WO2016128030A1 - Procédé et appareil de gestion d'un réseau de communication - Google Patents

Procédé et appareil de gestion d'un réseau de communication Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016128030A1
WO2016128030A1 PCT/EP2015/052786 EP2015052786W WO2016128030A1 WO 2016128030 A1 WO2016128030 A1 WO 2016128030A1 EP 2015052786 W EP2015052786 W EP 2015052786W WO 2016128030 A1 WO2016128030 A1 WO 2016128030A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
network
identified
function
performance
deployed
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2015/052786
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Michael Grimes
Prudhvi DANDU
Raghavendra MAHALINGAPPA
Jan Groenendijk
Premnath KANDHASAMY NARAYANAN
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
Priority to PCT/EP2015/052786 priority Critical patent/WO2016128030A1/fr
Publication of WO2016128030A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016128030A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/14—Network analysis or design
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/12—Discovery or management of network topologies
    • H04L41/122—Discovery or management of network topologies of virtualised topologies, e.g. software-defined networks [SDN] or network function virtualisation [NFV]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50—Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/5003—Managing SLA; Interaction between SLA and QoS
    • H04L41/5009—Determining service level performance parameters or violations of service level contracts, e.g. violations of agreed response time or mean time between failures [MTBF]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50—Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/5003—Managing SLA; Interaction between SLA and QoS
    • H04L41/5019—Ensuring fulfilment of SLA
    • H04L41/5025—Ensuring fulfilment of SLA by proactively reacting to service quality change, e.g. by reconfiguration after service quality degradation or upgrade
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50—Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/5058—Service discovery by the service manager
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/40—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks using virtualisation of network functions or resources, e.g. SDN or NFV entities

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and network element for managing a communication network.
  • the present invention also relates to a computer program product configured, when run on a computer, to carry out a method for managing a communication network.
  • Network functions support a range of network functions which contribute to the smooth functioning of the network. Examples of network functions may include optimisation, packet inspection, load balancing, Automatic Neighbour Relations (ANR) etc.
  • Network functions may be realised in a centralised, distributed or hybrid manner. Centralised network functions are implemented in centralised network components, including for example a network Operations Support System or central controller. Distributed network functions are implemented outside of the central elements, for example in network elements forming part of an operator access network. Hybrid network functions are shared between centralised and distributed network elements.
  • Figure 1 illustrates example operator networks comprising centralised network functions 1 , distributed network functions 2 and hybrid network functions 3. The choice of how to deploy network functions within a network is typically made by the network operator on the basis of standard design assumptions.
  • Network Function Virtualisation is a network architecture concept involving the virtualisation of network functions into building blocks which may be chained together to provide end to end services.
  • NFV proposes migrating from a proprietary hardware model, in which application specific hardware is deployed to provide network functions, to a virtualised model, in which network functions are realised as virtual machines running different software or processes. These virtual machines may run on industry standard high volume servers, switches and storage, and may for example be housed on cloud computing data centres.
  • Virtualised Network Functions may be Software Defined Network (SDN) functions, Self Organising Network (SON) functions, Autonomous Network Functions (ANFs) or other types of network function.
  • centralised, distributed and hybrid network functions may all be realised as virtual machines on the same industry standard hardware.
  • a centralised network function and a distributed network function could be run as virtual machines or virtual containers on the same cloud data centre.
  • Advantages of NFV include both flexibility and reduced development lead time, as virtualised network functions may be tested and readied for deployment much faster than the corresponding hardware based solutions.
  • Some network functions may be repeated in both centralised and distributed implementations. Additionally, certain network operators may deploy network functions from different vendors and using different underlying technologies within a single network. This creates an overlapping feature environment for the network operator, and may lead to conflicts when the different network functions attempt to operate at the same time. Conflicts may manifest for example in the form of conflicting results for the same parameter set being produced by a centralised and distributed implementation of overlapping network functions. Individual workarounds are required to avoid such conflicts, imposing a burden of manual tuning whenever a more complex deployment of functions, or multivendor solution is implemented. This manual tuning negates many of the advantages offered by SON, SDF and ANF functions when deployed individually. Summary
  • a method for managing a communication network the communication network capable of supporting a plurality of network functions.
  • the method comprises discovering network functions deployed in the network, obtaining a measure of network performance, evaluating the measure of network performance to identify a network performance condition, identifying a network function to address the identified network performance condition, and deploying the identified network function.
  • the network may be physical, virtual or may combine both physical and virtual elements.
  • the method may run as a process for example in a virtual machine or Linux Container (LXC).
  • the identified network function may comprise at least one of a Self Organising Network, SON, function, a Software Defined Network, SDN, function, or an Autonomous Network Function, ANF.
  • Example network functions may include optimisation, packet inspection, load balancing, Automatic Neighbour Relations (ANR), Mobility Robustness (MRO), energy saving, transport capacity etc.
  • the identified network function may comprise a SON use case as defined in 3GPP TR 36.902.
  • the identified network function may comprise a Virtualised Network Function, VNF.
  • the identified network function may comprise a plurality of VNFs, the plurality of VNFs cooperating to provide the network function.
  • discovering network functions deployed in the network may comprise discovering at least two network functions having different underlying technology or supplied by different vendors.
  • discovering network functions deployed in the network may comprise receiving information from a network element such as an Operations Support System (OSS), probing network elements, or packet inspection.
  • OSS Operations Support System
  • the discovered functions may in some examples be centralised, distributed and/or hybrid.
  • discovering network functions deployed on the network may further comprise assembling a Network Forwarding Graph, NFG, expressing connectivity between the discovered network functions.
  • NFG Network Forwarding Graph
  • the method may further comprise updating the NFG with the deployed network function.
  • identifying a network performance condition may comprise identifying an obtained measure of network performance failing to meet a predefined standard for that measure of network performance.
  • the standard may be defined by an operator of the network and may therefore be consistent with operator priorities for the network.
  • identifying a network performance condition may comprise identifying a plurality of obtained measures of network performance failing to meet a predefined collective standard for those measures of network performance.
  • the plurality of measures may relate to a single aspect of network performance, and the collective standard may be defined for the aspect of network performance.
  • identifying a network function to address the identified network performance condition may comprise checking for currently deployed network functions relating to the identified network performance condition, checking for network functions available for deployment, and selecting, in light of the currently deployed network functions, a network function operable to improve the identified network performance condition from among the network functions available for deployment.
  • checking for network functions available for deployment may comprise checking a catalogue of network functions available to the network, for example in the form of a software catalogue.
  • identifying a network function to address the identified network performance condition may further comprise checking for network functions which have previously been deployed to address the identified network performance condition.
  • this may comprise checking a knowledge base including details of historic performance measures and deployed functions, which knowledge base may be internal to the element hosting the process or may be external.
  • deploying the identified network function may comprise downloading software corresponding to the identified network function and instantiating the downloaded software.
  • the software may be instantiated in any part of the network appropriate to address the identified network performance condition and compatible with the downloaded software.
  • the deployed network function may thus be centralised, distributed or hybrid.
  • the method may further comprise monitoring network performance following deployment of the identified network function and scaling the deployment of the network function according to the monitored network performance.
  • Scaling of the deployed network function may comprise scaling up, scaling down, and/or redeploying the network function. Configuration changes resulting from such scaling may be updated in the NFG maintained according to some examples of the invention.
  • the method may further comprise updating a knowledge base with the network performance condition, the deployed network function and the monitored network performance. This knowledge base may then be consulted to inform future identification of network functions to address similar network performance conditions.
  • the method may further comprise discovering an execution environment of the network.
  • An execution environment of the network may comprise an underlying hardware and/or software environment within which the network exists.
  • An execution environment may thus comprise at least one of a hardware environment or a software environment such as a cloud environment.
  • discovering an execution environment of the network may comprise obtaining execution environment configurations and capabilities.
  • the process of discovering the execution environment may thus comprise identifying network elements responsible for administration of the network and querying the identified network elements for details of the execution environment.
  • network elements may for example include Operations Support Systems (OSS) in the case of a hardware execution environment, or Data Centre Managers in the case of a cloud execution environment.
  • OSS Operations Support Systems
  • Data Centre Managers in the case of a cloud execution environment.
  • the execution environment configurations and capabilities may comprise hardware configurations and capabilities, for example obtained from an OSS, or may comprise data centre configurations and capabilities, for example obtained from a data centre manager.
  • the method may further comprise identifying resources in the execution environment available for deployment of network functions. According to some examples of the invention, the method may further comprise reserving resources in the execution environment for deployment of the identified function. According to some examples of the invention, the method may further comprise maintaining a record of the discovered execution environment and updating the record of the discovered execution environment following deployment of the identified network function. According to some examples of the invention, identifying a network function to address the network performance condition may comprise consulting the discovered execution environment and identifying a network function appropriate to the discovered execution environment.
  • the method may further comprise defining a satisfaction criterion for the identified network function; monitoring network performance against the satisfaction criterion following deployment of the identified network function; and, on attainment of the satisfaction criterion, stopping the deployed network function.
  • stopping the network function may comprise hibernating the function, decommissioning the function or un-deploying the function, for example releasing the resources used for deploying the function and reversing the system configurations made to enable deployment of the function.
  • the satisfaction criterion may be defined according to a predefined standard for an aspect of network performance.
  • the method may further comprise checking performance associated with previous instances of the defined satisfaction criterion and updating the defined satisfaction criterion according to the check.
  • information regarding previous instances of the defined satisfaction criterion may be retrieved from a knowledge base.
  • the method may further comprise updating a knowledge base with the network performance condition, the deployed network function, the satisfaction criterion and the monitored network performance.
  • the method may further comprise discovering analytics capabilities in the network.
  • the method may further comprise identifying analytics capabilities for the identified network function.
  • the analytics capabilities may for example be identified from a catalogue of available analytics capabilities.
  • the method may further comprise checking performance associated with previous instances of the identified analytics capabilities deployed with the identified network function.
  • the information regarding previous instances may for example be retrieved from a knowledge base.
  • the method may further comprise deploying the identified analytics capabilities.
  • deploying the identified analytics capabilities may comprise downloading software corresponding to the identified analytics capabilities and instantiating the downloaded software.
  • the method may further comprise updating the NFG with the deployed analytics capabilities.
  • the method may further comprise maintaining a record of the discovered analytics capabilities, and updating the record with the deployed analytics capabilities.
  • the method may further comprise updating a knowledge base with the network performance condition, the deployed network function, and the deployed analytics capabilities.
  • a computer program configured, when run on a computer, to carry out a method according to the first aspect of the present invention.
  • the computer may in some example comprise a cloud computing data centre.
  • a computer program product comprising computer readable material, the computer readable material having stored thereon a computer product according to the preceding aspect of the present invention.
  • a network element for managing a communication network comprising a processor and a memory, the memory containing instructions executable by the processor such that the processor is operable to carry out a method according to the first aspect of the present invention.
  • a network element for managing a communication network comprising a discovery unit configured to discover network functions deployed in the network, a performance unit configured to obtain a measure of network performance, and an evaluation unit configured to evaluate the measure of network performance to identify a network performance condition.
  • the network element further comprises a function unit configured to identify a network function to address the identified network performance condition, and a deployment unit configured to deploy the identified network function.
  • Figure 1 is an illustration of centralised, distributed and hybrid network functions
  • Figure 2 is a flow chart illustrating steps in a method for managing a communication network
  • Figure 3 is a representation of an implementation of the method of Figure 2
  • Figure 4 is a flow chart illustrating steps in another method for managing a communication network
  • Figure 5 is a chart illustrating sub steps in a step of the method of Figure 4
  • Figure 6 is a signalling flow diagram
  • Figure 7 is another signalling flow diagram
  • Figure 8 is another signalling flow diagram
  • Figure 9 is another signalling flow diagram
  • Figure 10 is a representation of elements considered according to examples of the method of Figure 4.
  • Figure 1 1 is a block diagram illustrating a network element
  • Figure 12 is a block diagram illustrating another example of network element.
  • aspects of the present invention provide a method for managing a communication network in which network performance is evaluated, a network performance condition is identified and a network function is deployed to address the network performance condition.
  • Figure 2 is a flow chart illustrating process steps in a method for managing a communication network, which may be a physical network, a virtual network or may combine both physical and virtual elements.
  • the method may run as a process for example in a virtual machine or Linux Container (LXC).
  • LXC Linux Container
  • the method comprises discovering network functions deployed in the network. This may comprise querying appropriate network elements to discover what network functions are already deployed in the network. Discovered functions may include centralised, distributed and/or hybrid network functions and may include functions from more than one vendor or involving more than one underlying technology.
  • the deployed network functions may be SON, SDF or ANF and may or may not be virtualised.
  • the method comprises obtaining a measure of network performance.
  • the network performance measure may include multiple network performance measures indicating network performance levels for one or more aspects of network performance.
  • the method 100 comprises evaluating the obtained measure of network performance to identify a network performance condition. This may comprise comparing the network performance measure to a threshold for acceptable performance, and identifying a network performance condition when a network performance measure is identified as failing to meet the corresponding threshold.
  • a combined threshold for a series of related network performance measures may be defined, and a network performance condition may be identified when the combined threshold is not met.
  • the threshold or thresholds may be predefined by a network operator in accordance with operator priorities for the network.
  • the method 100 then comprises identifying a network function to address the identified network performance condition in step 140. This may comprise checking what network functions were discovered as deployed in step 1 10 and then checking which of the deployed functions relate to the identified network performance condition. Identifying a network function may also comprise checking what network functions are available for deployment, and selecting, in light of the currently deployed network functions, a network function operable to improve the identified network performance measure or measures corresponding to the identified network performance condition. By checking upon already deployed network functions, the method may distinguish between a situation in which no network function has yet been deployed to address a network performance issue, and a situation in which a network function has already been deployed but is perhaps underperforming, or is overwhelmed by current network conditions.
  • the method 100 comprises deploying the identified network function in step 160.
  • the network function may be deployed in a centralised, distributed or hybrid manner as appropriate to the identified network condition. For example, if the network condition comprises an imbalance between a few overloaded cells and neighbouring under-utilised cells, a distributed load balancing function may be deployed in the affected cells. Other examples appropriate to different network performance conditions may be envisaged.
  • FIG 3 illustrates an example of the method 100 in operation in an NFV framework.
  • an NFV Infrastructure 10 provides an execution environment for VNFs 4.
  • a virtual network element running an example of the method 100 for managing a communication network is illustrated at 6.
  • the virtual network element receives measures of performance of the network and identifies a network performance condition in the form of a network performance measure that is failing to meet an operator defined threshold for acceptable performance.
  • the virtual network element identifies a suitable network function to address this condition, and deploys the network function 8.
  • the network function comprises a plurality of individual VNFs chained together as a VNF Forwarding Graph 12. These VNFs together provide an end to end service to address the network performance condition identified by the virtual network element.
  • the method may take additional elements into consideration in selection of a suitable network function, and may select and initiate other functions to support the selected network function.
  • the method may comprise discovering an execution environment of the communication network.
  • the execution environment of a network may comprise the underlying hardware and/or software environment within which the network exists.
  • the execution environment may for example be a hardware environment, or may be a software environment such as a cloud environment.
  • Knowledge of the network execution environment may enable the method to select a network function suited to the environment, and may also enable the method to take into account resources available in the environment for the deployment of the selected network function.
  • the method may comprise discovering and deploying analytics capabilities to enable monitoring of the selected network function.
  • the method may for example comprise discovering what analytics capabilities are already available and/or deployed in the network, and may include selecting an analytics capability suited to monitor the performance of the selected network function.
  • the method may then comprise deploying the selected analytics capability to support monitoring of the selected network function when deployed.
  • the method may select and monitor a satisfaction criterion for the selected network function.
  • a satisfaction criterion for network performance after deployment of the selected network function may be defined or retrieved in line with operator priorities. Network performance following deployment of the selected network function may then be monitored against the satisfaction criterion, enabling the method to identify when the satisfaction criterion has been met and to manage the deployed network function accordingly.
  • FIG 4 is flow chart illustrating another example of a method 200 for managing a communication network.
  • the method 200 illustrates one way in which the steps of the method 100 may be implemented and augmented to provide the above discussed and additional functionality.
  • the communication network being managed is a virtual network and the method is running as a process in a virtual machine implementing a virtual network element to carry out the method. It will be appreciated that this example is merely for the purposes of illustration, and that other examples in which a physical or hybrid network is managed using an example of the methods of the present invention which is implemented other ways may be envisaged.
  • the virtual network element discovers network functions deployed in the network, an execution environment of the network and analytics capabilities of the network.
  • the network functions deployed in the network may include centralised, distributed and hybrid functions originating from different vendors and employing different underlying technologies.
  • the network is a virtual network
  • the execution environment of the network comprises a cloud environment.
  • Discovering the execution environment thus comprises establishing the cloud computing resources available to the network. This may be achieved for example by querying appropriate data centre managers.
  • the virtual network element then assembles the discovered information at step 212.
  • this comprises assembling a Network Forwarding Graph (NFG), representing the currently deployed network functions and their interrelations.
  • NFG Network Forwarding Graph
  • the discovered execution environment and analytics capabilities this comprises assembling a record of the execution environment, including available resources, and a record of the deployed analytics capabilities.
  • the NFG and environment and analytics records may be referred to and updated by the virtual network element in later method steps.
  • the virtual network element obtains measures of network performance.
  • the virtual network element may obtain a range of measures detailing various different aspects of performance. These measures may be received individually by the virtual network element or may be received in the form of a report, for example assembled by a network monitoring function and forwarded to the virtual network element.
  • the virtual network element evaluates the measures of network performance and identifies performance measures failing to meet predefined standards. Predefined standards may vary between operators according to operator priorities for service provision. Different operators may prioritise different aspects of service provision according to their business model. For example, for some operators, network coverage and reliability may be their key priorities, with a reduction in service quality or available bandwidth being an acceptable consequence of maintaining reliable coverage for all users. For other operators, a guaranteed quality of service for key users may be prioritised.
  • a network performance condition is identified by the virtual network element when one or more measures are identified as failing to meet predefined thresholds.
  • a network performance condition may be defined with reference to several performance measures, all related to a particular aspect of network performance. For example, mobility robustness may be represented by several different performance measures. A single one of those performance measures failing to meet a predefined threshold may be treated as an aberration, whereas a plurality of the performance measures all failing to meet their predefined thresholds may be identified as a mobility robustness performance condition.
  • the virtual network element may then identify a network function in step 240 to address the network performance condition. Identifying a network function may comprise several sub steps, as illustrated in Figure 5. Referring to Figure 5, in a first sub step 240a, the virtual network element checks among the discovered network functions for currently deployed network functions relating to the identified network performance measure that is failing to meet its predefined threshold. This enables the virtual network element to establish what network functions are already deployed within the network to manage the relevant network conditions. In sub step 240b, the virtual network element checks for network functions that are available for deployment. This may involve checking a software catalogue for network functions that are available to the network.
  • the virtual network function selects from among the available network functions, a suitable network function to improve the identified network performance measure. Knowing what functions are already deployed in the network and relating to the identified network performance measure may assist the virtual network element with selecting the most appropriate network function for deployment. Referring again to Figure 4, having selected a network function, the virtual network element then checks a knowledge base in step 240d.
  • the knowledge base may include details of previously identified network performance conditions, the network functions that were deployed to address those conditions and any monitoring data relating to the effect of the deployment on the relevant network performance measures. In this manner, the virtual network function may use historical data to verify the selected network function and perhaps identify additional network functions that have proved effective for similar network performance conditions in the past.
  • the virtual network element may also discard a selected network function that has proved ineffective against the identified network performance condition in the past. After checking the sleeted network function, the virtual network element then takes the first step towards deploying the selected network function by downloading the appropriate software for the selected network function in step 260a.
  • the virtual network element In a parallel process flow to that concerned with selection of a network function, the virtual network element also identifies resources in the execution environment available for deployment of network functions in step 242. This identification of available resources may inform the selection of a network function which takes place in step 240. The virtual network function then reserves resources required for deployment of the selected network function in step 244.
  • the virtual network element also defines a satisfaction criterion for the selected network function in step 246. This criterion may be defined by the virtual network function itself or may be retrieved from a memory. The satisfaction criterion may be checked with a network administrator or a knowledge base and updated accordingly in step 248.
  • the virtual network element also identifies analytics capabilities appropriate to the selected network function and discovered execution environment in step 250. The virtual network element may check against existing deployed analytics capabilities to determine whether capabilities suitable for the selected network function are already deployed. In step 252 the virtual network element checks against a knowledge base for previous performance of the identified analytics capabilities with the identified network function and then downloads the appropriate software for the identified analytics capabilities in step 254.
  • step 260b the virtual network function instantiates the downloaded software for the selected network function and analytics capabilities, and configures or reconfigures the necessary resources from the execution environment, completing the deployment of the selected network function and analytics capabilities.
  • step 262 the NFG and records for the execution environment and analytics capabilities are updated. The updated NFG reflects the newly deployed network function and analytics capabilities, the environment record reflects the new use and configuration of resources and the analytics record reflects the newly available analytics capabilities.
  • the virtual network element monitors network performance and in step 266, the virtual network element checks whether or not scaling is required in light of the monitored performance. Scaling may include scaling up or down of the deployed network function, in accordance with the evolving network performance measures.
  • step 260b the virtual network element returns to step 260b, reconfiguring environment resources to enable the appropriate scaling, and then updating the NFG and records accordingly. If scaling is not required, the virtual network element then checks whether or not the satisfaction criterion has been met. If the satisfaction criterion has not been met, then a repeat check as to the necessity for scaling is made and the virtual network element continues to monitor network performance and scale the deployed network function accordingly. If the satisfaction criterion has been met, then the software instantiated in step 260b is stopped in step 270. This may include hibernating the deployed function, decommissioning the function or un-deploying the function, for example releasing the resources used for deploying the function and reversing the system configurations made to enable deployment of the function.
  • the NFG and environment and analytics records are updated in step 272 and a knowledge base is updated in step 274.
  • the knowledge base may be the knowledge base consulted in checking steps 240d and 252, and may be updated with the identified network performance condition, the network function and analytics capabilities deployed, and the resulting network performance. Maintaining a record of this information enables the virtual network element to learn from past performances, incorporating insight from past function deployments to inform future deployment selections.
  • the virtual network element is capable of running in any execution environment and manages functions within the network regardless of their type, the nature of their deployment or their original vendor.
  • the methods of the present invention enables an integrated solution to the problem of overlapping network functions; one single management process discovers all deployed functions in the network, evaluates a need for further deployments and manages those deployments, selecting new functions for deployment from a catalogue of available functions on the basis of network performance.
  • the network function identified and deployed to address a network performance condition may be a SON function, an SDF function, an ANF function etc.
  • the network function may comprise a use case for a particular network architecture, as defined in appropriate telecommunications standards. Taking the example of SON network architecture, various use cases that might be identified and deployed are discussed below.
  • Mobility Robustness may be appropriate for example when network performance measures indicate that handovers between neighboring cells in the network are taking place too early, too late or with errors. The handovers may involve the same or different radio access technology.
  • Load Balancing (LB) may be appropriate for example when the network performance measures indicate that a few cells are overloaded with remaining cells significantly underused.
  • ANR Automatic Neighbor Relation
  • RACH Optimization may be appropriate if significant numbers of uplink re-attempts are indicated by the network performance measures.
  • Automated configuration of Physical Cell Identity (PCI) may be appropriate if PCI conflicts are reported by the nodes.
  • energy saving, capacity optimization, coverage optimization, core elements load balancing and transport capacity use may all also be appropriate according to the network performance measures received.
  • examples of the methods of the present invention may identify the required system configurations for the function, based on the discovered execution environment, identify the appropriate analytics capabilities according to available analytics software, and determine an appropriate satisfaction criterion to be met by the function based on the current network conditions.
  • the selected function Once deployed, the selected function may be optimised or expanded according to performance and current or expected traffic, and may be shut down and its resources released once the satisfaction criterion has been met.
  • examples of the present invention may involve consideration of four elements contributing to the overall implementation of the method. These include network functions, network execution environment, network analytics capabilities, and satisfaction criteria. Examples of the invention may be "aware" of all these elements, and may take each element into account in implementation of the method, and in some cases in managing others of the elements. Example signalling flow relating to each of these elements is separated out from the example process flow of Figure 4 and illustrated in the signalling diagrams of Figures 6 to 9.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates signalling flow relating to network functions.
  • the network element running an example method according to the invention discovers deployed network functions with support of a "Network Information" module (for example an OSS) and builds an NFG internally. If a Network Information module is not available, the network element could for example identify nearby network elements by probing or by deep packet inspection.
  • the network element evaluates network information in the form of performance measures in light of the currently deployed network functions, and identifies whether any additional network function, such as a SON use case, should be introduced.
  • the network element checks a knowledge base, which may for example be an external expert system, to verify the network function or functions identified for deployment, and to check for any additional functions which may have been effective in the past for similar network circumstances.
  • appropriate software including for example SON modules, dependent libraries, platform/operating system layers, and their version information, is obtained.
  • the NFG and internal records are updated with the deployed functions.
  • FIG 7 illustrates signalling flow relating to analytics capabilities.
  • the network element discovers Analytics capability information from an Analytics Catalogue.
  • the network element identifies analytics capabilities appropriate to the selected network function from an Available Analytics module. This information is then validated in step 3 by checking for prior experience with the identified analytics capabilities and selected network function in a knowledge base.
  • the required analytics software and version information for the identified analytics capabilities is obtained. This may include modules, dependent libraries, platform/operating system layers etc.
  • the NFG and analytics capabilities records are updated with the appropriate information for the deployed capabilities.
  • Figure 8 illustrates signalling flow relating to satisfaction criteria.
  • the network element identifies a satisfaction criterion for the or each network function to be deployed.
  • a check is made with a knowledge base to evaluate previous success rates with the satisfaction criterion and to check for side effects.
  • the satisfaction criterion may be updated in light of this check in step 3.
  • Figure 9 illustrates signalling flow relating to network execution environment.
  • the network element retrieves execution environment information.
  • the information is retrieved from an OSS or similar node.
  • the information is retrieved from data centre managers.
  • the information may include configuration information for hardware or cloud data systems.
  • the network element determines available configuration for deploying additional network functions from the hardware system modules for example using SNMP GET, or using appropriate cloud systems such as REST APIs.
  • the network element updates the appropriate configuration details in execution environment records.
  • the methods of the present invention may be conducted in a network element, which may be a virtual or a physical network element.
  • the method may be implemented on receipt of suitable computer readable instructions, which may be embodied within a computer program running on a network element.
  • Figure 1 1 illustrates a first example of a network element which may execute the methods of the present invention, for example on receipt of suitable instructions from a computer program.
  • the network element 300 comprises a processor 301 and a memory 302.
  • the memory 302 contains instructions executable by the processor 301 such that the network element 300 is operative to conduct the steps of the methods of Figures 2 or 4 and the signalling flow of Figures 6 to 9.
  • the memory may also store measurements and processing data generated during the process.
  • Figure 12 illustrates functional units in another example of network element 400 which may execute the process of the present invention, for example according to computer readable instructions received from a computer program. It will be understood that the units illustrated in Figure 12 are functional units, and may be realised in any appropriate combination of hardware and/or software.
  • the network element comprises a discovery unit 410 configured to discover network functions deployed in the network, a performance unit 420 configured to obtain a measure of network performance, an evaluation unit 430 configured to evaluate the measure of network performance to identify a network performance condition, a function unit 440 configured to identify a network function to address the identified network performance condition, and a deployment unit 460 configured to deploy the identified network function.
  • the discovery unit 410 may be configured to discover at least two network functions having different underlying technology or supplied by different vendors, to assemble a Network Forwarding Graph (NFG) expressing connectivity between the discovered network functions, and to update the NFG with the deployed network function.
  • the evaluation unit 430 may be configured to identify a network performance condition by identifying a measure of network performance failing to meet a predefined standard for that measure of network performance.
  • the function unit 440 may be configured to identify a network function to address the identified network performance condition by checking for currently deployed network functions relating to the identified measure of network performance, checking for network functions available for deployment, and selecting, in light of the checked currently deployed network functions, a network function operable to improve the identified network performance measure from among the network functions available for deployment.
  • the function unit 440 may be further configured to check for network functions which have previously been deployed to address the identified network condition.
  • the deployment unit 460 may be configured to download software corresponding to the identified network function and to instantiate the downloaded software.
  • the performance unit 420 may be configured to monitor network performance following deployment of the identified network function and the deployment unit 460 may further be configured to scale the deployment of the network function according to the monitored network performance.
  • the discovery unit 410 may be further configured to discover an execution environment of the network, which may comprise obtaining execution environment configurations and capabilities.
  • the network element 400 may further comprise an environment unit 442 configured to identify resources in the execution environment available for deployment of network functions and to reserve resources in the execution environment for deployment of the identified function.
  • the environment unit 442 may be further configured to maintain a record of the discovered execution environment and to update the record of the discovered execution environment following deployment of the identified network function.
  • the network element 400 may further comprise a criterion unit 446 configured to define a satisfaction criterion for the identified network function.
  • the performance unit 420 may be configured to monitor network performance against the satisfaction criterion following deployment of the identified network function, and the deployment unit 460 may be configured to stop the deployed network function on attainment of the satisfaction criterion.
  • the criterion unit 446 may be configured to check performance associated with previous instances of the defined satisfaction criterion and to update the defined satisfaction criterion according to the check.
  • the discovery unit 410 may be further configured to discover analytics capabilities in the network, and the network element may further comprise an analytics unit 450 configured to identify analytics capabilities appropriate for the identified network function.
  • the analytics unit 450 may be further configured to check performance associated with previous instances of the identified analytics capabilities deployed with the identified network function and the deployment unit 460 may be configured to deploy the identified analytics capabilities.
  • the function unit 440 may be configured to update the NFG with the deployed analytics capabilities, and the analytics unit 450 may be configured to maintain a record of the discovered analytics capabilities and to update the record with the deployed analytics capabilities.
  • Embodiments of the present invention thus provide a method for managing a communication network that overcomes integration issues between centralised, distributed and hybrid functions and between overlapping functions from different vendors and with different underlying technologies.
  • network functions of different types and different deployments are discovered and managed through network performance monitoring and identification and deployment of appropriate network functions.
  • duplication of feature implementation in different parts of the network can be avoided.
  • Software and integration costs may be reduced owing to the autonomous nature of the method and its capacity to manage different types of SON, SDN and ANF functions.
  • a wide range of network functions may be managed and deployed including for example Analytics, SON functions such as ANR, MRO, LB, CCO, CCLB etc., SDN functions for focused group of networks and Deep Packet Inspection.
  • Analytics such as ANR, MRO, LB, CCO, CCLB etc.
  • SDN functions for focused group of networks
  • Deep Packet Inspection on demand supporting functions for tracing, debugging etc can be identified and activated. Upgrade and migration of autonomous functions, as well as introduction of new functions is comparatively easy, as such updates or introductions need only be added to a software catalogue available to the entity running the management method.
  • Initial deployment of network functions may involve only basic functionality required for connectivity and service delivery, with additional functionality auto-deployed later on the basis of network conditions.
  • multivendor realisation of functions can be managed without manual tuning, through the distribution of appropriate adaptation layer software that is recognisable and configurable by the entity running examples of the methods of the present invention.
  • the methods of the present invention may be implemented in hardware, or as software modules running on one or more processors. The methods may also be carried out according to the instructions of a computer program, and the present invention also provides a computer readable medium having stored thereon a program for carrying out any of the methods described herein.
  • a computer program embodying the invention may be stored on a computer-readable medium, or it could, for example, be in the form of a signal such as a downloadable data signal provided from an Internet website, or it could be in any other form.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé (100) de gestion d'un réseau de communication apte à prendre en charge une pluralité de fonctions de réseau. Le procédé consiste à : découvrir des fonctions réseau déployées dans le réseau (110); obtenir une mesure de performance du réseau (120); évaluer la mesure de performance du réseau pour identifier une condition de performance du réseau (130); identifier une fonction réseau pour gérer la condition de performance du réseau identifiée (140); et déployer la fonction réseau identifiée (160). L'invention concerne également un élément de réseau (300, 400) et un produit programme d'ordinateur configuré pour exécuter un procédé de gestion d'un réseau de communication.
PCT/EP2015/052786 2015-02-10 2015-02-10 Procédé et appareil de gestion d'un réseau de communication WO2016128030A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2015/052786 WO2016128030A1 (fr) 2015-02-10 2015-02-10 Procédé et appareil de gestion d'un réseau de communication

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2015/052786 WO2016128030A1 (fr) 2015-02-10 2015-02-10 Procédé et appareil de gestion d'un réseau de communication

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016128030A1 true WO2016128030A1 (fr) 2016-08-18

Family

ID=52464407

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2015/052786 WO2016128030A1 (fr) 2015-02-10 2015-02-10 Procédé et appareil de gestion d'un réseau de communication

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2016128030A1 (fr)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018067780A1 (fr) * 2016-10-05 2018-04-12 Convida Wireless, Llc Exposition de capacité d'instanciation de service
WO2018099569A1 (fr) * 2016-12-02 2018-06-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Contrôle de la configuration d'un réseau
CN108255571A (zh) * 2016-12-28 2018-07-06 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 一种网元的部署方法和装置
US10355912B2 (en) 2017-04-06 2019-07-16 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Network trouble shooting digital assistant system
WO2020191513A1 (fr) * 2019-03-22 2020-10-01 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Service de rappel dans un réseau central

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130014101A1 (en) * 2011-07-06 2013-01-10 Microsoft Corporation Offering Network Performance Guarantees in Multi-Tenant Datacenters
US20130124712A1 (en) * 2011-11-10 2013-05-16 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Elastic cloud networking
US20140280900A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. Representing software defined networks using a programmable graph model
US20140351199A1 (en) * 2013-05-24 2014-11-27 Connectloud, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamically predicting workload growth based on heuristic data
US20140351400A1 (en) * 2013-05-24 2014-11-27 Connectloud, Inc. Method for Weight Based Performance Optimization for Cloud Compute

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130014101A1 (en) * 2011-07-06 2013-01-10 Microsoft Corporation Offering Network Performance Guarantees in Multi-Tenant Datacenters
US20130124712A1 (en) * 2011-11-10 2013-05-16 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Elastic cloud networking
US20140280900A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. Representing software defined networks using a programmable graph model
US20140351199A1 (en) * 2013-05-24 2014-11-27 Connectloud, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamically predicting workload growth based on heuristic data
US20140351400A1 (en) * 2013-05-24 2014-11-27 Connectloud, Inc. Method for Weight Based Performance Optimization for Cloud Compute

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018067780A1 (fr) * 2016-10-05 2018-04-12 Convida Wireless, Llc Exposition de capacité d'instanciation de service
CN109952741A (zh) * 2016-10-05 2019-06-28 康维达无线有限责任公司 服务实例化的能力暴露
US11252048B2 (en) 2016-10-05 2022-02-15 Convida Wireless, Llc Capability exposure for service instantiation
US11888711B2 (en) 2016-10-05 2024-01-30 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Capability exposure for service instantiation
WO2018099569A1 (fr) * 2016-12-02 2018-06-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Contrôle de la configuration d'un réseau
US11184228B2 (en) 2016-12-02 2021-11-23 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Configuration control for network
CN108255571A (zh) * 2016-12-28 2018-07-06 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 一种网元的部署方法和装置
US10355912B2 (en) 2017-04-06 2019-07-16 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Network trouble shooting digital assistant system
US10764116B2 (en) 2017-04-06 2020-09-01 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Network trouble shooting digital assistant system
US11343135B2 (en) 2017-04-06 2022-05-24 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Network troubleshooting digital assistant system
WO2020191513A1 (fr) * 2019-03-22 2020-10-01 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Service de rappel dans un réseau central

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3800926B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'alarme
US11424977B2 (en) Method and system for performing effective orchestration of cognitive functions in distributed heterogeneous communication network
US11212181B2 (en) Cloud zone network analytics platform
CN111065116B (zh) 一种端到端切片自动化部署方法及系统
US10402293B2 (en) System for virtual machine risk monitoring
US10484265B2 (en) Dynamic update of virtual network topology
JP6466003B2 (ja) Ｖｎｆフェイルオーバの方法及び装置
US8903373B1 (en) Method and system for coordinating cellular networks operation
WO2016128030A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de gestion d'un réseau de communication
CN108337110B (zh) 一种虚拟资源管理方法及装置、计算机可读存储介质
KR20190120833A (ko) 네트워크 슬라이스 관리 방법, 유닛 및 시스템
US10877741B2 (en) Containerized systems and methods for customer premises equipment
US11678201B2 (en) Femtocell provisioning and service issue optimization
WO2019109039A1 (fr) Gestion de ressources basée sur la priorité dans un environnement de virtualisation de fonctions de réseau (nfv)
WO2020063550A1 (fr) Procédé, appareil et système de décision de politique, et support d'informations, unité de décision de politique et groupe
US20230033886A1 (en) Multi-environment cellular network slice testing system
US20200137661A1 (en) Partitioning method and apparatus for partitioning a plurality of wireless access points into management clusters
CN106576260B (zh) Nfv系统中的策略协调方法和装置
US20230032088A1 (en) Multi-environment cellular network development and testing system
US20220191716A1 (en) Updating Record of Border Cells
CN110417568B (zh) Nfv策略协商方法及系统
US20240064086A1 (en) System and methods for dynamic orchestration of deep packet inspection probes
CA3234663A1 (fr) Systeme d'execution d'action et son procede de commande
WO2023241802A1 (fr) Appareils et procédés de mappage d'applications basées sur l'apprentissage automatique à des unités logiques d'intention
WO2021164888A1 (fr) Découverte d'instance de service

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15703602

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 15703602

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1