WO2019028631A1 - Method for determining relative confidentiality of technical know-how - Google Patents
Method for determining relative confidentiality of technical know-how Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2019028631A1 WO2019028631A1 PCT/CN2017/096297 CN2017096297W WO2019028631A1 WO 2019028631 A1 WO2019028631 A1 WO 2019028631A1 CN 2017096297 W CN2017096297 W CN 2017096297W WO 2019028631 A1 WO2019028631 A1 WO 2019028631A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- technical solution
- technical
- judged
- determined
- related public
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/30—Semantic analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/18—Legal services; Handling legal documents
Definitions
- the invention relates to the field of enterprise intellectual property management, in particular to a method for judging the relative secrecy of technical secrets.
- the object of the present invention is to provide a relative secret determination method for a technical secret, which can quickly and accurately determine whether the technical solution to be determined has confidentiality.
- the present invention provides a relative secret determination method for a technical secret, which includes:
- the keyword includes each technical element of the technical solution to be determined and a grammatical relationship between the technical elements.
- the keyword also includes synonyms, synonyms, and common spelling errors for each technical element.
- the keyword also includes synonyms, synonyms, and common spelling errors of the subordinate concepts of each technical element
- the grammatical relationship includes a parallel relationship, a bearing relationship, and a causal relationship.
- step "determining whether the technical solution to be judged has novelty in the sense of patent law before the judgment reference date according to the judgment rule of novelty” further includes the following steps: if all the technical elements of the technical solution to be judged Corresponding to the existence of the related public documents, and then determining whether there is a grammatical relationship corresponding to the grammatical relationship of the technical solution to be determined in the related public document; if all the technical elements and the grammatical relationship are in the related public document Corresponding to the existence, determining that the technical solution to be judged has no relative confidentiality with respect to the related public document; if any of the technical elements and the grammatical relationship do not exist in the related public document, determining the The technical solution to be judged is novel with respect to the related publication, and a list of experts is given.
- the judgment result of the comparison between the scheme and the second related public document and the technical solution to be judged are different, the judgment result of the first related public document and the technical solution to be judged is preferentially used.
- an authoritative related public document and a general related public document are simultaneously found, it is preferred to use an authoritative related public document to compare with the technical solution to be judged.
- Another aspect of the present invention provides a relative secret determination method for a technical secret, which includes:
- the keyword includes each technical element of the technical solution to be judged and a grammatical relationship between each technical element; the keyword also includes synonyms, synonyms and common spelling errors of each technical element; the keyword also includes each technology Synonyms, synonyms, and common spelling errors of the underlying concepts of elements; the grammatical relationships include juxtaposition, inheritance, and causality;
- the judgment result of the comparison between the scheme and the second related public document and the technical solution to be judged are different, the judgment result of the first related public document and the technical solution to be judged is preferentially used. If at the same time, an authoritative relevant public document and a general related public document are found, it is preferred to use an authoritative related public document to compare with the technical solution to be judged.
- the method for determining the relative confidentiality of a technical secret provided by the present invention has the beneficial effects of being able to quickly and accurately determine whether the technical solution to be determined has confidentiality.
- FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for determining a relative confidentiality of a technical secret according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- a method for judging the relative confidentiality of a technical secret includes the following steps:
- S2 Provide a database for obtaining technical information published by countries around the world.
- the keyword includes each technical element of the technical solution to be determined and a grammatical relationship (such as a parallel relationship, a bearing relationship, a causal relationship, etc.) between the technical elements, and includes synonyms, synonyms, and commons of each technical element. Spelling errors; also includes synonyms, synonyms, and common spelling mistakes for the subordinate concepts of each technical element.
- the technical elements of the technical solution to be determined are marked as A1, A2, A3...An, synonym, synonym and common spelling mistakes and subordinate concepts of the technical element A1 and their synonyms, synonyms and common spelling mistakes.
- the judgment result of the first related public document and the technical solution to be judged is preferentially used.
- an authoritative related public document and a general related public document are simultaneously found, it is preferred to use an authoritative related public document to compare with the technical solution to be judged.
- S6 Output a report with judgment results and suggestions.
- the report contains a judgment result as to whether or not the judgment technical solution has a secretness, and when it is novel, a list of experts is given and sorted according to a predetermined rule.
- the predetermined rule is, for example, a rule such as rating or preference by the user, or the number of cases handled by the expert.
- the technical secret relative secret judgment system and method provided by the present invention has the beneficial effects of being able to quickly and accurately determine whether the technical solution to be determined has confidentiality, thereby saving a large amount of time and money.
Abstract
A method for determining relative confidentiality of technical know-how, comprising: inputting a determining reference date and a technical solution to be determined (S1); providing a database for acquiring technical information published in all the countries in the world (S2); analyzing the technical solution to be determined and extracting all keywords in the technical solution to be determined (S3); performing searching in the database according to all the keywords to find published documents relevant to the technical solution to be determined (S4); determining, according to a determining rule of novelty, whether the technical solution to be determined is novel in the sense of patent law before the determining reference date, and drawing a conclusion that the technical solution to be determined is not confidential when the technical solution to be determined lacks novelty before the determining reference date, or when the technical solution to be determined is novel before the determining reference date, giving a candidate authentication expert list and performing ordering on the list according to a predetermined rule so as to further determine whether the technical solution to be determined is confidential (S5); and outputting a report with the determining result and suggestions (S6).
Description
本发明涉及企业知识产权管理领域，特别涉及一种技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法。The invention relates to the field of enterprise intellectual property management, in particular to a method for judging the relative secrecy of technical secrets.
企业出于保护自己研发成果的目的，经常会将核心技术方案作为技术秘密进行保护，然而一个技术方案是否能成为技术秘密，是否具有秘密性，则需要专业人士进行全面的检索分析，对于大部分小微企业来说，这是不仅需要大量的时间，而且需要较多的资金。For the purpose of protecting their own research and development results, enterprises often protect core technology solutions as technical secrets. However, whether a technical solution can become a technical secret or whether it is secretive requires professional personnel to conduct comprehensive search and analysis. For small and micro enterprises, this requires not only a lot of time, but also more funds.
鉴于以上弊端，实有必要提供一种技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法以克服以上缺陷。In view of the above drawbacks, it is necessary to provide a relative secret judgment method of technical secrets to overcome the above drawbacks.
发明内容Summary of the invention
本发明的目的是提供一种技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，能够快速准确地判断待判断技术方案是否具有秘密性。The object of the present invention is to provide a relative secret determination method for a technical secret, which can quickly and accurately determine whether the technical solution to be determined has confidentiality.
为了实现上述目的，本发明提供一种技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其包括：In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a relative secret determination method for a technical secret, which includes:
S1，输入判断基准日期及待判断的技术方案；S1, input the judgment reference date and the technical solution to be judged;
S2，提供一个用于获取世界各国公开的技术信息的数据库；S2, providing a database for obtaining technical information published by countries all over the world;
S3，分析该待判断技术方案并提取该待判断技术方案的所有关键字；S3, analyzing the technical solution to be determined and extracting all keywords of the technical solution to be determined;
S4，根据该所有关键字在该数据库中进行检索，以找到该待判断技术方案
的相关公开文献；S4, searching in the database according to the all keywords to find the technical solution to be judged
Related publications;
S5，根据新颖性的判断规则判断该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前是否具有专利法意义上的新颖性；在该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前不具有新颖性时，给出不具有秘密性的结论；在该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前具有新颖性时，给出候选鉴定专家名单，并根据预定规则对名单进行排序，以进一步判断其是否具有秘密性；S5, judging whether the technical solution to be judged has novelty in the sense of patent law before the judgment reference date according to the judging rule of novelty; when the technical solution to be judged does not have novelty before the judgment reference date, Secret conclusion; when the technical solution to be judged has novelty before the judgment reference date, a list of candidate identification experts is given, and the list is sorted according to a predetermined rule to further judge whether it is secret;
S6，输出具有判断结果及建议的报告。S6, outputting a report with the judgment result and the suggestion.
进一步地，该关键字包括该待判断技术方案的各技术要素及各技术要素之间的语法关系。Further, the keyword includes each technical element of the technical solution to be determined and a grammatical relationship between the technical elements.
进一步地，该关键字还包括每个技术要素的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误。Further, the keyword also includes synonyms, synonyms, and common spelling errors for each technical element.
进一步地，该关键字同时还包括每个技术要素的下位概念的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误；Further, the keyword also includes synonyms, synonyms, and common spelling errors of the subordinate concepts of each technical element;
进一步地，该语法关系包括并列关系、承接关系、因果关系。Further, the grammatical relationship includes a parallel relationship, a bearing relationship, and a causal relationship.
进一步地，在该步骤“根据新颖性的判断规则判断该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前是否具有专利法意义上的新颖性”中还包括如下步骤：若该待判断技术方案的所有技术要素在该相关公开文献中都对应存在，接着判断该相关公开文献中是否存在与该待判断技术方案的语法关系相对应的语法关系；若该所有技术要素及该语法关系都在该相关公开文献中对应存在，则判断该待判断技术方案相对于该相关公开文献不具有技术秘密的相对秘密性；若该所有技术要素及该语法关系中的任意一个在该相关公开文献中不存在，则判断该待判断技术方案相对于该相关公开文献具有新颖性，并给出专家名单列表。
Further, in the step, "determining whether the technical solution to be judged has novelty in the sense of patent law before the judgment reference date according to the judgment rule of novelty" further includes the following steps: if all the technical elements of the technical solution to be judged Corresponding to the existence of the related public documents, and then determining whether there is a grammatical relationship corresponding to the grammatical relationship of the technical solution to be determined in the related public document; if all the technical elements and the grammatical relationship are in the related public document Corresponding to the existence, determining that the technical solution to be judged has no relative confidentiality with respect to the related public document; if any of the technical elements and the grammatical relationship do not exist in the related public document, determining the The technical solution to be judged is novel with respect to the related publication, and a list of experts is given.
进一步地，若同时找到该待判断技术方案所在技术领域的第一相关公开文献及该待判断技术方案相邻技术领域的第二相关公开文献，且采用该第一相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果与采用该第二相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果不同，则优先采用该第一相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果。Further, if the first related public document in the technical field of the technical solution to be determined and the second related public document in the technical field adjacent to the technical solution to be determined are found, and the first related public document and the technology to be judged are adopted If the judgment result of the comparison between the scheme and the second related public document and the technical solution to be judged are different, the judgment result of the first related public document and the technical solution to be judged is preferentially used. .
进一步地，若同时找到具有权威性的相关公开文献及一般性相关公开文献则优先采用具有权威性的相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行对比。Further, if an authoritative related public document and a general related public document are simultaneously found, it is preferred to use an authoritative related public document to compare with the technical solution to be judged.
本发明另一方面提供一种技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其包括：Another aspect of the present invention provides a relative secret determination method for a technical secret, which includes:
S1，输入判断基准日期及待判断的技术方案；S1, input the judgment reference date and the technical solution to be judged;
S2，提供一个用于获取世界各国公开的技术信息的数据库；S2, providing a database for obtaining technical information published by countries all over the world;
S3，分析该待判断技术方案并提取该待判断技术方案的所有关键字；S3, analyzing the technical solution to be determined and extracting all keywords of the technical solution to be determined;
该关键字包括该待判断技术方案的各技术要素及各技术要素之间的语法关系；该关键字还包括每个技术要素的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误；该关键字同时还包括每个技术要素的下位概念的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误；该语法关系包括并列关系、承接关系、因果关系；The keyword includes each technical element of the technical solution to be judged and a grammatical relationship between each technical element; the keyword also includes synonyms, synonyms and common spelling errors of each technical element; the keyword also includes each technology Synonyms, synonyms, and common spelling errors of the underlying concepts of elements; the grammatical relationships include juxtaposition, inheritance, and causality;
S4，根据该所有关键字在该数据库中进行检索，以找到该待判断技术方案的相关公开文献；S4, performing a search in the database according to the all keywords to find a related public document of the technical solution to be judged;
S5，根据新颖性的判断规则判断该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前是否具有专利法意义上的新颖性；在该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前不具有新颖性时，给出不具有秘密性的结论；在该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前具有新颖性时，给出候选鉴定专家名单，并根据预定规则对名单进行排序，以进一步判断其是否具有秘密性；具体地，若该待判断技术方案的所有技术要素在
该相关公开文献中都对应存在，接着判断该相关公开文献中是否存在与该待判断技术方案的语法关系相对应的语法关系；若该所有技术要素及该语法关系都在该相关公开文献中对应存在，则判断该待判断技术方案相对于该相关公开文献不具有技术秘密的相对秘密性；若该所有技术要素及该语法关系中的任意一个在该相关公开文献中不存在，则判断该待判断技术方案相对于该相关公开文献具有新颖性，并给出专家名单列表。S5, judging whether the technical solution to be judged has novelty in the sense of patent law before the judgment reference date according to the judging rule of novelty; when the technical solution to be judged does not have novelty before the judgment reference date, a secret conclusion; when the technical solution to be judged has novelty before the judgment reference date, a list of candidate identification experts is given, and the list is sorted according to a predetermined rule to further judge whether it has secrecy; specifically, if All the technical elements of the technical solution to be judged are
Corresponding to the related public documents, and then determining whether there is a grammatical relationship corresponding to the grammatical relationship of the technical solution to be determined in the related public document; if all the technical elements and the grammatical relationship are corresponding in the related public document Exist, determining that the technical solution to be judged has no relative confidentiality with respect to the related public document; if any of the technical elements and the grammatical relationship do not exist in the related public document, determining the waiting The judging technical solution is novel with respect to the related publication, and a list of experts is given.
S6，输出具有判断结果及建议的报告。S6, outputting a report with the judgment result and the suggestion.
进一步地，若同时找到该待判断技术方案所在技术领域的第一相关公开文献及该待判断技术方案相邻技术领域的第二相关公开文献，且采用该第一相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果与采用该第二相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果不同，则优先采用该第一相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果；若同时找到具有权威性的相关公开文献及一般性相关公开文献则优先采用具有权威性的相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行对比。Further, if the first related public document in the technical field of the technical solution to be determined and the second related public document in the technical field adjacent to the technical solution to be determined are found, and the first related public document and the technology to be judged are adopted If the judgment result of the comparison between the scheme and the second related public document and the technical solution to be judged are different, the judgment result of the first related public document and the technical solution to be judged is preferentially used. If at the same time, an authoritative relevant public document and a general related public document are found, it is preferred to use an authoritative related public document to compare with the technical solution to be judged.
与现有技术相比较，本发明提供的一种技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法的有益效果在于：能够快速准确地判断待判断技术方案是否具有秘密性。Compared with the prior art, the method for determining the relative confidentiality of a technical secret provided by the present invention has the beneficial effects of being able to quickly and accurately determine whether the technical solution to be determined has confidentiality.
图1为本发明一实施例提供的技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法的流程图。FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for determining a relative confidentiality of a technical secret according to an embodiment of the present invention.
为了使本发明的目的、技术方案和有益技术效果更加清晰明白，以下结合
附图和具体实施方式，对本发明进行进一步详细说明。应当理解的是，本说明书中描述的具体实施方式仅仅是为了解释本发明，并不是为了限定本发明。In order to make the objects, technical solutions and beneficial technical effects of the present invention more clear, the following combinations
The invention is further illustrated in the drawings and detailed description. The specific embodiments described in the specification are to be construed as illustrative only and not limiting.
如图1所示，本发明一实施例提供的一种技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其包括如下步骤：As shown in FIG. 1 , a method for judging the relative confidentiality of a technical secret according to an embodiment of the present invention includes the following steps:
S1：输入判断基准日期及待判断的技术方案；S1: input the judgment reference date and the technical solution to be judged;
S2：提供一个用于获取世界各国公开的技术信息的数据库。S2: Provide a database for obtaining technical information published by countries around the world.
S3：分析该待判断技术方案并提取该待判断技术方案的所有关键字。具体的，该关键字包括该待判断技术方案的各技术要素及各技术要素之间的语法关系(比如并列关系、承接关系、因果关系等)，还包括每个技术要素的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误；同时还包括每个技术要素的下位概念的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误。在本实施例中，将该待判断技术方案的技术要素标记为A1、A2、A3…An，将该技术要素A1的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误及下位概念及其同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误分别标记为A11、A12、A13…A1n，将该技术要素A1的下位概念的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误分别标记为a11、a12、a13…a1n，将各技术要素之间的语法关系标记为B1，B2，B3…Bn。S3: Analyze the technical solution to be determined and extract all the keywords of the technical solution to be determined. Specifically, the keyword includes each technical element of the technical solution to be determined and a grammatical relationship (such as a parallel relationship, a bearing relationship, a causal relationship, etc.) between the technical elements, and includes synonyms, synonyms, and commons of each technical element. Spelling errors; also includes synonyms, synonyms, and common spelling mistakes for the subordinate concepts of each technical element. In this embodiment, the technical elements of the technical solution to be determined are marked as A1, A2, A3...An, synonym, synonym and common spelling mistakes and subordinate concepts of the technical element A1 and their synonyms, synonyms and common spelling mistakes. Marked as A11, A12, A13...A1n, respectively, the synonym, synonym and common spelling errors of the lower concept of the technical element A1 are marked as a11, a12, a13...a1n, respectively, and the grammatical relationship between the technical elements is marked as B1. , B2, B3...Bn.
S4：根据该所有关键字在该数据库中进行检索，以找到该待判断技术方案的相关公开文献。S4: Searching in the database according to the all keywords to find related public documents of the technical solution to be judged.
