WO2014210135A2 - Réduction de niveaux de contaminants - Google Patents

Réduction de niveaux de contaminants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014210135A2
WO2014210135A2 PCT/US2014/044064 US2014044064W WO2014210135A2 WO 2014210135 A2 WO2014210135 A2 WO 2014210135A2 US 2014044064 W US2014044064 W US 2014044064W WO 2014210135 A2 WO2014210135 A2 WO 2014210135A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
microbes
mercury
bioreactor
water
contaminants
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2014/044064
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2014210135A3 (fr
Inventor
Scott Miller HURST
Richard Squire
Jay WIEDEMANN
Original Assignee
Hurst Scott Miller
Richard Squire
Wiedemann Jay
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hurst Scott Miller, Richard Squire, Wiedemann Jay filed Critical Hurst Scott Miller
Publication of WO2014210135A2 publication Critical patent/WO2014210135A2/fr
Publication of WO2014210135A3 publication Critical patent/WO2014210135A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/34—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage characterised by the microorganisms used
    • C02F3/348—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage characterised by the microorganisms used characterised by the way or the form in which the microorganisms are added or dosed
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/34—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage characterised by the microorganisms used
    • C02F3/341—Consortia of bacteria
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/20—Bacteria; Culture media therefor
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/36—Adaptation or attenuation of cells
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2101/00—Nature of the contaminant
    • C02F2101/10—Inorganic compounds
    • C02F2101/106—Selenium compounds
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2101/00—Nature of the contaminant
    • C02F2101/10—Inorganic compounds
    • C02F2101/20—Heavy metals or heavy metal compounds
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
    • C02F2103/18—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated from the purification of gaseous effluents
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2209/00—Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
    • C02F2209/02—Temperature
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2209/00—Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
    • C02F2209/06—Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment pH
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2209/00—Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
    • C02F2209/40—Liquid flow rate
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2209/00—Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
    • C02F2209/44—Time
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2303/00—Specific treatment goals
    • C02F2303/24—Separation of coarse particles, e.g. by using sieves or screens

Definitions

  • This invention relates to reducing levels of contaminants, and more particularly to reducing levels of contaminants by bioremediation and/or using catalyzed reactions that produce contaminant ions.
  • Contaminant resistance is the ability for microbes to capture contaminants and convert those contaminants from toxic forms to elemental forms and benign compounds.
  • the science and engineering communities have studied contaminant resistant traits for more than half a century and shared a great wealth of knowledge about these traits through refereed scientific literature.
  • One common metric for contaminant resistance is the highest contaminant concentration at which microbes remain viable.
  • This disclosure describes the production of and the use of enhanced microbes that have specific contaminant resistance(s). This disclosure also describes the process for removing contaminants from air or gaseous effluents using catalyst(s) in combination with a wet scrubber containing an aqueous solvent.
  • This disclosure describes cultivation and enhancement processes used to produce living enhanced microbes that very efficiently capture, convert and eliminate contaminants (e.g., species of arsenic, mercury, lead, boron, cadmium, selenium, chromium, nickel, thallium, vanadium, zinc, nitrogen, chlorine, bromine, iron, copper and aluminum) from sediment-laden aqueous environments.
  • Enhanced microbes in the context of this document are the products of embodiments of the cultivation and enhancement processes disclosed.
  • the disclosed process uses native microbes to produce the enhanced microbes.
  • Native microbes refer to microbes indigenous to a specific sediment-laden aqueous environment or microbes from a similar sediment- laden aqueous environment.
  • the enhanced microbes exhibit cellular processes that selectively bind to a specific contaminant or specific contaminants even in the presence of other contaminants or chemicals, which are possibly higher in concentrations, reduce species (e.g., all species) of the contaminant to its elemental form and benign compounds, and expel the elemental form to the extracellular medium.
  • these cellular processes are commonly referred to as contaminant resistive properties; i.e., the enhanced microbes are specific- contaminants) resistant.
  • Enhanced microbes not only possess the well-documented properties of specific-contaminant(s) resistance, they also possess properties of resilience (e.g. viability in relatively broad ranges of temperature, excess acidity and/or excess alkalinity) that uniquely distinguish them from other specific- contaminants) resistant microbes discussed in the literature.
  • Resistant microbes' selectivity, efficiency and overall efficacy in capture and conversion of contaminants have placed them at the forefront of consideration in the development of new remediation technologies since these resistive properties were discovered.
  • the harsh environmental conditions of industrial waste streams have precluded the practical industrial application of resistant microbes.
  • Embodiments of this process provide means to produce enhanced microbes with not only the resistance properties sought for their remediation potential but also resilience properties that allow them to sustain harsh industrial waste stream conditions.
  • This disclosure describes methods for production of enhanced microbes in sediment -laden aqueous environments that convert
  • the compounds of these elements typically are considered contaminants in aqueous environments because their explicit presence or the concentration of their presence has a detrimental impact on the environment as defined by the US
  • Contaminants include but are not limited to compounds of arsenic, mercury, lead, boron, cadmium, selenium, chromium, nickel, thallium, vanadium, zinc, nitrogen, chlorine, bromine, iron, copper and aluminum.
  • the relative concentration of other elements or compounds of other elements in the aqueous environment do not affect the efficacy of the microbes' abilities to transform compounds of targeted element(s) or contaminant(s).
  • These enhanced microbes have resilience properties contributing to the efficacy and derived from the method of production. These resilience properties allow the enhanced microbes to survive in contaminated aqueous environments and distinguish the enhanced microbes from microbes produced using other techniques and/or processes and used to treat similarly contaminated aqueous environments.
  • the disclosure identifies the unique action of using microbes indigenous to or native to a contaminated area as a precursor in the production of the previously described enhanced microbes.
  • the combination and relative number of microbial species and the relative spatial structure of those microbial species can be important in the process used to produce the enhanced microbes.
  • the enhanced microbes resulting from this process using the native microbial communities do not necessarily have the same combination and relative number of microbial species as the native microbial communities or the relative spatial structure of microbial species as the native microbial communities.
  • the enhanced microbes can be used within a bioreactor for the reduction of contaminants from different environments.
  • the enhanced microbes can be produced to reduce contaminants such as, for example, species of arsenic, mercury, lead, boron, cadmium, selenium, chromium, nickel, thallium, vanadium, zinc, nitrogen, chlorine, bromine, iron, copper and aluminum.
  • the methods described have produced enhanced microbes for use in systems like a bioreactor for the reduction of mercury from different environments. For example, some approaches include using a mixed population of many native bacteria strains.
  • the systems and methods described can provide a cost-effective process to reduce the mercury content of mercury containing solutions including industrial process effluent(s).
  • the system and methods are especially effective in the removal of mercury from coal impoundment ponds that can specifically use enhanced microbes that only remove mercury. The resulting cost of contaminant removal by the enhanced microbes is significantly less than with standard reagents.
  • the enhanced microbes were used to treat solutions (e.g., water from coal waste impoundment ponds) initially containing high levels of mercury to reduce mercury levels in the bioreactor effluent below method detection limits of 1 part per billion (ppb).
  • solutions e.g., water from coal waste impoundment ponds
  • ppb 1 part per billion
  • These systems and methods can provide a resilient process for treating the highly variable waste streams that result from design variations between individual facilities (e.g., power plants) and from changing operating conditions and the types of coal burned.
  • These systems and methods can make the capture of mercury and the reduction of mercuric ion, Hg 2+ , and/or highly toxic organomercury compounds to non-toxic Hg° more feasible than other applicable technologies.
  • these systems and methods can provide the ability to remove Hg 2 + (as opposed to Hg 0) ).
  • these systems and methods exclusively bind, for example, to mercury.
  • These enhanced microbes are not bound to other metals so fewer enhanced microbes may be used to provide the same effect as that of a greater quantity of non-specific complexing agents or other non-specific binding material.
  • a series of naturally occurring (native) microbes can capture mercury exclusively if allowed to appropriately evolve in a toxic mercury environment as described in the disclosed method, then reduce the mercury from an Hg 2+ to Hg° in a mixed microbial community.
  • Several colonies have been isolated from coal impoundment ponds. Laboratory work has established that low levels of mercury can be captured by these colonies.
  • technologies that utilize expensive non-specific complexing agents also capture numerous other metals requiring an excessive amount of the complexing agent. In these non-specific processes, an irreversible binding complex is formed, eliminating any chance to use the complexing agents multiple times.
  • these systems and methods exclusively bind, for example, to all forms of selenium.
  • systems and methods are also well adapted to provide microbes with sufficient resilience to reduce heavy metal concentrations in waste streams that contain other constituents that typically interfere with bioremediation.
  • the systems and methods develop microbes effective in the removal of mercury from aqueous sources under adverse chemical conditions.
  • gas-process gaseous or airborne waste-streams
  • gas-process includes oxidation of contaminants with a catalyst, which makes them water-soluble.
  • the gas-process includes use of an appropriate wet scrubber to dissolve the contaminant ions in an aqueous solution.
  • a potential processes for use sequentially after the gas-process includes but is not limited to
  • Figure 1 is a flow chart of a method for developing enhanced microbes for bioremediation.
  • Figure 2 is a chart illustrating the systematic increase of mercury
  • concentration in microbial cultures used in the microbe enhancement process to produce enhanced microbes specifically resistant to mercury used in the microbe enhancement process to produce enhanced microbes specifically resistant to mercury.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic of a plug- flow bioreactor (PFR) that illustrates one embodiment of reactor that incorporates enhanced microbes.
  • PFR plug- flow bioreactor
  • Figure 4 is a process diagram of a treatment system, which equilibrates a first part of a reactor with a later portion of the reactor through a common vent to the atmosphere.
  • Figures 5 A and 5B are schematics for incorporation of the described systems into a coal-fired power plant and an illustration of the fate of mercury across key waste streams.
  • Figure 5A illustrates the potential placement of mercury removal units using enhanced microbes before placement of waste in an ash pond.
  • Figure 5B illustrates the potential placement of the gas-process to eliminate mercury emissions.
  • Figure 6 illustrates a typical example of the incorporation of redundant 300 systems with other essentially linearly-scalable equipment.
  • Figure 7 is an illustration of an exemplary application of the gas-process systems at a coal-fired power plant.
  • Figure 8 is an illustration of an exemplary process for concurrent use of the gas-process and bioreactor with enhanced microbes to treat all sources of air and water pollution at a coal-fired power plant (The Mercury Plus Process).
  • microbes enhanced microbes
  • capture and convert contaminants e.g. species of arsenic, mercury, lead, boron, cadmium, selenium, chromium, nickel, thallium, vanadium, zinc, nitrogen, chlorine, bromine, iron, copper and aluminum
  • contaminants e.g. species of arsenic, mercury, lead, boron, cadmium, selenium, chromium, nickel, thallium, vanadium, zinc, nitrogen, chlorine, bromine, iron, copper and aluminum
  • the enhanced microbes exhibit cellular processes that first bind to specific contaminant material(s) even in the presence of other materials which are possibly higher in concentrations. Following the binding, the enhanced microbes very efficiently convert the contaminant material(s) to a non-toxic form.
  • the capture and conversion properties of these microbes are commonly called resistive properties.
  • This microbial process facilitated through resistive properties can be more efficient than current standard chemical treatments for removing, for example, heavy- metal contaminants and/or toxic heavy-metal species from a contaminated environment.
  • Current standard chemical techniques use complexing agents for chemically and non-specifically binding to, for example, heavy-metal contaminants and/or toxic heavy-metal species, in a contaminated environment subsequently to remove them from that environment.
  • the environments including these toxic heavy- metal species also typically include nontoxic heavy-metal species.
  • These chemical treatments nonspecifically facilitate the binding of complexing agents to both the toxic and the nontoxic heavy metal species.
  • the resulting volume of agent-heavy- metal-species complexes therefore includes both toxic and nontoxic heavy-metal species.
  • this disclosure describes a method of mercury removal considerably more sophisticated than chemical treatment.
  • the mercury-resistive enhanced microbes exhibit cellular processes that selectively bind mercury. This binding activates other unique biological processes, which transfers the mercury to other sites within the microbe and subsequently reduces the organic and inorganic forms of mercury to the less harmful elemental form of mercury, Hg°, and other benign compounds.
  • the elemental form of mercury diffuses out of the microbe and out of the microbial community to the bulk media, which allows for collection through precipitation or volatilization techniques.
  • the enhanced microbes derived from native microbe populations as disclosed are significantly more resilient than resistive microbe populations derived from isolated microbial species. This significant resilience is the enhanced microbes' ability to survive, for example, in broader temperature ranges, broader pH ranges, broader ranges of mechanically perturbed conditions than the counterpart resistive microbe populations derived from isolated microbial species.
  • the resistive microbes and their microbial community constitute the enhanced microbes.
  • These enhanced microbes can reduce the problems associated with the pollution of groundwater by contaminants in, for example, waste impoundment ponds and/or the industrial systems feeding these ponds.
  • enhanced microbes developed to reduce mercury concentrations have demonstrated a reduction in mercury species from contaminated waters from coal waste impoundment ponds to a limit for which mercury species are no longer detectable.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a method 100 of developing living enhanced microbes based on the selection of initial source microbial communities and amplification of resistance to contaminants without isolating individual microbial species.
  • the resulting enhanced microbes exhibit surprisingly high levels of resistance to the toxic effects of contaminants in wastewater being treated. These microbes can be developed so they can respond to a single contaminant or multiple contaminants in environments where the other materials have similar chemical properties to the contaminants and may be present in higher concentration.
  • the initial step in developing enhanced microbes to treat aqueous solutions associated with a specific site includes identifying dormant bodies of water on the site that have contaminant concentrations representative of the overall site contamination (step 110).
  • starter-microbe source means an accumulation of water that satisfies the criteria for including microbes with properties that can be used to produce enhanced microbes using the process described herein.
  • the location of a starter-microbe source has standing water continuously present. For example, an area within a wastewater pond that has a continuous head of water throughout the year can be a starter-microbe source.
  • a starter- microbe source includes wastewater ponds that have standing water present throughout the year such as a coal waste impoundment pond with an area that always has a puddle or pool above the mixture of coal dust and other sediments. Locations that have puddles or pools that temporarily occur after storm events or other events that produce water that eventually runs off or evaporates are not sufficient to produce the requisite precursor microbes to produce enhanced microbes and are not starter- microbe sources. Contaminants in a starter-microbe source are between the average concentration and the highest concentration of contaminants observed on the polluted site.
  • a waterbody or a portion of a waterbody can be considered dormant for the purposes of identifying a starter-microbe source if it has been at least six months (e.g., at least nine months, at least one year, at least 15 months, at least 18 months, etc.) since waste containing contaminants was added to the waterbody or a specific discrete portion of the waterbody.
  • sample 112 After identifying a dormant waterbody that has contaminant concentrations representative of site contamination, take samples from the identified waterbody (step 112). Take samples at the interface between sediments and standing water such that the samples contain water that is present, for example, in coal fines and other sediment particles as well as water sitting above these materials in puddles or pools. In addition, if agglomerations of microbial life suspended in water are present, it is desirable that the samples include such agglomerations.
  • the method can include different sampling techniques. For example, the basis for developing desired enhanced microbes can be grab samples. Other sampling techniques include gathering composite samples from multiple locations in an individual waterbody or from multiple waterbodies across a site.
  • the target contaminant(s) e.g., mercury, selenium, arsenic, etc.
  • culturing native site microbes in a growth media, nutritive substance, while increasing the mercury content in coordination with successive generations of microbial growth produces living enhanced microbes of mixed native, transformed microbes resistant to mercury toxicity and with enhanced mercury removal activity.
  • Competent microbes are transferred into a conventional growth media with varying levels of mercury added such as three different medias with 0.001, 0.005, and O.OlnM mercuric chloride, respectively.
  • the cultures, mixtures of microbes from samples and medium, are incubated for approximately 24 hours and checked for microbial growth.
  • the microbial colony with the highest mercury concentration but sustained microbial growth can be used as a baseline. From that baseline, fresh growth media with the baseline level of mercury can be inoculated every 24 hours for a week to create stock microbes able to grow using the baseline conditions.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a sequence of using this procedure to raise the mercury concentration to successively higher levels: 0.003mM, O.OlmM, 0.05mM, 0.1 mM, 0.2mM, 0.4mM, 0.6mM, and finally lmM Hg 2+ .
  • Each step produces stock samples for subsequent steps with portions of the products at each step stored by freezing for subsequent use. Freezing the microbial colonies facilitates effectively indefinite storage of enhanced microbes for use at will.
  • the cultivation medium should not contain any substances that tend to induce speciation of the microbes or selective elimination of a particular species.
  • the contaminant concentration is gradually increased until the desired contaminant resistance level is acquired.
  • developing microbial communities with a contaminant resistance higher than intrinsic contamination levels at a site facilitate the opportunity for incorporating contaminant concentration processes, like reverse osmosis, in the overall remediation process thus reducing the total volume of water treated in the contaminant reduction/removal component of the overall process.
  • Appendix A includes additional details about the method.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a contaminant removal technique using a continuous plug- flow bioreactor with living enhanced microbes developed from a mixture of native microbes.
  • System 300 includes a plug-flow reactor 310 receiving a wastewater stream 312 to be treated, an inoculant 314 containing enhanced microbes, and a chemical feed stream 316 to provide nutrients to the microbes.
  • the reactor 310 is a bead-packed column. Live enhanced microbes adhere to beads and act to remove contaminants as wastewater passes through the reactor 310.
  • the system 300 includes pumps (not shown) used to transfer wastewater, inoculant, and chemical feed.
  • a pump transfers wastewater 312 to the reactor 310 on an ongoing basis during operation of the system.
  • a second pump transfers inoculant 314 containing enhanced microbes from a supply source like a holding tank to the reactor 310 prior to introduction of wastewater to the reactor. After an adequate amount of enhanced microbe, colonies are established, pumping of the wastewater 312 into the reactor 310 initiates normal operating conditions.
  • the second pump also can be used to introduce additional enhanced microbes 314 to the reactor 310 during normal operation of the system 300 to supplement enhanced microbe colonies already present in the reactor 310.
  • a third pump provides means to add the chemical feed 316 to the reactor 310.
  • the chemical feed mixture can include, for example, nutrients such as Luria-Bertani medium to encourage microbial growth activity and caustic/acid additions to control pH.
  • Additional pumps can be used to introduce specific components of the previously described chemical feed mixture through unused ports in the port-manifold of the reactor 310 from pure component sources if a specific application requires variable control of the addition of a specific component of the chemical feed.
  • the composition and magnitude of the chemical feed is application-specific. For example, in a large coal impoundment pond, the pH does not vary much and caustic/acid additions to control pH may not be necessary.
  • pH control and/or other types of pretreatment may be necessary before introducing wastewater from, for example, an industrial waste stream directly emanating from a plant process into the reactor 310.
  • the system 300 may include screening and/or filtration of influent wastewater, temperature control, and the like to address issues such as variable pH from chemical treatment of waste streams, variable temperature, intermittent high concentration of organic compounds, various oils, trash such as leaves, sticks, and other miscellaneous materials.
  • the stream to be processed can include pretreatment such as: a trash rake and/or screens to remove solid debris, and/or a pH control loop that can maintain a specified pH, and/or a preheat or precool step to maintain a specified operating temperature that is typically between 75 to 80 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and/or an oil /organic skimmer if the waste stream includes a mixture of immiscible components. If the waste stream includes a mixture of immiscible components, it may be difficult to get the needed concentration of organics below the needed level to avoid a "sheen" on the effluent using a skimmer, a permit violation in many cases. If this is the case, organic control at the source is usually the most economical method of control via an isolation tank or other equipment.
  • pretreatment such as: a trash rake and/or screens to remove solid debris, and/or a pH control loop that can maintain a specified pH, and/or a preheat or precool step to maintain a specified operating temperature that
  • the system 300 uses other mechanisms for transferring fluids (e.g., gravity feed, etc.) within the system.
  • fluids e.g., gravity feed, etc.
  • Other systems include, for example, a support column, a column packed with the enhanced microbes, simply enhanced microbes suspended in the influent as floes, floccules, or other types of suspensions.
  • sensors such as, for example, inline monitor(s), can be used to detect contaminants in the effluent stream as an indicator of when the enhanced microbes efficiency is negatively impacted.
  • the system 300 can also include other sensors such as, for example, a standard pH meter for aqueous solutions, thermocouples to monitor temperature. We expect the simple mechanical design of system 300 to be easy to maintain with limited equipment malfunctions.
  • Port 320 is optionally provided to facilitate sampling of the effluent stream 318.
  • the system 300 is designed to provide the residence time necessary for inoculated enhanced microbes to react with and remove the specific contaminant from the wastewater being treated.
  • the volume of the wastewater being treated, flow velocity, and residence time can be increased or decreased by changing the cross section and/or volume of the removal apparatus as well as the flow rates of the various materials being introduced into the reactor 310.
  • the system 300 includes temperature control mechanisms.
  • the system 300 can include a heat exchanger in which the warm, contaminant- free effluent heats the incoming influent.
  • Electric heaters, natural gas heaters, bottled propane heaters, or similar heaters can provide additional heat as necessary.
  • the ability to heat or cool fluids within the system 300 can be important, especially for portable systems that are deployed outdoors during the winter. For example, skid mounted units can be deployed on-site and adjacent to coal waste impoundments or ash ponds. This feature may be less important for systems that are installed indoors (e.g., to treat industrial wastewater as part of a process stream).
  • Regeneration of the system 300 may be necessary after the significant buildup of elemental forms of contaminants (e.g., elemental mercury, elemental selenium, elemental arsenic) but this is anticipated to take months under normal operation.
  • elemental forms of contaminants e.g., elemental mercury, elemental selenium, elemental arsenic
  • the elemental forms of contaminants will accumulate in the well (drain port) in the center of the device, which is at the lowest point.
  • the reactor 310 is a bead-packed column.
  • Other systems can be implemented using, for example, a support column, a column packed with the enhanced microbes, or simply enhanced microbes suspended in the influent.
  • system 300 can include sensors such as, for example, in-line monitor(s)to detect contaminants in the effluent stream as an indicator of when the enhanced microbes efficiency is negatively impacted.
  • the systems 300 can be provided as independent modules such that multiple systems 300 can be installed and operated in parallel in order to increase throughput and/or provide treatment redundancy. For example, if a first system 300 must be taken off-line because of enhanced microbe exhaustion or a high level of contaminant product collection, the contaminant containing influent can be switched to a second system 300.
  • the simple mechanical design of system 300 is easy to maintain with limited equipment malfunctions and provides significant operational flexibility. For example, multiple columns can be used in parallel (e.g., in a skid-mounted unit) to provide a portable treatment unit.
  • Figure 6 illustrates a typical example of the incorporation of a system 300 with other essentially linearly scalable equipment.
  • Figure 6 illustrates but one of many different configurations possible for treating contaminants using embodiment of previously described reactor units in conjunction with contaminant concentrating units like reverse osmosis units.
  • a million gallon per day influent to a mercury removal system may require six exemplary units for proper abatement.
  • the mercury contaminants in the influent can be concentrated with the aid of reverse osmosis so that two exemplary units can accomplish the removal.
  • Small (column) reactors containing media e.g., lava rock, etc.
  • media e.g., lava rock, etc.
  • the reactor is easily vented through the sampling port valve 300 or similar valves placed in areas to release the gases from the reactor. The occurrence of these backpressure events can cause a loss of residence time and can lead to higher mercury concentrations in the effluent if the residence time is set to a minimum.
  • Figure 4 illustrates a large scale system 400, e.g., for treatment of mercury contaminants, that addresses the potential issues of gas development resulting in back pressures by equilibrating a first part of a reactor 410 with a later portion of the reactor 410 through a common vent 411 to the atmosphere.
  • the atmospheric vent 41 1 has a material (e.g., Hydrar(R), hopcalite, or sodium sulfide impregnated filter) which can capture the incidental contaminant vapor.
  • the metallic mercury pulled out of solution in the reactor 410 being used to treat waste from coal mining processes usually aggregates due to surface tension effects and then settles to the bottom of the reactor, but the metallic mercury does have a finite, yet low, vapor pressure.
  • the very high surface tension of mercury can enable the system to trap it in the drain well which can be equipped with a draw-off.
  • the system 400 is similar to the system 300 in having wastewater 412, inoculant 416, and chemical feed streams 414 introduced into the reactor 410 which discharges a treated effluent stream 418.
  • the wastewater feed stream 412 optionally includes pretreatment modules.
  • the wastewater feed stream 412 includes a coarse screening module 420 and a fine filtration module 422. These modules can be included in systems where it is desirable to remove particulate matter (e.g., leaves, sediments, etc.) that particularly can be an issue in treating wastewater from sources such as coal-waste impoundments and ash ponds.
  • particulate matter e.g., leaves, sediments, etc.
  • the system 400 includes a process-to-process heat exchanger 424 and an electric heater 426 to warm influent wastewater to approximately 75-80 degrees Fahrenheit before the wastewater is introduced into the reactor 410.
  • the process-to- process heat exchanger 424 uses warm effluent from the reactor 410 to heat the incoming wastewater.
  • the process-to-process heat exchanger 424 reduces the amount of energy required by the electric heater 426 to raise the wastewater temperature to the desired range while also cooling the water being discharged by the system 400 (e.g., to a surface water body, a municipal sewer system, etc.).
  • the system 400 also includes optional pH adjustment module 428 with an inline pH monitor(s), pumps operable to dispense caustic/acid additions into the influent stream, and a controller receiving signals from the pH monitor(s) and sending control signals to the pumps.
  • optional pH adjustment module 428 with an inline pH monitor(s), pumps operable to dispense caustic/acid additions into the influent stream, and a controller receiving signals from the pH monitor(s) and sending control signals to the pumps.
  • the reactor 410 is horizontally oriented and includes baffles 430 extending from the floor and ceiling of the reactor 410. Some embodiments include baffles that are oriented side-to-side which could completely eliminate the need for any lava rock or other potential obstruction which might end up in the filter after operation.
  • a drain port 432 installed in a low spot in the floor of the reactor 410 facilitates removal of precipitates from the reactor. Figure 4 only shows one port but other embodiments of system 400 include multiple drain ports 432.
  • Enhanced microbes developed using the approach described herein have been observed to effectively remove contaminants from solution even in the absence of support media (e.g. beads, pumice stone, activated carbon, semi-permeable membranes) used to pack columns in the system 300 described with reference to Figure 3.
  • support media e.g. beads, pumice stone, activated carbon, semi-permeable membranes
  • Bioreactors systems conventionally rely on microbes attached to support media and it is surprising that these enhanced microbes produced as described herein effectively function in suspension.
  • the reactor 410 is generally free of media but includes lava rock chips piled between the bottom of downward extending baffles 430 and the floor of the reactor.
  • the limited use of media in the reactor 410 can provide advantages including but not limited to increased flow capacity, reduced cleaning requirements, lower media costs, lower total organic carbon (TOC) loads and controlled growth of microbes relative to media filled reactors of similar dimensions.
  • the lava rock chips are anticipated to prevent solids build up in a situation where an unusually large amount of microbes is formed that otherwise might load against a baffle.
  • the media can create a zone away from the baffle where the liquid velocity is reduced such that solids are likely to settle away from a baffle.
  • atmospheric vent 41 1 equilibrates a first part of a reactor 410 with a later portion of the reactor 410.
  • Other embodiments of system 400 include more than 2 linked atmospheric vents.
  • the reactor 410 discharges to a separation module consisting of a filter 436 and a settling tank 442 that separates water with relatively low levels of solids, recycled slurry, 444 from the filtered slurry.
  • the recycled slurry 444 returns to the inlet end of the reactor 410 to help maintain appropriate levels of the enhanced microbes in the reactor 410.
  • Excess solids can be removed from a slurry, for example, by settling in the settling tank 446.
  • the enhanced microbes act to convert soluble heavy metals into their insoluble elemental form. Removal of solids from the slurry will also tend to remove insoluble contaminants, in particular, as the agglomerated contaminants will tend to be denser and settle faster than enhanced microbes present in the slurry.
  • the warm water discharged 418 from the separation module consisting of the filter 436 and settling tank 442 is routed to heat exchanger 424 before being discharged from the system 400.
  • the illustrated system 400 includes a total organic carbon (TOC) treatment module 448 and a reverse osmosis module 450 operable to remove salts and/or nutrients added to the influent to support enhanced microbes but not desirable in the effluent. Additional nutrient 414 may be added to increase enhanced microbe populations to capture and convert high concentrations of contaminants.
  • These optional secondary treatment modules can be operated or bypassed as appropriate for conditions in a particular wastewater stream. Some embodiments of system 400 do not include any secondary treatment modules.
  • Figures 5A and 5B illustrates the fate of mercury across key waste streams and a flue gas path at a coal-fired power plant.
  • the systems can be installed in the byproduct exit stream of either a bag house or an electrostatic precipitator or a flue gas desulfurizer scrubber unit at a coal-fired power plant.
  • stream modification e.g. to control temperature, to address excess acidity and/or excess alkalinity, etc.
  • the systems could also be effectively used to remove mercury contaminants from waste streams so mercury contaminants do not jeopardize the continued use of these waste streams in the manufacture of gypsum or concrete products.
  • a conventional approach to prevent mercury escape to the atmosphere through stack gases at coal-fired power plants includes enhancing the trapping of flue-gas mercury by injecting activated carbon at various locations in the process stream and adding halogen salts to the coal being used as fuel.
  • the coal is burned and the flue gas is passed to a selective catalytic reduction unit (SCR).
  • SCR selective catalytic reduction unit
  • the SCR's primary purpose is to remove nitrogen oxides, but it also oxidizes mercury to the mercuric ion. Based on the mercury oxidation potential, not all of the mercury is oxidized in the selective catalytic reduction unit (SCR) unless halogen salts are added to the flue before the flue gas enters the SCR to complete the mercury oxidation.
  • the flue gas from the SCR subsequently passes through a precipitation unit followed by a desulfurization unit producing fly ash and gypsum, respectively.
  • the mercuric ion produced in the SCR therefore is ultimately included in the fly ash and gypsum if it is not emitted from the stack. While this flue-gas treatment process effectively removes mercury from the flue gas, it indirectly increases the mercury content in the waste streams of ash and gypsum that are used in products like concrete and wallboard. This increased mercury content jeopardizes the continued use of fly ash and gypsum for use in concrete and wallboard, respectively, and similar products.
  • halogenated compounds produced through use of the halogen salts can cause serious corrosion issues in ducts and carbon silos.
  • the flue gas runs at 230 Fahrenheit so there is no condensation of halogen compounds while in operation.
  • the halogen compounds can rapidly react with the equipment during cool-down, which leads to pitting and general overall corrosion. Similar degradation can occur during the reheating of the equipment at start-up.
  • Our system uses cold liquid solutions and runs near neutrality which slows the corrosion process down considerably.
  • the systems could be further modified so that they may be installed on the flue gas stream after various units (e.g., electrostatic precipitator, ESP, FGD) have performed their tasks and preferably just prior to the exit stack as illustrated in Figure 5B.
  • the mercury can be oxidized to mercuric ion using existing technologies such as plate-type catalysts, quantitatively captured by a standard wet scrubber and subsequently processed using an embodiment of the systems described herein. That is, the wet scrubber solution can be treated easily using processes incorporating the enhanced microbes produced as previously described.
  • Figure 6 illustrates but one of many different configurations possible for treating contaminants using embodiment of previously described reactor units in conjunction with contaminant concentrating units like reverse osmosis units, the variance of which are dependent on the size and concentration of contaminants in the influent to the overall process. For example, a million gallon per day influent to a mercury removal system may require six exemplary units for proper abatement. However, with the flexibility of using enhanced microbes capable of treating higher concentrations of mercury contaminants than present in the influent, the mercury contaminants in the influent can be concentrated with the aid of reverse osmosis so that two exemplary units can accomplish the removal.
  • Figure 7 illustrates the gas-process for removing contaminants from gaseous or airborne waste-streams (gas-process) including, for example, gaseous waste- streams present at coal-fired power plants. While the process can be used in several embodiments of gaseous waste streams, Figure 5B includes exemplary placement of the gaseous process in a coal-fired power plant, specifically after the flue gas desulfurization equipment and before the emission stack. Figure 7 illustrates exemplary use of the gas-process to remove mercury and other air toxics from a coal- fired power plant's emissions 700.
  • the polluted gaseous effluent 702 enters a duct 704 that includes a low temperature catalyst. The catalyst facilitates
  • the gaseous stream that includes the contaminant ions enters the bottom of a wet scrubber 706.
  • the pressure on the gases that exit the area containing the catalyst 704 and enter the wet scrubber 706 forces the gases up the scrubber 706.
  • the rising gases encounter a downward-flowing scrubbing-liquid fluid. While other chemical constituents may be included, the primary component of the scrubbing fluid is water. Contaminant ions are transferred from the rising gas to the scrubbing fluid as the gas rises to the top of the scrubber 706 and the scrubbing fluid flows to the bottom of the scrubber 706.
  • the aqueous stream that includes entrained contaminant ions from the scrubber 706 flows to a process for extracting and/or filtering and/or precipitating the ions from the aqueous stream 708 (e.g., processing through a bioreactor with enhanced microbes for specific contaminant ions, processing through a reactor that adds lime to the aqueous solution to cause precipitation of hydroxides of the contaminant ions followed by filtration, and processing through a reactor that increases the pH to a point that causes precipitation of carbonates followed by filtration ) to produce a collection of condensed contaminants 710.
  • a process for extracting and/or filtering and/or precipitating the ions from the aqueous stream 708 e.g., processing through a bioreactor with enhanced microbes for specific contaminant ions, processing through a reactor that adds lime to the aqueous solution to cause precipitation of hydroxides of the contaminant ions followed by filtration, and processing through a reactor that increases the
  • the gas- process transfers gas phase materials to the aqueous phase where they can be treated by techniques like chemical precipitation, flotation, adsorption, ion exchange, and electrochemical deposition as well as a bioremediation process using enhanced microbes.
  • the resulting aqueous stream 712 contains very low or non-detectable metals, no biological oxygen demand (BOD) or total organic carbon (TOC).
  • BOD biological oxygen demand
  • TOC total organic carbon
  • the aforementioned gas- process facilitates the efficient use of the selective catalytic reduction unit (SCR) and the flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) unit for removal of the pollutants for which they originally were designed, nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides, respectively.
  • SCR selective catalytic reduction unit
  • FGD flue-gas desulfurization
  • the gas-process facilitates the use of operating conditions for nitrogen oxide and sulfur oxide scrubbers for their intended purposes.
  • the gas-process allows sufficient capture of contaminants so that MATS can be satisfied.
  • the gas-process removes 98+% of the air contaminant emissions compared to the MATS requirement of 90%.
  • the indirect effects of reducing the amount of contaminants present in the waste streams emerging from the scrubbers and products formed from components of these waste streams are also advantageous.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a process 800 that includes the gas-process and bioreactor with enhanced microbes to treat sources of air and water pollution at a coal-fired power plant.
  • the process 800 is an application of the gas-process 700 using a bioreactor with enhanced microbes 824 as a component of the process for extracting and/or filtering and/or precipitating contaminate ions 820 & 824.
  • the combination of the gas-process with a bioreactor using enhanced microbes produces a feasible scenario for treating all sources of a targeted contaminant at a coal-fired power plant.
  • the process 800 is discussed with respect to the treatment of mercury but can also be used to treat other contaminants. Polluted flue gas 802 and effluents from the scrubbers as well as material already collected in the ash ponds from the scrubbers 810 are concurrently treated in process 800.
  • Polluted flue gas 802 enters a duct 804 that includes a low temperature catalyst.
  • the catalyst facilitates oxidation/reduction of contaminants including, for example, mercury, arsenic, lead, boron, cadmium, selenium, chromium, nickel, thallium, vanadium, zinc, chlorine, bromine, iron, copper, and aluminum.
  • the gaseous effluent of the duct 804 includes ions of the contaminants formed by the
  • the gaseous effluent form the duct 804 enters the bottom of a wet scrubber 806.
  • the pressure on the gases that exit the area containing the catalyst 804 and subsequently enter the wet scrubber 806 forces the gases up the scrubber 806.
  • the rising gases encounter a downward-flowing scrubbing-liquid fluid. While other chemical constituents (e.g. acids, bases) may be included, the primary component of the scrubbing fluid is water. Contaminant ions migrate from the rising gas to the scrubbing fluid as the gas rises to the top of the scrubber 806 and the scrubbing fluid flows to the bottom of the scrubber 806.
  • the gaseous effluent from the scrubber 806 constitutes pollutant- free flue gas from the plant 816.
  • the pollutant free gas 816 is expelled into the atmosphere through the plant stack 818.
  • the aqueous stream that includes entrained contaminant ions from the scrubber 806 flows to a unit composed of a pump and a flow divider 808.
  • the unit 808 facilitates addition of ash pond water 810 that has undergone pretreatment 812 to the aqueous effluent of the scrubber 806 that enters the first phase of the contaminant removal process 820.
  • the pretreatment process 812 primarily removes trash, sticks, leaves, and other water-insoluble materials from the ash pond water 810 before the effluent of the pretreatment process 812 enters the unit 808.
  • These devices can include but are not limited to traveling water screens and/or trash rakes and/or settlers and/or concentrators and/or clarifiers.
  • the unit 808 can recirculate a portion of the aqueous stream 814 from the pump and flow divider unit 808 to the aqueous influent port of the scrubber 806.
  • multiple passes of the aqueous solution 814 through the scrubber 806 are required to saturate the aqueous solution with the contaminant ions entrained in or captured by the solution 814.
  • the recirculation 814 allows a net decrease in the flow of aqueous solutions through the process 800.
  • the pump and flow divider unit 808 is equipped with sensory equipment that determines if recirculation of a portion of the effluent from the unit 808 can sustain the desired level of contaminant removal in the wet scrubber 806. If sensory equipment does not indicate that recirculation will sustain the appropriate level of contaminant removal, the unit 808 can circulate pollutant- free water 828 through the recirculation loop 814.
  • This process 820 produces a collection of condensed contaminants 822.
  • These condensed contaminants do not include any products derived from organomercury compounds like methyl mercury that were present in the effluent of the unit 808.
  • Organomercury compounds and possibly some inorganic mercury compounds will persist in the effluent of the process for extracting and/or filtering and/or precipitating the contaminant ions 820.
  • Subsequent treatment of the effluent from the process for extracting and/or filtering and/or precipitating the contaminant ions 820 in a bioreactor with enhanced microbes 824 will facilitate production of elemental mercury 826 and innocuous organic compounds. Much, if not all, of the innocuous organic compounds are consumed by the aerobic enhanced microbes in the bioreactor 824 through a metabolic process that produces primarily carbon dioxide and water, which are expelled into the atmosphere.
  • the aqueous effluent of the bioreactor 828 is pollutant-free water, which is allowed to enter local waterways 830 or discharged to sewer systems as appropriate.
  • gas-process for removing contaminants from the emissions of other industrial plants. These embodiments include but are not limited to combing the gas-process with a bioreactor that uses enhanced microbes to remove contaminants (e.g. species of arsenic, mercury, lead, boron, cadmium, selenium, chromium, nickel, thallium, vanadium, zinc, nitrogen, chlorine, bromine, iron, copper and aluminum) not removed or not adequately removed by conventional extracting and/or filtering and/or precipitating processes.
  • contaminants e.g. species of arsenic, mercury, lead, boron, cadmium, selenium, chromium, nickel, thallium, vanadium, zinc, nitrogen, chlorine, bromine, iron, copper and aluminum
  • the methods described above were used to develop resilient enhanced microbes effective to treat mercury contamination in water from native microbial populations present in a coal waste impoundment.
  • the research team performed a preliminary site study of a coal waste impoundment and observed color and odor consistent with the presence of live microbes and in particular, bacteria in water at the coal waste impoundment pond.
  • the ponds were known to be contaminated with heavy-metal contaminants and other chemical contaminants that impair water quality. Some microbes present in the ponds would have to be composed of a strain or strains resistant to the heavy metals and other chemicals.
  • Mechanisms for heavy-metal resistance in bacteria include processes that reduced the heavy metals to their elemental form, which, in turn, made the heavy metal contaminants insoluble in water.
  • microbes from each of the 24 samples were cultivated in standard culture mediums, Luria-Bertani (LB) broth, for 24 hours using standard techniques to increase the amount of each sample available for subsequent mercury resistance tests.
  • Escherichia coli (E. Coli) strain MM294 purchased from Carolina Biological Supply Company was concurrently cultivated for use as a blank reference for subsequent mercury resistance studies.
  • Ethylene glycol was placed in the microbe cultures originating from each of the 24 samples and the blank to create 20% ethylene glycol solutions. These stock microbe mixtures were stored at negative 85 degrees Celsius.
  • the microbes produced and used showed greater resilience to physical perturbations like bubbles and agitation, and greater resilience to chemical perturbations like those present in highly organo- chlorinated waste streams.
  • the resilience exceeded our expectations since the microbes survived and grew in a mixture of organo-chlorine components from a mercury-cell chlorine unit.
  • the area sampled must be an area that continuously has puddles or pools of water sitting above the saturated coal dust and other sediments. Areas that have puddles or pools that temporarily occur after storm events or other activities that produce water that eventually runs off or evaporates are not sufficient to produce the requisite microbial colonies.
  • the team also hypothesizes that the perturbations of the site produced by addition of new waste disrupts the natural selection process. For example, samples taken from ponds that were created within a year of collection of the sample did not produce microbes that could be cultivated for use in subsequent cultivation and enhancement processes. Similar results were found with older ponds to which new waste was being added at the time of sample collection. This disruption prevents the requisite colonies for the cultivation/enhancement process from being established. It is worth noting, however, that the treatment colonies produced by ponds that are not perturbed by the addition of new waste can be used in the treatment of waters in nearby active ponds, ponds to which new waste is being added.
  • the applicability of a treatment colony from a dormant pond in a remediation process for an active pond has only been correlated with two factors thus far.
  • the ponds are within the same valley and the waste added to the newer pond is similar to the waste added to the dormant pond.
  • the applicability of the treatment colonies originating from a dormant pond on an active pond most likely stems from the great similarity of the overall ecosystems in each pond.
  • the team subsequently conducted efforts to isolate the individual strains of bacteria within the highly -resistant multi-species colony with the hope of identifying the specific specie or the best specie for subsequent use in a reduction/separation process. Two of eight species in these colonies were isolated. The level of mercury resistance demonstrated by each of these isolated species in the conventional tests was similar to the level of mercury resistance demonstrated by their parent colony.
  • the conventional tests were conducted using mercuric chloride as the source of mercury, Luria-Bertani (LB) broth as a source of nutrients and growth factors, and distilled water as a source of water.
  • the isolated species demonstrated reduced resistance and resilience compared to the resistance and resilience demonstrated in the conventional, distilled-water tests.
  • the parent colony of the isolated species demonstrated the same resistance with water from the site as with distilled water.
  • These superstructures have sufficiently low densities to maintain the planktonic characteristics of the colony. While studies about the formation of mercury resistant bacterial colonies in the Aussa River in Italy have properties consistent with the enhanced microbes described, the enhanced microbes in associated planktonic superstructures produced as described in this disclosure have demonstrated increased resistance and resilience.
  • concentrations from 55 ppm to 920 ppm Studies for concentrations less than 55 ppm have not been completed but are expected to show similar resistive action. In these lower concentrations, the microbes could possibly use selenium in their nutritional systems. Given the selenium reduction studied is an aerobic process, the potential for use of this process on an industrial scale shows great promise compared to anaerobic counterparts due to its comparative simplicity and, thus, concurrent lower cost.
  • the findings from the work with mercury and selenium support the conclusion that it is plausible to create a treatment microbial colony, enhanced microbes, which can resist specific contaminants.
  • the findings also indicate it is plausible to create enhanced microbes that will resist multiple contaminants concurrently using essentially the same procedure.
  • the findings indicate the enhanced- microbes have resilience properties that allow them to survive the expected fluctuations in environmental conditions like pH and temperature at the polluted site. Findings also indicate the presence of metal ions in addition to the target contaminants of mercury and/or selenium does not affect the efficacy of the enhanced microbes.
  • the contaminants referenced in this document are detrimental to ecosystems if their soluble concentration levels exceed limits unique to each of the contaminants as reported by the EPA.
  • microbes cannot survive in the area unless some members of the microbial community have a mechanism for eliminating the contaminant from the aqueous environment. Unless some microbes exposed to conditions that include pollutant levels of contaminants have resistant characteristics, the microbial communities cannot survive in areas that include pollutant levels of the contaminants.
  • the resistant properties of the enhanced microbes almost exclusively results in the reduction of the contaminant to its elemental form that facilitates a phase separation of the contaminant from the water-laden environment.
  • the resistant processes invoked by the microbes remove the pollutant from water.
  • the elemental forms of the contaminants are not toxic. (Please note that some elemental forms of contaminants including mercury are referenced as toxic not because the elemental form in itself is toxic but because the element can be easily oxidized/reduced into a toxic form.)
  • the same gas-process can be used within any process that produces air or gaseous emissions that include contaminants and those contaminants are not limited to mercury.
  • the contaminants can include but are not limited to mercury, arsenic, lead, boron, cadmium, selenium, chromium, nickel, thallium, vanadium, zinc, chlorine, bromine, iron, copper, and aluminum. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
  • Water-Laden Environment An environment in which all non-water components of the environment have sufficient exposure to water that heavy metal species present in the water are partially if not totally borne from the contact of the water with the non-water component.
  • Bacterial Colonies Numerous bacterial cells either derived from one parent or having the individual characteristics as if they were derived from one parent.
  • Bacterial Communities Numerous bacterial cells either derived from more than one parent or having the individual characteristics as if they were derived from more than one parent.
  • Bacterial Microbes - Aggregate structures that are formed by bacterial colonies or bacterial communities. These aggregates have planktonic character in they can be suspended in solution or precipitate from solution but are not affixed to a substrate.
  • the solvent for the solution is water in the context of this document.
  • Species included in these aggregates can include planktonic and/or sessile bacteria. In addition to the bacteria, these aggregates may be embedded in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances which these cells have produced.
  • Bacterial Group - A term used herein to collectively refer to bacterial colonies, bacterial communities, bacterial microbes, bacterial biofilms, other bacterial superstructures, and other collections of bacteria that naturally exist in water-laden environments.
  • the italicized term "Bacterial Group” will be used specifically in reference to a bacterial group developed using the METHOD described herein.
  • Species of a Heavy Metal - All organic and inorganic compounds that include the heavy metal in a covalent, ionic, or ligand bound form. Any form of the heavy metal excluding its naturally occurring elemental form.
  • Targeted (Species of) Heavy Metal(s) - Specific (species of) heavy metal(s) among group of (species of) heavy metals present in the environment.
  • This document describes methods for production of Bacterial Groups (METHOD) including but not limited to bacterial colonies, bacterial communities, bacterial microbes, bacterial biofilms, and other bacterial superstructures that convert all targeted species of a specific heavy metal (HM) or all targeted species of a specific combination of heavy metals (CHM) in water-laden environments to species that exclude heavy metals and elemental forms of the heavy metals.
  • Methods for production of Bacterial Groups including but not limited to bacterial colonies, bacterial communities, bacterial microbes, bacterial biofilms, and other bacterial superstructures that convert all targeted species of a specific heavy metal (HM) or all targeted species of a specific combination of heavy metals (CHM) in water-laden environments to species that exclude heavy metals and elemental forms of the heavy metals.
  • HM specific heavy metal
  • CHM specific combination of heavy metals
  • Bacterial Groups provide means for facilitating this conversion in a water-laden environment that includes other, non-targeted heavy metals without any interference by or conversion of those other, non-targeted species of heavy metals; the Bacterial Groups specifically convert HM or CHM in the presence of other heavy metals and species of other heavy metals irrespective of the relative concentration of the HM or CHM to the other heavy metals and/or species of other heavy metals present.
  • BACATERIAL GROUPS BACATERIAL GROUPS
  • the bacterial property that describes bacterial reduction of species of a heavy metal to species that exclude the heavy metal and the elemental form of the heavy metal is called heavy-metal resistance.
  • the heavy-metal resistance of a Bacterial Group is consistent with many documented observations and mechanistic
  • the mercury resistant Bacterial Group is illustrative of all the heavy-metal resistant Bacterial Groups.
  • the mercury resistant Bacterial Group exhibits cellular processes that selectively bind to mercury even in the presence of other heavy-metals which are possibly higher in concentrations, reduces all species of mercury to elemental mercury and species that exclude mercury, and expel elemental mercury to the extracellular medium.
  • Barkay et al. provide a thorough historical review of bacterial mercury resistance as well as a summary of the accepted molecular mechanisms that facilitate this resistance which is consistent with the observed properties of the mercury resistant Bacterial Group.
  • a Bacterial Group not only possesses the well-documented properties of heavy-metal-resistance, it possesses resilient properties that uniquely distinguish it from the heavy-metal resistant bacteria predominantly if not exclusively discussed in the literature.
  • the literature shows many examples of the use of colonies of bacteria and communities of bacteria that are heavy-metal resistant. These colonies and communities of bacteria have limited practical use in industrial settings given the very restrictive environmental conditions that must be maintained for the bacteria to survive and exhibit the desirable heavy-metal resistance property.
  • a Bacterial Group produced using the METHOD described herein has not only heavy-metal resistive properties but high resilience properties with respect to the range of environmental conditions in which it is expected to survive.
  • the ranges of environmental conditions include but are not limited to the range of pH, the range of ionic strength, the range of temperatures and the range of nascent microorganisms that can compete with the mercury resistant bacteria.
  • the Bacterial Group is prepared from a source-bacterial-group that is known to have the resilience properties required for subsequent industrial applications.
  • the METHOD used to create the Bacterial Group maintains a distribution of species, structural relationship among species, and other important collective characteristics which are necessary to sustain the resilience properties of the source-bacterial-group.
  • the METHOD used to create the Bacterial Group also stimulates the source bacterial group to exhibit enhanced heavy-metal resistance compared to the resistance exhibited in their natural environment.
  • the Bacterial Groups developed using the METHOD described herein have appropriate collective properties to provide them with resilience to real-world application environments and stimulated properties of heavy-metal resistance for them to be used in conventional bioreactor systems for removal of specific heavy metals from water.
  • Bacterial Group required for treatment of wastewater at a particular site gives rise to three categories of Bacterial Groups: Same-site Bacterial Groups (Tl -Bacterial Groups), similar-site Bacterial Groups (T2-Bacterial Groups), and pretreatment-with-similar-site Bacterial Groups (T3-Bacterial Groups). While the METHOD used to produce the Bacterial Group required to treat wastewater at each type of site is the same, additional controls and pretreatments to maximize the efficiency of the treatment may differ among the categories.
  • the same-site Bacterial Group (Tl -Bacterial Group) is developed from a source-bacterial-group collected from sites that include the wastewater that will be ultimately treated using the Tl -Bacterial Group prepared.
  • the Tl -Bacterial Group is used to treat wastewater from the same site used to collect the source-bacterial-group. Little or no pretreatment of the waste-water treated with the Tl -Bacterial Group is expected given the resilience properties associated with the expected variations in pH, temperature or other environmental properties of the waste-water are inherited from the source-bacterial-group.
  • T2-Bacterial Group The similar-site Bacterial Group (T2-Bacterial Group) is developed from a source-bacterial-group collected from a site that have the same characteristics as the intended-use site when the intended-use site has not had appropriate time to mature as required by the METHOD discussed herein. For a waste-water site to be sufficiently mature, it must remain "dormant” for a sufficient period of time for an appropriate source-bacterial-group to develop. If, however, the environmental conditions of the waste-water site are essentially the same as a "dormant" site, a source-bacterial-group collected from the "dormant" site can be used to develop an applicable T2-Bacterial Group.
  • a coal waste impoundment pond to which additional coal waste has not been added (first pond) for a sufficient period to allow development of a source-bacterial-group can be considered a "dormant" site.
  • a source-bacterial-group may not be present in a second coal-waste impoundment pond to which coal waste is regularly added (second pond). This second pond being continuously perturbed by the addition of coal waste would not constitute a "dormant" site.
  • the environmental conditions of the second pond sufficiently resemble the first "dormant" pond such that a source-bacterial-group from the first pond can be used to produce T2 -Bacterial Groups that not only have the heavy-metal resistance properties but the resilience properties required to make the T2-Bacterial Groups effective for treatment of the second pond wastewater with little or no pre-treatment.
  • T3-Bacterial Group A pretreatment-with-similar-site Bacterial Groups (T3-Bacterial Group) is developed from a source-bacterial-group that has similar characteristics as the intended-use site but certain resilience properties of the T3 -Bacterial Groups produced are expected to be inadequate.
  • T3-Bacterial Groups from a source-bacterial-group collected from a "dormant" fly ash pond adjacent to a coal-fired power plant may not be applicable to treatment of wastewater coming directly from the plant scrubber without some pretreatment of the wastewater.
  • This pretreatment of the wastewater includes adjustments to the properties of the wastewater to fall within the range defined by the resilience properties of the T3- Bacterial Group produced from the fly-ash-pond source-bacterial-group.
  • Specific pretreatments will vary depending on the extent to which the waste-water properties deviate from the range allowed by the resilience properties of the T3 -Bacterial Group.
  • An example of potential pretreatment is adjustment of the pH of the wastewater by passing the wastewater across a sufficient amount of limestone to adjust the pH to be within the range defined by the resilience properties of the T3 -Bacterial Group.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a method (100) for producing a specific Bacterial Group based on the selection of a source location to harvest the source-bacterial-group, collection of the heterogeneous sample of condensed material and supernatant liquids in which the source-bacterial-group is entrained, and cultivation of the source- bacterial-group in a manner that enhances the desired heavy-metal resistance for HM or CHM to form the Bacterial Group while maintaining the resilience properties of the source-bacterial-group. All categories of Bacterial Groups are developed using the illustrated method. The specific category is based on the relationship of the source- bacterial-group and thus Bacterial Group to the wastewater treated as previously described.
  • the method for producing Bacterial Groups to treat wastewater associated with a specific site includes three steps: identification of the source location, collection of the requisite sample from the source location, and preparation of the Bacterial Group from the cultivation and enhancement of the source-bacterial-groups entrained in the source location sample.
  • Identifying a source location is the initial step in developing a Bacterial Group to treat wastewater associated with a specific site is identification of a source location within the specific site that has HM or CHM representative of the HM or CHM of concern in the wastewater, (step 1 10).
  • a source location has a body of water continuously present. For example, an area within a waste impoundment pond that has a continuous head of water throughout the year can be considered a source location. Puddles or pools that temporarily occur after storm events or other events that produce water that eventually runs off or evaporates are not sufficient to produce the requisite source-bacterial-group and are not considered a source location.
  • the site that includes the body of water or a portion of a body of water that satisfy the continuous head criteria must be dormant to produce a reasonable expectation for identifying a source location.
  • a dormant site has not been exposed to any man-made perturbations including but not limited to addition of waste or treatment chemicals for at least six months (e.g., at least nine months, at least one year, at least 15 months, at least 18 months, etc.).
  • a dormant site can have experienced natural changes to the site including but not limited to addition of water through storms or streams.
  • the area that has the continuous head of water also must contain HM or CHM between the average concentration and the highest concentration of HM or CHM observed within the polluted site to be considered a source location.
  • samples are taken from the source location (step 1 12).
  • the samples of the sediments and supernatant liquids in the source location are collected such that the samples contain water that is present in sediment particles as well as the solution immediately above the sediment particles.
  • it is desirable that the samples taken from the source location include such agglomerations.
  • the sampling technique must produce a heterogeneous mixture of sediment and supernatant liquid or a composite sample. Typically, a sample includes approximately one-third by volume wetted sediment and two-thirds by volume supernatant liquid.
  • Composite sampling is typically not used for bacterial examination given the composites will not facilitate the display of the range and variation of bacteria suspended in solution separate from the range and variation of bacteria included in the wetted sediment.
  • Composite sampling is the preferred sampling technique for the METHOD given the objective of the sample is obtain a collection of all potential source-bacterial-groups without concern for the relative proportions of those source-bacterial-groups representing the distribution in the source location.
  • a Bacterial Group is produced from the source-bacterial-groups present in the sample using a cultivation/enhancement process that includes a gradual increase of a representative specie of the HM or representative species of the CHM in the cultivation medium (Step 114).
  • the cultivation medium must not contain any substances that could potentially induce speciation of the bacteria or selective elimination of a particular species.
  • the representative HM or CHM species concentration is gradually increased until the desired HM or CHM resistance level is acquired.
  • the METHOD has been used successfully to produce HM or CHM resistances orders of magnitude higher than the contamination levels in the wastewater. This increased level of resistance facilitates the opportunity for incorporating HM or CHM contaminate concentration processes, like reverse osmosis, in the overall remediation process.
  • a process for concentrating the contaminates reduces the total volume of wastewater for treatment in the bioreactor that incorporates the Bacterial Group.
  • the potential for treating wastewater with higher concentrations of HM or CHM provides opportunity for treating larger flow rates of wastewater through a waste-water treatment facility with a relatively low flow rate bioreactor.
  • the sample is thoroughly mixed to maximize the concentration of source- bacterial-groups suspended in the solution. This mixing can be accomplished by hand through capping the sample then shaking and inverting the sample container several times, placing the sample container in a vortex mixer, or using other mixing techniques that agitate the sample to near homogeneity while mixing.
  • the heavy granular components of the composite sample will fall to the bottom of the container.
  • An inoculation loop is placed in the sample container and forced into the granular components until the loop is completely covered by the granular components.
  • the loop is extracted from the granular components, through the supernatant liquid, and out of the sample container. If solid particulates from the granular portion of the sample adhere to the loop, they should not be removed from the loop. These granules can be transferred to the growth medium without affecting the desired results of the METHOD.
  • the loop is subsequently immersed in a complex medium that will support all types of bacteria indigenous to the site from which the sample was obtained.
  • An example complex medium is Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. After the loop is immersed in the medium, gently swirl the loop to transfer the source-bacterial-groups and any particulates that adhere to the loop.
  • the source-bacterial-groups are allowed to grow in the inoculated broth for 24 hours.
  • the bacteria and broth after the 24-hour period are considered the stock solution for the initial step of the subsequent enhancement component of the process.
  • the following steps provide a general guideline for enhancing the heavy metal resistive properties of the source-bacterial-groups produced using the cultivation component of this process to ultimately produce the desired Bacterial Group.
  • the essential component of the enhancement is increasing the concentration of the contaminants at a slow enough rate that the source-bacterial-groups can naturally evolve to resist the contaminants at the desired concentration. Successive generations of the bacteria will successively express higher levels of heavy metal resistance when those heavy metals are stress factors for previous generations. It is essential not to increase the stress level at a rate faster than the resistance level can increase through this generational evolution.
  • a complex medium broth e.g. Luria-Bertani (LB) broth
  • a sufficient volume of a solution containing representative species of the HM (CHM) contaminate(s) in the wastewater is (are) added to the broth to create a solution with concentration(s) ten times the highest concentration(s) of HM (CHM) observed within the polluted site.
  • CHM HM
  • mercuric chloride could be used as a representative species of all the possible species of mercury in the wastewater. This initial broth with ten times the highest concentration of contaminates present in the polluted site is referenced as EB10.
  • a sufficient volume of EB 10 must be produced to allow for sequential dilutions of the EB10 to form a broth that includes 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0.5 times the highest concentration(s) of HM (CHM) observed within the polluted site.
  • CHM HM
  • These broth mixtures are referenced as EB9, EB8, EB7, EB6, EB5, EB4, EB3, EB2, EB 1, EB0.5.
  • Each of these broth solutions are inoculated with the stock solution produced in the initial cultivation step.
  • the extent of bacteria growth in each of the eleven inoculated broth mixtures is determined using a growth correlation with the difference of turbidity measurements at the start and end of the growth period.
  • the percent change in the concentration(s) of representative HM (CHM) in each inoculated broth mixture is determined through use of the appropriate EPA method(s).
  • the inoculated broth mixture that has the highest initial concentration(s) of representative HM or CHM, shows maximum growth, and maximum conversion of the HM or HM to their elemental form is used as the inoculant in subsequent enrichment steps.
  • EB0.5, EB 1, EB2, and EB3 show comparable growth while there is diminished or no growth in the other assays.
  • the percentage decrease in the concentration(s) of HM or CHM is approximately 90% for EB0.5, EB 1, and EB2 while the decrease is approximately 50% for EB3.
  • EB2 would be the inoculant for the subsequent enhancement steps.
  • a broth solution that includes ten times the concentration of representative species as present in the inoculant identified in step 2 is created. Dilutions of this broth solution with 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0.5 times the concentration of the representative species in the inoculant identified in step 2 are created. Each of these solutions is inoculated using the inoculant identified in step 2. Step 2 is repeated using the assays developed in this step for EB 10, EB9, EB8, EB7, EB6, EB5, EB4, EB3, EB2, EB1, EB0.5.
  • step 3 Repeat the sequence of step 2 followed by step 3 until an assay that resists the desired concentration(s) of HM or CHM is (are) produced or an assay that demonstrates maximum resistance is obtained.
  • the maximum resistance is identifiable when subsequent steps to increase the concentration of the contaminants in the growth medium result in diminished or no growth.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Purification Treatments By Anaerobic Or Anaerobic And Aerobic Bacteria Or Animals (AREA)
  • Removal Of Specific Substances (AREA)
  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne des systèmes et des procédés de bioremédiation qui peuvent être utilisés pour traiter des contaminants, notamment, par exemple, des métaux (par exemple, le mercure) ainsi que d'autres éléments qui sont considérés comme des métalloïdes et des non-métaux (par exemple, l'arsenic, le sélénium, etc.).
PCT/US2014/044064 2013-06-25 2014-06-25 Réduction de niveaux de contaminants WO2014210135A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361839336P 2013-06-25 2013-06-25
US61/839,336 2013-06-25

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014210135A2 true WO2014210135A2 (fr) 2014-12-31
WO2014210135A3 WO2014210135A3 (fr) 2016-06-16

Family

ID=51211346

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2014/044064 WO2014210135A2 (fr) 2013-06-25 2014-06-25 Réduction de niveaux de contaminants

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2014210135A2 (fr)

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006084261A2 (fr) * 2005-02-04 2006-08-10 E.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company Technique permettant d'accroitre la biodegradation de polyesters aliphatiques-aromatiques suflones par adjonction d'un consortium microbien
WO2010129743A1 (fr) * 2009-05-08 2010-11-11 Southern Research Institute Systèmes et procédés pour réduire l'émission de mercure
EP2474609A1 (fr) * 2011-01-05 2012-07-11 Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen Procédé pour l'évolution adaptative d'une cellule et la sélection d'un phénotype souhaité par la propagation en série dans système à base d'émulsion et utilisations correspondantes

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2014210135A3 (fr) 2016-06-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Karri et al. Critical review of abatement of ammonia from wastewater
Ighalo et al. A review of treatment technologies for the mitigation of the toxic environmental effects of acid mine drainage (AMD)
Tan et al. Selenium: environmental significance, pollution, and biological treatment technologies
Zhu et al. Using biochar capping to reduce nitrogen release from sediments in eutrophic lakes
US10227247B2 (en) Methods and systems for remediation of heavy metals in combustion waste
Foul et al. Primary treatment of anaerobic landfill leachate using activated carbon and limestone: batch and column studies
Kshirsagar Bioremediation of wastewater by using microalgae: an experimental study
Swami et al. Removal of contaminants from industrial wastewater through various non-conventional technologies: a review
Hill Review of available technologies for the removal of selenium from water
US20120145628A1 (en) Phytoremediation for desalinated water post-processing
El-Saadony et al. Hazardous wastes and management strategies of landfill leachates: A comprehensive review
Yan et al. Cadmium and mercury removal from non-point source wastewater by a hybrid bioreactor
Filote et al. Overview of using living and non-living microorganisms for the removal of heavy metals from wastewaters.
Lin et al. Reutilization of waste oyster shell as filler for filter for drinking water pretreatment: feasibility and implication
Aziz et al. Physico-chemical treatment of anaerobic landfill leachate using activated carbon and zeolite: Batch and column studies
CN1785827A (zh) 一种生活污水的处理方法
CN106630489A (zh) 一种去除含镉污水污染物的方法
Directo et al. Pilot plant study of physical-chemical treatment
WO2014210135A2 (fr) Réduction de niveaux de contaminants
US20190255372A1 (en) Methods and systems for remediation of heavy metals in combustion waste
Karnanta et al. Terraced Wetland Construction of Liquid Waste Pollution Countermeasures from Tofu Industry (Case Study of Tofu Industry in Mojosongo, Surakarta)
CN111807630A (zh) 一种高效除钼垂直潜流人工湿地净化装置
Gaydardjiev et al. Opportunities for using two low-cost methods for treatment of metal bearing aqueous streams
CN203728685U (zh) 有机污水一体化生物处理装置
Mahmood Phosphate removal from wastewater by furnace bottom ash

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14741477

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 14741477

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2