WO2021003576A1 - Machine tournante et son procédé de fonctionnement - Google Patents

Machine tournante et son procédé de fonctionnement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2021003576A1
WO2021003576A1 PCT/CA2020/050955 CA2020050955W WO2021003576A1 WO 2021003576 A1 WO2021003576 A1 WO 2021003576A1 CA 2020050955 W CA2020050955 W CA 2020050955W WO 2021003576 A1 WO2021003576 A1 WO 2021003576A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
air gap
stator
rotor
rotary machine
actuator
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CA2020/050955
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Cloutier MARIUS
Cloutier MATHIEU
Original Assignee
Vibrosystm Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vibrosystm Inc. filed Critical Vibrosystm Inc.
Publication of WO2021003576A1 publication Critical patent/WO2021003576A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02K—DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINES
    • H02K5/00—Casings; Enclosures; Supports
    • H02K5/26—Means for adjusting casings relative to their supports
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02K—DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINES
    • H02K15/00—Methods or apparatus specially adapted for manufacturing, assembling, maintaining or repairing of dynamo-electric machines
    • H02K15/16—Centering rotors within the stator; Balancing rotors
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02K—DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINES
    • H02K2201/00—Specific aspects not provided for in the other groups of this subclass relating to the magnetic circuits
    • H02K2201/03—Machines characterised by aspects of the air-gap between rotor and stator

Definitions

  • a rotary machine with an air gap configuration adjustment system having sensors providing a signal indicative of the air gap configuration during operation, and actuators configured to move a corresponding portion of the rotor or stator relative to the other one of the rotor and stator, to correct a defect in the air gap configuration which has appeared during operation.
  • a computer can be used to process signals received from sensors in a manner to monitor the air gap configuration and identify defects in the air gap configuration. Upon identifying a defect, the computer can determine a required correction, and the actuators can be controlled accordingly, in real time.
  • a concentricity defect can be corrected by translating the axis of one of the rotor and stator relative to the axis of the other one of the rotor and stator, for instance, whereas an ovality defect can be corrected by stretching or compressing the stator across its diameter, for instance, to name two examples of possible corrections.
  • a stator shape correction system for large rotating machines includes adjustable/automated stator anchoring system, an air gap monitoring system, a user interface and a management software that drives the automated anchoring.
  • the automated anchoring is activated on demand by the airgap monitoring system through the management software based on the air gap monitoring system algorithm output.
  • a comprehensive magnetic flux monitoring system could be used: replacing the air gap sensors by magnetic flux sensors and using only one air gap sensor strategically positioned.
  • a rotary machine having a rotor and a stator, a plurality of sensors configured to provide a signal indicative of an air gap configuration between the stator and the rotor, at least one of the rotor and the stator being supported via at least one actuator capable of moving a corresponding portion of the rotary machine relative to a ground reference, a computer configured to receive the signal from the plurality of sensors, determines a defect in the air gap configuration based on said signal, and controls the at least one actuator to correct the defect in the air gap configuration, during operation of the rotary machine, while the rotor rotates
  • a computer-implemented method of monitoring and correcting air gap defects in a rotary machine having a rotor, a stator, and an air gap between the rotor and the stator, at least one of the rotor and the stator being supported via at least one actuator, the method being performed during rotation of the rotor relative to the stator, and comprising : using a plurality of sensors, generating a signal indicative of a configuration of the air gap; determining a defect in the air gap configuration based on said signal, and controlling the at least one actuator to correct the defect in the air gap configuration.
  • a gearless sag mill having a rotor and a stator, a plurality of sensors configured to provide a signal indicative of an air gap configuration between the stator and the rotor, at least one of the rotor and the stator being supported via at least one actuator capable of moving a corresponding portion of the rotary machine relative to a ground reference in a manner to change the air gap configuration.
  • a computer program product stored on a non-transitory memory media and comprising computer readable instructions to receive an input from a plurality of sensors, the input being signal indicative of a configuration of an air gap between a rotor and a stator of a rotary machine; determining a defect in the air gap configuration based on said signal, and controlling the at least one actuator to correct the defect in the air gap configuration.
  • the expression“computer” as used herein is not to be interpreted in a limiting manner. It is rather used in a broad sense to generally refer to the combination of some form of one or more processing units and some form of non-transitory memory system accessible by the processing unit(s).
  • the use of the expression“computer” in its singular form as used herein includes within its scope the combination of a two or more computers working collaboratively to perform a given function.
  • the expression “computer” as used herein includes within its scope the use of partial capacities of a processing unit of an elaborate computing system also adapted to perform other functions.
  • the expression 'controller' as used herein is not to be interpreted in a limiting manner but rather in a general sense of a device, or of a system having more than one device, performing the function(s) of controlling one or more device such as an electronic device or an actuator for instance.
  • the various functions of a computer or of a controller can be performed by hardware or by a combination of both hardware and software.
  • hardware can include logic gates included as part of a silicon chip of the processor.
  • Software can be in the form of data such as computer-readable instructions stored in the memory system.
  • the expression “configured to” relates to the presence of hardware or a combination of hardware, firmware and software which is operable to perform the associated functions.
  • Fig. 1 is a photograph of a sag mill
  • FIG. 2 is a schematized cross-sectional view of a sag mill having an exaggerated ovality defect
