WO2016091848A1 - Fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine - Google Patents

Fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016091848A1
WO2016091848A1 PCT/EP2015/078917 EP2015078917W WO2016091848A1 WO 2016091848 A1 WO2016091848 A1 WO 2016091848A1 EP 2015078917 W EP2015078917 W EP 2015078917W WO 2016091848 A1 WO2016091848 A1 WO 2016091848A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
injector
valve
fuel
voltage
control valve
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2015/078917
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Sebastien COUET
Thierry Cochet
Philippe ARCHAMBAULT
Christian FASOLO
Fabien DE OLIVEIRA
Guillaume Meissonnier
Original Assignee
Delphi International Operations Luxembourg S.À R.L.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Delphi International Operations Luxembourg S.À R.L. filed Critical Delphi International Operations Luxembourg S.À R.L.
Publication of WO2016091848A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016091848A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02DCONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/24Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents characterised by the use of digital means
    • F02D41/2406Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents characterised by the use of digital means using essentially read only memories
    • F02D41/2425Particular ways of programming the data
    • F02D41/2429Methods of calibrating or learning
    • F02D41/2451Methods of calibrating or learning characterised by what is learned or calibrated
    • F02D41/2464Characteristics of actuators
    • F02D41/2467Characteristics of actuators for injectors
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02DCONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/20Output circuits, e.g. for controlling currents in command coils
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02DCONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/30Controlling fuel injection
    • F02D41/38Controlling fuel injection of the high pressure type
    • F02D41/40Controlling fuel injection of the high pressure type with means for controlling injection timing or duration
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02DCONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/20Output circuits, e.g. for controlling currents in command coils
    • F02D2041/202Output circuits, e.g. for controlling currents in command coils characterised by the control of the circuit
    • F02D2041/2051Output circuits, e.g. for controlling currents in command coils characterised by the control of the circuit using voltage control
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02DCONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/20Output circuits, e.g. for controlling currents in command coils
    • F02D2041/202Output circuits, e.g. for controlling currents in command coils characterised by the control of the circuit
    • F02D2041/2055Output circuits, e.g. for controlling currents in command coils characterised by the control of the circuit with means for determining actual opening or closing time
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02DCONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D2200/00Input parameters for engine control
    • F02D2200/02Input parameters for engine control the parameters being related to the engine
    • F02D2200/06Fuel or fuel supply system parameters
    • F02D2200/0618Actual fuel injection timing or delay, e.g. determined from fuel pressure drop
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/10Internal combustion engine [ICE] based vehicles
    • Y02T10/40Engine management systems

