WO2019018829A1 - Atténuation de menaces de cybersécurité perfectionnée au moyen de l'analytique profonde et comportementale - Google Patents

Atténuation de menaces de cybersécurité perfectionnée au moyen de l'analytique profonde et comportementale Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019018829A1
WO2019018829A1 PCT/US2018/043191 US2018043191W WO2019018829A1 WO 2019018829 A1 WO2019018829 A1 WO 2019018829A1 US 2018043191 W US2018043191 W US 2018043191W WO 2019018829 A1 WO2019018829 A1 WO 2019018829A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
network
processor
data
cyber
analysis
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2018/043191
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Jason Crabtree
Andrew Sellers
Original Assignee
Fractal Industries, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US15/655,113 external-priority patent/US10735456B2/en
Application filed by Fractal Industries, Inc. filed Critical Fractal Industries, Inc.
Priority to CN201880059195.3A priority Critical patent/CN111316272A/zh
Priority to EP18835963.2A priority patent/EP3655878A4/fr
Publication of WO2019018829A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019018829A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/57Certifying or maintaining trusted computer platforms, e.g. secure boots or power-downs, version controls, system software checks, secure updates or assessing vulnerabilities
    • G06F21/577Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G06F21/552Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures involving long-term monitoring or reporting
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/14Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1433Vulnerability analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N20/00Machine learning

Definitions

  • the disclosure relates to the field of computer management, and more particularly to the field of cybersecurity and threat analytics.
  • the inventor has developed a system for advanced cybersecurity threat mitigation using behavioral and deep analytics.
  • a system for detection and mitigation of cyberattacks employing an advanced cyber decision platform comprising: a time series data store comprising at last a processor, a memory, and a plurality of programming instructions stored in the memory and operating on the processor, wherein upon operating the software instructions the processor is configured to monitor a plurality of network events and produce time-series data, the time-series data comprising at least a record of a network event and the time at which the event occurred; an action outcome simulation module comprising at last a processor, a memory, and a plurality of programming instructions stored in the memory and operating on the processor, wherein upon operating the software instructions the processor is configured to generate simulated network events, and configured to produce recommendations based at least in par on the results of analysis performed by the directed computational graph module; an observation and state estimation module comprising at last a processor, a memory, and a plurality of programming instructions stored in the memory and operating on the processor, wherein upon operating the software instructions tie processor is configured to monitor a plurality of connected resources on
  • a method for mitigation of cyberattacks employing an advanced cyber decision platform comprising the steps of; a) producing, using an observation and state estimation module, a cyber-physical graph representing a plurality of connected resources on a network; b) analyzing, using a directed computational graph module, at least a portion of the cyber-physical graph; c) simulating, using an action outcome simulation module, a plurality of network events; d) monitoring, using a time series data store, at least a portion of the network events; e) producing time-series data based at least in part on the network events; f) analyzing at least a portion of the time-series data; and g) producing a security recommendation based at least in part, on the results of the analysis, is disclosed,
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of an exemplary architecture of an advanced cyber decision platform according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 2 is a flow diagram of an exemplary function of the business operating system in the detection and mitigation of predetermining factors leading to and steps to mitigate ongoing cyberattacks.
  • Fig. 3 is a process diagram showing business operating system functions in use to mitigate cyberattacks.
  • Fig. 4 is a process flow diagram of a method for segmenting cyberattack information to appropriate corporation parties.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram of an exemplary architecture for a system for rapid predictive analysis of very large data sets using an actor-driven distributed computational graph, according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 6 is a diagram of an exemplary architecture for a system for rapid predictive analysis of very large data sets using an actor-driven distributed computational graph, according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 7 is a diagram of an exemplary architecture for a system for rapid predictive analysis of very large data sets using an actor- driven distributed computational graph, according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 8 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method for cybersecurity behavioral analytics, according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 9 is a flow dia.gram of an exemplary method for measuring the effects of
  • cybersecurity attacks according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 10 is a flo diagram of an exemplary method for continuous cybersecurity monitoring and exploration, according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 11 is a flo diagram of an exemplary method for mapping a cyber- physical system graph, according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 12 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method for continuous network resilience scoring, according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 13 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method for cybersecurity privilege oversight, according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 14 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method for cybersecurity risk management, according to one aspect.
  • FIG. 15 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method for mitigating compromised credential threats, according to one aspect.
  • Fig. 16 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary hardware architecture of a computing device.
  • FIG. 17 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary logical architecture for a client device.
  • Fig. 18 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary architectural arrangement of clients, servers, and external services.
  • Fig. 19 is another block diagram illustrating an exemplary' hardware architecture of a computing device.
  • devices that are in communication with each other may communicate directly or indirectly through one or more communication means or intermediaries, logical or physical.
  • steps may be performed simultaneously despite being described or implied as occurring non- simultaneously (e.g., because one step is described after the other step).
  • the illustration of a process by its depiction in a drawing does not imply that the illustrated process is exclusive of other variations and modifications thereto, does not imply that the illustrated process or any of its steps are necessary to one or more of the aspects, and does not imply that the illustrated process is preferred.
  • steps are generally described once per aspect, but this does not mean they must occur once, or that they may only occur once each time a process, method, or algorithm is carried out or executed. Some steps may be omitted in some aspects or some occurrences, or some steps may be executed more than once in a given aspect or occurrence.
  • a "swirnlane” is a communication channel between a time series sensor data reception and apportioning device and a data store meant to hold the apportioned data time series sensor data.
  • a swirnlane is able to move a specific, finite amount of data between the two devices. For example, a single swirnlane might: reliably cany and have incorporated into the data store, the data equivalent of .5 seconds worth of data from 10 sensors in 5 seconds, this being its capacity. Attempts to place 5 seconds worth of data received from 6 sensors using one swirnlane would result in data loss.
  • a "metaswimlane” is an as-needed logical combination of transfer capacity of two or more real swimlanes that is transparent to the requesting process. Sensor studies where the amount of data received per unit time is expected to be highly heterogeneous over time may be initiated to use metaswirnlanes.
  • graph is a representation of information and relationships, where each primary unit of information makes up a “node” or " vertex” of the graph and the relationship between two nodes makes up an edge of the graph.
  • Nodes can be further qualified by die connection of one or more descriptors or "properties” to that node. For example, given the node “James R,” name information for a person, qualifying properties might be "183 cm tall", “DOB 08/13/1965" and "speaks English", Similar to the use of properties to further describe the information in a node, a relationship between two nodes that forms an edge can be qualified using a "label".
  • die graph is designated as "undirected.”
  • James R is "taller” than Thomas G
  • the order of the endpoints is significant.
  • Graphs with such edges are designated as "directed.”
  • transformation pipeline are represented as directed graph with each transformation comprising a node and the output messages between transformations comprising edges.
  • Distributed computational graph stipulates die potential use of non-linear transformation pipelines which are programmatically linearized. Such linearization can result in exponential growth of resource consumption. The most, sensible approach to overcome possibility is to introduce new transformation pipelines just as they are needed, creating only those that are ready to compute. Such method results in tra sformation graphs which are highly variable in size and node, edge composition as the system processes data streams.
  • transformation graph may assume many shapes and sizes ⁇ a vast topography of edge relationships. The examples given were chosen for illustrative purposes only and represent a small number of the simplest of possibilities. These examples should not be taken to define the possible graphs expected as part of operation of the invention
  • transformation is a function performed on zero or more streams of input data which results in a single stream of output which may or may not then be used as input for another transformation. Transformations may comprise any combination of machine, human or machi e-human interactions Transformations need not change data that enters them, one example of this type of transformation would be a storage transformation which would receive input and then act as a queue for that data for subsequent transformations. As implied above, a specific transformation may generate output data in the absence of input data. A time stamp serves as a example. In the invention, transformations are placed into pipelines such that the output of one transformation may serve as an input for another. These pipelines can consist of two or more transformations with die number of transformations limited only by the resources of die system.
  • transformation pipelines have been linear with each transformation in die pipeline receiving input from one antecedent and providing output to one subsequent with no branching or iteration.
  • Other pipeline configurations are possible.
  • the invention is designed to permit several of these configurations including, but not limited to; linear, afferent branch, efferent branch and cyclical,
  • a “database” or “data storage subsystem” (these terms may be considered substantially synonymous), as used herein, is a system adapted for the long-term storage, indexing, and retrieval of data, the retrieval ty ically being via some sort of querying interface or language.
  • “Database” may be used to refer to relational database management systems known in the art, but should not be considered to be limited to such systems.
  • Many alternative database or data storage system technologies have been, and indeed are being, introduced in the art, including but not limited to distributed non-relational data storage systems such as Hadoop, column- oriented databases, in-memory databases, and the like.
  • any data storage architecture may be used according to the aspects.
  • one or more particular data storage needs are described as being satisfied by separate components (for example, an expanded private capital markets database and a configuration database), these descriptions refer to functional uses of data storage systems and do not refer to their physical architecture.
  • any group of data storage systems of databases referred to herein may be included together in a single database management system operating on a single machine, or they may be included in a single database management system operating on a cluster of machines as is known in the art.
  • any single database (such as an expanded private capital markets database) may be implemented on a single machine, on a set of machines using clustering technology, on several machines connected by one or more messaging systems known in the art, or in a master/slave arrangement common in the art.
  • a "data context”, as used herein, refers to a set of arguments identifying the location of data. This could be a Rabbit queue, a ,csv file in cloud-based storage, or any other such location reference except a single event or record. Activities may pass either events or data contexts to each other for processing. The nature of a pipeline allows for direct information passing between activities, and data locations or files do not need to be predetermined at pipeline start [044]
  • StreamBatchP otocol data object This object is responsible for determining when and if the batch process is run.
  • One or more of three possibilities can be used for processing triggers: regular timing interval, every N events, or optionally an external trigger.
  • the events are held in a queue or similar until processing.
  • Each batch activity may contain a "source” data context (this may be a streaming context if the upstream activities are streaming), and a "destination” data context (which is passed to the next activity).
  • Streaming activities may- have an optional "destination" streaming data context (optional meaning: cachingy'persistence of events vs. ephemeral), though this should not be part of the initial implementation.
  • Fig. 1 is a diagram of an exemplary architecture of an advanced cyber decision platform (ACDP) 100 according to one aspect.
  • CASSANDRATM or RED1STM are examples of the business data analyzed by the system both from sources within the confines of the client business, and from cloud based sources, also enter the system through the cloud interface 110, data being passed to the connector module 135 which may possess the API routines 135a needed to accept and convert the external data arid then pass the normalized information to other analysis and transformation components of the system, the directed computational graph module 155, high volume web crawler module 115, multidimensional time series database 120 and the graph stack service 145, The directed computational graph module 155 retrieves one or more streams of data from a plurality of sources, which includes, but is in no way not limited to, a plurality of physical sensors, network service providers, web based questionnaires and surveys, monitoring of electronic infrastructure, crowd sourcing campaigns, and human input device information.
  • data may be split into two identical streams in a specialized pre-programmed data pipeline 155a, wherein one sub-stream may be sent for batch processing and storage while the other sub-stream may be reformatted for transformation pipeline analysis.
  • the data is then transferred to the general transformer service module 160 for linear data tra formation as part of analysis or the decomposable transformer service module 150 for branching or iterative transformations (hat are part of analysis.
  • the directed computational graph module 155 represents all data as directed graphs where the transformations are nodes and the result messages between transformations edges of the graph.
  • the high volume web crawling module 115 uses multiple server hosted preprogrammed web spiders, which while autonomously configured are deployed within a web scraping framework
  • the multiple dimension time series data store module 120 may receive streaming data from a large plurality of sensors that may be of several different types.
  • the multiple dimension time series data store module may also store any time series data encountered by the system such as but not limited to enterprise network usage data, component and system logs, performance data, network service information captures such as, but not limited to news and financial feeds, and sales and service related customer data.
  • the module is designed to accommodate irregular and high volume surges by dynamically allotting network bandwidth and server processing channels to process the incoming data.
  • computational graph 155 and associated general transformer service 150 and decomposable transformer service 160 modules may be sent, often with scripted cuing information determining important vertexes 145a, to the graph stack service module 145 which, employing standardized protocols for converting streams of information into graph
  • ilie graph stack service module 145 represents data in graphical form influenced by any pre- determined scripted modifications 145a and stores it in a graph-based data store 145b such as GIRAPHTM or a key value pair type data store REDISTM, or RIAKTM, among others, all of which are suitable for storing graph-based information.
  • a graph-based data store 145b such as GIRAPHTM or a key value pair type data store REDISTM, or RIAKTM, among others, all of which are suitable for storing graph-based information.
  • Results of the transformative analysis process may then be combined with further client directives, additional business rules and practices relevant to the analysis and situational information external to the already available data in the automated planning service module 130 which also runs powerful information theory 130a based predictive statistics functions and machine learning algorithms to allow future trends and outcomes to be rapidly forecast based upon the current system derived results and choosing each a plurality of possible business decisions.
  • the automated planning service module 130 may propose business decisions most likely to result is ilie most favorable business outcome with a usably high level of certainty.
  • the action outcome simulation module 125 with its discrete event simulator programming module 125a coupled with the end user facing- observation and state estimation service 140 which is highly scriptable 140b as circumstances require and has a game engine 140a to more realistically stage possible outcomes of business decisions under consideration, allows business decision makers to investigate the probable outcomes of choosing one pending course of action over another based upon analysis of the current available data.
  • the Information Assurance department is notified by the system 100 that principal X is using credentials K (Kerberos Principal Key) never used by it: before to access service Y.
  • Service Y utilizes these same credentials to access secure data on data store Z.
  • the system 100 based on this data and analysis, was able to detect and recommend mitigation of a cyberattack that represented an existential threat to all business operations, presenting, at the time of the attack, information most needed for an actionable plan to human analysts at multiple levels in the mitigation and remediation effort through use of the observation and state estimation service 140 which had also been specifically preprogrammed to handle cybersecurity events 140b.
  • the advanced cyber decision platform a specifically programmed usage of the business operating system, continuously monitors a client enterprise's normal network activity for behaviors such as but not limited to normal users on the network, resources accessed by each user, access permissions of each user, machine to machine traffic on the network, sanctioned external access to the core network and administrative access to the network's identity and access management servers in conjunction with real-time analytics informing knowledge of cyberattack methodology.
  • the system uses this information for two purposes: First, the advanced computational analytics and simulation capabilities of the system are used to provide immediate disclosure of probable digital access points both at the network periphery and within the enterprise's information transfer and trust structure and
  • the advanced cyber decision platform continuously monitors the network in real-time both for types of traffic and through techniques such as deep packet inspection for pre-decided analytically significant deviation in user traffic for indications of known cyberattack vectors such as, but not limited to, ACTIVE DIRECTORYTM / Kerberos pass-the- ticket attack, ACTIVE DIRECTORYTM / Kerberos pass-the-hash attack and the related ACTIVE DIRECTORYTM / Kerberos overpass-the-hash attack , ACTIVE DIRECTORYTM / Kerberos Skeleton Key, ACTIVE DIRECTORYTM / Kerberos golden arid silver ticket attack, privilege escalation attack, compromised user credentials, and ransomware disk attacks.
  • known cyberattack vectors such as, but not limited to, ACTIVE DIRECTORYTM / Kerberos pass-the- ticket attack, ACTIVE DIRECTORYTM / Kerberos pass-the-hash attack and the related ACTIVE DIRECTORYTM / Kerberos overpass-
  • the system issues action-focused alert information to ail predesignated parties specifically tailored to their roles in attack mitigation or remediation and formatted to provide predictive attack modeling based upon historic, current, and contextual attack progression analysis such that human decision makers can rapidly formulate the most effective courses of action at their levels of responsibility in command of the most actionable infomiation with as little distractive data as possible.
  • the system then issues defensive measures in the most actionable form to end the attack with the least possible damage and exposure. All attack data are persistently stored for later forensic analysis.
  • Fig. 2 is a flow diagram of an exemplary function of the business operating system in the detection and mitigation of predetermining factors leading to and steps to mitigate ongoing cyberattacks 200.
  • the system continuously retrieves network traffic data 201 which may be stored and preprocessed by the multidimensional time series data store 120 and its programming wrappers 120a. All captured data are then analyzed to predict the normal usage patterns of network nodes such as internal users, network connected systems and equipment and sanctioned users external to the enterprise boundaries for example off-site employees, contractors and vendors, just to name a few likely participants.
  • network nodes such as internal users, network connected systems and equipment and sanctioned users external to the enterprise boundaries for example off-site employees, contractors and vendors, just to name a few likely participants.
  • network nodes such as internal users, network connected systems and equipment and sanctioned users external to the enterprise boundaries for example off-site employees, contractors and vendors, just to name a few likely participants.
  • network nodes such as internal users, network connected systems and equipment and sanctioned users external to the enterprise boundaries for example off-
  • Analysis of network traffic may include graphical analysis of parameters such as network item to network usage using specifically developed programming in the graphstack service 145, 145a, analysis of usage by each network item may be accomplished by specifically pre-developed algorithms associated with the directed computational graph module 155, general transformer service module 160 and decomposable service module 150, depending on the complexity of the individual usage profile 201,
  • These usage pattern analyses in conjunction with additional data concerning an enterprise's network topology; gateway firewall programming; internal firewall configuration: directory services protocols and configuration; and permissions profiles for both users and for access to sensitive information, just to list a few non-exclusive examples may ill en be analyzed further within the automated planning service module 130, where machine learning techniques which include but are not limited to information theory statistics 130a may be employed and the action outcome simulation module 125, specialized for predictive simulation of outcome based on current data 125a may be applied to formulate a current, up-to-date and continuously evolving baseline network usage profile 202, This same data would be combined with up-to-date known cyberattack methodology reports, possibly retrieved from several diver
  • anomalous activities may include a user attempting to gain access several workstations or servers in rapid succession, or a user attempting to gain access to a domain server of server with sensitive information using random user!Ds or another user's userlD and password, or attempts by any user to brute force crack a privileged user's password, or replay of recently issued ACTIVE ticket granting tickets, or the presence on any known, ongoing exploit on the network or the introduction of known malware to the network, just to name a very small sample of the cyberattack profiles known to those skilled in the field.
  • the invention being predictive as well as aware of known exploits is designed to analyze any anomalous network behavior, formulate probable outcomes of the behavior, and to then issue any needed alerts regardless of whether the attack follows a published exploit specification or exhibits novel characteristics deviant to normal network practice.
  • the system then is designed to get: needed information to responding parties 206 tailored, where possible, to each role in mitigating the attack and damage arising from it 207. This may include the exact subset of information included in alerts and updates and the format in which the information is presented which may be through the enterprise's existing security information and event managemen system.
  • Network administrators might receive information such as but not limited to where on the network the attack is believed to have originated, what systems are believed currently affected, predictive information on where the attack may progress, what enterprise information is at risk and actionable recommendations on repelling the intrusion and mitigating the damage, whereas a chief information security officer may receive alert: including but not limited to a timeline of the cyberattack, the services and information believed compromised, what action, if any has been taken to mitigate the attack, a prediction of how the attack may unfold and the recommendations given to control and repel the attack 207, although all parties may access any network and cyberattack information for which they have granted access at any time, unless compromise is suspected. Other specifically tailored updates may be issued by the system 206, 207.
  • Fig. 3 is a process diagram showing a general flow 300 of business operating system functions in use to mitigate cyberattacks.
  • Input network data which may include network flow patterns 321, the origin and destination of each piece of measurable network traffic 322, system logs from servers and workstations on the network 323, endpoint data 323a, any security event log data from servers or available security information and event (SIEM) systems 324, external threat intelligence feeds 324a, identity or assessment, context 325, external network health or cybersecurity feeds 326, Kerberos domain controller or ACTIVE DIRECTORYTM server logs or instrumentation 327 and business unit performance related data 328, among many other possible data types for which the invention was designed to analyze and integrate, may pass into 315 the business operating system 310 for analysis as part of its cyber security function.
  • SIEM security information and event
  • These multiple types of data from a plurality of sources may be transformed for analysis 311, 312 using at least one of the specialized cybersecurity, risk assessment or common functions of the business operating system in the role of cybersecurity system, such as, but not limited to network and system user privilege oversight 331, network and system user behavior analytics 332, attacker and defender action timeline 333, SIEM integration and analysis 334, dynamic benchmarking 335, and incident identification and resolution performance analytics 336 among other possible cybersecurity functions; value at risk (VAR) modeling and simulation 341, anticipatory vs.
  • VAR value at risk
  • Output 317 can be used to configure network gateway security appliances 361, to assist in preventing network intrusion through predictive change to infrastructure recommendations 362, to alert an enterprise of ongoing cyberattack early in the attack cycle, possibly thwarting it but at least mitigating the damage 362, to record compliance to standardized guidelines or SLA requirements 363, to continuously probe existing network infrastructure and issue alerts to any changes which may make a breach more likely 364, suggest solutions to any domain controller ticketing weaknesses detected 365, detect presence of malware 366, and perform one time or continuous vulnerability scanning depending on client directives 367.
  • Fig. 4 is a process flow diagram of a method for segmenting cyberattack information to appropriate corporation parties 400.
  • one of the strengths of the advanced cyber-decision platform is the ability to finely customize reports and dashboards to specific audiences, concurrently is appropriate. This customization is possible due to the devotion of a portion of the business operating system's programming specifically to outcome presentation by modules which include the observation and state estimation service 140 with its game engine 140a and script interpreter 140b.
  • issuance of specialized alerts, updates and reports may significantly assist in getting the correct mitigating actions done in the most timely fashion while keeping all participants informed at predesignated, appropriate granularity.
  • Examples of groups that may receive specialized infonnation streams include but may not be limited to front line responders during the attack 404, incident forensics support both during and after the attack 405, chief information security officer 406 and chief risk officer 407 the information sent to the latter two focused to appraise overall damage and to implement both mitigating strategy and preventive changes after the attack.
  • Front line responders may use the cyber-decision platform's analyzed, transformed and correlated information specifically sent to them 404a to probe the extent of the attack, isolate such tilings as: the predictive attacker's entry point onto the enterprise's network, the systems involved or the predictive ultimate targets of the attack and may use the simulation capabilities of the system to investigate alternate methods of successfully ending the attack and repelling the attackers in the most efficient manner, although many other queries known to those skilled in the art are also answerable by the invention.
  • Simulations run may also include the predictive effects of any attack mitigating actions on normal and critical operation of the enterprise's IT systems and corporate users.
  • a chief information security officer may use the cyber-decision platform to predictively analyze 406a what corporate information has already been compromised, predictively simulate the ultimate information targets of the attack that may or may no have been compromised and the total impact of the attack what can be done now and in the near future to safeguard that information.
  • the forensic responder may use the cyber-decision platform 405a to clearly and completely map the extent of network infrastructure through predictive simulation and large volume data analysis.
  • the forensic analyst may also use the platform's capabilities to perform a time series and infrastructural spatial analysis of the attack's progression with methods used to infiltrate the enterprise's subnets and servers. Again, the chief risk officer would perform analyses of what information 407a was stolen and predictive simulations on what the theft means to the enterprise as time progresses. Additionally, the system's predictive capabilities may be employed to assist in creation of a plan for changes of the IT infrastructural that should be made that are optimal for remediation of cybersecurity risk under possibly limited enterprise budgetary constraints in place at the company so as to maximize financial outcome. [054] Fig.
  • a DCG 500 may comprise a pipeline orchestrator 501 that may be used to perform a variety of data transformation functions on data within a processing pipeline, and may be used with a messaging system 510 that enables communication with any number of various services and protocols, relaying messages and translating them as needed into protocol-specific API system calls for interoperability with external systems (rather than requiring a particular protocol or service to be integrated into a DCG 500).
  • Pipeline orchestrator 501 may spawn a plurality of child pipeline clusters 502a-b, which may be used as dedicated workers for streamlining parallel processing. In some arrangements, an entire data processing pipeline may be passed to a child cluster 502a for handling, rather than individual processing tasks, enabling each child cluster 502a-b to handle an entire data pipeline in a dedicated fashion to maintain isolated processing of different pipelines using different cluster nodes 502a-b.
  • Pipeline orchestrator 501 may provide a software API for starting, stopping, submitting, or saving pipelines. When a pipeline is started, pipeline orchestrator 501 may send the pipeline information to an available worker node 502a-b, for example using AKKATM clustering.
  • a reporting object with status information may be maintained.
  • Streaming activities may report the last time an event was processed, and the number of events processed.
  • Batch activities may report status messages as they occur.
  • Pipeline orchestrator 501 may perform batch caching using, for example, an IGFSTM caching filesystem. This allows activities 512a-d within a pipeline 502a-b to pass data contexts to one another, with any necessary parameter configurations.
  • a pipeline manager 511a-b may be spawned for every new running pipeline, and may be used to send activity, status, lifecycle, and event count information to the pipeline orchestrator 501.
  • a plurality of activity actors 512a-d may be created by a pipeline manager 511a-b to handle individual tasks, and provide output to data services 522a-d.
  • Data models used in a given pipeline may be determined by the specific pipeline and activities, as directed by a pipeline manager 51 la-b.
  • Each pipeline manager 511a-b controls and directs the operation of any activity actors 512a-d spawned by it.
  • a pipeline process may need to coordinate streaming data between tasks.
  • a pipeline manager 51 la-b may spawn service connectors to dynamically create TCP connections between activity instances 512a-d.
  • Data contexts may be maintained for each individual activity 512a-d, and may be cached for provision to other activities 512a-d as needed.
  • a data context defines how an activity accesses information, and an activity 512a-d may process data or simpl forward it to a next step. Forwarding data between pipeline steps may route data through a streaming context or batch context.
  • a client service cluster 530 may operate a plurality of seivice actors 521 a-d to serve the requests of activity actors 512a-d, ideally maintaining enough service actors 521a-d to support each activity per the service type. These may also be arranged within sendee clusters 52Ga-d, in a manner similar to the logical organization of activiiy actors 512a-d within clusters 502a-b in a data pipeline.
  • a logging sendee 530 may be used to log and sample DCG requests and messages during operation while notification sendee 540 may be used to receive alerts and other notifications during operation (for example to alert on errors, which may then be diagnosed by reviewing records from logging seivice 530), and by being connected externally to messaging system 510, logging arid notification services can be added, removed, or modified during operation without impacting DCG 500.
  • a plurality of DCG protocols 550a-b may be used to provide structured messaging between a DCG 500 and messaging system 510, or to enable messaging system 510 to distribute DCG messages across service clusters 520a-d as shown.
  • a seivice protocol 560 ma be used to define service interactions so that a DCG 500 may be modified without impacting service implementations. In this manner it can be appreciated that the overall structure of a system using an actor-driven DCG 500 operates in a modular fashion, enabling modification and substitution of various components without impacting other operations or requiring additional reconfiguration.
  • Fig. 6 is a diagram of an exemplary architecture for a system for rapid predictive analysis of very large data sets using an actor-driven distributed computational graph 500, according to one aspect.
  • a variant messaging arrangement may utilize messaging system 510 as a messaging broker using a streaming protocol 610, transmitting and receiving messages immediately using messaging system 510 as a message broker to bridge communication between service actors 521 a-b as needed.
  • individual services 522a-b may be utilized as a messaging broker using a streaming protocol 610, transmitting and receiving messages immediately using messaging system 510 as a message broker to bridge communication between service actors 521 a-b as needed.
  • individual services 522a-b may
  • a batch context 620 communicates directly in a batch context 620, using a data context service 630 as a broker to batch-process and relay messages between services 522a-b.
  • Fig. 7 is a diagram of an exemplary architecture for a system for rapid predictive analysis of very large data sets using an actor-driven distributed computational graph 500, according to one aspect.
  • a variant messaging arrangement may utilize a service connector 710 as a central message broker between a plurality of service actors 521a-b, bridging messages in a streaming context 610 while a data context service 630 continues to provide direct peer-to-peer messaging between individual services 522a-b in a batch context 620.
  • Fig. 8 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method 800 for cybersecurity behavioral analytics, according to one aspect.
  • behavior analytics may utilize passive information feeds from a plurality of existing endpoints (for example, including but not limited to user activity on a network, network perfo nuance, or device behavior) to generate security solutions.
  • a web crawler 115 may passively collect activity information, which may then be processed 802 using a DCG 155 to analyze behavior patterns.
  • anomalous behavior may be recognized 803 (for example, based on a threshold of variance from an established pattern or trend) such as high-risk users or malicious software operators such as bots.
  • anomalous behaviors may then be used 804 to analyze potential angles of attack and then produce 805 security suggestions based on this second-level analysis and predictions generated by an action outcome simulation module 125 to determine the likely effects of the change.
  • the suggested behaviors may then be automatically implemented 806 as needed.
  • Passive monitoring 801 then continues, collecting information after new security solutions are implemented 806, enabling machine learning to improve operation over time as the relationship between security changes and observed behaviors and threats are observed and analyzed.
  • This method 800 for behavioral analytics enables proactive and high-speed reactive defense capabilities against a variety of cyberattack threats, including anomalous human behaviors as well as nonhuman "bad actors” such as automated software bots that may probe for, and ilien exploit, existing vulnerabilities.
  • Automated behavioral learning in this manner provides a much more responsive solution than manual intervention, enabling rapid response to threats to mitigate any potential impact.
  • Utilizing machine learning behavior further enhances this approach, providing additional proactive behavior that is not possible in simple automated approaches that merely react to threats as they occur,
  • Fig. 9 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method 900 for measuring the effects of cybersecurity attacks, according to one aspect.
  • impact assessment of an attack may be measured using a DCG 155 to analyze a user account and identify its access capabilities 901 (for example, what files, directories, devices or domains an account may have access to). This may then be used to generate 902 an impact assessment score for the account, representing the potential risk should that account be compromised.
  • the impact assessment score for any compromised accounts may be used to produce a "blast radius" calculation 903, identifying exactly what resources are at risk as a result of the intrusion and where security personnel should focus their attention.
  • simulated intrusions may be run 904 to identify potential blast radius calculations for a variety of attacks and to determine 905 high risk accounts or resources so that security may be improved in those key areas rather than focusing on reactive solutions.
  • Fig. 10 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method 1000 for continuous cybersecurity monitoring and exploration, according to one aspect.
  • a state observation service 140 may receive data from a variety of connected systems 1001 such as (for example, including but not limited to) servers, domains, databases, or user directories. This information may be received continuously, passively collecting events and monitoring activity over time while feeding 1002 collected information into a graphing service 145 for use in producing time-series graphs 1003 of states and changes over time. This collated time-series data may then be used to produce a visualization 1004 of changes over time, quantifying collected data into a meaningful and understandable format. As new events are recorded, such as changing user roles or permissions, modifying servers or data structures, or other changes within a security
  • Fig. 11 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method 1100 for mapping a cyber-physical system graph (CPG), according to one aspect.
  • a cyber-physical system graph may comprise a visualization of hierarchies and relationships between devices and resources in a security infrastructure, contextualizing securit information with physical device relationships that are easily understandable for security personnel and users.
  • behavior analytics information (as described previously, referring to Fig, 8) may be received at a graphing service 145 for inclusion in a CPG.
  • impact assessment scores (as described previously, referring to Fig. 9 ⁇ may be received and incorporated in the CPG information, adding risk assessment context to the behavior information.
  • a next step 1103 time-series information (as described previously, referring to Fig. 10) may be received and incorporated, updating CPG information as changes occur and events are logged.
  • This information may then be used to produce 1104 a graph visualization of users, servers, devices, and other resources correlating physical relationships (such as a user's personal computer or smartphone, or physical connections between servers) with logical relationships (such as access privileges or database connections), to produce a meaningful and contextualized visualization of a security infrastructure that reflects the cuixent state of the internal relationships present in the infrastructure.
  • Fig. 12 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method 1200 for continuous network resilience scoring, according to one aspect.
  • a baseline score can be used to measure an overall level of risk for a network infrastructure, and may be compiled by first collecting 1201 information on publicly-disclosed vulnerabilities, such as (for example) using the Internet or common vul erabilities and exploits (CVE) process. This information may then 1202 be incorporated into a CPG as described previously in Fig. 11, and the combined data of the CPG and the known vulnerabilities may then be analyzed 1203 to identify the relationships between known vulnerabilities and risks exposed by components of the infrastructure. This produces a combined CPG 1204 that incorporates both the internal risk level of network resources, user accounts, and devices as well as the actual risk level based on the analysis of known vulnerabilities and security risks. [067] Fig.
  • time-series data (as described above, referring to Fig. 10) may be collected 1301 for user accounts, credentials, directories, and other user-based privilege and access information. This data may then 1302 be analyzed to identify changes over time that may affect security, such as modifying user access privileges or adding new users. The results of analysis may be checked 1303 against a CPG (as described previously in Fig. 11), to compare and correlate user directory changes with the actual infrastructure state.
  • CPG as described previously in Fig. 11
  • This comparison may be used to perform accurate and context-enhanced user directory audits 1304 that identify not only current user credentials and other user-specific infonnation, but changes to this information over time arid how the user information relates to the actual infrastructure (for example, credentials that grant access to devices and may therefore implicitly grant additional access due to device relationships that were not immediately apparent from the user directory alone).
  • Fig. 14 is a flo diagram of an exemplary method 1400 for cyberseeurity risk management, according to one aspect.
  • multiple methods described previously may be combined to provide live assessment of attacks as they occur, by first receiving 1401 time-series data for an infrastructure (as described previously, in Fig, 10) to provide live monitoring of network events.
  • This data is then enhanced 1402 with a CPG (as described above in Fig. 11) to con-elate events with actual infrastructure elements, such as servers or accounts.
  • an event for example, an attempted attack against a vulnerable system or resource
  • the event is logged in the time-series data 1404, and compared against the CPG 1405 to determine the impact.
  • This is enhanced with the inclusion of impact assessment information 1406 for any affected resources, and the attack is then checked against a baseline score 1407 to determine the full extent of the impact of the attack and any necessary
  • Fig. 15 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method 1500 for mitigating compromised credential threats, according to one aspect.
  • impact assessment scores (as described previously, referring to Fig. 9) may be collected 1501 for user accounts in a directory, so that the potential impact of any given credential attack is known in advance of an actual attack event.
  • This information may be combined with a CPG 1502 as described previously in Fig, 11, to contextualize impact assessment scores within the infrastructure (for example, so that it may be predicted what systems or resources might be at risk for any given credential attack).
  • a simulated attack may then be performed 1503 to use machine learning to improve security without waiting for actual attacks to trigger a reactive response.
  • a blast radius assessment (as described above in Fig, 9) may be used in response 1504 to determine the effects of the simulated attack and identify points of weakness, and produce a recommendation report 1505 for improving and hardening the infrastructure against future attacks.
  • the techniques disclosed herein may be implemented on hardware or a combination of software and hardware. For example, they may be implemented in an operating system kernel, in a separate user process, in a library package bound into network applications, on a specially constructed machine, on an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or on a network interface card.
  • ASIC application-specific integrated circuit
  • Software/hardware hybrid implementations of at least some of the aspects disclosed herein may be implemented on a programmable network-resident machine (which should be understood to include intermittently connected network-aware machines) selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in memory.
  • Such network devices may have multiple network interfaces that may be configured or designed to utilize different types of network communication protocols.
  • a general architecture for some of these machines may be described herein in order to illustrate one or more exemplary means by which a given unit of functionality may be implemented.
  • At least some of the features or functionalities of the various aspects disclosed herein may be implemented on one or more general-purpose computers associated with one or more networks, such as for example an end- user computer system, a client computer, a network server or other server system, a mobile computing device (e.g., tablet computing device, mobile phone, smartphone, laptop, or other appropriate computing device), a consumer electronic device, a music player, or any other suitable electronic device, router, switch, or other suitable device, or any combination thereof.
  • at least some of the features or functionalities of the various aspects disclosed herein may be implemented in one or more virtualized computing environments (e.g., network computing clouds, virtual machines hosted on one or more physical computing machines, or other appropriate virtual environments).
  • FIG. 16 there is shown a block diagram depicting an exemplar)' computing device 10 suitable for implementing at least a portion of the features or functionalities disclosed herein.
  • Computing device 10 may be, for example, any one of the computing machines listed in the previous paragraph, or indeed any other electronic device capable of executing software- or hardware-based instructions according to one or more programs stored in memory.
  • Computing device 10 may be configured to communicate with a plurality of other computing devices, such as clients or servers, over communications networks such as a wide area network a metropolitan area network, a local area network, a wireless network, the Internet, or any other network, using known protocols for such communication, whether wireless or wired.
  • communications networks such as a wide area network a metropolitan area network, a local area network, a wireless network, the Internet, or any other network, using known protocols for such communication, whether wireless or wired.
  • computing device 10 includes one or more central processing units (CPU) 12, one or more interfaces 15, and one or more busses 14 (such as a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) bus).
  • CPU 12 may be responsible for implementing specific functions associated with the functions of a specifically configured computing device or machine.
  • a computing device 10 may be configured or designed to function as a server system utilizing CPU 12, local memory 11 and/or remote memory 16, and interfacefs) 15.
  • CPU 12 may be caused to perform one or more of the different types of functions and/or operations under the control of software modules or components, which for example, may include an operating system and any appropriate applications software, drivers, and the like.
  • CPU 12 may include one or more processors 13 such as, for example, a processor from one of the Intel, ARM, Qualcomm, and AMD families of microprocessors.
  • processors 13 may include specially designed hardware such as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), field- programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and so forth, for controlling operations of computing device 10.
  • ASICs application-specific integrated circuits
  • EEPROMs electrically erasable programmable read-only memories
  • FPGAs field- programmable gate arrays
  • a local memory 11 such as non-volatile random access memory
  • RAM random access memory
  • ROM read-only memory
  • CPU 12 may be one of a variety of system-on-a-chip (SOC) type hardware that may include additional hardware such as memory or graphics processing chips, such as a QUALCOMM SNAPDRAGONTM or SAMSUNG EXYNOSTM CPU as are becoming increasingly common in the art, such as for use in mobile devices or integrated devices,
  • SOC system-on-a-chip
  • processor is not limited merely to those integrated circuits referred to in the art as a processor, a mobile processor, or a microprocessor, but broadly refers to a microcontroller, a microcomputer, a programmable logic controller, an application-specific integrated circuit, and any other programmable circuit.
  • interfaces 15 are provided as network interface cards (NICs).
  • NICs control the sending arid receiving of data packets over a computer network; other types of interfaces 15 may for example support other peripherals used with computing device 10.
  • interfaces that may be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring intesfaces, graphics interfaces, and the like.
  • interfaces may be provided such as, for example, universal serial bus (USB), Serial, Ethernet, FIRE WIRETM, THUNDERBOLTTM, PCI, parallel, radio frequency (RF), BLUETOOTHTM, near-field communications (e.g., using near-field magnetics), 802.11 (WiFi), frame relay, TCP/IP, ISDN, fast Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, Serial ATA (SATA) or external SATA (ESATA) interfaces, high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI), digital visual interface (DVT), analog or digital audio interfaces, asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) interfaces, high-speed serial interface (HSSI) interfaces, Point of Sale (POS) interfaces, fiber data distributed interfaces (FDDIs), and the like.
  • USB universal serial bus
  • RF radio frequency
  • BLUETOOTHTM near-field communications
  • near-field communications e.g., using near-field magnetics
  • WiFi wireless FIRE WIRETM
  • PCI parallel
  • Such interfaces 15 may include physical ports appropriate for communication with appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor (such as a dedicated audio or video processor, as is common in the art for high-fidelity A/V hardware interfaces) and, in some instances, volatile and/or non-volatile memory (e.g., RAM).
  • an independent processor such as a dedicated audio or video processor, as is common in the art for high-fidelity A/V hardware interfaces
  • volatile and/or non-volatile memory e.g., RAM
  • FIG. 16 illustrates one specific architecture for a computing device 10 for implementing one or more of the aspects described herein, it is by no means the only device architecture on which at least a portion of the features and techniques described herein may be implemented.
  • architectures having one or any number of processors 13 may be used, and such processors 13 may be present in a single device or distributed among any number of devices.
  • a single processor 13 handles communications as well as routing computations, while in other aspects a separate dedicated communications processor may be provided.
  • ty es of features or functionalities may be implemented in a system according to the aspect that includes a client device (such as a tablet device or smartphone running client software) and server systems (such as a server system described in more detail below).
  • client device such as a tablet device or smartphone running client software
  • server systems such as a server system described in more detail below.
  • the system of an aspect may employ one or more memories or memory modules (such as, for example, remote memory block 16 arid local memory 11) configured to store data, program instructions for the general-purpose network operations, or other information relating to the functionality of the aspects described herein (or any combinations of the above).
  • Program instructions may control execution of or comprise an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example.
  • Memory 16 or memories 11, 16 may also be configured to store data structures, configuration data, encryption data, historical system operations information, or any other specific or generic non-program information described herein.
  • network device aspects may include nontransitory machine-readable storage media, which, for example, may be configured or designed to store program instructions, state information, arid the like for performing various operations described herein.
  • nontransitory machine- readable storage media include, but are not limited to, magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROM disks; magneto-optical media such as optical disks, and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory devices (ROM), flash memory (as is common in mobile devices and integrated systems), solid state drives (SSD) and "hybrid SSD” storage drives that may combine physical components of solid state and hard disk drives in a single hardware device (as are becoming increasingly common in the art with regard to personal computers), memristor memory, random access memory (RAM), and the like.
  • ROM read-only memory
  • flash memory as is common in mobile devices and integrated systems
  • SSD solid state drives
  • hybrid SSD hybrid SSD
  • such storage means may be integral and non-removable (such as RAM hardware modules that may be soldered onto a motherboard or otherwise integrated into an electronic device), or they may be removable such as swappable flash memory modules (such as “thumb drives” or other removable media designed for rapidly exchanging physical storage devices), "hot-swappable” hard disk drives or solid state drives, removable optical storage discs, or other such removable media, and that such integral and removable storage media may be utilized interchangeably.
  • program instructions include both object code, such as may be produced by a compiler, machine code, such as may be produced by an assembler or a linker, byte code, such as may be generated by for example a JAVATM compiler and may be executed using a Java virtual machine or equivalent, or files containing higher level code that may be executed by the computer using an interpreter (for example, scripts written in Python, Perl, Ruby, Groovy, or any- other scripting language),
  • interpreter for example, scripts written in Python, Perl, Ruby, Groovy, or any- other scripting language
  • systems may be implemented on a standalone computing system.
  • Computing device 20 includes processors 21 that may run software that carry out one or more functions or applications of aspects, such as for example a client application 24.
  • Processors 21 may carry out computing instructions under control of an operating system 22 such as, for example, a version of MICROSOFT WINDOWSTM operating system, APPLE macOSTM or iOSTM operating systems, some variety of the Linux operating system, ANDROIDTM operating system, or the like.
  • an operating system 22 such as, for example, a version of MICROSOFT WINDOWSTM operating system, APPLE macOSTM or iOSTM operating systems, some variety of the Linux operating system, ANDROIDTM operating system, or the like.
  • one or more shared services 23 may be operable in system 20, and may be useful for providing common services to client applications 24.
  • Services 23 may for example be WINDOWSTM services, user-space common services in a Linux environment, or any other type of common sendee architecture used with operating system 21.
  • Input, devices 28 may be of any type suitable for receiving user input, including for example a keyboard, touchscreen, microphone (for example, for voice input), mouse, touchpad, trackball, or any combination thereof.
  • Output devices 27 may be of any type suitable for providing output to one or more users, whether remote or local to system 20, and may include for example one or more screens for visual output, speakers, printers, or any combination thereof.
  • Memory 25 may be random- access memory having any structure and architecture known in the art, for use by processors 21, for example to run software.
  • Storage devices 26 may be any magnetic, optical, mechanical, memristor, or electrical storage device for storage of data in digital form (such as those described above, referring to Fig. 16). Examples of storage devices 26 include flash memory, magnetic hard drive, CD-ROM, and/or the like. [081] In some aspects, systems may be implemented on a distributed computing network, such as one having any number of clients and/or servers. Referring now to Fig. 18, there is shown a block diagram depicting an exemplary architecture 30 for implementing at least a portion of a system according to one aspect on a distributed computing network. According to the aspect, any number of clients 33 may be provided. Each client 33 may run software for implementing client- side portions of a system; clients may comprise a system 20 such as that illustrated in Fig. 17.
  • any number of servers 32 may be provided for handling requests received from one or more clients 33.
  • Clients 33 arid servers 32 may communicate with one another via one or more electronic networks 31, which may be in various aspects any of the Internet, a wide area network, a mobile telephony network (such as CDMA or GSM cellular networks), a wireless network (such as WiFi, WiMAX, LTE, and so forth), or a local area network (or indeed any network topology known in the art; the aspect does not prefer any one network topology over any other).
  • Networks 31 may be implemented using any known network protocols, including for example wired and/or wireless protocols.
  • servers 32 may call external services 37 when needed to obtain additional information, or to refer to additional data concerning a particular call.
  • external services 37 may take place, for example, via one or more networks 31.
  • external services 37 may comprise web-enabled services or functionality related to or installed on the hardware device itself.
  • client applications 24 may obtain information stored in a server system 32 in the cloud or on an external service 37 deployed on one or more of a particular enterprise's or user's premises.
  • clients 33 or servers 32 may make use of one or more specialized services or appliances that may be deployed locally or remotely across one or more networks 31.
  • one or more databases 34 may be used or referred to by one or more aspects. It should be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art that databases 34 may be arranged in a wide variety of architectures and using a wide variety of data access and manipulation means.
  • one or more databases 34 may comprise a relational database system using a structured query language (SQL), while others may comprise an alternative data storage technology such as those referred to in the art as "NoSQL” (for example, HADOOP CASSANDRATM, GOOGLE BIGTABLETM, and so forth).
  • SQL structured query language
  • variant database architectures such as column-oriented databases, in-memory databases, clustered databases, distributed databases, or even flat file data repositories may be used according to the aspect. It will be appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the ail thai any combination of known or future database technologies may be used as appropriate, unless a specific database technology or a specific arrangement of components is specified for a particular aspect described herein. Moreover, it should be appreciated that the term "database” as used herein may refer to a physical database machine, a cluster of machines acting as a single database system, or a logical database within an overall database management system.
  • configuration systems 35 Security and configuration management are common information technology (IT) and web functions, and some amount of each are generally associated with any IT or web systems. It should be understood by one having ordinary- skill in the art that any configuration or security subsystems known in the art: now or in the future may be used in conjunction with aspects without limitation, unless a specific security 36 or configuration system 35 or approach is specifically required by the description of any specific aspect.
  • IT information technology
  • Fig. 19 shows an exemplary overview of a computer system 40 as may be used in any of the various locations throughout the system. It is exemplary of any computer that may execute code to process data. Various modifications and changes may be made to computer system 40 without, departing from the broader scope of the system and method disclosed herein.
  • Central processor unit (CPU) 41 is connected to bus 42, to which bus is also connected memory 43, nonvolatile memoiy 44, display 47, inputy'output (I/O) unit 48, and network interface card (NIC) 53.
  • I/O unit 48 may, typically, be connected to keyboard 49, pointing device 50, hard disk 52, and real-time clock 51.
  • NIC 53 connects to network 54, which may be the Internet or a local network, which local network may or may not have connections to the Internet.
  • power supply unit 45 connected, in this example, to a main alternating current (AC) supply 46.
  • AC main alternating current
  • functionality for implementing systems or methods of various aspects may be distributed among any number of client and/or server components.
  • various software modules may be implemented for performing various functions in connection with the system of any particular aspect, and such modules may be variously implemented to run on server and/or client components.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

D'après la présente invention, un système d'atténuation de cyberattaques utilisant une plate-forme de cyberdécision perfectionnée comprend une mémoire de données chronologiques, un module de graphe de calcul orienté, un module de simulation de résultats d'actions et un module d'observation et d'estimation d'état. L'état d'un réseau est surveillé et utilisé pour produire un graphe cyberphysique représentant des ressources du réseau. Des événements du réseau simulés sont produits et surveillés. Puis les événements du réseau et leurs effets sont analysés de façon à produire des recommandations de sécurité.
PCT/US2018/043191 2017-07-20 2018-07-20 Atténuation de menaces de cybersécurité perfectionnée au moyen de l'analytique profonde et comportementale WO2019018829A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201880059195.3A CN111316272A (zh) 2017-07-20 2018-07-20 使用行为和深度分析的先进网络安全威胁减缓
EP18835963.2A EP3655878A4 (fr) 2017-07-20 2018-07-20 Atténuation de menaces de cybersécurité perfectionnée au moyen de l'analytique profonde et comportementale

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/655,113 US10735456B2 (en) 2015-10-28 2017-07-20 Advanced cybersecurity threat mitigation using behavioral and deep analytics
US15/655,113 2017-07-20

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019018829A1 true WO2019018829A1 (fr) 2019-01-24

Family

ID=65015309

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2018/043191 WO2019018829A1 (fr) 2017-07-20 2018-07-20 Atténuation de menaces de cybersécurité perfectionnée au moyen de l'analytique profonde et comportementale

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3655878A4 (fr)
CN (1) CN111316272A (fr)
WO (1) WO2019018829A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108011893A (zh) * 2017-12-26 2018-05-08 广东电网有限责任公司信息中心 一种基于网络资产信息采集的资产管理系统

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11444961B2 (en) * 2019-12-20 2022-09-13 Intel Corporation Active attack detection in autonomous vehicle networks
CN114143052B (zh) * 2021-11-19 2023-04-28 北京灰度科技有限公司 基于可控入侵模拟的网络防御体系风险评估方法、设备及存储介质
CN115277404B (zh) * 2022-05-13 2023-06-02 清华大学 云网络大规模变更发布编排方法、装置、设备和存储介质

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160028758A1 (en) * 2014-03-28 2016-01-28 Zitovault, Inc. System and Method for Predicting Impending Cyber Security Events Using Multi Channel Behavioral Analysis in a Distributed Computing Environment
US20170126712A1 (en) * 2015-10-28 2017-05-04 Fractal Industries, Inc. Detection mitigation and remediation of cyberattacks employing an advanced cyber-decision platform
US20170139763A1 (en) * 2015-11-13 2017-05-18 Kriwan Industrie-Elektronik Gmbh Cyber physical system
US20170149802A1 (en) * 2015-11-19 2017-05-25 Threat Stream, Inc. Protecting threat indicators from third party abuse

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10735456B2 (en) * 2015-10-28 2020-08-04 Qomplx, Inc. Advanced cybersecurity threat mitigation using behavioral and deep analytics

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160028758A1 (en) * 2014-03-28 2016-01-28 Zitovault, Inc. System and Method for Predicting Impending Cyber Security Events Using Multi Channel Behavioral Analysis in a Distributed Computing Environment
US20170126712A1 (en) * 2015-10-28 2017-05-04 Fractal Industries, Inc. Detection mitigation and remediation of cyberattacks employing an advanced cyber-decision platform
US20170139763A1 (en) * 2015-11-13 2017-05-18 Kriwan Industrie-Elektronik Gmbh Cyber physical system
US20170149802A1 (en) * 2015-11-19 2017-05-25 Threat Stream, Inc. Protecting threat indicators from third party abuse

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP3655878A4 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108011893A (zh) * 2017-12-26 2018-05-08 广东电网有限责任公司信息中心 一种基于网络资产信息采集的资产管理系统

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3655878A4 (fr) 2021-04-07
CN111316272A (zh) 2020-06-19
EP3655878A1 (fr) 2020-05-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11323471B2 (en) Advanced cybersecurity threat mitigation using cyberphysical graphs with state changes
US11750631B2 (en) System and method for comprehensive data loss prevention and compliance management
US10432660B2 (en) Advanced cybersecurity threat mitigation for inter-bank financial transactions
US10609079B2 (en) Application of advanced cybersecurity threat mitigation to rogue devices, privilege escalation, and risk-based vulnerability and patch management
US11089045B2 (en) User and entity behavioral analysis with network topology enhancements
US10594714B2 (en) User and entity behavioral analysis using an advanced cyber decision platform
US11582207B2 (en) Detecting and mitigating forged authentication object attacks using an advanced cyber decision platform
US11818169B2 (en) Detecting and mitigating attacks using forged authentication objects within a domain
US11968227B2 (en) Detecting KERBEROS ticket attacks within a domain
US10248910B2 (en) Detection mitigation and remediation of cyberattacks employing an advanced cyber-decision platform
US20220377093A1 (en) System and method for data compliance and prevention with threat detection and response
US11757920B2 (en) User and entity behavioral analysis with network topology enhancements
US20220263860A1 (en) Advanced cybersecurity threat hunting using behavioral and deep analytics
US20220060453A1 (en) Detecting and mitigating forged authentication object attacks in multi - cloud environments
WO2019018829A1 (fr) Atténuation de menaces de cybersécurité perfectionnée au moyen de l'analytique profonde et comportementale
WO2020102601A1 (fr) Système et procédé de prévention de perte complète de données et de gestion de conformité
EP3679506A2 (fr) Atténuation améliorée de menace de cybersécurité pour des transactions financières interbancaires
WO2019113492A1 (fr) Détection et atténuation d'attaques par objet d'authentification falsifié au moyen d'une plateforme de cyberdécision avancée
WO2019051131A1 (fr)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18835963

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018835963

Country of ref document: EP

Effective date: 20200220