WO2015136585A1 - Appareil de commande, procédé de commande et programme de commande - Google Patents

Appareil de commande, procédé de commande et programme de commande Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015136585A1
WO2015136585A1 PCT/JP2014/006207 JP2014006207W WO2015136585A1 WO 2015136585 A1 WO2015136585 A1 WO 2015136585A1 JP 2014006207 W JP2014006207 W JP 2014006207W WO 2015136585 A1 WO2015136585 A1 WO 2015136585A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
processing
flow
packet
rule
processing rule
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2014/006207
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
暢彦 伊藤
淳 西岡
Original Assignee
日本電気株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 日本電気株式会社 filed Critical 日本電気株式会社
Priority to JP2016507133A priority Critical patent/JPWO2015136585A1/ja
Publication of WO2015136585A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015136585A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00—Data switching networks
    • H04L12/64—Hybrid switching systems
    • H04L12/6418—Hybrid transport

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a control device, a control method, and a control program for controlling a packet processing device that processes packets.
  • OpenFlow captures communication as an end-to-end flow and performs path control, failure recovery, load balancing, and optimization on a per-flow basis.
  • An OpenFlow switch that functions as a packet processing device includes a secure channel with an OpenFlow controller that is positioned as a path control device. The OpenFlow switch operates in accordance with a flow entry that is appropriately added or rewritten by the OpenFlow controller. The flow entry is information defining processing for a packet for each flow.
  • a table in the OpenFlow switch that stores flow entries is called a flow table.
  • a set of identification information for identifying a flow and a processing method for a packet of a flow that matches the identification information is referred to as a processing rule.
  • the flow entry in the open flow also corresponds to the processing rule.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a control device, a control method, and a control program that can reduce the number of processing rules stored in a packet processing device.
  • a control device is a control device that controls a packet processing device that processes a packet, and defines flow identification information creating means for creating flow identification information for identifying a flow, and a processing method for a packet of the flow.
  • the processing rule creation means for creating the processing rule including the flow identification information and the processing method the processing rule of the flow, and the processing rule of the other flow can be aggregated, the processing rule of the flow and the other flow And a notifying means for notifying the packet processing apparatus of the processing rule.
  • the control method according to the present invention is a control method for controlling a packet processing apparatus that processes a packet.
  • the control method creates flow identification information for identifying a flow, defines a processing method for the packet of the flow, and sets the flow identification information. If the processing rule of the flow and the processing rule of the other flow can be aggregated, the processing rule of the flow and the processing rule of the other flow are aggregated and processed. The rule is notified to the packet processing device.
  • a control program is a control program installed in a computer that controls a packet processing apparatus that processes packets, and a flow identification information creation process for creating flow identification information for identifying a flow in the computer. If a processing rule creation process that defines a processing method for a flow packet and creates a processing rule including flow identification information and a processing method, and the processing rule of the flow and the processing rule of another flow can be aggregated, the flow And a notification processing for notifying the packet processing device of the processing rule.
  • the number of processing rules stored in the packet processing device can be reduced.
  • FIG. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a control device of the present invention.
  • the control device 1 of the present invention includes a control unit 10, a processing rule granularity determination unit 11, and a management database (hereinafter simply referred to as DB) storage unit 12.
  • DB management database
  • the control device 1 controls a packet processing device (not shown in FIG. 1) that processes packets. There are a plurality of packet processing devices, and a network is formed by the plurality of packet processing devices. The control device 1 controls the packet processing device by notifying the packet processing device of the processing rule.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing processing rules.
  • the processing rule is a set of identification information for identifying a flow (hereinafter referred to as an identification rule) and a processing method for a packet of a flow that matches the identification rule (see FIG. 2). ).
  • the packet processing device searches for a processing rule corresponding to the flow of the packet. If the processing rule cannot be searched, the packet processing device inquires of the control device 1 about the processing rule. Upon receiving this inquiry, the control device 1 notifies the processing rule to each packet processing device to which the packet is to be transferred. As a result, the packets are sequentially transferred by the packet processing device.
  • the protocol by which the control device 1 controls the packet processing device may be an open flow protocol. In that case, the processing rule corresponds to the flow entry in the open flow. Further, the protocol for controlling the packet processing device by the control device 1 may be other than the open flow protocol.
  • the control unit 10 receives a processing rule inquiry from the packet processing device.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines the granularity of the processing rule in response to the processing rule inquiry from the packet processing device, and notifies the packet processing device of the processing rule of the granularity.
  • a control policy is input to the processing rule granularity determination unit 11.
  • the control policy is information that defines a packet processing method for each flow in each packet processing device through which the flow passes.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a packet processing method in each packet processing device through which the flow passes according to the control policy. If one packet processing apparatus has the same processing method and processing rules corresponding to different flows, the processing rules corresponding to these flows are set to 1 corresponding to the plurality of flows. It aggregates into one processing rule (in other words, it summarizes). In this embodiment, the case where a control policy is input from the outside is described as an example. However, the control device 1 may hold the control policy inside.
  • the management DB storage unit 12 is a storage device that stores processing rules to be notified to the packet processing device.
  • the processing rules stored in the management DB storage unit 12 can be updated when a new processing rule query is generated from the packet processing device.
  • the control unit 10 and the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 are realized by, for example, a CPU of a computer that operates according to a control program.
  • the CPU is, for example, from a program recording medium such as a program storage device (not shown) of the computer. What is necessary is just to read a control program and operate
  • the control unit 10 and the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 may be realized by separate hardware.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a flow.
  • packet processing apparatuses 2a, 2b, and 2c When the packet processing devices 2a, 2b, and 2c are not particularly distinguished, they are simply referred to as “packet processing device 2”.
