WO2019046967A1 - Generating a yield map for an agricultural field using classification and regression methods - Google Patents
Generating a yield map for an agricultural field using classification and regression methods Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2019046967A1 WO2019046967A1 PCT/CA2018/051109 CA2018051109W WO2019046967A1 WO 2019046967 A1 WO2019046967 A1 WO 2019046967A1 CA 2018051109 W CA2018051109 W CA 2018051109W WO 2019046967 A1 WO2019046967 A1 WO 2019046967A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- yield
- array
- cell
- cells
- field
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V20/00—Scenes; Scene-specific elements
- G06V20/10—Terrestrial scenes
- G06V20/17—Terrestrial scenes taken from planes or by drones
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01D—HARVESTING; MOWING
- A01D41/00—Combines, i.e. harvesters or mowers combined with threshing devices
- A01D41/12—Details of combines
- A01D41/127—Control or measuring arrangements specially adapted for combines
- A01D41/1271—Control or measuring arrangements specially adapted for combines for measuring crop flow
- A01D41/1272—Control or measuring arrangements specially adapted for combines for measuring crop flow for measuring grain flow
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/02—Food
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/02—Agriculture; Fishing; Mining
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V20/00—Scenes; Scene-specific elements
- G06V20/10—Terrestrial scenes
- G06V20/188—Vegetation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01B—SOIL WORKING IN AGRICULTURE OR FORESTRY; PARTS, DETAILS, OR ACCESSORIES OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINES OR IMPLEMENTS, IN GENERAL
- A01B79/00—Methods for working soil
- A01B79/005—Precision agriculture
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to generating a yield map for an agricultural field, and more specifically to using a yield model including current measurements and previous observations as indicators for the yield model.
- FIG. 4A is an illustration of a field array, according to one example embodiment.
- This method seeks to generate a yield map for an agricultural field using a yield model that leverages indicators obtained from field measurement and observation systems.
- a yield map is a visual representation of yield values for a number of areas of the agricultural field.
- a yield value is a quantification of yield for an area of the field, such as, for example, bushels harvested per acre, or dollars per acre.
- the yield model generates a yield map from a data structure that includes a number of data cells where each data cell represents an area of the field. The yield model populates each data cell with a yield value using machine learning algorithms that utilize the indicators obtained from the measurement and observation systems.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a system environment 100 for generating a yield map for an agricultural field.
- a client system 110 generates a yield map using a yield model 112.
- a network system 120 accesses measured indicators and observed indicators from a measurement system 130 and an observation system 140 via a network 150, respectively.
- a client system 110 may request measured indicators and observed indicators ("indicators" in aggregate) via the network 150 and the network system 120 may provide the indicators in response.
- the indicators are data used by the yield model 112 to generate a yield map.
- the system environment 100 may include additional or fewer systems. Further, the capabilities attributed to one system within the environment may be distributed to one or more other systems within the system environment 100.
- systems herein can be implemented in hardware, firmware, and/or software (e.g., a hardware server comprising computational logic), other embodiments can include additional functionality, can distribute functionality between systems, can attribute functionality to more or fewer systems, can be implemented as a standalone program or as part of a network of programs, and can be loaded into memory executable by processors.
- a hardware server comprising computational logic
- other embodiments can include additional functionality, can distribute functionality between systems, can attribute functionality to more or fewer systems, can be implemented as a standalone program or as part of a network of programs, and can be loaded into memory executable by processors.
- a client system 110 is operated by a user responsible for managing crop production in an agricultural field.
- the user of the client system 110 inputs a request for a yield map for an agricultural field into the yield model 112 and the yield model 112 generates a yield map for the agricultural field in response.
- the agricultural field is located at a field location and the agricultural field has a field shape and a field size.
- the agricultural field can include any number of sub-areas that, in aggregate, approximate the field size and field shape.
- the agricultural field is managed by the user of client system 110 but could be managed by any other person.
- the client system 110 may be located within, or approximately adjacent to, the agricultural field.
- the client system 110 may reside on a farming machine operating in or near the agricultural field for which a yield map is being generated.
- a measurement system 130 may filter (i.e., remove) the erroneous measured indicators before using the indicators to generate a yield map.
- Various criteria can be used to filter erroneous measurement indicators.
- indicators measured by the measurement system 130 during specific times may be filtered. For example, measured indicators obtained during a period of time after a measurement system begins measuring yield may be filtered (i.e., start pass delay). Similarly, measured indicators obtained during a period of time before the measurement system stops measuring yield may be filtered (i.e., end pass delay).
- the periods of time may be predetermined (e.g., 12s), selected by an operator of the client system (e.g., as an input), etc.
- measured indicators that exceed localized difference thresholds may be filtered. That is, some variation in yield across a field is common; abrupt variation is less common unless an external influence (e.g., flooding, chemical drift, or wildlife damage) is introduced. Thus, if a single measured indicator lies outside a threshold amount from the distribution of its local neighbor measured indicators, the outlier may be filtered.
- the thresholds may be predetermined (e.g., 25% variation), selected by an operator of the client system (e.g., as an input), etc.
- measured indicators obtained by a measurement system 130 can include, for example, up to fifty percent erroneous measured indicators. As such, appropriately filtering measured indictors is important to accurately generating a yield map using a yield model.
- An observation system 140 is any system or device that can provide observed indicators to the network system and client system. Observed indicators are any type of spatial agricultural datasets or observations describing observed characteristics of the agricultural field. For example, observed indicators may be imagery indicators, weather indicators, or soil indicators. In some examples, an observation system 140 is a system observing some aspect of the field and storing the observation for later quantification. For example, an observation system 140 may be an observation satellite that captures images of an agricultural field as the satellite passes over the field. The measurement system can be many other systems. For example, the image may be captured by a drone or an aircraft rather than a satellite.
- Weather indicators can play a heavy role in crop monitoring and forecasting. Additionally, vegetation indices may be determined from imagery indicators. These indicators correlate strongly with biomass in certain crop types and, thereby, can be a strong indicator of crop yield. Further, the indicators can also correlate to nitrogen content and other physical parameters (e.g., pigment concentrations).
- Weather indicators are obtained as climate-pertinent variables, such as, for example, min max temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, wind speed/direction, etc. Weather indicators can be event-based (e.g. the maximum temperature for the day) or aggregate (e.g. the accumulated rainfall over the month of June or during a particular stage in a crop's life cycle). Weather indicators can be obtained from observation systems such as, for example, weather measurement stations, historical weather databases, etc. Weather indicators can be a strong indicator of crop yield.
- Soil indicators are obtained as static and dynamic characteristics of soil and can include, for example, soil texture, water-holding capacity, topography, and climate zone. Soil indicators can also have dynamic properties such as, for example, pre-season and in-season measurement of macronutrients (e.g. nitrogen), micronutrients (e.g. boron), and other properties (e.g. pH, electrical conductivity, etc.). Soil indicators can be obtained from observation systems such as, for example, a soil sampling and testing system. Soil indicators can be a strong indicator of yield.
- macronutrients e.g. nitrogen
- micronutrients e.g. boron
- other properties e.g. pH, electrical conductivity, etc.
- Soil indicators can be obtained from observation systems such as, for example, a soil sampling and testing system. Soil indicators can be a strong indicator of yield.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 200 for generating a yield map.
- the method 200 may be executed by a yield model 112 executing on client system 110.
- the method 200 can include additional or fewer steps and the steps may occur in any order.
- a yield model 112 receives 210 a request to generate a yield map for an agricultural field.
- an operator of the client system 110 inputs a location of the agricultural field (e.g., coordinates) into the yield model 112 and initializes the request.
- the yield model 112 accesses a map (or some other spatial representation) of the agricultural field using the coordinates.
- the operator manages the agricultural field and is a person responsible for crop production in the agricultural field.
- the yield model 112 receives 230 observed indicators from an observation system 140 that has previously observed the field.
- the observation system 140 is a satellite and the observed indicator is a satellite image of the field.
- the yield model 112 receives observed indicators that are a dataset indicating the pre-season soil nitrogen values obtained from an observation system 140 that is a soil fertilizing machine.
- an observed indicator may be an indicator observed concurrently to a measured indicator.
- a combine harvester may capture images of the field as it harvests plants.
- the yield model 112 generates 240 a yield map using the indicators.
- the yield map is a field raster indicating a determined yield and/or a measured yield for areas in the field based on the satellite image, the nitrogen dataset, and the measured yield values.
- the yield map is configured for display as a heat map on the client system 110 such that the operator can easily visualize different areas and regions of determined yield.
- the method for mapping a cell g, to an input x, in an input array X depends on the type of information encoded in the input x,-. For example, if the input x; is a set of points (e.g. soil cores), the yield model 112 may apply a kriging interpolation method to map the grid cells g to input x;. Other similar interpolation methods may be appropriate. In another example, if the input x; is an array of values (e.g., pixels in a satellite image), yield model 112 may apply a set of morphological operators (e.g. warping, subsampling, super-sampling, etc.) to align the array of the input ⁇ ; ⁇ to the cells g of the field array G.
- morphological operators e.g. warping, subsampling, super-sampling, etc.
- FIGs. 4A-4C illustrate the process of yield model 112 mapping cells g of a field array G to an input x; in an input array X.
- FIG. 4A illustrates a field array G 410 including a number of cells g 420. Each cell g; 420 is illustrated as a small square and the field array G 410 is the combination of all the small squares. The cells g 420 of the field array G 410, in aggregate, approximate the size and shape of the agricultural field for which the yield model 112 is generating a yield map.
- FIG. 4B illustrates an input x, 430 from the input array X.
- the input x,- 430 is a satellite image 432 of the agricultural field including a number of plants 434.
- FIG. 4C illustrates a mapped input x;,, relieve 440 of a mapped input array X m .
- the cells g 420 of the field array G 410 in FIG. 4A have been mapped to the input x, 430 of FIG. 4B.
- the mapped input x,. m 440 is illustrated as the satellite image 432 overlaid with the cells 420 of the field array G 410.
- all illustrated cells correspond to the four centermost cells 422 of the field array G 410 shown in FIG. 4A.
- the four centermost cells 422 are outlined by a dashed line.
- yield array andy is a value, or values, of a measured indicator ("yield points").
- Yield points is associated with the location in the field in which it was measured.
- the yield points y are a quantification of crop yield measured by a combine harvester at a location in the agricultural field.
- Yield model 112 maps the yield points y in the yield array Y to the cells g of the field array G to generate a mapped yield array Y m . That is, for every cell g; in field array G, i.e., gi € G, yield model 112 maps that cell g, to yield points y of the yield array 7. In this manner, each cell in a mapped yield array Y transit, may indicate a quantification of crop yield in the area of the agricultural field associated with that cell g,.
- the yield mapping function F creates a yield value for the cell that is the average value of all yield points y within that cell. That is, a yield value for a cell in a mapped yield array Y m is an average of all yield points measured within the corresponding region of the field.
- the bottom left cell and the top right cell are included in the negative mapped array Y ⁇ .
- Yield model 112 determines yield values for each null value in each unknown u in unknown array U using the predictor array P. More explicitly, yield model 112 inputs a predictor array P and outputs a yield value for each cell of an unknown array. That is, yield model 112 determines yield values for cells in the mapped yield array that did not include yield points. Thus, the null value for each unknown u in an unknown array U is assigned a predicted yield value determined by the yield model 112.
- yield model 112 can use any standard classification and/or regression methods to determine 318 yield values for the unknown array U.
- client system 110 generates and/or continuously updates functions used by the yield model 112 to determine 318 yield values using the predictor arrays P.
- the yield model 112 can include any method or methods that maps a set of predictors p (i.e., input values) in a predictor array P to a yield value. Some example models using classification and/or regression methods include feature selection, over-fit control, validation through training, and test sets would be performed.
- the yield model 112 may also output a set of variables used by the yield model 112 in determining yield values. Additionally, the yield model may also output a list of evaluation metrics from training the yield model using predictor arrays P. The metrics may include accuracy, precision, Fl score, etc. The metrics can be used to determine whether a sufficiently accurate model has been generated.
- the yield model 112 may generate a visualization of the yield map.
- the yield model may generate a heat map using the values in the yield map.
- the yield model 112 may overlay the heat map on an image of the agricultural field for which the yield model 112 is determining yield values.
- FIG. 9 is a visualization of a yield map.
- the visualization 810 is a heat map overlaid on a satellite image of the agricultural field for which the yield model determined yield values.
- Each color in the visualization represents a range of yield values.
- each cell in a yield map is associated with a region of the agricultural field and, thereby, the color for each pixel of the visualization corresponds to a yield value.
- the yield map presents data included in a yield map in such a way that operators can more easily make determinations about agricultural field management.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2018329244A AU2018329244A1 (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2018-09-10 | Generating a yield map for an agricultural field using classification and regression methods |
CA3073291A CA3073291C (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2018-09-10 | Generating a yield map for an agricultural field using classification and regression methods |
BR112020004630-2A BR112020004630A2 (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2018-09-10 | generation of a yield map for an agricultural field using regression and classification methods |
EP18854013.2A EP3682410A4 (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2018-09-10 | Generating a yield map for an agricultural field using classification and regression methods |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201762556975P | 2017-09-11 | 2017-09-11 | |
US62/556,975 | 2017-09-11 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2019046967A1 true WO2019046967A1 (en) | 2019-03-14 |
Family
ID=65629946
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2018/051109 WO2019046967A1 (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2018-09-10 | Generating a yield map for an agricultural field using classification and regression methods |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11317562B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3682410A4 (en) |
AR (1) | AR113109A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2018329244A1 (en) |
BR (1) | BR112020004630A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA3073291C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2019046967A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AT16964U1 (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2021-01-15 | Maschinenring Agrar Concept Gmbh | Process for analyzing and / or mapping an agricultural area |
Families Citing this family (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10581952B1 (en) | 2015-11-06 | 2020-03-03 | Scruggs Equipment Company, Inc. | Device and method for manufacturer-independent interface between mobile computers and remotely accessible data storage |
US20190325466A1 (en) | 2018-04-24 | 2019-10-24 | Indigo Ag, Inc. | Satellite-based agricultural modeling |
US11467605B2 (en) | 2019-04-10 | 2022-10-11 | Deere & Company | Zonal machine control |
US11079725B2 (en) | 2019-04-10 | 2021-08-03 | Deere & Company | Machine control using real-time model |
US11240961B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2022-02-08 | Deere & Company | Controlling a harvesting machine based on a geo-spatial representation indicating where the harvesting machine is likely to reach capacity |
US11641800B2 (en) | 2020-02-06 | 2023-05-09 | Deere & Company | Agricultural harvesting machine with pre-emergence weed detection and mitigation system |
US11653588B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2023-05-23 | Deere & Company | Yield map generation and control system |
US11957072B2 (en) | 2020-02-06 | 2024-04-16 | Deere & Company | Pre-emergence weed detection and mitigation system |
US11589509B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2023-02-28 | Deere & Company | Predictive machine characteristic map generation and control system |
US11178818B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2021-11-23 | Deere & Company | Harvesting machine control system with fill level processing based on yield data |
US11672203B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2023-06-13 | Deere & Company | Predictive map generation and control |
US11778945B2 (en) | 2019-04-10 | 2023-10-10 | Deere & Company | Machine control using real-time model |
US11234366B2 (en) | 2019-04-10 | 2022-02-01 | Deere & Company | Image selection for machine control |
US10872417B1 (en) * | 2019-07-04 | 2020-12-22 | FlyPard Analytics GmbH | Automatic delineation agricultural field management zones using remote sensing and field data |
EP3845050B1 (en) * | 2019-12-30 | 2023-11-29 | AGCO Corporation | Methods and systems for measuring organic material throughput data of harvested crops |
KR102308667B1 (en) * | 2020-01-08 | 2021-10-05 | 고려대학교 산학협력단 | Device and method for progressive top-k subarray query processing in array databases |
US11477940B2 (en) | 2020-03-26 | 2022-10-25 | Deere & Company | Mobile work machine control based on zone parameter modification |
MX2023000724A (en) | 2020-07-16 | 2023-02-13 | Climate Llc | Predicting horticultural yield for a field location using multi-band aerial imagery. |
US11825768B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-11-28 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11895948B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-02-13 | Deere & Company | Predictive map generation and control based on soil properties |
US11874669B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-01-16 | Deere & Company | Map generation and control system |
US11845449B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-12-19 | Deere & Company | Map generation and control system |
US11650587B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-05-16 | Deere & Company | Predictive power map generation and control system |
US11849672B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-12-26 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11727680B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-08-15 | Deere & Company | Predictive map generation based on seeding characteristics and control |
US11889788B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-02-06 | Deere & Company | Predictive biomass map generation and control |
US11675354B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-06-13 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11711995B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-08-01 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11592822B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-02-28 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11864483B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-01-09 | Deere & Company | Predictive map generation and control system |
US11927459B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-03-12 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11844311B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-12-19 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11474523B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2022-10-18 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive speed map |
US11849671B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-12-26 | Deere & Company | Crop state map generation and control system |
US11635765B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-04-25 | Deere & Company | Crop state map generation and control system |
US11871697B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-01-16 | Deere & Company | Crop moisture map generation and control system |
US11946747B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-04-02 | Deere & Company | Crop constituent map generation and control system |
US11889787B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-02-06 | Deere & Company | Predictive speed map generation and control system |
US20230206430A1 (en) * | 2021-12-27 | 2023-06-29 | Deere & Company | Crop yield component map |
WO2024035410A1 (en) * | 2022-08-11 | 2024-02-15 | Deere & Company | Systems and methods for predictive harvesting logistics |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020035431A1 (en) * | 2000-06-05 | 2002-03-21 | Todd Ell | System and method for creating application maps for site-specific farming |
US20030036852A1 (en) * | 2000-06-05 | 2003-02-20 | Agco | System and method for creating input crop requirement maps for site-specific farming |
US20170109395A1 (en) * | 2015-10-14 | 2017-04-20 | The Climate Corporation | Computer-generated accurate yield map data using expert filters and spatial outlier detection |
US20180018517A1 (en) * | 2016-07-13 | 2018-01-18 | The Climate Corporation | Generating pixel maps from non-image data and difference metrics for pixel maps |
US20180132422A1 (en) * | 2016-11-16 | 2018-05-17 | The Climate Corporation | Identifying management zones in agricultural fields and generating planting plans for the zones |
US20180146624A1 (en) * | 2016-11-28 | 2018-05-31 | The Climate Corporation | Determining intra-field yield variation data based on soil characteristics data and satellite images |
Family Cites Families (56)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6651005B2 (en) | 2000-09-25 | 2003-11-18 | O'neall Donald L. | Method for establishing universal standards for yield measurement |
US6549852B2 (en) | 2001-07-13 | 2003-04-15 | Mzb Technologies, Llc | Methods and systems for managing farmland |
US7400770B2 (en) | 2002-11-06 | 2008-07-15 | Hrl Laboratories | Method and apparatus for automatically extracting geospatial features from multispectral imagery suitable for fast and robust extraction of landmarks |
US7702597B2 (en) | 2004-04-20 | 2010-04-20 | George Mason Intellectual Properties, Inc. | Crop yield prediction using piecewise linear regression with a break point and weather and agricultural parameters |
US9195891B2 (en) | 2006-11-07 | 2015-11-24 | The Curators Of The University Of Missouri | Method of predicting crop yield loss due to n-deficiency |
CN101101612B (en) | 2007-07-19 | 2010-08-04 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Method for simulating farmland micro-terrain spatial distribution state |
US8134497B2 (en) | 2008-09-30 | 2012-03-13 | Trimble Navigation Limited | Method and system for location-dependent time-specific correction data |
CA2663917C (en) | 2009-04-22 | 2014-12-30 | Dynagra Corp. | Variable zone crop-specific inputs prescription method and systems therefor |
WO2010126783A2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2010-11-04 | Roman Gitlin | Method and apparatus for streamlined implementation of interpolation in multiple dimensions |
US8306750B2 (en) * | 2009-08-18 | 2012-11-06 | Plant Health Care, Inc. | Computer-automated spatial analysis |
US8412419B1 (en) | 2009-09-17 | 2013-04-02 | Helena Chemical Company | System for mapping GIS layers |
US8638342B2 (en) | 2009-10-20 | 2014-01-28 | Apple Inc. | System and method for demosaicing image data using weighted gradients |
BR112012018114A2 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2016-05-03 | Monsanto Company Llc | crop performance enhancement within an area of interest |
CA2697608A1 (en) | 2010-03-23 | 2011-09-23 | Dennis Bulani | Method of predicting crop yield |
US20110276336A1 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2011-11-10 | Tracy Sweely | Method and apparatus for managing production complexity of high yield, multiple crop gardening and sustainable farming operations |
US20150206255A1 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2015-07-23 | HydroBio, Inc | Method and system to prescribe variable seeding density across a cultivated field using remotely sensed data |
US10096073B2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2018-10-09 | The Climate Corporation | Systems to prescribe and deliver fertilizer over agricultural fields and related methods |
US20130124239A1 (en) | 2011-11-15 | 2013-05-16 | Uriel Rosa | Crop yield per location measurer |
US8935057B2 (en) | 2012-01-17 | 2015-01-13 | LimnTech LLC | Roadway mark data acquisition and analysis apparatus, systems, and methods |
US9818193B2 (en) | 2012-01-30 | 2017-11-14 | Scanadu, Inc. | Spatial resolution enhancement in hyperspectral imaging |
US8917336B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2014-12-23 | Apple Inc. | Image signal processing involving geometric distortion correction |
US9743057B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2017-08-22 | Apple Inc. | Systems and methods for lens shading correction |
US9105078B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2015-08-11 | Apple Inc. | Systems and methods for local tone mapping |
US9077943B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2015-07-07 | Apple Inc. | Local image statistics collection |
US8953882B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2015-02-10 | Apple Inc. | Systems and methods for determining noise statistics of image data |
US8872946B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2014-10-28 | Apple Inc. | Systems and methods for raw image processing |
US20140032271A1 (en) | 2012-07-20 | 2014-01-30 | Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) | System and method for processing demographic data |
US20150371161A1 (en) | 2013-01-30 | 2015-12-24 | The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois | System and methods for identifying, evaluating and predicting land use and agricultural production |
US9924629B2 (en) | 2013-06-21 | 2018-03-27 | Appareo Systems, Llc | Method and system for optimizing planting operations |
WO2015051339A1 (en) | 2013-10-03 | 2015-04-09 | Farmers Business Network, Llc | Crop model and prediction analytics |
US10373353B2 (en) | 2013-10-31 | 2019-08-06 | Trimble Inc. | Crop yield data adjustments |
BR112016014292A2 (en) | 2013-12-19 | 2017-08-08 | Phytech Ltd | CROP TREATMENT MANAGEMENT METHOD AND SYSTEM |
US9578808B2 (en) | 2014-05-16 | 2017-02-28 | Deere & Company | Multi-sensor crop yield determination |
WO2015200489A1 (en) | 2014-06-24 | 2015-12-30 | 360 Yield Center, Llc | Agronomic system, methods and apparatuses |
US9131644B2 (en) | 2014-08-19 | 2015-09-15 | Iteris, Inc. | Continual crop development profiling using dynamical extended range weather forecasting with routine remotely-sensed validation imagery |
US20160055593A1 (en) | 2014-08-21 | 2016-02-25 | David P. Groeneveld | System and Method to Predict Field Access and the Potential for Prevented Planting Claims for Use by Crop Insurers |
CN107148633B (en) | 2014-08-22 | 2020-12-01 | 克莱米特公司 | Method for agronomic and agricultural monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicle system |
US20160063639A1 (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2016-03-03 | David P. Groeneveld | System and Method to Assist Crop Loss Adjusting of Variable Impacts Across Agricultural Fields Using Remotely-Sensed Data |
RU2699005C2 (en) * | 2014-08-27 | 2019-09-02 | Премьер Кроп Системс, ЛЛС | System and method of controlling machines for randomisation and repetition of preset modes of agricultural resource application |
US10109024B2 (en) | 2014-09-05 | 2018-10-23 | The Climate Corporation | Collecting data to generate an agricultural prescription |
US10667456B2 (en) | 2014-09-12 | 2020-06-02 | The Climate Corporation | Methods and systems for managing agricultural activities |
US10564316B2 (en) | 2014-09-12 | 2020-02-18 | The Climate Corporation | Forecasting national crop yield during the growing season |
US11080798B2 (en) | 2014-09-12 | 2021-08-03 | The Climate Corporation | Methods and systems for managing crop harvesting activities |
US9756785B2 (en) | 2014-09-12 | 2017-09-12 | Appareo Systems, Llc | Grain quality sensor |
US9916505B2 (en) | 2014-09-22 | 2018-03-13 | Deere & Company | Method and system for collecting image data |
US10126282B2 (en) | 2014-09-23 | 2018-11-13 | Deere & Company | Yield estimation |
US9903979B2 (en) | 2014-09-23 | 2018-02-27 | Deere & Company | Yield estimation |
WO2016099723A2 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2016-06-23 | SlantRange, Inc. | Systems and methods for aggregating and facilitating the display of spatially variable geographic data acquired by airborne vehicles |
US9953241B2 (en) | 2014-12-16 | 2018-04-24 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for satellite image processing to estimate crop yield |
US9792557B2 (en) | 2015-01-14 | 2017-10-17 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Precision agriculture system |
US9037521B1 (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2015-05-19 | Iteris, Inc. | Modeling of time-variant threshability due to interactions between a crop in a field and atmospheric and soil conditions for prediction of daily opportunity windows for harvest operations using field-level diagnosis and prediction of weather conditions and observations and user input of harvest condition states |
WO2016127094A1 (en) | 2015-02-06 | 2016-08-11 | The Climate Corporation | Methods and systems for recommending agricultural activities |
US10677962B2 (en) | 2015-03-06 | 2020-06-09 | The Climate Corporation | Estimating temperature values at field level based on less granular data |
EP3278281A1 (en) | 2015-04-01 | 2018-02-07 | The Climate Corporation | Forecasting national crop yield during the growing season |
EP3281158A1 (en) | 2015-04-08 | 2018-02-14 | The Climate Corporation | Improving weather forecasts through post-processing |
US10331931B2 (en) * | 2016-02-05 | 2019-06-25 | The Climate Corporation | Modeling trends in crop yields |
-
2018
- 2018-09-10 WO PCT/CA2018/051109 patent/WO2019046967A1/en unknown
- 2018-09-10 US US16/126,697 patent/US11317562B2/en active Active
- 2018-09-10 BR BR112020004630-2A patent/BR112020004630A2/en unknown
- 2018-09-10 CA CA3073291A patent/CA3073291C/en active Active
- 2018-09-10 EP EP18854013.2A patent/EP3682410A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2018-09-10 AU AU2018329244A patent/AU2018329244A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2018-09-11 AR ARP180102577A patent/AR113109A1/en unknown
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020035431A1 (en) * | 2000-06-05 | 2002-03-21 | Todd Ell | System and method for creating application maps for site-specific farming |
US20030036852A1 (en) * | 2000-06-05 | 2003-02-20 | Agco | System and method for creating input crop requirement maps for site-specific farming |
US20170109395A1 (en) * | 2015-10-14 | 2017-04-20 | The Climate Corporation | Computer-generated accurate yield map data using expert filters and spatial outlier detection |
US20180018517A1 (en) * | 2016-07-13 | 2018-01-18 | The Climate Corporation | Generating pixel maps from non-image data and difference metrics for pixel maps |
US20180132422A1 (en) * | 2016-11-16 | 2018-05-17 | The Climate Corporation | Identifying management zones in agricultural fields and generating planting plans for the zones |
US20180146624A1 (en) * | 2016-11-28 | 2018-05-31 | The Climate Corporation | Determining intra-field yield variation data based on soil characteristics data and satellite images |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP3682410A4 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AT16964U1 (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2021-01-15 | Maschinenring Agrar Concept Gmbh | Process for analyzing and / or mapping an agricultural area |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA3073291A1 (en) | 2019-03-14 |
EP3682410A4 (en) | 2021-06-02 |
CA3073291C (en) | 2023-01-17 |
US20190075727A1 (en) | 2019-03-14 |
BR112020004630A2 (en) | 2020-09-24 |
AR113109A1 (en) | 2020-01-29 |
US11317562B2 (en) | 2022-05-03 |
AU2018329244A1 (en) | 2020-03-12 |
EP3682410A1 (en) | 2020-07-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11317562B2 (en) | Generating a yield map for an agricultural field using classification and regression methods | |
US11022719B2 (en) | Statistical blending of weather data sets | |
AU2017215188B2 (en) | Modeling trends in crop yields | |
ES2942415T3 (en) | Automatic detection of harvest data outliers | |
US20170270446A1 (en) | Agronomic systems, methods and apparatuses for determining yield limits | |
US10317260B2 (en) | Yield data calibration methods | |
Kayad et al. | How many gigabytes per hectare are available in the digital agriculture era? A digitization footprint estimation | |
BR112021001667A2 (en) | automatic yield forecast and sowing rate recommendation based on weather data | |
CN113226009B (en) | Predictive seed script processing for soybeans | |
CN114466587A (en) | Hybrid vision system for crop ground navigation | |
WO2018107245A1 (en) | Detection of environmental conditions | |
CN107437262B (en) | Crop planting area early warning method and system | |
CN113570273A (en) | Spatial method and system for irrigation farmland statistical data | |
Li et al. | Analysis of influencing factors on winter wheat yield estimations based on a multisource remote sensing data fusion | |
CN115511224B (en) | Intelligent monitoring method and device for growing vigor of crops integrated with heaven and earth and electronic equipment | |
Garzella et al. | Sampling and interpretation of maps | |
Danlard | IoT based Sustainable Agriculture-Advances, Challenges and Opportunities | |
CN117454074A (en) | Crop area estimation method and device | |
CN116402633A (en) | Agricultural drought remote sensing monitoring method for vector projection analysis | |
Grego et al. | Technologies developed in precision agriculture. |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 18854013 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 3073291 Country of ref document: CA |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2018329244 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20180910 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: BR Ref legal event code: B01A Ref document number: 112020004630 Country of ref document: BR |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2018854013 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20200414 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 112020004630 Country of ref document: BR Kind code of ref document: A2 Effective date: 20200307 |