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to internal combustion engines and more generally to injection control in such engines.
  • Such method for fuel injector parameters installation is for example de- 5 scribed in US 7,136,743.
  • WO201 1/073147 Another method of fuel injector installation has been disclosed in WO201 1/073147, which uses a segmented master performance curve.
  • Each fuel injector to be installed in the engine is provided with specific fuel injector parameters in a machine-readable format, and these parameters are transi t) ferred to the engine ECU.
  • Fitting information preferably coefficients for a characteristic equation attributed to each respective segment of the master flow curve, are contained in these fuel injector specific parameters.
  • EP2375036 discloses a method for determining an injector closing time based on the voltage trace measured at the coil of the electromagnetic actuator 15 of the injector.
  • the present invention provides an improved method of controlling fuel injection in an internal combustion engine having at least one cylinder with an associated electromagnetically actuated fuel injector for performing injector events, wherein for each injector event a drive signal is applied to said fuel injector.
  • the fuel injector comprises: a valve group having a needle slideably arranged therein in order to control at least one spray orifice through its displacement; and a control chamber arranged to be filled with high pressure fuel so as to exert, directly or indirectly, a pressure force on the needle in its closing direction, an outlet path of the control chamber being controlled by a control valve operated by an electromagnetic actuator with a coil.
  • the method comprises the steps of: a) performing at least one injector event by applying, to said electromagnetic actuator, a drive pulse having a predetermined pulse width; b) recording the voltage across said electromagnetic actuator, after the end of the drive pulse; c) processing the recorded voltage data to identify a predetermined waveform pattern in the corresponding secondary voltage derivative, following the end of the drive pulse; and d) computing a valve indicator representative of the magnitude of said pre- determined waveform pattern.
  • the present invention relies on the finding that the secondary voltage derivative reflects an individual characteristic of the control valve, which is related to the movement of the valve member of the control valve.
  • the control valve When the control valve has been opened and returns to its valve seat (closed position), it tends to rebound on the valve seat and cause a glitch on the voltage trace.
  • the timing of this control valve closing can be accurately determined from the secondary derivative of the coil voltage of the electromagnetic actuator. More specifically, it has been found that the timing of closing coincides with a predetermined waveform pattern in the corresponding secondary voltage derivative, and that the magnitude of this waveform can be used as valve indicator that can be employed in a variety of applications, and this over the full operating range of the injector.
  • the waveform pattern is the first wave, in particular the first half- wave, of the waveform described by the secondary voltage derivative following the end of the drive pulse.
  • the first wave or half-wave may be detected as a predetermined increase in the secondary voltage derivative.
  • the predetermined waveform pattern, respectively the first wave or half-wave, is advantageously amplified.
  • the valve indicator is then determined by compu- ting the magnitude of the amplified waveform pattern, respectively of the amplified first wave or half-wave.
  • the amplification is carried out by convoluting the measured voltage data with a predetermined function of similar shape, preferably a triangle function.
  • the triangle function may be configured so that the triangle has a width corresponding to the width of the first half-wave.
  • Method Step c) advantageously involves processing said recorded voltage data to compute filtered secondary derivative voltage data, and identifying the predetermined waveform pattern from the filtered secondary derivative voltage data.
  • the filtering step preferably involves a low pass filter, an in particular a weighted moving average calculation.
  • the determined valve indicator is used for injection control only if it exceeds a predetermined threshold.
  • the closing time of the control valve can be determined as the timing of the local extremum of the predetermined waveform pattern. Also, the control valve closing delay may then be generally calculated as the difference between the closing time and the length of the drive pulse (pulse width).
  • valve indicator, control valve closing time and closing time constitute so-called glitch data that can be used in part or as a whole for a variety of injection control strategies in the engine, namely for correcting injection parameters such as e.g. a pulse width of an injection drive signal, an injector needle opening or closing delay... Examples of control strategies based on the glitch data are given below.
  • valve indicator correlates satisfactorily with the fuel viscosity and may thus be used to monitor the latter.
  • the actual knowledge of the fuel viscosity while the engine is running permits implementing correction strategies.
  • the pulse width, injector needle opening delay or injector needle closing delay may be corrected by an offset determined from a mapping having viscosity as input, the valve indicator being dependent on the viscosity.
  • the valve indicator may also be used to monitor control valve lacquering. As a matter of fact, glitch event data of injectors affected by lacquering significantly differ from nominal values for all the injector family. Injector lacquering can thus be detected by monitoring the glitch event data.
  • MDP A further use of the valve indicator is to determine the minimum delivery pulse of the control valve. This can be done by repeating the routine of steps a) to d) with increasing pulse width, starting from a non-injecting pulse width, until the valve indicator exceeds a predetermined threshold, and computing the minimum delivery pulse MDP based on the difference between the pulse width PW and closing delay CD (MDP V
  • V PW - CD V
  • the injection pulse width may be corrected for injector drift based on a difference between current and reference closing delays.
  • the time period for opening the control valve may be calculated based on the difference between the timing of fully open control valve and minimum delivery pulse.
  • the present invention thus also concerns a variety of fuel injection control method implementing correction strategies based on the above-mentioned applications.
  • the present invention concerns a system for controlling fuel injection in an internal combustion engine having at least one cylinder with an associated electromagnetically actuated fuel injector with a coil, wherein the system comprises a programmable computing device config- ured for implementing the above method and applications thereof.
  • FIG. 1 shows two graphs: a) current and voltage evolution vs. time at the coil of the injector's electromagnetic actuator, and b) voltage trace vs. time after the end of the pulse width;
  • FIG. 2 shows two graphs: a) coil voltage after the end of the pulse width and b) the filtered second derivative of the coil voltage during a time window about the glitch;
  • FIG. 3 shows three graphs: a) the filtered second derivative of the coil voltage during a time window about the glitch - similar to Fig.2 b); b) is the triangle function used for convolution; c) is the processed voltage waveform resulting from the convolution of the two signals a) and b);
  • FIG. 4 shows three graphs: a) coil secondary voltage vs. time after the PW and at different temperatures; b) the filtered and convoluted signals of Fig. 4a) vs. time; c) viscosity vs. glitch magnitude evidencing the substantially linear correlation;
  • FIG. 5 is (a) a graph of the closing delay vs. time and of (b) the valve indicator vs. time for a fuel injector affected by lacquering;
  • FIG.6 is a graph illustrating the variation of current and valve lift vs. time for a corresponding pulse witdh;
  • FIG. 7 shows two graphs of injector flow performance curves (fuel quantity vs.
  • graph b) is corrected based on MDP va iv e ;
  • FIG.8 shows (a) a plot of the control valve closing delay vs. pulse width and (b) a detail of this graph around the first peak;
  • FIG.9 is a graph of the injected fuel quantity vs. time required for the full valve lift of the control valve.
  • an electromagnetically actuated fuel injector generally compris- es a valve group having a needle that is axially movable in order to open and close one or more flow orifices through which fuel is sprayed into an engine combustion chamber.
  • an electromagnetically actuated fuel injector generally compris- es a valve group having a needle that is axially movable in order to open and close one or more flow orifices through which fuel is sprayed into an engine combustion chamber.
  • the opening and closing of the needle is controlled by a hydraulic pressure force in a control chamber, the pressure force being adjusted by means of the actuator .
  • This control chamber is arranged to be filled with high- pressure fuel so as to exert, at least indirectly, a pressure force on the needle in its closing direction.
  • An outlet path of the control chamber is controlled by a control valve, which, when open, allows fuel from the control chamber to escape and thus creates a pressure drop in the control chamber, thereby causing the needle to lift and open the flow orifice in order to spray fuel into the engine combustion chamber.
  • This control valve is operated by the electromagnetic actuator.
  • the electromagnetic actuator includes a solenoid, which typically has an excitation coil arrangement and a movable armature. For actuation of the control valve, the movable armature is connected to the movable valve member (obturating member) of the control valve.
  • a fuel injector comprising a control chamber with a valve member operated by means of a solenoid actuator is e.g. known from EP 2 647 826.
  • the fuel injector specifically the electromagnetic actuator is operated by a drive signal that is applied during a duration known as "pulse width" (PW).
  • PW pulse width
  • a value of pulse width is read from a table and possibly corrected, and the fuel injector is operated, for a given injector event, so that the drive signal is applied during a time period corresponding to the pulse width, to influence a desired injection time and normally inject a given fuel amount.
  • a PW is generated to command a corresponding injector opening duration in order to deliver fuel.
  • the electromagnetic actuator is energized and an electric current flows therethrough at a defined voltage.
  • the mobile part of the electromagnetic actuator is magnetically attracted by the magnetic coil and lifts the valve member of the control valve to open the outlet path of the control chamber creating thereby a pressure drop therein, which in return lifts the injector needle against a closing spring.
  • the electromagnetic actuator is no more energized and the applied drive voltage is removed; as the magnetic attraction is removed, the control valve returns to its seat to thereby close the outlet path of the control chamber. Consequently the injector needle returns to its closing position under the action of the closing spring and fuel pressure. This leads to the build up of eddy currents through the magnetic coil due to the movement of the actuator mobile part.
  • the electromagnetic actuator may be used as a sensor to measure the eddy current and its voltage. Especially, the control valve closure movement can be detected by monitoring the voltage across the actuator coil at the end of the injection. The voltage evolution during the PW and thereafter are shown in Fig .1 .
  • the drive voltage is applied to the coil and current flows therethrough.
  • the measured voltage curve describes an exponential decay. This is well known in the art.
  • the circle in Fig .1 identifies a discontinuity, also herein called “glitch”, in the coil voltage curve or trace, occurring after the end of the PW.
  • the glitch which can be better seen in the voltage vs. time graph of Fig .1 b), corresponds to the closing time of the control valve, and the timing of the glitch can thus be considered as the closing time of the injector needle.
  • the glitch is due to a modification of the eddy current induced in the coil when the valve member of the control valve hits its valve seats.
  • CD closing delay
  • Fig .2 a is a graph of the filtered coil voltage versus time after the end of pulse. Again, the circle indicates the glitch in the coil voltage trace, which occurs at the time of the closing of the control valve.
  • Fig .2 b shows the secondary voltage derivative of the voltage curve of Fig .2 a) around the glitch.
  • the voltage secondary derivative curve has a characteristic sine waveform, and more specifically that of a damping sine waveform.
  • the signal of Fig.2b) is a filtered second derivative of the voltage data; a low pass filter may be used. A possible calculation and filtering algorithm is proposed below.
  • the present inventors have observed that the local extremum (i.e. minimum or maximum) of the first half-sine waveform, following the end of the pulse width (t En d) corresponds to the closing time t c of the control valve.
  • this first half wave correlates with the speed of the valve member (i.e. closing member) of the injector control valve (i.e. the valve controlling the pressure applied on the injector needle in the control chamber). Since the valve member is typically elastically biased (e.g. by a spring) in the closing direction, the valve member reaches its maximal speed just before hitting its seat. The valve member further tends to rebound on its seat. This rebound phenomenon is believed to be the cause for the damping sine waveform observed in the voltage secondary derivative. As it will be understood, the greater the valve speed, the greater the magnitude of the first half-sine.
  • the magnitude of the first half-sine can then be used as a valve indicator that reflects the speed of the valve member when returning to its closed position.
  • the valve indicator i.e. a value reflecting the magnitude of the first half-sine
  • FWM a value reflecting the magnitude of the first half-sine
  • magnitude designates the change of the signal over the first half-wave (it is also known as peak amplitude or semi-amplitude, i.e. the half of the peak-to-peak amplitude).
  • This valve indicator FWM can then be used in a variety of applications related to injection control, and over the full injector operating range, as will be discussed below.
  • the stroke of the valve member may be too small for the valve member to fully open, and under some circumstances, even too small for injection to occur.
  • the sine waveform of the voltage secondary derivative is caused by the valve member hitting the valve seat, such waveform is likely to be observed on the voltage secondary derivative curve also where actually no injection occurred, provided the valve member has been displaced.
  • the determined magnitude of the first half-sine can be compared to a predetermined magnitude threshold.
  • This magnitude threshold is calibrated in function of the injector technology and based on testings. Hence, in practice, one will preferably consider that the measured magnitude of the first half-sine is significant, and hence can be used as valve indicator FWM, when it is greater than the calibrated, predetermined magnitude threshold.
  • the present method in the engine, it should preferably require only a small amount of computing resources and be adapted to handle the measured voltage signal, which may be relatively weak. It is there- fore preferable to amplify this signal in the region of interest, i.e. around the first half-sine of —- .
  • voltage data measured at the injector actuator coil after the end of the pulse width are generally stored in a table with the corresponding timings.
  • the second derivative can e.g. be computed using the following approach.
  • n is a parameter of the filter.
  • ⁇ - ⁇ - (t) Constl ⁇ (V(t - Const!) + V(t + Const!) - ! ⁇ V(t))
  • Constl and Constl depend on filter weights and sampling frequency.
  • the half-sine waveform is advantageously amplified by convolution with a selected function, and preferably a triangle function. This treatment is illustrated in Fig.3.
  • Fig.3 a shows the voltage secondary derivative waveform as in Fig.2 b). This waveform is convoluted with the triangle function of Fig.3 b), leading to the amplified secondary voltage waveform shown in Fig.3c).
  • valve indicator FWM is validated only if it is above a predetermined magnitude threshold. In the affirmative, the timing of the maximum of the first half-sine is used to compute the closing delay:
  • Fuel viscosity is a critical parameter in cold conditions which affects the injected fuel quantity. But fuel viscosity can be very different from one fuel to another and the fuel property is a priori unknown to the engine control unit (ECU). Moreover, a significant increase in fuel viscosity leads to changes in the injector flow curve, as well as in the opening and closing delays. The knowledge of the fuel viscosity would allow adapting relevant injection parameters.
  • Figure 4 a shows the actuator coil voltage trace after t En d for several fuel temperatures.
  • the glitch timing i.e. the closing time t c
  • the magnitude of the first half-sine decreases with increasing viscosity.
  • valve indicator FWM for estimating the fuel viscosity
  • a proposed algorithm for fuel viscosity estimation is the following:
  • ACD CDcoid - CD hot ;
  • AFWM FWM CO id - FWM hot ⁇
  • Visco F(ACD, AFWM)
  • the opening and closing delay as a function of viscosity variation, it is possible to significantly improve the accuracy of the delivered fuel quantity, which is also favourable with regard to the cold start time as well as cold idle stability.
  • the glitch event data of injectors affected by lacquering significantly differ from nominal values for all the injector family. This confirms that injector lacquering can be detected by monitoring the glitch event data.
  • Another aspect of interest for controlling the injection of fuel in an engine is the detection of the control valve opening delay, in particular for small pulses such as in the in the ballistic operating region.
  • the term "ballistic” is generally used to designate needle movements for which the needle essentially opens and closes, without remaining in (or even reaching) the fully open position.
  • Such ballistic behavior also exists for the control valve, specifically its valve member.
  • the problem of operating in the ballistic zone is that the global behavior is particularly affected by opening and closing responses/delays.
  • the learning of the valve opening delay is preferably done at the smallest possible pulses.
  • valve MDP the valve's minimum drive pulse needed to move the injector control valve
  • a) Set the PW at a known non-injecting pulse b) perform injector event (pulse) for the set PW
  • This MDPviv can then be used for pulse width adaptation over the full injector operating range.
  • MDP valve learning according to the present method can also be useful to compensate for battery voltage changes.
  • Fig. 7 a) below shows the flow performance curve for one injector at 4 different rail pressures, and at 10 V and 14 V respectively (10V curves are indicated 6, 14V curves indicated 8). It can be observed that the injected quantity is lower at lower voltage, for a same pulse width. Conversely, to inject a given fuel quantity a larger pulse width is required at lower voltages.
  • Pulse new Pulse n0 minai + AMDP
  • the pulse length to be used for injection is thus calculated as the difference between the nominal pulse width, less the difference between the current and reference MDPs.
  • the benefits are the ability to compensate the battery voltage effect for each injector, decrease cylinder to cylinder dispersion and compensate partially injector drift during its lifetime.
  • T v iv_fuii_iift is an image of the actual lift (total stroke) of the valve lift (noted VL). It is thus possible to estimate the valve lift by computing the time required to move from the fully closed to fully open positions of the valve member.
  • the following algorithm may be used for determining the lift of the control valve: ⁇ Determined the MDP of the valve (as in section 4 above)
  • Tvivjuiijift Pulse t0 wave MDP
  • the control valve lift is known as an important parameter influencing injector mass flow. Moreover, the control valve lift is also known as a parameter moving during the injector life.
  • Fig.9 illustrates the influence of valve full lift on the injected fuel quantity. The graph is obtained for 12 different injectors to which a PW of ⁇ is applied. A correlation between the injected fuel quantity and full lift is clearly observed.
  • Pulse PWRON om + APW
  • control valve closing delay is likely to vary due to wear of the control valve seat. This will alter the injector closing delay as well as injected fuel quantity.
  • control valve closing delay can be monitored. Accordingly, partial compensation of the injector drift can be achieved by the following algorithm:
  • This algorithm is beneficial for partial compensation of injector ageing and can be used to adapt compensation strategy depending on injector timing.

Abstract

A method of fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine having at least one cylinder with an associated solenoid actuated fuel injector for performing injector events is presented. The injector has a valve group with a needle, which is at least indirectly controlled by a pressure force in a control chamber, which is in turn controlled by a control valve operated by the solenoid actuator. The method comprising the steps of: a) performing at least one injector event by applying, to said electromagnetic actuator, a drive pulse having a predetermined pulse width (PW); b) recording the voltage across said electromagnetic actuator, after the end of the drive pulse; c) processing the recorded voltage data to identify a predetermined waveform pattern in the corresponding secondary voltage derivative, following the end of the drive pulse; and d) computing a valve indicator (FWM) representative of the magnitude of said predetermined waveform pattern. This valve indicator can be used in a variety of applications related to injection control, and over the full injector operating range, e.g. for monitoring viscosity or lacquering, determining MDP, correcting for drift or voltage changes, determining the control valve lift.

Description

FUEL INJECTION CONTROL IN AN
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to internal combustion engines and more generally to injection control in such engines.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The contemporary design of internal combustion engines must cope with the increasingly stringent regulations on pollutant emissions. Accordingly, automotive engineers strive for designing engines with low fuel consumption and low emission of pollutants, which implies including electronic devices capable of monitoring the combustion performance and emissions.
In order to comply with this emissions standard, a proper operation of a fuel-injected engine requires that the fuel injectors and their controller allow for a timely, precise and reliable fuel injection, whatever the operating condition and during all injector lifecycle (at least 240 000 km). Indeed, it is well known that problems arise when the performance, or more particularly the timing, and the quantity of fuel delivered by the injectors diverge beyond acceptable limits. For example, injector performance deviation or variability will cause different torques to be generated between cylinders due to unequal fuel amounts being injected, or from the relative timing of such fuel injection. This problem is particularly acute when injecting small fuel quantities, due to response delays at opening and closing. The injector performance is also affected by a number of uncontrolled parameters such as for example: injector ageing, deposit, fuel properties (especially viscosity)...
In order to take into account the individual specificities of an electromag- netically actuated fuel injector, it has been proposed to associate to a given fuel injector a number of performance parameters thereof. These performance parameters are, e.g., encoded in a bar code applied to the injector, so that the performance parameters can be retrieved by a bar code scanner at the time of installation in the engine and transferred to the engine control unit (ECU).
Such method for fuel injector parameters installation is for example de- 5 scribed in US 7,136,743.
Another method of fuel injector installation has been disclosed in WO201 1/073147, which uses a segmented master performance curve. Each fuel injector to be installed in the engine is provided with specific fuel injector parameters in a machine-readable format, and these parameters are transi t) ferred to the engine ECU. Fitting information, preferably coefficients for a characteristic equation attributed to each respective segment of the master flow curve, are contained in these fuel injector specific parameters.
EP2375036 discloses a method for determining an injector closing time based on the voltage trace measured at the coil of the electromagnetic actuator 15 of the injector.
Although the above-mentioned methods are beneficial in that they allow more appropriately describing the flow performance per injector and provide finer control in the ballistic zone, it is still desirable to find ways of improving the control of fuel injection in an internal combustion engine. In particular, it is 20 desirable to make sure that an injector has properly opened in the ballistic area, or to be able to properly detect fuel viscosity, or lacquering in order to take appropriate measures.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an improved method of controlling fuel injection in an internal combustion engine having at least one cylinder with an associated electromagnetically actuated fuel injector for performing injector events, wherein for each injector event a drive signal is applied to said fuel injector. The fuel injector comprises: a valve group having a needle slideably arranged therein in order to control at least one spray orifice through its displacement; and a control chamber arranged to be filled with high pressure fuel so as to exert, directly or indirectly, a pressure force on the needle in its closing direction, an outlet path of the control chamber being controlled by a control valve operated by an electromagnetic actuator with a coil.
The method comprises the steps of: a) performing at least one injector event by applying, to said electromagnetic actuator, a drive pulse having a predetermined pulse width; b) recording the voltage across said electromagnetic actuator, after the end of the drive pulse; c) processing the recorded voltage data to identify a predetermined waveform pattern in the corresponding secondary voltage derivative, following the end of the drive pulse; and d) computing a valve indicator representative of the magnitude of said pre- determined waveform pattern.
The present invention relies on the finding that the secondary voltage derivative reflects an individual characteristic of the control valve, which is related to the movement of the valve member of the control valve. When the control valve has been opened and returns to its valve seat (closed position), it tends to rebound on the valve seat and cause a glitch on the voltage trace. It has been found that the timing of this control valve closing can be accurately determined from the secondary derivative of the coil voltage of the electromagnetic actuator. More specifically, it has been found that the timing of closing coincides with a predetermined waveform pattern in the corresponding secondary voltage derivative, and that the magnitude of this waveform can be used as valve indicator that can be employed in a variety of applications, and this over the full operating range of the injector.
Preferably, the waveform pattern is the first wave, in particular the first half- wave, of the waveform described by the secondary voltage derivative following the end of the drive pulse. The first wave or half-wave may be detected as a predetermined increase in the secondary voltage derivative.
The predetermined waveform pattern, respectively the first wave or half-wave, is advantageously amplified. The valve indicator is then determined by compu- ting the magnitude of the amplified waveform pattern, respectively of the amplified first wave or half-wave.
In one embodiment, the amplification is carried out by convoluting the measured voltage data with a predetermined function of similar shape, preferably a triangle function. The triangle function may be configured so that the triangle has a width corresponding to the width of the first half-wave.
Method Step c) advantageously involves processing said recorded voltage data to compute filtered secondary derivative voltage data, and identifying the predetermined waveform pattern from the filtered secondary derivative voltage data. The filtering step preferably involves a low pass filter, an in particular a weighted moving average calculation.
To filter out noise and non-significant actuations, the determined valve indicator is used for injection control only if it exceeds a predetermined threshold.
Once a valid valve indicator value has been obtained (i.e. above threshold), the closing time of the control valve can be determined as the timing of the local extremum of the predetermined waveform pattern. Also, the control valve closing delay may then be generally calculated as the difference between the closing time and the length of the drive pulse (pulse width).
The valve indicator, control valve closing time and closing time constitute so- called glitch data that can be used in part or as a whole for a variety of injection control strategies in the engine, namely for correcting injection parameters such as e.g. a pulse width of an injection drive signal, an injector needle opening or closing delay... Examples of control strategies based on the glitch data are given below.
1. Viscosity. The valve indicator correlates satisfactorily with the fuel viscosity and may thus be used to monitor the latter. The actual knowledge of the fuel viscosity while the engine is running permits implementing correction strategies. In particular the pulse width, injector needle opening delay or injector needle closing delay may be corrected by an offset determined from a mapping having viscosity as input, the valve indicator being dependent on the viscosity.
2. Lacquering. The valve indicator may also be used to monitor control valve lacquering. As a matter of fact, glitch event data of injectors affected by lacquering significantly differ from nominal values for all the injector family. Injector lacquering can thus be detected by monitoring the glitch event data. 3. MDP. A further use of the valve indicator is to determine the minimum delivery pulse of the control valve. This can be done by repeating the routine of steps a) to d) with increasing pulse width, starting from a non-injecting pulse width, until the valve indicator exceeds a predetermined threshold, and computing the minimum delivery pulse MDP based on the difference between the pulse width PW and closing delay CD (MDPV|V = PW - CDV|V).
4. Voltage change. The difference between minimum delivery pulse at a reference and current voltage may be used to correct the injection pulse width for battery voltage changes.
5. Drift. The injection pulse width may be corrected for injector drift based on a difference between current and reference closing delays.
6. Valve lift. The time period for opening the control valve may be calculated based on the difference between the timing of fully open control valve and minimum delivery pulse. The knowledge of the time period for opening the control valve allows reading a correction value APW from a mapping designed for the injector family: APW = f(time period for opening), which can be used as offset to correct the pulse width on an injection drive signal.
The present invention thus also concerns a variety of fuel injection control method implementing correction strategies based on the above-mentioned applications. According to a further aspect, the present invention concerns a system for controlling fuel injection in an internal combustion engine having at least one cylinder with an associated electromagnetically actuated fuel injector with a coil, wherein the system comprises a programmable computing device config- ured for implementing the above method and applications thereof.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 : shows two graphs: a) current and voltage evolution vs. time at the coil of the injector's electromagnetic actuator, and b) voltage trace vs. time after the end of the pulse width;
FIG. 2: shows two graphs: a) coil voltage after the end of the pulse width and b) the filtered second derivative of the coil voltage during a time window about the glitch;
FIG. 3: shows three graphs: a) the filtered second derivative of the coil voltage during a time window about the glitch - similar to Fig.2 b); b) is the triangle function used for convolution; c) is the processed voltage waveform resulting from the convolution of the two signals a) and b);
FIG. 4: shows three graphs: a) coil secondary voltage vs. time after the PW and at different temperatures; b) the filtered and convoluted signals of Fig. 4a) vs. time; c) viscosity vs. glitch magnitude evidencing the substantially linear correlation;
FIG. 5: is (a) a graph of the closing delay vs. time and of (b) the valve indicator vs. time for a fuel injector affected by lacquering;
FIG.6: is a graph illustrating the variation of current and valve lift vs. time for a corresponding pulse witdh;
FIG. 7: shows two graphs of injector flow performance curves (fuel quantity vs.
pulse) at different battery voltages; where graph b) is corrected based on MDPvaive;
FIG.8: shows (a) a plot of the control valve closing delay vs. pulse width and (b) a detail of this graph around the first peak; and
FIG.9: is a graph of the injected fuel quantity vs. time required for the full valve lift of the control valve.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention addresses the problem of performance variability of fuel injectors, which is particularly acute in the ballistic region in the case of some modern designs of electromagnetically (solenoid) actuated fuel injectors. As it is known, an electromagnetically actuated fuel injector generally compris- es a valve group having a needle that is axially movable in order to open and close one or more flow orifices through which fuel is sprayed into an engine combustion chamber. In modern diesel fuel injectors, as used e.g. in common rail systems, the opening and closing of the needle is controlled by a hydraulic pressure force in a control chamber, the pressure force being adjusted by means of the actuator . This control chamber is arranged to be filled with high- pressure fuel so as to exert, at least indirectly, a pressure force on the needle in its closing direction. An outlet path of the control chamber is controlled by a control valve, which, when open, allows fuel from the control chamber to escape and thus creates a pressure drop in the control chamber, thereby causing the needle to lift and open the flow orifice in order to spray fuel into the engine combustion chamber. This control valve is operated by the electromagnetic actuator. In the context of the present invention the electromagnetic actuator includes a solenoid, which typically has an excitation coil arrangement and a movable armature. For actuation of the control valve, the movable armature is connected to the movable valve member (obturating member) of the control valve. A fuel injector comprising a control chamber with a valve member operated by means of a solenoid actuator is e.g. known from EP 2 647 826. The fuel injector, specifically the electromagnetic actuator is operated by a drive signal that is applied during a duration known as "pulse width" (PW). Generally, to inject a fuel amount Q, a value of pulse width is read from a table and possibly corrected, and the fuel injector is operated, for a given injector event, so that the drive signal is applied during a time period corresponding to the pulse width, to influence a desired injection time and normally inject a given fuel amount. Hence, for any electromagnetically actuated fuel injection to be performed, a PW is generated to command a corresponding injector opening duration in order to deliver fuel. During the PW, the electromagnetic actuator is energized and an electric current flows therethrough at a defined voltage. The mobile part of the electromagnetic actuator is magnetically attracted by the magnetic coil and lifts the valve member of the control valve to open the outlet path of the control chamber creating thereby a pressure drop therein, which in return lifts the injector needle against a closing spring. Once the pulse ends, the electromagnetic actuator is no more energized and the applied drive voltage is removed; as the magnetic attraction is removed, the control valve returns to its seat to thereby close the outlet path of the control chamber. Consequently the injector needle returns to its closing position under the action of the closing spring and fuel pressure. This leads to the build up of eddy currents through the magnetic coil due to the movement of the actuator mobile part. The electromagnetic actuator may be used as a sensor to measure the eddy current and its voltage. Especially, the control valve closure movement can be detected by monitoring the voltage across the actuator coil at the end of the injection. The voltage evolution during the PW and thereafter are shown in Fig .1 .
For the timing PW (between time tstart and tEnd, the drive voltage is applied to the coil and current flows therethrough. At the end of the PW (i.e. after tEnd) the measured voltage curve describes an exponential decay. This is well known in the art. The circle in Fig .1 identifies a discontinuity, also herein called "glitch", in the coil voltage curve or trace, occurring after the end of the PW. The glitch, which can be better seen in the voltage vs. time graph of Fig .1 b), corresponds to the closing time of the control valve, and the timing of the glitch can thus be considered as the closing time of the injector needle. The glitch is due to a modification of the eddy current induced in the coil when the valve member of the control valve hits its valve seats.
The determination of the glitch and of its timing allows computing the so- called "closing delay" (CD), which is the time period between the end of the pulse and the time of the glitch, when the closing member of the control valve reaches its closing position, causing the closing of the injector needle.
Fig .2 a) is a graph of the filtered coil voltage versus time after the end of pulse. Again, the circle indicates the glitch in the coil voltage trace, which occurs at the time of the closing of the control valve.
It has been found that the actual timing of the control valve closing (noted tc) can be determined from the secondary derivative — of the recorded dt
voltage trace as measured at the coil of the electromagnetic actuator.
Fig .2 b) shows the secondary voltage derivative of the voltage curve of Fig .2 a) around the glitch. As can be seen, the voltage secondary derivative curve has a characteristic sine waveform, and more specifically that of a damping sine waveform. It may be noted here that the signal of Fig.2b) is a filtered second derivative of the voltage data; a low pass filter may be used. A possible calculation and filtering algorithm is proposed below.
The present inventors have observed that the local extremum (i.e. minimum or maximum) of the first half-sine waveform, following the end of the pulse width (tEnd) corresponds to the closing time tc of the control valve. With reference to Fig.2b), the local extremum is a minimum and the closing time is thus tc=120 με.
It has further been found that the magnitude of this first half wave correlates with the speed of the valve member (i.e. closing member) of the injector control valve (i.e. the valve controlling the pressure applied on the injector needle in the control chamber). Since the valve member is typically elastically biased (e.g. by a spring) in the closing direction, the valve member reaches its maximal speed just before hitting its seat. The valve member further tends to rebound on its seat. This rebound phenomenon is believed to be the cause for the damping sine waveform observed in the voltage secondary derivative. As it will be understood, the greater the valve speed, the greater the magnitude of the first half-sine.
The magnitude of the first half-sine can then be used as a valve indicator that reflects the speed of the valve member when returning to its closed position. The valve indicator, i.e. a value reflecting the magnitude of the first half-sine, is hereinafter noted FWM. In the context of a generally sine-shaped waveform, the term magnitude herein designates the change of the signal over the first half-wave (it is also known as peak amplitude or semi-amplitude, i.e. the half of the peak-to-peak amplitude).
This valve indicator FWM can then be used in a variety of applications related to injection control, and over the full injector operating range, as will be discussed below.
It is however to be noted that for low pulse widths, namely in the ballistic region, the stroke of the valve member may be too small for the valve member to fully open, and under some circumstances, even too small for injection to occur. However, since the sine waveform of the voltage secondary derivative is caused by the valve member hitting the valve seat, such waveform is likely to be observed on the voltage secondary derivative curve also where actually no injection occurred, provided the valve member has been displaced.
To be able to filter out such situations where the valve opening was too small and/or too short for injection to occur at the spray tip, the determined magnitude of the first half-sine can be compared to a predetermined magnitude threshold. This magnitude threshold is calibrated in function of the injector technology and based on testings. Hence, in practice, one will preferably consider that the measured magnitude of the first half-sine is significant, and hence can be used as valve indicator FWM, when it is greater than the calibrated, predetermined magnitude threshold.
1. Practical embodiment
In order to implement the present method in the engine, it should preferably require only a small amount of computing resources and be adapted to handle the measured voltage signal, which may be relatively weak. It is there- fore preferable to amplify this signal in the region of interest, i.e. around the first half-sine of —- .
dt2
1.1 Derivative calculation routine
In the engine, voltage data measured at the injector actuator coil after the end of the pulse width are generally stored in a table with the corresponding timings. The second derivative can e.g. be computed using the following approach.
- Computation of the first derivative:
V (t) - V (t - l)
A t
- then the first derivative data Di(t) are filtered with a weighted moving average:
n
∑ z'( (t - i) + Dl(t + ) + (n + l)Dl(t)
where n is a parameter of the filter.
- The obtained filtered first derivative data are then derivated again with the same algorithm.
These 3 steps can in fact be combined as a simple algorithm:
^-ζ- (t) = Constl (V(t - Const!) + V(t + Const!) - ! V(t))
dt where Constl and Constl depend on filter weights and sampling frequency.
1.2 Convolution
In order to obtain robust data, the half-sine waveform is advantageously amplified by convolution with a selected function, and preferably a triangle function. This treatment is illustrated in Fig.3.
Fig.3 a) shows the voltage secondary derivative waveform as in Fig.2 b). This waveform is convoluted with the triangle function of Fig.3 b), leading to the amplified secondary voltage waveform shown in Fig.3c).
The magnitude of this amplified first half-sine is then the value which is advantageously used as valve indicator FWM.
Again, to avoid false detection, the valve indicator FWM is validated only if it is above a predetermined magnitude threshold. In the affirmative, the timing of the maximum of the first half-sine is used to compute the closing delay:
CDviv = tc - PW
2. Monitoring fuel viscosity
Fuel viscosity is a critical parameter in cold conditions which affects the injected fuel quantity. But fuel viscosity can be very different from one fuel to another and the fuel property is a priori unknown to the engine control unit (ECU). Moreover, a significant increase in fuel viscosity leads to changes in the injector flow curve, as well as in the opening and closing delays. The knowledge of the fuel viscosity would allow adapting relevant injection parameters.
Figure 4 a) shows the actuator coil voltage trace after tEnd for several fuel temperatures. As can be seen, as the fuel temperature drops, the glitch timing, i.e. the closing time tc, is delayed (shift to the right) and its intensity appears to be reduced. This can be better observed on the corresponding secondary voltage derivative curves shown in Fig.4b): the magnitude of the first half-sine decreases with increasing viscosity.
It has thus been found that the present valve indicator FWM satisfactorily correlates with the fuel viscosity, as shown in Fig.4 c).
In a preferred method using the present valve indicator FWM for estimating the fuel viscosity, it is preferable to use a variation of the valve indicator to take into account the differences between each injector, in particular with the help of a reference point done in hot conditions (where fuel viscosity is known as very low).
A proposed algorithm for fuel viscosity estimation is the following:
• Determining reference values of the glitch event in hot conditions: closing delay in hot conditions is noted CDhot The valve indicator in hot conditions is noted FWMhot
• Determining the glitch event values in the desired operating conditions at lower temperature: CDCOid and FWMCOid
• Determining the difference between hot and cold conditions:
ACD= CDcoid - CDhot; AFWM= FWMCOid - FWMhot · Estimating the fuel viscosity using a mapping in function of the glitch event data comparison:
Visco = F(ACD, AFWM) The actual knowledge of the viscosity then allows modifying injection parameters such as: o correcting the Pulse Width by a pulse offset value determined from a mapping: PW0ffSet = f(Visco) o correcting the needle opening delay using by an offset determined from a map: OD0ffSet = f(Visco) o correcting the needle closing delay using an offset determined from a map: CD_INJ0ffSet = f(Visco)
By being able to modify the pulse length, the opening and closing delay as a function of viscosity variation, it is possible to significantly improve the accuracy of the delivered fuel quantity, which is also favourable with regard to the cold start time as well as cold idle stability.
3. Injector lacquering monitoring
Another phenomenon affecting the injection of an engine is the deposit in the control valve. In fact, while it is desirable that injectors have a steady performance, fuel quality is not the same around the world. Poor quality fuels can produce deposit (e.g. lacquering) inside the injector and modify the injector performance. Deposit at the control valve slows down the valve, and in worst case situations leads to sticking of the valve. At high temperature, injection still works up to a certain amount of deposit. However, this phenomenon becomes of great importance when operating at cold temperatures or engine start, where the injector simply fails to deliver fuel. When there is deposit on the control valve, the glitch event data (control valve closing delay and valve indicator FWM) are strongly modified. The striking drift of the glitch event data can be observed from Fig.5, wherein the grey rectangles 2 and 4 show the nominal operating regions of the injectors. As it appears, the injectors in the test operate clearly out of the nominal regions: region 2 indicates the nominal values of valve closing delays; region 4 indicates the nominal values of the valve indicator FWM.
As can be seen, the glitch event data of injectors affected by lacquering significantly differ from nominal values for all the injector family. This confirms that injector lacquering can be detected by monitoring the glitch event data.
A possible algorithm for valve deposit detection is proposed:
• determining the current glitch event data CD and FWM
• comparing the current glitch event data with reference (nominal) operating thresholds of closing delay CDRef and valve indicator FWMRef
• Concluding to a valve deposit situation where both CD is higher than CDRef and the valve indicator FWM is lower than FWMRef
Early detection of deposit inside the injector can be alerted with a warning light before injector failure and possibly adapt earlier injection pattern / parameters when deposit occurs.
4. Control valve opening
Another aspect of interest for controlling the injection of fuel in an engine is the detection of the control valve opening delay, in particular for small pulses such as in the in the ballistic operating region. As is it known in the art, the term "ballistic" is generally used to designate needle movements for which the needle essentially opens and closes, without remaining in (or even reaching) the fully open position. Such ballistic behavior also exists for the control valve, specifically its valve member. The problem of operating in the ballistic zone is that the global behavior is particularly affected by opening and closing responses/delays.
It has been observed in the context of the present invention that in the ballistic region the valve closure lasts the same time as the valve opening (CDviv=ODViv), since the valve lift curve generally describes a bell shape or the like.
In order to avoid inertia effects and to be able to do carry out learning without fuel injection, the learning of the valve opening delay is preferably done at the smallest possible pulses.
The following algorithm is proposed to determine the valve's minimum drive pulse needed to move the injector control valve (the valve MDP is illustrated in Fig.6): a) Set the PW at a known non-injecting pulse b) perform injector event (pulse) for the set PW c) Record voltage trace and compute valve indicator FWM: a. If measured valve indicator FWM is less than the predetermined threshold (FWM < FWMth): go back to step b with in- creased pulse: PW=PW+5PW b. If glitch magnitude is found (i.e. FWM > FWMth), then compute MDPViv = PW - CDviv
This MDPviv can then be used for pulse width adaptation over the full injector operating range.
5. Battery Voltage Compensation
When the battery voltage changes, the time needed to establish the electromagnetic force changes as well. In other words, for a same pulse length at different battery voltages, the injected fuel quantity is not the same because the valve opens later or sooner. This phenomenon is conventionally compensated by an "average" map for all injectors.
MDP valve learning according to the present method can also be useful to compensate for battery voltage changes. Fig. 7 a) below shows the flow performance curve for one injector at 4 different rail pressures, and at 10 V and 14 V respectively (10V curves are indicated 6, 14V curves indicated 8). It can be observed that the injected quantity is lower at lower voltage, for a same pulse width. Conversely, to inject a given fuel quantity a larger pulse width is required at lower voltages.
It has been found that the higher and lower voltage curves are in fact offset by an amount corresponding to MDPV|V. The following routine can thus be used to compensate for battery voltage: · Store MDP valve at nominal battery voltage to be used as reference: MDPref
• Learn MDP value: MDPcur
• Compare learned value to reference: AMDP= MDPcur - MDPref
• Adapt pulse length: Pulsenew = Pulsen0minai + AMDP The pulse length to be used for injection is thus calculated as the difference between the nominal pulse width, less the difference between the current and reference MDPs.
The result is illustrated in Fig. 7b), where it can be observed that the flow curves obtained by applying the above correction routine leads to flow curves at 10V that substantially correspond to those obtained at 14V.
The benefits are the ability to compensate the battery voltage effect for each injector, decrease cylinder to cylinder dispersion and compensate partially injector drift during its lifetime.
6. Valve lift estimation
It has been observed that the control valve closing delay depends on the pulse width. Figures 8 a) is a graph of the closing delay vs. pulse width; and Fig.8 b) illustrates a detail of Fig.8a). Looking closer at the curve of Fig.8a), one can observe that the closing delay first increases with the pulse width. In this linear region, the valve operates in the ballistic zone. Around PW=260 s, the CD reaches a peak at 136 με, undergoes a small decrease to subsequently reach a steady level at about 140 με. First peak illustrated in Fig.8 b) is due to control valve inertia and rebound of the valve member against the top seat (fully open).
The longer the stroke of the control valve, the longer the time required to reach the valve full lift. Accordingly, the time needed to reach the valve's fully open position (noted Tviv_fuii_iift) is an image of the actual lift (total stroke) of the valve lift (noted VL). It is thus possible to estimate the valve lift by computing the time required to move from the fully closed to fully open positions of the valve member.
The following algorithm may be used for determining the lift of the control valve: · Determined the MDP of the valve (as in section 4 above)
• Find the PW corresponding to of the top of the first wave:
Pulsetop_ wave
• Compute time needed to reach the valve full lift:
Tvivjuiijift = Pulset0 wave MDP
The control valve lift is known as an important parameter influencing injector mass flow. Moreover, the control valve lift is also known as a parameter moving during the injector life. Fig.9 illustrates the influence of valve full lift on the injected fuel quantity. The graph is obtained for 12 different injectors to which a PW of δθθμε is applied. A correlation between the injected fuel quantity and full lift is clearly observed.
The following algorithm can be used to correct the injected fuel quantity:
• Determine time needed to attempt valve full lift (see previous algo- rithm TV|V_fUiUift)
• Read a correction value APW from a mapping designed for the injector family: APW = f(Tviv_fuii_iift)
• Adapt the nominal pulse PW„om: Pulse = PW„om + APW
There are several benefits to this correction; it allows:
• estimating a physical injector parameter and its evolution during injector life;
• compensating partially injector wearing; · decreasing cylinder to cylinder dispersion.
7. Injector drift estimation
During injector life, the control valve closing delay is likely to vary due to wear of the control valve seat. This will alter the injector closing delay as well as injected fuel quantity.
As explained above, the control valve closing delay can be monitored. Accordingly, partial compensation of the injector drift can be achieved by the following algorithm:
• determine and store the valve closing delay when the injector is new (stored as CDref)
• regularly determine the valve closing delay: CDcur
• compare the current CDcur value to the reference: ACDV|V = CDcur - CDref
• Adapt PW if the difference between the learned value and the reference is higher than a threshold: PW = PW„om + f(ACDV|V > CDthr)
This algorithm is beneficial for partial compensation of injector ageing and can be used to adapt compensation strategy depending on injector timing.

Claims

Claims
A method of determining a parameter of a fuel injector in an internal combustion engine having at least one cylinder with an associated electro- magnetically actuated fuel injector for performing injector events, wherein for each injector event a drive signal is applied to said fuel injector, said injector comprising: a valve group having a needle slideably arranged therein in order to control at least one spray orifice through its displacement; a control chamber arranged to be filled with high pressure fuel so as to exert, at least indirectly, a pressure force on said needle in its closing direction, an outlet path of said control chamber being controlled by a control valve operated by an electromagnetic actuator with a coil; said method comprising the steps of: a) performing at least one injector event by applying, to said electromagnetic actuator, a drive pulse having a predetermined pulse width (PW); b) recording the voltage across said electromagnetic actuator, after the end of the drive pulse; characterized by the steps of c) processing the recorded voltage data to identify a predetermined waveform pattern in the corresponding secondary voltage derivative, following the end of the drive pulse; and d) computing said parameter, said parameter being a valve indicator (FWM) representative of the magnitude of said predetermined waveform pattern.
The method according to claim 1 , wherein said waveform pattern is a first wave, in particular a first half-wave, of the waveform described by the secondary voltage derivative following the end of the drive pulse.
The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said predetermined wave- form pattern, respectively said first wave or half-wave, is amplified and said valve indicator is determined by computing the magnitude of the amplified waveform pattern, respectively of said amplified first wave or half-wave.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein said amplification is carried out by convoluting the measured voltage data with a predetermined function of similar shape.
5. The method according to claim 4 wherein said shape is a triangle function
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein said triangle function is configured so that the triangle has a width corresponding to the width of said first half-wave.
7. The method according to any one of claims 2 to 6, wherein said first wave or half-wave is detected as a predetermined increase in the secondary voltage derivative.
8. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the timing of said predetermined waveform pattern, of a local extremum of said predetermined waveform pattern defines the closing time (tc) of said control valve.
9. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, said valve indicator is used for injection control only if it exceeds a predetermined threshold.
10. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said valve indicator is used to monitor the fuel viscosity.
1 1 .The method according to claim 10, wherein an injection pulse width, injector needle opening delay or injector needle closing delay is corrected by an offset depending on fuel viscosity.
12. The method according to any one of the claims 1 to 8, wherein said valve indicator is used to monitor control valve lacquering.
13. The method according to any one of the claims 1 to 8, wherein said valve indicator is used to determine the minimum delivery pulse of the control valve, in particular by repeating the routine of steps a) to d) with increasing pulse width, starting from a non-injecting pulse width, until said valve indicator exceeds a predetermined threshold, and computing the minimum deliv- ery pulse based on the difference between the pulse width and closing delay.
14. The method according to any one of the claims 1 to 9, wherein the timing of the fully open control valve is determined, and the time period for opening the control valve is calculated based on the difference between the timing of fully open control valve and the minimum delivery pulse.
15. The method according to claim 14, wherein an injection pulse width is adapted based on a map having as input the time period for opening the control valve.
16. The method according to any one of the claims 1 to 9, wherein said valve indicator is used to determine the minimum delivery pulse of the control valve, wherein the difference between the minimum delivery pulse at a reference and current voltage is used to correct the injection pulse width for voltage changes.
17. The method according to any one of the claims 1 to 9, wherein an injection pulse width is corrected for injector drift based on a difference between current and reference closing delays.
18. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said step c) involves processing said recorded voltage data to compute filtered secondary derivative voltage data, and identifying said predetermined waveform pattern from said filtered secondary derivative voltage data.
19. The method according to claim 18, wherein said filtering involves a low pass filter,
20. The method of claim 19 where said low pass filter is a weighted moving average calculation. A system for controlling fuel injection in an internal combustion engine having at least one cylinder with an associated electromagnetically actuated fuel injector, wherein said fuel injector has a valve group having a needle slideably arranged therein in order to control at least one spray orifice through its displacement; a control chamber arranged to be filled with high pressure fuel so as to exert, at least indirectly, a pressure force on said needle in its closing direction, an outlet path of said control chamber being controlled by a control valve operated by an electromagnetic actuator with a coil; wherein the system comprises a programmable computing device configured for implementing the method according to any one of the preceding claims.
PCT/EP2015/078917 2014-12-09 2015-12-08 Fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine WO2016091848A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB1421853.1A GB201421853D0 (en) 2014-12-09 2014-12-09 Fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine
GB1421853.1 2014-12-09

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016091848A1 true WO2016091848A1 (en) 2016-06-16

Family

ID=52425664

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2015/078917 WO2016091848A1 (en) 2014-12-09 2015-12-08 Fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB201421853D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2016091848A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108869072A (en) * 2017-05-10 2018-11-23 福特全球技术公司 For characterizing the method and system of port fuel injector
US10401398B2 (en) 2017-03-03 2019-09-03 Woodward, Inc. Fingerprinting of fluid injection devices
IT201800005765A1 (en) * 2018-05-28 2019-11-28 METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN OPENING TIME OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC FUEL INJECTOR
CN110541769A (en) * 2018-05-28 2019-12-06 马涅蒂-马瑞利公司 Method for determining the closing moment of an electromagnetic fuel injector
JP2021148037A (en) * 2020-03-18 2021-09-27 日立Astemo株式会社 Detection device
WO2022171818A1 (en) * 2021-02-15 2022-08-18 Delphi Technologies Ip Limited Method of determining the opening delay of a fuel injector

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020130192A1 (en) * 2001-03-15 2002-09-19 Siemens Vdo Automotive Corporation End of valve motion detection for a spool control valve
DE102009003215A1 (en) * 2009-05-19 2010-11-25 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and control device for operating an injection valve
EP2455600A1 (en) * 2010-11-17 2012-05-23 Continental Automotive GmbH Method and apparatus for operating an injection valve
EP2469064A1 (en) * 2010-12-24 2012-06-27 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Method of controlling an internal combustion engine
WO2013191267A1 (en) * 2012-06-21 2013-12-27 日立オートモティブシステムズ株式会社 Control device for internal combustion engine
US20140000564A1 (en) * 2012-06-27 2014-01-02 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Fuel injector closing timing adjustment systems and methods
EP2685074A1 (en) * 2012-07-13 2014-01-15 Delphi Automotive Systems Luxembourg SA Fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine
US20140326218A1 (en) * 2011-05-12 2014-11-06 Peter Matthias Ruße Method For Determining A Position Of A Lock Element Of An Injection Valve For An Internal Combustion Engine

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020130192A1 (en) * 2001-03-15 2002-09-19 Siemens Vdo Automotive Corporation End of valve motion detection for a spool control valve
DE102009003215A1 (en) * 2009-05-19 2010-11-25 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and control device for operating an injection valve
EP2455600A1 (en) * 2010-11-17 2012-05-23 Continental Automotive GmbH Method and apparatus for operating an injection valve
EP2469064A1 (en) * 2010-12-24 2012-06-27 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Method of controlling an internal combustion engine
US20140326218A1 (en) * 2011-05-12 2014-11-06 Peter Matthias Ruße Method For Determining A Position Of A Lock Element Of An Injection Valve For An Internal Combustion Engine
WO2013191267A1 (en) * 2012-06-21 2013-12-27 日立オートモティブシステムズ株式会社 Control device for internal combustion engine
US20140000564A1 (en) * 2012-06-27 2014-01-02 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Fuel injector closing timing adjustment systems and methods
EP2685074A1 (en) * 2012-07-13 2014-01-15 Delphi Automotive Systems Luxembourg SA Fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10401398B2 (en) 2017-03-03 2019-09-03 Woodward, Inc. Fingerprinting of fluid injection devices
US10712373B2 (en) 2017-03-03 2020-07-14 Woodward, Inc. Fingerprinting of fluid injection devices
CN108869072A (en) * 2017-05-10 2018-11-23 福特全球技术公司 For characterizing the method and system of port fuel injector
CN110541770A (en) * 2018-05-28 2019-12-06 马涅蒂-马瑞利公司 Method for determining the opening time of an electromagnetic fuel injector
JP2019206966A (en) * 2018-05-28 2019-12-05 マグネティ マレッリ ソチエタ ペル アツィオニ Method of determining rise time of electromagnetic fuel injector
CN110541769A (en) * 2018-05-28 2019-12-06 马涅蒂-马瑞利公司 Method for determining the closing moment of an electromagnetic fuel injector
EP3575583A1 (en) 2018-05-28 2019-12-04 Magneti Marelli S.p.A. Method to determine an opening time of an electromagnetic fuel injector
IT201800005765A1 (en) * 2018-05-28 2019-11-28 METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN OPENING TIME OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC FUEL INJECTOR
US10830172B2 (en) 2018-05-28 2020-11-10 Marelli Europe S.P.A. Method to determine an opening time of an electromagnetic fuel injector
CN110541770B (en) * 2018-05-28 2022-11-08 马涅蒂-马瑞利公司 Method for determining the opening time of an electromagnetic fuel injector
CN110541769B (en) * 2018-05-28 2023-02-17 马涅蒂-马瑞利公司 Method for determining the closing moment of an electromagnetic fuel injector
JP7330759B2 (en) 2018-05-28 2023-08-22 マグネティ マレッリ ソチエタ ペル アツィオニ How to Determine the Rise Time of an Electromagnetic Fuel Injector
JP2021148037A (en) * 2020-03-18 2021-09-27 日立Astemo株式会社 Detection device
JP7247135B2 (en) 2020-03-18 2023-03-28 日立Astemo株式会社 detector
WO2022171818A1 (en) * 2021-02-15 2022-08-18 Delphi Technologies Ip Limited Method of determining the opening delay of a fuel injector

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201421853D0 (en) 2015-01-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR102001978B1 (en) Fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine
WO2016091848A1 (en) Fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine
KR101784735B1 (en) Determining the closing point in time of an injection valve on the basis of an analysis of the actuating voltage using an adapted reference voltage signal
US9512801B2 (en) Fuel injection controller
KR101808643B1 (en) Method for determining the opening point in time of a fuel injector
US7930089B2 (en) Controller for a solenoid operated valve
EP2850307B1 (en) Method for monitoring an injection valve
US10865727B2 (en) Device for controlling at least one switchable valve
US10712373B2 (en) Fingerprinting of fluid injection devices
CN107567537B (en) Pressure determination in a fuel injection valve
US10060381B2 (en) Method for determining an opening delay of a fuel injector
US20180258877A1 (en) Fuel injection control device for internal combustion engine
JP2019210933A (en) Method for determining closing point of electromagnetic fuel injector
KR20130115269A (en) Ascertaining the ballistic trajectory of an electromagnetically driven armature of a coil actuator
US11365700B2 (en) Fuel injection control device for internal combustion engine
US20180209365A1 (en) Control device for fuel injection device
JP6092740B2 (en) Solenoid valve drive control device
GB2543260A (en) Fuel injection control in an internal combustion engine
US11293370B1 (en) Method and system for valve position monitoring
US20240141849A1 (en) Method of determining the opening delay of a fuel injector
JP6022427B2 (en) Solenoid valve drive control device
US20240044299A1 (en) Fuel injector control system and method
US20240093655A1 (en) A method of determining closing time of needle valve of a fuel injector
WO2022171818A1 (en) Method of determining the opening delay of a fuel injector
KR20230063866A (en) Method for controlling an electromagnetically controllable gas valve, control unit, computer program and computer program product

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15816382

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 15816382

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1