WO2021130056A1 - System and methods for optimizing lighting timeout by fusing data from sensor bundles - Google Patents

System and methods for optimizing lighting timeout by fusing data from sensor bundles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2021130056A1
WO2021130056A1 PCT/EP2020/086147 EP2020086147W WO2021130056A1 WO 2021130056 A1 WO2021130056 A1 WO 2021130056A1 EP 2020086147 W EP2020086147 W EP 2020086147W WO 2021130056 A1 WO2021130056 A1 WO 2021130056A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
timeout
controller
motion
sensor
environment
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2020/086147
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Abhishek MURTHY
Original Assignee
Signify Holding B.V.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Signify Holding B.V. filed Critical Signify Holding B.V.
Publication of WO2021130056A1 publication Critical patent/WO2021130056A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05BELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B47/00Circuit arrangements for operating light sources in general, i.e. where the type of light source is not relevant
    • H05B47/10Controlling the light source
    • H05B47/105Controlling the light source in response to determined parameters
    • H05B47/115Controlling the light source in response to determined parameters by determining the presence or movement of objects or living beings
    • H05B47/13Controlling the light source in response to determined parameters by determining the presence or movement of objects or living beings by using passive infrared detectors
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05BELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B47/00Circuit arrangements for operating light sources in general, i.e. where the type of light source is not relevant
    • H05B47/10Controlling the light source
    • H05B47/105Controlling the light source in response to determined parameters
    • H05B47/115Controlling the light source in response to determined parameters by determining the presence or movement of objects or living beings
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02BCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO BUILDINGS, e.g. HOUSING, HOUSE APPLIANCES OR RELATED END-USER APPLICATIONS
    • Y02B20/00Energy efficient lighting technologies, e.g. halogen lamps or gas discharge lamps
    • Y02B20/40Control techniques providing energy savings, e.g. smart controller or presence detection

Definitions

  • the present disclosure is directed generally to optimizing lighting timeout by fusing data captured by sensor bundles.
  • a control mechanism must decide when to activate a light (the “onset”). Typical lighting systems are required to activate a light within 750 milliseconds of an occupant entering the space. Second, the control mechanism must decide when to deactivate the light when the occupant leaves the space (the “timeout”). Typical lighting systems are required to operate for at least 8,000 hours in between deactivations due to false positives, i.e., timeout when the space is occupied.
  • PIR sensors detect motion of heat-emitting objects, including human bodies. PIR sensors can detect motion very quickly and are therefore ideally configured for onset detection. However, PIR sensors are poorly configured for presence detection. If an occupant does desk work involving very little motion, a PIR sensor may accordingly fail to detect the motion, causing the controller to turn off the light. The time between the last detected motion and the deactivation of the light is called the timeout interval. While the timeout interval may be improved using heuristics, the interval is typically not optimized, leading to the lights turning off when occupants are working in a relatively still position. The occupants often must move their hands or even get-up and walk around for the light to turn back on again. Accordingly, a more accurate sensor system to optimize timeout of a light is needed.
  • the present disclosure is directed to inventive systems and methods for optimizing timeout of a lighting control in an environment, such as an office, by fusing data captured by two sensor modalities of a sensor bundle.
  • the systems and methods analyze data collected by a presence sensor, such as a single pixel thermopile (SPT), and a motion sensor, such as a passive infrared (PIR) sensor. Analyzing data collected by these two types of sensors provides greater precision in occupancy determination, especially in cases where occupants are sitting relatively still for prolonged periods of time.
  • the presence sensor is configured to detect the sustained presence of an occupant.
  • a lighting system for optimizing timeout of a luminaire in an environment.
  • the lighting system may include a motion sensor.
  • the motion sensor may be configured to generate a motion signal.
  • the motion sensor may be a PIR sensor.
  • the lighting system may include a presence sensor.
  • the presence sensor may be configured to generate a presence signal.
  • the presence sensor may be an SPT.
  • the lighting system may include a controller.
  • the controller may be in communication with the luminaire, the motion sensor, and the presence sensor.
  • the controller may be configured to determine if a timeout event has occurred based on the motion signal and a timeout detector.
  • the timeout detector may include a motion threshold.
  • the timeout detector may include an analysis period.
  • the controller may be further configured to determine if one or more persons are present in the environment based on the presence signal and a presence detector.
  • the presence detector may include a step analysis module configured to determine if one or more persons are present in the environment.
  • the controller may be further configured to power off the luminaire if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are not present in the environment.
  • the controller may be further configured to update the timeout detector if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are present in the environment.
  • the controller may be further configured to update the timeout detector by increasing an analysis period.
  • the controller may be further configured to update the timeout detector by decreasing a motion threshold.
  • the controller may be further configured to determine if a power on event has occurred based on the motion signal and a power on detector.
  • the controller may be further configured to power on the luminaire if the power on event has occurred.
  • a method for optimizing timeout of a luminaire in an environment may include generating, via a motion sensor, a motion signal.
  • the method may further include generating, via a presence sensor, a presence signal.
  • the method may further include determining, via a controller, if a timeout event has occurred based on the motion signal and a timeout detector.
  • the method may further include determining, via the controller, if one or more persons are present in the environment based on the presence signal and a presence detector.
  • the method may further include powering off the luminaire, via the controller, if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are not present in the environment.
  • the method may further include updating, via the controller, the timeout detector stored in the memory based on the motion signal if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are present in the environment.
  • the updating may include increasing an analysis period of the timeout detector and/or decreasing a motion threshold of the timeout detector.
  • the method may further include performing, via the controller, a step analysis of the presence signal to determine if one or more persons are present in the environment.
  • a processor or controller may be associated with one or more storage media (generically referred to herein as “memory,” e.g., volatile and non-volatile computer memory such as RAM, PROM, EPROM, and EEPROM, floppy disks, compact disks, optical disks, magnetic tape, etc.).
  • the storage media may be encoded with one or more programs that, when executed on one or more processors and/or controllers, perform at least some of the functions discussed herein.
  • program or “computer program” are used herein in a generic sense to refer to any type of computer code (e.g., software or microcode) that can be employed to program one or more processors or controllers.
  • FIG. l is a schematic of a system for lighting control timeout optimization, in accordance with an example.
  • FIG. 2 is a further schematic of a system for lighting control timeout optimization, in accordance with an example.
  • FIGS. 3A to 3D are example presence signals undergoing signal processing.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a method for lighting control timeout optimization, in accordance with an example.
  • the present disclosure is directed to inventive systems and methods for optimizing timeout of a lighting control in an environment, such as an office.
  • the systems and methods analyze data collected by a presence sensor, such as a single pixel thermopile (SPT), and a motion sensor, such as a passive infrared (PIR) sensor. Analyzing data collected by these two types of sensors provides greater precision in occupancy determination, especially in cases where occupants are sitting relatively still for prolonged periods of time.
  • the systems and methods may be configured to activate a luminaire when a PIR detects motion and an SPT detects presence.
  • the systems and methods may be further configured to deactivate a luminaire when a PIR fails to detect motion and an SPT fails to detect presence. If, while a luminaire is activated, the PIR fails to detect motion and the SPT detects presence, the luminaire will remain activated, and the system may adjust the motion detection process.
  • a lighting system 100 for optimizing timeout of a luminaire 110 in an environment 120 is provided.
  • the environment 120 may be an indoor or outdoor area for which it would be advantageous to activate and deactivate lights based on the occupancy.
  • the environment 120 may be an individual office in an office building.
  • the lighting system 100 may include a motion sensor 130.
  • the motion sensor 130 may be configured to generate a motion signal 160.
  • the motion signal 160 may be an electronic representation of the movement within a field of view of the motion sensor 130.
  • the motion sensor 130 may be a PIR sensor.
  • the motion sensor 130 may be any sensor or plurality of sensors, passive or active, capable of detecting motion.
  • the motion sensor 130 will be positioned in an office to detect motion of one or more persons 200 within the office.
  • the motion signal 130 may include data designating each detected motion as a “minor”, “medium”, or “major” motion.
  • the lighting system 100 may include a presence sensor 140.
  • the presence sensor 140 may be configured to generate a presence signal 170.
  • the presence signal 170 may be an electronic representation of presence within a field of view of the presence sensor 170.
  • the presence sensor 170 may be an SPT.
  • An SPT generates a presence signal 170 in terms of temperature. Example presence signals 170 captured by an SPT are shown in FIGS.
  • the measured temperature noticeably increases, or “steps up” in the presence of one or more persons 200.
  • the presence sensor 140 may be any sensor or plurality of sensors, passive or active, capable of detecting presence.
  • the presence sensor 170 will be positioned in an office to detect motion of one or more persons 200 within the office.
  • the motion sensor 130 and the presence sensor 140 may be packaged together in a sensor bundle.
  • the lighting system 100 may include a controller 150.
  • the controller 150 may include a memory 270.
  • the controller 150 may be in communication with the luminaire 110, the motion sensor 130, and the presence sensor 140. The communication may be wired and/or wireless, depending on the application.
  • the motion sensor 130 provides a motion signal 160 to the controller 150 for analysis.
  • the presence sensor 140 provides a presence signal 170 to the controller 150.
  • the controller 150 may be configured to determine if a timeout event 180 has occurred based on the motion signal 160 and a timeout detector 190.
  • the timeout detector 190 comprises criteria, such as algorithms and variables, used by the controller 150 to analyze the motion signal 160.
  • the controller 150 may analyze the motion signal 160 for criteria defined by the timeout detector 180 indicative of a lack of motion, and therefore, an unoccupied environment 120.
  • the timeout detector 190 may include a motion threshold 220.
  • the motion threshold 220 may be optimized according to the environment 120.
  • the timeout detector 190 may include an analysis period 230.
  • the analysis period 230 is the length of the time the controller 150 will analyze the motion signal 160 to determine if a timeout event 180 has occurred. In one example, if the motion signal 160 fails to exceed the motion threshold 220 during the analysis period 230, the controller 150 may determine the timeout event 180 has occurred.
  • the timeout detector 190 may include any other algorithms, values, or variables useful to analyze the motion signal 160 for human motion.
  • the controller 150 may be further configured to determine if one or more persons 200 are present in the environment 120 based on the presence signal 170 and a presence detector 210.
  • the presence detector 210 comprises criteria, such as algorithms and variables, used by the controller 150 to analyze the presence signal 170.
  • the controller 150 may analyze the presence signal 170 for criteria defined by the presence detector 210 indicative of a lack of presence, and therefore, an unoccupied environment 120.
  • the presence detector 210 may include a step analysis module 260 configured to determine if one or more persons 200 are present in the environment 120.
  • the step analysis module 260 may be configured to analyze the presence signal 170 for one or more “steps up” and “steps down” in temperature.
  • a “step up” in temperature is likely indicative of a person 200 entering the environment 120, while a “step down” is likely indicative of a person 200 leaving.
  • Example presence signals 170 are shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B. In these example signals, the measured temperature noticeably increases, or “steps up” when one or more persons 200 are in the field of view of the presence sensor 140.
  • the step analysis module 260 may be configured to convolve the presence signal 170 with a step function.
  • the convolved signal is shown in FIG. 3D.
  • the convolved signal will peak if the shape of the presence signal 170 corresponds to the step function. More specifically, the convolved signal will peak (or crest) to a maximum value during a “step up”, and fall (or trough) to a minimum value during a “step down”.
  • the controller 150 may determine if a “step up” or “step down” has occurred, and then further determine if a person 200 has entered or left the field of view of the presence sensor 140.
  • the controller 150 may be further configured to power off the luminaire 110 if the timeout event 180 has occurred and one or more persons 200 are not present in the environment 120. Analyzing data captured by both a motion sensor 130 and a presence sensor 140 prevents the controller 150 from inconveniently deactivating the luminaire 110 when the one or more persons 200 sit still for a prolonged period.
  • the controller 150 may be further configured to update the timeout detector 190 if the timeout event 180 has occurred and one or more persons 200 are present in the environment 120. This updating can be used to optimize the timeout detector 190 to prevent the detection of a timeout event 180 when one or more persons 200 are present in the environment 120.
  • the controller 150 may be further configured to update the timeout detector 190 by increasing an analysis period 230.
  • the controller 150 may be configured to update the timeout detector 190 by decreasing a motion threshold 220.
  • the analysis period 230 may be successively increased at a pre-determined rate.
  • the pre-determined rate may be dynamically adjusted based on a variety of factors, including the number of successive false positive timeout events 180.
  • the controller 150 in response to a first false positive timeout event 180, the controller 150 may double the analysis period 230. If the first false positive timeout event 180 is closely followed by a second, the controller may again double the analysis period 230. This successive doubling results in an exponential increase of the analysis period 230. This exponential increase may continue until false positive timeout events 180 no longer occur.
  • Exponentially increasing the analysis period 230 may result in energy inefficiencies due to the luminaire 110 remaining activated during a long analysis period 230 in which no persons 200 are present in the environment 120. Accordingly, the controller 150 may increase the analysis period 230 in a manner other than simple doubling. In one example, after doubling the analysis period 230 a certain number of times, the analysis period 230 may be multiplied by a factor slightly less than 2.00, such as 1.90 or 1.95 when a false positive timeout event 180 occurs.
  • the controller 150 may optimize the responsiveness of the lighting system 100 by decreasing the analysis period 230 by a pre-determined rate.
  • stored data captured by the presence sensor 140 may be mined to optimize the timeout detector 190.
  • the stored data may include presence signals 170 previously captured by the presence sensor 140.
  • a high degree of variability in the stored data over time may be indicative of frequent motion activity. Accordingly, if the controller 150 determines the stored data exhibits a high degree of variability, the controller 150 may decrease the analysis period 230 by a pre-determined rate. Similarly, a low degree of variability may be indicative of infrequent motion activity. Accordingly, if the controller 150 determines the stored data exhibits a low degree of variability, the controller 150 may increase the analysis period 230 by a pre-determined rate.
  • the controller 150 may be further configured to determine if a power on event 240 has occurred based on the motion signal 160 and a power on detector 250. PIR sensors are specifically preferred to determine a power on event due to their rapid data capture and processing rates. The controller 150 may be further configured to power on the luminaire 110 if the power on event 240 has occurred. In other embodiments, the controller 150 may be configured to determine the occurrence of a power on event 240 based on the presence signal 170.
  • a method 500 for optimizing timeout of a luminaire in an environment may include generating 510, via a motion sensor, a motion signal.
  • the method 500 may further include generating 520, via a presence sensor, a presence signal.
  • the method 500 may further include determining 530, via a controller, if a timeout event has occurred based on the motion signal and a timeout detector.
  • the method 500 may further include determining 540, via the controller, if one or more persons are present in the environment based on the presence signal and a presence detector.
  • the method 500 may further include powering off 550 the luminaire, via the controller, if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are not present in the environment.
  • the method 500 may further include updating 560, via the controller, the timeout detector stored in the memory based on the motion signal if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are present in the environment.
  • the updating 560 may include increasing 580 an analysis period of the timeout detector and/or decreasing 590 a motion threshold of the timeout detector.
  • the method 500 may further include performing 570, via the controller, a step analysis of the presence signal to determine if one or more persons are present in the environment.
  • the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements.
  • This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified.
  • inventive embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and claimed.
  • inventive embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, kit, and/or method described herein.

Abstract

A lighting system for optimizing timeout of a luminaire in an environment is provided. The lighting system may include a motion sensor configured to generate a motion signal and a presence sensor configured to generate a presence signal. The lighting system may include a controller in communication with the luminaire, the motion sensor, and the presence sensor. The controller may be configured to determine if a timeout event has occurred based on the motion signal and a timeout detector. The controller may be further configured to determine if one or more persons are present in the environment based on the presence signal and a presence detector. The controller may be further configured to power off the luminaire if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are not present in the environment.

Description

System and methods for optimizing lighting timeout by fusing data from sensor bundles
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE
The present disclosure is directed generally to optimizing lighting timeout by fusing data captured by sensor bundles.
BACKGROUND
Automatic control of a light in a space fundamentally involves two decisions. First, a control mechanism must decide when to activate a light (the “onset”). Typical lighting systems are required to activate a light within 750 milliseconds of an occupant entering the space. Second, the control mechanism must decide when to deactivate the light when the occupant leaves the space (the “timeout”). Typical lighting systems are required to operate for at least 8,000 hours in between deactivations due to false positives, i.e., timeout when the space is occupied.
Traditionally, both onset and timeout decisions were made using passive infrared (PIR) sensors. PIR sensors detect motion of heat-emitting objects, including human bodies. PIR sensors can detect motion very quickly and are therefore ideally configured for onset detection. However, PIR sensors are poorly configured for presence detection. If an occupant does desk work involving very little motion, a PIR sensor may accordingly fail to detect the motion, causing the controller to turn off the light. The time between the last detected motion and the deactivation of the light is called the timeout interval. While the timeout interval may be improved using heuristics, the interval is typically not optimized, leading to the lights turning off when occupants are working in a relatively still position. The occupants often must move their hands or even get-up and walk around for the light to turn back on again. Accordingly, a more accurate sensor system to optimize timeout of a light is needed.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
The present disclosure is directed to inventive systems and methods for optimizing timeout of a lighting control in an environment, such as an office, by fusing data captured by two sensor modalities of a sensor bundle. The systems and methods analyze data collected by a presence sensor, such as a single pixel thermopile (SPT), and a motion sensor, such as a passive infrared (PIR) sensor. Analyzing data collected by these two types of sensors provides greater precision in occupancy determination, especially in cases where occupants are sitting relatively still for prolonged periods of time. In particular, the presence sensor is configured to detect the sustained presence of an occupant.
Generally, in one aspect, a lighting system for optimizing timeout of a luminaire in an environment is provided. The lighting system may include a motion sensor. The motion sensor may be configured to generate a motion signal. The motion sensor may be a PIR sensor.
The lighting system may include a presence sensor. The presence sensor may be configured to generate a presence signal. The presence sensor may be an SPT.
The lighting system may include a controller. The controller may be in communication with the luminaire, the motion sensor, and the presence sensor. The controller may be configured to determine if a timeout event has occurred based on the motion signal and a timeout detector. The timeout detector may include a motion threshold. The timeout detector may include an analysis period.
The controller may be further configured to determine if one or more persons are present in the environment based on the presence signal and a presence detector. In one example, the presence detector may include a step analysis module configured to determine if one or more persons are present in the environment.
The controller may be further configured to power off the luminaire if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are not present in the environment.
In one example, the controller may be further configured to update the timeout detector if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are present in the environment. The controller may be further configured to update the timeout detector by increasing an analysis period. The controller may be further configured to update the timeout detector by decreasing a motion threshold.
In one example, the controller may be further configured to determine if a power on event has occurred based on the motion signal and a power on detector. The controller may be further configured to power on the luminaire if the power on event has occurred.
Generally, in another aspect, a method for optimizing timeout of a luminaire in an environment is provided. The method may include generating, via a motion sensor, a motion signal. The method may further include generating, via a presence sensor, a presence signal. The method may further include determining, via a controller, if a timeout event has occurred based on the motion signal and a timeout detector. The method may further include determining, via the controller, if one or more persons are present in the environment based on the presence signal and a presence detector. The method may further include powering off the luminaire, via the controller, if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are not present in the environment.
In one example, the method may further include updating, via the controller, the timeout detector stored in the memory based on the motion signal if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are present in the environment. The updating may include increasing an analysis period of the timeout detector and/or decreasing a motion threshold of the timeout detector.
In one example, the method may further include performing, via the controller, a step analysis of the presence signal to determine if one or more persons are present in the environment.
In various implementations, a processor or controller may be associated with one or more storage media (generically referred to herein as “memory,” e.g., volatile and non-volatile computer memory such as RAM, PROM, EPROM, and EEPROM, floppy disks, compact disks, optical disks, magnetic tape, etc.). In some implementations, the storage media may be encoded with one or more programs that, when executed on one or more processors and/or controllers, perform at least some of the functions discussed herein.
Various storage media may be fixed within a processor or controller or may be transportable, such that the one or more programs stored thereon can be loaded into a processor or controller so as to implement various aspects as discussed herein. The terms “program” or “computer program” are used herein in a generic sense to refer to any type of computer code (e.g., software or microcode) that can be employed to program one or more processors or controllers.
It should be appreciated that all combinations of the foregoing concepts and additional concepts discussed in greater detail below (provided such concepts are not mutually inconsistent) are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. In particular, all combinations of claimed subject matter appearing at the end of this disclosure are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. It should also be appreciated that terminology explicitly employed herein that also may appear in any disclosure incorporated by reference should be accorded a meaning most consistent with the particular concepts disclosed herein. These and other aspects of the various embodiments will be apparent from and elucidated with reference to the embodiment s) described hereinafter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the various embodiments.
FIG. l is a schematic of a system for lighting control timeout optimization, in accordance with an example.
FIG. 2 is a further schematic of a system for lighting control timeout optimization, in accordance with an example.
FIGS. 3A to 3D are example presence signals undergoing signal processing.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a method for lighting control timeout optimization, in accordance with an example.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
The present disclosure is directed to inventive systems and methods for optimizing timeout of a lighting control in an environment, such as an office. The systems and methods analyze data collected by a presence sensor, such as a single pixel thermopile (SPT), and a motion sensor, such as a passive infrared (PIR) sensor. Analyzing data collected by these two types of sensors provides greater precision in occupancy determination, especially in cases where occupants are sitting relatively still for prolonged periods of time. The systems and methods may be configured to activate a luminaire when a PIR detects motion and an SPT detects presence. The systems and methods may be further configured to deactivate a luminaire when a PIR fails to detect motion and an SPT fails to detect presence. If, while a luminaire is activated, the PIR fails to detect motion and the SPT detects presence, the luminaire will remain activated, and the system may adjust the motion detection process.
With reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, in one aspect, a lighting system 100 for optimizing timeout of a luminaire 110 in an environment 120 is provided. The environment 120 may be an indoor or outdoor area for which it would be advantageous to activate and deactivate lights based on the occupancy. In one example, the environment 120 may be an individual office in an office building.
The lighting system 100 may include a motion sensor 130. The motion sensor 130 may be configured to generate a motion signal 160. The motion signal 160 may be an electronic representation of the movement within a field of view of the motion sensor 130. The motion sensor 130 may be a PIR sensor. In other examples, the motion sensor 130 may be any sensor or plurality of sensors, passive or active, capable of detecting motion. In some examples, the motion sensor 130 will be positioned in an office to detect motion of one or more persons 200 within the office. The motion signal 130 may include data designating each detected motion as a “minor”, “medium”, or “major” motion.
The lighting system 100 may include a presence sensor 140. The presence sensor 140 may be configured to generate a presence signal 170. The presence signal 170 may be an electronic representation of presence within a field of view of the presence sensor 170. The presence sensor 170 may be an SPT. An SPT generates a presence signal 170 in terms of temperature. Example presence signals 170 captured by an SPT are shown in FIGS.
3 A and 3B. In these example signals, the measured temperature noticeably increases, or “steps up” in the presence of one or more persons 200. In other examples, the presence sensor 140 may be any sensor or plurality of sensors, passive or active, capable of detecting presence. In some examples, the presence sensor 170 will be positioned in an office to detect motion of one or more persons 200 within the office. In some examples, the motion sensor 130 and the presence sensor 140 may be packaged together in a sensor bundle.
The lighting system 100 may include a controller 150. The controller 150 may include a memory 270. The controller 150 may be in communication with the luminaire 110, the motion sensor 130, and the presence sensor 140. The communication may be wired and/or wireless, depending on the application. In a preferred example, the motion sensor 130 provides a motion signal 160 to the controller 150 for analysis. Similarly, in another preferred example, the presence sensor 140 provides a presence signal 170 to the controller 150.
The controller 150 may be configured to determine if a timeout event 180 has occurred based on the motion signal 160 and a timeout detector 190. The timeout detector 190 comprises criteria, such as algorithms and variables, used by the controller 150 to analyze the motion signal 160. In one example, the controller 150 may analyze the motion signal 160 for criteria defined by the timeout detector 180 indicative of a lack of motion, and therefore, an unoccupied environment 120.
The timeout detector 190 may include a motion threshold 220. In one example, if the amplitude of the motion signal 160 exceeds the motion threshold 220, the environment 120 is presumed to be occupied by one or more persons 200. If the amplitude of the motion signal 160 fails to exceed the motion threshold 220, the environment 120 is presumed to be unoccupied. The motion threshold 220 may be optimized according to the environment 120.
The timeout detector 190 may include an analysis period 230. The analysis period 230 is the length of the time the controller 150 will analyze the motion signal 160 to determine if a timeout event 180 has occurred. In one example, if the motion signal 160 fails to exceed the motion threshold 220 during the analysis period 230, the controller 150 may determine the timeout event 180 has occurred.
The timeout detector 190 may include any other algorithms, values, or variables useful to analyze the motion signal 160 for human motion.
The controller 150 may be further configured to determine if one or more persons 200 are present in the environment 120 based on the presence signal 170 and a presence detector 210. The presence detector 210 comprises criteria, such as algorithms and variables, used by the controller 150 to analyze the presence signal 170. In one example, the controller 150 may analyze the presence signal 170 for criteria defined by the presence detector 210 indicative of a lack of presence, and therefore, an unoccupied environment 120.
In one example, the presence detector 210 may include a step analysis module 260 configured to determine if one or more persons 200 are present in the environment 120. The step analysis module 260 may be configured to analyze the presence signal 170 for one or more “steps up” and “steps down” in temperature. A “step up” in temperature is likely indicative of a person 200 entering the environment 120, while a “step down” is likely indicative of a person 200 leaving. Example presence signals 170 are shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B. In these example signals, the measured temperature noticeably increases, or “steps up” when one or more persons 200 are in the field of view of the presence sensor 140.
With reference to FIG. 3C, the step analysis module 260 may be configured to convolve the presence signal 170 with a step function. The convolved signal is shown in FIG. 3D. As shown in FIGS. 3C and 3D, the convolved signal will peak if the shape of the presence signal 170 corresponds to the step function. More specifically, the convolved signal will peak (or crest) to a maximum value during a “step up”, and fall (or trough) to a minimum value during a “step down”. By further processing the convolved signal for peak detection, the controller 150 may determine if a “step up” or “step down” has occurred, and then further determine if a person 200 has entered or left the field of view of the presence sensor 140.
The controller 150 may be further configured to power off the luminaire 110 if the timeout event 180 has occurred and one or more persons 200 are not present in the environment 120. Analyzing data captured by both a motion sensor 130 and a presence sensor 140 prevents the controller 150 from inconveniently deactivating the luminaire 110 when the one or more persons 200 sit still for a prolonged period.
In one example, the controller 150 may be further configured to update the timeout detector 190 if the timeout event 180 has occurred and one or more persons 200 are present in the environment 120. This updating can be used to optimize the timeout detector 190 to prevent the detection of a timeout event 180 when one or more persons 200 are present in the environment 120. In an example, the controller 150 may be further configured to update the timeout detector 190 by increasing an analysis period 230. In another example, the controller 150 may be configured to update the timeout detector 190 by decreasing a motion threshold 220.
In a specific example of repeated occurrences of a timeout event 180 while persons 200 are present in the environment 120, the analysis period 230 may be successively increased at a pre-determined rate. The pre-determined rate may be dynamically adjusted based on a variety of factors, including the number of successive false positive timeout events 180. In an example, in response to a first false positive timeout event 180, the controller 150 may double the analysis period 230. If the first false positive timeout event 180 is closely followed by a second, the controller may again double the analysis period 230. This successive doubling results in an exponential increase of the analysis period 230. This exponential increase may continue until false positive timeout events 180 no longer occur.
Exponentially increasing the analysis period 230 may result in energy inefficiencies due to the luminaire 110 remaining activated during a long analysis period 230 in which no persons 200 are present in the environment 120. Accordingly, the controller 150 may increase the analysis period 230 in a manner other than simple doubling. In one example, after doubling the analysis period 230 a certain number of times, the analysis period 230 may be multiplied by a factor slightly less than 2.00, such as 1.90 or 1.95 when a false positive timeout event 180 occurs.
Further, if the controller 150 detects a succession of non-false positive timeout events 180, the controller 150 may optimize the responsiveness of the lighting system 100 by decreasing the analysis period 230 by a pre-determined rate.
In another specific example, stored data captured by the presence sensor 140 may be mined to optimize the timeout detector 190. The stored data may include presence signals 170 previously captured by the presence sensor 140. A high degree of variability in the stored data over time may be indicative of frequent motion activity. Accordingly, if the controller 150 determines the stored data exhibits a high degree of variability, the controller 150 may decrease the analysis period 230 by a pre-determined rate. Similarly, a low degree of variability may be indicative of infrequent motion activity. Accordingly, if the controller 150 determines the stored data exhibits a low degree of variability, the controller 150 may increase the analysis period 230 by a pre-determined rate.
In one example, the controller 150 may be further configured to determine if a power on event 240 has occurred based on the motion signal 160 and a power on detector 250. PIR sensors are specifically preferred to determine a power on event due to their rapid data capture and processing rates. The controller 150 may be further configured to power on the luminaire 110 if the power on event 240 has occurred. In other embodiments, the controller 150 may be configured to determine the occurrence of a power on event 240 based on the presence signal 170.
With reference to FIG. 4, in another aspect, a method 500 for optimizing timeout of a luminaire in an environment is provided. The method 500 may include generating 510, via a motion sensor, a motion signal. The method 500 may further include generating 520, via a presence sensor, a presence signal. The method 500 may further include determining 530, via a controller, if a timeout event has occurred based on the motion signal and a timeout detector. The method 500 may further include determining 540, via the controller, if one or more persons are present in the environment based on the presence signal and a presence detector. The method 500 may further include powering off 550 the luminaire, via the controller, if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are not present in the environment.
In one example, the method 500 may further include updating 560, via the controller, the timeout detector stored in the memory based on the motion signal if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are present in the environment. The updating 560 may include increasing 580 an analysis period of the timeout detector and/or decreasing 590 a motion threshold of the timeout detector.
In one example, the method 500 may further include performing 570, via the controller, a step analysis of the presence signal to determine if one or more persons are present in the environment.
All definitions, as defined and used herein, should be understood to control over dictionary definitions, definitions in documents incorporated by reference, and/or ordinary meanings of the defined terms. The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.”
The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements so conjoined, i.e., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases. Multiple elements listed with “and/or” should be construed in the same fashion, i.e., “one or more” of the elements so conjoined. Other elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified by the “and/or” clause, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, “or” should be understood to have the same meaning as “and/or” as defined above. For example, when separating items in a list, “or” or “and/or” shall be interpreted as being inclusive, i.e., the inclusion of at least one, but also including more than one, of a number or list of elements, and, optionally, additional unlisted items. Only terms clearly indicated to the contrary, such as “only one of’ or “exactly one of,” or, when used in the claims, “consisting of,” will refer to the inclusion of exactly one element of a number or list of elements. In general, the term “or” as used herein shall only be interpreted as indicating exclusive alternatives (i.e. “one or the other but not both”) when preceded by terms of exclusivity, such as “either,” “one of,” “only one of,” or “exactly one of.”
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified.
It should also be understood that, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, in any methods claimed herein that include more than one step or act, the order of the steps or acts of the method is not necessarily limited to the order in which the steps or acts of the method are recited.
In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitional phrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” “holding,” “composed of,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of’ and “consisting essentially of’ shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively.
While several inventive embodiments have been described and illustrated herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision a variety of other means and/or structures for performing the function and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantages described herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of the inventive embodiments described herein. More generally, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that all parameters, dimensions, materials, and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that the actual parameters, dimensions, materials, and/or configurations will depend upon the specific application or applications for which the inventive teachings is/are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific inventive embodiments described herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and claimed. Inventive embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, kit, and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods, if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the inventive scope of the present disclosure.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A lighting system (100) for optimizing timeout of a luminaire (110) in an environment (120), comprising: a motion sensor (130) configured to generate a motion signal (160); a presence sensor (140) configured to generate a presence signal (170), wherein the presence sensor (140) is different from the motion sensor (130); a controller (150) in communication with the luminaire (110), the motion sensor (130), and the presence sensor (140), the controller (150) configured to: determine if a timeout event (180) has occurred based on the motion signal (160) and a timeout detector (190); determine if one or more persons (200) are present in the environment (120) based at least in part on a step detection in the presence signal (170) and; and power off the luminaire (110) if the timeout event (180) has occurred and one or more persons (200) are not present in the environment (120).
2. The lighting system (100) of claim 1, wherein the timeout detector (190) comprises a motion threshold (220).
3. The lighting system (100) of claim 1, wherein the timeout detector (190) comprises an analysis period (230).
4. The lighting system (100) of claim 1, wherein the controller (150) is further configured to update the timeout detector (190) if the timeout event (180) has occurred and one or more persons (200) are present in the environment (120).
5. The lighting system (100) of claim 4, wherein the controller (150) is further configured to update the timeout detector (190) by increasing an analysis period (230).
6. The lighting system (100) of claim 4, wherein the controller (150) is further configured to update the timeout detector (190) by decreasing a motion threshold (220).
7. The lighting system (100) of claim 1, wherein the controller (150) is further configured to determine if a power on event (240) has occurred based on the motion signal (160) and a power on detector (250).
8. The lighting system (100) of claim 7, wherein the controller (150) is further configured to power on the luminaire (110) if the power on event (240) has occurred.
9. The lighting system (100) of claim 1, wherein the motion sensor (130) is a passive infrared (PIR) sensor.
10. The lighting system (100) of claim 1, wherein the presence sensor (140) is a single-pixel thermopile (SPT).
11. The lighting system (100) of claim 1, wherein the step detection comprises a step analysis module (260) configured to determine if one or more persons (200) are present in the environment (120).
12. A method (500) for optimizing timeout of a luminaire in an environment, comprising: generating (510), via a motion sensor, a motion signal; generating (520), via a presence sensor, a presence signal, wherein the presence sensor is different from the motion sensor; determining (530), via a controller, if a timeout event has occurred based on the motion signal and a timeout detector; determining (540), via the controller, if one or more persons are present in the environment based at least in part on a step detection on the presence signal ; and powering off (550) the luminaire, via the controller, if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are not present in the environment.
13. The method (500) of claim 12, further comprising updating (560), via the controller, the timeout detector stored in the memory based on the motion signal if the timeout event has occurred and one or more persons are present in the environment.
14. The method (500) of claim 13, wherein the updating (560) comprises increasing (580) an analysis period of the timeout detector and/or decreasing (590) a motion threshold of the timeout detector.
15. The method (500) of claim 12, further comprising performing (570), via the controller, a step analysis of the presence signal to determine if one or more persons are present in the environment.
PCT/EP2020/086147 2019-12-26 2020-12-15 System and methods for optimizing lighting timeout by fusing data from sensor bundles WO2021130056A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201962953796P 2019-12-26 2019-12-26
US62/953,796 2019-12-26
EP20150404 2020-01-07
EP20150404.0 2020-01-07

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2021130056A1 true WO2021130056A1 (en) 2021-07-01

Family

ID=73790126

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2020/086147 WO2021130056A1 (en) 2019-12-26 2020-12-15 System and methods for optimizing lighting timeout by fusing data from sensor bundles

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2021130056A1 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100102760A1 (en) * 2008-10-28 2010-04-29 Square D Company Automatic timing adjustment system for occupancy sensors
EP2466995A1 (en) * 2010-12-20 2012-06-20 Redwood Systems, Inc. Light timeout optimization
WO2018054752A1 (en) * 2016-09-20 2018-03-29 Philips Lighting Holding B.V. Lighting control

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100102760A1 (en) * 2008-10-28 2010-04-29 Square D Company Automatic timing adjustment system for occupancy sensors
EP2466995A1 (en) * 2010-12-20 2012-06-20 Redwood Systems, Inc. Light timeout optimization
WO2018054752A1 (en) * 2016-09-20 2018-03-29 Philips Lighting Holding B.V. Lighting control

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6724159B2 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling lighting based on user behavior
EP2534929B1 (en) Presence detection system and lighting system comprising such system
JP6866305B2 (en) Methods and systems for managing spatial composition
US11181878B2 (en) Dual mode system for detecting occupancy of a room
US9377365B2 (en) Thermal sensor module with lens array
US20130181617A1 (en) System and method for space vacancy sensing using gas monitoring
JP2016500903A (en) Occupancy state detection method and system
US9569670B2 (en) Destination and duration of stay determination in a geographically bounded area
JP2020122803A5 (en) Particle measurement system and particle measurement method
US20050080601A1 (en) Traffic and geometry modeling with sensor networks
WO2021130056A1 (en) System and methods for optimizing lighting timeout by fusing data from sensor bundles
US20180288850A1 (en) Trajectory tracking using low cost occupancy sensor
US20230016414A1 (en) Systems and methods for fusing data from single pixel thermopiles and passive infrared sensors for counting occupants in open offices
EP4082301A1 (en) Systems and methods for multimodal sensor fusion in connected lighting systems using autoencoder neural networks for occupant counting
CN101937201B (en) Delay self-adaption method of controller and controller based on method
US20160338177A1 (en) Lighting control system and lighting control method
KR102055760B1 (en) Method for controlling cleaning of home gateway connected to the floor and home gateway therefor and mobile cleaning robot using the same
CN115698657A (en) Method and system for waking up device
WO2014097072A1 (en) System and method for occupancy detection
KR102399976B1 (en) Sensor control apparatus and control method thereof
JP7280976B2 (en) Image acquisition means for object tracking
TW202146863A (en) Method and system for detecting presence of a person
US9929875B2 (en) Detection system and method and space control system using such a detection system
JP2022528219A (en) Methods and systems for detecting the presence of a person
CN115553625A (en) Intelligent curtain control method, device, equipment and storage medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20821279

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 20821279

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1