  • the number of packet processing devices 2 is not limited to three.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the case where the three flows A to C pass through the packet processing devices 2a, 2b, and 2c, respectively.
  • the same processing method is defined in the control policy as the processing method for the flow A packet and the processing method for the flow C packet.
  • this processing method is referred to as processing method (1).
  • the processing method (2) is defined in the control policy as a processing method for the packet of the flow B.
  • flows occur in the order of flow A, flow B, and flow C.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of processing progress of the control device 1.
  • the packet processing device 2a searches for the processing rule corresponding to the flow A from the processing rules stored in the packet processing device 2a.
  • the packet processing device 2a transmits a processing rule inquiry (in this example, a processing method inquiry for the packet of the flow A) to the control device 1.
  • the packet processing device 2a also transmits the packet (in this example, the packet of the flow A) to the control device 1.
  • the control unit 10 of the control device 1 receives the processing rule inquiry and the packet (step S51).
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 creates an identification rule for identifying the flow A based on the packet (step S52). For example, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 creates an identification rule by combining the header field information of the received packet.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a processing method corresponding to the flow A for each packet processing device through which the flow A passes based on the control policy.
  • the processing rule for each packet processing device through which the flow A passes is determined by this processing method and the identification rule created in step SS52.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines whether it is possible to create a processing rule in which processing rules corresponding to this flow A and processing rules corresponding to other flows can be created (step S53). If the control policy of a plurality of flows is the same, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines that a processing rule in which the processing rules of the plurality of flows are aggregated can be created.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 aggregates processing rules corresponding to a plurality of flows when the processing method is the same and there are processing rules corresponding to different flows.
  • the processing rules corresponding to different flows are aggregated into one processing rule.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 performs this determination for each packet processing device 2. In this example, since only the processing rule for the flow A is created, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines that the processing rules corresponding to a plurality of flows cannot be aggregated into one processing rule.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 registers the processing rule obtained in step S53 in the management DB storage unit 12 (step S54).
  • the processing rule for the flow A obtained for each packet processing device through which the flow A passes is registered in the management DB storage unit 12.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines each processing rule for each packet processing device 2 registered in step S54 (in this example, the processing rule for the flow A obtained for each packet processing device through which the flow A passes). And notifies the corresponding packet processing device 2 (step S55).
  • the packet processing device 2a receives the flow B packet. Then, the packet processing device 2a does not store the processing rule corresponding to the flow B, and transmits a processing rule inquiry (in this example, a processing method inquiry for the packet of the flow B) to the control device 1. Shall. At this time, the packet processing device 2a also transmits the packet (in this example, the packet of the flow B) to the control device 1. The control device 1 receives this inquiry and performs the operation shown in FIG.
  • a processing rule inquiry in this example, a processing method inquiry for the packet of the flow B
  • control unit 10 of the control device 1 receives the processing rule inquiry and the packet (step S51). Then, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 creates an identification rule for identifying the flow B based on the packet (step S52).
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a processing method corresponding to the flow B for each packet processing device through which the flow B passes based on the control policy. With this processing method and the identification rule created in step SS52, the processing rule for each packet processing device through which the flow B passes is determined. Then, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines whether it is possible to create a processing rule in which the processing rules of this flow B and the processing rules of other flows are aggregated (step S53). At this time, the processing rule corresponding to the flow A is stored in the management DB storage unit 12, but the processing method (1) for the flow A packet is different from the processing method (2) for the flow B packet. Therefore, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines that each processing rule corresponding to the plurality of flows A and B cannot be integrated into one processing rule in each packet processing device 2.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 registers the processing rule obtained in step S53 in the management DB storage unit 12 (step S54).
  • the processing rule for the flow B obtained for each packet processing device through which the flow B passes is registered in the management DB storage unit 12.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing processing rules registered in the management DB storage unit 12 at this point.
  • the processing rules corresponding to the flow A and the processing rules corresponding to the flow B are registered in the management DB storage unit 12 as the processing rules in each of the packet processing devices 2a, 2b, and 2c.
  • “processing method (1)” and “processing method (2)” are shown, but the specific contents of processing method (1) are different for each packet processing device 2. May be. The same applies to the processing method (2).
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines each processing rule registered in step S54 for each packet processing device 2 (in this example, the processing rule for the flow B obtained for each packet processing device through which the flow B passes). And notifies the corresponding packet processing device 2 (step S55).
  • the packet processing device 2a receives the packet of the flow C.
  • the packet processing device 2a does not store the processing rule corresponding to the flow C, and transmits a processing rule inquiry (in this example, a processing method inquiry for the packet of the flow C) to the control device 1.
  • a processing rule inquiry in this example, a processing method inquiry for the packet of the flow C
  • the packet processing device 2 a also transmits the packet (in this example, the packet of the flow C) to the control device 1.
  • the control device 1 receives this inquiry and performs the operation shown in FIG.
  • the processing method for the flow A packet and the processing method for the flow C packet are the same.
  • the control unit 10 of the control device 1 receives the processing rule inquiry and the packet (step S51). Then, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 creates an identification rule for identifying the flow C based on the packet (step S52).
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a processing method corresponding to the flow C for each packet processing device through which the flow C passes based on the control policy. With this processing method and the identification rule created in step SS52, the processing rule for each packet processing device through which the flow C passes is determined. Then, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines whether it is possible to create a processing rule in which the processing rules of the flow C and the processing rules of other flows are aggregated (step S53). If the processing method is the same and there are processing rules corresponding to different flows, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines that the processing rules of the plurality of flows can be aggregated, and the different flows Are integrated into one processing rule.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines that the processing rule corresponding to the flow C in the packet processing device 2a and the processing rule corresponding to the flow A in the packet processing device 2a can be integrated into one, and the two Combine processing rules into one. Specifically, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines an identification rule (in other words, an identification rule that matches each of the plurality of flows) that includes a plurality of flows (in this example, flows A and C), and identifies them. A set of rules and the same processing method may be defined for the plurality of flows.
  • the packet processing device 2a has been described as an example, but the same applies to the other packet processing devices 2b and 2c.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 registers the processing rule obtained in step S53 in the management DB storage unit 12 (step S54). When a processing rule in which a plurality of processing rules are integrated into one is determined, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 registers the processing rule in the management DB storage unit 12. In addition, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 deletes the existing processing rule (in this example, the processing rule of the flow A) that is aggregated into one processing rule from the management DB storage unit 12.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing processing rules registered in the management DB storage unit 12 at this point.
  • the processing rules corresponding to the flow A and the processing rules corresponding to the flow C are aggregated into one processing rule, and the processing rules corresponding to the existing flow A shown in FIG. Has been deleted.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 notifies the corresponding packet processing device 2 of the processing rules for each packet processing device 2 registered in step S54 (in this example, processing rules corresponding to flows A and C). (Step S55).
  • the processing rule to be notified is an aggregation of processing rules corresponding to a plurality of flows
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 deletes an existing processing rule corresponding to the aggregated flow. Is also transmitted to the packet processing apparatus 2.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 also transmits a notification to delete the existing processing rule corresponding to the flow A in step S55.
  • the packet processing devices 2a, 2b, and 2c do not need to store the processing rules corresponding to the flow A and the processing rules corresponding to the flow C separately, and store the processing rules corresponding to the flows A and C. To do. Therefore, the number of processing rules stored in the packet processing device 2 can be reduced.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an example of the packet processing device 2.
  • the packet processing device 2 includes a processing rule setting unit 20, a storage unit 21, and a packet processing unit 22.
  • the storage unit 21 is a storage device that stores processing rules.
  • the processing rule setting unit 20 stores the processing rule notified from the control device 1 in the storage unit 21.
  • the processing rule setting unit 20 receives an instruction to delete the processing rule from the control device 1, the processing rule setting unit 20 deletes the processing rule designated to be deleted by the control device 1 from the storage unit 21.
  • the packet processing unit 22 searches the processing rule stored in the storage unit 21 for a processing rule having an identification rule corresponding to the received packet.
  • the packet processing unit 22 processes the received packet according to the processing method defined by the processing rule.
  • the packet processing unit 22 processes the received packet together with the received packet. Send a rule query.
  • the control device 1 performs the operations after step S51 described above.
  • the processing rule setting unit 20 and the packet processing unit 22 are realized by, for example, a CPU of a computer that operates according to a packet processing device program.
  • the CPU may read the packet processing device program from a program recording medium such as a computer program storage device (not shown) and operate as the processing rule setting unit 20 and the packet processing unit 22 according to the program.
  • the processing rule setting unit 20 and the packet processing unit 22 may be realized by separate hardware.
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of the packet processing device 2 controlled by the control device 1.
  • the numbers indicated with the # symbol are port numbers.
  • terminals 8a, 8b, and 8c are connected to the packet processing device 2a.
  • a terminal 8d is connected to the packet processing device 2c.
  • the IP (Internet Protocol) address of the terminal 8a is 172.20.1.1.1.
  • IP address of the terminal 8b is 172.20.1.2.
  • IP address of the terminal 8c is 172.20.1.3.
  • the IP address of the terminal 8d is assumed to be 172, 20.2.1.
  • the terminal 8a transmits a packet with the terminal 8d as a destination.
  • the packet processing device 2a receives the packet. Since the processing rule corresponding to the received packet is not stored in the storage unit 21, the packet processing unit 22 of the packet processing device 2a transmits an inquiry about the processing rule for the flow (flow 1) of the packet to the control device 1. . At this time, the packet processing unit 22 of the packet processing device 2 a also transmits the packet to the control device 1.
  • the control unit 10 of the control device 1 receives the processing rule inquiry and the packet from the packet processing device 2a (step S51).
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 creates an identification rule for identifying the flow 1 based on the packet (step S52).
  • the identification rule created in step S52 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.1” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1”.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a processing method corresponding to the flow 1 for each packet processing device 2 through which the flow 1 passes, and sets a processing rule for each packet processing device 2 based on the control policy. Then, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines whether it is possible to create a processing rule in which the flow 1 and other flows are aggregated (step S53).
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2a is “transfer from port # 4”. That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.1” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” for the packet processing device 2a.
  • a processing rule including an identification rule and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 4” is defined.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2b is “transfer from port # 2.” That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.1” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” with respect to the packet processing device 2b. A processing rule including an identification rule and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 2” is determined.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2c is “transfer from port # 2.” That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.1” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” for the packet processing device 2c. A processing rule including an identification rule and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 2” is determined.
  • step S53 after setting the processing rule for each packet processing device 2 as described above, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 can create a processing rule in which the processing rules of flow 1 and the processing rules of other flows are aggregated. It is determined whether or not.
  • FIG. 9 shows an example of the processing progress of the determination process of whether or not it is possible to create a processing rule in which processing rules for a plurality of flows are aggregated.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines whether there is another identification rule having the same processing method as the processing rule created in step S53 as described above (step S531). In this example, an identification rule having the same processing method as the processing rule created in step S53 as described above is not stored in the management DB storage unit 12 (NO in step S531). In this case, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines to register the processing rule including the identification rule obtained in step S52 (the processing rule created in step S53 as described above) (step S533).
  • step S532 When the identification rule having the same processing method as the processing rule created in step S53 as described above is stored in the management DB storage unit 12 (YES in step S531), the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 It is determined that a processing rule including the processing rule including the identification rule and the processing rule generated in step S53 as described above is created and the processing rule is registered (step S532). The case of executing step S532 will be described later.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 manages the processing rule including the identification rule obtained in step S52 (the processing rule created in step S53 as described above) according to the determination in step S533 in step S54.
  • Register in the DB storage unit 12 step S54). Processing rules registered in the management DB storage unit 12 at this time are shown in FIG.
  • the processing rule granularity determining unit 11 notifies the corresponding packet processing device 2 of each processing rule registered in step S54 for each packet processing device 2 (step S55).
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 notifies the packet processing device 2a of the processing rules of the packet processing device 2a shown in FIG.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 notifies the packet processing device 2b of the processing rules of the packet processing device 2b shown in FIG.
  • the processing rule granularity determining unit 11 notifies the packet processing device 2c of the processing rules of the packet processing device 2c shown in FIG.
  • the processing rule setting unit 20 (see FIG. 7) of each packet processing device 2 stores the notified processing rule in the storage unit 21. Then, the packet processing unit 22 processes the received packet according to the processing rule. As a result, the packets of flow 1 are sequentially transferred according to the processing rule corresponding to flow 1.
  • the terminal 8b transmits a packet with the terminal 8d as a destination.
  • the packet processing device 2a receives the packet. Since the processing rule corresponding to the received packet is not stored in the storage unit 21, the packet processing unit 22 (see FIG. 7) of the packet processing device 2a controls the processing rule inquiry for the flow (flow 2) of the packet. Transmit to device 1. At this time, the packet processing unit 22 of the packet processing device 2 a also transmits the packet to the control device 1.
  • the control unit 10 of the control device 1 receives the processing rule inquiry and the packet from the packet processing device 2a (step S51).
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 creates an identification rule for identifying the flow 2 based on the packet (step S52).
  • an identification rule represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.2” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” is created.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a processing method corresponding to the flow 2 for each packet processing device 2 through which the flow 2 passes, and sets a processing rule for each packet processing device 2 based on the control policy. Then, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines whether it is possible to create a processing rule in which the processing rules of the flow 2 and the processing rules of other flows are aggregated (step S53).
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2a is “transfer from port # 5”. That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.2” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” for the packet processing device 2a.
  • a processing rule including an identification rule and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 5” is defined.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2b is “transfer from port # 4”. That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.2” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” with respect to the packet processing device 2b.
  • a processing rule including an identification rule and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 4” is defined.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2c is “transfer from port # 4”. That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.2” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” for the packet processing device 2c.
  • a processing rule including an identification rule and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 4” is defined.
  • step S53 after setting the processing rule for each packet processing device 2 as described above, can the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 create a processing rule that aggregates the processing rule of the flow 2 and the processing rule of another flow? Determine whether or not.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines whether there is another identification rule having the same processing method as the processing rule created in step S53 as described above (see step S531, FIG. 9).
  • the processing rules shown in FIG. 10 (processing rules corresponding to the flow 1) are stored in the management DB storage unit 12.
  • the processing rule processing method shown in FIG. 10 is different from the processing rule processing method created in step S53 as described above. Therefore, an identification rule having the same processing method as the processing rule created in step S53 as described above is not stored in the management DB storage unit 12 (NO in step S531). Therefore, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines to register the processing rule including the identification rule obtained in step S52 (the processing rule created in step S53 as described above) (see step S533, FIG. 9).
  • step S54 the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 stores the processing rule including the identification rule obtained in step S52 (the processing rule created in step S53 as described above) in the management DB in accordance with the determination in step S533.
  • Register in the unit 12 step S54).
  • the processing rules registered in the management DB storage unit 12 at this time are shown in FIG.
  • a processing rule including an identification rule represented by a combination of a source IP address “172.20.1.2” and a destination IP address “172.20.2.1” is newly registered. Processing rules.
  • the processing rule granularity determining unit 11 notifies the corresponding packet processing device 2 of each processing rule registered in step S54 for each packet processing device 2 (step S55).
  • each packet processing device 2 that has received the processing rule notification is the same as the operation already described.
  • the processing rules of the packet processing device 2a shown in FIG. 11 are stored in the packet processing device 2a.
  • the processing rules of the packet processing device 2b shown in FIG. 11 are stored in the packet processing device 2b.
  • the processing rules of the packet processing device 2c shown in FIG. 11 are stored in the packet processing device 2c.
  • the packet processing unit 22 processes the received packet according to the processing rule.
  • the packet of flow 1 is sequentially transferred according to the processing rule corresponding to flow 1
  • the packet of flow 2 is sequentially transferred according to the processing rule corresponding to flow 2.
  • the terminal 8c transmits a packet with the terminal 8d as a destination.
  • the packet processing device 2a receives the packet. Since the processing rule corresponding to the received packet is not stored in the storage unit 21, the packet processing unit 22 (see FIG. 7) of the packet processing device 2a controls the processing rule inquiry for the flow (flow 3) of the packet. Transmit to device 1. At this time, the packet processing unit 22 of the packet processing device 2 a also transmits the packet to the control device 1.
  • the control unit 10 of the control device 1 receives the processing rule inquiry and the packet from the packet processing device 2a (step S51).
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 creates an identification rule for identifying the flow 3 based on the packet (step S52).
  • an identification rule represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.3” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” is created.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a processing method corresponding to the flow 3 for each packet processing device 2 through which the flow 3 passes, and sets a processing rule for each packet processing device 2 based on the control policy. Then, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines whether it is possible to create a processing rule in which the processing rules of the flow 3 and the processing rules of other flows are aggregated (step S53).
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2a is “transfer from port # 4”. That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.3” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” for the packet processing device 2a.
  • a processing rule including an identification rule and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 4” is defined.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2b is “transfer from port # 2.” That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.3” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” for the packet processing device 2b. A processing rule including an identification rule and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 2” is determined.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2c is “transfer from port # 2.” That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.3” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” for the packet processing device 2c. A processing rule including an identification rule and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 2” is determined.
  • step S53 after the processing rule is determined for each packet processing device 2 as described above, can the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 create a processing rule in which the processing rules of the flow 3 and the processing rules of other flows are aggregated? Determine whether or not.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines whether there is another identification rule having the same processing method as the processing rule created in step S53 as described above (see step S531, FIG. 9).
  • the processing rules shown in FIG. 11 (the processing rules corresponding to the flow 1 and the processing rules corresponding to the flow 2) are stored in the management DB storage unit 12.
  • the processing rule processing method corresponding to the flow 1 is the same as the processing rule processing method created in step S53 as described above. Therefore, an identification rule having the same processing method as the processing rule created in step S53 as described above is stored in the management DB storage unit 12 (YES in step S531). Therefore, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines that the processing rule including the identification rule and the processing rule generated in step S53 as described above are aggregated and the processing rule is registered. (Step S532).
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines an identification rule including the flow 3 and the flow 1 (in other words, an identification rule that matches each of the flow 3 and the flow 1).
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 uses, for example, a source IP address “172.20.1.0/30” and a destination IP address “172.20.2.1” as an identification rule that includes the flow 3 and the flow 1.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 creates a set of processing methods that are the same in the processing rules of the flow 3 and the processing rules of the flow 1 and a set of the identification rules, thereby collecting a plurality of processing rules. Create a rule.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a set of the above-described identification rule and a processing method having a content “transfer from port # 4”.
  • the packet processing device 2a has been described as an example, but the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 performs the same processing on the other packet processing devices 2b and 2c.
  • step S54 the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 registers the processing rule newly created in step S532 in the management DB storage unit 12 in accordance with the determination in step S532 (step S54). Further, when the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 registers the processing rule newly created in step S532 in the management DB storage unit 12, the existing processing rule (in this example, the flow 1 of the flow 1) collected in the new processing rule. Processing rules (see FIGS. 10 and 11) are deleted from the management DB storage unit 12. Processing rules registered in the management DB storage unit 12 at this time are shown in FIG. A processing rule including an identification rule (see FIG.
  • the processing rule granularity determining unit 11 notifies the corresponding packet processing device 2 of each processing rule registered in step S54 for each packet processing device 2 (step S55). If the existing processing rule is deleted in step S54, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 transmits to the packet processing device 2 in step S55, together with an instruction to delete the processing rule. To do. In this example, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 also transmits a notification to delete the existing processing rule corresponding to the flow 1 in step S55.
  • the processing rule setting unit 20 (see FIG. 7) of each packet processing device 2 stores the notified processing rule in the storage unit 21. Further, the processing rule setting unit 20 deletes the processing rule specified by the control device 1 from the storage unit 21 in accordance with an instruction from the control device 1. As a result, the processing rules of the packet processing device 2a shown in FIG. 12 are stored in the packet processing device 2a. Further, the processing rules of the packet processing device 2b shown in FIG. 12 are stored in the packet processing device 2b. Further, the processing rules of the packet processing device 2c shown in FIG. 12 are stored in the packet processing device 2c. As a result, the packet of flow 1 and the packet of flow 3 are sequentially transferred according to the processing rule corresponding to flows 1 and 3, and the packet of flow 2 is sequentially transferred according to the processing rule corresponding to flow 2.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 aggregates the processing rules corresponding to the different flows. Therefore, the number of processing rules stored in the packet processing device 2 can be reduced.
  • an IP address is used as an identification rule
  • the aspect of the identification rule is not limited to the aspect using an IP address.
  • a tunnel identifier of a mobile system may be applied.
  • the information used for the identification rule may be information that can be described as an identification rule including a plurality of flows.
  • FIG. 1 The control apparatus 1 of 2nd Embodiment is the structure (refer FIG. 1) similar to 1st Embodiment, and 2nd Embodiment is described with reference to FIG.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a group identifier for identifying a flow group as an identification rule.
  • the identification rule in the processing rule notified to the first-stage packet processing device 2 is the same as the identification rule in the first embodiment.
  • an example in which not only the first-stage packet processing device 2 but also the identification rule in the processing rule notified to the last-stage packet processing device 2 is the same as the identification rule in the first embodiment is taken as an example. I will explain.
  • the first-stage packet processing device 2 is a packet processing device 2 that directly receives a packet from a terminal.
  • the last stage packet processing apparatus 2 is a packet processing apparatus 2 that directly transfers a packet to a terminal.
  • the packet processing device 2 is an L3 (Layer 3) switch
  • L3 Layer 3
  • MAC Media Access Control
  • rewriting the MAC address of the packet transferred by the L3 switch does not affect the transfer.
  • FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of the packet processing device 2 controlled by the control device 1.
  • FIG. 13 illustrates a case where there are three packet processing apparatuses 2a, 2b, and 2c.
  • the numbers indicated with the # symbol are port numbers.
  • terminals 8a, 8b, and 8c are connected to the packet processing device 2a.
  • a terminal 8d is connected to the packet processing device 2c.
  • the IP addresses of the terminals 8a, 8b, 8c, and 8d shown in FIG. 13 are the same as the IP addresses of the terminals 8a, 8b, 8c, and 8d shown in FIG.
  • the flow from the terminal 8a to the terminal 8d is flow 1.
  • Let the flow from the terminal 8b to the terminal 8d be flow 2.
  • Let the flow from the terminal 8c to the terminal 8d be flow 3. It is assumed that the processing method for the flow 1 packet and the processing method for the flow 3 packet are the same. Also, the processing method for the flow 2 packet is different from the processing method for the flow 1 and 3 packets.
  • the terminal 8a transmits a packet with the terminal 8d as the destination.
  • the packet processing device 2a receives the packet. Since the processing rule corresponding to the received packet is not stored in the storage unit 21, the packet processing unit 22 of the packet processing device 2a transmits an inquiry about the processing rule for the flow (flow 1) of the packet to the control device 1. . At this time, the packet processing unit 22 of the packet processing device 2 a also transmits the packet to the control device 1.
  • the control unit 10 of the control device 1 receives the processing rule inquiry and the packet from the packet processing device 2a.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines an identification rule for identifying the flow 1.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines the MAC address “X” as an identification rule for the flow 1.
  • the identification rules in the processing rules notified to the first-stage packet processing device 2a and the last-stage packet processing device 2c are determined in the same manner as in the first embodiment. That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 uses a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.1” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” as the identification rule.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a processing method corresponding to the flow 1 for each packet processing device 2 through which the flow 1 passes, and sets a processing rule for each packet processing device 2 based on the control policy.
  • the processing rule of the different flow is aggregated by using the processing rule as the processing rule of the flow 1.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 creates a processing rule for the flow 1.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2a is “rewrite the source MAC address to X and transfer from port # 4”.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 represents the first-stage packet processing device 2a as a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.1” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1”.
  • a processing rule including “a rewrite source MAC address to X and transfer from port # 4” is defined.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2b is “transfer from port # 2.” That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a processing rule including an identification rule “X” and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 2” for the packet processing device 2b.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2c is “transfer from port # 2.” That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 uses a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.1” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” for the packet processing device 2c at the final stage.
  • a processing rule including an identification rule to be expressed and a processing method with a content of “transfer from port # 2” is defined.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 registers the processing rule determined as described above in the management DB storage unit 12. Processing rules registered in the management DB storage unit 12 at this time are shown in FIG.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 notifies the corresponding packet processing device 2 of each processing rule determined as described above.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 notifies the packet processing device 2a of the processing rules of the packet processing device 2a shown in FIG.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 notifies the packet processing device 2b of the processing rules of the packet processing device 2b shown in FIG.
  • the processing rule granularity determining unit 11 notifies the packet processing device 2c of the processing rules of the packet processing device 2c shown in FIG.
  • the processing rule setting unit 20 (see FIG. 7) of each packet processing device 2 stores the notified processing rule in the storage unit 21. Then, the packet processing unit 22 processes the received packet according to the processing rule.
  • the packet processing device 2a rewrites the transmission source MAC address of the packet of flow 1 received from the terminal 8a to X, and outputs the packet from port # 4.
  • the packet processing device 2b that has received the packet outputs the packet from the port # 2 in accordance with the notified processing rule.
  • the packet processing device 2c that has received the packet outputs the packet from the port # 2 in accordance with the notified processing rule. As a result, the packet of flow 1 reaches the destination terminal 8d.
  • the terminal 8b transmits a packet with the terminal 8d as a destination.
  • the packet processing device 2a receives the packet. Since the processing rule corresponding to the received packet is not stored in the storage unit 21, the packet processing unit 22 of the packet processing device 2a transmits a processing inquiry for the flow of the packet (flow 2) to the control device 1. At this time, the packet processing unit 22 of the packet processing device 2 a also transmits the packet to the control device 1.
  • the control unit 10 of the control device 1 receives the processing rule inquiry and the packet from the packet processing device 2a.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines an identification rule for identifying the flow 2.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines the MAC address “Y” as an identification rule for the flow 2.
  • the identification rules in the processing rules notified to the first-stage packet processing device 2a and the last-stage packet processing device 2c are determined in the same manner as in the first embodiment. That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 uses a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.2” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” as the identification rule.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a processing method corresponding to the flow 2 for each packet processing device 2 through which the flow 2 passes, and sets a processing rule for each packet processing device 2 based on the control policy.
  • the processing rule of the different flow is aggregated by using the processing rule as the processing rule of the flow 2.
  • the processing rule for flow 1 has already been created, but the group for flow 1 and the group for flow 2 are different. Accordingly, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 creates a processing rule for the flow 2.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2a is “rewrite the source MAC address to Y and transfer from port # 4”. That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 represents the first-stage packet processing device 2a as a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.2” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1”. And a processing rule including “a rewrite source MAC address to Y and transfer from port # 4” is defined.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2b is “transfer from port # 2.” That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines a processing rule including an identification rule “Y” and a processing method with the content “transfer from port # 2” for the packet processing device 2b.
  • the processing method defined for the packet processing device 2c is “transfer from port # 2.” That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 uses the combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.2” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” for the packet processing device 2c at the final stage.
  • a processing rule including an identification rule to be expressed and a processing method with a content of “transfer from port # 2” is defined.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 registers the processing rule determined as described above in the management DB storage unit 12. Processing rules registered in the management DB storage unit 12 at this time are shown in FIG.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 notifies the corresponding packet processing device 2 of each processing rule determined as described above.
  • each packet processing device 2 that has received the processing rule notification is the same as the operation already described.
  • the processing rules of the packet processing device 2a shown in FIG. 15 are stored in the packet processing device 2a.
  • the processing rules of the packet processing device 2b shown in FIG. 15 are stored in the packet processing device 2b.
  • the processing rules of the packet processing device 2c shown in FIG. 15 are stored in the packet processing device 2c.
  • the packet processing device 2a rewrites the transmission source MAC address of the packet of the flow 2 received from the terminal 8b to Y, and outputs the packet from the port # 4.
  • the packet processing device 2b that has received the packet outputs the packet from the port # 2 in accordance with the notified processing rule.
  • the packet processing device 2c that has received the packet outputs the packet from the port # 2 in accordance with the notified processing rule. As a result, the packet of the flow 2 reaches the destination terminal 8d.
  • the terminal 8c transmits a packet with the terminal 8d as the destination.
  • the packet processing device 2a receives the packet. Since the processing rule corresponding to the received packet is not stored in the storage unit 21, the packet processing unit 22 of the packet processing device 2a transmits a processing inquiry for the flow of the packet (flow 3) to the control device 1. At this time, the packet processing unit 22 of the packet processing device 2 a also transmits the packet to the control device 1.
  • the control unit 10 of the control device 1 receives the processing rule inquiry and the packet from the packet processing device 2a.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines an identification rule for identifying the flow 3.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 determines the MAC address “X” as an identification rule for the flow 3.
  • the identification rules in the processing rules notified to the first-stage packet processing device 2a and the last-stage packet processing device 2c are determined in the same manner as in the first embodiment. That is, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 uses a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.3” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1” as the identification rule.
  • the newly generated flow 3 is a flow belonging to the same group as the flow 1 in which the processing rule has already been created. Therefore, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 aggregates the processing rules of the different flows 1 and 3 by using the processing rule of the flow 1 as the processing rule of the flow 3.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 does not change the processing rules of the packet processing device 2b other than the first stage and the last stage.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 changes the identification rule in the processing rule corresponding to the flow 1 of the first-stage packet processing device 2a and the last-stage packet processing device 2c to an identification rule including flows 1 and 3.
  • the identification rule in the processing rule corresponding to the flow 1 is represented by a combination of the source IP address “172.20.1.0/30” and the destination IP address “172.20.2.1”. Change to the identification rule.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 reflects the change of the processing rule (change of the identification rule) of the packet processing devices 2a and 2c at the first stage and the final stage in the processing rule stored in the management DB storage unit 12.
  • the processing rules registered in the management DB storage unit 12 at this time are shown in FIG.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 Since the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 has not changed the processing rules of the packet processing device 2b other than the first and last stages, the processing rule need not be notified to the packet processing device 2b.
  • processing rule granularity determination unit 11 notifies the first-stage packet processing device 2a and the final-stage packet processing device 2c of the processing rule whose identification rule has been changed and deletes the processing rule before the change. Send instructions.
  • the processing rule setting unit 20 of the packet processing devices 2 a and 2 c stores the notified processing rule in the storage unit 21 and deletes the processing rule designated to be deleted from the storage unit 21.
  • the processing rules of the packet processing device 2a shown in FIG. 16 are stored in the packet processing device 2a.
  • the processing rules of the packet processing device 2b shown in FIG. 16 are stored in the packet processing device 2b.
  • the processing rules of the packet processing device 2c shown in FIG. 16 are stored in the packet processing device 2c.
  • the packet processing device 2a rewrites the transmission source MAC address of the packet of the flow 3 received from the terminal 8c to X, and outputs the packet from the port # 4.
  • the packet processing device 2b that has received the packet outputs the packet from the port # 2 in accordance with the notified processing rule.
  • the packet processing device 2c that has received the packet outputs the packet from the port # 2 in accordance with the notified processing rule.
  • the packet transfer mode of the flow 3 is the same as the packet transfer mode of the flow 1.
  • the processing rules of different flows are aggregated, so that the number of processing rules stored in the packet processing device 2 can be reduced.
  • the first-stage packet processing device 2a that receives a packet whose source MAC address has not been rewritten has a processing rule including an identification rule similar to that of the first embodiment without using a group identifier as an identification rule. Be notified. Even with the same identification rule as in the first embodiment, an identification rule including a plurality of flows can be described, so that processing rules can be aggregated. Therefore, the number of processing rules to be stored can be reduced also in the first-stage packet processing device 2.
  • the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 may determine a processing method including the content of writing the group identifier in the vendor extension area in the packet.
  • the identification rule in the processing rule notified to the packet processing apparatus 2c at the final stage is the same as that in the first embodiment has been described as an example.
  • the identification rule in the processing rule notified to the final stage packet processing device 2c may be represented by a group identifier.
  • FIG. 17 is a block diagram showing an outline of the control device of the present invention.
  • the control device of the present invention includes a flow identification information creating unit 91, a processing rule creating unit 92, an aggregation unit 93, and a notification unit 94.
  • the flow identification information creating unit 91 (for example, the processing rule granularity determining unit 11 that executes step S52) creates flow identification information (for example, an identification rule) for identifying a flow.
  • the processing rule creation means 92 determines a processing method for a flow packet, and creates a processing rule including flow identification information and a processing method.
  • the aggregation unit 93 (for example, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 that executes step S53) can aggregate the processing rule of the flow and the processing rule of the other flow, the processing rule of the flow and the other flow The processing rules are consolidated.
  • the notification means 94 (for example, the processing rule granularity determination unit 11 that executes Step S55) notifies the processing rule to the packet processing device.
  • Such a configuration can reduce the number of processing rules stored in the packet processing apparatus.
  • the configuration may be such that the aggregation means 93 determines that the processing rules of different flows can be aggregated when the processing methods included in the processing rules of different flows are the same.
  • the aggregation means 93 determines that the processing rules of the different flows can be aggregated when the processing methods included in the processing rules of the different flows are the same, determines flow identification information that matches each of the different flows,
  • the configuration may be such that the processing rules are aggregated by creating a processing rule including the flow information and its processing method.
  • the flow identification information creating unit 91 determines flow identification information for identifying a group of flows, When the newly created flow is a flow that belongs to the same group as the flow for which the processing rule has already been created, the aggregation means 93 uses the processing rule as the processing rule for the newly generated flow.
  • the configuration may be such that the processing rules of different flows are aggregated.
  • the present invention is suitably applied to a control device that controls a packet processing device.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un appareil de commande pour permettre une réduction du nombre de règles de traitement qui doivent être stockées par un appareil de traitement de paquets. Un moyen de création d'informations d'identification de flux (91) crée des informations d'identification de flux devant être utilisées pour identifier un flux. Un moyen de création de règles de traitement (92) détermine un procédé de traitement pour des paquets du flux et crée une règle de traitement comprenant les informations d'identification de flux et le procédé de traitement. Lorsque la règle de traitement du flux et la règle de traitement d'un autre flux peuvent être agrégées, un moyen d'agrégation (93) agrège la règle de traitement de flux et la règle de traitement de l'autre flux.
PCT/JP2014/006207 2014-03-14 2014-12-12 Appareil de commande, procédé de commande et programme de commande WO2015136585A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016507133A JPWO2015136585A1 (ja) 2014-03-14 2014-12-12 制御装置、制御方法および制御プログラム

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2014051330 2014-03-14
JP2014-051330 2014-03-14

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015136585A1 true WO2015136585A1 (fr) 2015-09-17

Family

ID=54071066

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2014/006207 WO2015136585A1 (fr) 2014-03-14 2014-12-12 Appareil de commande, procédé de commande et programme de commande

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JPWO2015136585A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2015136585A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2015186213A (ja) * 2014-03-26 2015-10-22 富士通株式会社 制御装置、及びそのテーブル作成方法

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013008134A2 (fr) * 2011-07-08 2013-01-17 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Module oam commandé par contrôleur pour openflow
JP2013545320A (ja) * 2010-12-01 2013-12-19 日本電気株式会社 通信システム、制御装置、通信方法及びプログラム
JP2014505379A (ja) * 2011-01-05 2014-02-27 日本電気株式会社 通信制御システム、制御サーバ、転送ノード、通信制御方法および通信制御プログラム

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013545320A (ja) * 2010-12-01 2013-12-19 日本電気株式会社 通信システム、制御装置、通信方法及びプログラム
JP2014505379A (ja) * 2011-01-05 2014-02-27 日本電気株式会社 通信制御システム、制御サーバ、転送ノード、通信制御方法および通信制御プログラム
WO2013008134A2 (fr) * 2011-07-08 2013-01-17 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Module oam commandé par contrôleur pour openflow

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2015186213A (ja) * 2014-03-26 2015-10-22 富士通株式会社 制御装置、及びそのテーブル作成方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2015136585A1 (ja) 2017-04-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5440691B2 (ja) パケット転送システム、制御装置、転送装置、処理規則の作成方法およびプログラム
RU2523917C2 (ru) Система управления связью и способ управления связью
US20150131666A1 (en) Apparatus and method for transmitting packet
WO2015101119A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de mise en correspondance de table de flux et système d'échange openflow
US9363158B2 (en) Reduce size of IPV6 routing tables by using a bypass tunnel
JP6007972B2 (ja) 通信ノード、パケット処理方法及びプログラム
US20150341267A1 (en) Control apparatus, communication apparatus, communication system, switch control method, and program
JP2016019052A (ja) パケット処理装置、制御プログラム、及びパケット処理装置の制御方法
US10084613B2 (en) Self adapting driver for controlling datapath hardware elements
JP5534033B2 (ja) 通信システム、ノード、パケット転送方法およびプログラム
US10462064B2 (en) Maximum transmission unit installation for network traffic along a datapath in a software defined network
US20150263990A1 (en) Network device, control method, and program
JP5720162B2 (ja) 通信システム、スイッチングハブ、およびルータ
JP6127900B2 (ja) パケット処理装置、パケット処理方法、パケット処理プログラム
WO2015075862A1 (fr) Dispositif de commande de réseau, procédé de commande de réseau et programme
WO2014126094A1 (fr) Système et procédé de communication, dispositif de gestion, et procédé et programme de contrôle de dispositif de gestion
WO2015136585A1 (fr) Appareil de commande, procédé de commande et programme de commande
WO2016173196A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil d'apprentissage de relation de mappage d'adresses
US20180198704A1 (en) Pre-processing of data packets with network switch application -specific integrated circuit
JPWO2014125636A1 (ja) 通信装置またはパケット転送方法
WO2015165229A1 (fr) Procédé, dispositif et système d'identification de flux de données ip anormal
KR101707073B1 (ko) Sdn 기반의 에러 탐색 네트워크 시스템
JP5854488B2 (ja) 通信システム、制御装置、処理規則の設定方法およびプログラム
JP7359299B2 (ja) パケット識別装置、パケット識別方法およびパケット識別プログラム
JP6898846B2 (ja) 異常原因特定支援システムおよび異常原因特定支援方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14885772

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2016507133

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 14885772

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1