WO2015193645A1 - Gas sensors and gas sensor arrays - Google Patents
Gas sensors and gas sensor arrays Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2015193645A1 WO2015193645A1 PCT/GB2015/051716 GB2015051716W WO2015193645A1 WO 2015193645 A1 WO2015193645 A1 WO 2015193645A1 GB 2015051716 W GB2015051716 W GB 2015051716W WO 2015193645 A1 WO2015193645 A1 WO 2015193645A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- nanowires
- gas sensor
- electrodes
- gas
- nanoparticles
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 title abstract description 13
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 239000002086 nanomaterial Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 239000002070 nanowire Substances 0.000 claims description 210
- XLOMVQKBTHCTTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N zinc oxide Inorganic materials [Zn]=O XLOMVQKBTHCTTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 82
- 239000002105 nanoparticle Substances 0.000 claims description 57
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 35
- 239000012855 volatile organic compound Substances 0.000 claims description 33
- KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isopropanol Chemical compound CC(C)O KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 32
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N titanium dioxide Inorganic materials O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 26
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 19
- QPLDLSVMHZLSFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N CuO Inorganic materials [Cu]=O QPLDLSVMHZLSFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 18
- 229910052709 silver Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- NUJOXMJBOLGQSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N manganese dioxide Inorganic materials O=[Mn]=O NUJOXMJBOLGQSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 13
- XOLBLPGZBRYERU-UHFFFAOYSA-N SnO2 Inorganic materials O=[Sn]=O XOLBLPGZBRYERU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- GNTDGMZSJNCJKK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Vanadium(V) oxide Inorganic materials O=[V](=O)O[V](=O)=O GNTDGMZSJNCJKK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- BERDEBHAJNAUOM-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper(I) oxide Inorganic materials [Cu]O[Cu] BERDEBHAJNAUOM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 11
- -1 polyethylene terephthalate Polymers 0.000 claims description 11
- ZNOKGRXACCSDPY-UHFFFAOYSA-N tungsten(VI) oxide Inorganic materials O=[W](=O)=O ZNOKGRXACCSDPY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- 229910001868 water Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 11
- 229910002601 GaN Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 10
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 10
- GNRSAWUEBMWBQH-UHFFFAOYSA-N nickel(II) oxide Inorganic materials [Ni]=O GNRSAWUEBMWBQH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 9
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 229920000139 polyethylene terephthalate Polymers 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000005020 polyethylene terephthalate Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- KRFJLUBVMFXRPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N cuprous oxide Chemical compound [O-2].[Cu+].[Cu+] KRFJLUBVMFXRPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011112 polyethylene naphthalate Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920003207 poly(ethylene-2,6-naphthalate) Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920005439 Perspex® Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004926 polymethyl methacrylate Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 122
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 25
- 235000019441 ethanol Nutrition 0.000 description 17
- CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetone Chemical compound CC(C)=O CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 16
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 14
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 14
- 229910044991 metal oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 12
- 150000004706 metal oxides Chemical class 0.000 description 11
- 230000001699 photocatalysis Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000011941 photocatalyst Substances 0.000 description 5
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000000513 principal component analysis Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 125000000954 2-hydroxyethyl group Chemical group [H]C([*])([H])C([H])([H])O[H] 0.000 description 3
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000003570 air Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004720 dielectrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-NJFSPNSNSA-N methanone Chemical compound O=[14CH2] WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-NJFSPNSNSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000001000 micrograph Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000007539 photo-oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 3
- IKHGUXGNUITLKF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetaldehyde Chemical compound CC=O IKHGUXGNUITLKF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- GPXJNWSHGFTCBW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Indium phosphide Chemical compound [In]#P GPXJNWSHGFTCBW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- SWXVUIWOUIDPGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N diacetone alcohol Natural products CC(=O)CC(C)(C)O SWXVUIWOUIDPGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000000879 optical micrograph Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920000620 organic polymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000006722 reduction reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- XMWRBQBLMFGWIX-UHFFFAOYSA-N C60 fullerene Chemical compound C12=C3C(C4=C56)=C7C8=C5C5=C9C%10=C6C6=C4C1=C1C4=C6C6=C%10C%10=C9C9=C%11C5=C8C5=C8C7=C3C3=C7C2=C1C1=C2C4=C6C4=C%10C6=C9C9=C%11C5=C5C8=C3C3=C7C1=C1C2=C4C6=C2C9=C5C3=C12 XMWRBQBLMFGWIX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010034972 Photosensitivity reaction Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000001299 aldehydes Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000012080 ambient air Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- UHYPYGJEEGLRJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N cadmium(2+);selenium(2-) Chemical compound [Se-2].[Cd+2] UHYPYGJEEGLRJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002041 carbon nanotube Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910021393 carbon nanotube Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001684 chronic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006356 dehydrogenation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003795 desorption Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 125000002887 hydroxy group Chemical group [H]O* 0.000 description 1
- 229910001872 inorganic gas Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000013461 intermediate chemical Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001883 metal evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002082 metal nanoparticle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002923 metal particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002127 nanobelt Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002159 nanocrystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011858 nanopowder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002926 oxygen Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052763 palladium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006552 photochemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036211 photosensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004810 polytetrafluoroethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001343 polytetrafluoroethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000005036 potential barrier Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009257 reactivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000241 respiratory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052703 rhodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- HBMJWWWQQXIZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicon carbide Chemical compound [Si+]#[C-] HBMJWWWQQXIZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910010271 silicon carbide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052950 sphalerite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006557 surface reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010301 surface-oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tungsten Chemical compound [W] WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052721 tungsten Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010937 tungsten Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052984 zinc sulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
- G01N27/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating impedance
- G01N27/04—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating impedance by investigating resistance
- G01N27/12—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating impedance by investigating resistance of a solid body in dependence upon absorption of a fluid; of a solid body in dependence upon reaction with a fluid, for detecting components in the fluid
- G01N27/125—Composition of the body, e.g. the composition of its sensitive layer
- G01N27/127—Composition of the body, e.g. the composition of its sensitive layer comprising nanoparticles
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/08—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for evaluating the respiratory organs
- A61B5/082—Evaluation by breath analysis, e.g. determination of the chemical composition of exhaled breath
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/0004—Gaseous mixtures, e.g. polluted air
- G01N33/0009—General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment
- G01N33/0027—General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector
- G01N33/0031—General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector comprising two or more sensors, e.g. a sensor array
-
- G01N33/4975—
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B82—NANOTECHNOLOGY
- B82Y—SPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
- B82Y15/00—Nanotechnology for interacting, sensing or actuating, e.g. quantum dots as markers in protein assays or molecular motors
Abstract
The present invention relates to gas sensors and gas sensor arrays, and methods of their formation. The gas sensors and gas sensor arrays according to the present invention comprise nanomaterials.
Description
Title: Gas sensors and gas sensor arrays
Description of Invention The present invention relates to gas sensors and gas sensor arrays. More particularly, the present invention relates to gas sensors and gas sensor arrays for detecting volatile organic compounds. The present invention also relates to a method of forming gas sensors and gas sensor arrays. Chemical analysis of the human breath is a technique that could be used as a non-invasive tool for early disease detection and diagnosis. The detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the breath is of particular interest for clinical diagnostics and the self-management of chronic respiratory conditions. There are approximately more than 200 different compounds that have been detected in human breath, some of which have been correlated, either on their own or in combination with other compounds, to various diseases. Laboratory based analysis of exhaled air is a complex, expensive and time consuming process and thus is not in wide spread use in occupational medicine. Currently, metal oxide based gas sensors are used to monitor different VOCs due to their response to different types of gases and low cost. Such metal oxide based gas sensors do not include nanomaterials. Metal doping of gas sensors has been used to enhance metal oxides catalytic activity towards a particular gas or gases. However, these types of gas sensors have a number of limitations in terms of poor sensitivity and selectivity. In addition, these types of gas sensors must be heated to temperatures up to 400°C to obtain optimum performance, which can involve relatively high electrical power consumption (for example 200 mW); this limits their application in portable devices.
There is a need for low power and low cost gas sensors which can be used in hand-held portable devices, enabling near patient testing and home monitoring using breath analysis. According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of forming a gas sensor, the method comprising:
providing a first solution of nanowires, the solution comprising a solvent and nanowires;
placing the first solution of nanowires on a first set of at least two electrodes;
applying an AC (alternating current) voltage signal to the first set of at least two electrodes; and,
permitting the solvent to evaporate. In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of forming a gas sensor array, the method comprising the steps above and further comprising:
providing a second solution of nanowires, the solution comprising a solvent and nanowires;
placing the second solution of nanowires on a second set of at least two electrodes;
applying an AC (alternating current) voltage signal to the second set of at least two electrodes; and,
permitting the solvent to evaporate.
Preferably, further comprising:
repeating the steps of claim 1 or claim 2 for any one of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 or 50 different solutions of nanowires, each repeat on different sets of at least two electrodes.
Further preferably, further comprising the step of:
prior to placing the first solution of nanowires and the second solution of nanowires on the first set of at least two electrodes, the second set of at least two electrodes or the first and second set of at least two electrodes, placing a barrier layer around the electrodes to prevent the solutions of nanowires on each set of electrodes from mixing.
Advantageously, wherein the barrier layer has a void around the area of the electrodes to form each gas sensor.
Preferably, wherein the barrier layer is formed of perspex.
Further preferably, further comprising the step of removing the barrier layer when the solvent has evaporated.
Advantageously, wherein the nanowires have: a length (longest dimension) of from 20 nm to 15 pm, preferably from 1 pm to 15 pm; and, a width (shortest dimension) of from 1 nm to 300 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 100 nm, 50 nm or 10 nm; and, an aspect ratio (length divided by width) of from 20 to 50, preferably to 40 or 30.
Preferably, wherein the nanowires are formed of Au, Pt, Cu, Ag, Co, Fe, Ni, Si, Sn02, W03, ZnO, Ti02, InP, CuO, Cu20, NiO, Mn02, V205 and GaN, or combinations thereof.
Further preferably, wherein the solutions of nanowires further comprise nanoparticles.
Advantageously, wherein the nanoparticles have: at least one dimension from 1 nm to 100 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 10 nm; and, an aspect ratio (length divided by width) of from 1 to 4, preferably from 1 to 2.
Preferably, wherein the nanoparticles are formed of Au, Pt, Cu, Ag, Co, Fe, Ni, Si, Sn02, W03, ZnO, Ti02, InP, CuO, Cu20, NiO, Mn02, V205 or GaN, or combinations thereof. Further preferably, wherein the solution of nanowires and nanoparticles is mixed using an ultrasonic bath.
Advantageously, wherein the at least two electrodes, in each case, are individually electrically isolatable and metallic; and/or wherein the electrodes are spaced by from 1 pm to 20 pm; optionally from 1 pm to 2 pm, 5 pm or 10 pm.
Preferably, wherein each electrode is formed of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 or 50 prongs.
Further preferably, wherein two or more of the prongs of each electrode interdigitate with two or more of the prongs of another electrode. Advantageously, wherein the solvent is water, ethanol or isopropanol; and/or wherein the electrodes rest on a substrate; optionally wherein the substrate is formed of glass, silicon or plastic; optionally wherein the plastic is polyethylene terephthalate or polyethylene naphthalate. In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a gas sensor or a gas sensor array obtainable by a method according to any one of the above methods.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a gas sensor comprising:
at least two electrodes, and,
nanowires arranged between the at least two electrodes, wherein the nanowires have a density of from 106 nanowires/cm3 up to and including 1014 nanowires/cm3 Preferably, wherein the nanowires have a density of from 106 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 107 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 108 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 109 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1010 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1011 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1012 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1013 nanowires/cm3, up to and including 1014 nanowires/cm3.
Further preferably, wherein the nanowires are arranged in an open nanowire network. Advantageously, wherein the nanowires have: a length (longest dimension) of from 20 nm to 15 pm, preferably from 1 pm to 15 pm; and, a width (shortest dimension) of from 1 nm to 300 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 100 nm, 50 nm or 10 nm; and, an aspect ratio (length divided by width) of from 20 to 50, preferably to 40 or 30.
Preferably, wherein the nanowires are formed of Au, Pt, Cu, Ag, Co, Fe, Ni, Si, Sn02, W03, ZnO, Ti02, InP, CuO, Cu20, NiO, Mn02, V205 and GaN, or combinations thereof. Further preferably, wherein the gas sensor further comprises nanoparticles mixed with the nanowires.
Advantageously, wherein the nanoparticles have: at least one dimension from 1 nm to 100 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 10 nm; and, an aspect ratio (length divided by width) of from 1 to 4, preferably from 1 to 2.
Preferably, wherein the nanoparticles are formed of Au, Pt, Cu, Ag, Co, Fe, Ni, Si, Sn02, W03, ZnO, Ti02, InP, CuO, Cu20, NiO, Mn02, V205 or GaN, or combinations thereof. Further preferably, wherein the at least two electrodes, in each case, are individually electrically isolatable and metallic; and/or wherein the electrodes are spaced by from 1 pm to 20 pm; optionally from 1 pm to 2 pm, 5 pm or 10 pm. Advantageously, wherein each electrode is formed of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 or 50 prongs. Preferably, wherein two or more of the prongs of each electrode interdigitate with two or more of the prongs of another electrode; and/or wherein the electrodes rest on a substrate; optionally wherein the substrate is formed of glass, silicon or plastic; optionally wherein the plastic is polyethylene terephthalate or polyethylene naphthalate.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a gas sensor array comprising two or more gas sensors according to any one of the above.
Preferably, wherein the gas sensor array comprises 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 or 50 different gas sensors.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of measuring the presence of a volatile organic compound, comprising:
exposing a gas sensor or a gas sensor array according to any one of the above to one or more volatile organic compounds; and,
measuring the change in conductance of the gas sensor or gas sensor array.
Preferably, further comprising the step of:
prior to exposing the gas sensor or gas sensor array to one or more volatile organic compounds, exposing the gas sensor or gas sensor array to UV light.
Further preferably, wherein the UV light has a wavelength greater than the band gap of the nanomaterial on each particular gas sensor.
Embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 is a schematic representation of an array of gas sensors according to the present invention.
Figure 2 is a schematic representation of two alternative sets of electrodes prior to forming arrays of gas sensors according to the present invention.
Figure 3 is a top-plan view of an array of four gas sensors according to the present invention.
Figure 4 is a reflected light optical micrograph of four alternative ZnO nanowire gas sensors, each of Figures 4a-4d having different densities of nanowires.
Figure 5 shows the response of gas sensors according to the present invention to different volatile organic compounds. Figure 6 shows the response of another gas sensor according to the present invention to different volatile organic compounds.
Figure 7 shows the response of other gas sensors according to the present invention to different volatile organic compounds.
Figure 8 shows the response of other gas sensor arrays according to the present invention to different volatile organic compounds after performing a principal component analysis to the response data.
Figure 9 shows the change in a sensor's response for different power densities.
Some of the components of the gas sensors of the present invention, together with their sources, are set out below.
Nanomaterials
Nanomaterials are materials which are sized in at least one dimension from 1 to 300 nm, preferably from 1 to 100 nm. Examples of nanomaterials include, but are not limited to, carbon nanotubes, buckminsterfullerene, nanowires, nanoparticles, nanopowders, nanobelts and nanocrystals. Compared to larger scale materials, nanomaterials have a high ratio of surface area to volume; this results in nanomaterials having different properties compared to larger scale materials.
Nanowires
Nanowires are defined in this specification as nanomaterials which have a length (longest dimension) of from 20 nm to 15 pm, preferably from 1 pm to 15 pm, and a width (shortest dimension) of from 1 nm to 300 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 100 nm, 50 nm or 10 nm, and an aspect ratio (length divided by width) of from 20 to 50, preferably to 40 or 30. Preferred nanowires are generally cylindrical, although they can have different geometric shapes, for example rectangular. If the nanowires are not cylindrical, the aspect ratio is calculated
as the length divided by the greatest dimension across a cross-section of the nanowire.
Nanowires used in the present invention can be metallic (for example Au, Pt, Cu, Ag, Co, Fe and Ni) or semiconducting (for example Si, SnO2, WO3, ZnO, TiO2, InP, CuO, Cu2O, NiO, MnO2, V2O5 and GaN), but not insulating.
Nanoparticles Nanoparticles are defined in this specification as particles having at least one dimension from 1 nm to 100 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 10 nm, and an aspect ratio (length divided by width) of from 1 to 4, preferably from 1 to 2. Nanoparticles used in the present invention can be metallic (for example Au, Pt, Ag, Fe, Pd, Rh, ZnS and CdSe) or semiconducting (for example Si, SnO2, WO3, ZnO, TiO2, InP, CuO, Cu2O, NiO, MnO2, V2O5 and GaN), but not insulating.
Open nanowire network Open nanowire networks are arrangements of nanowires which are physically and electrically connected to one or more other nanowires in the network to form an open, highly branched, porous, intertwined structure. Open nanowire networks are discussed, for example, on page 404, in Advances in Nanotechnology Research and Application: 2013 Edition, Edited by Q. Ashton Acton, PhD, published by ScholarlyEditions™, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.
The present invention concerns including nanowires in gas sensors. The inventors found that including nanowires in gas sensors provides the sensors with useful properties. Without wishing to be bound by theory, some of the properties of the nanowires are thought to arise from the relatively large surface to volume ratio (compared with conventional, larger scale materials). Sensors according to the present invention generate enough electrical power
to self-heat themselves when exposed to UV light, due to photo-desorption of surface molecules and do not require external heaters.
Another aspect of including nanowires in gas sensors is their fast response and recovery after sensing any particular gas; this is linked to the large nanowire surface area. This is a direct advantage over porous metal oxide based sensors which have diffusion limited gas reactions, affecting their response and recovery. Although simple single nanowire sensor devices have been demonstrated it is difficult and expensive to make them in a scalable way.
The present inventors fabricated gas sensor arrays which are composed of different metal oxides (for example ZnO and T1O2) nanowires, optionally doped with Au and Ag nanoparticles (<10 nm). These arrays may be optically excited using UV light (365 nm) to use the photocatalytic action of the metal doped metal oxides to detect and differentiate between different VOCs. Alternatively, the gas sensor arrays of the present invention may be excited by the application of heat.
Gas sensors according to the present invention undergo the photocatalytic effect when exposed to UV light. When a photocatalytic material is illuminated by light greater than its band gap energy (hv≥Eg), the photocatalyst generates electron/hole pairs which diffuse out to the surface of the photocatalytic material, and start a number of chemical reactions. According to certain embodiments of the present invention, a UV LED bulb producing a wavelength of 365 nm (hv=3.39eV) is used; the band gap of Ti02=3.2eV, and ZnO=3.2eV. If other materials are used with different band gaps, alternative wavelengths of UV or visible light may be used to produce the photocatalytic effect. In certain embodiments, T1O2 and ZnO are used as semiconductor photocatalysts because of their high photosensitivity, photochemical stability, large band gap, strong oxidizing power and low cost. A wide range of oxide materials have
been studied for photoelectrochemical properties, including WO3 (band gap 2.7eV), Fe203 (band gap 2.2eV), CuO (band gap 1 .6 eV) and Cu2O (band gap 2.3 eV). Gas sensor preparation
Figure 1 shows an array 10 of four gas sensors A, B, C and D according to the present invention. The array 10 comprises an array of electrodes 1 ,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. The electrodes 1 ,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 are metallic, preferably formed of Pt or Au. The electrodes 1 ,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 are connected to a voltage source 50, such that a voltage can be applied between two or more electrodes. Any one or more of electrodes 1 ,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 may be formed of a plurality of prongs, which interdigitate with another electrode having a plurality of prongs (shown in more detail with reference to Figure 2B).
Figure 1 shows the array 10 once formed, that is each sensor A, B, C and D comprises a nanomaterial, which can be a different nanomaterial for each sensor, or the same for two or more of the sensors, the nanomaterial forming an electrical link between a pair of electrodes. In Figure 1 , sensor A comprises electrodes 1 and 2 with nanomaterial 30 forming an electrical link between electrodes 1 and 2. Sensor B comprises electrodes 3 and 4 with a nanomaterial 20 (which can be a different nanomaterial to nanomaterial 30) forming an electrical link between electrodes 3 and 4. Sensor C comprises electrodes 5 and 6 with a nanomaterial (which can be a different nanomaterial to nanomaterials 20 and 30) forming an electrical link between electrodes 5 and 6. Sensor D comprises electrodes 7 and 8 with a nanomaterial (which can be a different nanomaterial to nanomaterials 20 and 30) forming an electrical link between electrodes 7 and 8. In this embodiment, the sets of electrodes rest on a generally inert substrate 40, which can be composed of glass. Alternatively, the substrate 40 can be
composed of a silicon substrate or a plastics substrate, for example polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or polyethylene naphthalate (PEN).
In this embodiment there are four sensors A, B, C and D in one array. In other embodiments, there can be two, three, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten or more sensors in any one array. In other embodiments, each sensor A, B, C and D may comprise more than one prong of each electrode, for example 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 or 50 prongs of each electrode.
Figure 2A shows the array 10 of Figure 1 , prior to placing nanomaterials between the pairs of electrodes. In Figure 2A, a nozzle 200 is located above the array 10. The nozzle 200 can provide a desired amount of a nanomaterial or nanomaterials, optionally in a solvent. The solvent is preferably water, ethanol or isopropanol.
Figure 2B shows an alternative array 101 , prior to placing nanomaterials between the pairs of electrodes, which is similar to the array shown in Figure 2A, with each electrode 1 1 , 21 , 31 , 41 , 51 , 61 , 71 , 81 formed of a plurality of interdigitated prongs. Each gas sensor A1 , B1 , C1 and D1 , once formed, of Figure 2B comprises two electrodes. In figure 2B, each electrode is formed of four prongs which interdigitate with the four prongs of a corresponding electrode (for example the four prongs of electrode 1 1 interdigitate with the four prongs of electrode 21 ). Nozzle 200 can provide a desired amount of nanomaterial to each pair of electrodes to form gas sensors A1 , B1 , C1 and D1 .
In Figure 3, a gas sensor array 102 is shown in plan view. The array comprises gas sensors A2, B2, C2 and D2. For clarity, only electrodes 12 and 22 of sensor A2 are numbered in Figure 3. The electrodes 12 and 22, in this embodiment, each comprises 31 prongs (not shown). Each gas sensor A2,
B2, C2 and D2 comprises a pair of electrodes, each electrode being individually electrically isolatable and each electrode comprising a plurality of prongs interdigitated with another electrode. The electrode prongs may be separated by any nanometre scale distance. In the embodiment of Figure 3, the electrode prongs are each 5pm in width and are separated from an interdigitated electrode prong by 5pm.
Figure 3 shows the dimensions of the different components of the array 102, in this embodiment. Around sensor A2 is a circle 300. The circle 300 shows a thin layer of organic polymer, for example perspex, (a non-limiting example of a barrier layer) which is present on the majority of the area of the array 102 but not present within each of the circles 300 et al. This void within the sensor structure permits the nozzle 200 to place a solution of nanomaterial onto any particular set of electrodes without it contaminating any other gas sensor being formed on the same array 102. The organic polymer can be peeled away after the solvent has evaporated from each sensor.
Nanowires (for example ZnO or T1O2) were deposited at each sensor (A,B,C,D or A1 ,B1 ,C1 ,D1 or A2,B2,C2,D2) as required. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the nanowires were dispersed in water, ethanol or isopropanol before being deposited at each sensor through the nozzle 200.
In one embodiment, the dispersions were produced by placing the desired nanowires into a container. Solvent was then added to the container and the mixture was optionally placed in an ultrasonic bath for 5 minutes. The dispersions were decanted and filtered using a PTFE filter and then centrifuged to remove any particles with dimensions greater than 15 pm, optionally greater than 1 pm, from the dispersions. When using ZnO or TiO2 nanowires in water, according to one embodiment, the solution was well dispersed and almost clear. The concentration of nanowires in one exemplary embodiment ranged from 0.01 mg/ml to 100 mg/ml, preferably from 0.1 mg/ml to 10 mg/ml.
If nanoparticles were to be added to a solution of nanowires to prepare a particular gas sensor, nanoparticles (for example, Au or Ag nanoparticles) were dispersed in water or ethanol. The Ag or Au nanoparticles solutions were added to the nanowire dispersions and mixed using an ultrasonic bath, for approximately 5 minutes. This method permitted the nanowires to be mixed with a uniform density of nanoparticles. When a sensor comprised a mixture of nanowires and nanoparticles, this was found to enhance the photocatalytic activity of the particular sensor.
The resulting solution (nanowires solution, or, nanowires and nanoparticles solution) was then drop-cast onto interdigitated electrodes from a nozzle 200 (as shown in Figure 2). In some embodiments, the electrodes had a fixed metal electrode width and spacing, for example an electrode width and spacing from 1 pm to 20 pm, preferably from 1 pm to 2 pm, 5 pm or 10 pm.
When the droplet was placed onto the electrodes, the electrodes were biased with an AC (alternating current) voltage signal (1 -100 kHz) and 1 -10 V amplitude, which was optimized depending on the nanomaterial type to provide order to the arrangement of the nanowires between the electrodes. Applying an AC voltage generated an alternating electrostatic force on the nanowires in the solution, which could be altered to vary the alignment of the nanowires between the electrodes. The application of an AC voltage signal to nanowires in a solvent was described in J. Suehiro, Nanotechnology 17 (2006) 2567-2573, and is referred to as dielectrophoresis.
In the embodiment described with reference to Figure 1 , each sensor A, B, C, D is composed of three dimensional arrangements of metal oxide nanowires (20 and 30, for example) which are arranged on a glass substrate 40. Each substrate (10x6 mm in the embodiment shown in Figure 3) contains four individually isolatable interdigitated electrodes (referred to as 1 ,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 in Figure 1 ). The resistance across each pair of electrodes (1 and 2, 3 and 4, 5
and 6, 7 and 8) can be measured when the array 10 is exposed to a sample of gas to be measured. Depending on the particular nanomaterial present between each pair of electrodes, different readings of resistance are measured depending on the test substance. On this basis, the readings from each sensor A, B, C and D can be measured to ascertain which substances are present in any given sample.
To create a three dimensional arrangement of nanowires which have an open nanowire network, the gap between electrodes is greater than the average nanowire length. During application of the AC (alternating current) voltage signal, the nanowires are attracted to the AC field around the electrode and align to the metal electrode in an open nanowire network. By increasing the density of nanowires in the dispersion a two dimensional arrangement develops that is angular to the metal electrodes.
Reflected light optical micrographs of a ZnO nanowire sensor structure are shown in Figures 4a-d. The micrographs of Figures 4a-d show sensor structures with 5 pm electrode with and 5 pm gap. The samples were placed on the optical stage of a metallurgical microscope and illuminated using a standard tungsten light source. The images were obtained using a GXML3003, Trinocular reflected light metallurgical microscope, GX Microscopes, and captured using a GXCAM-3 Digital microscope camera (Resolution 2048x1536). The density of nanowires used in the dispersion was increased, starting with a low density in Figure 4a to the highest density in Figure 4d (Number of nanowires in each starting solution: A=1 mg/cm3=4.86x1012 nanowires per cm3, B=2mg/cm3=9.71x1012 nanowires per cm3, C=4mg/ cm3=1.94x1013 nanowires per cm3, D=5mg/cm3 =2.43x1013 nanowires per cm3), to determine optimum sensor performance. Metal oxide nanowires cannot usually be imaged in an optical microscope because the nanowires are below the optical resolution (<1 pm) and the features observed in the micrographs are interference related and do not
accurately relate to the true density. However, the images of Figure 4 can be used to understand alignment of the nanowires. The optical features observed in the microscope change in alignment and density (two-dimensional density of the nanowires after solvent evaporated Fig 4a=1 .23x106/cm2, 4b=5.15x106/cm2 4c=1 .84x107/cm2 4d greater than 107/cm2).
In the embodiment of Figure 4, the micrographs were taken from sensors with different coverage of nanowires. The metal electrode spacing was 5 pm and the average length of ZnO nanowires was 3 pm with a diameter of 70 nm. At low concentrations (Figure 4a) of ZnO nanowires the nanowires connected to the metal electrodes at an angle and start to bridge each other. As the density of nanowires increases two dimensional arrangements formed. Sensors containing different densities of nanowires were then exposed to different volatile organic compounds to determine the optimum sensor structure. The most sensitive array sensors contained a high density (three-dimensional density of from 106 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 107 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 108 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 109 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1010 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1011 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1012 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1013 nanowires/cm3, up to and including 1014 nanowires/cm3), of crossed nanowires having an open nanowire network as shown in Figure 4d. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is thought that the ordering of the nanowires by application of an AC (alternating current) voltage signal coupled with a high density of nanowires, provides the greatest surface area for volatile organic compounds to adsorb to, therefore providing high sensitivity of the gas sensors. The order of the nanowires is described as an open nanowire network.
Gas exposure tests
A gas sensor array was loaded into a stainless steel gas chamber. A fixed voltage (from 1 to 5V) was applied to the sensor electrodes to measure the
nanomaterial conductance change during gas exposure. The gas sensor array included, in different experiments, two or more gas sensors, each gas sensor as described with reference to Figure 3 and having (in all cases at a three- dimensional density of from 4.86x108 to 2.45x1010 nanowires/cm3 or (nanowires + nanoparticles)/cm3, respectively): ZnO nanowires; ZnO nanowires doped with Au nanoparticles; ZnO nanowires doped with Ag nanoparticles; TiO2 nanowires doped with Au nanoparticles; and/or, TiO2 nanowires doped with Ag nanoparticles. The sensors were excited using an ultraviolet light emitting diode (365 nm wavelength) which had a controlled light intensity output and the gas sensing measurements were made at room temperature. The light intensity was measured using a commercially available silicon carbide photodetector, namely, a sglux GmbH TOCON A6.
