WO2017196998A1 - Improved infrared sensor - Google Patents

Improved infrared sensor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2017196998A1
WO2017196998A1 PCT/US2017/031988 US2017031988W WO2017196998A1 WO 2017196998 A1 WO2017196998 A1 WO 2017196998A1 US 2017031988 W US2017031988 W US 2017031988W WO 2017196998 A1 WO2017196998 A1 WO 2017196998A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
layer
infrared sensor
sensor
reflective
stress mitigating
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2017/031988
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
David Watson GRAY
Pamela L. BOLING
Jay L. KANE
Original Assignee
Grauling Research Incorporated
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Grauling Research Incorporated filed Critical Grauling Research Incorporated
Publication of WO2017196998A1 publication Critical patent/WO2017196998A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01J—MEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
    • G01J5/00—Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry
    • G01J5/10—Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry using electric radiation detectors
    • G01J5/28—Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry using electric radiation detectors using photoemissive or photovoltaic cells
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01J—MEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
    • G01J5/00—Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry
    • G01J5/02—Constructional details
    • G01J5/0205—Mechanical elements; Supports for optical elements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01J—MEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
    • G01J5/00—Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry
    • G01J5/02—Constructional details
    • G01J5/08—Optical arrangements
    • G01J5/0803—Arrangements for time-dependent attenuation of radiation signals
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L27/00—Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate
    • H01L27/14—Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate including semiconductor components sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation and specially adapted either for the conversion of the energy of such radiation into electrical energy or for the control of electrical energy by such radiation