  • Fig. 3 is a polar graph showing stator shape vs. temperature derived from data obtained via an Air Gap Monitoring System (AGMS) having twelve (12) sensors;
  • AGMS Air Gap Monitoring System
  • Fig. 4 is a display of a user interface of the AGMS
  • Fig. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a process of correcting an air gap defect in accordance with one embodiment
  • FIG. 6A is a schematic of a rotary machine, having another embodiment of a monitoring and correction system having four sole plate actuators and four air gap sensors;
  • Fig. 6B is a block diagram of the monitoring and correction system of Fig. 6A;
  • Fig. 6C is a flow chart of a process of correcting an air gap defect which can be used with the system of Fig. 6A;
  • Fig. 7 is a XY graph showing air gap distance values obtained both: from magnetic field intensity using Magnetic Field Monitoring System (MFMS) and air gap distance obtained from AGMS;
  • MFMS Magnetic Field Monitoring System
  • FIG. 8A is a schematic of a rotary machine, having another embodiment of a monitoring and correction system having four sole plate actuators and four magnetic flux sensors;
  • Fig. 8B is a block diagram of the monitoring and correction system of Fig. 8A.
  • Fig. 8C is a flow chart of a process of correcting an air gap defect which can be used with the system of Fig. 8A.
  • Fig. 1 shows an example of a SAG mill 2, one type of large rotating machine.
  • FIG. 2 schematizes, in a somewhat exaggerated manner, an ovality defect 4 which was detected using an air gap monitoring system having a plurality of sensors circumferentially interspaced from one another.
  • an air gap monitoring system having a plurality of sensors circumferentially interspaced from one another.
  • a circularity defect can occur due to thermal expansion, but can even be present on a stopped machine which has reached ambient temperature.
  • the SAG mill 2 has a rotor 6 mounted in a manner to extend inside a stator 8.
  • An air gap 10 extends in the form of an annular spacing between the rotor 6 and the stator 8.
  • FIG. 3 presents actual measurements of an air gap 10 of a SAG mill 2 as a function of angular position and temperature. As seen in the graph 12, the ovality increases with temperature, reaching its greatest extent at 61° C which was the highest temperature reached during this test.
  • Such air gap configuration behaviour can stem, in the case of a SAG mill 2, from the fact that the stator 8 is supported on a few points: typically three and sometimes only two. In many cases, SAG mill 2 designers rely on the stiffness of the stator 8 core 14 and frame 16 to keep the uniform shape or constant diameter all around.
  • the air gap 10 is a significant design parameter for many large rotating machines.
  • the rotor 6 In situations where the rotor 6 is very large, it can be preferred to assess the rotor 6 shape before addressing stator 8 shape.
  • the rotor 6 can suffer non uniformity usually referred to as roundness anomaly.
  • the case of SAG and Ball mills involve salient pole rotor which make it more difficult to build keeping the same diameter for each pole attached to rotor frame. The difficulty comes also from the large size of such machines. Because of the big dimension, the machines cannot be transported in one piece on site via the roads so the machine’s final assembly is done on site, often with limited means. As for the poles, they are fixed, on site, around the rim.
  • the rotor 6 roundness is one of the points to consider before controlling the stator 8 shape.
  • the stator 8 shape can then be controlled by adjusting stator sole plates, for instance. For that reason, an example assembly protocol can begin with the confirmation of rotor 6 specifications using an air gap monitoring system.
  • the nominal air gap 10 can be of 15mm +or-10% as specified. It was found that a machine that is well adjusted all around cold at standstill may show surprising results under its different operating conditions.
  • stator 8 shape As will now be exemplified, the evolution of the stator 8 shape can be adjusted while in operation.
  • Figure 4 is an example of instantaneous results from an air gap monitoring system of a gearless SAG mill 2; it is showing indications to understand the stator 8 shape correction need on that type of machine with the following results:
  • ⁇ 1.48 mm is the rotor 6 circularity
  • ⁇ 8.10 mm is the stator 8 circularity.
  • stator 8 While the rotor 6 is well centered with an acceptable circularity, the stator 8 is also well centered but its circularity is bad at 8.10 mm.
  • Figure 4 shows actual results obtained from air gap monitoring system (AGMS) installed on a Gearless Sag Mill 2. That Gearless Sag Mill 2 is equipped with twelve (12) stator 8 mounted airgap sensors. The air gap monitoring system is the input for the stator shape control (SSC).
  • Figure 4 shows representation of the rotor 18 inside the stator 20 and some calculated results 22 using the many algorithms that are part of the AGMS software and firmware.
  • the rotor 6 shape is acceptable with 1.48 mm of circularity which is within the rotor’s specifications.
  • the stator 8 is showing a much worse condition with 8.10 mm of circularity. As indicated in figure 4, the rotor 6 circularity is 9.27% while the stator 8 circularity is 60%.
