WO2020168387A1 - Online candidate selection tool - Google Patents

Online candidate selection tool Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2020168387A1
WO2020168387A1 PCT/AU2020/050148 AU2020050148W WO2020168387A1 WO 2020168387 A1 WO2020168387 A1 WO 2020168387A1 AU 2020050148 W AU2020050148 W AU 2020050148W WO 2020168387 A1 WO2020168387 A1 WO 2020168387A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
candidate selection
hirer
job
selection method
candidates
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/AU2020/050148
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Phillip Emmerton
Original Assignee
Driver Power Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Driver Power Pty Ltd filed Critical Driver Power Pty Ltd
Publication of WO2020168387A1 publication Critical patent/WO2020168387A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/105—Human resources
    • G06Q10/1053—Employment or hiring
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • G06Q10/06311—Scheduling, planning or task assignment for a person or group
    • G06Q10/063112—Skill-based matching of a person or a group to a task

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to an online candidate selection tool.
  • recruiters can be engaged to assist in the matching process, but are invariably expensive and can take significant time to fill a position. Advertising is also time consuming with long lead times.
  • the preferred embodiment provides a useful tool in suggesting candidates for a job, without then need for a recruiter or advertising.
  • an online candidate selection method involving:
  • the hirer details may include the hirer’s company which, in turn, results in suggestion of candidates for the job at that company.
  • the hirer details may further include a job title of the job and/or a location for the job. In one embodiment, the location is automatically populated based upon the location of the hirer.
  • the suggesting may involve comparing the responses with candidate profiles. Each candidate profile may be constructed from a resume or other source, and can include previous job titles. The method may involve filtering the suggested candidates using additional criteria. The method may involve the candidate modifying their profile or filters and skill criteria.
  • the method may further involve rating skills of the candidates.
  • the step of suggesting may further involve using the rating.
  • the rating may be verified and/or rated.
  • the method may further include displaying the suggested candidates in order or priority.
  • the priority may be determined using: points awarded for holding required accreditations; points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2; less points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2; and/or considerably less points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2, preferably in that order.
  • an online candidate selection tool including:
  • a prompter for prompting for one or more hirer details provided by a hirer a prompter for prompting for one or more hirer details provided by a hirer
  • a receiver for receiving one or more responses to the prompting
  • suggestion means for suggesting one or more candidates for a job using the responses.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an online job candidate selection website in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a display of suggested candidates generated using the website of Figure 1 ;
  • Figure 3 shows a full profile of a suggested candidate
  • Figure 4 shows a population tool of the website of Figure 1 ;
  • Figure 5 shows a ranking tool of the website of Figure 1 ;
  • Figure 6 shows an eagerness assessment tool of the website of Figure 1 ;
  • Figure 7 shows a qualification tool of the website of Figure 1 .
  • an online job candidate selection website 100 (i.e. tool) as shown in Figure 1 for use by a hirer wanting to hire a candidate for a job.
  • the website 100 includes a bar prompter 102 for prompting for hirer details provided by the hirer.
  • the hirer details include the hirer’s company 104 which, in turn, results in suggestion of candidates for the job at that company.
  • the hirer details further include a job title 106 of the job and a location 108 for the job.
  • the website 100 also includes a selection box receiver 1 10 with respective boxes 1 12-1 16 for receiving selected hirer detail responses to the prompting. Once the hirer selects the company 104, job title 106 and location 108 in the respective receiver boxes 1 12-1 16, the search button 1 18 can be actuated to generate the suggested candidates display 200 in Figure 2.
  • the display 200 (i.e. suggestion means) includes a vertical list suggesting one or more candidates 202 for the job using the responses.
  • the list is generated by comparing the selected hirer responses 104-108 with candidate profiles stored in a database.
  • Each candidate profile is constructed from a resume, and can include previous job titles.
  • the display 200 displays the suggested candidates 202 in order or priority.
  • the priority is determined using: points awarded for holding required accreditations; points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2; less points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2; and/or considerably less points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2, in that order of importance.
  • the display 200 also includes the list of skills 204 used to match the candidates 202 to the job.
  • the priority of the skills 204 can be re-ordered and the skills 204 can be added and removed by the hirer to filter the candidates displayed.
  • the display 200 also includes an input accreditation 206 where any required accreditation for the job can be entered by the hirer.
  • the display 200 also includes a location box 208 where location details can be edited.
  • the display 200 also includes a date limiter 210 to limit the date range of last candidate activity.
  • Each suggested candidate 202 shows the skills 212 that match the searched job, and qualifications 214 held by candidate matching the job.
  • a full profile 300 of a suggested candidate 202 can be displayed upon selection of the candidate 202 by the hirer.
  • the profile 300 may include details such as licence expiry, copies/scans, past feedback, banking, OH&S details, skills, etc.
  • the candidate profiles 300 are populated and stored in a database using a population tool 400 as shown in Figure 4.
  • Skills required to do a particular task are stored against each client profile 300. These skills are populated to each profile 300 in various ways including candidates register or interact with the website, resumes can be parsed, and candidates can continue to modify their profile 300 by selecting additional skills not parsed from the resume and prompted based upon a previously selected or parsed skill.
  • the method may further involve rating skills of the candidate 202 using a ranking tool 500 as shown in Figure 5.
  • the candidate is prompted to enter the frequency percentage of some skills used while working for the selected past employer.
  • the website 100 calculates the length of experience in months, based on the selection combined with start and end dates of a prior role. The rating is used in suggesting the candidates 202 to the hirer.
  • Figure 6 shows an eagerness assessment tool 600 in which candidates 202 can enter their eagerness to use their skills which is used in suggesting candidates 202.
  • Figure 7 shows a qualification tool 700 in which qualifications and
  • candidates 202 are prompted for possible qualifications based on the percentile of qualification held or required for a known skill set.
  • the location 108 in receiver box 1 16 is automatically populated based upon the location of the hirer.
  • the candidate rating may be verified which is used when suggesting candidates.
  • this system 100 be used in reverse where the candidate will match using his profile and information contained therein to show jobs he would suit.
  • embodiment means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the appearance of the phrases‘in one embodiment’ or‘in an embodiment’ in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
  • the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more combinations.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to an online candidate selection method. The method involves prompting for one or more hirer details provided by a hirer, and receiving one or more responses to the prompting. The method involves suggesting one or more candidates for a job using the responses. Advantageously, the hirer details may include the hirer's company which, in turn, results in suggestion of candidates for the job at that company.

