WO2017016779A1

WO2017016779A1 - Method to determine level of reductant in a tank

Info

Publication number: WO2017016779A1
Application number: PCT/EP2016/065198
Authority: WO
Inventors: Martin Sykes; Peter Spadafora
Original assignee: Delphi International Operations Luxembourg S.À R.L.
Priority date: 2015-07-28
Filing date: 2016-06-29
Publication date: 2017-02-02
Also published as: GB201513220D0

Abstract

A method of determining the level of reductant in a storage tank of a Selective Catalytic Reduction dosing system comprising: a) determining the initial air pressure within said tank P1; b) pressurizing the tank; c) determining the added mass of air during said pressurization, m added; d) measuring the pressure of the tank subsequent to pressurization, P2; e) determining the volume of air in the tank from P1, P2 and m added; f) determining the level of reductant in the tank form the determined volume of air in the tank from step e) and the assumed or determined volume of the tank before and/or after pressurization.

Description

Method to Determine Level of Reductant in a Tank Technical Field

The present invention relates to a reagent dosing system for dosing a reagent into the exhaust gas flow of an internal combustion engine, and specifically to a Selective Catalytic Reduction dosing system in a vehicle such as a Diesel vehicle. It has particular application in determining the volume of reagent such as urea in a storage tank.

Background of the Invention Reagent dosing systems such as Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) dosing systems are used in vehicles to reduce emissions such as nitrogen oxide (NOx) in the exhaust gas flow, by converting the emissions into other substances.

A known SCR dosing system doses a reagent comprising urea into an exhaust gas flow. The system comprises a urea tank, a urea delivery module

(UDM), a feed line, and a coolant system comprising a cooler and a temperature sensor. The UDM may be adjacent, or fitted to, the urea tank. The UDM may integrate three sensors, for filtering and tank heating, temperature and

concentration, and urea level. Urea is delivered from the urea tank, via the UDM and the feed line to a dosing injector module comprising a water-cooled pump injector. A flow of engine coolant, which runs at too high a temperature to be used directly for cooling urea, is further cooled by the cooler. The subsequent flow of coolant to the injector module prevents the urea from reaching boiling point during hot vehicle running conditions.

In a further known SCR dosing system, pressurised urea is supplied to a dosing injector module comprising a water-cooled solenoid injector. A pressuring means comprising a pump and a pressure sensor directly pressurises the urea, within part of the feed line, after is has left the urea tank. The boiling point of the urea is increased by the pressurisation, and therefore the system can operate with a coolant system supplied with normal engine coolant at 90 - 110°C, without the requirement for an additional cooler. However, the pump required to directly pressurise the urea is complex and expensive, and must be sufficiently robust to the accommodate the pressures of frozen urea.

In an enhanced known design the urea is pressurised by providing means to pressurise the air in the urea tank, thus pressurising the urea.

It is an object of the invention to reduce the cost of such systems by providing a system and method to determine the level of urea without the need for a level sensor or such like. Statement of the Invention

In one aspect is provided a method of determining the level of reductant in a storage tank of a Selective Catalytic Reduction dosing system comprising: a) determining the initial air pressure within said tank PI; b) pressurizing the tank; c) determining the added mass of air during said pressurization, m_added_; d) measuring the pressure of the tank subsequent to pressurization, P2;

e) determining the volume of air in the tank from PI, P2 and m added; and and f) determining the level of reductant in the tank form the determined volume of air in the tank from step e) and the assumed or determined volume of the tank before and/or after pressurization

Step f) may comprise determining the level of the reductant by subtracting the assumed or determined volume of the tank from the determined volume of step e) .

The method may include determining the volume of the tank before pressurization Vtl and /or after pressurization Vt2 dependent on temperature and/or pressure PI and/ or P2 and using the thus determined values of Vtl and/or Vt2 in step f).

The method may include the steps of determining the volume of the tank before pressurization Vtl and after pressurization Vt2, and taking any difference into consideration in the determination step f)

The method is preferably performed during routine pressurization of the reductant tank.

The method is preferably performed subsequent to the following steps: i) determining the current tank pressure and/or temperature: ii) calculating the expected tank pressure from a previously recorded tank temperature/and or pressure; iii) determining if the current tank pressure deviates from said expected tank pressure from ii) by more than a pre-set threshold, and performing the methods of claims 1 to 4 where it is determined that said deviation is more than said pre-set threshold.

In step ii) the method preferably includes compensating for any change in temperature and/or leakage rate and/or usage of reductant. Detailed Description of Examples

Figure 1 shows a urea or reductant dispensing system with which the current method may be used. It shows a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) dosing system 102, for supplying a reagent such as urea to a dosing injector module 122.

The system 102 comprises a urea tank 112, which in the present embodiment is pressure-resistant, a pressure sensor 132 for sensing air pressure within the urea tank 112, a reagent delivery module comprising a Urea Delivery Module (UDM) 110, and a feed line 104.

The UDM 110 comprises a filter, an electrical heater, and a temperature sensor. The tank 112 contains a volume of urea 128, and a volume of air 162. The feed line 104, which comprises a first freeze-resistant section 118 and a second freeze resistant, high temperature section 120, supplies urea from a volume of the urea 128 in the urea tank 112, via the UDM 110, to an injector module 122 comprising a dosing injector such as a pump-injector, which is water-cooled by coolant provided from a coolant supply line 124.

The urea tank 112 is pressurised, by a source of air pressure. In, the source of air pressure is an air pump assembly 114, comprising an electric air pump and a filter. In alternative embodiments, the urea tank 112 could be pressurised by compressed air from a vehicle brake system (i.e. in heavy duty applications), compressed air from a mechanical air pump on a cam

shaft/alternator etc., compressed air from an air suspension system, boosted air pressure from an inlet manifold, or by a combination of suitable sources of air pressure.

Detailed Description of Invention

In one aspect the method calculates the volume of urea/reductant in a storage tank by determining the volume of air in the tank. The volume of liquid urea or reductant is determined as the tank volume minus the volume of air. The volume of the tank may be assumed fixed or variable with temperature and/or pressure.

The volume of air in the tank according to an example is determined by measuring the pressure of the tank before and after a pressurization process where e.g. air is pumped into the tank to pressurize it. The change in pressure is a function of the volume of air in the tank (i.e. tank volume minus urea volume, the latter may be assumed to be incompressible) and the mass of air pumped in. Typically with the systems described above, a pressure sensor is already present which can detect the tank pressure. If not a pressure sensor can be provided which is cheaper in some instances that a level sensor. This allows the removal of a complex level sensor from the system or replacement of the level sensor with a simpler more cost effective one.

Methodology of examples involves in examples using relationships between parameters such as the pressure, volume, optionally temperature, and the mass of air pumped into the tank, plus optionally estimation of the impact of pressure and temperature on tank volume, as well as optionally modelling of mass flow delivery from an air pump and optionally the observance of any leakages from the system with additional logic to check the validity of previous level calculations.

Figure 2a to d shows the effect of operation of the air pump to achieve for example a pre-defined pressure increase. The tank is operated between times tl and t2 and the urea volume may be calculated after pressurization at time t2. Preferably the tank level is determined when the air pump has been turned on for a certain time; e.g. minimum threshold time or when the air pressure has risen by a certain amount e.g. above a threshold.

Example 1

The following equation is utilized in the determination of urea volume,

Equation 1: Urea Volume Tank Volume - Air Volume

If the tank volume is known, the urea volume can be determined if the air volume is known/determined. Thus according to a simple embodiment the air volume is estimated and used to determine the urea volume from the equation above.

The Ideal Gas Equation is as follows:

Equation 2 PV = mRT According to the basic example, the initial pressure of the tank is determined PI and the tank is then pressurized e.g. by pumping means which adds an additional mass of air to the tank, madded to the existing or initial mass of air mo. The pressure P2 after pressurization is determined.

Equation 3 PiV =m_oRTl

Where V is the air volume (tank volume) minus the reductant volume, and assumed to be constant.

After pressurization:

Equation 4 P₂V= (mo + madded) RT₂. Assuming Tl and T2 are the same, equations 3 and 4 this gives the volume V:

Equation 5 V= madded RT/(P2 - PI) where P2 and PI are the air pressure before and after the pumping operation.

Preferably the air mass added to pressurize the tank is determined form the following equation :

Equation 6 m added = Sum (Air Mass Flow * deltaTime)

Where deltaTime is the duration of a pumping operation and

AirMassFLow is the flow mass of air through/from the pump.

Thus if the air mass can be determined after the pumping operation by integrating air flow with respect to time. In examples, the Air Mass Flow can be determined by modelling the characteristics of the air pump as a function of air pressure supply , supply voltage etc. Alternatively the air flow could be measured by a simple air flow meter in series with the air pump.

In a simple embodiment, the tank temperature is assumed constant during the pressure increase

In preferred aspect, the tank volume is not assumed to be constant but varies according to the tank pressure and/or temperature. Variation in physical tank volume due to pressure and temperature will generally be small but depends on tank construction. Thus the tank volume can be determined from:

Equation 7: Tank Volume = f (Tank Pressure, Tank Temperature) The above methodology may be performed during normal pressurisation periods of the tank. Periodic pressurisation is necessary to ensure adequate injection of urea.

Further Examples

With a urea delivery system with no air leaks the pump may not be activated for several drive cycles. Thus in enhanced embodiment, the following may be used to infer knowledge of the tank state in between pump operations. So alternatively, the process including pressurisation may be determined at times outside the normal operational pressurisation times.

Preferably any application of the methodology above outside normal pressurisation periods is only performed if diagnostics suggest it may be necessary, e.g. if there may be a leak or the tank is getting below a critical value. In the following examples, it is determine when, i,e. under what circumstances it is preferable to perform the method. Example 1

Figure 3 illustrates an example of the invention and show a flow chart of the operation. The method starts at step S 1. At step S2 the tank pressure and temperature are measured.

At step S3 the expected tank pressure is determined from the last known tank temperature and pressure and compensating for the new tank temperature, as well as optionally any leakage or usage rate over time.

In step S4, the current tank pressure is compared with the expected tank pressure from step S3. If it is less than the expected tank pressure the procedure proceed to step S5

At S5 it is assumed that there is no change in the urea volume.

If at step 4 the current tank pressure is less than expected tank level may have changed. The process proceeds to step S6 where the air pump is activated to increase the pressure and the tank level determined as described above at step S7. This may involve the procedure described above. At S8 the new tank level is confirmed as correct.

Refined Example 2

Figure 4 shows a flow chart of methodology when the tank is running.

At vehicle start-up the tank level logic is as following: The current tank pressure and temperature is acquired at step SI 1. As step S12 this is determined if the current tank pressure is less than the expected demanded tank pressure. If so at step S 13 the pump is activated to increase pressure. At step S 14 the tank level is determined. Again steps S13 and S14 may be performed as described above. If not at step S 15 the calculated expected tank pressure is determined form the last known tank temperature and pressure compensating optionally with new tank temperature/any urea consumption over time/leakage rate over time. At step S 16 it is determined if the tank pressure is less than expected tank pressure. If not at step S17 there is assumed to be no change in the volume of urea. If so however the process proceeds to step SI 8 where it is assumed the tank level has changed or there is an air leak. The air pump is activated and the process proceeds to step S14 where the new tank level is computed. Therefore steps S18 and S14 perform the methodology as described in the figure 3 example.

This is confirmed at step S20. The leakage rate is also calculated at step S19 and used in the calculation of expected tank pressure/step S15. Additionally

In the case when the system starts and the pressure in the tank is already greater than the demand. A plausibility check can be made if the temperature of the tank has changed from the last know condition.

Using

Where

Pi = Pressure in tank at vehicle key off or shutdown

Ti = Temperature in tank at vehicle key off or shutdown

Vi = Volume in tank at vehicle key off or shutdown

P₂ = Pressure in tank at vehicle key on or startup

T₂ = Temperature in tank at vehicle key on or startup

V₂ = Calculated Volume in tank at vehicle key on or startup

Claims

1. A method of determining the level of reductant in a storage tank (112) of a Selective Catalytic Reduction dosing system (102) comprising:

a) determining the initial air pressure within said tank PI (S2);

b) pressurizing the tank (S6);

c) determining the added mass of air during said pressurization, m added;

d) measuring the pressure of the tank subsequent to pressurization, P2; e) determining the volume of air in the tank from PI, P2 and m added; and;

f) determining the level of reductant in the tank form the determined volume of air in the tank from step e) and the assumed or determined volume of the tank before and/or after pressurization

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 where step f) comprises determining the level of the reductant by subtracting the assumed or determined volume of the tank from the determined volume of step e).

3. A method as claimed in claim 1 including determining the volume of the tank before pressurization Vtl and /or after pressurization Vt2 dependent on temperature and/or pressure PI and/ or P2 (S3) and using the thus determined values of Vtl and/or Vt2 in step f).

4. As claimed in claim 2 including the steps of determining the volume of the tank before pressurization Vtl and after pressurization Vt2, and taking any difference into consideration in the determination step f)

5. A method as claimed in any preceding claim where said method is performed during routine pressurization of the reductant tank (112).

6. A method as claimed in claim lto 4 wherein said method is performed subsequent to the following steps:

i) determining the current tank pressure and/or temperature (SI 1):

ii) calculating the expected tank pressure from a previously recorded tank temperature/and or pressure (SI 5) ;

iii) determining if the current tank pressure deviates from said expected tank pressure from ii) by more than a pre-set threshold (SI 6); and performing the methods of claims 1 to 4 where it is determined that said deviation is more than said pre-set threshold.

7. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein step ii) includes compensating for any change in temperature and/or leakage rate and/or usage of reductant.