WO2019088185A1 - Design assistance device and design assistance method - Google Patents

Design assistance device and design assistance method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019088185A1
WO2019088185A1 PCT/JP2018/040558 JP2018040558W WO2019088185A1 WO 2019088185 A1 WO2019088185 A1 WO 2019088185A1 JP 2018040558 W JP2018040558 W JP 2018040558W WO 2019088185 A1 WO2019088185 A1 WO 2019088185A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
composition
combination
raw materials
specified
raw material
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2018/040558
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
慶行 但馬
綱雄 奥村
智子 大嶺
義則 望月
Original Assignee
株式会社日立製作所
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社日立製作所 filed Critical 株式会社日立製作所
Publication of WO2019088185A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019088185A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a design support apparatus and a design support method for supporting product design in the manufacture of chemical products, food products and the like.
  • Patent Document 1 Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2016-200903 proposes that “a method of creating an approximate model of a structure includes a structure and a plurality of design variables that define materials constituting the structure; A plurality of characteristic values defining a structure and a material constituting the structure are obtained to obtain a first approximate model having a characteristic value as an objective function, which is created using a non-linear response relation.
  • the first Pareto solution is extracted using the model, at least one of the upper limit value and the lower limit value is extracted in the first Pareto solution, and at least one value of the extracted upper limit value and the lower limit value is fixed and extracted.
  • Set a new value of the design variable by changing the non-design variable create a second approximate model using the new design variable, perform multi-objective optimization calculation, and extract a second Pareto solution " Bets have been disclosed (see solutions).
  • Patent Document 1 since the technique described in Patent Document 1 executes the search after inputting the conditions regarding all the objects and constraints in advance, there is also a solution that does not satisfy the desired characteristics if the constraints on the cost and raw materials other than the characteristics are excessive. There may be many output. That is, when searching for a predetermined solution, it is not taken into consideration that the solution may not be obtained if the constraint is not appropriately set.
  • the object of the present invention is made in view of the above, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a design support apparatus and method which make it easy to input constraints of a manufacturing recipe of a product having a predetermined characteristic.
  • one example of the design support apparatus of the present invention is a design support apparatus for designing a product or an intermediate product made using two or more raw materials and supporting the design of the design target.
  • management means for managing at least the raw material composition information on the composition or composition ratio of the raw material, the property request information required as the property of the design object, and the composition or composition ratio of the design object.
  • the raw material composition information is processed based on the input means for inputting the composition parameter which defines the allowable range of the allowable value as the value, and the characteristic request information inputted by the input means, and the condition specified by the characteristic request information is Identify the composition or composition ratio of the design object to be satisfied, and for the composition or composition ratio of the identified design object, the item specified in the composition parameter
  • the constituent elements are not necessarily essential except in the case where they are particularly clearly shown and where they are considered to be obviously essential in principle. Needless to say.
  • a plastic product or the like having desired characteristics in chemical product manufacture, for example, characteristics meeting characteristics required for manufacturing the product (characteristics meeting the required specifications).
  • characteristics meeting characteristics required for manufacturing the product characteristics meeting the required specifications.
  • the outline of the design support device is described. Not only plastic but also chemical products such as rubber, food, medicine or medicine can be implemented. These are collectively called chemicals or just products.
  • the product is not limited to the finished product, but it is also possible to design an intermediate product that supports production of the finished product to be used, mixed or combined as part of the finished product.
  • the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and when a product having characteristics meeting the requirements implies a finished product as a final product, for example, a finished product is produced from raw material plastic.
  • the present invention can also be applied to intermediate products (intermediate products) such as pellets and compounds obtained in the process.
  • a product or an intermediate product is to be designed. It explained as a product including such an intermediate product.
  • the above-mentioned chemical products are food materials such as texture, taste, hardness, texture, shape, baking, etc. if they are foods, and if they are medicines or medicines, the amount of a plurality of raw materials in order to obtain predetermined characteristics Because it is necessary to combine, it requires very complicated calculation.
  • the processing of the design support apparatus in the present embodiment is divided into a basic data registration phase, a prediction model construction phase, and a search phase, and is sequentially processed. The flow of a series of processing will be described below for each phase.
  • basic data is data obtained when an experiment is performed to combine a raw material and generate a predetermined product (chemical product) in the past, and corresponds to a product having predetermined characteristics
  • Product Various basic data on physical properties of products (chemicals) such as raw materials combination of (chemicals), (2) cost of raw materials (unit cost), composition of raw materials, such as molecular weight, and (3) gloss and fluidity. Register in the database.
  • a prediction model for predicting physical properties from the composition ratio of raw materials is constructed.
  • the composition ratio includes chemical components such as elements and compounds constituting the substance, nutritional components such as vitamins, calcium, proteins and sugars, effects, effects and the like. Moreover, when a chemical reaction occurs due to heat treatment or the like, information before and after the reaction may be included.
  • search phase first, query data representing physical property information desired by a user who is a designer of a product, and a parameter representing how much the request is allowed to deviate are received. Next, a search for the composition ratio of the product satisfying the physical properties of the product (chemical product) is performed using the prediction model.
  • a recipe (raw material combination) in which the composition ratio of the product falls within the predetermined discrepancy category and the cost (unit cost) of the product or production decreases is searched.
  • search result data (physical properties, composition ratio, combination of raw materials) is registered in the database. Not limited to the above unit cost, it is possible to search based on the time of product production, availability of raw materials, and the like. In the present specification, a search method using a unit cost will be representatively described.
  • a product falling within the category of discontinuation refers to a product that does not exactly match a predetermined property but that has similar characteristics to the predetermined property as a product. That is, it has characteristics different from predetermined characteristics but satisfies the characteristics as a product.
  • the search result (data registered in the database) is presented to the user (displayed on the display terminal of the user).
  • the process of the above search phase may actually be repeatedly performed halfway according to the interaction with the user.
  • FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing a system configuration and a functional configuration in the present embodiment.
  • the design support apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment includes at least a calculation server 11 that performs data management, prediction of physical properties, and a search for combinations of raw materials, and an operation terminal 12 that a user inputs and outputs data.
  • the calculation server 11 includes a data registration unit 111, a prediction model construction unit 112, a search unit 113, and a data management unit 114.
  • the operation terminal 12 has an operation unit 121.
  • the components of the design support apparatus 1 are mutually connected by a network 13 such as a LAN (Local Area Network).
  • a network 13 such as a LAN (Local Area Network).
  • each component is connected by LAN, but may be connected via WWW (World Wide Web).
  • WWW World Wide Web
  • the number of elements of the calculation server 11 and the operation terminal 12 may be two or more.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the hardware configuration in the present embodiment.
  • the data registration unit 111, the prediction model construction unit 112, the search unit 113, and the data management unit 114 included in the calculation server 11 of the design support apparatus 1 are CPU (Central Processing Unit) 1H101, ROM (Read Only Memory) 1H102 or an external storage.
  • the program stored in the device 1H104 is read into a RAM (Read Access Memory) 1H103, and the communication I / F (Interface) 1H105, an external input device 1H106 represented by a mouse or a keyboard, an external output device 1H107 represented by a display or the like Is realized by controlling the
  • the data management unit 114 functions as a management unit that manages at least the material composition information (the cost composition data 1D2 in FIG. 4) regarding the composition or composition ratio of the material as a management target.
  • the search unit 113 processes the raw material composition information (cost composition data 1D2 in FIG. 4) based on the characteristic request information (query data 1D4 in FIG. 6) input by the operation unit 121 (input unit) of the operation terminal 12
  • the composition or composition ratio of the design target satisfying the condition specified in the characteristic requirement information (query data 1D4 in FIG. 6) is specified (step 1F303 in FIG. 15), and the composition or composition ratio of the specified design object is It functions as processing means for specifying (step 1F 304 in FIG. 15) the combination of raw materials that falls within the allowable range of the conditions specified by the composition parameter (composition discrepancy parameter 1D6 in FIG. 8).
  • the operation unit 121 included in the operation terminal 12 of the design support apparatus 1 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 1H101, a program stored in a read only memory (ROM) 1H102 or an external storage device 1H104 in a read access memory (RAM) 1H103. This is realized by reading and controlling the communication I / F (Interface) 1H105, the external input device 1H106 represented by a mouse and a keyboard, and the external output device 1H107 represented by a display and the like.
  • CPU central processing unit
  • ROM read only memory
  • RAM read access memory
  • the operation unit 121 (external input device 1H106) accepts as the target value the characteristic request information (query data 1D4 in FIG. 6) required as the characteristic of the design object (product) and the composition or composition ratio of the design object It functions as an input means for inputting at least a composition parameter (composition discrepancy parameter 1D6 in FIG. 8) which defines an allowable range of the value to be calculated.
  • the operation unit 121 (external output device 1H 107) functions as a display unit that displays information from the output of the processing unit (search unit 113).
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of experimental recipe data in the present embodiment.
  • the experimental recipe data 1D1 is data representing a combination of raw materials for each experiment performed in the past, and includes experimental number 1D101, raw materials “1” to “20” (1D102 to 1D121), and the data management unit 114 Stored.
  • the experiment number 1D101 is a number uniquely identifying a past experiment.
  • the raw materials “1” to “20” (1D102 to 1D12) represent the amounts of each raw material used in each experiment.
  • the raw materials are 20 types of the raw materials “1” to “20”, they may be increased or decreased according to the embodiment. Further, in the following, the raw material may be simply referred to except the case of specifying any one of the raw materials “1” to “20”.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of cost composition data in the present embodiment.
  • the cost composition data 1D2 is data representing the cost and composition for each raw material, and includes a raw material name 1D201, a unit cost 1D202, and compositions “1” to “10” (1D203 to 1D222), and the data management unit 114 Stored in The raw material name 1D201 is a name for uniquely identifying the raw material.
  • the unit cost 1D 202 is a cost per unit amount (1 kg, etc.). Other unit amounts may be used.
  • the composition “1” to the composition “10” (1D203 to 1D222) are one or more characteristic quantities representing the composition of the raw material, such as molecular weight and chemical structure of the raw material.
  • composition of the raw material is set to 10 types of composition “1” to composition “10”, this may be increased or decreased according to the embodiment.
  • composition may be simply referred to as a composition except when specifying the composition of any one of the compositions “1” to “10”.
  • information belonging to the raw material name 1D201 and unit cost 1D202, and compositions “1” to “10” (1D203 to 1D222) includes cost (unit cost) to the raw material and cost composition information on the composition or composition ratio of the raw material.
  • the information that belongs to the material name 1D201 and the compositions “1” to “10” (1D203 to 1D222) constitutes material composition information on the composition or composition ratio of the material.
  • unit cost 1D 202 it is possible to provide a recipe of a product in which a combination of raw materials having predetermined characteristics and low manufacturing cost is specified.
  • experimental physical property data 1D3 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described with reference to FIG.
  • FIG. 5 is a configuration diagram of experimental physical property data corresponding to an experiment in the present embodiment.
  • the experimental physical property data 1D3 is data of physical properties measured by the recipe of the experiment, and includes experimental number 1D301, gloss 1D302, fluidity 1D303, flexural rigidity 1D304, breaking elongation 1D305, and softening temperature 1D306, and the data It is stored in the management unit 114.
  • the experimental physical property data is information indicating physical properties of a product manufactured in the past or a product manufactured experimentally.
  • the physical properties will be described representatively for the gloss 1D 302, the flowability 1D 303, and the like, but the characteristics of the other products described above can be used.
  • Physical properties are characteristics obtained by measuring or analyzing manufactured products. Moreover, not only the physical properties of the product actually manufactured in the past, but also the physical properties corresponding to the recipe of the product designed by the design support apparatus can be used.
  • the experiment number 1D301 corresponds to the above-described experiment number 1D101, and is a number uniquely identifying a past experiment.
  • the gloss 1D 302, flowability 1D 303, flexural rigidity 1D 304, breaking elongation 1D 305, and softening temperature 1D 306 are indices indicating physical properties of a product (chemical product). In the present embodiment, although five types of indicators of physical properties are used, this may be increased or decreased according to the embodiment.
  • the product is not limited to the finished product, but data of an intermediate product that supports the production of the finished product to be used, mixed or combined as part of the finished product can be registered in the experimental physical property data 1D3. Also in this case, the user can simplify the input of the characteristic and the constraint condition.
  • the data of the intermediate product can be registered or designed not only in the experimental physical data 1D3 but also in other data.
  • the query data 1D4 is data for indicating to the design support device 1 a request as to what kind of physical property or characteristic the user wants to design when designing a new product (a characteristic required as a characteristic of the product to be designed) This is request information), and includes query number 1D 401, physical property name 1D 402, search type 1D 403, and parameters “1” and “2” (1D 404, 1 D 405), which are stored in the data management unit 114.
  • the query number 1D 401 is a number for uniquely identifying a query.
  • Physical property name 1D402 indicates the required physical property name described in the query, for example, "gloss”, “flowability”, “bending stiffness”, “break elongation”, and "softening temperature”.
  • Search type 1D 403 is a label indicating what kind of physical property is desirable, and in the present embodiment, maximization, minimization, or more (a certain value or more), larger than a certain value, or less (not more than a certain value) , Less than a certain value, and within a range (a range of a certain value 1 and a certain value 2).
  • the parameters “1” and “2” (1D404 and 1D405) have parameters according to the search type 1D403, and in the maximization and minimization, None is set and above (a certain value or more), larger than a certain value, (Less than or equal to a certain value), less than a certain value, a value corresponding to “some value” is set to the parameter “1” (1D 404).
  • “7.5” is set in the following, “90” is set in the above, “None” is set in the parameter “2” (1D 405), and the range (a certain value 1 and a certain value 2 In the range, for example, “170” is set as the “certain value 1” to the parameter “1” (1D 404), and “220” is set as the “certain value 2” for the parameter “2” (1D405) can do.
  • the seven types of search types 1D 403 are selected, but may be increased or decreased according to the embodiment. If the parameter to be set is increased or decreased according to the increase or decrease, parameters “3”, “4”, etc. may be added, or parameters “1” and “2” (1D404 and 1D405). Semistructured data may be held therein.
  • search type 1D 403 and parameters “1” and “2” (1D 404 and 1 D 405) are conditions specified (defined) by characteristic request information corresponding to each physical property, and “gloss” and “break elongation” “Maximization” is used as an objective function, and “flowability”, “bending stiffness”, “softening temperature”, “below”, “range”, “above” are used as constraint conditions.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of raw material filter data in the present embodiment.
  • the raw material filter data 1D5 is data for limiting the raw material used for the recipe (raw material combination) output in the search phase (raw material filter information indicating the presence or absence of use of the raw material), and the query number 1D501, the raw material “1” Raw materials “20” (1D 502 to 1 D 521) are stored in the data management unit 114.
  • the query number 1D501 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query.
  • the raw materials “1” to “20” (1D 502 to 1 D 521) are values indicating whether the corresponding raw materials are used or not used (not used).
  • the past experimental data and product information described above can also be used by the user to select a product or parameter having characteristics similar to the desired product.
  • composition discrepancy parameter 1D6 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described with reference to FIG.
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram of the composition discrepancy parameter in the present embodiment.
  • the recipe raw material combination
  • the composition ratio deviation parameter 1D6 allows for the composition ratio (for example, the target value of the composition and the search If the absolute value of the difference from the result is a specific example of a discrepancy and the value falls within the range practically satisfactory), or if the corresponding recipe can not be found under the specified condition, the condition is automatically set.
  • the allowable deviation indicates a range of characteristics different from the predetermined characteristics but satisfying as a product.
  • the allowable deviation is, for example, a value representing the upper limit of the practically satisfactory range. Also called similar specific range.
  • the query number 1D601 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query.
  • the composition name 1D 602 indicates a composition name that designates the tolerance of the discrepancy, for example, “composition 1”, “composition 2”.
  • the allowable discrepancy 1D 604 is a discrepancy in the composition ratio accepted at the time of recipe search. For example, if tolerance deviation 1D604 is 3% and automatic relaxation 1D603 is "NG", it is ensured that the composition ratio when a recipe (viable solution) is found is within plus or minus 3% of the target value Be done.
  • composition name for which nothing is specified is set to a default value of “NG” for the automatic relaxation 1D 603 and “3%” for the allowable discrepancy 1D 604.
  • “OK” is set, there is a possibility that the range is relaxed.
  • the automatic relaxation 1D603 and the allowable deviation 1D604 are the conditions specified (defined) by the composition deviation parameter 1D6 corresponding to the composition name 1D602, and the allowable deviation 1D604 is a target for the composition or composition ratio of the product
  • the difference has been described as an example of the difference with the value (the difference between the target value and the allowable limit value), it is a parameter (information) that defines an allowable range having characteristics satisfying the product.
  • the present invention is not limited to the difference, and other examples of the concept of the difference include the square of the difference, the log, the approximation, etc. (the value acceptable as the target value), and can be appropriately selected according to the parameters.
  • FIG. 9 is a block diagram of search result physical data in the present embodiment.
  • Search result physical property data 1D7 is data representing physical property values searched in the early stage of the search phase, and query number 1D701, candidate number 1D702, gloss 1D703, fluidity 1D704, flexural rigidity 1D705, fracture elongation 1D 706 and a softening temperature 1D 707, which are stored in the data management unit 114.
  • the query number 1D701 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query.
  • the candidate number 1D 702 is a number for uniquely identifying a candidate obtained as a result of searching for a query with respect to the same query.
  • the gloss 1D 703, the fluidity 1D 704, the bending rigidity 1D 705, the breaking elongation 1D 706, and the softening temperature 1D 707 are the prediction results (the search results of the search unit 113) regarding the respective physical properties.
  • the prediction result is, for example, a pair of data such as [86.4, 1.2] in which the query number 1D 701 corresponds to “1”, and represents an average value (expected value) and a standard deviation, respectively.
  • the expression method of a prediction result may be made into the parameter of an average value or the probability density function estimated more easily.
  • FIG. 10 is a configuration diagram of search result composition ratio data in the present embodiment.
  • the search result composition ratio data 1D8 is data representing a composition value corresponding to the physical property value searched in the early stage of the search phase, and the query number 1D801, candidate number 1D802, composition “1” to composition “10” (1D802 To 1D 812), and is stored in the data management unit 114.
  • the query number 1D801 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query.
  • the candidate number 1D 802 is a number for uniquely identifying, for the same query, a candidate obtained as a result of searching for a query corresponding to the candidate number 1D 702.
  • compositions “1” to “10” are the values of the composition ratio (composition ratio of the product) respectively searched for. Note that a plurality of candidates are usually output for a single.
  • search result recipe data 1D9 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described using FIG.
  • FIG. 11 is a block diagram of search result recipe data in the present embodiment.
  • Search result recipe data 1D9 is recipe (raw material combination) data to be output at the end of the search phase, and the query number 1D901, the search number 1D902, the cost 1D 903 and the raw materials “1” to “20” (1D 904) To 1D 923) and stored in the data management unit 114.
  • the query number 1D901 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query.
  • the search number 1D 902 is a number given to identify the result when the raw material search for a certain candidate of a certain query results in an executable solution, and regarding the certain query number 1D 901, It is a number that uniquely identifies a search result.
  • the cost 1D 903 is the cost (raw material cost) per unit of the searched recipe.
  • the raw materials “1” to “20” (1D904 to 1D923) respectively represent the blending amounts of the respective raw materials, and represent the combination of blending in total.
  • the manufacturing cost may be variable according to the recipe, if necessary.
  • FIG. 12 is a block diagram of search result discrepancy data in the present embodiment.
  • Search result recipe data 1D10 is data indicating how much the target composition ratio (target value of the composition ratio) is out of alignment with the recipe (raw material combination) output at the end of the search phase
  • a query number 1D1001, a search number 1D1002, the number of types 1D1003, and compositions "1" to "10" (1D1003 to 1D1013) are stored in the data management unit 114.
  • the query number 1D1001 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query.
  • the search number 1D1002 is a number corresponding to the search number 1D902 of the search result recipe data 1D9, and is a number uniquely identifying a search result regarding a certain query number 1D01.
  • the type number 1D1003 is the number of raw materials used.
  • compositions “1” to “10” are pieces of information indicating how relaxed each composition is with respect to the target value. In the case of upswing, it takes a positive value. “0” indicates that the degree of relaxation is 0 and the value of the composition ratio is equal to the target value.
  • the user can know the correspondence between the production cost and the number of types of products of the product recipe. You can choose a recipe. In addition, these can also be displayed together with the number of types 1D103 corresponding to products of similar characteristics within the range of discrepancies, it is possible to compare recipes having characteristics satisfactory as products, and user convenience is improved Do.
  • FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing the process flow of the basic data registration phase (experimental data registration) in the present embodiment. This process is started by the CPU 1 H 101 activating the data registration unit 111 that functions as a data registration program.
  • the data registration unit 111 registers experimental recipe data 1D1 input by the user via the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12 in the data management unit 114 as a database (1F101).
  • the data registration unit 111 registers the cost composition data 1D2 input from the user via the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12 in the data management unit 114 (step 1F102).
  • the data registration unit 111 registers the experimental physical property data 1D3 input by the user via the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12 in the data management unit 114, and the process ends (step 1F103).
  • the data management unit 114 functions as a management unit that manages various registered data (information) as a management target.
  • FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing a process flow of prediction model learning in the present embodiment. This process is started by the CPU 1 H 101 activating the prediction model construction unit 112 functioning as a prediction model construction program.
  • the prediction model construction unit 112 calculates the composition ratio (composition ratio of the raw material) in each experiment using the experimental recipe data 1D1 and the cost composition data 1D2 registered in the data management unit 114 in the basic data registration phase. (Step 1F201).
  • the prediction model construction unit 112 learns a prediction model (simulator) using the composition ratio in each experiment described above and the experimental physical data 1D3 registered in the data management unit 114 in the basic data registration phase (step 1F202) ).
  • CGAN Conditional Generative Adversalial Nets
  • CGAN Supplemental Generative Adversalial Nets
  • 100 samples can be generated from CGAN, and their mean and variance can be used.
  • CGAN is used in the present embodiment, other statistical and machine learning models can be used.
  • linear regression models, support vector regressions, decision trees, other neural networks, etc. may be used in combination of one or more as required.
  • the prediction model is lightweight (processing time is fast).
  • a plurality of prediction models may be appropriately used, such as using a linear regression model, etc., except for the final stage of composition ratio search or evaluation of final dispersion (dispersion etc.).
  • a prediction model is constructed by learning from experimental data, and further, a case where only one prediction model is handled is described for simplicity. Further, in the present embodiment, although the manufacturing conditions and the like are not included in the prediction model, they may be input as conditions as needed.
  • FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing a processing flow of the raw material combination search in the present embodiment. This process is started by the CPU 1 H 101 activating the search unit 113 functioning as a search program.
  • search unit 113 receives query data 1 D 4 (characteristic request information including physical property information) input from the user via operation unit 121 of operation terminal 12 and raw material filter data 1 D 5, and registers them in data management unit 114. (Step 1F301).
  • the search unit 113 receives the composition discrepancy parameter 1D6 input by the user via the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12, and registers it in the data management unit 114 (step 1F302).
  • the searching unit 113 searches for a composition ratio (composition ratio of the product) that satisfies the physical properties designated by the query data 1D4 (step 1F303).
  • the search uses NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II), which is a standard method of multi-objective optimization.
  • the solution candidate is not adopted.
  • the solution candidate generation is repeated until a solution candidate satisfying the constraints is found.
  • NSGA-II which is a multi-objective optimization method, is adopted, but other optimization methods may be used.
  • the searching unit 113 determines that the composition ratio (composition ratio of the product) falls within the discrepancy (within the allowable range designated by the composition discrepancy parameter 1D6) designated by the composition discrepancy parameter 1D6, and designates by the raw material filter data 1D5.
  • a recipe raw material combination whose cost is reduced is searched for (step 1F 304). Linear programming is used for the search.
  • the range of the composition ratio of the product (for example, 12.1-5 ⁇ composition “1” ⁇ 12.1 + 5) is set as a constraint condition, a problem that minimizes the cost is set, and the best solution is searched.
  • “12.1” indicates the composition ratio of the composition “1”
  • “5” indicates the allowable discrepancy (%).
  • the constraints on the range of composition ratio of the product are gradually relaxed.
  • the target value of the composition ratio of composition “1” is 10% and the allowable deviation is 1%
  • the composition ratio of composition “1” is initially less than 11%
  • the composition ratio of composition “1” is 9%
  • the composition ratio of composition “1” is smaller than 11.5%
  • the composition ratio of composition “1” is larger than 8.5%
  • it is assumed that the cost is linear with respect to the amount of each raw material used.
  • the method of relieving constraints by 0.5% each is only an example, and it may be relaxed by another method. That is, when a solution corresponding to a predetermined constraint condition can not be obtained, the condition may be relaxed stepwise.
  • the search unit 113 sends the search result physical property data 1D7, the search result composition ratio data 1D8, the search result recipe data 1D9, and the search result discrepancy data 1D10, which are the search results obtained in step 1F304, to the data management unit 114. It registers (step 1F305).
  • step 1F305 the method of creating the result of squeezing the raw materials to be used in the form of two, three, four etc. is simply to select all the combinations of two types of raw materials, three types of raw materials Set the problem in all combinations and solve the set problem.
  • the combination of raw materials to be used may be searched using an exchange Monte Carlo method or the like.
  • the operation unit 121 presents the user with various search results and related past results (experimental recipe data 1D1, cost composition data 1D2, and experimental physical data 1D3 with similar physical properties) to the user, and ends the process (step 1F306). . That is, these pieces of information are displayed on the screen of the operation unit 121.
  • a prediction model of physical properties with respect to the composition ratio of raw materials is built, and in the first stage search, an objective function and constraint conditions regarding the physical properties of the product are configured, and the composition ratio of the product is searched as a determination variable Do.
  • the objective function and the constraint conditions are configured using the raw material cost (unit cost) and the product composition ratio, and the raw material combination is searched as a decision variable to select the raw material (raw material combination ) Can be obtained.
  • the search result of the first stage and the search result of the second stage can be displayed on the screen of the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12.
  • the operation unit 121 executes an operation of changing or adding any one of the condition (information) defined in the query data 1D4, the raw material filter data 1D5, and the composition discrepancy parameter 1D6. Based on the changed or added conditions, the first stage search and the second stage search can be performed again.
  • FIG. 16 is a configuration diagram of a query registration screen in the present embodiment.
  • the query registration screen 1G1 includes a physical property input pane 1G101, a raw material filter input pane 1G102, an OK button 1G103, and a reset button 1G104.
  • the external output device 1H107 of the operation terminal 12 functions as a display unit (query registration screen display unit) or display means for displaying a query registration screen 1G1 for receiving data from the external input device 1H106.
  • the external output device 1H107 and the external input device 1H106 can be implemented integrally or separately.
  • the physical property input 1G101 has a function of registering search types and parameters of glossiness, fluidity, flexural rigidity, fracture elongation, and softening temperature corresponding to the query data 1D4. In the initial state, nothing is set. The user sets the physical properties of the request including one or more maximizations or minimizations.
  • the raw material filter input pane 1G102 has a function of registering the use and non-use of each raw material corresponding to the raw material filter data 1D5.
  • " ⁇ " corresponds to use
  • " ⁇ ” corresponds to non-use
  • all initial values are " ⁇ ”.
  • the user can register various data in the data management unit 114 of the calculation server 11 by inputting the physical property input 1G101 and the input pane 1G102 and pressing the OK button 1G103.
  • the search process is performed.
  • pressing the reset button 1G104 resets the initial state of various input contents.
  • FIG. 17 is a configuration diagram of a physical property display screen in the present embodiment.
  • the physical property display screen 1G2 includes a physical property display pane 1G201 for displaying the searched physical property, a detailed display pane 1G202 for displaying the detailed physical property and composition ratio of the candidate selected in the physical property display pane 1G201, and a material combination display for displaying the raw material combination.
  • a button 1G203 and a back button 1G204 are provided.
  • the external output device 1H 107 of the operation terminal 12 functions as a display unit (physical property display unit) that displays the physical properties searched by the search unit 113.
  • the physical property display pane 1G201 displays a set of candidate (pareto solutions) 1G 201a obtained as a result of executing multi-objective optimization on physical properties for which one or more maximizations or minimizations have been set, and past experimental results 1G 201b.
  • the past experimental results are various data (1D1, 1D2, 1D3) of the experiment.
  • a candidate (Pareto solution) related to gloss and fracture elongation or a solution in the vicinity thereof and a past experiment result having similar characteristics are displayed.
  • the physical property information or the outline thereof regarding the candidate or the past experiment result is displayed in the pop-up 1 G 201 c.
  • FIG. 17 shows the case where the maximization is specified particularly for two physical properties (“gloss”, “breaking elongation”), so the graph is a two-dimensional plot.
  • the solution near the best candidate is displayed as a one-dimensional graph.
  • three-dimensional display may be performed, or a combination of physical properties for which a two-dimensional graph is specified may be displayed side by side. Further, in the present embodiment, only the physical properties for which the maximization or the minimization is specified are displayed on the graph, but the physical properties for which the larger or smaller range is specified may be displayed on the graph. Good.
  • the detailed display pane 1G202 shows detailed physical properties ("Gloss”, “Flowability”, “Bending stiffness”, “Break elongation”, “Softening temperature”) of the candidates selected by the user on the physical property display pane 1G201. And the predicted value (expected value) and the composition ratio are displayed in the sub-pane (1G202a, 1G202b) based on the search result physical property data 1D7 and the search result composition ratio data 1D8.
  • dispersion is described as a representative example of variation, mean, deviation, correlation or the like may be used.
  • the raw material combination display button 1G203 By pressing the raw material combination display button 1G203, it is possible to transition to a screen (raw material combination display screen 1G3 (described later)) for displaying a recipe (raw material combination) regarding the candidate selected by the user on the physical property display pane 1G201.
  • a screen raw material combination display screen 1G3 (described later)
  • a recipe raw material combination
  • the back button 1G 204 when the back button 1G 204 is pressed, it is possible to return to the setting of the query (required physical property).
  • FIG. 18 is a block diagram of the raw material combination display screen in the present embodiment.
  • the raw material combination display screen 1G3 is a display screen for displaying the search result of the search unit 113, and includes a cost display pane 1G301, a raw material combination display pane 1G302, a relaxation condition display pane 1G303, a report output button 1G304, and a back button 1G305.
  • the external output device 1H 107 of the operation terminal 12 in FIG. 2 functions as a display unit (search result display unit) that displays the search results of the search unit 113 shown in FIG.
  • the degree of relaxation is an automatically relaxed range or value, or a range or value of discrepancy.
  • the degree of relaxation is output or automatically set in the degree-of-relaxation display pane 1G 303, and the range or value thereof is displayed.
  • the cost display pane 1G301 displays, based on the search result recipe data 1D9, the cost (raw material cost) for each of the used raw material numbers for the candidate selected on the physical property display screen 1G2. For example, the cost display pane 1G 301 displays information on a combination of low cost raw materials (3 types use to 6 types use). In this case, use of six types is the minimum cost.
  • the raw material combination display pane 1G302 displays, based on the search result recipe data 1D9, a combination of raw materials for the number of used raw materials for the candidate selected on the physical property display screen 1G2. For example, in the case of “use of three types”, the raw material combination display pane 1G 302 displays that the raw material “2” with the mixing amount of the raw material “24” is combined with the other two kinds of raw materials (not shown) become. Moreover, in the case of four types of utilization, it is a recipe which combines the raw material 2 and the raw material 3, and two other raw materials which are not shown in figure.
  • the search part 113 shown in FIG. Identify combinations that do not use specified raw materials.
  • the combination which does not use the identified raw material is excluded from among the combinations of raw materials which fall within the allowable range of the condition specified by the compositional discrepancy parameter 1D6.
  • the combinations of raw materials that fall within the allowable range of the conditions specified by the compositional deviation parameter 1D6 are specified.
  • the combination of the identified raw materials is displayed on the raw material combination display pane 1G302.
  • the relaxation degree display pane 1G303 displays, for the candidates selected on the physical property display screen 1G2, the degree of relaxation of the composition ratio for each number of used materials based on the search result discrepancy data 1D10. For example, in the case of “three types of use”, the relaxation degree display pane 1G 303 displays that the relaxation degree of the composition ratio of “composition 1” is “1.3%”.
  • the screen example regarding the case of using three to six types of raw materials is shown, but it can be increased or decreased according to the search result or the request from the user. It is also possible to display a search result based on the input product characteristics or information input by the user in the past, even if the request is not made by the user.
  • the user can simply compare the number of raw materials that are difficult to convert into expenses.
  • composition ratio for every number of used raw materials is not displayed, you may display together as needed.
  • search result physical property data 1D7 search result composition ratio data 1D8, search result recipe data 1D9, and search result discrepancy data 1D10 are displayed on the screen of the operation unit 121 of FIG. You can also It is not necessary to display all the items, and the display items can be changed according to the setting of the user.
  • User interfaces such as physical property display pane 1G201, detail display pane 1G202, cost display pane 1G301, raw material combination display pane 1G302, and relaxation condition display pane 1G303 described in FIGS. 17 and 18 can be freely combined and displayed. It can. Also, some panes may not be displayed as needed.
  • compositions or composition ratio of the product having the characteristics meeting the requirements different conditions (for example, the composition and composition discrepancy parameter specified in the cost composition data 1D2) Since the combination of materials is searched in consideration (with consideration) of conditions defined by 1D6 and including conditions that can be changed by reusing conditions etc. defined by query data 1D4, etc. Recipes for products with matching characteristics can be identified.
  • the prediction model for the composition or composition ratio of the raw material can be reused.
  • the characteristic meeting the requirement it is a physical property required as a product, which satisfies the condition defined by the query data 1D4 (characteristic request information) of FIG.
  • the user can select a recipe with less degree of relaxation.
  • the place where the degree of relaxation is large can be selected to search for new formulation possibilities.
  • FIG. 19 is a configuration diagram of composition data corresponding to raw material types and amounts in this embodiment.
  • Composition data 1D2a corresponding to the type and amount of raw material is data indicating a composition that changes depending on the type and amount of raw material.
  • the type of raw material 1D 201a to be mixed or combined, the amount 1D 202a of the raw material 1, and the amount 1D 203a of the raw material 2 are shown.
  • the user can display a graph having the raw material “1” and the raw material “2” as parameters, and the user can know the amount of the composition for the combination of predetermined raw materials .
  • the second stage search is not a linear programming problem, and is achieved by using, for example, a genetic algorithm or the like.
  • two types of raw materials are used, but three or more types of combinations may be input and displayed as a three-dimensional graph or the like.
  • the display method is not limited to these and may be another expression method.
  • the data management unit 114 in FIG. 1 functions as a management unit that manages at least raw material composition information (cost composition data 1D2) related to the composition or composition ratio of the raw material.
  • the operation unit 121 (external input device 1H106) shown in FIG. 1 allows the characteristic request information (query data 1D4 shown in FIG. 6) required as the characteristic of the design object and the composition or composition ratio of the design object as the target value. It functions as an input means for inputting at least a composition parameter (composition discrepancy parameter 1D6 in FIG. 8) which defines an allowable range of the value to be calculated.
  • the search unit 113 in FIG. 1 processes the raw material composition information (cost composition data 1D2 in FIG. 4) based on the characteristic request information (query data 1D4 in FIG. 6) input by the input means, and the characteristic request information (query data)
  • the composition or composition ratio of the design object satisfying the conditions specified in 1D4) is identified (step 1F303 in FIG. 15), and the composition parameter (composition discrepancy parameter in FIG. 8) is obtained for the composition or composition ratio of the identified design object It functions as processing means for specifying (step 1F 304) a combination of raw materials that falls within the allowable range of the conditions specified in 1D6).
  • the operation unit 121 (external output device 1H 107) in FIG. 1 can function as a display unit that displays information from the output of the processing unit (search unit 113).
  • the processing means (searching unit 113) specifies a combination of conditions (raw material type) different from the conditions used when specifying the combination of raw materials, and displays the combination of the different conditions that were specified as the display means (raw material combination display screen 1G3 Display on). Thereby, it is possible to simplify the input of the constraint conditions of the production recipe of the product having the predetermined characteristics.
  • the processing means searches unit 113) requires that cost composition information (cost composition data 1D2) relating to the cost to the raw material and the composition or composition ratio of the raw material exist as a management target of the management means (data management unit 114).
  • cost composition information cost composition data 1D2 relating to the cost to the raw material and the composition or composition ratio of the raw material exist as a management target of the management means (data management unit 114).
  • cost display pane 1G301 a combination of low cost raw materials is specified based on the cost composition information, and the specified low cost raw material combination is displayed on the display means (cost display pane 1G301). Since the combination of the low cost raw materials is displayed, the combination of the low cost raw materials can be determined as a product.
  • the processing means searching unit 113 Identify combinations that do not use raw materials designated for nonuse, and exclude combinations that do not use the specified raw materials from among combinations of raw materials that fall within the allowable range of the conditions specified in the composition parameters, Among the combinations of raw materials belonging to the allowable range of the condition specified by the parameter, the combination of the raw materials excluding the combination without using the raw material is specified, and the combination of the specified raw materials is displayed as display means (raw material combination of FIG. 18 Display on display pane 1G 302). Since the combination of raw materials used for the product having the predetermined characteristics is displayed, it is possible to confirm the combination of raw materials used for the product.
  • the processing means is information managed by the managing means (data management unit 114), and is index information on an index indicating the physical properties of the product or intermediate product different from the design target (experimental physical property data of FIG. 3)
  • the display device (physical property display pane 1G201 of FIG. 17) displays index information (past experiment result) relating to an index indicating physical properties of a product or an intermediate manufactured in the past than the design target. As past performance is displayed, this information can be used as a reference when entering the manufacturing recipe constraints of the product having the predetermined characteristics.
  • the processing means specifies the predicted value of the physical property of the design object and the variation thereof in the process of specifying the composition or the composition ratio of the design object, and the predicted value of the physical property of the identified design object and the dispersion It is displayed on the display device (sub pane 1G 202a in FIG. 17).
  • the predicted values of physical properties to be designed and their variations can be visualized, and the visualized information can be used as a reference when inputting the constraints of the manufacturing recipe of a product having a predetermined characteristic.
  • the processing means (searching unit 113) further specifies the number of types of raw materials belonging to the combination of low cost raw materials based on the specified combination of low cost raw materials, and the number of types of specified raw materials (see FIG.
  • the number of types of the 12 search result discrepancies data 1D10 is displayed on the display device. Display and visualize the number of types of raw materials belonging to the combination of low cost raw materials.
  • processing means searching unit 113
  • the processing means searching unit 113 can not specify the combination of the raw materials belonging to the allowable range of the condition specified by the composition difference parameter, it gradually reduces the allowable range of the condition specified by the composition difference parameter. It is possible to suppress the inability to identify the combination of raw materials and to accelerate the processing.
  • the processing means is a relaxation degree indicating a difference between the low cost source material combination and the target value of the composition or composition ratio to be designed based on the specified low cost source material combination.
  • the composition “1” to the composition “10” of the search result discrepancy data 1D10 of FIG. 12) are further specified, and the identified relaxation condition is displayed on the display device (the relaxation condition display pane 1G303 of FIG. 18). Since the information on the degree of relaxation is displayed and visualized, this information can be used as a reference when inputting constraints of a production recipe of a product having a predetermined characteristic.
  • the processing unit searches a combination of raw materials that satisfies the changed or added condition. It is possible to identify a combination of raw materials that satisfy the changed or added conditions in which the conditions for inputting manufacturing recipe constraints are changed or added.
  • Reference Signs List 1 design support apparatus, 11 calculation server, 12 operation terminals, 111 data registration unit, 112 prediction model construction unit, 113 search unit, 114 data management unit, 121 operation unit

