WO2016024162A1 - Method and apparatus for determining a rogue onu in a pon - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for determining a rogue onu in a pon Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2016024162A1 WO2016024162A1 PCT/IB2015/001547 IB2015001547W WO2016024162A1 WO 2016024162 A1 WO2016024162 A1 WO 2016024162A1 IB 2015001547 W IB2015001547 W IB 2015001547W WO 2016024162 A1 WO2016024162 A1 WO 2016024162A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- onu
- determining
- time slot
- condition
- infected zone
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04Q—SELECTING
- H04Q11/00—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems
- H04Q11/0001—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems using optical switching
- H04Q11/0062—Network aspects
- H04Q11/0067—Provisions for optical access or distribution networks, e.g. Gigabit Ethernet Passive Optical Network (GE-PON), ATM-based Passive Optical Network (A-PON), PON-Ring
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/03—Arrangements for fault recovery
- H04B10/032—Arrangements for fault recovery using working and protection systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/10—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/14—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
- H04L63/1408—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic by monitoring network traffic
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04Q—SELECTING
- H04Q11/00—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems
- H04Q11/04—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems for time-division multiplexing
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04Q—SELECTING
- H04Q11/00—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems
- H04Q11/0001—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems using optical switching
- H04Q11/0062—Network aspects
- H04Q2011/0079—Operation or maintenance aspects
- H04Q2011/0083—Testing; Monitoring
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a passive optical network, and particularly to a method and apparatus for determining a rogue ONU in a PON.
- TDM Time Division Multiplexing
- PON Passive Optical Network
- the Optical Line Terminal talks to OUNs in a broadcast manner over the downstream wavelength on optical fiber. And each ONU talks to the OLT within a given time slot allocated by the OLT over upstream wavelength (normally, upstream and downstream wavelength is different on the same trunk fiber). If a rogue ONU intentionally or unintentionally transmits optical signals to the OLT in the time slot which is allocated to other ONUs, the upstream service transmitted by other ONUs over this trunk fiber will be disturbed seriously.
- Rogue ONU typically refers to an ONU which is transmitting in a manner not consistent with parameters specified in the standard. In the actual PON, it is an important issue to be solved, as the rogue ONU prevents the normal communications between the ONUs and the OLT.
- the rogue behavior of the rogue ONU can be caused by many reasons such as MAC error, software error, transmitter error, and so on. The most common case happens both in the TDM-PON and in the TWDM-PON is that the rogue ONU transmits its upstream signal in wrong time slots, as shown in Fig 1. Normally, the failed transmitter turns on ahead of schedule because of the software or hardware error; or it turns off later than the schedule because of the component aging or other reasons.
- the upstream bursts from other ONUs which are adjacent to the rogue ONU will be disturbed and cannot be received correctly by the OLT.
- determining a rogue ONU can be difficult since the affected ONUs are not always the ONUs which cause the disturbance.
- the present application provides a method and apparatus for determining a rogue ONU in a PON.
- a method for determining a rogue ONU in an OLT of a PON the OLT receiving uplink signals of multiple ONUs, the method comprising the steps of: D. determining an original infected zone based on a first time slot allocation in which each time slot corresponds to an uplink signal of one ONU; B. determining a new infected zone based on a second time slot allocation in which each time slot corresponds to an uplink signal of one ONU; F. determining if there is a same ONU in the original infected zone and the new infected zone to determine a rogue ONU candidate; and G. determining rogue ONU based on the rogue ONU candidate.
- the method further comprises step A before the step D, the step A comprises: determining that a first condition is satisfied based on a current time slot allocation, the first condition being whether an uplink error rate of any ONU controlled by the OLT is larger than an error rate threshold; if the first condition is satisfied, determining whether a second condition is satisfied, the second condition being whether a difference value between an optical power value and respective historical optical power value of an uplink signal of every ONU is larger than a pre-defined optical power threshold.
