. It should be noted that the corresponding relationship between the verification logic and the work type can be referred to related technologies, which is not particularly limited here.
  • the node corresponding to the external account can first determine the type of the work to be reviewed corresponding to the user. After determining the type of the work to be reviewed, the node can call the verification logic corresponding to the type of work in the contract code of the original review smart contract deployed in the blockchain to perform preliminary verification of the work to be reviewed.
  • the aforementioned node can further call the sending logic in the contract code of the original review smart contract deployed in the aforementioned blockchain, so that each review node can perform original review of the aforementioned work to be reviewed.
  • each review node When each review node returns its own review results to the above-mentioned original review smart contract in the review order, it can further call the determination logic in the contract code of the above-mentioned original review smart contract. The final review result of the work.
  • the above determination logic may be that the minority obeys the majority. Specifically, if the number of audit nodes that have passed the audit result is greater than the number of audit nodes that have failed the audit result, the final audit result for the above-mentioned work to be reviewed is determined to be approved; otherwise, it is determined that the audit failed.
  • the above determination logic may be an absolute threshold method. Specifically, the number of audit nodes that have passed the audit result can be counted, and the foregoing number can be compared with a preset threshold. If the above-mentioned quantity reaches the above-mentioned preset threshold, the final audit result of the above-mentioned work to be examined can be determined as approved; otherwise, it can be determined as rejected.
  • the aforementioned preset threshold may be set by the developer based on experience; or calculated based on a neural network model.
  • the node corresponding to the above-mentioned user can give feedback to the above-mentioned user based on the above-mentioned final review result.
  • the node can prompt the user through the display unit of the audit result, and the reason for the audit failure can also be displayed to the user through the display unit, so that The user can modify the work based on the above reasons.
  • the above-mentioned node can determine that the work uploaded by the above-mentioned user is an original work and can be published on the Internet, and prompt the user accordingly.
  • the above-mentioned node can automatically display the above-mentioned work on a public platform (for example, Zhihu, Sohu, etc.); or the above-mentioned node can make the above-mentioned work public after obtaining the user's permission.
  • a part of the review fee may be deducted from the account corresponding to the user.
  • the above review fee specifically refers to the necessary expenses in the original review.
  • the above-mentioned audit fee may be the gas fee generated by the execution of the smart contract.
  • the aforementioned audit fee may be an audit quotation of an auditor. It should be noted that the type of audit fee can be determined according to the actual situation and is not limited here.
  • the audit fee is the fee that the user must submit at the same time when the user initiates the audit transaction, it causes a certain cost to the user. Therefore, the user will only initiate the audit transaction when there is a real need, thereby avoiding the user from maliciously submitting works frequently. Audit.
  • the review result of each review node can be compared with the above final review result, and the review accuracy rate corresponding to each review node can be updated based on the above comparison result;
  • the above-mentioned review accuracy rate specifically refers to the probability that the review result of the corresponding node for a certain work is consistent with the final review result of the work.
  • the number of times that the audit result of the node has been audited is consistent with the final audit result corresponding to each audit can be divided by the number of original audits undertaken by the blockchain where the node is located. Get the number of times.
  • the probability that the audit results made by the corresponding node will be consistent with the final audit result when the new work to be reviewed is audited can be predicted, thereby reflecting the operating ability of the corresponding node.
  • the audit nodes in this application are audited according to a randomly determined audit sequence, the audit nodes at the end of the above audit sequence may copy their previous audit nodes to make false audits, and use this to improve the correctness of their corresponding audits. Rate.
  • the audit nodes can be sorted according to the audit order of the audit nodes; then, the audits from the first node after sorting to the middle of the Mth node The audit accuracy rate corresponding to the node is updated.
  • the above M may be set by the developer according to requirements or experience, and is not particularly limited here.
  • a user When a user initiates a review transaction, in addition to sending the review transaction to the review node for original review, it can also interact with non-review nodes so that the above-mentioned non-review nodes can also review the above-mentioned pending works.
  • the above-mentioned non-review node can read the works uploaded by the above-mentioned user in the above-mentioned blockchain, and make corresponding review results for the above-mentioned works to be reviewed based on the review method (for example, search and comparison method). After the audit result is made, the aforementioned non-audit node can encrypt the audit result and upload the encrypted audit result to the blockchain.
  • the review method for example, search and comparison method
  • the above-mentioned non-auditing node can upload the decryption key to the blockchain, so that other nodes in the above-mentioned blockchain can obtain the audit result of the non-auditing node.
  • the audit results of the above-mentioned non-audit nodes are compared with the above-mentioned final audit results for the above-mentioned works to be audited, and the audit accuracy rate of the above-mentioned non-audit nodes is updated based on the above-mentioned comparison results.
  • the above-mentioned replacement audit node program can be started periodically. Specifically, the following steps may be performed on each audit node in the above-mentioned blockchain in sequence periodically: determining whether the audit accuracy rate of the above-mentioned audit node reaches a preset threshold.
  • the above-mentioned preset threshold is usually the correct rate of review accepted in the field of original review.
  • the threshold can usually be set by the developer based on experience, or obtained through a neural network algorithm, and is not limited here.
  • the audit node can be replaced with a non-audit node with the highest statistical audit accuracy rate.
  • the audit node can always maintain a high audit accuracy rate, so as to supervise the audit node.
  • the audit nodes and non-audit nodes can be sorted from high to low according to the audit accuracy rates corresponding to each audit node and each non-audit node on a regular basis. Then, the correct audit rate of the audit node at the end is compared with the correct audit rate of the non-audit node at the top.
  • the above-mentioned audit node is replaced with the above-mentioned non-audit node; otherwise, no replacement operation is performed.
  • the adoption of the end-of-line elimination system can still effectively supervise the review nodes to conduct review work, thereby improving the quality and efficiency of original review.
  • the middle-aged person may also adopt a regular reshuffle method to perform related operations of replacing the audit node.
  • audit nodes and non-audit nodes can be mixed and sorted periodically according to the audit accuracy rate, and then the top N nodes are selected as audit nodes.
  • the above-mentioned N is the number of audit nodes preset by the original audit platform.
  • Figure 2 is a structural diagram of an original review platform based on a blockchain network shown in this application.
  • the above-mentioned original review platform is based on blockchain.
  • the above-mentioned blockchain includes several nodes. Among them, the above-mentioned nodes include audit nodes elected by an election algorithm.
  • the review node in the aforementioned blockchain can respond to the review transaction initiated by the user to conduct original review of the work to be reviewed uploaded by the user.
  • the node 1 corresponding to the above account can call the sending logic in the original audit smart contract, and the audit transaction can be sent to each audit node for audit.
  • Each review node can upload their review results in a randomly determined review sequence.
  • the aforementioned node 1 After the aforementioned node 1 receives the audit results submitted by each audit node, it can call the determination logic in the aforementioned original audit smart contract to determine whether the audit result is whether the number of nodes that have passed the audit reaches the preset threshold.
  • the above node 1 can be determined that the above work is an original work. After determining that the above-mentioned work uploaded by the user is an original work, the node 1 may interact with the user through the equipped interactive module to determine whether the user will disclose the original work. If the above-mentioned node receives a response from the user confirming the disclosure, the original work can be sent to the corresponding server of the open platform (for example, Zhihu) to complete the disclosure of the original work.
  • the open platform for example, Zhihu
  • the original review can be decentralized, avoiding erroneous review due to a single review.
  • This application also provides a device for reviewing original works based on blockchain. Please refer to FIG. 3, which is a structural diagram of a device for reviewing original works based on blockchain shown in this application.
  • the device 300 includes: an election module 310, which interacts with other node devices in the blockchain to elect a number of work review nodes; a sending module 320, in response to a transaction initiated by a user, The work to be reviewed carried in the transaction is distributed to each review node, and each review node conducts an original review of the work to be reviewed; the determination module 330 responds to the review result submitted by each review node, and The final review result for the work to be reviewed is determined based on the review results returned by the review nodes.
  • the election module 310 is further used for: an election algorithm based on the DPOS consensus mechanism to interact with other node devices in the blockchain to elect a number of work review nodes.
  • the election module 310 is further configured to: sort the audit accuracy rates corresponding to each node device maintained in the blockchain in descending order of numerical value; from the sorted nodes , The first N nodes are selected as the review nodes; wherein, the review accuracy rate indicates the probability that the review result of the corresponding node for a certain work is consistent with the final review result of the work; the N is a natural number.
  • the above-mentioned apparatus 300 further includes: an update module 340, which, in response to a user-initiated transaction request, distributes the work to be reviewed in the transaction request to each non-review node other than the review node, and Each non-review node performs original review on the work to be reviewed; obtains the review result of each non-review node; and performs the review result of each non-review node on the work to be reviewed and the final review result Compare, and update the audit accuracy rate of each non-audit node based on the comparison result.
  • an update module 340 which, in response to a user-initiated transaction request, distributes the work to be reviewed in the transaction request to each non-review node other than the review node, and Each non-review node performs original review on the work to be reviewed; obtains the review result of each non-review node; and performs the review result of each non-review node on the work to be reviewed and the final review result Compare, and update the
  • the above-mentioned apparatus 300 further includes: a replacement module 350, which compares the audit results of each audit node with the final audit result, and updates the audit correctness corresponding to each audit node based on the comparison result. Perform the following steps for each audit node in turn: determine whether the audit accuracy rate of the audit node reaches the preset threshold; if not, determine the non-audit node with the highest audit accuracy rate from the non-audit nodes , And replace the audit node with the determined non-audit node.
  • a replacement module 350 which compares the audit results of each audit node with the final audit result, and updates the audit correctness corresponding to each audit node based on the comparison result. Perform the following steps for each audit node in turn: determine whether the audit accuracy rate of the audit node reaches the preset threshold; if not, determine the non-audit node with the highest audit accuracy rate from the non-audit nodes , And replace the audit node with the determined non-audit node.
  • the update module 340 includes: a sorting module, which sorts the audit nodes according to the audit order of the audit nodes; an update sub-module, for each audit starting from the first node after sorting to the middle of the Mth node The audit accuracy rate corresponding to the node is updated.
  • the sending module 320 includes: invoking a sending logic module, in response to a transaction initiated by a user, invoking the sending logic in the contract code of the original audit smart contract deployed in the blockchain to transfer the transaction
  • the work to be reviewed carried in is distributed to each review node.
  • the determining module 330 includes: calling a determining logic module, in response to the review results submitted by each review node, further calling the determination logic in the contract code of the original review smart contract, based on each review node
  • the returned review result is determined to be the final review result of the work to be reviewed.
  • the sending module 320 further includes: invoking a verification logic module, in response to a transaction initiated by the user, invoking the verification logic in the contract code of the original audit smart contract deployed in the blockchain, for The work to be reviewed performs preliminary verification; if the preliminary verification passes, the sending logic in the contract code of the original review smart contract deployed in the blockchain is further invoked.
  • the embodiment of the image data acquisition device shown in this application can be applied to a blockchain-based work original review device.
  • the device embodiments can be implemented by software, or can be implemented by hardware or a combination of software and hardware. Taking software implementation as an example, as a logical device, it is formed by reading the corresponding computer program instructions in the non-volatile memory into the memory through the processor of the electronic device where it is located. From a hardware perspective, as shown in Figure 4, the hardware structure diagram of a blockchain-based work original review device shown in this application, except for the processor, memory, network interface, and In addition to the volatile memory, the electronic device in which the device is located in the embodiment generally may include other hardware according to the actual function of the electronic device, which will not be repeated here.
  • the device includes: a processor; a memory for storing executable instructions of the processor; wherein the processor is configured to call the memory
  • the executable instructions stored in implement the blockchain-based original review method for works as described in the previous embodiment.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Bioethics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Technology Law (AREA)
  • Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

本申请的一个或多个实施例提出基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备。上述方法包括，与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点。然后，响应于用户发起的交易，将所述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点，由所述各审核节点针对所述待审作品进行原创审核。最后，响应于所述各审核节点提交的审核结果，并基于所述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对所述待审作品的最终审核结果。

Description

基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备 技术领域
本申请涉及区块链技术领域，尤其涉及一种基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备。
背景技术
区块链技术，也被称之为分布式账本技术，是一种由若干台计算设备共同参与“记账”，共同维护一份完整的分布式数据库的新兴技术。由于区块链技术具有去中心化、公开透明、每台计算设备可以参与数据库记录、并且各计算设备之间可以快速的进行数据同步的特性，使得区块链技术已在众多的领域中广泛的进行应用。
发明内容
本申请提出一种基于区块链的作品原创审核方法，包括：与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点；响应于用户发起的交易，将所述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点，由所述各审核节点针对所述待审作品进行原创审核；响应于所述各审核节点提交的审核结果，并基于所述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对所述待审作品的最终审核结果。
本申请提出一种基于区块链的作品原创审核装置，包括：选举模块，与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点；发送模块，响应于用户发起的交易，将所述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点，由所述各审核节点针对所述待审作品进行原创审核；确定模块，响应于所述各审核节点提交的审核结果，并基于所述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对所述待审作品的最终审核结果。
由上述技术方案可知，一方面，由于区块链自身具有存储内容不可篡改性，因此，在对用户上传的作品进行原创审核时，可保证上述作品不被篡改，保证作品本身的真实性；另一方面，由于针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果是参考选举出的各审核节点提交的审核结果作出的，因此，可以使原创审核可以去中心化，避免由于单一审核出现错误审核。
附图说明
图1为本申请示出的一种基于区块链的作品原创审核方法的方法流程图；
图2为本申请示出的一种基于区块链网络搭建的原创审核平台的结构图；
图3为本申请示出的一种基于区块链的作品原创审核装置的结构图；
图4为本申请示出的一种基于区块链的作品原创审核设备的硬件结构图。
具体实施方式
随着互联网络的逐渐普及，越来越多的用户选择在网络上公开自身原创的作品。而用户的原创作品通常需要经过作品审核方进行原创审核通过后，才可以被公开在互联网中。
上述原创审核，具体是指作品审核方安排专业人员通过专门的审核方法(例如，检索比对法)，对用户上传的作品进行审核的过程。当上述原创审核通过后，则可以认为用户上传的作品为原创作品；否则，则认为上述作品可能涉及抄袭。
当作品审核方对用户上传的作品进行原创审核时，通常会安排专门的审核人员(或者团队)进行原创审核作业。上述审核人员通常将先阅读用户上述的作品，并确定若干关键字。然后审核人员将基于上述若干关键字在数据库中检索携带上述若干关键字的作品。在找到上述作品后，审核人员再将检索出的作品与用户上传的作品进行比对。如果用户上传的作品与检索出的作品的表述方式与表达的含义几乎一致，则可以确定上述用户上传的作品可能涉嫌抄袭。如果用户上传的作品与检索出的作品的表述方式或表达的含义不一致，则可以确定上述用户上传的作品为原创作品，并允许将上述原创作品上传至互联网络中。
由上述过程可见，在相关技术中由于在进行原创审核时通常由单一的作品审核方进行原创审核，因此将可能导致原创审核中心化，使得审核结果不客观，甚至出现错误审核。
基于此，本申请提出一种基于区块链的作品原创审核方法。该方法可以通过在区块链系统中选举出若干审核节点，并基于上述各审核节点针对用户发起的待审作品的审核结果确定最终审核结果，从而使得原创审核可以去中心化，避免由于单一审核出现错误审核。
具体地，上述区块链系统中的节点可以与上述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点。然后，上述区块链系统中的节点在收到用户发起的审核交易后，可以响应于用户发起的交易，将上述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至上述各审核节点，由上述各审核节点针对上述待审作品进行原创审核。在各审核节点提交审核结果后，上述区块链系统中的节点还可以响应于上述各审核节点提交的审核结果，并基于上述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果。
以下结合具体的实施例对本申请提出的技术方案进行说明。
请参见图1，图1为本申请示出的一种基于区块链的作品原创审核方法的方法流程图。如图1所示，上述方法包括步骤S101～S103。
S101，与上述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点。
S102，响应于用户发起的交易，将上述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至上述各审核节点，由上述各审核节点针对上述待审作品进行原创审核。
S103，响应于上述各审核节点提交的审核结果，并基于上述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果。
上述区块链系统，具体可以是基于服务器或服务器集群构建的公有链(Public Blockchain)、私有链(Private Blockchain)、联盟链(Consortium Blockchain)，或者上述任意的结合。上述区块链系统可以包括若干节点。上述节点可以是手机、IPAD等终端设备。
上述节点可以包括审核节点和非审核节点。其中，上述审核节点是上述区块链系统包括的各节点通过预设的选举算法，进行相互交互后选举出来的。在对待审作品进行原创审核时，通常参考上述审核节点上传的审核结果。上述非审核节点也可以进行原创审核，不过在对待审作品进行原创审核时，通常不会参考上述非审核节点上传的审核结果。
需要说明的是，在一定条件下，上述审核节点和上述非审核节点可能发生相互转换。例如，在上述区块链中可以维护上述各节点的审核情况，当上述审核节点经常不参与审核或者审核的结果总是与最终审核结果不一致时，可以说明其该审核节点“工作”不认真，需要转换为非审核节点。在将该审核节点转换为非审核节点后，可以将上述非审核节点中积极参与审核并且审核的结果总是与最终审核结果一致的非审核节点转换为审核节点。
当用户通过某一节点广播一笔交易(审核交易)时，上述各节点可以各自对用户上传的作品进行原创审核，并将审核结果共识至区块链中。上述区块链中的节点在收到个审核节点共识的审核结果后，可以基于上述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果。
在一实施例中，在基于上述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果时，可以采用少数服从多数的机制。具体地，如果审核结果为通过的审核节点的数量大于审核结果为不通过的审核节点的数量，则将针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果确定为审核通过；反之，则确定为审核不通过。
在另一实施例中，在基于上述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果时，可以采用绝对阈值法。具体地，可以统计审核结果为通过的审核节点的数量，并将上述数量与预设阈值比较。如果上述数量达到上述预设阈值，则可以将针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果确定为审核通过；反之，则确定为审核不通过。其中，上述预设阈值可以是开发人员基于经验设定；或者基于神经网络模型计算得到。
由上述技术方案可知，一方面，由于区块链自身具有存储内容不可篡改性，因此，在对用户上传的作品进行原创审核时，可保证上述作品不被篡改，保证作品本身的真实性；
另一方面，由于针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果是参考选举出的各审核节点提交的审核结果作出的，因此，可以使原创审核可以去中心化，避免由于单一审核出现错误审核。
以下将本申请记载的技术方案分为选举审核节点、进行原创审核、更换审核节点三个环节进行详细说明。
一、选举审核节点。在基于区块链搭建原创作品审核平台时，通常需要通过预设的选举算法从区块链包括的各节点中选举出若干审核节点。
在一实施例中，上述选举算法可以是基于DPOS共识机制的选举算法。
上述DPOS(Delegated Proof of Stake，代理权益证明)共识机制，是一种基于投票选举的共识算法(可以参考投票选举股东)。具体地，可以在组成区块链包括的各节点中，基于各节点提交的投票结果，采用统计方法确定出若干拥有记账权的节点。
在基于DPOS共识机制选举审核节点时，上述原创作品审核平台搭建方(上述原创作品审核平台搭建方可以是上述区块链中的一个节点)可以先确定审核节点的数量Q (通常Q可以为21或101)。在确定审核节点的数量后，上述搭建方可以通知上述区块链中各节点进行投票，并将各节点的投票结果进行汇总。上述搭建方在得到投票汇总结果后，可以基于数学统计分析法，对各节点获取到的票数从高到底排序，将位置处于前Q位的节点作为上述审核节点。
在选举出审核节点后，当上述区块链中的节点接收到用户发起的交易后，则可以基于各审核节点提交的审核结果确定针对待审作品的最终审核结果。
在另一实施例中，在选举审核节点时，上述原创作品审核平台搭建方可以将上述区块链中维护的各节点设备对应的审核正确率按照数值从大到小的顺序进行排序。然后，上述搭建方可以从排序后的各节点中，选取前N个节点作为上述审核节点；其中，上述审核正确率指示对应节点针对某一作品的审核结果与该作品的最终审核结果一致的概率；上述N为自然数。
上述审核正确率，具体是指对应节点针对某一作品的审核结果与该作品的最终审核结果一致的概率。
在一种情形中，上述区块链中的各节点通常为公知的或官方的曾经参与过互联网原创作品审核的审核方，在相关领域中通常会有针对其审核能力的考核。此时，在确定节点对应的审核正确率时，可以参考相关领域对其作出的审核能力的考核，计算出与该节点审核正确率(审核能力强，则审核正确率高)，从而可以预判出当该节点进行原创作品审核时，所作出的审核结果与该作品的最终审核结果一致的概率。
例如，在原创作品审核领域，通常会存在相关的考核单位对审核方的审核能力进行考核，从而可以淘汰掉审核能力差的审核方，保持审核队伍的高效公正性。此时，当原创作品审核平台搭建方搭建平台时将上述审核方作为节点时，可以通过数学方法将审核能力考核结果转化为上述节点对应的审核正确率。
在确定出各节点对应的审核正确率后，上述原创作品审核平台搭建方可以将上述区块链中维护的各节点设备对应的审核正确率按照数值从大到小的顺序进行排序。
在排序完成后，上述原创作品审核平台搭建方可以从排序后的各节点中，选取前N个节点作为上述审核节点；其中，上述N为自然数。
例如，假设在实际情形中需要21个审核节点(即N为21)。此时，上述原创作品审核平台搭建方可以从排序后的各节点中，选取前N个节点作为上述审核节点。
至此，上述区块链系统中的审核节点选举完毕，上述原创作品审核平台搭建完毕。
二、进行原创审核。当用户需要在互联网中上传自身创造的作品时，该用户可以通过外部账户(预先分配给用户的账户)将待审作品上传至上述区块链中，并发起一笔交易。
响应于该用户发起的交易，上述外部账户对应的节点可以将上述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至上述各审核节点，由上述各审核节点针对上述待审作品进行原创审核。
在实现时，上述外部账户对应的节点可以响应于用户发起的交易，调用上述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑，将上述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至上述各审核节点。
在一种情形中，上述原创审核智能合约可以是由外部账户创建并存储在区块中的。此时，在调用上述智能合约时，区块链中的节点可以直接调用。
在另一种情形中，上述原创审核智能合约可以是由外部账户创建存储在节点本地的。此时，在调用上述智能合约时，可以通过调用上述区块链中与上述原创审核智能合约对应的区块头来执行该智能合约。
当上述各审核节点接收到上述用户发起的交易后，可以通过发起对上述待审作品进行原创审核。
在此，需要说明的是，为了原创审核的公正性，在进行各审核节点进行原创审核前，通常需要先随机确定各审核节点的审核顺序。在确定上述审核顺序后，各审核节点须将按照审核顺序将自身的审核结果返回至智能合约存储。
在一实施例中，如果任一审核节点没有按照随机确定的上述审核顺序返回审核结果，或者在预设的时间段内没有返回审核结果，则可以确定该审核节点的审核结果为失败，并可以视为上述审核节点执行审核工作“不认真”。
当审核节点针对上述待审作品进行原创审核时，在一实施例中可以采用检索比对法(在此不详细说明)。如果用户上传的作品与检索出的作品的表述方式与表达的含义几乎一致，则可以确定上述用户上传的作品可能涉嫌抄袭。如果用户上传的作品与检索出的作品的表述方式或表达的含义不一致，则可以确定上述用户上传的作品为原创作品，并允许将上述原创作品上传至互联网络中。
在一实施例中，为了节省审核节点(审核人员)的审核工作量，在调用上述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑之前，可以先调用上述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的校验逻辑，针对上述待审作品进行初步校验。 如果上述初步校验通过，则进一步调用上述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑。
在实际应用中，上述区块链的各节点中可以预先被共识了包括校验逻辑的原创审核智能合约。其中，上述校验逻辑具有多种校验方式，可以与不同作品类型对应。
例如，当需要校验的作品的类型为图片时，上述校验逻辑可以是图片相似度校验。当需要校验的作品的类型为文字时，上述校验逻辑可以是哈希校验。需要说明的是，上述校验逻辑与作品类型的对应关系可以参照相关技术，在此不作特别限定。
当用户通过外部账户发起一笔审核交易后，上述外部账户对应的节点可以先确定上述用户对应的待审作品的类型。在确定上述待审作品的类型后，上述节点可以调用上述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的与上述作品类型对应校验逻辑，以对上述待审作品进行初步校验。
如果上述初步校验通过，则可以认为上述待审作品经过初审合格，需要进一步经过人工进行审核。此时，上述节点可以进一步调用上述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑，以使各审核节点对上述待审作品进行原创审核。
如果上述初步校验不通过，则可以在初审阶段极爱那个上述待审作品确定为涉嫌抄袭的作品。此时，可以避免审核节点(审核人员)进行人工审核，可以减少审核节点工作量，提升审核效率。
当各审核节点按照审核顺序将自身的审核结果返回至上述原创审核智能合约时，可以进一步调用上述原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的确定逻辑，基于各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对上述待审作品最终审核结果。
在一实施例中，上述确定逻辑可以为少数服从多数。具体地，如果审核结果为通过的审核节点的数量大于审核结果为不通过的审核节点的数量，则将针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果确定为审核通过；反之，则确定为审核不通过。
在另一实施例中，上述确定逻辑可以为绝对阈值法。具体地，可以统计审核结果为通过的审核节点的数量，并将上述数量与预设阈值比较。如果上述数量达到上述预设阈值，则可以将针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果确定为审核通过；反之，则确定为审核不通过。其中，上述预设阈值可以是开发人员基于经验设定；或者基于神经网络模型计算得到。
当针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果确定后，上述用户对应的节点可以基于上述 最终审核结果向上述用户作出反馈。
在一种情形中，如果上述最终审核结果为审核不通过，则上述节点可以通过显示单元向上述用户提示上述审核结果，并且还可以将审核不通过的原因通过上述显示单元向用户展示，以使用户可以基于上述原因对作品作出修改。
在另一种情形中，如果上述最终审核结果为审核通过，则上述节点可以确定上述用户上传的作品为原创作品可以公开至互联网中，并向用户作出相应提示。在实际应用中，上述节点可以自动将上述作品通过公开的平台(例如，知乎、搜狐等)进行展示；或者上述节点可以在经过用户的许可后再将上述作品进行公开。
在一实施例中，为了避免用户恶意频繁提交作品审核，在用户发起审核交易时，可以从上述用户对应的账户中扣除一部分审核费。
上述审核费，具体是指在原创审核中所必要的花费。在一种情形中，上述审核费可以是执行智能合约产生的汽油费。在另一种情形中，上述审核费可以是审核人员的审核报价。需要说明的是，审核费的类型可以根据实际情形进行确定，在此不作限定。
此时，由于审核费用是用户在发起审核交易时同时要递交的费用，对用户造成一定花销，因此，使用户仅会在有真正需求时才会发起审核交易，从而避免用户恶意频繁提交作品审核。
三、更换审核节点。为了督促审核节点(审核人员)进行原创审核作业，在本申请中还提出了一种更换审核节点的方法。
具体地，在每次确定待审作品对应的最终审核结果后，可以将每一审核节点的审核结果与上述最终审核结果进行比较，并基于上述比较结果更新上述各审核节点对应的审核正确率；
上述审核正确率，具体是指其对应节点针对某一作品的审核结果与该作品的最终审核结果一致的概率。在计算某一节点对应的审核正确率时，可以将统计的该节点已完成审核的审核结果与每次审核所对应的最终审核结果一致的次数，除以该节点所在区块链承担原创审核的次数得到。
例如，假设节点A所在区块链已承担50次原创审核作业。上述节点A在上述50次审核中所作出的审核结果与每次审核所对应的最终审核结果一致的次数为40次。由此可以计算出上述节点A对应的审核正确率为，40除以50等于80％。
在实际应用中，可以基于该审核正确率预测其对应节点在针对新的待审作品进行审核时，所作出的审核结果与最终审核结果一致的概率，从而反映出对应节点的作业能力，
由于本申请中审核节点是按照随机确定的审核顺序进行审核的，因此，处于上述审核顺序末尾的审核节点可能抄袭其之前的审核节点而作出虚假的审核，并以此来提升自身对应的审核正确率。为了避免上述情形，在更换审核节点对应的审核正确率时，可以先按照审核节点的审核顺序将审核节点排序；然后，对从排序后的首个节点开始，至第M个节点中间的各审核节点所对应的审核正确率进行更新。需要说明的是，上述M可以是开发人员根据需求或经验设定的，在此不作特别限定。
由于处于上述审核顺序末尾(位置处于第M个节点之后)的审核节点对应的审核节点不会被更新，因此，可以避免由于上述审核节点进行虚假审核而提升其对应的审核正确率。
当用户发起审核交易时，除了将审核交易发送至审核节点进行原创审核外，还可以与非审核节点交互，使上述非审核节点也可以对上述待审作品作出审核。
具体地，上述非审核节点可以读取到上述用户在上述区块链中上传的作品，并基于审核方法(例如，检索比对法)针对上述待审作品作出相应审核结果。在作出审核结果后，上述非审核节点可以将审核结果进行加密存储，并将加密后的审核结果上传至区块链中。
当上述待审作品的最终审核结果被确定后，上述非审核节点可以将解密密钥上传至区块链中，以由上述区块链中的其他节点获取该非审核节点的审核结果，从而将上述各非审核节点针对上述待审作品的审核结果与上述最终审核结果进行比较，并基于上述比较结果更新上述各非审核节点的审核正确率。
在一实施例中，可以定期启动上述更换审核节点程序。具体地，可以周期性的依次对上述区块链中的各审核节点执行以下步骤：确定上述审核节点的审核正确率是否达到预设阈值。
如果未达到，则从上述各非审核节点中确定审核正确率最大的非审核节点，并将上述审核节点替换为确定出的非审核节点。
如果达到，则说明上述审核节点的审核正确率达标。不对该审核节点进行更换操作。
上述预设阈值，通常是在原创审核领域开业接受的审核正确率。该阈值通常可以是开发人员基于经验设定，或者是通过神经网络算法得到，在此不做限定。
例如，假设上述预设阈值为70％。如果某一审核节点对应的审核正确率未达到70％，则说明上述审核节点审核正确率不达标，工作能力较差，应当被替换。因此，在上述更好审核节点程序中，可以将该审核节点替换为统计的审核正确率最高的非审核节点。
由上述程序可知，通过上述更换审核节点方法，可以使审核节点始终保持较高的审核正确率，从而对审核节点进行督促。
在另一实施例中，还可以采用末位淘汰制进行更换审核节点的相关操作。
在实际应用中，可以定期按照各审核节点和各非审核节点各自对应的审核正确率分别对审核节点和非审核节点进行从高到地的排序。然后，将处于末尾的审核节点的正确审核率与排在首位的非审核节点的正确审核率进行比较。
如果上述非审核节点的争取率较高，则将上述审核节点替换为上述非审核节点；反之，则不进行任何更换操作。
采用末尾淘汰制仍然可以有效的督促审核节点进行审核工作，从而提升原创审核质量和效率。
在另一实施例中年，还可以采用定期大洗牌的方式进行更换审核节点的相关操作。
在实际应用中，可以定期按照审核正确率将审核节点和非审核节点混在一起进行排序，然后选出排名处于前N的节点作为审核节点。其中，上述N为原创审核平台预设的审核节点数量。
采用上述定期大洗牌的方式可以有效的督促审核节点进行审核工作，从而提升原创审核质量和效率。
以下结合实际场景对本申请实施例进行说明。
请参见图2，图2为本申请示出的一种基于区块链网络搭建的原创审核平台的结构图。如图2所示，上述原创审核平台为基于区块链构建。上述区块链包括若干节点。其中，上述节点包括通过选举算法选举出的审核节点。上述区块链中的审核节点可以响应于用户发起的审核交易，对用户上传的待审作品进行原创审核。
当用户通过其对应账户发起审核交易后，上述账户对应的节点1可以调用原创审核智能合约中的发送逻辑，将所述审核交易可以被发送至各审核节点中进行审核。
各审核节点可以按照随机确定的审核顺序上传各自的审核结果。
当上述节点1接收到各审核节点提交的审核结果后，可以调用上述原创审核智能合约中的确定逻辑，确定审核结果为通过审核节点的数量是否达到预设阈值。
如果达到，上述节点1则可以确定上述作品为原创作品。在确定上述用户上传的作品为原创作品后，所述节点1可以通过搭载的交互模块与用户进行交互以确定用户是否将所述原创作品进行公开。如果上述节点接受到用户确认公开的响应，则可以将所述原创作品发送至公开平台(例如，知乎)对应的服务端，以完成对所述原创作品进行公开。
由此可见，通过上述原创审核平台对用户上传的作品进行原创审核，一方面，由于区块链自身具有存储内容不可篡改性，因此，在对用户上传的作品进行原创审核时，可保证上述作品不被篡改，保证作品本身的真实性；
另一方面，由于针对上述待审作品的最终审核结果是参考选举出的各审核节点提交的审核结果作出的，因此，可以使原创审核可以去中心化，避免由于单一审核出现错误审核。
本申请还提供一种基于区块链的作品原创审核装置。请参见图3，图3为本申请示出的一种基于区块链的作品原创审核装置的结构图。
如图3所示，所述装置300包括：选举模块310，与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点；发送模块320，响应于用户发起的交易，将所述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点，由所述各审核节点针对所述待审作品进行原创审核；确定模块330，响应于所述各审核节点提交的审核结果，并基于所述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对所述待审作品的最终审核结果。
在一实施例中，所述选举模块310还用于：基于DPOS共识机制的选举算法，与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点。
在一实施例中，所述选举模块310还用于：将所述区块链中维护的各节点设备对应的审核正确率按照数值从大到小的顺序进行排序；从排序后的各节点中，选取前N个节点作为所述审核节点；其中，所述审核正确率指示其对应节点针对某一作品的审核结果与该作品的最终审核结果一致的概率；所述N为自然数。
在一实施例中，上述装置300还包括：更新模块340，响应于用户发起的交易请求，将所述交易请求中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点以外的各非审核节点，由所 述各非审核节点针对所述待审作品进行原创审核；获取所述各非审核节点的审核结果；将所述各非审核节点针对所述待审作品的审核结果与所述最终审核结果进行比较，并基于所述比较结果更新所述各非审核节点的审核正确率。
在一实施例中，上述装置300还包括：替换模块350，将所述各审核节点的审核结果与所述最终审核结果进行比较，并基于所述比较结果更新所述各审核节点对应的审核正确率；依次对所述各审核节点执行以下步骤：确定所述审核节点的审核正确率是否达到预设阈值；如果未达到，则从所述各非审核节点中确定审核正确率最大的非审核节点，并将所述审核节点替换为确定出的非审核节点。
在一实施例中，所述更新模块340包括：排序模块，按照审核节点的审核顺序将审核节点排序；更新子模块，对从排序后的首个节点开始，至第M个节点中间的各审核节点所对应的审核正确率进行更新。
在一实施例中，所述发送模块320包括：调用发送逻辑模块，响应于用户发起的交易，调用所述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑，将所述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点。
在一实施例中，所述确定模块330包括：调用确定逻辑模块，响应于所述各审核节点提交的审核结果，进一步调用所述原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的确定逻辑，基于各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对所述待审作品最终审核结果。
在一实施例中，所述发送模块320还包括：调用校验逻辑模块，响应于用户发起的交易，调用所述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的校验逻辑，针对所述待审作品进行初步校验；如果所述初步校验通过，则进一步调用所述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑。
本申请示出的图像数据的采集装置的实施例可以应用于基于区块链的作品原创审核设备上。装置实施例可以通过软件实现，也可以通过硬件或者软硬件结合的方式实现。以软件实现为例，作为一个逻辑意义上的装置，是通过其所在电子设备的处理器将非易失性存储器中对应的计算机程序指令读取到内存中运行形成的。从硬件层面而言，如图4所示，为本申请示出的一种基于区块链的作品原创审核设备的硬件结构图，除了图4所示的处理器、内存、网络接口、以及非易失性存储器之外，实施例中装置所在的电子设备通常根据该电子设备的实际功能，还可以包括其他硬件，对此不再赘述。
请参考图4所示的一种基于区块链的作品原创审核设备，上述设备包括：处理器； 用于存储处理器可执行指令的存储器；其中，所述处理器被配置为调用所述存储器中存储的可执行指令，实现如先前实施例所述的基于区块链的作品原创审核方法。
应当理解的是，本申请并不局限于上面已经描述并在附图中示出的精确结构，并且可以在不脱离其范围进行各种修改和改变。本申请的范围仅由所附的权利要求来限制。
以上上述仅为本申请的较佳实施例而已，并不用以限制本申请，凡在本申请的精神和原则之内，所做的任何修改、等同替换、改进等，均应包含在本申请保护的范围之内。

Claims (19)

  1. 一种基于区块链的作品原创审核方法，包括：
    与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点；
    响应于用户发起的交易，将所述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点，由所述各审核节点针对所述待审作品进行原创审核；
    响应于所述各审核节点提交的审核结果，并基于所述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对所述待审作品的最终审核结果。
  2. 根据权利要求1所述的方法，与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点，包括：
    基于DPOS共识机制的选举算法，与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点。
  3. 根据权利要求1所述的方法，
    与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点，包括：
    将所述区块链中维护的各节点设备对应的审核正确率按照数值从大到小的顺序进行排序；
    从排序后的各节点中，选取前N个节点作为所述审核节点；其中，所述审核正确率指示其对应节点针对某一作品的审核结果与该作品的最终审核结果一致的概率；所述N为自然数。
  4. 根据权利要求1所述的方法，还包括：
    响应于用户发起的交易请求，将所述交易请求中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点以外的各非审核节点，由所述各非审核节点针对所述待审作品进行原创审核；
    获取所述各非审核节点的审核结果；
    将所述各非审核节点针对所述待审作品的审核结果与所述最终审核结果进行比较，并基于所述比较结果更新所述各非审核节点的审核正确率。
  5. 根据权利要求4所述的方法，还包括：
    将所述各审核节点的审核结果与所述最终审核结果进行比较，并基于所述比较结果更新所述各审核节点对应的审核正确率；
    依次对所述各审核节点执行以下步骤：
    确定所述审核节点的审核正确率是否达到预设阈值；
    如果未达到，则从所述各非审核节点中确定审核正确率最大的非审核节点，并将所述审核节点替换为确定出的非审核节点。
  6. 根据权利要求5所述的方法，还包括：
    按照审核节点的审核顺序将审核节点排序；
    对从排序后的首个节点开始，至第M个节点中间的各审核节点所对应的审核正确率进行更新。
  7. 根据权利要求1-6中任一项所述的方法，响应于用户发起的交易，将所述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点，包括：
    响应于用户发起的交易，调用所述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑，将所述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点。
  8. 根据权利要求7所述的方法，响应于所述各审核节点提交的审核结果，并基于所述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对所述待审作品最终审核结果，包括：
    响应于所述各审核节点提交的审核结果，进一步调用所述原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的确定逻辑，基于各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对所述待审作品最终审核结果。
  9. 根据权利要求7所述的方法，响应于用户发起的交易，调用所述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑，包括：
    响应于用户发起的交易，调用所述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的校验逻辑，针对所述待审作品进行初步校验；
    如果所述初步校验通过，则进一步调用所述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑。
  10. 一种基于区块链的作品原创审核装置，包括：
    选举模块，与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点；
    发送模块，响应于用户发起的交易，将所述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点，由所述各审核节点针对所述待审作品进行原创审核；
    确定模块，响应于所述各审核节点提交的审核结果，并基于所述各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对所述待审作品的最终审核结果。
  11. 根据权利要求10所述的装置，所述选举模块还用于：
    基于DPOS共识机制的选举算法，与所述区块链中的其他各节点设备进行交互，选举出若干作品审核节点。
  12. 根据权利要求10所述的装置，所述选举模块还用于：
    将所述区块链中维护的各节点设备对应的审核正确率按照数值从大到小的顺序进行排序；
    从排序后的各节点中，选取前N个节点作为所述审核节点；其中，所述审核正确率指示其对应节点针对某一作品的审核结果与该作品的最终审核结果一致的概率；所述N为自然数。
  13. 根据权利要求10所述的装置，还包括：
    更新模块，响应于用户发起的交易请求，将所述交易请求中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点以外的各非审核节点，由所述各非审核节点针对所述待审作品进行原创审核；
    获取所述各非审核节点的审核结果；
    将所述各非审核节点针对所述待审作品的审核结果与所述最终审核结果进行比较，并基于所述比较结果更新所述各非审核节点的审核正确率。
  14. 根据权利要求13所述的装置，还包括：
    替换模块，将所述各审核节点的审核结果与所述最终审核结果进行比较，并基于所述比较结果更新所述各审核节点对应的审核正确率；
    依次对所述各审核节点执行以下步骤：
    确定所述审核节点的审核正确率是否达到预设阈值；
    如果未达到，则从所述各非审核节点中确定审核正确率最大的非审核节点，并将所述审核节点替换为确定出的非审核节点。
  15. 根据权利要求14所述的装置，所述更新模块包括：
    排序模块，按照审核节点的审核顺序将审核节点排序；
    更新子模块，对从排序后的首个节点开始，至第M个节点中间的各审核节点所对应的审核正确率进行更新。
  16. 根据权利要求10-15中任一项所述的装置，所述发送模块包括：
    调用发送逻辑模块，响应于用户发起的交易，调用所述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑，将所述交易中携带的待审核作品分发至所述各审核节点。
  17. 根据权利要求16所述的装置，所述确定模块包括：
    调用确定逻辑模块，响应于所述各审核节点提交的审核结果，进一步调用所述原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的确定逻辑，基于各审核节点返回的审核结果确定针对所述待审作品最终审核结果。
  18. 根据权利要求16所述的装置，所述发送模块还包括：
    调用校验逻辑模块，响应于用户发起的交易，调用所述区块链中部署的原创审核智 能合约的合约代码中的校验逻辑，针对所述待审作品进行初步校验；
    如果所述初步校验通过，则进一步调用所述区块链中部署的原创审核智能合约的合约代码中的发送逻辑。
  19. 一种基于区块链的作品原创审核设备，包括：
    处理器；
    用于存储所述处理器可执行指令的存储器；
    其中，所述处理器被配置为调用所述存储器中存储的可执行指令，实现权利要求1至9中任一项所述的基于区块链的作品原创审核方法。
PCT/CN2021/074487 2020-03-20 2021-01-29 基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备 Ceased WO2021184981A1 (zh)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010202832.7A CN111414589B (zh) 2020-03-20 2020-03-20 基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备
CN202010202832.7 2020-03-20

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2021184981A1 true WO2021184981A1 (zh) 2021-09-23

Family

ID=71491412

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2021/074487 Ceased WO2021184981A1 (zh) 2020-03-20 2021-01-29 基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (2) CN111414589B (zh)
WO (1) WO2021184981A1 (zh)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113901403A (zh) * 2021-09-27 2022-01-07 浪潮云信息技术股份公司 一种基于ipfs与区块链实现的工具包分享平台与方法
US12125040B2 (en) 2021-10-27 2024-10-22 Qwiti Holdings II, LLC Systems and methods for consensus in a blockchain network

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111414589B (zh) * 2020-03-20 2021-11-16 支付宝(杭州)信息技术有限公司 基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备
CN112650978B (zh) * 2020-08-14 2023-01-20 支付宝(杭州)信息技术有限公司 基于区块链的侵权检测方法及装置、电子设备
CN114726736B (zh) * 2020-12-18 2023-12-05 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 数据监管方法、第一监管节点、被监管节点、数据监管装置
CN114169884A (zh) * 2021-11-08 2022-03-11 北京中合谷投资有限公司 一种分布式网络的链路层
CN114418548A (zh) * 2022-01-25 2022-04-29 中国工商银行股份有限公司 开户业务审核方法、装置、设备、存储介质和程序产品
CN115081029A (zh) * 2022-06-17 2022-09-20 中国银行股份有限公司 一种基于区块链的代码库构建方法、装置及设备
CN115438385A (zh) * 2022-08-26 2022-12-06 中国兵器工业信息中心 基于区块链的设计图纸原创性保护及追溯方法
CN116955702A (zh) * 2022-10-31 2023-10-27 中移（杭州）信息技术有限公司 基于区块链的视频处理方法、装置及存储介质

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108597090A (zh) * 2018-04-20 2018-09-28 济南浪潮高新科技投资发展有限公司 一种基于区块链的投票方法、装置及系统
CN108876560A (zh) * 2018-07-18 2018-11-23 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 一种基于区块链对作品发布者进行信用评价的方法及装置
CN109086577A (zh) * 2018-08-06 2018-12-25 深圳市网心科技有限公司 一种基于区块链的原创音乐作品管理方法及相关设备
CN110472201A (zh) * 2019-07-26 2019-11-19 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 基于区块链的文本相似性检测方法及装置、电子设备
CN111414589A (zh) * 2020-03-20 2020-07-14 支付宝(杭州)信息技术有限公司 基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106357405A (zh) * 2016-09-19 2017-01-25 弗洛格（武汉）信息科技有限公司 一种基于区块链技术一致性算法的数据管理方法及系统
CN107659610B (zh) * 2017-08-02 2020-08-21 北京瑞卓喜投科技发展有限公司 基于区块链技术的著作权保护方法、装置和系统
CN108550041A (zh) * 2018-03-20 2018-09-18 深圳市元征科技股份有限公司 保护原创作品的方法、装置和终端
CN108664787A (zh) * 2018-05-15 2018-10-16 深圳市网心科技有限公司 合约部署、调用方法、合约审核设备、存储介质及系统
CN108717630B (zh) * 2018-05-19 2020-12-22 上海分布信息科技有限公司 一种出块方法及其实现系统
CN108876621A (zh) * 2018-06-29 2018-11-23 杭州云象网络技术有限公司 基于区块链技术的分布自治式投融资平台建设方法
CN109150972B (zh) * 2018-07-17 2021-07-23 湖南宸瀚信息科技有限责任公司 一种双层分片的高效区块链的共识机制的工作方法
CN109474584B (zh) * 2018-10-29 2021-12-07 中化能源科技有限公司 一种基于规则的区块链网络自动许可加入方法
CN109961287A (zh) * 2019-02-12 2019-07-02 众安信息技术服务有限公司 一种区块链的监管方法及监管系统
CN110009497B (zh) * 2019-03-26 2021-01-26 创新先进技术有限公司 基于区块链的决策方法及装置和电子设备
CN109993669A (zh) * 2019-04-11 2019-07-09 北京启迪区块链科技发展有限公司 一种购房资格审核方法、装置、设备及存储介质
CN110188515A (zh) * 2019-05-16 2019-08-30 中细软集团有限公司 一种区块链网络数字作品登记方法和客户端
CN110348248B (zh) * 2019-07-16 2023-07-21 山西智博睿星科技有限公司 一种区块链技术中分布式记账权生成方法
CN110555319B (zh) * 2019-07-22 2022-12-27 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 基于区块链的资源预期结果审核方法、装置和计算机设备
CN110533429A (zh) * 2019-08-30 2019-12-03 北京金山云网络技术有限公司 区块链中的交易背书方法、装置和区块链网络
CN110782251B (zh) * 2019-09-18 2023-05-12 江苏电力信息技术有限公司 一种基于智能合约自动化部署区块链网络的方法

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108597090A (zh) * 2018-04-20 2018-09-28 济南浪潮高新科技投资发展有限公司 一种基于区块链的投票方法、装置及系统
CN108876560A (zh) * 2018-07-18 2018-11-23 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 一种基于区块链对作品发布者进行信用评价的方法及装置
CN109086577A (zh) * 2018-08-06 2018-12-25 深圳市网心科技有限公司 一种基于区块链的原创音乐作品管理方法及相关设备
CN110472201A (zh) * 2019-07-26 2019-11-19 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 基于区块链的文本相似性检测方法及装置、电子设备
CN111414589A (zh) * 2020-03-20 2020-07-14 支付宝(杭州)信息技术有限公司 基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113901403A (zh) * 2021-09-27 2022-01-07 浪潮云信息技术股份公司 一种基于ipfs与区块链实现的工具包分享平台与方法
US12125040B2 (en) 2021-10-27 2024-10-22 Qwiti Holdings II, LLC Systems and methods for consensus in a blockchain network

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN114065145A (zh) 2022-02-18
CN111414589B (zh) 2021-11-16
CN111414589A (zh) 2020-07-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2021184981A1 (zh) 基于区块链的作品原创审核方法、装置及设备
US11588651B2 (en) Blockchain timestamp agreement
CN112084257B (zh) 有效的数据库机器学习验证
KR102537774B1 (ko) 기밀 지식의 특화된 증명을 제공하는 시스템들 및 방법들
US10678598B2 (en) Enforcing compute equity models in distributed blockchain
US11057225B2 (en) Enforcing compute equity models in distributed blockchain
US20230070625A1 (en) Graph-based analysis and visualization of digital tokens
EP3816916A1 (en) Method and device for storing merchant authentication data into blockchain, and method and device for obtaining merchant authentication data from blockchain
US20200013025A1 (en) Conditional deferred transactions for blockchain
US11314729B2 (en) Multi-candidate data structure for transaction validation
US20210194672A1 (en) Partially-ordered blockchain
CN115004625B (zh) 用于区块链分类账的索引结构
US10922097B2 (en) Collaborative model execution
CN112084255A (zh) 机器学习应用的有效验证
US20190182254A1 (en) Enforcing compute equity models in distributed blockchain
CN112868210A (zh) 区块链时间戳协议
US20200076573A1 (en) Special relationships in a blockchain
US12155764B2 (en) Optimal endorser node determination based on state
US11455598B2 (en) Automated conflict resolution
US20200364215A1 (en) Blockchain-based recording and querying operations
CN112733159A (zh) 用于区块链的自由搭乘节点识别
CN114186971B (zh) 一种业务审核单分配方法、装置、计算机设备及存储介质
CN112418819A (zh) 用于建筑企业诚信管理的区块链系统
US11941673B2 (en) Optimization of trusted invoicing
Dif et al. AutoDFL: A Scalable and Automated Reputation-Aware Decentralized Federated Learning

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21770872

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21770872

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1