WO2020004654A1 - Information processing device - Google Patents

Abstract

The objective of the present invention is to provide a lively event for the purpose of enhancing social health. An event information acquisition unit 101 has an event log acquisition unit 111 for acquiring an event log, which is objective event information, an event appraisal acquisition unit 112 for acquiring an event appraisal, which is subjective event information, and an event evaluation analysis unit 113 for analyzing an event evaluation from the event appraisal. The event information acquisition unit 101 stores these as event information in an event information database 121. A "person/thing/matter" analysis unit 102 analyzes an evaluation of a "person," "thing," and "matter," on the basis of the event information, and stores a result in an analysis result database 124. A "person/thing/matter" relationship analysis unit 103 analyzes the relationship for a combination of two or more of the "person," "thing," and "matter," and stores a result in the analysis result database 124. An analysis result transmission unit 104 transmits the event information and the analysis results to a stakeholder via a stakeholder terminal.

Description

Information processing equipment

<< The present invention relates to an information processing device.

Up to now, the management and promotion of physical and mental health for health has been done. For example, there is an invention that promotes exercise for physical health or manages physical information such as weight (for example, see Patent Document 1).

Japanese Patent No. 4305671

健康 However, health is not just physical and mental. For example, according to the preamble of the WHO Charter of the World Health Organization (hereinafter referred to as “WHO”), “health is not a disease or a weakness, but not a physical one. All mentally and socially. " That is, there is a need to be physically and mentally and socially fulfilled and healthy, that is, to improve and promote their health.

As mentioned above, physical and mental health has been actively pursued. However, social health initiatives are not as active as physical and mental health.

The present invention has been made in view of such a situation, and has an object not only to manage and improve social health but also to promote it.

In order to achieve the above object, an information processing device of one embodiment of the present invention
At a predetermined time during which one or more persons are intervening, a place is generated based on first information that is objective information about the place and second information that is subjective information about the place for the person. Acquiring means for acquiring third information indicating the evaluation of the place,
Providing means for providing the first information and the third information to interested parties of the venue;
Is provided.

According to the present invention, it is possible not only to manage and improve social health but also to improve it.

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a flow of information processing according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of an information processing system that performs the information processing of FIG. 1. FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of a server in the information processing system of FIG. 2. FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of the server in FIG. 3. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of place information stored in the server of FIG. 4. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a flow of an evaluation process executed by the server having the functional configuration in FIG. 4. It is the figure which showed the relationship with the place about the quantity and quality of connection, and the credit evaluation based on relationship. It is a figure about re-recognizing a relationship based on "personal thing relationship information." FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of an outline of a rating control service among the present services. It is a schematic diagram explaining an example of the outline of a priority calculation service among this service. FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of an outline of a role management service among the services. It is a schematic diagram explaining an example of an outline of a credit asset point management service in this service. It is a figure in a credit asset point management service which shows the relation of the request source, the request destination, and the mediator who mediates it. It is a functional block diagram showing an example of functional composition of a server in an information processing system concerning a 2nd embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of a GUI (Graphical User Interface) displayed by a browser function of the place information input terminal when the place information input terminal is configured by a personal computer. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of a GUI displayed by dedicated application software installed in the place information input terminal when the place information input terminal is configured by a smartphone or a tablet. It is a figure which shows the structure of the capital required for achieving a social result in a business or a project. It is a figure showing B / S (balance sheet) based on credit evaluation. It is a figure showing P / L (Profit and Loss Statement) based on credit evaluation. It is a figure showing a value flow based on credit evaluation.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

(1st Embodiment)
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of an outline of a service to which the information processing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention is applied (hereinafter, referred to as “this service”).
As shown in FIG. 1, in this service, each of n (where n is an integer value of 1 or more) fields F1 to Fn is a unit.
Here, the “place” is a time during which one or more natural people are intervening. Hereinafter, for convenience of explanation, it is assumed that the “place” is formed by a conference in which a plurality of natural people (hereinafter, appropriately referred to as “participants”) participate.
For example, the place F1 is formed by a conference in which the participants U1 and U2 participate. Further, the place F2 is formed by another conference in which the participants U2, U3, and U4 participate.
That is, the participant U1 attends only the conference of the place F1. The participant U3 and the participant U4 attend only the conference in the place F2. On the other hand, the participant U2 is attending both the meeting in the place F1 and the meeting in the place F2.

Here, in the example of FIG. 1, in each of the venues F1 to Fn, one predetermined participant generates log information (hereinafter, referred to as “bath log”) including objective information such as minutes. At the same time, each participant generates objective information (hereinafter, referred to as a “place watching”) such as an impression and a view on the meeting (place). In addition, an evaluation of a meeting (place) (hereinafter, referred to as a “place evaluation”) is generated based on the place of all participants. The venue evaluation may be generated by a participant or the like, but in the present embodiment, it is assumed that the venue evaluation is automatically generated by a server described later.

Specifically, for example, in the venue F1, the venue log FL1 is generated by the participant U1.
The venue log FL1 is, as objective information about the conference in the venue F1, for example, “date and time and place”, “participants”, “related information reference materials”, “decisions”, and “assignments / ToDo” for the conference. And so on as constituent elements. Note that these components may be different depending on the place, but in the present embodiment, it is assumed that the constituent elements are the same in any place (for example, a place F2 described later).

Further, for example, in the place F1, the participant U1 and the participant U2 respectively generate the place watching FM11 and the place watching FM12.
Each of the place watching FM11 and the place watching FM12 may include, for example, “importance”, “impression”, and “impression” of the meeting as objective information of each of the participants U1 and U2 of the meeting of the place F1. The evaluation point is a component. Note that these components may be different depending on the place, but in the present embodiment, it is assumed that the constituent elements are the same in any place (for example, a place F2 described later).

Then, in the place F1, a place evaluation FE1 is generated based on the place watching FM11 and the place watching FM12.
The place evaluation FE1 is an overall evaluation of the whole participant (participant U1 and participant U2) participating in the place F1 with respect to the place F1 (conference). The method of generating the field evaluation FE1 is not particularly limited, and is a method of averaging the evaluation points of the field observation FM11 and the field observation FM12, a method of averaging the respective importance levels, and items of the field observation. Various methods such as a method of evaluating by using the weighting can be applied. Further, the field evaluation FE1 is not limited to the evaluation of a single item (component), and may be based on each evaluation of several items (components). What is based on each evaluation means a single evaluation generated based on each evaluation, an aggregate of a plurality of evaluations generated based on each evaluation, and an aggregate of each evaluation itself. It is a concept.

In summary, in the place F1, the place log FL1 is generated as objective information about the place F1, and the place watching FM11, the place watching FM12, and the place evaluation FE1 are subjective information about the place F1. Generated.
In addition, the objective information regarding a predetermined place is hereafter called "objective place information." In addition, the subjective information on the predetermined place is hereinafter referred to as “subjective place information”. A set of objective place information and subjective place information for the predetermined place is hereinafter referred to as “place information”.
That is, in the place F1, the place information FD1-K including the place log FD1-K including the place log FM1 and the subjective place information FD1-S including the place watching FM11 and the place watching FM12 and the place evaluation FE1 is set. Is generated.

Similarly, for example, in the place F2, the participant U3 generates the place log FL2.
In addition, each of the participant U2, the participant U3, and the participant U4 generates a place watching FM22, a place watching FM23, and a place watching FM24, respectively. Then, a field evaluation FE2 is generated based on the field watching FM22, the field watching FM23, and the field watching FM24.
In summary, in the place F2, the place log FL2 is generated as objective information about the place F2, and the place observations FM22 to FM24 and the place evaluation FE2 are generated as subjective information about the place F2. .
That is, in the place F2, the place information FD2 is generated as a set of the objective place information FD2-K including the place log F2 and the subjective place information FD2-S including the place observations FM22 to FM24 and the place evaluation FE2. You.

The same applies to the other fields Fk (k is any value from 3 to n). That is, although not shown, in the place Fk, objective place information FDk-K including the place log FLk, and subjective place information FDk-S including the place watching FMk and the place evaluation FEk by each participant. Are generated, the field information FDk is generated.

In the following, when it is not necessary to individually distinguish each of the fields F1 to Fn, these are collectively referred to as a "field F". Also, when it is called “Place F”, the participant U1 etc. is called “Participant U”, the place information FD1 etc. is called “Place information FD”, and the objective place information FD1-K etc. is “ The objective place information FD-K is called, the subjective place information FD1-S, etc. is called “subjective place information FD-S”, the place log FL1, etc., is called a “place log FL”, and the place stand FM11, etc. Is referred to as a "field evaluation FM", and the field evaluation FE1 and the like are referred to as a "field evaluation FE".

At least a part of the place information FD of the place F is shared not only with the participants U of the place F, but also with interested parties SH who have not participated in the place F.
Here, the stakeholder SH is, for example, a person who does not participate in the venue F (meeting), regardless of whether or not he or she has participated in the venue F. Specifically, for example, the boss of the participant U of the venue F Etc. Note that a participant U who has participated in one place F but has not participated in another place F can also be included in the stakeholders SH related to the other place F. Further, the number of interested parties SH is one in the example of FIG. 1, but is not particularly limited thereto, and a plurality of interested parties SH may be used.

Specifically, for example, in the example of FIG. 1, the information shared by the stakeholders SH is a place evaluation FE of the subjective place information FD-S and a place log FL which is the objective place information FD-K. is there. That is, among the subjective place information FD-S, the place watching FM which can be said to be the personal information of the participant U is not the shared information but the place evaluation FE indicating the comprehensive evaluation of each participant U in the whole place. Is shared information.
That is, the participant U who participated in the place F does not share his / her own opinion with other interested parties SH. Thus, the participant U who has participated in the place F can create a place look-alike FM that incorporates obedient opinions.
However, needless to say, FIG. 1 is merely an example. That is, depending on the situation, a part or the whole of the place watching FM may be shared by the interested parties SH. Thereby, the interested party SH can confirm the opinion (opinion) of the participant U in the predetermined place F.

Here, in the above-described example, one or more participants U are assumed to intervene in the place F. However, this is because a conference is used as an example, and the concept of “participation” is not always familiar. Therefore, a natural person who intervenes in the place F is hereinafter generally and generally referred to as a "person".
Further, in the place F, there may be “things” related to the place F and “things” related to the place F, in addition to “person”.
Here, the "thing" is a tangible object related to the field F. For example, “things” may include “whiteboards” and “projectors” in a conference room, and further include “materials in foreign languages (things)” and “documents (things) nearing the deadline”. May be.
Further, “thing” is an intangible thing regarding the field F. For example, "thing" may include "a certain matter (thing)", "making an idea", and the like, and furthermore, "that the room temperature was high" and "there was an incoming call during the meeting. And the like. That is, “things” include all intangibles such as matters, methods, environments, and events.

Therefore, a server (for example, the server 1 in FIG. 2) described below, based on the respective place evaluations FE of the plurality of places F, “person” involved in at least one of the plurality of places F, the plurality of places Information indicating at least one of “things” involved in at least one of the Fs or “things” relating to the plurality of places F can be generated.
Hereinafter, the information generated in this manner is referred to as “personal thing information”.
Details of the "personal thing information" will be described later with reference to FIG.

Furthermore, a server (for example, the server 1 in FIG. 2) described later, for a combination of at least two of a plurality of “persons”, a plurality of “things”, and a plurality of “things”, includes a “person” included in the combination. , "Things", or "things", based on the "things information" for each of the "persons", "things", or "things" included in the combination Generate the information shown.
Hereinafter, the information generated in this manner is referred to as “personal thing relationship information”.
Details of the "personal thing relationship information" will be described later with reference to FIG.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of an information processing system that performs the information processing of FIG.

The information processing system shown in FIG. 2 includes a server 1, each of the venue information input terminals 2-1 to 2-m used by each of the participants U1 to Um, and a stakeholder used by the stakeholder SH. The terminal 3 is configured to be connected to each other via a predetermined network N such as the Internet.

In the present embodiment, each of the m participants U1 to Um uses each of the place information input terminals 2-1 to 2-m. However, hereinafter, when it is not necessary to individually distinguish the place information input terminals 2-1 to 2-m, they will be referred to as "place information input terminals 2".

The participant U operates the place information input terminal 2 and inputs a place log FL and a place look-up FM. However, the place log FL only needs to be input by one user per one place F. In that case, the other participants U who participated in the same place operate the place information input terminal 2 and input only the place watching FM.
The place information input terminal 2 is composed of, for example, a personal computer, a smartphone, or the like.

The server 1 executes various processes such as evaluation of the place evaluation FE based on the place log FL and the place observation FM input by the place information input terminal 2.

The interested party terminal 3 presents the information processed by the server 1 to the interested party SH. The stakeholder terminal 3 presents, for example, a place observation FM and a place evaluation FE for the predetermined place F to the stakeholder SH, and furthermore, the “person” generated by the server 1 based on the place information FD. Thing and relationship information "can be presented.
The stakeholder terminal 3 is composed of, for example, a personal computer, a smartphone, or the like.

In summary, the information processing system according to the present embodiment uses the network N, collects the place log FL and the place watching FM regarding the place F in which the participant U has participated through the place information input terminal 2, and collects the server The information or the like on which the predetermined processing has been performed in 1 can be provided to the interested parties SH.
Information processing systems do not simply provide stakeholders with minutes of a meeting or evaluation of a meeting. The analysis of the place referred to here is based on the objective information of the place and the subjective information from the participants of the place. Includes analyzing "thing information" and evaluating "one thing and relationship information".

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a hardware configuration of the server 1 in the information processing system of FIG.

The server 1 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 11, a ROM (Read Only Memory) 12, a RAM (Random Access Memory) 13, a bus 14, an input / output interface 15, an output unit 16, an input unit 17, and the like. , A storage unit 18, a communication unit 19, and a drive 20.

The CPU 11 executes various processes according to a program recorded in the ROM 12 or a program loaded from the storage unit 18 into the RAM 13.
The RAM 13 also appropriately stores data and the like necessary for the CPU 11 to execute various processes.

The CPU 11, the ROM 12, and the RAM 13 are connected to each other via a bus 14. The bus 14 is also connected to an input / output interface 15. The output unit 16, the input unit 17, the storage unit 18, the communication unit 19, and the drive 20 are connected to the input / output interface 15.

The output unit 16 includes a display, a speaker, and the like, and outputs various types of information as images and sounds.
The input unit 17 includes a keyboard, a mouse, and the like, and inputs various information.

The storage unit 18 includes a hard disk, a DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory), and the like, and stores various data.
The communication unit 19 communicates with other devices (in the example of FIG. 1, the place information input terminal 2 and the stakeholder terminal 3) via a network N including the Internet.

In the drive 20, a removable medium 31 made of a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a semiconductor memory, or the like is appropriately mounted. The program read from the removable medium 31 by the drive 20 is installed in the storage unit 18 as needed.
Further, the removable medium 31 can also store various data stored in the storage unit 18 in the same manner as the storage unit 18.

Although not shown, the field information input terminal 2 and the interested party terminal 3 of the information processing system in FIG. 2 have basically the same configuration as the hardware configuration shown in FIG.

FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of the server in FIG.
In the example of FIG. 4, a functional configuration in the case where field information on the field F1 in FIG. 1 is input is drawn. That is, in the example of FIG. 4, only the place information input terminals 2-1 and 2-2 are drawn, but this is merely an example, and the number of place information input terminals 2 is not particularly limited to two.

The place information input terminal 2-1 is operated by the participant U1 (FIG. 1). The input unit 201-1 inputs the place observation FM11 and the place log FL1 by the operation of the participant U1.
The venue log acquisition unit 202-1 acquires the venue log FL1 input by the input unit 201-1, and transmits the venue log FL1 to the server 1 via the communication unit 204-1. The place observation acquisition unit 203-1 acquires the place observation FM11 input by the input unit 201-1 and transmits it to the server 1 via the communication unit 204-1.

The place information input terminal 2-2 is operated by the participant U2 (FIG. 1). The input unit 201-2 inputs the place watching FM12 by the operation of the participant U2.
The place observation acquisition unit 203-2 acquires the place observation FM11 input by the input unit 201-2, and transmits it to the server 1 via the communication unit 204-1.
Since the participant U2 may input the place log FL in some place F, the place information input terminal 2-2 includes the place log acquisition unit 202-2. However, since the participant U2 does not input the venue log FL1 in the example of FIG. 1, the venue log acquisition unit 202-2 does not function (indicated by a dotted line in FIG. 4 to show this).

In the CPU 11 of the server 1, the place information acquisition unit 101, the "things" analysis unit 102, the "things" relationship analysis unit 103, and the analysis result transmission unit 104 function.

The venue information acquisition unit 101 includes a venue log acquisition unit 111, a venue observation acquisition unit 112, and a venue evaluation analysis unit 113.
The venue log acquisition unit 111 acquires the venue log FL1 supplied from the venue information input terminal 2-1 via the communication unit 19.
The place sight acquisition unit 112 acquires the place sight FM 11 supplied from the place information input terminal 2-1 via the communication unit 19. In addition, the place observation acquisition unit 112 acquires the place observation FM 12 supplied from the place information input terminal 2-2 via the communication unit 19. Then, the venue observation acquisition unit 112 supplies the venue observation FM11 and the venue observation FM12 to the venue evaluation analysis unit 113.
The field evaluation analysis unit 113 generates a field evaluation FE1 which is an evaluation of the field F1 by analyzing the field watching FM11 and the field watching FM12.

As described above, the place evaluation FE is a comprehensive evaluation of the place by one or more participants U who participated in the place.
For example, the place evaluation FE1 is an average value of the evaluation points of the place observation FM11 and the place observation FM12, or an average of their respective importance levels, and uses each of the appearance items for weighting. The evaluation may be made (hereinafter, as one item of the field evaluation FE, the “average value of the evaluation points of the field observation FM” is referred to as “evaluation point average value”). In addition, for example, dispersion of evaluation points may be used. The field evaluation is not limited to the evaluation using one item. That is, the field evaluation may be a sum of the evaluations of several items.