The sensors were then exposed to pure nitrogen or zero air (zero air being ambient air filtered to contain less than 0.1 parts per million of total hydrocarbons) to produce a background gas measurement for the sensing experiments. Different gas mixtures were produced for gas sensor testing each mixture contained VOCs or inorganic gases in nitrogen. The gas sensors were then exposed to a sample gas mixture and their response recorded. The response of each sensor element was recorded and the experiment was repeated five times to calculate their average response. At a molecular level, the gas sample caused a change in conductivity of any particular gas sensor on adsorption to the sensor.
The sensor response was calculated using the following equation.
S=(G1 -G0)/G1
Where G1 and GO represent the conductance under and before the exposure to different gas mixtures.
Figure 5 shows a comparison between two gas sensors, one comprising nanomaterial including ZnO nanowires, and the other including ZnO nanowires doped with Ag nanoparticles. In this example, the gas sensors included: ZnO
nanowires; and, ZnO nanowires doped with Ag nanoparticles (at 4.86x10 to 2.45x1010 nanowires/cm3 or (nanowires + nanoparticles)/cm3, respectively). Figure 5 shows that peaks are observed when each of ethanol, isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and acetone are introduced.
Figure 6 shows a comparison between two gas sensors, both comprising nanomaterial ZnO nanowires doped with Au nanoparticles. In this example, the gas sensors included: ZnO nanowires doped with Au nanoparticles (at 4.86x108 to 2.45x1010 nanowires/cm3 or (nanowires + nanoparticles)/cm3, respectively). Figure 6 shows that peaks are observed when each of ethanol, formaldehyde, acetone and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) are introduced. The peaks are qualitatively the same for both gas sensors. The recovery and responses are similar for each sensor and the sensor recovery is very different for each chemical. This transient recovery can yield further information useful in understanding the sensed chemical's interactions with the sensor.
Figure 7 shows a comparison between two gas sensors, one comprising nanomaterial T1O2 nanowires, and the other including T1O2 nanowires doped with Au nanoparticles. In this example, the gas sensors included: T1O2 nanowires; and, TiO2 nanowires doped with Au nanoparticles (at 4.86x108 to 2.45x1010 nanowires/cm3 or (nanowires + nanoparticles)/cm3, respectively). Figure 7 shows that peaks are observed when each of ethanol, acetone and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) are introduced. Figure 8 was produced by providing an array having four gas sensors; namely, a gas sensor comprising nanomaterial ZnO nanowires doped with Au nanoparticles; a gas sensor comprising nanomaterial T1O2 nanowires doped with Ag nanoparticles; a gas sensor comprising nanomaterial TiO2 nanowires doped with Au nanoparticles; and, a gas sensor comprising nanomaterial ZnO nanowires (without nanoparticles) (all at 4.86x108 to 2.45x1010 nanowires/cm3 or (nanowires + nanoparticles)/cm3, respectively).
Each gas sensor was different and therefore responded to different chemicals in different ways. The array was exposed to the same concentration (1 ppm plus or minus 20%) of different gases: acetone, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol and formaldehyde, and then the sensor array response recorded. Data analysis of the sensor response to the VOC chemicals was analysed using principal component analysis (PCA). The analysis process is summarized below:
• The sensor response was calculated using the observed change in its conductivity in relation to the background signal. As shown in the equation: Sensor Response=AG=(G1 - G0)/G0
Where GO is the conductance of the sensor before gas exposure and G1 is the conductance of the sensor after gas exposure.
• The sensor responses were normalized to eliminate any effects caused by external factors.
· Then the data was auto-scaled to unit variance; to eliminate any arbitrary weighting factors.
• The results were then analysed using a commercial software package ("Solo", as sold by Eigenvector Reseach Inc.) to determine the variance in the data.
Figure 8 is a PCA Biplot showing that the sensor array can discriminate between ethanol, formaldehyde, acetone and isopropanol (IPA) and the total variance of PC1 and PC2 is 83.82 %, which confirms the creditability of the data set. Further considerations
The gas sensors of the present invention are different to other nanowire gas sensors at least because the nanowires are angularly arranged causing them to cross each other. In other words, the nanowires are more ordered that being randomly distributed but not all parallel. This is in contrast to any single nanowire device or devices having multiple parallel nanowires, which do not
cross. Random networks of nanowires are useful for some applications because the variable properties observed for individual nanowires become averaged, which produces devices with more uniform properties. However, very large dense random nanowire networks are needed to overcome the variations caused by single nanowires and to produce reliable consistent devices with uniform characteristics. Charge transport in random networks of nanowires is affected by the wire contact resistance when nanowires cross. These crossed and bridged nanowires degrade the conductivity and mobility of random networks compared with single nanowires devices.
The present inventors have shown that a high density of crossed nanowires improves the sensor performance, in terms of sensitivity and recovery after gas exposure. Without wishing to be bound by theory, this is due to a number of different reasons caused by an electronic effect at the interface the crossed nanowires. In these crossed wires there is an electrical junction formed at the intersection of the nanowires and a subsequent potential barrier. When the nanowires are exposed to different VOCs, the conduction changes at the junction will be much greater than the surface of individual nanowires. This is shown by gas sensor measurements on randomly arranged nanowires which have a much lower sensitivity and slower recovery after gas exposure than arrays that have crossed nanowires and an angular arrangement.
It is believed that using the dielectrophoresis technique during sensor fabrication increases the number of crossed nanowires (compared to a random distribution) and forms an open nanowire network. The resultant angular nanowires structure is more active than a random network because gases can easily enter and leave the structure freely. The AC signal applied during dielectrophoresis improves the electrical pathways through the network and provides greater ohmic connections between the nanowires and metal electrodes. Also the open nanowire network is believed to enhance electron mobility creating more active sensors.
The metal doping method, when using nanowires doped with nanoparticles, produces highly active photo-catalyst sensors. Most approaches to forming photo-catalyst sensors use metal evaporation and then thermal annealing. It is believed that by using reagent free metal nanoparticles there is an optimal interaction of clean Au or Ag nanoparticles, for example, with the metallic nanowires, producing strong metal particle-nanowire interactions.
The ultrasonic process used during metal doping of nanowires produces a chemical interaction between the nanoparticles and the nanowires. Defect formation within the nanowires may occur during ultrasonic agitation to facilitate metal particle deposition, which also enhances the sensor performance.
UV light has been used to optically activate nanowires gas sensors rather than using external heaters on the sensor structure. However there is no discussion of the photo-catalytic effect in metal-doped metal oxide nanowires for gas sensors. The present inventors utilised UV excitation power to obtain the photo-catalytic effect (from 0.2 to 10 mWs). The present inventors noticed that the excitation power could affect the gas sensors selectivity to different VOC gasses. Increasing the UV LED power changed the sensor response to different VOCs. At fixed power density differences in sensor response (% change, response and recovery) are numerically analysable to differentiate between different VOCs. Increasing the power density also changed sensor response and this provides another way of differentiating between VOCs.
Figure 9 shows the change in the response of a sensor for Ethanol, IPA and Acetone at two different UV LED power densities. Figure 9 shows a comparison between one gas sensor exposed to different power densities, the gas sensor comprising nanomaterial including ZnO nanowires doped with Ag nanoparticles. In this example, the gas sensor included: ZnO nanowires doped with Ag nanoparticles (at 4.86x108 to 2.45x1010 (nanowires + nanoparticles)/cm3). The sensor response at 2.0 mW excitation is greater for
Ethanol and I PA, compared to Acetone, at increased power density (increasing from 0.5mW for the higher plot to 2mW for the lower plot).
The presently disclosed Au and Ag nanoparticles doped gas sensors show a unique property when reacting to different VOCs; after gas exposure the sensors show a decrease in conductivity; while the disclosed ZnO nanowire (not doped with nanoparticles) sensors exhibit an increase in conductivity while reacting with VOCs. ZnO sensors for VOC detection show an increase in conductivity after reaction with VOCs (i.e. reducing gases). In general, for n-type semiconductor metal oxides such as ZnO, the conductance increases when interacting with reducing gases. This can be explained by the following surface reaction, after oxygen adsorption, it adsorbs electrons from the conduction band of the metal oxide to form a new species, O". Then this oxygen species reacts with reducing gases (for example ethanol) to produce electrons which increase the conductance of the n-type semiconductor (for example ZnO and T1O2). This effect is shown below in the equations below. O2 (gas) + 2e→20"(ads)
C2H5OH (gas)+6O" (ads)→ 2CO2 (gas) +3H2O (gas)+6e~
In general, the addition of Au or Ag nanoparticles to ZnO metal oxide nanowire sensors enhances this effect, (a bigger increase in conductivity is observed after VOC exposure as compared metal free ZnO sensors) this is due to enhanced surface adsorption producing enhanced surface reactivity.
Whereas Au or Ag nanoparticle doped ZnO sensors under UV excitation show a decrease in conductivity after VOC exposure. Without wishing to be bound by theory, this behaviour is believed to be due to the unique formation of very small nanoparticles (<10 nm) that have an intimate interaction with the ZnO nanowires and act as efficient photo-catalysts.
Under UV excitation these sensors form electron hole pairs which produce new species that are involved in the oxidation and reduction reactions on the sensor surface.
ZnO + hv→ e + h+
02 (ad) + e"→02 "
H20→OH- + H+
The surface oxidation can occur through the formation of surface hydroxyl OH' radicals which trap a hole, these radicals are very reactive to adsorbed VOC molecules, and produce a number intermediate organic compounds before complete reaction to form CO2 and H2O and mineral acid.
H2O + h+→ OH- + h+
R-H + OH"→ R- + H2O
R- + h+→ R+→CO2 + H2O
During the UV excitation and VOC gas exposure on these sensors, there will be a number compounds produced during photo-oxidation. These reactions consume electron and hole pairs and therefore decrease the sensor conductivity.
Intermediate chemicals have been detected in the photochemical reactions of different VOCs, for example for alcohols the oxidation reaction leads to dehydrogenation and the formation of aldehydes. For ethanol photo-oxidation on ZnO and Au-ZnO, the following reaction occurs to produce acetlyaldehyde.
C2H5OH (gas) → C2H5OH (ad) → C2H5O (ad) + H (ad)
Then the adsorbed C2H5O species becomes oxidised by photoelectrons
C2H5O (ad) + e"→ C2H5O- (ad) → CH3CHO (ad) + H (ad)→ CH3CHO (gas)
The consumption of photoelectrons in this reaction leads to a lower concentration of electrons which could also reduce the number of electrons returning the ZnO conduction band and therefore it leads to a reduction of its conductivity. Similar types of reaction could occur on the metal doped Ti02 nanowire sensors. The improved photo-catalytic effect in the presently disclosed metal doped catalyst is attributed to the charge separation due to the Au and Ag nanoparticles. This in effect leads to more electrons and holes being available for photo-oxidation. As can be seen from the above results, gas sensors according to the present invention have beneficial properties.
When used in this specification and claims, the terms "comprises" and "comprising" and variations thereof mean that the specified features, steps or integers are included. The terms are not to be interpreted to exclude the presence of other features, steps or components.
The features disclosed in the foregoing description, or the following claims, or the accompanying drawings, expressed in their specific forms or in terms of a means for performing the disclosed function, or a method or process for attaining the disclosed result, as appropriate, may, separately, or in any combination of such features, be utilised for realising the invention in diverse forms thereof.
Claims
1 . A method of forming a gas sensor, the method comprising:
providing a first solution of nanowires, the solution comprising a solvent and nanowires;
placing the first solution of nanowires on a first set of at least two electrodes;
applying an AC (alternating current) voltage signal to the first set of at least two electrodes; and,
permitting the solvent to evaporate.
2. A method of forming a gas sensor array, the method comprising the steps of claim 1 and further comprising:
providing a second solution of nanowires, the solution comprising a solvent and nanowires;
placing the second solution of nanowires on a second set of at least two electrodes;
applying an AC (alternating current) voltage signal to the second set of at least two electrodes; and,
permitting the solvent to evaporate.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:
repeating the steps of claim 1 or claim 2 for any one of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 or 50 different solutions of nanowires, each repeat on different sets of at least two electrodes.
4. The method of any one of claims 2 or 3, further comprising the step of: prior to placing the first solution of nanowires and the second solution of nanowires on the first set of at least two electrodes, the second set of at least two electrodes or the first and second set of at least two electrodes, placing a
barrier layer around the electrodes to prevent the solutions of nanowires on each set of electrodes from mixing.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the barrier layer has a void around the area of the electrodes to form each gas sensor.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the barrier layer is formed of perspex.
7. The method of any one of claims 4-6, further comprising the step of removing the barrier layer when the solvent has evaporated.
8. A method of any one of claims 1 -7, wherein the nanowires have: a length (longest dimension) of from 20 nm to 15 pm, preferably from 1 pm to 15 pm; and, a width (shortest dimension) of from 1 nm to 300 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 100 nm, 50 nm or 10 nm; and, an aspect ratio (length divided by width) of from 20 to 50, preferably to 40 or 30.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the nanowires are formed of Au, Pt, Cu, Ag, Co, Fe, Ni, Si, Sn02, W03, ZnO, Ti02, InP, CuO, Cu20, NiO, Mn02, V205 and GaN, or combinations thereof.
10. The method of any one of the previous claims, wherein the solutions of nanowires further comprise nanoparticles.
1 1 . The method of claim 10, wherein the nanoparticles have: at least one dimension from 1 nm to 100 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 10 nm; and, an aspect ratio (length divided by width) of from 1 to 4, preferably from 1 to 2.
12. The method of claim 10 or claim 1 1 , wherein the nanoparticles are formed of Au, Pt, Cu, Ag, Co, Fe, Ni, Si, Sn02, W03, ZnO, TiO2, InP, CuO, Cu2O, NiO, MnO2, V2Os or GaN, or combinations thereof.
13. The method of any one of claims 10-12, wherein the solution of nanowires and nanoparticles is mixed using an ultrasonic bath.
14. The method of any one of the previous claims, wherein the at least two electrodes, in each case, are individually electrically isolatable and metallic; and/or wherein the electrodes are spaced by from 1 pm to 20 pm; optionally from 1 pm to 2 m, 5 pm or 10 pm.
15. The method of any one of the previous claims, wherein each electrode is formed of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 or 50 prongs.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein two or more of the prongs of each electrode interdigitate with two or more of the prongs of another electrode.
