WO2018039567A1 - Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor - Google Patents
Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2018039567A1 WO2018039567A1 PCT/US2017/048629 US2017048629W WO2018039567A1 WO 2018039567 A1 WO2018039567 A1 WO 2018039567A1 US 2017048629 W US2017048629 W US 2017048629W WO 2018039567 A1 WO2018039567 A1 WO 2018039567A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- data
- signature
- omics
- apobec
- therapeutic outcome
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16B—BIOINFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR GENETIC OR PROTEIN-RELATED DATA PROCESSING IN COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- G16B25/00—ICT specially adapted for hybridisation; ICT specially adapted for gene or protein expression
- G16B25/10—Gene or protein expression profiling; Expression-ratio estimation or normalisation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P35/00—Antineoplastic agents
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P37/00—Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
- A61P37/02—Immunomodulators
- A61P37/04—Immunostimulants
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P43/00—Drugs for specific purposes, not provided for in groups A61P1/00-A61P41/00
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6813—Hybridisation assays
- C12Q1/6827—Hybridisation assays for detection of mutation or polymorphism
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6869—Methods for sequencing
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
- C12Q1/6883—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
- C12Q1/6886—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material for cancer
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16B—BIOINFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR GENETIC OR PROTEIN-RELATED DATA PROCESSING IN COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- G16B20/00—ICT specially adapted for functional genomics or proteomics, e.g. genotype-phenotype associations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16B—BIOINFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR GENETIC OR PROTEIN-RELATED DATA PROCESSING IN COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- G16B20/00—ICT specially adapted for functional genomics or proteomics, e.g. genotype-phenotype associations
- G16B20/20—Allele or variant detection, e.g. single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] detection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16B—BIOINFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR GENETIC OR PROTEIN-RELATED DATA PROCESSING IN COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- G16B25/00—ICT specially adapted for hybridisation; ICT specially adapted for gene or protein expression
- G16B25/20—Polymerase chain reaction [PCR]; Primer or probe design; Probe optimisation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16B—BIOINFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR GENETIC OR PROTEIN-RELATED DATA PROCESSING IN COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- G16B30/00—ICT specially adapted for sequence analysis involving nucleotides or amino acids
- G16B30/10—Sequence alignment; Homology search
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16B—BIOINFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR GENETIC OR PROTEIN-RELATED DATA PROCESSING IN COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- G16B40/00—ICT specially adapted for biostatistics; ICT specially adapted for bioinformatics-related machine learning or data mining, e.g. knowledge discovery or pattern finding
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16B—BIOINFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR GENETIC OR PROTEIN-RELATED DATA PROCESSING IN COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- G16B50/00—ICT programming tools or database systems specially adapted for bioinformatics
- G16B50/20—Heterogeneous data integration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/20—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/30—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/106—Pharmacogenomics, i.e. genetic variability in individual responses to drugs and drug metabolism
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/156—Polymorphic or mutational markers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/158—Expression markers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2570/00—Omics, e.g. proteomics, glycomics or lipidomics; Methods of analysis focusing on the entire complement of classes of biological molecules or subsets thereof, i.e. focusing on proteomes, glycomes or lipidomes
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A90/00—Technologies having an indirect contribution to adaptation to climate change
- Y02A90/10—Information and communication technologies [ICT] supporting adaptation to climate change, e.g. for weather forecasting or climate simulation
Definitions
- the field of the invention is computational analysis of omics data to allow for patient stratification with respect to immune therapy, especially where such therapy uses checkpoint inhibition in addition to a vaccine composition and/or cell-based composition.
- Immune therapy using genetically modified viruses has become a conceptually effective and attractive route for treatment of various cancers.
- numerous challenges remain to be resolved.
- the choice of suitable antigens to be expressed is non-trivial (see e.g., Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Jul 10;30(7):658-70).
- epitopes will not guarantee a strong and tumor-protective immune reaction in all patients.
- various inhibitory factors may nevertheless prevent a therapeutically effective response.
- a sufficient immune response may be blunted or even prevented by Tregs (i.e., regulatory T cells) and/or MDSCs (myeloid derived suppressor cells).
- Tregs i.e., regulatory T cells
- MDSCs myeloid derived suppressor cells
- various therapeutic compositions are known in the art to block or silence immune checkpoints (e.g., Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab for PD-1 system, or Ipilimumab for the CTLA-4 system)
- administration is not consistently effective to promote a durable and therapeutically useful response.
- the number of immunologically visible neoepitopes was used as a predictive marker for likely positive outcome of a treatment with checkpoint inhibitors where the number exceeded a predetermined threshold.
- such methods additionally included in at least some aspects a determination of microsatellite instability. While such analysis advantageously considered the HLA type of the patient, and with that the visibility of neoepitopes, the predicted treatment outcome was generally limited to the use of checkpoint inhibitors.
- the inventive subject matter is directed to various systems and methods of analysis of omics data to predict likely treatment success to immune therapy.
- Computational analysis is preferably performed on omics data obtained from a tumor to so identify MSI (microsatellite instability) status, mutational signatures (and particularly APOBEC and/or POLE signatures), and/or immune checkpoint expression.
- MSI microsatellite instability
- mutational signatures and particularly APOBEC and/or POLE signatures
- immune checkpoint expression will integrate various features that, when considered individually, will not allow for a reliable outcome prediction for immunotherapy that uses in addition to checkpoint inhibition a vaccine component and/or a cell-based component.
- the inventors contemplate a method of predicting therapeutic outcome for immune therapy of a cancer that includes the steps of obtaining omics data from a tumor of a patient, identifying at least one of an APOBEC signature and a POLE signature in the omics data, quantifying expression of a plurality of genes associated with checkpoint inhibition from the omics data, and determining an MSI status from the omics data.
- the APOBEC signature and/or POLE signature, the determined expression quantity of the plurality of genes, and the MSI status are then used to update or generate a patient profile that indicates a prediction of therapeutic outcome for the immune therapy of the cancer.
- the immune therapy will include a checkpoint inhibition component and at least one of a vaccine component and a cell-based component.
- contemplated methods will further include a step of identifying at least one additional mutational signature.
- suitable additional signatures include a kataegis signature, an Ig gene hypermutation signature, a smoking mutational signature, an age related mutational signature, a UV light mutational signature, and a DNA MMR related mutational signature.
- Preferred omics data include whole genome sequencing data, RNA sequencing data, transcription level data, cfDNA sequence data, cfRNA sequence data, and proteomics data, and most typically at least two of these data that are preferably normalized against corresponding omics data from a healthy tissue of the same patient.
- APOBEC signatures typically include one or more of TpCpS ⁇ TpKpS, TpCpN ⁇ TpApN, and TpCpW ⁇ TpKpW, wherein S is C or G, K is G or T, N is C or G or A or T, and W is A or T, while preferred POLE signatures include TpCpT ⁇ TpApT and TpTpT ⁇ TpGpT.
- genes associated with checkpoint inhibition include at least one, or at least two, or at least three, or at least four, or at least five of IDO, TDO, TIM3, CD40, LAG3, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA4, PD1, and IL2.
- MSI status is preferably inferred from a quantity of neoepitopes that bind to an MHC complex of the patient.
- the prediction of therapeutic outcome for the immune therapy of the cancer is a qualitative prediction.
- presence of the APOBEC signature and/or the POLE signature is indicative of a favorable therapeutic outcome
- a positive MSI is indicative of a favorable therapeutic outcome
- over-expression of the plurality of genes associated with checkpoint inhibition is indicative of a favorable therapeutic outcome.
- contemplated methods may also include a step of determining the pathway activity for Thl T cell activation, cytotoxic T cell activation, and/or natural killer cell activation.
- Figure 1 exemplarily depicts a patient profile according to the inventive subject matter.
- the inventors have now discovered that likely treatment outcome of cancer immune therapy can be predicted by computational analysis of patient omics data from tumor tissue where the immune therapy comprises administration of a cancer vaccine and/or cell based therapy in addition to checkpoint inhibitors. More particularly, the inventors discovered that the likely treatment outcome is associated with the overall immune status of the tumor, and especially with APOBEC and/or POLE mutational signatures, MSI status, and immune expression of genes associated with checkpoint inhibition. [0019] While not limiting to the inventive subject matter, the inventors contemplate that the presence of APOBEC and/or POLE signatures were found to sharply increase the number of neoepitopes, possibly due to the specific mutational pattern in these signatures.
- APOBEC and/or POLE mutations also affect other genes associated with DNA repair, the frequency of mutations may abruptly increase once a critical number of APOBEC and/or POLE mutations is found.
- APOBEC and/or POLE signatures may be particularly useful as a predictor of immunotherapy success as the number of SNVs will lead to a greater number of neoepitopes engendering stronger immune responses with vaccines targeting neoepitopes in an adaptive immune response, and NK cells and their derivatives targeting neoepitopes via ADCC in an innate immune response.
- such responses can be further complemented or enhanced with one or more checkpoint inhibitors.
- a tumor biopsy is obtained from the patient and that an omics analysis is performed on the so obtained sample.
- blood or other bodily fluid may be drawn from the patient, and cell free circulating RNA (cfRNA) and/or cell free circulating DNA (cfDNA) may be isolated from the blood or other biological fluid as is exemplarily described in WO 2016/077709.
- cfRNA cell free circulating RNA
- cfDNA cell free circulating DNA
- the omics analysis includes whole genome and/or exome sequencing, RNA sequencing and/or quantification, sequencing and/or quantification of cfRNA and/or cfDNA, and/or proteomics analysis.
- genomic analysis can be performed by any number of analytic methods, however, especially preferred analytic methods include WGS (whole genome sequencing) and exome sequencing of both tumor and matched normal sample, typically done using next generation sequencing.
- WGS whole genome sequencing
- exome sequencing of both tumor and matched normal sample typically done using next generation sequencing.
- cfDNA may be quantified and analyzed after isolation from the bodily fluid. Computational analysis of the sequence data may be performed in numerous manners.
- RNA sequencing and/or quantification can be performed in all manners known in the art and may use various forms of RNA.
- preferred materials include mRNA and primary transcripts (hnRNA), and RNA sequence information may be obtained from reverse transcribed polyA + -RNA, which is in turn obtained from a tumor sample and a matched normal (healthy) sample of the same patient.
- polyA + -RNA is typically preferred as a representation of the transcriptome
- other forms of RNA hn-RNA, non-polyadenylated RNA, siRNA, miRNA, etc.
- Preferred methods include quantitative RNA (hnRNA or mRNA) analysis and/or quantitative proteomics analysis.
- RNA quantification and sequencing is performed using qPCR and/or rtPCR based methods, although other methods (e.g., solid phase hybridization-based methods) are also deemed suitable.
- transcriptomic analysis may be suitable (alone or in combination with genomic analysis) to identify and quantify genes having a cancer and patient specific mutation.
- cfRNA may be quantified and analyzed after isolation from the bodily fluid, and analysis typically includes a step of reverse transcription.
- proteomics analysis can be performed in numerous manners, and all known manners or proteomics analysis are contemplated herein.
- particularly preferred proteomics methods include antibody-based methods and mass spectroscopic methods (and especially selected reaction monitoring).
- the proteomics analysis may not only provide qualitative or quantitative information about the protein per se, but may also include protein activity data where the protein has catalytic or other functional activity.
- Exemplary techniques for conducting proteomic assays include US7473532 and US9091651.
- the omics data may also be obtained from one or more computational resources, including publicly available or proprietary databases, and one or more sequencing devices.
- the omics data may be in numerous formats, including raw data (e.g., FASTA, FASTQ), processed data (e.g., BAM, SAM, GAR) or analyzed format that indicates changes (e.g., VCF).
- raw data e.g., FASTA, FASTQ
- processed data e.g., BAM, SAM, GAR
- analyzed format that indicates changes e.g., VCF
- sequencing of nucleic acids is performed to obtain the omics data
- such data may also be in various formats, including raw data formats, processed data formats, and formats from an analytic device.
- any language directed to a computer should be read to include any suitable combination of computing devices, including servers, interfaces, systems, databases, agents, peers, engines, controllers, or other types of computing devices operating individually or collectively.
- computing devices comprise a processor configured to execute software instructions stored on a tangible, non- transitory computer readable storage medium (e.g., hard drive, solid state drive, RAM, flash, ROM, etc.).
- the software instructions preferably configure the computing device to provide the roles, responsibilities, or other functionality as discussed below with respect to the disclosed apparatus.
- the disclosed technologies can be embodied as a computer program product that includes a non-transitory computer readable medium storing the software instructions that causes a processor to execute the disclosed steps associated with
- the various servers, systems, databases, or interfaces exchange data using standardized protocols or algorithms, possibly based on HTTP, HTTPS, AES, public-private key exchanges, web service APIs, known financial transaction protocols, or other electronic information exchanging methods.
- Data exchanges among devices can be conducted over a packet-switched network, the Internet, LAN, WAN, VPN, or other type of packet switched network; a circuit switched network; cell switched network; or other type of network.
- mutational signatures While there are numerous suitable mutational signatures it should be appreciated that particularly preferred mutational signatures have a frequency and base change patterns that produce a high rate of nonsense or missense mutations, which in turn lead to defective protein function and a higher rate of neoepitopes that are 'visible' to the immune system (i.e., that are bound by a patient's MHC complex for presentation on antigen presenting cells).
- APOBEC and POLE signatures are especially preferred. Indeed, APOBEC mutations are frequently found in cancers (see e.g., Nat Genet 2013 September; 45(9): 970-976; Genome Res 2016; 26: 174-182).
- APOBEC3A and 3B are cytidine deaminases of the APOBEC family, and are among the main factors causing mutations in human cancers.
- the APOBEC cytidine deaminase converts cytosine to uracil, which usually results in C ⁇ T or C ⁇ G mutations, and much less frequently, in C ⁇ A mutations.
- fractions of the APOB EC-induced mutations occur as clusters in single-stranded DNA produced during repair of double-stranded breaks (DSBs), and such clusters ("kataegis”) are contemplated suitable for use herein.
- APOBEC signatures exhibit a transcriptional strand bias of mutations in exons and C>T and C>G exchange
- suitable APOBEC signatures include TpCpS ⁇ TpKpS, TpCpN ⁇ TpApN, and TpCpW ⁇ TpKpW (S is C or G, K is G or T, N is C or G or A or T, and W is A or T).
- APOBEC mutagenesis is pervasive in cancers and correlates with APOBEC mRNA levels.
- APOBEC mutational signatures expression levels (especially over-expression relative to corresponding normal tissue) of APOBEC genes is also particularly contemplated.
- High expression of PD-1 ligands has been shown to be associated with kataegis mutational signatures and APOBEC3 alterations. Therefore, where APOBEC signatures are detected, it is especially contemplated that the omics analysis may further include sequence and transcriptional analysis of APOBEC genes and/or genes associated with checkpoint inhibition.
- APOBEC-dependent or APOBEC-like mechanisms may also be the etiologic agent for kataegis, give rise to MSI, and/or expression and presentation of neoepitopes that can be recognized and attacked by the immune system so long as no checkpoint inhibition is present as further discussed below.
- mutations based on APOBEC may be a leading indicator of MSI and/or an increased number of immunologically visible neoepitopes, which may increase the likelihood of desirable treatment outcome where the treatment is performed using immune therapeutic agents.
- the inventors also contemplate POLE mutational signatures.
- Such signature typically exhibits a strand bias for C>A mutations at TpCpT context and T>G mutations at TpTpT context, and is commonly associated with some of most mutated cancer samples (samples exhibiting this mutational signature have also been termed ultra-hypermutators).
- samples exhibiting this mutational signature have also been termed ultra-hypermutators.
- these mutations have a frequency and base change patterns that produce a high rate of nonsense or missense mutations, which in turn lead to defective protein function and a higher rate of neoepitopes that are 'visible' to the immune system.
- preferred POLE signature include TpCpT ⁇ TpApT and TpTpT ⁇ TpGpT.
- mutational signatures also especially include POLD (see e.g., Nature Genetics 45, 136-144 (2013); published online EpubFeb (10.1038/ng.2503).
- APOBEC and POLE signatures there respect to identification of APOBEC and POLE signatures, it should be noted that various manners are known to identify such signatures (see e.g., Nature 2013 August 22; 500(7463): 415-421; Genome Res. 2016. 26: 174-182; Nat Genet. 2013 September; 45(9): 970-976; US 2012/0059670, or US 2012/0066001).
- the tumor mutational signatures are identified against a matched normal control sample from the same patient using location guided synchronous alignment.
- Such alignment can provide output files (e.g., using vcf format) and information on type and location, as well as allow for classification into a particular mutational signature.
- Suitable signatures include the smoking mutational signature (e.g., transcriptional strand bias for C>A mutations, CC>AA dinucleotide substitutions), the age related mutational signature (e.g., spontaneous deamination of 5- methylcytosine), the UV light mutational signature (e.g., CC>TT dinucleotide mutations at dipyrimidines), the DNA MMR related mutational signature (e.g., small indels), and Ig gene hypermutation signature. Further signatures, details, and considerations can be found at URL: cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic/signatures and elsewhere (e.g., BMC Med Genomics. 2014; 7: 11.)
- contemplated systems and methods may also include an overall estimate or determination of mutations in the genome (and/or exome and/or transcriptome), and it is generally contemplated that above a predefined threshold value, a mutation frequency may be indicative of increased likelihood of a desirable treatment outcome.
- a mutation frequency of greater than 3 per MB (or greater than 2 per MB, or greater than 1 per MB, or greater than 0.5 per MB, or greater than 0.1 per MB,) of coding DNA may be indicative of increased likelihood of a desirable treatment outcome.
- Such mutation frequency may be especially relevant where the mutation encodes a neoepitope that binds with an affinity of equal or less than 200 nM to the patient' s MHC-I and/or MHC-II complex.
- MSI may be inferred for cancers having a relatively high number of neoepitopes, typically at least 50, at least 80, at least 100, at least 150, at least 200, at least 250, at least 500, and even higher.
- MSI microsatellite instability
- contemplated receptors, ligands, and other mediators include IDO, TDO, TIM3, CD40, LAG3, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA4, PD1, and IL2.
- molecules that indirectly activate or suppress immune response are also expressly contemplated herein.
- STAT3 signaling has the potential to contribute to an immune suppressive environment by several mechanisms, including suppression of dendritic cell (DC) maturation and function, enhanced myeloid derived suppressor cell (MDSC) activity, and suppression of T-cell mediated antitumor activity.
- DC dendritic cell
- MDSC enhanced myeloid derived suppressor cell
- T-cell mediated antitumor activity suppression of regulatory components may further provide insight into outcome prediction.
- immune checkpoint components may be quantified using various manners, and that all manners known in the art are deemed suitable for use herein.
- immune checkpoint components may be quantified using omics data, and especially transcriptomics data.
- omics data for genes associated with checkpoint inhibition are obtained from a blood sample using cfRNA and/or cfDNA.
- immune checkpoint components may be quantified using SRM mass spectroscopy, or immunohistochemical methods, either directly from the tumor, from processed tumor tissue, or from blood.
- the omics data may also be processed to obtain pathway activity and other pathway relevant information using various systems and methods known in the art.
- particularly preferred systems and methods include those in which the pathway data are processed using probabilistic graphical models as described in WO/2011/139345 and WO/2013/062505, incorporated by reference herein.
- pathway analysis for a patient may be performed form a single patient sample and matched control, which will significantly improve and refine analytic data as compared to single omics analysis that is compared against an external reference standard.
- the same analytic methods may further be refined with patient specific history data (e.g., prior omics data, current or past pharmaceutical treatment, etc.).
- differentially activated pathways and pathway elements in the output of the pathway analysis are then ranked, and the most significant portion (e.g., top 500 features, top 200 features, top 100 features) is analyzed for feature sets associated with immunogenicity of a tumor.
- the most significant portion e.g., top 500 features, top 200 features, top 100 features
- an especially contemplated feature set that corresponds to presence or activity of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (especially cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells) and Thl-type T cells and associated Thl signaling may be used to evaluate positive correlation with high tumor immunogenicity while another feature set that corresponds to Th2-type T cells and associated Th2 signaling may be used to evaluate negative correlation with tumor immunogenicity.
- further feature sets include genes and activities related to inflammation, innate immunity, etc.
- Prediction of likely treatment outcome will then be a qualitative and/or quantitative composite score that takes into account one or more mutational signatures (and especially APOBEC and/or POLE signatures, the MSI status, and immune checkpoint expression data.
- an MSI status that is indicative of microsatellite instability will weigh in favor of a positive treatment outcome.
- detection of one or more mutational signatures (with high frequency of SNPs, and especially SNPs that change the protein sequence, that are expressed at relatively high level, and that are presented via the patient' s MHC) will weigh in favor of a positive treatment outcome.
- determination of overexpression of one or more components for checkpoint inhibition will also weigh in favor of a positive treatment outcome.
- Figure 1 depicts an exemplary updated patient record that reflects contemplated systems and methods as presented herein.
- microsatellites were deemed instable by quantification of expressed and MHC-bound neoepitopes as described in US 2017/0032082 using a threshold value of 100 HLA matched neoepitopes, and positive treatment outcome ('immunotherapy permissible' : yes) was predicted for microsatellite instability, while negative treatment outcome ('immunotherapy permissible' : no) was predicted for stable microsatellites.
- microsatellite instability can also be determined using other known protocols (e.g., Nature Communications 2017; DOI: 10.1038/ncommsl5180).
- APOBEC and POLE mutation signatures were identified by analysis of the bases directly adjacent to a mutated base position, and exposure to APOBEC and POLE mutation signatures was calculated using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) on the counts of mutated triplets identified in the tumor sample, and substantially followed a protocol as described elsewhere (Nature 2013 August 22; 500(7463): 415-421).
- NMF non-negative matrix factorization
- various alternative methods of identification of APOBEC and/or POLE signatures are also deemed suitable and include those described in Genome Res. 2016. 26: 174-182; Nat Genet. 2013 September; 45(9): 970-976; US 2012/0059670, and US
- cut-off values are also deemed suitable, and especially contemplated overall genomic mutation rates that separate immunotherapy treatment permissive from non-permissive are 0.5, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, and hypermutation rates above 5.0.
- Immune checkpoint expression was deemed immunotherapy permissive where at least 30% of all tested genes with function in checkpoint inhibition were expressed or even overexpressed (e.g., more than 20% as measured by TPM relative to matched normal from the same patient). While TIM-3, LAG-3, PD-1, PD-Ll, PD-L2, IDO, TDO, CTLA4, IL2, and CD40 are particularly preferred, numerous other genes related to checkpoint inhibition are also contemplated suitable for use herein. Likewise, immune checkpoint expression may also be deemed immunotherapy permissive where at least 40%, or 50%, or 60%, or 70%, or 80% of all tested genes with function in checkpoint inhibition are expressed or overexpressed.
- Treatment outcome will typically be with respect to immunotherapy, and particularly with respect treatments that include a vaccine component, a cell-based component, and/or a drug that interferes with checkpoint inhibition and/or immunostimulatory drugs.
- suitable cell-based treatment includes treatments with recombinant or transfected NK cells, dendritic cells, or T cells expressing neoepitopes or chimeric antigen receptors binding to one or more neoepitopes).
- NK92 cells and derivatives thereof e.g., aNK cells, haNK cells and tank cells, commercially available from NantKwest, 9920 Jefferson Blvd. Culver City, CA 90232).
- particularly preferred vaccine based treatments include recombinant viral, bacterial, or yeast those that comprise a nucleic acid that encodes one or more neoantigens, preferably together with immunostimulatory molecules and/or checkpoint inhibitors.
- suitable recombinant viral vaccines include adenovirus- based vaccines (and especially Ad5-based viruses with reduced immunogenicity as described in US 2017/0165341 or US 2017/0065693), while preferred bacterial vaccines include those produced in E. coli having a reduced endotoxin (e.g., commercially available from
- Lucigen,2905 Parmenter St., Middleton, WI 53562), and preferred yeast vaccines are based on S. cerevisiae.
- an APOBEC and/or POLE signature in addition to other mutational patterns such as MSI and overall mutation rate substantially increased accuracy of treatment outcome prediction where a cancer patient is treated with immunotherapy (that typically includes a vaccine component (e.g., neoepitope based adenoviral, yeast, or bacterial vaccine), a cell-based component (e.g. , NK cell, aNK cell, or haNK cell based), and/or administration of one or more checkpoint inhibitors.
- a vaccine component e.g., neoepitope based adenoviral, yeast, or bacterial vaccine
- a cell-based component e.g. , NK cell, aNK cell, or haNK cell based
- APOBEC and/or POLE signatures frequently resulted in a substantial upshift in missense neoepitopes with concurrent reduction of DNA repair, which generated a substantially increased number of targets that are 'visible' to the immune system (i.e., can be presented on antigen presenting cells).
- Such scenario is particularly beneficial for immunotherapy where multiple checkpoint inhibition related genes are also present or overexpressed, which renders the tumors more susceptible to treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.
- consideration of APOBEC and/or POLE signatures in the context of other mutational events substantially increases accuracy of predicted treatment outcome of a cancer with immunotherapy.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (10)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA3034771A CA3034771C (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
SG11201901432YA SG11201901432YA (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
JP2019510972A JP6995842B2 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and their use |
US16/327,802 US11875877B2 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
KR1020207000181A KR20200003294A (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
CN201780052115.7A CN109937452B (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and uses thereof |
EP17844492.3A EP3500966B1 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
AU2017315468A AU2017315468B2 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
KR1020197008366A KR20190038935A (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and their uses (IMMUNOTHERAPY MARKERS AND USES THEREFOR) |
US18/506,554 US20240079089A1 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2023-11-10 | Immunotherapy Markers And Uses Therefor |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201662379700P | 2016-08-25 | 2016-08-25 | |
US62/379,700 | 2016-08-25 |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/327,802 A-371-Of-International US11875877B2 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
US18/506,554 Continuation US20240079089A1 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2023-11-10 | Immunotherapy Markers And Uses Therefor |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2018039567A1 true WO2018039567A1 (en) | 2018-03-01 |
Family
ID=61246344
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/048629 WO2018039567A1 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2017-08-25 | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US11875877B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3500966B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6995842B2 (en) |
KR (2) | KR20190038935A (en) |
CN (1) | CN109937452B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2017315468B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA3034771C (en) |
SG (1) | SG11201901432YA (en) |
WO (1) | WO2018039567A1 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108796077A (en) * | 2018-05-30 | 2018-11-13 | 朱运峰 | The primer pair group and kit of cytosine deaminase and related molecule gene modification difference are detected in cfDNA |
WO2019095017A1 (en) * | 2017-11-17 | 2019-05-23 | Gmdx Co Pty Ltd | Systems and methods for predicting the efficacy of cancer therapy |
WO2020091944A1 (en) * | 2018-10-31 | 2020-05-07 | Nantomics, Llc | Genomic and immune infiltration differences between msi and mss gi tumors |
WO2020176797A1 (en) * | 2019-02-27 | 2020-09-03 | Nektar Therapeutics | Immunotherapeutic combination for treating cancer |
WO2020249774A1 (en) * | 2019-06-14 | 2020-12-17 | Cray Innovation Ab | Method of stratifying subjects into sub-groups for therapeutic treatment |
US20210189505A1 (en) * | 2018-08-23 | 2021-06-24 | Nantcell, Inc. | Assessing microsatellite instability by liquid biopsy |
US11875877B2 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2024-01-16 | Nantomics, Llc | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2019070769A1 (en) * | 2017-10-02 | 2019-04-11 | Curematch, Inc. | Method of prediction of tumor-derived neo-peptide antigenicity and/or immunogenicity using mutational signature patterns |
US11564980B2 (en) | 2018-04-23 | 2023-01-31 | Nantcell, Inc. | Tumor treatment method with an individualized peptide vaccine |
TWI787500B (en) * | 2018-04-23 | 2022-12-21 | 美商南特細胞公司 | Neoepitope vaccine and immune stimulant combinations and methods |
CN111883203B (en) * | 2020-07-03 | 2023-12-29 | 上海厦维医学检验实验室有限公司 | Construction method of model for predicting PD-1 curative effect |
WO2022099004A1 (en) * | 2020-11-06 | 2022-05-12 | The General Hospital Corporation | Methods for characterizing biological samples |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2015069770A1 (en) * | 2013-11-05 | 2015-05-14 | Cognate Bioservices, Inc. | Combinations of checkpoint inhibitors and therapeutics to treat cancer |
US20150354009A1 (en) * | 2012-11-26 | 2015-12-10 | Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne (Epfl) | Colorectal cancer classification with differential prognosis and personalized therapeutic responses |
WO2016100975A1 (en) * | 2014-12-19 | 2016-06-23 | Massachsetts Institute Ot Technology | Molecular biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy |
Family Cites Families (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ES2428941T3 (en) | 2003-03-10 | 2013-11-12 | Expression Pathology, Inc. | Liquid tissue preparation from biological samples, tissues and cells histopathologically processed |
CA2596448A1 (en) * | 2005-02-11 | 2006-08-11 | University Of Rochester | Methods and compositions related to heightened apobec-1 related protein (arp) expression |
EP3061462B1 (en) | 2007-07-02 | 2019-02-27 | Etubics Corporation | Methods and compositions for producing an adenovirus vector for use with multiple vaccinations |
CA3007713C (en) | 2010-04-29 | 2020-05-26 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Pathway recognition algorithm using data integration on genomic models (paradigm) |
US10192641B2 (en) | 2010-04-29 | 2019-01-29 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method of generating a dynamic pathway map |
WO2011149534A2 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2011-12-01 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Bambam: parallel comparative analysis of high-throughput sequencing data |
US9646134B2 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2017-05-09 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Bambam: parallel comparative analysis of high-throughput sequencing data |
JP2014527036A (en) * | 2011-06-27 | 2014-10-09 | ザ ジャクソン ラボラトリー | Methods and compositions for the treatment of cancer and autoimmune diseases |
US20130086705A1 (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2013-04-04 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Compositions and methods for reducing and detecting viral infection |
WO2013096862A2 (en) | 2011-12-21 | 2013-06-27 | Integrated Diagnostics, Inc. | Selected reaction monitoring assays |
US9605276B2 (en) | 2012-08-24 | 2017-03-28 | Etubics Corporation | Replication defective adenovirus vector in vaccination |
CN104903467B (en) | 2012-11-05 | 2020-09-08 | Gmdx私人有限公司 | Method for determining cause of somatic mutation |
ES2790823T3 (en) | 2014-11-14 | 2020-10-29 | Liquid Genomics Inc | Use of circulating cell-free RNA for cancer diagnosis and / or monitoring |
MA40737A (en) * | 2014-11-21 | 2017-07-04 | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center | DETERMINANTS OF CANCER RESPONSE TO PD-1 BLOCKED IMMUNOTHERAPY |
EP3314025A4 (en) | 2015-06-29 | 2019-04-24 | Regents of the University of Minnesota | Apobec3b mutagenesis and immunotherapy |
US20180185302A1 (en) | 2015-06-30 | 2018-07-05 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Methods for downregulating apobec3b |
WO2017031551A1 (en) | 2015-08-26 | 2017-03-02 | Gmdx Co Pty Ltd | Methods of detecting cancer recurrence |
EP3362930A4 (en) | 2015-10-12 | 2019-06-19 | Nantomics, LLC | Systems, compositions, and methods for discovery of msi and neoepitopes that predict sensitivity to checkpoint inhibitors |
WO2017087819A1 (en) | 2015-11-19 | 2017-05-26 | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Signatures for predicting cancer immune therapy response |
JP2019527894A (en) | 2016-08-03 | 2019-10-03 | ナントミクス,エルエルシー | Dasatinib reaction prediction model and method |
WO2018039567A1 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2018-03-01 | Nantomics, Llc | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
-
2017
- 2017-08-25 WO PCT/US2017/048629 patent/WO2018039567A1/en active Search and Examination
- 2017-08-25 CN CN201780052115.7A patent/CN109937452B/en active Active
- 2017-08-25 KR KR1020197008366A patent/KR20190038935A/en active Application Filing
- 2017-08-25 SG SG11201901432YA patent/SG11201901432YA/en unknown
- 2017-08-25 AU AU2017315468A patent/AU2017315468B2/en active Active
- 2017-08-25 US US16/327,802 patent/US11875877B2/en active Active
- 2017-08-25 CA CA3034771A patent/CA3034771C/en active Active
- 2017-08-25 JP JP2019510972A patent/JP6995842B2/en active Active
- 2017-08-25 KR KR1020207000181A patent/KR20200003294A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2017-08-25 EP EP17844492.3A patent/EP3500966B1/en active Active
-
2023
- 2023-11-10 US US18/506,554 patent/US20240079089A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150354009A1 (en) * | 2012-11-26 | 2015-12-10 | Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne (Epfl) | Colorectal cancer classification with differential prognosis and personalized therapeutic responses |
WO2015069770A1 (en) * | 2013-11-05 | 2015-05-14 | Cognate Bioservices, Inc. | Combinations of checkpoint inhibitors and therapeutics to treat cancer |
WO2016100975A1 (en) * | 2014-12-19 | 2016-06-23 | Massachsetts Institute Ot Technology | Molecular biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
HARADHVALA, NICHOLAS J. ET AL.: "Mutational strand asymmetries in cancer genomes reveal mechanisms of DNA damage and repair", CELL, vol. 164, 28 January 2016 (2016-01-28), pages 538 - 549, XP055468738 * |
See also references of EP3500966A4 * |
XIAO, YANPING ET AL.: "The microsatellite instable subset of colorectal cancer is a particularly good candidate for checkpoint blockade immunotherapy", CANCER DISCOVERY, vol. 5, no. 1, January 2015 (2015-01-01), pages 16 - 18, XP055271983 * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11875877B2 (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2024-01-16 | Nantomics, Llc | Immunotherapy markers and uses therefor |
WO2019095017A1 (en) * | 2017-11-17 | 2019-05-23 | Gmdx Co Pty Ltd | Systems and methods for predicting the efficacy of cancer therapy |
CN108796077A (en) * | 2018-05-30 | 2018-11-13 | 朱运峰 | The primer pair group and kit of cytosine deaminase and related molecule gene modification difference are detected in cfDNA |
CN108796077B (en) * | 2018-05-30 | 2021-11-09 | 朱运峰 | Primer pair group and kit for detecting cytosine deaminase and related molecular gene modification difference in cfDNA |
US20210189505A1 (en) * | 2018-08-23 | 2021-06-24 | Nantcell, Inc. | Assessing microsatellite instability by liquid biopsy |
WO2020091944A1 (en) * | 2018-10-31 | 2020-05-07 | Nantomics, Llc | Genomic and immune infiltration differences between msi and mss gi tumors |
WO2020176797A1 (en) * | 2019-02-27 | 2020-09-03 | Nektar Therapeutics | Immunotherapeutic combination for treating cancer |
WO2020249774A1 (en) * | 2019-06-14 | 2020-12-17 | Cray Innovation Ab | Method of stratifying subjects into sub-groups for therapeutic treatment |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA3034771C (en) | 2021-10-26 |
EP3500966B1 (en) | 2021-04-21 |
KR20190038935A (en) | 2019-04-09 |
US11875877B2 (en) | 2024-01-16 |
JP2019534685A (en) | 2019-12-05 |
KR20200003294A (en) | 2020-01-08 |
CN109937452B (en) | 2023-04-11 |
US20190237196A1 (en) | 2019-08-01 |
EP3500966A4 (en) | 2020-05-06 |
CA3034771A1 (en) | 2018-03-01 |
SG11201901432YA (en) | 2019-03-28 |
JP6995842B2 (en) | 2022-01-17 |
EP3500966A1 (en) | 2019-06-26 |
AU2017315468B2 (en) | 2020-02-13 |
US20240079089A1 (en) | 2024-03-07 |
CN109937452A (en) | 2019-06-25 |
AU2017315468A1 (en) | 2019-03-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20240079089A1 (en) | Immunotherapy Markers And Uses Therefor | |
US20230307090A1 (en) | Systems, Compositions, And Methods For Discovery Of MSI And Neoepitopes That Predict Sensitivity To Checkpoint Inhibitors | |
Jia et al. | Titin mutation associated with responsiveness to checkpoint blockades in solid tumors | |
US11361841B2 (en) | High-throughput identification of patient-specific neoepitopes as therapeutic targets for cancer immunotherapies | |
CN110214275B (en) | Tumor antigenicity processing and presentation | |
KR20210014111A (en) | Size-tagged preferred end and orientation-cognition assays to determine the properties of cell-free mixtures | |
WO2017218798A1 (en) | Systems and methods for diagnosing familial hypercholesterolemia | |
Doig et al. | Tumour mutational burden: an overview for pathologists | |
US20210398612A1 (en) | Detecting tumor mutation burden with rna substrate | |
CN111670255A (en) | BAM characteristics from liquid and solid tumors and uses thereof | |
US20240112813A1 (en) | Methods and systems for annotating genomic data | |
US20240161868A1 (en) | System and method for gene expression and tissue of origin inference from cell-free dna | |
JP2023524048A (en) | Composite biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy | |
Poltronieri et al. | Dongdong Yang1†, Jinling Yu2†, Bing Han3, Yue Sun3, Steven Mo4, 5 and Jing Hu3 | |
Sverchkova et al. | Integrative HLA typing of tumor and adjacent normal tissue can reveal insights into the tumor immune response | |
WO2023146978A2 (en) | Systems and methods for determining t-cell cross-reactivity between antigens | |
Yan et al. | DCBLD1 is a Prognostic Biomarker and Correlated with an Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in Pan-Cancer | |
WO2023194491A1 (en) | Analysis of hla alleles transcriptional deregulation | |
US20210375395A1 (en) | Omics Detection of Nonhomologous End Joining Repair Site Signatures | |
WO2020092038A1 (en) | Cdkn2a screening germline expression |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
DPE1 | Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 17844492 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 3034771 Country of ref document: CA |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2019510972 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20197008366 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2017315468 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20170825 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2017844492 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20190320 |