That is, for example, a field evaluation FE in which the average value of the evaluation points of the field evaluation FE1 is 4 points and the average value of the evaluation points of the field evaluation FE2 is 5 points is given. Thus, it can be seen that the field F2 was a better field (in terms of the average score) than the field F1. Further, for example, if the score of the field F1 is higher than the score of the field F2, if the score of the field F1 is higher than the average of the importance of the field evaluation FE, the field F2 can feel higher importance than the field F1. It turns out that it was. In addition, for example, if the average value of the evaluation points of the venue evaluation FE is high and the variance is small, it can be understood that many of the attendees were places where high evaluations were given.

The place information acquisition unit 101 stores and manages the place evaluation FE1, the place observations FM11 and FM12, and the place log FL1 in the place information DB 121 as the place information FD1 on the place F1. The above is the operation when the place information on the place F1 is input.
Similarly, the place information acquisition unit 101 stores and manages the place information FD2 to FDn for each of the places F2 to Fn. That is, the place information FD is stored in the place information DB for each place F. An example of the contents of the place information FD will be described later with reference to FIG.

(4) When the field information FD is collected for a certain amount of the field F, the “personal thing” analysis unit 102 performs an evaluation on “personal thing” and generates “personal thing information” based on the evaluation.

The “personal thing” analysis unit 102 obtains information on the business, organization, human resources, etc. to which the participant U belongs from the place information DB 121 and the business organization human resource information DB 122, thereby obtaining “persons”, “things”, As a "thing", decide what elements to take. Here, the business information may indicate, for example, a business or a project in the organization to which the participant U belongs.

That is, the business information in the business organization human resource information DB 122 is, for example, information for each business, and may include classification of business titles, genres, etc., scale, results, plans, and the like. The organization information in the business organization human resources information DB 122 is, for example, information for each organization, and may include the organization configuration, the business contents of the organization, a list of members to which the organization belongs, and the like. . The information on human resources in the business organization human resources information DB 122 is, for example, information for each human resource, and may include the work content, career, specialty field, and the like in charge of each in the organization.

That is, when analyzing the “thing” of a certain business from the business organization human resources information DB 122, the “personal thing” analysis unit 102 compares the “thing” with the place log BL stored in the place information DB 121 to obtain a predetermined information. It is possible to distinguish whether the meeting of the place F is a place related to the business (thing).

The "personal information" is information evaluated using the place information FD stored in the place information DB 121. For example, one or both of the place observation FM and the place evaluation FE, that is, what is evaluated using the subjective place information FD-S may be “personal information”.
For example, the evaluation of “person” (hereinafter referred to as “person” evaluation) is based on the average score of a certain item of the field evaluation FE where the “person” participated for “person” such as the participant U. Is also good. For example, in the example of FIG. 1, the “personal thing” analysis unit 102 calculates an average of an evaluation point average value, which is an item of the field evaluation FE1, and an evaluation point average value, which is an item of the field evaluation FE2, The “person” evaluation can be performed on the participant U2 who has participated in both places F. Actually, an average can be obtained for the place F in which the participant U2 has participated among the places F1 to Fn.

For example, the “person” evaluation of the participant U1 is compared with the “person” evaluation of the participant U2, and if the “person” evaluation of the participant U2 is high, the participant U2 is an element that enhances the evaluation of the place. It is clear that the person is likely to be a "person."

Similarly, the “things” analysis unit 102 evaluates “things” and “things” using the place information FD stored in the place information DB 121 and the information stored in the business organization personnel information DB 122. Also analyze. Results of analysis of "things" By this, "people", "things" and "things" can be evaluated. Thereby, it is possible to know whether each evaluation is good or bad, that is, the influence on the place. However, like the place evaluation FE, the “personal thing information” is not limited to the evaluation based on one item. That is, the field evaluation may be a sum of the evaluations of several items.
The "things" analysis unit 102 stores and manages "things information" in the analysis result DB 124. Here, the evaluation is stored in the analysis result DB 124 for each "personal thing information", that is, for each "person", "thing", and "thing".

The “personal thing” analysis unit 102 obtains information on the business, organization, human resources, etc. from the business organization human resource information DB 122, and determines what elements as “person”, “thing”, and “thing”. Decide what to take. Here, the business information may indicate, for example, a business or a project in an organization provided with the information processing system.

The “things and things” relationship analysis unit 103 uses the place information FD stored in the places information DB 121 and the “things and things” evaluation stored in the analysis result DB 124 to determine the relationship between “things and things”. Evaluate and obtain and store "personal thing relationship information".
Here, the evaluation of the relationship between “persons” (hereinafter referred to as “person” relationship evaluation) is an evaluation of the relationship between a certain “person” and other “persons”, “things”, and “things”. is there. The evaluation of the relationship between “person” and “person” between the participant U1 and the participant U2 can be performed, for example, as follows.

That is, for example, for the place F where the participant U1 is present and the participant U2 is present, the average value of the place evaluation of the place watching FM by the participant U1 is derived. Next, for a place F where the participant U1 is present and the participant U2 is not present, an average value of the place evaluation of the place watching FM by the participant U1 is derived. By comparing these, the participant U1 can evaluate how the average value of the evaluation points changes when the participant U2 is present. Similarly, the participant U2 can evaluate how the average value of the evaluation points changes when the participant U1 is present. By using these, it is possible to evaluate the relationship between “person” and “person” between the participant U1 and the participant U2.

Similarly, for example, regarding the place F where the participant U1 attended, how the average value of the evaluation points changes depending on the presence or absence of a “thing” called a whiteboard in a place where the place F is provided, for example, in a conference room. Can be evaluated. As a result, the relationship between “person” and “thing” between the participant U1 and the whiteboard can be evaluated.

Similarly, the “personal thing” relationship analysis unit 103 compares the place information FD stored in the place information DB 121, the information stored in the business organization personnel information DB 122, and the information stored in the analysis result DB 124. Also, the evaluation of the relationship between "person", "thing", and "thing", that is, "person and thing relationship information" is analyzed. Thereby, it is possible to know whether each relationship is good or bad, that is, the influence on the place. However, as in the case of the field evaluation FE, the evaluation of the “one thing” relationship is not limited to the evaluation using one item. That is, the field evaluation may be a sum of the evaluations of several items.

Up to this point, for convenience of explanation, the evaluation of “person's thing relationship information” has been described using the place observation FM, but the “person's thing relationship information” An evaluation may be performed. Specifically, for example, it is assumed that the participant U2 has a high evaluation of “person”. At this time, in a case where there are two or more places F in which the participant U1 has participated, if the places are classified according to whether or not the participant U2 is present in those places, the case where the participant U2 is present is as follows. The evaluation of the place is expected to be high. However, on the contrary, it is assumed that the evaluation value of the participant U1 is low when the participant U2 is present. In this case, it can be seen that the participant U1 and the participant U2 are incompatible. In other words, the evaluation of a single thing can be a bias to the evaluation of the place, and by comparing the expected bias with the evaluation of the actual place, the relationship between the things can be evaluated. it can.

The “things and things” relationship analysis unit 103 stores and manages “things and things relationship information” in the analysis result DB 124. Here, in the analysis result DB 124, for each “thing and thing relationship information”, that is, “person” and “person”, “person” and “thing”, “person” and “thing”, “person” and “thing” Is stored for each relationship such as "."

The analysis result transmitting unit 104 transmits a part or all of the place information FD stored in the place information DB 121, or the analysis result of “one thing” evaluation or the “one thing relationship information” analysis result of the analysis result DB 124. Acquisition and transmission to the interested party terminal 3 via the communication unit 19.

(4) The stakeholder terminal 3 outputs an analysis result obtained from the analysis result transmission unit 104 from an output unit (not shown) according to an operation of the stakeholder SH. Thereby, the stakeholder SH can grasp whether each of “person”, “thing”, and “thing” has an influence on the place F. Further, it is possible to grasp the soundness / unhealthyness of the relationship between "person", "thing", and "thing".

For lively discussions and social health, it is desirable that the evaluation score of Site F be good. Therefore, it is desirable that the stakeholder SH make adjustments so that the evaluation point of the field F is improved.
The stakeholder SH can use the information processing system to grasp the "person", "things", and "things" that have an influence on the evaluation points, and the elements that have an adverse effect on the evaluation points Can be eliminated or improved. In addition, by evaluating "personal thing relationship information", not only the influence of "person" alone, but also the compatibility of each person, such as the relationship between "person" and "person", etc. Such effects can be grasped.

That is, it can be used as a material for judging who should be tagged with "people". Further, it can be used as a material for judging the suitability of a “person” from an evaluation that a certain “person” has a good relationship with a certain “thing”. As a result, it is possible to enhance each evaluation of the place F and make the place lively.

Here, an example of the contents of the place information FD and the stored place information DB 121 will be described. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of the contents of the stored place information DB 121.

(5) The example of the contents of the place information DB 121 in FIG. 5 is described along the case where there are places F1 to Fn in FIG. As an example of the contents of the place information DB 121, specifically, in the server 1 of FIG. 4, the place information acquisition unit 101 stores the contents in the place information DB 121.

As shown in FIG. 5, for example, in the column of items at the top, “place ID”, “place log”, “place watch U1”, “place watch U2”, “place watch U3” are displayed from the left. , “...”, and “field evaluation” are displayed.
“Place ID” is an ID for specifying the place F uniquely given to the place F. For example, it may be a character string such as F1, F2 as shown in the table, or may be an integer value simply given in the order of storage.
"Place log" is a place log corresponding to the objective place information FD-K of the place F. That is, as described above, it may be composed of “holding date / time”, “participant”, “related information reference material”, “decision item”, “assignment / ToDo”, and the like.
The “place watching U1” is based on the participant U1 in the viewing of the site, and is a part of the subjective field information FD-S of the field F. That is, as described above, it may be composed of “importance”, “impression”, “evaluation score”, and the like.
“Place watch U2” is the participant's U1 of the place watch. The content is the same as that of "Place watch U1". "Place observation U3" and "..." are similarly the place observation by each of the participants U.
“Place evaluation” is a place evaluation that is analyzed from each of the appearances of the place. That is, as described above, it may be composed of “the average value of the evaluation points of the place watching”.

The column in which the "place ID" at the top shown in FIG. 5 is "F1" will be described.
The place ID of the place F1 shown in FIG. 1 is “F1”. The field log FL1 is a field log corresponding to the field F1. The “place observation U1” is a place observation FM11 that is a place observation by the participant U1 with respect to the place F1. In the “place watching U2”, a room watching FM12 that is a room watching by the participant U2 with respect to the room F1 is stored. Since the participant U3 does not participate in the place F1 in the place stand U3, the place stand is not stored as "-". Although not shown, since each of the participants U4 to Um does not participate in the venue F1, the venues U4 to Um do not exist, and thus the venues are not stored as "-". The “field evaluation” stores a field evaluation FE1 that is a field evaluation for the field F1.

Next, the field where the “place ID” is “F2” will be described.
The place ID of the place F2 shown in FIG. 1 is “F2”. In the field log, a field log FL2 that is a field log corresponding to the field F2 is stored. Since the participant U1 does not participate in the place F2, the place stand is not stored as "-". The "place observation U2" stores a place observation FM22 that is a place observation by the participant U2 with respect to the place F2. In the “place watching U3”, a room watching FM12 that is a room watching by the participant U3 with respect to the room F1 is stored. The “field evaluation” stores a field evaluation FE1 that is a field evaluation for the field F1.

Similarly, for each of the places F1 to Fn, the “place ID” is stored up to the “place Fn” column.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the flow of an evaluation process executed by the server having the functional configuration of FIG.
The evaluation process is executed when acquiring the place log and the place stand of the place F. At this time, the place information FD may or may not be already stored in the place information DB 121.

In step S11, the venue log acquisition unit 111 of the venue information acquisition unit 101 acquires the venue log FL. Similarly, the place observation acquisition unit 112 of the place information acquisition unit 101 acquires the place observation FM.

In step S12, the place evaluation analysis unit 113 analyzes the place evaluation from the place watching FM acquired in step S11.

In step S13, the place information acquisition unit 101 stores the place log FL as the acquired objective place information FD-K, the place observation FM and the place evaluation FE as the subjective place information FD-S, in the place information DB 121. To be stored.

In step S14, the CPU 11 determines whether or not place information has been stored for a predetermined number of places.
When the place information FD is not stored for the predetermined number of places, NO is determined in step S14, the process returns to step S11, and the subsequent processes are repeated. That is, steps S11 to S13 are repeated until the place information FD is stored for a predetermined number of places. When the place information FD has been stored for a predetermined number of places, YES is determined in step S14, and the process proceeds to step S15.

In step S15, the "personal thing" analysis unit 102 evaluates "personal thing information".

In step S16, the "things and things" relationship analysis unit 103 evaluates "things and things relationship information".

As above, a series of flows of the evaluation process for providing the present system has been described.
Hereinafter, the quantity and quality of the connection and the relationship will be described.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the relationship between the venue and the amount and quality of the connection and the credit evaluation based on the relationship.
FIG. 7 illustrates each of the seven fields F. Further, eight participants U are drawn in the place F, respectively. For example, a participant U11 is participating in the venue F11. The participant U11 also participates in the place F12.
On the other hand, FIG. 7 illustrates an organization and its subordinate concepts. For example, the organization has a business J1 and a business J2. Further, the business J1 has a project P11 and a project P12. The business J2 has a project P21 and a project P22. That is, the organization is promoting each of several businesses, and the business is promoting each of several projects.

Each of the sites F is, for example, a meeting related to one of the projects, a meeting related to the entire business, or a meeting related to the entire organization. That is, a place can be defined in daily work and daily life, and it is possible to accumulate logs of the place in daily life and visualize the relationship.

For each of the F fields, the “organizational structure information” is obtained by using the field log FL that is the objective field information FD-K and the field appraisal FM that is the subjective field information FD-S, and the organizational structure and the like. It can be included and analyzed. That is, by analyzing the "personal thing relationship information" from the place information, "visualization of the quantity and quality of connection" becomes possible, and a "credit evaluation index based on the relationship" can be obtained.

Above, we explained the quantity and quality of connections and their relationships.

The following describes how to re-establish the relationship based on the “quantity and relationship information” that is the quantity and quality of the connection.

FIG. 8 is a diagram related to re-establishing the relationship based on the "personal thing relationship information".
The upper part of FIG. 8 shows a flow of visualizing the quantity and quality of the connection. On the left of the upper row are eight “places” and five “people”. This indicates that there are many places F and many people intervening in the place. The symbol between the place F and the person indicates that each person is intervening in the place F. In the present invention, first, field information FD is collected from these fields F and analyzed. At this time, analysis can be performed from the field information FD from the following two viewpoints.
First, as a "logical" viewpoint, there are "actual results / trends of individual activities", "personal strengths / inconsistencies", and "personal achievements". Second, as "sensory" viewpoints, there are "motivation for individual activities", "compatibility with other people", and "sensory evaluation of individuals". This is equivalent to analyzing the "personal thing information" described above.

Further, on the upper right, there are “organization”, “business”, and “project”. The symbol on the left indicates that many “places” and many “people” belong to “organization”, “business”, and “project”. In the present invention, as described above, the "personal thing relationship information" is analyzed from the "personal thing information" which is the analysis result. At this time, analysis can be performed from these "personal thing information" from the following two viewpoints.
First, as a “logical” perspective, “Activities / Trends of each organization / business / project”, “Pros and cons of each organization / business / project”, “Results of each organization / business / project” There is. Second, as "sensory" perspectives, "motivation for activities by organization / business / project", "compatibility with other people by organization / business / project", "sense of organization / business / project" Evaluation ". This corresponds to analyzing the above-mentioned "person and thing relationship information".

In other words, when there is a "place" and there is a "person" intervening in the place F, by collecting and analyzing the place information of the place F, each of the persons can be viewed from a logical viewpoint and a sensory viewpoint. Can be evaluated individually. That is, each of the participants U can be evaluated. Furthermore, by using the evaluation and the place information of each of the participants U, the relationship of each of the participants U (that is, “person and thing relationship information”) and the “organization” in which each of the participants U is involved , "Business" and "project" can be evaluated.

が あ る In the lower part of FIG. 8, there is an illustrated example of “person and thing relationship information”. In the illustrated example, "person", "thing", and "thing" are indicated by a solid line and a broken line, respectively, and another combination of a thick line and a thin line. The solid line indicates that the relationship is sound, and the broken line indicates that the relationship is unhealthy. A thick line indicates that the relationship is extremely healthy or unhealthy, and a thin line indicates that the relationship is reasonably healthy or unhealthy. The same applies hereinafter, not limited to the relationship between persons.

For example, the person H1 and the person H2 are connected by a solid thick line. This indicates that the relationship between the person H1 and the person H2 is extremely healthy. The person H2 and the person H3 are connected by a solid thin line. This indicates that the relationship is sound. On the other hand, the person H1 and the person H3 are connected by a thin broken line. This indicates that the relationship is unhealthy.
The stakeholders SH can share such information so as to prevent the persons H1 and H3 from being present in the same project. Further, it is possible to take measures to make the relationship between the person H1 and the person H3 sound.

Further, for example, the person H1 and the person M1 are connected by a solid thick line. The person H2 and the person M2 are connected by a solid thick line. That is, person H1, person H2, and M1 indicate that the relationship is extremely healthy.
By sharing this information, the stakeholders SH can respond to assigning and promoting persons H1 and H2 to the project related to M1. As a result, the project can be hoped for further development.

Further, for example, T1 of the person H3 and T1 are connected by a thick broken line. That is, T1 with the person H3 indicates that the relationship is extremely unhealthy.
The stakeholders SH can share the information so as not to provide a place F relating to the person H3 and T1. Further, it can be a trigger for finding out that the sound is unhealthy and investigating the reason.

に As described above, “person and thing relationship information” can be illustrated and shared with the stakeholders SH. In other words, the information can be used as so-called information for the right person in the right place, and it can be used as a trigger for finding unhealthy relationships and improving relationships.

ま で So far, the illustrated example of “person's thing relationship information” has been shown. However, needless to say, FIG. 1 is merely an example. That is, depending on the situation, the “personal thing relationship information” may be shown in a text format such as a table or a ranking, or in another illustration not depending on the legend described above.

Above, we explained about re-establishing relationships based on the "quantity and relationship information" that is the quantity and quality of connections.

(2nd Embodiment)
According to this service, in addition to the above services, for example, a rating control service, a priority calculation service, a role management service, and a credit asset point management service shown in FIGS. 9 to 13 are provided.
FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of an outline of a rating control service of the present service.

The “rating control service” refers to a service that automatically performs a rating control to make it difficult for the participant U who evaluates the place F to perform the guesswork.
That is, the “rating control service” is a service that adjusts the evaluation result by taking into account the habit of the participant U when the evaluation point of the participant U is input by the participant U of the place F. The habit of the participant U is derived by analyzing past evaluation patterns.
By providing the rating control service, the reliability of the above-mentioned field evaluation FE can be improved.

Specifically, as shown in FIG. 9, among the participants U, there is a participant U whose evaluation of the place F is biased. For example, a participant U who gives a score of only 3 to 5 points out of 5 out of 5 points as the evaluation of the place F can be said to be "biased in the evaluation of the place F". In the case of such a participant U, the practical lowest score is 3 points, and the highest score is 5 points.
Therefore, for such a participant U, a process such as re-acquisition of a value (for example, “4”) serving as a center of evaluation is performed by the rating control service, and the score is reconfigured.
In other words, as shown in FIG. 9, when there is such a participant U1 having a biased evaluation, and a participant U2 having an unbiased evaluation that gives 1 to 5 points evenly. For example, the following rating control is performed.
That is, the evaluation value of the participant U1 of three points, four points, and five points is the same as the evaluation value of the participant U2 of one point, three points, and five points. The rating control is made such that
Thereby, it is possible to make it difficult for the participant U performing the evaluation to perform the evaluation, so that the reliability of the field evaluation FE can be improved.

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of an outline of a priority calculation service of the present service.

The “priority calculation service” is a service that automatically calculates the priority and the impact of a project or the like according to the amount of tasks and tasks associated with the project in which the participant U of the venue F is involved. Say.
In the “priority calculation service”, “importance” is set based on the “issue” derived from the record (log) of the field F, and “the task” and “request” are further derived from the derived task. Urgency ”is set. Then, based on the set "importance" and "urgency" and the contents set in advance by the manager or the person in charge, the role, the business or the project, and the priority of the organization or the community that keep changing dynamically And influence are calculated automatically.

Here, the “problem” refers to a state in which it is necessary to consider a solution or an implementation method itself as shown in FIG. 10, and “thinking” is necessary for the solution. The number of “issues” indicates importance. Specifically, “issues” refer to themes that need to be considered, the issues that need to be resolved, and the risks that need to be addressed.
As shown in FIG. 10, a “task” refers to a state in which a solution and an implementation method already exist and can be implemented, but a “practice” is required for the solution. The number of "tasks" indicates urgency. Specifically, the “task” refers to manual work, correspondence to instructions, and execution of a work plan.
As shown in FIG. 10, “request” refers to a state in which a solution or an implementation method exists, but cannot be handled with confidence and requires cooperation of another person. The number of “requests” indicates urgency as in the case of “tasks”. Specifically, "request" refers to outsourcing, outsourcing, and work instructions.

Specifically, for example, it is assumed that there is a project P1 in which the numbers of tasks and tasks are 5 and 10, respectively, and a project P2 in which the numbers of tasks and tasks are 5 and 3, respectively.
In this case, the “importance” is set at the same level because the number of issues is 5 in both projects. On the other hand, the “urgency” is set higher for the project P1 because the number of tasks (10) of the project P1 is seven more than the number of tasks (3) of the project P2.
As described above, when the “importance” and “urgency” of both projects are set, respectively, the priority of both projects is set based on the set contents and the contents set in advance by the person in charge or the person in charge. The degree and the degree of influence are calculated.
Here, the mode of the calculated priority or influence is not particularly limited. For example, the priority and influence may be indicated in five stages of 1 to 5. In this case, for example, the priority of the project with the highest priority can be set to “5”, and the priority of the project with the lowest priority can be set to “1”.
In this way, according to the priority calculation service, even if, for example, multiple projects coexist and it is unclear which project to focus on, it is necessary to show the priority and impact for each project Can be.

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of an outline of a role management service of the present service.

The “role management service” analyzes “personal thing relationship information” while managing what “role” the participant U of the place F participates in the place F. Refers to services.
In other words, the “role management service” is a service for deciphering the relationship from the role set by the business or project, not the personality of the participant U as a natural person.
In the real world, the participant U who participates in the place F often does not simply participate as a “person” but as a “role”. Therefore, the role management service manages “issues” and “tasks” associated with the place F based on “roles” instead of “persons”.
That is, in the role setting service, when the participant U participates in the venue F (for example, a meeting or the like) as a “role”, the setting contents are “visualized” so that there are no omissions or omissions in the tasks and tasks associated with the project. Is performed automatically.

Specifically, for example, it is assumed that the participant U1 has a “role” of “project manager” in the project P1 and has a role of “designer” in the project P2.
In this case, according to the role management service, in the project P1, the participant U1 is set with a "role" of "project manager". In the project P2, the participant U1 is set with a "role" of "designer".
As a result, the project P1 is associated and managed as an issue or task as a “project manager”, and the project P2 is associated and managed as an issue or task as a “designer”.
As a result, even if the role of the participant U is different for each project, issues and tasks are separately managed.

Specifically, in the role management service, as shown in FIG. 11, the participant U is regarded as “human resources”, and based on the role set for the human resources, analysis of “personal thing relationship information” is performed. Is performed.
In other words, according to the role management service, based on the “role” of a human resource, the organization or community to which the human resource belongs, the target (for example, social issues, vision, reference information, etc.) to which the human resource is interested, etc. Relationship is unraveled.
Accordingly, for example, when the participant U participates in the project P1 with a “role” of “project manager”, the tasks and issues associated with this “role” can be checked in a list. Omission can be prevented.

FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of an outline of a credit asset point management service of the present service.

The “credit asset point management service” is a service that enables a credit evaluation index for human resources to be converted into credit asset points.
The “credit evaluation index” is an index derived based on the result of “relationship-based credit evaluation” performed in the service.
“Credit asset points” are pseudo currencies distributed in this service that can be used when the participant U makes “requests” (for example, outsourcing, outsourcing, work instructions, etc.) to others. Say.

Specifically, as shown in the lower left of FIG. 12, when the participant U looks at the place F, the content (the place look-up FM) consequently evaluates the participant U as a human resource. Is reflected in The evaluation of the participant U as a human resource is indicated as a “credit evaluation index”.
Here, according to the credit asset point management service, the credit evaluation index for human resources can be converted into credit asset points and given to the participants U. The participant U given the credit asset points can make a “request” to another person by consuming the credit asset points.
In this way, the participant U who is the requester consumes his / her credit asset points by making the “request”, and the participant U receiving the “request” responds to the “request”. By doing so, credit asset points can be obtained. Here, “response” means that the “problem” is solved by the cooperation of the person who received the request, and the distribution of knowledge from the requester to the requestee exists as a premise of “request” and “response”. I do.
If the problem is solved by the "response" by the client, the organization, community, business, project, or role will be activated, and the venue F will be developed at the same time. Can be expected.

That is, credit asset points can be distributed by request. In other words, the requester makes a request to another person (requestee) using the credit asset points held by the requester, and the requester can obtain credit asset points by responding to the request. The requester sets credit asset points to be used in accordance with the contents of the request. After receiving the request, the requestor will share the credit asset points they want based on the results. Based on the amount presented by the requester and the requestee, the credit asset points that both (the requester and the requestee) can agree on are determined.
In other words, for the requester, the number of opportunities to make a request and the qualitative difficulty are the degree of trust already acquired. Further, for the request destination, the quantity of the corresponding request and the qualitative difficulty are the degree of expectation. Since the requester and the requestee each have values, credit asset points are determined based on the values of both. That is, the credit assets to be deducted are determined.

Credit asset points can be increased in response to requests. The consumption of credit asset points can be restored to the standard value based on the evaluation of human resources. On the other hand, the credit asset point expires and disappears unless the additional earned portion is used.
In addition, when the requestee responds before the expiration date, the credit asset points can be added with a bonus according to the number of days ahead of schedule. Also, a bonus can be added according to the priority set by the request destination.
In addition, when the credit asset points have passed, the onus can be deducted according to the number of days or time that the credit asset points have passed.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a relationship between a request source, a request destination, and an intermediary that mediates the request in the credit asset point management service.

As described above, the credit asset points can be increased so as to “correspond” to “request”. In addition, if a person who can respond is intervened without having to respond, credit asset points may be given to the contribution.
Specifically, as shown in FIG. 13, it is assumed that a relationship among a participant U21 as a request source, a participant U23 as a request destination, and a participant U22 as an intermediary that mediates the request is established. . In this case, the credit asset points may be given to not only the participant U23 as the request destination but also the participant U22 as the intermediary.

Credit asset points can be awarded in addition to contributions to communication.
Here, the additional factors of credit asset points by a person who performs log registration include, for example, creation of information accompanying addition of a record, information amount of the created record (the number of characters, data amount based on image and sound analysis, etc.), record , The amount of information (such as the number of characters, the amount of data based on image and voice analysis, etc.) of the comment on the record, and the like.
The additional factors of credit asset points at the information sharing destination include, for example, a reaction performed on a record (for example, a sign such as “like”), an information amount of a comment performed on the record (the number of characters, an image, There are, for example, the amount of data based on voice analysis), the total number of responses to one's own comment (for example, the total number of “likes”), the amount of information on comments for one's own comment (the number of characters, the amount of data based on image and voice analysis, etc.) .

Credit asset points can be dynamically tapered. That is, the credit asset points obtained by responding to the request or communicating or consumed as the request source are gradually reduced in a time series. As a result, it is possible to continuously stimulate the will to respond to requests.
That is, although not shown, the credit asset points are fixed at the initial value for the first fixed period. During this period, the aim of the credit asset point acquisition side is to secure the amount and increase the request opportunities. The aim of the consumer of credit asset points is to stimulate the desire to acquire credit asset points (corresponding to a request) by continuing the decreasing state.
After a lapse of the first fixed period, the amount of decrease in credit asset points increases with time. The purpose of the credit asset point acquisition side during this period is to motivate the use (request) as soon as the credit asset point decreases. In addition, the aim of the credit asset points on the consumer side is to stimulate the willingness to continuously acquire (correspond to requests) by slowing the recovery.
When the credit asset points fall below a certain value, there is a fixed consumption period. The aim of the credit asset point acquisition side during this period is to extend the available period to increase the request opportunities. In addition, the aim of the credit asset points on the consumer side is to extend the recovery period to maintain the willingness to respond to requests.

Note that the configuration of the information processing system that performs information processing for realizing the various services illustrated in FIGS. 9 to 13 is the same as the system configuration illustrated in FIG.
In the information processing system for performing information processing for realizing various services shown in FIGS. 9 to 13, the server 1, the place information input terminal 2, and the stakeholder terminal 3 have the hardware configuration shown in FIG. Has basically the same configuration. Therefore, description of the hardware configuration of the server 1, the venue information input terminal 2, and the interested party terminal 3 will be omitted.

FIG. 14 is a functional block diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of a server in the information processing system according to the second embodiment of the present invention.

In the example of FIG. 14, in addition to the example of FIG. 4, a functional configuration in which a rating control process, a priority calculation process, a role management process, and a credit asset point management process are executed is drawn.
“Rating control processing” refers to processing executed when the above-described rating control service is provided.
The priority calculation process is a process executed when the above-described priority calculation service is provided.
"Role management processing" refers to processing executed when the above-described role management service is provided.
The "credit asset point management process" refers to a process executed when the above-described credit asset point management service is provided.

The functional configuration of the venue information input terminal 2-1 and the venue information input terminal 2-2 are the same as the functional configurations of the venue information input terminal 2-1 and the venue information input terminal 2-2 shown in FIG. It is. Therefore, description of the functional configuration of the venue information input terminal 2-1 and the venue information input terminal 2-2 shown in FIG. 14 will be omitted.

In the CPU 11 of the server 1, the place information acquisition unit 101, the “things” analysis unit 102, the “things” relationship analysis unit 103, the analysis result transmission unit 104, and the credit evaluation management unit 105 Function.

In addition, the functional configuration of the venue observation acquiring unit 112, the “personal thing” analyzing unit 102, and the analysis result transmitting unit 104 of the venue information acquiring unit 101 are the same as the respective functional configurations shown in FIG. . For this reason, the description of the functional configuration of the place observation acquisition unit 112, the "personal thing" analysis unit 102, and the analysis result transmission unit 104 of the place information acquisition unit 101 shown in FIG. 14 is omitted.

The venue log acquiring unit 111 of the venue information acquiring unit 101 acquires role information on the role of the participant U in addition to the functions described with reference to FIG.
The “role information” includes, for example, the role of the participant U and tasks and tasks associated with the role.

The place evaluation analysis unit 113 of the place information acquisition unit 101 performs, in addition to the functions described with reference to FIG. 4, the evaluations input by each of the participants U1 to Um based on the past evaluation pattern of the participant U. Coordinate between participants.
Specifically, the venue evaluation analysis unit 113 adjusts the content of the venue evaluation FE generated by itself based on the evaluation result information indicating the past evaluation patterns of each of the participants U1 to Um.
Here, the specific method of adjustment by the field evaluation analysis unit 113 is not particularly limited. For example, the field evaluation analysis unit 113 performs adjustment by normalizing the content of the field evaluation FE generated by itself.
Accordingly, the past evaluation results of the evaluator (participant U) can be reflected on the generated place evaluation FE, so that a highly reliable place evaluation FE can be provided.

The "things" relationship analysis unit 103 performs the following processing in addition to the functions described with reference to FIG. That is, the “one thing” relationship analysis unit 103 uses the place information FD stored in the place information DB 121, the information stored in the business organization personnel information DB 122, and the information stored in the analysis result DB 124. Then, the priority and the influence of each of “person”, “thing”, and “thing” are calculated.
Specifically, the “personal thing” relationship analysis unit 103 sets the “importance” based on the “task” derived from the record (log) of the field F, and further sets the “task” derived from the derived task. And the "request" are set. Then, based on the set "importance" and "urgency" and the contents set in advance by the manager or the person in charge, the role, the business or the project, and the priority of the organization or the community that keep changing dynamically And influence.
Thus, for example, even when a plurality of projects coexist, the priority and the degree of influence can be indicated for each project, so that the projects to be focused on can be narrowed down.

The credit evaluation management unit 105 evaluates the credit of the participant U and converts a credit evaluation index as a result of the evaluation into credit asset points and manages it.
The participant U who has been given the credit asset point makes a “request” to another person by consuming the credit asset point. In this case, the credit evaluation management unit 105 manages an increase or decrease in credit asset points held by the participant U.
In addition, when the above-described intermediary exists, the credit evaluation management unit 105 manages the credit asset points of the request source, the request destination, and the intermediary.
Thus, for example, when the problem is solved by “response” by the request destination, the organization, the community, the business, the project, or the role is activated. In addition, since the field F develops at the same time, the result of the field watching FM can be improved as a result.

FIGS. 15A and 15B are diagrams showing specific examples of a GUI displayed on the place information input terminal when the credit asset point management service is provided.

FIG. 15A shows a specific example of a GUI displayed by the browser function of the place information input terminal 2 when the place information input terminal 2 is constituted by a personal computer.
The GUI shown in FIG. 15A is composed of icons and columns indicating each of a user name, a notice, various menus, a credit asset point balance, a credit evaluation index, a search engine, and a timeline.
The icon I1 indicating the notification is an icon for notifying, when there is a log sharing, request, comment, or the like, that fact.
The icons I2 indicating various menus are composed of icons described as "log registration", "review", "strategy", "request", "task", and "other". For example, when an icon described as “log registration” is pressed, another GUI (not shown) for registering a log is displayed.
The column R1 indicating the credit asset point balance indicates the current credit asset point balance, the number of credit asset points acquired in the last month, the number of credit asset points used in the last month, and the like. Are provided.
In the column R2 indicating the credit evaluation index, the score of each of the four indexes of future development, logic, empathy, and reality is indicated by points.
The field R3 indicating the search engine is an input field for performing a free word search, a pull-down button for selecting and specifying a table to be searched, and a pull-down button for selecting and specifying a period to be searched. Consists of buttons and.
In a column R4 indicating a timeline, for example, the latest information on registration and update is displayed.

FIG. 15B shows a specific example of a GUI displayed by dedicated application software installed in the place information input terminal 2 when the place information input terminal 2 is configured by a smartphone or a tablet.
The GUI shown in FIG. 15B is configured with columns indicating a search engine and a timeline, respectively.
The participant U can easily receive the service using the GUI shown in FIGS. 15A and 15B.

Fig. 16 is a diagram showing the composition of capital required to achieve social results in businesses and projects.

Ｂ On the left side of FIG. 16, a B / S (balance sheet) showing the composition of goods that can be used for a business or project is drawn. On the right side of FIG. 16, a P / L (Profit and Loss Statement) indicating the composition of the results of the business or project is drawn.

The right side of the B / S (so-called lender) is a combination of three types of capital: “economic capital”, “intellectual capital”, and “social capital”. The left side of the B / S (so-called debit) is the “total capital available” as the sum of the three types of capital combinations.
Of the capitals that make up the “total capital that can be used”, “economic capital” includes “money” and “material value”, and “intellectual capital” includes “wisdom” and “know-how” Is included. The “social capital” includes “relationship” and “social credit”.
By optimizing each of the three types of capital, “economic capital”, “intellectual capital” and “social capital” on the right side of the B / S, the “total available capital” on the left side of the B / S The capital will be developed and maximized.
By maximizing the total capital of the B / S, the social results shown in the P / L can be created.

The left side of the P / L (so-called debit) is a combination of three types of results: “profit”, “knowledge”, and “trust”. The right side of the P / L (so-called lender) is “social common value” as the sum of the combinations of these three types of results, that is, “products by goods”.
Among the achievements constituting the “common social value”, “profit” includes “sales” and “profit”, and “knowledge” includes “notice” and “experience”. “Trust” includes “satisfaction” and “happiness”.
By optimizing each of the three types of outcomes: “revenue”, “knowledge”, and “trust” on the left side of the P / L, “social common value” on the right side of the P / L (performance by goods) Can be maximized.
In addition, the three types of results of “revenue”, “knowledge” and “trust” on the left side of the P / L are respectively referred to as “economic capital” and “intellectual capital” on the right side of the B / S. , And "social capital".
As a result, each of the three types of capital, “economic capital”, “intellectual capital”, and “social capital” on the right side of the B / S can be optimized. Of the total capital that can be used, and make the most of it.
Then, by making the most of the total capital of the B / S, a cycle is completed in which the social results shown in the P / L can be created.

Note that, among the above three types of capital, “social capital” is a source of the other two types of capital (“economic capital” and “intellectual capital”) and is a return destination.
"Social capital" enables a new challenge from "nothing". This can create new value creation (ie, innovation) that goes beyond complexity.

FIGS. 17A to 17C are diagrams showing specific examples of financial statements generated based on the result of credit evaluation as specific examples of analysis by the server.

In the server 1, the credit evaluation of the participant U is performed, and based on the result, the financial statements shown in FIGS. 17A to 17C are generated.
In the financial statements shown in FIGS. 17A to 17C, since the credit asset points and the credit evaluation index are added to the conventional financial statements, the state of management which could not be seen in the monetary valuation Can be visualized.

FIG. 17A shows the B / S based on the credit evaluation.
The right side of the B / S (so-called credit) is a combination of “money value (currency) representing economically active capital”, “credit asset point representing intellectual capital”, and “credit index representing social capital”. Has become. The left side of the B / S (so-called debit) is “total assets representing business activities” as the sum of these combinations.
Of the “total assets representing business activities”, “money value (currency) representing economic activity capital” includes items described in the conventional B / S credit, and “credit asset points representing intellectual capital” , And the “credit index representing social capital” are all calculated by this service.
The “total assets representing business activities on the left side of the B / S” include, for each account item, the specific contents of monetary value (currency), intellectual value (credit asset points), and social relationship value (credit index) Is shown. Note that the subtotal and total are balanced on the left and right (debit and credit).

FIG. 17B shows P / L based on credit evaluation.
P / L based on credit evaluation includes monetary value (currency), intellectual value (credit asset points), and social relationship value for each of provided value (sales), acquisition value (cost), and final evaluation (profit). Specific contents of (credit index) are shown. Note that a credit index for which there is no actual transaction is calculated based on the difference from the above.

FIG. 17C shows a value flow based on credit evaluation.
The value flow based on the credit evaluation indicates the specific contents of the monetary value (currency) for each of the operating flow, the investment flow, and the financial flow. In addition, specific contents of intellectual value (credit asset points) and social relationship value (credit index) are shown for each of the investment flow and the financial flow. In other words, the financial flow occurs only in monetary value (currency). Note that a credit index for which there is no actual transaction is calculated based on the difference from the above.

The embodiments of the information processing system to which the present invention is applied have been described above. However, the embodiment to which the present invention is applied may be, for example, as follows.

In the present embodiment, the place F is a meeting, the place information FD is a place log FL and a place stand FM, and the place log FL is minutes, but the present invention is not limited to this. That is, the place F may be any place as long as one or more natural people are intervening. The place information FD may be any information as long as it comprises objective place information FD-K and subjective place information FD-S.

{Circle around (2)} Although the place information FD is transmitted from the place information input terminal 2 to the server 1 via the network, it is sufficient that the place information FD can be input to the server 1. That is, for example, the participant U may directly input the place information FD to the server 1, or may collect the contents corresponding to the place information FD on a medium such as paper and input the same to the server 1. .

(4) Although the information shared from the server 1 is shared with the interested party SH via the interested party terminal 3, it is sufficient that the information is shared with the interested party SH. That is, for example, the information may be printed from a printer controlled by the server 1 and presented to interested parties SH on a medium such as paper.

Further, according to the present invention, for example, the following effects can be expected.
In other words, it is possible to build a dialogue opportunity and a practical opportunity for creating new value, starting from a social issue brought to a local information agency. Thereby, the development of a new business and the transformation of the business can be realized. As a result, it can be converted to social value.

Also, for example, a community can be formed by building a trusting relationship for data (information). In addition, a business based on data (information) can be formed. Forming a community and forming a business need to be promoted simultaneously as two wheels.

Also, for example, regional intelligence agencies can form an ecosystem of data (information). This can support the formation of a business based on data (information). The “formation of a business” here refers to, for example, developing or utilizing an application.

Also, for example, local intelligence agencies can promote the distribution of human resources, which are the source of value. Specifically, the model is based on the management of professional sports clubs and leagues, whereby the distribution and activation of highly skilled human resources can be realized.

Also, for example, local information agencies can properly use surplus assets. As a result, it is possible to expand the possibility of creating an innovation that has not been possible in a conventional organization.

Further, for example, according to the above-described relationship analysis, it is possible to overlook who is in what kind of relationship and to visualize the situation in which one is located.
In this case, "CORE3" is the three people who have the most core trust, "HOT15" is the 15 people who can always communicate and support each other. The name is "My Community", those who have approached themselves but have no relationship with them are "My Contact", and those who want to connect but are not connected are "My Approach". Each can be defined.

Further, for example, according to the above-described analysis of the relationship, the social graph can be qualitatively captured and connected to an action.
In this case, for example, analysis based on the following five viewpoints can be performed. That is, analysis based on compatibility, specialty, influence, interest, and channel can be performed. Of these, "compatibility" can be analyzed from the viewpoint of who and who in combination will increase productivity, and who will be involved in what type of role or business to increase productivity. The “specialty” can be analyzed from the viewpoint of who has what kind of specialty, and which areas have high coordination and affinity between specialty fields. "Impact" is an analysis from the perspective of who has an impact on the whole, not the apparent appearance of the system, but who is in effect affecting decisions and actions. Can be. "Interest" is an analysis from the perspective of what should be taken as a direct stakeholder, what or who needs to be involved, and what or who should be targeted not to be involved. Can be. “Channel” can analyze from the viewpoint of what order of communication is necessary to build a good relationship, and who is effective in asking who to say.

Further, for example, according to the above-described analysis of the relationship, it is possible to analyze the state of the abilities of individual human resources and teams such as projects, and utilize the results in a human resource development / organization development strategy.
In this case, specifically, the ability state can be evaluated based on the following factors. That is, the state of the ability can be analyzed based on the bird's-eye view ability, management and execution ability, vision setting, autonomous development and learning, practical action, trust and cooperation, specialized ability, and digital literacy.
The ability status can be evaluated at 11 levels from 0 to 10. That is, level “0” is “no recognition of the relevant field”, level “1” is “recognized that the relevant field exists”, level “2” is “a general recognition of the relevant field”, and level “2”. "3" is "only knowledge in the field", "4" is "experience in the field", "5" is "experience in the field", and "6" is "Sufficient practical experience in this field", level "7" is "sufficient leader experience in this field", level "8" is "sufficient track record in this field", level "9" Can be evaluated for each level such as "leader who has a proven track record in the field" and level "10" is "social authority / leader".

Further, for example, according to the above-described analysis of the relationship, it is possible to realize cooperation with external data.
In this case, by cooperating with already distributed external data, it is possible to perform analysis from the viewpoint of society, business, or human resources, and to visualize issues and possibilities for growth and development.
Examples of the external data include policy-related data (for example, open government), business data (for example, accounting, human resources, labor information), commercial data (for example, a website), and personal data (for example, biometric data and living data). .
The analysis from the social point of view specifically includes, for example, the impact on social problem solving and social transformation, the relationship with policies and NPO (Nonprofit Organization) activities related to social problems and vision, and the contribution of contribution. It is an analysis from the viewpoint of visualization and utilization of problem extraction to create higher results.
An analysis from a business perspective is, for example, a combination of market evaluation of business activities, business sustainability, social issues and vision, as well as information, accounting, personnel, and labor data related to the business of others. It is an analysis from the perspective of grasping and clarifying the evolution required for business.
Analyzes from the perspective of human resources include, for example, the combination of contributions to society and markets, human resource values, social effects and business potential with individual activity data, and visualization of the risks and possibilities of utilizing human resources. (E.g., man-hour problems, health risks).

Further, for example, prediction based on machine learning using AI (artificial intelligence) or the like can be performed based on the analysis of the relationship described above.
In other words, by providing predictions by machine learning based on data analysis, it is possible to promote more creative exploration, and by digitizing the practical results, it will be a creative growth program by people and machines be able to.
Specifically, after data accumulation and data analysis are performed, for example, prediction of social problems, proposal of vision and emergence, prediction of business growth, proposal of measures, and proposal of team formation can be performed. .
In the “prediction of social problems”, among the social problems that have already occurred, those that are expected to increase their attention in the future are predicted in view of changes in related projects. Although it is not yet a social problem, what will become a social problem in the future can be estimated from keywords raised in each project.
The “Vision and Emergent Proposal” proposes a vision that should be discussed more deeply in view of changes in related projects from the already presented vision. In addition, the viewpoint necessary for exploring the vision is presented based on the related issues, and the emergence through dialogue is promoted.
In the “business growth forecast”, businesses and projects, organizations, and communities that are closely related to each other are extracted based on forecasts of social issues and visions. It is also estimated what value businesses, projects, organizations and communities can provide in society.
In “Proposal of measures”, measures that need to be taken in existing businesses and projects are proposed by analogy with past cases based on changes in the business environment. In addition, the necessary roles and issues that need to be dealt with in the set roles are clarified. In addition, specific tasks and request items for proceeding with each task are proposed.
In “Proposal of team formation”, a necessary team formation is proposed in view of changes in the business environment and the state of the business. Also, appropriate human resources are extracted according to the compatibility of the human resources and the contents of the measures. In addition, conditions (salary treatment, etc.) for active human resources and negotiation channels are also proposed.
After that, creative inquiry and decision-making are made through stakeholder dialogue and implemented as practical measures.

Further, for example, according to the present invention, a system can be set up for each arbitrary group such as an area and an organization to share data.
That is, the credit evaluation can be shared by a plurality of group systems via the information processing system of FIG. 2 which is a common system.

Further, for example, according to the present invention, by establishing an information sharing environment through a venue and visualizing an information sharing route, information management and intellectual property management can be optimized.
Specifically, visualization is performed from the viewpoint of history management, information transmission route, information control, and guarantee of intellectual property.
That is, in the “history management”, management is performed to grasp when and where the connection was made, and to clarify the history of the connection based on the related information. As a result, it is possible to contribute to searching for a responsible place and a cause when a problem occurs.
In the “information transmission route”, it is understood who and how the information has been transmitted, how far the information has spread, and where the information has stopped.
In the “information control”, a range of information transmission is determined, whether a strategy can be set in advance, a data sharing range on the system is specified, information leakage is prevented, and the like.
In the “guarantee of intellectual property”, it is used as evidence for asserting the copyright owner's self-confidence, and visualization of the contribution to the result is performed. As a result, legitimate claims can be made.

{Also, for example, the GUI shown in FIG. 15B is configured to be displayed by dedicated application software installed in the venue information input terminal 2, but is not limited thereto. For example, the configuration may be such that the information is displayed by the browser function of the place information input terminal 2.

Further, for example, the above-described series of processing can be executed by hardware or can be executed by software.
In other words, the functional configuration of FIG. 4 is merely an example, and is not particularly limited.
That is, it suffices that the information processing system has a function capable of executing the above-described series of processing as a whole, and what kind of functional block is used to realize this function is not particularly limited to the example of FIG. Further, the location of the functional block is not particularly limited to FIG. 4 and may be arbitrary. For example, the functional blocks of the server 1 may be transferred to the place information input terminal 2 or the like. Conversely, the function blocks of the place information input terminal 2 may be transferred to the server 1 or the like.
Further, one functional block may be constituted by hardware alone, may be constituted by software alone, or may be constituted by a combination thereof.

Further, for example, when a series of processing is executed by software, a program constituting the software is installed in a computer or the like from a network or a recording medium.
The computer may be a computer embedded in dedicated hardware.
Further, the computer may be a computer that can execute various functions by installing various programs, for example, a general-purpose smartphone or a personal computer other than a server.

Further, for example, a recording medium including such a program is not only constituted by a removable medium (not shown) distributed separately from the apparatus main body to provide the program to the participant U, but also incorporated in the apparatus main body in advance. And a recording medium or the like provided to the participant U in a state where the participant U is placed.

In this specification, the steps of describing a program recorded on a recording medium include, in addition to the processing performed in chronological order according to the order, the processing is not necessarily performed in chronological order. This includes the processing to be executed.
Also, in this specification, the term system refers to an entire device including a plurality of devices and a plurality of means.

In other words, the information processing apparatus to which the present invention is applied can adopt various embodiments having the following configurations.
That is, the information processing apparatus to which the present invention is applied (for example, the server 1 in FIGS. 2 and 4)
A predetermined time during which one or more persons are intervening (for example, a time of a conference in which the participants U1 and U2 are participating) is set as a place, and first information (for example, the place shown in FIG. Log FL1) and third information (e.g., FIG. 1) indicating the evaluation of the place generated based on second information (for example, the place observations FM11 and FM12 in FIG. 1) which is subjective information on the place for the person. Acquisition means (for example, the venue information acquisition unit 101 in FIG. 4) for acquiring the first venue evaluation FE1);
Providing means (for example, the analysis result transmitting unit 104 in FIG. 4) for providing the first information and the third information to the interested parties in the place;
Any information processing device provided with is sufficient.
Thereby, for example, interested parties can know the contents of the place and the evaluation of the place.

Further, based on the third information of each of the plurality of places, the person involved in at least one of the plurality of places, the person involved in at least one of the plurality of places, or the plurality of places A first generation unit (for example, the "things" analysis unit 102 in FIG. 4) for generating fourth information (for example, the above-mentioned "things information") indicating the evaluation of at least one of the following.
Further comprising
The providing unit may further provide the fourth information to the interested party.
Thereby, for example, the interested parties can know the respective evaluations of “person”, “thing”, and “thing”.

Further, for a combination of at least two or more of the plurality of persons, the plurality of things, and the plurality of things, the fourth information about each of the people, the things, or each of the things included in the combination is A second generation unit that generates, based on the combination, fifth information (for example, the above-mentioned “things-and-things relationship information”) indicating an evaluation of a relationship between the person, the thing, or each of the things included in the combination; (For example, the "personal thing" relationship analysis unit 103 in FIG. 4),
Further comprising
The providing unit may further provide the fifth information to the interested party.
Thereby, for example, the stakeholder can obtain information such as whether the relationship is sound or unhealthy for at least two or more combinations of “person”, “thing”, and “thing”. In other words, the information can be used as so-called information for the right person in the right place, and it can be used as a trigger for finding unhealthy relationships and improving relationships. Thus, by providing a lively place, a further lively place can be provided via a loop. In addition, a lively place can enhance social health.

Further, the second generation means can further generate the fifth information based on a past evaluation result of a provider of the second information.
This enables rating control. As a result, the reliability of the field evaluation FE can be improved.

In addition, the second generation unit can generate, as the evaluation of the relationship, sixth information indicating a priority of each of the person, the object, and each of the above.
Thus, for example, even when a plurality of projects coexist, the priority and the degree of influence can be indicated for each project. As a result, you can narrow down the projects to focus on.

Further, the obtaining means includes:
The second information including information on the role of the person can be obtained.
As a result, the acquiring unit acquires the role information. For example, when the participant U participates in the project with the “role” of “project manager”, the task or the task associated with this “role” is You can check it in the list. As a result, it is possible to prevent a corresponding omission.

The fourth information includes an evaluation of the credibility of the person;
Further comprising credit management means for converting the evaluation related to credit into a predetermined exchange good and managing the individual credits.
As a result, the credit evaluation index for human resources can be converted into credit asset points and given to the participants U. A participant who has been given credit asset points can make a “request” to another person by consuming credit asset points.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Server, 2 ... Field information input terminal, 3 ... Stakeholder terminal, 11 ... CPU, 12 ... ROM, 13 ... RAM, 14 ... Bus, 15 ..Input / output interface, 16 output unit, 17 input unit, 18 storage unit, 19 communication unit, 20 drive, 31 removable media, 101・ Place information acquisition unit, 102: “one thing” analysis unit, 103: “one thing” relationship analysis unit, 104: analysis result transmission unit, 105: credit evaluation management unit, 111: site log acquisition unit, 112: site observation acquisition unit, 113: site evaluation analysis unit, 18: storage unit, 121: site information DB, 122: business organization human resources Information DB, 123: Existing data DB, 124: Analysis result DB, F・ Place, FL ・ ・ ・ Place log, FD ・ ・ ・ Place information, FM ・ ・ ・ Place observation, FE ・ ・ ・ Place evaluation, U ・ ・ ・ Participant, SH ・ ・ ・ Stakeholders, S ・ ・・ Each step, J ・ ・ ・ Business, P ・ ・ ・ Project, H ・ ・ ・ People, T ・ ・ ・ Thing, I ・ ・ ・ Icon, R ・ ・ ・ Column, N ・ ・ ・ Network

Claims (7)

1. At a predetermined time during which one or more persons are intervening, a place is generated based on first information that is objective information about the place and second information that is subjective information about the place for the person. Acquiring means for acquiring third information indicating the evaluation of the place,
   Providing means for providing the first information and the third information to interested parties of the venue;
   An information processing apparatus comprising:
2. The person involved in at least one of the plurality of places, the person involved in at least one of the plurality of places, or among the plurality of places, based on the third information of each of the plurality of places. First generating means for generating fourth information indicating an evaluation of at least one of:
   Further comprising
   The providing unit further provides the fourth information to the interested party;
   The information processing device according to claim 1.
3. For a combination of at least two or more of the plurality of persons, the plurality of things, and the plurality of things, based on the fourth information on each of the people, the things, or each of the things included in the combination. A second generation unit that generates fifth information indicating an evaluation of the relevance of each of the person, the thing, or the thing included in the combination;
   Further comprising
   The providing unit further provides the fifth information to the interested party;
   The information processing device according to claim 2.
4. The second generation means further generates the fifth information based on a past evaluation result of a provider of the second information.
   The information processing device according to claim 3.
5. The second generation unit generates, as the evaluation of the relationship, sixth information indicating a priority of the person, the object, or each of the above.
   The information processing device according to claim 3.
6. The acquisition means,
   Obtaining the second information including information on the role of the person;
   The information processing apparatus according to claim 1.
7. The fourth information includes an evaluation of the credibility of the person;
   Further comprising credit management means for converting the evaluation related to credit into a predetermined exchange good and managing the individual credits.
   The information processing device according to claim 2.

Images