- the method further comprises step B, the step B comprises: determining an ONU which corresponds to a difference value larger than a predefined optical power threshold as a first source ONU, when the second condition is satisfied; not determining an ONU which corresponds to a difference value as a first source ONU, when the second condition is not satisfied.
- the method further comprises determining the first source ONU and an ONU which corresponds to adjacent time slots of a time slot of the first source ONU in the first time slot allocation as the original infected zone.
- the step E comprises: El . changing the first time slot allocation to generate the second time slot allocation, and informing every ONU of the second time slot allocation.
- the method further comprises performing step A and step B after the step El .
- the step E further comprises: determining an ONU which corresponds to a difference value larger than a predefined optical power threshold as a second source ONU, when the second condition is satisfied; not determining an ONU which corresponds to a difference value as a second source ONU, when the second condition is not satisfied.
- the step E further comprises: determining the second source ONU and an ONU which corresponds to adjacent time slots of a time slot of the second source ONU in the second time slot allocation as the new infected zone.
- the step F further comprises determining whether there is a same ONU between the original infected zone and the new infected zone: if yes, determining a same ONU in the original infected zone and in the new infected zone as a rogue ONU candidate; if no, performing the step E again.
- the step G comprises closing in turn the rogue ONU candidates and checking error rates of other ONUs except the closed ONU; if all error rates of the other ONUs are not larger than the error rate threshold, determining the closed rouge ONU candidate as the rouge ONU.
- an apparatus for determining a rogue ONU in an OLT of a PON the OLT receiving uplink signals of multiple ONUs
- the apparatus comprising: an original infected zone determination unit for determining an original infected zone based on a first time slot allocation in which each time slot corresponds to an uplink signal of one ONU; a second time slot determination unit for changing the first time slot allocation to generate a second time slot allocation, and informing each ONU of the second time slot allocation; a new infected zone determination unit for determining a new infected zone based on a second time slot allocation in which every time slot corresponds to an uplink signal of one ONU; a determination unit for determining if there is a same ONU in the original infected zone and in the new infected zone to determine a rogue ONU candidate; and an ONU determination unit for determining a rogue ONU based on the rogue ONU candidate.
- the apparatus further comprises: a first condition determination unit for determining whether the first condition is satisfied based on a current time slot allocation, the first condition being whether an uplink error rate of any ONU controlled by the OLT is larger than an error rate threshold; a second condition determination unit for determining whether a second condition is satisfied if the first condition is satisfied, the second condition being whether a difference value between an optical power value and respective historical optical power value of an uplink signal of every ONU is larger than a pre-defined optical power threshold.
- the original infected zone determination unit further comprises: determining an ONU which corresponds to a difference value larger than a predefined optical power threshold as a first source ONU, when the second condition is satisfied; not determining an ONU which corresponds to a difference value as a first source ONU, when the second condition is not satisfied.
- the original infected zone determination unit further comprises determining the first source ONU and an ONU which corresponds to adjacent time slots of a time slot of the first source ONU in the first time slot allocation as the original infected zone.
- the new infected zone determination unit further comprises: determining an ONU which corresponds to a difference value larger than a predefined optical power threshold as a second source ONU when the second condition is satisfied; not determining an ONU which corresponds to a difference value as a second source ONU when the second condition is not satisfied.
- the new infected zone determination unit further comprises determining the second source ONU and an ONU which corresponds to adjacent time slots of a time slot of the second source ONU in the second time slot allocation as the new infected zone.
- the determination unit further comprises determining whether there is a same ONU in the original infected zone and in the new infected zone: if yes, determining a same ONU in the original infected zone and the new infected zone as a rogue ONU candidate.
- the ONU determination unit comprises closing in turn the rogue ONU candidates and checking error rates of other ONUs except the closed ONU; if all error rates of the other ONUs are not larger than the error rate threshold, determining the closed rouge ONU candidate as the rouge ONU.
- TDM-PON system but also in a TWDM-PON (NG-PON2) system.
