WO2019013665A1 - Seal arrangement with highly elongated fin tip - Google Patents

Seal arrangement with highly elongated fin tip Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019013665A1
WO2019013665A1 PCT/RU2017/000524 RU2017000524W WO2019013665A1 WO 2019013665 A1 WO2019013665 A1 WO 2019013665A1 RU 2017000524 W RU2017000524 W RU 2017000524W WO 2019013665 A1 WO2019013665 A1 WO 2019013665A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
fin
seal arrangement
gap
working medium
fin tip
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/RU2017/000524
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Mikhail Sergeevich GRITCKEVICH
Viacheslav Vsevolodovich Schuchkin
Original Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft filed Critical Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Priority to PCT/RU2017/000524 priority Critical patent/WO2019013665A1/en
Publication of WO2019013665A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019013665A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D11/00Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages
    • F01D11/001Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages for sealing space between stator blade and rotor
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D11/00Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages
    • F01D11/005Sealing means between non relatively rotating elements
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D11/00Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages
    • F01D11/08Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages for sealing space between rotor blade tips and stator
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D11/00Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages
    • F01D11/08Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages for sealing space between rotor blade tips and stator
    • F01D11/12Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages for sealing space between rotor blade tips and stator using a rubstrip, e.g. erodible. deformable or resiliently-biased part
    • F01D11/127Preventing or minimising internal leakage of working-fluid, e.g. between stages for sealing space between rotor blade tips and stator using a rubstrip, e.g. erodible. deformable or resiliently-biased part with a deformable or crushable structure, e.g. honeycomb
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05DINDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F05D2240/00Components
    • F05D2240/55Seals

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to sealing arrangements employed to prevent a working medium to flow between two parts from a high pressure area to a low pressure area.
  • this invention relates to sealing in rotating machines, such as turbines (gas and steam) , compressors, pumps, etc.
  • Seal arrangements are interposed between a high pressure area and a low pressure area to provide noncontact sealing. Different sealing techniques are used at various locations in the rotating machines to prevent leakage of the working medium both between two relatively rotating parts, e.g. a rotor and a stator, and two relatively stationary parts, e.g. various housing parts, cooling air plenums, etc.
  • two relatively rotating parts e.g. a rotor and a stator
  • two relatively stationary parts e.g. various housing parts, cooling air plenums, etc.
  • the labyrinth seals, mateface seals, strip seals, rope seals could be distinguished .
  • a fin gap between a first part and a second part is fixed and must be large enough to accommodate thermal expansion of the parts and thermal changes in the surrounding structure, as well as the centrifugal expansion of the two parts in case of the relatively rotating parts, to avoid any contact between the seal arrangement and the other part.
  • the performance of the rotating machine depends on the size of such fin gap and can be enhanced by decreasing the leakage of the working medium through the fin gap.
  • FIG 1 shows a conventionally known seal arrangement 1 in a rotating machine.
  • the seal arrangement 1 is generally comprised of successive fins 2 and cavities 3 formed along the adjacent surfaces 4, 5 of a first part 6 and a second part 7 respectively.
  • the sealing arrangement 1 is considered for the case when the fins 2 are located on the first part 6.
  • the fins 2 can be positioned on one of the first part 6 and the second part 7 , or even on both parts 6 , 7.
  • the first part 6 and the second part 7 are arranged in such way that a gap 8 of the height H is formed between them.
  • a fin tip 9 and a surface 4 of the first part form a fin gap 10 of the height h.
  • the working medium flows along the direction 11 from a high pressure area to a low pressure area.
  • One of the basic concepts of any seal arrangement 1 design is to form a fluid barrier between areas of high and low pressure of working medium in order to retard the working medium flow through the seal arrangement 1 to a desired level .
  • the desired retardation is achieved by forcing a high- velocity working medium to pass sequentially through the fin gaps 10, which are formed between the fin tips 9 and the surface 5 of the second part 7, with the successive entering of the flowing working medium into the caverns 3, where energy of the flowing working medium is largely dissipated into turbulence .
  • Several origins of the aforementioned turbulence generation within the seal arrangement 1 can be distinguished. One of them is the friction between the high-velocity working medium and the adjacent seal surfaces, i.e. the surface 4 and/or the surface 5.
  • Another origin is the intense friction of free shear layers between a high velocity working medium jet discharging from a fin gap 10, i.e. slit-like orifice formed between the fin tips 9 and the surface 5 of the second part 7, and a relatively slow moving working medium in the cavern 3 immediately downstream of the fin gap 10.
  • the efficiency of the conventionally known seal arrangements could be improved by reducing the fin gap 10.
  • the fin gap 10 can only be reduced to a limited extent so as to avoid contact between the first part 6 and the second part 7.
  • such requirement should be satisfied for relatively rotating parts during the operation of the rotating machine since any contact of the first and the second part can result in damage to the parts of the rotating equipment .
  • the contact can be caused by many factors such as the eccentricity of a rotating part, centrifugal growth, vibrations, manufacturing tolerances, misalignment during assembling etc.
  • the fin gap 10 has to be sufficiently large to avoid accidental contact between two parts - a stationary part and a rotating part, which in turn impairs the sealing efficiency of the conventionally known seal arrangement .
  • the seal arrangement employs specially chosen wall positioning and wall curvature to introduce sharp turns in the working medium flow path providing the additional friction in shear layers.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide another variant of the seal arrangement such that the flow of a working medium from a high pressure area to a low pressure area is minimized, while the fin gap is preserved large enough to avoid contact of the first part and the second part. Therefore, the efficiency of such seal arrangements is increased.
  • the seal arrangement comprises a first part and a second part, wherein the first part and the second part are located opposite to each other and arranged in such way that there is a gap between the first part and the second part.
  • the first part and the second part can be configured to be relatively rotatable parts, e.g. a rotor and a stator, or relatively stationary parts, e.g. various housing parts or cooling air plenums etc, within the rotating machine, e.g. within a gas turbine.
  • relatively rotatable parts e.g. a rotor and a stator
  • relatively stationary parts e.g. various housing parts or cooling air plenums etc
  • At least one of the first part and the second part has at least one fin extending from there into the gap towards other of the first part and the second part to a fin tip so as to form a barrier against a flow of a working medium between the first part and the second part.
  • the seal arrangement can include series of the fins that are distributed along either the first part or the second part.
  • the fin tip extension of the at least one fin along a streamwise direction is larger than a fin gap being formed between the fin tip of the at least one fin and other of the first part and the second part.
  • the present invention is based on the insight that the additional energy losses of the working medium flow occur due to the growing boundary layer at the fin tip. Indeed, once the fin tip extension along the streamwise direction is sufficiently large comparing to the height of the fin gap, the thickness of a boundary layer cannot be neglected anymore .
  • the boundary layer has a noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium.
  • the effective fin gap is continuously decreasing with the increase of the fin tip extension. And as a result, the energy losses of the working medium flowing through such fin gap is noticeably larger than those of the prior art design. At the same time, the geometrical sizes of the fin gap still remain large enough to avoid any rubbing between the first part and the second part .
  • the present invention is proposed to provide a new seal arrangement with highly elongated fin tip that minimize flow of a working medium from an area of high pressure to an area of low pressure.
  • a ratio of the fin tip extension to the height of the fin gap is 2 or more.
  • the boundary layer formed at the fin tip is thin and does not provide any noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium.
  • one of the first part and the second part is a rotating part and another part is a stationary part.
  • the first part may be, but not limited to a rotor segment of a gas turbine whereas the second part may be, but not limited to, a stator segment of the gas turbine.
  • the first part is configured to be stationary and the second part is configured to be rotatable, for example the first part may be, but not limited to a stator segment of a gas turbine whereas the second part may be, but not limited to, a rotor segment of the gas turbine .
  • Such feature allows applying the seal arrangement in different rotating machines for which the first part and the second part are relatively rotating, e.g. in turbine engines.
  • the other of the first part and the second part has a surface that is opposite to the fin tip, and this surface comprises an abradable material, such as honeycombs, felt metal etc. This is desirable for some rotating machines to avoid the permanent damage to the second part during the operation.
  • the abradable material is honeycomb cells.
  • a free-shear layer emanating from the honeycomb cell structure is decreasing the effective fin gap.
  • the ratio of the fin tip extension to a width of a cell of the honeycomb cell structure is 1 or more.
  • the boundary layer from at the fin tip is thin and does not provide any noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium.
  • the effective clearance is increasing since the flow of the working medium can enter the honeycomb cell upstream of the fin and exit from the cell downstream of the fin without impairing the sealing efficiency.
  • the boundary layer provides a noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium and the effective gap is decreased.
  • Fig. 1 schematically illustrates the conventionally known seal arrangement (prior art) ;
  • Fig. 2 schematically illustrates a seal arrangement in accordance with the present invention
  • Fig. 3 schematically illustrates an embodiment of the seal arrangement in accordance with the present invention
  • Fig. 4 schematically illustrates a honeycomb cell structure (prior art)
  • Fig. 5 schematically illustrates other embodiment of the seal arrangement in accordance with the present invention.
  • Various embodiments are described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout.
  • numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of one or more embodiments. It may be noted that the illustrated embodiments are intended to explain, and not to limit the invention. It may be evident that such embodiments may be practiced without these specific details.
  • the terms "first”, “second”, etc. Are used herein only to facilitate discussion, and carry no particular temporal or chronological significance unless otherwise is indicated.
  • FIG 2 illustrates a seal arrangement 1 to minimize flow of a working medium from a high pressure area 13 to a low pressure area 14 in accordance with the present invention.
  • the seal arrangement 1 comprises a first part 6 and a second part 7, wherein the first part 6 and the second part 7 are located opposite to each other and arranged in such way that there is a gap 8 of the height H between the first part 6 and the second part 7.
  • the first part 6 and the second part 7 can be configured to be relatively rotating parts or relatively stationary parts within the rotating machines, such as turbines (gas, steam, etc.), compressors, pumps, etc.
  • the first part 6 may be, but not limited to, a rotor segment of a gas turbine
  • the second part 7 may be, but not limited to, a stator segment of the gas turbine.
  • the first part 6 can be configured to be stationary within the rotating equipment and the second part 7 is configured to be rotatable within the rotating equipment, e.g. the first part 6 may be, but not limited to, a stator segment of a gas turbine, whereas the second part 7 may be, but not limited to, a rotor segment of the gas turbine .
  • the first part 6 and the second part 7 can be, e.g. various housing parts, cooling air plenums etc,
  • At least one of the first part 6 and the second part 7 has at least one fin 2 extending from there into the gap 8 towards other of the first part 6 and the second part 7 to a fin tip 9 so as to form a barrier against a flow of a working medium between the first part 6 and the second part 7.
  • the at least one fin 2 is positioned on one of the first part 6 and the second part 7.
  • FIG 2 depicts the fin 2 to be positioned on the first part 6, particularly on the surface 4 of the first part 6.
  • the fin 2 extends towards the other part, i.e. in example of FIG 2 the fins 2 extends towards the second part 7, and particularly towards the surface 5 of the second part 7.
  • each of the first part 4 and the second part 5 has the at least one fin 2 extending from there into the gap 8 towards other of the first part 6 and the second part 7 to a fin tip 9 as shown on FIG 3.
  • the at least one fin 2 along with the fin tip 9 of the at least one fin 2, forms a circumferential barrier against a flow of a working medium that intends to flow between the first part 6 and the second part 7 i.e. between the surfaces 4 and 5.
  • the seal arrangement can 1 include one fin 2 or a plurality of the fins 2 that are distributed along either the first part 6 or the second part 7 , or both of them 6 , 7.
  • the at least one fin 2 is either angled or slanted with respect to a direction 11 of the working medium flow, or alternatively the fin 2 may extend normally from the surface 4 on which the fin 2 positioned.
  • the fin tip 9 extension 1 of the at least one fin 2 along a streamwise direction 11 is larger than the height h of the fin gap 10 being formed between the fin tip 9 of the at least one fin 2 and other of the first part 6 and the second part 7.
  • the fin tip 9 extension 1 of the at least one fin 2 along the streamwise direction 11 is larger than the height h of the fin gap 10 being formed between the fin tip 9 of the at least one fin 2 and the surface 5 of the second part 7.
  • this ratio equals 2 or more.
  • the surface 4 , 5 of one of the first part 6 or the second part 7 that is opposite to the at least one fin tip 9, comprises abradable material, for example, honeycomb cells, felt metal etc.
  • the cell 12 width w of the cells of honeycomb cell structure (as shown on FIG 4) of the known abradable material is typically 0.8 mm - 3.2 mm.
  • FIG 5 illustrates the embodiment of the present invention in case the surface 5 of the second part 7 comprises the honeycomb cells.
  • the ratio of the fin tip extension 1 to the width w of a cell 12 of the honeycomb cells is 1 or more .
  • the seal arrangement 1 works as follows. The working medium flows from the area of high pressure 13 to the area of low pressure 14 between the first part 6 and the second part 7. Such flow is nearly blocked by the fin 2 and strongly compressed in the area of the fin tip 9.
  • the fin tip extension 1 of the fin 2 along the streamwise direction 11 is larger than the height h of the fin gap 10
  • a boundary layer 15 is formed on the surface of the fin tip 9.
  • another boundary layer 16 is formed on the surface 5 of the second part 6. Therefore, the working medium flow enters the fin gap 10 of the effective height h eff , which is formed between two boundary layers 15 and 16 (as shown on FIG 2) . Further downstream, the working medium expands into the area of low pressure 14.
  • the effective height h eff of the fin gap 10 is decreased, while the physical height h of the fin gap 10 stays the same .
  • the boundary layer 15 is thin and does not provide any noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium. As soon as the ratio is 2 or more the boundary layer 15 provides noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium and the effective height h eff of the fin gap 10 is being decreased.
  • the length 1 of the fin tip extension is limited by the geometry and physical sizes of the first part 6 and the second part 7. For example, when the second part 7 is manufactured in a «stepped» way (as shown on FIG 1) , the length 1 of the fin tip extension is limited by the size L of the step of the second part 7.
  • a free-shear layer 17 is formed as it is shown on FIG 5.
  • the boundary layer 15 is thin and does not provide noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium. As soon as the ratio is 1 or more the boundary layer 15 provides a noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium and the effective height h eff of the fin gap 10 is decreased.
  • the length 1 of the fin tip extension is limited by the geometry and physical sizes of the first part 6 and the second part 7.

Abstract

The present invention provides a seal arrangement to minimize flow of a working medium from a high pressure area to a low pressure area is presented. The seal arrangement comprises a first part and a second part, wherein the first part and the second part are located opposite to each other and are arranged in such way that there is a gap between the first part and the second part. At least one of the first part and the second part has at least one fin extending from there into the gap towards other of the first part and the second part to a fin tip so as to form a barrier against a flow of a working medium between the first part and the second part. According to the present invention the fin tip extension of the at least one fin along a streamwise direction is larger than a fin gap being formed between the fin tip of the at least one fin and the other of the first part and the second part.

Description

SEAL ARRANGEMENT WITH HIGHLY ELONGATED FIN TIP
The present invention relates to sealing arrangements employed to prevent a working medium to flow between two parts from a high pressure area to a low pressure area. In particular this invention relates to sealing in rotating machines, such as turbines (gas and steam) , compressors, pumps, etc.
The control of the working medium (gas, steam, fluid) flow inside rotating machines is of paramount importance with regards to both functionality and effectiveness.
Seal arrangements are interposed between a high pressure area and a low pressure area to provide noncontact sealing. Different sealing techniques are used at various locations in the rotating machines to prevent leakage of the working medium both between two relatively rotating parts, e.g. a rotor and a stator, and two relatively stationary parts, e.g. various housing parts, cooling air plenums, etc. Among the abovementioned seal arrangements the labyrinth seals, mateface seals, strip seals, rope seals could be distinguished .
In the noncontact seal arrangement a fin gap between a first part and a second part is fixed and must be large enough to accommodate thermal expansion of the parts and thermal changes in the surrounding structure, as well as the centrifugal expansion of the two parts in case of the relatively rotating parts, to avoid any contact between the seal arrangement and the other part. On the other hand, the performance of the rotating machine depends on the size of such fin gap and can be enhanced by decreasing the leakage of the working medium through the fin gap.
FIG 1 shows a conventionally known seal arrangement 1 in a rotating machine. The seal arrangement 1 is generally comprised of successive fins 2 and cavities 3 formed along the adjacent surfaces 4, 5 of a first part 6 and a second part 7 respectively.
In the following description, for the purpose of explanation, the sealing arrangement 1 is considered for the case when the fins 2 are located on the first part 6. However, the fins 2 can be positioned on one of the first part 6 and the second part 7 , or even on both parts 6 , 7.
The first part 6 and the second part 7 are arranged in such way that a gap 8 of the height H is formed between them. A fin tip 9 and a surface 4 of the first part form a fin gap 10 of the height h. The working medium flows along the direction 11 from a high pressure area to a low pressure area. One of the basic concepts of any seal arrangement 1 design is to form a fluid barrier between areas of high and low pressure of working medium in order to retard the working medium flow through the seal arrangement 1 to a desired level .Generally, the desired retardation is achieved by forcing a high- velocity working medium to pass sequentially through the fin gaps 10, which are formed between the fin tips 9 and the surface 5 of the second part 7, with the successive entering of the flowing working medium into the caverns 3, where energy of the flowing working medium is largely dissipated into turbulence . Several origins of the aforementioned turbulence generation within the seal arrangement 1 can be distinguished. One of them is the friction between the high-velocity working medium and the adjacent seal surfaces, i.e. the surface 4 and/or the surface 5. Another origin is the intense friction of free shear layers between a high velocity working medium jet discharging from a fin gap 10, i.e. slit-like orifice formed between the fin tips 9 and the surface 5 of the second part 7, and a relatively slow moving working medium in the cavern 3 immediately downstream of the fin gap 10.
The efficiency of the conventionally known seal arrangements could be improved by reducing the fin gap 10. However, the fin gap 10 can only be reduced to a limited extent so as to avoid contact between the first part 6 and the second part 7. In particular, such requirement should be satisfied for relatively rotating parts during the operation of the rotating machine since any contact of the first and the second part can result in damage to the parts of the rotating equipment .
The contact can be caused by many factors such as the eccentricity of a rotating part, centrifugal growth, vibrations, manufacturing tolerances, misalignment during assembling etc. As a result, the fin gap 10 has to be sufficiently large to avoid accidental contact between two parts - a stationary part and a rotating part, which in turn impairs the sealing efficiency of the conventionally known seal arrangement . There are several known approaches for minimizing the flow of the working medium through the seal arrangement while keeping physical fin gap between the first part and the second part.
In one prior art design for relatively rotating parts (US Patent N'l 482 031) this is achieved by using of a "stepped" surface of the stationary part, which prevents the working medium to flow through a seal arrangement without entering the cavities between the fins and, thus, increases the losses due to the friction between a high-velocity flow and seal surfaces and minimizes the leakage flow.
In another configuration (US Patent No. 3 940 153) the seal arrangement employs specially chosen wall positioning and wall curvature to introduce sharp turns in the working medium flow path providing the additional friction in shear layers.
Another way of decreasing the spurious leakage is to use abradable materials at stationary parts, which allows minimizing clearances between rotating and stationary parts. In that case, fins can cut into the stationary part with the consequent formation of grooves preventing a seal arrangement from being seized. Such approach has been for example proposed in the prior art designs of US Patents No. 2 963 307, No. 4 477 089, and No. 6 652 226, where honeycomb cells have been mounted to stationary members permitting the attainment of small clearances between stationary and rotating members without subjecting a seal to a damage due to a rubbing .
Accordingly, the object of the present invention is to provide another variant of the seal arrangement such that the flow of a working medium from a high pressure area to a low pressure area is minimized, while the fin gap is preserved large enough to avoid contact of the first part and the second part. Therefore, the efficiency of such seal arrangements is increased.
The object of the present invention is achieved by a seal arrangement as defined in claim 1. Advantageous embodiments of the present invention are provided in dependent claims. Features of claim 1 can be combined with features of dependent claims, and features of dependent claims can be combined together. In an aspect of the present invention, a seal arrangement to minimize flow of a working medium flow from a high pressure area to a low pressure area is presented.
The seal arrangement comprises a first part and a second part, wherein the first part and the second part are located opposite to each other and arranged in such way that there is a gap between the first part and the second part.
The first part and the second part can be configured to be relatively rotatable parts, e.g. a rotor and a stator, or relatively stationary parts, e.g. various housing parts or cooling air plenums etc, within the rotating machine, e.g. within a gas turbine.
At least one of the first part and the second part has at least one fin extending from there into the gap towards other of the first part and the second part to a fin tip so as to form a barrier against a flow of a working medium between the first part and the second part.
The seal arrangement can include series of the fins that are distributed along either the first part or the second part.
According to the present invention the fin tip extension of the at least one fin along a streamwise direction is larger than a fin gap being formed between the fin tip of the at least one fin and other of the first part and the second part.
The present invention is based on the insight that the additional energy losses of the working medium flow occur due to the growing boundary layer at the fin tip. Indeed, once the fin tip extension along the streamwise direction is sufficiently large comparing to the height of the fin gap, the thickness of a boundary layer cannot be neglected anymore .
Therefore, the boundary layer has a noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium. Moreover, the effective fin gap is continuously decreasing with the increase of the fin tip extension. And as a result, the energy losses of the working medium flowing through such fin gap is noticeably larger than those of the prior art design. At the same time, the geometrical sizes of the fin gap still remain large enough to avoid any rubbing between the first part and the second part .
Thus, the present invention is proposed to provide a new seal arrangement with highly elongated fin tip that minimize flow of a working medium from an area of high pressure to an area of low pressure.
Further embodiments of the present invention are subject of the further sub-claims and of the following description, referring to the drawings . In a possible embodiment of the seal arrangement a ratio of the fin tip extension to the height of the fin gap is 2 or more. In case of the ratio of the fin tip extension to the height of the fin gap is less then 2 (typical for the prior- art designs) , the boundary layer formed at the fin tip is thin and does not provide any noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium. In contrast, as soon as such ratio is 2 or more the boundary layer provides noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium and the effective gap is decreased. In other possible embodiment of the seal arrangement one of the first part and the second part is a rotating part and another part is a stationary part.
For example the first part may be, but not limited to a rotor segment of a gas turbine whereas the second part may be, but not limited to, a stator segment of the gas turbine. Alternatively, in another embodiment of the seal arrangement the first part is configured to be stationary and the second part is configured to be rotatable, for example the first part may be, but not limited to a stator segment of a gas turbine whereas the second part may be, but not limited to, a rotor segment of the gas turbine .
Such feature allows applying the seal arrangement in different rotating machines for which the first part and the second part are relatively rotating, e.g. in turbine engines.
In other possible embodiment of the seal arrangement, the other of the first part and the second part has a surface that is opposite to the fin tip, and this surface comprises an abradable material, such as honeycombs, felt metal etc. This is desirable for some rotating machines to avoid the permanent damage to the second part during the operation.
In enhanced embodiment of the seal arrangement the abradable material is honeycomb cells. In such case a free-shear layer emanating from the honeycomb cell structure is decreasing the effective fin gap.
In enhanced embodiment of the seal arrangement the ratio of the fin tip extension to a width of a cell of the honeycomb cell structure is 1 or more. In case of the ratio of the fin tip extension to the width of the cell of the honeycomb cell structure is less then 1, the boundary layer from at the fin tip is thin and does not provide any noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium. In addition, if the fin tip is smaller than the honeycomb cell, the effective clearance is increasing since the flow of the working medium can enter the honeycomb cell upstream of the fin and exit from the cell downstream of the fin without impairing the sealing efficiency. In contrast, as soon as the ratio is 1 or more the boundary layer provides a noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium and the effective gap is decreased.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in accompanying drawings. The invention is explained in more details below using exemplary embodiments which are specified in the schematic figures of the drawings, in which: Fig. 1 schematically illustrates the conventionally known seal arrangement (prior art) ;
Fig. 2 schematically illustrates a seal arrangement in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 3 schematically illustrates an embodiment of the seal arrangement in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 4 schematically illustrates a honeycomb cell structure (prior art) ;
Fig. 5 schematically illustrates other embodiment of the seal arrangement in accordance with the present invention; Various embodiments are described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purpose of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of one or more embodiments. It may be noted that the illustrated embodiments are intended to explain, and not to limit the invention. It may be evident that such embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. It may be noted that in the present disclosure, the terms "first", "second", etc. Are used herein only to facilitate discussion, and carry no particular temporal or chronological significance unless otherwise is indicated.
FIG 2 illustrates a seal arrangement 1 to minimize flow of a working medium from a high pressure area 13 to a low pressure area 14 in accordance with the present invention.
The seal arrangement 1 comprises a first part 6 and a second part 7, wherein the first part 6 and the second part 7 are located opposite to each other and arranged in such way that there is a gap 8 of the height H between the first part 6 and the second part 7.
The first part 6 and the second part 7 can be configured to be relatively rotating parts or relatively stationary parts within the rotating machines, such as turbines (gas, steam, etc.), compressors, pumps, etc.
In case of relatively rotating parts, the first part 6 may be, but not limited to, a rotor segment of a gas turbine, whereas the second part 7 may be, but not limited to, a stator segment of the gas turbine. And vise versa, the first part 6 can be configured to be stationary within the rotating equipment and the second part 7 is configured to be rotatable within the rotating equipment, e.g. the first part 6 may be, but not limited to, a stator segment of a gas turbine, whereas the second part 7 may be, but not limited to, a rotor segment of the gas turbine . In case of relatively stationary parts, the first part 6 and the second part 7 can be, e.g. various housing parts, cooling air plenums etc,
At least one of the first part 6 and the second part 7 has at least one fin 2 extending from there into the gap 8 towards other of the first part 6 and the second part 7 to a fin tip 9 so as to form a barrier against a flow of a working medium between the first part 6 and the second part 7.
The at least one fin 2 is positioned on one of the first part 6 and the second part 7. FIG 2 depicts the fin 2 to be positioned on the first part 6, particularly on the surface 4 of the first part 6. The fin 2 extends towards the other part, i.e. in example of FIG 2 the fins 2 extends towards the second part 7, and particularly towards the surface 5 of the second part 7. In the enhanced embodiment of the seal arrangement 1 each of the first part 4 and the second part 5 has the at least one fin 2 extending from there into the gap 8 towards other of the first part 6 and the second part 7 to a fin tip 9 as shown on FIG 3. In case of the first part 6 and the second part 7 are configured to be relatively rotating, the at least one fin 2, along with the fin tip 9 of the at least one fin 2, forms a circumferential barrier against a flow of a working medium that intends to flow between the first part 6 and the second part 7 i.e. between the surfaces 4 and 5. The seal arrangement can 1 include one fin 2 or a plurality of the fins 2 that are distributed along either the first part 6 or the second part 7 , or both of them 6 , 7.
The at least one fin 2 is either angled or slanted with respect to a direction 11 of the working medium flow, or alternatively the fin 2 may extend normally from the surface 4 on which the fin 2 positioned.
According to the present invention the fin tip 9 extension 1 of the at least one fin 2 along a streamwise direction 11 is larger than the height h of the fin gap 10 being formed between the fin tip 9 of the at least one fin 2 and other of the first part 6 and the second part 7. I.e. in example of FIG 2, the fin tip 9 extension 1 of the at least one fin 2 along the streamwise direction 11 is larger than the height h of the fin gap 10 being formed between the fin tip 9 of the at least one fin 2 and the surface 5 of the second part 7. In the enhanced embodiment of the seal arrangement 1 this ratio equals 2 or more.
In embodiment of the seal arrangement 1 the surface 4 , 5 of one of the first part 6 or the second part 7 that is opposite to the at least one fin tip 9, comprises abradable material, for example, honeycomb cells, felt metal etc.
The cell 12 width w of the cells of honeycomb cell structure (as shown on FIG 4) of the known abradable material is typically 0.8 mm - 3.2 mm. FIG 5 illustrates the embodiment of the present invention in case the surface 5 of the second part 7 comprises the honeycomb cells. In enhanced embodiment of the seal arrangement 1 the ratio of the fin tip extension 1 to the width w of a cell 12 of the honeycomb cells is 1 or more . The seal arrangement 1 works as follows. The working medium flows from the area of high pressure 13 to the area of low pressure 14 between the first part 6 and the second part 7. Such flow is nearly blocked by the fin 2 and strongly compressed in the area of the fin tip 9.
However, due to the fact that the fin tip extension 1 of the fin 2 along the streamwise direction 11 is larger than the height h of the fin gap 10, a boundary layer 15 is formed on the surface of the fin tip 9. In addition to that, another boundary layer 16 is formed on the surface 5 of the second part 6. Therefore, the working medium flow enters the fin gap 10 of the effective height heff, which is formed between two boundary layers 15 and 16 (as shown on FIG 2) . Further downstream, the working medium expands into the area of low pressure 14.
Therefore, the effective height heff of the fin gap 10 is decreased, while the physical height h of the fin gap 10 stays the same .
In case of the ratio of the fin tip extension 1 to the height h of the fin gap 10 is less then 2, the boundary layer 15 is thin and does not provide any noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium. As soon as the ratio is 2 or more the boundary layer 15 provides noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium and the effective height heff of the fin gap 10 is being decreased.
In fact, higher ratio of the fin tip extension 1 to the height h of the fin gap 10 yield more effective sealing, since the relatively thick boundary layer 15 is formed on the surface of the fin tip 9 and, therefore, the effective height he f of the fin gap 10 is getting smaller. However, the length 1 of the fin tip extension is limited by the geometry and physical sizes of the first part 6 and the second part 7. For example, when the second part 7 is manufactured in a «stepped» way (as shown on FIG 1) , the length 1 of the fin tip extension is limited by the size L of the step of the second part 7.
In case of the surface 5 comprising the honeycomb cells, instead of the boundary layer 16, a free-shear layer 17 is formed as it is shown on FIG 5. In case of the ratio of the length 1 of the fin tip extension to the width w of the cell 12 of the honeycomb cell structure is less than 1, the boundary layer 15 is thin and does not provide noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium. As soon as the ratio is 1 or more the boundary layer 15 provides a noticeable displacement effect on the main flow of the working medium and the effective height heff of the fin gap 10 is decreased.
In fact, higher ratios of the length 1 of fin tip extension to the width w of the cell 12 of the honeycomb cell structure yield more effective sealing, since the relatively thick boundary layer 15 is formed on the surface of the fin tip 9, therefore, the effective height heff of the fin gap 10 is getting smaller.
However, as it was mentioned above, the length 1 of the fin tip extension is limited by the geometry and physical sizes of the first part 6 and the second part 7.
While the present invention has been described in detail with the reference to certain embodiments, it should be appreciated that the present invention is not limited to those precise embodiments. Rather, in view of the present disclosure which describes exemplary modes for practicing the invention, many modifications and variations would present themselves to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the following claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes, modifications, and variations coming within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be considered within their scope.
Reference numerals
1 - seal arrangement
2 - fin
3 - cavern
4 - surface of the first part
5 - surface of the second part
6 - first part
7 - second part
8 - gap
9 - fin tip
10 - fin gap
11 - streamwise direction
12 - cell
13 - high pressure area
14 - low pressure area
15, 16 - boundary layer
17 - free- shear layer

Claims

PATENT CLAIMS
1. A seal arrangement (1) to minimize a flow of a working medium from a high pressure area (13) to a low pressure area (14) , comprising a first part (6) and a second part (7) , wherein the first part (6) and the second part (7) are located opposite to each other and arranged in such way that there is a gap (8) between the first part (6) and the second part (7) , wherein at least one of the first part (6) and the second part (7) has at least one fin (2) extending from there into the gap (8) towards other of the first part (6) and the second part (7) to a fin tip (9) so as to form a barrier against a flow of a working medium between the first part (6) and the second part (7) characterized in that the fin tip extension (1) of the at least one fin (2) along a streamwise direction (11) is larger than a fin gap (10) being formed between the fin tip (9) of the at least one fin (2) and other of the first part (6) and the second part (7) .
2. The seal arrangement (1) according to claim 1, wherein a ratio of the fin tip extension (1) to the height (h) of the clearance gap (10) is 2 or more.
3. The seal arrangement (1) according any of claims 1 or 2, wherein one of the first part (6) and the second part
(7) is configured to be stationary and wherein the other of the first part (6) and the second part (7) is configured to be rotatable .
4. The seal arrangement (1) according any of claims from 1 to 3, wherein the other of the first part (6) and the second part (7) has a surface (4) that is opposite to the fin tip ( 9 ) , and wherein the surface (4) comprises an abradable material.
5. The seal arrangement (1) according claim 4 wherein the abradable material is honeycomb cells.
6. The seal arrangement (1) according claim 5, wherein the ratio of the fin tip extension (1) to a width (w) of a cell (12) of the honeycomb cell structure is 1 or more.
PCT/RU2017/000524 2017-07-14 2017-07-14 Seal arrangement with highly elongated fin tip WO2019013665A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/RU2017/000524 WO2019013665A1 (en) 2017-07-14 2017-07-14 Seal arrangement with highly elongated fin tip

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/RU2017/000524 WO2019013665A1 (en) 2017-07-14 2017-07-14 Seal arrangement with highly elongated fin tip

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019013665A1 true WO2019013665A1 (en) 2019-01-17

Family

ID=59846625

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/RU2017/000524 WO2019013665A1 (en) 2017-07-14 2017-07-14 Seal arrangement with highly elongated fin tip

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2019013665A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114483210A (en) * 2021-12-27 2022-05-13 东方电气集团东方汽轮机有限公司 Steam seal structure between dynamic and static parts of radial flow turbine

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US482031A (en) 1892-09-06 Trolley for electric railways
US2963307A (en) 1954-12-28 1960-12-06 Gen Electric Honeycomb seal
GB1221229A (en) * 1967-12-11 1971-02-03 Garrett Corp Labyrinth seal
US3940153A (en) 1974-12-09 1976-02-24 General Motors Corporation Labyrinth seal
US4477089A (en) 1982-07-26 1984-10-16 Avco Corporation Honeycomb seal for turbine engines
US5244216A (en) * 1988-01-04 1993-09-14 The Texas A & M University System Labyrinth seal
US6652226B2 (en) 2001-02-09 2003-11-25 General Electric Co. Methods and apparatus for reducing seal teeth wear
US20110309585A1 (en) * 2009-06-16 2011-12-22 Hidekazu Uehara Shaft seal device
EP2613008A1 (en) * 2012-01-04 2013-07-10 General Electric Company Modification of turbine engine seal abradability
EP2813671A1 (en) * 2013-05-29 2014-12-17 Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Ltd. Gas turbine with honeycomb seal

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US482031A (en) 1892-09-06 Trolley for electric railways
US2963307A (en) 1954-12-28 1960-12-06 Gen Electric Honeycomb seal
GB1221229A (en) * 1967-12-11 1971-02-03 Garrett Corp Labyrinth seal
US3940153A (en) 1974-12-09 1976-02-24 General Motors Corporation Labyrinth seal
US4477089A (en) 1982-07-26 1984-10-16 Avco Corporation Honeycomb seal for turbine engines
US5244216A (en) * 1988-01-04 1993-09-14 The Texas A & M University System Labyrinth seal
US6652226B2 (en) 2001-02-09 2003-11-25 General Electric Co. Methods and apparatus for reducing seal teeth wear
US20110309585A1 (en) * 2009-06-16 2011-12-22 Hidekazu Uehara Shaft seal device
EP2613008A1 (en) * 2012-01-04 2013-07-10 General Electric Company Modification of turbine engine seal abradability
EP2813671A1 (en) * 2013-05-29 2014-12-17 Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Ltd. Gas turbine with honeycomb seal

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114483210A (en) * 2021-12-27 2022-05-13 东方电气集团东方汽轮机有限公司 Steam seal structure between dynamic and static parts of radial flow turbine
CN114483210B (en) * 2021-12-27 2024-02-13 东方电气集团东方汽轮机有限公司 Steam seal structure between dynamic and static parts of radial turbine

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7971882B1 (en) Labyrinth seal
US6942445B2 (en) Gas turbine cooled shroud assembly with hot gas ingestion suppression
US7857582B2 (en) Abradable labyrinth tooth seal
US7234918B2 (en) Gap control system for turbine engines
CN103216277B (en) Refreshable inter-stage becomes corner seal
JP2005155620A (en) Seal assembly for turbine, bucket/turbine containing seal assembly, and method of sealing interfaces between rotary and stationary components of turbine
EP2233800B1 (en) Seal member, assembly and method
US8967973B2 (en) Turbine bucket platform shaping for gas temperature control and related method
JP2009062979A (en) Labyrinth compression seal and turbine incorporating the same
US10655481B2 (en) Cover plate for rotor assembly of a gas turbine engine
US10619490B2 (en) Turbine rotor blade arrangement for a gas turbine and method for the provision of sealing air in a turbine rotor blade arrangement
JP5971544B2 (en) Shaft sealing device and rotating machine
US20100054924A1 (en) Brush seal and turbine using the same
US20170114655A1 (en) Sealing assembly
US10215033B2 (en) Stator seal for turbine rub avoidance
US20180355744A1 (en) Abradable structure for a turbomachine, turbomachine having an abradable structure, and method for manufacturing an abradable structure
US9920644B2 (en) Riffled seal for a turbomachine, turbomachine and method of manufacturing a riffled seal for a turbomachine
JP2016160935A (en) Turbine bucket platform for controlling incursion losses
US9829007B2 (en) Turbine sealing system
JP2011137543A (en) Brush seal
CN111373122B (en) Labyrinth abradable structure, in particular for an aircraft turbine
WO2019013665A1 (en) Seal arrangement with highly elongated fin tip
KR101695126B1 (en) Structure for reinforcing a turbine's sealing by using bump-shape
US9835040B2 (en) Turbomachine
JP6197985B2 (en) Seal structure and turbine device provided with the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 17764924

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 17764924

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1