WO2016196983A1 - Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils - Google Patents

Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016196983A1
WO2016196983A1 PCT/US2016/035806 US2016035806W WO2016196983A1 WO 2016196983 A1 WO2016196983 A1 WO 2016196983A1 US 2016035806 W US2016035806 W US 2016035806W WO 2016196983 A1 WO2016196983 A1 WO 2016196983A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
pulp
cellulose nanofibrils
cnf
refining
purity
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2016/035806
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Bruce Crossley
Marc GERRER
Original Assignee
Bruce Crossley
Gerrer Marc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bruce Crossley, Gerrer Marc filed Critical Bruce Crossley
Priority to CA2988124A priority Critical patent/CA2988124C/en
Priority to CN201680032576.3A priority patent/CN108137709A/en
Priority to EP16804554.0A priority patent/EP3303404A4/en
Priority to US15/578,786 priority patent/US10240290B2/en
Priority to BR112017025970-2A priority patent/BR112017025970B1/en
Priority to JP2018515194A priority patent/JP6821664B2/en
Publication of WO2016196983A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016196983A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21DTREATMENT OF THE MATERIALS BEFORE PASSING TO THE PAPER-MAKING MACHINE
    • D21D5/00Purification of the pulp suspension by mechanical means; Apparatus therefor
    • D21D5/02Straining or screening the pulp
    • D21D5/04Flat screens
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08BPOLYSACCHARIDES; DERIVATIVES THEREOF
    • C08B15/00Preparation of other cellulose derivatives or modified cellulose, e.g. complexes
    • C08B15/08Fractionation of cellulose, e.g. separation of cellulose crystallites
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08LCOMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08L1/00Compositions of cellulose, modified cellulose or cellulose derivatives
    • C08L1/02Cellulose; Modified cellulose
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C9/00After-treatment of cellulose pulp, e.g. of wood pulp, or cotton linters ; Treatment of dilute or dewatered pulp or process improvement taking place after obtaining the raw cellulosic material and not provided for elsewhere
    • D21C9/001Modification of pulp properties
    • D21C9/007Modification of pulp properties by mechanical or physical means
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21DTREATMENT OF THE MATERIALS BEFORE PASSING TO THE PAPER-MAKING MACHINE
    • D21D1/00Methods of beating or refining; Beaters of the Hollander type
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21DTREATMENT OF THE MATERIALS BEFORE PASSING TO THE PAPER-MAKING MACHINE
    • D21D99/00Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H11/00Pulp or paper, comprising cellulose or lignocellulose fibres of natural origin only
    • D21H11/16Pulp or paper, comprising cellulose or lignocellulose fibres of natural origin only modified by a particular after-treatment
    • D21H11/18Highly hydrated, swollen or fibrillatable fibres

Definitions

  • NFC Nano-Fibrillated Cellulose
  • MFC Microfibrillated Cellulose
  • MNFC Micro-Nano Fibrillated Cellulose
  • Cellulose Nanomaterials etc.
  • the knotter uses a barrier, or screen cylinder, with perforations in the 8 to 12mm diameter range being most common, although perforations as small as 6mm or as large as 16 have been used. The most common size is 9.5mm diameter. Pulp stock passes through this screen cylinder, while the larger pieces of uncooked wood chips cannot pass through. Flows on the inlet side of the screen cylinder carry the knots to one end of the screen cylinder, from which they are discharged as "rejects".
  • a conventional process for producing Cellulose Nanofibrils (CNF) pulp uses refiners equipped with various differing refiner plates and expends significant amounts of refining energy applied to conventional hardwood or softwood pulp.
  • This refining process is usually a recirculation system whereby the refiner discharge is directed back into an agitated feed tank to be fed through the refiner numerous times.
  • Energy is applied through this process to shorten the fiber, increase fibrillation, and increase CNF content of the pulp.
  • the refiner plate gaps are reduced significantly in order to maintain the desired level of energy application and CNF development.
  • This constant application of energy and shortening of the fiber results in a decreasing ability of the refiner plates to capture the fiber on the bar edges resulting in reduced refining efficiency.
  • the conventional method of producing Cellulose Nanofibrils is through a multistage refining or grinding process, which starts with any number of various pulp types like but not limited to bleached softwood Kraft pulp.
  • the pulp supply can be bleached or unbleached, softwood, hardwood, virgin or recycled fiber, or other plant fiber.
  • the refining process is carried out in a way that recirculates 42 all or a portion of the pulp supply through the refiner while applying energy to the fiber to result in an ever increasing fines level in the pulp.
  • the process could be either continuous or batch but a typical continuous process is very equipment intensive.
  • As the refining energy is applied the CNF level increases but at a decreasing rate as the fiber is shortened and CNF increases.
  • This process can be carried out in several stages; possibly each stage using a different refiner plate pattern than the previous.
  • a typical energy input to produce CNF at a 90% fines level is 2500 - 3500 kWh/ton.
  • Some of the targeted CNF levels for certain applications may approach or exceed 95% as measured by an optical fiber length analyzer or other similar device.
  • An alternative measurement method could be Water Retention Values with, but not limited to, targets in the 5.0 to 10.0 range. Significant amounts of energy may be expended to reach those target levels.
  • a cellulose nanofibrils production method comprising the steps of: identifying a desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity, partially refining pulp to produce a cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity between 5% and 20% less than the desired desired purity, and then separating out the cellulose nanofibrils from the longer fibers to produce the desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity.
  • This disclosure addresses the level of energy required and plate wear that occurs toward the end of a refining process by stopping the refining process at a lower CNF level and processing the resulting pulp in a device that removes the longer fiber, thereby resulting in a pulp with the desired CNF characteristics with little or no long fiber present in the product.
  • the refining or fibrillation and shortening of the fibers can be done by conical and disc type refiners, grinders, homogenizers, super mass colliders, etc.
  • This disclosure allows a more standard product to be produced through refining which is then processed using a dynamic washer (such as that disclosed in US Gero et al. Patent 5538632, issued 23 July 1996, incorporated herein by reference), or other fine fractionation device to remove the objectionable longer fiber from the NFC slurry.
  • a dynamic washer such as that disclosed in US Gero et al. Patent 5538632, issued 23 July 1996, incorporated herein by reference
  • Other fine fractionation device to remove the objectionable longer fiber from the NFC slurry.
  • This disclosure also allows development of a simple continuously operating system by reducing the number of refining stages thereby significantly reducing the energy applied and refining time required in the fibrillation and CNF development refining process.
  • FIG. 1 is a single stage conventional batch CNF system with a production capacity of approximately 1 to 2 tons per day.
  • FIG. 2 is a multistage conventional batch CNF system utilizing multiple refiners to result in a production capacity of approximately 10 to 20 tons per day.
  • FIG. 3 is the improved continuous CNF system of this disclosure.
  • FIG. 4 shows the effect of varying the stopping point for refining and the resulting fines content of the CNF after the purification process. These results are all using a 1 .0% feed consistency.
  • FIG. 5 shows the effect of feed consistency to the purification process on the purity of the CNF being produced.
  • identifying a desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity comprising the steps of: identifying a desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity, partially refining pulp to produce a cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity between 5% and 20% less than the desired desired purity, and then separating out the cellulose nanofibrils from the longer fibers to produce the desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity. For example, if a desired level, for a particular product, of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity is 80.5%, then pulp could be refined to 18% less than the desire purity, or to a level of 66.3%. The pulp would then be screened to get to 80.5% level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity.
  • the disclosed process 10 processes pulp with a relatively lower CNF level by way of a device 34 which is capable of filtering out longer fibers, thereby leaving the processed pulp with increased CNF purity, and minimized "long fiber" present.
  • This device 34 can be but is not limited to the dynamic washer referenced above, or a commercial product such as the GL&V Dynamic Washer, GL&V Liquor Filter, or some similar device, that is capable of filtering out the longer fiber present in the pulp.
  • perforated or slotted screening plate utilizing very fine slots or perforations, smooth or “profiled” with a rotating pulsation generator running in close proximity to the perforated screening plate.
  • a typical perforation size would be (but not limited to) 0.006" (0.15 mm) diameter or 0.004" (0.10 mm) diameter holes. It is expected that the smaller perforations will result in a purer CNF with a higher fines content than a process utilizing larger perforations.
  • the action of the pulsation generator is sufficient to generate pulsations capable of causing semi-fluidization of the incoming pulp slurry.
  • the finest of the fiber elements present (CNF) are allowed to pass through the fine perforations in the screen basket while the longer fibers present become entangled and are retained in the feed side of the screen plate.
  • the filtered fine fiber elements (CNF) that pass through the screen cylinder are allowed to discharge out of the device and are passed on in the process for use in various applications.
  • the retained longer fibers are collected in a reject area and are discharged from the filtering device to be sent back in the system to join with un-processed materials being fed to the refining device for further processing.
  • the retained longer fibers can also be used as is in other systems in a mill "as is", or disposed of.
  • the processed CNF pulp has a much narrower fiber length distribution than the refiner discharge alone, and thus is purer than the material this not treated in such a way.
  • Preliminary testing has produced 6% to 14% increase in fines content by utilization of this process. Fines measurement is carried out using the
  • Dynamic Washer results in greater or lesser purification of the CNF from this device.
  • the component parts for a conventional refining system, to generate CNF consists of a source of raw material, slushed pulp which is discharged into an agitated refiner feed tank 18 with a refiner system feed pump, with its suction connection attached to tanks (FIG. 1 ).
  • a two-stage refiner system comprises of one or more refiners 22 connected in series or parallel or some combination of both, with the refining system discharge connected back to the refiner feed or forward to CNF storage, as shown in FIG. 2. There may be a need for intermediate CNF storage 26 between the refining stages in FIG. -2.
  • the improved refining system of this disclosure is illustrated in FIG. 3.
  • the added CNF purification stage consists of a purification stage feed pump connected with its suction connected to the previously mentioned CNF storage tank 30.
  • the pump discharge is connected to the feed connection of a purification device, such as the GL&V Dynamic Washer.
  • the discharge of the purification device consists of two ports on the device, one of which contains the purified CNF which then is discharged to a "Purified CNF" storage 38 for transfer to its final use or addition point to the paper making process or other such application.
  • the second discharge port on the purification device is the separated longer fiber component of the feed stock.
  • This port is connected and returned 46 to the refiner feed chest for mixing with incoming raw material and reprocessing in the refining system (FIG. 3).
  • the addition of a thickening stage for the separated long fiber may be useful or advantageous at this point in the system before being blended with the un-refined raw feedstock.
  • This purification process could be run as either a continuous or batch process with the purification device being run either continuously or intermittently in a batch mode. The preferred embodiment would be to run as a continuous process.
  • FIG. 4 shows the results of purification testing starting with differing inlet fines level resulting in differing accept fines energy reductions and energy savings.
  • Feed consistency is 1 .0% (measured by the mass of dry pulp divided by the mass of the pulp slurry) for all points.
  • FIG. 5 shows the effect of feed consistency to the Purifier (Dynamic Washer) on the fines content (Purity) of the resulting CNF.
  • the lower feed consistency in this case 0.7% consistency compared to the higher 1 .25% feed consistency
  • the higher fines content in the purified CNF results in higher fines content in the purified CNF ("Y" axis). This is true for the entire range of CNF flow tested. This also shows that the lower volumetric flow as a percentage of total feed to the Purifier does result in a purer CNF (higher fines content).
  • An alternate embodiment of the process would be to separate the long fiber from the CNF and process it in a satellite or side stream system. This would consist of the addition of an agitated tank to collect the long fiber stream from the purification device for additional processing in a separate refining system similar to the one previously described. This additional refining system may be operated in the same fashion as the primary system. The final discharge from the system would be taken to the feed tank 18 of the CNF purification device could be combined with the discharge of the mainstream refining system and additional processing.
  • An additional alternate embodiment of this process would be to separate the long fiber from the CNF process and add it to the paper machine pulp system, thereby adding refined fiber to the main stream fiber source for paper manufacturing and also effectively reducing the required refiner power in that area of the system.
  • the advantages of this process are a significant reduction of applied power to the pulp being processed over that of a system that utilizes refiners alone to reach the targeted high fines level of 80%or greater.
  • a second advantage of this process is reduced refiner plate wear and longer filling life due to the reduction of the length of time that the refiners are run while processing the extremely short fiber length associated with the targeted high fines levels.
  • the refining time required to increase the fines content from 80% to 90% can be significant depending on the batch time and the energy level that the pulp will support.
  • This process also provides the opportunity to reduce the amount of required equipment thereby also contributing to a reduction of the total system power requirement and cost to reach the targeted CNF quality level. Both the refining time and reduced energy usage will be dependent upon the system capacity and production rate. Total gross energy savings of 19% to 24% have been seen in testing of this process.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Polysaccharides And Polysaccharide Derivatives (AREA)

Abstract

A cellulose nanofibrils production method comprising the steps of: identifying a desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity, partially refining pulp to produce a cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity between 5% and 15% less than the desired desired purity, and then separating out the cellulose nanofibrils from the longer fibers to produce the desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity.

Description

METHOD OF PRODUCING CELLULOSE NANOFIBRILS
BACKGROUND
[0001] There are some applications of Nano-Fibrillated Cellulose (NFC) that require greater purity or less long fiber than others. Conventional production of this purer product requires longer refining times to reach that condition. NFC, also commonly referred to as Microfibrillated Cellulose (MFC), Micro-Nano Fibrillated Cellulose (MNFC), Cellulose Nanomaterials, etc., are small cellulose fibers on the order of about .25 to .05 mm in length.
[0002] The knotter uses a barrier, or screen cylinder, with perforations in the 8 to 12mm diameter range being most common, although perforations as small as 6mm or as large as 16 have been used. The most common size is 9.5mm diameter. Pulp stock passes through this screen cylinder, while the larger pieces of uncooked wood chips cannot pass through. Flows on the inlet side of the screen cylinder carry the knots to one end of the screen cylinder, from which they are discharged as "rejects".
[0003] A conventional process for producing Cellulose Nanofibrils (CNF) pulp uses refiners equipped with various differing refiner plates and expends significant amounts of refining energy applied to conventional hardwood or softwood pulp. This refining process is usually a recirculation system whereby the refiner discharge is directed back into an agitated feed tank to be fed through the refiner numerous times. Energy is applied through this process to shorten the fiber, increase fibrillation, and increase CNF content of the pulp. During this process the refiner plate gaps are reduced significantly in order to maintain the desired level of energy application and CNF development. This constant application of energy and shortening of the fiber results in a decreasing ability of the refiner plates to capture the fiber on the bar edges resulting in reduced refining efficiency. This then results in potentially significant plate wear along with the additional power applied over time. [0004] The conventional process, when run to the point of very high fines concentration such as but not limited to >85%, uses increasingly greater power as the CNF level increases. Additionally, there is always present some volume of longer fiber which can be detrimental in some applications of this product.
[0005] The conventional method of producing Cellulose Nanofibrils (CNF) is through a multistage refining or grinding process, which starts with any number of various pulp types like but not limited to bleached softwood Kraft pulp. The pulp supply can be bleached or unbleached, softwood, hardwood, virgin or recycled fiber, or other plant fiber. The refining process is carried out in a way that recirculates 42 all or a portion of the pulp supply through the refiner while applying energy to the fiber to result in an ever increasing fines level in the pulp. The process could be either continuous or batch but a typical continuous process is very equipment intensive. As the refining energy is applied, the CNF level increases but at a decreasing rate as the fiber is shortened and CNF increases. This process can be carried out in several stages; possibly each stage using a different refiner plate pattern than the previous.
[0006] As the refining process continues, the efficiency of energy transfer to the fiber decreases as the decreasing fiber length and increasing CNF level takes place. Thus, more and more energy is expended to further increase the CNF content to a desired target. A typical energy input to produce CNF at a 90% fines level is 2500 - 3500 kWh/ton. Some of the targeted CNF levels for certain applications may approach or exceed 95% as measured by an optical fiber length analyzer or other similar device. An alternative measurement method could be Water Retention Values with, but not limited to, targets in the 5.0 to 10.0 range. Significant amounts of energy may be expended to reach those target levels.
SUMMARY
[0007] Disclosed is a cellulose nanofibrils production method comprising the steps of: identifying a desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity, partially refining pulp to produce a cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity between 5% and 20% less than the desired desired purity, and then separating out the cellulose nanofibrils from the longer fibers to produce the desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity. [0008] This disclosure addresses the level of energy required and plate wear that occurs toward the end of a refining process by stopping the refining process at a lower CNF level and processing the resulting pulp in a device that removes the longer fiber, thereby resulting in a pulp with the desired CNF characteristics with little or no long fiber present in the product. The refining or fibrillation and shortening of the fibers can be done by conical and disc type refiners, grinders, homogenizers, super mass colliders, etc.
[0009] This disclosure allows a more standard product to be produced through refining which is then processed using a dynamic washer (such as that disclosed in US Gero et al. Patent 5538632, issued 23 July 1996, incorporated herein by reference), or other fine fractionation device to remove the objectionable longer fiber from the NFC slurry. Testing has confirmed that this provides an excellent quality product, while reducing the amount of refining energy by 19% to 24% over that would be required when using refining alone. It is expected that additional testing and optimization will result in gross energy savings over 30%. Comparative testing has shown that the CNF produced utilizing this process has equal or in some cases, superior properties to that produced in a typical system using only refining to produce CNF, thus demonstrating the effectiveness of this process.
[00010] This disclosure also allows development of a simple continuously operating system by reducing the number of refining stages thereby significantly reducing the energy applied and refining time required in the fibrillation and CNF development refining process.
DRAWINGS
[0001 1] FIG. 1 is a single stage conventional batch CNF system with a production capacity of approximately 1 to 2 tons per day.
[00012] FIG. 2 is a multistage conventional batch CNF system utilizing multiple refiners to result in a production capacity of approximately 10 to 20 tons per day.
[00013] FIG. 3 is the improved continuous CNF system of this disclosure. [00014] FIG. 4 shows the effect of varying the stopping point for refining and the resulting fines content of the CNF after the purification process. These results are all using a 1 .0% feed consistency.
[00015] FIG. 5 shows the effect of feed consistency to the purification process on the purity of the CNF being produced.
[00016] Before one embodiment of the disclosure is explained in detail, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details of the construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The disclosure is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. Use of "including" and "comprising" and variations thereof as used herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and
equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Use of "consisting of and variations thereof as used herein is meant to encompass only the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof. Further, it is to be understood that such terms as "forward", "rearward", "left", "right", "upward", "downward", "side", "top" and "bottom", etc., are words of convenience and are not to be construed as limiting terms.
PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[00017] Disclosed is a cellulose nanofibrils production method 10
comprising the steps of: identifying a desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity, partially refining pulp to produce a cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity between 5% and 20% less than the desired desired purity, and then separating out the cellulose nanofibrils from the longer fibers to produce the desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity. For example, if a desired level, for a particular product, of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity is 80.5%, then pulp could be refined to 18% less than the desire purity, or to a level of 66.3%. The pulp would then be screened to get to 80.5% level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity. This results in a savings of 513.46kWh/ton, over refining alone to get the pulp to the 80.5% purity level (see FIG. 4). [00018] The disclosed process 10 processes pulp with a relatively lower CNF level by way of a device 34 which is capable of filtering out longer fibers, thereby leaving the processed pulp with increased CNF purity, and minimized "long fiber" present. This device 34 can be but is not limited to the dynamic washer referenced above, or a commercial product such as the GL&V Dynamic Washer, GL&V Liquor Filter, or some similar device, that is capable of filtering out the longer fiber present in the pulp. This is accomplished by use of a perforated or slotted screening plate utilizing very fine slots or perforations, smooth or "profiled" with a rotating pulsation generator running in close proximity to the perforated screening plate. A typical perforation size would be (but not limited to) 0.006" (0.15 mm) diameter or 0.004" (0.10 mm) diameter holes. It is expected that the smaller perforations will result in a purer CNF with a higher fines content than a process utilizing larger perforations.
[00019] The action of the pulsation generator is sufficient to generate pulsations capable of causing semi-fluidization of the incoming pulp slurry. The finest of the fiber elements present (CNF) are allowed to pass through the fine perforations in the screen basket while the longer fibers present become entangled and are retained in the feed side of the screen plate. The filtered fine fiber elements (CNF) that pass through the screen cylinder are allowed to discharge out of the device and are passed on in the process for use in various applications. The retained longer fibers are collected in a reject area and are discharged from the filtering device to be sent back in the system to join with un-processed materials being fed to the refining device for further processing. In the alternative, the retained longer fibers can also be used as is in other systems in a mill "as is", or disposed of.
[00020] The processed CNF pulp has a much narrower fiber length distribution than the refiner discharge alone, and thus is purer than the material this not treated in such a way. Preliminary testing has produced 6% to 14% increase in fines content by utilization of this process. Fines measurement is carried out using the
Technidyne Morfi Fiber length Analyzer, but a similar device from another manufacturer could be utilized for this testing. Additionally, varying the feed consistency to the
Dynamic Washer results in greater or lesser purification of the CNF from this device.
More particularly, a reduction in feed consistency results in higher fines in the CNF stream. Conversely, increasing the feed consistency reduces the fines of the CNF stream, as seen in FIG. 5.
[00021] The component parts for a conventional refining system, to generate CNF, consists of a source of raw material, slushed pulp which is discharged into an agitated refiner feed tank 18 with a refiner system feed pump, with its suction connection attached to tanks (FIG. 1 ). A two-stage refiner system comprises of one or more refiners 22 connected in series or parallel or some combination of both, with the refining system discharge connected back to the refiner feed or forward to CNF storage, as shown in FIG. 2. There may be a need for intermediate CNF storage 26 between the refining stages in FIG. -2.
[00022] The improved refining system of this disclosure is illustrated in FIG. 3. The added CNF purification stage consists of a purification stage feed pump connected with its suction connected to the previously mentioned CNF storage tank 30. The pump discharge is connected to the feed connection of a purification device, such as the GL&V Dynamic Washer. The discharge of the purification device consists of two ports on the device, one of which contains the purified CNF which then is discharged to a "Purified CNF" storage 38 for transfer to its final use or addition point to the paper making process or other such application.
[00023] The second discharge port on the purification device is the separated longer fiber component of the feed stock. This port is connected and returned 46 to the refiner feed chest for mixing with incoming raw material and reprocessing in the refining system (FIG. 3). The addition of a thickening stage for the separated long fiber may be useful or advantageous at this point in the system before being blended with the un-refined raw feedstock. This purification process could be run as either a continuous or batch process with the purification device being run either continuously or intermittently in a batch mode. The preferred embodiment would be to run as a continuous process.
[00024] FIG. 4 shows the results of purification testing starting with differing inlet fines level resulting in differing accept fines energy reductions and energy savings. Feed consistency is 1 .0% (measured by the mass of dry pulp divided by the mass of the pulp slurry) for all points.
[00025] FIG. 5 shows the effect of feed consistency to the Purifier (Dynamic Washer) on the fines content (Purity) of the resulting CNF. The lower feed consistency (in this case 0.7% consistency compared to the higher 1 .25% feed consistency) to the Purifier results in higher fines content in the purified CNF ("Y" axis). This is true for the entire range of CNF flow tested. This also shows that the lower volumetric flow as a percentage of total feed to the Purifier does result in a purer CNF (higher fines content).
[00026] An alternate embodiment of the process would be to separate the long fiber from the CNF and process it in a satellite or side stream system. This would consist of the addition of an agitated tank to collect the long fiber stream from the purification device for additional processing in a separate refining system similar to the one previously described. This additional refining system may be operated in the same fashion as the primary system. The final discharge from the system would be taken to the feed tank 18 of the CNF purification device could be combined with the discharge of the mainstream refining system and additional processing.
[00027] An additional alternate embodiment of this process would be to separate the long fiber from the CNF process and add it to the paper machine pulp system, thereby adding refined fiber to the main stream fiber source for paper manufacturing and also effectively reducing the required refiner power in that area of the system.
[00028] The advantages of this process are a significant reduction of applied power to the pulp being processed over that of a system that utilizes refiners alone to reach the targeted high fines level of 80%or greater. A second advantage of this process is reduced refiner plate wear and longer filling life due to the reduction of the length of time that the refiners are run while processing the extremely short fiber length associated with the targeted high fines levels. The refining time required to increase the fines content from 80% to 90% can be significant depending on the batch time and the energy level that the pulp will support. This process also provides the opportunity to reduce the amount of required equipment thereby also contributing to a reduction of the total system power requirement and cost to reach the targeted CNF quality level. Both the refining time and reduced energy usage will be dependent upon the system capacity and production rate. Total gross energy savings of 19% to 24% have been seen in testing of this process.
[00029] Various other features of this disclosure are set forth in the following claims.

Claims

1. A cellulose nanofibrils production method comprising the steps of: identifying a desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity, partially refining pulp to produce a cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity between 5% and 20% less than the desired desired purity, and then separating out the cellulose nanofibrils from the longer fibers to produce the desired level of cellulose nanofibrils pulp purity.
2. A cellulose nanofibrils production method according to claim 1 wherein the cellulose nanofibrils are separated from the longer fibers by a screening plate.
3. A cellulose nanofibrils production method according to claim 1 wherein the pulp to be refined has a feed consistency of no greater than 1 .25%.
4. A cellulose nanofibrils production method according to claim 3 wherein the pulp to be refined has a feed consistency of less than 1 %.
PCT/US2016/035806 2015-06-04 2016-06-03 Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils WO2016196983A1 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2988124A CA2988124C (en) 2015-06-04 2016-06-03 Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils
CN201680032576.3A CN108137709A (en) 2015-06-04 2016-06-03 The production method of cellulose nanometer fibril
EP16804554.0A EP3303404A4 (en) 2015-06-04 2016-06-03 Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils
US15/578,786 US10240290B2 (en) 2015-06-04 2016-06-03 Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils
BR112017025970-2A BR112017025970B1 (en) 2015-06-04 2016-06-03 CELLULOSE NANOFIBRIL PRODUCTION METHOD
JP2018515194A JP6821664B2 (en) 2015-06-04 2016-06-03 Manufacturing method of cellulose nanofibril

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562170953P 2015-06-04 2015-06-04
US62/170,953 2015-06-04

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016196983A1 true WO2016196983A1 (en) 2016-12-08

Family

ID=57441830

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2016/035806 WO2016196983A1 (en) 2015-06-04 2016-06-03 Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US10240290B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3303404A4 (en)
JP (1) JP6821664B2 (en)
CN (1) CN108137709A (en)
BR (1) BR112017025970B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2988124C (en)
WO (1) WO2016196983A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10100232B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2018-10-16 University Of Tennessee Research Foundation Wood adhesives containing reinforced additives for structural engineering products
US10240290B2 (en) * 2015-06-04 2019-03-26 Gl&V Usa, Inc. Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils
EP3825459A4 (en) * 2018-07-17 2022-04-20 Suzano S.A. Process for producing a nanocelullosic material comprising at least two stages of defibrillation of cellulosic feedstock and at least one intermediate fractioning stage

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10941520B2 (en) 2015-08-21 2021-03-09 Pulmac Systems International, Inc. Fractionating and refining system for engineering fibers to improve paper production
US10041209B1 (en) 2015-08-21 2018-08-07 Pulmac Systems International, Inc. System for engineering fibers to improve paper production
US11214925B2 (en) 2015-08-21 2022-01-04 Pulmac Systems International, Inc. Method of preparing recycled cellulosic fibers to improve paper production
CA3087854A1 (en) * 2018-06-29 2020-01-02 Pulmac Systems International, Inc. Fractionating and refining system for engineering fibers to improve paper production

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110277947A1 (en) * 2010-05-11 2011-11-17 Fpinnovations Cellulose nanofilaments and method to produce same
WO2012072874A1 (en) 2010-11-30 2012-06-07 Upm-Kymmene Corporation A method and a system for producing nanocellulose, and nanocellulose
US20140124150A1 (en) * 2012-11-02 2014-05-08 Andritz Inc. Method for production of micro fibrillated cellulose
WO2014106684A1 (en) 2013-01-04 2014-07-10 Stora Enso Oyj A method of producing microfibrillated cellulose
WO2014111854A1 (en) * 2013-01-18 2014-07-24 Stora Enso Oyj Method for the production of microfibrillated cellulose from a precursor material
WO2014147293A1 (en) 2013-03-22 2014-09-25 Andritz Oy Method for producing nano- and microfibrillated cellulose
WO2014174152A1 (en) * 2013-04-25 2014-10-30 Upm-Kymmene Corporation Method for catalytic oxidation of cellulose

Family Cites Families (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8201990B2 (en) * 2008-10-08 2012-06-19 Ovivo Luxembourg S.à r.l. Mixing impeller
JP5500842B2 (en) * 2009-03-13 2014-05-21 国立大学法人京都大学 Method for producing cellulose nanofiber
SE0950534A1 (en) * 2009-07-07 2010-10-12 Stora Enso Oyj Method for producing microfibrillar cellulose
GB0919422D0 (en) * 2009-11-05 2009-12-23 Interface Internat B V Apparatus and method for the manufacture of paper and/or card
FI123289B (en) * 2009-11-24 2013-01-31 Upm Kymmene Corp Process for the preparation of nanofibrillated cellulosic pulp and its use in papermaking or nanofibrillated cellulose composites
FI126842B (en) * 2010-06-07 2017-06-15 Aalto Univ Found A novel process for preparing microcellulose
FI122889B (en) * 2010-12-31 2012-08-31 Upm Kymmene Corp Method and apparatus for preparing nanocellulose
CA2824191C (en) * 2011-01-21 2015-12-08 Fpinnovations High aspect ratio cellulose nanofilaments and method for their production
FR2981206B1 (en) * 2011-10-06 2013-11-29 Inst Polytechnique Grenoble PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF SELF-SUPPORTED FLEXIBLE ELECTRODES
JP2013087132A (en) * 2011-10-13 2013-05-13 Oji Holdings Corp Method for producing fine fibrous cellulose
FI126457B (en) * 2011-11-14 2016-12-15 Upm Kymmene Corp Method for producing fibril pulp
JP5827178B2 (en) * 2012-06-05 2015-12-02 北越紀州製紙株式会社 Cellulose porous body and method for producing the same
CN107630385B (en) * 2012-08-10 2020-12-11 王子控股株式会社 Microfibrous cellulose aggregate, process for producing same, and process for remanufacturing microfibrous cellulose dispersion
SE538243C2 (en) * 2012-11-09 2016-04-12 Stora Enso Oyj Process for forming and then drying a composite material comprising a microfibrillated cellulose
JP5895834B2 (en) * 2012-12-26 2016-03-30 王子ホールディングス株式会社 Method for producing fine cellulose fiber
SE537949C2 (en) * 2013-04-25 2015-12-01 Stora Enso Oyj A method of treating cellulose fibers to prepare a composition comprising microfibrillated cellulose, and a composition prepared according to the method
JP6146115B2 (en) * 2013-05-09 2017-06-14 株式会社ブリヂストン Cellulose fiber, rubber composition, vulcanized rubber composition and tire
FI128835B (en) * 2013-05-14 2021-01-15 Upm Kymmene Corp A method and a device for producing nanofibrillar cellulose
AU2014353890B2 (en) * 2013-11-22 2019-11-14 The University Of Queensland Nanocellulose
FI126755B (en) * 2014-04-28 2017-05-15 Kemira Oyj Procedure for a suspension of microfibrillar cellulose, microfibrillar cellulose and its use
PT3140454T (en) * 2014-05-07 2020-02-25 Univ Maine System High efficiency production of nanofibrillated cellulose
JP6646045B2 (en) * 2014-05-30 2020-02-14 ボレガード アーエス Microfibrillated cellulose
CA2988124C (en) * 2015-06-04 2023-01-17 Bruce Crossley Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils
WO2017015467A1 (en) * 2015-07-22 2017-01-26 Glucan Biorenewables, Llc High purity cellulose compositions and production methods
SE540016E (en) * 2015-08-27 2020-11-13 Stora Enso Oyj Method and apparatus for producing microfibrillated cellulose fiber
SE539629C2 (en) * 2015-09-17 2017-10-24 Stora Enso Oyj A method of manufacturing an oxygen barrier film comprising microfibrillated cellulose involving two suspensions having different schopper-riegler values
PL3445910T3 (en) * 2016-04-22 2023-01-16 Fiberlean Technologies Limited Method of improving the physical and/or mechanical properties of re-dispersed microfibrillated cellulose
JP2019515144A (en) * 2016-04-22 2019-06-06 ファイバーリーン テクノロジーズ リミテッド Fibers containing microfibrillated cellulose and processes for producing fibers and non-woven materials therefrom
BR112019004795B1 (en) * 2016-09-14 2022-11-29 Fpinnovations METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CELLULOSE FILAMENTS

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110277947A1 (en) * 2010-05-11 2011-11-17 Fpinnovations Cellulose nanofilaments and method to produce same
WO2012072874A1 (en) 2010-11-30 2012-06-07 Upm-Kymmene Corporation A method and a system for producing nanocellulose, and nanocellulose
US20140124150A1 (en) * 2012-11-02 2014-05-08 Andritz Inc. Method for production of micro fibrillated cellulose
WO2014106684A1 (en) 2013-01-04 2014-07-10 Stora Enso Oyj A method of producing microfibrillated cellulose
WO2014111854A1 (en) * 2013-01-18 2014-07-24 Stora Enso Oyj Method for the production of microfibrillated cellulose from a precursor material
WO2014147293A1 (en) 2013-03-22 2014-09-25 Andritz Oy Method for producing nano- and microfibrillated cellulose
WO2014174152A1 (en) * 2013-04-25 2014-10-30 Upm-Kymmene Corporation Method for catalytic oxidation of cellulose

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP3303404A1

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10100232B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2018-10-16 University Of Tennessee Research Foundation Wood adhesives containing reinforced additives for structural engineering products
US10240290B2 (en) * 2015-06-04 2019-03-26 Gl&V Usa, Inc. Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils
EP3825459A4 (en) * 2018-07-17 2022-04-20 Suzano S.A. Process for producing a nanocelullosic material comprising at least two stages of defibrillation of cellulosic feedstock and at least one intermediate fractioning stage

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20180135246A1 (en) 2018-05-17
BR112017025970A2 (en) 2018-08-07
EP3303404A4 (en) 2019-01-23
JP6821664B2 (en) 2021-01-27
CA2988124A1 (en) 2016-12-08
JP2018517863A (en) 2018-07-05
CA2988124C (en) 2023-01-17
US10240290B2 (en) 2019-03-26
EP3303404A1 (en) 2018-04-11
CN108137709A (en) 2018-06-08
BR112017025970B1 (en) 2022-11-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2988124C (en) Method of producing cellulose nanofibrils
US5564572A (en) Method and apparatus for screening waste paper pulp
EP1954873B1 (en) Method for manufacturing paper
FI127682B (en) A method of producing microfibrillated cellulose
CN104711880B (en) A kind of chemi-mechanical pulp pulping process
US20130303749A1 (en) Method and a system for producing nanocellulose, and nanocellulose
CN101027446A (en) Process and device to manufacture cellulose pulp
US3791917A (en) Process for producing kraft paper laminate of top stock and base stock layers
Sandberg et al. On the development of the refiner mechanical pulping process–a review
JP2018517863A5 (en)
US20230250588A1 (en) Containerboard products incorporating surface enhanced pulp fibers and making the same
US11926961B2 (en) Pressure screen and method for dilution for a pressure screen
NO315429B1 (en) Upgrade of TMP to SC / LWC quality
US20190301094A1 (en) Process of producing fibrillated nanocellulose with low energy consumption
SE459924B (en) SET FOR MANUFACTURE OF MECHANICAL MASS
US10941520B2 (en) Fractionating and refining system for engineering fibers to improve paper production
US5368693A (en) Apparatus for treating white water
JPS63264994A (en) Continuous production of fiber-containing pulp
Wakelin et al. TMP long fibre fractionation with pressure screeens
CN105008615B (en) Method for forming and handling fibrous suspension
US5470432A (en) Method and arrangement for the treatment of a fiber suspension
US7163604B2 (en) Production of fiber suspension from waste paper
WO2018075877A1 (en) A method for creation of cellulose nanofibrils with a refining plate
JP2012520948A (en) Apparatus, system and method for the treatment of cellulose pulp
CN112601857A (en) Fiber preparation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16804554

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2988124

Country of ref document: CA

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018515194

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2016804554

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112017025970

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112017025970

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20171201