Definitions

  • the invention relates most generally to infrared (IR) sensors, and more particularly to coated IR sensors, and still more particularly to an improved IR sensor including a stress mitigating layer and an optical coating stack, including, among others, an anti-reflective optical stack deposited atop an IR sensor surface.
  • IR infrared
  • Infrared sensors are well known in commerce, industry, and in government applications. They come in many varieties. There are IR detectors that operate on thermal principles and others that are photonic, i.e., photoconductive or photovoltaic.
  • a common class of photoconductive IR sensors is made from lead salts, namely lead selenide (PbSe) and lead sulfide (PbS). Lead sulfide IR sensors detect IR radiation in the 1 to 2.5 micron range, while lead selenide is sensitive to IR from approximately 1.5 to 5.2 microns. Indium antimonide and indium arsenide are two other common photovoltaic IR detection materials.
  • Lead sulfide is one of the earliest materials used in IR detector fabrication. Lead sulfide detectors work in one of two ways: either the change in resistance or the photocurrent generated by the IR radiation can be measured. With lead selenide, the change in
  • Indium antimonide and indium arsenide are photovoltaic photodiodes, generating electric current when exposed to IR radiation.
  • the index of refraction for the detector materials is high, commonly around four, meaning that about forty percent of the incident radiation is lost due to surface reflection.
  • the methods commonly used for depositing IR sensors are chemical bath deposition (CBD) or epitaxial growth. These low energy deposition processes result in low density films with a porous structure. The films are easily stressed and are also vulnerable to moisture contamination. Exposure to the ambient atmosphere is often sufficient to cause the films to take up moisture and degrade the performance of the sensor by reducing the signal response to incident infrared radiation.
  • the materials are soft, with a low Mohs hardness rating, and are thus susceptible to damage.
  • a common solution to these problems is to encapsulate the IR detector in glass to protect it from the surrounding environment and to prevent moisture contamination and damage.
  • a glass enclosure increases the loss of incident radiation due to surface reflection, makes the detector unit larger and heavier, and adds cost due to increased labor and materials in production.
  • the increase in surface reflection from the encapsulating may render their performance unacceptable and thereby decreases production yield.
  • the instant invention solves the above-described problems by providing an IR sensor with a thin film deposition of a stress mitigating layer and an anti-reflecting optical stack on top of the sensor substrate.
  • the anti -reflective (AR) coating works by decreasing the surface reflection of the substrate, thereby allowing more light to be transmitted to the IR sensor and improving its performance.
  • a simple single layer AR film is formed by depositing a material that is transparent to IR radiation and has an index of refraction matched as closely as possible to the square root of the substrate index of refraction.
  • Anti-reflective coatings are well known in the thin film and optical coating industries. Accordingly, it might seem obvious to apply an AR coating to an IR sensor in order to reduce the surface reflection and result in more IR radiation reaching the sensor, thereby increasing the signal response. However, when an AR coating is applied to an IR sensor, the results are entirely contrary to what one would expect: Rather than improving the signal response, the signal is degraded and the sensor performs significantly worse than the uncoated sensor.
  • the instant invention solves this difficulty by providing an IR sensor having a stress mitigating layer deposited between the IR sensor and the AR thin film.
  • the stress mitigating layer can be composed of many different materials and can comprise more than one layer.
  • the key features of this mitigating layer are that it is optically inert and less dense and more porous than the AR thin film deposited on top of it. Keeping it optically inert prevents the stress mitigating layer from interfering with the decrease in surface reflection provided by the AR coating. Making the layer less dense and more porous results in it being more "flexible.” It can be deposited on top of the sensor without disrupting its electrical performance and protect it from the denser, less flexible AR coating.
  • a further advantage of depositing an AR coating on an IR sensor which is more dense and less porous than a stress mitigating layer deposited below it is that the denser films provide environmental protection as well, forming a hermetic seal that prevents moisture contamination, and it creates a harder, more durable surface. This eliminates the need to encapsulate the sensors in glass, which reduces labor costs, material costs, production time, increases yield, and prevents loss of incident radiation due to surface reflection from the glass. If the basic AR coating design is comprised of materials that are not environmentally durable, an optically neutral, environmentally durable layer may be added to the design to hermetically seal the sensor. This seal may include one or more layers and may include multiple materials.
  • the coatings may be deposited by evaporation, sputtering, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), or other commonly known processes.
  • CVD chemical vapor deposition
  • different types of processes may be combined to produce the optimal sensor performance.
  • an evaporated aluminum (III) oxide coating is deposited on a lead salt sensor as the stress mitigating layer.
  • An evaporation process may be used for the deposition because it typically produces lower stress, more porous films.
  • a simple one layer AR composed of sputtered zirconium dioxide may be deposited to reduce surface reflection.
  • the stress mitigating layer prevents the signal degradation observed when the zirconium dioxide layer is deposited directly onto the sensor, and the signal response improves more than an optical model predicts.
  • the zirconium dioxide also provides a durable, wear- resistant coating that is highly resistant to moisture contamination.
  • this first example involves a single layer AR
  • more complex multilayer coatings can also be deposited in order to form broader AR coatings that reduce reflection over a larger range or that have other desired optical effects.
  • Multilayer stress mitigating designs may also be used.
  • the IR sensor of the present invention may include an active IR substrate, a stress mitigating layer deposited atop the IR substrate, one or more AR layers deposited atop the stress mitigating layer, and one or more optical filter layers deposited atop the AR layer.
  • the IR sensor of the present invention may include an active IR substrate, a stress mitigating layer deposited atop the IR substrate, one or more AR layers deposited atop the stress mitigating layer, one or more optical filter layers deposited atop the AR layer, and an environmental durability layer deposited atop the optical filter layers.
  • the IR sensor may include an active IR substrate, a stress mitigating layer deposited atop the IR substrate, and one or more optical filter layers deposited atop the stress mitigating layer in lieu of the AR layer.
  • the IR sensor may include an active IR substrate, a stress mitigating layer deposited atop the IR substrate, one or more optical filter layers deposited atop the stress mitigating layer in lieu of the AR layer, and an environmental durability layer deposited atop the optical filter layers.
  • the IR sensor may include an active IR substrate, a stress mitigating layer deposited atop the IR substrate, and an environmental durability layer deposited atop the stress mitigating layer.
  • the invention described and claimed herein improves the performance of an IR sensor by increasing signal response and durability. It also obviates the need to encapsulate the sensor in glass, thereby eliminating increased surface reflection of incident radiation, additional detector volume, and increased labor costs.
  • FIG. 1 is a highly schematic cross-sectional side view in elevation showing a sensor with a stress mitigating layer and an anti -reflective coating.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic cross- sectional side view in elevation showing a sensor with a stress mitigating layer, an anti -reflective coating, and a hermetic sealing layer.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph comparing signal responses of a first IR sensor having an AR coating without a stress mitigating later with a second IR sensor having a stress mitigating layer.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic cross-sectional side view in elevation showing an IR sensor having optimal filter layers disposed atop an anti -reflective layer.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic cross- sectional side view in elevation showing an IR sensor having optical filter layers disposed atop a stress mitigating layer in lieu of one or more AR layers.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 there is illustrated therein a new and improved infrared sensor.
  • the invention is an improved IR sensor that has increased signal response and does not need to be encased in a protective covering to protect it from environmental degradation.
  • the current state of the art IR sensor has limited performance for many reasons.
  • the high index of refraction of common sensor materials means that up to forty percent of the incident infrared radiation is lost due to surface reflection.
  • Sensors are also commonly made by chemical bath deposition or epitaxial growth. These low-energy processes result in porous, low density films that are susceptible to moisture contamination and are easily damaged.
