WO2017003793A1 - Prédiction hybride répartie de changements d'état de feux de circulation - Google Patents

Prédiction hybride répartie de changements d'état de feux de circulation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2017003793A1
WO2017003793A1 PCT/US2016/038817 US2016038817W WO2017003793A1 WO 2017003793 A1 WO2017003793 A1 WO 2017003793A1 US 2016038817 W US2016038817 W US 2016038817W WO 2017003793 A1 WO2017003793 A1 WO 2017003793A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
traffic signal
vehicle
signal
data
prediction
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2016/038817
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Kiel Roger OVA
Thomas Bauer
Jingtao Ma
Kyle Zachary HATCHER
Original Assignee
Traffic Technology Services, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Traffic Technology Services, Inc. filed Critical Traffic Technology Services, Inc.
Priority to EP16745223.4A priority Critical patent/EP3314601A1/fr
Publication of WO2017003793A1 publication Critical patent/WO2017003793A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/09—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions
    • G08G1/0962—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions having an indicator mounted inside the vehicle, e.g. giving voice messages
    • G08G1/09623—Systems involving the acquisition of information from passive traffic signs by means mounted on the vehicle
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/09—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions
    • G08G1/0962—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions having an indicator mounted inside the vehicle, e.g. giving voice messages
    • G08G1/0967—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits
    • G08G1/096733—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits where a selection of the information might take place
    • G08G1/096741—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits where a selection of the information might take place where the source of the transmitted information selects which information to transmit to each vehicle
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/09—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions
    • G08G1/0962—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions having an indicator mounted inside the vehicle, e.g. giving voice messages
    • G08G1/0967—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits
    • G08G1/096766—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits where the system is characterised by the origin of the information transmission
    • G08G1/096775—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits where the system is characterised by the origin of the information transmission where the origin of the information is a central station
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/09—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions
    • G08G1/0962—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions having an indicator mounted inside the vehicle, e.g. giving voice messages
    • G08G1/0967—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits
    • G08G1/096766—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits where the system is characterised by the origin of the information transmission
    • G08G1/096783—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits where the system is characterised by the origin of the information transmission where the origin of the information is a roadside individual element