S5：根据新颖性的判断规则判断该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前是否具有专利法意义上的新颖性；。在该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前不具有新颖性时，给出不具有秘密性的结论；在该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前具有新颖性时，给出候选鉴定专家名单，并根据预定规则对名单进行排序，以进一步判断其是否具有秘密性；具体的，若该待判断技术方案的所有技术要
素在该相关公开文献中都对应存在，接着判断该相关公开文献中是否存在与该待判断技术方案的语法关系相对应的语法关系；若该所有技术要素及该语法关系都在该相关公开文献中对应存在，则判断该待判断技术方案相对于该相关公开文献不具有技术秘密的相对秘密性；若该所有技术要素及该语法关系中的任意一个在该相关公开文献中不存在，则判断该待判断技术方案相对于该相关公开文献具有新颖性，并给出专家名单列表，以供进一步判断其秘密性。S5: judging whether the technical solution to be judged has novelty in the sense of patent law before the judgment reference date according to the judging rule of novelty; When the technical solution to be judged does not have novelty before the judgment reference date, a conclusion that there is no secrecy is given; when the technical solution to be judged has novelty before the judgment reference date, a list of candidate identification experts is given, and Sorting the list according to predetermined rules to further determine whether it is confidential; specifically, if all the technologies of the technical solution to be judged are
Correspondingly exist in the related public document, and then determining whether there is a grammatical relationship corresponding to the grammatical relationship of the technical solution to be judged in the related public document; if all the technical elements and the grammatical relationship are in the related public document If there is a corresponding existence, it is determined that the technical solution to be judged has no relative confidentiality with respect to the related public document; if any of the technical elements and the grammatical relationship does not exist in the related public document, then it is determined The technical solution to be judged is novel with respect to the related public document, and a list of experts is given for further judging its confidentiality.
进一步的，若同时找到该待判断技术方案所在技术领域的第一相关公开文献及该待判断技术方案相邻技术领域的第二相关公开文献，且采用该第一相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果与采用该第二相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果不同，则优先采用该第一相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果。Further, if the first related publication of the technical field in which the technical solution to be determined is located and the second related publication of the technical field adjacent to the technical solution to be determined are simultaneously found, and the first related public document and the technology to be judged are adopted If the judgment result of the comparison between the scheme and the second related public document and the technical solution to be judged are different, the judgment result of the first related public document and the technical solution to be judged is preferentially used. .
进一步的，若同时找到具有权威性的相关公开文献及一般性相关公开文献则优先采用具有权威性的相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行对比。Further, if an authoritative related public document and a general related public document are simultaneously found, it is preferred to use an authoritative related public document to compare with the technical solution to be judged.
S6：输出具有判断结果及建议的报告。该报告中含有是否该带判断技术方案是否具有秘密性的判断结果，并具有新颖性时，给出专家名单列表，并按预定规则进行排序。预定规则例如为按用户评价或者喜好，或者该专家处理案件的数量等规则。S6: Output a report with judgment results and suggestions. The report contains a judgment result as to whether or not the judgment technical solution has a secretness, and when it is novel, a list of experts is given and sorted according to a predetermined rule. The predetermined rule is, for example, a rule such as rating or preference by the user, or the number of cases handled by the expert.
与现有技术相比较，本发明提供的一种技术秘密的相对秘密性判断系统及方法的有益效果在于：能够快速准确地判断待判断技术方案是否具有秘密性，从而节省大量的时间及金钱。Compared with the prior art, the technical secret relative secret judgment system and method provided by the present invention has the beneficial effects of being able to quickly and accurately determine whether the technical solution to be determined has confidentiality, thereby saving a large amount of time and money.
本发明并不仅仅限于说明书和实施方式中所描述，因此对于熟悉领域的人员而言可容易地实现另外的优点和修改，故在不背离权利要求及等同范围所限
定的一般概念的精神和范围的情况下，本发明并不限于特定的细节、代表性的设备和这里示出与描述的图示示例。
The invention is not limited by the description and the embodiments, so that other advantages and modifications may be readily made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
The present invention is not limited to the specific details, representative devices, and illustrated examples shown and described herein.
Claims (10)
- 一种技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其特征在于，包括：A relative secret judgment method for technical secrets, characterized in that it comprises:S1，输入判断基准日期及待判断的技术方案；S1, input the judgment reference date and the technical solution to be judged;S2，提供一个用于获取世界各国公开的技术信息的数据库；S2, providing a database for obtaining technical information published by countries all over the world;S3，分析该待判断技术方案并提取该待判断技术方案的所有关键字；S3, analyzing the technical solution to be determined and extracting all keywords of the technical solution to be determined;S4，根据该所有关键字在该数据库中进行检索，以找到该待判断技术方案的相关公开文献；S4, performing a search in the database according to the all keywords to find a related public document of the technical solution to be judged;S5，根据新颖性的判断规则判断该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前是否具有专利法意义上的新颖性；在该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前不具有新颖性时，给出不具有秘密性的结论；在该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前具有新颖性时，给出候选鉴定专家名单，并根据预定规则对名单进行排序，以进一步判断其是否具有秘密性；S5, judging whether the technical solution to be judged has novelty in the sense of patent law before the judgment reference date according to the judging rule of novelty; when the technical solution to be judged does not have novelty before the judgment reference date, Secret conclusion; when the technical solution to be judged has novelty before the judgment reference date, a list of candidate identification experts is given, and the list is sorted according to a predetermined rule to further judge whether it is secret;S6，输出具有判断结果及建议的报告。S6, outputting a report with the judgment result and the suggestion.
- 如权利要求1所述的技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其特征在于：该关键字包括该待判断技术方案的各技术要素及各技术要素之间的语法关系。The relative secret determination method of the technical secret according to claim 1, wherein the keyword includes each technical element of the technical solution to be determined and a grammatical relationship between the technical elements.
- 如权利要求2所述的技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其特征在于：该关键字还包括每个技术要素的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误。The relative secret judgment method of the technical secret according to claim 2, wherein the keyword further includes synonyms, synonyms and common spelling errors of each technical element.
- 如权利要求3所述的技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其特征在于：该关键字同时还包括每个技术要素的下位概念的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误；The method according to claim 3, wherein the keyword further includes synonym, synonym and common spelling errors of the subordinate concept of each technical element;
- 如权利要求2所述的技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其特征在于：该语法关系包括并列关系、承接关系、因果关系。 The relative secret judgment method of the technical secret according to claim 2, wherein the grammatical relationship includes a parallel relationship, a bearing relationship, and a causal relationship.
- 如权利要求1所述的技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其特征在于：在该步骤“根据新颖性的判断规则判断该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前是否具有专利法意义上的新颖性”中还包括如下步骤：若该待判断技术方案的所有技术要素在该相关公开文献中都对应存在，接着判断该相关公开文献中是否存在与该待判断技术方案的语法关系相对应的语法关系；若该所有技术要素及该语法关系都在该相关公开文献中对应存在，则判断该待判断技术方案相对于该相关公开文献不具有技术秘密的相对秘密性；若该所有技术要素及该语法关系中的任意一个在该相关公开文献中不存在，则判断该待判断技术方案相对于该相关公开文献具有新颖性，并给出专家名单列表。The relative confidentiality judging method of the technical secret according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the step "determining whether the technical solution to be judged has novelty in the sense of patent law before the judgment reference date according to the judging rule of novelty The method further includes the following steps: if all technical elements of the technical solution to be determined correspond in the related public document, and then determining whether there is a grammatical relationship corresponding to the grammatical relationship of the technical solution to be determined in the related public document If all the technical elements and the grammatical relationship correspond in the related public document, it is determined that the technical solution to be judged has no relative confidentiality with respect to the related public document; if all the technical elements and the grammar Any one of the relationships does not exist in the related publication, and it is judged that the technical solution to be judged is novel with respect to the related publication, and a list of experts is given.
- 如权利要求6所述的技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其特征在于：若同时找到该待判断技术方案所在技术领域的第一相关公开文献及该待判断技术方案相邻技术领域的第二相关公开文献，且采用该第一相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果与采用该第二相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果不同，则优先采用该第一相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果。The method for determining the relative confidentiality of the technical secret according to claim 6, wherein the first related public document in the technical field in which the technical solution to be determined is located and the second technical field adjacent to the technical solution to be determined are simultaneously found. In the related publication, and the judgment result of the comparison between the first related public document and the technical solution to be judged is different from the judgment result by using the second related public document and the technical solution to be judged, the priority is adopted. The judgment result of the comparison of the first related publication document and the technical solution to be judged.
- 如权利要求6或7所述的技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其特征在于：若同时找到具有权威性的相关公开文献及一般性相关公开文献则优先采用具有权威性的相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行对比。The method according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the method for determining the relative confidentiality of the technical secret is characterized in that, if the relevant related public documents and the general related public documents are found at the same time, the relevant related public documents and the authoritative documents are preferentially used. The technical solutions to be judged are compared.
- 一种技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其特征在于，其包括：A relative secret judgment method for technical secrets, characterized in that it comprises:S1，输入判断基准日期及待判断的技术方案；S1, input the judgment reference date and the technical solution to be judged;S2，提供一个用于获取世界各国公开的技术信息的数据库；S2, providing a database for obtaining technical information published by countries all over the world;S3，分析该待判断技术方案并提取该待判断技术方案的所有关键字； S3, analyzing the technical solution to be determined and extracting all keywords of the technical solution to be determined;该关键字包括该待判断技术方案的各技术要素及各技术要素之间的语法关系；该关键字还包括每个技术要素的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误；该关键字同时还包括每个技术要素的下位概念的同义词、近义词及常见拼写错误；该语法关系包括并列关系、承接关系、因果关系；The keyword includes each technical element of the technical solution to be judged and a grammatical relationship between each technical element; the keyword also includes synonyms, synonyms and common spelling errors of each technical element; the keyword also includes each technology Synonyms, synonyms, and common spelling errors of the underlying concepts of elements; the grammatical relationships include juxtaposition, inheritance, and causality;S4，根据该所有关键字在该数据库中进行检索，以找到该待判断技术方案的相关公开文献；S4, performing a search in the database according to the all keywords to find a related public document of the technical solution to be judged;S5，根据新颖性的判断规则判断该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前是否具有专利法意义上的新颖性；在该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前不具有新颖性时，给出不具有秘密性的结论；在该待判断技术方案在判断基准日之前具有新颖性时，给出带有候选鉴定专家名单，并根据预定规则对名单进行排序，以进一步判断其是否具有秘密性；具体地，若该待判断技术方案的所有技术要素在该相关公开文献中都对应存在，接着判断该相关公开文献中是否存在与该待判断技术方案的语法关系相对应的语法关系；若该所有技术要素及该语法关系都在该相关公开文献中对应存在，则判断该待判断技术方案相对于该相关公开文献不具有技术秘密的相对秘密性；若该所有技术要素及该语法关系中的任意一个在该相关公开文献中不存在，则判断该待判断技术方案相对于该相关公开文献具有新颖性，并给出专家名单列表。S5, judging whether the technical solution to be judged has novelty in the sense of patent law before the judgment reference date according to the judging rule of novelty; when the technical solution to be judged does not have novelty before the judgment reference date, a secret conclusion; when the technical solution to be judged has novelty before the judgment reference date, a list of candidate identification experts is given, and the list is sorted according to a predetermined rule to further judge whether it is secret; specifically If all the technical elements of the technical solution to be judged are correspondingly present in the related public document, then it is determined whether there is a grammatical relationship corresponding to the grammatical relationship of the technical solution to be determined in the related public document; if all the technical elements are And the grammatical relationship correspondingly exists in the related public document, determining that the technical solution to be judged has no relative confidentiality with respect to the related public document; if any of the technical elements and the grammatical relationship are If the related public document does not exist, it is determined that the technical solution to be judged is relatively The relevant published literature novel, and gives a list of list of experts.S6，输出具有判断结果及建议的报告。S6, outputting a report with the judgment result and the suggestion.
- 如权利要求9所述的技术秘密的相对秘密性判断方法，其特征在于：若同时找到该待判断技术方案所在技术领域的第一相关公开文献及该待判断技术方案相邻技术领域的第二相关公开文献，且采用该第一相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果与采用该第二相关公开文献与该待判断 技术方案进行比对的判断结果不同，则优先采用该第一相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行比对的判断结果；若同时找到具有权威性的相关公开文献及一般性相关公开文献则优先采用具有权威性的相关公开文献与该待判断技术方案进行对比。 The method for determining the relative confidentiality of the technical secret according to claim 9, wherein the first related public document in the technical field in which the technical solution to be determined is located and the second technical field adjacent to the technical solution to be determined are simultaneously found. Related publications, and using the first related public document to compare the judgment result with the technical solution to be judged and adopting the second related public document and the to-be judged If the technical solution compares the judgment results, the judgment result of the comparison between the first related public document and the technical solution to be judged is preferentially adopted; if the relevant related public literature and the general related public literature are simultaneously found, the priority is given priority. The authoritative relevant public literature is compared with the technical solution to be judged.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2017/096297 WO2019028631A1 (en) | 2017-08-07 | 2017-08-07 | Method for determining relative confidentiality of technical know-how |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2017/096297 WO2019028631A1 (en) | 2017-08-07 | 2017-08-07 | Method for determining relative confidentiality of technical know-how |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2019028631A1 true WO2019028631A1 (en) | 2019-02-14 |
Family
ID=65273071
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2017/096297 WO2019028631A1 (en) | 2017-08-07 | 2017-08-07 | Method for determining relative confidentiality of technical know-how |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| WO (1) | WO2019028631A1 (en) |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101751479A (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2010-06-23 | 北京东方灵盾科技有限公司 | Similarity matching system for prescription information of traditional medicine patents and matching method thereof |
| JP2013174988A (en) * | 2012-02-24 | 2013-09-05 | Hitachi Ltd | Similar document retrieval support apparatus and similar document retrieval support program |
| CN104778201A (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2015-07-15 | 湖南科技大学 | Multi-query result combination-based prior art retrieval method |
| CN104809106A (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2015-07-29 | 合肥汇众知识产权管理有限公司 | System and method for excavating patent schemes |
| CN106484904A (en) * | 2016-10-21 | 2017-03-08 | 长沙市麓智信息科技有限公司 | Patent retrieval analysis system and its analysis method |
| CN106503265A (en) * | 2016-11-30 | 2017-03-15 | 北京赛迈特锐医疗科技有限公司 | Structured search system and its searching method based on weights |
| CN106649222A (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2017-05-10 | 浙江网新恒天软件有限公司 | Text approximately duplicated detection method based on semantic analysis and multiple Simhash |
-
2017
- 2017-08-07 WO PCT/CN2017/096297 patent/WO2019028631A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101751479A (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2010-06-23 | 北京东方灵盾科技有限公司 | Similarity matching system for prescription information of traditional medicine patents and matching method thereof |
| JP2013174988A (en) * | 2012-02-24 | 2013-09-05 | Hitachi Ltd | Similar document retrieval support apparatus and similar document retrieval support program |
| CN104778201A (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2015-07-15 | 湖南科技大学 | Multi-query result combination-based prior art retrieval method |
| CN104809106A (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2015-07-29 | 合肥汇众知识产权管理有限公司 | System and method for excavating patent schemes |
| CN106484904A (en) * | 2016-10-21 | 2017-03-08 | 长沙市麓智信息科技有限公司 | Patent retrieval analysis system and its analysis method |
| CN106503265A (en) * | 2016-11-30 | 2017-03-15 | 北京赛迈特锐医疗科技有限公司 | Structured search system and its searching method based on weights |
| CN106649222A (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2017-05-10 | 浙江网新恒天软件有限公司 | Text approximately duplicated detection method based on semantic analysis and multiple Simhash |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Aguirre-Urreta et al. | Sample size determination and statistical power analysis in PLS using R: an annotated tutorial | |
| US10095992B1 (en) | Using classified text, deep learning algorithms and blockchain to identify risk in low-frequency, high value situations, and provide early warning | |
| US11727203B2 (en) | Information processing system, feature description method and feature description program | |
| WO2018000269A1 (en) | Data annotation method and system based on data mining and crowdsourcing | |
| WO2017000513A1 (en) | Information pushing method and apparatus based on user search behavior, storage medium, and device | |
| WO2013129548A1 (en) | Document classification system, document classification method, and document classification program | |
| US20140279583A1 (en) | Systems and Methods for Classifying Entities | |
| US20150106378A1 (en) | Document Categorization By Rules and Clause Group Scores Associated with Type Profiles Apparatus and Method | |
| JP5723067B1 (en) | Data analysis system, data analysis method, and data analysis program | |
| US20200387505A1 (en) | Information processing system, feature description method and feature description program | |
| CN107609021A (en) | The secret of know-how judges system | |
| Mittal et al. | Got a complaint?-keep calm and tweet it! | |
| Borden et al. | Opening up dark digital archives through the use of analytics to identify sensitive content | |
| WO2019028631A1 (en) | Method for determining relative confidentiality of technical know-how | |
| Curcin | Why does human phenomics matter today? | |
| US20150106276A1 (en) | Identification of Clauses in Conflict Across a Set of Documents Apparatus and Method | |
| CN107391738A (en) | A kind of secret determination methods of know-how | |
| JP6642429B2 (en) | Text processing system, text processing method, and text processing program | |
| CN114239561A (en) | Supply relation obtaining method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| Gower et al. | The European assistive technology information portal (EASTIN): improving usability through language technologies | |
| WO2019028629A1 (en) | Method for determining confidentiality of technical know-how | |
| WO2019028628A1 (en) | System for determining confidentiality of technical know-how | |
| Picker | The coherent fragmentation of international economic law: lessons from the transpacific partnership agreement | |
| Isaev | Formation of individual infological models of performance management systems | |
| US20150106880A1 (en) | Authorized Document Distribution and Transmission Control By Groups of Categorized Clauses Apparatus and Method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 17920719 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |