WO2018115423A1 - Fatigue load minimization in an operation of a wind farm - Google Patents

Fatigue load minimization in an operation of a wind farm Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018115423A1
WO2018115423A1 PCT/EP2017/084350 EP2017084350W WO2018115423A1 WO 2018115423 A1 WO2018115423 A1 WO 2018115423A1 EP 2017084350 W EP2017084350 W EP 2017084350W WO 2018115423 A1 WO2018115423 A1 WO 2018115423A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
local
wind
load
controller
wind turbines
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2017/084350
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Haoran Zhao
Qiuwei WU
Shaojun Huang
Zhaoxi LIU
Original Assignee
Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Danmarks Tekniske Universitet filed Critical Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Publication of WO2018115423A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018115423A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D7/00Controlling wind motors 
    • F03D7/02Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
    • F03D7/028Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor controlling wind motor output power
    • F03D7/0292Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor controlling wind motor output power to reduce fatigue
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D7/00Controlling wind motors 
    • F03D7/02Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
    • F03D7/04Automatic control; Regulation
    • F03D7/042Automatic control; Regulation by means of an electrical or electronic controller
    • F03D7/048Automatic control; Regulation by means of an electrical or electronic controller controlling wind farms
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2270/00Control
    • F05B2270/10Purpose of the control system
    • F05B2270/103Purpose of the control system to affect the output of the engine
    • F05B2270/1033Power (if explicitly mentioned)
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2270/00Control
    • F05B2270/30Control parameters, e.g. input parameters
    • F05B2270/332Maximum loads or fatigue criteria
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/20Administration of product repair or maintenance
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70Wind energy
    • Y02E10/72Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to a method and system for controlling an operation of a wind farm having a number of wind turbines by introducing a load sensitivity exchange signal and distributing optimization calculations for minimizing the fatigue load of the wind turbines.
  • Wind power is the fastest growing Renewable Energy Resource (RES). With the increasing penetration level, the variability and uncertainty of wind power have brought new technical challenges to the power system operation.
  • the technical requirements for wind power integration are more stringent. This includes that the wind farm shall be capable of tracking the power reference from the grid provided by the system operator.
  • WTGs Wind Turbine Generators
  • the first dispatch schemes for the power references to the WTGs only focused on the power reference tracking.
  • the power references in these systems were proportionally distributed to individual WTGs according to either the available power or the actual output power.
  • the present disclosure relates to a method for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, the wind farm comprising a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller, the method comprising the steps of:
  • the proposed dispatch algorithm is suitable for real-time control of large-scale wind farms.
  • the load sensitivity based optimal active power dispatch algorithm overcomes the problem of the known approaches of having either a centralized or a distributed approach by defining and introducing a measure of the sensitivity of fatigue loads of the wind turbines in relation to their power references. In this manner the sensitivity loads can be minimized while tracking the wind farm power reference.
  • the formulation of the optimal dispatch algorithm for this purpose can be simplified without considering the high order wind farm model, and most computation tasks can be undertaken by the local controllers in the wind turbines. Expression of the load sensitivities are derived, which may significantly improve the calculation efficiency of the local controllers.
  • the optimal problem may be solved in a centralized manner while the computation burden in the central controller is largely reduced. In contrast to the known distributed schemes, no additional iterations are required.
  • the fatigue load of a wind turbine may comprise the load of the drive train due to the torsion of the shaft and the load of the tower structure due to the tower deflection in the wind turbine. Compared to the static loads, the dynamic stress causing the structural damage is typically a bigger issue of wind turbines.
  • the load sensitivity exchange signal of the presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind farm may indicate an expected fatigue load change as a result of the local power reference of the wind turbine. This information can be used in the central controller for solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines, and based on the solved optimal dispatch algorithm provide local power references to the local controllers.
  • the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load may comprise a minimization of the total shaft torque and thrust force variation for all wind turbines.
  • a control objective of the system typically also includes tracking power references from the system operator i.e. complying with power requirements, such as active power requirements, provided by the grid. Therefore, in one embodiment the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines comprises the step of complying with power reference requirements provided by the grid. The step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load may also comprise the step of minimizing a difference between a total generated power of all wind turbines and the power reference provided by the grid.
  • the present disclosure further relates to a system for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, the system comprising:
  • At least one central controller comprising a central hardware processor and at least a first non-transitive, computer-readable storage device for storing instructions that, when executed by the central hardware processor, causes the at least one central hardware processor to perform the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines according to presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, thereby providing local power references to each of the local controllers;
  • each local controller comprising a local hardware
  • processors for each of a plurality of local wind turbines, and secondary non- transitive, computer-readable storage devices associated with the local hardware processors for storing instructions that, when executed by the local hardware processors, perform the step of calculating load sensitivities according to the presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid.
  • the local controllers may comprise local communication units for communicating the calculated load sensitivities to the central controller.
