WO2016004431A2 - Improved process for recovering precious metals from clay-containing ores - Google Patents

Improved process for recovering precious metals from clay-containing ores Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016004431A2
WO2016004431A2 PCT/US2015/039223 US2015039223W WO2016004431A2 WO 2016004431 A2 WO2016004431 A2 WO 2016004431A2 US 2015039223 W US2015039223 W US 2015039223W WO 2016004431 A2 WO2016004431 A2 WO 2016004431A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
containing ore
precious metals
leaching
clay containing
solution
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2015/039223
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2016004431A9 (en
WO2016004431A3 (en
Inventor
Charles F. Palmer, Jr.
John W. MCKIERNAN
Charles F. PALMER, III
Original Assignee
Ethox Chemicals, Llc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ethox Chemicals, Llc filed Critical Ethox Chemicals, Llc
Publication of WO2016004431A2 publication Critical patent/WO2016004431A2/en
Publication of WO2016004431A9 publication Critical patent/WO2016004431A9/en
Publication of WO2016004431A3 publication Critical patent/WO2016004431A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B11/00Obtaining noble metals
    • C22B11/08Obtaining noble metals by cyaniding

Definitions

  • the present invention is related to an improved process for recovering precious metals from clay-containing ores. More specifically, the present invention is related to the use of specific polymers and wetting agents for improved precious metal recovery from clay.
  • Heap leaching is an industrial mining process for the extraction of precious metals such as copper, uranium, and other compounds from ore.
  • the process includes a series of chemical reactions that absorb specific minerals and then releases them after their division from other earth materials.
  • heap leach mining differs in that it places ore on a liner with chemicals added via drip systems to the ore.
  • the mined ore is usually crushed into small chunks and heaped on an impermeable plastic and/or clay lined leach pad where it can be irrigated with a leach solution to dissolve the valuable metals. While sprinklers are occasionally used for irrigation, drip irrigation is preferred to minimize evaporation, provide more uniform distribution of the leach solution, and to avoid damaging the exposed mineral.
  • the solution percolates through the heap and leaches both the target as well as other minerals. This process, called the "leach cycle,” generally takes one or two months for simple oxide ores, such as most gold ores, to two years for other ores such as nickel laterite ores.
  • the leach solution containing the dissolved minerals is typically collected, treated in a process plant to recover the target mineral and in some cases precipitate other minerals, and then recycled to the heap after reagent levels are adjusted.
  • Ultimate recovery of the target mineral can range from 30% of contained ores, such as run-of-mine dump leaching sulfide copper ores, to over 90% for the easiest to leach ores such as some of the oxide gold ores.
  • the crushed ore is irrigated with a dilute alkaline cyanide solution.
  • the solution containing the dissolved precious metals typically referred in the art as pregnant solution, continues percolating through the crushed ore until it reaches the liner at the bottom of the heap where it drains into a storage pond which is often referred to in the art as a pregnant solution pond.
  • the dilute cyanide solution typically referred to in the art as a "barren solution”
  • the dilute cyanide solution is normally re-used in the heap-leach-process or occasionally sent to an industrial water treatment facility where the residual cyanide is treated and residual metals are removed.
  • very high rainfall areas such as the tropics, in some cases there is surplus water that is then discharged to the environment, after treatment, posing possible water pollution if treatment is not properly carried out.
  • the process generates a large volume of waste material and is rather burdensome on a large scale.
  • the production of the equivalent of one gold ring through the heap method can generate 20 tons of waste material.
  • the gold ions are solubilized by forming complex ions with the cyanide:
  • electrowinning a current is passed from an inert anode through a liquid leach solution containing the metal so that the metal is extracted as it is deposited in an electroplating process onto the cathode.
  • the anodes consist of unrefined impure metal, and as the current passes through the acidic electrolyte the anodes are corroded into the solution so that the electroplating process deposits refined pure metal onto the cathodes.
  • Clay in the precious metal ore can interfere with the leaching process. Certain clays can hydrate and swell when exposed to the aqueous leaching solution. The swollen clay particles can slow or block the flow of leaching solution through the heap and thus reduce leaching productivity. Therefore, there is a need in the mining industry for materials or processes which minimize the deleterious effects of clay swelling on heap leaching productivity. [0011] In spite of the ongoing effort those of skill in the art still do not have a suitable option for mitigating the productivity losses associated with clay in heap leaching.
  • a method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore comprising: forming a heap of ore on a leach bed; percolating a leach solution through the heap wherein the leach solution comprises cyanide; a wetting agent; and a clay stabilizing polymer; thereby forming a pregnant leach solution comprising the precious metal; and removing the precious metal from the pregnant leach solution.
  • Fig. 1 is a graphical representation of an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a graphical representation of an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 3 is a graphical representation of an embodiment of the invention.
  • the instant invention is directed to the addition of certain additives to the cyanide based heap leaching solution to increase percolation rates of the solution through the heap, or at least to minimize drop off in leaching rates with time. More specifically, the present invention is directed to a leach solution for improved extraction of precious metals from clay wherein the solution comprises a cyanide solution comprising a wetting agent and at least one clay stabilizing polymer additive.
  • Crude clay deposits such as Georgia kaolins, contain micrometer-size particles, ranging in size from about 0.1 microns to 15 microns. Particles at the smaller end of this range tend to be plate-like in shape, with diameters about 6 to 10 times thickness. Larger particles comprise stacks of particles that adhere in a face- to-face manner, like a stack of coins. Larger, granular clay particles can be broken down into smaller, delaminated particles by splitting the layered stacks into thin, platey units.
  • Clay is a naturally occurring mineral in the phyllosilicate category, consisting of aluminum silicate as a principal component, along with various other metals such as calcium, potassium and magnesium, with varying levels of water content.
  • Clays are formed from alternating sheets of tetrahedral Si0 4 and octahedral AiOe, with the two sheets forming a layer. If a layer includes only one silica sheet and one alumina sheet, it is termed a 1 :1 clay. Kaolin is an example of such a clay. These layers are tightly attached through hydrogen bonding. If, on the other hand, a layer is made of three sheets, as a silica-aluminum-silica sandwich, the clay is termed a 2:1 clay. Layers are attached to each other by van der Waals forces. There is a gap of about 1 nm between the layers, called the "gallery,” where various cations such as sodium, magnesium, calcium and lithium may reside. The smectite family of clays, such as montmoril!onite, hectorite and saponite are 2:1 clays.
  • the clay stabilizing polymer additive stabilizes the clay by impeding the breakdown of the clay particles thereby minimizing their ability to block flow passages.
  • the wetting agent is believed to improve the function of the clay stabilizing polymer additive with regards to the ability of the polymer additive to stabilize the clay.
  • the leach solution is preferably basic. More preferably, the leach solution has a pH of at least 8 to no more than about 1 1 . Below a pH of about 8 the reaction of the cyanide with the metal is inefficient. Above a pH of about 1 1 the leach solution is caustic which increases handling difficulties and increases the rate of equipment corrosion. A pH of about 9.5 to 10.5 is optimal.
  • the clay stabilizing polymer additive is selected from a polyalkylene oxide copolymer; propoxylated glycols; polyamine copolymers comprising dicyandiamide, formaldehyde and ammonia; polyvinyl alcohol; partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetate; polyacrylamide; quarternary amines and particularly tetramethyl ammonium salts; carboxymethyl cellulose; methacrylate copolymers; hydroxyaldehydes;
  • hydroxyketones and copolymers of anionic or cationic monomers, more preferably cationic monomers.
  • a clay stabilizing polymer additive selected from a polyalkylene oxide copolymer, propoxylated glycols and polyamine copolymer comprising dicyandiamide, formaldehyde and ammonia.
  • the clay stabilizing polymer absorbs onto the clay or shale thereby inhibiting separation through shearing.
  • the clay stabilizing polymer additive is either a high molecular weight polymer with limited solubility, which is believed to cause the polymer to form somewhat of a barrier on the clay, or a charged species which electrostatically forms a barrier on the clay.
  • the polyalkylene oxide copolymer preferably comprising a polypropylene oxide (PO) block, and at least one polymeric block selected from the group
  • EO polyethylene oxide
  • aromatic polyester aromatic polyester
  • aliphatic polyester EO
  • polyalkylene oxide copolymer is defined by formula:
