WO2015006852A1 - Fonctionnement commandé d'un système d'éclairage à diodes électroluminescentes au niveau d'une couleur de sortie cible - Google Patents

Fonctionnement commandé d'un système d'éclairage à diodes électroluminescentes au niveau d'une couleur de sortie cible Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015006852A1
WO2015006852A1 PCT/CA2013/050855 CA2013050855W WO2015006852A1 WO 2015006852 A1 WO2015006852 A1 WO 2015006852A1 CA 2013050855 W CA2013050855 W CA 2013050855W WO 2015006852 A1 WO2015006852 A1 WO 2015006852A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
emitter
led
color
drive
emitters
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CA2013/050855
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Marco Michele Sisto
Original Assignee
Institut National D'optique
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from CA2821545A external-priority patent/CA2821545C/fr
Priority claimed from US13/946,155 external-priority patent/US9013467B2/en
Application filed by Institut National D'optique filed Critical Institut National D'optique
Publication of WO2015006852A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015006852A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05B—ELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B45/00—Circuit arrangements for operating light-emitting diodes [LED]
    • H05B45/20—Controlling the colour of the light

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to LED lighting systems, and more particularly concerns a color control method for multi-chromatic LED lighting systems.
  • LED light sources emitting either white light or colored light
  • LED light sources are used for numerous applications such as interior and exterior lighting, decorative lighting, entertainment and the like. It is a recognized problem of the lighting industry that LED light sources must be carefully controlled in order to provide the best possible trade-off between requirements such as good electrical efficiency, high light intensity, color stability and color rendering.
  • each emitter In LED lighting systems having multiple LED emitters, the driving conditions of each emitter must be properly calibrated and controlled. Optimum driving conditions for each emitter must simultaneously take into account a specific target output color point as well as specific target light source intensity, and maintain both parameters stable over variations of environment temperature. In order to minimize the cost and complexity of a lighting system, it is desirable that appropriate LED driving conditions be obtained without resorting to color feedback, i.e., without measuring the light source emitted color, as this would require using expensive color sensors. Identification of an appropriate drive condition for each LED emitter of a lighting system is nontrivial, since the color emitted by a LED emitter depends on the injected current and the LED junction temperature. As the LED dissipates heat when lit, the junction temperature is itself dependent on a number of parameters including the injected current, the junction voltage drop, the environment temperature and the efficiency at which the heat flowing from the junction to the environment is dissipated.
  • the drive condition of LED sources is often controlled by acting on the time-averaged forward current injected in the LED using some kind of current pulse modulation.
  • a typical example is a PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) drive where the LED intensity is typically controlled by adjusting the duty cycle of a pulsed current waveform having constant predetermined maximum and minimum values (the latter being possibly set to zero).
  • PWM Pulse Width Modulation
  • Various PWM schemes are known in the literature and may use a fixed or variable pulse frequency, constant or variable current values and complex waveforms.
  • pulsed drive methods are affected by electromagnetic interference (EMI) problems and suffer from limitations on the achievable modulation depth.
  • EMI electromagnetic interference
  • recent physiological studies demonstrate that slow PWM may create uncomfortable flickering of light. Minimizing the perceived flickering requires high frequency (> 300 Hz) PWM, which may be hard and costly to implement.
  • PWM is nevertheless often chosen for LED driving as it is an energy efficient current modulation method. Furthermore, its implementation is relatively straightforward as the LED intensity is an approximately linear function of the PWM duty cycle.
  • Constant Current (CC) regulation is an alternative driving method that creates no flickering, low EMI and allows for larger variations of LED intensity. However, it can be energetically inefficient and cause large color variations. Depending on the application, one method may be preferred over the other. Hence, it would be advantageous to provide a color control method which is applicable with all LED drivers, independently on the type of current control scheme.
  • Several methods based on simple linear models relating the junction temperature of each LED emitter to the emitted color are known in the art. However, these methods are effective only over a limited range of temperatures where the linear approximation is valid. Such methods may be inadequate for outdoor lighting subjected to largely- varying temperatures over the year.
  • the temperature of a LED emitter can be highly dependent on the LED casing and the efficiency of the heat dissipation in the lighting source design. Dimming control adds to this problem as a LED dimmed to low intensity will experience a junction temperature near the environment temperature, while a fully lit LED may have a junction temperature many tens of degrees above the temperature of the environment.
  • the quality of the light generated by a LED lighting system affects the perceived colors of an illuminated scene: the color rendering property of a LED system is then another factor to be taken into account.
  • Color rendering can be characterized using the CRI (color rendering index), which is a color rendering metric standardized by the CIE (Commission Internationale de I'Eclairage), or the CQS (Color Quality Scale), which is an alternative metric proposed by the NIST.
  • CRI color rendering index
  • CIE Commission Internationale de I'Eclairage
  • CQS Color Quality Scale
  • LED-based lighting systems having four or more LED emitters with different "primary” colors can be used to reach or to exceed the CRI threshold of 90 if appropriately controlled.
  • the method should further allow maintaining these specified targets for the intensity and white shade over variations of environment temperature. Shades of white light are typically described by the light CCT (Correlated Color Temperature), but can also be described as a target color point in an appropriate color space.
  • a method for operating a LED lighting system at a target output color has three or more LED emitters of different colors, and each LED emitter is operable at a controllable emitter drive setting and has a junction temperature.
  • the method involves the steps of: a) providing calibration data for each LED emitter at a plurality of values of the corresponding emitter drive setting and at a plurality of values of the corresponding junction temperature;
  • the drive recursion loop calculates the drive setting of each emitter based on an input value for the junction temperature of each emitter, in view of the target output color and of the calibration data;
  • a LED lighting system for operation at a target output color.
  • the LED lighting system includes three or more LED emitters of different colors, each having an junction temperature.
  • a LED driver is associated with each LED emitter.
  • Each LED driver is configured to apply a controllable emitter drive setting to the corresponding LED emitter.
  • the LED lighting system further includes a memory containing calibration data for each LED emitter at a plurality of values of the corresponding emitter drive setting and at a plurality of values of the corresponding junction temperature.
  • the LED lighting system further includes a controller configured to execute a drive recursion loop.
  • the drive recursion loop calculates the drive setting of each emitter based on an input value for the junction temperature of each emitter and in view of the target output color and of the calibration data.
  • the controller is further configured to:
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a multi-chromatic LED lighting system which can be controlled in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 2A and 2B are schematic representations of LED lighting systems according to embodiments of the invention, respectively including three and four LED emitters.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a calibration process according to one embodiment.
  • FIG. 4 shows a calibration table according to one embodiment, including tristimulus coordinates, a junction voltage, a junction temperature and coefficients used for color rendering metric optimization for a plurality of combinations of target junction temperature and drive current values.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a method for operating a LED lighting system according to one embodiment.
  • FIGs. 6A and 6B show a flow chart of a current recursion loop according to one embodiment.
  • FIG. 7 is a graph showing an example of the selection of weight coefficients as part of the control of a LED lighting system according to one embodiment.
  • FIG. 8 is a graph showing another example of the selection of weight coefficients.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates the quality of the color control obtained using an embodiment of the invention for a LED lighting system having four LED emitters;
  • FIG. 10 contrasts the quality of the color control obtained with the same system but without using the teachings of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 1 illustrates the quality of the color control obtained using an embodiment of the invention for another LED lighting system having four LED emitters.
  • the present invention generally relates to the control of multi-chromatic LED (Light- Emitting Diode) lighting systems. LED lighting systems may be used for numerous applications such as interior and exterior lighting, decorative lighting, entertainment and the like. Referring to FIG. 1 , a LED lighting system 20 is shown by way of example.
  • the LED lighting system 20 may include three, four or more LED emitters 22, each having a different color, controlled by appropriate control electronics 25.
  • the LED emitters 22 may for example embody a RGB scheme, the LED lighting system therefore including a red emitter 22 R , a green emitter 22 G and a blue emitter 22 B .
  • a four-emitter embodiment is shown, where the fourth emitter may typically be a white emitter 22 w , therefore embodying a RGBW color scheme.
  • the resulting light 21 generated by a LED lighting system is perceived as a colorimetric combination of the individual light beams 23 R , 23 G , 23 B and 23 w generated by the different LED emitters of the system. Varying the relative intensities of these light beams therefore provides a control of the resulting overall color.
  • a LED system may include a greater number of emitters forming groups of same colored emitters, for example a group of red emitters, a group or green emitters and a group of blue emitters in a RGB scheme.
  • the LED emitters of a same group may be electrically connected together or operated individually. It will be readily understood that in such cases the present method may be applied to one LED emitter of each group and the remaining LED emitters of the same group controlled according to the same parameters, or, alternatively, identical LED emitters may each be controlled according to the principles explained herein without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • LED emitters of different colors is a shorthand for indicating that the light beams generated by the respective emitters have different colors.
  • the system 20 includes three or four LED emitters of different colors, here embodied by a red emitter 22 R , a green emitter 22 G a blue emitter 22 B in both embodiments of FIGs. 2A and 2B, and further including a white emitter 22 w in the embodiment of FIG. 2B.
  • a LED emitter is typically embodied by a chip made up of semiconductor materials doped with impurities, forming a p-n junction. An electrical current flows through the junction and it generates light of wavelength determined, among other factors, by the band-gap energy of the materials.
  • Each LED emitter may be embodied by a "regular" or "direct emission” LED, or by a PCLED (phosphor-converted LED).
  • the LED system is configured for operation at a target color.
  • target color refers to the color of the light resulting from the combination of the light beams generated by the individual LED emitters of the LED lighting system.
  • the target color may be described by color point coordinates in a given color space, i.e., by a model providing a specific mathematical representation of colors.
  • Typical color spaces known in the art include the CIE 1931 XYZ and the CIELAB.
  • CIE 1931 XYZ is historically the first attempt to describe colors on the basis of measurements of human color perception and it is the basis for almost all other color spaces.
  • CIE 1931 XYZ is linear in terms of color mixing. This means that a target color can be expressed as linear combinations of N primary colors weighted by appropriate coefficients C. In matrix form:
  • X, Y, Z are the tristimulus coordinates of the target color while X n , Y n and Z n are tristimulus coordinates for each individual LED emitter n.
  • the CIELAB is not linear in terms of color mixing but it is more linear than CIE 1931 XYZ in terms of color perception. Perceptual linearity means that a change of the same amount in the CIELAB coordinates produces a change of about the same visual importance in the colors represented by those coordinates. Direct and inverse transformation rules exist among common color spaces, so that a given color can be expressed univocally in any chosen color space.
  • the lighting system 20 includes a user input 26 through which control parameters can be provided by the user.
  • the user control parameters may include the target color, which may be in the form of color point coordinates in a given color space or other information allowing deduction of the specific target color required by the user.
  • the user control parameters may be provided through knobs, keyboard, mouse, touchscreen, or any other device providing a suitable user interface. It will however be understood that in other variants the target color may be preprogrammed, selected or deduced automatically without involving the intervention of a user.
  • Other user control parameters may optionally include luminance, Correlated Color Temperature (CCT), dominant wavelength, saturation, hue, etc.
  • CCT Correlated Color Temperature
  • the lighting system 20 further includes a LED driver 24 connected to each LED emitter 22.
  • the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 2A therefore includes three LED drivers 24 R , 24 G , 24 B while the embodiment of FIG. 2B further includes a fourth LED driver 24 w .
  • the LED drivers 24 may be embodied by any device or combination of devices which can be configured to apply a controllable drive setting to the corresponding LED emitter. It will be readily understood that the intensity of the light generated by a LED emitter can be changed through a control of its driving conditions. Controlling the drive conditions of LED emitters is typically achieved by acting on the time-averaged forward current injected in the LED emitter.
  • the LED emitters 22 are controlled according to a PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) scheme.
  • the drive setting may be a current modulation duty cycle, that is, the duty cycle of a pulsed current waveform having constant predetermined maximum and minimum current values, the minimum current value being possibly an absence of current, i.e., a zero current value.
  • Variants of PWM are known in the literature and may use a fixed or variable pulse frequency, constant or variable current values and complex waveforms.
  • each LED driver 24 includes for example a pulsed current source with controllable duty cycle.
  • each LED emitter 22 may be driven according to a Constant Current (CC) regulation method where the drive setting would be embodied by a constant current value.
  • each LED driver 24 includes for example a continuous current source with controllable current amplitude.
  • Other driving methods such as pulse frequency modulation, pulse density modulation or the like are also known in the art and considered to be within the scope of the present invention.
  • Each LED emitter 22 has a corresponding junction temperature. As a LED emitter dissipates heat when lit, the junction temperature depends on a number of parameters including the injected current, the junction voltage drop, the environment temperature and the efficiency of dissipation of the heat flowing from the junction to the environment. Since each LED emitter 22 can be operated under different drive conditions, the junction temperature may vary from emitter to emitter within a same LED lighting system 20.
  • the lighting system 20 may include a temperature determining module configured to measure, calculate or estimate the junction temperature of each LED emitter 22.
  • the temperature determining module includes a junction voltage meter 28 R , 28 G , 28 B and 28 w connected to each LED emitter 22 R , 22 G , 22 B and 22 w in order to measure the corresponding junction voltage drop.
  • the junction voltage drop may be used to determine the junction temperature, as will be explained further below.
  • the lighting system 20 further includes a controller 30.
  • the controller 30 may be embodied by a microcontroller, a processor, an electronic circuit or by any other device or combination of devices providing the computing power required to perform the tasks described below.
  • the controller 30 is configured to execute the steps of the method according to embodiments of the invention, which will be described further below.
  • the lighting system 20 further includes a memory 32 containing calibration data for each LED emitter.
  • the calibration data includes entries at a plurality of values of the corresponding emitter drive setting and at a plurality of values of the corresponding junction temperature, as will also be explained further below.
  • the memory may be embodied by any device or combination of devices apt to store the calibration data, such as a random-access memory (RAM), a programmable or non programmable read-only memory (ROM), a solid-state memory, an universal serial bus (USB) flash drive, a hard-disk drive, a magnetic tape or an optical disk.
  • RAM random-access memory
  • ROM programmable or non programmable read-only memory
  • USB universal serial bus
  • controller 30, memory 32 and LED drivers 24 R , 24 G , 24 B and 24 w are shown in FIGs. 2A and 2B as parts of a same group of control electronics 25, it will be readily understood that these components may be arranged in a variety of configurations without departing from the scope of the invention.
  • a method for operating a LED lighting system at a target output color the LED system having three or more LED emitters of different colors.
  • each LED emitter is operable at a controllable drive setting and has a junction temperature.
  • the method allows finding the optimal drive setting for each LED emitter of the LED lighting system.
  • this method can simultaneously take into account a specific target color and a specific target luminance, the two parameters fully defining target X, Y, Z tristimulus coordinates, and can maintain both parameters over variations of environment temperature. Furthermore, this can be accomplished without measuring the color of the light emitted by the LED lighting system, that is, no color feedback is required.
  • the method first includes a step of providing calibration data for each LED emitter at a plurality of values of the corresponding emitter drive setting and at a plurality of values of the corresponding junction temperature. In other words, a number of parameters is provided for each combination of junction temperature and emitter drive setting.
  • the calibration data is represented by a set of calibration parameters, which preferably include, at a minimum, a voltage value and color point coordinates for each LED emitter for each drive setting and junction temperature combination, as explained in further details below. Additional parameters may be provided for LED lighting systems having more than three LED emitters, for example, data related to a LED color rendering index or luminous efficacy optimization.
  • FIG. 3 there is shown a flow chart illustrating a calibration process 100 according to one embodiment of the invention, that is, a strategy for building the calibration data for a lighting system including N > 3 LED emitters. It will however be understood that the operation method described in a later section is independent of the process described herein to obtain the calibration data and that this process is shown by way of example only.
  • the description of the calibration process 100 assumes that the LED emitters are driven using a CC regulation scheme.
  • adaptation of this process to PWM-driven LED emitters or to other driving methods would be straightforward to one skilled in the art.
  • the calibration process 100 is performed with the lighting system placed in a temperature controlled environment.
  • the temperature of the environment is controlled in such a way that the junction temperature of each LED emitter can be fixed to a known value.
  • each LED emitter is mounted on a temperature controlled plate (not shown).
  • an appropriate calibration set of P junction temperature values Ti , ... ,T P is chosen (101 ).
  • the temperature limits are preferably fixed by the maximum and minimum operating temperatures of the LED.
  • An appropriate calibration set of Q drive settings Di , ... ,D Q is also selected (102), that is, a group of values for the drive settings.
  • the numbers of drive setting and junction temperature values are preferably selected so that the calibration data efficiently covers the possible operating conditions of the LED emitters.
  • the set of junction temperature values may range from 0°C to 100°C in 20°C increments while the set of drive settings may be current values between 5 mA and 700 mA in 50 mA increments.
  • the increments may be smaller at low current values and larger when approaching the maximum operating current.
  • the current increments may be 10 mA from 5 mA to 100 mA and 50 mA from 100 mA to 700 mA.
  • Current step optimization may provide better characterization of operating regions where the emitter color or luminance are the most sensitive to the injected current.
  • n for the LED emitters are all set to 1 (103).
  • p for the junction temperature and q for the drive settings are all set to 1 (103).
  • n for the LED emitters is selected (104), its junction temperature (105) its drive setting (106) are also set.
  • the calibration parameters are measured and recorded for each drive setting value.
  • the color point and junction voltage of the currently considered LED emitter are measured (107), and the color point, junction voltage, junction temperature and drive setting are recorded (108).
  • additional data may also be recorded (109), such as, for example, data used in color rendering or luminous efficacy calculation.
  • the process then involves checking if all the drive settings have been processed, that is, if q ⁇ Q (1 10) and if so, q is incremented (1 1 1 ) after each set of measurements. Once all drive setting values have been used, the process involves verifying if all temperature values have been processed, that is, if p ⁇ P (1 12) and if so p is incremented (1 13) and the same sequence is performed for the next junction temperature value. It will be readily understood that a different order may be followed, for example by first fixing the drive setting value and sweeping the different temperature values, as long as the calibration routine allows all the required data to be acquired.
  • the process involves verifying if n ⁇ N at 1 14, and incrementing n (1 15) if it remains some LED emitters to be processed.
  • the calibration parameters are measured in this manner for each combination of LED emitter, junction temperature and current values.
  • FIG. 4 there is shown an example of a calibration table according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the illustrated table is suitable for describing one emitter n of a four-emitter lighting system such as the one illustrated in FIG. 2B.
  • the vertical axis of the illustrated calibration table lists the target junction temperatures T J n and the horizontal axis the applied current values.
  • applying a given junction temperature may for example involve applying a given setting to the temperature controlled plate on which the LED emitter is mounted.
  • the calibration parameters may therefore include a measured value of the junction temperature T J n . This value may for example be obtained from the method described in Zong, Y. and Ohno, Y., "New practical method for measurement of high- power LEDs", CIE Expert Symposium 2008 on Advances in Photometry and Colorimetry. 2008, Turin, IT: NIST.
  • the calibration parameters preferably further include the junction voltage Vj, n . In the illustrated embodiments of FIGs. 2A and 2B, this may simply be measured using the corresponding voltage meters 28.
  • the calibration parameters further include data related to a measurement of the color of the light emitted by the corresponding LED emitter.
  • the color of a light beam is determined by its spectral profile or spectrum S(A), i.e., the variation of its intensity as a function of wavelength.
  • the measurement of the calibration parameters may for example include a measurement of the spectrum S(A) of the light emitted from the LED emitter, using an appropriate spectrally-resolved light detector such as a spectroradiometer (not shown).
  • a spectroradiometer not shown.
  • the color point coordinates are preferably tristimulus coordinates X, Y and Z.
  • the tristimulus coordinates are defined relative to color matching functions related to the perception of colors by the photoreceptors, or cones, of the human eye.
  • the Y coordinate corresponds to the luminance
  • Z is nearly equal to blue stimulation
  • X is a mix of cone response curves chosen to be non-negative.
  • CMF X , CMF Y and CMF Z are the color matching functions specified by the CIE.
  • the calibration parameters may therefore include the tristimulus coordinates X n , Y n and Z n measured for each LED emitter n.
  • the use of the standard CIE 1931 XYZ color space is shown here by way of example only, and in other embodiments any other convention allowing the calculation of color point coordinates from the recorded spectra could be used.
  • the calibration data may further include, for example, color rendering parameters used for calculation of a color rending metric, such as the Color Rendering Index (CRI) or the Color Quality Scale (CQS) or any other similar metric.
  • color rendering parameters are obtained by calculating the spectrum of the light emitted from a given LED emitter after reflection on a reference sample.
  • the CRI standard includes a total of 8 samples, whereas the CQS standard uses 15 samples. The collected spectra are used to calculate the following quantities:
  • S(A) is the measured spectrum of the LED emitter before reflection by the reference sample.
  • F(A) is the reflectance spectrum of the reference sample F (this may be measured or CIE standard reflectance curves may be used)
  • the product S(A) F(A) represents the spectrum reflected by the reference sample F when illuminated by the LED emitter
  • CMF X , CMF Y , CMF Z are again the CIE 1931 standard color matching functions, or any other suitable definition of color matching functions.
  • the F(A) reflectance curves are known as values tabulated versus wavelength.
  • the reflectance curves of reference samples used for the calculation of CRI are available from the CIE.
  • the calibration table of FIG. 4 is based on the CQS standard and therefore includes 15 sets of coordinates X n ,F[1 .. 5], Y n ,F[1 - 15] and Z n ,F[1 ..15] at each entry. Operation of the LED lighting system
  • the target output color corresponds to the color that is to be produced by combining the outputs of all the LED emitters of the LED lighting system.
  • the target output color is represented by tristimulus coordinates X, Y, Z.
  • the method first includes providing the calibration data (120).
  • the calibration data includes a voltage value and color point coordinates for each LED emitter at each one of the plurality of values of the drive setting and junction temperature. A measured value for the junction temperature may optionally be included.
  • additional data such as color rendering parameters are preferably provided.
  • the calibration data may have been obtained according to the process described above, and stored in a suitable location so as to be accessible during operation of the LED lighting system.
  • the calibration data is stored in the memory 32.
  • the calibration data may be stored in a different location and provided for use by any appropriate means of communication.
  • the calibration process may have been performed at a different time and location than the operation of the LED lighting system, which may for example be supplied in a pre-calibrated state to the user.
  • the method of operation need not have access to all the equipment and facilities required for the calibration process.
  • the method of operation does not require the measurement and analysis of the emission spectra of the LED emitters.
  • the method 200 is based on a drive recursion loop 300 which calculates the drive setting of each LED emitter based on an input value of its junction temperature, in view of the target output color and of the calibration data.
  • the drive recursion loop is repeated for a number of iterations of the input temperature, counted in the illustrated flow chart by a temperature loop index R T .
  • the loop formed by steps 204 to 210 in FIG. 5 is referred to as the temperature loop.
  • the maximum number of iterations Ri.max of the temperature loop can be determined in advance as a preliminary step 201 .
  • the maximum number of iterations can be determined during the execution of the algorithm by observing the stabilization of the solution provided by the drive recursion loop 300 over successive executions of the temperature loop.
  • the maximum number of iterations of the temperature loop can be determined by observing the variation of the drive currents , I N over two successive temperature loop executions: the loop ends when the current values vary by less than 1 mA, or by less than any other appropriate value.
  • a small number of iterations can suffice to obtain a stable solution, and the maximum number of iterations Ri.max may be as small as 3.
  • Each iteration of the drive recursion loop uses an input value for the junction temperature of each emitter.
  • the input value of the junction temperature of each emitter is set to the environment temperature, i.e., the temperature of the environment of the lighting device.
  • the environment temperature may differ depending on the location where it is measured, for example whether such measurement is taken inside or outside of the casing or packaging that houses the LED emitters, and that such differences are immaterial to the invention as the environment temperature is simply used as a starting value for an iterative process.
  • the environment temperature may be obtained through any suitable temperature measuring device or simply estimated.
  • the temperature loop index R T is set to 1 (203) and the drive recursion loop is executed (204) for a first time.
  • a drive recursion loop 300 As its name entails, the drive recursion loop 300 is performed for several iterations of drive setting values, and therefore a drive recursion loop index R
  • the maximum number of iterations of the calculations within the drive recursion loop can be predetermined, and can for example be set to the desired number Ri, ma x at the same time as setting Ri.max at step 201 (see FIG. 5). Alternatively, the maximum number of iterations can be determined during the execution of the algorithm by observing the stabilization of the solution provided by the drive recursion loop 300.
  • the maximum number of iterations can be determined by observing the variation of the C n coefficients over two successive loop executions: the drive recursion loop ends when the C n coefficients vary by less than 0.1 %, or by less than any other appropriate value.
  • the solution to the drive recursion loop can be stable within 3 to 5 iterations.
  • the recursion loop 300 preferably includes establishing a start value for the drive setting of each LED emitter.
  • this start value is for example chosen as the maximum current value l max which can be applied to the corresponding LED emitter.
  • the drive setting is a current modulation duty cycle
  • the start value of the drive setting of each emitter could for example be an 100% duty cycle.
  • Other values could of course be used without departing from the scope of the invention.
  • l max is considered the same for all of the N LED emitters, but that in other embodiments different start values could be used for the drive setting of different LED emitters.
  • the next step of the drive recursion loop 300 involves calculating (306) the color weight coefficients Ci , ... C N in view of the color point coordinates determined in the previous step and of the color point coordinates X, Y, Z of the target output color. In the illustrated embodiment, this is accomplished by solving the matrix equation:
  • X, Y, Z are the color point coordinates of the target output color
  • X n , Y n and Z n are the tristimulus coordinates of the LED emitter n obtained from the calibration data
  • C n is the color weight coefficient associated to the LED emitter n.
  • the drive recursion loop 300 aims to optimise the color weight coefficients by recursively recalculating them, using the color point coordinates for virtual emitters based on the color weight coefficients calculated in the previous recursion step and the calibration data.
  • the optimisation of the weight coefficients first involves evaluating corrected tristimulus coordinates X n ,c n , Y n ,cn, and Z n ,c n based on the weight coefficients and the calibration data. For a given emitter, this is preferably performed by considering the LED emitter to be lit at a luminance value:
  • Yn.Cn YnXCn , Y n being the luminance measured at drive setting l max .
  • the calibration data is consulted to extrapolate the coordinates X n ,c n and Z n ,c n associated with the obtained luminance value Y n ,c n -
  • X n ,c n ⁇ X n xC n , and Z n ,c n ⁇ Z n xC n as the emitter color points typically vary nonlinearly with injected current and, hence, with luminance.
  • Such nonlinear behaviour is accounted for by extrapolating the X n ,c n and Z n ,cn from the calibration data.
  • the N LED emitters are processed sequentially.
  • the index n is first set to 1 (307). Then, the corresponding set of corrected tristimulus coordinates X n ,c n , Y n ,cn, and Z n ,cn (308) is evaluated.
  • the next step involves defining (31 1 ) N "virtual emitters", that is, emitters having color point coordinates X n , V irtuai, Yn.virtua as follows:
  • these are considered virtual emitters since they do not emit the same color at maximum drive conditions as the real emitters - in other words, the real LED emitters have different X and Z values at maximum drive conditions.
  • This definition of virtual emitters allows for correcting the nonlinear variations of Z n and X n with the variations of drive conditions C n .
  • the temperature recursion index is verified at 206, and if the maximum number of iterations has not been reached then an operation value for the junction temperature of each LED emitter is determined to serve as input temperature value to the next execution of the drive recursion loop.
  • the operation value for the junction temperature is obtained by waiting for a stabilisation period, so that the junction temperature of each emitter stabilizes (207).
  • the stabilization period can be as short as a fraction of a second to a few seconds.
  • the junction voltage of each LED emitter is measured (208) and the corresponding junction temperature is estimated (209) from the measured junction voltage and the calibration data. A set of N junction temperatures is therefore obtained.
  • the temperature recursion index R T is incremented (210) and the drive recursion loop executed again (204), using the operation value of the junction temperature of each emitter as the input value therefor.
  • the method described above may be performed at the time of lighting of the LED lighting system at the desired output color.
  • the temperature and operating conditions of the LED emitters may be assumed stable enough to trust that the target color will be maintained for as long as the LED lighting system is lit.
  • the method above may be repeated periodically to ensure that a change in operating conditions or environment temperature has not degraded the color quality.
  • the method may be repeated at preprogrammed time intervals.
  • one or more factors representative of the operating conditions or color quality of the LED lighting system may be monitored and the method above repeated when a given threshold is met.
  • the method may be performed again whenever desired by the user.
  • the matrix equation is fully determined by the conditions imposed by the target X, Y, and Z color coordinates.
  • the algorithm is identical but the matrix equation is under-determined and has an infinite number of solutions, all providing the same target color.
  • Various approaches may be used to select a particular solution. The selection of one preferred solution requires imposing additional conditions. Such conditions may be expressed by linear or nonlinear equations that are functions of the weight coefficients C n or, equivalently, of the emitter drive conditions.
  • One solution can for example be chosen by applying a strategy such as the one disclosed in patent application US 2010/0060185 A1 , which aims to minimize power consumption and in which linear conditions are imposed.
  • a mathematical method based on the so-called Moore-Penrose inverse can be used to select one solution.
  • an optimum solution can be chosen that not only provides the target color but also meets a color rendering metric such as the CQS or CRI.
  • a color rendering metric such as the CQS or CRI.
  • the X n , F , Y n ,F, Z n ,F color rendering parameters pre-calculated during the calibration process and stored in the calibration table may be used to calculate the color rendering metric for several solutions.
  • the color rendering metrics are nonlinear functions of the drive conditions C n .
  • linear matrix-based solution techniques cannot be used.
  • well- known nonlinear optimization techniques can be used to select the solution that meets the following criteria:
  • the CRI and CQS are well behaved functions of the drive condition of any single one of the four emitters, the drive conditions for the other three emitters being fixed by the requirements related to the target color point.
  • the functions are well behaved in the sense that they have a single absolute maximum.
  • One brute force optimization technique may simply be based on solving the matrix equation repeatedly with the weight coefficient C of one emitter fixed at a value sweeping between 0 and 1 by discrete steps. For every step, the CRI or CQS is estimated and the procedure stops as soon as a maximum for the selected metric is found.
  • any solution selection technique should take into account the fact that the weight coefficients C n take on values lying between 0 and 1 , those limits corresponding to an emitter completely off and lit at maximum drive condition, respectively. In case of conflicting optimization targets, the 0 ⁇ C ⁇ 1 condition for all emitters should prevail.
  • FIGs. 7 and 8 show the criteria for solution selection in a LED lighting system having four emitters, where a maximum CQS is sought.
  • the solution with maximum CQS for a RGBW LED lighting system is shown, in a situation where a solution is achieved within drive condition limits.
  • the hatched area is the accessible region with 0 ⁇ C ⁇ 1 for all emitters.
  • CR, CG, CB, CW are the weight coefficients for the red, blue, green and white emitters, respectively.
  • FIG. 8 shows a solution with maximum CQS for a similar system in a situation where the solution is constrained by the region of feasibility.
  • the red LED emitter is turned on at maximum drive condition and the CQS is slightly below the theoretical maximum, which is not accessible with 0 ⁇ C ⁇ 1 for all emitters.
  • the hatched area represents the accessible region with 0 ⁇ C ⁇ 1 for all emitters.
  • FIGs. 9 to 1 1 demonstrate that the method for operating a LED lighting system according to embodiments of the invention allows properly maintaining color within the color difference perception limit of the eye for various dimming and environment temperature settings. It is also shown that the color error is significant when the temperature is neglected.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates the color control of a first commercially available LED lighting system having 4 LED emitters over various dimming levels, represented by flux from a normalized value of 1 to 3.2, and environment temperature varying from 45 to 58 .
  • the target color in this example is D65 white in the CIELAB color space.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates the control of the same LED lighting system in the same conditions but assuming that the environment temperature is constant at 45 instead of performing the method described herein. It can readily be seen that the color error rapidly grows above eye perceptibility limit for high-flux settings due to LED self-heating.
  • FIG. 1 1 illustrates the color control of a second commercially available LED lighting system having 4 LED emitters over various dimming levels, represented by flux from a normalized value of 1 to 3, and environment temperature varying from 26 to 59 .
  • embodiments of the present invention provide for the controlled operation of a LED lighting system having three of more LED emitters that has several advantages over prior art.
  • the proposed color control method does not rely on the linearity of the relation between the PWM duty cycle and emitter intensity.
  • the color is well controlled (AE * ab ⁇ 1 ) for either PWM or CC driving methods.
  • the method presented herein does not rely on the use of color sensors for color feedback during operation of the system.

Landscapes

  • Circuit Arrangement For Electric Light Sources In General (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé permettant de faire fonctionner un système d'éclairage à DEL comportant trois, ou plus de trois, émetteurs à DEL de différentes couleurs. Le procédé permet de trouver le réglage d'excitation optimal pour chaque émetteur à DEL du système, en prenant en compte une couleur cible spécifique. Le procédé implique les étapes suivantes : fourniture de données d'étalonnage pour chaque émetteur à DEL au niveau d'une pluralité de valeurs de réglage d'excitation et de température de jonction ; et exécution d'une boucle récursive d'excitation calculant le réglage d'excitation de chaque émetteur en se basant sur une valeur entrée pour la température de chaque émetteur et en prenant en considération la couleur de sortie cible et les données d'étalonnage. De manière avantageuse, ceci peut être accompli sans mesurer la couleur émise par le système d'éclairage à DEL, c'est-à-dire qu'aucune rétroaction de couleur n'est requise. L'invention concerne en outre un système d'éclairage à DEL mettant en œuvre selon ledit procédé.
PCT/CA2013/050855 2013-07-19 2013-11-07 Fonctionnement commandé d'un système d'éclairage à diodes électroluminescentes au niveau d'une couleur de sortie cible WO2015006852A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2821545A CA2821545C (fr) 2013-07-19 2013-07-19 Fonctionnement commande d'un systeme d'eclairage del produisant une couleur ciblee
CA2,821,545 2013-07-19
US13/946,155 US9013467B2 (en) 2013-07-19 2013-07-19 Controlled operation of a LED lighting system at a target output color
US13/946,155 2013-07-19

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015006852A1 true WO2015006852A1 (fr) 2015-01-22

Family

ID=52345645

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2013/050855 WO2015006852A1 (fr) 2013-07-19 2013-11-07 Fonctionnement commandé d'un système d'éclairage à diodes électroluminescentes au niveau d'une couleur de sortie cible

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2015006852A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107155245A (zh) * 2017-07-21 2017-09-12 无锡市永晶光电科技有限公司 三温区线性恒功率led驱动集成电路
US10300016B2 (en) 2014-10-06 2019-05-28 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Carrier-antibody compositions and methods of making and using the same

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2305021A1 (fr) * 1999-04-16 2000-10-16 Patent-Treuhand-Gesellschaft Fuer Elektrische Gluehlampen Mbh Methode permettant de modifier au moins un parametre de fonctionnement d'un dispositif de commande de lampe electrique
US7868562B2 (en) * 2006-12-11 2011-01-11 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Luminaire control system and method
CA2835875A1 (fr) * 2011-05-26 2012-11-29 Terralux, Inc. Mesure de temperature dans le circuit de diodes electroluminescentes

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2305021A1 (fr) * 1999-04-16 2000-10-16 Patent-Treuhand-Gesellschaft Fuer Elektrische Gluehlampen Mbh Methode permettant de modifier au moins un parametre de fonctionnement d'un dispositif de commande de lampe electrique
US7868562B2 (en) * 2006-12-11 2011-01-11 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Luminaire control system and method
CA2835875A1 (fr) * 2011-05-26 2012-11-29 Terralux, Inc. Mesure de temperature dans le circuit de diodes electroluminescentes

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10300016B2 (en) 2014-10-06 2019-05-28 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Carrier-antibody compositions and methods of making and using the same
CN107155245A (zh) * 2017-07-21 2017-09-12 无锡市永晶光电科技有限公司 三温区线性恒功率led驱动集成电路

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9013467B2 (en) Controlled operation of a LED lighting system at a target output color
US9338851B2 (en) Operation of a LED lighting system at a target output color using a color sensor
USRE49137E1 (en) Illumination device and method for avoiding an over-power or over-current condition in a power converter
US9521721B2 (en) Method of controling illumination device based on current-voltage model
EP2636035B1 (fr) Systèmes et procédés de commande de dispositifs d'éclairage à semi-conducteurs et appareil d'éclairage incorporant ces systèmes et/ou procédés
US8760060B2 (en) Solid state light fixture with enhanced thermal cooling and color mixing
US8177389B1 (en) Deterministically calculating dimming values for four or more light sources
JP5243531B2 (ja) 組合せ光出力測定結果を使用して固体照明パネルを較正するためのシステムおよび方法
Bęczkowski et al. LED spectral and power characteristics under hybrid PWM/AM dimming strategy
CN107113940B (zh) 相关色温控制系统和方法
US20060018118A1 (en) Spectrum matching
US20110241552A1 (en) Method for maximizing the performance of a luminaire
US20090079358A1 (en) Regulation of Wavelength Shift and Perceived Color of Solid State Lighting with Temperature Variation
WO2008006205A1 (fr) Source lumineuse et procédé d'optimisation de ses caractéristiques d'éclairage
WO2019139637A1 (fr) Systèmes multicanaux pour fournir une lumière accordable à rendu de couleur et effets biologiques élevés
US9237612B1 (en) Illumination device and method for determining a target lumens that can be safely produced by an illumination device at a present temperature
US20170265258A1 (en) Color mixing model provisioning for light-emitting diode-based lamps
US20220151040A1 (en) Color correction lighting control
US8928253B2 (en) Method for generating light with a desired light colour by means of light-emitting diodes
EP2586272A2 (fr) Capteur de flux relatif et procédé de détermination d'un rapport entre des intensités maximales de lumière, dispositif de commande, lampe réglable en couleur, et luminaire et produit-programme informatique
WO2015006852A1 (fr) Fonctionnement commandé d'un système d'éclairage à diodes électroluminescentes au niveau d'une couleur de sortie cible
Sisto et al. Accurate chromatic control and color rendering optimization in LED lighting systems using junction temperature feedback
US20120010861A1 (en) Method for optimal selecting LED light sources and implementing full spectrum light
CA2821545C (fr) Fonctionnement commande d'un systeme d'eclairage del produisant une couleur ciblee
CA2848855C (fr) Fonctionnement d'un systeme d'eclairage del produisant une couleur ciblee a l'aide d'un capteur de couleur

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 13889610

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 13889610

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1