  • the local controllers are configured to communicate load sensitivities indicating expected fatigue load changes for each of the local wind turbines a result of the local power references to each of the wind turbines.
  • the central controller may comprise a central
  • Fig. 1 provides an example of the central controller (102) and local controllers (101 ) in relation to each other and in relation to the grid (103) and the wind turbines (104).
  • the local controllers (101 ) provide load sensitivities (105) to the central controller (102) and the central controller provide local power references (106) to the local controllers (101 ).
  • a central processing unit configured to perform the steps of solving the optimal dispatch algorithm
  • local processing units in the local controllers configured to perform the step of calculating load sensitivities.
  • Fig. 1 shows a wind farm control structure according to the presently disclosed method and system for controlling an operation of a wind farm.
  • Fig. 2 shows a model of an individual wind turbine having a local controller.
  • Fig. 3 shows a first example of power reference tracking for a wind farm using a conventional proportionally distributed power reference approach and the presently disclosed optimal algorithm.
  • Fig. 4 shows fatigue load diagrams for the conventional algorithm and the presently disclosed optimal algorithm of the first example.
  • Fig. 5 shows a second example of power reference tracking for a wind farm using a conventional proportionally distributed power reference approach and the presently disclosed optimal algorithm.
  • Fig. 6 shows fatigue load diagrams for the conventional algorithm and the presently disclosed optimal algorithm of the second example. Detailed description of the invention
  • the present disclosure relates to a method and a system for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid.
  • the wind farm comprises a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller.
  • the method introduces an exchange signal between the local controllers and the central controller, wherein said exchange signal comprises a calculated load sensitivity.
  • the load sensitivity may be based on fluctuations of at least one fatigue load parameter the individual wind turbines.
  • the central controller solves an optimal dispatch algorithm to minimize an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines, wherein the problem formulation is based on the load sensitivities.
  • the solving of the optimal dispatch algorithm may involve the provision of local power references to the local controllers.
  • the central controller also takes into account the power reference tracking provided by the grid in the control of the local power references of the controllers.
  • FIG. 1 An embodiment of a wind farm control structure according to the presently disclosed system and method is shown in fig. 1 .
  • the system comprises is a central controller and i local WTG controllers. Between the grid and the system controller there is a power reference from the grid, provided by the system operator, to the wind farm
  • the local controllers may also provide power reference constraints f tne individual WTGs.
  • the central controller may provide power references to the WTGs.
  • the method and system are suitable for real-time or substantially real-time control of a wind farm comprising a plurality of WTGs.
  • the method and system may also be applied on large scale wind farms, such as in systems comprising more than 50, or more than 100, or more than 200 WTGs.
  • the present disclosure relates to a method for controlling the operation of a wind farm and system for performing the method.
  • One embodiment of the system comprises a central processing unit configured to perform the steps of solving the optimal dispatch algorithm, and a number of local processing units in the local controllers configured to perform the step of calculating load sensitivities.
  • the system comprises a first non-transitive, computer-readable storage device for storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, performs the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines.
  • the system may further comprise secondary non-transitive, computer-readable storage devices for storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, performs the step of calculating load sensitivities in the local controllers.
  • the secondary non-transitive, computer-readable storage devices may be placed in the local controllers.
  • the present disclosure further relates to a windfarm comprising a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller, wherein the central and local controllers are configured to perform the presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind.
  • the at least one fatigue load parameter of said wind turbine may a load of a drive train of each wind turbine.
  • the at least one fatigue load parameter may also be related to an aerodynamic torque T n and a thrust force F t .
  • the at least one fatigue load parameter may represent a measure of shaft torque fluctuations and/or thrust force fluctuations of each wind turbine.
  • the at least one fatigue load parameter may also represent an internal structural load of the wind turbine.
  • the fatigue load parameters may have a significant impact on the lifetime of the WTGs.
  • the fatigue load parameters may be based on a wind speed, and/or a pitch angle and/or a rotor generation speed of the wind turbine.
  • Fig. 2 shows a model of an individual wind turbine having a local controller.
  • the local controller receives a local power reference from the central controller.
  • the WTG The WTG
  • the turbine may further comprise parts for modelling a tower, aerodynamics, a pitch actuator, a drive train and a generator and may represent a variable speed pitch-controlled wind turbine.
  • the sampling time of the wind farm controller T s may be in seconds. Therefore, the fast dynamics in the generator and pitch actuator may, as one option, be ignored.
  • the oscillations in the shaft torsion and tower nodding may also be disregarded to reduce the model complexity.
  • a simplified non-linear wind turbine model with a local control may be introduced, which is used to calculate the load sensitivities.
  • An aerodynamic torque T a and thrust force F may be used as sources of nonlinearities, calculated by:
  • C p and C are the power coefficient and thrust coefficient, respectively, R is the length of the blade, p is the air density, v r is the effective wind speed on the rotor, and ⁇ is the tip speed ratio, defined by
  • ⁇ ⁇ and ⁇ are the rotor and generator speed, respectively, and ⁇ 9 is the gear box ratio.
  • the vector control may be used to ensure a fast (in milliseconds) and accurate response. Since the dynamic is neglected, the generator torque T g is approximately equal to its reference, i.e. T g ⁇ T g _ ref . Load sensitivity
  • the load sensitivity may comprise one part corresponding to a load of the drive train due to torsion of the shaft and one part corresponding to the load of the tower structure due to tower deflection.