  • R 1 and R 5 are terminal groups independently selected from the group consisting of H, hydroxyl, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons, -OC(O)R 6 wherein R 6 is a hydrogen or a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons;
  • R 2 , R 3 or R 4 is polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO groups and preferably 2 to 100 PO groups;
  • R 2 , R 3 or R 4 is otherwise independently selected from the groups consisting of:
  • R 3 is PO and R 2 , R 3 and R 4 are independently selected from EO and polyester.
  • the polyalkylene oxide copolymer preferably comprises PO and EO with the ratio of PO/EO being at a ratio sufficient to maintain a low solubility in water and have high affinity for the clay particle surface. It is preferable that the polyalkylene oxide copolymer have low solubility in water. However, it is preferable that the polyalkylene oxide copolymer have enough water solubility to be dispersible in water thereby allowing the polyalkylene oxide copolymer to be delivered from water and to adsorb over the surface of the clay particles so some level of solubilizing groups is believed to be necessary.
  • a high level of PO in the polymer increases its affinity for the clay surface and decreases its water solubility so that it is not easily washed off in the leaching process. It is particularly preferred that the polyalkylene oxide copolymer have at least 10% up to 50% EO and at least 40 to 90% PO with the proviso that the low solubility is realized.
  • the polyalkylene oxide copolymer needs to have a molecular weight and polymer chain length sufficient to enable the polymer to cover the clay particle sufficiently to slow the exfoliation process. Longer blocks of polypropylene glycol in the copolymers increase the affinity for coating clay particles reduce its proclivity to wash off during the leaching process.
  • Propoxylated glycols comprise a glycol backbone with repeat units derived from propylene oxide. More specifically, the propoxylated glycols are defined by the formula:
  • R 12 , R 13 are independently selected from polyethylene oxide (EO) with 1 to 100 EO groups and preferably 2 to 100 EO groups; polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO groups and preferably 2 to 100 PO groups; and n is an integer of 1 to 4.
  • EO polyethylene oxide
  • PO polypropylene oxide
  • n is an integer of 1 to 4.
  • the polyamine copolymer is defined as comprising dicyandiamide, formaldehyde and ammonia with a hydroxyl number of at least 20 to no more than 35 and more preferably a hydroxyl number of at least 26 to no more than 31 .
  • a hydroxyl number of 20 the polyamine is insufficiently bound to the clay and therefore the benefits are muted.
  • the cyanide solution is an aqueous solution preferably comprises at least 50 ppm cyanide to no more than 1000 ppm cyanide. Below about 50 ppm cyanide the rate of extraction of the precious metals is insufficient for commercial use. Above about 1000 ppm the rate of extraction of the precious metals is not increased to the degree necessary to justify the additional material usage. More preferably, the cyanide solution comprises at least about 200 to no more than about 800 ppm cyanide
  • the wetting agent is preferably selected from the group consisting of alcohol ethoxylates; polyethylene glycol esters with 3 to 20 and more preferably 7 to 12 polyethylene groups; hydrophilic modified silicones, fatty amine ethoxylates and sulfosuccinates, particularly dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (doss).
  • Alcohol ethoxylates are non-ionic surfactants composed of an alkyl chain with 5-20 carbon atoms, and more preferably 10-15 carbon atoms, combined with 2 to 20 ethylene oxide units, and preferable 3 to 14 ethylene oxide units.
  • the mined ore is crushed into small particles to increase the surface area.
  • the crushed ore is then placed on a leach pad with an impermeable plastic and/or clay lined leach pad in thick regions referred to as heaps.
  • the heaps are then treated with leach solution comprising cyanide, wetting agent, and a polymer as described elsewhere herein by any technique known in the art such as drip irrigation, sprinkling and the like such that the solution percolates through the ore leaching out precious metals as it percolates thereby forming a pregnant leach solution.
  • the pregnant leach solution is then treated to isolate the precious metals.
  • the leach solution after isolation of the precious metals therefrom, is regenerated by adding depleted chemicals and then reused as recycled solution.
  • aliphatic, aromatic and alkyl refer to either substituted or unsubstituted groups.
  • aliphatic and alkyl refer to saturated and unsaturated unless otherwise specified.
  • Two techniques were used to measure the effectiveness of the inventive solution.
  • One technique was a flow through method utilizing a column assembly wherein the solution was allowed to flow through the column with aspirator vacuum assist.
  • a second technique utilized a slurry wherein the solution being tested was mixed with soil and later separated from the soil by filtration.
  • a column assembly was prepared using a Buchner funnel fitted with a #4 Whatman filter.
  • a polyethylene column of different heights was formed from a cylindrical sleeve cut from polyethylene sample bottles.
  • the column assembly was placed on a filter flask connected to a sink aspirator.
  • the column was charged with 100 ml of soil followed by flow through extraction with 100 ml_ of solution under aspirator vacuum to facilitate liquid leaching through the soil.
  • samples A1 -A5 were tested by the column method and samples B1 -B5 were tested by the slurry method.
  • a stock extract solution of 500 ppm NaCN was formed by diluting 125 mL of 2.5% NaCN with 500 mL water to form 625 mL of solution.
  • a spiked extract solution was made by adding 2 g of additive to 198 g of the 500 ppm NaCN stock extract solution. In each case the amount of liquid recovered was determined as was the metals extracted.
  • Results are presented in Table 1 wherein "Solution” lists the additive.
  • the column labelled “Drop” reports the time required to collect the first drop of liquid.
  • the column labelled “100 mL” reports the time required for loading 100 mL of extracting solution into the funnel.
  • A indicates the solution was light orange and turned darker after sitting
  • B indicates the material foamed during filtration
  • C indicates the solution was dark orange
  • D indicates that the vacuum pulled gas from solution.
  • NaCN was purchased as 2.5% (w/v) from LabChem, Inc. Zelienople, PA Cat # LC23700-7 lot# D008-12 Exp 1/9/16.
  • HPLC grade water was used unless otherwise stated.
  • CS-1550 a very low molecular weight, high charge density polyamine clay stabilizer, was obtained from Polymer Ventures of Washington, SC. It is believed to be a terpolymer of
  • CS-1420 is a low molecular weight, high charge density polyamine clay stabilizer obtained from Polymer
  • Ethox 4439 is a commercially available ethylene oxide-propylene oxide-ethylene oxide block copolymer with 40% ethylene oxide available from Ethox Chemicals, LLC as P-104. Extracts of collected solution were sent to Nevada Analytical Services in Reno, NV 89502 for analysis by ICP-AES. The results are presented in Tables 2-4 wherein the metal is reported in ppm relative to the extract in Table 2, in mg in the extract in Table 3, and in ppm in soil in Table 4. Reporting as concentration in soil normalizes the results in terms of the amount of extract collected as well as the amount of soil tested.
  • ERS 02257 is a commercially available ethylene oxide-propylene oxide-ethylene oxide copolymer available from Ethox Chemicals LLC as ETHOX 4439 or P-104.
  • ERS 02258 is a terpolymer of dicyandiamide and formaldehyde and ammonium chloride. Measurement of the sample containing 0.1 % ERS 02257 was aborted due to technical difficulties.
  • a particularly preferred embodiment is a mixture of clay stabilizing polymers.
  • the material that performed best under these conditions was a blend of two materials.
  • the major component of the blend was Ethox P-104 which is a block polymer of approximately 54 moles of propylene oxide and 64 moles of ethylene oxide on diethylene glycol.
  • the material has a molecular weight of approximately 6000 Daltons.
  • the second material was CS-1550 is a material that is sold by
  • Mass of pregnant solution collected was plotted as a function of time in the graphs shown in figures 2 and 3.
  • plots obtained for treated solutions may be compared to plots obtained from data collected for a control solution (an aqueous solution which contained only sodium cyanide and sodium hydroxide).
  • the objective of this test is to identify additives that prevent pooling of solution when it is placed on a heap of ore. Solutions that prevent pooling are expected to pass through the heap at a faster rate.
  • Voranol CP 6001 Polyol, a glycerol, propylene oxide, and ethylene oxide polymer, which is sold by Dow Chemicals, was evaluated as a replacement for ERS 02257.
  • wetting agents were evaluated for replacement of ERS 02258 in the blend. Compounds which are commonly used as soil wetting agents were chosen for evaluation.
  • a blend of 75% Voranol CP 6001 and 25% dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DOSS) performed well in the filtration test, shown in Figure 2, plotted with long dashes, as compared with the original blend (75% ERS 02257 and 25% ERS
  • Voranol CP 6001/DOSS blend was found to separate upon aging. Adjustment of the blend to pH 5 with hydrochloric acid prevented separation. The pH was readjusted to pH 10 with ammonium hydroxide and the material remained in a single liquid phase. This reformulated blend was clear and was found to perform well in ore extraction laboratory tests (compare the solid dark grey trace in figure 3 labeled.
  • a blend of 75% 222-09 and 25% DOSS solution performed as well as the Voranol CP 6001/DOSS solution.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

A solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore and a method of leaching ore is described. The solution comprises a cyanide; a wetting agent; and a clay stabilizing polymer.

Description

IMPROVED PROCESS FOR RECOVERING PRECIOUS METALS FROM CLAY- CONTAINING ORES
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims priority to pending U.S. Provisional Patent Appl. No. 62/020,976 filed July 3, 2014 and to U.S. Provisional Patent Appl. No.
62/020,816 filed July 3, 2014, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND
[0002] The present invention is related to an improved process for recovering precious metals from clay-containing ores. More specifically, the present invention is related to the use of specific polymers and wetting agents for improved precious metal recovery from clay.
[0003] Heap leaching is an industrial mining process for the extraction of precious metals such as copper, uranium, and other compounds from ore. The process includes a series of chemical reactions that absorb specific minerals and then releases them after their division from other earth materials. Similar to in situ mining, heap leach mining differs in that it places ore on a liner with chemicals added via drip systems to the ore.
[0004] The mined ore is usually crushed into small chunks and heaped on an impermeable plastic and/or clay lined leach pad where it can be irrigated with a leach solution to dissolve the valuable metals. While sprinklers are occasionally used for irrigation, drip irrigation is preferred to minimize evaporation, provide more uniform distribution of the leach solution, and to avoid damaging the exposed mineral. The solution percolates through the heap and leaches both the target as well as other minerals. This process, called the "leach cycle," generally takes one or two months for simple oxide ores, such as most gold ores, to two years for other ores such as nickel laterite ores. The leach solution containing the dissolved minerals is typically collected, treated in a process plant to recover the target mineral and in some cases precipitate other minerals, and then recycled to the heap after reagent levels are adjusted. Ultimate recovery of the target mineral can range from 30% of contained ores, such as run-of-mine dump leaching sulfide copper ores, to over 90% for the easiest to leach ores such as some of the oxide gold ores.
[0005] The crushed ore is irrigated with a dilute alkaline cyanide solution. The solution containing the dissolved precious metals, typically referred in the art as pregnant solution, continues percolating through the crushed ore until it reaches the liner at the bottom of the heap where it drains into a storage pond which is often referred to in the art as a pregnant solution pond. After separating the precious metals from the pregnant solution, the dilute cyanide solution, typically referred to in the art as a "barren solution", is normally re-used in the heap-leach-process or occasionally sent to an industrial water treatment facility where the residual cyanide is treated and residual metals are removed. In very high rainfall areas, such as the tropics, in some cases there is surplus water that is then discharged to the environment, after treatment, posing possible water pollution if treatment is not properly carried out.
[0006] The process generates a large volume of waste material and is rather burdensome on a large scale. By way of example, the production of the equivalent of one gold ring through the heap method can generate 20 tons of waste material.
[0007] During the extraction phase, the gold ions are solubilized by forming complex ions with the cyanide:
Au1 +(s) + 2 CN"(aq) Au(CN)2 "(aq) According to J, B. Hiskey, Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Fieldnotes, Vol. 15, No. 4, Winter 1985, gold is dissolved in an aerated cyanide solution according to the following two-step reaction sequence:
2Au + 4 ON- + 02 + 2 H20 -> 2Au(CN)2 " +2 OH" + H202 (1 )
2 Au + 4 ON- + H202 -> 2 Au(CN)2 ' + 2 OH- (2).
[0008] Recuperation of the gold is readily achieved with a redox-reaction or with electrowinning, also called electroextraction, wherein metals are electrodeposited from their ores that have been put in solution. Electrorefining uses a similar process to remove impurities from a metal. Both processes use electroplating on a large scale and are important techniques for the economical and straightforward
purification of non-ferrous metals.
[0009] In electrowinning, a current is passed from an inert anode through a liquid leach solution containing the metal so that the metal is extracted as it is deposited in an electroplating process onto the cathode. In electrorefining, the anodes consist of unrefined impure metal, and as the current passes through the acidic electrolyte the anodes are corroded into the solution so that the electroplating process deposits refined pure metal onto the cathodes.
[0010] Clay in the precious metal ore can interfere with the leaching process. Certain clays can hydrate and swell when exposed to the aqueous leaching solution. The swollen clay particles can slow or block the flow of leaching solution through the heap and thus reduce leaching productivity. Therefore, there is a need in the mining industry for materials or processes which minimize the deleterious effects of clay swelling on heap leaching productivity. [0011] In spite of the ongoing effort those of skill in the art still do not have a suitable option for mitigating the productivity losses associated with clay in heap leaching.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0012] It is an object of the invention to provide an improved solution for extraction of precious metals from clay and an improved process related thereto.
[0013] It is another object of the invention to provide a solution which increases the efficiency of precious metal extraction from clay without alteration of the extraction bed or process steps.
[0014] These and other advantages, as will be realized, are provided in a solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore comprising: cyanide; a wetting agent; and a clay stabilizing polymer.
[0015] A method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore comprising: forming a heap of ore on a leach bed; percolating a leach solution through the heap wherein the leach solution comprises cyanide; a wetting agent; and a clay stabilizing polymer; thereby forming a pregnant leach solution comprising the precious metal; and removing the precious metal from the pregnant leach solution.
FIGURES
[0016] Fig. 1 is a graphical representation of an embodiment of the invention.
[0017] Fig. 2 is a graphical representation of an embodiment of the invention.
[0018] Fig. 3 is a graphical representation of an embodiment of the invention.
DESCRIPTION
[0019] The instant invention is directed to the addition of certain additives to the cyanide based heap leaching solution to increase percolation rates of the solution through the heap, or at least to minimize drop off in leaching rates with time. More specifically, the present invention is directed to a leach solution for improved extraction of precious metals from clay wherein the solution comprises a cyanide solution comprising a wetting agent and at least one clay stabilizing polymer additive.
[0020] Crude clay deposits, such as Georgia kaolins, contain micrometer-size particles, ranging in size from about 0.1 microns to 15 microns. Particles at the smaller end of this range tend to be plate-like in shape, with diameters about 6 to 10 times thickness. Larger particles comprise stacks of particles that adhere in a face- to-face manner, like a stack of coins. Larger, granular clay particles can be broken down into smaller, delaminated particles by splitting the layered stacks into thin, platey units. Clay is a naturally occurring mineral in the phyllosilicate category, consisting of aluminum silicate as a principal component, along with various other metals such as calcium, potassium and magnesium, with varying levels of water content. Clays are formed from alternating sheets of tetrahedral Si04 and octahedral AiOe, with the two sheets forming a layer. If a layer includes only one silica sheet and one alumina sheet, it is termed a 1 :1 clay. Kaolin is an example of such a clay. These layers are tightly attached through hydrogen bonding. If, on the other hand, a layer is made of three sheets, as a silica-aluminum-silica sandwich, the clay is termed a 2:1 clay. Layers are attached to each other by van der Waals forces. There is a gap of about 1 nm between the layers, called the "gallery," where various cations such as sodium, magnesium, calcium and lithium may reside. The smectite family of clays, such as montmoril!onite, hectorite and saponite are 2:1 clays.
[0021] While not limited to theory, it is hypothesized that the clays shear, or become separated along faces, in the presence of water thereby exposing
hydrophilic portions which migrate, or wick, with the water flow. The result is believed to be a physical plugging of flow paths of the cyanide solution thereby reducing the effectiveness of the leaching operation. Still without limit to theory, it is hypothesized that the clay stabilizing polymer additive stabilizes the clay by impeding the breakdown of the clay particles thereby minimizing their ability to block flow passages. Further without limit to theory, the wetting agent is believed to improve the function of the clay stabilizing polymer additive with regards to the ability of the polymer additive to stabilize the clay.
[0022] The leach solution is preferably basic. More preferably, the leach solution has a pH of at least 8 to no more than about 1 1 . Below a pH of about 8 the reaction of the cyanide with the metal is inefficient. Above a pH of about 1 1 the leach solution is caustic which increases handling difficulties and increases the rate of equipment corrosion. A pH of about 9.5 to 10.5 is optimal.
[0023] The clay stabilizing polymer additive is selected from a polyalkylene oxide copolymer; propoxylated glycols; polyamine copolymers comprising dicyandiamide, formaldehyde and ammonia; polyvinyl alcohol; partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetate; polyacrylamide; quarternary amines and particularly tetramethyl ammonium salts; carboxymethyl cellulose; methacrylate copolymers; hydroxyaldehydes;
hydroxyketones; and copolymers of anionic or cationic monomers, more preferably cationic monomers. Particularly preferred is a clay stabilizing polymer additive selected from a polyalkylene oxide copolymer, propoxylated glycols and polyamine copolymer comprising dicyandiamide, formaldehyde and ammonia. The clay stabilizing polymer absorbs onto the clay or shale thereby inhibiting separation through shearing. The clay stabilizing polymer additive is either a high molecular weight polymer with limited solubility, which is believed to cause the polymer to form somewhat of a barrier on the clay, or a charged species which electrostatically forms a barrier on the clay.
[0024] The polyalkylene oxide copolymer preferably comprising a polypropylene oxide (PO) block, and at least one polymeric block selected from the group
consisting of polyethylene oxide (EO), aromatic polyester, and aliphatic polyester.
[0025] More specifically, the polyalkylene oxide copolymer is defined by formula:
R1-R2-R3-R4-R5
wherein:
R1 and R5 are terminal groups independently selected from the group consisting of H, hydroxyl, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons, -OC(O)R6 wherein R6 is a hydrogen or a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons;
at least one of R2, R3 or R4 is polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO groups and preferably 2 to 100 PO groups;
R2, R3 or R4 is otherwise independently selected from the groups consisting of:
polyethylene oxide (EO) with 1 to 100 EO groups and preferably 2 to 100 EO groups; polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO groups and preferably 2 to 100 PO groups with the proviso that at least one of R2, R3 and R4 is not PO; polyester defined by -(OC(O)R7C(O)O)z- wherein R7 is aromatic with at least one to no more than four aromatic rings or a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic with 1 to 20 carbons and z is an integer of 1 to 100 and preferably 2 to 100. In a preferred embodiment R3 is PO and R2, R3 and R4 are independently selected from EO and polyester.
[0026] The polyalkylene oxide copolymer preferably comprises PO and EO with the ratio of PO/EO being at a ratio sufficient to maintain a low solubility in water and have high affinity for the clay particle surface. It is preferable that the polyalkylene oxide copolymer have low solubility in water. However, it is preferable that the polyalkylene oxide copolymer have enough water solubility to be dispersible in water thereby allowing the polyalkylene oxide copolymer to be delivered from water and to adsorb over the surface of the clay particles so some level of solubilizing groups is believed to be necessary. A high level of PO in the polymer increases its affinity for the clay surface and decreases its water solubility so that it is not easily washed off in the leaching process. It is particularly preferred that the polyalkylene oxide copolymer have at least 10% up to 50% EO and at least 40 to 90% PO with the proviso that the low solubility is realized. The polyalkylene oxide copolymer needs to have a molecular weight and polymer chain length sufficient to enable the polymer to cover the clay particle sufficiently to slow the exfoliation process. Longer blocks of polypropylene glycol in the copolymers increase the affinity for coating clay particles reduce its proclivity to wash off during the leaching process.
[0027] Propoxylated glycols comprise a glycol backbone with repeat units derived from propylene oxide. More specifically, the propoxylated glycols are defined by the formula:
R10-CH2-CH(OR12)CH2(OCH2CH(OR13)CH2)nOR1 1 wherein R10 and R1 1 are terminal groups independently selected from selected from the group consisting of H, hydroxyl, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons; or OC(O)R15 wherein R15 is a hydrogen or a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons;
R12, R13 are independently selected from polyethylene oxide (EO) with 1 to 100 EO groups and preferably 2 to 100 EO groups; polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO groups and preferably 2 to 100 PO groups; and n is an integer of 1 to 4.
[0028] The polyamine copolymer is defined as comprising dicyandiamide, formaldehyde and ammonia with a hydroxyl number of at least 20 to no more than 35 and more preferably a hydroxyl number of at least 26 to no more than 31 . Below a hydroxyl number of 20 the polyamine is insufficiently bound to the clay and therefore the benefits are muted. Above a hydroxyl number of 35 the solubility increases thereby muting the ability of the polyamine copolymer to precipitate onto the surface.
[0029] The cyanide solution is an aqueous solution preferably comprises at least 50 ppm cyanide to no more than 1000 ppm cyanide. Below about 50 ppm cyanide the rate of extraction of the precious metals is insufficient for commercial use. Above about 1000 ppm the rate of extraction of the precious metals is not increased to the degree necessary to justify the additional material usage. More preferably, the cyanide solution comprises at least about 200 to no more than about 800 ppm cyanide
[0030] The wetting agent is preferably selected from the group consisting of alcohol ethoxylates; polyethylene glycol esters with 3 to 20 and more preferably 7 to 12 polyethylene groups; hydrophilic modified silicones, fatty amine ethoxylates and sulfosuccinates, particularly dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (doss).
[0031] Alcohol ethoxylates are non-ionic surfactants composed of an alkyl chain with 5-20 carbon atoms, and more preferably 10-15 carbon atoms, combined with 2 to 20 ethylene oxide units, and preferable 3 to 14 ethylene oxide units.
[0032] In the process for extracting precious metals from clay rich ore the mined ore is crushed into small particles to increase the surface area. The crushed ore is then placed on a leach pad with an impermeable plastic and/or clay lined leach pad in thick regions referred to as heaps. The heaps are then treated with leach solution comprising cyanide, wetting agent, and a polymer as described elsewhere herein by any technique known in the art such as drip irrigation, sprinkling and the like such that the solution percolates through the ore leaching out precious metals as it percolates thereby forming a pregnant leach solution. The pregnant leach solution is then treated to isolate the precious metals. In a preferred embodiment the leach solution, after isolation of the precious metals therefrom, is regenerated by adding depleted chemicals and then reused as recycled solution.
[0033] Throughout the description terms such as aliphatic, aromatic and alkyl refer to either substituted or unsubstituted groups. The terms aliphatic and alkyl refer to saturated and unsaturated unless otherwise specified.
Example 1
[0034] Two techniques were used to measure the effectiveness of the inventive solution. One technique was a flow through method utilizing a column assembly wherein the solution was allowed to flow through the column with aspirator vacuum assist. A second technique utilized a slurry wherein the solution being tested was mixed with soil and later separated from the soil by filtration.
[0035] For the flow through method, a column assembly was prepared using a Buchner funnel fitted with a #4 Whatman filter. A polyethylene column of different heights was formed from a cylindrical sleeve cut from polyethylene sample bottles. The column assembly was placed on a filter flask connected to a sink aspirator. The column was charged with 100 ml of soil followed by flow through extraction with 100 ml_ of solution under aspirator vacuum to facilitate liquid leaching through the soil.
[0036] For the slurry method 100 ml_ of soil was introduced into a 500 ml_ beaker followed by addition of 100 ml_ of solution. The materials were swirled for
approximately 5 minutes to completely wet the soil. The slurry was allowed to sit for 60 minutes followed by filtration of the slurry using a Buchner funnel fitted with a #4 Whatman filter with aspirator vacuum assist. [0037] In the Tables samples A1 -A5 were tested by the column method and samples B1 -B5 were tested by the slurry method. A stock extract solution of 500 ppm NaCN was formed by diluting 125 mL of 2.5% NaCN with 500 mL water to form 625 mL of solution. A spiked extract solution was made by adding 2 g of additive to 198 g of the 500 ppm NaCN stock extract solution. In each case the amount of liquid recovered was determined as was the metals extracted. Results are presented in Table 1 wherein "Solution" lists the additive. The column labelled "Drop" reports the time required to collect the first drop of liquid. The column labelled "100 mL" reports the time required for loading 100 mL of extracting solution into the funnel.
Table 1 :
Figure imgf000013_0001
Figure imgf000014_0001
[0038] In the comments of Table 1 , A indicates the solution was light orange and turned darker after sitting, B indicates the material foamed during filtration, C indicates the solution was dark orange and D indicates that the vacuum pulled gas from solution.
[0039] For the purposes of the experiments, NaCN was purchased as 2.5% (w/v) from LabChem, Inc. Zelienople, PA Cat # LC23700-7 lot# D008-12 Exp 1/9/16.
HPLC grade water was used unless otherwise stated. CS-1550, a very low molecular weight, high charge density polyamine clay stabilizer, was obtained from Polymer Ventures of Charleston, SC. It is believed to be a terpolymer of
dicyandiamide, formaldehyde, and ammonium chloride. CS-1420 is a low molecular weight, high charge density polyamine clay stabilizer obtained from Polymer
Ventures of Charleston, SC. CS-1420ST is a salt tolerant low molecular weight, high charge density polyamine clay stabilizer available from Polymer Ventures of
Charleston, SC. Ethox 4439 is a commercially available ethylene oxide-propylene oxide-ethylene oxide block copolymer with 40% ethylene oxide available from Ethox Chemicals, LLC as P-104. Extracts of collected solution were sent to Nevada Analytical Services in Reno, NV 89502 for analysis by ICP-AES. The results are presented in Tables 2-4 wherein the metal is reported in ppm relative to the extract in Table 2, in mg in the extract in Table 3, and in ppm in soil in Table 4. Reporting as concentration in soil normalizes the results in terms of the amount of extract collected as well as the amount of soil tested.
[0040] In Tables 2-4 soil and solution collected are reported in grams, ND indicates below reporting limit, i.e., < 0.25 ppm for Au and Ag, < 0.20 ppm for Hg, NA indicates not applicable. The amount of each metal in the extract was calculated by the formula: A = (B x C)/1000 wherein: A is the amount of metal in extract in mg, B is the amount of extract in grams and C is the concentration in the extract in ppm. Concentration of metals in the original sample were calculated by the formula: D = 1000 x A / E, wherein A is the amount of metal in extract in mg; D is the
concentration of metals in the original sample in ppm, E is the amount of soil tested in grams. The results are provided in Table 2. In the results provided in Table 2 gold was not detected. Extraction of Au was not observed due to the low level of Au in the soil and the test scale. Based on expected correlation Ag and Hg extraction efficiencies are expected to correlate to Au extraction.
Table 2:
Figure imgf000015_0001
Table 3:
Figure imgf000016_0001
Table 4:
Figure imgf000016_0002
B2 134.25 59.2633 NA 0.1 15 NA
B3 135.55 57.1 100 NA 0.122 0.169
B4 134.43 60.2596 NA NA 0.121
B5 134.1 1 53.8605 NA NA 0.108
[0041] From these data it is apparent that all of the solutions that contained a clay stabilizer (A2-A5) had more leach solution collected through the column than the blank solution with no clay stabilizer. CS-1420 and Ethox 4439 filter much more quickly through soil than the solution with no treatment (A1 ), and solutions prepared with CS-1550 and CS-1420ST. Metal determination data suggested that the concentration of metal in the soil was too low to obtain results that were much greater than the detection limits of the methods.
Example 2
[0042] A column which was 0.914 M (3 feet) tall and 5.08 cm (2 inches) in diameter was fitted on one end with a plastic Buchner funnel. The column was charged with 1300 grams of soil filling about 2/3 of the column. The column was tapped hard onto a rubber pad about 20 times to ensure that the soil was tightly packed. Two liters of solution were prepared containing 500 ppm NaCN and 0.1 % NaOH in deionized water and additive as indicated in Table 5. The
solutions were poured into the top of the column, above the soil to wet the soil and the excess amount continuously fed from this beaker into the top of the column by a pump. Any overflow was returned to the source beaker by way of an overflow tube thereby maintaining approximately 12 inches of solution on top of the soil. The column effluent was captured in a separate beaker on a top loading balance with 0.1 gram of readability. The mass was recorded automatically into a data file. An increase in the time required for the flow to cease, as measured by the weight of effluent remaining substantially unchanged, was defined as an indication of a decrease in the blockage of flow passages with a rate of 0.05 g/min used as the endpoint. Many samples were tested with a subset of the results provided in Table 5 and illustrated graphically in Fig. 1 . The additive ERS 02257 is a commercially available ethylene oxide-propylene oxide-ethylene oxide copolymer available from Ethox Chemicals LLC as ETHOX 4439 or P-104. ERS 02258 is a terpolymer of dicyandiamide and formaldehyde and ammonium chloride. Measurement of the sample containing 0.1 % ERS 02257 was aborted due to technical difficulties.
[0043] A particularly preferred embodiment is a mixture of clay stabilizing polymers. The material that performed best under these conditions was a blend of two materials. The major component of the blend was Ethox P-104 which is a block polymer of approximately 54 moles of propylene oxide and 64 moles of ethylene oxide on diethylene glycol. The material has a molecular weight of approximately 6000 Daltons. The second material was CS-1550 is a material that is sold by
Polymer Ventures, Charleston, SC, and is promoted by that company to be a clay stabilizing agent.
[0044] As described in Table 5, the 0.2% blend of ERS 02257 and ERS 02258 showed the greatest improvement in terms of time (233%) and amount of solution filtered (184%). Of the 0.2% blend, 75% consisted of ERS 02257, 25% was ERS 02258. Field testing of this material at a customer's site confirmed greater throughput of material as compared with solution that did not contain this blend.
Example 3
[0045] Laboratory testing continued during field trials of the 0.2% blend of ERS 02257 and ERS 02258. The test method was modified from that described in Example 2, to decrease total test time so more materials could be evaluated in a shorter amount of time. The same test column was used (3 feet long, 2 inch diameter), the same amount of ore (1300 grams) was packed into the column. In these tests all solutions were made with 0.2% additive and the same concentrations of sodium cyanide and sodium hydroxide as used previously. One liter of solution was tested, rather than 2 liters of solution, and the solution was passed through the ore only a single time, rather than recirculated. As before, the mass was monitored as a function of time. Mass of pregnant solution collected was plotted as a function of time in the graphs shown in figures 2 and 3. In these graphs, plots obtained for treated solutions may be compared to plots obtained from data collected for a control solution (an aqueous solution which contained only sodium cyanide and sodium hydroxide). The objective of this test is to identify additives that prevent pooling of solution when it is placed on a heap of ore. Solutions that prevent pooling are expected to pass through the heap at a faster rate.
[0046] Voranol CP 6001 Polyol, a glycerol, propylene oxide, and ethylene oxide polymer, which is sold by Dow Chemicals, was evaluated as a replacement for ERS 02257.
[0047] Wetting agents were evaluated for replacement of ERS 02258 in the blend. Compounds which are commonly used as soil wetting agents were chosen for evaluation. A blend of 75% Voranol CP 6001 and 25% dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DOSS) performed well in the filtration test, shown in Figure 2, plotted with long dashes, as compared with the original blend (75% ERS 02257 and 25% ERS
02258), shown in the gray trace with the long dash and dot, in the same figure. Note the faster rate of filtration for 75% Voranol CP 6001 / 25% DOSS. [0048] The Voranol CP 6001/DOSS blend was found to separate upon aging. Adjustment of the blend to pH 5 with hydrochloric acid prevented separation. The pH was readjusted to pH 10 with ammonium hydroxide and the material remained in a single liquid phase. This reformulated blend was clear and was found to perform well in ore extraction laboratory tests (compare the solid dark grey trace in figure 3 labeled.
[0049] Voranol 6001/DOSS/HCI/NH4OH to the dashed gray line labeled CP/ 6001 / DOSS). A second material from Dow, 222-029 polyol, a polyalkylene glycol, was also evaluated as a replacement for ERS 02257. A blend of 75% 222-09 and 25% DOSS solution performed as well as the Voranol CP 6001/DOSS solution.
[0050] Other blends were prepared using Voranol CP 6001 , their plots are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. All but one of these showed improvement in flow of solution through ores, as compared with the untreated solution, labeled control. The other wetting agents tested were: hexylene glycol; a combination of DOSS and ERS 02258; decyl alcohol with 2 moles propylene oxide (PO) and 4 moles ethylene oxide (EO), labeled 1437; undecyl alcohol with 7 moles of EO, labeled 4374; a blend containing tridecyl alcohol with 9 moles of EO labeled 4708; decyl alcohol with 4 moles of EO labeled DA-4; decyl alcohol with 6 moles of EO, labeled DA-6; diamyl phenol with 10 moles of EO, labeled DAP-10; octyl-decyl alcohol with 4 moles each of PO and EO, labeled 2848.
[0051] To quantitatively compare test results it is useful to compare the time required to pass 550 grams of each solution through the column. This mass represents a time when a significant portion of the solution has passed through the column, wetting the ore, and yet some of the liquid solution remains on top of the ore and the ore has not become dry. These times are reported in Table 6 for solutions that were tested in this example.
Table 5:
Figure imgf000021_0001
Time required to collect 550 grams of solution containing the indicated
Figure imgf000021_0002
Voranol CP 6001 / DOSS† (9:1 ) 6:20
222-029 Polyol / DOSS* (3:1 ) 6:40
ERS 02257 and 02258 (3:1 ) 8:03
CP6001/4708 8:52
8000 / Hexylene glycol / DA-4 (45:5:50) 9:15
CP6001 / DOSS† / DA-4 / HCI / NH4OH 9:51
CP6001/DAP-10 10:58
CP6001/DOSS† 1 1 :13
CP6001/DA-6 1 1 :28
Voranol CP 6001 / DOSS* / ERS 02258 12:21
DOSS† 12:23
Blank 12:58
Blank 13:26
CP6001/2848 14:57
* DOSS = Cytec OT-75 † DOSS = Polywet 750 PG† DOSS = Ethox 4540
[0052] The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments without limit thereto. One of skill in the art would realize additional embodiments and improvements which are not specifically set forth herein but which are within the scope of the invention as more specifically set forth in the claims appended hereto.

Claims

Claimed is:
1 . A solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore comprising: cyanide;
a wetting agent; and
a clay stabilizing polymer.
2. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 1 with a pH of at least 8 to no more than 1 1 .
3. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 2 with a pH of at least 9.5 to no more than 10.5.
4. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 1 comprising at least 50 ppm cyanide to no more than 1000 ppm cyanide.
5. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 4 comprising at least 200 ppm cyanide to no more than 800 ppm cyanide.
6. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 1 wherein said clay stabilizing polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyalkylene oxide copolymer; propoxylated glycols; polyamine copolymers comprising dicyandiamide, formaldehyde and ammonia; polyvinyl alcohol; partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetate; polyacrylamide; quaternary amines and particularly tetramethylammonium salts; carboxymethyl cellulose;
methacrylate copolymers; hydroxyaldehydes; hydroxyketones; and copolymers of anionic or cationic monomers.
7. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 6 wherein said clay stabilizing polymer is selected from the group consisting of a polyalkylene oxide copolymer, a propoxylated glycol and a polyamine
copolymer.
8. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 7 wherein said polyalkylene oxide copolymer is defined by:
R1-R2-R3-R4-R5
wherein:
R1 and R5 are terminal groups independently selected from the group
consisting of H, hydroxyl, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons, -OC(O)R6 wherein R6 is a hydrogen or a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons;
at least one of R2, R3 or R4 is polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO
groups;
R2, R3 or R4 is otherwise independently selected from the groups consisting of: polyethylene oxide (EO) with 1 to 100 EO groups; polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO groups with the proviso that at least one of R2, R3 and R4 is not PO; polyester defined by -(OC(O)R7C(O)O)z- wherein R7 is aromatic with at least one to no more than four aromatic rings or a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic with 1 to 20 carbons and z is an integer of 1 to 100.
9. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 8 wherein said R2, R3 or R4 is ethylene oxide with 2 to 100 EO groups.
10. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 8 wherein said R2, R3 or R4 is propylene oxide with 2 to 100 PO groups.
1 1 . The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 8 wherein z is an integer of 2 to 100.
12. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 8 wherein R3 is PO and R2, R3 and R4 are independently selected from EO and polyester.
13. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 7 wherein said propoxylated glycol is defined by the formula:
R10-CH2-CH(OR12)CH2(OCH2CH(OR13)CH2)nOR1 1 wherein R10 and R1 1 are terminal groups independently selected from
selected from the group consisting of H, hydroxyl and saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons or -OC(O)R15 wherein R15 is a hydrogen or a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons; R12, R13 are independently selected from polyethylene oxide (EO) with 1 to 100 EO groups; polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO groups; and
n is an integer of 1 to 4.
14. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 13 wherein said R12, R13 are independently ethylene oxide with 2 to 100 EO groups.
15. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 13 wherein said R12, R13 are independently propylene oxide with 2 to 100 PO groups.
16. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 7 wherein said polyamine comprises dicyandiamide, formaldehyde, and ammonia.
17. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 16 wherein said polyamine has a hydroxyl number of at least 20 to no more than 35.
18. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 17 wherein said polyamine has a hydroxyl number of at least 26 to no more than 31 .
19. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 1 wherein said wetting agent is selected from the group consisting of alcohol ethoxylates; polyethylene glycol esters, hydrophilic modified silicones, and fatty amine ethoxylates.
20. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 19 wherein said polyethylene glycol esters has 3 to 20 polyethylene groups.
21 . The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 20 wherein said polyethylene glycol esters has 7 to 12 polyethylene groups.
22. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 19 wherein said alcohol ethoxylate has an alkyl chain with 5-20 carbon atoms.
23. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 22 wherein said alcohol ethoxylate has an alkyl chain with 10-15 carbon atoms.
24. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 19 wherein said alcohol ethoxylate has 2 to 20 ethylene oxide units.
25. The solution for leaching precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 24 wherein said alcohol ethoxylate has 3 to 14 ethylene oxide units.
26. A method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore
comprising:
forming a heap of ore on a leach bed; percolating a leach solution through said heap wherein said leach solution comprises:
cyanide;
a wetting agent; and
a clay stabilizing polymer;
thereby forming a pregnant leach solution comprising said precious metal; and
removing said precious metal from said pregnant leach solution.
27. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 26 wherein said leach solution has a pH of at least 8 to no more than 1 1 .
28. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 27 wherein said leach solution has a pH of at least 9.5 to no more than 10.5.
29. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 26 wherein said leach solution comprises at least 50 ppm cyanide to no more than 1000 ppm cyanide.
30. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 29 wherein said leach solution comprises at least 200 ppm cyanide to no more than 800 ppm cyanide.
31 . The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 26 wherein said clay stabilizing polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyalkylene oxide copolymer; propoxylated glycols; polyamine copolymer comprising dicyandiamide, formaldehyde and ammonia; polyvinyl alcohol; partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetate; polyacrylamide; quaternary amines and particularly tetramethylammonium salts; carboxymethyl cellulose; methacrylate copolymers; hydroxyaldehydes; hydroxyketones; and
copolymers of anionic or cationic monomers.
32. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 31 wherein said clay stabilizing polymer is selected from the group consisting of a polyalkylene oxide copolymer, a propoxylated glycol and a polyamine copolymer.
33. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 32 wherein said polyalkylene oxide copolymer is defined by:
R1-R2-R3-R4-R5
wherein:
R1 and R5 are terminal groups independently selected from the group
consisting of H, hydroxyl, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons, -OC(O)R6 wherein R6 is a hydrogen or a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons;
at least one of R2, R3 or R4 is polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO
groups;
R2, R3 or R4 is otherwise independently selected from the groups consisting of: polyethylene oxide (EO) with 1 to 100 EO groups; polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO groups with the proviso that at least one of R2, R3 and R4 is not PO; polyester defined by -(OC(O)R7C(O)O)z- wherein R7 is aromatic with at least one to no more than four aromatic rings or a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic with 1 to 20 carbons and z is an integer of 1 to 100.
34. The method for heap leaching of precious metais from clay containing ore of claim 33 wherein said R2, R3 or R4 is ethylene oxide with 2 to 100 EO groups.
35. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 33 wherein said R2, R3 or R4 is propylene oxide with 2 to 100 PO groups.
36. The method for heap leaching of precious metais from clay containing ore of claim 33 wherein z is an integer of 2 to 100.
37. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 33 wherein R3 is PO and R2, R3 and R4 are independently selected from EO and polyester.
38. The method for heap leaching of precious metais from clay containing ore of claim 32 wherein said propoxylated glycol is defined by the formula:
R10-CH2-CH(OR12)CH2(OCH2CH(OR13)CH2)nOR1 1 wherein R10 and R1 1 are terminal groups independently selected from
selected from the group consisting of H, hydroxyl and saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons or OC(O)R15 wherein R15 is a hydrogen or a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic of 1 to 30 carbons; R12, R13 are independently selected from polyethylene oxide (EO) with 1 to 100 EO groups; polypropylene oxide (PO) with 1 to 100 PO groups; and
n is an integer of 1 to 4.
39. The method for heap leaching of precious metais from clay containing ore of claim 38 wherein said R12, R13 are independently ethylene oxide with 2 to 100 EO groups.
40. The method for heap leaching of precious metais from clay containing ore of claim 38 wherein said R12, R13 are independently propylene oxide with 2 to 100 PO groups.
41 . The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 32 wherein said polyamine comprises dicyandiamide, formaldehyde and ammonia.
42. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 41 wherein said polyamine has a hydroxyl number of at least 20 to no more than 35.
43. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 41 wherein said polyamine has a hydroxyl number of at least 26 to no more than 31 .
44. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 26 wherein said wetting agent selected from the group consisting of alcohol ethoxylates; polyethylene glycol esters, hydrophilic modified silicones, and fatty amine ethoxylates.
45. The method for heap leaching of precious metais from clay containing ore of claim 44 wherein said polyethylene glycol esters has 3 to 20 polyethylene groups.
46. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 45 wherein said polyethylene glycol esters has 7 to 12 polyethylene groups.
47. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 44 wherein said alcohol ethoxylate has an alkyl chain with 5-20 carbon atoms.
48. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 47 wherein said alcohol ethoxylate has an alkyl chain with 10-15 carbon atoms.
49. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 44 wherein said alcohol ethoxylate has 2 to 20 ethylene oxide units.
50. The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 49 wherein said alcohol ethoxylate has 3 to 14 ethylene oxide units.
51 . The method for heap leaching of precious metals from clay containing ore of claim 26 comprising:
mixing said cyanide;
said wetting agent and said clay stabilizing polymer at a pH below 7; and
adjusting to a pH above 8.
PCT/US2015/039223 2014-07-03 2015-07-06 Improved process for recovering precious metals from clay-containing ores WO2016004431A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201462020816P 2014-07-03 2014-07-03
US201462020976P 2014-07-03 2014-07-03
US62/020,816 2014-07-03
US62/020,976 2014-07-03

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016004431A2 true WO2016004431A2 (en) 2016-01-07
WO2016004431A9 WO2016004431A9 (en) 2016-03-10
WO2016004431A3 WO2016004431A3 (en) 2016-04-21

Family

ID=55020107

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2015/039223 WO2016004431A2 (en) 2014-07-03 2015-07-06 Improved process for recovering precious metals from clay-containing ores

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2016004431A2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018057519A1 (en) * 2016-09-20 2018-03-29 Ethox Chemicals, Llc Non-chlorinated alkoxylated alcohol phosphate for metal working
CN109554171A (en) * 2018-12-21 2019-04-02 中国石油集团渤海钻探工程有限公司 Environment-friendlysticky sticky soil stabilizer
CN109679642A (en) * 2018-12-21 2019-04-26 中国石油集团渤海钻探工程有限公司 Environmentally friendly clay stabilizer

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5332559A (en) * 1991-07-10 1994-07-26 Newmont Gold Co. Biooxidation process for recovery of metal values from sulphur-containing ore materials
JP5866617B2 (en) * 2007-01-24 2016-02-17 エトクス ケミカルズ リミテッド ライアビリティ カンパニー Method for improving water transport properties of hydrophobic surfaces

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018057519A1 (en) * 2016-09-20 2018-03-29 Ethox Chemicals, Llc Non-chlorinated alkoxylated alcohol phosphate for metal working
CN109554171A (en) * 2018-12-21 2019-04-02 中国石油集团渤海钻探工程有限公司 Environment-friendlysticky sticky soil stabilizer
CN109679642A (en) * 2018-12-21 2019-04-26 中国石油集团渤海钻探工程有限公司 Environmentally friendly clay stabilizer

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2016004431A9 (en) 2016-03-10
WO2016004431A3 (en) 2016-04-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107406909B (en) Leaching aid for metal recovery
EP1620365B1 (en) Treatment of aqueous suspensions
CN108603243B (en) Leaching aid and method of using a leaching aid
US11111559B2 (en) Process for recovering precious metals from clay-containing ores
WO2016004431A2 (en) Improved process for recovering precious metals from clay-containing ores
CN103781923A (en) Process for purifying zinc oxide
WO2019143750A1 (en) Process for producing zero-valent iron nanoparticles and treating acid mine drainage
CN112805396A (en) Leaching aid and method of using a leaching aid
FR2766842A1 (en) PROCESS FOR SELECTIVE PRECIPITATION OF NICKEL AND COBALT
CN101466855A (en) Nickel sulphide precipitation process
CN104955968A (en) Settling separation method for nuetralized slurry and wet smelting method for nickel oxide ore
EP2883969B1 (en) Method for effluent treatment in smelting of nickel oxide ore
US6428597B1 (en) Heap leach agglomeration/percolation extraction aids for enhanced gold and silver recovery
Kurama et al. Recovery of zinc from waste material using hydro metallurgical processes
US6258245B1 (en) Copper leach process aids
CN113245070A (en) Treatment of copper ions in ore pulp from carbon pulp process
CN104254498B (en) The process of acid ore deposit discharge
JP2008093567A (en) Method for treating particulate containing calcium component and lead component and system for the same
AU2019430430B2 (en) Method and process arrangement for removing Si based compounds from a leaching liquor and use
CA3161875A1 (en) Processing method
AU2009200438B2 (en) Pellitization process
US20240084416A1 (en) Recovery of metal from leach processing
CN112723581B (en) Process water treatment method
KR101456132B1 (en) Method for separating useful metals from mine drainage
JP4735947B2 (en) Zinc raw material processing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15814763

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

DPE1 Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 15814763

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2