Definitions

  • This disclosure pertains to vehicles and to electric traffic signals of the sort commonly found at street intersections, freeway ramps, and the like, for directing vehicular traffic.
  • Ginsberg refers to predicting a likely remaining duration of the traffic signal in a particular state; see U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2013/0166109.
  • the need remains, however, for a practical and effective solution to generating predictions of future traffic signal state changes and communicate that information to users (human or autonomous systems) in a timely manner.
  • the stumbling block with known technologies is the technological problem of achieving timely and accurate traffic signal predictions delivered where they are needed, namely in a vehicle (car, bicycle, bus, truck, public transit, light rail, etc.)
  • the technological problem involves two dimensions.
  • the problem is that predictions are not entirely accurate. Some predictions are based on statistics, and therefore are inherently imprecise.
  • a new input in the traffic control system can cause it to be wrong.
  • a number of cars waiting or in the queue to turn left can cause the controller to extend the usual or default left-turn green state duration.
  • the duration may be variable, in response to a number of cars in the queue, or other factors, up to a
  • Figure 1 is a simplified conceptual diagram of a traffic control prediction system.
  • Figure 2A is a simplified timing diagram illustrating synchronization of a controller emulator process to a field signal controller.
  • Figure 2B is an augmented version of Figure 2A illustrating a series of staged future predictions.
  • Figure 3 is a simplified flow diagram illustrating a process for short-term signal status prediction based on a control emulation process.
  • Figure 4 is a simplified flow diagram of an alternative process for short-term signal status prediction based on using a plurality of control emulation processes.
  • Figure 5 is a simplified high-level diagram showing information flow in some embodiments and applications of the present disclosure.
  • Figure 6 is a simplified communications diagram of a traffic control prediction system.
  • Figure 7 is a simplified flow diagram illustrating a process for traffic signal predictions utilizing a combination of statistical analysis of historical signal call data, combined with emulation process results.
  • Figure 8 is a simplified flow diagram of an alternative emulation process that utilizes a plurality of emulator instances, all advancing from a common synchronization state.
  • Figure 9 shows an example of a traffic signal prediction display in a vehicle dashboard.
  • Figure 10 is a simplified communication diagram illustrating operation of some systems and methods for traffic signal prediction in a vehicle in near real-time.
  • Figure 11 is a simplified flow diagram of a process that may be carried out by suitable software in a back-end server system, to support signal state predictions and the like in vehicles that are in use. Detailed Description
  • Traffic Signal or simply “Signal”.
  • FSC Field Signal Controller
  • Field Signal Controller Refers to a controller, generally comprising electronics and/ or software, arranged to control a Traffic Signal.
  • the Field Signal Controller may be located at or near the corresponding Traffic Signal location, such as a street intersection, or at a central traffic management center, or some
  • An FSC may operate according to various rules, algorithms, and inputs, depending on the location and circumstances of the signal it controls. For example, raw inputs may be provided to the FSC by a Detector.
  • Field Signal Controller State refers to the state of an FSC, for example, the status of one or more internal timers, and the state or status of one more Indicators controlled by the FSC.
  • the FSC has a given state at a specific time.
  • Cycle Time An FSC may change state according to a Cycle Time, although the cycle time may not always be constant. For example, a weekday cycle time may differ from a weekend cycle time for a given FSC.
  • Detector Refers to an electrical, magnetic, optical, video or any other sensor arranged to provide raw input signals to an FSC in response to detection of an entity such as a motor vehicle, transit vehicle, bicycle or pedestrian.
  • the input signal may correspond to the arrival, presence, or departure of the vehicle.
  • a detector also may be activated manually, for example, by a pedestrian or a driver pressing a button. Of course, a detector also may be initiated remotely or wirelessly, similar to a garage or gate opener.
  • Detectors provide raw inputs or stimuli to an FSC.
  • Controller Emulator Is discussed in more detail below, but in general may comprise computer hardware or other electronics, and/or software, wherever located, that is arranged to mimic or emulate the operation of an FSC.
  • Indicator refers to one or more signal lights or other visible and/or audible indicators arranged to direct or inform a user such as a motor vehicle driver, bicyclist, pedestrian, or transit vehicle operator at or near a given traffic signal location.
  • a common Indicator for motor vehicles is the ubiquitous Green - Yellow - Red arrangement of lights.
  • an Indicator is triggered or otherwise controlled by the FSC associated with the signal location.
  • a Controller Emulator may be implemented as part of a system to predict the future behavior of a Field Signal Controller, and more specifically, to predict the specific types and timing of a field signal controller future state change.
  • Phase In a signal timing plan, for example, a Phase is "A controller timing unit associated with the control of one or more movements.
  • the MUTCD defines a phase as the right-of-way, yellow change, and red clearance intervals in a cycle that are assigned to an independent traffic movement.” So it refers to one or multiple movements that are allowed to go together under the signal control, for example, a northbound left turn can have its own (protected) phase. Or the northbound left turn can also be coupled with the northbound through (and right turn in that matter) and thus the entire northbound movements become one phase (in this case
  • northbound left turn vehicles may have to find gaps between opposing southbound through traffic to cross the street).
  • Some traffic signals operate on a fixed schedule, while some others are "actuated” or may be adaptive to various conditions. Embodiments of the present invention may be used with all types of non-fixed time signals.
  • a traffic signal controller adapts to current traffic conditions and various inputs according to a predetermined signal timing plan.
  • Some communication infrastructure is necessary to deliver various "signal data" (for example, states, timers or predictions) into a (potentially moving) vehicle in real-time.
  • the vehicle or its operator not only is informed about the current status of the signal, but also what the signal is going to do in the near-term future.
  • Predictions of traffic control signal status and or changes can be utilized to advantage by a vehicle control system, either autonomously or with driver participation. Predictions of traffic control signal status and or changes can be utilized by a vehicle operator independently of a vehicle control system.
  • One important aspect of the following discussion is to describe how to create traffic signal predictions and deliver them to a vehicle/ driver in a timely and useful manner.
  • Predictions of traffic control signal status and or changes may be delivered to a vehicle in various ways, for example, using the wireless telecom network, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth or any other wireless system for data transfer.
  • Any of the above communication means can be used for communication to a vehicle, for example, to a "head unit" or other in-vehicle system, or to a user's portable wireless device, such as a tablet computer, handheld, smart phone or the like.
  • a user's portable device may or may not be communicatively coupled to the vehicle, for example, it is known to couple a mobile phone to a vehicle head unit for various reasons, utilizing wired or wireless connections.
  • Predictions of traffic control signal status and or changes may be displayed for a user on a vehicle dashboard, head unit display screen, auxiliary display unit, or the display screen of the user's portable wireless device, such as a tablet computer, handheld, smart phone or the like.
  • a prediction that a yellow light is going to turn red in two seconds may be provided to a driver and/or to a vehicle that is approaching the subject intersection.
  • One aspect of this disclosure is directed to the use of control emulation to generate this type of short-term prediction.
  • FIG. 5 is a simplified introductory diagram showing information flow 500 in some embodiments and applications of the present disclosure.
  • a traffic management center 510 may be deployed, for example, in a city, to provide centralized traffic management functions.
  • the traffic management center may communicate data or instructions electronically to individual signal controllers.
  • the traffic may communicate data or instructions electronically to individual signal controllers.
  • a management center may be arranged to receive information from signal controllers around the city.
  • the individual controllers may provide state data, which may include vehicle call data responsive to detector inputs signals.
  • a server 512 may be configured to store and analyze data received at or provided by the TMC.
  • the server 512 may be arranged to receive and store longer term controller data (defined later), such as vehicle call data, and to generate statistical analyses of such data, as further explained below.
  • the server may provide data as further described below to be used in a signal prediction feature 514.
  • the signal prediction process in turn generates signal prediction data into a database 516.
  • That database 516 may be made accessible to selected customers 520. For example, such customers may include automobile manufacturers, after-market automotive suppliers, etc.
  • the prediction data in the database may then be communicated electronically to motor vehicles or their operators, also referred to as consumers 522.
  • FIG. 6 shows an alternative system in more detail.
  • One or more detectors referenced generally at 146, provide raw data or input signals to an FSC 150. Details of these connections are known.
  • the FSC 150 is often coupled to a communication system 152 operated by local traffic management authorities.
  • the authorities may operate a central traffic management center 154, although some FSC's may operate autonomously.
  • a prediction system as disclosed herein may obtain data from the central management center, as indicated in Figure 5. In other embodiments, the prediction system may obtain data solely from the FSC.
  • the FSC 150 receives raw data from the detectors 146 and processes that raw data to generate vehicle call data or "calls."
  • a call may result from, for example, the detected arrival of a car 50 feet behind an intersection limit line, in a particular lane.
  • vehicle call or “vehicle call data” herein in a broad, generic sense in that any given call may be responsive to any type of vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle or other input stimulus.
  • the vehicle call data is provided to the prediction system 156. It may be communicated via the communication system 152. Preferably, the same vehicle call data generated by the FSC is provided both to the prediction system 156 and to the central management center 154.
  • the FSC may have a wireless modem 151 installed to communicate call data wirelessly. It may receive detector data wirelessly as well.
  • the prediction system 156 responsive to received vehicle call data and other parameters, generates predictions of FSC state changes, which may include indicator state changes.
  • the predictions may be communicated to a client or customer 160.
  • the client may be an automobile manufacturer, or an aftermarket product or service vendor.
  • the predictions may be conveyed to the client 160 using a push protocol, a pull protocol, regularly scheduled updates or other variations which, in general, should be arranged to be reasonably timely.
  • a push message is executed once per second.
  • the client 160 may communicate predictions, or information based on the predictions, via a wireless communication system or network 170, to its customers or consumers 180, typically in a motor vehicle.
  • the prediction system 156 in some embodiments may correspond to the prediction system 100 explained in more detail with regard to Figure 1.
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified conceptual diagram of an example of a traffic control prediction system 100.
  • the system comprises a control emulation component or system 102, which may include control logic 110 and local control parameters 112.
  • the local control parameters match those of the actual FSC of interest.
  • the local control parameters may include, for example, timing parameters, cycle time, etc.
  • the prediction system 100 receives current signal status (observed) as input data 120.
  • the current signal status (real time) may be communicated from the FSC using known protocols.
  • the signal status preferably includes state information and current vehicle call data.
  • the prediction system also receives past signal status
  • Past signal status data may be collected and processed off-line. For example, such data may be accumulated over several days or weeks. This data may be stored in a database for statistical analysis as further described below.
  • the prediction system 100 also receives future vehicle call data (Predicted) as input data 140.
  • the future (predicted) detection data 140 is used to advance the control emulator, while applying the local control parameters, to a new state that reflects what the actual controller state is likely to become in the near future.
  • the emulator can be clocked at a rate faster than real-world time, so that it "gets ahead" of the current state of the actual FSC being emulated.
  • the results of the emulation may comprise a future signal status (predicted signal status), indicated as output data 130.
  • the predicted signal status may be communicated to a vehicle or a vehicle operator, or other user, as further described below.
  • Figure 2A is a simplified timing diagram illustrating the pertinent timing relationships in greater detail.
  • time is indicated along the bottom axis 200, moving from the past on the left to the future on the right.
  • the actual (real world) current time t is indicated at vertical line 208.
  • a first bar 202 represents time in the field signal controller, as for example, may be maintained by a local system clock.
  • a second bar 230 represents "time" in the controller emulator (or emulation process).
  • One challenge presented is to synchronize a state of the controller emulator to the current state of the actual FSC.
  • the difficulty arises because the FSC continues to run, and change state, continuously. It is not practical, and potentially even dangerous, to stop the FSC in order and capture a current state.
  • a process may proceed as follows. First, actual FSC data is collected during a period 203 that is before the point in time marked "Sync Point" 204. An emulator process is initialized to that "old" FSC status to begin. Then, at the sync point in time 204, at least one emulator process is started, and it runs forward from the sync point, up to the current time t and beyond.
  • the emulator "catches up" to the current real-world time t by clocking it at a faster rate.
  • the emulator process receives call data provided by the FSC responsive to detector inputs or the like. Consequently, the emulator will clock through the same state changes as the actual FSC during this period, up to the current time (t) at 208.
  • the emulator is now fully synchronized to the FSC, at the actual current time.
  • the emulator receives "future detection data" indicated as 140 in Figure 1.
  • the future detection data may be generated, for example, by a statistical or probability analysis of actual detection data received at the subject FSC in the past. Again, the controller emulator is running in "fast forward" mode.
  • one detector might be an in-ground induction loop that detects the presence of a car. Or, it might be a pedestrian push-button.
  • the raw input signals from the detector are received by the FSC and converted into vehicle call data as noted. That call data may be collected and stored over a data collection period, say two weeks, and analyzed using known statistical analyses. The goal is to analyze past behavior of the FSC to help predict its likely future behavior.
  • the data collection period may vary depending on circumstances, and may be changed to optimize it for a given application.
  • the analysis may show, for example, that there is a 40% likelihood of a given call after 2 seconds; and a 60% likelihood of receiving that call after 3 seconds; and perhaps a 90% likelihood or receiving that call after 4 seconds.
  • Each emulator may be calibrated as to how best use this data. For example, the 60% likelihood may be deemed sufficient to trigger a predicted call at t+3. In another application, it may wait until t+4 when the likelihood is greater. Assuming the predicted (and simulated) call is input to the emulator at time t+3, it will change state accordingly. Assuming no other inputs for simplicity of illustration, the emulator now reflects a state that the real FSC is likely to reflect in the future, namely at time t+3. Thus a prediction at 210 is completed.
  • Figure 2B is an augmented version of Figure 2A illustrating a series of staged future predictions.
  • the results are stored in a buffer or queue to be available for communication to the client.
  • Obtaining the live statuses from an FSC takes time, as does running the emulator.
  • multiple predictions can be made in each emulation step. For example, assume a prediction is made that an indicator light will change from red to green 3 seconds into the future, as indicated at mark 210.
  • FIG. 3 is a simplified flow diagram illustrating one emulation method 300 of the type described above, utilizing a single emulator process.
  • process to refer to a computer software process, thread, or the like. In a preferred embodiment, the following process steps may be executed once per second.
  • the method calls for finding signal status at a last sync point in a database.
  • a controller emulator is initialized and advanced to that last sync point.
  • the method calls for feeding past call data into the emulation, from the last sync point, until the current time t. As noted with regard to Figure 2, at this time t the emulator is synchronized to the subject FSC, as noted in block 308.
  • the likely future FSC behavior is predicted by fast forwarding the controller emulator, using predicted (future) detection data.
  • the predicted state change may be saved and/or exported, as noted above.
  • the same emulator process may then be re-initialized and run again, in the same fashion as above. Or a new instance may be spawned. On the next operation, and each subsequent run, the process is re-initialized to a more recent sync point.
  • FIG. 7 is another simplified flow diagram illustrating a process for traffic signal predictions utilizing a combination of statistical analysis of historical signal call data, combined with emulation process results.
  • block 720 On the left side of diagram indicated at 700, block 720, we acquire and store longer term signal call data. "Longer term" here refers to multiple days, typically, or even several weeks. These magnitudes of time, and preferably two weeks, have been found suitable for some applications.
  • block 722 the historical data is analyzed for selected time intervals. The time intervals may be for example, 15 minutes, or an hour or two, or a day, or a number of cycle times.. The statistical analyses may also include variables for time of day, calendar date, time of year, holidays, etc.
  • the process may determine, at block 724, a probability of a specific signal phase being called or extended. In some embodiments, historical analysis may be done offline, or in a process or processor separate from the controller emulator process.
  • An emulator process may be initialized and synchronized, block 752.
  • an emulator process may be synchronized to a sync point as discussed.
  • current vehicle call data may be input to the emulator process, block 754.
  • "short-term past” may correspond to the time period 207 in Figure 2A, between a sync point and the current time t.
  • the emulator is run "fast forward" block 756 and during that time it receives and processes both the actual call data 754 and the predicted call data via path 727 from process block 724.
  • the emulator creates 760 a prediction of what state change will occur in a corresponding field signal controller, and when.
  • a method may include repeating the foregoing steps at a rate of once per second, so as to enable updating the predicted signal status once per second.
  • field detection data may be received as signal phase data for input to the emulator.
  • the current state of the emulator includes indicator phase displays (e.g., red, yellow, green, walk, flashing don't walk), and active timers (e.g., minimum green, yellow clearance, red clearance, pedestrian walk, pedestrian clearance, etc.)
  • the predicted signal status may be forwarded or communicated to a vehicle/ driver who may be approaching the subject traffic signal.
  • a motor vehicle may be equipped with suitable equipment to receive that prediction data, and convey it to a control system and/ or a passenger or driver of the vehicle.
  • prediction data may be displayed on the dashboard; in another embodiment it may be displayed on a head unit or navigation unit display screen.
  • the "navigation unit" may be standalone, or implemented as an "app" on a mobile device.
  • FIG. 9 shows an example of a traffic signal prediction display (930) in a vehicle dashboard.
  • a vehicle dashboard is indicated generally at 900.
  • Dashboard 900 may include an instrument panel 902, comprising various gauges or instruments 912, and typically a speedometer 920.
  • a steering wheel 910 is shown (in part) for context.
  • a traffic signal prediction display 930 in this example may comprise a time display 932 ("3 SECS") and a signal display 934.
  • the signal display 934 may comprise three light indicators. They may be red, yellow and green, and they may be arranged like the signal lights in a typical intersection traffic control signal.
  • the light indicators be arranged in that manner, or that colored lights are used at all.
  • Various visual display arrangements other than this example may be used; and indeed, audible signaling (not shown) may be used as an alternative, or in addition to, a visual display.
  • the essential feature is to convey some traffic signal prediction information to a user.
  • the time display 932 may indicate a number of seconds remaining until the traffic signal that the vehicle is approaching is expected to change state, say from yellow to red.
  • the traffic signal prediction display 930 may include a speed indicator 938 ("28 MPH"). This may be used to indicate a speed calculated for the vehicle to reach the next signal while it is in the green state.
  • Having knowledge of what an upcoming traffic signal is going to do in the near future can be used to save gas, save time, and reduce driver stress. For example, when the wait at a red light is going to be relatively long, the driver or an on-board control system may turn off the engine to save fuel. And the prediction system will alert the driver in advance of the light changing to green, to enable a timely restart of the engine. Or, a driver or control system may adjust speed to arrive at a green light. Travel time may be saved by routing optimizations that are responsive to anticipated traffic signal delays. Toward that end, the database prediction data may be provided to a mapping application. Stress is reduced as a driver need not continuously stare at a red signal light, waiting for it to change. In fact, if the wait is known to be long, the driver may want to check her email or safely send a message.
  • FIG. 4 is a simplified flow diagram of an alternative process 400 for short-term signal status prediction, utilizing a plurality of control emulation processes. Process steps may be executed periodically, for example, once per second, although this interval is not critical.
  • a first controller emulator (or controller emulator process) 420-1 is synchronized to the field controller, block 410, thereby establishing an initial "Current Time.”
  • a second controller emulator 420-2 also is synchronized to the field controller, so that the second emulator also is synchronized to the "Current Time.”
  • additional controller emulator processes may be synchronized to the same Current Time, as indicated by 420-N. After all relevant emulator processes have been initialized and synchronized, all of them commence execution responsive a common clock signal, and thereby remain synchronized.
  • FIG 8 provides a simplified flow diagram 800 of a multiple-emulator embodiment.
  • each emulator may be an instance of suitable code.
  • N is an integer on the order of approximately 10-40, although this number is not critical.
  • all N instances are synchronized to the same field signal controller at a current time. Methods for doing so are described above.
  • the system selects one of the running emulator instances, and then, block 810, "fast forwards" only the one selected instance, typically by applying a faster clock than the real-time clock.
  • predicted future detection data is input to the instance, as discussed above.
  • the selected instance performs this prediction over a one-second interval.
  • block 812 the system saves the selected emulator prediction results. For a first selected emulator, this would provide t+1 second prediction results. Then the selected emulator process (only one) is terminated, block 814. Note that meanwhile the other N-l instances have continued, under real-time clocking, to remain synchronized to the field signal controller, so they are ready to go "fast forward" from their current state. Decision 816 determines whether all N instances have terminated. If not, the process continues via path 820 back to block 808, and selects a second one of the remaining emulators. The second selected emulator instance, only, is then "fast forwarded" as described above with regard to block 810 and the process continues as before using the second selected emulator instance to perform a second prediction.
  • the second prediction may be for time t+2.
  • This same loop 820 is then repeated again for each of the remaining N-2 instances, so that each instance provides a prediction at a time in the future. So, for example, 50 instances might be provisioned to predict signal changes 50 seconds into the future.
  • Decision 816 detects when all N instances have terminated. The process then loops via path 830 back to block 804 whereupon all N instances are synchronized anew to the new current time t. The process continues to repeat as described so as to continually provide predictions of field controller state.
  • newer vehicles especially autonomous vehicles, have cameras built in, and an on-board camera can be used to recognize a current state of a traffic signal as the vehicle approaches the signal.
  • the "state" of a signal refers to RYG status.
  • the camera captures the signal status in real-time. Accordingly, where camera/ image data is available in the vehicle, that data source can be used to advantage to update or synchronize a prediction process, again avoiding latency issues.
  • the image data can be acquired on an internal vehicle data bus through a suitable interface using known technologies.
  • computing resources may be moved on-board a vehicle. That is, on-board computing resources in a vehicle can be used to provide or assist in the prediction process.
  • Computing resources may be provided as part of a standard vehicle configuration, or they may be modified or added in some vehicle configurations. Computing resources may be added in the form of after-market products.
  • computing resources may be provided by a portable, hand carried device such as a smart phone.
  • the smart phone may be communicatively coupled to vehicle systems or networks, for example, via a head unit or navigation system. Such coupling may be by cable or short- range wireless connection. Any combination of standard or custom resources may be used within the scope of this disclosure.
  • modern vehicles, including hybrid and pure electric vehicles evolve, they increasingly contain multiple networks, processors and other computer- type resources such as user interface devices (display screens, joysticks, voice input, etc.). In some vehicle environments, relatively few changes will be needed to implement
  • On-board prediction results can be used in various ways. Some examples include (1) display of prediction information in the vehicle; (2) transmission of the information to the back-end server; (3) transmission in the vehicle to an on-board an autonomous vehicle control system for use in autonomous operation of the vehicle; (4) transmission over short- range communications to a portable device in the vehicle.
  • Display of prediction results for example, the expected time remaining to a specified state change (say yellow to red, or red to green) for a signal in front of the vehicle, may be done on a dashboard display (See Fig. 9 for example), or in a "head unit” or navigation system display screen, a windshield “heads up" display, a wearable display, etc. These examples are illustrative and not intended to be limiting.
  • the prediction results may be provided in audible form. For example, an audio message about upcoming signal changes may be played over the vehicle audio or entertainment system, a smartphone speaker, etc.
  • a Back-end System A may be a "lean" version of a prediction system such as that described above.
  • System A preferably is configured to maintain (or have access to) signal timing plans. Timing plans are individualized for each traffic signal. They may include sequences of state changes (for example, green - yellow - red), and a maximum duration for each state and other localized settings.
  • System A may include or have access to a data store of individual signal timing plans for a given geographic area. System A is also configured to compile prediction parameters.
  • this system may generate likely or expected future detection data for a given FSC based on a statistical analysis of a collection of long- term past field detection data acquired from the corresponding FSC.
  • the backend system A is not intended to be located on board a vehicle. Typically, it may be installed at a fixed location or "in the cloud.” In some embodiments, it could be portable.
  • System A includes network communications capability to send and receive data over a network, for example, the internet or wireless telecom.
  • the backend system may have accumulated 1 month of data (vehicle arrivals, vehicle presence, in combination with the signal status) from the TMC via communication path "3." This one-month time period is not critical.
  • the backend system statistics processing module will calculate the following:
  • This task is performed periodically on the backend system, for example, in the cloud.
  • This statistics database dataset P will then be transferred to the in-vehicle computer at request of the approaching vehicle, as the data support to the prediction system.
  • a system “B” represents a signal state prediction system deployed on board a vehicle, for example, a car, bus, etc.
  • System B preferably is
  • the prediction system may be executable on computing resources in the vehicle as described above.
  • System A is configured to send vehicle calls and prediction parameters to each system B.
  • system A may have an assigned geographic area, and it may send data to vehicles in its operating area.
  • three vehicles 1050, 1060 and 1070 are shown for illustration.
  • system B In each vehicle there is an in-vehicle signal state prediction system B, as indicated by dashed lines 1052, 1062 and 1072, respectively.
  • System B is not distributed; rather, there is a corresponding one of them in each vehicle.
  • the system B requests and receives data from the back-end system A, for example, via the internet or other wireless communications means.
  • System B utilizes the data to perform predictions on board the vehicle.
  • An example of a prediction process is described in detail above, particularly with regard to Figs. 3 and 7. However, other prediction methods may be used in system B.
  • System B also is coupled by appropriate interfaces for interaction with systems, networks or other resources on-board the vehicle.
  • system C is a traffic management center ("TMC").
  • TMC traffic management center
  • the system C is arranged to collect signal status data and send that data to the backend system A over a communication link 3.
  • the TMC typically is also arranged to collect vehicle call data (typically generated by sensors, not shown), from signal controllers 1078, also labeled D in the drawing.
  • vehicle call data are not part of the data dictionary for DSRC communications.
  • vehicle call data and other traffic flow related data may become part of the data dictionary; in this case, vehicle call data can also be transmitted directly to the in-vehicle prediction system and thus eliminate the latencies introduced via link 3.
  • Each intersection or traffic signal 1080 may have a corresponding controller 1078.
  • Data collected by the TMC and forwarded to the system A is subject to latencies that may be variable and not well-defined. Additional latencies may be encountered in communications between the system A and the vehicle system B.
  • the traffic controllers labeled D in the drawing may implement a wireless, short- range broadcast system to send current signal states with minimal latency to nearby vehicles.
  • the controller may implement "DSRC" - Dedicated Short-Range Communications system, a system specifically designed for automotive use and a
  • ETSI Telecommunications Standards Institute
  • the DSRC broadcasts are illustrated by the arrows at number 4.
  • the vehicle say 1070, may have a camera 1082 on board that is configured to capture signal status (by taking a picture or video of a traffic signal in its view).
  • the captured image or corresponding image data, or a simplified result based on the image, for example, ' " the signal is RED,” is provided to the sy tem B, for example, over an on-board network.
  • a vehicle 1070 is approaching a traffic signal 1080, which may be called the "target signal.”
  • the prediction system B in the car sends a request "1" to the back-end system A, for example, via the internet, for information about the target signal.
  • the request message preferably includes an identifier of the target signal or its location. One way to determine its location is via GPS. Another way to identify the target signal is to receive its DSRC broadcast.
  • the back-end system sends data via path "2" comprising prediction system inputs for the target signal.
  • the back-end system may send the following statistics: At start of signal switch, depending on the switch type (red to green, or green to red), the probability of vehicle arrivals or presence for each second till the end of the maximum.
  • the back-end system may send the statistics database dataset P described above.
  • the back-end system develops these statistics over time by accumulating data via path "3" from the TMC or an equivalent source. With this information the system B can predict likely upcoming changes at the target signal.
  • the system B may emulate the target signal controller D operation, utilizing the statistical inputs as expected sensor call data.
  • the prediction can be improved, however, with real-time target signal state information. That is, the prediction process can be adjusted or synchronized to the actual current signal status if known in real time. As explained above, this can be acquired by a DSRC system broadcast from the target signal, and/or utilizing on-board camera 1082 image data. With that information, the prediction system can instantly change state to match the current actual state of the target signal, and the problems of latency are overcome.
  • FIG 11 is a simplified flow diagram of an example of a process that may be carried out by suitable software in a back-end server system, to support signal state predictions and the like in vehicles that are in use.
  • the back-end process is initialized, block 1102. It may acquire individual signal timing plans, block 1104, as noted above. This process 1104 may be repeated to update or augment a collection of timing plans.
  • the back-end system may not acquire signal timing plans at all; rather, that may be left to the on-board vehicle systems. They may, for example, continuously acquire local signal timing plans as they travel.
  • the process calls for accumulating sensor call data, block 1106; this is ongoing or periodically repeated over time.
  • the data may be collected from a TMC illustrated in Fig. 10.
  • the back-end process further calculates statistical analyses of the accumulated data, block 1110, as described in more detail above.
  • the process steps in Fig. 11 need not be carried out in the order shown. Further, some of them may be concurrent processes.
  • the process further calls for monitoring for communications from vehicles, decision 1114. This should be done more or less continuously, see loop 1116. If and when a request message is received from a vehicle (YES branch), the system assembles a reply message, and communicates it to the requesting vehicle, block 1120. Representative examples of data included in a reply were described above.
  • a request from a vehicle may include a request for a target signal timing plan, decision 1122.
  • a request for a timing plan may be included in, or separate from, a request for prediction statistical data. If requested, the timing plan may be transmitted, block 1126, to the requesting vehicle prediction system. If not, the process continues at 1124 and loops back via path 1130 to continue monitoring for request messages.
  • a single back-end system may execute numerous instances of these processes, or numerous threads, to service requests from numerous vehicles substantially simultaneously. Conveniently, resources may be provisioned in the cloud as necessary to particular applications.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Atmospheric Sciences (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne des prédictions informatisées d'états ou de changements d'état à venir de feux de régulation de la circulation, pouvant être utilisées afin d'améliorer la commodité pour les conducteurs, la sécurité et l'économie de carburant. Ces informations peuvent être utilisées avantageusement par un opérateur humain ou par un système autonome ou semi-autonome de commande de véhicule. Les prédictions peuvent être calculées à l'aide de machines appropriées installées dans un véhicule, en coopération avec un système serveur d'appui à distance. Les calculs de prédiction dans le véhicule peuvent s'appuyer sur des données communiquées à l'équipement de calcul du véhicule via diverses communications sans fil, notamment des systèmes de télécoms, des DSRC, etc.
PCT/US2016/038817 2015-06-29 2016-06-22 Prédiction hybride répartie de changements d'état de feux de circulation WO2017003793A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP16745223.4A EP3314601A1 (fr) 2015-06-29 2016-06-22 Prédiction hybride répartie de changements d'état de feux de circulation

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562185833P 2015-06-29 2015-06-29
US62/185,833 2015-06-29

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2017003793A1 true WO2017003793A1 (fr) 2017-01-05

Family

ID=56555714

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2016/038817 WO2017003793A1 (fr) 2015-06-29 2016-06-22 Prédiction hybride répartie de changements d'état de feux de circulation

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3314601A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2017003793A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9928738B2 (en) 2013-04-12 2018-03-27 Traffic Technology Services, Inc. Red light warning system based on predictive traffic signal state data
US10008113B2 (en) 2013-04-12 2018-06-26 Traffic Technology Services, Inc. Hybrid distributed prediction of traffic signal state changes

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1615190A2 (fr) * 2004-07-09 2006-01-11 Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. Procédé et terminal pour produire et donner des information sur la signalisation de circulation
US20110115646A1 (en) * 2009-03-11 2011-05-19 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Driving supporting device
US20120288138A1 (en) * 2011-05-10 2012-11-15 GM Global Technology Operations LLC System and method for traffic signal detection
US20130166109A1 (en) 2007-09-07 2013-06-27 On Time Systems. Inc. Driver Red Light Duration Notification System
US20140277986A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Clemson University Systems and Methods for Predicting Traffic Signal Information
EP2824647A1 (fr) * 2013-07-09 2015-01-14 TomTom International B.V. Procédés et systèmes pour déterminer des informations relatives au fonctionnement de signaux de contrôle du trafic
US20160284215A1 (en) * 2013-04-12 2016-09-29 Traffic Technology Services, Inc. Hybrid distributed prediction of traffic signal state changes

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1615190A2 (fr) * 2004-07-09 2006-01-11 Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. Procédé et terminal pour produire et donner des information sur la signalisation de circulation
US20130166109A1 (en) 2007-09-07 2013-06-27 On Time Systems. Inc. Driver Red Light Duration Notification System
US20110115646A1 (en) * 2009-03-11 2011-05-19 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Driving supporting device
US20120288138A1 (en) * 2011-05-10 2012-11-15 GM Global Technology Operations LLC System and method for traffic signal detection
US20140277986A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Clemson University Systems and Methods for Predicting Traffic Signal Information
US20160284215A1 (en) * 2013-04-12 2016-09-29 Traffic Technology Services, Inc. Hybrid distributed prediction of traffic signal state changes
EP2824647A1 (fr) * 2013-07-09 2015-01-14 TomTom International B.V. Procédés et systèmes pour déterminer des informations relatives au fonctionnement de signaux de contrôle du trafic

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9928738B2 (en) 2013-04-12 2018-03-27 Traffic Technology Services, Inc. Red light warning system based on predictive traffic signal state data
US10008113B2 (en) 2013-04-12 2018-06-26 Traffic Technology Services, Inc. Hybrid distributed prediction of traffic signal state changes

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3314601A1 (fr) 2018-05-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10140862B2 (en) Hybrid distributed prediction of traffic signal state changes
US10192436B2 (en) Red light warning system based on predictive traffic signal state data
US9396657B1 (en) Prediction of traffic signal state changes
US10733883B1 (en) Configurable virtual traffic detection system under predictive signal states
CN109686116B (zh) 交通灯信息提供系统、交通灯信息提供方法及所用服务器
US8981964B2 (en) Driving supporting device
US10629071B1 (en) Adaptive traffic control using vehicle trajectory data
EP3871207B1 (fr) Correction de prédiction d'état de signal de trafic et validation de données de sonde en temps réel
KR102491563B1 (ko) 자율 주행 차량에 사용되는 센서의 타이밍의 검증
JP2018185693A (ja) ライドシェア管理装置、ライドシェア管理方法、およびプログラム
US20120253646A1 (en) Real time estimation of vehicle traffic
WO2016105900A1 (fr) Système et procédé d'interaction avec une signalisation routière numérique
US10002532B2 (en) Communication device and method
CN110197417B (zh) 移动轨迹的处理方法及装置、存储介质、电子装置
KR20210105918A (ko) 자율 주행 차량의 동기화 센서
WO2017003793A1 (fr) Prédiction hybride répartie de changements d'état de feux de circulation
US20210065543A1 (en) Method, Device, and System of Traffic Light Control Utilizing Virtual Detectors
EP3411867B1 (fr) Système d'avertissement pour feu rouge basé sur les données prédictives de l'état d'un signal de circulation
US11523251B2 (en) Information processing system, information processing device, and information processing method
JP2020126538A (ja) 運転支援装置
CN109116357B (zh) 用于同步时间的方法、装置及服务器
KR20160051398A (ko) 교통 표지판 인식을 통한 네비게이션 데이터베이스 업데이트 시스템 및 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2016745223

Country of ref document: EP

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16745223

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2016745223

Country of ref document: EP