  • the load sensitivity may be a dynamic load or a dynamic stress. Compared with static load, the dynamic stress causing the structural damage is typically a bigger issue for a WTG. In the presently disclosed method fluctuations of the shaft torque T s and thrust force F, may be damped, which reduces the related fatigue loads.
  • the load sensitivities may therefore comprise components related to
  • the load sensitivity indicates an expected fatigue load change as a result of the local power reference of the wind turbine or as a result of the actual generated power of the wind turbine. The following section describes how the load sensitivities may be calculated.
  • the time of the operating point may be t 0 .
  • the wind speed v r may be estimated or measured.
  • equations of ⁇ g and ⁇ may be derived:
  • K c0 f c (P g o, ⁇ 0 ).
  • One embodiment of the presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind farm further comprises the step of calculating local pitch angle and/or generator torque references in the local controller of each wind turbine based on the local power reference for each controller.
  • ⁇ ⁇ and ⁇ g representing changes in the torque a certain point in time, can be calculated as:
  • the partial derivatives of T a then may be calculated as:
  • the nonlinear function C p can be identified as a Piece-Wise
  • a first load sensitivity component - may then be calculated as:
  • the derived load sensitivity first component may comprise two parts.
  • a first part, part 1 is dependent only on the operating point.
  • a second part, part 2 is dependent both on the operating point and the deviation of the power reference from the central
  • a second load sensitivity component may be calculated as:
  • the derived load sensitivity second component may comprise two parts.
  • a first part, part 1 is a constant, dependent only on the operating point and the second part, part 2, is a variable, dependent both on the operating point and the deviation of the power reference ⁇ ⁇ from the central controller to the local controller.
  • an optimal dispatch algorithm may be formulated and solved.
  • a first control objective of minimizing the fatigue loads of the WTGs may be introduced.
  • Minimization of the fatigue loads of the WTGs may comprise minimization of T s and F t .
  • a second control objective of tracking the power reference tracking provided by the grid, may also be used.
  • the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines comprises the step of complying with power reference requirements provided by the grid.
  • the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load may further comprise the step of minimizing a difference between a total generated power of all wind turbines and the power reference provided by the grid.
  • a cost function may be introduced. If a wind farm comprises Nwt wind turbines a control vector u may be defined as:
  • the optimization problem can then be formulated as: where is a weighting factor which penalizes the variation Ts of the /th WTG, and
  • Qp t is the weighting factor which penalizes the variation of Ft of the /th WTG.
  • the total shaft torque and thrust force variation comprises a weighting factor for each wind turbine.
  • the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load may therefore comprise minimization of a total shaft torque and thrust force variation for all wind turbines.
  • constraints that may be taken into account are the power reference tracking of the WTGs: and local constraints of ⁇ and ⁇ T g .For individual WTGs there may be incremental constraints in the local WTG controller. Based on the derived incremental state space model, these constraints can be equivalently transformed into the constraints of control variable u,. A feasible range of u, may also be sent to the central controller.
  • the exchange signal further comprises at least one physical limitation parameter of the wind turbine.
  • the at least one physical limitation parameter comprises a power feasible operation range, and/or a generator torque range, and/or a pitch angle range.
  • a feasible operation range may be expressed as: wherein represents a minimum suitable power reference to the local controller and x represents a maximum suitable power reference to the local controller.
  • the local power references to each of the local controllers may represent upper limits of the power production of the individual wind turbines.
  • a wind farm comprising 10x5MW wind turbines.
  • Case 1 the ramp rate limitation control was tested. Over a simulation time of 300 seconds the active power of the wind farm was observed.
  • Fig. 3 shows a first example of power reference tracking for a wind farm using a conventional proportionally distributed power reference approach and the presently disclosed optimal algorithm. It can be observed that P wfc of both algorithms follow the reference closely.
  • the Damage Equivalent Load (DEL), based on Miner's rule and dependent on materials properties specified by the slope of the S-N curve, may also be used to quantify the load minimization.
  • Table 1 shows the calculated DELs for all wind turbines of the Case 1 setup.
  • Case 2 a balance control scheme, wherein the wind farm production is reduced to specified constant level, is shown.
  • balance control is applied i.e.:
  • Fig. 5 illustrates the available wind power for both a conventional proportional dispatch algorithm (CON) and the presently disclosed method (OPT). It can be observed that P wfc of both OPT and CON track the reference closely.
  • fig. 6A shows the variations of T s .
  • the variation of the shaft torque ⁇ s is significantly reduced for the presently disclosed OPT approach.
  • According to the cumulative rainflow cycles in fig. 6B less cycles are found for the OPT approach, which implies less fatigue loads experienced by the wind turbine.
  • the at least one fatigue load parameter is a load of a drive train of each wind turbine 3.
  • the at least one fatigue load parameter is a measure of shaft torque fluctuations and/or thrust force fluctuations of each wind turbine. 4.
  • the at least one fatigue load parameter is based on a wind speed, and/or a pitch angle and/or a rotor generation speed of the wind turbine. 6. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the load
  • the exchange signal further comprises at least one physical limitation parameter of the wind turbine.
  • the at least one physical limitation parameter comprises a power feasible operation range, and/or a generator torque range, and/or a pitch angle range.
  • solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load comprises minimization of a total shaft torque and thrust force variation for all wind turbines.
  • solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load comprises the step of minimizing a difference between a total generated power of all wind turbines and the power reference provided by the grid.
  • a system configured to perform the method according to any of items 1-15. 17.
  • the system according to item 16 comprising a central processing unit
  • a windfarm comprising a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller, wherein the central and local controllers are configured to perform the method for controlling an operation of a wind farm according to any of items 1 -15.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Wind Motors (AREA)

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a method and system for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, the wind farm comprising a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller, the method comprising the steps of: calculating a load sensitivity in the local controller of each wind turbine based on fluctuations of at least one fatigue load parameter of said wind turbine; providing an exchange signal between each of the local controllers and the central controller, said exchange signal comprising the calculated load sensitivity; solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines in the central controller based on the calculated load sensitivities of the wind turbines and power reference tracking provided by the grid, thereby providing local power references to each of the local controllers. The disclosure further relates to system for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, the system comprising: at least one central controller comprising a central hardware processor and at least a first non-transitive, computer-readable storage device for storing instructions that, when executed by the central hardware processor, causes the at least one central hardware processor to perform the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines according to the disclosed method, thereby providing local power references to each of the local controllers; and local controllers, each local controller comprising a local hardware processor for each of a plurality of local wind turbines, and secondary non-transitive, computer-readable storage devices associated with the local hardware processors for storing instructions that, when executed by the local hardware processors, perform the step of calculating load sensitivities according to the disclosed method.

Description

Fatigue load minimization in an operation of a wind farm
The present disclosure relates to a method and system for controlling an operation of a wind farm having a number of wind turbines by introducing a load sensitivity exchange signal and distributing optimization calculations for minimizing the fatigue load of the wind turbines.
Background of invention
Wind power is the fastest growing Renewable Energy Resource (RES). With the increasing penetration level, the variability and uncertainty of wind power have brought new technical challenges to the power system operation. The technical requirements for wind power integration are more stringent. This includes that the wind farm shall be capable of tracking the power reference from the grid provided by the system operator.
With the fast development of power electronics, the controllability of modern Wind Turbine Generators (WTGs) has been largely improved. When the required wind farm power is less than the maximum available power, the WTGs will limit the power production and operate at the derated mode.
The first dispatch schemes for the power references to the WTGs only focused on the power reference tracking. The power references in these systems were proportionally distributed to individual WTGs according to either the available power or the actual output power.
In recent studies, several multi-objective dispatch algorithms have been proposed. On top of providing the desired power production, the fatigue loads are minimized by coordination among WTGs. One known solution is to formulate the wind farm as a coupled, constrained multiple input and multiple output (MIMO) system. One problem with such an approach is that the order of such a system drastically grows with the increasing number of WTGs, which makes the system complex and unmanageable for real-time application.
If the formulated optimal problem is instead solved in a distributed manner, the computation burden at one place is reduced. However, in order to guarantee the optimality, iteration among the WTGs is required which introduces very demanding requirements on the communication speeds between parts of the system.
Summary of invention
The present disclosure relates to a method for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, the wind farm comprising a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller, the method comprising the steps of:
- calculating a load sensitivity in the local controller of each wind turbine
based on fluctuations of at least one fatigue load parameter of said wind turbine;
- providing an exchange signal between each of the local controllers and the central controller, said exchange signal comprising the calculated load sensitivity;
- solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines in the central controller based on the calculated load sensitivities of the wind turbines and power reference tracking provided by the grid, thereby providing local power references to each of the local controllers. The proposed dispatch algorithm is suitable for real-time control of large-scale wind farms. The load sensitivity based optimal active power dispatch algorithm overcomes the problem of the known approaches of having either a centralized or a distributed approach by defining and introducing a measure of the sensitivity of fatigue loads of the wind turbines in relation to their power references. In this manner the sensitivity loads can be minimized while tracking the wind farm power reference. The formulation of the optimal dispatch algorithm for this purpose can be simplified without considering the high order wind farm model, and most computation tasks can be undertaken by the local controllers in the wind turbines. Expression of the load sensitivities are derived, which may significantly improve the calculation efficiency of the local controllers. Thus, according to the present disclosure, the optimal problem may be solved in a centralized manner while the computation burden in the central controller is largely reduced. In contrast to the known distributed schemes, no additional iterations are required.
The fatigue load of a wind turbine may comprise the load of the drive train due to the torsion of the shaft and the load of the tower structure due to the tower deflection in the wind turbine. Compared to the static loads, the dynamic stress causing the structural damage is typically a bigger issue of wind turbines. The load sensitivity exchange signal of the presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind farm may indicate an expected fatigue load change as a result of the local power reference of the wind turbine. This information can be used in the central controller for solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines, and based on the solved optimal dispatch algorithm provide local power references to the local controllers. The step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load may comprise a minimization of the total shaft torque and thrust force variation for all wind turbines.
A control objective of the system typically also includes tracking power references from the system operator i.e. complying with power requirements, such as active power requirements, provided by the grid. Therefore, in one embodiment the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines comprises the step of complying with power reference requirements provided by the grid. The step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load may also comprise the step of minimizing a difference between a total generated power of all wind turbines and the power reference provided by the grid.
The present disclosure further relates to a system for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, the system comprising:
- at least one central controller comprising a central hardware processor and at least a first non-transitive, computer-readable storage device for storing instructions that, when executed by the central hardware processor, causes the at least one central hardware processor to perform the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines according to presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, thereby providing local power references to each of the local controllers; and
- local controllers, each local controller comprising a local hardware
processor for each of a plurality of local wind turbines, and secondary non- transitive, computer-readable storage devices associated with the local hardware processors for storing instructions that, when executed by the local hardware processors, perform the step of calculating load sensitivities according to the presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid.
The local controllers may comprise local communication units for communicating the calculated load sensitivities to the central controller. In one embodiment the local controllers are configured to communicate load sensitivities indicating expected fatigue load changes for each of the local wind turbines a result of the local power references to each of the wind turbines.The central controller may comprise a central
communication unit for communicating local power references to each of the local controllers. The communication units may be adapted to use any suitable means of communication for communicating the exchange signals, including any wireless or wired communication. This applies in both directions, i.e. for the central and local controllers. Fig. 1 provides an example of the central controller (102) and local controllers (101 ) in relation to each other and in relation to the grid (103) and the wind turbines (104). The local controllers (101 ) provide load sensitivities (105) to the central controller (102) and the central controller provide local power references (106) to the local controllers (101 ).
Preferably in such a system there is a central processing unit configured to perform the steps of solving the optimal dispatch algorithm, and local processing units in the local controllers configured to perform the step of calculating load sensitivities.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 shows a wind farm control structure according to the presently disclosed method and system for controlling an operation of a wind farm.
Fig. 2 shows a model of an individual wind turbine having a local controller.
Fig. 3 shows a first example of power reference tracking for a wind farm using a conventional proportionally distributed power reference approach and the presently disclosed optimal algorithm.
Fig. 4 shows fatigue load diagrams for the conventional algorithm and the presently disclosed optimal algorithm of the first example.
Fig. 5 shows a second example of power reference tracking for a wind farm using a conventional proportionally distributed power reference approach and the presently disclosed optimal algorithm.
Fig. 6 shows fatigue load diagrams for the conventional algorithm and the presently disclosed optimal algorithm of the second example. Detailed description of the invention
The present disclosure relates to a method and a system for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid. The wind farm comprises a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller. The method introduces an exchange signal between the local controllers and the central controller, wherein said exchange signal comprises a calculated load sensitivity. The load sensitivity may be based on fluctuations of at least one fatigue load parameter the individual wind turbines. Preferably the central controller then solves an optimal dispatch algorithm to minimize an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines, wherein the problem formulation is based on the load sensitivities. The solving of the optimal dispatch algorithm may involve the provision of local power references to the local controllers. Preferably the central controller also takes into account the power reference tracking provided by the grid in the control of the local power references of the controllers.
An embodiment of a wind farm control structure according to the presently disclosed system and method is shown in fig. 1 . The system comprises is a central controller and i local WTG controllers. Between the grid and the system controller there is a power reference from the grid, provided by the system operator, to the wind farm
Figure imgf000007_0002
controller, and a total available power P from the central controller to the grid. In
Figure imgf000007_0003
contrast to the systems known in the art, the measurements of the WTGs
Figure imgf000007_0005
are not sent to the central controller but to the local controllers where they are used to calculate the load sensitivities The local controllers may also provide power reference constraints f tne individual WTGs. By solving an optimization
Figure imgf000007_0001
problem, the central controller may provide power references to the WTGs.
Figure imgf000007_0004
The method and system are suitable for real-time or substantially real-time control of a wind farm comprising a plurality of WTGs. The method and system may also be applied on large scale wind farms, such as in systems comprising more than 50, or more than 100, or more than 200 WTGs.
The present disclosure relates to a method for controlling the operation of a wind farm and system for performing the method. One embodiment of the system comprises a central processing unit configured to perform the steps of solving the optimal dispatch algorithm, and a number of local processing units in the local controllers configured to perform the step of calculating load sensitivities. In one embodiment the system comprises a first non-transitive, computer-readable storage device for storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, performs the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines.
The system may further comprise secondary non-transitive, computer-readable storage devices for storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, performs the step of calculating load sensitivities in the local controllers. The secondary non-transitive, computer-readable storage devices may be placed in the local controllers.
The present disclosure further relates to a windfarm comprising a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller, wherein the central and local controllers are configured to perform the presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind.
Modelling and operation
The at least one fatigue load parameter of said wind turbine may a load of a drive train of each wind turbine. The at least one fatigue load parameter may also be related to an aerodynamic torque Tn and a thrust force Ft. The at least one fatigue load parameter may represent a measure of shaft torque fluctuations and/or thrust force fluctuations of each wind turbine. The at least one fatigue load parameter may also represent an internal structural load of the wind turbine. The fatigue load parameters may have a significant impact on the lifetime of the WTGs. The fatigue load parameters may be based on a wind speed, and/or a pitch angle and/or a rotor generation speed of the wind turbine.
Fig. 2 shows a model of an individual wind turbine having a local controller. The local controller receives a local power reference from the central controller. The WTG
Figure imgf000008_0001
may further comprise parts for modelling a tower, aerodynamics, a pitch actuator, a drive train and a generator and may represent a variable speed pitch-controlled wind turbine.
The sampling time of the wind farm controller Ts may be in seconds. Therefore, the fast dynamics in the generator and pitch actuator may, as one option, be ignored. The oscillations in the shaft torsion and tower nodding may also be disregarded to reduce the model complexity. A simplified non-linear wind turbine model with a local control may be introduced, which is used to calculate the load sensitivities. An aerodynamic torque Ta and thrust force F, may be used as sources of nonlinearities, calculated by:
Figure imgf000009_0001
where Cp and C, are the power coefficient and thrust coefficient, respectively, R is the length of the blade, p is the air density, vr is the effective wind speed on the rotor, and λ is the tip speed ratio, defined by
Figure imgf000009_0003
In the model the drive train is considered to be rigidly coupled and a single-mass model is used, where the rotor mass Jr and generator mass Jg are merged into one equivalent mass J,, expressed by:
Figure imgf000009_0002
According to the low-shaft motion equation
Figure imgf000009_0004
where ωΓ and ω, are the rotor and generator speed, respectively, and η9 is the gear box ratio.
In the torque control loop of the model, the vector control may be used to ensure a fast (in milliseconds) and accurate response. Since the dynamic is neglected, the generator torque Tg is approximately equal to its reference, i.e. Tg≈ Tg _ref. Load sensitivity
The load sensitivity may comprise one part corresponding to a load of the drive train due to torsion of the shaft and one part corresponding to the load of the tower structure due to tower deflection. The load sensitivity may be a dynamic load or a dynamic stress. Compared with static load, the dynamic stress causing the structural damage is typically a bigger issue for a WTG. In the presently disclosed method fluctuations of the shaft torque Ts and thrust force F, may be damped, which reduces the related fatigue loads. The load sensitivities may therefore comprise components related to
Figure imgf000010_0003
Figure imgf000010_0004
and
Figure imgf000010_0002
In one embodiment the load sensitivity indicates an expected fatigue load change as a result of the local power reference of the wind turbine or as a result of the actual generated power of the wind turbine. The following section describes how the load sensitivities may be calculated.
The time of the operating point may be t0.The wind speed vr may be estimated or measured. The measured power production, generator speed and pitch angle at t = to may be defined by Pg0, ωg0 and θ0. In a first step, equations of Δωg and ΔΘ may be derived:
Figure imgf000010_0001
where Kc0 = fc(Pgo, θ0).
One embodiment of the presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind farm further comprises the step of calculating local pitch angle and/or generator torque references in the local controller of each wind turbine based on the local power reference for each controller. In a second step, ΔΤη and ΔΤg , representing changes in the torque a certain point in time, can be calculated as:
Figure imgf000011_0001
In a third step the partial derivatives of Ta then may be calculated as:
Figure imgf000011_0002
wherein The nonlinear function Cp can be identified as a Piece-Wise
Figure imgf000011_0007
Affine function.
Based on the calculations of ΔΤη and ΔΤg, the rotor mass and generator mass and gear box ratio, a first load sensitivity component - may then be calculated as:
f
Figure imgf000011_0006
Figure imgf000011_0003
The derived load sensitivity first component may comprise two parts. A first part, part 1 , is dependent only on the operating point. A second part, part 2, is dependent both on the operating point and the deviation of the power reference from the central
Figure imgf000011_0004
controller to the local controller.
A second load sensitivity component may be calculated as:
Figure imgf000011_0005
Figure imgf000012_0001
The derived load sensitivity second component may comprise two parts. A first part, part 1 , is a constant, dependent only on the operating point and the second part, part 2, is a variable, dependent both on the operating point and the deviation of the power reference Δ } from the central controller to the local controller.
Figure imgf000012_0003
Optimal dispatch problem
In order to minimize the overall fatigue load of the WTGs an optimal dispatch algorithm may be formulated and solved. For this purpose a first control objective of minimizing the fatigue loads of the WTGs may be introduced. Minimization of the fatigue loads of the WTGs may comprise minimization of Ts and Ft. A second control objective of tracking the power reference tracking provided by the grid, may also be used.
Figure imgf000012_0004
Therefore, in one embodiment of the presently disclosed method for controlling an operation of a wind farm, the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines comprises the step of complying with power reference requirements provided by the grid.
The step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load may further comprise the step of minimizing a difference between a total generated power of all wind turbines and the power reference provided by the grid. For minimizing the overall fatigue load, a cost function may be introduced. If a wind farm comprises Nwt wind turbines a control vector u may be defined as:
Figure imgf000012_0002
The optimization problem can then be formulated as:
Figure imgf000013_0001
where is a weighting factor which penalizes the variation Ts of the /th WTG, and
Figure imgf000013_0004
Qpt is the weighting factor which penalizes the variation of Ft of the /th WTG.
In one embodiment of the presently disclosed method the total shaft torque and thrust force variation comprises a weighting factor for each wind turbine. The step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load may therefore comprise minimization of a total shaft torque and thrust force variation for all wind turbines.
Other constraints that may be taken into account are the power reference tracking of the WTGs:
Figure imgf000013_0002
and local constraints of ΔΘ and ΔTg.For individual WTGs there may be incremental constraints in the local WTG controller. Based on the derived incremental state space model, these constraints can be equivalently transformed into the constraints of control variable u,. A feasible range of u, may also be sent to the central controller.
In one embodiment the exchange signal further comprises at least one physical limitation parameter of the wind turbine. The at least one physical limitation parameter comprises a power feasible operation range, and/or a generator torque range, and/or a pitch angle range.
A feasible operation range may be expressed as:
Figure imgf000013_0003
wherein
Figure imgf000013_0005
represents a minimum suitable power reference to the local controller and x represents a maximum suitable power reference to the local controller. Alternatively the local power references to each of the local controllers may represent upper limits of the power production of the individual wind turbines.
Examples
An example of a wind farm where the presently disclosed method has been
implemented includes a wind farm comprising 10x5MW wind turbines.
In a first case, Case 1 , the ramp rate limitation control was tested. Over a simulation time of 300 seconds the active power of the wind farm was observed. Fig. 3 shows a first example of power reference tracking for a wind farm using a conventional proportionally distributed power reference approach and the presently disclosed optimal algorithm. It can be observed that Pwfc of both algorithms follow the reference closely.
Figure imgf000014_0001
In the same case the fatigue loads were also observed. Only the fatigue load on the drive train was considered. The variations of Ts with the two algorithms are shown in fig. 4A. It can be observed that compared with CON (conventional proportional dispatch algorithm) (the power reference is proportionally distributed to individual WTGs), OPT (presently disclosed algorithm) reduces the variation of the shaft torque ΔΤs. The rainflow-counting algorithm is a known method for analysis of fatigue data in order to reduce a spectrum of varying stress into a set of simple stress reversals. In fig. 4B it is shown that less rainflow cycles are observed for the OPT method, which implies less fatigue load experienced by the wind turbine. The Damage Equivalent Load (DEL), based on Miner's rule and dependent on materials properties specified by the slope of the S-N curve, may also be used to quantify the load minimization. Table 1 shows the calculated DELs for all wind turbines of the Case 1 setup.
Figure imgf000014_0002
Figure imgf000015_0004
In a second case, Case 2, a balance control scheme, wherein the wind farm production is reduced to specified constant level, is shown. In this case, balance control is applied i.e.:
Figure imgf000015_0001
Fig. 5 illustrates the available wind power
Figure imgf000015_0002
for both a conventional proportional dispatch algorithm (CON) and the presently disclosed method (OPT). It can be observed that Pwfc of both OPT and CON track the reference closely.
Figure imgf000015_0003
For the fatigue loads of the two approaches, fig. 6A shows the variations of Ts. The variation of the shaft torque ΔΤs is significantly reduced for the presently disclosed OPT approach. According to the cumulative rainflow cycles in fig. 6B less cycles are found for the OPT approach, which implies less fatigue loads experienced by the wind turbine.
The calculated DELs of all wind turbines are listed in Table 2.
Figure imgf000015_0005
Figure imgf000016_0001
Further details of the invention
The invention will now be described in further detail with reference to the following items:
1 . A method for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, the wind farm comprising a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller, the method comprising the steps of:
- calculating a load sensitivity in the local controller of each wind turbine based on fluctuations of at least one fatigue load parameter of said wind turbine;
- providing an exchange signal between each of the local controllers and the central controller, said exchange signal comprising the calculated load sensitivity;
- solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines in the central controller based on the calculated load sensitivities of the wind turbines and power reference tracking provided by the grid, thereby providing local power references to each of the local controllers. 2. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the at least one fatigue load parameter is a load of a drive train of each wind turbine 3. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the at least one fatigue load parameter is a measure of shaft torque fluctuations and/or thrust force fluctuations of each wind turbine. 4. The method ac di to any of the preceding items, wherein the at least one fatigue load pa epresents an internal structural load of the wind turbine 5. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the at least one fatigue load parameter is based on a wind speed, and/or a pitch angle and/or a rotor generation speed of the wind turbine. 6. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the load
sensitivity indicates an expected fatigue load change as a result of the local power reference of the wind turbine or as a result of the actual generated power of the wind turbine. 7. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the exchange signal further comprises at least one physical limitation parameter of the wind turbine. 8. The method according to item 7, wherein the at least one physical limitation parameter comprises a power feasible operation range, and/or a generator torque range, and/or a pitch angle range. 9. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the step of
solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load comprises minimization of a total shaft torque and thrust force variation for all wind turbines.
10. The method according to item 9, wherein the total shaft torque and thrust force variation comprises a weighting factor for each wind turbine. 1 1. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines comprises the step of complying with power reference requirements provided by the grid.
12. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the step of
solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load comprises the step of minimizing a difference between a total generated power of all wind turbines and the power reference provided by the grid.
13. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the local power references to each of the local controllers represent upper limits of the power production of the wind turbines. 14. The method according to any of the preceding items, further comprising the step of calculating local pitch angle and or generator torque references in the local controller of each wind turbine based on the local power reference for each controller. 15. The method according to any of the preceding items, wherein the operation is substantially in real-time.
16. A system configured to perform the method according to any of items 1-15. 17. The system according to item 16 comprising a central processing unit
configured to perform the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines and local processing units in the local controllers configured to perform the step of calculating load sensitivities in the local controllers.
18. A system of:
- a first non-transitive, computer-readable storage device for storing
instructions that, when executed by a processor, performs the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines according to the method according to any of items 1 -15; and - secondary non-transitive, computer-readable storage devices for storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, performs the step of calculating load sensitivities according to the method according to any of items 1 -15. 19. A windfarm comprising a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller, wherein the central and local controllers are configured to perform the method for controlling an operation of a wind farm according to any of items 1 -15.

Claims

Claims
1 . A method for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, the wind farm comprising a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each ocal controller, the method comprising the steps of: sensitivity in the local controller of each wind turbine based on fluctuations of at least one fatigue load parameter of said wind turbine;
- providing an exchange signal between each of the local controllers and the central controller, said exchange signal comprising the calculated load sensitivity;
- solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines in the central controller based on the calculated load sensitivities of the wind turbines and power reference tracking provided by the grid, thereby providing local power references to each of the local controllers. 2. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the at least one fatigue load parameter is a load of a drive train of each wind turbine 3. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the at least one fatigue load parameter is a measure of shaft torque fluctuations and or thrust force fluctuations of each wind turbine.
4. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the at least one fatigue load parameter is based on a wind speed, and/or a pitch angle and or a rotor generation speed of the wind turbine.
5. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the load
sensitivity indicates an expected fatigue load change as a result of the local power reference of the wind turbine or as a result of the actual generated power of the wind turbine.
6. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the exchange signal further comprises at least one physical limitation parameter of the wind turbine.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the at least one physical limitation parameter comprises a power feasible operation range, and/or a generator torque range, and/or a pitch angle range.
8. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load comprises minimization of a total shaft torque and thrust force variation for all wind turbines.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the total shaft torque and thrust force variation comprises a weighting factor for each wind turbine.
10. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines comprises the step of complying with power reference requirements provided by the grid.
11. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load comprises the step of minimizing a difference between a total generated power of all wind turbines and the power reference provided by the grid.
12. The method according to any of the preceding claims, further comprising the step of calculating local pitch angle and/or generator torque references in the local controller of each wind turbine based on the local power reference for each controller.
13. A system configured to perform the method according to any of claims 1 -12.
14. A system for controlling an operation of a wind farm connected to a grid, the system comprising:
- at least one central controller comprising a central hardware processor and at least a first non-transitive, computer-readable storage device for storing instructions that, when executed by the central hardware processor, causes the at least one central hardware processor to perform the step of solving an optimal dispatch algorithm for minimizing an overall fatigue load of the wind turbines according to the method according to any of claims 1 -12, thereby providing local power references to each of the local controllers; and
local controllers, each local controller comprising a local hardware processor for each of a plurality of local wind turbines, and secondary non- transitive, computer-readable storage devices associated with the local hardware processors for storing instructions that, when executed by the local hardware processors, perform the step of calculating load sensitivities according to the method according to any of claims 1 -12.
15. The system according to claim 14, wherein the local controllers comprise local communication units for communicating the calculated load sensitivities to the central controller, and wherein the central controller comprises a central communication unit for communicating local power references to each of the local controllers.
16. The system according to claim 15, wherein the load sensitivities indicate
expected fatigue load changes for each of the local wind turbines a result of the local power references to each of the wind turbines.
17. A windfarm comprising a central controller and a plurality of wind turbines, each wind turbine having a local controller, wherein the central and local controllers are configured to perform the method for controlling an operation of a wind farm according to any of claims 1 -12.
PCT/EP2017/084350 2016-12-23 2017-12-22 Fatigue load minimization in an operation of a wind farm WO2018115423A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP16206539 2016-12-23
EP16206539.5 2016-12-23

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018115423A1 true WO2018115423A1 (en) 2018-06-28

Family

ID=57680122

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2017/084350 WO2018115423A1 (en) 2016-12-23 2017-12-22 Fatigue load minimization in an operation of a wind farm

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2018115423A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109659985A (en) * 2019-01-14 2019-04-19 华北电力大学 Electric system combined scheduling method based on large-scale wind power and adjustable load
CN109785186A (en) * 2019-01-15 2019-05-21 东南大学 It is a kind of consider new energy power grid that demand response participates in a few days ago-in a few days energy storage dispatching method
CN110535174A (en) * 2019-07-23 2019-12-03 电子科技大学 A kind of active power controller method considering wind power plant fatigue load distribution and production capacity
CN111539586A (en) * 2020-06-05 2020-08-14 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 Power dispatching center and decision-making assisting method
CN113869771A (en) * 2021-10-12 2021-12-31 浙江大学 Offshore wind power plant power scheduling method based on local fatigue load balancing

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013044925A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Control of wind turbines
US20160333854A1 (en) * 2015-05-15 2016-11-17 General Electric Company Digital Twin Interface for Operating Wind Farms

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013044925A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Control of wind turbines
US20160333854A1 (en) * 2015-05-15 2016-11-17 General Electric Company Digital Twin Interface for Operating Wind Farms

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109659985A (en) * 2019-01-14 2019-04-19 华北电力大学 Electric system combined scheduling method based on large-scale wind power and adjustable load
CN109785186A (en) * 2019-01-15 2019-05-21 东南大学 It is a kind of consider new energy power grid that demand response participates in a few days ago-in a few days energy storage dispatching method
CN110535174A (en) * 2019-07-23 2019-12-03 电子科技大学 A kind of active power controller method considering wind power plant fatigue load distribution and production capacity
CN110535174B (en) * 2019-07-23 2023-03-10 电子科技大学 Active power control method considering fatigue load distribution and productivity of wind power plant
CN111539586A (en) * 2020-06-05 2020-08-14 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 Power dispatching center and decision-making assisting method
CN111539586B (en) * 2020-06-05 2022-04-26 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 Power dispatching center and decision-making assisting method
CN113869771A (en) * 2021-10-12 2021-12-31 浙江大学 Offshore wind power plant power scheduling method based on local fatigue load balancing
CN113869771B (en) * 2021-10-12 2024-04-19 浙江大学 Marine wind farm power scheduling method based on local fatigue load balancing

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2018115423A1 (en) Fatigue load minimization in an operation of a wind farm
Staino et al. Actuator control of edgewise vibrations in wind turbine blades
Yuan et al. Adaptive pitch control of wind turbine for load mitigation under structural uncertainties
Fitzgerald et al. Improved reliability of wind turbine towers with active tuned mass dampers (ATMDs)
Yuan et al. Multivariable robust blade pitch control design to reject periodic loads on wind turbines
Zhao et al. Fatigue load sensitivity-based optimal active power dispatch for wind farms
CN104595106B (en) Wind-power generating variable pitch control method based on intensified learning compensation
CN104005909B (en) The wind generating set pitch control that nonlinear feedforward is combined with fuzzy is away from control method
Inthamoussou et al. LPV-based active power control of wind turbines covering the complete wind speed range
Shirazi et al. Wind turbine integrated structural and LPV control design for improved closed-loop performance
CN110206685A (en) Feedforward control method and device for wind generating set in wind power plant
Shaltout et al. An adaptive economic model predictive control approach for wind turbines
Nam et al. Alleviating the tower mechanical load of multi-MW wind turbines with LQR control
Bottasso et al. Wind tunnel testing of wind turbines and farms
Bartholomay et al. Repetitive model predictive control for load alleviation on a research wind turbine using trailing edge flaps
JP2018178900A (en) Wind power generation system
Shakeel Neural networks based prediction of wind energy using pitch angle control
CN112636366B (en) Wind power plant dynamic frequency control method based on control process data fitting
Wang et al. Lidar-assisted wind turbine feedforward torque controller design below rated
CN109611274A (en) A kind of wind power generating set high wind speed area LQG optimal control method
Martin et al. LPV-based torque control for an extreme-scale morphing wind turbine rotor
Bergami et al. High‐fidelity linear time‐invariant model of a smart rotor with adaptive trailing edge flaps
Laks et al. Comparison of wind turbine operating transitions through the use of iterative learning control
Baltag et al. Design of H∞ Robust Controllers for Wind Turbines Based on DFIG
Camblong et al. Wind turbine controller comparison on an island grid in terms of frequency control and mechanical stress

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 17822311

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 17822311

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1