  • the current solution is to encase the sensors in glass, which is labor intensive, costly, decreases yield and increases the size of the sensor, rendering it less suitable for many applications.
  • IR sensors are well-known in the sensor industry, as are anti -reflection coatings, yet AR coatings have not been commonly used with these IR sensors due to such coatings unexpectedly degrading the performance of the sensors.
  • a sensor's response to IR radiation is highly dependent on its crystalline structure and research showed that the denser, less porous anti -reflective coatings caused a stress mismatch that disrupted the crystalline structure and therefore its response to infrared radiation.
  • the instant invention uses a stress-mitigating layer made of material which is softer and more porous than the AR coating material deposited on the stress mitigating layer. This combination of material characteristics does not negatively affect sensor performance.
  • the stress mitigating layer shields the sensor from the stress mismatch of the anti- reflective coating. This permits the anti -reflective coating to serve its intended purpose of decreasing surface reflection and increasing the amount of incident radiation that reaches the sensor. Experiments show that depositing a stress mitigating layer before the anti-reflective coating not only improves sensor performance, it improves it more than would be predicted by the AR coating alone, which was unexpected.
  • FIG. 1 An embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 1.
  • the IR sensor 10 includes an IR substrate (the IR sensitive or active layer) 12 with an upper (or top) surface 14 having a stress mitigating layer 16 deposited on the upper surface.
  • the stress mitigating layer may be comprised of one or more layers and may be made of multiple materials. It may be deposited using a variety of techniques, including sputtering,
  • the anti-reflective coating 18 is then deposited on upper surface 20 of the stress mitigating layer.
  • the anti -reflective coating may be a single layer of one material, or it may be a more complex design consisting of multiple layers and multiple materials, depending on what wavelength range the AR coating is required to cover.
  • the AR coating may be deposited using the same variety of techniques available for the stress mitigating layer. Alternatively, a different process may be used for each layer. In an embodiment the AR coating may also provide environmental durability, depending on the materials chosen.
  • an IR sensor 30 again includes an IR substrate (IR active layer) 32, a stress mitigating layer 34 deposited on the upper surface 36 of the IR substrate.
  • the stress mitigating layer may be comprised of one or more layer and may be made of multiple materials. It may be deposited using a variety of techniques, including sputtering, evaporation, ion beam deposition, or CVD.
  • An anti-reflective coating 38 is then deposited on the upper surface 40 of the stress mitigating layer.
  • the anti-reflective coating may be a single layer comprising one material or a more complex design consisting of multiple layers and multiple materials, depending on what wavelength range the AR coating is required to cover.
  • the AR coating may be deposited using the same variety of techniques available for the stress mitigating layer. A different process may be used for each layer.
  • the AR coating does not provide environmental durability, a characteristic that may occur when a good design for the desired AR performance uses less environmentally durable materials.
  • a durability layer 42 that provides protection from moisture and other environmental degradation can be deposited on the upper surface 44 of the AR coating.
  • the durability layer may be comprised of one or more layers and may be made from one or more materials.
  • the durability layer may be deposited using the same techniques available for the stress mitigating and AR layers. The same deposition technique may be used for each layer, or different deposition processes may be used.
  • an aluminum oxide (III) (A1 2 0 3 ) stress mitigating layer and a single layer zirconium dioxide (Zr0 2 ) anti -reflective coating were deposited on a group of lead sulfide sensors. Before the coatings were applied, sensor performance was measured.
  • the A1 2 0 3 coating was applied using evaporation techniques in a vacuum coater.
  • the chamber was pumped down to a range of 10-5 torr and 3/8 inches of 99.99% aluminum wire 1/8 inch in diameter was placed in a tungsten boat.
  • Oxygen was added to the chamber and the material was evaporated at a pressure of approximately 3.5 x 10-4 torr.
  • the aluminum wire was evaporated in the oxygen atmosphere for six minutes at approximately 2.6 V dc, depositing a layer of aluminum (III) oxide on the infrared sensors.
  • the evaporation system was shut off and a single layer of zirconium dioxide was sputtered on top of the evaporated aluminum (III) oxide layer.
  • the zirconium dioxide layer was designed to provide both anti- reflective optical properties and environmental durability.
  • the zirconium dioxide was sputtered at a pressure of 4.2 mT in a combined atmosphere of argon and oxygen, using a standard dc power supply operating at 3 kW.
  • the lower line 52 shows sensors that were coated with an anti -reflective coating but lacked an aluminum (III) oxide stress mitigating layer underneath the anti -reflective layer.
  • the upper line 54 shows identical sensors but including a stress-mitigating layer disposed between the IR substrate and the anti -reflective layer. The results compare the performances of uncoated sensors with those of coated sensors and show the differences as a percentage. That is, a data point at the 20 percent line for a coated sensor has a performance (signal response) twenty percent that of the uncoated sensor. A sensor with a reading of 140 percent has a signal response forty percent greater than that of the uncoated sensor.
  • the graph of FIG. 3 clearly shows that without a stress mitigating layer, the coated sensors had a performance significantly lower than coated sensors, while sensors having a stress mitigating layer applied before the anti-reflective coating showed a significantly improved signal response - as high as fifty percent higher.
  • the anti-reflective coating greatly improves environmental durability.
  • An uncoated sensor is highly sensitive to moisture contamination, so much so that simply leaving the uncoated sensor out in a regular environment can cause it to take up moisture and degrade its performance, necessitating the labor intensive and costly solution of
  • the sensors can be placed in a high moisture environment, such as a humidity chamber, and still have an unchanged performance, indicating they are no longer sensitive to moisture contamination.
  • the stress mitigating layer may be made of different materials, such as oxides, nitrides, or mixed materials.
  • the stress mitigating layer may be deposited by evaporation, sputtering, CVD or any other deposition method. The best choice will be determined by the sensor material.
  • the stress mitigating layer may also be composed of a multilayer coating if desired.
  • the anti -reflective coating may also be deposited using different coating methods and different materials. As shown in FIG. 4, if an IR sensor 60 having broader anti -reflective range is desired, the sensor may include a sensor substrate 62 having an upper surface 64, a stress mitigating layer 66 deposited on the upper surface of the sensor substrate and itself having an upper surface 68, and an anti-reflective coating composed of multiple layers 70a, 70b, the uppermost 70b having an upper surface 72, designed to give the desired optical performance. If further optical properties are desired, single or multilayer filters 74a, 74b may be deposited on the upper surface 72 of the upper anti -reflective coating layer 70b.
  • an IR substrate 72 may have a stress mitigating layer 74 deposited on its upper surface 76, and a single or multilayer optical filter coating 78a, 78b, may be placed directly on the upper surface 80 of the stress mitigating layer 74. Also, if the desired optical properties are best acquired using less durable materials, a layer of a material 82 different from the rest of the design may be deposited on the upper surface 84 of the upper optical filter coating 78b as the top (or outer) layer of the design in order to maintain environmental durability.
  • the instant invention is also applicable for many different types of sensor materials in addition to the lead sulfide and lead selenide IR sensors discussed above. These materials include, but are not limited to, InAs/GasInSb, HgTe/CdTe, Si:As, Si:Ga, Si:Sb, Ge:Hg, Ge:Ga, GaAs/AlGaAs, PtSi, IrSi, InAs/GaAs, PbTe, PbSe, PbS, CdS, CdSe, PbCdS, PbxSnl-xTe, PbySnl-ySe, HgCdTe, InSb, InAs, QWIPs, QDIPs.
  • InAs/GasInSb, HgTe/CdTe Si:As, Si:Ga, Si:Sb, Ge:Hg, Ge:Ga, GaAs/AlGaAs, P
  • the improved sensor overcomes persisting problems by providing an IR sensor having an anti -reflective coating deposited on top of an IR sensor with a stress mitigating layer disposed between the sensor substrate and the AR layer.
  • the stress mitigating layer prevents the anti -reflective coating from disrupting the crystalline structure of the sensor, and therefore its electrical properties, due to stress. This allows the AR to perform its intended function of decreasing surface reflection and allows more incident radiation to reach the sensor, thereby improving sensor performance.
  • the anti -reflective coating also serves to improve the environmental durability of the sensor, decreasing its susceptibility to moisture contamination, and obviating the need to encapsulate the sensor in glass, with corresponding decreases in production time and expense, as well as a reduction in sensor size.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Photometry And Measurement Of Optical Pulse Characteristics (AREA)

Abstract

An infrared sensor having superior signal response and durability, including an IR active layer, either an optical filter layer or an anti-reflective layer, and a stress mitigating layer disposed therebetween. The anti -reflective or optical filter layer is made from a material that is more dense and less porous than the material from which the stress mitigating layer is made. This configuration obviates the need to encapsulate the sensor in glass, thereby eliminating increased surface reflection of incident radiation, additional detector volume, and increased labor costs.

Description

IMPROVED INFRARED SENSOR
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Technical Field
[0001] The invention relates most generally to infrared (IR) sensors, and more particularly to coated IR sensors, and still more particularly to an improved IR sensor including a stress mitigating layer and an optical coating stack, including, among others, an anti-reflective optical stack deposited atop an IR sensor surface.
Background Art
[0002] Infrared (IR) sensors are well known in commerce, industry, and in government applications. They come in many varieties. There are IR detectors that operate on thermal principles and others that are photonic, i.e., photoconductive or photovoltaic. A common class of photoconductive IR sensors is made from lead salts, namely lead selenide (PbSe) and lead sulfide (PbS). Lead sulfide IR sensors detect IR radiation in the 1 to 2.5 micron range, while lead selenide is sensitive to IR from approximately 1.5 to 5.2 microns. Indium antimonide and indium arsenide are two other common photovoltaic IR detection materials.
[0003] Lead sulfide is one of the earliest materials used in IR detector fabrication. Lead sulfide detectors work in one of two ways: either the change in resistance or the photocurrent generated by the IR radiation can be measured. With lead selenide, the change in
conductivity of a thin film of the material is measured when IR radiation is incident upon it. Indium antimonide and indium arsenide are photovoltaic photodiodes, generating electric current when exposed to IR radiation.
[0004] Several things reduce the efficiency of an IR sensor. To being with, the index of refraction for the detector materials is high, commonly around four, meaning that about forty percent of the incident radiation is lost due to surface reflection. Second, the methods commonly used for depositing IR sensors are chemical bath deposition (CBD) or epitaxial growth. These low energy deposition processes result in low density films with a porous structure. The films are easily stressed and are also vulnerable to moisture contamination. Exposure to the ambient atmosphere is often sufficient to cause the films to take up moisture and degrade the performance of the sensor by reducing the signal response to incident infrared radiation. Finally, the materials are soft, with a low Mohs hardness rating, and are thus susceptible to damage.
[0005] A common solution to these problems is to encapsulate the IR detector in glass to protect it from the surrounding environment and to prevent moisture contamination and damage. However, a glass enclosure increases the loss of incident radiation due to surface reflection, makes the detector unit larger and heavier, and adds cost due to increased labor and materials in production. For sensors that marginally meet performance specifications, the increase in surface reflection from the encapsulating may render their performance unacceptable and thereby decreases production yield.
[0006] The foregoing patents reflect the current state of the art of which the present inventor is aware. Reference to, and discussion of, these patents is intended to aid in discharging Applicant's acknowledged duty of candor in disclosing information that may be relevant to the examination of claims to the present invention. However, it is respectfully submitted that none of the above-indicated patents disclose, teach, suggest, show, or otherwise render obvious, either singly or when considered in combination, the invention described and claimed herein.
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODFMENTS
Disclosure of Invention
[0007] The instant invention solves the above-described problems by providing an IR sensor with a thin film deposition of a stress mitigating layer and an anti-reflecting optical stack on top of the sensor substrate.
[0008] The anti -reflective (AR) coating works by decreasing the surface reflection of the substrate, thereby allowing more light to be transmitted to the IR sensor and improving its performance. For example, a simple single layer AR film is formed by depositing a material that is transparent to IR radiation and has an index of refraction matched as closely as possible to the square root of the substrate index of refraction.
[0009] Anti-reflective coatings are well known in the thin film and optical coating industries. Accordingly, it might seem obvious to apply an AR coating to an IR sensor in order to reduce the surface reflection and result in more IR radiation reaching the sensor, thereby increasing the signal response. However, when an AR coating is applied to an IR sensor, the results are entirely contrary to what one would expect: Rather than improving the signal response, the signal is degraded and the sensor performs significantly worse than the uncoated sensor.
[0010] This unexpected result is due to stress. The crystalline structure of these sensors is crucial to their performance and depositing a denser, less porous AR coating on them causes a stress mismatch between the sensor and the AR film and disrupts the electrical properties of the sensor and decreases its performance. Research has shown that the sensors are very sensitive to this stress mismatch.
[0011] The instant invention solves this difficulty by providing an IR sensor having a stress mitigating layer deposited between the IR sensor and the AR thin film. The stress mitigating layer can be composed of many different materials and can comprise more than one layer. The key features of this mitigating layer are that it is optically inert and less dense and more porous than the AR thin film deposited on top of it. Keeping it optically inert prevents the stress mitigating layer from interfering with the decrease in surface reflection provided by the AR coating. Making the layer less dense and more porous results in it being more "flexible." It can be deposited on top of the sensor without disrupting its electrical performance and protect it from the denser, less flexible AR coating.
[0012] A further advantage of depositing an AR coating on an IR sensor which is more dense and less porous than a stress mitigating layer deposited below it is that the denser films provide environmental protection as well, forming a hermetic seal that prevents moisture contamination, and it creates a harder, more durable surface. This eliminates the need to encapsulate the sensors in glass, which reduces labor costs, material costs, production time, increases yield, and prevents loss of incident radiation due to surface reflection from the glass. If the basic AR coating design is comprised of materials that are not environmentally durable, an optically neutral, environmentally durable layer may be added to the design to hermetically seal the sensor. This seal may include one or more layers and may include multiple materials.
[0013] Different materials and coating processes can be used to produce a stress mitigating layer and an AR coating tuned to a sensor's specific wavelength response range. For example, the coatings may be deposited by evaporation, sputtering, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), or other commonly known processes. In addition, different types of processes may be combined to produce the optimal sensor performance.
[0014] In an embodiment of the invention an evaporated aluminum (III) oxide coating is deposited on a lead salt sensor as the stress mitigating layer. An evaporation process may be used for the deposition because it typically produces lower stress, more porous films. After this layer is formed, a simple one layer AR composed of sputtered zirconium dioxide may be deposited to reduce surface reflection. In this embodiment, the stress mitigating layer prevents the signal degradation observed when the zirconium dioxide layer is deposited directly onto the sensor, and the signal response improves more than an optical model predicts. The zirconium dioxide also provides a durable, wear- resistant coating that is highly resistant to moisture contamination.
[0015] While this first example involves a single layer AR, more complex multilayer coatings can also be deposited in order to form broader AR coatings that reduce reflection over a larger range or that have other desired optical effects. Multilayer stress mitigating designs may also be used.
[0016] In an embodiment, the IR sensor of the present invention may include an active IR substrate, a stress mitigating layer deposited atop the IR substrate, one or more AR layers deposited atop the stress mitigating layer, and one or more optical filter layers deposited atop the AR layer.
[0017] In another embodiment, the IR sensor of the present invention may include an active IR substrate, a stress mitigating layer deposited atop the IR substrate, one or more AR layers deposited atop the stress mitigating layer, one or more optical filter layers deposited atop the AR layer, and an environmental durability layer deposited atop the optical filter layers.
[0018] In still another embodiment, the IR sensor may include an active IR substrate, a stress mitigating layer deposited atop the IR substrate, and one or more optical filter layers deposited atop the stress mitigating layer in lieu of the AR layer.
[0019] In another embodiment, the IR sensor may include an active IR substrate, a stress mitigating layer deposited atop the IR substrate, one or more optical filter layers deposited atop the stress mitigating layer in lieu of the AR layer, and an environmental durability layer deposited atop the optical filter layers.
[0020] In another embodiment, the IR sensor may include an active IR substrate, a stress mitigating layer deposited atop the IR substrate, and an environmental durability layer deposited atop the stress mitigating layer.
[0021] In summary, as will be clear from the foregoing, the invention described and claimed herein improves the performance of an IR sensor by increasing signal response and durability. It also obviates the need to encapsulate the sensor in glass, thereby eliminating increased surface reflection of incident radiation, additional detector volume, and increased labor costs.
[0022] The foregoing summary broadly sets out the more important features of the present invention so that the detailed description that follows may be better understood, and so that the present contributions to the art may be better appreciated. There are additional features of the invention that will be described in the detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention which will form the subject matter of the claims appended hereto.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0023] The invention will be better understood and objects other than those set forth above will become apparent when consideration is given to the following detailed description thereof. Such description makes reference to the annexed drawings wherein:
[0024] FIG. 1 is a highly schematic cross-sectional side view in elevation showing a sensor with a stress mitigating layer and an anti -reflective coating.
[0025] FIG. 2 is a schematic cross- sectional side view in elevation showing a sensor with a stress mitigating layer, an anti -reflective coating, and a hermetic sealing layer.
[0026] FIG. 3 is a graph comparing signal responses of a first IR sensor having an AR coating without a stress mitigating later with a second IR sensor having a stress mitigating layer.
[0027] FIG. 4 is a schematic cross-sectional side view in elevation showing an IR sensor having optimal filter layers disposed atop an anti -reflective layer. [0028] FIG. 5 is a schematic cross- sectional side view in elevation showing an IR sensor having optical filter layers disposed atop a stress mitigating layer in lieu of one or more AR layers.
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
[0029] Referring first to FIGS. 1 and 2, there is illustrated therein a new and improved infrared sensor. The invention is an improved IR sensor that has increased signal response and does not need to be encased in a protective covering to protect it from environmental degradation. The current state of the art IR sensor has limited performance for many reasons. The high index of refraction of common sensor materials means that up to forty percent of the incident infrared radiation is lost due to surface reflection. Sensors are also commonly made by chemical bath deposition or epitaxial growth. These low-energy processes result in porous, low density films that are susceptible to moisture contamination and are easily damaged. The current solution is to encase the sensors in glass, which is labor intensive, costly, decreases yield and increases the size of the sensor, rendering it less suitable for many applications.
[0030] As noted above, photoconductive and photovoltaic IR sensors are well-known in the sensor industry, as are anti -reflection coatings, yet AR coatings have not been commonly used with these IR sensors due to such coatings unexpectedly degrading the performance of the sensors. A sensor's response to IR radiation is highly dependent on its crystalline structure and research showed that the denser, less porous anti -reflective coatings caused a stress mismatch that disrupted the crystalline structure and therefore its response to infrared radiation. The instant invention uses a stress-mitigating layer made of material which is softer and more porous than the AR coating material deposited on the stress mitigating layer. This combination of material characteristics does not negatively affect sensor performance.
[0031] The stress mitigating layer shields the sensor from the stress mismatch of the anti- reflective coating. This permits the anti -reflective coating to serve its intended purpose of decreasing surface reflection and increasing the amount of incident radiation that reaches the sensor. Experiments show that depositing a stress mitigating layer before the anti-reflective coating not only improves sensor performance, it improves it more than would be predicted by the AR coating alone, which was unexpected. [0032] An embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 1. Here it is seen that the IR sensor 10 includes an IR substrate (the IR sensitive or active layer) 12 with an upper (or top) surface 14 having a stress mitigating layer 16 deposited on the upper surface. The stress mitigating layer may be comprised of one or more layers and may be made of multiple materials. It may be deposited using a variety of techniques, including sputtering,
evaporation, ion beam deposition, or CVD. An anti-reflective coating 18 is then deposited on upper surface 20 of the stress mitigating layer. The anti -reflective coating may be a single layer of one material, or it may be a more complex design consisting of multiple layers and multiple materials, depending on what wavelength range the AR coating is required to cover. The AR coating may be deposited using the same variety of techniques available for the stress mitigating layer. Alternatively, a different process may be used for each layer. In an embodiment the AR coating may also provide environmental durability, depending on the materials chosen.
[0033] In another embodiment, shown in FIG. 2, an IR sensor 30 again includes an IR substrate (IR active layer) 32, a stress mitigating layer 34 deposited on the upper surface 36 of the IR substrate. The stress mitigating layer may be comprised of one or more layer and may be made of multiple materials. It may be deposited using a variety of techniques, including sputtering, evaporation, ion beam deposition, or CVD. An anti-reflective coating 38 is then deposited on the upper surface 40 of the stress mitigating layer. The anti-reflective coating may be a single layer comprising one material or a more complex design consisting of multiple layers and multiple materials, depending on what wavelength range the AR coating is required to cover. The AR coating may be deposited using the same variety of techniques available for the stress mitigating layer. A different process may be used for each layer. In this embodiment, the AR coating does not provide environmental durability, a characteristic that may occur when a good design for the desired AR performance uses less environmentally durable materials. In this instance, a durability layer 42 that provides protection from moisture and other environmental degradation can be deposited on the upper surface 44 of the AR coating. The durability layer may be comprised of one or more layers and may be made from one or more materials. The durability layer may be deposited using the same techniques available for the stress mitigating and AR layers. The same deposition technique may be used for each layer, or different deposition processes may be used. [0034] In tests analyzing the performance of an embodiment of the invention, an aluminum oxide (III) (A1203) stress mitigating layer and a single layer zirconium dioxide (Zr02) anti -reflective coating were deposited on a group of lead sulfide sensors. Before the coatings were applied, sensor performance was measured.
[0035] The A1203 coating was applied using evaporation techniques in a vacuum coater. The chamber was pumped down to a range of 10-5 torr and 3/8 inches of 99.99% aluminum wire 1/8 inch in diameter was placed in a tungsten boat. Oxygen was added to the chamber and the material was evaporated at a pressure of approximately 3.5 x 10-4 torr. The aluminum wire was evaporated in the oxygen atmosphere for six minutes at approximately 2.6 V dc, depositing a layer of aluminum (III) oxide on the infrared sensors.
[0036] After the aluminum (III) oxide layer was deposited, the evaporation system was shut off and a single layer of zirconium dioxide was sputtered on top of the evaporated aluminum (III) oxide layer. The zirconium dioxide layer was designed to provide both anti- reflective optical properties and environmental durability. The zirconium dioxide was sputtered at a pressure of 4.2 mT in a combined atmosphere of argon and oxygen, using a standard dc power supply operating at 3 kW.
[0037] After the two coatings were applied, the sensors were measured and their performance compared to sensors that had been coated with the same zirconium dioxide anti- reflective coating but which lacked the stress mitigating layer. The results are shown in the graph 50 of FIG. 3.
[0038] The lower line 52 (connecting square data points) shows sensors that were coated with an anti -reflective coating but lacked an aluminum (III) oxide stress mitigating layer underneath the anti -reflective layer. The upper line 54 (connecting diamond data points) shows identical sensors but including a stress-mitigating layer disposed between the IR substrate and the anti -reflective layer. The results compare the performances of uncoated sensors with those of coated sensors and show the differences as a percentage. That is, a data point at the 20 percent line for a coated sensor has a performance (signal response) twenty percent that of the uncoated sensor. A sensor with a reading of 140 percent has a signal response forty percent greater than that of the uncoated sensor.
[0039] The graph of FIG. 3 clearly shows that without a stress mitigating layer, the coated sensors had a performance significantly lower than coated sensors, while sensors having a stress mitigating layer applied before the anti-reflective coating showed a significantly improved signal response - as high as fifty percent higher.
[0040] Note that the anti-reflective coating greatly improves environmental durability. An uncoated sensor is highly sensitive to moisture contamination, so much so that simply leaving the uncoated sensor out in a regular environment can cause it to take up moisture and degrade its performance, necessitating the labor intensive and costly solution of
encapsulating the sensor in glass. With an anti -reflective coating, the sensors can be placed in a high moisture environment, such as a humidity chamber, and still have an unchanged performance, indicating they are no longer sensitive to moisture contamination.
[0041] The foregoing tests cover only one embodiment of the invention, yet there are many ways the inventive IR sensor could be implemented, many obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art. For example, the stress mitigating layer may be made of different materials, such as oxides, nitrides, or mixed materials. The stress mitigating layer may be deposited by evaporation, sputtering, CVD or any other deposition method. The best choice will be determined by the sensor material. The stress mitigating layer may also be composed of a multilayer coating if desired.
[0042] The anti -reflective coating may also be deposited using different coating methods and different materials. As shown in FIG. 4, if an IR sensor 60 having broader anti -reflective range is desired, the sensor may include a sensor substrate 62 having an upper surface 64, a stress mitigating layer 66 deposited on the upper surface of the sensor substrate and itself having an upper surface 68, and an anti-reflective coating composed of multiple layers 70a, 70b, the uppermost 70b having an upper surface 72, designed to give the desired optical performance. If further optical properties are desired, single or multilayer filters 74a, 74b may be deposited on the upper surface 72 of the upper anti -reflective coating layer 70b.
[0043] In still another embodiment, 80, FIG. 5, wherein an anti -reflective coating is not needed, an IR substrate 72 may have a stress mitigating layer 74 deposited on its upper surface 76, and a single or multilayer optical filter coating 78a, 78b, may be placed directly on the upper surface 80 of the stress mitigating layer 74. Also, if the desired optical properties are best acquired using less durable materials, a layer of a material 82 different from the rest of the design may be deposited on the upper surface 84 of the upper optical filter coating 78b as the top (or outer) layer of the design in order to maintain environmental durability.
[0044] The instant invention is also applicable for many different types of sensor materials in addition to the lead sulfide and lead selenide IR sensors discussed above. These materials include, but are not limited to, InAs/GasInSb, HgTe/CdTe, Si:As, Si:Ga, Si:Sb, Ge:Hg, Ge:Ga, GaAs/AlGaAs, PtSi, IrSi, InAs/GaAs, PbTe, PbSe, PbS, CdS, CdSe, PbCdS, PbxSnl-xTe, PbySnl-ySe, HgCdTe, InSb, InAs, QWIPs, QDIPs.
[0045] The improved sensor overcomes persisting problems by providing an IR sensor having an anti -reflective coating deposited on top of an IR sensor with a stress mitigating layer disposed between the sensor substrate and the AR layer. The stress mitigating layer prevents the anti -reflective coating from disrupting the crystalline structure of the sensor, and therefore its electrical properties, due to stress. This allows the AR to perform its intended function of decreasing surface reflection and allows more incident radiation to reach the sensor, thereby improving sensor performance. The anti -reflective coating also serves to improve the environmental durability of the sensor, decreasing its susceptibility to moisture contamination, and obviating the need to encapsulate the sensor in glass, with corresponding decreases in production time and expense, as well as a reduction in sensor size.
[0046] The above disclosure is sufficient to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention, and provides the best mode of practicing the invention presently contemplated by the inventor. While there is provided herein a full and complete disclosure of the preferred embodiments of the invention, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction, dimensional relationships, and operation shown and described. Various modifications, alternative constructions, changes and equivalents will readily occur to those skilled in the art and may be employed, as suitable, without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Such changes might involve alternative materials, components, structural arrangements, sizes, shapes, forms, functions, operational features or the like.
[0047] Therefore, the above description and illustrations should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed as invention is:
1. An infrared sensor, comprising:
an infrared substrate having a top surface;
at least one stress mitigating layer deposited on said top surface, said at least one stress mitigating layer having an upper surface; and
a top layer deposited on said upper surface and including either at least one anti- reflective layer or at least one optical filter layer.
2. The infrared sensor of claim 1, wherein said top layer is made from a material more dense and less porous than the material from which said stress mitigating layer is made.
3. The infrared sensor of claim 2, wherein said stress mitigating layer includes a single layer.
4. The infrared sensor of claim 3, wherein said top layer includes a single anti- reflective layer.
5. The infrared sensor of claim 3, wherein said top layer includes a plurality of anti- reflective layers.
6. The infrared sensor of claim 3, wherein said top layer includes a single optical filter layer.
7. The infrared sensor of claim 3, wherein said top layer includes a plurality of optical filter layers.
8. The infrared sensor of claim 3, wherein said top layer includes a single anti- reflective layer and a single optical filter layer.
9. The infrared sensor of claim 3, wherein said top layer includes a single anti- reflective layer and a plurality of optical filter layers.
10. The infrared sensor of claim 3, wherein said top layer includes a plurality of anti- reflective layers and a plurality of optical filter layers.
11. The infrared sensor of claim 2, wherein said stress mitigating layer includes a plurality of layers.
12. The infrared sensor of claim 11, wherein said top layer includes a single anti- reflective layer.
13. The infrared sensor of claim 11, wherein said top layer includes a plurality of anti-reflective layers.
14. The infrared sensor of claim 11, wherein said top layer includes a single optical filter layer.
15. The infrared sensor of claim 11, wherein said top layer includes a plurality of optical filter layers.
16. The infrared sensor of claim 11, wherein said top layer includes a single anti- reflective layer and a single optical filter layer.
17. The infrared sensor of claim 11, wherein said top layer includes a single anti- reflective layer and a plurality of optical filter layers.
18. The infrared sensor of claim 11, wherein said top layer includes a plurality of anti- reflective layers and a plurality of optical filter layers.
19. An infrared sensor, comprising:
an infrared active layer;
a stress mitigating coating deposited on top of said infrared active layer; and at least one layer of an anti -reflective coating deposited on top of said stress mitigating layer.
20. The infrared sensor of claim 19, wherein the material from which said anti- reflective coating is made is less porous and more dense than the material from which said stress mitigating layer is made.
21. The infrared sensor of claim 1, further including an environmental durability coating.
22. The infrared sensor of claim 21, wherein said environmental durability coating is said anti -reflective coating.
23. The infrared sensor of claim 22, wherein said anti -reflective coating includes zirconium dioxide.
24. The infrared sensor of claim 22, wherein said environmental durability coating includes zirconium dioxide.
PCT/US2017/031988 2016-05-10 2017-05-10 Improved infrared sensor WO2017196998A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201662334040P 2016-05-10 2016-05-10
US62/334,040 2016-05-10

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2017196998A1 true WO2017196998A1 (en) 2017-11-16

Family

ID=60267818

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2017/031988 WO2017196998A1 (en) 2016-05-10 2017-05-10 Improved infrared sensor

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2017196998A1 (en)

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3761160A (en) * 1972-05-31 1973-09-25 Optical Coating Laboratory Inc Wide band anti-reflection coating and article coated therewith
US5425983A (en) * 1992-08-10 1995-06-20 Santa Barbara Research Center Infrared window protected by multilayer antireflective coating
US20040027652A1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2004-02-12 Turan Erdogan Optical filter and fluorescence spectroscopy system incorporating the same
US20060087739A1 (en) * 2004-10-21 2006-04-27 Jds Uniphase Corporation Low net stress multilayer thin film optical filter
US20060240232A1 (en) * 2003-07-28 2006-10-26 Vampire Optical Coatings, Inc. Anti-reflective coating
US20060261273A1 (en) * 2005-05-18 2006-11-23 Essex Douglas M Absorptance enhancing coating for MWIR detectors
US20080297932A1 (en) * 2006-08-30 2008-12-04 Canon Denshi Kabushiki Kaisha Optical filter and image pickup apparatus
US20140147582A1 (en) * 2011-01-27 2014-05-29 Guardian Industries Corp. Heat treatable four layer anti-reflection coating
WO2015169761A1 (en) * 2014-05-06 2015-11-12 Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives Optical filtering device including fabry-perot cavities comprising a structured layer and having different thicknesses

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3761160A (en) * 1972-05-31 1973-09-25 Optical Coating Laboratory Inc Wide band anti-reflection coating and article coated therewith
US5425983A (en) * 1992-08-10 1995-06-20 Santa Barbara Research Center Infrared window protected by multilayer antireflective coating
US20040027652A1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2004-02-12 Turan Erdogan Optical filter and fluorescence spectroscopy system incorporating the same
US20060240232A1 (en) * 2003-07-28 2006-10-26 Vampire Optical Coatings, Inc. Anti-reflective coating
US20060087739A1 (en) * 2004-10-21 2006-04-27 Jds Uniphase Corporation Low net stress multilayer thin film optical filter
US20060261273A1 (en) * 2005-05-18 2006-11-23 Essex Douglas M Absorptance enhancing coating for MWIR detectors
US20080297932A1 (en) * 2006-08-30 2008-12-04 Canon Denshi Kabushiki Kaisha Optical filter and image pickup apparatus
US20140147582A1 (en) * 2011-01-27 2014-05-29 Guardian Industries Corp. Heat treatable four layer anti-reflection coating
WO2015169761A1 (en) * 2014-05-06 2015-11-12 Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives Optical filtering device including fabry-perot cavities comprising a structured layer and having different thicknesses

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101587792B1 (en) Multilayer component for the encapsulation of a sensitive element
US9196772B2 (en) Layered element and photovoltaic device comprising such an element
US9059425B2 (en) Multilayer electronic device having one or more barrier stacks
US10036832B2 (en) Multilayer component for the encapsulation of a sensitive element
US10745795B2 (en) Inorganic graded barrier film and methods for their manufacture
Aé et al. ZnO nanorod arrays as an antireflective coating for Cu (In, Ga) Se2 thin film solar cells
US20020179143A1 (en) Method for producing solar cells and thin-film solar cell
US20110168261A1 (en) High transmittance optical windows and method of constructing the same
US20120228641A1 (en) Protective substrate for a device that collects or emits radiation
WO2014120342A2 (en) Broad band anti-reflection coating for photovoltaic devices and other devices
US20100252100A1 (en) Multi-layer thin film for photovoltaic cell
KR101809296B1 (en) Transparent electode and electronic device comprising the same
Hála et al. Highly conductive ZnO films with high near infrared transparency
US20140373906A1 (en) Anti-reflection coatings for multijunction solar cells
WO2017196998A1 (en) Improved infrared sensor
US20150075603A1 (en) Novel hydrophobic coatings and methods and compositions relating thereto
Jo et al. Efficiency enhancement of Cu (In, Ga) Se2 thin film solar cells by employing onmi‐directional ZnO nanostructure with MgF2 anti‐reflection‐coating layer
Wilken et al. Influence of ZnSnOx barrier layer on the texturing of ZnO: Al layers for light management in flexible thin‐film silicon solar cells
KR20140026941A (en) Anti-reflective layer and silicon thin film sloar cell produced thereby

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 17796775

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 17796775

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1