  • FIG 3 shows stator 8 graphic 12 shape illustration changes over temperature changes which are clear indication of the stator 8 shape defects. In this case, the oval shape is always present getting worst with temperature rise. A good way to visualize the situation is shown at figure 2.
  • Figure 2 is also showing the major physical attachment points 22 holding the stator 8, these are the possible locations 22, 24 where the corrective actions 34, 36, 38, 40 can be applied using the SSC (stator shape control).
  • the air gap 10 has twelve sensors equidistant around the stator 8 and only 2 locations 22, 24 are available for the actuators 26, 28, 30 32.
  • the number of air gap sensors is twelve (12) while the number of actuators 26, 28, 30, 32 is four (4) in two (2) locations 22, 24; the two locations are called left 22 (L) and right 24 (R).
  • the 2 actuators per location 22, 24 are horizontal and vertical.
  • the horizontal actuator 28 is LH and the vertical actuator 26 is LV and on right side, are horizontal actuator 30 is RH and vertical actuator 32 is RV.
  • the twelve (12) air gap sensors feeding the air gap monitoring system are providing the average minimum air gap (AMAG) of the whole machine.
  • AMAG average minimum air gap
  • the AMAG value is then used as a target value to position the four (4) actuators 26, 28, 30, 32.
  • the process description, presented at Fig. 5, includes continuous monitoring of the rotor 6 shape which is possible since the commercialization of AGMS. For that reason, the flow chart 42 has a part dedicated to the rotor 6 shape. Even if the rotor 6 is monitored in real time, the real time correction concerned the stator 8 only.
  • Fig. 5 illustrates one embodiment for a rotor 6 equipped with salient poles.
  • i R (Right) & L (Left)
  • S number of stator 8 fixed sensors
  • N number of poles on the rotor 6 of a salient pole machine
  • the flow chart 42 being air gap based for salient pole machine SAG mills 2.
  • Flow chart 42 at step 44 the process starts, going to step 46 where the air gap monitoring system is used with a salient pole rotor to measure the minimum air gap 10 for each pole and for each air gap sensor.
  • the rotor 6 shape is extracted and evaluated at step 50 base on industry standards. If the rotor 6 shape is not acceptable, step 52 advices to stop the machine and proceed to the correction.
  • step 54 and step 56 are starting there processing horizontal data step 54 and vertical data step 56.
  • the average minimum air gap (AMAG) is extracted as a result of the twelve (12) air gap sensor outputs and the possible vertical positioning is extracted for the best horizontal positioning of the actuators 26, 28, 30, 32 on the right side (BHPR) and left side (BHPL).
  • the actual position is compared to the best ones right and left. Difference between Actual Horizontal Position (AH Pi) and the Best Horizontal Position (BHPi) is Correction Horizontal (CHi). If the result is 0 within an error margin, the process proceeds with stop step 66 until a change of situation outside the set limits which brings the request for a correction. If the difference is outside of the accepted error margin, step 64 proceeds with the requested CHi on the actuator MHi. After correction is applied, resulting position is verified for a confirmation of the correction effect and if so step 66 stops the process until a change brings back the need for correction.
  • step 56 down the same processing like step 54 is done for the vertical signals.
  • FIG. 6A, 6B and 6C A second embodiment will now be discussed in relation with Figs. 6A, 6B and 6C.
  • the rotor has the proper shape, i.e. a rotor with poles having the same radius within their specifications. It will be noted here that such an embodiment can also be applied to a flat rotor machine.
  • Fig. 6A schematizes a machine 100 with salient poles equipped with four (4) actuators (Ai) 110, 112, 114, 116 (which can be sole plates in this case), four (4) proximity air gap sensors (VMi) 118, 120, 122, 124 and a feedback control system 126 which can have a computer connected as illustrated in Fig. 6B used to implement an algorithm such as shown in Fig. 6C, for instance.
  • M is the number of actuators
  • S the number of stator fixed sensors
  • i 1 to M.
  • the sensors output are treated by the processor 128 using algorithms included in flow chart 130 Fig. 6C.
  • the proper feedback information is sent to each actuator 110, 112, 114, 116 and the system can operate continuously in the form of a real time feedback control system 126 maintaining a suitable air gap 102 to the machine 100 all around.
  • an example control algorithm can be as follows: flow chart 130, at step 132, the process starts, at step 134 the air gap monitoring system measures the minimum air gap 102 for each air gap sensor 118, 120, 122, 124 and extracts the average minimum air gap of the whole machine (AMAG) from all the sensors 118, 120, 122, 124 around the stator 104.
  • the next step is 138 where Ci signal is sent to the local actuator Mi (i represents the actuator identification number since the number of air gap sensors can be higher than the number of actuators).
  • the process is applied to each actuator positioned around the stator 104 where, at step 138, local actuator applies the requested correction Ci.
  • resulting position is verified at step 136 to confirm the targeted value and if the difference between them is zero (0) within certain error margin, the process ends at step 140 until a change in the situation shows a need for correction again using the real time dynamic feedback control system 126 algorithms. Whenever the difference of values at step 136 reaches a value outside the set limits, the process restarts at step 136 and so on.
  • Error margins and hysteresis can be applied to avoid unstable system behavior. Moreover, a certain level of noise is to be expected, so hysteresis principles can be applied to avoid continuous back and forth movements. [0047]
  • One way to obtain a measurement of the air gap 102 is by using a proximity sensor and by associating the amplitude of the proximity sensor signal to a corresponding local stator to rotor distance.
  • Another way to obtain a measurement of the air gap 102, in the case of electric machines is by monitoring magnetic field intensity, which typically increases when the air gap 102 decreases.
  • Fig. 7 illustrates readings from both these types of sensors, with the proximity sensor reading 142 presented above, and the magnetic flux reading 144 presented below, and one can see how on a given machine, both readings can be strongly correlated.
  • FIG. 8C A second embodiment will now be presented in relation with Figs. 8A, 8B and 8C.
  • the algorithm of Fig. 8C is magnetic Flux based algorithm which can be used for a flat pole rotating machine.
  • the proper feedback information 229 is sent to each actuator 210, 212, 214, 216 and the system operates in real time to produce a real time feedback control system keeping the right magnetic field and as such assumed to keep the right air gap 202 to the machine 200 all around.
  • the air gap 202 and magnetic field can be directly correlated, and therefore, a magnetic field base system is applicable.
  • Fig. 8C flow chart 230, at step 232, the process starts, at step 234, the flux probe signal is integrated to get the magnetic field intensity from each flux probe, the peak value of each probe is kept and the average peak value from all the flux probes is calculated (APMF) representing the average peak magnetic field for the entire machine 200.
  • the peak value is the maximum amplitude positive or negative of the alternating current (ac) signal.
  • the next step is 238 where Ci is the correcting signal used by the local actuator Mi to proceed with the Ci displacement towards the wanted position.
  • resulting position is verified back at step 236 to confirm the targeted value and if the difference is within the error margins and hysteresis, the process ends at step 240 until a change in the situation shows a need for correction. That thanks to the real time dynamic feedback control system 226. So if the difference at step 236 becomes outside of set limits, the process restarts step 236. Error margins and hysteresis are applied to avoid unstable system behavior. Moreover, a certain level of noise is to be expected, so hysteresis principles can be applied to avoid continuous back and forth movements.
  • the stator 204 behavior dynamic shape correction can be performed in real time, while the rotor 206 shape can be fully taken care of at the time of assembly.
  • the system can take care of the stator 204 good positioning around the rotor 206 for an optimum performance of the machine 200.
  • the adjustments can be made to maintain the stator 204 shape in the optimal working condition taking into consideration the limitations due to its physical properties.
  • the process can take advantage of the air gap monitoring 225 results using them as feedback to keep a uniform air gap 202 and a well magnetic balanced electric machine.
  • it can constitute an air gap feedback system correcting the stator 204 at critical locations around the machine 200 in order to keep the average air gap uniform all around under its many working conditions.
  • a smoother better-balanced running rotating machine can be achieved due to its constant magnetic pull through the uniform air gap all around.
  • the adjustments can bring it as close as possible to the same air gap 202 value all around or at least within the standard specification.
  • the system can be used, in various embodiments, to temporarily compensate for air gap variations caused by the non-concentricity of the rotor or by the mechanical wear of the rotor bearings, or to temporarily compensate for magnetic flux imbalance caused by rotor shorted turns, to name a few examples.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Motors, Generators (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne une machine tournante qui comprend un rotor et un stator, une pluralité de capteurs configurés pour émettre un signal indiquant une configuration d'entrefer entre le stator et le rotor, le rotor et/ou le stator étant supporté par l'intermédiaire d'au moins un actionneur apte à déplacer une partie correspondante de la machine tournante par rapport à une référence au sol, et un ordinateur configuré pour recevoir le signal provenant de la pluralité de capteurs, qui détermine un défaut dans la configuration d'entrefer sur la base dudit signal et commande le ou les actionneurs pour corriger le défaut dans la configuration d'entrefer pendant le fonctionnement de la machine tournante, tandis que le rotor tourne.
PCT/CA2020/050955 2019-07-10 2020-07-10 Machine tournante et son procédé de fonctionnement WO2021003576A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201962872497P 2019-07-10 2019-07-10
US62/872,497 2019-07-10

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2021003576A1 true WO2021003576A1 (fr) 2021-01-14

Family

ID=74113503

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2020/050955 WO2021003576A1 (fr) 2019-07-10 2020-07-10 Machine tournante et son procédé de fonctionnement

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2021003576A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2023108267A1 (fr) * 2021-12-16 2023-06-22 Vibrosystm Inc. Système et procédé de gestion d'équipement de surveillance d'une grande machine électrique

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100253272A1 (en) * 2009-04-03 2010-10-07 Henrik Stiesdal Method and Arrangement to Adjust an Air-Gap
US20110200425A1 (en) * 2008-10-24 2011-08-18 Weaver Lloyd E Offshore wind turbines and deployment methods therefor
EP2532885A1 (fr) * 2011-06-10 2012-12-12 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Générateur électrique pour éolienne, éolienne et procédé de commande d'éolienne
US20140225576A1 (en) * 2013-02-08 2014-08-14 General Electric Company System and method for determining pole shift
EP2697893B1 (fr) * 2011-04-12 2016-01-13 Boulder Wind Power, Inc. Systèmes et procédés de réglage de l'entrefer
CA3042452A1 (fr) * 2016-11-28 2018-05-31 Wobben Properties Gmbh Procede de mesure et systeme de mesure pour mesurer un stator d'eolienne a entrainement direct

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110200425A1 (en) * 2008-10-24 2011-08-18 Weaver Lloyd E Offshore wind turbines and deployment methods therefor
US20100253272A1 (en) * 2009-04-03 2010-10-07 Henrik Stiesdal Method and Arrangement to Adjust an Air-Gap
EP2697893B1 (fr) * 2011-04-12 2016-01-13 Boulder Wind Power, Inc. Systèmes et procédés de réglage de l'entrefer
EP2532885A1 (fr) * 2011-06-10 2012-12-12 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Générateur électrique pour éolienne, éolienne et procédé de commande d'éolienne
US20140225576A1 (en) * 2013-02-08 2014-08-14 General Electric Company System and method for determining pole shift
CA3042452A1 (fr) * 2016-11-28 2018-05-31 Wobben Properties Gmbh Procede de mesure et systeme de mesure pour mesurer un stator d'eolienne a entrainement direct

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2023108267A1 (fr) * 2021-12-16 2023-06-22 Vibrosystm Inc. Système et procédé de gestion d'équipement de surveillance d'une grande machine électrique
US12085616B2 (en) 2021-12-16 2024-09-10 Vibrosystm Inc. System and method for managing monitoring equipment of a large electric machine

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104936702B (zh) 用于调节驱动装置的旋转速度的方法和装置
US10571890B2 (en) Diagnostic data acquisition system, diagnostic system, and computer readable medium
US7812493B2 (en) Spindle apparatus
RU2714354C1 (ru) Способ для контроля устройства магнитного подшипника
US10184985B2 (en) Systems and methods for crack detection in doubly-fed induction generators
CN104655977B (zh) 基于转矩比较原理的发电机励磁绕组短路故障诊断方法
JP6540911B1 (ja) モータ制御システム、モータ制御装置、及びベアリング寿命診断方法
JP2015091219A (ja) 回転機械のための絶縁監視の温度補償
WO2021003576A1 (fr) Machine tournante et son procédé de fonctionnement
US20150234011A1 (en) Real time monitoring of rotor or stator shape change for rotating machines
KR102676587B1 (ko) 공작기계용 전동기의 온라인 결함 진단 방법
CN105136394B (zh) 快速处理锅炉风机振动故障的方法及装置
JP2015150627A (ja) 焼き嵌め方法及び焼き嵌め装置
US20190219482A1 (en) Method for monitoring a magnetic bearing apparatus
US10554159B2 (en) Monitoring and compensating the angle of a rotor in an electric machine using an angle sensor
CN115199646B (zh) 一种磁悬浮系统及其控制方法、装置和存储介质
WO2021124515A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé d'inspection de machines électriques tournantes
RU2528620C2 (ru) Способ коррекции медленного раскачивания путем нагревания и быстрого охлаждения
JP2002039177A (ja) 非接触軸受スピンドル装置
JP6833554B2 (ja) 出力予測装置、及びそれを備えた出力予測システム、発電システム並びに出力予測方法
US20200166418A1 (en) Methods and systems for non-contact magnetostrictive sensor runout compensation
JP6961513B2 (ja) 軸受監視装置及びこの軸受監視装置を備えた回転機械
TWI615235B (zh) 自適應振動感測方法
EP3472926B1 (fr) Systèmes et procédés pour reduction de vibrations de torsion dans des systèmes turbomachines
JP2014521977A (ja) レオメータ内の測定間隙の保持

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20836275

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 20836275

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1