WO2017167131A1

WO2017167131A1 - Method and device for determining object to be unlocked

Info

Publication number: WO2017167131A1
Application number: PCT/CN2017/078047
Authority: WO
Inventors: 刘卓霖
Original assignee: 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司; 刘卓霖
Priority date: 2016-03-31
Filing date: 2017-03-24
Publication date: 2017-10-05
Also published as: CN107292137B; TW201737073A; TWI739805B; CN107292137A

Abstract

A method and a device for determining an object to be unlocked, enabling accurate selection, according to a use requirement of a user, of an application to be unlocked, and avoiding wastage of resources. The method comprises: upon determining that there are at least two locked applications to be unlocked, selecting a locked application having a current system evaluation value meeting a preset selection condition as an object to be unlocked, wherein the system evaluation value of the locked application represents the importance of the locked application to a user. Accordingly, the intelligent device of the present invention can determine a use habit of a user based on a system evaluation value, and accurately select, from multiple locked applications, a locked application which best meets the use habits of the user, as an object to be unlocked, thereby greatly improving unlocking efficiency and unlocking accuracy. Further, wastage of resources resulting from repeated selection and repeated user confirmation of an object to be unlocked is avoided.

Description

Method and device for determining object to be unlocked

Technical field

The present application relates to computer technology, and in particular, to a method and an apparatus for determining an object to be unlocked.

Background technique

Currently, in order to better protect the user's private data, the smart device provides the user with an application locking service, that is, the user can lock the specified application on the smart device according to his own use requirements, and needs to use the application. Then unlock it, so that people other than the user can't use the locked application, which enhances the security of the application.

Currently, when a smart device maintains a locked application, it needs to use a timer to check whether the locked application has been switched to the foreground operation at regular intervals. If an application is detected, the user is instructed to switch to In the foreground, the user needs to provide a visual operation interface to prompt the user to unlock according to the preset rules.

However, polling to see if there is an application that needs to be unlocked consumes too much system resources, and when there are multiple applications that need to be unlocked, it is impossible to accurately determine which one needs to be unlocked first, thus reducing the operation. effectiveness.

Summary of the invention

The embodiment of the present invention provides a method and a device for determining an object to be unlocked, which are used for accurately selecting an application to be unlocked according to a user's use requirement, and avoiding resource loss.

The specific technical solutions provided by the embodiments of the present application are as follows:

A method for determining an object to be unlocked includes:

Determining that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation;

Obtaining current system evaluation values of the at least two locked applications, wherein a system evaluation value of the locked application is used to characterize the importance of the one locked application relative to the user;

Select a locked application whose system evaluation value meets the preset filtering policy as the object to be unlocked.

Optionally, determining that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation, including:

It is determined from the system notification that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation.

Optionally, the system evaluation value of a locked application is generated based on historical usage status information of the locked application.

Optionally, further comprising:

According to the set period, the latest system evaluation value of each locked application is recalculated according to the latest historical usage status information of each locked application.

Optionally, the historical usage status information of a locked application includes one or any combination of the following parameters:

The frequency of use of the locked application within the first set time range;

The information update status of the locked application in the second set time range;

The degree of association between the locked application and other applications that the user uses during the third set time range.

Optionally, selecting a locked application whose system evaluation value meets a preset screening policy is used as an object to be unlocked, and the selecting unit is configured to:

If the first locked application selected in the last unlocking operation does not exist in the at least two locked applications, filtering out the second locked application with the highest priority corresponding to the current system evaluation value, And selecting the second locked application as an object to be unlocked;

If the first locked application selected in the last unlocking operation exists in the at least two locked applications, the highest priority number corresponding to the current system evaluation value is filtered out. The second locked application determines whether the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the second locked application meets a preset second change rule, and if yes, selects the second locked application as the object to be unlocked Otherwise, when it is determined that the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application conforms to the preset first change rule, the first locked application is selected as the object to be unlocked.

Optionally, when it is determined that the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application meets a preset first change rule, the selecting unit is configured to:

Determining that the priority of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application is increased compared to the last calculation, or that the priority of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application is lowered and the reduction is not reached When the first threshold is set, determining a change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application conforms to a preset first change rule.

Optionally, when determining that the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the second locked application conforms to a preset second change rule, the selecting unit is configured to:

Determining that the current system evaluation value of the second locked application is prioritized compared to the last calculation, and the current locked system of the second locked application is determined when the lifting amplitude reaches the set second threshold The change trend of the evaluation value conforms to the preset second change rule.

Optionally, further comprising:

Unlock the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked.

Optionally, the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked is unlocked, including:

The visualized operation interface is presented based on the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked, and the user is prompted to unlock based on the preset rule.

A determining device for an object to be unlocked includes:

a determining unit, configured to determine that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation;

An obtaining unit, configured to acquire a current system evaluation of the at least two locked applications a value, wherein a system evaluation value of a locked application is used to characterize the importance of the one locked application relative to the user;

The processing unit is configured to select a locked application whose system evaluation value meets the preset screening policy as the object to be unlocked.

Optionally, when it is determined that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to be unlocked, the determining unit is configured to:

Optionally, the obtaining unit is further configured to:

The frequency of use of the locked application within the first set time range;

Optionally, when a locked application that meets a preset screening policy is selected as the object to be unlocked, the processing unit is configured to:

Optionally, when it is determined that the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application meets a preset first change rule, the processing unit is configured to:

Optionally, when it is determined that the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the second locked application meets a preset second change rule, the processing unit is configured to:

Optionally, the processing unit is further configured to:

Unlock the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked.

Optionally, when the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked is unlocked, the processing unit is configured to:

In the embodiment of the present application, the smart device periodically calculates the system evaluation value of each locked application according to the default rule of the system, and selects the current system evaluation when it is determined that there are at least two locked applications that are instructed to be unlocked. Values that match the preset filter criteria should be locked The program is used as an object to be unlocked, wherein a system evaluation value of a locked application is used to characterize the importance of the one locked application relative to the user. In this way, the smart device can infer the user usage habit based on the system evaluation value, and accurately select the currently locked application that most closely matches the user's usage habit as the object to be unlocked in the plurality of locked applications, thereby greatly improving the unlocking efficiency. And the accuracy of the unlocking; further, the resource loss caused by repeatedly selecting and repeatedly confirming the object to be unlocked with the user is also avoided, thereby greatly improving the user experience.

DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a flowchart of an overview of unlocking an application in an embodiment of the present application;

2 is a detailed flowchart of parsing an application in an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of a function of a smart device according to an embodiment of the present application.

detailed description

In the embodiment of the present application, the smart device periodically calculates the system evaluation value of each locked application according to the default rule of the system, in order to be able to accurately select the application according to the user's use requirement, and to avoid the resource loss. When at least two locked applications are instructed to switch from the background to the foreground (ie, indicated to be unlocked), the locked application that selects the current system evaluation value according to the preset filtering condition is selected to be unlocked, wherein one locked application The system evaluation value characterizing system determines how important a locked application is to the user based on the historical usage state setting of the locked application.

Preferred embodiments of the present application are further described in detail below.

Referring to FIG. 1 , in the embodiment of the present application, an overview process for an intelligent device to unlock an application is as follows:

Step 100: The smart device acquires a list of locked applications.

In practical applications, when the user sets the locked application, the smart device will be in the system. The set of the locked application is maintained. In this embodiment, the locked application set is saved in the form of a list, and is also referred to as a locked application list. This term is used in the following embodiments, and details are not described herein.

Step 101: The smart device listens to the system kernel mapping file.

In this embodiment, the smart device does not poll whether the locked application needs to be unlocked, but monitors the system kernel mapping file. Once the unlocking operation is triggered, the flag bit in the system content mapping file is rewritten. The smart device knows that it needs to unlock the locked application.

In this embodiment, the touch lock operation may be triggered by multiple events including, but not limited to, the following:

1. According to the user's click operation, it is determined that the user has triggered an unlock operation of a locked application.

For example, if a user clicks on an application for managing photos and wants to view a private photo, the application for managing the photo will be triggered to unlock.

2. The timed event set by the user times out, triggering the unlock operation of the corresponding locked application.

For example, if the user presets to browse the bill within a certain period of time, the application for account management will be triggered to unlock the operation within the corresponding time period.

3. The related data of a locked application needs to be updated or/and the update operation of the locked application is triggered when it is already updated in the background.

For example, the stock information saved in the locked application for managing stocks is updated in the background and needs to be prompted for viewing, which triggers the unlocking operation of the locked application for managing stocks.

Step 102: The smart device determines, according to the monitoring result, whether there is a locked application that is triggered to unlock the operation. If yes, go to step 103; otherwise, go back to step 101.

Step 103: The smart device acquires a list of locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation.

After the unlocking operation is triggered, the smart device acquires the locked application list triggered by the unlocking operation. Generally, if only one locked application exists in the list, the smart device directly unlocks, and the embodiment is directed to multiple The locked application is determined to be triggered by the unlocking operation during the same time period, and therefore, it is assumed that there are currently at least two locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation.

Step 104: The smart device determines the current system evaluation value of each locked application that is triggered to unlock the operation, and filters out the locked application whose current system evaluation value meets the preset screening policy.

In the embodiment of the present application, the smart device calculates the latest system evaluation value of each locked application according to the latest historical usage state information of each locked application according to the set period, and the system evaluation of a locked application. The value used to characterize the importance of the locked application relative to the user is generated based on historical usage status information of the locked application.

Preferably, the historical usage status information may include, but is not limited to, one or any combination of the following parameters:

1. The frequency of use of the locked application within the first set time range.

Specifically, the more frequently a locked application is used, the higher the priority of the locked application's current system evaluation value. In other words, the smart device also determines that the locked application is relative to the user. The more important the words, the more you need to unlock them soon.

2. The information update status of the locked application in the second set time range.

Specifically, the closer the latest update time of a locked application (eg, stock information) is to the current time, the higher the priority of the currently evaluated system evaluation value of the locked application, in other words, The smart device also recognizes that the locked application is more important to the user and needs to be unlocked as soon as possible.

3. The degree of association between the locked application and other applications that the user uses during the third set time range.

Specifically, an associated application (eg, an application for mobile payment) of a locked application (eg, an application for billing) is recently used for the closest time to the current time, the locked application The higher the priority of the program's current system evaluation value, in other words, the smart device will also recognize that the locked application is more important to the user and needs to be unlocked as soon as possible.

Of course, the historical usage status information may also include other types of parameters. The foregoing three examples are merely examples. The smart device may perform weighting processing on various parameters included in the historical usage status information of a locked application, and then obtain the above one. The system evaluation value corresponding to the locked application.

On the other hand, the priority value of the system evaluation value may be that the smaller the value is, the higher the priority is, and the higher the value is, the higher the priority is. Technical solutions are not described here.

Further, the smart device may perform screening according to a preset screening policy based on current system evaluation values of each locked application to determine whether there is a locked application that meets the above screening policy.

The specific setting mode of the screening policy will be described in detail in the following embodiments, and details are not described herein again.

Step 105: The smart device determines whether to filter out a locked application, and if yes, execute step 106; otherwise, return to step 101.

Step 106: The smart device presents a visual operation interface on the filtered locked application, prompting the user to unlock according to a preset rule.

For example, the user may be prompted to input a preset password to unlock, or may be unlocked according to a preset pattern, and so on, and details are not described herein.

Referring to FIG. 2, the above embodiment is further described in detail below using a specific application scenario.

Step 200: After the system is started, the smart device records the identifier of each locked application and records the initial value of the system evaluation value of each locked application in the locked application list.

Optionally, under the Linux system, the oom_score value of the process can be configured as the system evaluation value of the locked application.

Step 201: The smart device performs system initialization and starts monitoring.

Step 202: The smart device acquires a locked application list (hereinafter referred to as list X) that is currently triggered to unlock the operation, and calculates a current system evaluation value of each locked application in the list X according to a preset evaluation rule.

Specifically, the current system evaluation value is calculated according to the latest historical usage status information of each locked application. The specific manner has been introduced in the previous embodiment, and details are not described herein again.

Step 203: The smart device updates each of the current system evaluation values of the locked application in the list X, and records the trend of changes of each person's locked application.

The trend of the so-called system evaluation value is the incremental trend or the decreasing trend compared to the previous calculation.

Step 204: The smart device sorts each of the lists X into the application in ascending order according to the current system evaluation value.

In actual applications, you can configure the value of the system evaluation value to be smaller. The higher the priority, the larger the value of the system evaluation value can be. In this embodiment, assuming that the smaller the value is, the higher the priority is. For example, after the system evaluation values are sorted in ascending order, the locked application with the highest priority (ie, the system evaluation value is the smallest) can be selected. .

Step 205: The smart device determines whether there is only one locked application in the list X. sequence? If yes, go to step 206; otherwise, go to step 207.

Step 206: The smart device directly selects a locked application in the list X whose current system evaluation value is the smallest (ie, the highest priority), and then proceeds to step 212.

Step 207: The smart device determines whether the locked application whose current system evaluation value is the smallest in the list X is the same application as the locked application selected in the previous unlocking operation. If yes, go back to step 206; otherwise, go to step 208.

Step 208: The smart device determines whether the trend of the system evaluation value conforms to the change rule A compared to the last calculation (ie, the system evaluation value calculation), the locked application of the current system evaluation value is the smallest. If yes, go to step 206; otherwise, go to step 209.

Specifically, the change rule A may be: compared with the last calculation, the minimum locked application of the current system evaluation value, the current system evaluation value changes in a decreasing trend, and the decrementing amplitude reaches the threshold A.

In this embodiment, the lower the priority of the system evaluation value is, the higher the priority is. For example, the above change rule A can be interpreted as: the current system evaluation value has the highest priority locked application, and its current The priority of the system evaluation value is improved compared to the previous calculation, and the increase rate reaches the threshold A.

This is because the smart device periodically updates the system evaluation value of each locked application, and the system evaluation value change must result in a change in priority. Therefore, in order to avoid the priority of some locked applications, temporary Slightly improved, causing the system to incorrectly select such locked applications for unlocking. Accordingly, it is necessary to determine that a locked application has the highest priority and the priority is increased compared to the previous calculation. The magnitude can be determined that the priority of the locked application is substantially improved, and the unlock operation needs to be performed immediately. This is done to avoid erroneous selection caused by subtle changes in priority.

Step 209: The smart device determines whether the change of the current system evaluation value is in accordance with the change rule compared to the previous calculation, the locked application selected in the last interpretation operation. B? If yes, go to step 211; otherwise, go to step 210.

In this embodiment, step 209 is an example of "the locked application selected in the last unlocking operation, and appears in the current list X" as an example, if the selected locked application is selected in the last unlocking operation. If the unlocking operation is not currently indicated, step 209 may not be performed.

Specifically, the change rule B may be: compared to the previous calculation, the selected locked application in the last unlocking operation has a trend of decreasing the current system evaluation value, or is an incremental change and the decrement is not The threshold B is reached.

In this embodiment, the lower the priority of the system evaluation value is, the higher the priority is. For example, the change rule B can be interpreted as: the selected locked application in the last unlocking operation, the current system. The priority of the evaluation value is increased compared to the previous calculation, or is decreased and the reduction is reached to the threshold A.

This is because the smart device periodically updates the system evaluation value of each locked application, and the system evaluation value change must result in a change in priority, and if the last locked application is unlocked, it currently appears. In the list X, it indicates that the locked application may indeed be an application that the user needs to use urgently. Then, if the current system has the highest priority, the current system evaluation value of the locked application does not change the priority trend. Rule A, you need to consider the priority to unlock the selected locked application in the last unlock operation.

At the same time, in order to avoid temporary subtle changes in the priority of certain locked applications, the system incorrectly does not select such locked applications to unlock, and accordingly, determine that one of the last unlocked is locked. The priority of the current system evaluation value of the application is increased, or, although the priority is decreased but the falling amplitude does not reach the threshold B, the smart device determines that the locked application does need to perform the unlocking operation immediately, and the processing is also to avoid priority. The wrong choice caused by subtle changes in the level.

Step 210: The smart device returns a null value, indicating that no lock is currently unlocked. Use the program.

In this case, it may be that the locked application has reached the unlock condition (eg, related information update, or other related applications are called), but its priority change trend does not meet the corresponding change rule. At this time, the locked application is not unlocked, and the processing is to avoid the frequency of the unlocking being too high, thereby causing interference to the user.

Step 211: The smart device again selects the locked application selected in the last unlocking operation.

Step 212: The smart device presents a corresponding visual operation interface based on the selected locked application, prompting the user to unlock according to a preset rule.

In this way, the smart device can combine the importance of each locked application with respect to the user, and try to select the most important locked application to unlock, so that the unlocking result is more in line with the user's usage habits.

For example, suppose that three locked applications are recorded in the list X currently acquired by the smart device, namely “instant messaging software”, “payment software” and “news software”, that is, the three softwares are triggered to perform the unlocking operation. Also assume that the smart device refers to the "frequency of use of the locked application in the last hour" and periodically updates the system evaluation values of the above three softwares.

scene 1:

Assume that in the last calculation, the locked application triggered by the unlock operation and the corresponding system evaluation values are: "order meal - 8 points", "payment software - 7 points", "news software - 6 points", and The software that is selected as the object to be unlocked at one time is a "order meal."

Also assume that in this calculation, the system evaluation values of each locked application in list X are: "instant communication software - 7 points", "payment software - 6 points", "news software - 2 points".

Obviously, the "order" does not appear in the currently obtained list X, then the smart device selects the "instant messaging software" with the highest system evaluation value as the object to be unlocked.

Scene 2:

Assume that in the last calculation, the locked application that triggered the unlock operation and the corresponding system evaluation values are: "instant messaging software - 8 points", "payment software - 7 points", "news software - 6 points", The software that was last selected as the object to be unlocked is "instant messaging software."

Obviously, the "instant messaging software" appears again in the currently acquired list X, although the system evaluation value of the "instant messaging software" is reduced from 8 points to 7 points, but lowering than the previous calculation. If the amplitude does not exceed the first threshold "2 points", the smart device still selects "instant messaging software" as the object to be unlocked again.

Scene 3:

Also assume that in this calculation, the system evaluation values of each locked application in list X are: "instant communication software - 4 points", "payment software - 9 points", "news software - 4 points".

Obviously, the "instant messaging software" appears again in the currently obtained list X, but compared to the previous calculation, the system evaluation value of the "instant messaging software" is reduced from 8 points to 4 points, and the reduction is more than The first threshold "2 points", therefore, the smart device cannot select "instant messaging software" as the object to be unlocked this time.

At the same time, compared with the previous calculation, the system evaluation value of “payment software” has increased from 7 points to 9 points, and the increase exceeds the second threshold “1 point”. Therefore, the smart device selects “payment software” this time. "As an object to be unlocked."

Based on the foregoing embodiment, referring to FIG. 3, in the embodiment of the present application, the smart device includes at least a determining unit 30, an obtaining unit 31, and a processing unit 32, where

a determining unit 30, configured to determine that at least two locked applications that are triggered to be unlocked are present;

An obtaining unit 31, configured to acquire current system evaluation values of the at least two locked applications, where a system evaluation value of a locked application is used to represent a degree of importance of the one locked application relative to a user;

The processing unit 32 is configured to select a locked application whose system evaluation value meets the preset screening policy as the object to be unlocked.

Optionally, when it is determined that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to be unlocked, the determining unit 30 is configured to:

Optionally, the obtaining unit 31 is further configured to:

The frequency of use of the locked application within the first set time range;

Optionally, when a selected application whose system evaluation value meets the preset screening policy is selected as the object to be unlocked, the processing unit 32 is configured to:

If the first locked application selected in the last unlocking operation does not exist in the at least two locked applications, filtering out the current system evaluation value corresponding to the highest priority Secondly locking the application and selecting the second locked application as the object to be unlocked;

If the first locked application selected in the last unlocking operation exists in the at least two locked applications, the second locked application with the highest priority corresponding to the current system evaluation value is filtered out, and the second locked application is determined. Whether the trend of the current system evaluation value of the second locked application conforms to the preset second change rule, and if so, selecting the second locked application as the object to be unlocked; otherwise, determining the When the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application conforms to the preset first change rule, the first locked application is selected as the object to be unlocked.

Optionally, when it is determined that the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application meets a preset first change rule, the processing unit 32 is configured to:

Optionally, when it is determined that the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the second locked application meets a preset second change rule, the processing unit 32 is configured to:

Optionally, the processing unit 32 is further configured to:

Unlock the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked.

Optionally, when the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked is unlocked, the processing unit 32 is configured to:

In summary, in the embodiment of the present application, the smart device periodically calculates the system evaluation value of each locked application according to the default rule of the system, and when it is determined that there are at least two locked applications that are instructed to be unlocked, The locked application whose current system evaluation value meets the preset screening condition is selected as the object to be unlocked, wherein the system evaluation value of the locked application is used to characterize the importance of the one locked application relative to the user. In this way, the smart device can infer the user usage habit based on the system evaluation value, and accurately select the currently locked application that most closely matches the user's usage habit as the object to be unlocked in the plurality of locked applications, thereby greatly improving the unlocking efficiency. And the accuracy of the unlocking; further, the resource loss caused by repeatedly selecting and repeatedly confirming the object to be unlocked with the user is also avoided, thereby greatly improving the user experience.

Further, the smart device can timely determine the locked application that is instructed to be unlocked according to the system notification, without polling the search, thereby eliminating the need to maintain the monitoring program in real time in the background, thereby effectively avoiding resource loss and prolonging the standby time of the device.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments of the present application can be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Thus, the present application can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment in combination of software and hardware. Moreover, the application can take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) including computer usable program code.

The present application is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (system), and computer program products according to embodiments of the present application. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flowchart illustrations and/or FIG. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor or other programmable data processing device to produce a machine such that instructions are executed by a processor of a computer or other programmable data processing device Means are provided for implementing the functions specified in one or more of the flow or in one or more blocks of the flow chart.

The computer program instructions can also be stored in a computer readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing device to operate in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable memory produce an article of manufacture comprising the instruction device. The apparatus implements the functions specified in one or more blocks of a flow or a flow and/or block diagram of the flowchart.

These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device such that a series of operational steps are performed on a computer or other programmable device to produce computer-implemented processing for execution on a computer or other programmable device. The instructions provide steps for implementing the functions specified in one or more of the flow or in a block or blocks of a flow diagram.

While the preferred embodiment of the present application has been described, it will be apparent that those skilled in the art can make further changes and modifications to the embodiments. Therefore, the appended claims are intended to be interpreted as including the preferred embodiments and the modifications and

It is apparent that those skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications to the embodiments of the present application without departing from the spirit and scope of the embodiments of the present application. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of the present invention, and the modifications and variations of the present invention are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention.

Claims

A method for determining an object to be unlocked, comprising:

Determining that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation;

Obtaining current system evaluation values of the at least two locked applications, wherein a system evaluation value of the locked application is used to characterize the importance of the one locked application relative to the user;

Select a locked application whose system evaluation value meets the preset filtering policy as the object to be unlocked.
The method of claim 1 wherein determining that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation comprises:

It is determined from the system notification that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation.
The method of claim 1 or 2 wherein the system evaluation value of a locked application is generated based on historical usage status information of said one locked application.
The method of claim 3, further comprising:

According to the set period, the latest system evaluation value of each locked application is recalculated according to the latest historical usage status information of each locked application.
The method of claim 3 wherein the historical usage status information of a locked application comprises one or any combination of the following parameters:

The frequency of use of the locked application within the first set time range;

The information update status of the locked application in the second set time range;

The degree of association between the locked application and other applications that the user uses during the third set time range.
The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein a selected application whose system evaluation value conforms to a preset screening policy is selected as an object to be unlocked, the selection Unit is used to:

If the first locked application selected in the last unlocking operation does not exist in the at least two locked applications, filtering out the second locked application with the highest priority corresponding to the current system evaluation value, And selecting the second locked application as an object to be unlocked;

If the first locked application selected in the last unlocking operation exists in the at least two locked applications, the second locked application with the highest priority corresponding to the current system evaluation value is filtered out, and the second locked application is determined. Whether the trend of the current system evaluation value of the second locked application conforms to the preset second change rule, and if so, selecting the second locked application as the object to be unlocked; otherwise, determining the When the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application conforms to the preset first change rule, the first locked application is selected as the object to be unlocked.
The method according to claim 6, wherein when the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application is determined to conform to a preset first change rule, the selecting unit is configured to:

Determining that the priority of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application is increased compared to the last calculation, or that the priority of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application is lowered and the reduction is not reached When the first threshold is set, determining a change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application conforms to a preset first change rule.
The method according to claim 6, wherein when the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the second locked application is determined to conform to a preset second change rule, the selecting unit is configured to:

Determining that the current system evaluation value of the second locked application is prioritized compared to the last calculation, and the current locked system of the second locked application is determined when the lifting amplitude reaches the set second threshold The change trend of the evaluation value conforms to the preset second change rule.
The method of claim 6 further comprising:

Unlock the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked.
The method of claim 9 wherein unlocking the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked comprises:

The visualized operation interface is presented based on the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked, and the user is prompted to unlock based on the preset rule.
A determining device for an object to be unlocked, comprising:

a determining unit, configured to determine that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation;

An obtaining unit, configured to acquire current system evaluation values of the at least two locked applications, wherein a system evaluation value of a locked application is used to represent a degree of importance of the one locked application relative to a user;

The processing unit is configured to select a locked application whose system evaluation value meets the preset screening policy as the object to be unlocked.
The apparatus according to claim 11, wherein when it is determined that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to be unlocked, the determining unit is configured to:

It is determined from the system notification that there are at least two locked applications that are triggered to unlock the operation.
The apparatus of claim 11 or 12 wherein the system evaluation value of a locked application is generated based on historical usage status information of said one locked application.
The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein said obtaining unit is further configured to:

According to the set period, the latest system evaluation value of each locked application is recalculated according to the latest historical usage status information of each locked application.
The apparatus of claim 13 wherein the historical usage status information of a locked application comprises one or any combination of the following parameters:

The frequency of use of the locked application within the first set time range;

The information update status of the locked application in the second set time range;

The degree of association between the locked application and other applications that the user uses during the third set time range.
The device according to any one of claims 11 to 15, wherein when the selected system evaluation value matches a locked application of the preset screening policy as the object to be unlocked, the processing unit is configured to:

If the first locked application selected in the last unlocking operation does not exist in the at least two locked applications, filtering out the second locked application with the highest priority corresponding to the current system evaluation value, And selecting the second locked application as an object to be unlocked;

If the first locked application selected in the last unlocking operation exists in the at least two locked applications, the second locked application with the highest priority corresponding to the current system evaluation value is filtered out, and the second locked application is determined. Whether the trend of the current system evaluation value of the second locked application conforms to the preset second change rule, and if so, selecting the second locked application as the object to be unlocked; otherwise, determining the When the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application conforms to the preset first change rule, the first locked application is selected as the object to be unlocked.
The apparatus according to claim 16, wherein when the change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application is determined to conform to a preset first change rule, the processing unit is configured to:

Determining that the priority of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application is increased compared to the last calculation, or that the priority of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application is lowered and the reduction is not reached When the first threshold is set, determining a change trend of the current system evaluation value of the first locked application conforms to a preset first change rule.
The device of claim 16 wherein said second locked is determined When the trend of the current system evaluation value of the application conforms to the preset second variation rule, the processing unit is configured to:

Determining that the current system evaluation value of the second locked application is prioritized compared to the last calculation, and the current locked system of the second locked application is determined when the lifting amplitude reaches the set second threshold The change trend of the evaluation value conforms to the preset second change rule.
The apparatus according to claim 16, wherein said processing unit is further configured to:

Unlock the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked.
The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein when the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked is unlocked, the processing unit is configured to:

The visualized operation interface is presented based on the locked application selected as the object to be unlocked, and the user is prompted to unlock based on the preset rule.