WO2019063056A1 - Microorganism stains lactobacillus buchneri biocc 203 dsm 32650 and lactobacillus buchneri biocc 228 dsm 32651 and their use - Google Patents

Microorganism stains lactobacillus buchneri biocc 203 dsm 32650 and lactobacillus buchneri biocc 228 dsm 32651 and their use Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019063056A1
WO2019063056A1 PCT/EE2018/000003 EE2018000003W WO2019063056A1 WO 2019063056 A1 WO2019063056 A1 WO 2019063056A1 EE 2018000003 W EE2018000003 W EE 2018000003W WO 2019063056 A1 WO2019063056 A1 WO 2019063056A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
biocc
dsm
silage
feed
lactobacillus
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EE2018/000003
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Epp Songisepp
Oksana GERULIS
Liina SADAM
Sirje KUUSIK
Merle MURUVEE
Anette NAPPA
Original Assignee
Biocc Oü
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from EEP201800024A external-priority patent/EE05825B1/en
Application filed by Biocc Oü filed Critical Biocc Oü
Priority to EA202090866A priority Critical patent/EA202090866A1/en
Priority to CN201880077117.6A priority patent/CN111601879A/en
Priority to JP2020518507A priority patent/JP7250783B2/en
Priority to EP18793358.5A priority patent/EP3688139A1/en
Publication of WO2019063056A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019063056A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/20Bacteria; Culture media therefor
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K30/00Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K30/10Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder
    • A23K30/15Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder using chemicals or microorganisms for ensilaging
    • A23K30/18Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder using chemicals or microorganisms for ensilaging using microorganisms or enzymes
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K50/00Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
    • A23K50/10Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for ruminants
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/20Bacteria; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/205Bacterial isolates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12RINDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES C12C - C12Q, RELATING TO MICROORGANISMS
    • C12R2001/00Microorganisms ; Processes using microorganisms
    • C12R2001/01Bacteria or Actinomycetales ; using bacteria or Actinomycetales
    • C12R2001/225Lactobacillus

Definitions

  • the invention belongs to the field of biotechnology and is applied to feed manufacturing.
  • the invention encompasses a microbiological silage additive and its use in feed fermentation to ensure aerobic stability, the quality of fermentation of the feed.
  • Silage is the material produced by the controlled fermentation of a crop of high moisture content (McDonald, P., Henderson, A. R., Heron, S.J.E. 1991 . The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed, Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, Bucks UK, p. 340).
  • Ensiling is a storage method of plant-based animal feed that rests on lactic acid fermentation under anaerobic conditions (Rooke, J., A. and Hatfield, G., D., 2003. Biochemistry of Ensiling. In: Silage Science and Technology, D. R. Buxton, R. E. Muck, and J. IT Harrison, eds. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 95-139).
  • the fermentation of silage can be divided into four stages: (1) the anaerobic stage in the silo after the harvest, (2) the fermentation stage, (3) the stable storage stage, and (4) the silage unloading stage, where the. silo is opened, and the silage is exposed to air.
  • the material to be ensiled must undergo correct microbial fermentation. Successful fermentation also depends on the type and quality of the grass plants, the techniques used in the ensiling process, climate, the development of undesirable microorganisms (e.g. Clostridium, enteropathogens. Listeria, bacilli) and fungi (yeasts and moulds), as well as the dry matter content of the material to be ensiled.
  • silage Most of the silage is produced with a dry matter content of 200. ,,500 g/kg. At such levels, many plant enzymes are active during the ensilage process, and numerous desirable and undesirable microorganisms, yeasts and moukis can grow in the silage under such conditions. Thus, getting the whole biological activity under control poses a remarkable challenge and can only be achieved by means of a well-managed ensilage process (Muck. R. E. 2010. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. R. Bras, Zootec. Vol, 39. July).
  • Silage may become exposed to oxygen both when the silo is opened for feeding and because of inadequate coverage of the silo.
  • the aerobic stability of silage also depends on the silage crop to be ensiled, its growth phase at the time of harvest, the biochemical and microbiological factors of fermentation, the physical characteristics of the silage material, the organisation of silage management, temperature, and the choice of silage additive.
  • the aerobic stability indicator of silage is the length of time that silage can resist aerobic spoilage processes, i.e. the length of time that it retains its quality upon exposure to air.
  • the aerobic stability of silage is estimated based on the rate at which the temperature of the silage rises. The longer the temperature of the silage remains stable, i.e.
  • Yeasts employ the residual sugar contained in silage as a source of energy; however, their first preference is lactic acid.
  • well-fermented silages with high lactic acid content are particularly susceptible to aerobic spoilage.
  • the activity of the yeasts causes the pH level of the silage to rise, enabling numerous other aerobic microorganisms and moulds to become active.
  • High microbial activity in well- fermented, nutritious silage is revealed by an increase in the temperature of the silage, It has been reported (Ohyama, Y., Hara, S. and Masaki, S, (1980) Analysis of the factors affecting aerobic deterioration of grass silages. In Thomas, C. (ed.) Forage conservation in the 80s. BGS Occasional Symposium No. 11, pp.
  • the low pH level of silage has no direct effect on the microorganisms that cause aerobic spoilage; the acids produced during the fermentation of the silage, however, have a variable importance.
  • the growth of yeasts is inhibited by undissociated short-chain fatty acids (Pahlow G., Muck R.E., Driehuis F., Oude Elfermk S.J..W.H. and Spoelstra S.F. (2003) Microbiology of ensiling. In: Buxton D.R., Muck R.E. and Harrison J.H, (eds.) Silage science and technology, pp. 31 -93. Madison, WI, USA: Agronomy Publication No. 42, American Society of Agronomy).
  • Undissociated acid molecules can penetrate the cell membrane of a microbe by means of passive diffusion, which results in the release of H+ ions. This lowers the pH level inside the cell, causing the cell to perish.
  • the dissociation rate of art acid in silage depends on the dissociation constant of the acid (pKa) and the pH level of the silage (Zirchrora (201.1) Dissociation constants oforganic acids and bases. Available at: http://www,zirchrom.com/organic.htm, (accessed 3 November 201 1)).
  • Acetic and propionic acid are less prone to dissociation than lactic acid, which explains the susceptibility of well-fermented silage with high lactic acid content to aerobic spoilage.
  • Acetic and propionic acid effectively inhibit the growth of yeasts and moulds.
  • Butyric acid has a similar effect.
  • Silage with high butyric acid content has good aerobic stability; however, this indicates the activity of spoilage-causing Clostridium.
  • Such silage exhibits extensive nutrient loss, and the high butyric acid content can cause health issues in animals.
  • Propionic acid content in silage is rare and small; the concentration of the microorganisms producing it in silage crops is low and their competitiveness is poor.
  • Acetic acid content in silage is an indication of heterofermentation; since acetic acid is highly toxic to yeasts; such silages typically display great aerobic stability.
  • silage additives have been developed to improve the ensilage process and the nutrition values of ensiled feed. .However, in addition to ensuring quick fermentation and. improving the quality of silage, silage additives are also expected to inhibit the -growth of spoilage (inch .aerobic spoilage) organisms. The main reason for using a silage additive to improve the aerobic stability of silage is to prevent the heating of the silage, the loss of nutrients and a decrease in the performance of the animals due to consumption of spoiled silage.
  • Silage additives often employ enzymes; however, these do not inhibit yeasts or moulds, meaning that silages prepared with enzymes have a very modest aerobic stability.
  • Organic acids such as propionic, acetic and benzoic acid etc, are effective in improving the aerobic stability of silage. These are added either in large quantities, to achieve the so-called final conservation of the feed, or in smaller quantities, in the latter case, the activity of yeasts is inhibited, but total conservation is not guaranteed, and ensilage continues to depend on natural fermentation. Ammonia has also been reported to have an inhibitory effect on bacteria, yeasts and moulds. Unfortunately, organic acids and other chemicals are aggressive and damaging on the siiage equipment; strict safety requirements apply to their handling and storage.
  • Biological silage additives based on lactic acid bacteria are regarded as natural products; their advantages include their lack of toxicity, lack of corrosive effect on equipment, and lack of environmental risks.
  • Lactic acid bacteria are divided into two groups based on glucose fermentation: homofermentative and heterofermentative species. Homofermentative lactic acid bacteria produce two moles of lactic acid from one mole of glucose, whereas heterofermentative bacteria produce one mole of lactic acid, one mole of carbon dioxide and one mole of either ethanol or acetic acid, it is wet! known that at the beginning of the fermentation process, homofermentative species dominate, but later on, as the environment becomes more acidic, heterofermentative bacteria become prevalent (Muck, R. E. 2010. Silage microbiology and its control through additives, R. Bras. Zootec. Vol. 39. July).
  • Silage additives based on homofermentative lactic acid bacteria improve the fermentation process of silage; however, most of such starter bacteria do little to inhibit the growth of yeasts and moulds. With the use of such a silage additive, the aerobic stability of the silage may be lower than without any silage additive, and it might even increase the heating risk of the silage.
  • Some silage starters contain bacteria (e.g. propionic acid bacteria) that produce propionic acid. This, unfortunately, does not improve the aerobic stability of the silage, because these microorganisms are not typically acid-tolerant, and their growth is slow.
  • starters that produce large quantities of acetic acid in addition to lactic acid do inhibit the microorganisms causing the aerobic spoilage of silage (yeasts, moulds etc.). i.e. they improve the aerobic stability of silage and prevent the spoiling of silage upon the opening of the silo or upon other kinds of exposure to air.
  • the addition of heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria during the ensiling process lowers the pH level and reduces dry matter loss.
  • strains are reported to have a strong inhibitory effect on the growth of yeasts and moulds, thereby improving the aerobic stability of the silage (Jatkauskas, J,, Vrotniakiene, V submit Ohlsson, C. Lund, B. 2013. The effect of three silage inoculants on aerobic stability in grass, clover-grass, lucerne and maize silage. Agricultural and Food Science. 22: 137-144).
  • different strains of the same species do not have identical properties, as due to genetic variations interspecies differences i.e. strain-specific properties occur.
  • the aim of this invention is to provide new strains Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 lor improving feed fermentation quality and prolonging the aerobic stability and storage time of silage.
  • the invention discloses the isolated microorganism strains Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651, and feed, feed additive and composition comprising one or both said strains.
  • the feed may be fermented feed, e.g. silage.
  • the feed additive may be a silage additive. Suitable excipients can be included as other ingredients in the composition of the additive product.
  • Said microorganisms can be used in lyophilized form.
  • the microorganism Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 ensure aerobic stability of the feed, including the feed difficult to ferment, e.g. feed with low ( ⁇ 20 percentage) dry matter content.
  • the next objective of the invention is the use of the named microorganism in: accelerating the fermentation of feed, increasing the concentration of lactic acid, reducing pH, and decreasing the loss of nutrients in feed and the concentration of ammonia nitrogen and butyric acid in feed.
  • Said microbes (together or separately) ate used to ferment feed and improve fermentation, to increase the concentration of lactic acid and acetic acid in feed, to lower the pH level and thereby reduce nutrient loss in. feed.
  • Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 inhibit the growth and action of undesirable microorganisms (pathogenic microorganisms, yeasts and moulds).
  • Said pathogens are Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus saprophytics, Salmonella enterica subsp, enter ica serovar Enteritidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli etc.
  • the invention also relates to a method for prolonging the preservation of feed, where one or both of microorganisms Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 228 DSM. 32651 are added to the feed during fermentation.
  • the rate of it is 1 x 10 5 ...1 x 10 6 CFU/g of the fermented feed.
  • the microorganism strains Lactobacillus huclmeri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus biichneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were isolated form ensiled naturally without the use of silage additives high quality maize (Zea mays L.) silage in Estonia.
  • a suspension (with descending concentrations) was made of solutions, using the decimal dilution method in peptone water (Sigma-Aldrich, France); and seeded on MRS (de Man Rogosa Sharpe) agar (Biolife.
  • the morphological characteristics of the cultures- of Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were determined after growth in MRS agar and broth (Biolife, Italy).
  • Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 is a Gram-positive regular rod-shaped non-motile non-spore forming bacterium, occurring singly and in short chains. Elongated cells occur during cultivation in MRS broth,
  • Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 is a Gram-positive regular rod-shaped non-motile non-spore forming bacterium, occurring singly and in short chains. Long and slender cells occur during cultivation in MRS broth,
  • MRS broth (for 48-72 hours) is suitable for cultivating the microbial strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 microaerobically or anaerobically, after which a homogenous turbid growth occurs.
  • the colonies are grayish white, 1.5-2 millimeters, flat, shiny, translucent, with rough texture and ismbonate.
  • the microbial strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 is obligately heterofemientative. catalase and oxidase negative, hydrolyzes arginine and produces carbon dioxide during the fermentation of glucose.
  • 32650 is 37 degrees; the strain also replicates at 15 degrees. To a small extent, growth can also be observed at 45 degrees.
  • the optimum pH range for growing the strain is 5.7- 6.2.
  • MRS broth (for 48-72 hours) is suitable for cultivating the microbial strain of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 microaerobically; after which a homogenous turbid growth occurs. After 48 hours of cultivation at 37 degrees in a microaerobic ( 10 percentage CO 2 ) or anaerobic (CO 2 /N 2 /H 2 : 5/90/5 percentage) environments the colonies are grayish white, 1.5-2 millimeters, flat, shiny, translucent, with rough texture and umbonate.
  • the microbial strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 is obligate! ⁇ ' heterofermentative, catalase and oxidase negative, hydrolyzes. arginine and produces carbon dioxide during the fermentation of glucose.
  • 32651 is 37 degrees; the strain also replicates at 15 degrees. To a small extent, growth can also be observed at 45 degrees.
  • the optimum pH range for growing the strain is 5.7- 6.2.
  • the microbial strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 was identified as Lactobacillus buchner using MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonik).
  • the microbial strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 was identified as Lactobacillus buchneri using MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonik).
  • Lactobacillus buchneri strain BioCC 203 was deposited in accordance with the Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorgajtiisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure in Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkuifuren GmbH under number DSM 32650 on 25 September 2017.
  • Lactobacillus buchneri- strain BioCC 228 was deposited in accordance with the Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure in Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH under number DSM 32651 on 25 September 2017.
  • strains can be categorised as susceptible or resistant, to antimicrobials
  • Susceptible (S) a bacterial strain is defined as susceptible when, it is inhibited at a concentration of a specific antimicrobial equal or lower than the established cut-off value (S ⁇ x mg/L).
  • Resistant (R) a bacterial strain is defined as resistant when it is not. inhibited at a concentration of a specific antimicrobial higher than the established cut-off value (R > x mg/L).
  • the minimum inhibitor)' concentrations for Lactobacillus buchneri strains BioCC ' 203 DSM 32650 and BioCC 228 DSM 32651 did not exceed the M IC cut-off values proposed for obligate hetero fermentative Lactobacillus proposed by EFSA.
  • the -purpose of the. experiment was to investigate the ability of the strains Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 to grow in the presence of various sugars and acidify the culture meedium.
  • n log N l -log No / log 2, where N l is the cell concentration at any given time; No is the initial cell concentration
  • w N t is the cell concentration at any given time; No is the initial cell concentration and t is the specified period of time in hous.
  • the grovsth of the strain of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 was one generation faster than that of the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 (Table 2) during the first 24 hours of microaerobic cultivation In a culture medium containing glucose, fructose, xylose or a mixture, of glucose, fructose and trehalose. Table 2.
  • Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 during microaerobic (10 percent CO 2 ) cultivation at 25 degrees for 24, 48 and 72 hours.
  • N number of n generations; V - growth rate; G - MRS broth with glucose; F - MRS broth with fructose; T - MRS broth with trehalose; M - MRS broth with a mixture of glucose - fructose - trehalose; X - MRS broth with xylose; Ma - MRS broth with maltose
  • Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 was on average two generations faster in medium containing fructose or a mixture of glucose, fructose and trehalose; within 48 hours for three generations faster in glucose containing medium and about 1.5 generations faster in fructose and xylose containing medium compared to the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 (Table 3).
  • Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 was slower growing, being able to outrun Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 after 48 hours of culturing in medium containing fructose or xylose and in a medium containing a mixture of glucose, fructose and trehalose.
  • N number of n generations; V - growth rate; G - MRS broth with glucose; F - MRS broth with fructose; T - MRS broth with trehalose; M - MRS broth with a mixture of glucose - fructose - trehalose: X - MRS broth with xylose; Ma - MRS broth with maltose
  • the purpose of the experiment was to determine the profile of organic acids and alcohols of strains Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 durina microaerobic and anaerobic cultivation.
  • Methods The 24h old cultures of Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 203 and Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 228 cultivated on MRS agar (Biolife. Italy) were suspended in peptone water according to the McFarland Turbidity Standard No 5 (1.5x 10 9 microbes/ml), seeded into MRS broth (Biolife.
  • Gas chromaiographycaily was organic acid and alcohol profile determined by a gas chromatograph Agilent 6890A capillary column CP-Wax 52 CB (30 m x 0.25 mm 0.25 ⁇ m). Column temperature programm 75 degrees 1 min hold. 10 degrees /min to 1 15 degrees 3 min hold. 20 degrees /min to 190 degrees 5 min hold. Detector (FID) 280 degrees.
  • Liquid chromatographycally organic acids were determined on a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC System. The samples were separated on Aminex HPX-87H ion-exclusion column (300 mm x 7.8 mm). The temperature of column was thermostated at 60degrees. flow rate was 0.6 ml/min and. organic acids were detected with PDA detector at 210 nm, Time of the analysis was 26 min.
  • Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were apparent (Table 4).
  • Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 was a significantly stronger producer of ethanot, acetic acid and lactic acid during cultivation m both niicroerobic and anaerobic environment.
  • Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 was capable of producing pyruvate in anaerobic environment (Table 4).
  • the strain Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC- 203 DSM 32650 utilised approximately 99.5 percent and 97.8 percent respectively of the citrate initially present in the culture medium.
  • Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 consumed 4,8 percent of the citrate initially present, in the culture medium. Unlike Lactobacillus huchnen BioCC 203 DSM 32650, the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 was able to produce 5.9 percent citrate during 72 hours of microaerobic cultivation. Table 4.
  • the purpose of the experiment was to determine the profile of organic acids and alcohols of strains Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 during plant material fermentation.
  • Liquid chromatographvcally organic acids were determined on a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC System. The samples were separated on Aminex HPX-87H ion-exclusion column (300mm x 7.8mm). The temperature of column was thermostated at 60 degrees, flow rate was 0.6 ml/min and organic acids were detected with PDA detector at 210 nm. Time of the analysis was 26 min.
  • Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 proved to be stronger producer of ethanol and lactic acid compared to Lactobacillus huchneri.
  • BioCC 228 DSM 32651 Table 5
  • the purpose of the experiment was to test the antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 to entero bathogens during microaerobie and anaerobic cultivation at 25 degrees.
  • the aim of the experiment was to evaluate the effect of Lactobacillus buchner BioCC 203.
  • DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchner BioCC 228 DSM 32651 supernatant against yeasts of maize silage origin using agar well-di ffusion method.
  • a 48-hour lactobacillus culture suspension was prepared in peptone water according to McParland Turbidity Standard No. 5 ( 1.5 x 10 9 microbes / ml), inoculated into MRS (Biolife.
  • Antimicrobial compounds produced by Lactobacillus bitchmri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 inhibit yeast growth of plant origin more strongly than those of the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650, Lactobacillus biiehneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 produced yeast growth inhibitory compounds already during 48 hours of cultivation, creating a wide clear growth inhibition zone on the agar medium around the well, as the supernatant of the strain BioCC 203 DSM 32650 only disturbed the growth of yeasts.
  • Example 5 Growth dynamics during the fermentation of plant material
  • the aim of the experiment was to evaluate the eflect of Lac to bacillus buchner BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchner BioCC 228 DSM 32651 growth dynamics during the fermentation of plant material
  • a 48-hour lactobaciilus culture suspension was prepared in peptone water according to McFarland Turbidity Standard No. 5 (1 ,5 x 10 9 microbes / ml), inoculated into MRS (Biolife. Italy) broth with a final volume of 1.5 x 10 6 microbes / ml, incubated micro aerobic-ally (10 percentage C0 2 ) and anaerobic (C02 / N 2 / H 2 : 5/90/5 ercentage) at 25 degrees for 24, 48 and 72 hours.
  • N l is the cell concentration at any given time; No is the initial cell concentration
  • V - log N l -log No / 0.301 x t, w N l is the cell concentration at any given time; N ⁇ , is the initial cell concentration and t is the specified period of time in hous.
  • the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 was four generations faster and 2.4 times faster in 48 hours than the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 (Table 7).
  • the silage trial was conducted, in 1 ,5 1 laboratory scale-silos with freshly chopped maize at dough stage of maturity. The following investigations were conducted: determination of the pH-Values and fermentation quality at day 90,
  • the first test was done after a storage period of 49 days with twice air stress (24 hours; at day 28 and day 42).
  • the test for aerobic stability was carried out in a temperature-conirolled room at approx.
  • Table 9 Chemical composition, nutritional values and fermentation quality indicators of maize silage from maize variety 'Cathy using microorganisms L huchneri after a storage period of 90 days.
  • the aerobic stability test done after a storage period of 49 days showed a significant increase of the aerobic stabilities for the L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 treated silages of nearly 2 to 2.5 days in comparison with the untreated control (control :3.9 days vs. L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650: 6.3 days and L.b uchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 : 5.8 days).
  • Extending the storage time up to 90 days resulted in an increased aerobic stabilitiy for both either the untreated control with 7,9 days, 10.6 days for the L. buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 treated and 1 1.4 days for the L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 silages. This difference of less than three days for L. buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and more than three days for L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 was found to be statistically significant.
  • the aim of the experiment was to evaluate the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of silage made from freshly chopped whole plant maize (Zea mays, maize variety 'Darker ) with low dry matter content ( ⁇ 20 percentage) using the microorganism strains L, buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lbuchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651. Strains L. buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L.buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were added to the ensiled material in the form of an aqueous solution with a concentration ot 1 x 10 5 CFU per 1 g of the plant material (feed) being ensiled. A3!
  • test variations (control silages, silages made with the lactic acid bacteria strains L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lhmhen BioCC 228 DSM 32651, and control silages made without silage additive were prepared in five replicates. All test silages were opened after 90 days of ensiling.
  • the aerobic stability of the silages was tested after a storage period of 90 days according to the method described by Honig (Honig, H., 1990; Evaluation of the aerobic stability. In: Proceedings of the Eurobae Conference, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala/Sweden, Special Issue). Silage was considered aerobically unstable if the temperature measured at its geometric centre exceeded the ambient temperature by 3 degrees. Changes in temperature over time were measured for 9 days (217 hours). Ambient temperatures and test silage temperatures were recorded once an hour, using Comet Temperature Data Logger SO 141. devices.
  • Silage samples were analysed using well-established methods (AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA).
  • the silage sample was dried to constant weight in a thermostat at 130 degrees.
  • crude ash content the silage sample was incinerated in a muffle furnace at 550 degrees for six hours.
  • Protein content was determined using a KjeltecTM 2300 analyser following the Kjeldahl method (Nx6.25). Crude fibre was determined according to the W.Henneberg and F. Stohmann method.
  • An Agilent 7890A gas chroraatograph was used for determining the acid and ethanol content of the silage.
  • the proportion of ammonia nitrogen in total nitrogen was established with a KjeltecTM 2300 analyser.
  • the acidity of the silage was determined using a Hanna instruments Hi 2210 pH-meter. Table 10.
  • silages from the maize variety 'Dorka' and treated with the L.b uchneri strain BioCC 203 DSM 32650 or L. buchneri strain BioCC 228 DSM 32651 had good fermentation characteristics (Table 1 1). Lactic acid was the dominant acid in aii silages.
  • the silage treated with the L. buchneri strain BioCC 203 DSM 32650 had higher concentration of acetic acid and 1 ,2-propanediol compared to the silage made with the L.b uchneri strain BioCC 228 DSM 32651 and control.
  • the eihanol content was low in all silages (range from 4.1 to 8.6 g / kg).
  • Table 1 1 Chemical composition, nutritional values and fermentation quality indicators of maize silage from maize variety 'Dorka' using microorganisms /,, huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L huchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 after a storage period of 90 days,
  • Microbiological indicators of the fermentation quality of ensiled material and maize silage are presented in Table 1 1.
  • the quantities of moulds were relatively high, Clostridia and yeasts were below detection limit.
  • Silage samples teated with the strains L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 or L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 contained very high quantities of lactic acid bacteria (>8.0 log 10 CFU / g silage) and the added strains dominated over endogenous lactobiota.
  • the amount of lactic acid bacteria counts in untreated control silage was 4.56 log 10 CFU / g silage.
  • Table 1 Microbiological indicators of the fermentation quality of fresh material and maize silage from maize variety 'Dorka” treated with microorganisms L buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 or L.b uchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651
  • strains L.b uchmri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L buchmri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 expressed surprisingly very vigorous growth in silages made of fresh material difficult to ferment.
  • the use of L. buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 increased the lactic acid and acetic acid content of silage made from low dry matter ( ⁇ 20 percentage) ensiled material, inhibited the activity of microorganisms and yeasts, thereby preventing the silage from heating, which ensured the improvement of aerobic stability of the silage on the opening of the silo and thus prolonged the storage time of the silage.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Birds (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides the isolated microorganism strains Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 and their use as microbiological feed additives. The strains are used for ensuring aerobic stability of feed with low dry matter content (≤ 20 percentage) and improving fermentation of feed, for increasing the concentration of lactic and acetic acids in feed and for reducing pH, hence decreasing the loss of nutrients in feed. Usage of the microorganisms in ensiling suppresses the function of pathogenic microorganisms (enteropathogens) and yeasts in feed. The strains can be used for prolonging the storage life of feed made from fresh material difficult to ferment.

Description

MICROORGASNISM STRAINS LACTOBACILLUS BUCHNERI BIOCC 203 DSM 32650 AND LACTOBACILLUS BUCHNERI BIOCC 228 DSM 32651 AND THEIR. USE
TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention belongs to the field of biotechnology and is applied to feed manufacturing. The invention encompasses a microbiological silage additive and its use in feed fermentation to ensure aerobic stability, the quality of fermentation of the feed.
BACKGROUND ART
It is necessary to preserve the nutrient content of silage from the harvest and storage of the feed up to the consumption of the feed by the animal.
Silage is the material produced by the controlled fermentation of a crop of high moisture content (McDonald, P., Henderson, A. R., Heron, S.J.E. 1991 . The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed, Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, Bucks UK, p. 340). Ensiling is a storage method of plant-based animal feed that rests on lactic acid fermentation under anaerobic conditions (Rooke, J., A. and Hatfield, G., D., 2003. Biochemistry of Ensiling. In: Silage Science and Technology, D. R. Buxton, R. E. Muck, and J. IT Harrison, eds. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 95-139). The fermentation of silage can be divided into four stages: (1) the anaerobic stage in the silo after the harvest, (2) the fermentation stage, (3) the stable storage stage, and (4) the silage unloading stage, where the. silo is opened, and the silage is exposed to air. To produce high-quality silage, the material to be ensiled must undergo correct microbial fermentation. Successful fermentation also depends on the type and quality of the grass plants, the techniques used in the ensiling process, climate, the development of undesirable microorganisms (e.g. Clostridium, enteropathogens. Listeria, bacilli) and fungi (yeasts and moulds), as well as the dry matter content of the material to be ensiled.
It is difficult to control the natural fermentation of feed, as the fermentation of silage is a complex combination of several different, chemical and microbiological processes and their interactions.
Most of the silage is produced with a dry matter content of 200. ,,500 g/kg. At such levels, many plant enzymes are active during the ensilage process, and numerous desirable and undesirable microorganisms, yeasts and moukis can grow in the silage under such conditions. Thus, getting the whole biological activity under control poses a remarkable challenge and can only be achieved by means of a well-managed ensilage process (Muck. R. E. 2010. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. R. Bras, Zootec. Vol, 39. July).
In a controlled ensilage process, water-soluble carbohydrates are fermented into lactic acid by lactic acid bacteria. As a result, the pH level of the material to be ensiled drops (the ensilage mass is acidified), which in turn inhibits the activity of the spoilage microorganisms (Oude Elferink, S, J. W. II. , Driehuis, P.. Gottsehal, J. C, Spoelstra, S. F. 2000. Silage fermentation processes and their manipulation. --- Journal FAG Plant Production and Protection No 161 , pp 17-30). The faster the acidity of the silage drops to pH 4, the quicker the enzymatic and microbial activity stops, the feed becomes stable and more nutrients are preserved.
It has been reported that the fermentation quality of silage can be significantly improved by means of additives containing lactic acid bacteria (McDonald, P., Henderson. A, R., Heron, S.J.E. 1991. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Chalcombe Publications, Mar!ow, Bucks UK. p. 340).
Just as important as the preservation of nutrients in the fermentation and storage stage of silage is the preservation of the nutrients in silage upon the opening of the silo. Silage may become exposed to oxygen both when the silo is opened for feeding and because of inadequate coverage of the silo.
Any silage that is exposed to air spoils sooner or later due to the activity of aerobic microorganisms. The aerobic stability of silage also depends on the silage crop to be ensiled, its growth phase at the time of harvest, the biochemical and microbiological factors of fermentation, the physical characteristics of the silage material, the organisation of silage management, temperature, and the choice of silage additive. The aerobic stability indicator of silage is the length of time that silage can resist aerobic spoilage processes, i.e. the length of time that it retains its quality upon exposure to air. The aerobic stability of silage is estimated based on the rate at which the temperature of the silage rises. The longer the temperature of the silage remains stable, i.e. the longer it does not rise above the ambient temperature by more than 3 °C (Commission Regulation (EC) No, 429/2008; DLG-Richtlinienfur die Pruiimg von Siiiemiitteln auf DLG-Gutezeichen-Fahigkeit. DLG Oktober 2013), the greater the aerobic stability and the quality of the silage. In most aerobically perishable silages, the temperature rises above the ambient temperature upon the microbial oxidation of acids and water-soluble carbohydrates into carbon dioxide and water.
Although the low pH level of silage inhibits the growth of undesirable microorganisms under anaerobic conditions, the low pH by itself does not suffice to prevent aerobic spoilage. The spoilage of silage in aerobic conditions mostly starts with yeasts, which can grow even at relatively low pH levels. Yeasts can grow in a broad pH range (pH 3, ,.8). The optimum pH for the growth of most yeasts is 3.5„.6.5. When silage becomes exposed to air on the opening of the silo, the acids and other compounds that have formed during fermentation are oxidised by aerobic bacteria, yeasts and moulds. The activity of yeasts results in the production of carbon dioxide, which heats up the silage - this in turn is a direct cause of dry matter loss ( McDonald, P., Henderson, A . R., Heron, S.J.E, 1991. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed, Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, Bucks UK, p. 340).
Yeasts employ the residual sugar contained in silage as a source of energy; however, their first preference is lactic acid. As a result, well-fermented silages with high lactic acid content are particularly susceptible to aerobic spoilage. The activity of the yeasts causes the pH level of the silage to rise, enabling numerous other aerobic microorganisms and moulds to become active. High microbial activity in well- fermented, nutritious silage is revealed by an increase in the temperature of the silage, It has been reported (Ohyama, Y., Hara, S. and Masaki, S, (1980) Analysis of the factors affecting aerobic deterioration of grass silages. In Thomas, C. (ed.) Forage conservation in the 80s. BGS Occasional Symposium No. 11, pp. 257-261. Reading, UK: British Grassland Society) that the dry matter, acetic and propionic acid content and the number of yeasts and moulds in the silage upon the opening of the silo are important determinants of the aerobic stability of silage. Negative correlation with regard to dry matter content and yeasts indicated that a greater concentration resulted in a Faster rise in the temperature of the silage upon exposure to air. With acetic and butyric acid, on the other hand, a greater concentration of these fermentation products was associated with more stable silage.
As noted, the low pH level of silage has no direct effect on the microorganisms that cause aerobic spoilage; the acids produced during the fermentation of the silage, however, have a variable importance. The growth of yeasts is inhibited by undissociated short-chain fatty acids (Pahlow G., Muck R.E., Driehuis F., Oude Elfermk S.J..W.H. and Spoelstra S.F. (2003) Microbiology of ensiling. In: Buxton D.R., Muck R.E. and Harrison J.H, (eds.) Silage science and technology, pp. 31 -93. Madison, WI, USA: Agronomy Publication No. 42, American Society of Agronomy). Undissociated acid molecules can penetrate the cell membrane of a microbe by means of passive diffusion, which results in the release of H+ ions. This lowers the pH level inside the cell, causing the cell to perish. The dissociation rate of art acid in silage depends on the dissociation constant of the acid (pKa) and the pH level of the silage (Zirchrora (201.1) Dissociation constants oforganic acids and bases. Available at: http://www,zirchrom.com/organic.htm, (accessed 3 November 201 1)). Acetic and propionic acid are less prone to dissociation than lactic acid, which explains the susceptibility of well-fermented silage with high lactic acid content to aerobic spoilage. Acetic and propionic acid, on the other hand, effectively inhibit the growth of yeasts and moulds. Butyric acid has a similar effect. Silage with high butyric acid content has good aerobic stability; however, this indicates the activity of spoilage-causing Clostridium. Such silage exhibits extensive nutrient loss, and the high butyric acid content can cause health issues in animals. Propionic acid content in silage is rare and small; the concentration of the microorganisms producing it in silage crops is low and their competitiveness is poor.
Acetic acid content in silage is an indication of heterofermentation; since acetic acid is highly toxic to yeasts; such silages typically display great aerobic stability.
An ideal fermentation of silage reduces fermentation losses and ensures sufficient stability during the storage of the feed and unloading it from the silo for feeding. An effective silage additive and proper organisation of the production and use of silage play a. key role in the achievement of these objectives. Most silage additives have been developed to improve the ensilage process and the nutrition values of ensiled feed. .However, in addition to ensuring quick fermentation and. improving the quality of silage, silage additives are also expected to inhibit the -growth of spoilage (inch .aerobic spoilage) organisms. The main reason for using a silage additive to improve the aerobic stability of silage is to prevent the heating of the silage, the loss of nutrients and a decrease in the performance of the animals due to consumption of spoiled silage.
Silage additives often employ enzymes; however, these do not inhibit yeasts or moulds, meaning that silages prepared with enzymes have a very modest aerobic stability.
Organic acids, such as propionic, acetic and benzoic acid etc, are effective in improving the aerobic stability of silage. These are added either in large quantities, to achieve the so-called final conservation of the feed, or in smaller quantities, in the latter case, the activity of yeasts is inhibited, but total conservation is not guaranteed, and ensilage continues to depend on natural fermentation. Ammonia has also been reported to have an inhibitory effect on bacteria, yeasts and moulds. Unfortunately, organic acids and other chemicals are aggressive and damaging on the siiage equipment; strict safety requirements apply to their handling and storage.
Biological silage additives based on lactic acid bacteria are regarded as natural products; their advantages include their lack of toxicity, lack of corrosive effect on equipment, and lack of environmental risks.
The goal of lowering the pH level of silage by means of lactic acid bacteria is to minimise fermentation losses. Lactic acid bacteria are divided into two groups based on glucose fermentation: homofermentative and heterofermentative species. Homofermentative lactic acid bacteria produce two moles of lactic acid from one mole of glucose, whereas heterofermentative bacteria produce one mole of lactic acid, one mole of carbon dioxide and one mole of either ethanol or acetic acid, it is wet! known that at the beginning of the fermentation process, homofermentative species dominate, but later on, as the environment becomes more acidic, heterofermentative bacteria become prevalent (Muck, R. E. 2010. Silage microbiology and its control through additives, R. Bras. Zootec. Vol. 39. July).
Silage additives based on homofermentative lactic acid bacteria improve the fermentation process of silage; however, most of such starter bacteria do little to inhibit the growth of yeasts and moulds. With the use of such a silage additive, the aerobic stability of the silage may be lower than without any silage additive, and it might even increase the heating risk of the silage.
Some silage starters contain bacteria (e.g. propionic acid bacteria) that produce propionic acid. This, unfortunately, does not improve the aerobic stability of the silage, because these microorganisms are not typically acid-tolerant, and their growth is slow. However, starters that produce large quantities of acetic acid in addition to lactic acid (L.b uchneri) do inhibit the microorganisms causing the aerobic spoilage of silage (yeasts, moulds etc.). i.e. they improve the aerobic stability of silage and prevent the spoiling of silage upon the opening of the silo or upon other kinds of exposure to air. The addition of heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria during the ensiling process lowers the pH level and reduces dry matter loss. Furthermore, some of these strains are reported to have a strong inhibitory effect on the growth of yeasts and moulds, thereby improving the aerobic stability of the silage (Jatkauskas, J,, Vrotniakiene, V„ Ohlsson, C. Lund, B. 2013. The effect of three silage inoculants on aerobic stability in grass, clover-grass, lucerne and maize silage. Agricultural and Food Science. 22: 137-144). However, different strains of the same species do not have identical properties, as due to genetic variations interspecies differences i.e. strain-specific properties occur.
The aim of this invention is to provide new strains Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 lor improving feed fermentation quality and prolonging the aerobic stability and storage time of silage.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
The invention discloses the isolated microorganism strains Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651, and feed, feed additive and composition comprising one or both said strains. The feed may be fermented feed, e.g. silage. The feed additive may be a silage additive. Suitable excipients can be included as other ingredients in the composition of the additive product. Said microorganisms can be used in lyophilized form.
The microorganism Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 ensure aerobic stability of the feed, including the feed difficult to ferment, e.g. feed with low (< 20 percentage) dry matter content.
The next objective of the invention is the use of the named microorganism in: accelerating the fermentation of feed, increasing the concentration of lactic acid, reducing pH, and decreasing the loss of nutrients in feed and the concentration of ammonia nitrogen and butyric acid in feed.
Said microbes (together or separately) ate used to ferment feed and improve fermentation, to increase the concentration of lactic acid and acetic acid in feed, to lower the pH level and thereby reduce nutrient loss in. feed.
Based on investigations into antimicrobial properties, Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 inhibit the growth and action of undesirable microorganisms (pathogenic microorganisms, yeasts and moulds). Said pathogens are Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus saprophytics, Salmonella enterica subsp, enter ica serovar Enteritidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli etc.
The invention also relates to a method for prolonging the preservation of feed, where one or both of microorganisms Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 228 DSM. 32651 are added to the feed during fermentation. In the case of use of one of the aforementioned strains is added to the feed, the rate of it is 1 x 105...1 x 106 CFU/g of the fermented feed.
DESCRIPTION OF THE STRAINS
The microorganism strains Lactobacillus huclmeri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus biichneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were isolated form ensiled naturally without the use of silage additives high quality maize (Zea mays L.) silage in Estonia. To determine the quantitative content of lactobacilli in the silage sample, a suspension (with descending concentrations) was made of solutions, using the decimal dilution method in peptone water (Sigma-Aldrich, France); and seeded on MRS (de Man Rogosa Sharpe) agar (Biolife. Italy), that was incubated at 37°C in microaerobic (10 percentage CO2) environment (thermostat„MCO-18AIC UV" Sanyo Electronic Co, Ltd, Japan) for 48 hours. Developed colonies were described, counted and the total count of microbes was determined. To describe the morphology of microbes, preparations were made using Gram's staining method, and microscopic examinations were performed. The strains Lactobacillus huclmeri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were isolated, based on colony and cell morphology specific to Lactobacillus spp. Provisional and detailed identification followed, this is described below.
The morphological characteristics of the cultures- of Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were determined after growth in MRS agar and broth (Biolife, Italy).
Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 is a Gram-positive regular rod-shaped non-motile non-spore forming bacterium, occurring singly and in short chains. Elongated cells occur during cultivation in MRS broth,
Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 is a Gram-positive regular rod-shaped non-motile non-spore forming bacterium, occurring singly and in short chains. Long and slender cells occur during cultivation in MRS broth,
PHYSIOLOGICAL-BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
MRS broth (for 48-72 hours) is suitable for cultivating the microbial strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 microaerobically or anaerobically, after which a homogenous turbid growth occurs. After 48 hours of cultivation at 37 degrees in a microaerobic (10 percentage CO2) or -anaerobic (CC2/Na2/H2: 5/90/5 percentage) environments the colonies are grayish white, 1.5-2 millimeters, flat, shiny, translucent, with rough texture and ismbonate.
The microbial strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 is obligately heterofemientative. catalase and oxidase negative, hydrolyzes arginine and produces carbon dioxide during the fermentation of glucose.
The optimal growth temperature of the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM
32650 is 37 degrees; the strain also replicates at 15 degrees. To a small extent, growth can also be observed at 45 degrees. The optimum pH range for growing the strain is 5.7- 6.2.
MRS broth (for 48-72 hours) is suitable for cultivating the microbial strain of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 microaerobically; after which a homogenous turbid growth occurs. After 48 hours of cultivation at 37 degrees in a microaerobic ( 10 percentage CO2) or anaerobic (CO2/N2/H2: 5/90/5 percentage) environments the colonies are grayish white, 1.5-2 millimeters, flat, shiny, translucent, with rough texture and umbonate.
The microbial strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 is obligate!}' heterofermentative, catalase and oxidase negative, hydrolyzes. arginine and produces carbon dioxide during the fermentation of glucose.
The optimal growth temperature of the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM
32651 is 37 degrees; the strain also replicates at 15 degrees. To a small extent, growth can also be observed at 45 degrees. The optimum pH range for growing the strain is 5.7- 6.2.
The microbial strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 was identified as Lactobacillus buchner using MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonik).
The microbial strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 was identified as Lactobacillus buchneri using MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonik).
Lactobacillus buchneri strain BioCC 203 was deposited in accordance with the Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorgajtiisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure in Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkuifuren GmbH under number DSM 32650 on 25 September 2017.
The address of DSMZ: Inhoffenstr. 7B, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
Lactobacillus buchneri- strain BioCC 228 was deposited in accordance with the Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure in Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH under number DSM 32651 on 25 September 2017.
The address of DSMZ; Inhoffenstr. 7B, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
Resistance to anitibotics
Methods: Antibiotic susceptibility of the Lactobacillus buchneri strains BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were analysed according to ISO10932:2010 standard with VetMIC Lact-I and VetMIC Lact-2 plates (SVA National Veterinary institute, Uppsala, Sweden) in anaerobic (CO2/N2/H2: 5/90/5 percentage) conditions at + 37 degrees for 48 hours. The minimum inhibitory co.neentrati.ons (MIC) were compared with MIC cut-off values reported by EFSA, Table 1. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MiC)-values (mg/L)of antibiotics for Lactobacillus buhneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651.
Figure imgf000010_0001
human and veterinary importance. EFSA Journal 2012. 10(6), 2740,
For the assessment of bacteria used as feed additives, strains can be categorised as susceptible or resistant, to antimicrobials;
Susceptible (S): a bacterial strain is defined as susceptible when, it is inhibited at a concentration of a specific antimicrobial equal or lower than the established cut-off value (S≤ x mg/L). Resistant (R): a bacterial strain is defined as resistant when it is not. inhibited at a concentration of a specific antimicrobial higher than the established cut-off value (R > x mg/L). Results of antibiotic susceptibility of strains LactohacUlus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 are presented in Table 1. The minimum inhibitor)' concentrations for Lactobacillus buchneri strains BioCC' 203 DSM 32650 and BioCC 228 DSM 32651 did not exceed the M IC cut-off values proposed for obligate hetero fermentative Lactobacillus proposed by EFSA.
FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF S TRAINS
Growth in the presence of various sugars
The -purpose of the. experiment was to investigate the ability of the strains Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 to grow in the presence of various sugars and acidify the culture meedium.
Methods: The 24h old cultures of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 cultivated on MRS agar were suspended in peptone water according to the McFariand Turbidity Standard No 5 (1.5.x 109 microbes/ml), seeded at final density of 1.5 x 106 microbes/mi into modified MRS broth containing 20 g / L either of glucose, fructose, trehalose, xylose or maltose or mix of glucose, fructose, trehalose (in ratio 1 : 1 :1 ), with a final concentration also of 20 g / L. Suspenisons were incubated in a thermostat microaerobically (10 percent CO2) and anaerobic-ally (CO2 / N2 / H2: 5/90/5 percent) at 25 degrees for 24, 48 and 72 hours, in the case of anaerobic environment, the medium was beforehand reduced guring 24 hours. The viable counts of both strains were registered, the yield, generation number in) and growth rate (V) were calculated as follows:
Yield - log Ni-Iog No where Nl is the cell concentration at any given time; No is the initial cell concentration
n = log Nl-log No / log 2, where Nl is the cell concentration at any given time; No is the initial cell concentration
V - log Ni-Iog No / 0.301 x t. w Nt is the cell concentration at any given time; No is the initial cell concentration and t is the specified period of time in hous. The grovsth of the strain of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 was one generation faster than that of the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 (Table 2) during the first 24 hours of microaerobic cultivation In a culture medium containing glucose, fructose, xylose or a mixture, of glucose, fructose and trehalose. Table 2. The effect of different sugars on the growth dynamics of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 during microaerobic (10 percent CO2) cultivation at 25 degrees for 24, 48 and 72 hours.
Figure imgf000012_0001
N - number of n generations; V - growth rate; G - MRS broth with glucose; F - MRS broth with fructose; T - MRS broth with trehalose; M - MRS broth with a mixture of glucose - fructose - trehalose; X - MRS broth with xylose; Ma - MRS broth with maltose
During the first 24 hours of anaerobic cultivation, the growth of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 was on average two generations faster in medium containing fructose or a mixture of glucose, fructose and trehalose; within 48 hours for three generations faster in glucose containing medium and about 1.5 generations faster in fructose and xylose containing medium compared to the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 (Table 3). Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 was slower growing, being able to outrun Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 after 48 hours of culturing in medium containing fructose or xylose and in a medium containing a mixture of glucose, fructose and trehalose.
Table 3. The effect of different sugars on the growth dynamics of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 during anaerobic (CO2/N2/H2: 5/90/5 percent) cultivation at 25 degrees for 24, 48 and
72 hours.
Figure imgf000013_0001
N - number of n generations; V - growth rate; G - MRS broth with glucose; F - MRS broth with fructose; T - MRS broth with trehalose; M - MRS broth with a mixture of glucose - fructose - trehalose: X - MRS broth with xylose; Ma - MRS broth with maltose
Example 1. Organic acid and alcohol profile
The purpose of the experiment was to determine the profile of organic acids and alcohols of strains Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 durina microaerobic and anaerobic cultivation. Methods: The 24h old cultures of Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 203 and Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 228 cultivated on MRS agar (Biolife. Italy) were suspended in peptone water according to the McFarland Turbidity Standard No 5 (1.5x 109 microbes/ml), seeded into MRS broth (Biolife. Italy) at final density of 1.5 x 10* microbes/ml and incubated microaerobieaily ( 10 percentage CO2) and anaerobic-ally (CO2/N2/H2: 5/90/5 percentage) in thermostat at 25 degrees for 24. 48 and 72 hours.
Gas chromaiographycaily was organic acid and alcohol profile determined by a gas chromatograph Agilent 6890A capillary column CP-Wax 52 CB (30 m x 0.25 mm 0.25 μm). Column temperature programm 75 degrees 1 min hold. 10 degrees /min to 1 15 degrees 3 min hold. 20 degrees /min to 190 degrees 5 min hold. Detector (FID) 280 degrees.
Liquid chromatographycally organic acids were determined on a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC System. The samples were separated on Aminex HPX-87H ion-exclusion column (300 mm x 7.8 mm). The temperature of column was thermostated at 60degrees. flow rate was 0.6 ml/min and. organic acids were detected with PDA detector at 210 nm, Time of the analysis was 26 min.
In the. profile of organic acids and alcohols, the strain-specific characteristics of the strains Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were apparent (Table 4). Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 was a significantly stronger producer of ethanot, acetic acid and lactic acid during cultivation m both niicroerobic and anaerobic environment. Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 was capable of producing pyruvate in anaerobic environment (Table 4).
During the first 24 hours of microaerobic and anaerobic cultivation, the strain Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC- 203 DSM 32650 utilised approximately 99.5 percent and 97.8 percent respectively of the citrate initially present in the culture medium.
During anaerobic cultivation, Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 consumed 4,8 percent of the citrate initially present, in the culture medium. Unlike Lactobacillus huchnen BioCC 203 DSM 32650, the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 was able to produce 5.9 percent citrate during 72 hours of microaerobic cultivation. Table 4. Organic acid and alcohol profile (mg7m) in MRS broth of the mieroaerobic (10 percentage CO2) and anaerobic (CO2/N2/H2: 5/90/5 percentage) cultivation of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228
DSM 32651 for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h at 25 degrees
Figure imgf000015_0001
Example 2. Organic acid and alcohol profile in maize plant supernatant
The purpose of the experiment was to determine the profile of organic acids and alcohols of strains Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 during plant material fermentation.
Methods: 226 g of maize {Zee mays L.) plants in vegetative growth stage (V6-V8) were chopped, homogenized in laboratory blender Bagmixer 400 (interscience. France) for 6 minutes with water.' filtered, centrifuged (5000 rpm 10 minutes at ambient temperature) and sterilized at 121 degrees for 5 minutes
The 24b old cultures of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 cultivated on MRS agar (Biolife. Italy) were suspended in peptone water according to the McFarland Turbidity Standard No 5 (i.5x 109 microbes/ml), seeded into maize plant supernatant at. final density of 1 .5 x 10° microbes/ml and incubated microaerobieally ( 10 percentage CO2) and anaerobically (CO2/N2/H2: 5/90/5 percentage) in thermostat at 25 degrees for 24 h 48 h and 72 h. Gas chromatographycally was organic acid and alcohol profile determined by a gas chromatograph Agilent 6890A capillary column CP-Wax 52 CB (30 m x 0.25 mm. 0.25 μm ). Column temperature programm 75 degrees 1 mm hold. 10 degrees /rain to 1 15 degrees 3 min hold. 20 degrees /min to 190 degrees 5 min hold. Detector (FID) 280 degrees.
Liquid chromatographvcally organic acids were determined on a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC System. The samples were separated on Aminex HPX-87H ion-exclusion column (300mm x 7.8mm). The temperature of column was thermostated at 60 degrees, flow rate was 0.6 ml/min and organic acids were detected with PDA detector at 210 nm. Time of the analysis was 26 min.
Table 5. Organic acid and alcohol profile (mg/m) in maize plant supernatant of the microaerobie (10 percentage CO2) cultivation of Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 for 24 h. 48 h and 72 h at. 25 degrees
Figure imgf000016_0001
in the fermentation test of the plant material, Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 proved to be stronger producer of ethanol and lactic acid compared to Lactobacillus huchneri. BioCC 228 DSM 32651 (Table 5).
Example 3, Antimicrobial activity towards pathogens
The purpose of the experiment was to test the antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 to entero bathogens during microaerobie and anaerobic cultivation at 25 degrees.
To evaluate the antimicrobial properties of Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus huchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 towards pathogens, streak- line procedure was used (Hutt P. Shchepeiova J. Loivukene K. Kullisaar T. Mikelsaar M. Antagonistic activity of probiotic laetohaciili and bifidobacteria against entero- and uropathogens. J Appl. Microbiol. 2006; 100(6); 1324-32)). To determine the growth inhibition on the target microbes, the growth-free zone, was measured in millimetres. Arithmetic mean and standard error were calculated on the basis of the results of the sample (Table 6) in an analogous manner to Hurt et al. (2006), and antagonistic activity (ram) was assessed based on the same.
Table 6. The antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 against pathogens using the streak- line method on modified MRS agar medium in microaerobic (10 percentage CO2) and anaerobic (CO2/N2/.H2: 5/90/5 percentage) environments (target microbe growth inhibition zone in mm)
Figure imgf000017_0001
17.1 1; strong >17.12. Inhibition zone in anaerobic environment (mm-s): weak < 10.67; average 1.0.66-14.94; strong >14,95. in a microaerobic environment, both strains expressed equally strong antimicrobial activity (Table 6). In an anaerobic environment. Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 has a slightly higher inhibitory effect on tested pathogenic microbes.
Example 4, Antifungal activity
The aim of the experiment was to evaluate the effect of Lactobacillus buchner BioCC 203. DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchner BioCC 228 DSM 32651 supernatant against yeasts of maize silage origin using agar well-di ffusion method. A 48-hour lactobacillus culture suspension was prepared in peptone water according to McParland Turbidity Standard No. 5 ( 1.5 x 109 microbes / ml), inoculated into MRS (Biolife. Italy) broth with a final volume of 1 ,5 x 106 microbes / ml, incubated micro aerobicaily (10 percentage CO2) and anaerobic (CO2 / N2 / H2: 5/90/5 ercentage) at 25 degrees for 48 and 72 hours, Microbial cells were removed by centrifugation (4500 rpm. 10 min). The supernatant was sterilized by filtration and concentrated by freeze-drying. The freeze-dried supernatant was resuspended to a 10-fold concentration of 10 mM acetic acid. Six strains of wild yeasts (Candida spp) isolated from maize silage were plated in a uniform layer at ihe PCA (Plate Count Agar; Liofilchem srl. Italy) medium. Wells with a diameter of 6-mm were cut in the agar aseptically and 100 μl of samples of supernatant was added to the wells. After incubation at 25 degrees, the antifungal effect was recorded as follows: no suppression; + weak suppression, growth, of the yeast disturbed; ++ strong suppression, growth of the yeast suppressed with detectable clear zones; +++ very strong suppression, growth of the yeast suppressed with large clear zones.
Antimicrobial compounds produced by Lactobacillus bitchmri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 inhibit yeast growth of plant origin more strongly than those of the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650, Lactobacillus biiehneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 produced yeast growth inhibitory compounds already during 48 hours of cultivation, creating a wide clear growth inhibition zone on the agar medium around the well, as the supernatant of the strain BioCC 203 DSM 32650 only disturbed the growth of yeasts. Example 5. Growth dynamics during the fermentation of plant material
The aim of the experiment was to evaluate the eflect of Lac to bacillus buchner BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchner BioCC 228 DSM 32651 growth dynamics during the fermentation of plant material
Methods. 226 g of maize (Zea mays L,) plants in vegetative growth stage (V6-V8) was chopped, homogenised with laboratory blender Bagmixer 400 (Interscience, France) for 6 minutes, filtered, centrifuged at room temperature for 5000 rpm for 10 minutes, and sterilized at 121 degrees for 5 minutes
A 48-hour lactobaciilus culture suspension was prepared in peptone water according to McFarland Turbidity Standard No. 5 (1 ,5 x 109 microbes / ml), inoculated into MRS (Biolife. Italy) broth with a final volume of 1.5 x 106 microbes / ml, incubated micro aerobic-ally (10 percentage C02) and anaerobic (C02 / N2 / H2 : 5/90/5 ercentage) at 25 degrees for 24, 48 and 72 hours.
The viable counts of both strains were registered, the yield, generation number (n) and growth rate (V) were calculated as follows:
Yield - log Nl-log No where Nl is the cell concentration at any given time; No is the initial cell concentration
n log Ni-iog No / log 2, where Nl is the cell concentration at any given time; No is the initial cell concentration
V - log Nl-log No / 0.301 x t, w Nl is the cell concentration at any given time; N<, is the initial cell concentration and t is the specified period of time in hous.
Table 7. The growth dynamics of Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 during microaerobic (10 percent C(¾) cultivation at 25 degrees for 24, 48 and 72 hours.
Figure imgf000019_0001
n - generation number; V - growth rate
During the first 24 hours of microaerobic cultivation, the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 was four generations faster and 2.4 times faster in 48 hours than the strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 (Table 7).
Example 6. Investigation of ihe effect of the silage additives L. buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L.buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 on fresh material medium to easy to ferment
Aim of investigation was determination of the effect of the silage additive L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L.buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 on aerobic stability and fermentation quality of maize (Zea mays, maize variety 'Cathy') silage (dry matter content > 30 percentage).
The silage trial was conducted, in 1 ,5 1 laboratory scale-silos with freshly chopped maize at dough stage of maturity. The following investigations were conducted: determination of the pH-Values and fermentation quality at day 90,
Two tests for aerobic stability were carried out The first test was done after a storage period of 49 days with twice air stress (24 hours; at day 28 and day 42).
The test for aerobic stability was carried out in a temperature-conirolled room at approx.
20 degree. Temperatures were recorded every four hours with a PS-ES Datalogging system.
The chemical composition of the fresh material is presented in Table 8, Table 8. The chemical composition of the fresh material
Figure imgf000020_0001
The application of L huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L huchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 led to significant increase of acetic acid and 1 ,2-propanediol in comparison with imtreated (Table 9).
Table 9. Chemical composition, nutritional values and fermentation quality indicators of maize silage from maize variety 'Cathy using microorganisms L huchneri after a storage period of 90 days.
Figure imgf000020_0002
Figure imgf000021_0001
n.d.- not deteced
The aerobic stability test done after a storage period of 49 days showed a significant increase of the aerobic stabilities for the L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 treated silages of nearly 2 to 2.5 days in comparison with the untreated control (control :3.9 days vs. L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650: 6.3 days and L.b uchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 : 5.8 days).
Extending the storage time up to 90 days resulted in an increased aerobic stabilitiy for both either the untreated control with 7,9 days, 10.6 days for the L. buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 treated and 1 1.4 days for the L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 silages. This difference of less than three days for L. buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and more than three days for L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 was found to be statistically significant.
Example 7. Investigation of the effect of the silage additives £. buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lbuchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 on fresh ntaterial difficult to ferment
The aim of the experiment was to evaluate the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of silage made from freshly chopped whole plant maize (Zea mays, maize variety 'Darker ) with low dry matter content (< 20 percentage) using the microorganism strains L, buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lbuchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651. Strains L. buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L.buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were added to the ensiled material in the form of an aqueous solution with a concentration ot 1 x 105 CFU per 1 g of the plant material (feed) being ensiled. A3! test variations (control silages, silages made with the lactic acid bacteria strains L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and Lhmhnen BioCC 228 DSM 32651, and control silages made without silage additive were prepared in five replicates. All test silages were opened after 90 days of ensiling.
The chemical composition of the fresh material is presented in Table 10.
The aerobic stability of the silages was tested after a storage period of 90 days according to the method described by Honig (Honig, H., 1990; Evaluation of the aerobic stability. In: Proceedings of the Eurobae Conference, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala/Sweden, Special Issue). Silage was considered aerobically unstable if the temperature measured at its geometric centre exceeded the ambient temperature by 3 degrees. Changes in temperature over time were measured for 9 days (217 hours). Ambient temperatures and test silage temperatures were recorded once an hour, using Comet Temperature Data Logger SO 141. devices.
Silage samples were analysed using well-established methods (AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA).
To determine dry matter content, the silage sample was dried to constant weight in a thermostat at 130 degrees. To establish crude ash content, the silage sample was incinerated in a muffle furnace at 550 degrees for six hours. Protein content was determined using a KjeltecTM 2300 analyser following the Kjeldahl method (Nx6.25). Crude fibre was determined according to the W.Henneberg and F. Stohmann method. An Agilent 7890A gas chroraatograph was used for determining the acid and ethanol content of the silage. The proportion of ammonia nitrogen in total nitrogen was established with a Kjeltec™ 2300 analyser. The acidity of the silage was determined using a Hanna instruments Hi 2210 pH-meter. Table 10. The chemical composi tion of the fresh material
Figure imgf000023_0001
The -dry matter content of all silages remained <18 percentage (Table 1 1). However, silages from the maize variety 'Dorka' and treated with the L.b uchneri strain BioCC 203 DSM 32650 or L. buchneri strain BioCC 228 DSM 32651 had good fermentation characteristics (Table 1 1). Lactic acid was the dominant acid in aii silages. The silage treated with the L. buchneri strain BioCC 203 DSM 32650 had higher concentration of acetic acid and 1 ,2-propanediol compared to the silage made with the L.b uchneri strain BioCC 228 DSM 32651 and control.
The eihanol content was low in all silages (range from 4.1 to 8.6 g / kg).
Table 1 1 , Chemical composition, nutritional values and fermentation quality indicators of maize silage from maize variety 'Dorka' using microorganisms /,, huchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L huchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 after a storage period of 90 days,
Figure imgf000024_0001
Microbiological indicators of the fermentation quality of ensiled material and maize silage are presented in Table 1 1. In the ensiled material the quantities of moulds were relatively high, Clostridia and yeasts were below detection limit. Silage samples teated with the strains L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 or L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 contained very high quantities of lactic acid bacteria (>8.0 log10 CFU / g silage) and the added strains dominated over endogenous lactobiota. The amount of lactic acid bacteria counts in untreated control silage was 4.56 log10 CFU / g silage.
Table 1 1. Microbiological indicators of the fermentation quality of fresh material and maize silage from maize variety 'Dorka" treated with microorganisms L buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 or L.b uchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651
Figure imgf000025_0001
- can't be calculated
in the aerobic stability test, four out of five replicates of the untreated silage heated up, The average aerobic stability of the control silage turned out to be 149 hours (u.e. 6.2 days). Silages treated with strains L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L.b uchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 were aerobically stable till the end of the test. i.e. until 217 hours (i.e. 9.04 days). Thus, treatment of the fresh material with strains L.b uchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 increased the aerobic stability of silages for 2,84 days. in conclusion: strains L.b uchmri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L buchmri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 expressed surprisingly very vigorous growth in silages made of fresh material difficult to ferment. The use of L. buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and L. buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 increased the lactic acid and acetic acid content of silage made from low dry matter (≤ 20 percentage) ensiled material, inhibited the activity of microorganisms and yeasts, thereby preventing the silage from heating, which ensured the improvement of aerobic stability of the silage on the opening of the silo and thus prolonged the storage time of the silage.

Claims

1. Isolated microorganism strain Lactobacillus huckneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650.
2. Isolated microorganism strain Lactobacillus buchmri BioCC 228 DSM 3265 \ .
3. The microorganism strain of claim 1 or claim 2 in !yophilised form,
4. A composition comprising one or more microorganisms according to any of claims 1 to 3.
5. Feed containing the microorganism strain according to any of claims 1 to 3.
6. Feed according to claim 5, which is a fermented feed, e.g. silage.
7. Use of a microorganism according to any of claims 1 to 3 as a feed additive.
8. Use of a microorganism according to any of claims 1 to 3 to support the aerobic stability of silage.
9. The use according to claim 8, wherein silage is made from feed of low dry matter content (≤ 20 percentage).
10. Use of a microorganism according to any of claims 1 to 3 for the fermentation of a feed.
1 1. A composition comprising one or more microorganisms according to any of claims 1 to 3 to accelerate the fermentation of the feed, to increase the concentration of lactic acid and acetic acid in the feed, to reduce the pH, and hence decrease the loss of nutrients in feed.
12, Use of a microorganism according to any of claims 1 to 3 to suppress the effect of pathogenic microbes and to inhibit yeast growth, by adding the microorganism, strain according to any of claims 1 to 3 to the feed to be fermented,
13. The use according to claim 12, wherein pathogenic microbes are enteropathogens.
14. Method for prolonging the preservati on of feed, where the microorganism according to any of claims 1 to 3 is added to feed before fermentation.
PCT/EE2018/000003 2017-09-28 2018-09-28 Microorganism stains lactobacillus buchneri biocc 203 dsm 32650 and lactobacillus buchneri biocc 228 dsm 32651 and their use WO2019063056A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EA202090866A EA202090866A1 (en) 2018-09-27 2018-09-28 STRAINS OF MICROORGANISMS LACTOBACILLUS BUCHNERI BIOCC 203 DSM 32650 AND LACTOBACILLUS BUCHNERI BIOCC 228 DSM 32651 AND THEIR APPLICATION
CN201880077117.6A CN111601879A (en) 2017-09-28 2018-09-28 Microbial strains lactobacillus buchneri BIOCC203 DSM32650 and lactobacillus buchneri BIOCC228 DSM32651 and uses thereof
JP2020518507A JP7250783B2 (en) 2017-09-28 2018-09-28 Microbial strains Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM32650 and Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM32651 and uses thereof
EP18793358.5A EP3688139A1 (en) 2017-09-28 2018-09-28 Microorganism stainslactobacillus buchneri

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EEP201700033 2017-09-28
EEP201700033 2017-09-28
EEP201800024A EE05825B1 (en) 2018-09-27 2018-09-27 Microorganism strain Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 and its use
EEP201800024 2018-09-27

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019063056A1 true WO2019063056A1 (en) 2019-04-04

Family

ID=64017233

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EE2018/000003 WO2019063056A1 (en) 2017-09-28 2018-09-28 Microorganism stains lactobacillus buchneri biocc 203 dsm 32650 and lactobacillus buchneri biocc 228 dsm 32651 and their use

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3688139A1 (en)
JP (1) JP7250783B2 (en)
CN (1) CN111601879A (en)
WO (1) WO2019063056A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113774003A (en) * 2021-11-11 2021-12-10 北京挑战农业科技有限公司 Lactobacillus buchneri and application thereof in preparation of low-moisture fermented feed

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000000040A1 (en) * 1998-06-26 2000-01-06 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Methods and compositions for improving aerobic stability of silage

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1703146B (en) * 2002-10-01 2014-07-09 营养生理有限责任公司 Compositions and methods for inhibiting pathogenic growth
US9822334B2 (en) * 2014-03-07 2017-11-21 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Rapid acting lactobacillus strains and their use to improve aerobic stability of silage
JP6762535B2 (en) 2015-12-28 2020-09-30 国立研究開発法人農業・食品産業技術総合研究機構 Lactic acid bacteria for new feed addition

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000000040A1 (en) * 1998-06-26 2000-01-06 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Methods and compositions for improving aerobic stability of silage

Non-Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BUXTON D.R., MUCK R.E. AND HARRISON J.H.: "Silage science and technology", 2003, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF AGRONOMY, article PAHLOW G.; MUCK R.E.; DRIEHUIS F.; OUDE ELFERINK S.J.W.H.; SPOELSTRA S.F.: "Microbiology of ensiling", pages: 31 - 93
D. R. BUXTON, R. E. MUCK, AND J. H. HARRISON: "Silage Science and Technology", 2003, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF AGRONOMY, article ROOKE, J., A.; HATFIELD, G., D.: "Biochemistry of Ensiling.", pages: 95 - 139
D. W. WIERSMA ET AL: "Kernel Milkline Stage and Corn Forage Yield, Quality, and Dry Matter Content", J PROD AGRIC, vol. 6, no. 1, 1 January 1993 (1993-01-01), pages 94 - 99, XP055525356, DOI: 10.2134/jpa1993.0094 *
HUTT P.; SHCHEPETOVA J.; LOIVUKENE K.; KULLISAAR T.; MIKELSAAR M.: "Antagonistic activity of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against entero- and uropathogens", J APPL. MICROBIOL., vol. 100, no. 6, 2006, pages 1324 - 32
I. FILYA ET AL: "The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation, aerobic stability and ruminal degradability of maize silage", JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY., vol. 101, no. 6, 1 December 2006 (2006-12-01), GB, pages 1216 - 1223, XP055525229, ISSN: 1364-5072, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03038.x *
JATKAUSKAS, J.; VROTNIAKIENE, V.; OHLSSON, C.; LUND, B.: "The effect of three silage inoculants on aerobic stability in grass, clover-grass, lucerne and maize silage", AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE, vol. 22, 2013, pages 137 - 144
LUCIANO COMINO ET AL: "Effects of an inoculant containing a Lactobacillus buchneri that produces ferulate-esterase on fermentation products, aerobic stability, and fibre digestibility of maize silage harvested at different stages of maturity", ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, vol. 198, 1 December 2014 (2014-12-01), AMSTERDAM, NL, pages 94 - 106, XP055525225, ISSN: 0377-8401, DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.10.001 *
MCDONALD, P.; HENDERSON, A. R.; HERON, S.J.E.: "The biochemistry of silage, 2nd ed", 1991, CHALCOMBE PUBLICATIONS, pages: 340
MUCK, R. E.: "Silage microbiology and its control through additives", R. BRAS. ZOOTEC., vol. 39, July 2010 (2010-07-01)
N. GOLLOP ET AL: "Antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria included in inoculants for silage and in silages treated with these inoculants", JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY., vol. 98, no. 3, 1 March 2005 (2005-03-01), GB, pages 662 - 666, XP055525482, ISSN: 1364-5072, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02504.x *
OUDE ELFERINK, S. J. W. H.; DRIEHUIS, F.; GOTTSCHAL, J. C.; SPOELSTRA, S. F.: "Silage fermentation processes and their manipulation", JOURNAL FAO PLANT PRODUCTION AND PROTECTION, 2000, pages 17 - 30
THOMAS, C.: "Forage conservation in the 80s. BGS Occasional Symposium", 1980, BRITISH GRASSLAND SOCIETY, article OHYAMA, Y.; HARA, S.; MASAKI, S.: "Analysis of the factors affecting aerobic deterioration of grass silages", pages: 257 - 261

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113774003A (en) * 2021-11-11 2021-12-10 北京挑战农业科技有限公司 Lactobacillus buchneri and application thereof in preparation of low-moisture fermented feed

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3688139A1 (en) 2020-08-05
JP7250783B2 (en) 2023-04-03
CN111601879A (en) 2020-08-28
JP2020534856A (en) 2020-12-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Wang et al. Sequencing and microbiota transplantation to determine the role of microbiota on the fermentation type of oat silage
Cai et al. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage
Weinberg et al. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and L. plantarum, applied at ensiling, on the ensiling fermentation and aerobic stability of wheat and sorghum silages
Whiter et al. The effect of a dry or liquid application of Lactobacillus plantarum MTD1 on the fermentation of alfalfa silage
Zhang et al. Lactic acid bacteria strains for enhancing the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of L eymus chinensis silage
CN106103697B (en) Quick-acting lactobacillus strain and application thereof in improving aerobic stability of silage
Ni et al. Effect of cellulase and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality and chemical composition of wheat straw silage
RU2645471C2 (en) Isolated lactobacillus plantarum tak 59 ncimb42150 strain and its application
CN101735964A (en) Microbial inoculum for preparing feed and application thereof
Fitzsimons et al. Assessment of Pediococcus acidilactici as a potential silage inoculant
Kim et al. Screening and investigation Lactobacillius spp. to improve Secale cereale silage quality
Wang et al. The effects of lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from various substrates on the fermentation quality of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) in Tibet
WO2019063056A1 (en) Microorganism stains lactobacillus buchneri biocc 203 dsm 32650 and lactobacillus buchneri biocc 228 dsm 32651 and their use
Parada et al. Microbiological and technological aspects of cassava-starch fermentation
Rauramaa et al. The effect of inoculants and cellulase on the fermentation and microbiological composition of grass silage: II Microbiological changes in the silages
EP3105355A1 (en) Microorganism lactobacillus brevis tak 124-1 ncimb42149 and its use
EA041159B1 (en) STRAINS OF MICROORGANISMS Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 203 DSM 32650 AND Lactobacillus buchneri BioCC 228 DSM 32651 AND THEIR USE
CN106615609A (en) Lactobacillus buchneri capable of improving feed ensiling qualities and application thereof
Aamod et al. Evaluation of bacillus circulans in imparting aerobic stability to silage
KR102390970B1 (en) Lactobacillus plantarum SW004 strain with excellent heat resistance and storage properties and feed additives and deodorants using the same
Angmo A fodder conservation technology in cold arid region of Ladakh, India
Alfarraj et al. Nutritive value and aerobic stability of whole quail bush and date waste silage ensiled at different compositions and the role of hetero-fermentative lactic acid bacteria
Li et al. Effect of different additives and their interactions on alfalfa silage quality.
Ölmez et al. The effect of wood vinegar on nutritional value and fermentation of grass silage
Čabarkapa et al. The effect of a bacterial inoculant on aerobic microflora in whole crop maize silage.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18793358

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2020518507

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018793358

Country of ref document: EP

Effective date: 20200428