WO2017142392A1 - Système et procédé pour évaluer un logiciel - Google Patents

Système et procédé pour évaluer un logiciel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2017142392A1
WO2017142392A1 PCT/MY2016/050083 MY2016050083W WO2017142392A1 WO 2017142392 A1 WO2017142392 A1 WO 2017142392A1 MY 2016050083 W MY2016050083 W MY 2016050083W WO 2017142392 A1 WO2017142392 A1 WO 2017142392A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
test
score
strategies
software
weightage
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/MY2016/050083
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Muhammad Dhiauddin Bin MOHAMED
Fairul Rizal Bin FAHRURAZI
Fook Ann LOO
Nur Farahin Binti AMAN
Norzamzarini Bin MOHD BAJURI
Original Assignee
Mimos Berhad
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mimos Berhad filed Critical Mimos Berhad
Publication of WO2017142392A1 publication Critical patent/WO2017142392A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668—Software testing
    • G06F11/3672—Test management

Definitions

  • the score for each of the plurality of test strategies is, but not limited to, a total score or a partial score.
  • the TR module configured to perform such as, but not limited to, regulate the score for each of the plurality of test strategies with the weightage of plurality of test strategies, calculate final score and assign rating.
  • the method to rate the software comprising the steps of retrieving request to rate the software, characterized in that, obtaining weightage of plurality of test strategies, identifying type of software rating to be computed, calculating score for each of the plurality of test strategies, regulating the score for each of the plurality of test strategies with the weightage of plurality of test strategies, calculating final score and assigning a final software rating.
  • the step of calculating score for plurality of test case results of the plurality of test strategies further comprising the steps of assigning highest weightage for first test iteration across the plurality of test case results of the plurality of test strategies and lower weightage for subsequent test iterations based on a number of completed test iterations and assigning highest weightage for last test iteration across the plurality of test case results of the plurality of test strategies and lower weightage for preceding test iterations based on the number of completed test iterations.
  • the step of calculating score for plurality of test case results of the plurality of test strategies further comprising a step of combining the scores with priority assigned to each of the plurality of test case results per the plurality of test strategies.
  • the system (100) to rate the software is implemented when the software enters system testing phase i.e. after software has been built completely during coding or construction phase, it is sent to independent testing team for system testing.
  • plurality of test strategies such as, but not limited to, functional test, performance test, security test and usability test are executed for the software.
  • the weightage is assigned to every test strategy based on the importance of particular test strategy.
  • scores are calculated based on number of test cases and test iterations either complete or incomplete. The total score for each strategy will be regulated against the strategy weightage assigned earlier. Then, the sum of all scores is calculated to get the complete score or real-time score.
  • the complete or real time score is mapped with pre-defined software rating table to get the final or real-time software rating.
  • the present invention determines the trustworthiness and capabilities of software under test in a form of scoring upon the completion of system test execution or on real-time based on the test strategies imposed: functional, Performance, Security and Usability. Also, the present invention provide rating to the software on the basis of multiple levels such as baseline strategies, completeness of system test execution (i.e. complete or real-time), test iterations, test case priority and test case result for each iteration.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un système (100) permettant d'évaluer un logiciel comprenant un module de gestion de cas de test (TCM) (102), un module d'identifiant de stratégie de test (TSI) (110), un module d'identifiant d'itération de test (TII) (112), un module de calcul de score de test (TSC) (114) et un module d'évaluation de test (TR) (116) pour fournir une certaine fiabilité et des capacités du logiciel soumis à un test sous une forme de calcul de score lors de l'achèvement d'une exécution de test de système ou en temps réel sur la base de la pluralité de stratégies de test imposées. En outre, l'invention concerne un procédé (200) pour évaluer le logiciel.
PCT/MY2016/050083 2016-02-17 2016-11-30 Système et procédé pour évaluer un logiciel WO2017142392A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
MYPI2016000280 2016-02-17
MYPI2016000280 2016-02-17

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2017142392A1 true WO2017142392A1 (fr) 2017-08-24

Family

ID=59625364

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/MY2016/050083 WO2017142392A1 (fr) 2016-02-17 2016-11-30 Système et procédé pour évaluer un logiciel

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2017142392A1 (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108711008A (zh) * 2018-05-17 2018-10-26 北京中软国际信息技术有限公司 一种基于卷积神经网络的多维度软件项目健康度评估方法
CN110955593A (zh) * 2019-10-28 2020-04-03 北京三快在线科技有限公司 客户端测试方法、装置、电子设备及可读存储介质
WO2022042726A1 (fr) * 2020-08-28 2022-03-03 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Procédé et appareil de test de système, dispositif, et support de stockage
CN117194267A (zh) * 2023-09-26 2023-12-08 江苏天好富兴数据技术有限公司 一种基于云平台的软件质量评级系统

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1526459A2 (fr) * 2003-10-23 2005-04-27 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Procédé amélioré pour diagnostiquer des défauts de système complexes
US20070006161A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-01-04 Kuester Anthony E Methods and systems for evaluating the compliance of software to a quality benchmark
US20090287679A1 (en) * 2008-05-14 2009-11-19 International Business Machines Corporation Evaluation of tamper resistant software system implementations
US20110246834A1 (en) * 2010-03-31 2011-10-06 Microsoft Corporation Testing software in electronic devices
US20130159774A1 (en) * 2011-12-19 2013-06-20 Siemens Corporation Dynamic reprioritization of test cases during test execution

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1526459A2 (fr) * 2003-10-23 2005-04-27 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Procédé amélioré pour diagnostiquer des défauts de système complexes
US20070006161A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-01-04 Kuester Anthony E Methods and systems for evaluating the compliance of software to a quality benchmark
US20090287679A1 (en) * 2008-05-14 2009-11-19 International Business Machines Corporation Evaluation of tamper resistant software system implementations
US20110246834A1 (en) * 2010-03-31 2011-10-06 Microsoft Corporation Testing software in electronic devices
US20130159774A1 (en) * 2011-12-19 2013-06-20 Siemens Corporation Dynamic reprioritization of test cases during test execution

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108711008A (zh) * 2018-05-17 2018-10-26 北京中软国际信息技术有限公司 一种基于卷积神经网络的多维度软件项目健康度评估方法
CN108711008B (zh) * 2018-05-17 2022-03-29 北京中软国际信息技术有限公司 一种基于卷积神经网络的多维度软件项目健康度评估方法
CN110955593A (zh) * 2019-10-28 2020-04-03 北京三快在线科技有限公司 客户端测试方法、装置、电子设备及可读存储介质
WO2022042726A1 (fr) * 2020-08-28 2022-03-03 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Procédé et appareil de test de système, dispositif, et support de stockage
CN117194267A (zh) * 2023-09-26 2023-12-08 江苏天好富兴数据技术有限公司 一种基于云平台的软件质量评级系统
CN117194267B (zh) * 2023-09-26 2024-04-26 江苏天好富兴数据技术有限公司 一种基于云平台的软件质量评级系统

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Freimut et al. An industrial case study of implementing and validating defect classification for process improvement and quality management
Briand et al. A replicated assessment and comparison of common software cost modeling techniques
Abdul Hameed et al. Assessing the influence of environmental and CEO characteristics for adoption of information technology in organizations
US8997052B2 (en) Risk-based test plan construction
US20120072268A1 (en) Reputation system to evaluate work
US8412556B2 (en) Systems and methods for facilitating an analysis of a business project
Christensen et al. Behind the numbers: Insights into large audit firm sampling policies
Tassey Methods for assessing the economic impacts of government R & D
US20070156482A1 (en) System and method for generating and providing priority information
WO2017142392A1 (fr) Système et procédé pour évaluer un logiciel
Jones Estimating software vulnerabilities
Raoufi et al. Key moderators of the relationship between construction crew motivation and performance
Jørgensen A strong focus on low price when selecting software providers increases the likelihood of failure in software outsourcing projects
Knauss et al. Investigating the impact of software requirements specification quality on project success
Methawachananont et al. Software process capability self-assessment support system based on task and work product characteristics: a case study of ISO/IEC 29110 standard
US20200167156A1 (en) Cognitive selection of software developer for software engineering task
Okunlola et al. Determining the performance of procurement methods against selection criteria using Outranking-satisfying methodology
CN110008098B (zh) 评估业务流程中的节点的运行状况的方法和装置
Matos et al. Realising web effort estimation: a qualitative investigation
Rosslyn-Smith et al. Establishing turnaround potential before commencement of formal turnaround proceedings
Confino et al. An open source software evaluation model
Pittaras et al. Crowdsourcing in single-document summary evaluation: the argo way
Primrose User experience grading via Kano categories
Shida et al. A Study of software estimation factors extracted using covariance structure analysis
Brown Standardized technology evaluation process (STEP) user’s guide and methodology for evaluation teams

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16890787

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 16890787

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1