- I ig. 1 illustrates a schematic view of a typical scenario of a rouge ONU behavior in a PON system
- Fig.4 illustrates a schematic view of an infected zone according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG.5 i llustrates a schematic view of determining a rouge ONU via changing DBA according to an embodiment of the invention
- FIG.6 illustrates a schematic view of an apparatus for determining a rogue ONU in a PON
- Fig.2 illustrates a schematic view of embedded memory chip in an OLT according to an embodiment of the invention, wherein a memory chip records historical error rates and error rate threshold of each ONU, the micro-processor determines the error rate threshold based on the historical error rates. Similarly, a memory chip records the historical optical power value and optical power threshold of each ONU.
- FIG.3 illustrates a flow chart of a method for determining a rogue ONU according to an embodiment of the invention, wherein the OLT in the PON controls multiple ONUs.
- the OLT determines an original infected zone based on a first time slot allocation in which each time slot corresponds to an uplink signal of one ONU.
- the OLT continuously determines whether an uplink error rate of other ONU controlled by the OLT is larger than the error rate threshold, this round of the determination is ended until the uplink error rates of all ONUs controlled by the OLT are checked.
- step S212 the OLT determines whether a second condition is satisfied, the second condition is that a difference value between an optical power value and respective historical optical power value of an uplink signal of every ONU is larger than a pre-defined optical power threshold.
- the OLT does not determine an ONU which corresponds to a difference value as a first source ONU. And the OLT continuously determines whether an uplink error rate of other ONU controlled by the OLT is larger than the error rate threshold, this round of the determination is ended until the uplink error rates of all ONUs controlled by the OLT are checked.
- the OLT determines an ONU which corresponds to a difference value larger than the predefined optical power threshold as a first source ONU.
- the OLT determines that the first source ONU and an ONU which corresponds to adjacent time slots of a time slot of the first source ONU in the first time slot allocation as the original infected zone.
- the ONU3 satisfies the first condition and the second condition simultaneously.
- the OLT marks the ONU3 as a first source ONU. Meanwhile, the OLT also marks ONU2 and ONU4 whose time slot are adjacent to the time slot of ONU3.
- ONU2, ONU3 and ONU4 compose an original infected zone. Every ONU in the original infected zone has potential risk to be a rogue ONU. !! ⁇ The skilled art should appreciate that "adjacent" in the present application is not limited to the ONUs at both sides of the first source ONU which satisfies the first condition and the second condition simultaneously. That is, in a needed basis, the original infected zone can be determined as ONU1, ONU2, ONU3 and ONU5.
- the OLT changes the first time slot allocation to generate a second time slot allocation, and informing every ONU of the second time slot allocation, wherein the second time slot allocation is different from the first time slot allocation.
- step S230 the OLT determines a new infected zone based on the second time slot allocation in which each time slot corresponds to an uplink signal of one ONU.
- the OLT determines whether the first condition is satisfied based on a current time slot allocation, the first condition is that an uplink error rate of an ONU controlled by the OLT is larger than an error rate threshold.
- the OLT continuously determines whether an uplink error rate of other ONU controlled by the OLT is larger than the error rate threshold, this round of the determination is ended until the uplink error rates of all ONUs controlled by the OLT are checked.
- the OLT determines whether the second condition is satisfied, the second condition is that a difference value between an optical power value and respective historical optical power value of an uplink signal of every ONU is larger than a pre-defined optical power threshold.
- the OLT does not determine an ONU which corresponds to a difference value as a second source ONU. And the OLT continuously determines whether an uplink error rate of other ONU controlled by the OLT is larger than the error rate threshold, this round of the determination is ended until the uplink error rates of all ONUs controlled by the OLT are checked.
- the OLT determines an ONU which corresponds to a difference value larger than the predefined optical power threshold as a second source ONU.
- the OLT determines the second source ONU and the ONU which corresponds to adjacent time slots of a time slot of the second source ONU in the second time slot allocation as the new infected zone.
- ONU5 satisfies the first condition and the second condition simultaneously, thus the OLT marks the ONU5 as the a second source ONU. Meanwhile, the OLT also marks ONU2 and ONU7 whose time slots are adjacent to the time slot of ONU5 as a rogue ONU. Thus, ONU2, ONU5 and ONU7 compose anew infected zone. Every ONU in the original infected zone has potential risk to be a rogue ONU.
- the OLT determines whether there is a same ONU in the original infected zone and in the new infected zone in order to determine a rogue ONU candidate.
- the OLT determines the same ONU in the original infected zone and in the new infected zone as a rogue ONU candidate. For example, as shown in Table 1, ONU2 appears both in the original infected zone and in the new infected zone, ONU2 is determined as the rogue ONU candidate.
- step S220 to step S240 are performed again, i.e., the OLT changes the first time slot allocation again to generate a time slot allocation, which is different from the first time slot allocation and the second time slot allocation, for determining a rogue ONU.
- 711 Fig.6 illustrates a schematic view of an apparatus for determining a rogue ONU in a PON.
- the apparatus 600 may be or may implement OLT in the embodiment described in the aforementioned description in conjunction with Figs 2-5.
- the apparatus 600 comprises an original infected zone determination unit 610 for determining an original infected zone based on a first time slot allocation in which each time slot corresponds to an uplink signal of one ONU; a second time slot determination unit 620 for changing the first time slot allocation to generate a second time slot allocation, and informing every ONU of the second time slot allocation; a new infected zone determination unit 630 for determining a new infected zone based on a second time slot allocation in which each time slot corresponds to an uplink signal of one ONU; a determination unit 640 for determining if there is a same ONU in the original infected zone and the new infected zone to determine a rogue ONU candidate; and an ONU determination unit 650 for determining a rogue ONU based on the rogue ONU candidate.
- the apparatus 600 further comprises a first condition determination unit for determining whether the first condition is satisfied based on a current time slot allocation, the first condition is that an uplink error rate of any ONU controlled by the OLT is larger than an error rate threshold; a second condition determination unit for determining whether a second condition is satisfied if the first condition is satisfied, the second condition is that a difference between an optical power value of an uplink signal of every ONU and respective historical optical power value is larger than a pre-defined optical power threshold.
- the apparatus 600 determines an ONU which corresponds to a difference value larger than a predefined optical power threshold as a first source ONU; when the second condition is not satisfied, the apparatus 600 does not determines an ONU which corresponds to a difference value as a first source ONU.
- the original infected zone determination unit 610 further comprises determining the first source ONU and an ONU which corresponds to adjacent time slots of a time slot of the first source ONU in the first time slot allocation as the original infected zone. 1761
- the new infected zone determination unit 630 further comprises determining an ONU which corresponds to a difference value larger than a predefined optical power threshold as a second source ONU when the second condition is satisfied; not determining an ONU which corresponds to a difference value as a second source ONU when the second condition is not satisfied.
- the new infected zone determination unit 630 further comprises determining the second source ONU and ONU which corresponds to adjacent time slots of a time slot of the second source ONU in the second time slot allocation as the new infected zone.
- the determination unit 640 further comprises determining whether there is a same ONU in the original infected zone and in the new infected zone: if yes, determining a same ONU in the original infected zone and the new infected zone as a rogue ONU candidate.
- the ONU determination unit 650 comprises closing in turn the rogue ONU candidates and checking error rate of other ONU except the closed ONU; if all error rates of the other ONUs are not larger than the error rate threshold, determining the closed rouge ONU candidate as the rouge ONU.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Small-Scale Networks (AREA)
- Optical Communication System (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP15784755.9A EP3180924B1 (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2015-08-03 | Method and apparatus for determining a rogue onu in a pon |
JP2017508500A JP6431184B2 (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2015-08-03 | Method and apparatus for determining fraudulent ONUs in a PON |
US15/327,712 US9992561B2 (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2015-08-03 | Method and apparatus for determining a rogue ONU in a PON |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410403806.5 | 2014-08-15 | ||
CN201410403806.5A CN105337657B (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2014-08-15 | Method and device in passive optical network for determining rogue ONU |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2016024162A1 true WO2016024162A1 (en) | 2016-02-18 |
Family
ID=54347582
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2015/001547 WO2016024162A1 (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2015-08-03 | Method and apparatus for determining a rogue onu in a pon |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9992561B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3180924B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6431184B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN105337657B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016024162A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107294595B (en) * | 2016-03-30 | 2020-09-04 | 南京中兴新软件有限责任公司 | Detection method and device for long-luminescence optical network unit and optical line terminal |
CN111107449B (en) * | 2018-10-25 | 2022-09-02 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Method and device for positioning burst type long-luminous-interference ONU (optical network Unit) |
WO2021093186A1 (en) * | 2020-01-31 | 2021-05-20 | Zte Corporation | Fast detection and recovery of a rogue optical network unit using a reset signal |
JP7477780B2 (en) * | 2020-02-13 | 2024-05-02 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Communication device and error detection method |
US11317423B2 (en) | 2020-05-14 | 2022-04-26 | Wipro Limited | Method and system for managing interference caused by rogue user equipment Li-Fi communication network |
CN114866139A (en) * | 2022-04-07 | 2022-08-05 | 上海联虹技术有限公司 | Troubleshooting method, troubleshooting device, troubleshooting system, troubleshooting equipment and storage medium |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070143645A1 (en) * | 2005-12-18 | 2007-06-21 | Pmc-Sierra Israel Ltd. | GPON rogue-ONU detector |
US20120163808A1 (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2012-06-28 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Detecting rogue onu, olt and pon system |
Family Cites Families (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100609703B1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-08-09 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus for determining remote fault isolation of subscriber terminals and Method thereof |
US7468958B2 (en) * | 2005-05-06 | 2008-12-23 | Tellabs Petaluma, Inc. | Optical line terminal that detects and identifies a rogue ONT |
JP4762107B2 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2011-08-31 | 富士通株式会社 | Abnormal ONU identification device, abnormal ONU identification program, and abnormal ONU identification method |
US8064764B2 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2011-11-22 | Verizon Services Organization Inc. | Optical network terminal agent |
CN101296034B (en) * | 2007-04-26 | 2012-07-11 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and apparatus for transmission of monitoring information, passive optical network system |
US20090010643A1 (en) * | 2007-07-06 | 2009-01-08 | Delew David A | Method and apparatus for identifying faults in a passive optical network |
JP5276935B2 (en) * | 2008-09-12 | 2013-08-28 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Passive optical network system and fault identification method thereof |
US8442398B2 (en) * | 2008-10-21 | 2013-05-14 | Broadcom Corporation | Performance monitoring in passive optical networks |
US8649679B2 (en) * | 2008-12-15 | 2014-02-11 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Management system for GPON based services |
US20120155858A1 (en) * | 2009-09-01 | 2012-06-21 | Nec Corporation | Optical network device, optical network system, malfunction detecting method for optical network device, and malfunction detecting program for optical network device |
JP5434461B2 (en) * | 2009-10-15 | 2014-03-05 | Kddi株式会社 | Fault ONU identification method and fault ONU identification apparatus |
CN102271293B (en) * | 2010-06-07 | 2015-08-12 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | A kind of method and system identifying malice optical network unit |
JP2012029176A (en) * | 2010-07-26 | 2012-02-09 | Kddi Corp | Hinderance onu specification device, hinderance onu specification method and pon system |
JP2012151737A (en) * | 2011-01-20 | 2012-08-09 | Nec Corp | Station side optical network terminal device, optical communication system, abnormality detection method, and device program |
CN103597759B (en) * | 2011-04-13 | 2017-09-29 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Mitigate in EPON(PON)In rogue's optical network unit(ONU)Behavior |
WO2013020023A1 (en) * | 2011-08-03 | 2013-02-07 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Rogue optical network unit mitigation in multiple-wavelength passive optical networks |
CN103312409B (en) * | 2012-03-06 | 2016-08-03 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | The method and device that a kind of optical module detecting optical node is abnormal luminous |
CN103036612B (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2015-07-08 | 华为技术有限公司 | Detection method, isolation method and device of rascal optical network unit (ONU) |
US9680568B2 (en) * | 2013-06-13 | 2017-06-13 | Alcatel Lucent | Method and apparatus for alien device identification in passive optical networks |
CN104660329B (en) * | 2013-11-21 | 2019-12-13 | 上海诺基亚贝尔股份有限公司 | method for identifying long-luminescence rogue ONU in passive optical network |
CN103888185B (en) * | 2014-03-24 | 2017-01-18 | 深圳市云猫信息技术有限公司 | Detection method and device of optical network unit |
US9692505B2 (en) * | 2014-05-08 | 2017-06-27 | Calix, Inc. | Rogue optical network interface device detection |
-
2014
- 2014-08-15 CN CN201410403806.5A patent/CN105337657B/en active Active
-
2015
- 2015-08-03 EP EP15784755.9A patent/EP3180924B1/en active Active
- 2015-08-03 US US15/327,712 patent/US9992561B2/en active Active
- 2015-08-03 WO PCT/IB2015/001547 patent/WO2016024162A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-08-03 JP JP2017508500A patent/JP6431184B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070143645A1 (en) * | 2005-12-18 | 2007-06-21 | Pmc-Sierra Israel Ltd. | GPON rogue-ONU detector |
US20120163808A1 (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2012-06-28 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Detecting rogue onu, olt and pon system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3180924A1 (en) | 2017-06-21 |
CN105337657A (en) | 2016-02-17 |
US9992561B2 (en) | 2018-06-05 |
US20170201814A1 (en) | 2017-07-13 |
EP3180924B1 (en) | 2022-01-12 |
CN105337657B (en) | 2018-08-24 |
JP6431184B2 (en) | 2018-11-28 |
JP2017529766A (en) | 2017-10-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9992561B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining a rogue ONU in a PON | |
US10148387B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting optical network unit, and passive optical network system | |
US7680414B2 (en) | Passive optical network system and operating method thereof | |
JP4820791B2 (en) | Passive optical network system and ranging method | |
US20090052897A1 (en) | Passive optical network system and ranging system thereof | |
US9473836B2 (en) | Maintaining channel-invariant optical network unit (ONU) equalization delay in a passive optical network | |
US9391734B2 (en) | Network system | |
JP4926253B2 (en) | Communication control method, station side device, subscriber side device, and communication system | |
US8971699B2 (en) | Optical network failure recovery method | |
US9130676B2 (en) | Transparent protection switching operation in a PON | |
US20140369676A1 (en) | Pon system, olt, and onu | |
EP3098979B1 (en) | Long luminance detection method and device | |
EP3220556B1 (en) | Method, device and system for detecting rogue optical network unit | |
US9859975B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting uplink optical signal | |
JP2011176897A (en) | Communication control method, station-side device and communication system | |
WO2017166546A1 (en) | Method and device for detecting continuously emitting optical network unit and optical line terminal | |
JP2007295151A (en) | Pon system and station side apparatus and terminal used for the same | |
US20170005724A1 (en) | Station-side device and pon system | |
CN115514626A (en) | Fault location detection method, root node, communication system topology and storage medium | |
KR20170118621A (en) | An optical line terminal and method for registrating optical network units thereof | |
JP6093282B2 (en) | Optical communication system, communication control method, and station side optical line terminator | |
US9088382B2 (en) | Optical line terminal of passive optical network, and method for controlling upstream band using the same | |
CN111970049A (en) | Optical power detection method and device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 15784755 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 15327712 Country of ref document: US |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2017508500 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
REEP | Request for entry into the european phase |
Ref document number: 2015784755 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2015784755 Country of ref document: EP |