Description

ONLINE CANDIDATE SELECTION TOOL
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention generally relates to an online candidate selection tool.
BACKGROUND
[0002] The reference to any prior art in this specification is not, and should not be taken as an acknowledgement or any form of suggestion that the prior art forms part of the common general knowledge.
[0003] Matching candidates to jobs is difficult, with several variables involved.
Recruiters can be engaged to assist in the matching process, but are invariably expensive and can take significant time to fill a position. Advertising is also time consuming with long lead times.
[0004] The preferred embodiment provides a useful tool in suggesting candidates for a job, without then need for a recruiter or advertising.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an online candidate selection method involving:
prompting for one or more hirer details provided by a hirer;
receiving one or more responses to the prompting; and
suggesting one or more candidates for a job using the responses.
[0006] Advantageously, the hirer details may include the hirer’s company which, in turn, results in suggestion of candidates for the job at that company.
[0007] The hirer details may further include a job title of the job and/or a location for the job. In one embodiment, the location is automatically populated based upon the location of the hirer. [0008] The suggesting may involve comparing the responses with candidate profiles. Each candidate profile may be constructed from a resume or other source, and can include previous job titles. The method may involve filtering the suggested candidates using additional criteria. The method may involve the candidate modifying their profile or filters and skill criteria.
[0009] The method may further involve rating skills of the candidates. The step of suggesting may further involve using the rating. The rating may be verified and/or rated.
[00010] The method may further include displaying the suggested candidates in order or priority. The priority may be determined using: points awarded for holding required accreditations; points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2; less points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2; and/or considerably less points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2, preferably in that order.
[00011] According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an online candidate selection tool including:
a prompter for prompting for one or more hirer details provided by a hirer;
a receiver for receiving one or more responses to the prompting; and
suggestion means for suggesting one or more candidates for a job using the responses.
[00012] Any of the features described herein can be combined in any combination with any one or more of the other features described herein within the scope of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[00013] Preferred features, embodiments and variations of the invention may be discerned from the following Detailed Description which provides sufficient information for those skilled in the art to perform the invention. The Detailed Description is not to be regarded as limiting the scope of the preceding Summary of the Invention in any way. The Detailed Description will make reference to a number of drawings as follows:
[00014] Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an online job candidate selection website in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; [00015] Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a display of suggested candidates generated using the website of Figure 1 ;
[00016] Figure 3 shows a full profile of a suggested candidate;
[00017] Figure 4 shows a population tool of the website of Figure 1 ;
[00018] Figure 5 shows a ranking tool of the website of Figure 1 ;
[00019] Figure 6 shows an eagerness assessment tool of the website of Figure 1 ; and
[00020] Figure 7 shows a qualification tool of the website of Figure 1 .
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[00021] According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an online job candidate selection website 100 (i.e. tool) as shown in Figure 1 for use by a hirer wanting to hire a candidate for a job. The website 100 includes a bar prompter 102 for prompting for hirer details provided by the hirer. Advantageously, the hirer details include the hirer’s company 104 which, in turn, results in suggestion of candidates for the job at that company. The hirer details further include a job title 106 of the job and a location 108 for the job.
[00022] The website 100 also includes a selection box receiver 1 10 with respective boxes 1 12-1 16 for receiving selected hirer detail responses to the prompting. Once the hirer selects the company 104, job title 106 and location 108 in the respective receiver boxes 1 12-1 16, the search button 1 18 can be actuated to generate the suggested candidates display 200 in Figure 2.