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

To cite an example of the present invention, provided is a design assistance device for treating a product or an intermediate product created using two or more ingredients as a subject to be designed and assisting in the design of the subject to be designed. Said device comprises: a management means for at least managing as a subject to be managed ingredient composition information relating to either a composition or a composition ratio of ingredients; an input means for receiving an input of at least characteristic request information being requested as a characteristic of the subject to be designed, and a composition parameter for either the composition or the composition ratio of the subject to be designed, said parameter defining an allowable range of a value allowed as a target value for the composition or the composition ratio; a processing means for processing the ingredient composition information on the basis of the characteristic request information received by the input means, identifying a composition or a composition ratio of the subject to be designed, which satisfies a condition designated in the characteristic request information, and identifying, for the identified composition or composition ratio of the subject to be designed, a combination of the ingredients falling within the allowable range of the condition indicated by the composition parameter; and a display means for displaying information based on an output from the processing means. The processing means identifies a combination of conditions different from the condition used when identifying the combination of the ingredients, and causes the display means to display the identified different condition combination.

Description

設計支援装置及び設計支援方法Design support apparatus and design support method
 本発明は、化学品や食品等の製造において、製品の設計を支援するための設計支援装置及び設計支援方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a design support apparatus and a design support method for supporting product design in the manufacture of chemical products, food products and the like.
 化学品や食品等の製造では、製造者やその顧客の求める1つ以上の特性を持った製品の製造のレシピを正確かつ迅速に設計することが求められる。ところが、製品の特性が複数の原料から構成される場合、組み合わせのパターンは膨大となるため、設計に多くの時間を要することとなる。 The manufacture of chemicals, foods and the like requires accurate and rapid design of recipes for the manufacture of products with one or more characteristics required by the manufacturer and its customers. However, when the characteristics of the product are composed of a plurality of raw materials, the combination patterns are enormous, and it takes a lot of time to design.
 これに対し、昨今では第一原理計算や機械学習を活用したシミュレーションを活用して、設計支援が検討されるようになっている。しかしながら、緻密なシミュレーションをしようとすると今度は計算に多くの時間を要する場合がある。 On the other hand, in recent years, design support has been studied using simulations that make use of first-principles calculations and machine learning. However, it may take a lot of time for calculation if you try to do precise simulation.
 この問題に対し、特許文献1(特開2016-200903号公報)には、「構造体の近似モデルの作成方法は、構造体および構造体を構成する材料を規定する複数種の設計変数と、構造体および構造体を構成する材料を規定する複数の特性値を対象とする。非線形応答関係を用いて作成された、特性値を目的関数とする第1の近似モデルを得る。第1の近似モデルを用いて第1のパレート解を抽出する。第1のパレート解において上限値および下限値の少なくとも一方を抽出し、抽出した上限値および下限値のうち少なくとも1つの値を固定し、抽出されていない設計変数を変動させて設計変数の新たな値を設定する。新たな設計変数を利用して第2の近似モデルを作成し、多目的最適化計算を実施し、第2のパレート解を抽出する。」ことが開示されている(解決手段参照)。 In order to address this problem, Patent Document 1 (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2016-200903) proposes that “a method of creating an approximate model of a structure includes a structure and a plurality of design variables that define materials constituting the structure; A plurality of characteristic values defining a structure and a material constituting the structure are obtained to obtain a first approximate model having a characteristic value as an objective function, which is created using a non-linear response relation. The first Pareto solution is extracted using the model, at least one of the upper limit value and the lower limit value is extracted in the first Pareto solution, and at least one value of the extracted upper limit value and the lower limit value is fixed and extracted. Set a new value of the design variable by changing the non-design variable, create a second approximate model using the new design variable, perform multi-objective optimization calculation, and extract a second Pareto solution " Bets have been disclosed (see solutions).
特開2016-200903号公報JP, 2016-200903, A
 しかしながら、特許文献1に記載の技術は、予めすべての目的や制約に関する条件を入力してから探索を実行するため、特性以外のコストや原料に対する制約を付けすぎると所望の特性を満たさない解も多数出力される可能性がある。すなわち、所定の解を探索する際に、制約条件が適切に設定されない場合には、解が得られないことが発生し得ることが考慮されていない。 However, since the technique described in Patent Document 1 executes the search after inputting the conditions regarding all the objects and constraints in advance, there is also a solution that does not satisfy the desired characteristics if the constraints on the cost and raw materials other than the characteristics are excessive. There may be many output. That is, when searching for a predetermined solution, it is not taken into consideration that the solution may not be obtained if the constraint is not appropriately set.
 本発明の目的は、上記を鑑みてなされたものであって、所定の特性を有する製品の製造レシピの制約条件の入力を簡便にする設計支援装置及び方法を提供することにある。 The object of the present invention is made in view of the above, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a design support apparatus and method which make it easy to input constraints of a manufacturing recipe of a product having a predetermined characteristic.
 前記課題を解決するために、本発明の設計支援装置の一例を挙げるならば、2以上の原料を用いて作られる製品または中間品を設計対象とし、設計対象の設計を支援する設計支援装置であって、原料が有する組成または組成比率に関する原料組成情報を少なくとも管理対象として管理する管理手段と、設計対象が有する特性として要求される特性要求情報と、設計対象の組成または組成比率について、その目標値として許容される値の許容範囲を規定した組成パラメータを入力する入力手段と、入力手段により入力された特性要求情報を基に原料組成情報を処理して、特性要求情報で指定される条件を満たす設計対象の組成または組成比率を特定し、且つ、特定された設計対象の組成または組成比率に対し、組成パラメータで指定される条件の範囲内に属する原料の組み合わせを特定する処理手段と、処理手段の出力による情報を表示する表示手段と、を有し、処理手段は、原料の組み合わせを特定する際に用いる条件とは異なる条件の組み合わせを特定し、特定された異なる条件の組み合わせを表示手段に表示させることを特徴とする。 In order to solve the above problems, one example of the design support apparatus of the present invention is a design support apparatus for designing a product or an intermediate product made using two or more raw materials and supporting the design of the design target. There are also management means for managing at least the raw material composition information on the composition or composition ratio of the raw material, the property request information required as the property of the design object, and the composition or composition ratio of the design object The raw material composition information is processed based on the input means for inputting the composition parameter which defines the allowable range of the allowable value as the value, and the characteristic request information inputted by the input means, and the condition specified by the characteristic request information is Identify the composition or composition ratio of the design object to be satisfied, and for the composition or composition ratio of the identified design object, the item specified in the composition parameter The processing means for specifying the combination of the raw materials belonging to the range, and the display means for displaying the information by the output of the processing means, the processing means being different from the conditions used when specifying the combination of the raw materials And a combination of different conditions specified is displayed on the display means.
 本発明によれば、所定の特性を有する製品の製造レシピの制約条件の入力を簡便にする設計支援装置及び方法を提供することができる。 According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a design support apparatus and method that make it easy to input constraint conditions of a production recipe of a product having predetermined characteristics.
本実施形態におけるシステム構成ならびに機能構成を示す構成図である。It is a block diagram which shows the system configuration | structure in this embodiment, and a function structure. 本実施形態におけるハードウェア構成を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the hardware constitutions in this embodiment. 本実施形態における実験レシピデータの図である。It is a figure of the experimental recipe data in this embodiment. 本実施形態におけるコスト組成データの図である。It is a figure of cost composition data in this embodiment. 本実施形態における実験物性データの図である。It is a figure of the experimental physical-property data in this embodiment. 本実施形態におけるクエリデータの図である。It is a figure of the query data in this embodiment. 本実施形態における原料フィルタデータの図である。It is a figure of the raw material filter data in this embodiment. 本実施形態における組成食い違いパラメータの図である。It is a figure of a composition discrepancy parameter in this embodiment. 本実施形態における探索結果物性データの図である。It is a figure of the search result physical-property data in this embodiment. 本実施形態における探索結果組成比率データの図である。It is a figure of the search result composition ratio data in this embodiment. 本実施形態における探索結果レシピデータの図である。It is a figure of the search result recipe data in this embodiment. 本実施形態における探索結果食い違いデータの図である。It is a figure of the search result discrepancy data in this embodiment. 本実施形態における実験データ登録の処理フローを示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the processing flow of experimental data registration in this embodiment. 本実施形態における予測モデル学習の処理フローを示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the processing flow of prediction model learning in this embodiment. 本実施形態における原料組み合わせ探索の処理フローを示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the processing flow of the raw material combination search in this embodiment. 本実施形態におけるクエリ登録画面の図である。It is a figure of the query registration screen in this embodiment. 本実施形態における物性表示画面の図である。It is a figure of the physical-property display screen in this embodiment. 本実施形態における原料組み合わせ表示画面の図である。It is a figure of the raw material combination display screen in this embodiment. 本実施形態における原料種類と量に対応する組成データの表示画面の一例である。It is an example of the display screen of the composition data corresponding to the raw material kind and quantity in this embodiment.
 以下、適宜図面を参照しながら本発明を実施するための代表的な形態を説明する。 Hereinafter, representative embodiments for carrying out the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings as appropriate.
 特に必要なとき以外は同一または同様な部分の説明を原則として繰り返さない。所定の図に記載された符号について他の図で説明をする場合であっても同一または同様な部分の説明は省略する。 The description of the same or similar parts will not be repeated in principle unless particularly required. The same or similar parts will not be described even if the reference numerals described in the predetermined drawings are described in other drawings.
 また、以下の実施の形態では便宜上その必要があるときは、複数のセクションまたは実施の形態に分割して説明するが、特に明示した場合を除き、それらはお互いに無関係なものではなく、一方は他方の一部または全部の変形例、詳細、補足説明などの関係にある。 Further, in the following embodiments, when it is necessary for the sake of convenience, it will be described divided into a plurality of sections or embodiments, but unless specifically stated otherwise, they are not unrelated to each other, one is The other part or all of the variations, the details, the supplementary explanation, etc. are in a relation.
 また、以下の実施の形態において、要素の数など(個数、数値、量、範囲などを含む)に言及する場合、特に明示した場合および原理的に明らかに特定の数に限定される場合などを除き、その特定の数に限定されるものではなく、特定の数以上でも以下でも良いものとする。 Further, in the following embodiments, when referring to the number of elements (including the number, numerical value, quantity, range, etc.), it is particularly pronounced and clearly limited to a specific number in principle. Except for the specific number, it is not limited to the specific number but may be more or less than the specific number.
 また、以下の実施の形態において、その構成要素(要素ステップ等も含む)は、特に明示した場合および原理的に明らかに必須であると考えられる場合等を除き、必ずしも必須のものではないことは言うまでもない。 Further, in the following embodiments, the constituent elements (including element steps and the like) are not necessarily essential except in the case where they are particularly clearly shown and where they are considered to be obviously essential in principle. Needless to say.
 本実施形態では、化学品製造における、所望の特性、例えば、製品を製造するにあたって要求に合った特性(要求された仕様に合った特性)を有する製品、プラスチック製品等の設計を支援するための設計支援装置の概略を述べる。プラスチックに限らず、ゴム、食品、薬品または医薬品等の化学品であれば実施できる。これらをまとめて化学品または単に製品と呼ぶ。 In the present embodiment, in order to support the design of a product, a plastic product or the like having desired characteristics in chemical product manufacture, for example, characteristics meeting characteristics required for manufacturing the product (characteristics meeting the required specifications). The outline of the design support device is described. Not only plastic but also chemical products such as rubber, food, medicine or medicine can be implemented. These are collectively called chemicals or just products.
 また、製品は完成品に限らず、完成品の一部として使用、混合または化合される完成品の製造を支援する中間品についても設計を行うことができる。 In addition, the product is not limited to the finished product, but it is also possible to design an intermediate product that supports production of the finished product to be used, mixed or combined as part of the finished product.
 なお、本発明は上記した実施形態に限定されるものではなく、要求に合った特性を有した製品が、最終製品としての完成品を意味する場合、例えば、原料のプラスチックから完成品を生成する過程で得られる、ペレット、コンパウンド等の中間品(中間製品)にも、適用することができる。 The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and when a product having characteristics meeting the requirements implies a finished product as a final product, for example, a finished product is produced from raw material plastic. The present invention can also be applied to intermediate products (intermediate products) such as pellets and compounds obtained in the process.
 この場合、製品又は中間品が設計対象となる。このような中間品も含めて製品として説明した。また、実施形態の構成の一部について、他の構成の追加・削除・置換をすることが可能である。 In this case, a product or an intermediate product is to be designed. It explained as a product including such an intermediate product. In addition, it is possible to add, delete, and replace other configurations for part of the configurations of the embodiment.
 上記の化学品は、食品であれば食感、味、硬さ、質感、形状や焼き加減等、薬品または医薬品であれば、形状や効能等について所定の特性を得るために複数の原材料の量を組み合わせる必要があるため、非常に複雑な計算が必要となる。 The above-mentioned chemical products are food materials such as texture, taste, hardness, texture, shape, baking, etc. if they are foods, and if they are medicines or medicines, the amount of a plurality of raw materials in order to obtain predetermined characteristics Because it is necessary to combine, it requires very complicated calculation.
 そのため、従来の予めすべての目的や制約に関する条件を入力してから解を探索する方法では、所望とする特性を達成できるレシピや製造方法の中で、コストや原料に対する制約を鑑みて選定するという、設計者が実際に行うプロセスに対応できない課題がある。また、最初に制約条件を付けすぎると条件を満たす解が見つからないということもある。 Therefore, in the conventional method of searching for a solution after inputting conditions on all the objects and constraints in advance, it is selected in view of the constraints on the cost and the raw materials among the recipes and manufacturing methods that can achieve the desired characteristics. There is a problem that the designer can not cope with the process actually performed. In addition, there are also cases where a solution that satisfies the condition can not be found if too many constraints are applied at first.
 実運用する場合には、しばしば原料自体が入手困難になったり、新しい種類のものが手に入ったりしたときに、これまで用いてきたモデルを一から作り直す必要があるという課題があるがこれらを考慮された設計支援装置及び方法は提供されていなかった。 In the case of actual operation, often when the raw material itself becomes difficult to obtain, or when a new kind of thing is available, there is a problem that it is necessary to recreate the model used so far from scratch. Design support devices and methods considered have not been provided.
 本実施形態における設計支援装置の処理は、基礎データ登録フェーズと、予測モデル構築フェーズと、探索フェーズとに分けられ、順に処理される。以下に一連の処理の流れをフェーズごとに説明する。 The processing of the design support apparatus in the present embodiment is divided into a basic data registration phase, a prediction model construction phase, and a search phase, and is sequentially processed. The flow of a series of processing will be described below for each phase.
 基礎データ登録フェーズでは、基礎データとして、過去に原料を組み合わせて所定の製品(化学品)を生成する実験を行った際のデータであって、所定の特性を有する製品に対応する(1)製品(化学品)の原料組み合わせ、(2)原料のコスト(単位コスト)ならびに、原料の、分子量などの組成、(3)光沢や流動性など、製品(化学品)の物性に関する各種の基礎データをデータベースに登録する。 In the basic data registration phase, basic data is data obtained when an experiment is performed to combine a raw material and generate a predetermined product (chemical product) in the past, and corresponds to a product having predetermined characteristics (1) Product Various basic data on physical properties of products (chemicals) such as raw materials combination of (chemicals), (2) cost of raw materials (unit cost), composition of raw materials, such as molecular weight, and (3) gloss and fluidity. Register in the database.
 次に、予測モデル構築フェーズでは、基礎データ登録フェーズ(実験データ登録フェーズ)でデータベースに登録された基礎データに基づいて、原料の組成比率から物性を予測する予測モデル(シミュレータ)を構築する。 Next, in the prediction model construction phase, on the basis of the basic data registered in the database in the basic data registration phase (experimental data registration phase), a prediction model (simulator) for predicting physical properties from the composition ratio of raw materials is constructed.
 組成比率とは、その物質を構成する元素や化合物などの化学成分、ビタミン、カルシウム、タンパク質、糖分等の栄養成分、効能、効果等を含む。また、熱処理等によって化学反応が起こる場合はその反応前後の情報を含めてもよい。 The composition ratio includes chemical components such as elements and compounds constituting the substance, nutritional components such as vitamins, calcium, proteins and sugars, effects, effects and the like. Moreover, when a chemical reaction occurs due to heat treatment or the like, information before and after the reaction may be included.
 探索フェーズでは、まず製品の設計者であるユーザが望む物性情報を表すクエリデータ、ならびに、どの程度要求に対して食い違いを許すかをあらわすパラメータを受け付ける。次に、製品(化学品)の物性を満足する製品の組成比率の探索を、前記予測モデルを用いて実行する。 In the search phase, first, query data representing physical property information desired by a user who is a designer of a product, and a parameter representing how much the request is allowed to deviate are received. Next, a search for the composition ratio of the product satisfying the physical properties of the product (chemical product) is performed using the prediction model.
 さらに、製品の組成比率が所定の食い違いの範疇に納まり、かつ、製品または製造のコスト(単位コスト)が小さくなるレシピ(原料組合せ)を探索する。そして、探索結果データ(物性、組成比率、原料組み合わせ)をデータベースに登録する。上記単位コストに限らず製品製造の時間や原材料の入手性等を条件に探索することもできる。本明細書では代表して単位コストを使った探索方法について説明する。 Furthermore, a recipe (raw material combination) in which the composition ratio of the product falls within the predetermined discrepancy category and the cost (unit cost) of the product or production decreases is searched. Then, search result data (physical properties, composition ratio, combination of raw materials) is registered in the database. Not limited to the above unit cost, it is possible to search based on the time of product production, availability of raw materials, and the like. In the present specification, a search method using a unit cost will be representatively described.
 食い違いの範疇に納まる製品とは、所定の特性と厳密に一致しないが、製品として所定の特性に類似する特性を有する製品をいう。つまり、所定の特性とは異なる特性を有するが製品としての特性を満たすものである。 A product falling within the category of discontinuation refers to a product that does not exactly match a predetermined property but that has similar characteristics to the predetermined property as a product. That is, it has characteristics different from predetermined characteristics but satisfies the characteristics as a product.
 すなわち、製品が所定の特性を満足する製品レシピの原料組み合わせの特定に使用する第一の条件を入力し、製造される製品が所定の特性に類似する特性を満足し、かつ、第一の条件とは異なる第二の条件を特定する。 That is, the first condition used to specify the combination of materials of the product recipe in which the product satisfies the predetermined characteristics is input, the manufactured product satisfies the characteristics similar to the predetermined characteristics, and the first condition is To identify a second condition different from
 この際、原料組み合わせを特定する際に用いる条件とは異なる条件の組み合わせを特定し、特定した内容をデータベースに登録する。その探索結果(データベースに登録されたデータ)をユーザに提示(ユーザの表示端末に表示)する。 At this time, a combination of conditions different from the condition used when specifying the raw material combination is specified, and the specified content is registered in the database. The search result (data registered in the database) is presented to the user (displayed on the display terminal of the user).
 以上の探索フェーズの処理は、実際にはユーザとのインタラクションに応じて途中で繰り返し実施される場合がある。 The process of the above search phase may actually be repeatedly performed halfway according to the interaction with the user.
<システム構成>
 次に、図1を用いて、本実施形態における設計支援装置1の構成を説明する。図1は、本実施形態におけるシステム構成ならびに機能構成を示す構成図である。
 図1において、本実施形態における設計支援装置1では、データ管理や物性の予測、原料の組み合わせの探索を行う計算サーバ11と、ユーザがデータの入出力を行う操作端末12を少なくとも備える。計算サーバ11は、データ登録部111、予測モデル構築部112、探索部113、データ管理部114を有する。
<System configuration>
Next, the configuration of the design support apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing a system configuration and a functional configuration in the present embodiment.
In FIG. 1, the design support apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment includes at least a calculation server 11 that performs data management, prediction of physical properties, and a search for combinations of raw materials, and an operation terminal 12 that a user inputs and outputs data. The calculation server 11 includes a data registration unit 111, a prediction model construction unit 112, a search unit 113, and a data management unit 114.
