WO2019076972A1 - Embedded optimization algorithm of parameters to drive deployment mechanism for displays - Google Patents
Embedded optimization algorithm of parameters to drive deployment mechanism for displays Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2019076972A1 WO2019076972A1 PCT/EP2018/078383 EP2018078383W WO2019076972A1 WO 2019076972 A1 WO2019076972 A1 WO 2019076972A1 EP 2018078383 W EP2018078383 W EP 2018078383W WO 2019076972 A1 WO2019076972 A1 WO 2019076972A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- parameter
- mse
- deployment
- deployment system
- display
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/01—Head-up displays
- G02B27/0149—Head-up displays characterised by mechanical features
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
- B60K35/00—Instruments specially adapted for vehicles; Arrangement of instruments in or on vehicles
- B60K35/20—Output arrangements, i.e. from vehicle to user, associated with vehicle functions or specially adapted therefor
- B60K35/21—Output arrangements, i.e. from vehicle to user, associated with vehicle functions or specially adapted therefor using visual output, e.g. blinking lights or matrix displays
- B60K35/23—Head-up displays [HUD]
- B60K35/233—Head-up displays [HUD] controlling the size or position in display areas of virtual images depending on the condition of the vehicle or the driver
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/01—Head-up displays
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
- B60K35/00—Instruments specially adapted for vehicles; Arrangement of instruments in or on vehicles
- B60K35/10—Input arrangements, i.e. from user to vehicle, associated with vehicle functions or specially adapted therefor
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
- B60K35/00—Instruments specially adapted for vehicles; Arrangement of instruments in or on vehicles
- B60K35/20—Output arrangements, i.e. from vehicle to user, associated with vehicle functions or specially adapted therefor
- B60K35/21—Output arrangements, i.e. from vehicle to user, associated with vehicle functions or specially adapted therefor using visual output, e.g. blinking lights or matrix displays
- B60K35/23—Head-up displays [HUD]
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R11/00—Arrangements for holding or mounting articles, not otherwise provided for
- B60R11/02—Arrangements for holding or mounting articles, not otherwise provided for for radio sets, television sets, telephones, or the like; Arrangement of controls thereof
- B60R11/0264—Arrangements for holding or mounting articles, not otherwise provided for for radio sets, television sets, telephones, or the like; Arrangement of controls thereof for control means
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R11/00—Arrangements for holding or mounting articles, not otherwise provided for
- B60R2011/0042—Arrangements for holding or mounting articles, not otherwise provided for characterised by mounting means
- B60R2011/008—Adjustable or movable supports
- B60R2011/0082—Adjustable or movable supports collapsible, e.g. for storing after use
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R11/00—Arrangements for holding or mounting articles, not otherwise provided for
- B60R2011/0042—Arrangements for holding or mounting articles, not otherwise provided for characterised by mounting means
- B60R2011/008—Adjustable or movable supports
- B60R2011/0085—Adjustable or movable supports with adjustment by rotation in their operational position
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01P—MEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
- G01P1/00—Details of instruments
- G01P1/04—Special adaptations of driving means
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/01—Head-up displays
- G02B27/0101—Head-up displays characterised by optical features
- G02B2027/014—Head-up displays characterised by optical features comprising information/image processing systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/01—Head-up displays
- G02B27/0149—Head-up displays characterised by mechanical features
- G02B2027/0154—Head-up displays characterised by mechanical features with movable elements
- G02B2027/0159—Head-up displays characterised by mechanical features with movable elements with mechanical means other than scaning means for positioning the whole image
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/01—Head-up displays
- G02B27/0149—Head-up displays characterised by mechanical features
- G02B2027/0161—Head-up displays characterised by mechanical features characterised by the relative positioning of the constitutive elements
- G02B2027/0163—Electric or electronic control thereof
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B27/00—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00
- G02B27/0093—Optical systems or apparatus not provided for by any of the groups G02B1/00 - G02B26/00, G02B30/00 with means for monitoring data relating to the user, e.g. head-tracking, eye-tracking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B11/00—Automatic controllers
- G05B11/01—Automatic controllers electric
- G05B11/36—Automatic controllers electric with provision for obtaining particular characteristics, e.g. proportional, integral, differential
- G05B11/42—Automatic controllers electric with provision for obtaining particular characteristics, e.g. proportional, integral, differential for obtaining a characteristic which is both proportional and time-dependent, e.g. P. I., P. I. D.
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/048—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators using a predictor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/011—Arrangements for interaction with the human body, e.g. for user immersion in virtual reality
- G06F3/012—Head tracking input arrangements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/011—Arrangements for interaction with the human body, e.g. for user immersion in virtual reality
- G06F3/013—Eye tracking input arrangements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
- G09G2380/00—Specific applications
- G09G2380/10—Automotive applications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P21/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of electric machines by vector control, e.g. by control of field orientation
- H02P21/13—Observer control, e.g. using Luenberger observers or Kalman filters
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P21/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of electric machines by vector control, e.g. by control of field orientation
- H02P21/14—Estimation or adaptation of machine parameters, e.g. flux, current or voltage
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P21/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of electric machines by vector control, e.g. by control of field orientation
- H02P21/14—Estimation or adaptation of machine parameters, e.g. flux, current or voltage
- H02P21/18—Estimation of position or speed
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P23/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by a control method other than vector control
- H02P23/14—Estimation or adaptation of motor parameters, e.g. rotor time constant, flux, speed, current or voltage
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P27/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by the kind of supply voltage
- H02P27/04—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by the kind of supply voltage using variable-frequency supply voltage, e.g. inverter or converter supply voltage
- H02P27/045—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by the kind of supply voltage using variable-frequency supply voltage, e.g. inverter or converter supply voltage whereby the speed is regulated by measuring the motor speed and comparing it with a given physical value
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P29/00—Arrangements for regulating or controlling electric motors, appropriate for both AC and DC motors
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P8/00—Arrangements for controlling dynamo-electric motors rotating step by step
- H02P8/14—Arrangements for controlling speed or speed and torque
Definitions
- Vehicles include devices, such as displays or head-up displays (HUDs), which are repositioned for different occupants. Such deployment of these devices causes the mechanical components of the devices to wear out.
- HUDs head-up displays
- the deployment system includes a non-transitory computer readable medium to store instructions of the deployment system and a processor configured to execute the instructions.
- the processor is configured to deploy the device using one or more parameters, determine a Mean Square Error (MSE) of the system response versus target, and run a Statistical Process Control (SPC) test on the MSE.
- MSE Mean Square Error
- SPC Statistical Process Control
- the processor is further configured to determine that no special event is present and adjust the one or more parameters.
- a deployment system for a vehicle having a microprocessor, a sensor, and a head-up display (HUD).
- the microprocessor is configured to execute instructions stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium.
- the sensor is coupled to the microprocessor and configured to receive information of surroundings of the deployment system.
- the HUD is coupled to the microprocessor.
- the microprocessor is further configured to initiate a target response for an occupant of the vehicle and deploy the HUD using the target response.
- the microprocessor is further configured to measure a real-time response of the HUD during deployment and compute a Mean Square Error (MSE) using the target response and the real-time response.
- MSE Mean Square Error
- the method includes performing deployment using one or more parameters, determining a Mean Square Error (MSE), and running a Statistical Process Control (SPC) test on the MSE.
- MSE Mean Square Error
- SPC Statistical Process Control
- the method further includes determining that no special event is present and processing new parameters using historical data, the MSE, and the SPC test results.
- FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram depicting exemplary components of the system in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process of the system in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure
- FIG. 3 is a graph of a target speed and a measured speed of a display in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure
- FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process of the system, in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 5 is a graph of an Evolutionary Operation (EVOP) algorithm in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure.
- EVOP Evolutionary Operation
- FIG. 1 is an illustrative block diagram, depicting exemplary components of the system 100 in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure.
- the system. 100 may include additional and/or fewer components and is not limited to those illustrated in FIG. 1.
- the system. 100 includes a control unit 102.
- the control unit 102 includes various components such as at least one microprocessor or processor 104, a memory 106, and an input/output 108.
- the control unit 102 may process the data captured by the sensor 1 1.2 to identify the environment surrounding the system. 100, or more particularly of the display 1 10.
- the sensor 112 may capture the real-time position and/or speed of the display 110.
- the control, unit 102 may process the realtime position and/or speed of the display 1 10 within that environment.
- the control, unit 102 processes data of the environment, like mechanical constraints or vibration that are captured by the sensor 112.
- the memory 106 stores data of the positions of the display 110. Using the record of previous positions of the display 110 and a new set of parameters, the processor 104 provides the new parameters to the display 1 10 to drive the deployment mechanism, for the display 110.
- the processor 104 is a device that processes signals and performs general computing and arithmetic functions.
- the processor 104 may include multiple single and multicore processors, co-processors, and architectures.
- the memory 106 may include a variety of memory, such as volatile memory and non-volatile memory.
- the memory 106 may also include a disk, such as but not limited to a flash memory card, a memory stick, a magnetic disk drive, a solid state disk drive, a CR-ROM, or a DVD ROM.
- the memory 106 may store a system that controls resources of a computing device and software that the processor 104 executes.
- the processor 104 and memory 106 are operatively coupled.
- the processor 104 performs processes by executing software instructions stored by the memory 106.
- the processes may include capturing data of the environment surrounding the display 1 10.
- the processes may include capturing data of the real-time speed when the display 1 10 is deploying and the real-time position of the display 1 10.
- the processes may also include determining the angle of the display 1 10.
- the processes may further include computing a metric measuring a Mean Square Error (MSE) while the display 1 10 is deploying.
- MSE Mean Square Error
- the processor 104 and the memory 106 communicate through the input/output
- the input/output 108 is a part of the system 100 and communicates with the sensor 1 12 and the display 1 10.
- the data captured by the sensor 1 12 is input to processor 104 for processing and outputting to the display 1 10 for providing display deployment assistance to optimize the position of the display 1 10 for an occupant of a vehicle.
- the memory 106 stores an optimization algorithm having software parameters to drive a deployment mechanism for the display 1 10.
- the optimization algorithm is embedded in the software of the display 1 10.
- the embedded optimization algorithm may be used with any mechanism that deploys the display 1 10.
- the position of the display 110 may be captured in realtime and stored in the memory 106.
- the speed of the display 110 as it deploys may be measured in real-time and stored in the memory 106.
- the display 110 includes the deployment mechanism for deploying the display 1 10. Each time the deployment mechanism is used in the vehicle for deploying the display 110 to a new position, a new set of software parameters is tested. Small variations of the system response are detected by sensor 1 12. The small variations may be undetectable by the occupant.
- the processor 104 computes a metric measuring the MSE during this deployment.
- the processor 104 calculates the parameters for the next deploy of the display 1 10.
- the embedded optimization algorithm is continuously improving the metric and the parameters to provide optimal performance to the occupant during the lifecycle of the display 1 10.
- the optimal performance reduces the wear of the deployment mechanism, because the wear of the mechanical components of the deployment mechanism are dynamically compensated by the embedded optimization algorithm.
- the embedded optimization algorithm measures the performance of the display 110 for evolutionary optimization.
- the optimization algorithm can be embedded into a variety of devices.
- the embedded optimization algorithm includes an initial parameter setting, such as a set point (SP).
- the parameters may include PID coefficients (e.g. proportional, integral, and/or derivative coefficients)
- PID coefficients e.g. proportional, integral, and/or derivative coefficients
- the parameters change using the particular device and the embedded optimization algorithm will evolve to find the device's particular optimum parameters (e.g. process variables (PV)).
- PV process variables
- the embedded optimization algorithm also accounts for potential interactions of the device with the environment, for example, mechanical constraints and vibration.
- the embedded optimization algorithm computes these influences and adapts continuously to the environment.
- FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary process 200 of the system 100.
- Step 202 includes at least one parameter of an occupant or driver of a vehicle.
- the parameters can be identified by xi, X2, . . . Xn.
- the processor 104 uses the parameters to a deployment mechanism, such as a motor.
- the embedded optimization algorithm uses the parameters xi, x 2 , . . . x n to drive the motor for deployment of the display 1 10.
- Each parameter has initial values and boundaries that define the design space for optimizing the deployment.
- the sensor 1 12 such as a Hall sensor, is used to capture position and/or speed of the display 1 10.
- Process 200 may continue to step 202 and evaluate the parameters and continue the process. Process 200 may continue to step 208 to drive the motor to deploy the display 1 10.
- the embedded optimization algorithm modifies the parameters driving the deployment device so that process 200 provides smooth, precise, and repeatable deployments of the display 1 10.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a graph 300 of a speed profile 302 of the display 1 10, including a target speed 304 and a measured speed 306.
- the processor 104 calculates an error ei between the target speed 304 and the measured speed 306.
- the processor 104 calculates the MSE of the target speed 304 and the measured speed 306.
- the parameters xi(j), X2(j), - - - Xn(j) include a response MSE(j).
- FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary process 400 of the embedded optimization algorithm of the system 100. Process 400 begins with establishing the default parameters at step 402.
- the parameters are identified by xi(0), X2(0), . . . Xn(0).
- process 400 proceeds to step 404.
- deployment j with parameters xiO), X2(j), ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ Xn(j) are performed.
- the processor 104 calculates a response MSE(j), the MSE is the sum of the square of a speed error or a position error at each period divided by one less than the number of period.
- a SPC test is run on the response MSE(j) using an exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) method.
- EWMA method uses a type of infinite impulse response filter that applies weighting factors which decrease exponentially. The weighting for each older datum decreases exponentially without reaching zero.
- the SPC is used on the MSE to determine if a special event occurred during the deployment of the display 1 10. If a special event occurred during deployment, the last result is discarded. In other words, if the response MSE(j) is out of control, there is a special event and process 400 returns to step 404 to redo the deployment j. If the response MSEy ' ) is in control, meaning that there is no special event, process 400 proceeds to step 408.
- a EVOP algorithm is used to calculate xi(j+l), x 2 (j+l), - - - Xn(j+1) using a previous n+1 in the control, results.
- the deployment j is adjusted to j+1 .
- process 400 proceeds to step 404 to perform the deployment j and the response. Process 400 continues until it stops. Process 400 may stop when the vehicle is turned off or after a period of time, and resume when the vehicle is turned on.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a graph 500 of an evolutionary operation, or EVOP 502, of the system 100.
- the EVOP 502 has two parameters XI and X2.
- Each vertex for example vertex 1-6, is represented by a dot on the graph 50.
- Vertex 1, 2, 3 are the initial vertexes.
- the value of XI and X2 may be adjusted from 0 to 100.
- the curves for example curves 504, 506, 508, represent a contour plot of the MSE. During the first three moves, e.g. from vertex 1 to vertex 2 to vertex 3, the MSE is calculated for each of the three vertexes.
- the vertex moves toward an optimal area 510 for the particular device having the embedded optimization algorithm.
- a vertex e.g. vertex 512
- the vertex 512 oscillates around the optimal area 510 until a condition changes. For example, if wear on the deployment mechanism or another influence is detected, the system behavior changes and the optimal area 510 will move to a more optimal area. In other words, the embedded optimization algorithm will adapt and the vertex will move to a new optimal area.
- the new set of parameters (e.g., the vertex) is calculated using the valid last n+1 deployments using EVOP 502.
- a different variant of EVOP 502 is used. For example, using a variable of fixed step size.
- One implementation of EVOP 502 is to 1) rank the MSE and 2) obtain a new vertex.
- a Vertex_W is the vertex with a higher MSE and a Vertex_G is the mean of all other vertexes.
- optimal parameters are determined and implemented as static parameters.
- the records of the MSE are refreshed. For example, records of the MSE older than 100 deploys or one month are actualized.
- the EVOP 502 may include additional, and/or fewer steps and is not limited to those illustrated in this disclosure.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Instrument Panels (AREA)
Abstract
A deployment system for a device of a vehicle is described. The deployment system includes a non-transitory computer readable medium to store instructions of the deployment system and a processor configured to execute the instructions. The processor is configured to deploy the device using a parameter, determine a Mean Square Error (MSE), and run a Statistical Process Control (SPC) test on the MSE. The processor is further configured to determine that no special event is present and process a new parameter using the parameter and the SPC test results. An evolutionary operation (EVOP) algorithm is also used to calculate the new parameter.
Description
EMBEDDED OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM OF PARAMETERS TO DRIVE
DEPLOYMENT MECHANISM FOR DISPLAYS
BACKGROUND
[0001] Vehicles include devices, such as displays or head-up displays (HUDs), which are repositioned for different occupants. Such deployment of these devices causes the mechanical components of the devices to wear out. There is a need for a smart system with a deployment mechanism for deploying the device to a new position, and continuously improving the deployment while taking into account potential interactions with the device environment (e.g. mechanical constraints, vibrations, etc.) and discrepancies between target and actual parameters of the device. This system would also account for manufacturing variations of such devices.
SUMMARY
[0002] This section provides a general summary of the present disclosure and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features, aspects, and objectives.
[0003] Disclosed herein are implementations of a deployment system for a device. The deployment system includes a non-transitory computer readable medium to store instructions of the deployment system and a processor configured to execute the instructions. The processor is configured to deploy the device using one or more parameters, determine a Mean Square Error (MSE) of the system response versus target, and run a Statistical Process Control (SPC) test on the MSE. The processor is further configured to determine that no special event is present and adjust the one or more parameters.
[0004] Also disclosed herein are implementations of a deployment system for a vehicle having a microprocessor, a sensor, and a head-up display (HUD). The microprocessor is configured to execute instructions stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium. The
sensor is coupled to the microprocessor and configured to receive information of surroundings of the deployment system. The HUD is coupled to the microprocessor. The microprocessor is further configured to initiate a target response for an occupant of the vehicle and deploy the HUD using the target response. The microprocessor is further configured to measure a real-time response of the HUD during deployment and compute a Mean Square Error (MSE) using the target response and the real-time response. The microprocessor then determines using a EVOP algorithm the new parameters for deployment of the HUD using the MSE and recorded parameters and responses from previous iterations.
[0005] Also disclosed herein are implementations of a method for deploying a display.
The method includes performing deployment using one or more parameters, determining a Mean Square Error (MSE), and running a Statistical Process Control (SPC) test on the MSE. The method further includes determining that no special event is present and processing new parameters using historical data, the MSE, and the SPC test results.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0006] The disclosure is best understood from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is emphasized that, according to common practice, the various features of the drawings are not to-scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features are arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity.
[0007] FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram depicting exemplary components of the system in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure;
[0008] FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process of the system in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure;
[0009] FIG. 3 is a graph of a target speed and a measured speed of a display in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure;
[0010] FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process of the system, in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure; and
[0011] FIG. 5 is a graph of an Evolutionary Operation (EVOP) algorithm in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0012] The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the disclosure in its application or uses. For purposes of clarity, the same reference numbers are used in the description and drawings to identify similar elements.
[0013] FIG. 1 is an illustrative block diagram, depicting exemplary components of the system 100 in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure. The system. 100 may include additional and/or fewer components and is not limited to those illustrated in FIG. 1. The system. 100 includes a control unit 102. The control unit 102 includes various components such as at least one microprocessor or processor 104, a memory 106, and an input/output 108. The control unit 102 may process the data captured by the sensor 1 1.2 to identify the environment surrounding the system. 100, or more particularly of the display 1 10. The sensor 112 may capture the real-time position and/or speed of the display 110. The control, unit 102 may process the realtime position and/or speed of the display 1 10 within that environment. The control, unit 102 processes data of the environment, like mechanical constraints or vibration that are captured by the sensor 112. The memory 106 stores data of the positions of the display 110. Using the record of previous positions of the display 110 and a new set of parameters, the processor 104 provides the new parameters to the display 1 10 to drive the deployment mechanism, for the display 110.
[0014] The processor 104 is a device that processes signals and performs general computing and arithmetic functions. The processor 104 may include multiple single and multicore processors, co-processors, and architectures. The memory 106 may include a variety of memory, such as volatile memory and non-volatile memory. The memory 106 may also include a disk, such as but not limited to a flash memory card, a memory stick, a magnetic disk drive, a solid state disk drive, a CR-ROM, or a DVD ROM. The memory 106 may store a system that controls resources of a computing device and software that the processor 104 executes. The processor 104 and memory 106 are operatively coupled. The processor 104 performs processes by executing software instructions stored by the memory 106. The processes may include capturing data of the environment surrounding the display 1 10. The processes may include capturing data of the real-time speed when the display 1 10 is deploying and the real-time position of the display 1 10. The processes may also include determining the angle of the display 1 10. The processes may further include computing a metric measuring a Mean Square Error (MSE) while the display 1 10 is deploying. The processes may also include calculating the parameters for the next deploy of the display 1 10, which improves the processes.
[0015] The processor 104 and the memory 106 communicate through the input/output
108. The input/output 108 is a part of the system 100 and communicates with the sensor 1 12 and the display 1 10. The data captured by the sensor 1 12 is input to processor 104 for processing and outputting to the display 1 10 for providing display deployment assistance to optimize the position of the display 1 10 for an occupant of a vehicle.
[0016] The memory 106 stores an optimization algorithm having software parameters to drive a deployment mechanism for the display 1 10. The optimization algorithm is embedded in the software of the display 1 10. The embedded optimization algorithm may be used with any
mechanism that deploys the display 1 10. The position of the display 110 may be captured in realtime and stored in the memory 106. The speed of the display 110 as it deploys may be measured in real-time and stored in the memory 106. The display 110 includes the deployment mechanism for deploying the display 1 10. Each time the deployment mechanism is used in the vehicle for deploying the display 110 to a new position, a new set of software parameters is tested. Small variations of the system response are detected by sensor 1 12. The small variations may be undetectable by the occupant. The processor 104 computes a metric measuring the MSE during this deployment. Using the result and the record of previous deploys, together with using an Evolutionary Operation (EVOP) algorithm and a Statistical Process Control (SPC), the processor 104 calculates the parameters for the next deploy of the display 1 10. The embedded optimization algorithm is continuously improving the metric and the parameters to provide optimal performance to the occupant during the lifecycle of the display 1 10. The optimal performance reduces the wear of the deployment mechanism, because the wear of the mechanical components of the deployment mechanism are dynamically compensated by the embedded optimization algorithm. Furthermore, each time the display 110 is deployed, the embedded optimization algorithm measures the performance of the display 110 for evolutionary optimization.
[0017] The optimization algorithm can be embedded into a variety of devices. The embedded optimization algorithm includes an initial parameter setting, such as a set point (SP). The parameters may include PID coefficients (e.g. proportional, integral, and/or derivative coefficients) The parameters change using the particular device and the embedded optimization algorithm will evolve to find the device's particular optimum parameters (e.g. process variables (PV)). The embedded optimization algorithm also accounts for potential interactions of the
device with the environment, for example, mechanical constraints and vibration. The embedded optimization algorithm computes these influences and adapts continuously to the environment.
[0018] FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary process 200 of the system 100. Step 202 includes at least one parameter of an occupant or driver of a vehicle. The parameters can be identified by xi, X2, . . . Xn. Using the parameters, at step 204, the processor 104 provides instructions to a deployment mechanism, such as a motor. For example, the embedded optimization algorithm uses the parameters xi, x2, . . . xn to drive the motor for deployment of the display 1 10. Each parameter has initial values and boundaries that define the design space for optimizing the deployment. At step 206, the sensor 1 12, such as a Hall sensor, is used to capture position and/or speed of the display 1 10. If the sensor captures data that changes the parameters, the values and boundaries defined may also change. Process 200 may continue to step 202 and evaluate the parameters and continue the process. Process 200 may continue to step 208 to drive the motor to deploy the display 1 10. The embedded optimization algorithm, modifies the parameters driving the deployment device so that process 200 provides smooth, precise, and repeatable deployments of the display 1 10.
[0019] FIG. 3 illustrates a graph 300 of a speed profile 302 of the display 1 10, including a target speed 304 and a measured speed 306. At each time interrupt, the processor 104 calculates an error ei between the target speed 304 and the measured speed 306. For each deployment j of the display 1 10, such as a head-up display (HUD), the processor 104 calculates the MSE of the target speed 304 and the measured speed 306. The parameters xi(j), X2(j), - - - Xn(j) include a response MSE(j). The equation for this calculation is as follows:
[0020] FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary process 400 of the embedded optimization algorithm of the system 100. Process 400 begins with establishing the default parameters at step 402. The parameters are identified by xi(0), X2(0), . . . Xn(0). After the default parameters are established, process 400 proceeds to step 404. At step 404, deployment j with parameters xiO), X2(j), · · · Xn(j) are performed. The processor 104 calculates a response MSE(j), the MSE is the sum of the square of a speed error or a position error at each period divided by one less than the number of period. At step 406, a SPC test is run on the response MSE(j) using an exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) method. The EWMA method uses a type of infinite impulse response filter that applies weighting factors which decrease exponentially. The weighting for each older datum decreases exponentially without reaching zero.
[0021] The SPC is used on the MSE to determine if a special event occurred during the deployment of the display 1 10. If a special event occurred during deployment, the last result is discarded. In other words, if the response MSE(j) is out of control, there is a special event and process 400 returns to step 404 to redo the deployment j. If the response MSEy') is in control, meaning that there is no special event, process 400 proceeds to step 408. At step 408, a EVOP algorithm, is used to calculate xi(j+l), x2(j+l), - - - Xn(j+1) using a previous n+1 in the control, results. At step 410, the deployment j is adjusted to j+1 . The parameters from the last n+1 records and the corresponding measures of the MSE are recorded and stored in memory 106. After deployment j is adjusted, process 400 proceeds to step 404 to perform the deployment j and the response. Process 400 continues until it stops. Process 400 may stop when the vehicle is turned off or after a period of time, and resume when the vehicle is turned on.
[0022] FIG. 5 illustrates a graph 500 of an evolutionary operation, or EVOP 502, of the system 100. In this embodiment, the EVOP 502 has two parameters XI and X2. Each vertex, for
example vertex 1-6, is represented by a dot on the graph 50. Vertex 1, 2, 3 are the initial vertexes. The value of XI and X2 may be adjusted from 0 to 100. The curves, for example curves 504, 506, 508, represent a contour plot of the MSE. During the first three moves, e.g. from vertex 1 to vertex 2 to vertex 3, the MSE is calculated for each of the three vertexes. After the MSE is calculated, the vertex moves toward an optimal area 510 for the particular device having the embedded optimization algorithm. When a vertex (e.g. vertex 512) reaches the optimal area 510, the vertex 512 oscillates around the optimal area 510 until a condition changes. For example, if wear on the deployment mechanism or another influence is detected, the system behavior changes and the optimal area 510 will move to a more optimal area. In other words, the embedded optimization algorithm will adapt and the vertex will move to a new optimal area.
[0023] The new set of parameters (e.g., the vertex) is calculated using the valid last n+1 deployments using EVOP 502. In another embodiment, a different variant of EVOP 502 is used. For example, using a variable of fixed step size. One implementation of EVOP 502 is to 1) rank the MSE and 2) obtain a new vertex. For step 1 , a Vertex_W is the vertex with a higher MSE and a Vertex_G is the mean of all other vertexes. For step 2, the new vertex is calculated as follows: New Vertex = 2*Vertex_G - Vertex_W. Basically, optimal parameters are determined and implemented as static parameters. To dynamically adapt to a change of the device, the records of the MSE are refreshed. For example, records of the MSE older than 100 deploys or one month are actualized. The EVOP 502 may include additional, and/or fewer steps and is not limited to those illustrated in this disclosure.
[0024] While the disclosure has been described in connection with certain embodiments, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included
within the scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures as is permitted under the law.
Claims
1. A deployment system for a device, comprising:
a non-transitory computer readable medium to store instructions of the deployment system; and
a processor configured to execute the instructions, the processor being configured to: deploy the device using a parameter;
determine a Mean Square Error (MSE);
run a Statistical Process Control (SPC) test on the MSE;
determine that no special event is present; and
process a new parameter using the parameter and the SPC test results.
2. The deployment system of claim 1, wherein the SPC test ran on the MSE includes using an exponentially weighted moving average method.
3. The deployment system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to:
determine that a special event is present; and
repeat deployment of the device using the parameter.
4. The deployment system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to:
initiate a default parameter;
deploy the device using the default parameter; and
process the new parameter using the default parameter and the SPC test results.
5. The deployment system of claim 1 , wherein processing the new parameter using the parameter and the SPC test results includes using an evolutionary operation (EVOP) algorithm to calculate the new parameter.
6. The deployment system of claim 1, further comprising:
a sensor to capture at least one of an actual speed of deploying the device and an actual position of the device.
7. The deployment system of claim 6, wherein the processor is further configured to determine the MSE using at least one of the actual speed versus a target speed of deploying the device and the actual position of the device versus a target position of the display.
8. The deployment system of claim 1 , wherein the device is at least one of a display or a head-up display (HUD).
9. A deployment system for a vehicle, comprising:
a microprocessor, the microprocessor being configured to execute instructions stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium;
a sensor coupled to the microprocessor and configured to receive information of surroundings of the deployment system; and
a head-up display (HUD) coupled to the microprocessor;
wherein the microprocessor is further configured to:
initiate a target parameter for an occupant of the vehicle;
deploy the HUD using the target parameter;
measure a real-time parameter of the HUD during deployment;
compute a Mean Square Error (MSE) using the target parameter and the real-time parameter; and
determine a new parameter for deployment of the HUD using the MSE.
10. The deployment system of claim 9, wherein the real-time parameter is at least one of speed and position of the HUD.
11. The deployment system of claim 9, wherein the processor is further configured to use an evolutionary operation (EVOP) algorithm and a Statistical Process Control (SPC) to determine the new parameter.
12. The deployment system of claim 9, wherein the information of the surroundings of the deployment system includes at least one of mechanical constraints and vibrations of the HUD.
13. The deployment system of claim 9, further comprising a deployment mechanism for deploying the HUD.
14. A method for deploying a display, comprising:
performing deployment using a parameter;
determining a Mean Square Error (MSE);
running a Statistical Process Control (SPC) test on the MSE;
determining that no special event is present; and
processing a new parameter using the parameter and the SPC test results.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the running the SPC test on the MSE includes using an exponentially weighted deploying average method.
16. The method of claim 14, further comprising:
determining that a special event is present; and
repeating deployment using the parameter and the SPC test results.
17. The method of claim 14, further comprising:
initiating a default parameter;
performing deployment using the default parameter; and
processing the new parameter using the default parameter and the SPC test results.
18. The method of claim 14, wherein processing a new parameter using the parameter and the SPC test results includes using an evolutionary operation (EVOP) algorithm to calculate the new parameter.
19. The method of claim 14, wherein determining the MSE using an actual speed of deploying the display versus a target speed of deploying the display.
20. The method of claim 14, wherein determining the MSE using an actual position of the display versus a target position of deploying the display.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US15/785,783 | 2017-10-17 | ||
| US15/785,783 US10520728B2 (en) | 2017-10-17 | 2017-10-17 | Embedded optimization algorithm of parameters to drive deployment mechanism for displays |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2019076972A1 true WO2019076972A1 (en) | 2019-04-25 |
Family
ID=64017350
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2018/078383 Ceased WO2019076972A1 (en) | 2017-10-17 | 2018-10-17 | Embedded optimization algorithm of parameters to drive deployment mechanism for displays |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US10520728B2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2019076972A1 (en) |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7890263B2 (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2011-02-15 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for sensing and deployment control supervision of a safety device |
| JP2014202834A (en) * | 2013-04-02 | 2014-10-27 | 矢崎総業株式会社 | Head-up display device |
Family Cites Families (38)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4792737A (en) * | 1987-06-15 | 1988-12-20 | Performance Controls, Inc. | Circuit for controlling the motion of a moving object |
| US5204666A (en) * | 1987-10-26 | 1993-04-20 | Yazaki Corporation | Indication display unit for vehicles |
| US5058836A (en) * | 1989-12-27 | 1991-10-22 | General Electric Company | Adaptive autopilot |
| US5394202A (en) * | 1993-01-14 | 1995-02-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating high resolution 3D images in a head tracked stereo display system |
| US6412848B1 (en) * | 1999-11-02 | 2002-07-02 | Rosen Products Llc | Vehicle display monitor system |
| US6529123B1 (en) * | 1999-11-02 | 2003-03-04 | Rosen Products Llc | Automatically deployable and stowable display monitor |
| US6618631B1 (en) * | 2000-04-25 | 2003-09-09 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Adaptive control system having hedge unit and related apparatus and methods |
| US8768286B2 (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2014-07-01 | Mouhamad Ahmad Naboulsi | Hands on steering wheel vehicle safety control system |
| ITTO20020473A1 (en) * | 2002-06-04 | 2003-12-04 | C R F Societa Con Sortile Per | COMMAND GROUP FOR THE ADJUSTMENT OF A OPLURALITY OF FUNCTIONS, PARTICULARLY FOR A VEHICLE. |
| JP4062502B2 (en) * | 2002-08-30 | 2008-03-19 | 日本精機株式会社 | Vehicle display device |
| US20080010875A1 (en) * | 2003-08-19 | 2008-01-17 | Takashi Kuwabara | Display apparatus to be mounted on an automotive vehicle |
| JP4196902B2 (en) * | 2004-08-23 | 2008-12-17 | ソニー株式会社 | Printing medium traveling apparatus, printing apparatus equipped with the traveling apparatus, printing medium traveling speed control method, and computer program |
| US20100176914A1 (en) * | 2005-03-10 | 2010-07-15 | Aurelio Rotolo Moraes | Control and Signaling Device for Vehicles |
| CN101171152B (en) * | 2005-05-09 | 2010-05-19 | 富士通天株式会社 | Electronic equipment |
| DE602006009643D1 (en) * | 2006-08-03 | 2009-11-19 | St Microelectronics Srl | A system for estimating the state of a system and associated apparatus for determining the position and speed of a brushless motor |
| US8031272B2 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2011-10-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method of adjusting viewing angle for display |
| US9736368B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2017-08-15 | Spatial Cam Llc | Camera in a headframe for object tracking |
| US10354407B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2019-07-16 | Spatial Cam Llc | Camera for locating hidden objects |
| JP2010057228A (en) * | 2008-08-27 | 2010-03-11 | Hitachi Ltd | Motor control device |
| DE102010005483A1 (en) * | 2009-02-03 | 2010-08-05 | Volkswagen Ag | Motor vehicle i.e. farm vehicle, has two displays arranged in left and right side areas of steering wheel for variable representation of information, and touch screens arranged at respective displays for input of instructions |
| US8564502B2 (en) * | 2009-04-02 | 2013-10-22 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Distortion and perspective correction of vector projection display |
| US7924146B2 (en) * | 2009-04-02 | 2011-04-12 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Daytime pedestrian detection on full-windscreen head-up display |
| US8384531B2 (en) * | 2009-04-02 | 2013-02-26 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Recommended following distance on full-windshield head-up display |
| US8203298B2 (en) * | 2009-08-26 | 2012-06-19 | Eaton Corporation | System and method for motor speed estimation of an electric motor |
| FR2955813B1 (en) * | 2010-02-02 | 2015-05-22 | Dav | HAPTIC RETURN MODULE FOR INTEGRATING IN A MOTOR VEHICLE FOR A NOMAD DEVICE AND CORRESPONDING CONTROL DEVICE |
| US8427093B2 (en) * | 2010-07-02 | 2013-04-23 | Woodward Hrt, Inc. | Controller for actuation system employing Kalman estimator incorporating effect of system structural stiffness |
| KR101460959B1 (en) * | 2010-09-18 | 2014-11-13 | 존슨 컨트롤스 게엠베하 | Head-up display comprising a projection screen and a device for moving and positioning a projection screen, and method for operating such a head-up display |
| CN103338706B (en) * | 2011-01-26 | 2016-05-04 | 皇家飞利浦有限公司 | Clinical setting control system |
| US10295993B2 (en) * | 2011-09-01 | 2019-05-21 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Method and system for detecting and correcting problematic advanced process control parameters |
| US10338800B2 (en) * | 2014-02-21 | 2019-07-02 | FLIR Belgium BVBA | Enhanced pilot display systems and methods |
| US9360668B2 (en) * | 2014-08-07 | 2016-06-07 | Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. | Dynamically calibrated head-up display |
| US9477083B2 (en) * | 2014-12-01 | 2016-10-25 | Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. | Adjusting an electronic display based on light sensing |
| DE102014019125B4 (en) * | 2014-12-19 | 2020-07-23 | Audi Ag | Motor vehicle with a control device and method for controlling a device depending on a seat inclination |
| US9893666B2 (en) * | 2015-02-03 | 2018-02-13 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Method and system for controlling angular rotor speeds of sensorless induction motors |
| US9633626B2 (en) * | 2015-03-12 | 2017-04-25 | Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. | Adjusting an electronic display based on gaze tracking |
| US20170285739A1 (en) * | 2016-04-04 | 2017-10-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods and Apparatus for Repositioning a Computer Display Based on Eye Position |
| US10099679B2 (en) * | 2016-10-20 | 2018-10-16 | Fca Us Llc | Battery state and parameter estimation using a mixed sigma-point kalman filtering and recursive least squares technique |
| US10287994B2 (en) * | 2017-05-12 | 2019-05-14 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Electronic throttle control using model predictive control |
-
2017
- 2017-10-17 US US15/785,783 patent/US10520728B2/en active Active
-
2018
- 2018-10-17 WO PCT/EP2018/078383 patent/WO2019076972A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7890263B2 (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2011-02-15 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for sensing and deployment control supervision of a safety device |
| JP2014202834A (en) * | 2013-04-02 | 2014-10-27 | 矢崎総業株式会社 | Head-up display device |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US10520728B2 (en) | 2019-12-31 |
| US20190113750A1 (en) | 2019-04-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP3767524B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting object | |
| JP6283112B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for defining a functional model based on data | |
| JP2015022027A5 (en) | ||
| JP2013117969A (en) | System and method for generating robust depth map utilizing multiple resolution procedure | |
| CN109752717A (en) | Device and method for the sensing data in associated vehicle | |
| US12540815B2 (en) | Image correlation for end-to-end displacement and strain measurement | |
| JP6998243B2 (en) | Impact test analyzer, impact test analysis system, impact test analysis method and program | |
| JP2012253713A (en) | Image processing device, method for controlling image processing device, and program for causing computer to execute the method | |
| US9489083B2 (en) | Touch panel controller, touch sensor system, and electronic device | |
| US9947361B2 (en) | Active vibration control device and design method therefor | |
| JP6647992B2 (en) | Design support equipment | |
| US10520728B2 (en) | Embedded optimization algorithm of parameters to drive deployment mechanism for displays | |
| JP7238984B2 (en) | Vibration measuring device, vibration measuring method, and program | |
| US11913889B2 (en) | Prediction device for predicting a growth direction of a crack in a subject and prediction method | |
| US20160216690A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for correcting distortion of 3d hologram | |
| MX2012007594A (en) | STABILIZATION METHOD AND COMPUTER SYSTEM. | |
| CN107967691B (en) | Visual mileage calculation method and device | |
| US20140098283A1 (en) | Method and system of curve fitting for common focus measures | |
| US9392158B2 (en) | Method and system for intelligent dynamic autofocus search | |
| US11830162B2 (en) | Image processing apparatus configured to perform edge preserving smoothing and image processing method thereof | |
| CN116952273A (en) | Time calibration method, electronic equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN111339604B (en) | Design method and device for dynamic stiffness of passive side of vibration isolation system and storage medium | |
| JP5338724B2 (en) | Image processing apparatus and image processing program | |
| JP7001376B2 (en) | Drives, devices, drive systems, programs and drive methods | |
| JP6552938B2 (en) | Method, apparatus and program for calculating hysteresis loss of filler filled rubber |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 18793380 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 18793380 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
