WO2018153439A1 - Full-duplex transceiver and receiving method - Google Patents

Full-duplex transceiver and receiving method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018153439A1
WO2018153439A1 PCT/EP2017/053976 EP2017053976W WO2018153439A1 WO 2018153439 A1 WO2018153439 A1 WO 2018153439A1 EP 2017053976 W EP2017053976 W EP 2017053976W WO 2018153439 A1 WO2018153439 A1 WO 2018153439A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
signal
transceiver
analog
phase
noise
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2017/053976
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Paul FERRAND
Melissa DUARTE GELVEZ
Original Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. filed Critical Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Priority to CN201780087098.0A priority Critical patent/CN110521128B/en
Priority to PCT/EP2017/053976 priority patent/WO2018153439A1/en
Publication of WO2018153439A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018153439A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B1/00Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
    • H04B1/38Transceivers, i.e. devices in which transmitter and receiver form a structural unit and in which at least one part is used for functions of transmitting and receiving
    • H04B1/40Circuits
    • H04B1/50Circuits using different frequencies for the two directions of communication
    • H04B1/52Hybrid arrangements, i.e. arrangements for transition from single-path two-direction transmission to single-direction transmission on each of two paths or vice versa
    • H04B1/525Hybrid arrangements, i.e. arrangements for transition from single-path two-direction transmission to single-direction transmission on each of two paths or vice versa with means for reducing leakage of transmitter signal into the receiver
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B1/00Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
    • H04B1/38Transceivers, i.e. devices in which transmitter and receiver form a structural unit and in which at least one part is used for functions of transmitting and receiving
    • H04B1/40Circuits
    • H04B1/54Circuits using the same frequency for two directions of communication
    • H04B1/56Circuits using the same frequency for two directions of communication with provision for simultaneous communication in two directions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an in-band Full-Duplex (FD) transceiver, and to a method of receiving a signal with a FD transceiver.
  • the present invention is concerned with a case, in which the same physical propagation medium is used for transmitting and receiving data signals.
  • the same physical propagation medium can be used for the transmission and reception of data signals.
  • the data transmission can create a large self-interference for the data reception.
  • wireless communication systems avoided this self-interference problem by separating the transmission and reception of data either in time or in different frequency bands.
  • new opportunities for transmitting and receiving data at the same time and in the same frequency band are enabled.
  • the main technical issue is still, however, an efficient removal of self-interference generated by the transmission signal interfering with the reception signal.
  • a receiver 102 For removing the self-interference occurring in a conventional FD transceiver 100 as shown in Fig. 1, a receiver 102 should know an analog signal emitted by the transmitter 101 as precisely as possible.
  • a reference signal 103 may be tapped from the transmitter 101, before it reaches one or more transmit antennas 104, and may be routed to the receiver 102.
  • the receiver 102 demodulates the tapped signal separately from a desired signal, which is received via one or more receive antennas 105.
  • the receiver 102 thus has both the desired signal plus a self-interference signal, as well as a reference self- interference signal. By subtracting the latter from the former, the receiver 102 can in theory almost perfectly remove the self-interference, and thus recover the desired signal.
  • the self-interference reference signal 103 tapped from the transmitter 101 is corrupted by various analog effects - such as additive white noise or multiplicative phase noise - which means that the self-interference signal cannot be known perfectly to the receiver 102.
  • the receiver 102 still has residual self-interference corrupting the desired signal. Since the self- interference signal received wirelessly is of much higher power than the desired signal - notably self-interference is transmitted very close to the receiver 102 - the residual self- interference can easily mask the desired signal, and can thus drastically degrade the performance of the FD transceiver 100.
  • Fig. 2 shows more details of a conventional FD transceiver 100, which was also considered when making the present invention.
  • the FD transceiver 100 comprises the data transmitter 101 and the data receiver 102 already shown in Fig. 1.
  • the transmitter 101 is specifically composed of a baseband processing unit 209, which is configured to shape an input digital signal into a baseband digital signal, a digital-to-analog (D/A) converter 210, which is configured to transform the digital baseband signal into an analog signal x(t), a local oscillator (LO) and mixer 211, which are configured to up- convert the analog signal to the relevant frequency band, a radio-frequency (RF) processing unit 212, which is configured to process and shape the analog signal, and a power amplifier (PA) 213, which is configured to feed the analog signal to the transmit antenna 104.
  • the FD transceiver 100 also includes an analog link, which is configured to tap the analog signal fed by the PA 213 to the transmit antenna 104, and to provide the tapped signal as the
  • the receiver 102 contains the receive antenna 105, an analog canceller 206, which is configured to take the signal tapped from the transmitter 101 (the analog reference signal) and attempt removing a part of the self-interference signal, a first RF processing unit 207, which is configured to process and shape the analog signal fed from the receive antenna 105, and at least two mixers 201 driven by the same LO 202, which are configured to down- convert the received signal and the reference signal to the baseband, in order to obtain signals y(t) and yref(t), respectively.
  • the LO 202 may particularly experience phase-noise (receiver phase-noise effects) and frequency offsets.
  • the receiver 102 also includes at least two A/D converters 203, which are configured to convert the received signal and the reference signal from analog into digital, and a digital canceller 204, which is configured to perform self-interference regeneration, in order to obtain a signal for digital self-interference cancellation.
  • the digital canceller 204 is also configured to combine the cancellation signal with the signal coming from the receive antenna 105, and thus to subtract some self-interference from the received signal.
  • the receiver 102 includes a baseband processing unit 205, which is configured to further process and shape the digital signal after the interference removal operation.
  • the receiver 102 is interfered by the transmitter 101 as already described above with respect to Fig. 1. Performance degrading effects, which arise from this interference, are illustrated in the following model.
  • y(t) represents the self-interference.
  • This self-interference consists of multiple delayed copies of the signal x(t) transmitted by the transmitter 101, due to reflections in the environment around the FD transceiver 100.
  • This is modeled through a multipath self-interference channel, represented as wherein c i is the attenuation due to path i, and ⁇ i is the delay due to path i.
  • the reference channel is represented as a simple delay ⁇ (t - ⁇ ref ) wherein ⁇ ref is in general different from the delays ⁇ i . Based on these models, the signal received from the reference channel is equal to x(t - ⁇ ref ) and the signal received from the self-interference channel is equal to ⁇ i c i x(t - ⁇ i ).
  • a key problem of the FD receiver 100 of Fig. 2 is related to the phase-noise generated in the receiving LO 202 (receiver phase noise effects).
  • the phase- noise sample at time t, ⁇ ( ⁇ ) ends up multiplying different delayed versions of the transmitted signal x(t). Specifically, when observing the reference signal y ref , the phase- noise at time t multiplies the transmitted signal delayed by ⁇ ref . On the other hand, when observing path i of the self-interference signal y, the same phase-noise at time t multiplies the transmitted signal delayed by ⁇ i .
  • the transmitted signal x(t) has the same phase-noise as the signal from the self-interference channel, but the same phase-noise is applied to different delayed versions of the transmitted signal.
  • This mismatch caused by the same phase-noise affecting the same signal but at different delays, causes a severe problem for the performance of the digital canceller 204 in the FD receiver 100.
  • the degradation can attain more than 3dB.
  • phase-noise issues of the conventional FD receiver 100 is acquiring more knowledge about the phase-noise process. Thus, it may subsequently be possible to better remove the phase-noise from both the reference signal and the received signal.
  • phase-noise obtained from the way it affects the transmitted signal
  • OFDM Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
  • Another approach that may be implemented in conjunction to the above-described approach consists in using existing pilot signals known in advance, in order to virtually decode the phase-noise on some part of the signal. Using such pilot signals, the receiver knows the phase-noise process at some positions in time, interleaved with data symbols, and is able to reconstruct the phase-noise process by using interpolation between these positions in time.
  • the present invention aims to improve a conventional FD transceiver and a corresponding receiving method.
  • the present invention has the object to provide a FD transceiver and corresponding method, which is configured to perform efficient self-interference cancellation even in the presence of receiver phase-noise effects.
  • the present invention desires a more effective removal of the self-interference from a received signal.
  • the present invention aims at a FD transceiver being well suited for practical systems.
  • the object of the present invention is achieved by the solution provided in the enclosed independent claims.
  • Advantageous implementations of the present invention are further defined in the dependent claims.
  • the present invention proposes a FD transceiver and a corresponding receiving method for digital self-interference cancellation, wherein multiple analog references are tapped from a transmitter path, and are separated by non-zero delay lines.
  • a first aspect of the present invention provides a FD transceiver comprising a transmitter and a receiver, a link configured to tap an analog transmit signal of the transmitter, at least two non-equal delay lines, each delay line being configured to receive the tapped signal, and to delay the tapped signal to create an analog reference signal, a converter configured to digitalize the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of the receiver, and a digital canceller configured to generate a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals, and to combine the cancellation signal with the digitalized analog receive signal.
  • the FD transceiver of the first aspect is furthermore well suitable for practical implementations.
  • a plurality of mixers are configured to down-convert the analog reference signals and the analog receive signal to a receiver baseband of the transceiver, wherein the plurality of mixers are driven by a common local oscillator.
  • the digital canceller is or comprises at least one adaptive filter.
  • An adaptive filter is a particularly effective and low complexity implementation of the digital canceller.
  • the at least one adaptive filter is configured to perform a regeneration of self-interference, which is caused by the receiver receiving over an air interface the transmit signal from the transmitter.
  • the self-interference signal can be effectively removed from the receive signal, even in the presence of phase-noise effects in the receiver LO.
  • the digital canceller is a bank of adaptive filters, preferably implemented as a block filter, each adaptive filter being fed with one of the digitalized analog reference signals.
  • the digital canceller can thus take into account each delayed version of the tapped reference signal, which allows estimating more precisely the multiple-path self- interference signal, and accordingly leads to a better removal thereof from the receive signal.
  • the output signal of the digital canceller is used to drive the adaptation of the adaptive filters.
  • the feedback of the output signal allows to iteratively remove the self-interference signal more efficiently.
  • the digital canceller for generating the cancellation signal, is configured to assign a first weight to at least one tap of each adaptive filter, and to update the first weights by following a Normalized Least Mean Squares, NLMS, procedure.
  • the digital canceller for generating the cancellation signal, is configured to assign a second weight to the at least one tap of each adaptive filter, wherein a higher second weight is assigned to an adaptive filter, if the adaptive filter is fed with a digitalized analog reference signal stemming from an analog reference signal with a delay that is closer to a delay of the transmitter signal received over the air interface by the receiver from the transmitter.
  • the phase- noise effects can be taken into account more precisely, and the self-interference signal can be removed most effectively from the digital receive signal.
  • the digital canceller is configured to estimate a phase-noise signal based on at least two of the analog or the digitalized analog reference signals, to remove the estimated phase-noise signal from the digitalized analog receive signal to obtain a phase-noise corrected receive signal, and to generate the cancellation signal based on the phase-noise corrected reference signal.
  • Estimating the phase-noise signal using multiple analog references allows for an even better removal of the self-interference signal. Because multiple copies of the phase-noise are provided by virtue of the multiple analog reference signals with different delays, the phase-noise can be estimated better than conventionally.
  • the transceiver further comprises a link configured to tap at least one baseband signal from a transmitter baseband of the transceiver, in order to obtain at least one digital baseband reference signal, wherein
  • the digital canceller is configured to generate the cancellation signal based on the at least one digital baseband reference signal and based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals.
  • the baseband reference signal further improves the removal of the self- interference signal.
  • the digital canceller is configured to remove the estimated phase-noise signal from at least one digitalized analog reference signal to obtain at least one phase-noise corrected reference signal, and to generate the cancellation signal based on the at least one phase-noise corrected reference signal.
  • the digital canceller is configured to estimate, before generating the cancellation signal, a phase-noise signal, and to remove the estimated phase-noise signal from each of the digital reference signals and from the digitalized analog receive signal.
  • the transceiver further comprises a link configured to tap at least one baseband signal from a transmitter baseband of the transceiver, in order to obtain at least one digital baseband reference signal, wherein the digital canceller is configured to estimate the phase-noise signal based on the at least one baseband reference signal and at least one digitalized analog reference signal. Taking additionally the baseband reference signal improves the estimation of the phase- noise signal, and thus effectively leads to a better removal of the self-interference signal.
  • a second aspect of the present invention provides a method for receiving a signal with a full-duplex, FD, transceiver, the method comprising the steps of tapping an analog transmit signal of a transmitter of the transceiver, providing the tapped signal with at least two non- equal delays to create at least two analog reference signals, digitalizing the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of a receiver of the transceiver, generating a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals, and combining the cancellation signal with digitalized analog receive signal.
  • the method further comprises down-converting the analog reference signals and the analog receive signal to a receiver baseband of the transceiver, wherein the plurality of mixers are driven by a common local oscillator.
  • the cancellation signal is generated with at least one adaptive filter.
  • the cancellation signal is generated by the at least one adaptive filter performing a regeneration of self-interference, which is caused by the receiver receiving over an air interface the transmit signal from the transmitter.
  • the cancellation signal is generated with a bank of adaptive filters, preferably implemented as a block filter, each adaptive filter being fed with one of the digitalized analog reference signals.
  • the method comprises using an output signal of the generation of the cancellation signal for driving the adaptation of the adaptive filters.
  • the cancellation signal is generated by assigning a first weight to at least one tap of each adaptive filter, and to update the first weights by following a Normalized Least Mean Squares, NLMS, procedure.
  • the cancellation signal is generated by assigning a second weight to the at least one tap of each adaptive filter, wherein a higher second weight is assigned to an adaptive filter, if the adaptive filter is fed with a digitalized analog reference signal stemming from an analog reference signal with a delay that is closer to a delay of the transmitter signal received over the air interface by the receiver from the transmitter.
  • the method further comprises estimating a phase-noise signal based on at least two of the analog or the digitalized analog reference signals, removing the estimated phase-noise signal from the digitalized analog receive signal to obtain a phase-noise corrected receive signal, and generating the cancellation signal based on the phase-noise corrected receive signal.
  • the method further comprises tapping at least one baseband signal from a transmitter baseband of the transceiver, in order to obtain at least one digital baseband reference signal, wherein the cancellation signal is generated based on the at least one digital baseband reference signal and based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals.
  • the method comprises removing the estimated phase-noise signal from at least one digitalized analog reference signal to obtain at least one phase-noise corrected reference signal, and generating the cancellation signal based on the at least one phase-noise corrected reference signal.
  • the method further comprises estimating, before generating the cancellation signal, a phase-noise signal, and removing the estimated phase-noise signal from each of the digitalized analog reference signals and from the digitalized analog receive signal.
  • the transceiver further comprises tapping at least one baseband signal from a transmitter baseband of the transceiver, in order to obtain at least one digital baseband reference signal, wherein the phase-noise signal is estimated based on the at least one baseband reference signal and at least one digitalized analog reference signal.
  • a second aspect of the present invention provides a computer program product comprising a computer-readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by at least one programmable processor, cause the at least one programmable processor to perform operations to implement the method of the second aspect as such or according to any implementation form of the second aspect.
  • Fig. 1 shows a basic wireless communication scenario with a conventional FD transceiver.
  • Fig. 2 shows a conventional FD transceiver.
  • Fig. 3 shows a digital canceller of a conventional FD transceiver.
  • Fig. 4 shows residual self-interference after digital self-interference cancellation in a conventional FD transceiver experiencing phase-noise (PN) effects based on the delay of the self-interference signal.
  • the delay of the reference signal is supposed to be 0.
  • Fig. 5 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 6 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 7 shows FD transceivers according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 8 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 9 shows a comparison of the performance of a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention versus a conventional FD transceiver.
  • Fig. 10 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 11 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 12 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 13 shows a method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the solution of the present invention is based on the insight that, in reality, the phase-noise process does not need to be separated from the receive signal.
  • reference is made to the following equation of the equivalent channel for the case of the single-tap self-interference channel.
  • the transmitted signal x(t) is convolved through both the reference channel fr ref (t) and the multi path self-interference channel h i (t), and is mixed in the LO 202 with the phase- noise 0(t) to obtain, respectively, the reference signal y ref (t), and the self-interference signal y(t) .
  • the correct solution for the digital canceller 204 is then to have a single coefficient
  • Fig. 5 shows a FD transceiver 500 according to a general embodiment of the present invention.
  • the FD transceiver 500 includes a transmitter 501 for transmitting signals, and a receiver 502 for receiving signals.
  • the above-mentioned problem of the phase-noise issues is solved in a different way than conventionally.
  • the receiver 502 will work perfectly.
  • the problem is thus essentially a problem of delay.
  • the self-interference channel is not a single-tap channel, but a multi-tap channel with multiple copies of the transmitted signal being received at different delays.
  • the delay of the self-interference channel cannot be matched, because there are, in fact, multiple delays for the same signal.
  • the receiver 502 it is ensured that the receiver 502 has access to multiple copies of the analog reference signal at different delays, in order to be able to match the multiple copies of the transmitted signal received on the self-interference channel.
  • the FD transceiver 500 comprises an analog link 503 configured to tap an analog transmit signal of the transmitter 501, and at least two non-equal delay lines 504, wherein each delay line 504 is configured to receive the tapped signal, and to delay the tapped signal, in order to create an analog reference signal.
  • the FD transceiver 500 comprises a converter 505 and a digital canceller 506, which are - as shown in Fig. 5 - preferably located in the receiver 502.
  • the converter 505 and canceller 506 could also be separate and connected to the receiver 502.
  • the converter 505 is specifically configured to digitalize the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of the receiver 502, respectively.
  • the digital canceller 506 is configured to generate a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals, and further to combine the cancellation signal with the digitalized analog receive signal.
  • the digital canceller 506 can thus more easily match the channel to provide a better estimate and cancellation of the self-interference signal, and the performance of the FD transceiver 500 is greatly improved.
  • the FD receiver 500 comprises the transmitter 501 and the receiver 502.
  • the transmitter 501 may have one or more transmit antennas 602, at least one D/A, and a LO driven mixer (similarly as the FD transceiver 100 shown in Fig. 2).
  • the receiver 502 may have one or more receive antennas 603, a plurality of LO 601 driven mixers 600, a plurality of A/Ds 505, and the digital canceller 506.
  • a link 503 between the transmitter 501 and the receiver 502 taps an analog signal, which is fed into the plurality of delays 504, in order to create the multiple analog reference signals.
  • another digital link 604 may provide a baseband reference signal from the transmitter 502 to the receiver 501.
  • the approach of the present invention with the FD transceiver 500 shown in Figs. 5 and 6 has numerous advantages over conventional FD transceivers.
  • the main advantage is that it is not necessary to decode the phase-noise, or the reference signal at all.
  • the phase-noise does not need to be treated in any specific way.
  • the implementation of the digital canceller 506 naturally matches the delays that are experienced in the self-interference channel, and can thus recover the performance degradation caused by the phase-noise almost completely.
  • phase-noise can be estimated better than in conventional FD transceivers.
  • Fig. 7 shows different principles of FD transceivers 500 according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • a FD transceiver 500 with multiple transmit antennas 602 connected to the transmitter 501, and multiple receive antennas 603 connected to the receiver 502 is shown. That is, the transmitted signal may be split to multiple transmit antennas 602, and the received signal may come from multiple reference antennas.
  • a FD transceiver 500 principle with one antenna 700 used for transmission and reception is shown. This transceiver 500 may be achieved when using a circulator 701. Of course, also multiple antennas 700 could be used for transmission and reception.
  • the different principles of FD transceivers 500 shown in Fig. 7 can be applied to all specific embodiments of FD transceivers 500 of the present invention.
  • a FD transceiver 500 according to a specific embodiment is shown in Fig. 8.
  • the embodiment bases on the FD transceiver 500 shown in Fig. 5.
  • N analog references are first converted to the digital domain, wherein each analog reference goes through a separate A/D converter 505.
  • the resulting N digital signals are input to the digital canceller 506, which performs the self-interference regeneration.
  • the digital canceller 506 is or comprises at least one adaptive filter 800, specifically it may be a bank of adaptive filters 800, preferably implemented as a block filter.
  • Each adaptive filter 800 may be fed with at least one of the digitalized analog reference signals.
  • each adaptive filter 800 is assigned a first weight w 1 , which is updated following an Normalized Least Mean Squares (NLMS) type procedure combined with a further novel weight recalculation w 2 that is a function of (1) the analog delay associated with analog reference j and (2) the total number of analog references N.
  • NLMS Normalized Least Mean Squares
  • the novel custom NLMS implementation of the bank of adaptive filters 800, each with P taps, follows the following procedure.
  • the adaptive filter input is defined as
  • y ref1 (t n ) denotes the sample of signal y ref1 at time t n .
  • the filter weights are defined as
  • w is the diagonal of the product between weights w 1 ⁇ C 1XNP computed via conventional NLMS and weights w 2 ⁇ C 1XNP , which are computed as a function of the analog delays associated with the analog references and the total number of analog references N.
  • the estimate of the self-interference is computed as
  • the digital canceller 506 output is equal to
  • the weights w 2 (t n ) can be constant for all t n hence computed offline. Intuitively, the weights w 2 (t n ) are used to give more weight to the signal coming from analog reference j, when the channel delay is closer to ⁇ . In a multi path channel, the weights w 2 (t n ) are also applied. In this multipath case if, for example, the channel has paths with delays ⁇ i and ⁇ j , then signals coming from analog references with delay closest to ⁇ i and ⁇ j are given the highest weights.
  • weights w 2 (t n ) are the following preliminary weights.
  • the weights for the first adaptive filter 800 are all equal to 1.
  • the weights that correspond to delays less than ( ⁇ 1 + ⁇ 2 )/2 are set equal to 0, and all others are set to 1.
  • the weights that correspond to delays less than ( ⁇ 2 + ⁇ 3 )/2 are set equal to 0, and all others are set to 1.
  • NLMS is explicitly considered, but the embodiment can also be implemented for any other type of adaptive filters 800, like Recursive Least Squares (RLS).
  • RLS Recursive Least Squares
  • the equations above do not explicitly show the effect of noise, however, the signals y (t n ) and y (t n ) are affected by noise, due to hardware imperfections. Also, other methods for computation of w 2 (t n ) are possible, one trivial case being having all 1.
  • one advantage of this embodiment is that it does not require a baseband reference signal.
  • Fig. 9 shows the significant performance improvement of the FD transceiver 500 of Fig. 8 compared to a conventional FD transceiver (e.g. FD transceiver 100).
  • a conventional FD transceiver e.g. FD transceiver 100.
  • a residual self-interference on the receive signal is plotted in units of dBm.
  • a delay is plotted in unit of ns. It can be seen that in the embodiment of Fig. 8 (Embodiment 1 in Fig. 9), the residual self-interference is significantly lower than for the conventional FD transceiver 100 (state of the art, with phase-noise) for each delay.
  • FD transceiver 500 Another specific embodiment of the FD transceiver 500 is shown in Fig. 10.
  • two analog references with different delay 504 here 'Analog reference 1 ' is not delayed, while 'Analog reference 2' is delayed
  • 'Analog reference 1 ' is not delayed
  • 'Analog reference 2' is delayed
  • the resulting signals are used to estimate the phase-noise process via standard signal processing
  • the digital canceller 506 which may include delay, conjugate, normalization and filtering. Other methods for estimation from two reference signals are also possible.
  • This signal is then used to correct (remove) the phase-noise from the signals that are used for the self-interference regeneration.
  • the self-interference regeneration can be implemented using any kind of adaptive filter 800.
  • Fig. 11 Another specific embodiment of the FD transceiver 500 is shown in Fig. 11.
  • two analog references are used to estimate the phase- noise process e via standard signal processing in the digital canceller 506, which may include delay, conjugate, normalization and filtering procedure.
  • the processing can be implemented all in the analog domain (as shown in Fig. 11) or may be split between the analog and digital domain. Other methods for estimation from two reference signals are also possible.
  • the phase-noise correction signal is then used to correct (remove) the phase-noise from the signal coming from the receive antenna 603.
  • the phase- noise corrected signal and a baseband reference signal provided via link 604 from the transmitter 501 to the receiver 502 are used for the self-interference regeneration, which can be implemented using any kind of adaptive filter 800.
  • a case without baseband reference may be considered, similar to the embodiment of Fig. 10.
  • the embodiment of Fig. 11 is modified such that the phase-noise correction signal is not only applied to the signal coming from the receive antenna 603, but it is also applied to one of the signals coming from the analog references (as in Fig. 10), and the resulting phase-noise corrected signals are used for self-interference regeneration.
  • Another specific embodiment of the FD transceiver 500 is shown in Fig. 12. This embodiment uses one baseband reference provided via digital link 604 and N analog references provided via another analog link 503. The baseband reference and one of the digitalized analog references are used to obtain an estimate of the phase-noise process .
  • the signal is then multiplied with all the N analog references and the signal coming from one or more receive antennas 603, thereby removing all or some part of the phase-noise.
  • the resulting signals are input to adaptive filters 800, which perform the self-interference regeneration.
  • the digital canceller 506 is implemented as a bank of adaptive filters 800, preferably implemented as a block filter.
  • the signal regeneration follows a procedure analogous to the adaptive filter 800 implementation described for the embodiment of Fig. 8.
  • Fig. 13 illustrates a method 1300 for receiving a signal according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the method 1300 is performed by a FD transceiver 500 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the method 1300 comprises a first step 1301 of tapping an analog transmit signal of a transmitter 501 of the transceiver 500.
  • the method 1300 comprises providing the tapped signal with at least two non-equal delays to create at least two analog reference signals.
  • the method 1300 comprises digitalizing the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of a receiver 502 of the transceiver 500.
  • the method 1300 comprises generating 1304 a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals.
  • the method 1300 comprises combining the cancellation signal with the digitalized analog receive signal

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Noise Elimination (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention provides an in-band Full-Duplex (FD) transceiver (500) and a corresponding method (1300). The FD transceiver (500) comprises a transmitter (501) and a receiver (502). It further comprises a link (503) configured to tap an analog transmit signal of the transmitter (501), and at least two non-equal delay lines (504). Each delay line (504) is configured to receive the tapped signal, and to delay the tapped signal to create an analog reference signal. The FD transceiver (500) also comprises a converter (505) configured to digitalize the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of the receiver (502), and a digital canceller (506) configured to generate a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals. The digital canceller (506) is finally configured to combine the cancellation signal with the digitalized analog receive signal.

Description

FULL-DUPLEX TRANSCEIVER AND RECEIVING METHOD
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to an in-band Full-Duplex (FD) transceiver, and to a method of receiving a signal with a FD transceiver. In particular, the present invention is concerned with a case, in which the same physical propagation medium is used for transmitting and receiving data signals.
BACKGROUND
In wireless communication systems, the same physical propagation medium can be used for the transmission and reception of data signals. In this case, the data transmission can create a large self-interference for the data reception. For a long time, wireless communication systems avoided this self-interference problem by separating the transmission and reception of data either in time or in different frequency bands. However, due to recent improvements in digital signal processing, new opportunities for transmitting and receiving data at the same time and in the same frequency band are enabled. The main technical issue is still, however, an efficient removal of self-interference generated by the transmission signal interfering with the reception signal.
For removing the self-interference occurring in a conventional FD transceiver 100 as shown in Fig. 1, a receiver 102 should know an analog signal emitted by the transmitter 101 as precisely as possible. To this end, a reference signal 103 may be tapped from the transmitter 101, before it reaches one or more transmit antennas 104, and may be routed to the receiver 102. The receiver 102 demodulates the tapped signal separately from a desired signal, which is received via one or more receive antennas 105. The receiver 102 thus has both the desired signal plus a self-interference signal, as well as a reference self- interference signal. By subtracting the latter from the former, the receiver 102 can in theory almost perfectly remove the self-interference, and thus recover the desired signal. In practical systems, however, the self-interference reference signal 103 tapped from the transmitter 101 is corrupted by various analog effects - such as additive white noise or multiplicative phase noise - which means that the self-interference signal cannot be known perfectly to the receiver 102. Thus, even after subtracting the self-interference signal, the receiver 102 still has residual self-interference corrupting the desired signal. Since the self- interference signal received wirelessly is of much higher power than the desired signal - notably self-interference is transmitted very close to the receiver 102 - the residual self- interference can easily mask the desired signal, and can thus drastically degrade the performance of the FD transceiver 100.
Fig. 2 shows more details of a conventional FD transceiver 100, which was also considered when making the present invention. The FD transceiver 100 comprises the data transmitter 101 and the data receiver 102 already shown in Fig. 1. The transmitter 101 is specifically composed of a baseband processing unit 209, which is configured to shape an input digital signal into a baseband digital signal, a digital-to-analog (D/A) converter 210, which is configured to transform the digital baseband signal into an analog signal x(t), a local oscillator (LO) and mixer 211, which are configured to up- convert the analog signal to the relevant frequency band, a radio-frequency (RF) processing unit 212, which is configured to process and shape the analog signal, and a power amplifier (PA) 213, which is configured to feed the analog signal to the transmit antenna 104. The FD transceiver 100 also includes an analog link, which is configured to tap the analog signal fed by the PA 213 to the transmit antenna 104, and to provide the tapped signal as the reference signal 103 to the data receiver 102.
The receiver 102 contains the receive antenna 105, an analog canceller 206, which is configured to take the signal tapped from the transmitter 101 (the analog reference signal) and attempt removing a part of the self-interference signal, a first RF processing unit 207, which is configured to process and shape the analog signal fed from the receive antenna 105, and at least two mixers 201 driven by the same LO 202, which are configured to down- convert the received signal and the reference signal to the baseband, in order to obtain signals y(t) and yref(t), respectively. Importantly, the LO 202 may particularly experience phase-noise (receiver phase-noise effects) and frequency offsets. The receiver 102 also includes at least two A/D converters 203, which are configured to convert the received signal and the reference signal from analog into digital, and a digital canceller 204, which is configured to perform self-interference regeneration, in order to obtain a signal for digital self-interference cancellation. The digital canceller 204 is also configured to combine the cancellation signal with the signal coming from the receive antenna 105, and thus to subtract some self-interference from the received signal. Finally, the receiver 102 includes a baseband processing unit 205, which is configured to further process and shape the digital signal after the interference removal operation. The receiver 102 is interfered by the transmitter 101 as already described above with respect to Fig. 1. Performance degrading effects, which arise from this interference, are illustrated in the following model.
For simplicity, the presence of the desired signal is ignored, and only the problematic self- interference signal is considered. Therefore, in Fig. 2 y(t) represents the self-interference. This self-interference consists of multiple delayed copies of the signal x(t) transmitted by the transmitter 101, due to reflections in the environment around the FD transceiver 100. This is modeled through a multipath self-interference channel, represented as
Figure imgf000005_0001
wherein ci is the attenuation due to path i, and Δi is the delay due to path i. The reference channel is represented as a simple delay δ(t - Δref) wherein Δref is in general different from the delays Δi. Based on these models, the signal received from the reference channel is equal to x(t - Δref) and the signal received from the self-interference channel is equal to ∑i cix(t - Δi).
A key problem of the FD receiver 100 of Fig. 2 is related to the phase-noise generated in the receiving LO 202 (receiver phase noise effects). Thus, including the phase-noise, the signal received from the reference channel is equal to yref(t) = ejΦ(t)x(t - Δref) and the signal received from the self-interference channel is equal to y(f) = ejΦ(t)i cix(t - Δi).
From these two equations, it can be seen that although the signals coming from the reference and self-interference channel experience the same phase-noise effects, the phase- noise sample at time t, φ(ΐ) , ends up multiplying different delayed versions of the transmitted signal x(t). Specifically, when observing the reference signal yref, the phase- noise at time t multiplies the transmitted signal delayed by Δref. On the other hand, when observing path i of the self-interference signal y, the same phase-noise at time t multiplies the transmitted signal delayed by Δi. Thus, after going through the reference channel and the LO 202, the transmitted signal x(t) has the same phase-noise as the signal from the self-interference channel, but the same phase-noise is applied to different delayed versions of the transmitted signal. This mismatch, caused by the same phase-noise affecting the same signal but at different delays, causes a severe problem for the performance of the digital canceller 204 in the FD receiver 100.
Phase-noise processes are highly unpredictable and vary at a very fast rate. In these conditions, the canceller 204 of the conventional FD receiver 100 will not be able to track the equivalent channel between yref (tn) and y(tn) correctly, and the performance of the self-interference cancellation will degrade significantly. Fig. 4 illustrates this situation.
Namely, in Fig. 4, the larger the delay ΔI of the self-interference signal, the more difficult it is for the receiver 102 to track the phase-noise process, and in turn cancel the self- interference correctly. For relatively small delays - e.g. hundreds of nanoseconds - the degradation can attain more than 3dB.
One conventional approach of solving the above-described phase-noise issues of the conventional FD receiver 100 is acquiring more knowledge about the phase-noise process. Thus, it may subsequently be possible to better remove the phase-noise from both the reference signal and the received signal.
For example, side information about the phase-noise obtained from the way it affects the transmitted signal may be used, when this transmitted signal uses Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM). By means of this side information, some performance lost due to the phase-noise effects (see Fig. 4) can be recovered. However, it is usually not sufficient to cancel out the phase-noise effects completely. Moreover, this approach is quite complex, especially because it requires completely decoding the transmitted signal, in order to recover some partial information about the phase-noise process.
Another approach that may be implemented in conjunction to the above-described approach, consists in using existing pilot signals known in advance, in order to virtually decode the phase-noise on some part of the signal. Using such pilot signals, the receiver knows the phase-noise process at some positions in time, interleaved with data symbols, and is able to reconstruct the phase-noise process by using interpolation between these positions in time.
One extreme generalization of this solution is to even have complete knowledge of the digital signal that was sent by the transmitter 101, for instance, by using a baseband reference signal on top of the existing analog reference signal. Using such baseband reference signal, the whole signal becomes virtually a pilot signal, and it becomes in theory possible to recover the phase-noise process almost perfectly. In practical systems however, it may be rather difficult for the transmitter 101 and the receiver 102 to share information, since they may, for example, be in two different, physically separated boxes.
Thus, the phase-noise issues of the conventional FD receiver 100 are not satisfyingly solved. SUMMARY
In view of the above-mentioned problems and disadvantages, the present invention aims to improve a conventional FD transceiver and a corresponding receiving method. The present invention has the object to provide a FD transceiver and corresponding method, which is configured to perform efficient self-interference cancellation even in the presence of receiver phase-noise effects. Thus, the present invention desires a more effective removal of the self-interference from a received signal. Thereby, the present invention aims at a FD transceiver being well suited for practical systems.
The object of the present invention is achieved by the solution provided in the enclosed independent claims. Advantageous implementations of the present invention are further defined in the dependent claims. In particular the present invention proposes a FD transceiver and a corresponding receiving method for digital self-interference cancellation, wherein multiple analog references are tapped from a transmitter path, and are separated by non-zero delay lines.
A first aspect of the present invention provides a FD transceiver comprising a transmitter and a receiver, a link configured to tap an analog transmit signal of the transmitter, at least two non-equal delay lines, each delay line being configured to receive the tapped signal, and to delay the tapped signal to create an analog reference signal, a converter configured to digitalize the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of the receiver, and a digital canceller configured to generate a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals, and to combine the cancellation signal with the digitalized analog receive signal.
By generating the multiple, differently delayed analog reference signals, phase-noise effects occurring in the receiver and influencing the self-interference signal on the receive signal can be better compensated, and the self-interference can thus be removed from the digital receive signal more effectively. The FD transceiver of the first aspect is furthermore well suitable for practical implementations. In a first implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the first aspect, a plurality of mixers are configured to down-convert the analog reference signals and the analog receive signal to a receiver baseband of the transceiver, wherein the plurality of mixers are driven by a common local oscillator.
In a second implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the first aspect as such or according to the first implementation form of the first aspect, the digital canceller is or comprises at least one adaptive filter. An adaptive filter is a particularly effective and low complexity implementation of the digital canceller.
In a third implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the second implementation form of the first aspect, for generating the cancellation signal, the at least one adaptive filter is configured to perform a regeneration of self-interference, which is caused by the receiver receiving over an air interface the transmit signal from the transmitter.
Thereby, the self-interference signal can be effectively removed from the receive signal, even in the presence of phase-noise effects in the receiver LO.
In a fourth implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the second or third implementation form of the first aspect, the digital canceller is a bank of adaptive filters, preferably implemented as a block filter, each adaptive filter being fed with one of the digitalized analog reference signals.
The digital canceller can thus take into account each delayed version of the tapped reference signal, which allows estimating more precisely the multiple-path self- interference signal, and accordingly leads to a better removal thereof from the receive signal.
In a fifth implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the fourth implementation form of the first aspect, the output signal of the digital canceller is used to drive the adaptation of the adaptive filters. The feedback of the output signal allows to iteratively remove the self-interference signal more efficiently. In a sixth implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the fourth or fifth implementation forms of the first aspect, for generating the cancellation signal, the digital canceller is configured to assign a first weight to at least one tap of each adaptive filter, and to update the first weights by following a Normalized Least Mean Squares, NLMS, procedure.
In a seventh implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the sixth implementation form of the first aspect, for generating the cancellation signal, the digital canceller is configured to assign a second weight to the at least one tap of each adaptive filter, wherein a higher second weight is assigned to an adaptive filter, if the adaptive filter is fed with a digitalized analog reference signal stemming from an analog reference signal with a delay that is closer to a delay of the transmitter signal received over the air interface by the receiver from the transmitter.
By weighting the taps of the adaptive filters in the above-mentioned manner, the phase- noise effects can be taken into account more precisely, and the self-interference signal can be removed most effectively from the digital receive signal.
In an eighth implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the first aspect as such or according to any previous implementation form of the first aspect, the digital canceller is configured to estimate a phase-noise signal based on at least two of the analog or the digitalized analog reference signals, to remove the estimated phase-noise signal from the digitalized analog receive signal to obtain a phase-noise corrected receive signal, and to generate the cancellation signal based on the phase-noise corrected reference signal. Estimating the phase-noise signal using multiple analog references allows for an even better removal of the self-interference signal. Because multiple copies of the phase-noise are provided by virtue of the multiple analog reference signals with different delays, the phase-noise can be estimated better than conventionally. In a ninth implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the eighth implementation form of the first aspect, the transceiver further comprises a link configured to tap at least one baseband signal from a transmitter baseband of the transceiver, in order to obtain at least one digital baseband reference signal, wherein
the digital canceller is configured to generate the cancellation signal based on the at least one digital baseband reference signal and based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals.
Taking additionally the baseband reference signal further improves the removal of the self- interference signal.
In a tenth implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the eighth or ninth implementation form of the first aspect, the digital canceller is configured to remove the estimated phase-noise signal from at least one digitalized analog reference signal to obtain at least one phase-noise corrected reference signal, and to generate the cancellation signal based on the at least one phase-noise corrected reference signal.
In an eleventh implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the first aspect as such or according to any implementation form of the first aspect, the digital canceller is configured to estimate, before generating the cancellation signal, a phase-noise signal, and to remove the estimated phase-noise signal from each of the digital reference signals and from the digitalized analog receive signal.
Estimating the phase-noise signal allows for an even better removal of the self-interference signal.
In a twelfth implementation form of the FD transceiver according to the eleventh implementation form of the first aspect, the transceiver further comprises a link configured to tap at least one baseband signal from a transmitter baseband of the transceiver, in order to obtain at least one digital baseband reference signal, wherein the digital canceller is configured to estimate the phase-noise signal based on the at least one baseband reference signal and at least one digitalized analog reference signal. Taking additionally the baseband reference signal improves the estimation of the phase- noise signal, and thus effectively leads to a better removal of the self-interference signal.
A second aspect of the present invention provides a method for receiving a signal with a full-duplex, FD, transceiver, the method comprising the steps of tapping an analog transmit signal of a transmitter of the transceiver, providing the tapped signal with at least two non- equal delays to create at least two analog reference signals, digitalizing the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of a receiver of the transceiver, generating a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals, and combining the cancellation signal with digitalized analog receive signal.
In a first implementation form of the method according to the second aspect, the method further comprises down-converting the analog reference signals and the analog receive signal to a receiver baseband of the transceiver, wherein the plurality of mixers are driven by a common local oscillator.
In a second implementation form of the method according to the second aspect as such or according to the first implementation form of the second aspect, the cancellation signal is generated with at least one adaptive filter.
In a third implementation form of the method according to the second implementation form of the second aspect, the cancellation signal is generated by the at least one adaptive filter performing a regeneration of self-interference, which is caused by the receiver receiving over an air interface the transmit signal from the transmitter.
In a fourth implementation form of the method according to the second or third implementation form of the second aspect, the cancellation signal is generated with a bank of adaptive filters, preferably implemented as a block filter, each adaptive filter being fed with one of the digitalized analog reference signals.
In a fifth implementation form of the method according to the fourth implementation form of the second aspect, the method comprises using an output signal of the generation of the cancellation signal for driving the adaptation of the adaptive filters. In a sixth implementation form of the method according to the fourth or fifth implementation forms of the second aspect, for generating the cancellation signal, the cancellation signal is generated by assigning a first weight to at least one tap of each adaptive filter, and to update the first weights by following a Normalized Least Mean Squares, NLMS, procedure.
In a seventh implementation form of the method according to the sixth implementation form of the second aspect, the cancellation signal is generated by assigning a second weight to the at least one tap of each adaptive filter, wherein a higher second weight is assigned to an adaptive filter, if the adaptive filter is fed with a digitalized analog reference signal stemming from an analog reference signal with a delay that is closer to a delay of the transmitter signal received over the air interface by the receiver from the transmitter.
In an eighth implementation form of the method according to the second aspect as such or according to any previous implementation form of the second aspect, the method further comprises estimating a phase-noise signal based on at least two of the analog or the digitalized analog reference signals, removing the estimated phase-noise signal from the digitalized analog receive signal to obtain a phase-noise corrected receive signal, and generating the cancellation signal based on the phase-noise corrected receive signal.
In a ninth implementation form of the method according to the eighth implementation form of the second aspect, the method further comprises tapping at least one baseband signal from a transmitter baseband of the transceiver, in order to obtain at least one digital baseband reference signal, wherein the cancellation signal is generated based on the at least one digital baseband reference signal and based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals.
In a tenth implementation form of the method according to the eighth or ninth implementation form of the second aspect, the method comprises removing the estimated phase-noise signal from at least one digitalized analog reference signal to obtain at least one phase-noise corrected reference signal, and generating the cancellation signal based on the at least one phase-noise corrected reference signal. In an eleventh implementation form of the method according to the second aspect as such or according to any implementation form of the second aspect, the method further comprises estimating, before generating the cancellation signal, a phase-noise signal, and removing the estimated phase-noise signal from each of the digitalized analog reference signals and from the digitalized analog receive signal.
In a twelfth implementation form of the method according to the eleventh implementation form of the second aspect, the transceiver further comprises tapping at least one baseband signal from a transmitter baseband of the transceiver, in order to obtain at least one digital baseband reference signal, wherein the phase-noise signal is estimated based on the at least one baseband reference signal and at least one digitalized analog reference signal.
A second aspect of the present invention provides a computer program product comprising a computer-readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by at least one programmable processor, cause the at least one programmable processor to perform operations to implement the method of the second aspect as such or according to any implementation form of the second aspect.
With the method of the second aspect and its implementation forms, all effects and advantages of the FD transceiver of the first aspect and its implementation forms, respectively, can be achieved.
It has to be noted that all devices, elements, units and means described in the present application could be implemented in the software or hardware elements or any kind of combination thereof. All steps which are performed by the various entities described in the present application as well as the functionalities described to be performed by the various entities are intended to mean that the respective entity is adapted to or configured to perform the respective steps and functionalities. Even if, in the following description of specific embodiments, a specific functionality or step to be performed by external entities is not reflected in the description of a specific detailed element of that entity which performs that specific step or functionality, it should be clear for a skilled person that these methods and functionalities can be implemented in respective software or hardware elements, or any kind of combination thereof. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
The above described aspects and implementation forms of the present invention will be explained in the following description of general and specific embodiments in relation to the enclosed drawings, in which
Fig. 1 shows a basic wireless communication scenario with a conventional FD transceiver.
Fig. 2 shows a conventional FD transceiver.
Fig. 3 shows a digital canceller of a conventional FD transceiver.
Fig. 4 shows residual self-interference after digital self-interference cancellation in a conventional FD transceiver experiencing phase-noise (PN) effects based on the delay of the self-interference signal. The delay of the reference signal is supposed to be 0.
Fig. 5 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 6 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 7 shows FD transceivers according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 8 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 9 shows a comparison of the performance of a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention versus a conventional FD transceiver. Fig. 10 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 11 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 12 shows a FD transceiver according to an embodiment of the present invention. Fig. 13 shows a method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
The solution of the present invention is based on the insight that, in reality, the phase-noise process does not need to be separated from the receive signal. To illustrate this, reference is made to the following equation of the equivalent channel for the case of the single-tap self-interference channel. As shown in Fig. 3, the signals received from the reference and self-interference channels are affected by the same phase-noise φ(ί). The transmitted signal x(t) is convolved through both the reference channel frref (t) and the multi path self-interference channel hi (t), and is mixed in the LO 202 with the phase- noise 0(t) to obtain, respectively, the reference signal yref(t), and the self-interference signal y(t) . For clarity purposes, the presence of the desired signal is omitted in the equations. Using tn to denote the digital domain time samples, the inputs to the digital canceller 204 are given by: y(tn) = ejΦ(tn)icix(tn - Δi)
Figure imgf000016_0001
with Ts being the symbol rate, at which the system samples. The goal of the digital canceller 204 is to find the coefficients wi such that it can reconstruct y(tn) using its knowledge of yref (tn) . In mathematical terms, it aims at finding the coefficients {wj such that y(tn) = ∑i wtyref(tn - iTs).
The interplay between phase-noise and delay can be better demonstrated using the following example. Under the assumption that there is only one reflection in the self- interference channel, one obtains hI(t) = δ(t - ΔI).
The difference between the reference signal delay ΔI and the self-interference signal delay Δref matters substantially, when phase-noise is present in the system, because in this case the relation between y(tn) and yref(tn) is
Figure imgf000017_0001
The correct solution for the digital canceller 204 is then to have a single coefficient
Figure imgf000017_0002
Fig. 5 shows a FD transceiver 500 according to a general embodiment of the present invention. The FD transceiver 500 includes a transmitter 501 for transmitting signals, and a receiver 502 for receiving signals. With this FD transceiver 500, the above-mentioned problem of the phase-noise issues is solved in a different way than conventionally.
If ΔI is equal to ΔΚΕΡ, then there is no issue, and the receiver 502 will work perfectly. The problem is thus essentially a problem of delay. As long as the receiver 502 has a reference signal with a delay that matches the delay of the interference channel, the phase-noise will have no effect on the performance. In real systems, however, the self-interference channel is not a single-tap channel, but a multi-tap channel with multiple copies of the transmitted signal being received at different delays. In this case, the delay of the self-interference channel cannot be matched, because there are, in fact, multiple delays for the same signal. Thus, as the core of the present invention, it is ensured that the receiver 502 has access to multiple copies of the analog reference signal at different delays, in order to be able to match the multiple copies of the transmitted signal received on the self-interference channel.
Accordingly, the FD transceiver 500 comprises an analog link 503 configured to tap an analog transmit signal of the transmitter 501, and at least two non-equal delay lines 504, wherein each delay line 504 is configured to receive the tapped signal, and to delay the tapped signal, in order to create an analog reference signal.
Furthermore, the FD transceiver 500 comprises a converter 505 and a digital canceller 506, which are - as shown in Fig. 5 - preferably located in the receiver 502. However, the converter 505 and canceller 506 could also be separate and connected to the receiver 502. The converter 505 is specifically configured to digitalize the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of the receiver 502, respectively. The digital canceller 506 is configured to generate a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals, and further to combine the cancellation signal with the digitalized analog receive signal. By creating the delayed copies of the reference signals in the analog domain, it can be ensured that at each time all the different delayed copies are corrupted with the same phase- noise as the self-interference signal, thus one can use one or several of these copies for digital cancellation. The digital canceller 506 can thus more easily match the channel to provide a better estimate and cancellation of the self-interference signal, and the performance of the FD transceiver 500 is greatly improved.
A block diagram overview of possible components of a FD transceiver 500 according to embodiments of the present invention, which base on the FD receiver 500 shown in Fig. 5, is shown in Fig. 6. The FD receiver 500 comprises the transmitter 501 and the receiver 502. The transmitter 501 may have one or more transmit antennas 602, at least one D/A, and a LO driven mixer (similarly as the FD transceiver 100 shown in Fig. 2). The receiver 502 may have one or more receive antennas 603, a plurality of LO 601 driven mixers 600, a plurality of A/Ds 505, and the digital canceller 506. A link 503 between the transmitter 501 and the receiver 502 taps an analog signal, which is fed into the plurality of delays 504, in order to create the multiple analog reference signals. Optionally, another digital link 604 may provide a baseband reference signal from the transmitter 502 to the receiver 501.
The approach of the present invention with the FD transceiver 500 shown in Figs. 5 and 6 has numerous advantages over conventional FD transceivers. The main advantage, however, is that it is not necessary to decode the phase-noise, or the reference signal at all. In fact, as will be shown with respect to specific embodiments below, the phase-noise does not need to be treated in any specific way. The implementation of the digital canceller 506 naturally matches the delays that are experienced in the self-interference channel, and can thus recover the performance degradation caused by the phase-noise almost completely.
Using the multiple analog references - as shown in Figs. 5 and 6 - can also be used to improve conventional FD transceivers with phase-noise estimation techniques. In fact, since access to multiple copies of the phase-noise is provided by virtue of the added delays 504, phase-noise can be estimated better than in conventional FD transceivers.
Fig. 7 shows different principles of FD transceivers 500 according to embodiments of the present invention. On the left hand side, a FD transceiver 500 with multiple transmit antennas 602 connected to the transmitter 501, and multiple receive antennas 603 connected to the receiver 502 is shown. That is, the transmitted signal may be split to multiple transmit antennas 602, and the received signal may come from multiple reference antennas. On the right hand side, a FD transceiver 500 principle with one antenna 700 used for transmission and reception is shown. This transceiver 500 may be achieved when using a circulator 701. Of course, also multiple antennas 700 could be used for transmission and reception. The different principles of FD transceivers 500 shown in Fig. 7 can be applied to all specific embodiments of FD transceivers 500 of the present invention.
A FD transceiver 500 according to a specific embodiment is shown in Fig. 8. The embodiment bases on the FD transceiver 500 shown in Fig. 5. In this embodiment, N analog references are first converted to the digital domain, wherein each analog reference goes through a separate A/D converter 505. The resulting N digital signals are input to the digital canceller 506, which performs the self-interference regeneration. The digital canceller 506 is or comprises at least one adaptive filter 800, specifically it may be a bank of adaptive filters 800, preferably implemented as a block filter. Each adaptive filter 800 may be fed with at least one of the digitalized analog reference signals. The taps of each adaptive filter 800 are assigned a first weight w1 , which is updated following an Normalized Least Mean Squares (NLMS) type procedure combined with a further novel weight recalculation w2 that is a function of (1) the analog delay associated with analog reference j and (2) the total number of analog references N.
The novel custom NLMS implementation of the bank of adaptive filters 800, each with P taps, follows the following procedure. The adaptive filter input is defined as
Figure imgf000020_0001
where yref1 (tn) denotes the sample of signal yref1 at time tn . The filter weights are defined as
Figure imgf000020_0005
Here, w is the diagonal of the product between weights w1∈ C1XNP computed via conventional NLMS and weights w2∈ C1XNP, which are computed as a function of the analog delays associated with the analog references and the total number of analog references N. The estimate of the self-interference is computed as
Figure imgf000020_0002
The digital canceller 506 output is equal to
Figure imgf000020_0003
which is used to update the weights
Figure imgf000020_0004
The weights w2 (tn) can be constant for all tn hence computed offline. Intuitively, the weights w2 (tn) are used to give more weight to the signal coming from analog reference j, when the channel delay is closer to Δ^. In a multi path channel, the weights w2(tn) are also applied. In this multipath case if, for example, the channel has paths with delays Δi and Δj, then signals coming from analog references with delay closest to Δi and Δj are given the highest weights. As an example, for three analog references with corresponding delays Δ1 = 0 , Δ2 > Δ1 and Δ3 > Δ2 , and three corresponding adaptive filters 800 implemented in the block form explained above, a simple way to compute weights w2 (tn) is the following. First, the following preliminary weights are defined. The weights for the first adaptive filter 800 are all equal to 1. For the second adaptive filter 800, the weights that correspond to delays less than (Δ1 + Δ2)/2 are set equal to 0, and all others are set to 1. For the third adaptive filter 800, the weights that correspond to delays less than (Δ2 + Δ3)/2 are set equal to 0, and all others are set to 1. Finally, it is normalized such that the weights w2 (tn) applied to filter taps that correspond to same time instant tn sum to 1.
In this embodiment, only NLMS is explicitly considered, but the embodiment can also be implemented for any other type of adaptive filters 800, like Recursive Least Squares (RLS). For simplicity of notation, the equations above do not explicitly show the effect of noise, however, the signals y (tn) and y (tn) are affected by noise, due to hardware imperfections. Also, other methods for computation of w2 (tn) are possible, one trivial case being having all 1. Finally, it is noted that one advantage of this embodiment is that it does not require a baseband reference signal.
Fig. 9 shows the significant performance improvement of the FD transceiver 500 of Fig. 8 compared to a conventional FD transceiver (e.g. FD transceiver 100). On the y-axis, a residual self-interference on the receive signal is plotted in units of dBm. On the x-axis, a delay is plotted in unit of ns. It can be seen that in the embodiment of Fig. 8 (Embodiment 1 in Fig. 9), the residual self-interference is significantly lower than for the conventional FD transceiver 100 (state of the art, with phase-noise) for each delay.
Another specific embodiment of the FD transceiver 500 is shown in Fig. 10. In this embodiment, two analog references with different delay 504 (here 'Analog reference 1 ' is not delayed, while 'Analog reference 2' is delayed) are first converted to the digital domain, wherein each analog reference goes through a separate A/D converter 505. The resulting signals are used to estimate the phase-noise process via standard signal processing
Figure imgf000021_0001
in the digital canceller 506, which may include delay, conjugate, normalization and filtering. Other methods for estimation
Figure imgf000022_0002
from two reference signals are also possible.
This signal
Figure imgf000022_0001
is then used to correct (remove) the phase-noise from the signals that are used for the self-interference regeneration. The self-interference regeneration can be implemented using any kind of adaptive filter 800.
Another specific embodiment of the FD transceiver 500 is shown in Fig. 11. In this embodiment, like in Fig. 10, again two analog references are used to estimate the phase- noise process e via standard signal processing in the digital canceller 506, which may include delay, conjugate, normalization and filtering procedure. The processing can be implemented all in the analog domain (as shown in Fig. 11) or may be split between the analog and digital domain. Other methods for estimation
Figure imgf000022_0003
from two reference signals are also possible. The phase-noise correction signal
Figure imgf000022_0004
is then used to correct (remove) the phase-noise from the signal coming from the receive antenna 603. The phase- noise corrected signal and a baseband reference signal provided via link 604 from the transmitter 501 to the receiver 502 are used for the self-interference regeneration, which can be implemented using any kind of adaptive filter 800.
As an alternative implementation for this embodiment, a case without baseband reference may be considered, similar to the embodiment of Fig. 10. In this case, the embodiment of Fig. 11 is modified such that the phase-noise correction signal
Figure imgf000022_0007
is not only applied to the signal coming from the receive antenna 603, but it is also applied to one of the signals coming from the analog references (as in Fig. 10), and the resulting phase-noise corrected signals are used for self-interference regeneration. Another specific embodiment of the FD transceiver 500 is shown in Fig. 12. This embodiment uses one baseband reference provided via digital link 604 and N analog references provided via another analog link 503. The baseband reference and one of the digitalized analog references are used to obtain an estimate of the phase-noise process
Figure imgf000022_0005
. The signal
Figure imgf000022_0006
is then multiplied with all the N analog references and the signal coming from one or more receive antennas 603, thereby removing all or some part of the phase-noise. The resulting signals are input to adaptive filters 800, which perform the self-interference regeneration. The digital canceller 506 is implemented as a bank of adaptive filters 800, preferably implemented as a block filter. The signal regeneration follows a procedure analogous to the adaptive filter 800 implementation described for the embodiment of Fig. 8.
Fig. 13 illustrates a method 1300 for receiving a signal according to an embodiment of the present invention. The method 1300 is performed by a FD transceiver 500 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
The method 1300 comprises a first step 1301 of tapping an analog transmit signal of a transmitter 501 of the transceiver 500. In a second step 1302, the method 1300 comprises providing the tapped signal with at least two non-equal delays to create at least two analog reference signals. In a third step 1303, the method 1300 comprises digitalizing the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of a receiver 502 of the transceiver 500. In a fourth step 1304, the method 1300 comprises generating 1304 a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals. In a fifth step 1305, the method 1300 comprises combining the cancellation signal with the digitalized analog receive signal
The present invention has been described in conjunction with various embodiments as examples as well as implementations. However, other variations can be understood and effected by those persons skilled in the art and practicing the claimed invention, from the studies of the drawings, this disclosure and the independent claims. In the claims as well as in the description the word "comprising" does not exclude other elements or steps and the indefinite article "a" or "an" does not exclude a plurality. A single element or other unit may fulfill the functions of several entities or items recited in the claims. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in the mutual different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used in an advantageous implementation.

Claims

Claims
1. Full-Duplex, FD, transceiver (500) comprising
a transmitter (501) and a receiver (502),
a link (503) configured to tap an analog transmit signal of the transmitter (501), at least two non-equal delay lines (504), each delay line (504) being configured to receive the tapped signal, and to delay the tapped signal to create an analog reference signal, a converter (505) configured to digitalize the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of the receiver (502), and
a digital canceller (506) configured to generate a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals, and to combine the cancellation signal with the digitalized analog receive signal.
2. FD transceiver (500) according to claim 1, further comprising
a plurality of mixers (600) configured to down-convert the analog reference signals and the analog receive signal to a receiver baseband of the transceiver (502),
wherein the plurality of mixers (600) are driven by a common local oscillator (601).
3. FD transceiver (500) according to claim 1 or 2, wherein
the digital canceller (506) is or comprises at least one adaptive filter (800).
4. FD transceiver (500) according to claim 3, wherein for generating the cancellation signal, the at least one adaptive filter (800) is configured to perform a regeneration of self- interference, which is caused by the receiver (502) receiving over an air interface the transmit signal from the transmitter (501).
5. FD transceiver (500) according to one of claims 3 to 4, wherein
the digital canceller (506) is a bank of adaptive filters, preferably implemented as a block filter, each adaptive filter (800) being fed with one of the digitalized analog reference signals.
6. FD transceiver (500) according to claim 5, wherein
the output signal of the digital canceller (506) is used to drive the adaptation of the adaptive filters (800).
7. FD transceiver (500) according to claim 5 or 6, wherein for generating the cancellation signal,
the digital canceller (506) is configured to assign a first weight to at least one tap of each adaptive filter (800), and to update the first weights by following a Normalized Least Mean Squares, NLMS, procedure.
8. FD transceiver (500) according to claim 7, wherein for generating the cancellation signal,
the digital canceller (506) is configured to assign a second weight to the at least one tap of each adaptive filter (800),
wherein a higher second weight is assigned to an adaptive filter (800), if the adaptive filter (800) is fed with a digitalized analog reference signal stemming from an analog reference signal with a delay that is closer to a delay of the transmitter signal received over the air interface by the receiver (502) from the transmitter (501).
9. FD transceiver (500) according to one of claims 1 to 8, wherein
the digital canceller (506) is configured to estimate a phase-noise signal based on at least two of the analog or the digitalized analog reference signals, to remove the estimated phase-noise signal from the digitalized analog receive signal to obtain a phase- noise corrected receive signal, and to generate the cancellation signal based on the phase- noise corrected reference signal.
10. FD transceiver (500) according to claim 9, further comprising
a link (604) configured to tap at least one baseband signal from a transmitter baseband of the transceiver (500), in order to obtain at least one digital baseband reference signal, wherein
the digital canceller (506) is configured to generate the cancellation signal based on the at least one digital baseband reference signal and based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals.
11. FD transceiver (500) according to claim 9 or 10, wherein
the digital canceller (506) is configured to remove the estimated phase-noise signal from at least one digitalized analog reference signal to obtain at least one phase-noise corrected reference signal, and to generate the cancellation signal based on the at least one phase-noise corrected reference signal.
12. FD transceiver (500) according to one of claims 1 to 8, wherein
the digital canceller (506) is configured to estimate, before generating the cancellation signal, a phase-noise signal, and to remove the estimated phase-noise signal from each of the digitalized analog reference signals and from the digital receive signal.
13. FD transceiver (500) according to claim 12, further comprising
a link (604) configured to tap at least one baseband signal from a transmitter baseband of the transceiver (500), in order to obtain at least one digital baseband reference signal, wherein
the digital canceller (506) is configured to estimate the phase-noise signal based on the at least one baseband reference signal and at least one digitalized analog reference signal.
14. Method (1300) for receiving a signal with a full-duplex, FD, transceiver (500), the method (1300) comprising the steps of
tapping (1301) an analog transmit signal of a transmitter (501) of the transceiver (500),
providing (1302) the tapped signal with at least two non-equal delays to create at least two analog reference signals,
digitalizing (1303) the at least two analog reference signals and an analog receive signal of a receiver (502) of the transceiver (500),
generating (1304) a cancellation signal based on the at least two digitalized analog reference signals, and
combining (1305) the cancellation signal with the digitalized analog receive signal.
15. A computer program product comprising a computer-readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by at least one programmable processor, cause the at least one programmable processor to perform operations to implement the method according to claim 14.
PCT/EP2017/053976 2017-02-22 2017-02-22 Full-duplex transceiver and receiving method WO2018153439A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201780087098.0A CN110521128B (en) 2017-02-22 2017-02-22 Full-duplex transceiver and receiving method
PCT/EP2017/053976 WO2018153439A1 (en) 2017-02-22 2017-02-22 Full-duplex transceiver and receiving method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2017/053976 WO2018153439A1 (en) 2017-02-22 2017-02-22 Full-duplex transceiver and receiving method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018153439A1 true WO2018153439A1 (en) 2018-08-30

Family

ID=58098627

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2017/053976 WO2018153439A1 (en) 2017-02-22 2017-02-22 Full-duplex transceiver and receiving method

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110521128B (en)
WO (1) WO2018153439A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2022122155A1 (en) * 2020-12-10 2022-06-16 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Full-duplex transceiver and method for operating the same
WO2022187630A1 (en) * 2021-03-04 2022-09-09 The Government Of The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Methods and apparatuses for adaptive sub-band filtering

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130301488A1 (en) * 2012-02-08 2013-11-14 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Systems and methods for cancelling interference using multiple attenuation delays
US20140247757A1 (en) * 2013-03-01 2014-09-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Multi-tap adaptive filter for transmit signal leakage cancellation
US20150049834A1 (en) * 2013-08-14 2015-02-19 Kumu Networks, Inc. Systems and methods for phase noise mitigation
US20150270865A1 (en) * 2014-03-19 2015-09-24 Trellisware Technologies, Inc. Joint analog and digital interference cancellation in wireless systems

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104521148B (en) * 2012-06-08 2016-08-24 利兰斯坦福青年大学托管委员会 Multiple decay time delay is used to eliminate the system and method for interference
CN103427872B (en) * 2013-09-03 2015-01-21 电子科技大学 Same-time same-frequency full duplex multi-tap radio frequency self-interference offset system and method
CN104935540B (en) * 2015-05-21 2018-12-07 电子科技大学 A kind of co-channel full duplex limit self-interference cancellation method simultaneously

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130301488A1 (en) * 2012-02-08 2013-11-14 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Systems and methods for cancelling interference using multiple attenuation delays
US20140247757A1 (en) * 2013-03-01 2014-09-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Multi-tap adaptive filter for transmit signal leakage cancellation
US20150049834A1 (en) * 2013-08-14 2015-02-19 Kumu Networks, Inc. Systems and methods for phase noise mitigation
US20150270865A1 (en) * 2014-03-19 2015-09-24 Trellisware Technologies, Inc. Joint analog and digital interference cancellation in wireless systems

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ACHALESHWAR SAHAI ET AL: "Understanding the impact of phase noise on active cancellation in wireless full-duplex", ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS. CONFERENCE RECORD, IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY, US, 4 November 2012 (2012-11-04), pages 29 - 33, XP032350857, ISSN: 1058-6393, ISBN: 978-1-4673-5050-1, DOI: 10.1109/ACSSC.2012.6488952 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2022122155A1 (en) * 2020-12-10 2022-06-16 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Full-duplex transceiver and method for operating the same
WO2022187630A1 (en) * 2021-03-04 2022-09-09 The Government Of The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Methods and apparatuses for adaptive sub-band filtering

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110521128B (en) 2021-04-20
CN110521128A (en) 2019-11-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11664836B2 (en) Passive intermodulation cancellation
US10644731B2 (en) Radio frequency transmitter noise cancellation
JP5524345B2 (en) Intermodulation distortion cancellation integrated circuit, communication unit and method
EP3210307B1 (en) Full duplex radio with tx leakage cancellation
WO2011053887A1 (en) Methods and systems for interference cancellation in multi-mode coexistence modems
US20150244450A1 (en) Echo cancellation in communication transceivers
WO2013008117A1 (en) Electronic duplexer
Motz et al. A survey on self-interference cancellation in mobile LTE-A/5G FDD transceivers
US8576965B2 (en) Methods and systems for interference cancellation in multi-mode coexistence modems
CN112970232B (en) Method, equipment and system for eliminating interference
WO2018153439A1 (en) Full-duplex transceiver and receiving method
US10873360B2 (en) Self-interference cancellation system and method
JP4740069B2 (en) Wraparound canceller
US10587349B2 (en) Frequency domain based digital cancellation of modulated spur interference in LTE-CA transceivers
JP6340118B2 (en) Sneak path estimation device and sneak canceller
US10498386B2 (en) Interference suppression in a radio transceiver device
WO2008140162A1 (en) On-channel repeater and on-channel repeating method
JP4017323B2 (en) Wraparound canceller
KR100976726B1 (en) On-channel repeater and its method
JP2004147118A (en) Sneak canceller
EP2814184B1 (en) Two stage leakage cancellation in full duplex communication
WO2016062576A2 (en) Full duplex radio
JP2009159455A (en) Sneak canceler
JP2009033219A (en) Radio relay device
MXPA98000841A (en) Cancellation of autointerference for communication bipartita retransmit

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 17706476

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 17706476

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1