WO2019233680A1 - Devices and methods for hydrocarbon cracking - Google Patents
Devices and methods for hydrocarbon cracking Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2019233680A1 WO2019233680A1 PCT/EP2019/061105 EP2019061105W WO2019233680A1 WO 2019233680 A1 WO2019233680 A1 WO 2019233680A1 EP 2019061105 W EP2019061105 W EP 2019061105W WO 2019233680 A1 WO2019233680 A1 WO 2019233680A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- reactor
- indentations
- indentation
- tubular wall
- range
- Prior art date
Links
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 title claims abstract description 46
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 title claims abstract description 46
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 35
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title description 37
- 238000007373 indentation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 203
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 150000001336 alkenes Chemical class 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 30
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 27
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 25
- 239000000571 coke Substances 0.000 description 19
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000005235 decoking Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000004230 steam cracking Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229910001092 metal group alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 238000012034 trail making test Methods 0.000 description 5
- VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethene Chemical compound C=C VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- QQONPFPTGQHPMA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propene Chemical compound CC=C QQONPFPTGQHPMA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000010953 base metal Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 4
- UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Benzene Chemical compound C1=CC=CC=C1 UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000003416 augmentation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004939 coking Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 3
- -1 for example Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008646 thermal stress Effects 0.000 description 3
- KAKZBPTYRLMSJV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Butadiene Chemical compound C=CC=C KAKZBPTYRLMSJV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910000975 Carbon steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000005977 Ethylene Substances 0.000 description 2
- ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propane Chemical compound CCC ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004411 aluminium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010962 carbon steel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000465 moulding Methods 0.000 description 2
- JRZJOMJEPLMPRA-UHFFFAOYSA-N olefin Natural products CCCCCCCC=C JRZJOMJEPLMPRA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 125000004805 propylene group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([*:1])C([H])([H])[*:2] 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004901 spalling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004227 thermal cracking Methods 0.000 description 2
- OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethane Chemical compound CC OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009412 basement excavation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009530 blood pressure measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001273 butane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000004432 carbon atom Chemical group C* 0.000 description 1
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009750 centrifugal casting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001427 coherent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010779 crude oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011143 downstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005530 etching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005272 metallurgy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- IJDNQMDRQITEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-butane Chemical compound CCCC IJDNQMDRQITEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OFBQJSOFQDEBGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-pentane Natural products CCCCC OFBQJSOFQDEBGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002028 premature Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001294 propane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000197 pyrolysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010517 secondary reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002352 steam pyrolysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J6/00—Heat treatments such as Calcining; Fusing ; Pyrolysis
- B01J6/008—Pyrolysis reactions
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J19/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
- B01J19/0053—Details of the reactor
- B01J19/006—Baffles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J19/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
- B01J19/24—Stationary reactors without moving elements inside
- B01J19/2415—Tubular reactors
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J19/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
- B01J19/24—Stationary reactors without moving elements inside
- B01J19/2415—Tubular reactors
- B01J19/2425—Tubular reactors in parallel
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G9/00—Thermal non-catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils
- C10G9/14—Thermal non-catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils in pipes or coils with or without auxiliary means, e.g. digesters, soaking drums, expansion means
- C10G9/18—Apparatus
- C10G9/20—Tube furnaces
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
- B01J2219/00049—Controlling or regulating processes
- B01J2219/00051—Controlling the temperature
- B01J2219/00157—Controlling the temperature by means of a burner
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
- B01J2219/00049—Controlling or regulating processes
- B01J2219/00164—Controlling or regulating processes controlling the flow
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
- B01J2219/00049—Controlling or regulating processes
- B01J2219/00245—Avoiding undesirable reactions or side-effects
- B01J2219/00247—Fouling of the reactor or the process equipment
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2400/00—Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
- C10G2400/20—C2-C4 olefins
Definitions
- the invention relates to the field of hydrocarbon cracking, such as by thermal cracking, steam cracking and/or pyrolysis. More specifically it relates to a reactor for cracking hydrocarbons, a system for cracking hydrocarbons and a method for producing light olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock.
- Hydrocarbon cracking is an approach, known in the art, for producing light olefins, such as, for example, ethene, propene, benzene and/or butadiene.
- Such light olefins are typically used as essential building blocks in the chemical industry, and may be commonly referred to as platform molecules. Due to the high demand for such platform molecules and for the sake of efficiency, hydrocarbon cracking processes may typically be performed at very large industrial scales. For example, a light olefin production capacity of a plant may be in the range of 300 kta to 2000 kta, and even higher capacities may be realistic. Steam cracking is such an industrial process that is commonly applied at a large scale.
- a hydrocarbon feedstock material such as ethane, propane, butane, naphtha, a light gas oil or even hydrotreated crude oil
- a reactor temperature e.g. in the range of 600°C to 1000 °C.
- the tubular reactor may have a length of, for example, about 10 m to about 100 m.
- the tubular reactor or, typically, a plurality of such tubular reactors may be suspended in a large furnace, e.g. a gas-fired furnace, to supply the heat for bringing the feedstock material up to the reactor temperature.
- Coke is a carbonaceous, graphite-like deposit with a relatively low thermal conductivity. Due to this low thermal conductivity, an efficient heat transfer from the furnace to the process gas inside the reactor is impeded. This can be compensated by increasing the fuel flow rate to the furnace to maintain a constant level of production, which, however, lowers the thermal efficiency of the process.
- the coke deposit also reduces the cross-sectional area of the tubular reactor that is available for the process gas, which results in a higher process gas flow velocity and hence a higher pressure drop over the tube.
- the outlet pressure may typically be constrained or determined by downstream processing steps, e.g.
- an inlet pressure has to be increased to compensate for the higher pressure drop.
- selectivity towards light olefins decreases as the secondary reactions between those olefins are favored over the primary reactions.
- the deposition of coke also decreases the carbon yield of the process, since the carbon atoms that are incorporated in the coke do not end up in the process products, i.e. are typically lost for producing the intended products.
- a decoking procedure may comprise the feeding of a steam/air mixture through the reactor to oxidize the carbon to carbon dioxide. This process may also be referred to as 'burning of the coke'.
- a shutdown of the furnace is required for such a decoking process to avoid damage to the reactor, since the oxidation process is exothermic.
- the reactor may require a shutdown and decoking when the furnace heat output is increased to a level where a reactor temperature approaches a maximum, e.g. a maximum tube metal temperature, and/or when a maximum pressure drop over the reactor tube is reached.
- a reactor temperature approaches a maximum
- a maximum e.g. a maximum tube metal temperature
- the whole furnace may typically be taken offline for decoking.
- the reactor coils may be directly exposed to the open flames in the furnace, cooling of the reactor material is essentially provided by the endothermic cracking reactions.
- the reactor wall temperature needs to increase to maintain a sufficient heat transfer to the feedstock gas in the reactor. Therefore, to prevent damage, the outer wall temperature of the reactor needs to be limited, for example, depending on the coil metallurgy, to a maximum in the range of 1050 °C to 1200 °C.
- the maximum pressure drop may be determined by the maximum pressure at the inlet.
- the feed distribution may rely on Venturi nozzles for maintaining a fixed mass flow rate to the reactor coils, e.g. independent of the backpressure.
- the backpressure can be too high to guarantee an equal flow distribution to all coils. This could result in damage to the coils due to the formation of hot spots.
- Typical intervals between subsequent decoking shutdowns i.e. run lengths, may range from 15 days to 60 days, while a decoking procedure may typically take 2 days to complete. Since decoking decreases the efficiency and profitability of the steam cracking process, the run length of a furnace is preferably as long as possible.
- US 7,963,318 discloses a tube comprising fins that increase the internal surface area to improve the convective heat transfer.
- US 9,359,560 discloses discrete mixing elements that are positioned at discrete locations along the length of the reactor, e.g. every few meters. These baffles transversally intersect the tube and make a 180° to 360° twist to bring substantially the entirety of the flow into a swirling motion.
- this allows a good heat transfer improvement relative to an unenhanced tube design, at the cost of only a limited additional pressure drop.
- WO 2017/178551 discloses a reactor inner wall comprising cavities rather than protrusions.
- spherical or oval cavities are introduced at the surface, similar to the surface of golf balls. These cavities may reduce drag forces in operation of the reactor by making the boundary layer more turbulent and by suppressing flow separation.
- the above objective is accomplished by a method and device according to the present invention.
- run length e.g. the time interval between shutdowns for decoking
- the run length can be longer, on average, compared to at least one approach for cracking hydrocarbons, e.g. steam cracking, known in the art.
- an advantageously long run length of a cracking furnace can reduce costs and improve economic profitability, e.g. in a large scale industrial application.
- a stable heat transfer may avoid damage to and/or reduce the wearing down of the reactor. It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that only a limited (i.e. a relatively small) increase (i.e. relative to a conventional reactor without specific geometry augmentations) of the internal surface area of the reactor wall may be required. For example, while a substantial increase of the internal surface area, such as by including fins in the reactor, may achieve a reduction of the metal temperature of the reactor wall, such a substantial increase of the internal surface area also disadvantageously increases the surface area available for cokes deposition, e.g. which may lead to a similar total coke yield in a design with fins as in a design without fins.
- the depth of internal surface features of the reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be substantially smaller than the height of a typical fin in a prior-art reactor.
- a prior-art design that includes fins in the reactor may have a significant temperature variation over the internal surface of the reactor in operation, e.g. due to the large size of such fins.
- the valley between two adjacent fins can be, for example, 10 K to 30 K higher in temperature than the temperature on the peak of the fins. This can lead to an increase in the thermal stresses inside the reactor material and this can significantly influence the lifetime of the coils.
- flow separation such as a zone of separated flow downstream of a reactor augmentation feature or even a complete separation between the flow in the fins and the flow near the reactor tube axis, can be reduced or avoided.
- Such flow separation may cause a substantial pressure drop over the reactor. It is therefore also an advantage that a pressure drop over the reactor can be kept relatively low.
- a flow separation between a bulk flow and a flow in the outer regions of the reactor tube are avoided or reduced, e.g. due to a good radial mixing, e.g. by interaction between flow between the tube axis and the near wall regions. It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that blockages due to cokes spalling can be avoided or reduced. In prior-art approaches, the cross-section in some parts of the coil can be substantially narrower, thus increasing the risk for blockages.
- stagnant zones i.e. of reduced or even zero flow during operation, in at least a part of a cavity in the reactor wall can be avoided or reduced.
- stagnant zones in hydrocarbon cracking reactor tubes may lead to high temperatures and hence fast coking.
- a cavity in a reactor wall can simultaneously support two flow vortices inside the cavity in operation of the reactor.
- the present invention relates to a reactor for use in cracking hydrocarbons of a hydrocarbon material.
- the reactor comprises an inlet, an outlet and a flow conduit between the inlet and the outlet for transporting the hydrocarbon material in a flow from the inlet to the outlet.
- the flow conduit comprises a tubular wall having an inner surface and an outer surface, in which the inner surface has a plurality of indentations provided in the tubular wall. Each indentation has an edge defining a circumferential shape of said indentation.
- Each indentation of the plurality of indentations comprises an elongated surface feature of the part of the inner surface forming the indentation, said elongated surface feature being distinct from the edge of the indentation, and/or a concavity of the edge of the indentation.
- the elongated surface feature and/or the concavity in operation of the reactor, causes the flow to separate into at least two distinct flow vortices in and/or near the indentation.
- At least one indentation of the plurality of indentations may comprise a concavity of the edge of the indentation.
- at least one indentation (which may be the same or a different indentation) of the plurality of indentations may comprise an elongated surface feature of the part of the inner surface forming the indentation.
- the concavity may be formed by a cusp of the edge.
- the elongated surface feature may comprise a ridge.
- said ridge may be oriented substantially along, e.g. parallel to, an axis that is substantially aligned with an axial direction of the flow conduit.
- the edge may be symmetrical when mirrored with respect to the said axis.
- each indentation of the plurality of indentations may be droplet-shaped or heart-shaped.
- each indentation of the plurality of indentations may be heart-shaped. A narrow end of the droplet or heart shape may be substantially directed toward the inlet.
- an area coverage defined as a total area of the inner surface that is covered by the plurality of indentations over a total area of the inner surface, may lie in a range of 5% to 90%.
- the indentations may be arranged in a plurality of rows, each row being substantially arranged along a cross-section of the tubular wall. Each row may be separated from each neighboring row in an axial direction of the tubular wall by a distance in the range of 0 to 5 times the cross- sectional diameter of the inner surface.
- At least one of the rows may comprise a number of the plurality of indentations, in which this number lies in the range of 1 to 20.
- a maximum width of the circumferential shape of each of the number N of indentations may lie in the range of nD/8N to nD/N, where D refers to the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface and N refers to the number of indentations in said row.
- neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be aligned such that corresponding indentations in each of the rows are positioned substantially at a same angular position on the tubular wall.
- neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be staggered such that corresponding indentations in each of the neighboring rows are angularly shifted with respect to each other.
- the indentations of at least one row of the plurality of rows may be spread out unevenly in the row, such that the inner surface of the tubular wall is devoid of indentations over an angular region.
- the angular region may cover an angle around the axial direction of the tubular wall in the range of 10° to 180°.
- At least one of the plurality of indentations may extend for a maximum depth into the tubular wall, in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.1 mm to 10 mm and/or in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.01 to 0.15 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
- the present invention relates to a furnace for producing light olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock material, the furnace comprising a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- the present invention relates to a method for producing light olefins using a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention and/or using a furnace in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- the present invention relates to a reactor for use in cracking hydrocarbons of a hydrocarbon material.
- the reactor comprises an inlet, an outlet and a flow conduit between the inlet and the outlet for transporting the hydrocarbon material in a flow from the inlet to the outlet.
- the flow conduit comprises a tubular wall having an inner surface and an outer surface, in which the inner surface has a plurality of indentations provided in the tubular wall.
- the indentations are arranged in a plurality of rows, each row being substantially arranged along a cross-section of the tubular wall.
- the indentations of at least one row e.g.
- each indentation of the plurality of indentations may be spherical, ovoid, droplet-shaped and/or heart-shaped.
- an area coverage defined as a total area of the inner surface that is covered by the plurality of indentations over a total area of the inner surface, may lie in a range of 5% to 90%.
- each row may be separated from each neighboring row in an axial direction of the tubular wall by a distance in the range of 0 to 5 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
- At least one of the rows may comprise a number of the plurality of indentations, in which this number lies in the range of 1 to 20.
- a maximum width of the circumferential shape of each of the number N of indentations may lie in the range of nD/8N to nD/N, where D refers to the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface and N refers to the number of indentations in said row.
- neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be aligned such that corresponding indentations in each of the rows are positioned substantially at a same angular position on the tubular wall.
- neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be staggered such that corresponding indentations in each of the neighboring rows are angularly shifted with respect to each other.
- At least one of the plurality of indentations may extend for a maximum depth into the tubular wall, in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.1 mm to 10 mm and/or in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.01 to 0.15 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
- FIG 1 shows a schematic overview of a first exemplary reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 2 shows a schematic overview of a second exemplary reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 3 shows an edge of an indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, which edge comprises a cusp that forms a concavity of the edge.
- FIG 4 shows an indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, in which the surface of the inner wall in the indentation comprises an elongate surface feature.
- FIG 5 shows an edge of an indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, which edge is substantially wider in a direction toward the outlet than toward the inlet.
- FIG 6 shows an exemplary configuration of a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention in which indentations are evenly distributed over cross-sections of the tubular wall.
- FIG 7 shows an exemplary configuration of a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention in which indentations are spread out unevenly over cross-sections of the tubular wall.
- FIG 8 shows an exemplary three-dimensional shape of an indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 9 illustrates a furnace for producing light olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock material in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 10 shows an exemplary heat transfer map for reactor having a staggered row design in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 11 shows a thermal enhancement factor (TEF) obtained in exemplary simulations illustrating embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 12 shows a relative heat transfer enhancement (Nusselt number ratio Nu/Nuo) w.r.t. the relative pressure drop (pressure drop ratio DR/DRo) obtained in the exemplary simulations of FIG 11, illustrating embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 13 shows a shape of an indentation as described by four Bezier curves, relating to a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 14 shows exemplary simulations of the circumferentially averaged wall temperature and the pressure, at the start of a run, as function of axial position along the reactor for two reactors in accordance with embodiments of the present invention and for a reference prior-art reactor.
- FIG 15 shows an evolution in time over a run of the maximum TMT and the pressure drop over the reactor for the two reactors in accordance with embodiments of the present invention and for the reference prior-art reactor.
- FIG 16 shows the evolution in time over a run of the produced ethylene and propylene fractions for the two reactors in accordance with embodiments of the present invention and for the reference prior-art reactor.
- FIG 17 shows exemplary simulation data of the pressure drop ratio Dr/Dro in function of the Nusselt number ratio Nu/Nuo, demonstrating the impact of the number and the geometrical configuration of the indentations in a cross-sectional row of a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention on the thermal enhancement and the pressure drop enhancement, relative to a conventional reactor as known in the art.
- FIG 18 shows a third-order Bezier curve defined by four points, for illustrating embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 19 illustrates slope angles cii to ct 4 in a plane through a downstream point, a central point and an upstream point of an indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 20 shows two exemplary three-dimensional shapes of indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 21 shows heat transfer maps with the local Nusselt number ratio Nu/Nuo for the two exemplary indentations of FIG 20.
- the present invention relates to a reactor for cracking hydrocarbons.
- the reactor is adapted for transporting a hydrocarbon material in a flow from an inlet to an outlet.
- the reactor comprises an inlet, and outlet and a flow conduit between the inlet and the outlet for transporting the hydrocarbon material in a flow from the inlet to the outlet.
- This flow conduit comprises (or consists of) a tubular wall having an inner surface and an outer surface.
- the inner surface has a plurality of indentations provided in the wall, e.g. cavities that extend into the tubular wall without extending through the tubular wall, e.g. such as not to perforate the tubular wall. For example, in each of the indentations, the inner surface locally recedes from a central longitudinal axis of the flow conduit.
- Each indentation of the plurality of indentations comprises at least one elongated surface feature of a part of the inner surface that forms the indentation and/or at least one concavity of the edge of the indentation that, in operation of the reactor, causes the flow to form at least two distinct flow vortices, e.g. non-transient flow vortices, in and/or near the indentation.
- the at least two distinct flow vortices may alternate to achieve a good mass and thermal mixing.
- FIG 1 and FIG 2 reactors 1 for cracking hydrocarbons in accordance with embodiments of the present invention is shown.
- the reactor 1 is adapted for transporting a hydrocarbon material in a flow from an inlet 2 to an outlet 3.
- the reactor 1 may be adapted for, in operation, being exposed to a high temperature environment, e.g. being placed in a hydrocarbon cracking furnace.
- the reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be a pyrolysis, thermal cracking, or steam cracking reactor.
- the reactor defines a flow conduit between the inlet 2 and the outlet 3, in which this flow conduit comprises a tubular wall 4 having an inner surface 5 and an outer surface 6.
- the flow conduit e.g. the tubular wall 4
- the flow conduit may have a length in the range of 10m to
- the inner surface 5 may have a cross-sectional diameter in the range of 2 cm to 25 cm, e.g. in the range of 3 cm to 15 cm.
- the outer surface 6 may have a cross-sectional diameter, larger than the cross- sectional diameter of the inner surface, in the range of 3 cm to 27 cm, e.g. in the range of 5 cm to 17 cm.
- the tubular wall 4 may have a thickness in the range of 3 mm to 25 mm, e.g. in the range of 5 mm to 10 mm.
- the tubular wall 4 may comprise a metal, a metal alloy, a ceramic, and/or a combination thereof.
- the tubular wall may be composed of aluminium, stainless steel, carbon steel, a glass-lined material, a polymer-based material, a nickel-base metal alloy, a cobalt-base metal alloy and/or a combination thereof.
- the tubular wall 4 may have a cylindrical shape. Flowever, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to straight cylindrical shapes.
- each cross section of the tubular wall may be substantially circular, yet the tubular wall may be curved along its axis A, e.g. may be bent or curved.
- the tubular wall may follow an undulating or helicoidal path, e.g. to promote a swirling of a feedstock gas in the conduit in operation, e.g. as known in the art.
- the cross section of the tubular wall may also have a different shape, such as elliptical, oval, square or rectangular or a combination thereof.
- the inner surface 5 has a plurality of indentations 7 provided in the wall, e.g. cavities that extend into the tubular wall without extending through the tubular wall, e.g. such as not to perforate the tubular wall.
- the inner surface 5 locally recedes from a central longitudinal axis A of the flow conduit.
- the plurality of indentations may reduce or avoid a flow separation, e.g. on at least a large scale, may provide a good radial mixing and/or may decrease the thermal boundary layer at the reactor wall, e.g. when compared to at least one prior-art reactor.
- Another advantage may be a relatively low pressure drop, in operation, between the inlet and the outlet, e.g. such that operation at lower pressures may be feasible and/or such that a selectivity towards the desired products may be advantageously high.
- Another advantage may be a good heat transfer, e.g. which may allow a longer run length on average.
- the outer surface 6 may also have protrusions corresponding to the indentations 7 of the inner surface 5, e.g. as shown in FIG 1.
- the protrusions may be formed by stamping (or otherwise deforming) the material of the tubular wall 4, e.g. such that the tubular wall is locally deformed outward to form each of the indentations. It is an advantage that a substantially uniform thickness of the tubular wall 4 can be obtained.
- the indentations may also be formed by locally removing, e.g. by drilling, etching or another known subtractive manufacturing technique, the material of the tubular wall.
- the indentations 7 are not necessarily perceivable on the outer surface 6.
- a molding or additive manufacturing process may be used to integrally form the tubular wall as having substantially the same properties as are obtainable by stamping or deforming a basic geometry and/or as are obtainable by a subtractive manufacturing technique to locally remove material from such a basic geometry.
- a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be manufactured by a process comprising steps of molding, centrifugal casting, excavation and/or deposition.
- the indentations may be composed of the same material as the tubular wall, but embodiments of the present invention are not necessarily limited thereto.
- the (wall of the) indentations may be composed of aluminium, stainless steel, carbon steel, a glass- lined material, a polymer-based material, a nickel-base metal alloy, a cobalt-base metal alloy and/or a combination thereof.
- the tubular wall 4 may have a dominant geometrical shape, such as a cylindrical shape, that is locally modified by the indentations 7.
- each indentation has an edge 8. Where reference is made to the circumferential shape of the indentation, reference is made to the shape of this edge 8.
- At least a portion of the inner surface may be smooth, e.g. not covered by any of the indentations.
- An area coverage e.g. defined as a total area of the inner surface covered by the indentations over a total area of the inner surface, may lie in the range of 10% to 99%, e.g. in the range of 30% to 90%, e.g. about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, about 70% or about 80%.
- the indentations may be provided in only a section of the reactor.
- This section may be, but is not necessarily, an end part of the reactor proximal to the outlet, e.g. may be a section close to or including the outlet.
- the section may extend over a length of the reactor in the longitudinal direction. The length of the section may lie in a range of 1 m to 20 m, e.g. 1 m to 10 m, e.g. 1 m to 5 m.
- An area coverage e.g. defined as a total area of the inner surface covered by the indentations over a total area of the inner surface of that section of the reactor that comprises the indentations, may lie in the range of 10% to 99%, e.g. in the range of 30% to 90%, e.g. about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, about 70% or about 80%.
- another section e.g. the complement of the aforementioned section, such as an end part of the reactor proximal to the inlet, may be devoid of the indentations.
- At least one, e.g. preferably a plurality of, cross-section of the tubular wall, e.g. perpendicular to the longitudinal axis A, may intersect a number N of indentations of the plurality of indentations, in which this number lies in the range of 1 to 30, e.g. in the range of 3 to 20.
- At least a portion of the plurality of indentations may be arranged in one or more patterns, e.g. preferably wherein the pattern is linear, staggered and/or crossed.
- rows of indentations in which each row 19 is substantially arranged along a cross-section of the tubular wall, may be separated from each neighboring row in the axial direction, e.g. along the longitudinal axis A, by a distance in the range of 0 to 5 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
- Neighboring rows in the axial direction may be aligned, e.g. such that corresponding indentations 18 in each of the rows are substantially at a same angular position on the tubular wall. It is an advantage that such configuration may favor a higher heat transfer efficiency.
- Neighboring rows in the axial direction may be staggered, e.g. such that corresponding indentations in each of the rows are angularly shifted, e.g. over an angle that substantially corresponds to half of the angular separation between two neighboring indentations in a same row. It is an advantage that such configuration may favor a lower pressure drop over the reactor.
- the exemplary heat transfer map of FIG 10 shows such a staggered configuration.
- the indentations may be spread out evenly (i.e. uniformly), e.g. as schematically illustrated in FIG 6 for eight indentations per row.
- each pair of neighboring indentations in a row may be separated by an angle of 45°, for the example of eight indentations per row, or, generally, by an angle of 360°/N where the row contains N indentations.
- FIG 17 illustrates the impact of the number N on the thermal enhancement Nu/NuO (Nusselt number ratio Nu/Nuo) and the pressure drop enhancement ff/ffO (pressure drop ratio Dr/Dro), as obtained by simulations of reactors in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- the indentations may also be spread out unevenly (i.e. not uniformly) in a row.
- the inner surface of the tubular wall may be devoid of indentations in an angular region, e.g. a cylinder segment.
- This angular region may cover an arc around the longitudinal axis A in the range of 10° to 300°, e.g. in the range of 45° to 225°, e.g. in the range of 90° to 180°, e.g. about 90°.
- the schematic representation and the three-dimensional rendering shown in FIG 7 do not relate to identical reactors, i.e. the number of indentations differ, even though both representations illustrate a non-uniform angular distribution of the indentations.
- a straight continuation 9 of the inner surface 5 over each indentation 7 and along the tangent of the inner surface may describe a closed and continuous surface that completes the dominant geometrical shape. While the meaning of the circumferential shape and/or edge of the indentation is clear on its own, the edge may also be defined as that closed curve over the inner surface that would form such continuous closure of the inner surface when the interior of the closed curve is excluded and replaced by a tangential continuation of the inner surface. Where reference is made to the volume of the indentation, reference is made to the volume enclosed by the indented inner surface and such tangential continuation of the inner surface.
- At least one, e.g. each, indentation 7 may extend for a maximum depth into the wall, e.g. relative to the straight continuation 9 of the inner surface, that lies in the range of 0.1 mm to 10 mm, e.g. preferably in the range of 0.2 mm to about 2.0 mm, e.g. in the range of 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm.
- the maximum depth of the (or each) indentation 7 into the wall may lie in the range of 0.01 to 0.15 times the (average) cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
- the point where the maximum depth is reached will be referred to herein as the 'point of maximal depth'.
- At least one, e.g. each, indentation 7 may have a diameter in the range of 0.1 cm to 5.0 cm, e.g. preferably in the range of 0.5 cm to 2.0 cm.
- this diameter may refer to a diameter of the smallest circle encompassing the edge 8 of the indentation.
- At least one, e.g. each, indentation 7 may have a depth-to-diameter ratio of the maximum depth mentioned hereinabove over the diameter mentioned hereinabove that lies in the range of 0.01 to 0.5, e.g. preferably in the range of 0.05 to 0.4, e.g. even more preferred in the range of 0.1 to 0.3.
- Each indentation 7 of the plurality of indentations comprises at least one elongated surface feature 14 of a part of the inner surface that forms the indentation and/or at least one concavity 13 of the edge 8 of the indentation that, in operation of the reactor, causes the flow to form at least two distinct flow vortices, e.g. non-transient flow vortices, in and/or near the indentation 7.
- an indentation 7 of the plurality of indentations may comprise a concavity 13 of the edge 8 of the indentation that, in operation of the reactor, causes the flow to form at least two distinct flow vortices, e.g. non-transient flow vortices, e.g. flow vortices that are counterrotating with respect to each other, in and/or near the indentation.
- This concavity 13 may be formed by a cusp, e.g. a spinode, of the edge.
- an indentation 7 of the plurality of indentations may comprise an elongated surface feature 14, e.g. a ridge, of a part of the inner surface that forms the indentation that, in operation of the reactor, causes the flow to form at least two distinct flow vortices, e.g. non-transient flow vortices, e.g. flow vortices that are counterrotating with respect to each other, in and/or near the indentation.
- elongated surface feature 14 may locally extend along (e.g. may be parallel to) the central longitudinal axis A of the flow conduit, e.g. forming a ridge.
- such elongated surface feature 14 may comprise a ridge along an axis B (e.g. a centerline B) of the indentation 7.
- axis B may be substantially aligned with, e.g. substantially parallel to or parallel to, the longitudinal axis A of the flow conduit.
- the depth of the indentation may comprise two local maxima on, respectively, either side of the axis B, e.g. caused by a ridge along the axis B.
- each indentation of the plurality of indentations 7 may have a circumferential shape, i.e. a shape of the edge 8 of the indentation on the inner surface 5, that is substantially wider in a direction B toward the outlet 3 than toward the inlet 2, e.g. where such width wi,W is expressed in a direction perpendicular to that direction B and substantially tangential to the shape of inner surface 5.
- each indentation of the plurality of indentations may be droplet-shaped or heart-shaped, where a narrow end of the droplet or heart shape may be substantially directed toward the inlet.
- the edge being a closed curve may imply that such width may approaches zero on both extremes 11 in respectively the direction B toward the outlet and in the inverse direction toward the inlet.
- the width W on the side toward the outlet may be on average larger than the width wi on the side toward the inlet.
- a maximum of the width W may be located in the part on the side between the midpoint 12 and the extreme point 11 in the direction toward the outlet 3.
- the concavity 13 of the edge 8 may be located in the part on the side between the midpoint 12 and the extreme point 11 in the direction toward the outlet 3.
- the direction B from the inlet 2 and toward the outlet 3 may be substantially parallel with the longitudinal axis A.
- the circumferential shape may be symmetrical when mirrored with respect to the direction B through a geometrical center of the shape.
- an exemplary three-dimensional shape of the indentation 7 is illustrated.
- the edge of the indentation may also have a concavity 13, e.g. a cusp point.
- the circumferential shape may be symmetrical when mirrored with respect to the direction B, e.g. a direction B substantially parallel with the longitudinal axis A of the flow conduit.
- the volume of the indentation 7 may be symmetrical when mirrored with respect to a plane through the direction B and substantially normal to the inner surface.
- a maximum width W of the circumferential shape of the indentation may lie in the range of nD/8N to nD/N, where D refer to the (average) cross- sectional diameter of the inner surface and N refers to the number of indentations in a row 19.
- a distance between the point of maximal depth 21 and a downstream point 23 on the edge 8 may lie in the range of 0.01 to 0.50 times the (average) cross-sectional diameter D of the inner surface.
- a distance between the point of maximal depth 21 and an upstream point 22 on the edge 8 may lie in the range of 0.05 to 1 times the (average) cross-sectional diameter D of the inner surface.
- a maximum distance in between the point of maximal depth 21 and that part of the edge 8 of the indentation that lies in the direction of the outlet with respect to the point of maximal depth 21, i.e. the downstream edge, may lie in the range of 0.01 to 0.50 of the (average) cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface. This maximum distance may be equal to, or may not be equal to, the distance between the point of maximal depth 21 and the downstream point 23 on the edge 8.
- the downstream point 22 and the upstream point 23 may be defined as the points where the edge 8 of the indentation intersects a plane through the point of maximal depth 21 that is that oriented along the direction B and oriented substantially normal to the inner surface, in which the downstream point 22 is closer to the outlet than the upstream point 23.
- a slope cii of the indentation 7 leading from the upstream point 23 to the point of maximal depth 21 may lie in the range of 0° to 70°.
- a slope ci of the indentation 7 leading from the point maximal depth 21 to the point of maximal depth 21 may lie in the range of 0° to 70°.
- a slope ci of the indentation 7 leading from the point of maximal depth 21 to the downstream point 22 may lie in the range of 5° to 90°.
- a slope a 4 of the indentation 7 leading from the downstream point 22 to the point of maximal depth 21 may lie in the range of 5° to 90°.
- These slopes cii, ci2, a ⁇ , a 4 may be defined relative to a reference plane formed by the continuation of the inner surface 9 as described hereinabove.
- the point of maximum depth will be, for the sake of simplicity, be referred to as the central point, without thereby implying that this point corresponds to, for example, a geometrical center.
- the shape of the indentation may be described by four Bezier curves, e.g. third-order Bezier curves, as illustrated in FIG 13, e.g. a first curve from the upstream point 23 to the central point 21, a second curve from the central point 21 to the downstream point 22, a third curve from a first lateral point 132 to the central point 21, and a fourth curve from a second lateral point 134 (on the side opposite of the side of the first lateral point) to the central point 21.
- Bezier curves e.g. third-order Bezier curves
- a Bezier curve can be defined by four points, namely a start point A, an end point B, a point C defining a slope at the start point, and a point D defining a slope at the end point.
- a smooth curve is defined by these four points, and the combination of the four Bezier curves referred to hereinabove may thus define a smooth indentation.
- a Bezier curve of order 3 constructed from four points Po,Pi,P2,P3 may be expressed by:
- the C and/or D points defining the slope in the central point 21 may lie in a same plane for the first curve from the upstream point 23 to the central point 21 and for the second curve from the central point 21 to the downstream point 22.
- the C and/or D points defining the slope in the central point 21 may lie in a same plane for the third curve from the first lateral point 132 to the central point 21 and for the fourth curve from the central point 21 to the second lateral point 134.
- the plane in which the upstream point 23, the central point 21 and the downstream point 22 lie may be a plane of symmetry of the indentation.
- six slope values may define the geometrical shape of the indentation, in combination with predetermined positions of the points 23,132,21,134,22: a slope at point 23 towards point 21, a slope at point 22 towards point 21, a slope at point 21 towards point 22, a slope at point 21 towards point 23, a slope at point 21 towards point 132 (being equal to the slope at point 21 towards point 134) and a slope at point 132 towards point 21 (being equal to the slope at point 134 towards point 21).
- These six degrees of freedom can be expressed by six slope values cii to ci 6 .
- FIG 19 illustrates the slope angles cii to a 4 in the plane through the downstream point 22, the central point 21 and the upstream point 23.
- the present invention also relates to a furnace for producing light olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock material, the furnace comprising a reactor 1 in accordance with embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention.
- the furnace comprises one or more reactors 1 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- Fleat Q is supplied by the furnace to heat a hydrocarbon material, e.g. transported by a steam flow, introduced via the inlet 2 in the reactor 1.
- the furnace 10 is adapted for providing light olefins, e.g. C FI and C H , at the outlet 3 of the reactor 1.
- the present invention relates to a method for producing light olefins using a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention and/or using a furnace in accordance with embodiments of the second aspect of the present invention.
- the method may comprise cracking a hydrocarbon feedstock material into light olefins at a temperature in the range of 700°C to 900°C.
- the present invention relates to a reactor for use in cracking hydrocarbons of a hydrocarbon material.
- the reactor comprises an inlet, an outlet and a flow conduit between the inlet and the outlet for transporting the hydrocarbon material in a flow from the inlet to the outlet.
- the flow conduit comprises a tubular wall having an inner surface and an outer surface, in which the inner surface has a plurality of indentations provided in the tubular wall.
- the indentations are arranged in a plurality of rows, each row being substantially arranged along a cross-section of the tubular wall.
- the indentations of at least one row e.g.
- each row, of the plurality of rows may be spread out unevenly in that row, such that the inner surface of the tubular wall is devoid of indentations over an angular region.
- the angular region devoid of indentations covers an angle around the axial direction of the tubular wall in the range of 45° to 225°, e.g. in the range of 90° to 180°.
- each indentation of the plurality of indentations may be spherical, ovoid, droplet-shaped and/or heart-shaped.
- an area coverage defined as a total area of the inner surface that is covered by the plurality of indentations over a total area of the inner surface, may lie in a range of 5% to 90%.
- each row may be separated from each neighboring row in an axial direction of the tubular wall by a distance in the range of 0 to 5 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
- At least one of the rows may comprise a number of the plurality of indentations, in which this number lies in the range of 1 to 20.
- a maximum width of the circumferential shape of each of the number N of indentations may lie in the range of nD/8N to nD/N, where D refers to the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface and N refers to the number of indentations in said row.
- neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be aligned such that corresponding indentations in each of the rows are positioned substantially at a same angular position on the tubular wall.
- neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be staggered such that corresponding indentations in each of the neighboring rows are angularly shifted with respect to each other.
- At least one of the plurality of indentations may extend for a maximum depth into the tubular wall, in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.1 mm to 10 mm and/or in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.01 to 0.15 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
- thermal enhancement factor TEF which may be defined as a
- FIG 10 shows a map of the heat transfer improvement Nu/Nu 0 , for a configuration in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- Simulations of the reactor design in accordance with embodiments of the present invention were performed with a customized solver based on the CFD software package OpenFOAM that is produced by OpenCFD Ltd. and released free and open source to the general public.
- the customized solver has been implemented for the detailed evaluation of heat transfer and friction characteristics in generic tubular geometries while another solver incorporates the chemical kinetics to perform full-scale reactive simulations.
- FIG 11 shows the thermal enhancement factor TEF, computed for the simulations in this example. As can be observed, an improvement of 16.6% over the reference bare tube performance can be obtained by a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 12 shows the relative heat transfer improvement, computed for the simulations in this example.
- FIG 14 shows simulations of the wall temperature and the pressure, at the start of a run, as function of axial position along the reactor for two reactors 141,142 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, and a reference prior-art reactor 140 comprising a bare tubular reactor.
- FIG 15 shows the evolution over a run, i.e. as function of the onstream time, of the maximum TMT and the pressure drop over the reactor.
- FIG 16 shows the evolution over a run, i.e. as function of the onstream time, of the produced ethylene and propylene fractions.
- FIG 20 shows two exemplary three-dimensional shapes of indentations: both have similar dimensions, but one is droplet-shaped (FIG 20A) and the other has a concavity 13 of its edge 8 in the form of a cusp, thereby being heart-shaped (FIG 20B).
- These indentation shapes correspond to designs 704 and 718 as marked on FIG 11.
- Heat transfer maps, showing the local Nusselt number ratio Nu/Nuo, for the droplet-shaped indentation and the heart-shaped indentation are depicted in FIG 21A and 21B respectively. For a bulk temperature of 726.9 °C, this corresponds to an average wall temperature of 754 °C, a maximum wall temperature of 767 °C and an overall Nusselt number ratio of 1.13 for the droplet-shaped indentation (A).
- the average wall temperature is 752.8 °C
- the maximum wall temperature is 765.5 °C
- the overall Nusselt number ratio is 1.20 for the heart-shaped indentation (B).
- a generally improved heat transfer, with lower average and maximum wall temperatures and a higher Nusselt number ratio, is thus observed for the heart-shaped indentation compared to the droplet-shaped indentation.
- Both indentations were furthermore seen to have a similar pressure drop value, so that overall the thermal enhancement factor (TEF) of the heart-shaped indentation was higher than that of the droplet-shaped indentation.
- TEF thermal enhancement factor
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
- Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a reactor (1) for use in cracking hydrocarbons of a hydrocarbon material. The reactor comprising an inlet (2), an outlet (3) and a flow conduit therein between for transporting the hydrocarbon material in a flow. The flow conduit comprises a tubular wall (4) having an inner surface (5) and an outer surface (6). The inner surface has a plurality of indentations (7) provided in the tubular wall. Each indentation of the plurality of indentations comprises an elongated surface feature (14) of the part of the inner surface forming the indentation and/or a concavity (13) of the edge (8) of the indentation. The elongated surface feature (14) and/or the concavity (13), in operation of the reactor, cause the flow to separate into at least two distinct flow vortices in and/or near the indentation (7).
Description
Devices and methods for hydrocarbon cracking
Field of the invention
The invention relates to the field of hydrocarbon cracking, such as by thermal cracking, steam cracking and/or pyrolysis. More specifically it relates to a reactor for cracking hydrocarbons, a system for cracking hydrocarbons and a method for producing light olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock.
Background of the invention
Hydrocarbon cracking is an approach, known in the art, for producing light olefins, such as, for example, ethene, propene, benzene and/or butadiene. Such light olefins are typically used as essential building blocks in the chemical industry, and may be commonly referred to as platform molecules. Due to the high demand for such platform molecules and for the sake of efficiency, hydrocarbon cracking processes may typically be performed at very large industrial scales. For example, a light olefin production capacity of a plant may be in the range of 300 kta to 2000 kta, and even higher capacities may be realistic. Steam cracking is such an industrial process that is commonly applied at a large scale.
In a steam cracking process as known in the art, a hydrocarbon feedstock material, such as ethane, propane, butane, naphtha, a light gas oil or even hydrotreated crude oil, is heated in a tubular reactor to a reactor temperature, e.g. in the range of 600°C to 1000 °C. The tubular reactor may have a length of, for example, about 10 m to about 100 m. The tubular reactor or, typically, a plurality of such tubular reactors may be suspended in a large furnace, e.g. a gas-fired furnace, to supply the heat for bringing the feedstock material up to the reactor temperature.
When a sufficiently high temperature is reached, the hydrocarbon feedstock undergoes cracking reactions. In such a free-radical process, large hydrocarbon molecules are broken down to smaller molecules and unsaturated bonds are formed. Process conditions such as temperature, residence time, dilution, etc. may be tuned to maximize the ethene yield.
It is a disadvantage of such prior art processes that a coke residue is deposited on the inner wall of the tubular reactor. Coke is a carbonaceous, graphite-like deposit with a relatively low thermal conductivity. Due to this low thermal conductivity, an efficient heat transfer from the furnace to the process gas inside the reactor is impeded. This can be compensated by increasing the fuel flow rate to the furnace to maintain a constant level of production, which, however, lowers the thermal efficiency of the process.
The coke deposit also reduces the cross-sectional area of the tubular reactor that is available for the process gas, which results in a higher process gas flow velocity and hence a higher pressure drop over the tube. The outlet pressure may typically be constrained or determined by downstream processing steps, e.g. such as by the operational parameters of a cracked gas compressor. Therefore, an inlet pressure has to be increased to compensate for the higher pressure drop. Moreover, due to the higher average pressure in the tube, selectivity towards light olefins decreases as the secondary reactions between those olefins are favored over the primary reactions.
As another disadvantage, the deposition of coke also decreases the carbon yield of the process, since the carbon atoms that are incorporated in the coke do not end up in the process products, i.e. are typically lost for producing the intended products.
It is known in the art to regularly shut a steam cracking installation down to remove the deposited coke from the inner wall of the reactor. For example, a decoking procedure may comprise the feeding of a steam/air mixture through the reactor to oxidize the carbon to carbon dioxide. This process may also be referred to as 'burning of the coke'. A shutdown of the furnace is required for such a decoking process to avoid damage to the reactor, since the oxidation process is exothermic.
Depending on the reactor geometry, process conditions and the feedstock material, the reactor may require a shutdown and decoking when the furnace heat output is increased to a level where a reactor temperature approaches a maximum, e.g. a maximum tube metal temperature, and/or when a maximum pressure drop over the reactor tube is reached. When one such shutdown criterium is met for at least one reactor coil in the furnace, the whole furnace may typically be taken offline for decoking.
Since the reactor coils may be directly exposed to the open flames in the furnace, cooling of the reactor material is essentially provided by the endothermic cracking reactions. As coke is deposited, the reactor wall temperature needs to increase to maintain a sufficient heat transfer to the feedstock gas in the reactor. Therefore, to prevent damage, the outer wall temperature of the reactor needs to be limited, for example, depending on the coil metallurgy, to a maximum in the range of 1050 °C to 1200 °C.
The maximum pressure drop may be determined by the maximum pressure at the inlet. The feed distribution may rely on Venturi nozzles for maintaining a fixed mass flow rate to the reactor coils, e.g. independent of the backpressure. However, once the inlet pressure exceeds a critical threshold, the backpressure can be too high to guarantee an equal flow
distribution to all coils. This could result in damage to the coils due to the formation of hot spots.
Typical intervals between subsequent decoking shutdowns, i.e. run lengths, may range from 15 days to 60 days, while a decoking procedure may typically take 2 days to complete. Since decoking decreases the efficiency and profitability of the steam cracking process, the run length of a furnace is preferably as long as possible.
Various furnace and reactor geometries are known in the art. For example, internal enhancements to the reactor coil design are known in the art for improving the heat transfer of the reactor, e.g. relative to a similar coil without such internal enhancements. However, such enhancements may also disadvantageously increase the pressure drop over the coil, relative to a similar unenhanced coil, which, as mentioned hereinabove, could lead to a loss in the product selectivity.
For example, US 7,963,318 discloses a tube comprising fins that increase the internal surface area to improve the convective heat transfer.
US 5,950,718 and US 2006/0102327 disclose another type of reactor enhancement known in the art. A single semi-circular rib spirals along the axis of the tube to systematically break down the thermal laminar boundary layer by flow of the feedstock gas over the rib with a subsequent region of reversed flow, thus achieving an improved heat transfer.
US 9,359,560 discloses discrete mixing elements that are positioned at discrete locations along the length of the reactor, e.g. every few meters. These baffles transversally intersect the tube and make a 180° to 360° twist to bring substantially the entirety of the flow into a swirling motion. Advantageously, this allows a good heat transfer improvement relative to an unenhanced tube design, at the cost of only a limited additional pressure drop.
WO 2017/178551 discloses a reactor inner wall comprising cavities rather than protrusions. In this design, spherical or oval cavities are introduced at the surface, similar to the surface of golf balls. These cavities may reduce drag forces in operation of the reactor by making the boundary layer more turbulent and by suppressing flow separation.
Summary of the invention
It is an object of embodiments of the present invention to provide a good and efficient reactor for cracking hydrocarbons, a system comprising such reactor and a related method for the production of light olefins.
The above objective is accomplished by a method and device according to the present invention.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that the run length, e.g. the time interval between shutdowns for decoking, can be longer, on average, compared to at least one approach for cracking hydrocarbons, e.g. steam cracking, known in the art.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that an advantageously long run length of a cracking furnace can reduce costs and improve economic profitability, e.g. in a large scale industrial application.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that turbulence of the process gas being treated in a hydrocarbon cracking process is promoted to obtain a good convective heat transfer.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that a good convective heat transfer to the process gas in hydrocarbon cracking can be achieved.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that a good convective heat transfer may lead to lower temperatures at the inner surface of the reactor in a hydrocarbon cracking process.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that a lower temperature of the reactor wall can lead to a lower coking rate, and hence to a longer run length of the furnace.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that a lower temperature of the reactor wall and a good convective heat transfer in the reactor can advantageously reduce thermal stresses inside the reactor wall.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that a good heat transfer from the furnace to the process gas can be obtained without incurring a large pressure drop over the reactor, i.e. between a process gas inlet and a process gas outlet of the reactor.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that a good light olefin selectivity can be maintained in the hydrocarbon cracking process.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that a stable and good heat transfer is achieved, e.g. without (locally) strongly fluctuating over time due to transient effects, such as transient vortex structures.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that a stable heat transfer may avoid damage to and/or reduce the wearing down of the reactor.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that only a limited (i.e. a relatively small) increase (i.e. relative to a conventional reactor without specific geometry augmentations) of the internal surface area of the reactor wall may be required. For example, while a substantial increase of the internal surface area, such as by including fins in the reactor, may achieve a reduction of the metal temperature of the reactor wall, such a substantial increase of the internal surface area also disadvantageously increases the surface area available for cokes deposition, e.g. which may lead to a similar total coke yield in a design with fins as in a design without fins. This is not limited to prior-art approaches where rib structures are used. For example, in prior art approaches where baffles are placed in the core of the flow, coke deposition may also occur on such baffles. The depth of internal surface features of the reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be substantially smaller than the height of a typical fin in a prior-art reactor.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that only a limited (i.e. a relatively small) variation (i.e. relative to a conventional reactor without specific geometry augmentations) of the temperature over the internal surface area of the reactor can be achieved. It is a further advantage that low thermal stresses due to variations in temperature in the reactor can be achieved. It is a further advantage that a good durability, e.g. a good life span, can be achieved for a reactor in hydrocarbon cracking.
For example, a prior-art design that includes fins in the reactor may have a significant temperature variation over the internal surface of the reactor in operation, e.g. due to the large size of such fins. In a prior-art approach, the valley between two adjacent fins can be, for example, 10 K to 30 K higher in temperature than the temperature on the peak of the fins. This can lead to an increase in the thermal stresses inside the reactor material and this can significantly influence the lifetime of the coils.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that flow separation, such as a zone of separated flow downstream of a reactor augmentation feature or even a complete separation between the flow in the fins and the flow near the reactor tube axis, can be reduced or avoided. Such flow separation may cause a substantial pressure drop over the reactor. It is therefore also an advantage that a pressure drop over the reactor can be kept relatively low.
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, a flow separation between a bulk flow and a flow in the outer regions of the reactor tube are avoided or reduced, e.g. due to a good radial mixing, e.g. by interaction between flow between the tube axis and the near wall regions.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that blockages due to cokes spalling can be avoided or reduced. In prior-art approaches, the cross-section in some parts of the coil can be substantially narrower, thus increasing the risk for blockages. For example, if baffles are present in the core of the flow, in accordance with a prior-art approach, coke can be deposited on both the baffle and the internal surface of the reactor, such that this region of the reactor may be particularly susceptible to blockages due to cokes spalling, i.e. relatively large pieces of the coke may break off from a coke layer due to shear stresses on the cokes and cause a blockage downstream. Such blockages may arise during operation, which may result in a premature decoking of the furnace, but also during decoking, which may cause the cokes to burn up too rapidly and may thus potentially lead to melting of the entire reactor tube. It is therefore also an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that damage to the reactor during decoking due to blockages can be reduced or avoided.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that stagnant zones, i.e. of reduced or even zero flow during operation, in at least a part of a cavity in the reactor wall can be avoided or reduced. For example, stagnant zones in hydrocarbon cracking reactor tubes may lead to high temperatures and hence fast coking.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention, that a cavity in a reactor wall can simultaneously support two flow vortices inside the cavity in operation of the reactor.
In a first aspect, the present invention relates to a reactor for use in cracking hydrocarbons of a hydrocarbon material. The reactor comprises an inlet, an outlet and a flow conduit between the inlet and the outlet for transporting the hydrocarbon material in a flow from the inlet to the outlet. The flow conduit comprises a tubular wall having an inner surface and an outer surface, in which the inner surface has a plurality of indentations provided in the tubular wall. Each indentation has an edge defining a circumferential shape of said indentation. Each indentation of the plurality of indentations comprises an elongated surface feature of the part of the inner surface forming the indentation, said elongated surface feature being distinct from the edge of the indentation, and/or a concavity of the edge of the indentation. The elongated surface feature and/or the concavity, in operation of the reactor, causes the flow to separate into at least two distinct flow vortices in and/or near the indentation.
In a preferred reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, at least one indentation of the plurality of indentations may comprise a concavity of the edge of the indentation. In such a reactor, at least one indentation (which may be the same or a
different indentation) of the plurality of indentations may comprise an elongated surface feature of the part of the inner surface forming the indentation.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the concavity may be formed by a cusp of the edge.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the elongated surface feature may comprise a ridge.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, said ridge may be oriented substantially along, e.g. parallel to, an axis that is substantially aligned with an axial direction of the flow conduit.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the edge may be symmetrical when mirrored with respect to the said axis.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, each indentation of the plurality of indentations may be droplet-shaped or heart-shaped. In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, each indentation of the plurality of indentations may be heart-shaped. A narrow end of the droplet or heart shape may be substantially directed toward the inlet.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, an area coverage, defined as a total area of the inner surface that is covered by the plurality of indentations over a total area of the inner surface, may lie in a range of 5% to 90%.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the indentations may be arranged in a plurality of rows, each row being substantially arranged along a cross-section of the tubular wall. Each row may be separated from each neighboring row in an axial direction of the tubular wall by a distance in the range of 0 to 5 times the cross- sectional diameter of the inner surface.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, at least one of the rows may comprise a number of the plurality of indentations, in which this number lies in the range of 1 to 20.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, a maximum width of the circumferential shape of each of the number N of indentations may lie in the range of nD/8N to nD/N, where D refers to the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface and N refers to the number of indentations in said row.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be aligned such that corresponding
indentations in each of the rows are positioned substantially at a same angular position on the tubular wall.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be staggered such that corresponding indentations in each of the neighboring rows are angularly shifted with respect to each other.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the indentations of at least one row of the plurality of rows may be spread out unevenly in the row, such that the inner surface of the tubular wall is devoid of indentations over an angular region. The angular region may cover an angle around the axial direction of the tubular wall in the range of 10° to 180°.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, at least one of the plurality of indentations may extend for a maximum depth into the tubular wall, in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.1 mm to 10 mm and/or in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.01 to 0.15 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
In a second aspect, the present invention relates to a furnace for producing light olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock material, the furnace comprising a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
In a third aspect, the present invention relates to a method for producing light olefins using a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention and/or using a furnace in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention relates to a reactor for use in cracking hydrocarbons of a hydrocarbon material. The reactor comprises an inlet, an outlet and a flow conduit between the inlet and the outlet for transporting the hydrocarbon material in a flow from the inlet to the outlet. The flow conduit comprises a tubular wall having an inner surface and an outer surface, in which the inner surface has a plurality of indentations provided in the tubular wall. The indentations are arranged in a plurality of rows, each row being substantially arranged along a cross-section of the tubular wall. The indentations of at least one row, e.g. of each row, of the plurality of rows may be spread out unevenly in that row, such that the inner surface of the tubular wall is devoid of indentations over an angular region. The angular region devoid of indentations covers an angle around the axial direction of the tubular wall in the range of 45° to 225°, e.g. in the range of 90° to 180°.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, each indentation of the plurality of indentations may be spherical, ovoid, droplet-shaped and/or heart-shaped.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, an area coverage, defined as a total area of the inner surface that is covered by the plurality of indentations over a total area of the inner surface, may lie in a range of 5% to 90%.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, each row may be separated from each neighboring row in an axial direction of the tubular wall by a distance in the range of 0 to 5 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, at least one of the rows may comprise a number of the plurality of indentations, in which this number lies in the range of 1 to 20.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, a maximum width of the circumferential shape of each of the number N of indentations may lie in the range of nD/8N to nD/N, where D refers to the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface and N refers to the number of indentations in said row.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be aligned such that corresponding indentations in each of the rows are positioned substantially at a same angular position on the tubular wall.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be staggered such that corresponding indentations in each of the neighboring rows are angularly shifted with respect to each other.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, at least one of the plurality of indentations may extend for a maximum depth into the tubular wall, in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.1 mm to 10 mm and/or in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.01 to 0.15 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
Particular and preferred aspects of the invention are set out in the accompanying independent and dependent claims. Features from the dependent claims may be combined with features of the independent claims and with features of other dependent claims as appropriate and not merely as explicitly set out in the claims.
These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from and elucidated with reference to the embodiment(s) described hereinafter.
Brief description of the drawings
FIG 1 shows a schematic overview of a first exemplary reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 2 shows a schematic overview of a second exemplary reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 3 shows an edge of an indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, which edge comprises a cusp that forms a concavity of the edge.
FIG 4 shows an indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, in which the surface of the inner wall in the indentation comprises an elongate surface feature.
FIG 5 shows an edge of an indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, which edge is substantially wider in a direction toward the outlet than toward the inlet.
FIG 6 shows an exemplary configuration of a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention in which indentations are evenly distributed over cross-sections of the tubular wall.
FIG 7 shows an exemplary configuration of a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention in which indentations are spread out unevenly over cross-sections of the tubular wall.
FIG 8 shows an exemplary three-dimensional shape of an indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 9 illustrates a furnace for producing light olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock material in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 10 shows an exemplary heat transfer map for reactor having a staggered row design in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 11 shows a thermal enhancement factor (TEF) obtained in exemplary simulations illustrating embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 12 shows a relative heat transfer enhancement (Nusselt number ratio Nu/Nuo) w.r.t. the relative pressure drop (pressure drop ratio DR/DRo) obtained in the exemplary simulations of FIG 11, illustrating embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 13 shows a shape of an indentation as described by four Bezier curves, relating to a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 14 shows exemplary simulations of the circumferentially averaged wall temperature and the pressure, at the start of a run, as function of axial position along the reactor for two reactors in accordance with embodiments of the present invention and for a reference prior-art reactor. FIG 15 shows an evolution in time over a run of the maximum TMT and the pressure drop over the reactor for the two reactors in accordance with embodiments of the present invention and for the reference prior-art reactor.
FIG 16 shows the evolution in time over a run of the produced ethylene and propylene fractions for the two reactors in accordance with embodiments of the present invention and for the reference prior-art reactor.
FIG 17 shows exemplary simulation data of the pressure drop ratio Dr/Dro in function of the Nusselt number ratio Nu/Nuo, demonstrating the impact of the number and the geometrical configuration of the indentations in a cross-sectional row of a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention on the thermal enhancement and the pressure drop enhancement, relative to a conventional reactor as known in the art.
FIG 18 shows a third-order Bezier curve defined by four points, for illustrating embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 19 illustrates slope angles cii to ct4 in a plane through a downstream point, a central point and an upstream point of an indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 20 shows two exemplary three-dimensional shapes of indentation in a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 21 shows heat transfer maps with the local Nusselt number ratio Nu/Nuo for the two exemplary indentations of FIG 20.
The drawings are only schematic and are non-limiting. In the drawings, the size of some of the elements may be exaggerated and not drawn on scale for illustrative purposes.
Any reference signs in the claims shall not be construed as limiting the scope.
In the different drawings, the same reference signs refer to the same or analogous elements.
Detailed description of illustrative embodiments
The present invention will be described with respect to particular embodiments and with reference to certain drawings but the invention is not limited thereto but only by the claims. The drawings described are only schematic and are non-limiting. In the drawings, the
size of some of the elements may be exaggerated and not drawn on scale for illustrative purposes. The dimensions and the relative dimensions do not correspond to actual reductions to practice of the invention.
Furthermore, the terms first, second and the like in the description and in the claims, are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a sequence, either temporally, spatially, in ranking or in any other manner. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances and that the embodiments of the invention described herein are capable of operation in other sequences than described or illustrated herein.
Moreover, the terms top, under and the like in the description and the claims are used for descriptive purposes and not necessarily for describing relative positions. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances and that the embodiments of the invention described herein are capable of operation in other orientations than described or illustrated herein.
It is to be noticed that the term "comprising", used in the claims, should not be interpreted as being restricted to the means listed thereafter; it does not exclude other elements or steps. It is thus to be interpreted as specifying the presence of the stated features, integers, steps or components as referred to, but does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps or components, or groups thereof. Thus, the scope of the expression "a device comprising means A and B" should not be limited to devices consisting only of components A and B. It means that with respect to the present invention, the only relevant components of the device are A and B.
Reference throughout this specification to "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases "in one embodiment" or "in an embodiment" in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, but may. Furthermore, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner, as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art from this disclosure, in one or more embodiments.
Similarly it should be appreciated that in the description of exemplary embodiments of the invention, various features of the invention are sometimes grouped together in a single embodiment, figure, or description thereof for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure and
aiding in the understanding of one or more of the various inventive aspects. This method of disclosure, however, is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the detailed description are hereby expressly incorporated into this detailed description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of this invention.
Furthermore, while some embodiments described herein include some but not other features included in other embodiments, combinations of features of different embodiments are meant to be within the scope of the invention, and form different embodiments, as would be understood by those in the art. For example, in the following claims, any of the claimed embodiments can be used in any combination.
In the description provided herein, numerous specific details are set forth. Flowever, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure an understanding of this description.
In a first aspect, the present invention relates to a reactor for cracking hydrocarbons. The reactor is adapted for transporting a hydrocarbon material in a flow from an inlet to an outlet. The reactor comprises an inlet, and outlet and a flow conduit between the inlet and the outlet for transporting the hydrocarbon material in a flow from the inlet to the outlet. This flow conduit comprises (or consists of) a tubular wall having an inner surface and an outer surface. The inner surface has a plurality of indentations provided in the wall, e.g. cavities that extend into the tubular wall without extending through the tubular wall, e.g. such as not to perforate the tubular wall. For example, in each of the indentations, the inner surface locally recedes from a central longitudinal axis of the flow conduit.
Each indentation of the plurality of indentations comprises at least one elongated surface feature of a part of the inner surface that forms the indentation and/or at least one concavity of the edge of the indentation that, in operation of the reactor, causes the flow to form at least two distinct flow vortices, e.g. non-transient flow vortices, in and/or near the indentation. For example, the at least two distinct flow vortices may alternate to achieve a good mass and thermal mixing.
Referring to FIG 1 and FIG 2, reactors 1 for cracking hydrocarbons in accordance with embodiments of the present invention is shown. The reactor 1 is adapted for transporting a hydrocarbon material in a flow from an inlet 2 to an outlet 3.
The reactor 1 may be adapted for, in operation, being exposed to a high temperature environment, e.g. being placed in a hydrocarbon cracking furnace.
The reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be a pyrolysis, thermal cracking, or steam cracking reactor.
The reactor defines a flow conduit between the inlet 2 and the outlet 3, in which this flow conduit comprises a tubular wall 4 having an inner surface 5 and an outer surface 6.
The flow conduit, e.g. the tubular wall 4, may have a length in the range of 10m to
500m.
The inner surface 5 may have a cross-sectional diameter in the range of 2 cm to 25 cm, e.g. in the range of 3 cm to 15 cm.
The outer surface 6 may have a cross-sectional diameter, larger than the cross- sectional diameter of the inner surface, in the range of 3 cm to 27 cm, e.g. in the range of 5 cm to 17 cm.
The tubular wall 4 may have a thickness in the range of 3 mm to 25 mm, e.g. in the range of 5 mm to 10 mm.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the tubular wall 4 may comprise a metal, a metal alloy, a ceramic, and/or a combination thereof. For example, the tubular wall may be composed of aluminium, stainless steel, carbon steel, a glass-lined material, a polymer-based material, a nickel-base metal alloy, a cobalt-base metal alloy and/or a combination thereof.
The tubular wall 4 may have a cylindrical shape. Flowever, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to straight cylindrical shapes. For example, each cross section of the tubular wall may be substantially circular, yet the tubular wall may be curved along its axis A, e.g. may be bent or curved. For example, the tubular wall may follow an undulating or helicoidal path, e.g. to promote a swirling of a feedstock gas in the conduit in operation, e.g. as known in the art. The cross section of the tubular wall may also have a different shape, such as elliptical, oval, square or rectangular or a combination thereof.
The inner surface 5 has a plurality of indentations 7 provided in the wall, e.g. cavities that extend into the tubular wall without extending through the tubular wall, e.g. such as not
to perforate the tubular wall. Thus, in each of the indentations 7, the inner surface 5 locally recedes from a central longitudinal axis A of the flow conduit.
It is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention that the plurality of indentations may reduce or avoid a flow separation, e.g. on at least a large scale, may provide a good radial mixing and/or may decrease the thermal boundary layer at the reactor wall, e.g. when compared to at least one prior-art reactor. Another advantage may be a relatively low pressure drop, in operation, between the inlet and the outlet, e.g. such that operation at lower pressures may be feasible and/or such that a selectivity towards the desired products may be advantageously high. Another advantage may be a good heat transfer, e.g. which may allow a longer run length on average.
The outer surface 6 may also have protrusions corresponding to the indentations 7 of the inner surface 5, e.g. as shown in FIG 1. For example, the protrusions may be formed by stamping (or otherwise deforming) the material of the tubular wall 4, e.g. such that the tubular wall is locally deformed outward to form each of the indentations. It is an advantage that a substantially uniform thickness of the tubular wall 4 can be obtained. Flowever, embodiments of the present invention are not limited thereto. For example, the indentations may also be formed by locally removing, e.g. by drilling, etching or another known subtractive manufacturing technique, the material of the tubular wall. Thus, as shown in FIG 2, the indentations 7 are not necessarily perceivable on the outer surface 6. It is to be noted that other manufacturing methods may be used to achieve substantially the same volumetric shape, e.g. a molding or additive manufacturing process may be used to integrally form the tubular wall as having substantially the same properties as are obtainable by stamping or deforming a basic geometry and/or as are obtainable by a subtractive manufacturing technique to locally remove material from such a basic geometry. For example, a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be manufactured by a process comprising steps of molding, centrifugal casting, excavation and/or deposition.
The indentations may be composed of the same material as the tubular wall, but embodiments of the present invention are not necessarily limited thereto. For example, the (wall of the) indentations may be composed of aluminium, stainless steel, carbon steel, a glass- lined material, a polymer-based material, a nickel-base metal alloy, a cobalt-base metal alloy and/or a combination thereof.
The tubular wall 4 may have a dominant geometrical shape, such as a cylindrical shape, that is locally modified by the indentations 7. For example, each indentation has an edge 8.
Where reference is made to the circumferential shape of the indentation, reference is made to the shape of this edge 8.
For example, at least a portion of the inner surface may be smooth, e.g. not covered by any of the indentations.
An area coverage, e.g. defined as a total area of the inner surface covered by the indentations over a total area of the inner surface, may lie in the range of 10% to 99%, e.g. in the range of 30% to 90%, e.g. about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, about 70% or about 80%.
However, in a preferred embodiment, the indentations may be provided in only a section of the reactor. This section may be, but is not necessarily, an end part of the reactor proximal to the outlet, e.g. may be a section close to or including the outlet. For example, the section may extend over a length of the reactor in the longitudinal direction. The length of the section may lie in a range of 1 m to 20 m, e.g. 1 m to 10 m, e.g. 1 m to 5 m.
An area coverage, e.g. defined as a total area of the inner surface covered by the indentations over a total area of the inner surface of that section of the reactor that comprises the indentations, may lie in the range of 10% to 99%, e.g. in the range of 30% to 90%, e.g. about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, about 70% or about 80%.
For example, another section, e.g. the complement of the aforementioned section, such as an end part of the reactor proximal to the inlet, may be devoid of the indentations.
For example, at least one, e.g. preferably a plurality of, cross-section of the tubular wall, e.g. perpendicular to the longitudinal axis A, may intersect a number N of indentations of the plurality of indentations, in which this number lies in the range of 1 to 30, e.g. in the range of 3 to 20.
At least a portion of the plurality of indentations may be arranged in one or more patterns, e.g. preferably wherein the pattern is linear, staggered and/or crossed.
Referring to FIG 6, rows of indentations, in which each row 19 is substantially arranged along a cross-section of the tubular wall, may be separated from each neighboring row in the axial direction, e.g. along the longitudinal axis A, by a distance in the range of 0 to 5 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
Neighboring rows in the axial direction may be aligned, e.g. such that corresponding indentations 18 in each of the rows are substantially at a same angular position on the tubular wall. It is an advantage that such configuration may favor a higher heat transfer efficiency.
Neighboring rows in the axial direction may be staggered, e.g. such that corresponding indentations in each of the rows are angularly shifted, e.g. over an angle that substantially
corresponds to half of the angular separation between two neighboring indentations in a same row. It is an advantage that such configuration may favor a lower pressure drop over the reactor. For example, the exemplary heat transfer map of FIG 10 shows such a staggered configuration.
In a row, the indentations may be spread out evenly (i.e. uniformly), e.g. as schematically illustrated in FIG 6 for eight indentations per row. For example, each pair of neighboring indentations in a row may be separated by an angle of 45°, for the example of eight indentations per row, or, generally, by an angle of 360°/N where the row contains N indentations.
For example, FIG 17 illustrates the impact of the number N on the thermal enhancement Nu/NuO (Nusselt number ratio Nu/Nuo) and the pressure drop enhancement ff/ffO (pressure drop ratio Dr/Dro), as obtained by simulations of reactors in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
Referring to FIG 7, the indentations may also be spread out unevenly (i.e. not uniformly) in a row. For example, the inner surface of the tubular wall may be devoid of indentations in an angular region, e.g. a cylinder segment. This angular region may cover an arc around the longitudinal axis A in the range of 10° to 300°, e.g. in the range of 45° to 225°, e.g. in the range of 90° to 180°, e.g. about 90°. It is to be noted that the schematic representation and the three-dimensional rendering shown in FIG 7 do not relate to identical reactors, i.e. the number of indentations differ, even though both representations illustrate a non-uniform angular distribution of the indentations.
For example, referring again to FIG 17, by spacing the N (in this example N = 4) indentations in a row over an arc of less than 360°, e.g. of about 180°, while leaving the remaining part, e.g. about 180°, of the circumference of the reactor uncovered by indentations, a surprising increase in the heat transfer enhancement Nu/Nuo can be achieved without a corresponding substantial change in the pressure drop enhancement Dr/Dro, as indicated by the marker 170.
A straight continuation 9 of the inner surface 5 over each indentation 7 and along the tangent of the inner surface, i.e. the tangent on the edge 8 and in accordance with the surface orientation outside of the indentation (or, more precise, the limit of the tangent when approaching the edge from outside the area circumscribed by the edge), may describe a closed and continuous surface that completes the dominant geometrical shape. While the meaning of the circumferential shape and/or edge of the indentation is clear on its own, the edge may
also be defined as that closed curve over the inner surface that would form such continuous closure of the inner surface when the interior of the closed curve is excluded and replaced by a tangential continuation of the inner surface. Where reference is made to the volume of the indentation, reference is made to the volume enclosed by the indented inner surface and such tangential continuation of the inner surface.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, at least one, e.g. each, indentation 7 may extend for a maximum depth into the wall, e.g. relative to the straight continuation 9 of the inner surface, that lies in the range of 0.1 mm to 10 mm, e.g. preferably in the range of 0.2 mm to about 2.0 mm, e.g. in the range of 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm.
The maximum depth of the (or each) indentation 7 into the wall may lie in the range of 0.01 to 0.15 times the (average) cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface. The point where the maximum depth is reached will be referred to herein as the 'point of maximal depth'.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, at least one, e.g. each, indentation 7 may have a diameter in the range of 0.1 cm to 5.0 cm, e.g. preferably in the range of 0.5 cm to 2.0 cm. For example, this diameter may refer to a diameter of the smallest circle encompassing the edge 8 of the indentation.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, at least one, e.g. each, indentation 7 may have a depth-to-diameter ratio of the maximum depth mentioned hereinabove over the diameter mentioned hereinabove that lies in the range of 0.01 to 0.5, e.g. preferably in the range of 0.05 to 0.4, e.g. even more preferred in the range of 0.1 to 0.3.
Each indentation 7 of the plurality of indentations comprises at least one elongated surface feature 14 of a part of the inner surface that forms the indentation and/or at least one concavity 13 of the edge 8 of the indentation that, in operation of the reactor, causes the flow to form at least two distinct flow vortices, e.g. non-transient flow vortices, in and/or near the indentation 7.
Referring to FIG 3, an indentation 7 of the plurality of indentations may comprise a concavity 13 of the edge 8 of the indentation that, in operation of the reactor, causes the flow to form at least two distinct flow vortices, e.g. non-transient flow vortices, e.g. flow vortices that are counterrotating with respect to each other, in and/or near the indentation. This concavity 13 may be formed by a cusp, e.g. a spinode, of the edge.
Referring to FIG 4, an indentation 7 of the plurality of indentations may comprise an elongated surface feature 14, e.g. a ridge, of a part of the inner surface that forms the indentation that, in operation of the reactor, causes the flow to form at least two distinct flow
vortices, e.g. non-transient flow vortices, e.g. flow vortices that are counterrotating with respect to each other, in and/or near the indentation. For example, such elongated surface feature 14 may locally extend along (e.g. may be parallel to) the central longitudinal axis A of the flow conduit, e.g. forming a ridge.
For example, such elongated surface feature 14 may comprise a ridge along an axis B (e.g. a centerline B) of the indentation 7. For example, such axis B may be substantially aligned with, e.g. substantially parallel to or parallel to, the longitudinal axis A of the flow conduit.
For example, the depth of the indentation may comprise two local maxima on, respectively, either side of the axis B, e.g. caused by a ridge along the axis B.
Referring to FIG 5, each indentation of the plurality of indentations 7 may have a circumferential shape, i.e. a shape of the edge 8 of the indentation on the inner surface 5, that is substantially wider in a direction B toward the outlet 3 than toward the inlet 2, e.g. where such width wi,W is expressed in a direction perpendicular to that direction B and substantially tangential to the shape of inner surface 5.
For example, each indentation of the plurality of indentations may be droplet-shaped or heart-shaped, where a narrow end of the droplet or heart shape may be substantially directed toward the inlet.
It shall be understood that the edge being a closed curve may imply that such width may approaches zero on both extremes 11 in respectively the direction B toward the outlet and in the inverse direction toward the inlet. Flowever, when dividing the shape in two complementary parts on either side of the midpoint 12 between these extremes 11, the width W on the side toward the outlet may be on average larger than the width wi on the side toward the inlet. Alternatively or additionally, a maximum of the width W may be located in the part on the side between the midpoint 12 and the extreme point 11 in the direction toward the outlet 3.
Referring again to FIG 3, the concavity 13 of the edge 8 may be located in the part on the side between the midpoint 12 and the extreme point 11 in the direction toward the outlet 3.
The direction B from the inlet 2 and toward the outlet 3 may be substantially parallel with the longitudinal axis A. The circumferential shape may be symmetrical when mirrored with respect to the direction B through a geometrical center of the shape.
Referring to FIG 8, an exemplary three-dimensional shape of the indentation 7 is illustrated. In this example, the edge of the indentation may also have a concavity 13, e.g. a
cusp point. The circumferential shape may be symmetrical when mirrored with respect to the direction B, e.g. a direction B substantially parallel with the longitudinal axis A of the flow conduit. The volume of the indentation 7 may be symmetrical when mirrored with respect to a plane through the direction B and substantially normal to the inner surface.
A maximum width W of the circumferential shape of the indentation, e.g. the maximum distance between any two points on the edge in the direction perpendicular to the direction B, may lie in the range of nD/8N to nD/N, where D refer to the (average) cross- sectional diameter of the inner surface and N refers to the number of indentations in a row 19.
A distance between the point of maximal depth 21 and a downstream point 23 on the edge 8 may lie in the range of 0.01 to 0.50 times the (average) cross-sectional diameter D of the inner surface.
A distance between the point of maximal depth 21 and an upstream point 22 on the edge 8 may lie in the range of 0.05 to 1 times the (average) cross-sectional diameter D of the inner surface.
A maximum distance in between the point of maximal depth 21 and that part of the edge 8 of the indentation that lies in the direction of the outlet with respect to the point of maximal depth 21, i.e. the downstream edge, may lie in the range of 0.01 to 0.50 of the (average) cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface. This maximum distance may be equal to, or may not be equal to, the distance between the point of maximal depth 21 and the downstream point 23 on the edge 8.
The downstream point 22 and the upstream point 23 may be defined as the points where the edge 8 of the indentation intersects a plane through the point of maximal depth 21 that is that oriented along the direction B and oriented substantially normal to the inner surface, in which the downstream point 22 is closer to the outlet than the upstream point 23.
A slope cii of the indentation 7 leading from the upstream point 23 to the point of maximal depth 21 may lie in the range of 0° to 70°.
A slope ci of the indentation 7 leading from the point maximal depth 21 to the point of maximal depth 21 may lie in the range of 0° to 70°.
A slope ci of the indentation 7 leading from the point of maximal depth 21 to the downstream point 22 may lie in the range of 5° to 90°.
A slope a4 of the indentation 7 leading from the downstream point 22 to the point of maximal depth 21 may lie in the range of 5° to 90°.
These slopes cii, ci2, a^, a4 may be defined relative to a reference plane formed by the continuation of the inner surface 9 as described hereinabove.
The point of maximum depth will be, for the sake of simplicity, be referred to as the central point, without thereby implying that this point corresponds to, for example, a geometrical center. The shape of the indentation may be described by four Bezier curves, e.g. third-order Bezier curves, as illustrated in FIG 13, e.g. a first curve from the upstream point 23 to the central point 21, a second curve from the central point 21 to the downstream point 22, a third curve from a first lateral point 132 to the central point 21, and a fourth curve from a second lateral point 134 (on the side opposite of the side of the first lateral point) to the central point 21.
Referring to FIG 18, as known in the art, a Bezier curve can be defined by four points, namely a start point A, an end point B, a point C defining a slope at the start point, and a point D defining a slope at the end point. A smooth curve is defined by these four points, and the combination of the four Bezier curves referred to hereinabove may thus define a smooth indentation. For example, a Bezier curve of order 3, constructed from four points Po,Pi,P2,P3 may be expressed by:
Bit ) = (1 — tfP0 + 3t(l— t)2Pi + 3t2 (l— t)P2 + t3P2, where t is a parameter in the range of 0 to 1.
Thus, eight slopes, e.g. corresponding to the points C and D for each of the four Bezier curves, may be used to characterize the geometrical shape of the indentation. Furthermore, to form a smooth indentation, the C and/or D points defining the slope in the central point 21 may lie in a same plane for the first curve from the upstream point 23 to the central point 21 and for the second curve from the central point 21 to the downstream point 22. Likewise, the C and/or D points defining the slope in the central point 21 may lie in a same plane for the third curve from the first lateral point 132 to the central point 21 and for the fourth curve from the central point 21 to the second lateral point 134. The plane in which the upstream point 23, the central point 21 and the downstream point 22 lie may be a plane of symmetry of the indentation.
Under the constraints referred to hereinabove, six slope values may define the geometrical shape of the indentation, in combination with predetermined positions of the points 23,132,21,134,22: a slope at point 23 towards point 21, a slope at point 22 towards point 21, a slope at point 21 towards point 22, a slope at point 21 towards point 23, a slope at point 21 towards point 132 (being equal to the slope at point 21 towards point 134) and a slope at
point 132 towards point 21 (being equal to the slope at point 134 towards point 21). These six degrees of freedom can be expressed by six slope values cii to ci6. For example, FIG 19 illustrates the slope angles cii to a4 in the plane through the downstream point 22, the central point 21 and the upstream point 23.
In a second aspect, the present invention also relates to a furnace for producing light olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock material, the furnace comprising a reactor 1 in accordance with embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention.
Referring to FIG 9, such furnace 10 is schematically illustrated. The furnace comprises one or more reactors 1 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. Fleat Q is supplied by the furnace to heat a hydrocarbon material, e.g. transported by a steam flow, introduced via the inlet 2 in the reactor 1.
The furnace 10 is adapted for providing light olefins, e.g. C FI and C H , at the outlet 3 of the reactor 1.
In a third aspect, the present invention relates to a method for producing light olefins using a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention and/or using a furnace in accordance with embodiments of the second aspect of the present invention. For example, the method may comprise cracking a hydrocarbon feedstock material into light olefins at a temperature in the range of 700°C to 900°C.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention relates to a reactor for use in cracking hydrocarbons of a hydrocarbon material. The reactor comprises an inlet, an outlet and a flow conduit between the inlet and the outlet for transporting the hydrocarbon material in a flow from the inlet to the outlet. The flow conduit comprises a tubular wall having an inner surface and an outer surface, in which the inner surface has a plurality of indentations provided in the tubular wall. The indentations are arranged in a plurality of rows, each row being substantially arranged along a cross-section of the tubular wall. The indentations of at least one row, e.g. of each row, of the plurality of rows may be spread out unevenly in that row, such that the inner surface of the tubular wall is devoid of indentations over an angular region. The angular region devoid of indentations covers an angle around the axial direction of the tubular wall in the range of 45° to 225°, e.g. in the range of 90° to 180°.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, each indentation of the plurality of indentations may be spherical, ovoid, droplet-shaped and/or heart-shaped.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, an area coverage, defined as a total area of the inner surface that is covered by the plurality of indentations over a total area of the inner surface, may lie in a range of 5% to 90%.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, each row may be separated from each neighboring row in an axial direction of the tubular wall by a distance in the range of 0 to 5 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, at least one of the rows may comprise a number of the plurality of indentations, in which this number lies in the range of 1 to 20.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, a maximum width of the circumferential shape of each of the number N of indentations may lie in the range of nD/8N to nD/N, where D refers to the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface and N refers to the number of indentations in said row.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be aligned such that corresponding indentations in each of the rows are positioned substantially at a same angular position on the tubular wall.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, neighboring rows of the plurality of rows in the axial direction may be staggered such that corresponding indentations in each of the neighboring rows are angularly shifted with respect to each other.
In a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, at least one of the plurality of indentations may extend for a maximum depth into the tubular wall, in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.1 mm to 10 mm and/or in which the maximum depth lies in the range of 0.01 to 0.15 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
Various advantageous effects of embodiments of the present invention may be simultaneously evaluated by the thermal enhancement factor TEF, which may be defined as a
Nu/Nu0 relative heat transfer improvement over a relative pressure drop increase, TEF =
Al/3'
(Ap0 J where Dr0 and Nu0 refer to the pressure drop between the inlet and outlet, respectively the heat transfer (Nusselt number), for a conventional reactor without specific optimizations, e.g. a bare and smooth cylindrical reactor without inserts or surface modifications, and Dr and Nu refer to the pressure drop, respectively the heat transfer (Nusselt number), for an augmented reactor design at hand, e.g. a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present
invention. For example, FIG 10 shows a map of the heat transfer improvement Nu/Nu0, for a configuration in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
Simulations of the reactor design in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, for a set of 1500 different geometrical configurations of the indentations, were performed with a customized solver based on the CFD software package OpenFOAM that is produced by OpenCFD Ltd. and released free and open source to the general public. The customized solver has been implemented for the detailed evaluation of heat transfer and friction characteristics in generic tubular geometries while another solver incorporates the chemical kinetics to perform full-scale reactive simulations.
An optimization routine was performed with the Dakota (Design Analysis Kit for Optimization and Terascale Applications) Toolkit. Reactive simulations can be performed with OpenFOAM. Evaluation of expected yields, TMTs and coking rates was performed using a purpose-specific simulation algorithm 'COILSIM1D'.
Information on the averaged pressure drop and heat transfer was implemented in a one-dimensional reactive simulation package, COILSIM1D, to estimate the TMT temperatures in an industrial furnace as well as assessing yields, coke formation and run length. These results showed a decrease of the maximum TMT of over 30 degrees, relative to a conventional reactor tube.
FIG 11 shows the thermal enhancement factor TEF, computed for the simulations in this example. As can be observed, an improvement of 16.6% over the reference bare tube performance can be obtained by a reactor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
FIG 12 shows the relative heat transfer improvement, computed for the simulations in this example.
FIG 14 shows simulations of the wall temperature and the pressure, at the start of a run, as function of axial position along the reactor for two reactors 141,142 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, and a reference prior-art reactor 140 comprising a bare tubular reactor. FIG 15 shows the evolution over a run, i.e. as function of the onstream time, of the maximum TMT and the pressure drop over the reactor. FIG 16 shows the evolution over a run, i.e. as function of the onstream time, of the produced ethylene and propylene fractions.
FIG 20 shows two exemplary three-dimensional shapes of indentations: both have similar dimensions, but one is droplet-shaped (FIG 20A) and the other has a concavity 13 of its edge 8 in the form of a cusp, thereby being heart-shaped (FIG 20B). These indentation shapes
correspond to designs 704 and 718 as marked on FIG 11. Heat transfer maps, showing the local Nusselt number ratio Nu/Nuo, for the droplet-shaped indentation and the heart-shaped indentation are depicted in FIG 21A and 21B respectively. For a bulk temperature of 726.9 °C, this corresponds to an average wall temperature of 754 °C, a maximum wall temperature of 767 °C and an overall Nusselt number ratio of 1.13 for the droplet-shaped indentation (A).
Under the same conditions, the average wall temperature is 752.8 °C, the maximum wall temperature is 765.5 °C and the overall Nusselt number ratio is 1.20 for the heart-shaped indentation (B). A generally improved heat transfer, with lower average and maximum wall temperatures and a higher Nusselt number ratio, is thus observed for the heart-shaped indentation compared to the droplet-shaped indentation. Both indentations were furthermore seen to have a similar pressure drop value, so that overall the thermal enhancement factor (TEF) of the heart-shaped indentation was higher than that of the droplet-shaped indentation.
To rationalize this difference, large eddy simulations were performed, which show that two separate vortices co-exist at all times for the heart-shaped indentation. These vortices do not display the transient behavior seen in spherical indentations, where a vortex alternates between two positions at opposite sides of the axial centerline of the dimple, as for example reported by Voskoboinick et al. (V. Voskoboinick, N. Kornev, and J. Turnow, "Study of Near Wall Coherent Flow Structures on Dimpled Surfaces Using Unsteady Pressure Measurements," Flow Turbulence and Combustion , vol. 90, pp. 709-722, Jun 2013.). Without being bound by theory, it is believed that these separate vortices lead to the observed improvement in heat transfer. These experiments therefore illustrate the improvements obtained with embodiments of the present invention in general, where an elongated surface feature and/or a concavity causes the flow to separate into at least two distinct flow vortices in and/or near the indentation; and the improvements obtained with embodiments comprising at least a concavity in particular.
Claims
1.- A reactor (1) for use in cracking hydrocarbons of a hydrocarbon material, said reactor comprising an inlet (2), an outlet (3) and a flow conduit between said inlet and said outlet for transporting said hydrocarbon material in a flow from said inlet to said outlet, wherein said flow conduit comprises a tubular wall (4) having an inner surface (5) and an outer surface (6),
wherein said inner surface has a plurality of indentations (7) provided in the tubular wall, each indentation (7) having an edge (8) defining a circumferential shape of said indentation (7),
wherein each indentation of the plurality of indentations comprises
- an elongated surface feature (14) of the part of the inner surface forming the indentation, said elongated surface feature (14) being distinct from the edge (8) of the indentation, and/or
- a concavity (13) of the edge (8) of the indentation,
wherein said elongated surface feature (14) and/or said concavity (13), in operation of the reactor, causes said flow to separate into at least two distinct flow vortices in and/or near said indentation (7).
2.- The reactor of claim 1, wherein said concavity (13) is formed by a cusp of said edge.
3.- The reactor of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said elongated surface feature (14) comprises a ridge.
4.- The reactor of claim 3, wherein said ridge is oriented along an axis (B) that is substantially aligned with an axial direction (A) of said flow conduit.
5.- The reactor of claim 4, wherein said edge (8) is symmetrical when mirrored with respect to the said axis (B).
6.- The reactor of any of the previous claims, wherein each indentation of said plurality of indentations (7) is droplet-shaped or heart-shaped, wherein a narrow end of said droplet or heart shape is substantially directed toward the inlet (2).
7.- The reactor of any of the previous claims, wherein an area coverage, defined as a total area of the inner surface (5) that is covered by said plurality of indentations (7), in at least a section of the reactor that encompasses said indentations, over a total area of the inner surface (5) of the reactor or of the section of the reactor comprising the indentations, lies in a range of 30% to 90%.
8.- The reactor of any of the previous claims, wherein said indentations (7) are arranged in a plurality of rows, each row (19) being substantially arranged along a cross-section of the tubular wall, each row being separated from each neighboring row in an axial direction of said tubular wall by a distance in the range of 0 to 5 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
9.- The reactor of claim 8, wherein at least one of said rows comprises a number of said plurality of indentations (7), in which said number lies in the range of 1 to 20.
10.- The reactor of claim 8 or claim 9, wherein a maximum width (W) of the circumferential shape of each of said number N of indentations lies in the range of nD/8N to nD/N, where D refers to the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface and N refers to the number of indentations in said row (19).
11.- The reactor of any of the claims 8 to 10, wherein neighboring rows of said plurality of rows in said axial direction are aligned such that corresponding indentations (18) in each of said rows are positioned substantially at a same angular position on the tubular wall, or wherein neighboring rows of said plurality of rows in said axial direction are staggered such that corresponding indentations in each of the neighboring rows are angularly shifted with respect to each other.
12.- The reactor of any of the claims 8 to 10, wherein the indentations of at least one row of said plurality of rows are spread out unevenly in said row, such that the inner surface of the tubular wall is devoid of indentations over an angular region, wherein said angular region covers an angle around the axial direction (A) of said tubular wall in the range of 10° to 180°.
13.- The reactor of any of the previous claims, wherein at least one of said plurality of indentations (7) extends for a maximum depth into the tubular wall, in which said maximum depth lies in the range of 0.1 mm to 10 mm and/or in which said maximum depth lies in the range of 0.01 to 0.15 times the cross-sectional diameter of the inner surface.
14.- A furnace (10) for producing light olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock material, said furnace comprising a reactor (1) in accordance with any of the previous claims.
15.- A method for producing light olefins using a reactor in accordance with any of the claims
1 to 13 and/or using a furnace in accordance with claim 14.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP18175683.4 | 2018-06-04 | ||
EP18175683 | 2018-06-04 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2019233680A1 true WO2019233680A1 (en) | 2019-12-12 |
Family
ID=62528300
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/061105 WO2019233680A1 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2019-04-30 | Devices and methods for hydrocarbon cracking |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
WO (1) | WO2019233680A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2593955A (en) * | 2020-03-16 | 2021-10-13 | Vozyakov Igor | Aquacracking - method and apparatus for oil refining |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5577555A (en) * | 1993-02-24 | 1996-11-26 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Heat exchanger |
US5950718A (en) | 1994-07-11 | 1999-09-14 | Kubota Corporation | Heat exchange tubes |
US20040083938A1 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2004-05-06 | Fred Olsen | Recesses on a surface |
US20060102327A1 (en) | 2002-11-15 | 2006-05-18 | Masahiro Inui | Cracking tube having helical fins |
US7963318B2 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2011-06-21 | Schmidt + Clemens Gmbh + Co., Kg | Finned tube for the thermal cracking of hydrocarbons, and process for producing a finned tube |
US9359560B2 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2016-06-07 | China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation | Heat transfer tube and cracking furnace using the heat transfer tube |
WO2017178551A1 (en) | 2016-04-12 | 2017-10-19 | Basf Antwerpen Nv | Reactor for a cracking furnace |
-
2019
- 2019-04-30 WO PCT/EP2019/061105 patent/WO2019233680A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5577555A (en) * | 1993-02-24 | 1996-11-26 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Heat exchanger |
US5950718A (en) | 1994-07-11 | 1999-09-14 | Kubota Corporation | Heat exchange tubes |
US20040083938A1 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2004-05-06 | Fred Olsen | Recesses on a surface |
US7963318B2 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2011-06-21 | Schmidt + Clemens Gmbh + Co., Kg | Finned tube for the thermal cracking of hydrocarbons, and process for producing a finned tube |
US20060102327A1 (en) | 2002-11-15 | 2006-05-18 | Masahiro Inui | Cracking tube having helical fins |
US9359560B2 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2016-06-07 | China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation | Heat transfer tube and cracking furnace using the heat transfer tube |
WO2017178551A1 (en) | 2016-04-12 | 2017-10-19 | Basf Antwerpen Nv | Reactor for a cracking furnace |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
POOJA PATIL ET AL: "Numerical Study of Flow and Heat Transfer in Circular Tube With Almond Shape Dimple", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, vol. 3, no. 8, 1 August 2014 (2014-08-01), pages 21 - 29, XP055528104, ISSN: 2278-0181 * |
V. VOSKOBOINICK; N. KORNEV; J. TURNOW: "Study of Near Wall Coherent Flow Structures on Dimpled Surfaces Using Unsteady Pressure Measurements", FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, vol. 90, June 2013 (2013-06-01), pages 709 - 722 |
VICTOR DE SAEGHER ET AL: "Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Reacting Flow applied to Combustion and Steam Cracking", MASTER THESIS, 2017, Ghent (Belgium), XP055527991, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:002367032> [retrieved on 20181128] * |
VICTOR DE SAEGHER ET AL: "Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Reacting Flow applied to Combustion and Steam Cracking", MASTER THESIS, 2017, XP055528638, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://lib.ugent.be/en/catalog/rug01:002367032?i=0&q=saegher&type=master> [retrieved on 20181129] * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2593955A (en) * | 2020-03-16 | 2021-10-13 | Vozyakov Igor | Aquacracking - method and apparatus for oil refining |
GB2593955B (en) * | 2020-03-16 | 2023-06-07 | Vozyakov Igor | Aquacracking - method and apparatus for oil refining |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR100288324B1 (en) | Ethylene Production Method | |
EP1136541B1 (en) | Internally finned U-shaped radiant coil | |
KR101153067B1 (en) | Metal tube for thermal cracking reaction | |
IL166229A (en) | Process and ribbed tube for thermally cleaving hydrocarbons | |
EP2702120B1 (en) | Furnace coil with protuberances on the external surface | |
EP2328851B1 (en) | Pyrolysis furnace with helical tube | |
US20120251407A1 (en) | Furnace coil fins | |
WO2019233680A1 (en) | Devices and methods for hydrocarbon cracking | |
KR102387593B1 (en) | Reactors for cracking furnaces | |
CA2774979C (en) | Flow enhancement devices for ethylene cracking coils | |
US20230019344A1 (en) | Internally profiled tubes | |
TW201743027A (en) | Furnace coil modified fins | |
JPH11199876A (en) | Thermal cracking pipe used for producing ethylene having coking-reducing performance | |
US10000707B2 (en) | Pinned furnace tubes | |
US8029749B2 (en) | Cracking furnace | |
JP2005221153A (en) | Steel pipe for thermal decomposing reaction |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 19720887 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 19720887 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |