WO2015108474A1 - Method and apparatus for providing a driver with support for taking decisions before overtaking - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for providing a driver with support for taking decisions before overtaking Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015108474A1
WO2015108474A1 PCT/SE2015/050020 SE2015050020W WO2015108474A1 WO 2015108474 A1 WO2015108474 A1 WO 2015108474A1 SE 2015050020 W SE2015050020 W SE 2015050020W WO 2015108474 A1 WO2015108474 A1 WO 2015108474A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
host vehicle
vehicle
speed
segment
driver
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/SE2015/050020
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Tony Sandberg
Original Assignee
Scania Cv Ab
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Scania Cv Ab filed Critical Scania Cv Ab
Priority to DE112015000207.3T priority Critical patent/DE112015000207T5/en
Publication of WO2015108474A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015108474A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W30/00Purposes of road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. of systems using conjoint control of vehicle sub-units, or advanced driver assistance systems for ensuring comfort, stability and safety or drive control systems for propelling or retarding the vehicle
    • B60W30/18Propelling the vehicle
    • B60W30/18009Propelling the vehicle related to particular drive situations
    • B60W30/18163Lane change; Overtaking manoeuvres
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W30/00Purposes of road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. of systems using conjoint control of vehicle sub-units, or advanced driver assistance systems for ensuring comfort, stability and safety or drive control systems for propelling or retarding the vehicle
    • B60W30/14Adaptive cruise control
    • B60W30/16Control of distance between vehicles, e.g. keeping a distance to preceding vehicle
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W50/00Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
    • B60W50/0097Predicting future conditions
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W50/00Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
    • B60W50/08Interaction between the driver and the control system
    • B60W50/14Means for informing the driver, warning the driver or prompting a driver intervention
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/16Anti-collision systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/16Anti-collision systems
    • G08G1/166Anti-collision systems for active traffic, e.g. moving vehicles, pedestrians, bikes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/16Anti-collision systems
    • G08G1/167Driving aids for lane monitoring, lane changing, e.g. blind spot detection
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2552/00Input parameters relating to infrastructure
    • B60W2552/20Road profile
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2554/00Input parameters relating to objects
    • B60W2554/80Spatial relation or speed relative to objects
    • B60W2554/804Relative longitudinal speed
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2556/00Input parameters relating to data
    • B60W2556/45External transmission of data to or from the vehicle
    • B60W2556/50External transmission of data to or from the vehicle for navigation systems
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2556/00Input parameters relating to data
    • B60W2556/45External transmission of data to or from the vehicle
    • B60W2556/65Data transmitted between vehicles
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2754/00Output or target parameters relating to objects
    • B60W2754/10Spatial relation or speed relative to objects
    • B60W2754/30Longitudinal distance
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/80Technologies aiming to reduce greenhouse gasses emissions common to all road transportation technologies
    • Y02T10/84Data processing systems or methods, management, administration

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for providing a driver with support when deciding whether to overtake.
  • Vehicles such as trucks are often subject to speed limits and are driven at an approximately uniform speed on roads. Some trucks for example travel at 80 km/h, others somewhere between 80 and 89 km/h. Those travelling slightly faster than others will often be tempted to overtake, which may take quite a long time and result in the formation of queues of other vehicles such as cars on the road behind the trucks. A truck driver is usually required to reach a final destination at a certain time, which may cause him/her to feel stressed and therefore wish to overtake.
  • the above object is at least partly achieved by a method according to the attached claims for providing a driver of a host vehicle with support for taking decisions before overtaking a vehicle in front.
  • the method comprises receiving a speed v se t which denotes the host vehicle's desired speed, and determining a speed v f of the preceding vehicle.
  • a difference ⁇ between v se t and v f is determined and serves as a basis for calculating for at least one segment Si of its journey how much more time Ati the host vehicle would take to travel the segment Si at the speed v f instead of at v se t-
  • the method also comprises presenting the time Ati for the driver of the host vehicle.
  • the above object is at least partly achieved by an apparatus according to the attached claims for providing a driver of a host vehicle with support for decisions before overtaking a vehicle in front.
  • the apparatus comprises a processor unit configured to receive speed data which represent a speed v se t which denotes the host vehicle's desired speed, and to determine a speed v f of the preceding vehicle.
  • the processor unit is also configured to calculate a difference ⁇ between v se t and v f , and to calculate on the basis of the difference ⁇ for at least one segment Si of its journey how much more time Ati the host vehicle would take to travel the segment Si at the speed v f instead of at Vset.
  • the processor unit is further configured to generate a first presentation signal CH which represents the time ⁇ , and to send it to a presentation unit which then presents the time ⁇ for the driver.
  • a first presentation signal CH which represents the time ⁇
  • the processor unit is further configured to generate a first presentation signal CH which represents the time ⁇ , and to send it to a presentation unit which then presents the time ⁇ for the driver.
  • the object is at least partly achieved by a computer programme P which comprises programme code for causing an apparatus to perform steps according to the method.
  • the object is at least partly achieved by a computer programme product comprising a programme code stored on a computer-readable non-volatile medium for conducting the method when said programme code is run on an apparatus.
  • Fig. 1 depicts an example of a host vehicle with which the method may be employed and in which the apparatus may be integrated.
  • Fig. 2 depicts a host vehicle and a preceding vehicle travelling along a road.
  • Fig. 3 depicts the apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 4 illustrates examples of average fuel savings for all of the vehicles in a train made up of sundry different vehicles.
  • Fig. 5 illustrates what may in one embodiment be displayed on the host vehicle's presentation unit.
  • Fig. 6 depicts a flowchart for the method according to an embodiment.
  • Fig. 1 depicts an example of a vehicle 1 in which an apparatus 2 for providing the vehicle's driver with support in making decisions may be integrated.
  • the vehicle here depicted takes the form of a truck but may instead be for example a car or other suitable vehicle.
  • the vehicle 1 is provided with a presentation unit 3 which may comprise a display screen and/or a loudspeaker.
  • the vehicle may also be provided with a detector unit 4 which may be intended to determine a distance ddi ff from a preceding vehicle 5, and/or a speed difference v d i ff between the vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5.
  • Preceding vehicle means a vehicle travelling immediately in front of the host vehicle.
  • the detector unit 4 may for example comprise a radar unit, a camera unit and/or a laser unit.
  • the host vehicle may further be provided with a cruise control 10, e.g. an adaptive cruise control, which the driver can set to maintain a certain desired speed v se t for the host vehicle.
  • the cruise control will thus be configured to ensure that the host vehicle maintains a certain time gap t se t between the host vehicle and the preceding vehicle.
  • the desired speed v se t may also be called the vehicle's set speed.
  • the cruise control may then be configured to calculate on the basis of the host vehicle's speed the time gap t se t which needs to be maintained relative to the preceding vehicle on the basis of the host vehicle's speed, and to generate reference values for an engine system of the host vehicle which regulates the host vehicle on the basis of the reference values so that the time gap between the vehicles 1 , 5 is maintained.
  • the reference values may for example be speed reference values which denote the speed at which the vehicle 1 needs to travel to maintain the time gap, or energy reference values which denote the amount of fuel which needs to be injected into the vehicle's engine for the time gap to be maintained.
  • the host vehicle may also be provided with a navigation system 1 1 configured to use the vehicle's current location p ego and final destination as a basis for determining the whole segment which the vehicle is to travel.
  • Whole segment means the length of the segment between the host vehicle's current location and its final destination.
  • the host vehicle's current location may for example be determined by a
  • the positioning unit 15 on board which is configured to determine the vehicle's location.
  • the positioning unit 15 may for example be configured to receive signals from a global positioning system such as GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System), GPS (Global Positioning System), GLONASS, Galileo or Compass.
  • GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System
  • GPS Global Positioning System
  • GLONASS Global Positioning System
  • Galileo Galileo or Compass.
  • the positioning unit may for example be configured to receive signals from one or more detectors 4 on board the host vehicle which measure relative distances from such objects as a road intersection, vehicles in the surroundings or the like with known locations. The positioning unit may then use these relative distances as a basis for determining the host vehicle's location.
  • a detector may also be configured to monitor for example signage, e.g. at a road intersection, which represents a certain location. The positioning unit may then be configured to determine its location by monitoring the signage.
  • the positioning unit may instead be configured to determine the strength of one or more signals from a plurality of base stations and/or road intersections etc. with known locations, and thereby determine the host vehicle's location by triangulation. The above techniques may of course be combined to verify the vehicle's location.
  • the vehicle's final destination may for example be indicated by the driver or be communicated by a haulage enterprise, e.g. via a server.
  • the navigation system 1 1 may then be configured to use map data to determine a road for the host vehicle from its current location to its final destination, and to determine the length of the segment between the vehicle's current location and its final destination.
  • the navigation system may also be configured to determine how much time the vehicle would take to travel the specific segment, allowing for speed limits etc.
  • the navigation system may base its calculations either on a predetermined speed for the vehicle or by having information about the vehicle's desired speed, e.g. from the cruise control 10.
  • the various units on board the vehicle 1 may communicate internally with one another and the apparatus 2 via for example a bus, e.g. a CAN (controller area network) bus, which employs a message-based protocol. Examples of other communication protocols which may be used are TTP (time-triggered protocol), Flexray etc. Signals and data herein described may thus be exchanged between various units on board the vehicle, e.g. they may be transmitted wirelessly between the various units and the apparatus 2.
  • the apparatus 2 is a control unit, an ECU (electronic control unit).
  • the apparatus may also comprise one or more of the units herein described.
  • the vehicle 1 may also be provided with a wireless communication unit 12 adapted to receiving and/or sending data to other vehicles and/or infrastructures and/or servers.
  • Fig. 2 depicts an example of a host vehicle 1 travelling
  • the vehicles 1 , 5 are each equipped to be able to communicate wirelessly via an antenna 6 on each vehicle.
  • the two vehicles may be configured to communicate directly with one another, so-called “vehicle to vehicle” communication, or via a roadside unit 7 or some other central unit, so-called “vehicle to infrastructure” communication, or via a server, so-called “vehicle to server” communication.
  • the cruise control 10 will ensure that a time gap t se t is maintained between the vehicles 1 , 5.
  • Fig. 3 illustrates how the apparatus 2 receives data from the units described above, and the function of the apparatus will now be described in more detail.
  • the processor unit comprises in one embodiment a CPU (central processing unit).
  • the apparatus 2 comprises also a memory unit 9 which in one embodiment comprises a nonvolatile memory (NVM), e.g. a flash memory.
  • NVM nonvolatile memory
  • the memory unit contains a computer programme P with programme instructions for causing the apparatus 2 to perform the steps described below when the instructions are run on the processor unit in the apparatus.
  • the memory unit 9 may be described as a form of computer programme product.
  • the programme instructions are therefore stored on a medium which is readable by a computer system.
  • the programme instructions may also be stored on a CD or the like.
  • the processor unit 8 is configured to determine a speed v f of the preceding vehicle 5, which may be done in various different ways. If the host vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5 are provided with wireless communication equipment, the host vehicle may receive information about the preceding vehicle's speed v f via the wireless communication unit 12. Another way of determining the preceding vehicle's speed v f is to detect the speed difference v d iff between the vehicles 1 , 5 by means of the detector 4 on board the host vehicle 1 .
  • the processor unit may also be configured to receive data about the host vehicle's current speed v ego , which will not necessarily be the same as the desired speed v se t- The data on the host vehicle's speed v ego may for example come from a speed sensor on board the host vehicle.
  • the preceding vehicle's speed v f may then be calculated by subtracting the speed difference v d iff from the host vehicle's speed v ego -
  • Another alternative is to quite simply wait until the host vehicle's speed has stabilised and the host vehicle is travelling behind the preceding vehicle, whereupon the two vehicles may be assumed to be travelling at the same speed. This may for example be determined by detecting that there is no change in the distance d d iff between the two vehicles.
  • the host vehicle's speed v ego will then be equal to the preceding vehicle's speed v f , and v ego may be used as an indication of v f .
  • the processor unit 8 is further configured to calculate a difference ⁇ between v se t and v f and to use the difference as a basis for calculating for at least one segment Si of its journey how much more time the host vehicle would take to travel the segment Si at the speed v f instead of at v se t.
  • the time ⁇ may be calculated by the equation
  • the processor unit is further configured to generate a first presentation signal ai which represents the time ⁇ and to send it to the presentation unit 3 which then presents the time ⁇ for the driver, enabling him/her to see how much longer the journey will take on different segments. He/she is thus provided with a basis for determining whether the host vehicle 1 will still arrive on time even if it stays behind the preceding vehicle 5.
  • the processor unit 8 is configured to receive data which represent the time gap
  • the data may for example be received via the host vehicle's cruise control 10.
  • the processor unit is further configured to deternnine a reduction Ab in the host vehicle's fuel consumption on the basis of the time gap tset-
  • the reduction Ab may for example be determined by using a predetermined table of the relationship between fuel saving and the time gap
  • the table may for example be stored in the memory unit 9 so that the processor unit can retrieve data from it.
  • Fig. 4 illustrates an example of a diagram of the relationship between fuel saving and the time gap
  • the data in the diagram in Fig. 4 may therefore be set out in the table instead.
  • the diagram has on one axis the time gap t se t in seconds.
  • the average fuel saving Ab Ab as a percentage (%) of the average fuel consumption which the vehicles in the train would achieve if they did not travel in a train but separately, for all of the vehicles in a train.
  • the average saving where the train also comprises more vehicles than the preceding vehicle is illustrated.
  • the host vehicle 1 may therefore in one embodiment choose to be part of a train together with at least the preceding vehicle 5.
  • the curve A2 represents the average fuel saving Ab if the host vehicle 1 is expected to be the second vehicle in the train.
  • the preceding vehicle 5 will then be the lead vehicle, and the vehicles 1 , 5 will together form a train.
  • the curve A3 represents the average fuel consumption Ab if the host vehicle 1 is expected to be third in the train, A4 the average fuel consumption Ab if the host vehicle is expected to be fourth, and A5 the average fuel saving Ab if it is expected to be fifth.
  • the host vehicle may receive information that the preceding vehicle 5 is part of a train, and also how many vehicles there are in the train, by wireless communication with the preceding vehicle 5 or with a central unit or a server.
  • the apparatus 2 and the processor unit 8 may thus know which position in the vehicle queue the host vehicle 1 would occupy if it joins a train which the preceding vehicle 5 is part of, and may retrieve from the table correct data about the potential fuel saving Ab.
  • Another embodiment uses only data concerning the curve A2 and assumes that the host vehicle 1 is always number two in the train. The host vehicle will thus need no information about the position it would occupy in the train.
  • the processor unit 8 is also configured to calculate the fuel saving which the host vehicle 1 will make if it travels at the lower speed of the preceding vehicle 5, rather than travelling the same segment at the higher speed v se t- How much fuel the host vehicle will consume at different speeds is often predefined, which means that its fuel consumption on a given segment can be calculated.
  • the fuel saving achieved by travelling at a lower speed may then be calculated by comparing the host vehicle's fuel consumption when travelling at the speed v se t with travelling at v f .
  • a fuel saving for the host vehicle may thus be determined on the basis of the speed difference ⁇ , i.e. v f - v se t- This further fuel saving may be added to that achieved by travelling in a train, and be included in Ab.
  • the processor unit is thus configured to determine a reduction Ab in fuel consumption for the host vehicle on the basis of both the time gap t se t and the speed difference ⁇ . It is further configured to generate a second presentation signal ⁇ 3 ⁇ 4 which represents the reduction Ab and to send it to the presentation unit 3 which then presents the reduction Ab for the driver. He/she may thus receive information about how much fuel will be saved by staying behind the preceding vehicle 5 instead of overtaking and continuing at the desired speed v se t-
  • the processor unit 8 is configured to use the difference ⁇ as a basis for calculating for a plurality of segments Sk of its journey how much more time At k the host vehicle would take to travel each segment at the speed v f instead of at v S et, and to generate a first presentation signal CM which represents the times At k and send it to the presentation unit 3 which then presents the times At k for the driver.
  • the processor unit then performs a plurality of calculations according to the equation (1 ).
  • the segments Sk may for example be 1 km, 10 km and 100 km long.
  • the segment Si is the host vehicle's whole segment from its current location to its final destination, which in one embodiment is predetermined by another system, e.g. the previously described navigation system 1 1 , which provides it to the apparatus 2 and the processor unit 8.
  • the apparatus 2 is provided with an input unit 14 to enable the driver to feed in a desired segment or segments S k .
  • Fig. 5 depicts an example of the screen 13 on a presentation unit 3 (Fig. 3).
  • the screen displays data from the first and second presentation signals CH, ⁇ 3 ⁇ 4.
  • the segment or segments S k are also presented for the driver by the presentation unit.
  • Fig. 5 illustrates an example of this, with the distances 1 , 10 and 100 km at the top of the screen, and below them how much more time At k the various segments would take than if the host vehicle 1 travelled at its desired speed v se t instead.
  • the bottom of the screen shows the fuel saving Ab which the host vehicle 1 achieves if it stays behind the preceding vehicle 5.
  • Fig. 5 is just one example of what the display might look like, and the order and/or positions of the calculated values may be different from those depicted.
  • the processor unit 8 is then configured to determine the reduction Ab in fuel consumption for the host vehicle's whole segment Si from its current location to its final destination. It is of course possible to only display on the presentation unit 3 the extra time Ati taken to travel the whole segment and the total fuel saving Ab.
  • the fuel saving may also be presented in litres or in litres per 1 , 10 or 100 km and so on.
  • One embodiment displays the total fuel saving for the whole segment Si in litres. The host vehicle's fuel consumption when it is not part of a train is then used for comparison.
  • the processor unit 8 is configured to receive from the preceding vehicle 5 route data ⁇ which indicate the route which the preceding vehicle is to take.
  • the route data ⁇ may for example be received by wireless communication from the preceding vehicle 5.
  • the processor unit is further configured to receive from the host vehicle 1 route data ⁇ ⁇ 90 which indicate the route which the host vehicle is to take.
  • the route data ⁇ ⁇ 90 from the host vehicle may for example be received via the navigation system 1 1 .
  • the processor unit is further configured to compare the host vehicle's route data ⁇ ⁇ 90 with the preceding vehicle's route data ⁇ and determine the segment Si to indicate on the basis of the comparison the length of the segment on which the two vehicles take the same route.
  • Route data may for example indicate locations by longitude and latitude.
  • the processor unit may then be configured to compare whether the locations coincide with one another within a predefined radius range, e.g. 5, 10, 20, 50 or 100 m. If they do coincide within the respective range, the vehicles 1 , 5 are regarded as taking the same route. On the basis of the route data for the two vehicles the driver will know how far the host vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5 share the same route.
  • a predefined radius range e.g. 5, 10, 20, 50 or 100 m.
  • Fig. 6 depicts a flowchart for a method for providing a driver of the host vehicle 1 with support for decisions before overtaking the preceding vehicle 5.
  • the method will now be explained with reference to this diagram.
  • the method may be implemented as computer instructions in a computer programme P. When the programme is run on the processor unit 8, the various steps of the method will be performed.
  • the method comprises receiving a speed v se t which denotes the host vehicle's desired speed (B1 ), and determining a speed v f of the preceding vehicle 5 (B2).
  • the host vehicle 1 is equipped with a cruise control 10, e.g. an adaptive cruise control, which is configured to maintain a certain time gap t se t between the host vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5.
  • the method may comprise determining on the basis of the time gap t se t and the speed difference ⁇ a reduction Ab in the host vehicle's fuel consumption, which reduction is then presented for the driver of the host vehicle.
  • the method comprises using the speed difference ⁇ as a basis for calculating for a plurality of segments S k how much more time At k the host vehicle would take to travel the segment S k at the speed v f instead of at v se t, and presenting the respective times At k for the driver.
  • the segment Si is the host vehicle's whole segment from its current location to its final destination. This makes it possible to determine the total difference between the host vehicle's estimated arrival time when travelling at the speed v se t and when travelling at the speed v f of the preceding vehicle 5, i.e. the total time difference ⁇ .
  • a navigation system 1 1 on board the host vehicle 1 may be configured to determine the whole segment for the host vehicle.
  • the determination of the reduction Ab in fuel consumption comprises determining the reduction for the whole segment from the host vehicle's current location to its final destination. The total time difference ⁇ and the reduction Ab in fuel
  • consumption for the whole segment from the host vehicle's current location to its final destination may then be presented for the driver.
  • the host vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5 are configured to communicate wirelessly and the method comprises receiving from the preceding vehicle 5 route data which indicate the route which the preceding vehicle is to take, and from the host vehicle 1 route data which indicate the route which the host vehicle is to take.
  • the method comprises thereafter comparing the host vehicle's route data with the preceding vehicle's route data and using the comparison as a basis for determining the segment Si to denote the length of the segment on which the host vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5 take the same route.
  • the present invention is not restricted to the embodiments described above.

Abstract

Method and apparatus for providing a driver of a host vehicle with support for decisions before overtaking a preceding vehicle. The method comprises receiving a speed vset which denotes the host vehicle's desired speed, and determining a speed vf of the preceding vehicle. This is followed by calculating a difference Δν between vset and vf and by using the calculated difference Δν as a basis for calculating for at least one segment S1 of its journey how much more time Δt1 the host vehicle would take to travel the segment S1 at the speed vf instead of at vset. The time Δt1 is thereafter presented for the driver of the host vehicle.

Description

Method and apparatus for providing a driver with support for taking decisions before overtaking
Field of the invention
The present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for providing a driver with support when deciding whether to overtake.
Background to the invention
Vehicles such as trucks are often subject to speed limits and are driven at an approximately uniform speed on roads. Some trucks for example travel at 80 km/h, others somewhere between 80 and 89 km/h. Those travelling slightly faster than others will often be tempted to overtake, which may take quite a long time and result in the formation of queues of other vehicles such as cars on the road behind the trucks. A truck driver is usually required to reach a final destination at a certain time, which may cause him/her to feel stressed and therefore wish to overtake.
In the future most trucks will be equipped with adaptive cruise control based on automatically following another vehicle. The vehicles may thus form a so-called vehicle train in which they travel close together and can therefore save fuel because of the reduced air resistance.
For a haulage enterprise it is generally desirable that a vehicle which is part of its fleet be driven as fuel-economisingly as possible, subject to reaching the final destination within a stated time. There is however a lack of support to help a driver in a potential overtaking situation to reach a correct decision about whether to overtake, or stay behind, a vehicle in front. The driver will not know whether he/she can reach the final destination on time without overtaking. A known practice from EP2060466B1 is to provide driver assistance in an overtaking situation whereby the driver is advised against overtaking if the difference in speed between his/her vehicle and those in front is too small. However, the object is to prevent traffic stacking and the driver is not provided with any basis for knowing whether he/she will reach the final destination on time.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide the driver with support for taking decisions in an overtaking situation, on the basis of minimising fuel consumption but reaching the final destination on time.
Summary of the invention
In a first aspect, the above object is at least partly achieved by a method according to the attached claims for providing a driver of a host vehicle with support for taking decisions before overtaking a vehicle in front. The method comprises receiving a speed vset which denotes the host vehicle's desired speed, and determining a speed vf of the preceding vehicle. A difference Δν between vset and vf is determined and serves as a basis for calculating for at least one segment Si of its journey how much more time Ati the host vehicle would take to travel the segment Si at the speed vf instead of at vset- The method also comprises presenting the time Ati for the driver of the host vehicle.
In a second aspect, the above object is at least partly achieved by an apparatus according to the attached claims for providing a driver of a host vehicle with support for decisions before overtaking a vehicle in front. The apparatus comprises a processor unit configured to receive speed data which represent a speed vset which denotes the host vehicle's desired speed, and to determine a speed vf of the preceding vehicle. The processor unit is also configured to calculate a difference Δν between vset and vf, and to calculate on the basis of the difference Δν for at least one segment Si of its journey how much more time Ati the host vehicle would take to travel the segment Si at the speed vf instead of at Vset. The processor unit is further configured to generate a first presentation signal CH which represents the time Δίι, and to send it to a presentation unit which then presents the time Δίι for the driver. In either of these aspects the driver of the host vehicle is helped to make judicious choices whereby he/she can balance the requirement for delivery precision and the desire to save fuel. This may lead rather to choosing not to overtake vehicles in front and to consequent fuel saving and/or better traffic flow.
In a third aspect, the object is at least partly achieved by a computer programme P which comprises programme code for causing an apparatus to perform steps according to the method. In a fourth aspect, the object is at least partly achieved by a computer programme product comprising a programme code stored on a computer-readable non-volatile medium for conducting the method when said programme code is run on an apparatus.
Preferred embodiments are described in the dependent claims and the detailed description.
Brief description of the attached drawings
The invention is described below with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 depicts an example of a host vehicle with which the method may be employed and in which the apparatus may be integrated.
Fig. 2 depicts a host vehicle and a preceding vehicle travelling along a road. Fig. 3 depicts the apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention.
Fig. 4 illustrates examples of average fuel savings for all of the vehicles in a train made up of sundry different vehicles.
Fig. 5 illustrates what may in one embodiment be displayed on the host vehicle's presentation unit.
Fig. 6 depicts a flowchart for the method according to an embodiment.
Detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention
Fig. 1 depicts an example of a vehicle 1 in which an apparatus 2 for providing the vehicle's driver with support in making decisions may be integrated. The vehicle here depicted takes the form of a truck but may instead be for example a car or other suitable vehicle. The vehicle 1 is provided with a presentation unit 3 which may comprise a display screen and/or a loudspeaker. The vehicle may also be provided with a detector unit 4 which may be intended to determine a distance ddiff from a preceding vehicle 5, and/or a speed difference vdiff between the vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5. Preceding vehicle means a vehicle travelling immediately in front of the host vehicle. The detector unit 4 may for example comprise a radar unit, a camera unit and/or a laser unit. The host vehicle may further be provided with a cruise control 10, e.g. an adaptive cruise control, which the driver can set to maintain a certain desired speed vset for the host vehicle. The cruise control will thus be configured to ensure that the host vehicle maintains a certain time gap tset between the host vehicle and the preceding vehicle. The desired speed vset may also be called the vehicle's set speed. The cruise control may then be configured to calculate on the basis of the host vehicle's speed the time gap tset which needs to be maintained relative to the preceding vehicle on the basis of the host vehicle's speed, and to generate reference values for an engine system of the host vehicle which regulates the host vehicle on the basis of the reference values so that the time gap between the vehicles 1 , 5 is maintained. The reference values may for example be speed reference values which denote the speed at which the vehicle 1 needs to travel to maintain the time gap, or energy reference values which denote the amount of fuel which needs to be injected into the vehicle's engine for the time gap to be maintained. The host vehicle may also be provided with a navigation system 1 1 configured to use the vehicle's current location pego and final destination as a basis for determining the whole segment which the vehicle is to travel. Whole segment means the length of the segment between the host vehicle's current location and its final destination. The host vehicle's current location may for example be determined by a
positioning unit 15 on board which is configured to determine the vehicle's location. The positioning unit 15 may for example be configured to receive signals from a global positioning system such as GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System), GPS (Global Positioning System), GLONASS, Galileo or Compass.
Alternatively, the positioning unit may for example be configured to receive signals from one or more detectors 4 on board the host vehicle which measure relative distances from such objects as a road intersection, vehicles in the surroundings or the like with known locations. The positioning unit may then use these relative distances as a basis for determining the host vehicle's location. A detector may also be configured to monitor for example signage, e.g. at a road intersection, which represents a certain location. The positioning unit may then be configured to determine its location by monitoring the signage. The positioning unit may instead be configured to determine the strength of one or more signals from a plurality of base stations and/or road intersections etc. with known locations, and thereby determine the host vehicle's location by triangulation. The above techniques may of course be combined to verify the vehicle's location. The vehicle's final destination may for example be indicated by the driver or be communicated by a haulage enterprise, e.g. via a server. The navigation system 1 1 may then be configured to use map data to determine a road for the host vehicle from its current location to its final destination, and to determine the length of the segment between the vehicle's current location and its final destination. The navigation system may also be configured to determine how much time the vehicle would take to travel the specific segment, allowing for speed limits etc. The navigation system may base its calculations either on a predetermined speed for the vehicle or by having information about the vehicle's desired speed, e.g. from the cruise control 10.
The various units on board the vehicle 1 may communicate internally with one another and the apparatus 2 via for example a bus, e.g. a CAN (controller area network) bus, which employs a message-based protocol. Examples of other communication protocols which may be used are TTP (time-triggered protocol), Flexray etc. Signals and data herein described may thus be exchanged between various units on board the vehicle, e.g. they may be transmitted wirelessly between the various units and the apparatus 2. In one embodiment the apparatus 2 is a control unit, an ECU (electronic control unit). In one embodiment the apparatus may also comprise one or more of the units herein described. The vehicle 1 may also be provided with a wireless communication unit 12 adapted to receiving and/or sending data to other vehicles and/or infrastructures and/or servers. Fig. 2 depicts an example of a host vehicle 1 travelling
immediately behind a preceding vehicle 5. The vehicles 1 , 5 are each equipped to be able to communicate wirelessly via an antenna 6 on each vehicle. The two vehicles may be configured to communicate directly with one another, so-called "vehicle to vehicle" communication, or via a roadside unit 7 or some other central unit, so-called "vehicle to infrastructure" communication, or via a server, so-called "vehicle to server" communication. Where the host vehicle 1 employs adaptive cruise control, the cruise control 10 will ensure that a time gap tset is maintained between the vehicles 1 , 5.
Fig. 3 illustrates how the apparatus 2 receives data from the units described above, and the function of the apparatus will now be described in more detail. It comprises a processor unit 8 configured to receive speed data which represent a speed vset which denotes the desired speed of the host vehicle 1 . The speed vset may for example be obtained from the cruise control 10. The processor unit comprises in one embodiment a CPU (central processing unit). The apparatus 2 comprises also a memory unit 9 which in one embodiment comprises a nonvolatile memory (NVM), e.g. a flash memory. The memory unit contains a computer programme P with programme instructions for causing the apparatus 2 to perform the steps described below when the instructions are run on the processor unit in the apparatus. The memory unit 9 may be described as a form of computer programme product. The programme instructions are therefore stored on a medium which is readable by a computer system. The programme instructions may also be stored on a CD or the like.
The processor unit 8 is configured to determine a speed vf of the preceding vehicle 5, which may be done in various different ways. If the host vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5 are provided with wireless communication equipment, the host vehicle may receive information about the preceding vehicle's speed vf via the wireless communication unit 12. Another way of determining the preceding vehicle's speed vf is to detect the speed difference vdiff between the vehicles 1 , 5 by means of the detector 4 on board the host vehicle 1 . The processor unit may also be configured to receive data about the host vehicle's current speed vego, which will not necessarily be the same as the desired speed vset- The data on the host vehicle's speed vego may for example come from a speed sensor on board the host vehicle. The preceding vehicle's speed vf may then be calculated by subtracting the speed difference vdiff from the host vehicle's speed vego- Another alternative is to quite simply wait until the host vehicle's speed has stabilised and the host vehicle is travelling behind the preceding vehicle, whereupon the two vehicles may be assumed to be travelling at the same speed. This may for example be determined by detecting that there is no change in the distance ddiff between the two vehicles. The host vehicle's speed vego will then be equal to the preceding vehicle's speed vf, and vego may be used as an indication of vf. The processor unit 8 is further configured to calculate a difference Δν between vset and vf and to use the difference as a basis for calculating for at least one segment Si of its journey how much more time the host vehicle would take to travel the segment Si at the speed vf instead of at vset. In general terms, the time Δίι may be calculated by the equation
In which "k" may range from "1 " to a desired number "n" of segments. The processor unit is further configured to generate a first presentation signal ai which represents the time Δίι and to send it to the presentation unit 3 which then presents the time Δίι for the driver, enabling him/her to see how much longer the journey will take on different segments. He/she is thus provided with a basis for determining whether the host vehicle 1 will still arrive on time even if it stays behind the preceding vehicle 5.
In one embodiment the processor unit 8 is configured to receive data which represent the time gap The data may for example be received via the host vehicle's cruise control 10. The processor unit is further configured to deternnine a reduction Ab in the host vehicle's fuel consumption on the basis of the time gap tset- The reduction Ab may for example be determined by using a predetermined table of the relationship between fuel saving and the time gap The table may for example be stored in the memory unit 9 so that the processor unit can retrieve data from it. Fig. 4 illustrates an example of a diagram of the relationship between fuel saving and the time gap The data in the diagram in Fig. 4 may therefore be set out in the table instead. The diagram has on one axis the time gap tset in seconds. On the other axis it has the average fuel saving Ab as a percentage (%) of the average fuel consumption which the vehicles in the train would achieve if they did not travel in a train but separately, for all of the vehicles in a train. To illustrate the advantages of staying behind the preceding vehicle 5, the average saving where the train also comprises more vehicles than the preceding vehicle is illustrated. In front of the preceding vehicle 5 there may thus be a plurality of vehicles which are part of the same train as the preceding vehicle. The larger the number of vehicles involved, the greater will be the average saving for each vehicle in the train. The host vehicle 1 may therefore in one embodiment choose to be part of a train together with at least the preceding vehicle 5. In Fig. 4, the curve A2 represents the average fuel saving Ab if the host vehicle 1 is expected to be the second vehicle in the train. The preceding vehicle 5 will then be the lead vehicle, and the vehicles 1 , 5 will together form a train. The curve A3 represents the average fuel consumption Ab if the host vehicle 1 is expected to be third in the train, A4 the average fuel consumption Ab if the host vehicle is expected to be fourth, and A5 the average fuel saving Ab if it is expected to be fifth. The host vehicle may receive information that the preceding vehicle 5 is part of a train, and also how many vehicles there are in the train, by wireless communication with the preceding vehicle 5 or with a central unit or a server. The apparatus 2 and the processor unit 8 may thus know which position in the vehicle queue the host vehicle 1 would occupy if it joins a train which the preceding vehicle 5 is part of, and may retrieve from the table correct data about the potential fuel saving Ab. Another embodiment uses only data concerning the curve A2 and assumes that the host vehicle 1 is always number two in the train. The host vehicle will thus need no information about the position it would occupy in the train. In a further embodiment the processor unit 8 is also configured to calculate the fuel saving which the host vehicle 1 will make if it travels at the lower speed of the preceding vehicle 5, rather than travelling the same segment at the higher speed vset- How much fuel the host vehicle will consume at different speeds is often predefined, which means that its fuel consumption on a given segment can be calculated. The fuel saving achieved by travelling at a lower speed may then be calculated by comparing the host vehicle's fuel consumption when travelling at the speed vset with travelling at vf. A fuel saving for the host vehicle may thus be determined on the basis of the speed difference Δν, i.e. vf - vset- This further fuel saving may be added to that achieved by travelling in a train, and be included in Ab. The processor unit is thus configured to determine a reduction Ab in fuel consumption for the host vehicle on the basis of both the time gap tset and the speed difference Δν. It is further configured to generate a second presentation signal <¾ which represents the reduction Ab and to send it to the presentation unit 3 which then presents the reduction Ab for the driver. He/she may thus receive information about how much fuel will be saved by staying behind the preceding vehicle 5 instead of overtaking and continuing at the desired speed vset-
In one embodiment the processor unit 8 is configured to use the difference Δν as a basis for calculating for a plurality of segments Sk of its journey how much more time Atk the host vehicle would take to travel each segment at the speed vf instead of at vSet, and to generate a first presentation signal CM which represents the times Atk and send it to the presentation unit 3 which then presents the times Atk for the driver. The processor unit then performs a plurality of calculations according to the equation (1 ). The segments Sk may for example be 1 km, 10 km and 100 km long. In one embodiment the segments Sk are predetermined and are stored on the memory unit 9. "k" may therefore range from "1 " to a desired number of segments "n". In the above example n=3. In one embodiment the segment Si is the host vehicle's whole segment from its current location to its final destination, which in one embodiment is predetermined by another system, e.g. the previously described navigation system 1 1 , which provides it to the apparatus 2 and the processor unit 8.
In another embodiment the apparatus 2 is provided with an input unit 14 to enable the driver to feed in a desired segment or segments Sk.
Fig. 5 depicts an example of the screen 13 on a presentation unit 3 (Fig. 3). The screen displays data from the first and second presentation signals CH, <¾. In one embodiment the segment or segments Sk are also presented for the driver by the presentation unit. Fig. 5 illustrates an example of this, with the distances 1 , 10 and 100 km at the top of the screen, and below them how much more time Atk the various segments would take than if the host vehicle 1 travelled at its desired speed vset instead. The bottom of the screen shows the fuel saving Ab which the host vehicle 1 achieves if it stays behind the preceding vehicle 5. Fig. 5 is just one example of what the display might look like, and the order and/or positions of the calculated values may be different from those depicted. It is for example possible to display only the whole segment Si and the extra time Ati taken to travel it, and the potential fuel saving percentage Ab. The processor unit 8 is then configured to determine the reduction Ab in fuel consumption for the host vehicle's whole segment Si from its current location to its final destination. It is of course possible to only display on the presentation unit 3 the extra time Ati taken to travel the whole segment and the total fuel saving Ab. The fuel saving may also be presented in litres or in litres per 1 , 10 or 100 km and so on. One embodiment displays the total fuel saving for the whole segment Si in litres. The host vehicle's fuel consumption when it is not part of a train is then used for comparison.
In another embodiment the processor unit 8 is configured to receive from the preceding vehicle 5 route data βί which indicate the route which the preceding vehicle is to take. The route data βί may for example be received by wireless communication from the preceding vehicle 5. The processor unit is further configured to receive from the host vehicle 1 route data ββ90 which indicate the route which the host vehicle is to take. The route data ββ90 from the host vehicle may for example be received via the navigation system 1 1 . The processor unit is further configured to compare the host vehicle's route data ββ90 with the preceding vehicle's route data βί and determine the segment Si to indicate on the basis of the comparison the length of the segment on which the two vehicles take the same route. Route data may for example indicate locations by longitude and latitude. The processor unit may then be configured to compare whether the locations coincide with one another within a predefined radius range, e.g. 5, 10, 20, 50 or 100 m. If they do coincide within the respective range, the vehicles 1 , 5 are regarded as taking the same route. On the basis of the route data for the two vehicles the driver will know how far the host vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5 share the same route.
Fig. 6 depicts a flowchart for a method for providing a driver of the host vehicle 1 with support for decisions before overtaking the preceding vehicle 5. The method will now be explained with reference to this diagram. The method may be implemented as computer instructions in a computer programme P. When the programme is run on the processor unit 8, the various steps of the method will be performed. The method comprises receiving a speed vset which denotes the host vehicle's desired speed (B1 ), and determining a speed vf of the preceding vehicle 5 (B2). This is followed by calculating a difference Δν between vset and vf (B3) and by using the calculated difference Δν as a basis for calculating how much more time Δίι the host vehicle would take to travel the segment Si at the speed vf instead of at vset (B4). Thereafter the time Δίι is then presented for the driver of the host vehicle (B5). The calculation of the difference Δίι may be by equation
(1 )-
In one embodiment the host vehicle 1 is equipped with a cruise control 10, e.g. an adaptive cruise control, which is configured to maintain a certain time gap tset between the host vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5. In this case the method may comprise determining on the basis of the time gap tset and the speed difference Δν a reduction Ab in the host vehicle's fuel consumption, which reduction is then presented for the driver of the host vehicle. In another embodiment the method comprises using the speed difference Δν as a basis for calculating for a plurality of segments Sk how much more time Atk the host vehicle would take to travel the segment Sk at the speed vf instead of at vset, and presenting the respective times Atk for the driver. In another embodiment the segment Si is the host vehicle's whole segment from its current location to its final destination. This makes it possible to determine the total difference between the host vehicle's estimated arrival time when travelling at the speed vset and when travelling at the speed vf of the preceding vehicle 5, i.e. the total time difference Δίι . A navigation system 1 1 on board the host vehicle 1 may be configured to determine the whole segment for the host vehicle. In a further embodiment the determination of the reduction Ab in fuel consumption comprises determining the reduction for the whole segment from the host vehicle's current location to its final destination. The total time difference Δίι and the reduction Ab in fuel
consumption for the whole segment from the host vehicle's current location to its final destination may then be presented for the driver.
In another embodiment the host vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5 are configured to communicate wirelessly and the method comprises receiving from the preceding vehicle 5 route data which indicate the route which the preceding vehicle is to take, and from the host vehicle 1 route data which indicate the route which the host vehicle is to take. The method comprises thereafter comparing the host vehicle's route data with the preceding vehicle's route data and using the comparison as a basis for determining the segment Si to denote the length of the segment on which the host vehicle 1 and the preceding vehicle 5 take the same route. The present invention is not restricted to the embodiments described above.
Sundry alternatives, modifications and equivalents may be used. The aforesaid embodiments therefore do not limit the invention's scope, which is defined by the attached claims.

Claims

Claims
1 . A method for providing a driver of a host vehicle (1 ) with support for decisions before overtaking a preceding vehicle (5), the method comprises
- receiving a speed vset which denotes the set speed of the host vehicle (1 );
- determining a speed vf of the preceding vehicle (5);
- calculating a difference Δν between vset and vf;
- using the difference Δν as a basis for calculating for at least one segment Si of its journey how much more time Δίι the host vehicle (1 ) would take to travel the segment Si at the speed vf instead of at vset;
- presenting the time Δίι for the driver of the host vehicle.
2. The method according to claim 1 , in which the host vehicle (1 ) is equipped with a cruise control (10) which is configured to maintain a certain time gap tset between the host vehicle (1 ) and the preceding vehicle (5),
- to determine on the basis of the time gap tset and the speed difference Δν a reduction Ab in the fuel consumption for the host vehicle (1 );
- to present the reduction Ab for the driver of the host vehicle (1 ).
3. The method according to any one of the foregoing claims, comprising calculating for a plurality of segments Sk on the basis of the speed difference Δν how much more time Atk the host vehicle (1 ) would take to travel the segment Sk at the speed vf instead of at vset, and presenting the times Atk for the driver.
4. The method according to any one of the foregoing claims, in which the segment Si is the whole segment for the host vehicle (1 ) from its current location to its final destination.
5. The method according to claims 2 and 4, in which the determination of the reduction Ab in fuel consumption comprises determining the reduction Ab in fuel consumption for the whole segment for the host vehicle (1 ) from its current location to its final destination.
6. The method according to claim 5, in which the host vehicle (1 ) is equipped with a navigation system (1 1 ) which is configured to use the current location and final destination of the host vehicle (1 ) as a basis for determining the whole segment for the host vehicle (1 ).
7. The method according to any one of the foregoing claims, in which the host vehicle (1 ) and the preceding vehicle (5) are configured to communicate wirelessly, which method comprises
- receiving from the preceding vehicle (5) route data which indicate the route which the preceding vehicle (5) is to take;
- receiving from the host vehicle (1 ) route data which indicate the route which the host vehicle (1 ) is to take;
- comparing the route data of the host vehicle (1 ) with the route data of the preceding vehicle (5);
- using the comparison as a basis for determining the segment Si to denote the length of the segment on which the host vehicle (1 ) and the preceding vehicle (5) take the same route.
8. An apparatus (2) for providing a driver of a host vehicle (1 ) with support for decisions before overtaking a preceding vehicle (5), which apparatus (2) comprises a processor unit (8) which is configured
- to receive speed data which represent a speed vset which denotes the set speed of the host vehicle (1 );
- to determine a speed vf of the preceding vehicle (5);
- to calculate a difference Δν between vset and vf;
- to use the difference Δν as a basis for calculating for at least one segment Si how much more time Δίι the host vehicle (1 ) would take to travel the segment Si at the speed vf instead of at vset; and - to generate a first presentation signal CH which represents the time Δίι and send it to a presentation unit (3) by which the time Δίι is then presented for the driver.
9. The apparatus (2) according to claim 8, whereby the host vehicle (1 ) is equipped with a cruise control (10) which is configured to maintain a certain time gap tset between the host vehicle (1 ) and the preceding vehicle (5), and the presentation unit (8) is configured
- to receive data which represent the time gap tset;
- to determine on the basis of the time gap tset and the speed difference Δν a reduction Ab in the host vehicle's fuel consumption;
- to generate a second presentation signal <¾ which represents the reduction Ab and send it to the presentation unit (3) which then presents the reduction Ab for the driver.
10. The apparatus (2) according to claims 8 or 9, whereby the processor unit (8) is configured to use the speed difference Δν as a basis for calculating for a plurality of segments Sk how much more time Δίι the host vehicle (1 ) would take to travel the segment Sk at the speed vf instead of at vset, and to generate a first presentation signal CM which represents the times Atk, and send it to the presentation unit (3) which then presents the times Atk for the driver.
1 1 . The apparatus (2) according to any one of claims 8 to 10, whereby the segment Si is the whole segment for the host vehicle (1 ) from its current location to its final destination.
12. The apparatus (2) according to claims 9 and 1 1 , whereby the processor unit (8) is configured to determine the reduction Ab in fuel consumption for the whole segment for the host vehicle (1 ) from its current location to its final destination.
13. The apparatus (2) according to claim 12, whereby the host vehicle (1 ) is equipped with a navigation system (1 1 ) which is configured to use the current location and final destination of the host vehicle (1 ) as a basis for determining the whole segment for the host vehicle (1 ).
14. The apparatus (2) according to any one of claims 8 to 13, whereby the host vehicle (1 ) and the preceding vehicle (5) are configured to communicate wirelessly, which method comprises
- receiving from the preceding vehicle (5) route data βί which indicate the route which the preceding vehicle (5) is to take;
- receiving from the host vehicle (1 ) route data ββ90 which indicate the route which the host vehicle (1 ) is to take;
- comparing the host vehicle's route data ββ90 with the preceding vehicle's route data
- using the comparison as a basis for determining the segment Si to denote the length of the segment on which the host vehicle (1 ) and the preceding vehicle (5) take the same route.
15. A computer programme programme P comprising programme code for causing an apparatus (2) to perform steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
16. A computer programme product comprising a programme code stored on a computer-readable non-volatile medium for performing method steps according to any one of claims 1 to 7 when said programme code is run on an apparatus (2).
PCT/SE2015/050020 2014-01-15 2015-01-13 Method and apparatus for providing a driver with support for taking decisions before overtaking WO2015108474A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE112015000207.3T DE112015000207T5 (en) 2014-01-15 2015-01-13 A method and apparatus for providing assistance to a driver in making decisions before overtaking

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE1450035-9 2014-01-15
SE1450035A SE538546C2 (en) 2014-01-15 2014-01-15 Method and apparatus for providing decision support to a driver prior to a detour

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015108474A1 true WO2015108474A1 (en) 2015-07-23

Family

ID=53543250

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SE2015/050020 WO2015108474A1 (en) 2014-01-15 2015-01-13 Method and apparatus for providing a driver with support for taking decisions before overtaking

Country Status (3)

Country Link
DE (1) DE112015000207T5 (en)
SE (1) SE538546C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2015108474A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3423325A4 (en) * 2016-03-02 2019-08-21 Scania CV AB Method and system for controlling the speed of a host vehicle along a road
CN111688699A (en) * 2020-06-28 2020-09-22 苏州健雄职业技术学院 Intelligent overtaking system for automatic driving and overtaking method thereof

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11432306B2 (en) 2020-08-05 2022-08-30 International Business Machines Corporation Overtaking anticipation and proactive DTCH adjustment

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080021600A1 (en) * 2006-07-12 2008-01-24 Juergen Sohr Radio communications for vehicle speed adjustment
US20130271295A1 (en) * 2010-10-07 2013-10-17 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and information system for informing a vehicle driver regarding the conditions of a planned passing maneuver

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080021600A1 (en) * 2006-07-12 2008-01-24 Juergen Sohr Radio communications for vehicle speed adjustment
US20130271295A1 (en) * 2010-10-07 2013-10-17 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and information system for informing a vehicle driver regarding the conditions of a planned passing maneuver

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3423325A4 (en) * 2016-03-02 2019-08-21 Scania CV AB Method and system for controlling the speed of a host vehicle along a road
CN111688699A (en) * 2020-06-28 2020-09-22 苏州健雄职业技术学院 Intelligent overtaking system for automatic driving and overtaking method thereof
CN111688699B (en) * 2020-06-28 2022-03-08 苏州健雄职业技术学院 Intelligent overtaking system for automatic driving and overtaking method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SE1450035A1 (en) 2015-07-16
DE112015000207T5 (en) 2016-07-28
SE538546C2 (en) 2016-09-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11821740B2 (en) Route generation using road lane line quality
US10648830B2 (en) Navigation lane guidance
JP5795078B2 (en) Vehicle side system
US10606263B2 (en) Handover notification arrangement, a vehicle and a method of providing a handover notification
US20170322041A1 (en) Network Based Storage Of Vehicle And Infrastructure Data For Optimizing Vehicle Routing
US8618923B2 (en) Speed alarm system
JP2020160939A (en) Traffic management system
US10184800B2 (en) Sharing safety driving metrics for navigable segments
US20200293043A1 (en) System and method and map for determining a driving route of a vehicle
JP2006236247A (en) Controlled-lane detection device and route recommending device for vehicle
JP7362733B2 (en) Automated crowdsourcing of road environment information
US11280917B2 (en) Information processing system, storage medium storing information processing program, and control method
US20220017076A1 (en) Drive assist device and program
SE540303C2 (en) Device, system and method for assisting a driver in forming a platoon
WO2015108474A1 (en) Method and apparatus for providing a driver with support for taking decisions before overtaking
JP2019074915A (en) Exit position setting device
JP5871946B2 (en) Center side system, vehicle side system and probe information system
US10621864B1 (en) V2X vehicle pullout advisory system
KR101544797B1 (en) Apparatus and method for estimating relative position of vehicle to vehicle
CN115240444B (en) Vehicle and method for performing traffic control preemption
JP6123556B2 (en) Vehicle authentication system
JP5090937B2 (en) Route guidance device
JPWO2019003992A1 (en) Information management device
JP2013007628A (en) Information providing server, onboard information providing device, and information providing method
JP2009174953A (en) Route guidance apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15737155

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1120150002073

Country of ref document: DE

Ref document number: 112015000207

Country of ref document: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 15737155

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1