[00023] Turning to Figure 2, the display 200 (i.e. suggestion means) includes a vertical list suggesting one or more candidates 202 for the job using the responses. The list is generated by comparing the selected hirer responses 104-108 with candidate profiles stored in a database. Each candidate profile is constructed from a resume, and can include previous job titles. [00024] The display 200 displays the suggested candidates 202 in order or priority. The priority is determined using: points awarded for holding required accreditations; points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2; less points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2; and/or considerably less points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill2, in that order of importance.
[00025] The display 200 also includes the list of skills 204 used to match the candidates 202 to the job. The priority of the skills 204 can be re-ordered and the skills 204 can be added and removed by the hirer to filter the candidates displayed.
[00026] The display 200 also includes an input accreditation 206 where any required accreditation for the job can be entered by the hirer. The display 200 also includes a location box 208 where location details can be edited. The display 200 also includes a date limiter 210 to limit the date range of last candidate activity. These inputs result in further filtration of the suggested candidates 202.
[00027] Each suggested candidate 202 shows the skills 212 that match the searched job, and qualifications 214 held by candidate matching the job.
[00028] Turning to Figure 3, a full profile 300 of a suggested candidate 202 can be displayed upon selection of the candidate 202 by the hirer. The profile 300 may include details such as licence expiry, copies/scans, past feedback, banking, OH&S details, skills, etc.
[00029] The candidate profiles 300 are populated and stored in a database using a population tool 400 as shown in Figure 4. Skills required to do a particular task are stored against each client profile 300. These skills are populated to each profile 300 in various ways including candidates register or interact with the website, resumes can be parsed, and candidates can continue to modify their profile 300 by selecting additional skills not parsed from the resume and prompted based upon a previously selected or parsed skill.
[00030] The method may further involve rating skills of the candidate 202 using a ranking tool 500 as shown in Figure 5. The candidate is prompted to enter the frequency percentage of some skills used while working for the selected past employer. The website 100 calculates the length of experience in months, based on the selection combined with start and end dates of a prior role. The rating is used in suggesting the candidates 202 to the hirer. Figure 6 shows an eagerness assessment tool 600 in which candidates 202 can enter their eagerness to use their skills which is used in suggesting candidates 202.
[00031] Figure 7 shows a qualification tool 700 in which qualifications and
accreditations are entered by the candidate 202 against each previous company.
Additionally, candidates 202 are prompted for possible qualifications based on the percentile of qualification held or required for a known skill set.
[00032] A person skilled in the art will appreciate that many embodiments and variations can be made without departing from the ambit of the present invention.
[00033] In one embodiment, the location 108 in receiver box 1 16 is automatically populated based upon the location of the hirer.
[00034] In one embodiment, the candidate rating may be verified which is used when suggesting candidates.
[00035] In one embodiment, this system 100 be used in reverse where the candidate will match using his profile and information contained therein to show jobs he would suit.
[00036] In compliance with the statute, the invention has been described in language more or less specific to structural or methodical features. It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to specific features shown or described since the means herein described comprises preferred forms of putting the invention into effect. The invention is, therefore, claimed in any of its forms or modifications within the proper scope of the appended claims appropriately interpreted by those skilled in the art.
[00037] Reference throughout this specification to‘one embodiment’ or‘an
embodiment’ means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearance of the phrases‘in one embodiment’ or‘in an embodiment’ in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more combinations.

Claims

The claims defining the invention are as follows:
1 . An online candidate selection tool including:
a prompter for prompting for one or more hirer details provided by a hirer;
a receiver for receiving one or more responses to the prompting; and
suggestion means for suggesting one or more candidates for a job using the responses.
2. An online candidate selection tool as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the hirer details include the hirer’s company which, in turn, results in suggestion of candidates for the job at that company.
3. An online candidate selection tool as claimed in claim 2, wherein the hirer details further include a job title of the job and/or a location for the job.
4. An online candidate selection tool as claimed in claim 1 , further including a filter for filtering the suggested candidates using additional criteria.
5. An candidate selection tool as claimed claim 1 , further including a rating tool for rating skills of the suggested candidates and/or wherein the suggested candidates are displayed in a prioritized order.
6. An online candidate selection method involving:
prompting for one or more hirer details provided by a hirer;
receiving one or more responses to the prompting; and
suggesting one or more candidates for a job using the responses.
7. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the hirer details include the hirer’s company which, in turn, results in suggestion of candidates for the job at that company.
8. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the hirer details include a job title of the job.
9. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the hirer details include a location for the job.
10. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the location is automatically populated based upon the location of the hirer.
1 1 . An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the suggesting involves comparing the responses with candidate profiles.
12. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 1 1 , wherein each candidate profile is constructed from a resume or other source, and can include previous job titles.
13. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 6, involving filtering the suggested candidates using additional criteria.
14. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 6, involving the candidate modifying their profile, filters and/or skill criteria.
15. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 6, further involving rating skills of the candidates.
16. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 15, wherein the step of suggesting further involves using the rating.
17. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 15, wherein the rating is verified and/or rated.
18. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 6, further including displaying the suggested candidates in order of priority.
19. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the priority is determined using: points awarded for holding required accreditations; points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill 2; less points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill 2; and/or considerably less points awarded for months experience in skill 1 and skill 2.
20. An online candidate selection method as claimed in claim 19, wherein the priority is determined in that order.
PCT/AU2020/050148 2019-02-22 2020-02-21 Online candidate selection tool WO2020168387A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2019100198 2019-02-22
AU2019100198A AU2019100198A4 (en) 2019-02-22 2019-02-22 Online candidate selection tool

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2020168387A1 true WO2020168387A1 (en) 2020-08-27

Family

ID=65817638

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU2020/050148 WO2020168387A1 (en) 2019-02-22 2020-02-21 Online candidate selection tool

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2019100198A4 (en)
WO (1) WO2020168387A1 (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050246299A1 (en) * 2000-08-03 2005-11-03 Unicru, Inc. Electronic employee selection systems and methods
US20130290208A1 (en) * 2012-04-30 2013-10-31 Gild, Inc. Social media data filtering for electronic job recruiting
US20140236852A1 (en) * 2011-07-01 2014-08-21 Phillip Joseph Emmerton System and method of determining worker skills and experience
US20160253627A1 (en) * 2015-02-27 2016-09-01 Karmasuit Technologies Inc. System and method for job seaching and referral
US20170337519A1 (en) * 1999-07-31 2017-11-23 Raymond Anthony Joao Apparatus and method for providing job searching services, recruitment services and/or recruitment-related services

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20170337519A1 (en) * 1999-07-31 2017-11-23 Raymond Anthony Joao Apparatus and method for providing job searching services, recruitment services and/or recruitment-related services
US20050246299A1 (en) * 2000-08-03 2005-11-03 Unicru, Inc. Electronic employee selection systems and methods
US20140236852A1 (en) * 2011-07-01 2014-08-21 Phillip Joseph Emmerton System and method of determining worker skills and experience
AU2016203257A1 (en) * 2011-07-01 2016-06-09 Goldmining Pty Ltd System and method of determining worker skills and experience
US20130290208A1 (en) * 2012-04-30 2013-10-31 Gild, Inc. Social media data filtering for electronic job recruiting
US20160253627A1 (en) * 2015-02-27 2016-09-01 Karmasuit Technologies Inc. System and method for job seaching and referral

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2019100198A4 (en) 2019-03-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Takeuchi Productivity: learning from the Japanese
Grima et al. Six Sigma: hints from practice to overcome difficulties
Soliman Why continuous improvement programs fail in the egyptian manufacturing organizations? a research study of the evidence
US20130218639A1 (en) Questionnaire creation supporting system, questionnaire implementing apparatus, and recording medium
Anvari et al. The strategic approach to exploration review on TQM and lean production
WO2014011045A1 (en) Computer implemented method for matchmaking employers and job candidates
US20070016436A1 (en) Computer system for resource management
Isac Principles of TQM in automotive industry
Abera Kaizen implementation in Ethiopia: evidence in literature
AU2019100198A4 (en) Online candidate selection tool
US6839722B2 (en) Method for referencing time-related entries in different files in a planning program
Bryde Underpinning modern project management with TQM principles
Sulistiyani et al. Change management methodology for e-government project in developing countries: A conceptual model
Sarasohn et al. The Fundamentals of Industrial Management: CCS Management Course
US20110145231A1 (en) Method and a system for ranking of employment candidates according to external databases
Marsuhin et al. Leadership, discipline and motivation affecting to the performance
Ivana et al. Kaizen as the Element of Overall Management Quality Control
Kumar et al. A Study on Role of Intra Communication on Employee Engagement in BSNL, Hyderabad Telecom District
Farag Essentials of Project Management
Grubisic et al. Methodology for the integrated management of technical and managerial risks related to the product design process
Wharton Auditing: a slapped wrist or a helping hand?
EP1542431B1 (en) Method and www-based communication system for guidance of user to at least one product
Suárez-Barraza Guiding Principle 1. Basic Elements
Azhashemi et al. Business process redesign and total integrated management
McAmis et al. Sales manager influence of new product adoption by their salesforce: A theoretical perspective

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20758684

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 20758684

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1