 操作端末12は、操作部121を有する。設計支援装置1の各構成要素は相互にLAN(Local Area Network)等のネットワーク13で接続される。なお、本実施形態では、各構成要素がLANで接続されるとしたが、WWW(World Wide Web)経由で接続されていてもかまわない。また、計算サーバ11、操作端末12の要素数は2以上であってもよい。 The operation terminal 12 has an operation unit 121. The components of the design support apparatus 1 are mutually connected by a network 13 such as a LAN (Local Area Network). In the present embodiment, each component is connected by LAN, but may be connected via WWW (World Wide Web). Further, the number of elements of the calculation server 11 and the operation terminal 12 may be two or more.
<機能とハードウェア>
 次に図1と図2を参照して機能とハードウェアについて説明する。図2は、本実施形態におけるハードウェア構成を示す構成図である。
<Functions and hardware>
Next, functions and hardware will be described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the hardware configuration in the present embodiment.
 設計支援装置1の計算サーバ11が備えるデータ登録部111、予測モデル構築部112、探索部113、データ管理部114は、CPU(Central Processing Unit)1H101が、ROM(Read Only Memory)1H102もしくは外部記憶装置1H104に格納されたプログラムをRAM(Read Access Memory)1H103に読み込み、通信I/F(Interface)1H105、マウスやキーボード等に代表される外部入力装置1H106、ディスプレイなどに代表される外部出力装置1H107を制御することで実現される。 The data registration unit 111, the prediction model construction unit 112, the search unit 113, and the data management unit 114 included in the calculation server 11 of the design support apparatus 1 are CPU (Central Processing Unit) 1H101, ROM (Read Only Memory) 1H102 or an external storage. The program stored in the device 1H104 is read into a RAM (Read Access Memory) 1H103, and the communication I / F (Interface) 1H105, an external input device 1H106 represented by a mouse or a keyboard, an external output device 1H107 represented by a display or the like Is realized by controlling the
 データ管理部114は、原料が有する組成または組成比率に関する原料組成情報(図4のコスト組成データ1D2)を少なくとも管理対象として管理する管理手段として機能する。探索部113は、操作端末12の操作部121(入力手段)により入力された特性要求情報(図6のクエリデータ1D4)を基に原料組成情報(図4のコスト組成データ1D2)を処理し、特性要求情報(図6のクエリデータ1D4)で指定される条件を満たす設計対象の組成又は組成比率を特定(図15のステップ1F303)し、且つ特定された設計対象の組成または組成比率に対し、組成パラメータ(図8の組成食い違いパラメータ1D6)で指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する原料の組み合わせを特定(図15のステップ1F304)する処理手段として機能する。 The data management unit 114 functions as a management unit that manages at least the material composition information (the cost composition data 1D2 in FIG. 4) regarding the composition or composition ratio of the material as a management target. The search unit 113 processes the raw material composition information (cost composition data 1D2 in FIG. 4) based on the characteristic request information (query data 1D4 in FIG. 6) input by the operation unit 121 (input unit) of the operation terminal 12 The composition or composition ratio of the design target satisfying the condition specified in the characteristic requirement information (query data 1D4 in FIG. 6) is specified (step 1F303 in FIG. 15), and the composition or composition ratio of the specified design object is It functions as processing means for specifying (step 1F 304 in FIG. 15) the combination of raw materials that falls within the allowable range of the conditions specified by the composition parameter (composition discrepancy parameter 1D6 in FIG. 8).
 設計支援装置1の操作端末12が備える操作部121は、CPU(Central Processing Unit)1H101が、ROM(Read Only Memory)1H102もしくは外部記憶装置1H104に格納されたプログラムをRAM(Read Access Memory)1H103に読み込み、通信I/F(Interface)1H105、マウスやキーボード等に代表される外部入力装置1H106、ディスプレイなどに代表される外部出力装置1H107を制御することで実現される。 The operation unit 121 included in the operation terminal 12 of the design support apparatus 1 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 1H101, a program stored in a read only memory (ROM) 1H102 or an external storage device 1H104 in a read access memory (RAM) 1H103. This is realized by reading and controlling the communication I / F (Interface) 1H105, the external input device 1H106 represented by a mouse and a keyboard, and the external output device 1H107 represented by a display and the like.
 操作部121(外部入力装置1H106)は、設計対象(製品)が有する特性として要求される特性要求情報(図6のクエリデータ1D4)と、設計対象の組成又は組成比率について、当該目標値として許容される値の許容範囲を規定した組成パラメータ(図8の組成食い違いパラメータ1D6)とを少なくとも入力する入力手段として機能する。操作部121(外部出力装置1H107)は、処理手段(探索部113)の出力による情報を表示する表示手段として機能する。 The operation unit 121 (external input device 1H106) accepts as the target value the characteristic request information (query data 1D4 in FIG. 6) required as the characteristic of the design object (product) and the composition or composition ratio of the design object It functions as an input means for inputting at least a composition parameter (composition discrepancy parameter 1D6 in FIG. 8) which defines an allowable range of the value to be calculated. The operation unit 121 (external output device 1H 107) functions as a display unit that displays information from the output of the processing unit (search unit 113).
<データ構造>
 次に、図3を用いて、データ管理部114が管理する、予測モデルの構築に用いる実験レシピデータ1D1を説明する。図3は、本実施形態における実験レシピデータの構成図である。実験レシピデータ1D1は、過去に行った実験ごとの原料の組み合わせを表すデータであって、実験番号1D101と、原料「1」~原料「20」(1D102~1D121)を備え、データ管理部114に格納される。
<Data structure>
Next, experimental recipe data 1D1 used for construction of a prediction model, which is managed by the data management unit 114, will be described using FIG. FIG. 3 is a block diagram of experimental recipe data in the present embodiment. The experimental recipe data 1D1 is data representing a combination of raw materials for each experiment performed in the past, and includes experimental number 1D101, raw materials “1” to “20” (1D102 to 1D121), and the data management unit 114 Stored.
 実験番号1D101は過去の実験を一意に特定する番号である。原料「1」~原料「20」(1D102~1D12)は、各実験で用いられた各原料の使用量を表す。なお、本実施形態では、原料は、原料「1」~原料「20」の20種類としたが、これは実施形態に応じて増減してもよい。また、以下では、原料「1」~原料「20」のいずれかの原料を特定する場合以外、単に、原料と称することがある。 The experiment number 1D101 is a number uniquely identifying a past experiment. The raw materials “1” to “20” (1D102 to 1D12) represent the amounts of each raw material used in each experiment. In the present embodiment, although the raw materials are 20 types of the raw materials “1” to “20”, they may be increased or decreased according to the embodiment. Further, in the following, the raw material may be simply referred to except the case of specifying any one of the raw materials “1” to “20”.
 次に、図4を用いて、データ管理部114が管理する、コスト組成データ1D2を説明する。図4は、本実施形態におけるコスト組成データの構成図である。 Next, cost composition data 1D2 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described using FIG. FIG. 4 is a block diagram of cost composition data in the present embodiment.
 コスト組成データ1D2は、各原料に対するコストと組成を表すデータであって、原料名1D201と、単位コスト1D202と、組成「1」~組成「10」(1D203~1D222)を備え、データ管理部114に格納される。原料名1D201は原料を一意に特定する名称である。 The cost composition data 1D2 is data representing the cost and composition for each raw material, and includes a raw material name 1D201, a unit cost 1D202, and compositions “1” to “10” (1D203 to 1D222), and the data management unit 114 Stored in The raw material name 1D201 is a name for uniquely identifying the raw material.
 単位コスト1D202は単位量(1kg等)あたりのコストである。他の単位量であってもよい。組成「1」~組成「10」(1D203~1D222)は、分子量や原料の化学的な構造など、原料の組成を表す1以上の特徴量である。 The unit cost 1D 202 is a cost per unit amount (1 kg, etc.). Other unit amounts may be used. The composition “1” to the composition “10” (1D203 to 1D222) are one or more characteristic quantities representing the composition of the raw material, such as molecular weight and chemical structure of the raw material.
 なお、本実施形態では、原料の組成を、組成「1」~組成「10」の10種類としたが、これは実施形態に応じて増減してもよい。 In the present embodiment, although the composition of the raw material is set to 10 types of composition “1” to composition “10”, this may be increased or decreased according to the embodiment.
 以下では、組成「1」~組成「10」のいずれかの組成を特定する場合以外、単に、組成と称することがある。また、原料名1D201と単位コスト1D202及び、組成「1」~組成「10」(1D203~1D222)に属する情報は、原料に対するコスト(単位コスト)と原料が有する組成または組成比率に関するコスト組成情報を構成し、原料名1D201と、組成「1」~組成「10」(1D203~1D222)に属する情報は、原料が有する組成または組成比率に関する原料組成情報を構成する。 Hereinafter, the composition may be simply referred to as a composition except when specifying the composition of any one of the compositions “1” to “10”. In addition, information belonging to the raw material name 1D201 and unit cost 1D202, and compositions “1” to “10” (1D203 to 1D222) includes cost (unit cost) to the raw material and cost composition information on the composition or composition ratio of the raw material. The information that belongs to the material name 1D201 and the compositions “1” to “10” (1D203 to 1D222) constitutes material composition information on the composition or composition ratio of the material.
 このように単位コスト1D202の概念によって、所定の特性を有し製造コストが小さい原料の組み合わせが特定された製品のレシピを提供することができる。 Thus, according to the concept of unit cost 1D 202, it is possible to provide a recipe of a product in which a combination of raw materials having predetermined characteristics and low manufacturing cost is specified.
 次に、図5を用いて、データ管理部114が管理する、実験物性データ1D3を説明する。図5は、本実施形態における実験に対応する実験物性データの構成図である。実験物性データ1D3は、実験のレシピで計測された物性のデータであって、実験番号1D301と、光沢1D302、流動性1D303と、曲げ剛性1D304と、破壊伸び1D305と、軟化温度1D306を備え、データ管理部114に格納される。 Next, experimental physical property data 1D3 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 5 is a configuration diagram of experimental physical property data corresponding to an experiment in the present embodiment. The experimental physical property data 1D3 is data of physical properties measured by the recipe of the experiment, and includes experimental number 1D301, gloss 1D302, fluidity 1D303, flexural rigidity 1D304, breaking elongation 1D305, and softening temperature 1D306, and the data It is stored in the management unit 114.
 実験物性データとは、過去に製造された製品、もしくは、実験的に製造した製品の物性を示す情報である。物性は、代表して光沢1D302や流動性1D303等について説明するが、上述の他の製品の特性を用いることができる。 The experimental physical property data is information indicating physical properties of a product manufactured in the past or a product manufactured experimentally. The physical properties will be described representatively for the gloss 1D 302, the flowability 1D 303, and the like, but the characteristics of the other products described above can be used.
 物性は製造された製品を計測または分析した特性である。また、過去に実際に製造された製品の物性のみならず、設計支援装置によって設計された製品のレシピに対応する物性を使用することもできる。 Physical properties are characteristics obtained by measuring or analyzing manufactured products. Moreover, not only the physical properties of the product actually manufactured in the past, but also the physical properties corresponding to the recipe of the product designed by the design support apparatus can be used.
 実験番号1D301は、前記の実験番号1D101に対応し、過去の実験を一意に特定する番号である。光沢1D302、流動性1D303と、曲げ剛性1D304と、破壊伸び1D305と、軟化温度1D306は、それぞれ製品(化学品)の物性を表す指標である。なお、本実施形態では、5種類の物性の指標を用いるものとしたが、これは実施形態に応じて増減してよい。 The experiment number 1D301 corresponds to the above-described experiment number 1D101, and is a number uniquely identifying a past experiment. The gloss 1D 302, flowability 1D 303, flexural rigidity 1D 304, breaking elongation 1D 305, and softening temperature 1D 306 are indices indicating physical properties of a product (chemical product). In the present embodiment, although five types of indicators of physical properties are used, this may be increased or decreased according to the embodiment.
 このように、実験物性データ1D3を表示することにより、過去の実績を確認した上で、製品の特性や制約条件を参考にすることができるため、ユーザは特性や制約条件の入力を簡便にすることができる。 As described above, by displaying the experimental physical property data 1D3, after confirming the past results, it is possible to refer to the product characteristics and the constraint conditions, so the user simplifies the input of the characteristics and the constraint conditions. be able to.
 また、製品は完成品に限らず、完成品の一部として使用、混合または化合される完成品の製造を支援する中間品のデータを実験物性データ1D3に登録することができる。この場合もユーザは特性や制約条件の入力を簡便にすることができる。なお、実験物性データ1D3に限らず他のデータに中間品のデータを登録または設計を行うことができる。 Further, the product is not limited to the finished product, but data of an intermediate product that supports the production of the finished product to be used, mixed or combined as part of the finished product can be registered in the experimental physical property data 1D3. Also in this case, the user can simplify the input of the characteristic and the constraint condition. The data of the intermediate product can be registered or designed not only in the experimental physical data 1D3 but also in other data.
 次に、図6を用いて、データ管理部114が管理する、クエリデータ1D4を説明する。図6は、本実施形態におけるクエリデータの構成図である。クエリデータ1D4は、ユーザが新しい製品を設計する際に、どのような物性または特性を設計したいかという要求を設計支援装置1に示すためのデータ(設計対象の製品が有する特性として要求される特性要求情報)であって、クエリ番号1D401と、物性名1D402と、探索タイプ1D403と、パラメータ「1」、「2」(1D404、1D405)を備え、データ管理部114に格納される。 Next, query data 1D4 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described using FIG. FIG. 6 is a block diagram of query data in the present embodiment. The query data 1D4 is data for indicating to the design support device 1 a request as to what kind of physical property or characteristic the user wants to design when designing a new product (a characteristic required as a characteristic of the product to be designed) This is request information), and includes query number 1D 401, physical property name 1D 402, search type 1D 403, and parameters “1” and “2” (1D 404, 1 D 405), which are stored in the data management unit 114.
 クエリ番号1D401は、クエリを一意に識別するための番号である。物性名1D402は、クエリに記載する要求の物性名、例えば、「光沢」、「流動性」、「曲げ剛性」、「破壊伸び」、「軟化温度」を表す。 The query number 1D 401 is a number for uniquely identifying a query. Physical property name 1D402 indicates the required physical property name described in the query, for example, "gloss", "flowability", "bending stiffness", "break elongation", and "softening temperature".
 探索タイプ1D403は、物性がどのようになれば望ましいのかを表すラベルであって、本実施形態では、最大化、最小化、以上(ある値以上)、ある値より大きい、以下(ある値以下)、ある値未満、範囲(ある値1とある値2の範囲)内、といったタイプを備える。 Search type 1D 403 is a label indicating what kind of physical property is desirable, and in the present embodiment, maximization, minimization, or more (a certain value or more), larger than a certain value, or less (not more than a certain value) , Less than a certain value, and within a range (a range of a certain value 1 and a certain value 2).
 パラメータ「1」、「2」(1D404、1D405)は、探索タイプ1D403に応じたパラメータを持ち、最大化、最小化ではすべてNoneが設定され、以上(ある値以上)、ある値より大きい、以下(ある値以下)、ある値未満、ではパラメータ「1」(1D404)に「ある値」に対応する値が設定される。 The parameters “1” and “2” (1D404 and 1D405) have parameters according to the search type 1D403, and in the maximization and minimization, None is set and above (a certain value or more), larger than a certain value, (Less than or equal to a certain value), less than a certain value, a value corresponding to “some value” is set to the parameter “1” (1D 404).
 例えば、以下では「7.5」が設定され、以上では「90」が設定され、パラメータ「2」(1D405)には、それぞれ「None」が設定され、範囲(ある値1とある値2の範囲)内ではパラメータ「1」(1D404)に「ある値1」として、例えば、「170」が設定され、パラメータ「2」(1D405)に「ある値2」として、例えば、「220」が設定することができる。 For example, “7.5” is set in the following, “90” is set in the above, “None” is set in the parameter “2” (1D 405), and the range (a certain value 1 and a certain value 2 In the range, for example, “170” is set as the “certain value 1” to the parameter “1” (1D 404), and “220” is set as the “certain value 2” for the parameter “2” (1D405) can do.
 なお、本実施形態では、前記の7種類の探索タイプ1D403を選択するものとしたが、実施形態に応じて増減してよい。また、その増減に応じて、設定すべきパラメータが増減する場合には、パラメータ「3」、「4」などを追加してもよいし、パラメータ「1」、「2」(1D404、1D405)の中に半構造化データを保持してもよい。 In the present embodiment, the seven types of search types 1D 403 are selected, but may be increased or decreased according to the embodiment. If the parameter to be set is increased or decreased according to the increase or decrease, parameters “3”, “4”, etc. may be added, or parameters “1” and “2” (1D404 and 1D405). Semistructured data may be held therein.
 また、探索タイプ1D403とパラメータ「1」、「2」(1D404、1D405)は、各物性に対応して、特性要求情報で指定(規定)される条件であって、「光沢」、「破壊伸び」、「最大化」は、目的関数で用いられ、「流動性」、「曲げ剛性」、「軟化温度」、「以下」、「範囲」、「以上」は、制約条件に用いられる。 Further, search type 1D 403 and parameters “1” and “2” (1D 404 and 1 D 405) are conditions specified (defined) by characteristic request information corresponding to each physical property, and “gloss” and “break elongation” “Maximization” is used as an objective function, and “flowability”, “bending stiffness”, “softening temperature”, “below”, “range”, “above” are used as constraint conditions.
 次に、図7を用いて、図1に記載のデータ管理部114が管理する、原料フィルタデータ1D5を説明する。図7は、本実施形態における原料フィルタデータの構成図である。 Next, the raw material filter data 1D5 managed by the data management unit 114 described in FIG. 1 will be described using FIG. 7. FIG. 7 is a block diagram of raw material filter data in the present embodiment.
 原料フィルタデータ1D5は、探索フェーズで出力されるレシピ(原料組合せ)に用いる原料を限定するためのデータ(原料の使用の有無を示す原料フィルタ情報)であって、クエリ番号1D501、原料「1」~原料「20」(1D502~1D521)を備え、データ管理部114に格納される。 The raw material filter data 1D5 is data for limiting the raw material used for the recipe (raw material combination) output in the search phase (raw material filter information indicating the presence or absence of use of the raw material), and the query number 1D501, the raw material “1” Raw materials “20” (1D 502 to 1 D 521) are stored in the data management unit 114.
 クエリ番号1D501は、前記クエリデータ1D4のクエリ番号1D401に対応する番号であって、クエリを一意に識別するための番号である。原料「1」~原料「20」(1D502~1D521)は、それぞれ対応する原料を使用するか、使用しない(不使用)かを表す値である。 The query number 1D501 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query. The raw materials “1” to “20” (1D 502 to 1 D 521) are values indicating whether the corresponding raw materials are used or not used (not used).
 使用する場合は、「使用」、使用しない場合は、「不使用」の値をとる。これらの値はユーザによって決定される。これにより、使用することが指定された原料による製品レシピの特定が可能となる。 When using it, take "use" and when not using it, take "unused". These values are determined by the user. This makes it possible to specify the product recipe by the raw material designated to be used.
 また、「不使用」であることが指定された原料を用いない、つまり、原料フィルタにより不使用の原料とは異なる原料を用いた原料による製品レシピを特定することができる。不使用の原料がある場合には、制約条件の特定や入力が難しくなるが、本発明は所定の特性と類似する特性の製品のレシピを特定することができるため、製品として特性を満足するレシピを提供することができる。 In addition, it is possible to specify a product recipe using a raw material that does not use a raw material designated as “not in use”, that is, uses a raw material different from the raw material not used by the raw material filter. If there is an unused raw material, it will be difficult to identify and enter constraints, but the present invention can identify a recipe of a product having a characteristic similar to a predetermined characteristic, so a recipe satisfying the characteristic as a product Can be provided.
 上記した過去の実験データや製品の情報を用いて、ユーザが所望の製品に類似する特性を有する製品やパラメータを選択することもできる。 The past experimental data and product information described above can also be used by the user to select a product or parameter having characteristics similar to the desired product.
 次に、図8を用いて、データ管理部114が管理する、組成食い違いパラメータ1D6を説明する。 Next, the composition discrepancy parameter 1D6 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described with reference to FIG.
  図8は、本実施形態における組成食い違いパラメータの構成図である。組成食い違いパラメータ1D6は、探索フェーズの終盤、製品の組成比率に対してレシピ(原料組合せ)を探索する際に、どの程度組成比率に対して食い違いを許容するか(例えば、組成の目標値と探索結果との差の絶対値が食い違いの具体例であって、その値が実用上満足する範囲に収まっているか)、また、指定した条件では該当するレシピが見つからない場合、自動的に当該条件を緩和してもよいかどうかを表すデータ(組成食い違い情報)であって、クエリ番号1D601と、組成名1D602と、自動緩和1D603と、許容食い違い1D604を備え、データ管理部114に格納される。 FIG. 8 is a block diagram of the composition discrepancy parameter in the present embodiment. When the recipe (raw material combination) is searched for the composition ratio of the product at the end of the search phase, whether the composition ratio deviation parameter 1D6 allows for the composition ratio (for example, the target value of the composition and the search If the absolute value of the difference from the result is a specific example of a discrepancy and the value falls within the range practically satisfactory), or if the corresponding recipe can not be found under the specified condition, the condition is automatically set. It is data (composition discrepancy information) indicating whether or not relaxation may be performed, and includes query number 1D 601, composition name 1D 602, automatic relaxation 1 D 603, and allowance discrepancy 1 D 604, and is stored in the data management unit 114.
 自動緩和を行うことにより、レシピが見つからない場合に、条件を緩和した所望のレシピに近いレシピを見つけることが可能となる。許容食い違いとは、所定の特性とは異なる特性であるが製品として満足する特性の範囲を示すものである。許容食い違いは、例えば、前記の実用上満足する範囲の上限を表す値である。類似する特定の範囲とも呼ぶ。 By performing the automatic relaxation, it is possible to find a recipe close to a desired recipe whose conditions have been relaxed, when no recipe is found. The allowable deviation indicates a range of characteristics different from the predetermined characteristics but satisfying as a product. The allowable deviation is, for example, a value representing the upper limit of the practically satisfactory range. Also called similar specific range.
 クエリ番号1D601は、前記クエリデータ1D4のクエリ番号1D401に対応する番号であって、クエリを一意に識別するための番号である。組成名1D602は、食い違いの許容範囲を指定する組成名、例えば、「組成1」、「組成2」を示す。自動緩和1D603は、あるクエリにおけるある組成名(例えば、クエリ番号=「1」、組成名=組成「1」)を探索時に実行可能解が見つかるまで緩和してよいかどうかを表す値である。 The query number 1D601 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query. The composition name 1D 602 indicates a composition name that designates the tolerance of the discrepancy, for example, “composition 1”, “composition 2”. The automatic relaxation 1D 603 is a value indicating whether or not a composition name (for example, query number = “1”, composition name = composition “1”) in a certain query may be relaxed until a feasible solution is found when searching.
 緩和してよい場合は、「OK」、そうでない場合は「NG」の値をとる。許容食い違い1D604は、レシピ探索時に許容する組成比率の食い違いである。たとえば、許容食い違い1D604が3%で、自動緩和1D603が「NG」である場合、レシピ(実行可能解)が見出されるときの組成比率は目標値に対してプラスマイナス3%以内であることが保障される。 If alleviation is acceptable, the value is "OK", otherwise "NG". The allowable discrepancy 1D 604 is a discrepancy in the composition ratio accepted at the time of recipe search. For example, if tolerance deviation 1D604 is 3% and automatic relaxation 1D603 is "NG", it is ensured that the composition ratio when a recipe (viable solution) is found is within plus or minus 3% of the target value Be done.
 この自動緩和1D603によって、所定の特性の目標値に収まる厳密な解が存在しない場合であっても製品として満足する特性を有する製品のレシピを特定することができる。また、緩和してよい範囲に納まる特性は、目標値に類似する特性と呼ぶ。 By this automatic relaxation 1D 603, it is possible to specify a recipe of a product having characteristics satisfying as a product even if there is no exact solution that falls within the target value of the predetermined characteristic. Also, a characteristic that falls within a range that can be relaxed is called a characteristic similar to the target value.
 なお、本実施形態では、何も指定しなかった組成名は、自動緩和1D603が「NG」、許容食い違い1D604は「3%」というデフォルト値に設定されるものとする。一方、「OK」を設定した場合は、その範囲以上に緩和される可能性がある。 In the present embodiment, it is assumed that the composition name for which nothing is specified is set to a default value of “NG” for the automatic relaxation 1D 603 and “3%” for the allowable discrepancy 1D 604. On the other hand, when "OK" is set, there is a possibility that the range is relaxed.
 なお、本実施形態では、食い違いの上振れ、下振れに対して区別していないが、必要に応じて区別するようにしてもよい。また、前記デフォルト値、食い違いや緩和の指定方法は、適宜用途に応じて変更してもかまわない。 In the present embodiment, no distinction is made between upward and downward deviations, but they may be distinguished as necessary. In addition, the default value and the designation method of the deviation or mitigation may be appropriately changed according to the application.
 また、自動緩和1D603と、許容食い違い1D604は、組成名1D602に対応して、組成食い違いパラメータ1D6で指定(規定)される条件であり、許容食い違い1D604は、製品の組成または組成比率について、その目標値との食い違い(目標値と許容限界値との差)の一例として差を用いて説明したが、製品として満足する特性を有する許容範囲を規定したパラメータ(情報)である。差に限られず、食い違いの概念の他の例として、差の二乗、log、近似等(目標値として許容される値)が含まれ、パラメータによって適宜選択することができる。 Further, the automatic relaxation 1D603 and the allowable deviation 1D604 are the conditions specified (defined) by the composition deviation parameter 1D6 corresponding to the composition name 1D602, and the allowable deviation 1D604 is a target for the composition or composition ratio of the product Although the difference has been described as an example of the difference with the value (the difference between the target value and the allowable limit value), it is a parameter (information) that defines an allowable range having characteristics satisfying the product. The present invention is not limited to the difference, and other examples of the concept of the difference include the square of the difference, the log, the approximation, etc. (the value acceptable as the target value), and can be appropriately selected according to the parameters.
 次に、図9を用いて、データ管理部114が管理する、探索結果物性データ1D7を説明する。図9は、本実施形態における探索結果物性データの構成図である。 Next, the search result physical property data 1D7 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 9 is a block diagram of search result physical data in the present embodiment.
 探索結果物性データ1D7は、探索フェーズの序盤で探索される物性値を表すデータであって、クエリ番号1D701と、候補番号1D702と、光沢1D703と、流動性1D704と、曲げ剛性1D705と、破壊伸び1D706と、軟化温度1D707を備え、データ管理部114に格納される。 Search result physical property data 1D7 is data representing physical property values searched in the early stage of the search phase, and query number 1D701, candidate number 1D702, gloss 1D703, fluidity 1D704, flexural rigidity 1D705, fracture elongation 1D 706 and a softening temperature 1D 707, which are stored in the data management unit 114.
 クエリ番号1D701は、前記クエリデータ1D4のクエリ番号1D401に対応する番号であって、クエリを一意に識別するための番号である。候補番号1D702は、クエリに対して探索した結果得られる候補を同一クエリに対して一意に識別するための番号である。 The query number 1D701 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query. The candidate number 1D 702 is a number for uniquely identifying a candidate obtained as a result of searching for a query with respect to the same query.
 次に、光沢1D703と、流動性1D704と、曲げ剛性1D705と、破壊伸び1D706と、軟化温度1D707は、それぞれの物性に関する予測結果(探索部113の探索結果)である。本実施形態では、予測結果は、例えば、クエリ番号1D701が「1」に対応する[86.4, 1.2]など、1対のデータであり、それぞれ平均値(期待値)と標準偏差を表す。なお、予測結果の表現方法は、より簡単に平均値や、推定される確率密度関数のパラメータにしてもよい。 Next, the gloss 1D 703, the fluidity 1D 704, the bending rigidity 1D 705, the breaking elongation 1D 706, and the softening temperature 1D 707 are the prediction results (the search results of the search unit 113) regarding the respective physical properties. In the present embodiment, the prediction result is, for example, a pair of data such as [86.4, 1.2] in which the query number 1D 701 corresponds to “1”, and represents an average value (expected value) and a standard deviation, respectively. In addition, the expression method of a prediction result may be made into the parameter of an average value or the probability density function estimated more easily.
 次に、図10を用いて、データ管理部114が管理する、探索結果組成比率データ1D8を説明する。図10は、本実施形態における探索結果組成比率データの構成図である。 Next, the search result composition ratio data 1D8 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described using FIG. FIG. 10 is a configuration diagram of search result composition ratio data in the present embodiment.
 探索結果組成比率データ1D8は、探索フェーズの序盤で探索される物性値に対応する組成値を表すデータであって、クエリ番号1D801、候補番号1D802と、組成「1」~組成「10」(1D802~1D812)を備え、データ管理部114に格納される。 The search result composition ratio data 1D8 is data representing a composition value corresponding to the physical property value searched in the early stage of the search phase, and the query number 1D801, candidate number 1D802, composition “1” to composition “10” (1D802 To 1D 812), and is stored in the data management unit 114.
 クエリ番号1D801は、前記クエリデータ1D4のクエリ番号1D401に対応する番号であって、クエリを一意に識別するための番号である。候補番号1D802は、候補番号1D702に対応するクエリに対して探索した結果得られる候補を同一クエリに対して一意に識別するための番号である。 The query number 1D801 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query. The candidate number 1D 802 is a number for uniquely identifying, for the same query, a candidate obtained as a result of searching for a query corresponding to the candidate number 1D 702.
 組成「1」~組成「10」(1D802~1D812)は、それぞれ探索された組成比率(製品の組成比率)の値である。なお、通常ある単一に対して複数の候補が出力される。 The compositions “1” to “10” (1D802 to 1D812) are the values of the composition ratio (composition ratio of the product) respectively searched for. Note that a plurality of candidates are usually output for a single.
 次に、図11を用いて、データ管理部114が管理する、探索結果レシピデータ1D9を説明する。 Next, search result recipe data 1D9 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described using FIG.
 図11は、本実施形態における探索結果レシピデータの構成図である。探索結果レシピデータ1D9は、探索フェーズの終盤に出力されるレシピ(原料組合せ)データであって、クエリ番号1D901と、探索番号1D902と、コスト1D903と、原料「1」~原料「20」(1D904~1D923)を備え、データ管理部114に格納される。 FIG. 11 is a block diagram of search result recipe data in the present embodiment. Search result recipe data 1D9 is recipe (raw material combination) data to be output at the end of the search phase, and the query number 1D901, the search number 1D902, the cost 1D 903 and the raw materials “1” to “20” (1D 904) To 1D 923) and stored in the data management unit 114.
 クエリ番号1D901は、前記クエリデータ1D4のクエリ番号1D401に対応する番号であって、クエリを一意に識別するための番号である。探索番号1D902は、あるクエリのある候補に対して原料探索した結果、実行可能な解が得られた場合に、その結果を識別するために付与される番号であって、あるクエリ番号1D901に関して、探索結果を一意に識別する番号である。 The query number 1D901 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query. The search number 1D 902 is a number given to identify the result when the raw material search for a certain candidate of a certain query results in an executable solution, and regarding the certain query number 1D 901, It is a number that uniquely identifies a search result.
 コスト1D903は探索されたレシピの単位あたりのコスト(原料費)である。原料「1」~原料「20」(1D904~1D923)は、それぞれ各原料の配合量を表し、全体で配合の組合せを表す。なお、本実施形態では製造費は同程度であるとして明に取り扱わないが、必要に応じてレシピに応じて可変な製造費などを考慮してもよい。 The cost 1D 903 is the cost (raw material cost) per unit of the searched recipe. The raw materials “1” to “20” (1D904 to 1D923) respectively represent the blending amounts of the respective raw materials, and represent the combination of blending in total. In the present embodiment, although the manufacturing cost is not treated as being the same, the manufacturing cost may be variable according to the recipe, if necessary.
 次に、図12を用いて、データ管理部114が管理する、探索結果食い違いデータ1D10を説明する。図12は、本実施形態における探索結果食い違いデータの構成図である。 Next, search result discrepancy data 1D10 managed by the data management unit 114 will be described using FIG. FIG. 12 is a block diagram of search result discrepancy data in the present embodiment.
 探索結果レシピデータ1D10は、探索フェーズの終盤に出力されるレシピ(原料組合せ)に対して、どの程度目標とした組成比率(組成比率の目標値)から食い違いが出ているのかを表すデータであって、クエリ番号1D1001と、探索番号1D1002と、種類数1D1003と、組成「1」~組成「10」(1D1003~1D1013)を備え、データ管理部114に格納される。 Search result recipe data 1D10 is data indicating how much the target composition ratio (target value of the composition ratio) is out of alignment with the recipe (raw material combination) output at the end of the search phase A query number 1D1001, a search number 1D1002, the number of types 1D1003, and compositions "1" to "10" (1D1003 to 1D1013) are stored in the data management unit 114.
 クエリ番号1D1001は、前記クエリデータ1D4のクエリ番号1D401に対応する番号であって、クエリを一意に識別するための番号である。探索番号1D1002は、前記探索結果レシピデータ1D9の探索番号1D902に対応する番号であって、あるクエリ番号1D01に関して、探索結果を一意に識別する番号である。種類数1D1003は、使用した原料数である。 The query number 1D1001 is a number corresponding to the query number 1D401 of the query data 1D4, and is a number for uniquely identifying a query. The search number 1D1002 is a number corresponding to the search number 1D902 of the search result recipe data 1D9, and is a number uniquely identifying a search result regarding a certain query number 1D01. The type number 1D1003 is the number of raw materials used.
 組成「1」~組成「10」(1D1003~1D1013)は、それぞれ各組成が目標値に対してどの位食い違いが生じているかを表す緩和具合を示す情報である。上振れの場合は正、下振れの場合は負の値をとる。なお、「0」は、緩和具合が0であって、組成比率の値が目標値に等しいことを示す。 The compositions “1” to “10” (1D1003 to 1D1013) are pieces of information indicating how relaxed each composition is with respect to the target value. In the case of upswing, it takes a positive value. “0” indicates that the degree of relaxation is 0 and the value of the composition ratio is equal to the target value.
 図11に示す探索番号1D902に対応するコスト1D903と図12に示す種類数1D1003を表示することにより、ユーザは製品レシピの製品の製造コストと種類数の対応関係を知ることができるため、より効率的なレシピを選択することができる。また、これらは食い違いの範囲内の類似する特性の製品に対応する種類数1D103を併せて表示することもでき、製品として満足する特性を有するレシピを比較することが可能となりユーザの利便性が向上する。 By displaying the cost 1D 903 corresponding to the search number 1D 902 shown in FIG. 11 and the number of types 1D 1003 shown in FIG. 12, the user can know the correspondence between the production cost and the number of types of products of the product recipe. You can choose a recipe. In addition, these can also be displayed together with the number of types 1D103 corresponding to products of similar characteristics within the range of discrepancies, it is possible to compare recipes having characteristics satisfactory as products, and user convenience is improved Do.
<処理フロー>
 次に、図13を用いて、本実施形態における設計支援装置1の基礎データ登録フェーズの処理フローを説明する。図13は、本実施形態における基礎データ登録フェーズ(実験データ登録)の処理フローを示すフローチャートである。この処理は、CPU1H101が、データ登録プログラムとして機能するデータ登録部111を起動することによって開始される。
<Processing flow>
Next, the processing flow of the basic data registration phase of the design support apparatus 1 in the present embodiment will be described using FIG. FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing the process flow of the basic data registration phase (experimental data registration) in the present embodiment. This process is started by the CPU 1 H 101 activating the data registration unit 111 that functions as a data registration program.
 まず、データ登録部111が、操作端末12の操作部121を介してユーザより入力される実験レシピデータ1D1を、データベースとしてのデータ管理部114に登録する(1F101)。 First, the data registration unit 111 registers experimental recipe data 1D1 input by the user via the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12 in the data management unit 114 as a database (1F101).
 次に、データ登録部111が、操作端末12の操作部121を介してユーザより入力されるコスト組成データ1D2を、データ管理部114に登録する(ステップ1F102)。 Next, the data registration unit 111 registers the cost composition data 1D2 input from the user via the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12 in the data management unit 114 (step 1F102).
 最後に、データ登録部111が、操作端末12の操作部121を介してユーザより入力される実験物性データ1D3を、データ管理部114に登録し、本処理を終了する(ステップ1F103)。この際、データ管理部114は、登録された各種データ(情報)を管理対象として管理する管理手段として機能する。 Finally, the data registration unit 111 registers the experimental physical property data 1D3 input by the user via the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12 in the data management unit 114, and the process ends (step 1F103). At this time, the data management unit 114 functions as a management unit that manages various registered data (information) as a management target.
 次に、図14を用いて、本実施形態における設計支援装置1の予測モデル構築フェーズの処理フローを説明する。図14は、本実施形態における予測モデル学習の処理フローを示すフローチャートである。この処理は、CPU1H101が、予測モデル構築プログラムとして機能する予測モデル構築部112を起動することによって開始される。 Next, a processing flow of a prediction model construction phase of the design support apparatus 1 in the present embodiment will be described using FIG. FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing a process flow of prediction model learning in the present embodiment. This process is started by the CPU 1 H 101 activating the prediction model construction unit 112 functioning as a prediction model construction program.
 まず、予測モデル構築部112が、基礎データ登録フェーズでデータ管理部114に登録された実験レシピデータ1D1と、コスト組成データ1D2を用いて、各実験における組成比率(原料の組成比率)を算出する(ステップ1F201)。 First, the prediction model construction unit 112 calculates the composition ratio (composition ratio of the raw material) in each experiment using the experimental recipe data 1D1 and the cost composition data 1D2 registered in the data management unit 114 in the basic data registration phase. (Step 1F201).
 次に、予測モデル構築部112が、前述の各実験における組成比率と、基礎データ登録フェーズでデータ管理部114に登録された実験物性データ1D3を用いて予測モデル(シミュレータ)を学習する(ステップ1F202)。 Next, the prediction model construction unit 112 learns a prediction model (simulator) using the composition ratio in each experiment described above and the experimental physical data 1D3 registered in the data management unit 114 in the basic data registration phase (step 1F202) ).
 本実施形態では、予測モデルとしてCGAN(Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets)を用いるものとする。すなわち、ある組成比率の条件下での物性の生成モデルをニューラルネットワークで構築する。後述の探索フェーズでは、CGANから例えば100点のサンプルを生成し、その平均や分散を使うことができる。 In this embodiment, CGAN (Conditional Generative Adversalial Nets) is used as a prediction model. That is, a generation model of physical properties under a condition of a certain composition ratio is constructed by a neural network. In the search phase to be described later, for example, 100 samples can be generated from CGAN, and their mean and variance can be used.
 なお、本実施形態ではCGANを用いるものとしたが、他の統計や機械学習のモデルを用いることができる。例えば、線形回帰モデル、サポートベクトル回帰、決定木、その他のニューラルネットワークなどを必要に応じて1つもしくは複数を組み合わせて用いることができる。なお、組成比率を探索する際は、予測モデルが軽量である(処理時間が早い)ことが有効となる場合がある。 Although CGAN is used in the present embodiment, other statistical and machine learning models can be used. For example, linear regression models, support vector regressions, decision trees, other neural networks, etc. may be used in combination of one or more as required. In addition, when searching for the composition ratio, it may be effective that the prediction model is lightweight (processing time is fast).
 そういった場合には、組成比率探索の終盤のみ、もしくは、最終的なばらつき(分散など)の評価を除いて、線形回帰モデルなどを使うなど、複数の予測モデルを適宜使い分けてもよい。 In such a case, a plurality of prediction models may be appropriately used, such as using a linear regression model, etc., except for the final stage of composition ratio search or evaluation of final dispersion (dispersion etc.).
 また、本実施形態では各種の実験データから予測モデルを学習によって構築する方法を取り扱っているが、第一原理的手法により予測結果を計算できる場合には、予測モデルとしてその計算式を採用してもよい。 Moreover, although the method of constructing a prediction model from various experimental data is dealt with in this embodiment, when the prediction result can be calculated by the first principle method, the calculation formula is adopted as the prediction model. It is also good.
 ただし、本実施形態では実験データから予測モデルを学習によって構築するものとし、さらに、簡単のため1つの予測モデルのみを取り扱った場合を記載するものとする。また、本実施形態では、製造条件などを予測モデルに含んでいないが、必要に応じてそれを条件(condition)として入力してもよい。 However, in the present embodiment, it is assumed that a prediction model is constructed by learning from experimental data, and further, a case where only one prediction model is handled is described for simplicity. Further, in the present embodiment, although the manufacturing conditions and the like are not included in the prediction model, they may be input as conditions as needed.
 次に、図15を用いて、本実施形態における設計支援装置1の探索フェーズの処理フローを説明する。図15は、本実施形態における原料組み合わせ探索の処理フローを示すフローチャートである。この処理は、CPU1H101が、探索プログラムとして機能する探索部113を起動することによって開始される。 Next, the processing flow of the search phase of the design support apparatus 1 in the present embodiment will be described using FIG. FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing a processing flow of the raw material combination search in the present embodiment. This process is started by the CPU 1 H 101 activating the search unit 113 functioning as a search program.
 まず、探索部113が、操作端末12の操作部121を介してユーザより入力されるクエリデータ1D4(物性情報を含む特性要求情報)と、原料フィルタデータ1D5を受付け、データ管理部114に登録する(ステップ1F301)。 First, search unit 113 receives query data 1 D 4 (characteristic request information including physical property information) input from the user via operation unit 121 of operation terminal 12 and raw material filter data 1 D 5, and registers them in data management unit 114. (Step 1F301).
 次に、探索部113が、操作端末12の操作部121を介してユーザより入力される組成食い違いパラメータ1D6を受付け、データ管理部114に登録する(ステップ1F302)。 Next, the search unit 113 receives the composition discrepancy parameter 1D6 input by the user via the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12, and registers it in the data management unit 114 (step 1F302).
 次に、探索部113が、クエリデータ1D4で指定された物性を満足する組成比率(製品の組成比率)を探索する(ステップ1F303)。探索には多目的最適化手法の標準的な手法であるNSGA-II(Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II)を用いる。 Next, the searching unit 113 searches for a composition ratio (composition ratio of the product) that satisfies the physical properties designated by the query data 1D4 (step 1F303). The search uses NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II), which is a standard method of multi-objective optimization.
 多目的最適化手法を採用することによって、特定の物性や、2つ以上の物性を重み付けした合成値に単目的最適化する場合に比べ多様性を維持した解候補を得ることができる。これは、最終的にレシピ(原料組合せ)の多様性を維持する上で有効である。 By adopting the multi-objective optimization method, it is possible to obtain a solution candidate that maintains diversity compared to the case of performing single-objective optimization to specific physical properties or a combined value obtained by weighting two or more physical properties. This is effective in maintaining the versatility of the recipe (raw material combination) in the end.
 また、クエリデータ1D4において、探索タイプ1D403で以下、以上、範囲などで指定した条件に関しては、解候補作成時に指定条件に合致しない解候補は生成しないようにすることで対応する。 Further, in the query data 1D4, with regard to the conditions specified by the search type 1D403 below, by the above, by the range, etc., it is coped with by not generating solution candidates that do not match the specified conditions at the time of solution candidate creation.
 例えば、曲げ剛性が170~220の範囲となるように制約が与えられている状況で、差分進化などで生成された解候補の曲げ剛性が230となるような場合、その解候補は採用せず、制約を満たす解候補が見つかるまで解候補生成を繰り返すようにする。なお、本実施形態では多目的最適化手法であるNSGA-IIを採用するものとしたが、他の最適化手法を用いても良い。 For example, in a situation where the bending stiffness is restricted to be in the range of 170 to 220, when the bending stiffness of the solution candidate generated by the difference evolution is 230, the solution candidate is not adopted. The solution candidate generation is repeated until a solution candidate satisfying the constraints is found. In the present embodiment, NSGA-II, which is a multi-objective optimization method, is adopted, but other optimization methods may be used.
 また、前記の予測モデルでは、各物性のサンプルが得られているので、予測値を示す平均値(期待値)だけでなく、ブレ具合・ばらつき(分散等)も評価可能であるが、本実施形態では平均値(期待値)だけを用いるものとするが、必要に応じて、たとえば予測にブレ具合・ばらつきが大きい場合にはペナルティをかけるといったことをすることも可能である。 Further, in the above prediction model, samples of each physical property are obtained, so it is possible to evaluate not only average value (expected value) indicating predicted values but also blurring condition / variation (dispersion etc.) Although only the average value (expected value) is used in the form, it is also possible to apply a penalty if, for example, the degree of fluctuation or fluctuation in the prediction is large, as needed.
 次に、探索部113が、組成比率(製品の組成比率)が組成食い違いパラメータ1D6で指定された食い違い(組成食い違いパラメータ1D6で指定された許容範囲内)に収まり、かつ、原料フィルタデータ1D5で指定された原料(使用する原料)のみを用いて、コストが小さくなるレシピ(原料組合せ)を探索する(ステップ1F304)。探索には、線形計画法を用いる。 Next, the searching unit 113 determines that the composition ratio (composition ratio of the product) falls within the discrepancy (within the allowable range designated by the composition discrepancy parameter 1D6) designated by the composition discrepancy parameter 1D6, and designates by the raw material filter data 1D5. Using only the raw materials (raw materials to be used), a recipe (raw material combination) whose cost is reduced is searched for (step 1F 304). Linear programming is used for the search.
 すなわち、製品の組成比率の範囲(例えば、12.1-5<組成「1」<12.1+5)を制約条件とし、コストを最小化するような問題を設定し、最良な解を探索する。なお、「12.1」は、組成「1」の組成比率を示し、「5」は、許容食い違い(%)を示す。 That is, the range of the composition ratio of the product (for example, 12.1-5 <composition “1” <12.1 + 5) is set as a constraint condition, a problem that minimizes the cost is set, and the best solution is searched. “12.1” indicates the composition ratio of the composition “1”, and “5” indicates the allowable discrepancy (%).
 線形計画法は高速に計算可能なソルバーが商用、非商用でも多数存在しているため、このように定式化することでクエリを満足する低コストなレシピを高速に発見することができる。なお、不使用とした原料に関しては、決定変数に組み込まないようにしておく。また、使用する原料の種類は一般的に少ないほうが好まれる。そこで、2種、3種、4種といった形で使用する原料を絞った結果を作成する。 Since there are many commercial and non-commercial solvers that can be calculated at high speed in linear programming, it is possible to rapidly find low-cost recipes that satisfy queries by formulating in this way. In addition, with regard to raw materials that have not been used, they are not included in the decision variables. Also, the type of raw material used is generally preferred to be small. Therefore, we will create the results of squeezing the raw materials to be used in the form of two, three or four.
 また、探索した結果、実行可能な解が見つからない場合は、製品の組成比率の範囲の制約を段階的に緩和していく。例えば、組成「1」の組成比率の目標値が10%で、許容食い違いが1%の場合、最初は組成「1」の組成比率が11%より小さい、組成「1」の組成比率が9%より大きい、という2つの制約が課されている状況であるが、自動緩和がOKであれば、組成「1」の組成比率が11.5%より小さい、組成「1」の組成比率が8.5%より大きい、といった具合に0.5%ずつ制約を緩和していく。なお、本実施形態は、コストが各原料の使用量に関して線形であることを仮定している。 If no feasible solution is found as a result of the search, the constraints on the range of composition ratio of the product are gradually relaxed. For example, when the target value of the composition ratio of composition “1” is 10% and the allowable deviation is 1%, the composition ratio of composition “1” is initially less than 11%, and the composition ratio of composition “1” is 9% In the situation where two restrictions are imposed, which is larger, if the automatic relaxation is OK, the composition ratio of composition “1” is smaller than 11.5%, and the composition ratio of composition “1” is larger than 8.5% And so on, we will ease the constraints by 0.5% each. In the present embodiment, it is assumed that the cost is linear with respect to the amount of each raw material used.
 もし、製造費などが、その仮定を崩すような場合、例えば、量が一定未満になるとコストが一定になるような場合、を考慮する必要がある場合などでは、線形計画法以外の探索手法を用いることもできる。 If it is necessary to consider, for example, the case where the cost becomes constant if the amount is less than a certain amount, if manufacturing costs etc. break the assumption, a search method other than linear programming should be used. It can also be used.
 また、制約の緩和方法も、0.5%ずつ緩和するという方法は一例にすぎず、別の方法で緩和してもよい。つまり、所定の制約条件に対応するレシピである解が得られない場合に、段階的に条件を緩和するように設定してもよい。 Also, the method of relieving constraints by 0.5% each is only an example, and it may be relaxed by another method. That is, when a solution corresponding to a predetermined constraint condition can not be obtained, the condition may be relaxed stepwise.
 次に、探索部113が、ステップ1F304で得られた探索結果である、探索結果物性データ1D7、探索結果組成比率データ1D8、探索結果レシピデータ1D9、探索結果食い違いデータ1D10を、データ管理部114に登録する(ステップ1F305)。 Next, the search unit 113 sends the search result physical property data 1D7, the search result composition ratio data 1D8, the search result recipe data 1D9, and the search result discrepancy data 1D10, which are the search results obtained in step 1F304, to the data management unit 114. It registers (step 1F305).
 ステップ1F305の処理において、2種、3種、4種といった形で使用する原料を絞った結果を作成する方法は、単純には、2種類の原料を選ぶすべての組合せ、3種類の原料を選ぶすべての組合せで問題を設定し、設定された問題を解く。ただし、原料の総数が多い場合などにより、レシピ探索の計算負荷が問題となる場合は、交換モンテカルロ法などを使って使用する原料の組合せも探索するようにしてもよい。 In the process of step 1F305, the method of creating the result of squeezing the raw materials to be used in the form of two, three, four etc. is simply to select all the combinations of two types of raw materials, three types of raw materials Set the problem in all combinations and solve the set problem. However, if the calculation load of the recipe search is a problem due to a large total number of raw materials, the combination of raw materials to be used may be searched using an exchange Monte Carlo method or the like.
 最後に、操作部121が、各種探索結果と、関連する過去実績(物性の近い実験レシピデータ1D1、コスト組成データ1D2、実験物性データ1D3)をユーザに提示し、処理を終了する(ステップ1F306)。つまり、これらの情報を操作部121の画面上に表示する。 Finally, the operation unit 121 presents the user with various search results and related past results (experimental recipe data 1D1, cost composition data 1D2, and experimental physical data 1D3 with similar physical properties) to the user, and ends the process (step 1F306). . That is, these pieces of information are displayed on the screen of the operation unit 121.
 上記したように、原料の組成比率に対する物性の予測モデルを構築しておき、第一段階目の探索では、製品の物性に関する目的関数ならびに制約条件を構成し、製品の組成比率を決定変数として探索する。 As described above, a prediction model of physical properties with respect to the composition ratio of raw materials is built, and in the first stage search, an objective function and constraint conditions regarding the physical properties of the product are configured, and the composition ratio of the product is searched as a determination variable Do.
 次に、第二段階目の探索では、原料のコスト(単位コスト)と製品の組成比率を使って目的関数ならびに制約条件を構成し、原料組合せを決定変数として探索することで原料(原料の組み合わせ)を得ることができる。 Next, in the second stage search, the objective function and the constraint conditions are configured using the raw material cost (unit cost) and the product composition ratio, and the raw material combination is searched as a decision variable to select the raw material (raw material combination ) Can be obtained.
 このような組成比率を介した二段階の探索により原料を探索することによって、ユーザの思考に合わせて柔軟に複雑な目的関数や制約条件を設定することができる。 By searching for the raw material through the two-step search via such composition ratio, it is possible to flexibly set complex objective functions and constraints according to the user's thinking.
 ユーザが制約条件を厳密に入力せずとも解であるレシピを特定することができる。二段階の探索を行うことで、入力された製品の特性に一致するレシピを特定するだけでなく、コストや過去の実験情報を考慮した入力された製品の特性に類似するレシピを特定することができる。また、予測モデルの再利用が可能となる。 It is possible to specify a recipe that is a solution even if the user does not input constraints strictly. By performing a two-step search, it is possible not only to identify a recipe that matches the input product characteristics but also to identify a recipe that is similar to the input product characteristics in consideration of cost and past experimental information. it can. In addition, it is possible to reuse the prediction model.
 また、探査空間が非常に大きくなる場合、段階的に問題を分割することで探索空間を小さくする効果も得られる。一般的に多目的最適化で複雑な制約を取り扱うことが困難になったり、問題の事前知識を要する場合が多くなったりしても、本実施形態では、一部(具体的には物性)に限った多目的最適化を実施する。 In addition, if the search space becomes very large, the problem can be divided in stages to obtain an effect of reducing the search space. In general, even if it is difficult to handle complex constraints in multi-objective optimization or it often requires prior knowledge of the problem, only a part (specifically, physical properties) is limited in this embodiment. Implement multi-objective optimization.
 その後、原料の種類数などに関しては問題自体を複数の線形計画問題に分割することで制約を与え探索するので、候補の多様性を維持しつつも、興味のある重要な制約を厳しく課した探索結果を効率的に得ることができる。 After that, regarding the number of types of raw materials, the problem itself is divided into multiple linear programming problems to give constraints and search, and therefore, a search that strictly imposes important constraints of interest while maintaining the diversity of candidates. Results can be obtained efficiently.
 また、第一段階の探索結果や第二段階の探索結果を操作端末12の操作部121の画面上に表示することができる。この際、探索部113は、クエリデータ1D4や原料フィルタデータ1D5、組成食い違いパラメータ1D6に規定された条件(情報)のうちいずれかを変更または追加する操作が、操作部121で実行された場合、変更または追加された条件を基に、再度、第一段階の探索や第二段階の探索を実行することができる。 Further, the search result of the first stage and the search result of the second stage can be displayed on the screen of the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12. At this time, when the operation unit 121 executes an operation of changing or adding any one of the condition (information) defined in the query data 1D4, the raw material filter data 1D5, and the composition discrepancy parameter 1D6. Based on the changed or added conditions, the first stage search and the second stage search can be performed again.
<ユーザインターフェース>
 図16を用いて、操作端末12の操作部121がユーザからクエリデータ1D4、原料フィルタデータ1D5を受け付けるためのクエリ登録画面1G1を説明する。図16は、本実施形態におけるクエリ登録画面の構成図である。
<User interface>
The query registration screen 1G1 for receiving the query data 1D4 and the raw material filter data 1D5 from the user by the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 16 is a configuration diagram of a query registration screen in the present embodiment.
 クエリ登録画面1G1は、物性入力ペイン1G101と、原料フィルタ入力ペイン1G102と、OKボタン1G103と、リセットボタン1G104を備える。この際、操作端末12の外部出力装置1H107は、外部入力装置1H106からのデータを受け付けるためのクエリ登録画面1G1を表示する表示部(クエリ登録画面表示部)あるいは表示手段として機能する。これらの外部出力装置1H107、外部入力装置1H106は一体であっても別体であっても実施できる。 The query registration screen 1G1 includes a physical property input pane 1G101, a raw material filter input pane 1G102, an OK button 1G103, and a reset button 1G104. At this time, the external output device 1H107 of the operation terminal 12 functions as a display unit (query registration screen display unit) or display means for displaying a query registration screen 1G1 for receiving data from the external input device 1H106. The external output device 1H107 and the external input device 1H106 can be implemented integrally or separately.
 物性入力1G101には、クエリデータ1D4に対応する、光沢、流動性、曲げ剛性、破壊伸び、軟化温度の探索タイプとパラメータを登録する機能を備える。初期状態は何も設定されていない状態である。ユーザは、1つ以上の最大化、もしくは、最小化を含む要求の物性を設定する。 The physical property input 1G101 has a function of registering search types and parameters of glossiness, fluidity, flexural rigidity, fracture elongation, and softening temperature corresponding to the query data 1D4. In the initial state, nothing is set. The user sets the physical properties of the request including one or more maximizations or minimizations.
 原料フィルタ入力ペイン1G102は、原料フィルタデータ1D5に対応する各原料の使用、不使用を登録する機能を備える。「○」が使用、「×」が不使用に対応しており、初期値はすべて「○」である。この記号部分を一度押下するたびに、「○」の場合は「×」、「×」の場合は「○」に変化する。 The raw material filter input pane 1G102 has a function of registering the use and non-use of each raw material corresponding to the raw material filter data 1D5. "○" corresponds to use, "×" corresponds to non-use, and all initial values are "○". Each time this symbol part is pressed, it changes to "x" in the case of "o", and changes to "o" in the case of "x".
 ユーザは、この物性入力1G101と入力ペイン1G102に入力しておいて、OKボタン1G103を押下することで、計算サーバ11のデータ管理部114に各種データを登録することができる。データの登録処理が完了した時点で、探索処理が行われることとなる。一方、新たな物性をはじめから入力したい場合は、リセットボタン1G104を押下することで、各種入力内容を初期状態はリセットされる。 The user can register various data in the data management unit 114 of the calculation server 11 by inputting the physical property input 1G101 and the input pane 1G102 and pressing the OK button 1G103. When the data registration process is completed, the search process is performed. On the other hand, when it is desired to input new physical properties from the beginning, pressing the reset button 1G104 resets the initial state of various input contents.
 図17を用いて、操作端末12の操作部121がユーザに物性の探索結果を提示するための物性表示画面1G2を説明する。図17は、本実施形態における物性表示画面の構成図である。 The physical property display screen 1G2 for the operation unit 121 of the operation terminal 12 to present the search result of physical properties to the user will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 17 is a configuration diagram of a physical property display screen in the present embodiment.
 物性表示画面1G2は、探索した物性を表示する物性表示ペイン1G201と、物性表示ペイン1G201で選択した候補の詳細な物性や組成比率を表示する詳細表示ペイン1G202と、原料組合せを表示する原料組合せ表示ボタン1G203と、戻るボタン1G204を備える。この際、操作端末12の外部出力装置1H107は、探索部113の探索した物性を表示する表示部(物性表示部)として機能する。 The physical property display screen 1G2 includes a physical property display pane 1G201 for displaying the searched physical property, a detailed display pane 1G202 for displaying the detailed physical property and composition ratio of the candidate selected in the physical property display pane 1G201, and a material combination display for displaying the raw material combination. A button 1G203 and a back button 1G204 are provided. At this time, the external output device 1H 107 of the operation terminal 12 functions as a display unit (physical property display unit) that displays the physical properties searched by the search unit 113.
 物性表示ペイン1G201には、1つまたは複数の最大化もしくは最小化を設定した物性に関する多目的最適化を実行した結果得られる候補(パレート解)1G201aの集合と、過去実験結果1G201bを表示する。ここで、過去実験結果とは、実験の各種データ(1D1、1D2、1D3)である。 The physical property display pane 1G201 displays a set of candidate (pareto solutions) 1G 201a obtained as a result of executing multi-objective optimization on physical properties for which one or more maximizations or minimizations have been set, and past experimental results 1G 201b. Here, the past experimental results are various data (1D1, 1D2, 1D3) of the experiment.
 図17の例では、光沢と破壊伸びに関する候補(パレート解)やその付近の解と、特性が類似する過去実験結果が表示される。また、ユーザが点を選択した場合、その候補または過去実験結果に関する物性情報もしくはその概略がポップアップ1G201cに表示される。 In the example of FIG. 17, a candidate (Pareto solution) related to gloss and fracture elongation or a solution in the vicinity thereof and a past experiment result having similar characteristics are displayed. In addition, when the user selects a point, the physical property information or the outline thereof regarding the candidate or the past experiment result is displayed in the pop-up 1 G 201 c.
 なお、図17では、特に2つの物性(「光沢」、「破壊伸び」)に関して最大化を指定した場合を示したため、グラフは2次元のプロット図となっている。 Note that FIG. 17 shows the case where the maximization is specified particularly for two physical properties (“gloss”, “breaking elongation”), so the graph is a two-dimensional plot.
 1つだけ最大化や最小化を指定した場合は、最良な候補付近の解を1次元のグラフとして表示する。 If only one maximization or minimization is specified, the solution near the best candidate is displayed as a one-dimensional graph.
 また、3つ以上最大化や最小化を指定した場合は、3次元表示したり、2次元グラフを指定した物性の組合せだけ並べて表示したりしてもよい。また、本実施形態では、最大化や最小化を指定した物性だけをグラフに表示するものとしたが、以下、以上、より大きい、より小さい、範囲などを指定した物性をグラフに表示してもよい。 When three or more maximizations or minimizations are specified, three-dimensional display may be performed, or a combination of physical properties for which a two-dimensional graph is specified may be displayed side by side. Further, in the present embodiment, only the physical properties for which the maximization or the minimization is specified are displayed on the graph, but the physical properties for which the larger or smaller range is specified may be displayed on the graph. Good.
 詳細表示ペイン1G202は、前記のとおり、ユーザが物性表示ペイン1G201で選択した候補について、その詳細な物性(「光沢」、「流動性」、「曲げ剛性」、「破壊伸び」、「軟化温度」)と予測値(期待値)及び組成比率を探索結果物性データ1D7ならびに探索結果組成比率データ1D8に基づいてサブペイン(1G202a、1G202b)に表示する。 As described above, the detailed display pane 1G202 shows detailed physical properties ("Gloss", "Flowability", "Bending stiffness", "Break elongation", "Softening temperature") of the candidates selected by the user on the physical property display pane 1G201. And the predicted value (expected value) and the composition ratio are displayed in the sub-pane (1G202a, 1G202b) based on the search result physical property data 1D7 and the search result composition ratio data 1D8.
 その際、物性の予測結果のばらつき(分散を示すブレ具合)も表示することによって、単純な期待値としての候補のよさだけでなく、予測の確からしさを確認することができる。ばらつきの例として代表して分散として説明するが、他に平均、偏差、相関等を用いてもよい。 At that time, not only the goodness of the candidate as a simple expected value but also the certainty of the prediction can be confirmed by displaying the dispersion of the prediction result of the physical property (the degree of blur indicating the dispersion). Although dispersion is described as a representative example of variation, mean, deviation, correlation or the like may be used.
 原料組合せ表示ボタン1G203を押下することで、ユーザが物性表示ペイン1G201で選択した候補に関するレシピ(原料組合せ)を表示する画面(原料組合せ表示画面1G3(後述))に遷移することができる。一方、戻るボタン1G204を押下することで、クエリ(要求物性)の設定に戻ることができる。 By pressing the raw material combination display button 1G203, it is possible to transition to a screen (raw material combination display screen 1G3 (described later)) for displaying a recipe (raw material combination) regarding the candidate selected by the user on the physical property display pane 1G201. On the other hand, when the back button 1G 204 is pressed, it is possible to return to the setting of the query (required physical property).
 このようなユーザインターフェースを設けることによって、探索結果と過去実験結果を比較することができる。また、探索結果と過去実験結果に対応する物性とその予測値やばらつきを表示することができるため利便性が高くなる。 By providing such a user interface, it is possible to compare search results with past experimental results. In addition, since the physical properties corresponding to the search result and the past experimental result, and the predicted values and variations thereof can be displayed, the convenience is enhanced.
 また、表示された探索結果や過去実験結果に対応する原料の組み合わせを表示することができるため、製品の特性のうち重視する特性を選択が容易となる。 Moreover, since the combination of the raw materials corresponding to the displayed search result and the past experimental result can be displayed, it becomes easy to select the characteristic to be emphasized among the characteristics of the product.
 図18を用いて、操作端末12の操作部121がユーザにレシピ(原料組合せ)を提示するための原料組合せ表示画面1G3を説明する。図18は、本実施形態における原料組み合わせ表示画面の構成図である。 The raw material combination display screen 1G3 for the operation part 121 of the operation terminal 12 to present a recipe (raw material combination) to a user is demonstrated using FIG. FIG. 18 is a block diagram of the raw material combination display screen in the present embodiment.
 原料組合せ表示画面1G3は、探索部113の探索結果を表示する表示画面であって、コスト表示ペイン1G301、原料組合せ表示ペイン1G302、緩和具合表示ペイン1G303、レポート出力ボタン1G304、戻るボタン1G305を備える。この際、図2における操作端末12の外部出力装置1H107は、図1に示す探索部113の探索結果を表示する表示部(探索結果表示部)として機能する。 The raw material combination display screen 1G3 is a display screen for displaying the search result of the search unit 113, and includes a cost display pane 1G301, a raw material combination display pane 1G302, a relaxation condition display pane 1G303, a report output button 1G304, and a back button 1G305. At this time, the external output device 1H 107 of the operation terminal 12 in FIG. 2 functions as a display unit (search result display unit) that displays the search results of the search unit 113 shown in FIG.
 緩和具合とは、自動緩和した範囲もしくは値、または、食い違いの範囲もしくは値である。この緩和具合を緩和具合表示ペイン1G303に、出力または自動で設定され、その範囲または値を表示する。 The degree of relaxation is an automatically relaxed range or value, or a range or value of discrepancy. The degree of relaxation is output or automatically set in the degree-of-relaxation display pane 1G 303, and the range or value thereof is displayed.
 コスト表示ペイン1G301は、物性表示画面1G2で選択された候補について、使用原料数ごとのコスト(原料費)を探索結果レシピデータ1D9に基づき表示する。例えば、コスト表示ペイン1G301は、低コストとなる原料の組み合わせ(3種類利用~6種類利用)に関する情報を表示する。この場合、6種類利用が、最小コストとなる。 The cost display pane 1G301 displays, based on the search result recipe data 1D9, the cost (raw material cost) for each of the used raw material numbers for the candidate selected on the physical property display screen 1G2. For example, the cost display pane 1G 301 displays information on a combination of low cost raw materials (3 types use to 6 types use). In this case, use of six types is the minimum cost.
 原料組合せ表示ペイン1G302は、物性表示画面1G2で選択された候補について、使用原料数ごとの原料の組合せを探索結果レシピデータ1D9に基づき表示する。例えば、原料組合せ表示ペイン1G302は、「3種類利用」の場合、原料の配合量が「24」の原料「2」と、他の2種類の原料(図示せず)を組み合わせることを表示することになる。また、4種類利用の場合は、原料2と原料3と図示しない他の原料2種類を組み合わせるレシピである。 The raw material combination display pane 1G302 displays, based on the search result recipe data 1D9, a combination of raw materials for the number of used raw materials for the candidate selected on the physical property display screen 1G2. For example, in the case of “use of three types”, the raw material combination display pane 1G 302 displays that the raw material “2” with the mixing amount of the raw material “24” is combined with the other two kinds of raw materials (not shown) become. Moreover, in the case of four types of utilization, it is a recipe which combines the raw material 2 and the raw material 3, and two other raw materials which are not shown in figure.
 この際、図1に示す探索部113は、操作部121から、図7に示す原料の使用の有無を示す原料フィルタデータ1D5が入力された場合、原料のうち、原料フィルタデータ1D5で不使用が指定された原料を用いない組み合わせを特定する。 Under the present circumstances, when the raw material filter data 1D5 which shows the presence or absence of use of the raw material shown in FIG. 7 from the operation part 121 is searched from the operation part 121, the search part 113 shown in FIG. Identify combinations that do not use specified raw materials.
 次に、特定された原料を用いない組み合わせを、組成食い違いパラメータ1D6で指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する原料の組み合わせの中から除外する。組成食い違いパラメータ1D6で指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する原料の組み合わせのうち、原料を用いない組み合わせが除外された原料の組み合わせを特定する。特定された原料の組み合わせを原料組合わせ表示ペイン1G302に表示させる。 Next, the combination which does not use the identified raw material is excluded from among the combinations of raw materials which fall within the allowable range of the condition specified by the compositional discrepancy parameter 1D6. Among the combinations of raw materials that fall within the allowable range of the conditions specified by the compositional deviation parameter 1D6, the combinations of raw materials from which the combinations not using the raw materials have been excluded are specified. The combination of the identified raw materials is displayed on the raw material combination display pane 1G302.
 緩和具合表示ペイン1G303は、物性表示画面1G2で選択された候補について、使用原料数ごとの組成比率の緩和具合を探索結果食い違いデータ1D10に基づいて表示する。例えば、緩和具合表示ペイン1G303は、「3種類利用」の場合、「組成1」の組成比率の緩和具合が、「1.3%」であることを表示する。 The relaxation degree display pane 1G303 displays, for the candidates selected on the physical property display screen 1G2, the degree of relaxation of the composition ratio for each number of used materials based on the search result discrepancy data 1D10. For example, in the case of “three types of use”, the relaxation degree display pane 1G 303 displays that the relaxation degree of the composition ratio of “composition 1” is “1.3%”.
 レポート出力ボタン1G304を押下することで、ユーザが実験依頼を行うためのレポートを出力することができる。一方、別の候補を確認したい場合は、戻るボタン1G305を押下することで、物性表示画面1G2に戻ることができる。 By pressing the report output button 1G304, it is possible to output a report for the user to request an experiment. On the other hand, when it is desired to confirm another candidate, it is possible to return to the physical property display screen 1G2 by pressing the back button 1G305.
 なお、本実施形態では3種類~6種類の原料を利用した場合に関する画面例を示したが、探索結果やユーザに要求に応じて増減することができる。ユーザの要求でなくとも入力された製品の特性やユーザが過去に入力した情報を基とした探索結果を表示することもできる。 In the present embodiment, the screen example regarding the case of using three to six types of raw materials is shown, but it can be increased or decreased according to the search result or the request from the user. It is also possible to display a search result based on the input product characteristics or information input by the user in the past, even if the request is not made by the user.
 このように、探索結果を利用した原料数ごとに表示することで、ユーザは単純に費用換算しづらい原料数を含めて比較することができるようになる。 As described above, by displaying the search results for each number of raw materials using the search results, the user can simply compare the number of raw materials that are difficult to convert into expenses.
 なお、図18の例では、使用原料数ごとの組成比率を表示していないが、必要に応じて併せて表示してもかまわない。 In addition, in the example of FIG. 18, although the composition ratio for every number of used raw materials is not displayed, you may display together as needed.
 また、探索結果物性データ1D7、探索結果組成比率データ1D8、探索結果レシピデータ1D9、探索結果食い違いデータ1D10の内容を探索部113の探索結果に合わせて、図1の操作部121の画面上に表示することもできる。すべての項目を表示する必要はなく、ユーザの設定に応じて表示項目を変更することができる。 Also, the contents of search result physical property data 1D7, search result composition ratio data 1D8, search result recipe data 1D9, and search result discrepancy data 1D10 are displayed on the screen of the operation unit 121 of FIG. You can also It is not necessary to display all the items, and the display items can be changed according to the setting of the user.
 図17、図18で説明した物性表示ペイン1G201、詳細表示ペイン1G202、コスト表示ペイン1G301、原料組合わせ表示ペイン1G302、緩和具合表示ペイン1G303等の各ユーザインターフェースはそれぞれ自由に組み合わせて表示することができる。また、必要に応じて表示ないペインがあってもよい。 User interfaces such as physical property display pane 1G201, detail display pane 1G202, cost display pane 1G301, raw material combination display pane 1G302, and relaxation condition display pane 1G303 described in FIGS. 17 and 18 can be freely combined and displayed. it can. Also, some panes may not be displayed as needed.
 以上に説明したように、本実施形態によれば、要求に合った特性を有する製品の組成または組成比率を特定した後に、異なる条件(例えば、コスト組成データ1D2で規定される組成と組成食い違いパラメータ1D6で規定される条件であって、クエリデータ1D4で規定される条件などを再度利用するなどして変更可能な条件を含む)を考慮(加味)して原料の組み合わせを探索するので、要求に合った特性を有する製品のレシピを特定することができる。 As described above, according to the present embodiment, after specifying the composition or composition ratio of the product having the characteristics meeting the requirements, different conditions (for example, the composition and composition discrepancy parameter specified in the cost composition data 1D2) Since the combination of materials is searched in consideration (with consideration) of conditions defined by 1D6 and including conditions that can be changed by reusing conditions etc. defined by query data 1D4, etc. Recipes for products with matching characteristics can be identified.
 また、異なる制約条件を考慮した製品の設計支援が可能となる。さらに、考慮すべき原料の組成または組成比率に変更がない限り原料の種類が増減した場合でも、原料の組成または組成比率に対する予測モデルを再利用することができる。 In addition, it is possible to support product design in consideration of different constraints. Furthermore, even if the type of raw material changes as long as there is no change in the composition or composition ratio of the raw material to be considered, the prediction model for the composition or composition ratio of the raw material can be reused.
 要求に合った特性の一例として、製品として要求される物性であって、図6のクエリデータ1D4(特性要求情報)で規定される条件を満たすものをいう。 As an example of the characteristic meeting the requirement, it is a physical property required as a product, which satisfies the condition defined by the query data 1D4 (characteristic request information) of FIG.
 また、複数のユーザの過去の実験結果を登録しておくことで、クエリデータに記載した物性の観点で過去の実験結果をユーザ間で共有できるようになり、似たようなレシピで設計するといった状況を回避することができる。 Also, by registering the past experiment results of multiple users, it becomes possible to share the past experiment results among users in terms of the physical properties described in the query data, and design with similar recipes The situation can be avoided.
 また、レシピに対して、組成比率とその目標値との食い違いを示す緩和具合の評価を行っているので、ユーザは、緩和具合が少ないレシピを選択することができる。緩和具合が大きいところを選択して新しい配合の可能性を探したりすることができる。 In addition, since the degree of relaxation indicating the discrepancy between the composition ratio and the target value is evaluated with respect to the recipe, the user can select a recipe with less degree of relaxation. The place where the degree of relaxation is large can be selected to search for new formulation possibilities.
 これらは、本発明が所望の特性を満たす製品に対応する第一の制約条件を入力し、第一の制約条件に対応した原料の組み合わせを特定し、特定された原料の組み合わせに類似する特性に対応する第二の制約条件によって特定される原料の組み合わせを探索することによって、当初入力された制約条件とは異なる条件を複数探索する思想によって実現できる。 These enter the first constraint corresponding to the product of the present invention that satisfies the desired characteristics, identify the combination of the raw materials corresponding to the first constraint, and have characteristics similar to the identified combination of raw materials. By searching the combination of raw materials specified by the corresponding second constraint, it is possible to realize by the idea of searching a plurality of conditions different from the initially input constraint.
 図19を用いて、図4で説明したコスト組成データ1D2の変形例について説明する。図4と異なり図19では、本実施形態における原料種類と量に対応する組成データの構成図である。 A modification of the cost composition data 1D2 described in FIG. 4 will be described with reference to FIG. Unlike FIG. 4, FIG. 19 is a configuration diagram of composition data corresponding to raw material types and amounts in this embodiment.
 原料種類と量に対応する組成データ1D2aは、原料の種類と量によって変化する組成を示すデータである。混合または化合される原料の種類1D201a、原料1の量1D202a、原料2の量1D203aが示される。 Composition data 1D2a corresponding to the type and amount of raw material is data indicating a composition that changes depending on the type and amount of raw material. The type of raw material 1D 201a to be mixed or combined, the amount 1D 202a of the raw material 1, and the amount 1D 203a of the raw material 2 are shown.
 原料を混合または化合する場合、組成によっては原料の量が増加量に対して線形増加せず非線形で増加する場合がある。この非線形で増加する関係を示す式が組成「1」の式1D204a等に示される。また、同様に組成「2」の式1D205aから所定の組成「n」の式1D222aが示される。 When the raw materials are mixed or combined, depending on the composition, the amount of the raw materials may increase non-linearly and not linearly with the increase. An equation showing this non-linear, increasing relationship is shown in the equation 1D 204a etc. of the composition "1". Similarly, Formula 1 D 222 a of composition “2” is represented by Formula 1 D 222 a of a predetermined composition “n”.
 ユーザがこの組成「1」の式1D204aを選択することで、原料「1」と原料「2」をパラメータとするグラフを表示し、所定の原料の組み合わせに対する組成の量をユーザは知ることができる。 By selecting Formula 1D 204a of the composition “1”, the user can display a graph having the raw material “1” and the raw material “2” as parameters, and the user can know the amount of the composition for the combination of predetermined raw materials .
 なお、この例のように組成が原料の種類と量に対して非線形である場合、第二段階目の探索は線形計画問題とはならないため、例えば遺伝的アルゴリズム等を用いることで達成される。 When the composition is nonlinear with respect to the type and amount of raw materials as in this example, the second stage search is not a linear programming problem, and is achieved by using, for example, a genetic algorithm or the like.
 また、この例では、原料を2種類としたが、3種類以上の組み合わせを入力し、3次元のグラフ等で表示することもできる。表示方法はこれらに限定されることなく他の表現方法であってもよい。 Further, in this example, two types of raw materials are used, but three or more types of combinations may be input and displayed as a three-dimensional graph or the like. The display method is not limited to these and may be another expression method.
 このように複数種類の原料を混合または化合した場合の組成を示すことにより、所定の特性を有する原料の組み合わせをユーザは知ることができ、製品のレシピに必要な制約条件を入力することが容易となる。 By showing the composition when mixing or combining a plurality of types of raw materials in this way, the user can know the combination of raw materials having predetermined characteristics, and it is easy to input the necessary constraint conditions in the product recipe It becomes.
 本実施形態の一例を説明するならば、図1のデータ管理部114は、原料が有する組成または組成比率に関する原料組成情報(コスト組成データ1D2)を少なくとも管理対象として管理する管理手段として機能する。 To explain an example of the present embodiment, the data management unit 114 in FIG. 1 functions as a management unit that manages at least raw material composition information (cost composition data 1D2) related to the composition or composition ratio of the raw material.
 図1の操作部121(外部入力装置1H106)は、設計対象が有する特性として要求される特性要求情報(図6のクエリデータ1D4)と、設計対象の組成又は組成比率について、当該目標値として許容される値の許容範囲を規定した組成パラメータ(図8の組成食い違いパラメータ1D6)とを少なくとも入力する入力手段として機能する。 The operation unit 121 (external input device 1H106) shown in FIG. 1 allows the characteristic request information (query data 1D4 shown in FIG. 6) required as the characteristic of the design object and the composition or composition ratio of the design object as the target value. It functions as an input means for inputting at least a composition parameter (composition discrepancy parameter 1D6 in FIG. 8) which defines an allowable range of the value to be calculated.
 図1の探索部113は、入力手段により入力された特性要求情報(図6のクエリデータ1D4)を基に原料組成情報(図4のコスト組成データ1D2)を処理し、特性要求情報(クエリデータ1D4)で指定される条件を満たす設計対象の組成又は組成比率を特定(図15のステップ1F303)し、且つ特定された設計対象の組成または組成比率に対し、組成パラメータ(図8の組成食い違いパラメータ1D6)で指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する原料の組み合わせを特定(ステップ1F304)する処理手段として機能する。 The search unit 113 in FIG. 1 processes the raw material composition information (cost composition data 1D2 in FIG. 4) based on the characteristic request information (query data 1D4 in FIG. 6) input by the input means, and the characteristic request information (query data) The composition or composition ratio of the design object satisfying the conditions specified in 1D4) is identified (step 1F303 in FIG. 15), and the composition parameter (composition discrepancy parameter in FIG. 8) is obtained for the composition or composition ratio of the identified design object It functions as processing means for specifying (step 1F 304) a combination of raw materials that falls within the allowable range of the conditions specified in 1D6).
 図1の操作部121(外部出力装置1H107)は、処理手段(探索部113)の出力による情報を表示する表示手段として機能させることができる。処理手段(探索部113)は、原料の組み合わせを特定する際に用いる条件とは異なる条件の組み合わせ(原料の種類を)特定し、特定した異なる条件の組み合わせを表示手段(原料組合わせ表示画面1G3)に表示させる。これにより、所定の特性を有する製品の製造レシピの制約条件の入力を簡便にすることができる。 The operation unit 121 (external output device 1H 107) in FIG. 1 can function as a display unit that displays information from the output of the processing unit (search unit 113). The processing means (searching unit 113) specifies a combination of conditions (raw material type) different from the conditions used when specifying the combination of raw materials, and displays the combination of the different conditions that were specified as the display means (raw material combination display screen 1G3 Display on). Thereby, it is possible to simplify the input of the constraint conditions of the production recipe of the product having the predetermined characteristics.
 また、処理手段(探索部113)は、管理手段(データ管理部114)の管理対象として、原料に対するコストと原料が有する組成または組成比率に関するコスト組成情報(コスト組成データ1D2)が存在することを条件に、コスト組成情報を基に低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを特定し、特定された低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを表示手段(コスト表示ペイン1G301)に表示させる。低コストとなる原料の組み合わせが表示されるので、製品として、低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを判別することができる。 In addition, the processing means (searching unit 113) requires that cost composition information (cost composition data 1D2) relating to the cost to the raw material and the composition or composition ratio of the raw material exist as a management target of the management means (data management unit 114). Under the conditions, a combination of low cost raw materials is specified based on the cost composition information, and the specified low cost raw material combination is displayed on the display means (cost display pane 1G301). Since the combination of the low cost raw materials is displayed, the combination of the low cost raw materials can be determined as a product.
 処理手段(探索部113)は、入力手段(操作部121)に、原料の使用の有無を示す原料フィルタ情報(図7の原料フィルタデータ1D5)が入力された場合、原料のうち、原料フィルタ情報で不使用が指定された原料を用いない組み合わせを特定し、特定された当該原料を用いない組み合わせを、組成パラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する原料の組み合わせの中から除外し、組成パラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する原料の組み合わせのうち、原料を用いない組み合わせが除外された原料の組み合わせを特定し、当該特定された原料の組み合わせを表示手段(図18の原料組合せ表示ペイン1G302)に表示させる。所定の特性を有する製品に使用する原料の組み合わせが表示されるので、製品に使用する原料の組み合わせを確認することができる。 When the raw material filter information (raw material filter data 1D5 in FIG. 7) indicating the presence or absence of use of the raw material is input to the input means (operation unit 121), the processing means (searching unit 113) Identify combinations that do not use raw materials designated for nonuse, and exclude combinations that do not use the specified raw materials from among combinations of raw materials that fall within the allowable range of the conditions specified in the composition parameters, Among the combinations of raw materials belonging to the allowable range of the condition specified by the parameter, the combination of the raw materials excluding the combination without using the raw material is specified, and the combination of the specified raw materials is displayed as display means (raw material combination of FIG. 18 Display on display pane 1G 302). Since the combination of raw materials used for the product having the predetermined characteristics is displayed, it is possible to confirm the combination of raw materials used for the product.
 処理手段(探索部113)は、管理手段(データ管理部114)により管理される情報であって、設計対象とは異なる製品又は中間品の物性を示す指標に関する指標情報(図3の実験物性データ1D3)を基に、設計対象よりも過去に製造された製品又は中間品の物性を示す指標に関する指標情報(過去実験結果)を表示装置(図17の物性表示ペイン1G201)に表示させる。過去の実績が表示されるので、この情報を、所定の特性を有する製品の製造レシピの制約条件を入力する際の参考にすることができる。 The processing means (searching unit 113) is information managed by the managing means (data management unit 114), and is index information on an index indicating the physical properties of the product or intermediate product different from the design target (experimental physical property data of FIG. 3) Based on 1D3), the display device (physical property display pane 1G201 of FIG. 17) displays index information (past experiment result) relating to an index indicating physical properties of a product or an intermediate manufactured in the past than the design target. As past performance is displayed, this information can be used as a reference when entering the manufacturing recipe constraints of the product having the predetermined characteristics.
 処理手段(探索部113)は、設計対象の組成又は組成比率を特定する過程で、設計対象の物性の予測値とそのばらつきを特定し、特定された設計対象の物性の予測値とそのばらつきを表示装置(図17のサブペイン1G202a)に表示させる。設計対象の物性の予測値とそのばらつきを可視化することができ、可視化された情報を、所定の特性を有する製品の製造レシピの制約条件を入力する際の参考にすることができる。 The processing means (searching unit 113) specifies the predicted value of the physical property of the design object and the variation thereof in the process of specifying the composition or the composition ratio of the design object, and the predicted value of the physical property of the identified design object and the dispersion It is displayed on the display device (sub pane 1G 202a in FIG. 17). The predicted values of physical properties to be designed and their variations can be visualized, and the visualized information can be used as a reference when inputting the constraints of the manufacturing recipe of a product having a predetermined characteristic.
 処理手段(探索部113)は、特定された低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを基に、低コストとなる原料の組み合わせに属する原料の種類数をさらに特定し、特定された原料の種類数(図12の探索結果食い違いデータ1D10の種類数)を表示装置に表示させる。低コストとなる原料の組み合わせに属する原料の種類数を表示し、可視化する。 The processing means (searching unit 113) further specifies the number of types of raw materials belonging to the combination of low cost raw materials based on the specified combination of low cost raw materials, and the number of types of specified raw materials (see FIG. The number of types of the 12 search result discrepancies data 1D10 is displayed on the display device. Display and visualize the number of types of raw materials belonging to the combination of low cost raw materials.
 処理手段(探索部113)は、組成食い違いパラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する原料の組み合わせを特定できない場合、組成食い違いパラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲を段階的に緩和する。原料の組み合わせが特定できなくなるのを抑制し、処理を迅速化することができる。 When the processing means (searching unit 113) can not specify the combination of the raw materials belonging to the allowable range of the condition specified by the composition difference parameter, it gradually reduces the allowable range of the condition specified by the composition difference parameter. It is possible to suppress the inability to identify the combination of raw materials and to accelerate the processing.
 処理手段(探索部113)は、特定された低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを基に、低コストとなる原料の組み合わせに対して設計対象の組成または組成比率の目標値との差を示す緩和具合(図12の探索結果食い違いデータ1D10の組成「1」~組成「10」)をさらに特定し、特定された緩和具合を表示装置(図18の緩和具合表示ペイン1G303)に表示させる。緩和具合の情報が表示され、可視化されるので、この情報を所定の特性を有する製品の製造レシピの制約条件を入力する際の参考にすることができる。 The processing means (searching unit 113) is a relaxation degree indicating a difference between the low cost source material combination and the target value of the composition or composition ratio to be designed based on the specified low cost source material combination. (The composition “1” to the composition “10” of the search result discrepancy data 1D10 of FIG. 12) are further specified, and the identified relaxation condition is displayed on the display device (the relaxation condition display pane 1G303 of FIG. 18). Since the information on the degree of relaxation is displayed and visualized, this information can be used as a reference when inputting constraints of a production recipe of a product having a predetermined characteristic.
 処理手段(探索部113)は、組成食い違いパラメータで指定される条件が入力手段(外部入力装置1H106)により変更または追加された場合、変更または追加された条件を満たす原料の組み合わせを特定する。製造レシピの制約条件を入力ための条件が変更または追加された、変更または追加された条件を満たす原料の組み合わせを特定することができる。 When the condition designated by the compositional discrepancy parameter is changed or added by the input unit (the external input device 1H 106), the processing unit (searching unit 113) specifies a combination of raw materials that satisfies the changed or added condition. It is possible to identify a combination of raw materials that satisfy the changed or added conditions in which the conditions for inputting manufacturing recipe constraints are changed or added.
1 設計支援装置、11 計算サーバ、12 操作端末、111 データ登録部、112 予測モデル構築部、113 探索部、114 データ管理部、121 操作部 Reference Signs List 1 design support apparatus, 11 calculation server, 12 operation terminals, 111 data registration unit, 112 prediction model construction unit, 113 search unit, 114 data management unit, 121 operation unit

Claims (15)

  1.  2以上の原料を用いて作られる製品または中間品を設計対象とし、前記設計対象の設計を支援する設計支援装置であって、
     前記原料が有する組成または組成比率に関する原料組成情報を少なくとも管理対象として管理する管理手段と、
     前記設計対象が有する特性として要求される特性要求情報と、前記設計対象の組成または組成比率について、その目標値として許容される値の許容範囲を規定した組成パラメータとを少なくとも入力する入力手段と、
     前記入力手段により入力された前記特性要求情報を基に前記原料組成情報を処理して、前記特性要求情報で指定される条件を満たす前記設計対象の組成または組成比率を特定し、且つ
     前記特定された前記設計対象の組成または組成比率に対し、前記組成パラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する前記原料の組み合わせを特定する処理手段と、
     前記処理手段の出力による情報を表示する表示手段と、を有し、
     前記処理手段は、
     前記原料の組み合わせを特定する際に用いる条件とは異なる条件の組み合わせを特定し、前記特定された前記異なる条件の組み合わせを前記表示手段に表示させる
    ことを特徴とする設計支援装置。
    A design support apparatus for designing a product or an intermediate product manufactured using two or more raw materials and supporting the design of the design target,
    Management means for managing at least management target material composition information related to the composition or composition ratio of the raw material;
    Input means for inputting at least property request information required as a property of the design object, and a composition parameter defining an allowable range of values acceptable as target values for the composition or composition ratio of the design object;
    The raw material composition information is processed based on the characteristic request information input by the input means, and the composition or composition ratio of the design object satisfying the condition specified by the characteristic request information is identified, and the identification is performed. A processing means for specifying the combination of the raw materials which fall within the allowable range of the conditions specified by the composition parameter with respect to the composition or composition ratio of the design object;
    Displaying means for displaying information from the output of the processing means;
    The processing means
    A design support apparatus characterized by specifying a combination of conditions different from the condition used when specifying the combination of the raw materials, and displaying the combination of the specified different conditions on the display means.
  2.  請求項1に記載の設計支援装置であって、
     前記処理手段は、
     前記管理手段の前記管理対象として、前記原料に対するコストと前記原料が有する組成または組成比率に関するコスト組成情報が存在することを条件に、前記コスト組成情報を基に低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを特定し、前記特定された前記低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを前記表示手段に表示させることを特徴とする設計支援装置。
    The design support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein
    The processing means
    Identify the combination of low cost materials based on the cost composition information on condition that cost composition information regarding the cost to the material and the composition or composition ratio of the material is present as the management target of the management means And the display supporting means is configured to display the combination of the specified low-cost raw materials on the display means.
  3.  請求項1に記載の設計支援装置であって、
     前記処理手段は、
     前記入力手段に、前記原料の使用の有無を示す原料フィルタ情報が入力された場合、
     前記原料のうち、前記原料フィルタ情報で不使用が指定された原料を用いない組み合わせを特定し、当該特定された前記原料を用いない組み合わせを、前記組成パラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する前記原料の組み合わせの中から除外し、前記組成パラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する前記原料の組み合わせのうち、前記原料を用いない組み合わせが除外された前記原料の組み合わせを特定し、当該特定された前記原料の組み合わせを前記表示手段に表示させることを特徴とする設計支援装置。
    The design support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein
    The processing means
    When raw material filter information indicating presence or absence of use of the raw material is input to the input unit,
    The combination which does not use the raw material designated as unused by the said raw material filter information among the said raw materials is specified, and the combination which does not use the said specified said raw material is within the tolerance | permissible_range of the conditions designated by the said composition parameter. The combination of the raw materials excluding the combination not using the raw material is specified among the combinations of the raw materials which are excluded from the combinations of the belonging raw materials and which fall within the allowable range of the condition specified by the composition parameter; A design support apparatus characterized by displaying the combination of the specified raw materials on the display means.
  4.  請求項1に記載の設計支援装置であって、
     前記処理手段は、
     前記管理手段により管理される情報であって、前記設計対象とは異なる製品または中間品の物性を示す指標に関する指標情報を基に、前記設計対象よりも過去に製造された製品または中間品の物性を示す指標に関する指標情報を前記表示手段に表示させることを特徴とする設計支援装置。
    The design support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein
    The processing means
    Physical properties of a product or an intermediate manufactured in the past than the design target on the basis of index information related to indexes managed by the management means and indicating physical properties of the product or intermediate different from the design target A design support apparatus for displaying index information on an index indicating the index on the display means.
  5.  請求項1に記載の設計支援装置であって、
     前記処理手段は、
     前記設計対象の組成または組成比率を特定する過程で、前記設計対象の物性の予測値とそのばらつきを特定し、前記特定された前記設計対象の物性の予測値とそのばらつきを前記表示手段に表示させることを特徴とする設計支援装置。
    The design support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein
    The processing means
    In the process of specifying the composition or composition ratio of the design object, the predicted value of the physical property of the design object and the variation thereof are specified, and the predicted value of the physical property of the design object identified and the variation thereof are displayed on the display means A design support apparatus characterized in that
  6.  請求項2に記載の設計支援装置であって、
     前記処理手段は、
     前記特定された前記低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを基に、前記低コストとなる原料の組み合わせに属する原料の種類数をさらに特定し、前記特定された前記原料の種類数を前記表示手段に表示させることを特徴とする設計支援装置。
    The design support apparatus according to claim 2, wherein
    The processing means
    The number of types of raw materials belonging to the combination of low cost raw materials is further specified based on the combination of the low cost raw materials specified above, and the type number of the specified raw materials is displayed on the display means A design support apparatus characterized in that
  7.  請求項1に記載の設計支援装置であって、
     前記処理手段は、
     前記組成パラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する前記原料の組み合わせを特定できない場合、前記組成パラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲を段階的に緩和することを特徴とする設計支援装置。
    The design support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein
    The processing means
    A design support apparatus characterized in that the allowable range of the conditions specified by the composition parameter is relaxed stepwise when it is not possible to specify the combination of the raw materials within the allowable range of the conditions specified by the composition parameters.
  8.  請求項2に記載の設計支援装置であって、
     前記処理手段は、
     前記特定された前記低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを基に、前記低コストとなる原料の組み合わせに対して前記設計対象の組成又は組成比率の目標値との差を示す緩和具合をさらに特定し、前記特定された前記緩和具合を前記表示手段に表示させることを特徴とする設計支援装置。
    The design support apparatus according to claim 2, wherein
    The processing means
    Based on the combination of the identified low cost raw materials, the degree of relaxation indicating the difference between the low cost raw material combination and the target value of the composition or composition ratio to be designed is further specified, A design support apparatus characterized by displaying the specified degree of relaxation on the display means.
  9.  請求項1に記載の設計支援装置であって、
     前記処理手段は、
     前記組成パラメータで指定される条件が前記入力手段により変更または追加された場合、前記変更または前記追加された条件を満たす前記原料の組み合わせを特定することを特徴とする設計支援装置。
    The design support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein
    The processing means
    A design support apparatus characterized by specifying a combination of the raw materials satisfying the change or the added condition when the condition specified by the composition parameter is changed or added by the input unit.
  10.  2以上の原料を用いて作られる製品または中間品を設計対象とし、前記設計対象の設計を支援する設計支援方法であって、
     前記原料が有する組成または組成比率に関する原料組成情報を少なくとも管理対象として管理する管理ステップと、
     前記設計対象が有する特性として要求される特性要求情報と、前記設計対象の組成または組成比率について、その目標値として許容される値の許容範囲を規定した組成パラメータとを少なくとも入力する入力ステップと、
     前記入力ステップにより入力された前記特性要求情報を基に前記原料組成情報を処理して、前記特性要求情報で指定される条件を満たす前記設計対象の組成または組成比率を特定し、且つ前記特定された前記設計対象の組成または組成比率に対し、前記組成パラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する前記原料の組み合わせを特定する処理ステップと、
     前記処理ステップの出力による情報を表示する表示ステップと、を有し、
     前記処理ステップでは、
     前記原料の組み合わせを特定する際に用いる条件とは異なる条件の組み合わせを特定し、
     前記表示ステップでは、
     前記処理ステップで特定された前記異なる条件の組み合わせを表示することを特徴とする設計支援方法。
    A design support method for designing a product or an intermediate product made using two or more raw materials and supporting the design of the design target,
    A management step of managing at least management target material composition information related to a composition or composition ratio of the raw material;
    An input step of inputting at least characteristic request information required as a characteristic possessed by the design object, and a composition parameter defining an allowable range of values acceptable as target values for the composition or composition ratio of the design object;
    The raw material composition information is processed based on the characteristic request information input in the input step to specify the composition or composition ratio of the design object that satisfies the condition specified by the characteristic request information, and And a processing step of specifying the combination of the raw materials which fall within the allowable range of the condition specified by the composition parameter with respect to the composition or composition ratio of the design object.
    Displaying information from the output of the processing step;
    In the processing step,
    Identify a combination of conditions different from the conditions used to identify the combination of raw materials,
    In the display step,
    A design support method characterized by displaying a combination of the different conditions specified in the processing step.
  11.  請求項10に記載の設計支援方法であって、
     前記処理ステップでは、
     前記管理ステップで管理される前記管理対象であって、前記原料に対するコストと前記原料が有する組成または組成比率に関するコスト組成情報を基に低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを特定し、
     前記表示ステップでは、
     前記処理ステップで特定された前記低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを表示することを特徴とする設計支援方法。
    The design support method according to claim 10, wherein
    In the processing step,
    Identifying a combination of low cost materials based on the cost composition information on the cost of the raw material and the composition or composition ratio of the raw material, which is the management target managed in the management step;
    In the display step,
    A design support method characterized by displaying a combination of the low cost raw materials specified in the processing step.
  12.  請求項10に記載の設計支援方法であって、
     前記処理ステップでは、
     前記入力ステップで、前記原料の使用の有無を示す原料フィルタ情報が入力された場合、前記原料のうち、前記原料フィルタ情報で不使用が指定された原料を用いない組み合わせを特定し、当該特定された前記原料を用いない組み合わせを、前記組成パラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する前記原料の組み合わせの中から除外し、前記組成パラメータで指定される条件の許容範囲内に属する前記原料の組み合わせのうち、前記原料を用いない組み合わせが除外された前記原料の組み合わせを特定し、
     前記表示ステップでは、
     前記処理ステップで特定された前記原料の組み合わせを表示することを特徴とする設計支援方法。
    The design support method according to claim 10, wherein
    In the processing step,
    In the input step, when raw material filter information indicating the presence or absence of use of the raw material is input, a combination not using the raw material whose nonuse is designated in the raw material filter information is specified among the raw materials, and the specified The combination which does not use the raw material is excluded from the combination of the raw materials which falls within the allowable range of the condition specified by the composition parameter, and the raw material of which the combination falls within the allowable range of the condition specified by the composition parameter Among the combinations, the combinations of the raw materials from which the combinations not using the raw materials are excluded are identified,
    In the display step,
    A design support method characterized by displaying a combination of the raw materials specified in the processing step.
  13.  請求項10に記載の設計支援方法であって、
     前記処理ステップでは、
     前記管理ステップで管理される情報であって、前記設計対象とは異なる製品または中間品の物性を示す指標に関する指標情報を基に、前記設計対象よりも過去に製造された製品または中間品の物性を示す指標に関する指標情報を特定し、
     前記表示ステップでは、
     前記処理ステップで特定された指標情報であって、前記設計対象よりも過去に製造された製品または中間品の物性を示す指標に関する指標情報を表示することを特徴とする設計支援方法。
    The design support method according to claim 10, wherein
    In the processing step,
    Physical properties of a product or an intermediate manufactured in the past than the design target based on index information related to indexes managed in the management step and indicating physical properties of the product or intermediate different from the design target Identify indicator information on indicators that indicate
    In the display step,
    A design support method characterized by displaying index information related to an index indicating physical properties of a product or an intermediate product manufactured in the past than the design object, which is index information specified in the processing step.
  14.  請求項10に記載の設計支援方法であって、
     前記処理ステップでは、
     前記設計対象の組成または組成比率を特定する過程で、前記設計対象の物性の予測値とそのばらつきを特定し、
     前記表示ステップでは、
     前記処理ステップで特定された前記設計対象の物性の予測値とそのばらつきを表示することを特徴とする設計支援方法。
    The design support method according to claim 10, wherein
    In the processing step,
    In the process of specifying the composition or composition ratio of the design object, the predicted value of the physical property of the design object and the variation thereof are specified;
    In the display step,
    A design support method characterized by displaying predicted values of physical properties of the design object specified in the processing step and variations thereof.
  15.  請求項11に記載の設計支援方法であって、
     前記処理ステップでは、
     前記特定された前記低コストとなる原料の組み合わせを基に、前記低コストとなる原料の組み合わせに属する原料の種類数をさらに特定し、
     前記表示ステップでは、
     前記処理ステップで特定された前記原料の種類数を表示することを特徴とする設計支援方法。
    The design support method according to claim 11, wherein
    In the processing step,
    Based on the combination of the identified low cost raw materials, the number of types of the raw materials belonging to the low cost raw material combination is further specified;
    In the display step,
    A design support method characterized by displaying the number of types of the raw material specified in the processing step.
PCT/JP2018/040558 2017-11-01 2018-10-31 Design assistance device and design assistance method WO2019088185A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017-211842 2017-11-01
JP2017211842A JP6918681B2 (en) 2017-11-01 2017-11-01 Design support device and design support method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019088185A1 true WO2019088185A1 (en) 2019-05-09

Family

ID=66332533

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2018/040558 WO2019088185A1 (en) 2017-11-01 2018-10-31 Design assistance device and design assistance method

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6918681B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2019088185A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111008791A (en) * 2019-12-24 2020-04-14 重庆科技学院 Bread production modeling and decision parameter optimization method based on support vector machine
WO2022124075A1 (en) * 2020-12-10 2022-06-16 昭和電工マテリアルズ株式会社 Design assitance device, design assitance method, and design assitance program
WO2022124077A1 (en) * 2020-12-10 2022-06-16 昭和電工マテリアルズ株式会社 Design assistance device, design assistance method, and design assistance program
JP7157402B1 (en) 2022-05-26 2022-10-20 株式会社エクサウィザーズ Information processing method and program

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7272873B2 (en) * 2019-06-11 2023-05-12 株式会社日立製作所 PLANNING SUPPORT DEVICE AND PLANNING SUPPORT METHOD
JP7348488B2 (en) * 2019-08-07 2023-09-21 横浜ゴム株式会社 Physical property data prediction method and physical property data prediction device
JP7348489B2 (en) * 2019-08-09 2023-09-21 横浜ゴム株式会社 Physical property data prediction method and device Physical property data prediction device
WO2021044913A1 (en) * 2019-09-05 2021-03-11 国立大学法人東京工業大学 Preparation and evaluation system, preparation and evaluation method, and program
JP6842731B1 (en) * 2019-09-05 2021-03-17 国立大学法人東京工業大学 Fabrication evaluation system, fabrication evaluation method and program
JP7267883B2 (en) * 2019-09-18 2023-05-02 株式会社日立製作所 Material property prediction system and material property prediction method
US11854672B2 (en) 2019-10-10 2023-12-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for generating chemical structure
KR102432995B1 (en) * 2020-10-07 2022-08-18 경북대학교 산학협력단 Precision animal feed formulation using an evolutionary multi-objective approach
JP7331885B2 (en) * 2021-05-27 2023-08-23 横河電機株式会社 Prediction device, prediction method, prediction program, and control device
CN117597698A (en) * 2021-06-10 2024-02-23 株式会社力森诺科 Information processing system, material composition search method, material composition search device, and program
WO2023167107A1 (en) * 2022-03-01 2023-09-07 株式会社レゾナック Information processing device, information processing system, program, and material composition searching method

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012048615A (en) * 2010-08-30 2012-03-08 Hitachi Chem Co Ltd Mechanism for storing and extracting material action composition analysis data
JP2013210804A (en) * 2012-03-30 2013-10-10 Hitachi Chemical Co Ltd Analysis system of functional material blending data
JP2017188032A (en) * 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Prediction method of performance of polymer composition

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012048615A (en) * 2010-08-30 2012-03-08 Hitachi Chem Co Ltd Mechanism for storing and extracting material action composition analysis data
JP2013210804A (en) * 2012-03-30 2013-10-10 Hitachi Chemical Co Ltd Analysis system of functional material blending data
JP2017188032A (en) * 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Prediction method of performance of polymer composition

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111008791A (en) * 2019-12-24 2020-04-14 重庆科技学院 Bread production modeling and decision parameter optimization method based on support vector machine
WO2022124075A1 (en) * 2020-12-10 2022-06-16 昭和電工マテリアルズ株式会社 Design assitance device, design assitance method, and design assitance program
WO2022124077A1 (en) * 2020-12-10 2022-06-16 昭和電工マテリアルズ株式会社 Design assistance device, design assistance method, and design assistance program
JP7157402B1 (en) 2022-05-26 2022-10-20 株式会社エクサウィザーズ Information processing method and program
WO2023228442A1 (en) * 2022-05-26 2023-11-30 株式会社エクサウィザーズ Information processing method, and program
JP2023173905A (en) * 2022-05-26 2023-12-07 株式会社エクサウィザーズ Information processing method and program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019086817A (en) 2019-06-06
JP6918681B2 (en) 2021-08-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2019088185A1 (en) Design assistance device and design assistance method
Ohtsuki et al. Evolutionary stability on graphs
US6973389B1 (en) Method of optimizing parameter values in a process of producing a product
Gomez-Gardenes et al. Evolutionary games defined at the network mesoscale: The public goods game
Paul Supplier selection for managing supply risks in supply chain: a fuzzy approach
Okudan et al. Concept selection methods–a literature review from 1980 to 2008
Li et al. An integrated framework for effective safety management evaluation: Application of an improved grey clustering measurement
JP6509303B1 (en) INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND PROGRAM
Özkale et al. Evaluation of the multiobjective ant colony algorithm performances on biobjective quadratic assignment problems
Kamelian et al. A novel graph-based partitioning algorithm for large-scale dynamical systems
Rozman et al. Apple variety assessment with analytical hierarchy process.
Van Raan Reference-based publication networks with episodic memories
CN103309296B (en) Controlling a manufacturing process
Achimugu et al. Using the fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for software requirements prioritization
Wang Defects tracking in mass customisation production using defects tracking matrix combined with principal component analysis
Sadrieh et al. An integrated Petri net and GA based approach for scheduling of hybrid plants
Hada et al. Mixture formulation through multivariate statistical analysis of process data in property cluster space
JP5714472B2 (en) Product information management apparatus, method, and program
Luo et al. An original bionic algorithm for batch scheduling of traditional Chinese medicine extraction workshop: Simulated population growth blocked algorithm
Draschner et al. Smart chef: Evolving recipes
Weigert et al. Modelling and optimisation of assembly processes
Bongers et al. Product driven process synthesis methodology
Moreno et al. Multiproduct batch plants design using linear process performance models
Suarez Palacios et al. Chemical product design integrating MCDA: Performance prediction and human preferences modelling
JP2020149498A (en) Data processing device, display control system, data processing method, and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18874934

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18874934

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1