WO2021172249A1 - Procédé de prédiction d'état d'usure, dispositif de prédiction d'état d'usure, programme de prédiction d'état d'usure et procédé de génération de modèle de prédiction - Google Patents

Procédé de prédiction d'état d'usure, dispositif de prédiction d'état d'usure, programme de prédiction d'état d'usure et procédé de génération de modèle de prédiction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2021172249A1
WO2021172249A1 PCT/JP2021/006535 JP2021006535W WO2021172249A1 WO 2021172249 A1 WO2021172249 A1 WO 2021172249A1 JP 2021006535 W JP2021006535 W JP 2021006535W WO 2021172249 A1 WO2021172249 A1 WO 2021172249A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
wear
data
aircraft
state prediction
wear state
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2021/006535
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
龍 花田
Original Assignee
株式会社ブリヂストン
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社ブリヂストン filed Critical 株式会社ブリヂストン
Publication of WO2021172249A1 publication Critical patent/WO2021172249A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60C—VEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES
    • B60C11/00—Tyre tread bands; Tread patterns; Anti-skid inserts
    • B60C11/24—Wear-indicating arrangements
    • B60C11/246—Tread wear monitoring systems
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60C—VEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES
    • B60C19/00—Tyre parts or constructions not otherwise provided for
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M17/00—Testing of vehicles
    • G01M17/007—Wheeled or endless-tracked vehicles
    • G01M17/02—Tyres

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a wear state prediction method, a wear state prediction device, a wear state prediction program, and a prediction model generation method.
  • Patent Document 1 a technique for predicting the wear state of an aircraft tire has been known (Patent Document 1).
  • the method described in Patent Document 1 applies a plurality of wear energies corresponding to a plurality of running states (for example, a touchdown running state, a deceleration running state after touchdown, a taxi running state, etc.) classified according to usage conditions.
  • the present invention has been made in view of such a situation, and is a wear state prediction method, a wear state prediction device, and wear that use the wear rate of an aircraft tire as training data input when generating a model.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a state prediction program and a prediction model generation method.
  • the wear state prediction method is associated with an explanatory variable and uses the wear rate of an aircraft tire as training data input when generating a model.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing the relationship between the wear state predictor, the network, and the airline company.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic configuration diagram of a wear state prediction device according to the present embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of machine learning according to the present embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of associating the learning data and the teacher data according to the embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a sequence diagram illustrating an operation example of the wear state prediction system according to the embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a sequence diagram illustrating an operation example of the wear state prediction system according to the embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of a method in which the air temperature after the day when the wear rate is predicted is taken into consideration.
  • the wear state prediction system 1 includes a wear state prediction device 10, a network 20, and an airline company 30.
  • the wear state prediction device 10 performs two-way communication with the airline company 30 via the network 20. Specifically, the wear state prediction device 10 acquires data on the aircraft 31 from the airline company 30 via the network 20. The wear state prediction device 10 generates a machine learning model using the acquired data, and predicts the wear state of the aircraft tire 32 mounted on the aircraft 31 using the generated machine learning model. Details of the data acquired by the wear state predictor 10 from the airline company 30 will be described later.
  • the network 20 is a communication network capable of transmitting and receiving data.
  • the network 20 is composed of various communication lines such as a dedicated line, a public switched telephone network, a satellite communication line, and a mobile communication line installed by a telecommunications carrier.
  • the aircraft tire 32 includes a tire mounted on the main gear and a tire mounted on the nose gear.
  • a plurality of (for example, 6) tires are mounted on the main gear.
  • a plurality of (for example, two) tires are mounted on the nose gear.
  • the wear state prediction device 10 is, for example, a general-purpose computer, and includes a CPU, a ROM (Read Only Memory), and a RAM (Random Access Memory).
  • the CPU reads the program stored in the ROM or the like into the RAM and executes it.
  • the wear state prediction device 10 may be a stationary terminal device or a portable terminal device (for example, a smartphone) that is easy to carry. Further, the wear state prediction device 10 may be configured as a server of the management center.
  • the wear state prediction device 10 includes a controller 11 (for example, a CPU) and a storage device 14.
  • the controller 11 includes a first processing function 12 and a second processing function 13 as a plurality of information processing functions.
  • the first processing function 12 is classified into a data acquisition unit 121, a data processing unit 122, an algorithm selection unit 123, and a model generation unit 124.
  • the second processing function 13 is classified into a new data acquisition unit 131, an application model selection unit 132, and a wear state prediction unit 133.
  • the data acquisition unit 121 acquires data from the airline company 30 via the communication unit (not shown).
  • the communication unit is an interface installed in the wear state prediction device 10 that connects to the network 20 and transmits / receives data to / from the airline company 30.
  • the data acquired by the data acquisition unit 121 from the airline company 30 includes temperature data of the aircraft 31, acceleration data of the aircraft 31, weight data of the aircraft 31, and data indicating the position where the aircraft tire 32 is mounted (hereinafter, simply mounting position). (Sometimes called data), etc. are included.
  • the temperature data of the aircraft 31 is the temperature data measured by the sensor installed in the aircraft 31.
  • the acceleration data of the aircraft 31 includes the acceleration data of the aircraft 31 in the XYZ directions.
  • the X direction is the front-rear direction of the aircraft 31.
  • the Y direction is the left-right direction of the aircraft 31.
  • the Z direction is the vertical direction of the aircraft 31.
  • the data processing unit 122 processes the data acquired by the data acquisition unit 121. The detailed contents of the process will be described later.
  • the algorithm selection unit 123 selects the algorithm used to generate the machine learning model.
  • Algorithms include, for example, linear multiple regression, Lasso regression, non-linear SVM, random forest, XGBost and the like.
  • the model generation unit 124 generates a machine learning model by machine learning the data generated by the data processing unit 122 using the algorithm selected by the algorithm selection unit 123.
  • the model generation unit 124 generates a machine learning model for each algorithm. Therefore, a plurality of machine learning models are generated.
  • the generated machine learning model is stored in the storage device 14.
  • the new data acquisition unit 131 acquires new data to be input to the machine learning model generated by the model generation unit 124 from the airline company 30.
  • the new data acquired by the new data acquisition unit 131 from the airline company 30 has the same attributes (temperature, acceleration, etc.) and structure (every second described later) as the data acquired by the data acquisition unit 121 from the airline company 30. However, the data itself is different.
  • the applied model selection unit 132 reads the machine learning model generated by the model generation unit 124 from the storage device 14, and evaluates the prediction performance of the read machine learning model.
  • the applied model selection unit 132 selects the machine learning model having the highest prediction performance based on the evaluation result.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 inputs new data acquired by the new data acquisition unit 131 into the machine learning model selected by the application model selection unit 132, and predicts the wear state.
  • the wear state includes the amount of wear and the rate of wear. Details of the amount of wear and the rate of wear will be described later.
  • the data regarding the predicted wear state is stored in the storage device 14.
  • machine learning is classified into a learning phase and a prediction phase.
  • the learning phase features are extracted from a huge amount of data (big data) and a machine learning model is generated.
  • the prediction phase new data is input to the generated machine learning model and the results are output.
  • the acquired data is data acquired from the airline company 30, such as temperature data of the aircraft 31, acceleration data of the aircraft 31, weight data of the aircraft 31, and mounting position data.
  • the data input for machine learning is sometimes called an explanatory variable.
  • the temperature data of the aircraft 31, the acceleration data of the aircraft 31, the weight data of the aircraft 31, the mounting position data, and the like are explanatory variables.
  • the data output from the trained model may be called an objective variable.
  • the wear state of the aircraft tire 32 is the objective variable.
  • Machine learning includes supervised learning using teacher data and learning that does not use teacher data.
  • supervised learning is used.
  • Teacher data means so-called “correct answer data”.
  • Supervised learning is a method using a learning data set (indicated by reference numeral 40 in FIG. 3) in which "input data” and "correct answer data” are set.
  • big data is processed to generate a learning data set 40 before machine learning is performed.
  • data preprocessing Such data processing before machine learning is referred to as data preprocessing below.
  • the data preprocessing means the aggregation of data and the association between the aggregated data and the teacher data. Such association is sometimes called labeling.
  • the data acquisition unit 121 acquires data from the airline company 30 for each flight. When data is acquired from a sensor mounted on an aircraft as a data structure for one flight, the data is stored, for example, every second. That is, temperature data, acceleration data, and the like are stored every second. Therefore, the amount of data is enormous even for one flight.
  • the number of flights from the time when the aircraft tire 32 is attached to the airframe to the time when it is taken out is several hundred times.
  • the number of flights from the time when the aircraft tire 32 is attached to the airframe to the time when it is taken out may be expressed as all flights.
  • the data to be machine-learned is the data of all flights (hundreds of flights) from the time when the aircraft tire 32 is attached to the body to the time when it is taken out.
  • the teacher data (wear rate based on the amount of wear) to be linked is one value.
  • the amount of wear means the amount of wear of the aircraft tire 32 from the time when the aircraft tire 32 is attached to the airframe to the time when it is taken out, and the unit is mm.
  • XY (mm) is the amount of wear. Is. Usually, the amount of wear is measured after the aircraft tire 32 is taken out, so there is only one value.
  • the wear rate is used as the teacher data.
  • the wear rate is defined as the amount of wear of the aircraft tire 32 in one landing.
  • the unit of wear rate is expressed as mm / LD.
  • the wear rate is calculated by dividing the amount of wear measured after the aircraft tire 32 is taken out by the total number of landings.
  • the wear rate calculated in this way is used as the teacher data.
  • the number of landings and the number of flights are synonymous.
  • the wear rate is not limited to the above.
  • the wear rate may be defined as the amount of wear relative to the taxi mileage. Taxi traveling means that the aircraft 31 travels on the ground (mainly a runway) using the power of the aircraft 31.
  • the wear rate is calculated by dividing the amount of wear measured after the aircraft tire 32 is taken out by the taxi mileage on all flights.
  • the taxi mileage in one flight is the total value of the taxi mileage at the departing airfield and the taxi mileage at the arriving airfield. This total value is usually several kilometers.
  • the wear rate may be defined as a parameter obtained by dividing the amount of wear by the cumulative value related to the flight.
  • Cumulative values for flights include, for example, the number of landings and taxi mileage described above.
  • the cumulative value related to the flight may include the total value of the representative values (for example, the average value) of the acceleration of each flight and the total value of the weight of each flight.
  • the wear rate will be described as the amount (mm / LD) that the aircraft tire 32 wears in one landing.
  • the wear rate may be a value obtained by dividing the amount of wear by the taxi mileage, or may be a parameter obtained by dividing the amount of wear by the cumulative value related to flight. Further, as described above, since the amount of wear is one value, the wear rate calculated by the amount of wear is also one value.
  • the reason for using the wear rate as the teacher data in this embodiment will be described.
  • the inventor's research has revealed that when wear is used as teacher data, all the data may be in a horizontal line, making accurate prediction difficult.
  • the inventor's research has revealed that when the number of landings is used as teacher data, it may be difficult to make an accurate prediction because the variation in the amount of residual groove is not reflected.
  • the inventor's research has shown that accurate predictions are possible when wear rates are used as teacher data. Therefore, in this embodiment, the wear rate is used as the teacher data.
  • the data processing unit 122 aggregates the temperature data, the acceleration data, the weight data, and the like into one value. Since the mounting position data is a fixed value, it does not need to be aggregated.
  • the data processing unit 122 averages the temperature data in one flight and calculates the average temperature data in one flight.
  • the data processing unit 122 repeats this process to calculate the average temperature data for each flight (first flight, second flight ... 100th flight ).
  • the data processing unit 122 averages the average temperature data for each flight and calculates the average temperature data (one value) for all flights (first to several hundredth times).
  • the representative value of the explanatory variable is not limited to the average value, and may be the median value or the mode value.
  • the stored air temperature data includes the air temperature data when the aircraft 31 is stopped, the air temperature data when the aircraft 31 is running, the air temperature data when the aircraft 31 is flying, and the like. Is done.
  • the data processing unit 122 may select and use a part of the data according to the state of the aircraft 31. For example, the temperature data when the aircraft 31 is in flight need not be used. In other words, the data processing unit 122 may calculate the average temperature data (one value) by averaging the temperature data of a part of each flight.
  • the acceleration data includes the respective acceleration data in the XYZ directions. Therefore, the data processing unit 122 aggregates each of the acceleration data in the X direction, the acceleration data in the Y direction, and the acceleration data in the Z direction.
  • acceleration data in the X direction will be described.
  • the data processing unit 122 calculates the average acceleration data (X direction) in one flight by squaring the acceleration data (X direction) in one flight and then averaging them. The data processing unit 122 repeats this process to calculate the average acceleration data (X direction) for each flight (first flight, second flight ... 100th flight ). Then, the data processing unit 122 averages the average acceleration data (X direction) for all flights and calculates the average acceleration data (one value in the X direction) for all flights (first to several hundred times). do. Since the same applies to the Y direction and the Z direction, description thereof will be omitted.
  • the data processing unit 122 extracts the maximum value from the weight data in one flight.
  • the data processing unit 122 repeats this process to extract the maximum value of the weight data for each flight (first flight, second flight ... 100th flight ).
  • the data processing unit 122 averages the maximum values of the weight data for each flight and calculates the average weight data (one value) for all the flights (first to several hundredth times).
  • the data processing unit 122 calculates the average temperature data, average acceleration data (X direction, Y direction, Z direction), and average weight data of all flights as one value. As shown in FIG. 4, one of these values (learning data 41) is associated with the teacher data 42 (wear rate) to generate a learning data set 40. Since the training data set 40 is generated for each aircraft tire, a plurality of training data sets 40 are usually generated.
  • the algorithm selection unit 123 selects an algorithm to be used to generate a machine learning model.
  • Algorithms include linear multiple regression, lasso regression, non-linear SVM, random forest, XGBost, etc., as described above.
  • the present invention is not limited to these, and any algorithm that enables supervised learning may be used. Since these algorithms are well known, detailed description thereof will be omitted.
  • the model generation unit 124 generates a machine learning model by machine learning the learning data set 40 generated by the data processing unit 122 using the algorithm selected by the algorithm selection unit 123.
  • the above-mentioned linear multiple regression, Lasso regression, non-linear SVM, random forest, and XGBost are used as the algorithm.
  • the prediction performance by a machine learning model is evaluated by one or a combination of items indicating the performance of the algorithm such as the coefficient of determination (R 2) and the root mean square error (RMSE).
  • R 2 the coefficient of determination
  • RMSE root mean square error
  • the applied model selection unit 132 selects the machine learning model having the highest prediction performance based on the evaluation result.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 inputs new data into the machine learning model (learned model) selected by the application model selection unit 132, and predicts the wear rate.
  • the new data is acquired by the new data acquisition unit 131.
  • the new data is data from the time when the aircraft tire 32 is attached to the airframe to the time when the wear rate is predicted.
  • average temperature data, average acceleration data, average weight data, mounting position data, and the like are used as explanatory variables for machine learning, but in these explanatory variables, the contribution rate to the objective variable is not uniform. .. The contribution rate indicates the magnitude of the influence of each explanatory variable on the objective variable, and the greater the influence on the objective variable, the more important the explanatory variable can be said to be.
  • the explanatory variables (average temperature data, average acceleration data, average weight data, mounting position data, etc.) in this embodiment are non-cumulative explanatory variables.
  • the cumulative explanatory variables are not used, and only the non-cumulative explanatory variables are used.
  • the cumulative explanatory variable is, for example, the taxi mileage described above. The reason for not using the cumulative explanatory variables is that the accuracy of the machine learning model is reduced when the cumulative explanatory variables are used.
  • the inventor analyzed the contribution rate of each of the explanatory variables to the objective variable. As a result, the inventor found that among the explanatory variables, the contribution rate of the average temperature data was the highest compared to other data. The inventor also found that the explanatory variable with the second highest contribution rate after the average temperature data is the average acceleration data. This indicates that a highly accurate model can be obtained by using the average temperature data as an explanatory variable when generating a machine learning model for predicting the wear rate. Moreover, it is shown that a more accurate model can be obtained by adopting the average acceleration data as an explanatory variable in addition to the average temperature data.
  • step S101 the temperature data of the aircraft 31, the acceleration data of the aircraft 31, the weight data of the aircraft 31, the mounting position data, and the like are transmitted from the airline company 30.
  • step S103 the data acquisition unit 121 acquires the data transmitted in step S101.
  • the process proceeds to step S105, and the data processing unit 122 processes the data acquired in step S103.
  • the data processing unit 122 aggregates temperature data, acceleration data, weight data, and the like into one value.
  • the data processing unit 122 creates the learning data set 40 by associating the aggregated data (learning data 41) with the teacher data 42.
  • step S107 the algorithm selection unit 123 selects an algorithm (linear multiple regression, Lasso regression, nonlinear SVM, random forest, XGBost, etc.) to be used for generating the machine learning model.
  • algorithm linear multiple regression, Lasso regression, nonlinear SVM, random forest, XGBost, etc.
  • step S109 the model generation unit 124 generates a machine learning model by machine learning the learning data set 40 generated in step S105 using the algorithm selected in step S107.
  • step S201 the temperature data of the aircraft 31, the acceleration data of the aircraft 31, the weight data of the aircraft 31, the mounting position data, and the like are transmitted from the airline company 30.
  • the data transmitted in step S201 is new data used to predict the wear rate.
  • step S203 the new data acquisition unit 131 acquires the new data transmitted in step S201.
  • the process proceeds to step S205, and the application model selection unit 132 evaluates the prediction performance of the machine learning model generated in step S109 and selects the machine learning model having the highest prediction performance.
  • step S207 the wear state prediction unit 133 inputs the new data acquired in step S203 into the machine learning model selected in step S207, and predicts the wear rate.
  • the wear state prediction device 10 uses the wear rate as the teacher data that is associated with the explanatory variables and input when the model (machine learning model) is generated.
  • the wear state prediction device 10 inputs the data of the aircraft 31 into the generated model and predicts the wear rate.
  • the inventor's research has shown that accurate predictions are possible when wear rates are used as teacher data. Therefore, by using the wear rate as the teacher data, it is possible to generate a machine learning model with high prediction performance. Then, by using a machine learning model having high prediction performance, it becomes possible to accurately predict the wear rate.
  • the wear rate is a value obtained by dividing the amount of wear of the aircraft tire 32 by the number of landings, or a value obtained by dividing the amount of wear of the aircraft tire 32 by the taxi mileage.
  • the new data (data at the time of prediction) input to the machine learning model is the data from the time when the aircraft tire 32 is mounted on the airframe to the time when the wear rate is predicted.
  • the data for generating the machine learning model is the data from the time when the aircraft tire 32 is attached to the airframe to the time when it is taken out.
  • the date on which the wear rate is predicted and the date on which the aircraft tire 32 is taken out do not always match. Therefore, the number of data from the day when the aircraft tire 32 is mounted on the airframe to the day when the wear rate is predicted, and the data from the day when the aircraft tire 32 is mounted on the airframe to the day when it is taken out. The numbers do not always match. As a result, highly accurate results may not be obtained.
  • the temperature after the day when the wear rate is predicted may be considered.
  • An example of a method in which the air temperature after the day when the wear rate is predicted is taken into consideration will be described with reference to FIG. 7.
  • January 8 shown in FIG. 7 is the day when the latest data exists, and January 11 is the day when the wear rate is predicted (hereinafter, it may be simply referred to as the prediction implementation date).
  • the latest data is the latest data transmitted by airline 30.
  • the data acquisition unit 121 first aggregates the data from the day when the aircraft tire 32 is mounted on the airframe to January 8. Among the aggregated data, the average temperature data (first temperature data) is 12.2 degrees as shown in FIG.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 inputs the aggregated data into the machine learning model and predicts the wear rate.
  • the predicted wear rate is 0.0130 as shown in FIG.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 calculates the amount of wear by multiplying the predicted wear rate (0.0130) by the number of flights (625 times). The wear state prediction unit 133 subtracts the calculated wear amount from the groove depth of the aircraft tire 32 when it is new, and calculates the remaining groove amount indicating the remaining groove depth. The calculated residual groove amount is 2.38 mm as shown in FIG. The wear state prediction unit 133 may calculate the amount of wear by multiplying the predicted wear rate by the cumulative value related to the flight.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 When the remaining groove amount is larger than 0, the wear state prediction unit 133 generates data for the next day (January 9). As shown in FIG. 7, since the remaining groove amount (2.38 mm) on January 8 is larger than 0, the wear state prediction unit 133 generates the data for the next day (January 9).
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 acquires the January average air temperature (second air temperature data) of the AAA airfield where the aircraft 31 arrives and stores it in the database. As a result, 8.9 degrees (see FIG. 7) is input to the average temperature of the AAA airfield on January 9.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 uses the temperature data of 8.9 degrees to update the average temperature data from the day when the aircraft tire 32 is attached to the airframe to January 9.
  • the updated average temperature data is 12.2 degrees as shown in FIG.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 inputs data including the updated average temperature data into the machine learning model, and predicts the wear rate again.
  • the predicted wear rate is 0.0130 as shown in FIG.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 calculates the amount of wear by multiplying the predicted wear rate (0.0130) by the number of flights (632 times).
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 subtracts the calculated wear amount from the groove depth of the aircraft tire 32 when it is new, and calculates the remaining groove amount.
  • the calculated residual groove amount is 2.28 mm as shown in FIG.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 Since the remaining groove amount (2.28 mm) on January 9 is larger than 0, the wear state prediction unit 133 generates data for the next day (January 10). Then, the same process is repeated until the amount of the remaining groove becomes 0 or less.
  • the average temperature of AAA airfield in February is 10.2 degrees Celsius.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 calculates the day when the aircraft tire 32 is taken out. Next, an example of a method of calculating the date on which the aircraft tire 32 is taken out will be described.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 uses the groove depth of the aircraft tire 32 when new and the wear speed (0.0120) on February 12, and the number of flights until just before the remaining groove amount becomes 0. (* 2 shown in FIG. 7) is calculated.
  • the wear state prediction unit 133 has calculated the cumulative number of flights from the time when the aircraft tire 32 was installed on the prediction implementation date (January 11) from the number of flights until the remaining groove amount becomes 0 (shown in FIG. 7).
  • * 1) is subtracted (875-662) to calculate the remaining number of possible landings (remaining LD number in FIG. 7: 213).
  • the remaining number of landings means the number of times the aircraft tire 32 can be used.
  • the wear condition prediction unit 133 divides the remaining number of possible landings by the number of flights per day (7 times) to calculate the number of days that the aircraft tire 32 can be used (the number of remaining days in FIG. 7: 30 days). do. Then, the wear state prediction unit 133 calculates February 10, which is 30 days after January 11 as, as the day when the aircraft tire 32 is taken out.
  • the wear state prediction device 10 calculates the date on which the aircraft tire 32 is taken out.
  • the temperature data of the aircraft 31 is used as an explanatory variable for generating the machine learning model. Then, it was explained that the temperature data of the aircraft 31 is the temperature data measured by the sensor installed in the aircraft 31.
  • the explanatory variables used to generate the machine learning model are not limited to the temperature data measured by the sensors installed in the aircraft 31.
  • the explanatory variables used to generate the machine learning model may be airfield temperature data.
  • the method of acquiring the air temperature data of the airfield is not particularly limited, but the air temperature data observed at a fixed point may be acquired, or the air temperature data published by an administrative agency (for example, the Japan Meteorological Agency in Japan) may be acquired.
  • the method of aggregating the air temperature data of the airfield is the same as the method of aggregating the air temperature data of the aircraft 31 described above. That is, the air temperature data of the airfield is averaged and aggregated into one value like the air temperature data of the aircraft 31.
  • the method of aggregating the air temperature data of the aircraft 31 and the air temperature data of the airfield is not limited to the average.
  • the air temperature data of the aircraft 31 and the air temperature data of the airfield used as explanatory variables may be the median value or the mode value.
  • the temperature data related to the aircraft 31 includes both the temperature data measured by the sensor installed in the aircraft 31 and the temperature data of the airfield.
  • the data processing unit 122 may aggregate the air temperature data of the aircraft 31 and the air temperature data of the airfield.
  • the period in which the air temperature data is stored may be divided and aggregated.
  • the data processing unit 122 may divide the period in which the temperature data is stored into the first half and the second half and aggregate them.
  • the number of flights from the time when the aircraft tire 32 is attached to the airframe to the time when it is taken out is several hundred times.
  • the number of flights from the time when the aircraft tire 32 is attached to the airframe to the time when the tire 32 is taken out is 500 times.
  • the data processing unit 122 may divide and aggregate the period in which the temperature data is stored into the first half (1st to 250th times) and the second half (251st to 500th times).
  • the average temperature data (one value) in the first half and the average temperature data (one value) in the second half can be obtained as the aggregated data.
  • the data associated with the teacher data may be the average temperature data in the first half or the average temperature data in the second half. Even if the period in which the temperature data is stored is divided and aggregated in this way, the same effect as the above-mentioned effect can be obtained.
  • the data to be divided is not limited to the temperature data, and the period in which the acceleration data is stored may be divided. Further, the division method is not limited to the first half and the second half, and may be divided into three.
  • the data processing unit 122 classifies the period in which the air temperature data is stored into two or more different periods, and aggregates them using the classified plurality of periods. You may. As an example of the method of classifying into two or more periods, the data processing unit 122 may classify the period in which the temperature data is stored into the entire period (1st to 500th times) and the first half (1st to 250th times). It is possible. The data processing unit 122 averages the average temperature data of each of the plurality of classified periods (all periods and the first half), and acquires the average temperature data (one value) of the plurality of classified periods (the whole period and the first half). do.
  • the data to be classified is not limited to the temperature data, and the period in which the acceleration data is stored may be classified into a plurality of periods. That is, the data processing unit 122 may classify the periods in which the explanatory variables of the same attribute are stored into two or more different periods, and aggregate them using the plurality of classified periods.
  • Wear condition prediction system 10
  • Wear condition prediction device 11
  • Controller 12
  • 1st processing function 13 2nd processing function 14
  • Storage device 20
  • Aircraft 31
  • Aircraft 32
  • Aircraft tire 121
  • Data acquisition unit 122
  • Data processing unit 123
  • Algorithm selection unit 124
  • Model Generation unit 131
  • New data acquisition unit 132
  • Applicable model selection unit 133
  • Wear condition prediction unit

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tires In General (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif de prédiction d'état d'usure (10) qui comprend un dispositif de commande (11) qui utilise un algorithme prédéterminé ayant des données pré-acquises portant sur un aéronef (31) en tant que variable explicative pour générer un modèle pour prédire la vitesse d'usure d'un pneu d'aéronef (32) en tant que variable objective. Le dispositif de commande (11) utilise la vitesse d'usure en tant que données d'enseignement liées à la variable explicative et en entrée pendant la génération d'un modèle. La vitesse d'usure est un paramètre obtenu par la division de la quantité d'usure du pneu d'aéronef (32) par une valeur cumulative se rapportant au vol.
PCT/JP2021/006535 2020-02-28 2021-02-22 Procédé de prédiction d'état d'usure, dispositif de prédiction d'état d'usure, programme de prédiction d'état d'usure et procédé de génération de modèle de prédiction WO2021172249A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020033209A JP7437973B2 (ja) 2020-02-28 2020-02-28 摩耗状態予測方法、摩耗状態予測装置、摩耗状態予測プログラム、及び予測モデル生成方法
JP2020-033209 2020-02-28

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2021172249A1 true WO2021172249A1 (fr) 2021-09-02

Family

ID=77491013

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2021/006535 WO2021172249A1 (fr) 2020-02-28 2021-02-22 Procédé de prédiction d'état d'usure, dispositif de prédiction d'état d'usure, programme de prédiction d'état d'usure et procédé de génération de modèle de prédiction

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7437973B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2021172249A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2022207375A1 (fr) * 2021-03-31 2022-10-06 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Procédé de prévision de l'état d'usure actuel d'un pneu identifié installé sur un avion identifié

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114756977B (zh) * 2022-06-16 2022-10-25 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 飞机交点孔镗削让刀量预测方法、装置、设备及存储介质

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013113724A (ja) * 2011-11-29 2013-06-10 Bridgestone Corp タイヤ摩耗予測方法及びタイヤ摩耗予測装置
JP2017156295A (ja) * 2016-03-04 2017-09-07 三菱重工業株式会社 タイヤの摩耗寿命推定システム
JP2017187418A (ja) * 2016-04-07 2017-10-12 三菱重工業株式会社 磨耗検査装置及び磨耗検査方法

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013113724A (ja) * 2011-11-29 2013-06-10 Bridgestone Corp タイヤ摩耗予測方法及びタイヤ摩耗予測装置
JP2017156295A (ja) * 2016-03-04 2017-09-07 三菱重工業株式会社 タイヤの摩耗寿命推定システム
JP2017187418A (ja) * 2016-04-07 2017-10-12 三菱重工業株式会社 磨耗検査装置及び磨耗検査方法

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2022207375A1 (fr) * 2021-03-31 2022-10-06 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Procédé de prévision de l'état d'usure actuel d'un pneu identifié installé sur un avion identifié
GB2619830A (en) * 2021-03-31 2023-12-20 Michelin & Cie Method for forecasting the current wear state of an identified tyre installed on an identified aeroplane
GB2619830B (en) * 2021-03-31 2024-07-03 Michelin & Cie Method for forecasting the current wear state of an identified tyre installed on an identified aeroplane

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2021135231A (ja) 2021-09-13
JP7437973B2 (ja) 2024-02-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11119878B2 (en) System to manage economics and operational dynamics of IT systems and infrastructure in a multi-vendor service environment
US9530256B2 (en) Generating cumulative wear-based indicators for vehicular components
EP3270252B1 (fr) Commande d'équipement sur la base de détermination de défaillance
WO2021172249A1 (fr) Procédé de prédiction d'état d'usure, dispositif de prédiction d'état d'usure, programme de prédiction d'état d'usure et procédé de génération de modèle de prédiction
CA2771401C (fr) Systeme de surveillance de sante de plate-forme
US9811950B2 (en) Aircraft electric taxi system diagnostic and prognostic evaluation system and method
KR20180010321A (ko) 예측 모델들의 동적 실행
US8990826B2 (en) System and method for receiving analysis requests and configuring analytics systems
GB2577063A (en) System and method for aircraft contaminant monitoring
CN107180461B (zh) 与飞行器发动机相关联的系统
JP2013096988A (ja) 航空機パラメータを推定するための方法およびシステム
US10824956B1 (en) System and method for price estimation of reports before execution in analytics
Fritzsche et al. Optimal prognostic distance to minimize total maintenance cost: The case of the airline industry
CN111415026A (zh) 无人设备调度装置、系统和方法
EP3451251A1 (fr) Appareil et procédé de planification de vol d'aéronef
WO2021172248A1 (fr) Procédé, dispositif et programme de prédiction d'état d'usure
CN116432806A (zh) 一种航班地面保障节点时间的滚动预测方法和系统
CN116794532A (zh) 基于多模态传感器融合算法的无人机电池电量预测方法
Pipe Practical prognostics for condition based maintenance
Kolaric et al. Gaussian Process Model of Uncertainty in Safety-Critical Autonomous Driving
CN117975770B (zh) 一种航班恢复方法、航班恢复系统、设备及介质
CN113884927B (zh) 一种基于云端大数据的电池寿命主动控制方法及系统
US20240280976A1 (en) Method and system for controlling a production system to manufacture a product
Konakhovych et al. Method of Reliability Increasing Based on Spare Parts Optimization for Telecommunication Equipment
Zaliskyi et al. Software Support for Simulation and Prediction of Failures and Faults During Aircraft Operations

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21760226

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21760226

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1