17. The method of any one of claims 1 -16, wherein the solvent is water, ethanol or isopropanol; and/or wherein the electrodes rest on a substrate, optionally wherein the substrate is formed of glass, silicon or plastic; optionally wherein the plastic is polyethylene terephthalate or polyethylene naphthalate.
18. A gas sensor or a gas sensor array obtainable by a method according to any one of claims 1 -17.
19. A gas sensor comprising:
at least two electrodes, and,
nanowires arranged between the at least two electrodes, wherein the nanowires have a density of from 106 nanowires/cm3 up to and including 1014 nanowires/cm3.
20. The gas sensor of claim 19, wherein the nanowires have a density of from 106 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 107 nanowires/cm3, optionally
greater than 108 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 109 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1010 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1011 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1012 nanowires/cm3, optionally greater than 1013 nanowires/cm3, up to and including 1014 nanowires/cm3.
21 . A gas sensor according to any one of claims 19 or 20, wherein the nanowires are arranged in an open nanowire network.
22. A gas sensor according to any one of claims 19-21 , wherein the nanowires have: a length (longest dimension) of from 20 nm to 15 pm, preferably from 1 pm to 15 pm; and, a width (shortest dimension) of from 1 nm to 300 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 100 nm, 50 nm or 10 nm; and, an aspect ratio (length divided by width) of from 20 to 50, preferably to 40 or 30.
23. The gas sensor of any one of claims 19-22, wherein the nanowires are formed of Au, Pt, Cu, Ag, Co, Fe, Ni, Si, Sn02, W03, ZnO, Ti02, InP, CuO, Cu20, NiO, Mn02, V2Os and GaN, or combinations thereof.
24. The gas sensor of any one of claims 19-23, wherein the gas sensor further comprises nanoparticles mixed with the nanowires.
25. The gas sensor of claim 24, wherein the nanoparticles have: at least one dimension from 1 nm to 100 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 10 nm; and, an aspect ratio (length divided by width) of from 1 to 4, preferably from 1 to 2.
26. The gas sensor of claim 24 or claim 25, wherein the nanoparticles are formed of Au, Pt, Cu, Ag, Co, Fe, Ni, Si, Sn02, W03, ZnO, TiO2, InP, CuO, Cu2O, NiO, MnO2, V2O5 or GaN, or combinations thereof.
27. The gas sensor of any one of claims 19-26, wherein the at least two electrodes, in each case, are individually electrically isolatable and metallic;
and/or wherein the electrodes are spaced by from 1 pm to 20 μητι; optionally from 1 pm to 2 pm, 5 pm or 10 pm.
28. The gas sensor of claim 27, wherein each electrode is formed of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 or 50 prongs.
29. The gas sensor of claim 28, wherein two or more of the prongs of each electrode interdigitate with two or more of the prongs of another electrode; and/or wherein the electrodes rest on a substrate; optionally wherein the substrate is formed of glass, silicon or plastic; optionally wherein the plastic is polyethylene terephthalate or polyethylene naphthalate.
30. A gas sensor array comprising two or more gas sensors according to any one of claims 19-29.
31. A gas sensor array according to claim 30, wherein the gas sensor array comprises 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 or 50 different gas sensors.
32. A method of measuring the presence of a volatile organic compound, comprising:
exposing a gas sensor or a gas sensor array according to any one of claims 18-31 to one or more volatile organic compounds; and,
measuring the change in conductance of the gas sensor or gas sensor array.
33. The method of claim 32, further comprising the step of:
prior to exposing the gas sensor or gas sensor array to one or more volatile organic compounds, exposing the gas sensor or gas sensor array to UV light or visible light.
34. The method of claim 33, wherein the UV light or visible light has a wavelength greater than the band gap of the nanomaterial on each particular gas sensor.
35. A gas sensor or a gas sensor array as hereinbefore described, with reference to Figures 1 , 2, 3 or 4.
36. Any novel feature or combination of features disclosed herein.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB1410931.8A GB2527340A (en) | 2014-06-19 | 2014-06-19 | Gas sensors and gas sensor arrays |
GB1410931.8 | 2014-06-19 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2015193645A1 true WO2015193645A1 (en) | 2015-12-23 |
Family
ID=51409834
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2015/051716 WO2015193645A1 (en) | 2014-06-19 | 2015-06-11 | Gas sensors and gas sensor arrays |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (1) | GB2527340A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015193645A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20180111829A1 (en) * | 2016-10-21 | 2018-04-26 | Uvic Industry Partnerships Inc. | Nanowire chain devices, systems, and methods of production |
CN110872097A (en) * | 2018-08-29 | 2020-03-10 | 天津大学 | High-sensitivity nano silicon-based gas sensing element for quickly detecting isopropanol at room temperature and preparation method thereof |
US11111399B2 (en) | 2016-10-21 | 2021-09-07 | Quirklogic, Inc. | Materials and methods for conductive thin films |
LU501058B1 (en) * | 2021-12-21 | 2023-06-22 | Luxembourg Inst Science & Tech List | Ethanol sensor with zno nanorods |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2019525137A (en) * | 2016-06-27 | 2019-09-05 | 学校法人沖縄科学技術大学院大学学園 | Ultra-sensitive nitrogen dioxide gas sensor based on iron nanocube |
AT519492B1 (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2019-03-15 | Mat Center Leoben Forschung Gmbh | Sensor arrangement for determining and optionally measuring a concentration of a plurality of gases and method for producing a sensor arrangement |
LU100442B1 (en) | 2017-09-19 | 2019-03-19 | Luxembourg Inst Science & Tech List | Gas sensor device with high sensitivity at low temperature and method of fabrication thereof |
AT521213B1 (en) * | 2018-05-04 | 2022-12-15 | Mat Center Leoben Forschung Gmbh | Method of making a sensor and sensor made therewith |
CN112964758B (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2022-01-25 | 浙江大学 | Manganese dioxide nanosheet/titanium dioxide nanowire array composite resistance type sensor and preparation method and application thereof |
CN113030194B (en) * | 2021-02-03 | 2023-06-27 | 中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院 | Gas sensor array, three alcohol species and method for identifying concentration of three alcohol species |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110227061A1 (en) * | 2010-03-17 | 2011-09-22 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Semiconductor oxide nanofiber-nanorod hybrid structure and environmental gas sensor using the same |
WO2013095730A2 (en) * | 2011-09-19 | 2013-06-27 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Multimode platform for detection of compounds |
WO2014088403A1 (en) * | 2012-12-07 | 2014-06-12 | Mimos Berhad | A resistive gas sensor device |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7163659B2 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2007-01-16 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Free-standing nanowire sensor and method for detecting an analyte in a fluid |
JP2008286704A (en) * | 2007-05-18 | 2008-11-27 | Toyama Univ | Gas sensor and method for manufacturing the same |
US8443647B1 (en) * | 2008-10-09 | 2013-05-21 | Southern Illinois University | Analyte multi-sensor for the detection and identification of analyte and a method of using the same |
JP2013080874A (en) * | 2011-10-05 | 2013-05-02 | Sharp Corp | Electronic device and method for manufacturing the same, and lighting device and sensor system having the same |
