WO2015171882A1 - Controlling a building system based on real time events - Google Patents

Controlling a building system based on real time events Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015171882A1
WO2015171882A1 PCT/US2015/029670 US2015029670W WO2015171882A1 WO 2015171882 A1 WO2015171882 A1 WO 2015171882A1 US 2015029670 W US2015029670 W US 2015029670W WO 2015171882 A1 WO2015171882 A1 WO 2015171882A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
building
occupancy
sensor
module
predictive schedule
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2015/029670
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jeremy B. Warren
Brandon Bunker
Jefferson LYMAN
Jungtaik Hwang
Original Assignee
Vivint, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US14/272,086 external-priority patent/US11099533B2/en
Priority claimed from US14/291,789 external-priority patent/US10197979B2/en
Application filed by Vivint, Inc. filed Critical Vivint, Inc.
Priority to EP15788885.0A priority Critical patent/EP3140702A4/en
Priority to CA2946891A priority patent/CA2946891A1/en
Publication of WO2015171882A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015171882A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B15/00Systems controlled by a computer
    • G05B15/02Systems controlled by a computer electric
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/20Pc systems
    • G05B2219/26Pc applications
    • G05B2219/2642Domotique, domestic, home control, automation, smart house

Definitions

  • a method for controlling a building system includes using at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, and associating real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule.
  • the method further includes deducing an unoccupied state of the building.
  • deducing the unoccupied state of the building includes sensing a door event.
  • deducing the unoccupied state of the building includes a lack of stimulus to the at least one sensor.
  • deducing the unoccupied state of the building is based at least in part on the predictive schedule.
  • the method further includes determining with an increased confidence that the deduced unoccupied state is accurate in response to a simultaneous occurrence of the real time event. Further, the method may include adjusting a building parameter based on the increased confidence of the unoccupied state.
  • a building parameter may include a climate parameter, a lighting parameter, a security parameter, another type of parameter, or combinations thereof.
  • the method may include predicting a transition time from the unoccupied state to an occupied state based on a simultaneous occurrence of the real time event.
  • the real time event may be detected with a location device incorporated into a mobile device.
  • the real time event may include a location device being in a specific location, a location device heading in a specific direction, a location device heading in a specific direction from a specific location, other real time events, or combinations thereof.
  • the method includes requesting information relevant to the predictive schedule from a user.
  • Requesting the information relevant to the predictive schedule from the user may include sending a question to a device associated with the user, asking a question of the user about missing data relevant to the predictive schedule, asking a question of the user about ascertained data relevant to the predictive schedule associated with an unreliable confidence score, requesting data about a period of time where no occupancy is detected, requesting the information about a number of occupants with location tracking mobile devices, or combinations thereof.
  • the method may also include changing a confidence score about ascertained data relevant to the predictive schedule based on the information from the user.
  • a computing device configured for controlling a building system.
  • the computing device includes a processor, memory in electronic communication with the processor, and instructions stored in the memory.
  • the instructions are executable by the processor to use at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determine a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, and associate real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule.
  • a computer program product is used for controlling a building system.
  • the computer-program product includes a non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions thereon.
  • the instructions are executable by a processor to use a first sensor type to use at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determine a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, identify real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule, deduce an unoccupied state of the building, determine with an increased confidence that the deduced unoccupied state is accurate based on a simultaneous occurrence of the real time event, and adjust a building parameter in response to determining the increased confidence of the unoccupied state.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example of an environment in which the present systems and methods may be implemented;
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example of a control unit of the environment shown in FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example of an real time event module of the control unit of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an example of a parameters module of the control unit of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an example of a mobile device of the environment of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an example of an hypothesis module of the control unit of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an example of a requesting module of the control unit of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an example of a response module of the control unit of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for controlling a building system
  • FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for controlling a building system
  • FIG. 1 1 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for controlling a building system
  • FIG. 12 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for determining occupancy with user provided information
  • FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for determining occupancy with user provided information
  • FIG. 14 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for determining occupancy with user provided information
  • FIG. 15 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for determining occupancy with user provided information
  • FIG. 16 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for determining occupancy with user provided information
  • FIG. 17 is a block diagram of a computer system suitable for implementing the present systems and methods of FIG. 1.
  • the systems and methods described herein relate to home automation, home security and related security systems and automation for use in commercial and business settings. More specifically, the systems and methods described herein relate to an improved arrangement for controlling parameters in a building.
  • the principles described herein use occupancy sensors to predict a schedule of when the building is occupied. The parameters in the building are adjusted based in part on the schedule. The parameters can also be changed in response to deducing that the building is unoccupied and determining a simultaneously occurrence of a real time event that correlates with an increased probability that the building is unoccupied.
  • module includes a combination of hardware and programmed instructions that are necessary for performing the designated function of the module.
  • Components of the modules may be located on the same physical device or some of the components may be located at remote locations that are in communication with the other components of the module.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting one embodiment of an environment 100 in which the present systems and methods may be implemented.
  • the environment 100 includes a control unit 102-a that is in communication with at least one occupancy sensor 104, a door sensor 106, and a mobile device 108-a.
  • the control unit 102-a is also in communication with a security system 1 10, lighting 1 12, and a climate control 1 14.
  • a wireless network is utilized to communicate between the control unit 102-a, the occupancy sensors 104, the door sensor 106, and the mobile device 108-a.
  • networks include, but are not limited to, local area networks (LAN), wide area networks (WAN), virtual private networks (VPN), wireless networks (using 802. 1 1 , for example), and/or cellular networks (using 3 G and/or LTE, for example), Bluetooth networks, z-wave networks, ZigBee networks, other types of networks, or combinations thereof.
  • the control unit 102-a may control at least a part of the security and/or automation system.
  • other sensors and/or actuators may send information to the control unit 102-a where the signals are processed.
  • sensors may include, for example, a camera sensor, audio sensor, forced entry sensor, shock sensor, proximity sensor, boundary sensor, appliance sensor, light fixture sensor, temperature sensor, light beam sensor, three-dimensional (3 -D) sensor, motion sensor, smoke sensor, glass break sensor, door sensor, window sensor, carbon monoxide sensor, accelerometer, global positioning system (GPS) sensor, Wi-Fi positioning system sensor, capacitance sensor, radio frequency sensor, near-field sensor, heartbeat sensor, breathing sensor, oxygen sensor, carbon dioxide sensor, brain wave sensor, movement sensor, voice sensor, other types of sensors, or combinations thereof.
  • actuators may include, but are not limited to, automated door locks, climate control adjustors, lighting adjusters, sensors activation mechanisms, other types of actuators, or combinations thereof.
  • the control unit 102-a may make decisions based on the communications from the occupancy sensor 104 and the door sensor 106. For example, based on the information sent from the occupancy sensor 104 and the door sensor 106 to the control unit 102-a, the control unit 102-a may make a decision to activate an alarm, adjust a climate control setting, open or close a window, lock or unlock a door, control a security parameter, manage energy consumption, check the status of a door, locate a person or item, control lighting, control cameras, receive notifications regarding a current status or anomaly associated with a building, perform another task, or combinations thereof. In some cases, a decision may be decided at one of the local sensors, and the local sensors may or may not notify the control unit 102-a of the decision and/or resulting action.
  • control unit 102-a includes a user interface where the occupant can interact with the control unit 102-a. For example, the occupant can manually give instructions to the control unit 102-a to adjust a building parameter, install an occupancy sensor 104, or perform another system task.
  • the control unit 102-a may determine whether the building is occupied or unoccupied.
  • the occupancy sensor 104 communicates with the control unit 102-a to determine the occupancy state of the building. Any appropriate type or types of occupancy sensors may be used in accordance with the principles described in the present disclosure. A non-exhaustive list of occupancy sensor types may include microphones, motion detectors, video cameras, mobile devices, location devices, infrared devices, temperature devices, touch input devices, other types of devices, or combinations thereof.
  • a single occupancy sensor 104 is used to determine whether the entire building is occupied. However, in other examples, multiple occupancy sensors 104 are distributed throughout the building to determine whether the building is occupied. In some cases, multiple different types of occupancy sensors 104 are used to increase the reliability of occupancy detection.
  • control unit 102- a may determine that the building is not occupied when the motion detector does not detect the presence of an occupant within the building. On the other hand, the control unit 102-a may determine that there is an occupant within the building when the motion detector is triggered.
  • the door sensor 106 or a window sensor may indicate to the control unit 102-a when an event occurs that may indicate a change in occupancy. For example, a probability exists that the building' s occupancy state will change when a door to the exterior of the building is open allowing occupants to enter and/or leave the building.
  • the control unit 102-a is aware that the occupancy of the building may have changed.
  • the control unit 102-a may associate a time stamp with the opening and/or closing of the door. The control unit 102-a may make an assumption that occupancy will be consistent until the occurrence of another door type event.
  • a motion detector (or another type of occupancy sensor) may detect the presence of an occupant. As a result, the control unit 102-a may determine that the building will be occupied until the occurrence of another door type event. Likewise, if the motion detector (or another type of occupancy sensor) does not detect an occupant, the control unit 102-a may determine that no occupants are within the building and determine that the building will be unoccupied until a subsequent door type event.
  • the subsequent door type event may be of the same type of event as the initial door type event.
  • the initial door type event and the subsequent door type event may both be opening the front door to a home.
  • the initial door type event is opening a front door
  • the subsequent door type event is the opening of a back door.
  • the initial door type event may be opening a door
  • the subsequent door type event may be the opening of a window, the opening of a garage door, another type of event that may indicate a potential change in occupancy, or combinations thereof. While these examples have been described with reference to specific types of events, any appropriate type of event of may be used for either of the initial door type event and the subsequent door type event that can indicate a potential change in occupancy.
  • control unit 102-a determines that there is occupancy or no occupancy after a predetermined time threshold lapses from the occurrence of the event. In other examples, the control unit 102-a calculates an increased confidence that there is no occupancy within the building as the time progresses from the occurrence of the event.
  • the control unit 102-a or another type of processing device may generate a schedule based on the data collected from the occupancy sensor 104.
  • the occupancy sensors 104 in a household of a single individual who leaves his or her home around 7 :45 a.m. and returns home around 5 : 15 p.m. may have fairly consistent occupancy patterns Monday through Friday.
  • the occupancy sensors may fail to detect the presence of the individual during the time period that starts around 7:45 a.m. and ends around 5 : 15 p.m.
  • the control unit 102-a may predict that the household will be unoccupied during this time period.
  • the control unit 102-a may determine that the home will be unoccupied until about 5 : 15 p.m.
  • Such a generated schedule may vary from day to day.
  • the control unit 102-a may have the capability to determine patterns for each day of the week to account for different schedules on different days of the week.
  • the control unit 102-a may have a capability to recognize weekly patterns, monthly patterns, annual patterns, patterns exhibited over less than a week, patterns exhibited over less than a day, other patterns, or combinations thereof.
  • the occupancy sensors may be positioned throughout an entire building. In other examples, the occupancy sensors are positioned just within areas that are highly indicative of occupancy throughout the entire building.
  • the predictive schedule may be used, at least in part, to make adjustments to parameters of the building. For example, if the control unit 102-a receives notice that a door type event has occurred, the control unit 102-a can consult the predictive schedule. If the door type event coincides with a predicted transition into an unoccupied state, the control unit 102-a may determine that the building is not occupied. In some examples, the control unit 102-a may continue to monitor the building with occupancy sensors 104 for a predetermined grace period before making the determination that the building is unoccupied.
  • the control unit 102-a may send commands to various control devices throughout the building to adjust parameters to conserve building resources while the building is unoccupied. For example, the control unit 102-a may communicate with lighting 1 12 and a climate control 1 14 to reduce energy consumption. Similarly, the control unit 102-a may automatically arm the security system 1 10 in response to determining that the building is unoccupied. In some examples, appliances like a washing machine may be turned on based on the determination that the building is in an unoccupied state, while other devices, like a television or a radio, may be turned off.
  • any appropriate parameter adjustment may be made including adjustments to security parameters, climate parameters, lighting parameters, cleaning parameters, energy consumption parameters, computer parameters, television parameters, door parameters, window parameters, blind parameters, fan parameters, appliance parameters, water parameters, network parameters, other types of parameters, or combinations thereof.
  • the control unit 102-a may also identify and associate real time events that correlate with different types of occupancy states predicted in the predictive schedule.
  • the predictive schedule has an occupied state and an unoccupied state.
  • a location device in the mobile device 108-a that is carried by a building occupant may indicate that the occupant is at a specific location remote to the building.
  • the control unit 102-a may associate the mobile device's presence at that specific location with an unoccupied state of the building.
  • the control unit 102-a may have some degree of confidence that the building is unoccupied after the door type event occurs. However, such a level of confidence may not be high enough for the control unit 102-a to start making adjustment to the building' s parameters just in case the building is actually still occupied.
  • the control unit 102-a may wait for a predetermined time period before making parameter adjustments. After such a predetermined time period, if no occupants are detected, the system' s confidence that the building is unoccupied increases. With the increased confidence, the control unit 102-a may cause the building' s parameters to be adjusted to reflect that the building is unoccupied. Thus, in keeping with the above example, the building' s parameters will be changed at 5 :45 a.m.
  • a predetermined time period to increase the control unit' s confidence that the building is unoccupied may be thirty minutes.
  • the building' s parameters will be unadjusted for at least those additional thirty minutes from when the occupant leaves the building.
  • the control unit 102-a may recognize the real time event based on the location of the occupant' s mobile device. The recognition of such a real time event may provide the control unit 102-a with the increased confidence that the building is unoccupied.
  • the control unit 102-a may cause the parameters in the building to be adjusted at 5 :20 a.m. instead of 5 :45 a.m.
  • more resources can be conserved.
  • control unit 102-a may associate an increased confidence that the building will be unoccupied when the mobile device is heading in the direction to work, not just merely being at the occupant's location of work. Thus, if the control unit 102-a determines, based on the route exhibited by the mobile device 108-a, that the occupant is headed towards work, the control unit 102- a may have a higher degree of confidence that the building will remain unoccupied as indicated in the schedule.
  • the predictive schedule may indicate that the building is to be occupied.
  • the mobile device' s location and/or direction may exhibit a real time event that is so strongly correlated with the building being unoccupied for a specified period of time that the control unit 102-a has an increased confidence that the building is unoccupied.
  • the control unit 102-a may determine, with an increased confidence, that the building is unoccupied, and therefore adjust the parameters of the building accordingly.
  • real time events that indicate that the occupant is at work may generate an increased confidence while other real time events that indicate that the occupant is at a certain store or in the neighborhood may be associated with a lower level of confidence.
  • the control unit 102-a makes the predictive schedule based on just the information from the occupancy sensor 104.
  • information from the occupancy sensor 104 may reveal very clear occupancy patterns with easily identified transitions from one state of occupancy to the next.
  • the occupancy sensor 104 may not have all of the information that the control unit 102-a desires to make a predictive schedule with a high degree of confidence. Further, some of the information from the occupancy sensor 104 may appear to be contradictory. As a result, the control unit 102-a may seek user input about those details relevant to the predictive schedule that are missing, vague, inconsistent, or that otherwise appear to be unreliable.
  • the control unit 102-a may request the clarifying information from the user. For example, the control unit 102-a may generate a question that is sent to a mobile device associated with at least one occupant of the building. Such a question may be narrowly tailored to provide the control unit 102-a with the information that the control unit 102-a desires to create and/or modify the predictive schedule. For example, if the control unit 102-a cannot determine an occupancy pattern for a specific time period on a particular day of the week, the control unit 102-a may send a question asking the user if he or she is home during that time period on that particular day of week. If the user responds by indicating that the occupant is not home during that time period, the control unit 102-a may construct a predictive schedule accordingly with confidence that the home will be unoccupied.
  • control unit 102-a may be in communication with a location tracking device of the occupant's mobile device 108 and the control unit 102-a may receive communications from the mobile device 108 indicating that the mobile device 108 is away from the building.
  • the control unit 102-a may make the assumption, based on the communications from the mobile device 108, that the occupant is also away from the building.
  • the control unit 102-a may send a question to the occupant asking whether he or she is currently at the building.
  • Another appropriate type of question may be a question asking the occupant if there is another occupant living in the home.
  • Yet another appropriate question may involve asking if another person uses the occupant' s mobile device.
  • the control unit 102-a may ask the occupant if there is another person living in the building.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a control unit 102-b.
  • the control unit 102-b has an occupancy deduction module 200-a, a predictive schedule module 202-a, a real time event module 204-a, an occupancy/event correlation module 206-a, a confidence module 208-a, a parameters module 210-a, an occupancy prediction module 212-a, a hypothesis module 214-a, a confidence module 216-a, a requesting module 218-a, a receiving module 220-a, and a response module 222-a.
  • the occupancy deduction module 200-a may be used to deduce whether a building is occupied or not. For example, if the occupancy sensor 104 detects the presence of a person, the occupancy deduction module 200-a may deduce that the building is currently in an occupied state. On the other hand, if the occupancy sensor 104 does not detect the presence of an occupant, the occupancy deduction module 200-a may deduce that the building is in an unoccupied state. However, in either state, the occupancy deduction module 200-a may have varying degrees of confidence about the deduced state.
  • the predictive schedule module 202-a may generate and/or maintain a schedule that predicts when the building will be occupied or unoccupied. Such a predictive schedule may be based on the historical occupancy patterns recorded over time with the occupancy sensors 104.
  • the predictive schedule may include schedules that are unique for each day of the week, month, year, other time periods, or combinations thereof.
  • the predictive schedule can be stored remotely or locally at the control unit 102-b. Further, the predictive schedule module 202-a can modify the predictive schedule over time as more occupancy data is gathered. In some examples, the predictive schedule module 202-a initially begins with a default schedule. In other examples, the predictive schedule module 202-a builds the predictive schedule from scratch based on the determined occupancy patterns.
  • the predictive schedule has just an occupied state and an unoccupied state.
  • the predictive schedule includes additional occupancy states that give more detail about the occupant' s behavior, such as an "on the way to work” state, an "at work” state, a “heading home from work” state, another type of state, or combinations thereof.
  • the additional occupancy states may help the control module understand when the building is likely to be reoccupied.
  • the real time event module 204-a may determine which real time events correspond to different occupancy states based on the predictive schedule. For example, the real time event module 204-a may determine that there is a high correlation that when the mobile device 108 is at the location of the occupant' s work, that the building is unoccupied. Likewise, other locations of the mobile device 108 may also have a strong correlation with the building being unoccupied. Further, when the mobile device is heading in the direction to such locations, there may be a strong correlation with the building being unoccupied.
  • the real time events may also include the directions that are not necessarily tied to specific locations. For example, if the occupant is leaving work and heads in a direction that is going away from his or her home, there may be a strong correction that the occupant is going to a gym, a sports event, out to dinner, or another type of activity that suggests that the building will continue to stay unoccupied for an additional predictable amount of time.
  • the real time events may include more than just the location of the mobile device 108 or the direction that the mobile device 108 is headed.
  • a non-exhaustive list of potential real time events that may correlate with the building' s occupancy state may include the duration that a door is left open, the presence of a pet or valuable possession within the home, whether the mobile device is turned on, a particular application is being run on the mobile device, the occurrence of a particular community event, the occurrence of a particular television show, a health condition of the occupant, another type of real time event, or combinations thereof.
  • more than one occupant resides in a home.
  • more than one mobile device 108-a may include a location device that is in communication with the control unit 102-b.
  • the real time events may include the simultaneous locations of more than one mobile device 108, a direction of one mobile device and a location of another mobile device, the directions of multiple mobile devices, the location and/or direction of a predominate mobile device, other complex relationships between the multiple mobile devices, or combinations thereof.
  • the occupancy/event correlation module 206-a determines which of the real time events correlate with a particular occupancy state of the building. In some examples, the occupancy/event correlation module 206-a also determines the amount of time that the building is likely to be within the correlated occupancy state based on the real time event. For example, real time events that indicate that the occupant is going to or is at work may be associated with a nine hour period of non- occupancy for the building. Likewise, a real time event that indicates that the occupant is sick may correlate to the occupant being home all day. In such a situation, a heart rate monitor or another type of physiological sensor may be used to determine the health condition of the occupant. Further, the strength of the correlation between the real time event and the occupancy state may vary.
  • the confidence module 208-a determines a confidence that the building is in the deduced state. For example, if the occupancy sensor is detecting that an occupant is in the building, the confidence module can have a high confidence that the building is occupied. In another situation, if the predictive schedule indicates that the building is unoccupied and the occupancy sensor 104 does not detect the presence of an occupant, the confidence module 208-a may have a certain level of confidence that the building is unoccupied. However, if a real time event that correlates with the unoccupied state additionally occurs simultaneously with the lack of occupancy detection and the predictive schedule, the confidence module 208-a can have an even greater confidence that the building is unoccupied.
  • the parameters module 210-a adjusts parameters in the building based on the predictive schedule, the readings of the occupancy sensor 104, and the confidence module 208-a. For example, the parameters module 210-a can adjust lighting parameters, climate parameters, security parameters, other parameters in the building, and so forth based on the predictive schedule.
  • the control unit 102-b continues to monitor the building for occupancy. So, even if the predictive schedule indicates that historically no occupant is in the building, but the occupancy sensors are detecting an occupant, the parameters module 210-a can refrain from adjusting parameters to conservation levels. In other words, the real time occupancy detection can override the predictive schedule and also the detection of real time events.
  • the parameters module 210-a may include a policy that it is better to conclude that there is an occupant in the building and risk wasting some energy resources when the building is not occupied than to conclude that the building is unoccupied when the building is actually occupied and thereby risk subjecting that occupant to the effects of running the building' s systems at conservation levels.
  • the occupancy prediction module 212-a predicts when the building will change from an unoccupied state to an occupied state. For example, if the predictive schedule indicates that the building will be unoccupied on a certain day of the week until 5 :00 p.m., the occupancy prediction module 212-a predicts that the occupancy state will change to an occupied state at 5 :00 p.m. In such an example, the occupancy prediction module 212-a communicates with the parameters module 210-a to determine when to adjust the various parameters of the building for the occupancy state. In some cases, the parameters module 210-a may begin to adjust heating and cooling parameters at a predetermined time period before the occupancy state changes while other parameters, such as security and lighting parameters, may not be adjusted until the building is actually occupied.
  • the occupancy prediction module 212-a may also use real time events to adjust the anticipated arrival time of an occupant and therefore the predicted time when the occupancy state will change.
  • a real time event may be that the occupant heads away from his location of employment in a different direction than towards his or her home. Such a real time event may have a strong correlation with the occupancy state transition being delayed by an hour or another time period. Thus, the occupancy prediction module 212-a may predict that the transition time will be an hour later on those days when the occupant heads home in the different direction.
  • a real time event may include that the occupant is leaving work early. Such a real time event may have a high correlation with the occupant being home within a specific time period after leaving from the location of his work.
  • the hypothesis module 214-a may construct any appropriate hypothesis about whether the building is occupied or a hypothesis about a detail that would help the predictive schedule module 202-a determine if the building is occupied or not. For example, if an occupancy sensor 104 detects music, but there is no other indication that an occupant is in the building, the hypothesis module 214-a may construct a hypothesis that the occupant left a radio playing before leaving the home. In another example, the hypothesis module 214-a may construct a hypothesis that the occupant is away from the building based on communications from the mobile device despite movements detected from the occupancy sensor 104 that may be attributable to curtains blowing in the breeze from an open window.
  • the hypothesis module 214-a may make a hypothesis about data that is desirable for constructing the predictive schedule, but such desirable data is missing. In other examples, the hypothesis module 214-a may make a hypothesis about information that appears to be unreliable or inconsistent with other information.
  • the hypothesis module 214-a may make any appropriate type of hypothesis about any detail relevant to making or modifying the predictive schedule. Further, while the above examples have been described with reference to specific types of information on which the hypothesis module 214-a may base the hypothesis, the hypothesis module 214-a may use any appropriate type of information to make a hypothesis.
  • the confidence module 216-a determines a confidence that the predictive schedule contains an accurate deduced state or that the details upon which the predictive schedule module 202-a relies are accurate. If the confidence module 216-a assigns a low confidence to a particular piece of information, such information may not be relied upon while constructing the predictive schedule. As a result, portions of the predictive schedule may include gaps where the predictive schedule fails to predict occupancy in the building. On the other hand, the predictive schedule module 202-a may rely on those pieces of information that are assigned a high enough confidence.
  • the requesting module 218-a generates a request for an occupant for information that is calculated to help find missing information, increase a confidence in obtained information, or otherwise ascertain information relevant to the constructing or modifying the predictive schedule.
  • the request may include a question that is intended to confirm whether the hypothesis made by the hypothesis module 214-a is accurate.
  • the request may seek information that is calculated to verify the accuracy of data received from the occupancy sensors 104.
  • the requesting module 218-a sends a request to the mobile device 108.
  • the occupant may respond to the request through a user interface incorporated into the mobile device 108.
  • the request is emailed to the user or displayed in a display incorporated into the control unit 102-a. While the examples above have been described with reference to specific mechanisms that the requesting module 218-a can use to deliver a request for information to the occupant, the requesting module 218-a may use any appropriate mechanism to send the request to the occupant.
  • the requesting module 218-a may send the request in any appropriate format.
  • the request may include predetermined answers that the user can select to reply.
  • the predetermined answers may be "yes" or "no" where the user can select the appropriate answer to reply.
  • a set of predetermined answers may include different types of information.
  • a predetermined answer may state "I typically get home around 5 pm.” If that predetermined answer is accurate, the occupant can select that predetermined answer.
  • the request may include a free text format, where the user can type in the answer to the request.
  • the receiving module 220-a receives the answers from the occupant. Any appropriate mechanism for receiving the answers may be used.
  • the receiving module 220-a may include a wireless or a hardwired connection with the device to which the request was sent.
  • the response module 222-a responses to the received information.
  • the response module 222-a determines the meaning of the information in the response. In those examples where a predetermined answer was provided and selected, the response module 222-a determines which of the answers was selected. In other examples, the response module 222-a may perform a key word analysis in a free text formatted answer. However, any appropriate mechanism may be implemented to determine the meaning of the information in the answer.
  • the response module 222-a responses to the meaning of the information in the answer.
  • the response module 222-a may send a communication to the predictive schedule module 202-a indicating either the hypothesis can be treated as fact or confirming to the predictive schedule module 202-a that the hypothesis is accurate.
  • changes to the predictive schedule may result based on the information received from the occupant.
  • the response module 222-a may determine that no action is appropriate.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a real time event module 204-b.
  • the real time event module 204-b has a location module 300, a direction module 302, and an event identification module 304.
  • the location module 300 identifies those locations where the occupant is location based on the input from the mobile device 108. The locations are compared to occupancy states of the building. For those locations that have a high correlation with a specific occupancy state, the event identification module 304 can identify that such a location is a real time event.
  • the direction module 302 identifies those directions that the occupant is headed to identify patterns. If such patterns are identified, the patterns can be compared to the predictive schedule to determine if such a direction correlates with a particular occupancy state. Further, such determinations may correlate with a specific pattern anomaly, such as the occupant arriving at the building an hour later when the occupant heads in a particular direction. The direction may also be correlated with locations and times of day.
  • the event identification module 304 identifies those real time events that have a high correlation with occupancy states, schedule anomalies, or other types of attributes of the predictive schedule.
  • the event identification module 304 may determine the correlation between the attributes of the predictive schedule and any type of real time event. For example, the readings from non-occupancy sensors, readings from the mobile device, readings from health monitoring sensors, readings from calendar appointments, other types of readings that indicate a real time event, or combinations thereof.
  • the event identification module 304 can also assign different confidence levels to the real time events. For example, those real time events with lower correlations to aspects of the predictive schedule may not receive the same confidence level as those real time events that are strongly correlated with certain aspects of the predictive schedule.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a parameters module 210-b.
  • the parameters module 210-b includes a conservation module 400, a comfort module 402, a lighting module 404, a climate module 406, and a security module 408.
  • the conservation module 400 may cause at least one parameter affecting the building to change based on the predictive schedule. For example, the conservation module 400 may cause the furnace to lower its output to conserve energy while the building is unoccupied. When there is a sufficiently high enough confidence level that the building is unoccupied, the conservation module 400 may cause the furnace' s parameters to be changed to lower the building' s temperature to a level that conserves the building's resources.
  • a sensor associated with the door type event sends a message to the control unit 102.
  • the control unit 102 may track the passage of time from the occurrence of the event to gain confidence that the building is unoccupied. However, if a real time event is detected that has a correlation with an unoccupied state, then the parameters module 210-b may determine sooner that the building is unoccupied without waiting through the predetermined time lapse.
  • the conservation module 400 may be in communication with any appropriate module.
  • the conservation module 400 may be in communication with the lighting module 404 that controls at least some of the lighting in the building, the climate module 406 that controls at least some of the mechanisms that affect the building's climate, the security module 410 that controls how the premise of the building is monitored for security purposes, other modules, or combinations thereof.
  • the comfort module 402 may cause parameters affecting the building to change in response to predicting that the building will be occupied.
  • the comfort module 402 may consult with the predictive schedule to determine when the building is predicted to be occupied.
  • the parameters are changed prior to the predicted occupancy time so that parameters that take time to achieve can begin to change early enough so that the comfort level is achieved by the time that the occupants arrive. For example, a furnace may take twenty minutes to raise the temperature of a home from the conservation level to a comfort level.
  • the comfort module 402 may initiate the parameter changes at 4:40 p.m. so that the building is heated to the comfort level at 5 :00 p.m.
  • the comfort module 402 may be in communication with the lighting module 404, the climate module 406, the security module 408, other modules, or combinations thereof.
  • the comfort module 402 may cause the parameters of the building to be such that the occupant' s environment within the building is comfortable.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a mobile device 108-b.
  • the mobile device 108-b includes a location device 500 with a location module 501 and a direction module 502.
  • the location and the direction of the mobile device 108-b are determined with the location device 500 of the mobile device 108-b and sent to the control unit 102.
  • Any appropriate type of mobile device 108-b may be used.
  • the mobile device 108-b may include a phone, an electronic tablet, a watch, a laptop, a digital device, glasses, a pedometer, a wearable computing device, a vehicle mounted device, another type of device, or combinations thereof.
  • any appropriate type of location device 500 may be used in accordance with the principles described in the present disclosure.
  • the location device 500 may include a global positioning system (GPS), a navigation mechanism, an accelerometer, magnetic field sensor, a compass, another type of locating device, or combinations thereof.
  • GPS global positioning system
  • FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a hypothesis module 214-b.
  • the hypothesis module 214-b has a predictive schedule analyzer module 600, a blind spot module 602, and a hypothesis construction module 604.
  • the predictive schedule analyzer module 600 analyzes the predictive schedule or the information to be relied upon to construct the predictive schedule. Such an analysis may look at the information that is relied upon to construct the predictive schedule. For example, the analysis may determine the readings from the occupancy sensors and make a determination as to whether that information is reliable for being used in the predictive schedule. In some examples, such information indicates that the building is occupied, but such indicators are not reliable and therefore a low confidence is associated with such information.
  • the blind spot module 602 identifies if the occupancy sensors 104 are capable of detecting an adequate amount of information to make the predictive schedule. For example, the blind spot module 602 may analyze information to determine whether occupancy sensors 104 are appropriately positioned throughout the building. Such an analysis may cause the blind spot module 602 to consider whether additional occupancy sensors are desirable for detecting occupancy. For example, if there is no occupancy sensor 104 positioned in a room of a home and no other occupancy sensors in the building would be able to detect the presence of an individual in that home, than the room may be part of a blind spot to the occupancy detection system. An analysis of the occupancy sensors may reveal that the sensors ' ability to detect the occupant' s presence disappears from time to time. Such a failure to detect the occupant' s presence may occur when the occupant enters the blind spot. Based on the analysis, the blind spot module 602 may identify patterns indicative of a blind spot.
  • the hypothesis construction module 604 constructs the hypothesis.
  • the hypothesis can be based on the analysis of the blind spot module 602, the predictive schedule analyzer module 600, another module, or combinations thereof.
  • An example of a hypothesis may include identifying a location where a blind spot exists.
  • Another example of a hypothesis may involve determining that the building is occupied based on data that suggests the building could be occupied, but is not conclusive.
  • Another example of a hypothesis could be predicting the time that the building will transition from one occupancy state to another.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a requesting module 218-b.
  • the requesting module 218-b includes a confirmation module 700, a sensor coverage module 702, a time period data module 704, and a location tracking module 706.
  • the confirmation module 700 may cause a request to be made that seeks to confirm whether a hypothesis generated by the hypothesis module 214 is accurate.
  • the confirmation module 700 may formulate a question that restates the hypothesis in a question format.
  • a request may include "yes" or "no" predetermined answers that can be selected by the recipient of the request.
  • the sensor coverage module 702 may format requests for information about the location of the occupancy sensors. For example, the request may include asking whether an occupancy sensor is located in a particular room. In another example, the request may involve asking if the occupant is located within a specific room when the occupant has disappeared from the occupancy sensors. In yet another example, a request may ask where the occupant was at a specific time. Such questions may be aimed at determining the adequacy of the occupancy sensors coverage.
  • the time period data module 704 may make requests for information about time periods where no reliable data for determining occupancy exists. For example, if a time period exists where no occupancy is detected, but no door type event has occurred that could indicate that an occupant left the building, then the request could be directed to finding out the location of where the occupant was during that time. In another example, the request could be directed at determining the location of the occupant when the occupancy sensors and other types of indicators are sending conflicting details about occupancy.
  • the location tracking module 706 may include requests that deal with determining how many mobile devices are available to determine occupancy. For example, a request may involve asking how many occupants use a mobile device that have location tracking mechanisms that the control unit 102 can use to determine occupancy. Another type of request may include asking how often the occupant is with his or her mobile device to determine how reliable the mobile device' s location can be associated with the occupant's location. For example, if the mobile device is often left behind when the occupant leaves his or her home, the control unit 102 can associate a lower confidence with data indicating the occupant' s location based on the mobile device' s location tracking mechanism.
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a response module 222-b.
  • the response module 222-b includes a predictive schedule modifying module 800, a confidence score modifying module 802, and a suggestion module 804.
  • the predictive schedule modifying module 800 may cause the predictive schedule to be modified based on the information provided by the user. For example, if the user indicates that the mobile device' s location tracking mechanism is not reliable because the occupant often lets a neighbor borrow his or her mobile device, and the predictive schedule was based on communications from the mobile device, the predictive schedule modifying module 800 may undo those portions of the predictive schedule that were based on the mobile device's communications.
  • the confidence score modifying module 802 may modify the confidence scores of the information used to construct a portion of the predictive module. For example, if the predictive schedule was based in part on data that had a lower confidence score than desired, and an answer from the occupant indicates that information is correct, the confidence score modifying module 802 may increase the confidence score. Similarly, if the occupant indicates that such information is not correct, then the confidence score modifying module 802 may decrease the information's confidence score.
  • the suggestion module 804 can make suggestions to the occupant based on the user' s response. For example, if the answer from the occupant indicates that there is likely a blind spot in the occupancy detection system, then the suggestion module 804 can send a message to the occupant suggesting that another occupancy sensor be installed to cover the blind spot.
  • FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 900 for controlling a building system.
  • the method 900 includes using 902 at least one sensor type to detect occupancy in a building over time, determine 904 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with a sensor, and identify 906 real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule.
  • Such a method 900 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2.
  • method 900 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
  • occupancy sensors are used to determine whether the building is occupied or unoccupied.
  • a sensor type may be any appropriate type of sensor that is capable of determining whether an occupant is present within the building.
  • a motion detector, video camera, microphone, thermometer, door sensor, window sensor, another type of sensor, or combinations thereof may be used to detect the presence of an occupant.
  • the predictive schedule is determined based on the occupancy patterns detected in the building over time. Such a schedule predicts when the building will be occupied and/or unoccupied.
  • real time events are identified that have a correlation with an occupancy state of the building according to the predictive schedule. Such real time events can provide the control unit 102 an additional amount of confidence that the building is in a deduced state when both the deduced state and the real time event occur simultaneously.
  • FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method
  • the method 1000 includes using 1002 at least one sensor type to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1004 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, identifying 1006 real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule, deducing 1008 an unoccupied state of the building, determining 1010 with an increased confidence that the deduced unoccupied state is accurate based on a simultaneous occurrence of the real time events, and adjusting 1012 a building parameter based on the increased confidence of the unoccupied state.
  • Such a method 1000 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1000 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
  • the occupancy state of the building is deduced.
  • the occupancy state of the building may be determined with readings from the occupancy sensors and/or the predictive schedule. For example, if none of the occupancy sensors detects the presence of an individual, then an unoccupied state may be deduced.
  • an increased confidence that the building is in the unoccupied state is determined based on the detection of a real time event.
  • control unit 102 can determine with a greater degree of confidence that the deduced unoccupied state is correct.
  • the parameters of the building are adjusted to a conservation level in response to the simultaneous occurrence of the deduced state and the detection of a real time event that historically confirms that unoccupied state.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 1000 for controlling a building system. Such a method 1000 may be implemented with a control unit shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1000 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
  • a sensor monitors for door events, such as opening and closing the doors.
  • a determination is made to whether a door event has occurred. If not, the method 1 100 includes continuing to monitor for a door event. On the other hand, if a door event has been detected, a sensor is used 1 106 to detect the presence of an occupant.
  • a determination is made as to whether the presence of an occupant has been detected. If the presence of an occupant is detected, then the method 1 100 includes deducing 1 1 10 that the building is occupied. In response to deducing that the building is not occupied, the building parameters are maintained 1 1 1 1. If there is no detection of an occupant, then the method 1 100 deduces 1 1 12 that the building is in an unoccupied state.
  • FIG. 12 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method
  • the method 1200 for determining occupancy with user provided information.
  • the method 1200 includes using 1202 at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1204 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, and requesting 1206 information relevant to the predictive schedule from a user.
  • Such a method 1200 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1200 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
  • occupancy sensors are used to determine whether the building is occupied or unoccupied.
  • An occupancy sensor may be any appropriate type of sensor that is capable of determining whether an occupant is present within the building.
  • a motion detector, video camera, microphone, thermometer, door sensor, window sensor, another type of sensor, or combinations thereof may be used to detect the presence of an occupant.
  • the predictive schedule is determined based on the occupancy patterns detected in the building over time. Such a schedule predicts when the building will be occupied and/or unoccupied.
  • a request is sent to the user for information that is relevant to the predictive schedule. Such user provided information may be used to change the predictive schedule, confirm hypothesis relevant to the predictive schedule, make a suggestion to the user, change a confidence score associated with information for making the predictive schedule, perform another action, or combinations thereof.
  • FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 1300 for determining occupancy with user provided information.
  • the method 1300 includes using 1302 at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1304 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, making 1306 a hypothesis about a detail affecting the predictive schedule, and requesting 1308 information from a user to confirm the hypothesis.
  • Such a method 1300 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1300 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
  • a hypothesis is formed that can serve as the basis of a question to be asked of the user.
  • Such a hypothesis may be based on desirable, but missing, information for making the predictive schedule, based on confidence scores relating to the accuracy of information for making the predictive schedule, based on occupancy sensor data that is indicative of a gap in occupancy sensor coverage, based on communications from a mobile device, based on user input, based on historical occupancy patterns, based on other types of information, or combinations thereof.
  • FIG. 14 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 1400 for determining occupancy with user provided information.
  • the method 1400 includes using 1402 at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1404 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, asking 1406 a question of the user about ascertained data relevant to the predictive schedule associated with an unreliable confidence score, receiving 1408 an answer from the user, and changing 1410 the confidence score based on the information from the user.
  • Such a method 1400 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1400 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
  • a question is asked of the user about data that has been ascertained by the occupancy detection system.
  • the ascertained data has a low confidence score.
  • Data with low confidence scores may be deemed too unreliable to be used to create the predictive schedule.
  • data with low confidence scores may be used to create the predictive schedule, although the system has a preference to use data with higher confidence scores.
  • Such a question is sent to the user in any appropriate manner, such as sending the question to the user' s mobile device.
  • an answer from the user is received, and at block 810 the confidence score of the relevant information is changed based on the user' s response. For example, if the user confirms the accuracy of the data, the confidence score associated with that data may increase. Similarly, if the user denies the accuracy of the data, the confidence score may accordingly decrease.
  • FIG. 15 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 1500 for determining occupancy with user provided information.
  • the method 1500 includes using 1502 at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1504 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, requesting 1506 information to determine whether the at least one sensor has a blind spot, and suggesting 1508 to install another sensor in response to identifying the blind spot.
  • Such a method 1500 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1500 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
  • a blind spot is an area where the occupancy sensors cannot detect the presence of an occupant although the occupant is present within that area. Such blind spots may occur when the occupant is out of range of the occupancy sensors.
  • a suggestion is made to install another sensor in response to identifying a blind spot. For example, if a blind spot is identified in a particular room within the building, the recommendation may be to install an occupancy sensor in that room. Likewise, if just a portion of a specific room is part of a blind spot, the suggestion may include recommending a second occupancy sensor in that room that will cover the area blind to the occupancy sensors. Other suggestions may include recommending that a particular type of occupancy sensor be replaced within another occupancy sensor type, that a specific occupancy sensor be replaced, that a certain occupancy sensor be programmed to operate differently, another type of suggestion, or combinations thereof.
  • FIG. 16 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 1600 for determining occupancy with user provided information.
  • the method 1600 includes using 1602 at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1604 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, asking 1606 a question of the user about missing data relevant to the predictive schedule, receiving 1608 an answer from the user, and changing 1610 the predictive schedule based on the information from the user.
  • Such a method 1600 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2.
  • method 1600 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
  • Such missing data may include data that is desirable to generate the predictive schedule, but was not collected.
  • Such data may not be sent to the appropriate module for creating or modifying the predictive schedule due to inconsistent data or other factors rendering the data less reliable than desired. In other examples, no data relevant to a portion of the predictive schedule was ever collected.
  • an answer to the question is received.
  • Such an answer may be a selected predetermined answer, a free text formatted answer, another type of answer, or combinations thereof.
  • the answer may be sent over a mobile device, a speech command, a button input, another mechanism, or combinations thereof.
  • a change is made to the predictive schedule based on the information from the user. For example, if the answer to the question indicates that some information previously believed to be unreliable is accurate data, the predictive schedule may be changed to rely on such information.
  • a question asking if the user is often home during that period may be sent to the user.
  • the user may indicate in a reply that the user is often home during that period.
  • the predictive schedule may be changed from an unknown predictive state to an occupied predicted state.
  • FIG. 17 depicts a block diagram of a controller 1700 suitable for implementing the present systems and methods.
  • the controller 1700 may be an example of the control unit 102-a in FIG. 1.
  • controller 1700 includes a bus 1705 which interconnects major subsystems of controller 1700, such as a central processor 1710, a system memory 1715 (typically RAM, but which may also include ROM, flash RAM, or the like), an input/output controller 1720, an external audio device, such as a speaker system 1725 via an audio output interface 1730, an external device, such as a display screen 1735 via display adapter 1740, an input device 1745 (e.g.
  • Bus 1705 allows data communication between central processor 1710 and system memory 1715, which may include read-only memory (ROM) or flash memory (neither shown), and random access memory (RAM) (not shown), as previously noted.
  • the RAM is generally the main memory into which the operating system and application programs are loaded.
  • the ROM or flash memory can contain, among other code, the Basic Input-Output system (BIOS) which controls basic hardware operation such as the interaction with peripheral components or devices.
  • BIOS Basic Input-Output system
  • an occupancy deduction module 200-b, a predictive schedule module 202-b, a real time event module 204-c, an occupancy/event correlation module 206-b, a confidence module 208-b, a parameters module 210-b, an occupancy prediction module 212-b, a hypothesis module 214-c, occupancy prediction module 212-c, requesting module 218-c, receiving module 220-b, and a response module 222-c may be used to implement the present systems and methods may be stored within the system memory 1015.
  • These modules may be an example of the modules illustrated in FIG. 2.
  • controller 1700 Applications resident with controller 1700 are generally stored on and accessed via a non-transitory computer readable medium, such as a hard disk drive (e.g., fixed disk 1775) or other storage medium. Additionally, applications can be in the form of electronic signals modulated in accordance with the application and data communication technology when accessed via network interface 1785.
  • a non-transitory computer readable medium such as a hard disk drive (e.g., fixed disk 1775) or other storage medium.
  • applications can be in the form of electronic signals modulated in accordance with the application and data communication technology when accessed via network interface 1785.
  • Storage interface 1780 can connect to a standard computer readable medium for storage and/or retrieval of information, such as a fixed disk drive 1775.
  • Fixed disk drive 1775 may be a part of controller 1700 or may be separate and accessed through other interface systems.
  • Network interface 1785 may provide a direct connection to a remote server via a direct network link to the Internet via a POP (point of presence).
  • Network interface 1785 may provide such connection using wireless techniques, including digital cellular telephone connection, Cellular Digital Packet Data (CDPD) connection, digital satellite data connection, or the like.
  • one or more sensors e.g.
  • the cellular radio 1790 may include a receiver and transmitter to wirelessly receive and transmit communications via, for example, a cellular network.
  • Code to implement the present disclosure can be stored in a non-transitory computer-readable medium such as one or more of system memory 1715 or fixed disk 1775.
  • the operating system provided on controller 1700 may be iOS ® , ANDROID ® , MS-DOS ® , MS-WINDOWS ® , OS/2 ® , UNIX ® , LINUX ® , or another known operating system.
  • a signal can be directly transmitted from a first block to a second block, or a signal can be modified (e.g., amplified, attenuated, delayed, latched, buffered, inverted, filtered, or otherwise modified) between the blocks.
  • a signal can be directly transmitted from a first block to a second block, or a signal can be modified (e.g., amplified, attenuated, delayed, latched, buffered, inverted, filtered, or otherwise modified) between the blocks.
  • modified signals e.g., amplified, attenuated, delayed, latched, buffered, inverted, filtered, or otherwise modified
  • a signal input at a second block can be conceptualized as a second signal derived from a first signal output from a first block due to physical limitations of the circuitry involved (e.g., there will inevitably be some attenuation and delay). Therefore, as used herein, a second signal derived from a first signal includes the first signal or any modifications to the first signal, whether due to circuit limitations or due to passage through other circuit elements which do not change the informational and/or final functional aspect of the first signal.

Abstract

Methods and systems are described for controlling parameters in a building. According to at least one embodiment, a method for controlling a building system includes using at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, and associate real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule.

Description

CONTROLLING A BUILDING SYSTEM BASED ON REAL TIME EVENTS
CROSS-REFERENCE
[0001] This application claims priority to U. S. Patent Application No. 14/272,086 filed on May 7, 2014 and titled Controlling a Building System Based on Real Time Events. This application also claims priority U.S. Patent Application No. 14/291 ,789 filed on May 30, 2014 and titled Determining Occupancy with User Provided Information.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Keeping a furnace of a building operating at a level high enough to make residents comfortable when there are no occupants in the home can be costly and wasteful. Likewise, keeping lights on when they are not in use also wastes resources and is an additional cost to homeowners and/or building management. Thus, residents in a home turn down the lights and/or lower the temperature in their homes when they leave for an extended amount of time to save costs. For example, if a homeowner takes a week-long vacation, the homeowner often manually adjusts the thermostat to keep the home at a temperature that will prevent the house from freezing or overheating while the homeowner is away. But, such a temperature may not necessarily be a temperature that is comfortable for the homeowner. Thus, when the homeowner returns, the homeowner must readjust the thermostat to return the house to a comfortable temperature.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Methods and systems are described for controlling parameters in a building. According to at least one embodiment, a method for controlling a building system includes using at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, and associating real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule.
[0004] In some embodiments, the method further includes deducing an unoccupied state of the building. In some cases, deducing the unoccupied state of the building includes sensing a door event. In other examples, deducing the unoccupied state of the building includes a lack of stimulus to the at least one sensor. In some situations, deducing the unoccupied state of the building is based at least in part on the predictive schedule.
[0005] In some instances, the method further includes determining with an increased confidence that the deduced unoccupied state is accurate in response to a simultaneous occurrence of the real time event. Further, the method may include adjusting a building parameter based on the increased confidence of the unoccupied state. Such a building parameter may include a climate parameter, a lighting parameter, a security parameter, another type of parameter, or combinations thereof.
[0006] Additionally, the method may include predicting a transition time from the unoccupied state to an occupied state based on a simultaneous occurrence of the real time event. The real time event may be detected with a location device incorporated into a mobile device. For example, the real time event may include a location device being in a specific location, a location device heading in a specific direction, a location device heading in a specific direction from a specific location, other real time events, or combinations thereof.
[0007] In some cases, the method includes requesting information relevant to the predictive schedule from a user. Requesting the information relevant to the predictive schedule from the user may include sending a question to a device associated with the user, asking a question of the user about missing data relevant to the predictive schedule, asking a question of the user about ascertained data relevant to the predictive schedule associated with an unreliable confidence score, requesting data about a period of time where no occupancy is detected, requesting the information about a number of occupants with location tracking mobile devices, or combinations thereof. In situations where requesting the information relevant includes asking a question of the user about ascertained data relevant to the predictive schedule associated with an unreliable confidence score, the method may also include changing a confidence score about ascertained data relevant to the predictive schedule based on the information from the user.
[0008] In another aspect of the principles described herein, a computing device is configured for controlling a building system. The computing device includes a processor, memory in electronic communication with the processor, and instructions stored in the memory. The instructions are executable by the processor to use at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determine a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, and associate real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule.
[0009] In yet another aspect of the principles described herein, a computer program product is used for controlling a building system. The computer-program product includes a non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions thereon. The instructions are executable by a processor to use a first sensor type to use at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determine a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, identify real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule, deduce an unoccupied state of the building, determine with an increased confidence that the deduced unoccupied state is accurate based on a simultaneous occurrence of the real time event, and adjust a building parameter in response to determining the increased confidence of the unoccupied state.
[0010] The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of examples according to the disclosure in order that the detailed description that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages will be described hereinafter. The conception and specific examples disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present disclosure. Such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Features which are believed to be characteristic of the concepts disclosed herein, both as to their organization and method of operation, together with associated advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. Each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only, and not as a definition of the limits of the claims. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the embodiments may be realized by reference to the following drawings. In the appended figures, similar components or features may have the same reference label. Further, various components of the same type may be distinguished by following the reference label by a dash and a second label that distinguishes among the similar components. If only the first reference label is used in the specification, the description is applicable to any one of the similar components having the same first reference label irrespective of the second reference label.
[0012] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example of an environment in which the present systems and methods may be implemented;
[0013] FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example of a control unit of the environment shown in FIG. 1 ;
[0014] FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example of an real time event module of the control unit of FIG. 2;
[0015] FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an example of a parameters module of the control unit of FIG. 2;
[0016] FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an example of a mobile device of the environment of FIG. 1 ;
[0017] FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an example of an hypothesis module of the control unit of FIG. 2;
[0018] FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an example of a requesting module of the control unit of FIG. 2;
[0019] FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an example of a response module of the control unit of FIG. 2;
[0020] FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for controlling a building system;
[0021] FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for controlling a building system;
[0022] FIG. 1 1 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for controlling a building system; [0023] FIG. 12 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for determining occupancy with user provided information;
[0024] FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for determining occupancy with user provided information;
[0025] FIG. 14 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for determining occupancy with user provided information;
[0026] FIG. 15 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for determining occupancy with user provided information;
[0027] FIG. 16 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a method for determining occupancy with user provided information;
[0028] FIG. 17 is a block diagram of a computer system suitable for implementing the present systems and methods of FIG. 1.
[0029] While the embodiments described herein are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. However, the exemplary embodiments described herein are not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the instant disclosure covers all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims.
BEST MODE(S) FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0030] The systems and methods described herein relate to home automation, home security and related security systems and automation for use in commercial and business settings. More specifically, the systems and methods described herein relate to an improved arrangement for controlling parameters in a building. The principles described herein use occupancy sensors to predict a schedule of when the building is occupied. The parameters in the building are adjusted based in part on the schedule. The parameters can also be changed in response to deducing that the building is unoccupied and determining a simultaneously occurrence of a real time event that correlates with an increased probability that the building is unoccupied.
[0031] As used herein, the term "module" includes a combination of hardware and programmed instructions that are necessary for performing the designated function of the module. Components of the modules may be located on the same physical device or some of the components may be located at remote locations that are in communication with the other components of the module.
[0032] FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting one embodiment of an environment 100 in which the present systems and methods may be implemented. In some embodiments, the environment 100 includes a control unit 102-a that is in communication with at least one occupancy sensor 104, a door sensor 106, and a mobile device 108-a. The control unit 102-a is also in communication with a security system 1 10, lighting 1 12, and a climate control 1 14.
[0033] Any appropriate mechanism for communicating between the control unit 102-a, the occupancy sensors 104, the door sensor 106, and the mobile device 108-a may be used. In some examples, a wireless network is utilized to communicate between the control unit 102-a, the occupancy sensors 104, the door sensor 106, and the mobile device 108-a. Examples of networks that may be used include, but are not limited to, local area networks (LAN), wide area networks (WAN), virtual private networks (VPN), wireless networks (using 802. 1 1 , for example), and/or cellular networks (using 3 G and/or LTE, for example), Bluetooth networks, z-wave networks, ZigBee networks, other types of networks, or combinations thereof.
[0034] The control unit 102-a may control at least a part of the security and/or automation system. For example, other sensors and/or actuators may send information to the control unit 102-a where the signals are processed. Such sensors may include, for example, a camera sensor, audio sensor, forced entry sensor, shock sensor, proximity sensor, boundary sensor, appliance sensor, light fixture sensor, temperature sensor, light beam sensor, three-dimensional (3 -D) sensor, motion sensor, smoke sensor, glass break sensor, door sensor, window sensor, carbon monoxide sensor, accelerometer, global positioning system (GPS) sensor, Wi-Fi positioning system sensor, capacitance sensor, radio frequency sensor, near-field sensor, heartbeat sensor, breathing sensor, oxygen sensor, carbon dioxide sensor, brain wave sensor, movement sensor, voice sensor, other types of sensors, or combinations thereof. Such actuators may include, but are not limited to, automated door locks, climate control adjustors, lighting adjusters, sensors activation mechanisms, other types of actuators, or combinations thereof.
[0035] The control unit 102-a may make decisions based on the communications from the occupancy sensor 104 and the door sensor 106. For example, based on the information sent from the occupancy sensor 104 and the door sensor 106 to the control unit 102-a, the control unit 102-a may make a decision to activate an alarm, adjust a climate control setting, open or close a window, lock or unlock a door, control a security parameter, manage energy consumption, check the status of a door, locate a person or item, control lighting, control cameras, receive notifications regarding a current status or anomaly associated with a building, perform another task, or combinations thereof. In some cases, a decision may be decided at one of the local sensors, and the local sensors may or may not notify the control unit 102-a of the decision and/or resulting action.
[0036] In some examples, the control unit 102-a includes a user interface where the occupant can interact with the control unit 102-a. For example, the occupant can manually give instructions to the control unit 102-a to adjust a building parameter, install an occupancy sensor 104, or perform another system task.
[0037] In addition to the capabilities mentioned above, the control unit 102-a may determine whether the building is occupied or unoccupied. In some examples, the occupancy sensor 104 communicates with the control unit 102-a to determine the occupancy state of the building. Any appropriate type or types of occupancy sensors may be used in accordance with the principles described in the present disclosure. A non-exhaustive list of occupancy sensor types may include microphones, motion detectors, video cameras, mobile devices, location devices, infrared devices, temperature devices, touch input devices, other types of devices, or combinations thereof. In some examples, a single occupancy sensor 104 is used to determine whether the entire building is occupied. However, in other examples, multiple occupancy sensors 104 are distributed throughout the building to determine whether the building is occupied. In some cases, multiple different types of occupancy sensors 104 are used to increase the reliability of occupancy detection.
[0038] In an example where a motion detector is used, the control unit 102- a may determine that the building is not occupied when the motion detector does not detect the presence of an occupant within the building. On the other hand, the control unit 102-a may determine that there is an occupant within the building when the motion detector is triggered.
[0039] In addition to the occupancy sensor 104, the door sensor 106 or a window sensor may indicate to the control unit 102-a when an event occurs that may indicate a change in occupancy. For example, a probability exists that the building' s occupancy state will change when a door to the exterior of the building is open allowing occupants to enter and/or leave the building. In response to the occurrence of such a door type event, the control unit 102-a is aware that the occupancy of the building may have changed. In response to such a door type event, the control unit 102-a may associate a time stamp with the opening and/or closing of the door. The control unit 102-a may make an assumption that occupancy will be consistent until the occurrence of another door type event. As time progresses from the occurrence of the event, a motion detector (or another type of occupancy sensor) may detect the presence of an occupant. As a result, the control unit 102-a may determine that the building will be occupied until the occurrence of another door type event. Likewise, if the motion detector (or another type of occupancy sensor) does not detect an occupant, the control unit 102-a may determine that no occupants are within the building and determine that the building will be unoccupied until a subsequent door type event.
[0040] The subsequent door type event may be of the same type of event as the initial door type event. For example, the initial door type event and the subsequent door type event may both be opening the front door to a home. In other examples, the initial door type event is opening a front door, and the subsequent door type event is the opening of a back door. In yet other examples, the initial door type event may be opening a door, and the subsequent door type event may be the opening of a window, the opening of a garage door, another type of event that may indicate a potential change in occupancy, or combinations thereof. While these examples have been described with reference to specific types of events, any appropriate type of event of may be used for either of the initial door type event and the subsequent door type event that can indicate a potential change in occupancy. [0041] In some examples, the control unit 102-a determines that there is occupancy or no occupancy after a predetermined time threshold lapses from the occurrence of the event. In other examples, the control unit 102-a calculates an increased confidence that there is no occupancy within the building as the time progresses from the occurrence of the event.
[0042] The control unit 102-a or another type of processing device may generate a schedule based on the data collected from the occupancy sensor 104. For example, the occupancy sensors 104 in a household of a single individual who leaves his or her home around 7 :45 a.m. and returns home around 5 : 15 p.m. may have fairly consistent occupancy patterns Monday through Friday. In such an example, the occupancy sensors may fail to detect the presence of the individual during the time period that starts around 7:45 a.m. and ends around 5 : 15 p.m. Based on such consistent measurements over time, the control unit 102-a may predict that the household will be unoccupied during this time period. As a result, when a door type event occurs around 7:45 a.m. on a week day, the control unit 102-a may determine that the home will be unoccupied until about 5 : 15 p.m.
[0043] Such a generated schedule may vary from day to day. For example, the control unit 102-a may have the capability to determine patterns for each day of the week to account for different schedules on different days of the week. Similarly, the control unit 102-a may have a capability to recognize weekly patterns, monthly patterns, annual patterns, patterns exhibited over less than a week, patterns exhibited over less than a day, other patterns, or combinations thereof.
[0044] The occupancy sensors may be positioned throughout an entire building. In other examples, the occupancy sensors are positioned just within areas that are highly indicative of occupancy throughout the entire building.
[0045] The predictive schedule may be used, at least in part, to make adjustments to parameters of the building. For example, if the control unit 102-a receives notice that a door type event has occurred, the control unit 102-a can consult the predictive schedule. If the door type event coincides with a predicted transition into an unoccupied state, the control unit 102-a may determine that the building is not occupied. In some examples, the control unit 102-a may continue to monitor the building with occupancy sensors 104 for a predetermined grace period before making the determination that the building is unoccupied.
[0046] If the predictive schedule also predicts that the building will be unoccupied for a sufficient period of time, the control unit 102-a may send commands to various control devices throughout the building to adjust parameters to conserve building resources while the building is unoccupied. For example, the control unit 102-a may communicate with lighting 1 12 and a climate control 1 14 to reduce energy consumption. Similarly, the control unit 102-a may automatically arm the security system 1 10 in response to determining that the building is unoccupied. In some examples, appliances like a washing machine may be turned on based on the determination that the building is in an unoccupied state, while other devices, like a television or a radio, may be turned off. While just a few specific parameters are described as being adjusted based on the determination of the building being in an unoccupied state, any appropriate parameter adjustment may be made including adjustments to security parameters, climate parameters, lighting parameters, cleaning parameters, energy consumption parameters, computer parameters, television parameters, door parameters, window parameters, blind parameters, fan parameters, appliance parameters, water parameters, network parameters, other types of parameters, or combinations thereof.
[0047] The control unit 102-a may also identify and associate real time events that correlate with different types of occupancy states predicted in the predictive schedule. In some examples, the predictive schedule has an occupied state and an unoccupied state. During the unoccupied state, a location device in the mobile device 108-a that is carried by a building occupant may indicate that the occupant is at a specific location remote to the building. Over time, there may be a strong correlation between the mobile device 108-a being at that specific location and the building being in an unoccupied state. In such an situation, the control unit 102-a may associate the mobile device's presence at that specific location with an unoccupied state of the building.
[0048] For example, if the predictive schedule indicates that an occupant generally leaves his or her home about 5 : 15 a.m., when a door type event occurs at 5 : 15 a.m., the control unit 102-a may have some degree of confidence that the building is unoccupied after the door type event occurs. However, such a level of confidence may not be high enough for the control unit 102-a to start making adjustment to the building' s parameters just in case the building is actually still occupied. To increase the confidence level that the building is unoccupied, the control unit 102-a may wait for a predetermined time period before making parameter adjustments. After such a predetermined time period, if no occupants are detected, the system' s confidence that the building is unoccupied increases. With the increased confidence, the control unit 102-a may cause the building' s parameters to be adjusted to reflect that the building is unoccupied. Thus, in keeping with the above example, the building' s parameters will be changed at 5 :45 a.m.
[0049] As an example, a predetermined time period to increase the control unit' s confidence that the building is unoccupied may be thirty minutes. In such an example where the occupant leaves for work at 5 : 15 a.m., the building' s parameters will be unadjusted for at least those additional thirty minutes from when the occupant leaves the building. However, if the occupant arrives at a real time event location, such as the occupant's place of work, at 5 :20 a.m., the control unit 102-a may recognize the real time event based on the location of the occupant' s mobile device. The recognition of such a real time event may provide the control unit 102-a with the increased confidence that the building is unoccupied. Thus, the control unit 102-a may cause the parameters in the building to be adjusted at 5 :20 a.m. instead of 5 :45 a.m. Thus, more resources can be conserved.
[0050] In another example, the control unit 102-a may associate an increased confidence that the building will be unoccupied when the mobile device is heading in the direction to work, not just merely being at the occupant's location of work. Thus, if the control unit 102-a determines, based on the route exhibited by the mobile device 108-a, that the occupant is headed towards work, the control unit 102- a may have a higher degree of confidence that the building will remain unoccupied as indicated in the schedule.
[0051] In other examples, the predictive schedule may indicate that the building is to be occupied. However, the mobile device' s location and/or direction may exhibit a real time event that is so strongly correlated with the building being unoccupied for a specified period of time that the control unit 102-a has an increased confidence that the building is unoccupied. Thus, if the occupancy sensor 104 is not indicating otherwise, the control unit 102-a may determine, with an increased confidence, that the building is unoccupied, and therefore adjust the parameters of the building accordingly.
[0052] In some situations, not all of the real time events will be associated with the same level of confidence. For example, real time events that indicate that the occupant is at work may generate an increased confidence while other real time events that indicate that the occupant is at a certain store or in the neighborhood may be associated with a lower level of confidence.
[0053] In some situations, the control unit 102-a makes the predictive schedule based on just the information from the occupancy sensor 104. In such a scenario, information from the occupancy sensor 104 may reveal very clear occupancy patterns with easily identified transitions from one state of occupancy to the next. However, in other situations, the occupancy sensor 104 may not have all of the information that the control unit 102-a desires to make a predictive schedule with a high degree of confidence. Further, some of the information from the occupancy sensor 104 may appear to be contradictory. As a result, the control unit 102-a may seek user input about those details relevant to the predictive schedule that are missing, vague, inconsistent, or that otherwise appear to be unreliable.
[0054] The control unit 102-a may request the clarifying information from the user. For example, the control unit 102-a may generate a question that is sent to a mobile device associated with at least one occupant of the building. Such a question may be narrowly tailored to provide the control unit 102-a with the information that the control unit 102-a desires to create and/or modify the predictive schedule. For example, if the control unit 102-a cannot determine an occupancy pattern for a specific time period on a particular day of the week, the control unit 102-a may send a question asking the user if he or she is home during that time period on that particular day of week. If the user responds by indicating that the occupant is not home during that time period, the control unit 102-a may construct a predictive schedule accordingly with confidence that the home will be unoccupied.
[0055] In another scenario, the control unit 102-a may be in communication with a location tracking device of the occupant's mobile device 108 and the control unit 102-a may receive communications from the mobile device 108 indicating that the mobile device 108 is away from the building. The control unit 102-a may make the assumption, based on the communications from the mobile device 108, that the occupant is also away from the building. However, if an on-site occupancy sensor indicates that the building is occupied, the control unit 102-a may send a question to the occupant asking whether he or she is currently at the building. Another appropriate type of question may be a question asking the occupant if there is another occupant living in the home. Yet another appropriate question may involve asking if another person uses the occupant' s mobile device. In some situations, the control unit 102-a may ask the occupant if there is another person living in the building.
[0056] FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a control unit 102-b. In this example, the control unit 102-b has an occupancy deduction module 200-a, a predictive schedule module 202-a, a real time event module 204-a, an occupancy/event correlation module 206-a, a confidence module 208-a, a parameters module 210-a, an occupancy prediction module 212-a, a hypothesis module 214-a, a confidence module 216-a, a requesting module 218-a, a receiving module 220-a, and a response module 222-a.
[0057] The occupancy deduction module 200-a may be used to deduce whether a building is occupied or not. For example, if the occupancy sensor 104 detects the presence of a person, the occupancy deduction module 200-a may deduce that the building is currently in an occupied state. On the other hand, if the occupancy sensor 104 does not detect the presence of an occupant, the occupancy deduction module 200-a may deduce that the building is in an unoccupied state. However, in either state, the occupancy deduction module 200-a may have varying degrees of confidence about the deduced state.
[0058] The predictive schedule module 202-a may generate and/or maintain a schedule that predicts when the building will be occupied or unoccupied. Such a predictive schedule may be based on the historical occupancy patterns recorded over time with the occupancy sensors 104. The predictive schedule may include schedules that are unique for each day of the week, month, year, other time periods, or combinations thereof. The predictive schedule can be stored remotely or locally at the control unit 102-b. Further, the predictive schedule module 202-a can modify the predictive schedule over time as more occupancy data is gathered. In some examples, the predictive schedule module 202-a initially begins with a default schedule. In other examples, the predictive schedule module 202-a builds the predictive schedule from scratch based on the determined occupancy patterns.
[0059] In some examples, the predictive schedule has just an occupied state and an unoccupied state. In other examples, the predictive schedule includes additional occupancy states that give more detail about the occupant' s behavior, such as an "on the way to work" state, an "at work" state, a "heading home from work" state, another type of state, or combinations thereof. The additional occupancy states may help the control module understand when the building is likely to be reoccupied.
[0060] The real time event module 204-a may determine which real time events correspond to different occupancy states based on the predictive schedule. For example, the real time event module 204-a may determine that there is a high correlation that when the mobile device 108 is at the location of the occupant' s work, that the building is unoccupied. Likewise, other locations of the mobile device 108 may also have a strong correlation with the building being unoccupied. Further, when the mobile device is heading in the direction to such locations, there may be a strong correlation with the building being unoccupied.
[0061] The real time events may also include the directions that are not necessarily tied to specific locations. For example, if the occupant is leaving work and heads in a direction that is going away from his or her home, there may be a strong correction that the occupant is going to a gym, a sports event, out to dinner, or another type of activity that suggests that the building will continue to stay unoccupied for an additional predictable amount of time.
[0062] The real time events may include more than just the location of the mobile device 108 or the direction that the mobile device 108 is headed. For example, a non-exhaustive list of potential real time events that may correlate with the building' s occupancy state may include the duration that a door is left open, the presence of a pet or valuable possession within the home, whether the mobile device is turned on, a particular application is being run on the mobile device, the occurrence of a particular community event, the occurrence of a particular television show, a health condition of the occupant, another type of real time event, or combinations thereof.
[0063] In some examples, more than one occupant resides in a home. In such a situation, more than one mobile device 108-a may include a location device that is in communication with the control unit 102-b. In such situations, the real time events may include the simultaneous locations of more than one mobile device 108, a direction of one mobile device and a location of another mobile device, the directions of multiple mobile devices, the location and/or direction of a predominate mobile device, other complex relationships between the multiple mobile devices, or combinations thereof.
[0064] The occupancy/event correlation module 206-a determines which of the real time events correlate with a particular occupancy state of the building. In some examples, the occupancy/event correlation module 206-a also determines the amount of time that the building is likely to be within the correlated occupancy state based on the real time event. For example, real time events that indicate that the occupant is going to or is at work may be associated with a nine hour period of non- occupancy for the building. Likewise, a real time event that indicates that the occupant is sick may correlate to the occupant being home all day. In such a situation, a heart rate monitor or another type of physiological sensor may be used to determine the health condition of the occupant. Further, the strength of the correlation between the real time event and the occupancy state may vary.
[0065] The confidence module 208-a determines a confidence that the building is in the deduced state. For example, if the occupancy sensor is detecting that an occupant is in the building, the confidence module can have a high confidence that the building is occupied. In another situation, if the predictive schedule indicates that the building is unoccupied and the occupancy sensor 104 does not detect the presence of an occupant, the confidence module 208-a may have a certain level of confidence that the building is unoccupied. However, if a real time event that correlates with the unoccupied state additionally occurs simultaneously with the lack of occupancy detection and the predictive schedule, the confidence module 208-a can have an even greater confidence that the building is unoccupied. [0066] The parameters module 210-a adjusts parameters in the building based on the predictive schedule, the readings of the occupancy sensor 104, and the confidence module 208-a. For example, the parameters module 210-a can adjust lighting parameters, climate parameters, security parameters, other parameters in the building, and so forth based on the predictive schedule. The control unit 102-b continues to monitor the building for occupancy. So, even if the predictive schedule indicates that historically no occupant is in the building, but the occupancy sensors are detecting an occupant, the parameters module 210-a can refrain from adjusting parameters to conservation levels. In other words, the real time occupancy detection can override the predictive schedule and also the detection of real time events. The parameters module 210-a may include a policy that it is better to conclude that there is an occupant in the building and risk wasting some energy resources when the building is not occupied than to conclude that the building is unoccupied when the building is actually occupied and thereby risk subjecting that occupant to the effects of running the building' s systems at conservation levels.
[0067] The occupancy prediction module 212-a predicts when the building will change from an unoccupied state to an occupied state. For example, if the predictive schedule indicates that the building will be unoccupied on a certain day of the week until 5 :00 p.m., the occupancy prediction module 212-a predicts that the occupancy state will change to an occupied state at 5 :00 p.m. In such an example, the occupancy prediction module 212-a communicates with the parameters module 210-a to determine when to adjust the various parameters of the building for the occupancy state. In some cases, the parameters module 210-a may begin to adjust heating and cooling parameters at a predetermined time period before the occupancy state changes while other parameters, such as security and lighting parameters, may not be adjusted until the building is actually occupied.
[0068] The occupancy prediction module 212-a may also use real time events to adjust the anticipated arrival time of an occupant and therefore the predicted time when the occupancy state will change. For example, a real time event may be that the occupant heads away from his location of employment in a different direction than towards his or her home. Such a real time event may have a strong correlation with the occupancy state transition being delayed by an hour or another time period. Thus, the occupancy prediction module 212-a may predict that the transition time will be an hour later on those days when the occupant heads home in the different direction. In another example, a real time event may include that the occupant is leaving work early. Such a real time event may have a high correlation with the occupant being home within a specific time period after leaving from the location of his work.
[0069] The hypothesis module 214-a may construct any appropriate hypothesis about whether the building is occupied or a hypothesis about a detail that would help the predictive schedule module 202-a determine if the building is occupied or not. For example, if an occupancy sensor 104 detects music, but there is no other indication that an occupant is in the building, the hypothesis module 214-a may construct a hypothesis that the occupant left a radio playing before leaving the home. In another example, the hypothesis module 214-a may construct a hypothesis that the occupant is away from the building based on communications from the mobile device despite movements detected from the occupancy sensor 104 that may be attributable to curtains blowing in the breeze from an open window.
[0070] The hypothesis module 214-a may make a hypothesis about data that is desirable for constructing the predictive schedule, but such desirable data is missing. In other examples, the hypothesis module 214-a may make a hypothesis about information that appears to be unreliable or inconsistent with other information.
[0071] While the above examples have been described with reference to specific types of hypothesis that the hypothesis module 214-a can make, the hypothesis module 214-a may make any appropriate type of hypothesis about any detail relevant to making or modifying the predictive schedule. Further, while the above examples have been described with reference to specific types of information on which the hypothesis module 214-a may base the hypothesis, the hypothesis module 214-a may use any appropriate type of information to make a hypothesis.
[0072] The confidence module 216-a determines a confidence that the predictive schedule contains an accurate deduced state or that the details upon which the predictive schedule module 202-a relies are accurate. If the confidence module 216-a assigns a low confidence to a particular piece of information, such information may not be relied upon while constructing the predictive schedule. As a result, portions of the predictive schedule may include gaps where the predictive schedule fails to predict occupancy in the building. On the other hand, the predictive schedule module 202-a may rely on those pieces of information that are assigned a high enough confidence.
[0073] The requesting module 218-a generates a request for an occupant for information that is calculated to help find missing information, increase a confidence in obtained information, or otherwise ascertain information relevant to the constructing or modifying the predictive schedule. For example, the request may include a question that is intended to confirm whether the hypothesis made by the hypothesis module 214-a is accurate. In another example, the request may seek information that is calculated to verify the accuracy of data received from the occupancy sensors 104.
[0074] In some examples, the requesting module 218-a sends a request to the mobile device 108. The occupant may respond to the request through a user interface incorporated into the mobile device 108. In other examples, the request is emailed to the user or displayed in a display incorporated into the control unit 102-a. While the examples above have been described with reference to specific mechanisms that the requesting module 218-a can use to deliver a request for information to the occupant, the requesting module 218-a may use any appropriate mechanism to send the request to the occupant.
[0075] Further, the requesting module 218-a may send the request in any appropriate format. For example, the request may include predetermined answers that the user can select to reply. For example, the predetermined answers may be "yes" or "no" where the user can select the appropriate answer to reply. In other examples, a set of predetermined answers may include different types of information. In such an example, a predetermined answer may state "I typically get home around 5 pm." If that predetermined answer is accurate, the occupant can select that predetermined answer. In other examples, the request may include a free text format, where the user can type in the answer to the request.
[0076] The receiving module 220-a receives the answers from the occupant. Any appropriate mechanism for receiving the answers may be used. For example, the receiving module 220-a may include a wireless or a hardwired connection with the device to which the request was sent.
[0077] The response module 222-a responses to the received information. First, the response module 222-a determines the meaning of the information in the response. In those examples where a predetermined answer was provided and selected, the response module 222-a determines which of the answers was selected. In other examples, the response module 222-a may perform a key word analysis in a free text formatted answer. However, any appropriate mechanism may be implemented to determine the meaning of the information in the answer.
[0078] Next, the response module 222-a responses to the meaning of the information in the answer. In those situations where the received information confirms the hypothesis generated by the hypothesis module 214-a, the response module 222-a may send a communication to the predictive schedule module 202-a indicating either the hypothesis can be treated as fact or confirming to the predictive schedule module 202-a that the hypothesis is accurate. In other examples, changes to the predictive schedule may result based on the information received from the occupant. In some examples, the response module 222-a may determine that no action is appropriate.
[0079] FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a real time event module 204-b. In this example, the real time event module 204-b has a location module 300, a direction module 302, and an event identification module 304.
[0080] The location module 300 identifies those locations where the occupant is location based on the input from the mobile device 108. The locations are compared to occupancy states of the building. For those locations that have a high correlation with a specific occupancy state, the event identification module 304 can identify that such a location is a real time event.
[0081] The direction module 302 identifies those directions that the occupant is headed to identify patterns. If such patterns are identified, the patterns can be compared to the predictive schedule to determine if such a direction correlates with a particular occupancy state. Further, such determinations may correlate with a specific pattern anomaly, such as the occupant arriving at the building an hour later when the occupant heads in a particular direction. The direction may also be correlated with locations and times of day.
[0082] The event identification module 304 identifies those real time events that have a high correlation with occupancy states, schedule anomalies, or other types of attributes of the predictive schedule. The event identification module 304 may determine the correlation between the attributes of the predictive schedule and any type of real time event. For example, the readings from non-occupancy sensors, readings from the mobile device, readings from health monitoring sensors, readings from calendar appointments, other types of readings that indicate a real time event, or combinations thereof.
[0083] The event identification module 304 can also assign different confidence levels to the real time events. For example, those real time events with lower correlations to aspects of the predictive schedule may not receive the same confidence level as those real time events that are strongly correlated with certain aspects of the predictive schedule.
[0084] FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a parameters module 210-b. In this example, the parameters module 210-b includes a conservation module 400, a comfort module 402, a lighting module 404, a climate module 406, and a security module 408.
[0085] The conservation module 400 may cause at least one parameter affecting the building to change based on the predictive schedule. For example, the conservation module 400 may cause the furnace to lower its output to conserve energy while the building is unoccupied. When there is a sufficiently high enough confidence level that the building is unoccupied, the conservation module 400 may cause the furnace' s parameters to be changed to lower the building' s temperature to a level that conserves the building's resources.
[0086] In response to detecting a door type event, a sensor associated with the door type event, sends a message to the control unit 102. In response to the receipt of such a message, the control unit 102 may track the passage of time from the occurrence of the event to gain confidence that the building is unoccupied. However, if a real time event is detected that has a correlation with an unoccupied state, then the parameters module 210-b may determine sooner that the building is unoccupied without waiting through the predetermined time lapse.
[0087] The conservation module 400 may be in communication with any appropriate module. For example, the conservation module 400 may be in communication with the lighting module 404 that controls at least some of the lighting in the building, the climate module 406 that controls at least some of the mechanisms that affect the building's climate, the security module 410 that controls how the premise of the building is monitored for security purposes, other modules, or combinations thereof.
[0088] The comfort module 402 may cause parameters affecting the building to change in response to predicting that the building will be occupied. The comfort module 402 may consult with the predictive schedule to determine when the building is predicted to be occupied. In some examples, the parameters are changed prior to the predicted occupancy time so that parameters that take time to achieve can begin to change early enough so that the comfort level is achieved by the time that the occupants arrive. For example, a furnace may take twenty minutes to raise the temperature of a home from the conservation level to a comfort level. In such an example, if the predicted occupancy time is 5 :00 p.m., the comfort module 402 may initiate the parameter changes at 4:40 p.m. so that the building is heated to the comfort level at 5 :00 p.m.
[0089] Similar to the conservation module 400, the comfort module 402 may be in communication with the lighting module 404, the climate module 406, the security module 408, other modules, or combinations thereof. The comfort module 402 may cause the parameters of the building to be such that the occupant' s environment within the building is comfortable.
[0090] FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a mobile device 108-b. In this example, the mobile device 108-b includes a location device 500 with a location module 501 and a direction module 502.
[0091] In this illustrated example, the location and the direction of the mobile device 108-b are determined with the location device 500 of the mobile device 108-b and sent to the control unit 102. Any appropriate type of mobile device 108-b may be used. For example, the mobile device 108-b may include a phone, an electronic tablet, a watch, a laptop, a digital device, glasses, a pedometer, a wearable computing device, a vehicle mounted device, another type of device, or combinations thereof. Further, any appropriate type of location device 500 may be used in accordance with the principles described in the present disclosure. For example, the location device 500 may include a global positioning system (GPS), a navigation mechanism, an accelerometer, magnetic field sensor, a compass, another type of locating device, or combinations thereof.
[0092] FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a hypothesis module 214-b. In this example, the hypothesis module 214-b has a predictive schedule analyzer module 600, a blind spot module 602, and a hypothesis construction module 604.
[0093] The predictive schedule analyzer module 600 analyzes the predictive schedule or the information to be relied upon to construct the predictive schedule. Such an analysis may look at the information that is relied upon to construct the predictive schedule. For example, the analysis may determine the readings from the occupancy sensors and make a determination as to whether that information is reliable for being used in the predictive schedule. In some examples, such information indicates that the building is occupied, but such indicators are not reliable and therefore a low confidence is associated with such information.
[0094] The blind spot module 602 identifies if the occupancy sensors 104 are capable of detecting an adequate amount of information to make the predictive schedule. For example, the blind spot module 602 may analyze information to determine whether occupancy sensors 104 are appropriately positioned throughout the building. Such an analysis may cause the blind spot module 602 to consider whether additional occupancy sensors are desirable for detecting occupancy. For example, if there is no occupancy sensor 104 positioned in a room of a home and no other occupancy sensors in the building would be able to detect the presence of an individual in that home, than the room may be part of a blind spot to the occupancy detection system. An analysis of the occupancy sensors may reveal that the sensors ' ability to detect the occupant' s presence disappears from time to time. Such a failure to detect the occupant' s presence may occur when the occupant enters the blind spot. Based on the analysis, the blind spot module 602 may identify patterns indicative of a blind spot.
[0095] The hypothesis construction module 604 constructs the hypothesis. The hypothesis can be based on the analysis of the blind spot module 602, the predictive schedule analyzer module 600, another module, or combinations thereof. An example of a hypothesis may include identifying a location where a blind spot exists. Another example of a hypothesis may involve determining that the building is occupied based on data that suggests the building could be occupied, but is not conclusive. Another example of a hypothesis could be predicting the time that the building will transition from one occupancy state to another.
[0096] FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a requesting module 218-b. In this example, the requesting module 218-b includes a confirmation module 700, a sensor coverage module 702, a time period data module 704, and a location tracking module 706.
[0097] The confirmation module 700 may cause a request to be made that seeks to confirm whether a hypothesis generated by the hypothesis module 214 is accurate. In one example, the confirmation module 700 may formulate a question that restates the hypothesis in a question format. In such an example, a request may include "yes" or "no" predetermined answers that can be selected by the recipient of the request.
[0098] The sensor coverage module 702 may format requests for information about the location of the occupancy sensors. For example, the request may include asking whether an occupancy sensor is located in a particular room. In another example, the request may involve asking if the occupant is located within a specific room when the occupant has disappeared from the occupancy sensors. In yet another example, a request may ask where the occupant was at a specific time. Such questions may be aimed at determining the adequacy of the occupancy sensors coverage.
[0099] The time period data module 704 may make requests for information about time periods where no reliable data for determining occupancy exists. For example, if a time period exists where no occupancy is detected, but no door type event has occurred that could indicate that an occupant left the building, then the request could be directed to finding out the location of where the occupant was during that time. In another example, the request could be directed at determining the location of the occupant when the occupancy sensors and other types of indicators are sending conflicting details about occupancy.
[00100] The location tracking module 706 may include requests that deal with determining how many mobile devices are available to determine occupancy. For example, a request may involve asking how many occupants use a mobile device that have location tracking mechanisms that the control unit 102 can use to determine occupancy. Another type of request may include asking how often the occupant is with his or her mobile device to determine how reliable the mobile device' s location can be associated with the occupant's location. For example, if the mobile device is often left behind when the occupant leaves his or her home, the control unit 102 can associate a lower confidence with data indicating the occupant' s location based on the mobile device' s location tracking mechanism.
[00101] FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a response module 222-b. In this example, the response module 222-b includes a predictive schedule modifying module 800, a confidence score modifying module 802, and a suggestion module 804.
[00102] The predictive schedule modifying module 800 may cause the predictive schedule to be modified based on the information provided by the user. For example, if the user indicates that the mobile device' s location tracking mechanism is not reliable because the occupant often lets a neighbor borrow his or her mobile device, and the predictive schedule was based on communications from the mobile device, the predictive schedule modifying module 800 may undo those portions of the predictive schedule that were based on the mobile device's communications.
[00103] The confidence score modifying module 802 may modify the confidence scores of the information used to construct a portion of the predictive module. For example, if the predictive schedule was based in part on data that had a lower confidence score than desired, and an answer from the occupant indicates that information is correct, the confidence score modifying module 802 may increase the confidence score. Similarly, if the occupant indicates that such information is not correct, then the confidence score modifying module 802 may decrease the information's confidence score.
[00104] The suggestion module 804 can make suggestions to the occupant based on the user' s response. For example, if the answer from the occupant indicates that there is likely a blind spot in the occupancy detection system, then the suggestion module 804 can send a message to the occupant suggesting that another occupancy sensor be installed to cover the blind spot.
[00105] FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 900 for controlling a building system. In this example, the method 900 includes using 902 at least one sensor type to detect occupancy in a building over time, determine 904 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with a sensor, and identify 906 real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule. Such a method 900 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 900 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[00106] At block 902, occupancy sensors are used to determine whether the building is occupied or unoccupied. Such a sensor type may be any appropriate type of sensor that is capable of determining whether an occupant is present within the building. For example, a motion detector, video camera, microphone, thermometer, door sensor, window sensor, another type of sensor, or combinations thereof may be used to detect the presence of an occupant.
[00107] At block 904, the predictive schedule is determined based on the occupancy patterns detected in the building over time. Such a schedule predicts when the building will be occupied and/or unoccupied.
[00108] At block 906, real time events are identified that have a correlation with an occupancy state of the building according to the predictive schedule. Such real time events can provide the control unit 102 an additional amount of confidence that the building is in a deduced state when both the deduced state and the real time event occur simultaneously.
[00109] FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method
1000 for controlling a building system. In this example, the method 1000 includes using 1002 at least one sensor type to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1004 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, identifying 1006 real time events that occur simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule, deducing 1008 an unoccupied state of the building, determining 1010 with an increased confidence that the deduced unoccupied state is accurate based on a simultaneous occurrence of the real time events, and adjusting 1012 a building parameter based on the increased confidence of the unoccupied state. Such a method 1000 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1000 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[00110] At block 1008, the occupancy state of the building is deduced. The occupancy state of the building may be determined with readings from the occupancy sensors and/or the predictive schedule. For example, if none of the occupancy sensors detects the presence of an individual, then an unoccupied state may be deduced.
[00111] At block 1010, an increased confidence that the building is in the unoccupied state is determined based on the detection of a real time event.
Historically, such a real time event may strongly correlate with unoccupied states.
Thus, the control unit 102 can determine with a greater degree of confidence that the deduced unoccupied state is correct.
[00112] At block 1012, the parameters of the building are adjusted to a conservation level in response to the simultaneous occurrence of the deduced state and the detection of a real time event that historically confirms that unoccupied state.
[00113] FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 1000 for controlling a building system. Such a method 1000 may be implemented with a control unit shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1000 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[00114] At block 1 102, a sensor monitors for door events, such as opening and closing the doors. At decision 1 104, a determination is made to whether a door event has occurred. If not, the method 1 100 includes continuing to monitor for a door event. On the other hand, if a door event has been detected, a sensor is used 1 106 to detect the presence of an occupant. [00115] At decision 1 108, a determination is made as to whether the presence of an occupant has been detected. If the presence of an occupant is detected, then the method 1 100 includes deducing 1 1 10 that the building is occupied. In response to deducing that the building is not occupied, the building parameters are maintained 1 1 1 1. If there is no detection of an occupant, then the method 1 100 deduces 1 1 12 that the building is in an unoccupied state.
[00116] At decision 1 1 14, a determination is made about whether a real time event has been detected. If no real time event has been detected then the method 1 100 includes waiting 1 1 16 a predetermined time period without occupancy detection to ensure that the building is unoccupied. After the predetermined time period passes, the building parameters are adjusted 1 1 18 to reflect that the building is unoccupied. However, if a real time event is detected, the method 1 100 includes determining 1 120 with an increased confidence that the building is unoccupied and proceeding to adjust 1 1 18 the building's parameters.
[00117] FIG. 12 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method
1200 for determining occupancy with user provided information. In this example, the method 1200 includes using 1202 at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1204 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, and requesting 1206 information relevant to the predictive schedule from a user. Such a method 1200 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1200 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[00118] At block 1202, occupancy sensors are used to determine whether the building is occupied or unoccupied. An occupancy sensor may be any appropriate type of sensor that is capable of determining whether an occupant is present within the building. For example, a motion detector, video camera, microphone, thermometer, door sensor, window sensor, another type of sensor, or combinations thereof may be used to detect the presence of an occupant.
[00119] At block 1204, the predictive schedule is determined based on the occupancy patterns detected in the building over time. Such a schedule predicts when the building will be occupied and/or unoccupied. [00120] At block 1206, a request is sent to the user for information that is relevant to the predictive schedule. Such user provided information may be used to change the predictive schedule, confirm hypothesis relevant to the predictive schedule, make a suggestion to the user, change a confidence score associated with information for making the predictive schedule, perform another action, or combinations thereof.
[00121] FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 1300 for determining occupancy with user provided information. In this example, the method 1300 includes using 1302 at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1304 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, making 1306 a hypothesis about a detail affecting the predictive schedule, and requesting 1308 information from a user to confirm the hypothesis. Such a method 1300 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1300 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[00122] At block 1306, a hypothesis is formed that can serve as the basis of a question to be asked of the user. Such a hypothesis may be based on desirable, but missing, information for making the predictive schedule, based on confidence scores relating to the accuracy of information for making the predictive schedule, based on occupancy sensor data that is indicative of a gap in occupancy sensor coverage, based on communications from a mobile device, based on user input, based on historical occupancy patterns, based on other types of information, or combinations thereof.
[00123] At block 1308, information is requested of the user to confirm that the hypothesis is true. In those situations where the predictive schedule is already based on an assumption that the hypothesis is true, no change to the predictive schedule is likely to occur. However, if the hypothesis does not appear to be true based on the user' s response, the predictive schedule may be changed accordingly. In other cases, the predictive schedule does not assume that the hypothesis is true before requesting a confirmation of the hypothesis from the user. In those cases where the user indicates that the hypothesis is false, no change to the predictive schedule is likely. However, in those situations where the hypothesis is confirmed by the user, the predictive schedule may be changed accordingly.
[00124] FIG. 14 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 1400 for determining occupancy with user provided information. In this example, the method 1400 includes using 1402 at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1404 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, asking 1406 a question of the user about ascertained data relevant to the predictive schedule associated with an unreliable confidence score, receiving 1408 an answer from the user, and changing 1410 the confidence score based on the information from the user. Such a method 1400 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1400 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[00125] At block 1406, a question is asked of the user about data that has been ascertained by the occupancy detection system. However, the ascertained data has a low confidence score. Data with low confidence scores may be deemed too unreliable to be used to create the predictive schedule. In other examples, data with low confidence scores may be used to create the predictive schedule, although the system has a preference to use data with higher confidence scores. Such a question is sent to the user in any appropriate manner, such as sending the question to the user' s mobile device.
[00126] At block 1408, an answer from the user is received, and at block 810 the confidence score of the relevant information is changed based on the user' s response. For example, if the user confirms the accuracy of the data, the confidence score associated with that data may increase. Similarly, if the user denies the accuracy of the data, the confidence score may accordingly decrease.
[00127] FIG. 15 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 1500 for determining occupancy with user provided information. In this example, the method 1500 includes using 1502 at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1504 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, requesting 1506 information to determine whether the at least one sensor has a blind spot, and suggesting 1508 to install another sensor in response to identifying the blind spot. Such a method 1500 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1500 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[00128] At block 1506, information is requested of the user to determine whether the sensors used to determine occupancy have a blind spot. A blind spot is an area where the occupancy sensors cannot detect the presence of an occupant although the occupant is present within that area. Such blind spots may occur when the occupant is out of range of the occupancy sensors.
[00129] At block 1508, a suggestion is made to install another sensor in response to identifying a blind spot. For example, if a blind spot is identified in a particular room within the building, the recommendation may be to install an occupancy sensor in that room. Likewise, if just a portion of a specific room is part of a blind spot, the suggestion may include recommending a second occupancy sensor in that room that will cover the area blind to the occupancy sensors. Other suggestions may include recommending that a particular type of occupancy sensor be replaced within another occupancy sensor type, that a specific occupancy sensor be replaced, that a certain occupancy sensor be programmed to operate differently, another type of suggestion, or combinations thereof.
[00130] FIG. 16 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method 1600 for determining occupancy with user provided information. In this example, the method 1600 includes using 1602 at least one sensor to detect occupancy in a building over time, determining 1604 a predictive schedule based on the occupancy detected with the at least one sensor, asking 1606 a question of the user about missing data relevant to the predictive schedule, receiving 1608 an answer from the user, and changing 1610 the predictive schedule based on the information from the user. Such a method 1600 may be implemented with a control unit 102 shown in FIGS. 1 and/or 2. In other examples, method 1600 may be performed generally by the environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[00131] At block 1606, a question is asked of the user about data that is missing and is relevant to the predictive schedule. Such missing data may include data that is desirable to generate the predictive schedule, but was not collected. Such data may not be sent to the appropriate module for creating or modifying the predictive schedule due to inconsistent data or other factors rendering the data less reliable than desired. In other examples, no data relevant to a portion of the predictive schedule was ever collected.
[00132] At block 1608, an answer to the question is received. Such an answer may be a selected predetermined answer, a free text formatted answer, another type of answer, or combinations thereof. The answer may be sent over a mobile device, a speech command, a button input, another mechanism, or combinations thereof.
[00133] At block 1610, a change is made to the predictive schedule based on the information from the user. For example, if the answer to the question indicates that some information previously believed to be unreliable is accurate data, the predictive schedule may be changed to rely on such information. In such an example, if occupancy data during a specific time period on week days appeared to be unreliable, a question asking if the user is often home during that period may be sent to the user. In response, the user may indicate in a reply that the user is often home during that period. In response to determining that the user is home during that time period, the predictive schedule may be changed from an unknown predictive state to an occupied predicted state.
[00134] FIG. 17 depicts a block diagram of a controller 1700 suitable for implementing the present systems and methods. The controller 1700 may be an example of the control unit 102-a in FIG. 1. In one configuration, controller 1700 includes a bus 1705 which interconnects major subsystems of controller 1700, such as a central processor 1710, a system memory 1715 (typically RAM, but which may also include ROM, flash RAM, or the like), an input/output controller 1720, an external audio device, such as a speaker system 1725 via an audio output interface 1730, an external device, such as a display screen 1735 via display adapter 1740, an input device 1745 (e.g. , remote control device interfaced with an input controller 1750), multiple USB devices 1765 (interfaced with a USB controller 1770), one or more cellular radios 1790, and a storage interface 1780. Also included are at least one sensor 1755 connected to bus 1705 through a sensor controller 1760 and a network interface 1785 (coupled directly to bus 1705). [00135] Bus 1705 allows data communication between central processor 1710 and system memory 1715, which may include read-only memory (ROM) or flash memory (neither shown), and random access memory (RAM) (not shown), as previously noted. The RAM is generally the main memory into which the operating system and application programs are loaded. The ROM or flash memory can contain, among other code, the Basic Input-Output system (BIOS) which controls basic hardware operation such as the interaction with peripheral components or devices. For example, an occupancy deduction module 200-b, a predictive schedule module 202-b, a real time event module 204-c, an occupancy/event correlation module 206-b, a confidence module 208-b, a parameters module 210-b, an occupancy prediction module 212-b, a hypothesis module 214-c, occupancy prediction module 212-c, requesting module 218-c, receiving module 220-b, and a response module 222-c may be used to implement the present systems and methods may be stored within the system memory 1015. These modules may be an example of the modules illustrated in FIG. 2. Applications resident with controller 1700 are generally stored on and accessed via a non-transitory computer readable medium, such as a hard disk drive (e.g., fixed disk 1775) or other storage medium. Additionally, applications can be in the form of electronic signals modulated in accordance with the application and data communication technology when accessed via network interface 1785.
[00136] Storage interface 1780, as with the other storage interfaces of controller 1700, can connect to a standard computer readable medium for storage and/or retrieval of information, such as a fixed disk drive 1775. Fixed disk drive 1775 may be a part of controller 1700 or may be separate and accessed through other interface systems. Network interface 1785 may provide a direct connection to a remote server via a direct network link to the Internet via a POP (point of presence). Network interface 1785 may provide such connection using wireless techniques, including digital cellular telephone connection, Cellular Digital Packet Data (CDPD) connection, digital satellite data connection, or the like. In some embodiments, one or more sensors (e.g. , motion sensor, smoke sensor, glass break sensor, door sensor, window sensor, carbon monoxide sensor, and the like) connect to controller 1700 wirelessly via network interface 1785. In one configuration, the cellular radio 1790 may include a receiver and transmitter to wirelessly receive and transmit communications via, for example, a cellular network.
[00137] Many other devices or subsystems (not shown) may be connected in a similar manner (e.g., entertainment system, computing device, remote cameras, wireless key fob, wall mounted user interface device, cell radio module, battery, alarm siren, door lock, lighting system, thermostat, home appliance monitor, utility equipment monitor, and so on). Conversely, all of the devices shown in FIG. 17 need not be present to practice the present systems and methods. The devices and subsystems can be interconnected in different ways from that shown in FIG. 17. The aspect of some operations of a system such as that shown in FIG. 17 are readily known in the art and are not discussed in detail in this application. Code to implement the present disclosure can be stored in a non-transitory computer-readable medium such as one or more of system memory 1715 or fixed disk 1775. The operating system provided on controller 1700 may be iOS®, ANDROID®, MS-DOS®, MS-WINDOWS®, OS/2®, UNIX®, LINUX®, or another known operating system.
[00138] Moreover, regarding the signals described herein, those skilled in the art will recognize that a signal can be directly transmitted from a first block to a second block, or a signal can be modified (e.g., amplified, attenuated, delayed, latched, buffered, inverted, filtered, or otherwise modified) between the blocks. Although the signals of the above described embodiment are characterized as transmitted from one block to the next, other embodiments of the present systems and methods may include modified signals in place of such directly transmitted signals as long as the informational and/or functional aspect of the signal is transmitted between blocks. To some extent, a signal input at a second block can be conceptualized as a second signal derived from a first signal output from a first block due to physical limitations of the circuitry involved (e.g., there will inevitably be some attenuation and delay). Therefore, as used herein, a second signal derived from a first signal includes the first signal or any modifications to the first signal, whether due to circuit limitations or due to passage through other circuit elements which do not change the informational and/or final functional aspect of the first signal. [00139] While the foregoing disclosure sets forth various embodiments using specific block diagrams, flowcharts, and examples, each block diagram component, flowchart step, operation, and/or component described and/or illustrated herein may be implemented, individually and/or collectively, using a wide range of hardware, software, or firmware (or any combination thereof) configurations. In addition, any disclosure of components contained within other components should be considered exemplary in nature since many other architectures can be implemented to achieve the same functionality.
[00140] The process parameters and sequence of steps described and/or illustrated herein are given by way of example only and can be varied as desired. For example, while the steps illustrated and/or described herein may be shown or discussed in a particular order, these steps do not necessarily need to be performed in the order illustrated or discussed. The various exemplary methods described and/or illustrated herein may also omit one or more of the steps described or illustrated herein or include additional steps in addition to those disclosed.
[00141] Furthermore, while various embodiments have been described and/or illustrated herein in the context of fully functional computing systems, one or more of these exemplary embodiments may be distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, regardless of the particular type of computer-readable media used to actually carry out the distribution. The embodiments disclosed herein may also be implemented using software modules that perform certain tasks. These software modules may include script, batch, or other executable files that may be stored on a computer-readable storage medium or in a computing system. In some embodiments, these software modules may configure a computing system to perform one or more of the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein.
[00142] The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the present systems and methods and their practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the present systems and methods and various embodiments with various modifications as may be suited to the particular use contemplated.
[00143] Unless otherwise noted, the terms "a" or "an," as used in the specification and claims, are to be construed as meaning "at least one of." In addition, for ease of use, the words "including" and "having," as used in the specification and claims, are interchangeable with and have the same meaning as the word "comprising." In addition, the term "based on" as used in the specification and the claims is to be construed as meaning "based at least upon."

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A method for controlling a building system, comprising:
detecting occupancy in a building over a time period using at least one sensor; determining a predictive schedule based at least in part on the occupancy
detected with the at least one sensor; and
associating a real time event that occurs simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule.
2. The method of claim I, further comprising:
deducing an unoccupied state of the building.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein deducing the unoccupied state of the building comprises sensing a door event.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein deducing the unoccupied state of the building comprises a lack of stimulus to the at least one sensor.
5. The method of claim 2, further comprising:
determining an increased confidence that the unoccupied state is accurate in response to a simultaneous occurrence of the real time event.
6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:
adjusting a building parameter based at least in part on the increased
confidence of the unoccupied state.
7. The method of claim 2, further comprising:
predicting a transition time from the unoccupied state to an occupied state based on the simultaneous occurrence of the real time event.
8. The method of claim I, wherein the real time event is detected with a location device incorporated into a mobile device.
9. The method of claim I, further comprising:
requesting information relevant to the predictive schedule from a user.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein requesting the information relevant to the predictive schedule from the user comprises sending a question to a device associated with the user.
1 1. The method of claim 9, wherein requesting the information relevant to the predictive schedule from the user comprises asking a question of the user about missing data relevant to the predictive schedule.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein requesting the information relevant to the predictive schedule from the user comprises asking a question of the user about ascertained data relevant to the predictive schedule associated with an unreliable confidence score.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising:
changing a confidence score about ascertained data relevant to the predictive schedule based on the information from the user.
14. The method of claim 9, wherein requesting the information relevant to the predictive schedule from the user comprises requesting data about a period of time where no occupancy is detected.
15. The method of claim 9, wherein requesting the information relevant to the predictive schedule from the user comprises requesting the information about a number of occupants with location tracking mobile devices.
16. A computing device configured for controlling parameters in a building, comprising:
a processor;
memory in electronic communication with the processor; and
instructions stored in the memory, the instructions being executable by the processor to:
detect occupancy in the building over a time period using at least one sensor; determine a predictive schedule based at least in part on the occupancy
detected with the at least one sensor; and
associate a real time event that occurs simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule.
17. The computing device of claim 16, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to:
deduce an unoccupied state of the building.
18. The computing device of claim 17, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to:
determine with an increased confidence that the unoccupied state is accurate based on a simultaneous occurrence of the real time event.
19. The computing device of claim 18, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to:
adjust a building parameter in response to determining the increased
confidence of the unoccupied state.
20. A computer-program product for controlling parameters in a building, the computer-program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions thereon, the instructions being executable by a processor to: detect occupancy in the building over a time period using at least one sensor; determine a predictive schedule based at least in part on the occupancy
detected with the at least one sensor;
identify a real time event that occurs simultaneously with an occupancy state of the predictive schedule;
deduce an unoccupied state of the building;
determine with an increased confidence that the unoccupied state is accurate based on a simultaneous occurrence of the real time event; and adjust a building parameter in response to determining the increased confidence of the unoccupied state.
PCT/US2015/029670 2014-05-07 2015-05-07 Controlling a building system based on real time events WO2015171882A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP15788885.0A EP3140702A4 (en) 2014-05-07 2015-05-07 Controlling a building system based on real time events
CA2946891A CA2946891A1 (en) 2014-05-07 2015-05-07 Controlling a building system based on real time events

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/272,086 2014-05-07
US14/272,086 US11099533B2 (en) 2014-05-07 2014-05-07 Controlling a building system based on real time events
US14/291,789 2014-05-30
US14/291,789 US10197979B2 (en) 2014-05-30 2014-05-30 Determining occupancy with user provided information

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015171882A1 true WO2015171882A1 (en) 2015-11-12

Family

ID=54392993

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2015/029670 WO2015171882A1 (en) 2014-05-07 2015-05-07 Controlling a building system based on real time events

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3140702A4 (en)
CA (1) CA2946891A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2015171882A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110101392A (en) * 2018-02-01 2019-08-09 德国福维克控股公司 System with vital sign data sensor and analytical unit
WO2020159611A1 (en) * 2019-01-28 2020-08-06 Google Llc Presence and directional motion detection
CN112655007A (en) * 2018-09-06 2021-04-13 皇家飞利浦有限公司 Monitoring movable entities in a predetermined area

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108491608B (en) * 2018-03-06 2021-06-08 大连理工大学 Sparse component analysis method for structural modal identification when sensor number is incomplete
EP3667629B1 (en) 2018-12-14 2022-12-07 Carrier Corporation Apparatus and method for testing a glass break detection system

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080079569A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Edward George Axelsen Real-Time Room Occupancy Monitoring System
US20120072030A1 (en) * 2007-10-04 2012-03-22 Mountainlogic, Inc. System and method of predictive occupancy room conditioning
US20120165993A1 (en) * 2010-10-28 2012-06-28 University Of Virginia Patent Foundation Self-Programming Thermostat System, Method and Computer Program Product
US20140005837A1 (en) * 2010-11-19 2014-01-02 Nest Labs, Inc. Thermostat user interface
WO2014033189A1 (en) * 2012-08-28 2014-03-06 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Control of thermally activated building systems

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080079569A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Edward George Axelsen Real-Time Room Occupancy Monitoring System
US20120072030A1 (en) * 2007-10-04 2012-03-22 Mountainlogic, Inc. System and method of predictive occupancy room conditioning
US20120165993A1 (en) * 2010-10-28 2012-06-28 University Of Virginia Patent Foundation Self-Programming Thermostat System, Method and Computer Program Product
US20140005837A1 (en) * 2010-11-19 2014-01-02 Nest Labs, Inc. Thermostat user interface
WO2014033189A1 (en) * 2012-08-28 2014-03-06 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Control of thermally activated building systems

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP3140702A4 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110101392A (en) * 2018-02-01 2019-08-09 德国福维克控股公司 System with vital sign data sensor and analytical unit
CN112655007A (en) * 2018-09-06 2021-04-13 皇家飞利浦有限公司 Monitoring movable entities in a predetermined area
WO2020159611A1 (en) * 2019-01-28 2020-08-06 Google Llc Presence and directional motion detection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2946891A1 (en) 2015-11-12
EP3140702A1 (en) 2017-03-15
EP3140702A4 (en) 2017-12-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11635737B1 (en) Determining occupancy with user provided information
US11099533B2 (en) Controlling a building system based on real time events
US10901379B2 (en) Controlling parameters in a building
US10223904B2 (en) Automatic security system mode selection
US20190243314A1 (en) Managing home automation system based on behavior and user input
US10481561B2 (en) Managing home automation system based on behavior
EP3241200B1 (en) Learned overrides for a home security system and method
US11062590B2 (en) Systems and methods of providing allowances for a security system
US9508247B2 (en) Systems and methods of automated arming and disarming of a security system
US20160187368A1 (en) Systems and methods of detecting failure of an opening sensor
WO2015171882A1 (en) Controlling a building system based on real time events
US10062265B2 (en) Adaptive exit arm times based on real time events and historical data in a home security system
US20200225624A1 (en) Selecting a level of autonomy
US10303137B2 (en) Structure modes for controlling various systems in closed environments
WO2016065149A1 (en) Managing home automation system based on behavior and user input

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15788885

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2946891

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2015788885

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2015788885

Country of ref document: EP