CN103412008A (en) * | 2013-08-21 | 2013-11-27 | 东北大学 | Pd-doped SnO2 nanowire gas sensor for detecting H2 under low temperature, and preparation method thereof |
CN103852496B (en) * | 2014-03-07 | 2016-02-17 | 天津大学 | Based on certainly to the preparation method of the gas sensor element of tungsten oxide nano |
-
2014
- 2014-06-19 GB GB1410931.8A patent/GB2527340A/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2015
- 2015-06-11 WO PCT/GB2015/051716 patent/WO2015193645A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110227061A1 (en) * | 2010-03-17 | 2011-09-22 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Semiconductor oxide nanofiber-nanorod hybrid structure and environmental gas sensor using the same |
WO2013095730A2 (en) * | 2011-09-19 | 2013-06-27 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Multimode platform for detection of compounds |
WO2014088403A1 (en) * | 2012-12-07 | 2014-06-12 | Mimos Berhad | A resistive gas sensor device |
Non-Patent Citations (8)
Title |
---|
KEVIN M ET AL: "Formation of hybrid structures: copper oxide nanocrystals templated on ultralong copper nanowires for open network sensing at room temperature", NANOTECHNOLOGY, IOP, BRISTOL, GB, vol. 22, no. 23, 7 April 2011 (2011-04-07), pages 235701, XP020205465, ISSN: 0957-4484, DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/23/235701 * |
KUMAR S ET AL: "Tin oxide nanosensor fabrication using AC dielectrophoretic manipulation of nanobelts", ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS, BARKING, GB, vol. 51, no. 5, 10 November 2005 (2005-11-10), pages 943 - 951, XP027694049, ISSN: 0013-4686, [retrieved on 20051110] * |
LI X ET AL: "Fabrication and integration of metal oxide nanowire sensors using dielectrophoretic assembly and improved post-assembly processing", SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B: CHEMICAL: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL DEVOTED TO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL TRANSDUCERS, ELSEVIER S.A, CH, vol. 148, no. 2, 15 July 2010 (2010-07-15), pages 404 - 412, XP027134605, ISSN: 0925-4005, [retrieved on 20100604] * |
NIMA MOHSENI KIASARI ET AL: "Dielectrophoresis-Assembled ZnO Nanowire Oxygen Sensors", IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, IEEE SERVICE CENTER, NEW YORK, NY, US, vol. 32, no. 7, 1 July 2011 (2011-07-01), pages 982 - 984, XP011357179, ISSN: 0741-3106, DOI: 10.1109/LED.2011.2149492 * |
PEIGUANG HU ET AL: "Enhancement of Ethanol Vapor Sensing of TiO 2 Nanobelts by Surface Engineering", ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, vol. 2, no. 11, 24 November 2010 (2010-11-24), pages 3263 - 3269, XP055208500, ISSN: 1944-8244, DOI: 10.1021/am100707h * |
RAMGIR NIRANJAN ET AL: "Metal oxide nanowires for chemiresistive gas sensors: Issues, challenges and prospects", COLLOIDS AND SURFACES. A, PHYSICACHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, vol. 439, 27 February 2013 (2013-02-27), pages 101 - 116, XP028764671, ISSN: 0927-7757, DOI: 10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2013.02.029 * |
WANG SHENGQIN ET AL: "Self-regenerating photocatalytic sensor based on dielectrophoretically assembled TiO2 nanowires for chemical vapor sensing", SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B: CHEMICAL: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL DEVOTED TO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL TRANSDUCERS, vol. 194, 24 December 2013 (2013-12-24), pages 1 - 9, XP028609174, ISSN: 0925-4005, DOI: 10.1016/J.SNB.2013.12.042 * |
YUAN ZHANG ET AL: "Decoration of ZnO nanowires with Pt nanoparticles and their improved gas sensing and photocatalytic performance", NANOTECHNOLOGY, IOP, BRISTOL, GB, vol. 21, no. 28, 18 June 2010 (2010-06-18), pages 285501, XP020194492, ISSN: 0957-4484, DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/28/285501 * |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20180111829A1 (en) * | 2016-10-21 | 2018-04-26 | Uvic Industry Partnerships Inc. | Nanowire chain devices, systems, and methods of production |
US10737938B2 (en) * | 2016-10-21 | 2020-08-11 | UVic Industry Partnership Inc. | Nanowire chain devices, systems, and methods of production |
US11111399B2 (en) | 2016-10-21 | 2021-09-07 | Quirklogic, Inc. | Materials and methods for conductive thin films |
CN110872097A (en) * | 2018-08-29 | 2020-03-10 | 天津大学 | High-sensitivity nano silicon-based gas sensing element for quickly detecting isopropanol at room temperature and preparation method thereof |
LU501058B1 (en) * | 2021-12-21 | 2023-06-22 | Luxembourg Inst Science & Tech List | Ethanol sensor with zno nanorods |
WO2023118331A1 (en) * | 2021-12-21 | 2023-06-29 | Luxembourg Institute Of Science And Technology (List) | Gas sensor with zno nanorods |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2527340A (en) | 2015-12-23 |
GB201410931D0 (en) | 2014-08-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2015193645A1 (en) | Gas sensors and gas sensor arrays | |
Park et al. | Chemoresistive materials for electronic nose: Progress, perspectives, and challenges | |
Tsai et al. | High sensitivity of NO gas sensors based on novel Ag-doped ZnO nanoflowers enhanced with a UV light-emitting diode | |
JP6719440B2 (en) | Chemical resistor type gas sensor with multi-layer structure | |
Shin et al. | Surface activity-tuned metal oxide chemiresistor: toward direct and quantitative halitosis diagnosis | |
Rasch et al. | Highly selective and ultra-low power consumption metal oxide based hydrogen gas sensor employing graphene oxide as molecular sieve | |
de Lacy Costello et al. | Highly sensitive room temperature sensors based on the UV-LED activation of zinc oxide nanoparticles | |
He et al. | Exploiting free-standing p-CuO/n-TiO2 nanochannels as a flexible gas sensor with high sensitivity for H2S at room temperature | |
Kim et al. | Realization of ppb-scale toluene-sensing abilities with Pt-functionalized SnO2–ZnO core–shell nanowires | |
US9557285B2 (en) | Gas sensors and methods of preparation thereof | |
Baik et al. | Tin-oxide-nanowire-based electronic nose using heterogeneous catalysis as a functionalization strategy | |
Lupan et al. | Room temperature gas nanosensors based on individual and multiple networked Au-modified ZnO nanowires | |
Dobrokhotov et al. | Toward the nanospring-based artificial olfactory system for trace-detection of flammable and explosive vapors | |
US9568448B2 (en) | Gas sensors and methods of preparation thereof | |
Ho | Gas sensor with nanostructured oxide semiconductor materials | |
JP6774127B2 (en) | Formaldehyde detection sensor and system using it | |
Hozák et al. | New Insight into the Gas-Sensing Properties of CuO x Nanowires by Near-Ambient Pressure XPS | |
Wang et al. | Room-Temperature Chemiresistive Effect of ${\rm TiO} _ {2}\!-\!{\rm B} $ Nanowires to Nitroaromatic and Nitroamine Explosives | |
Okechukwu et al. | Concomitant in situ FTIR and impedance measurements to address the 2-methylcyclopentanone vapor-sensing mechanism in MnO2–polymer nanocomposites | |
Choudhari et al. | Electrochemical studies on doped SnO2 nanocomposite for selective detection of lung cancer biomarkers | |
WO2017132667A1 (en) | In-situ localized growth of porous metal oxide films on microheater platform for low temperature gas detection | |
Baratto et al. | On the alignment of ZnO nanowires by Langmuir–Blodgett technique for sensing application | |
Kolmakov | Some recent trends in the fabrication, functionalisation and characterisation of metal oxide nanowire gas sensors | |
KR20150026151A (en) | GAS SENSOR and Method for Manufacturing GAS SENSOR | |
Devi et al. | Chemical sensors based on metal oxides |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 15730233 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 15730233 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |