WO2014154305A1 - Method and apparatus for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units in a power supply system - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units in a power supply system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014154305A1
WO2014154305A1 PCT/EP2013/060865 EP2013060865W WO2014154305A1 WO 2014154305 A1 WO2014154305 A1 WO 2014154305A1 EP 2013060865 W EP2013060865 W EP 2013060865W WO 2014154305 A1 WO2014154305 A1 WO 2014154305A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
power
power supply
supply system
load
node
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2013/060865
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Ulrich Münz
Diego ROMERES
Original Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft filed Critical Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Publication of WO2014154305A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014154305A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/24Arrangements for preventing or reducing oscillations of power in networks

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and apparatus for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units in a power supply system and in particular to a high voltage power supply system.
  • An electrical power supply system or electrical grid is a network for delivering electricity or current from suppliers to consumers.
  • a power supply system comprises power genera ⁇ tion units that produce electrical power and power transmis- sion lines that transport the generated electrical power from the power generation units to loads.
  • power generation units can comprise as a high voltage power supply system hydroelectric plants, nuclear plants, coal plants as well as medium-sized power plants.
  • a high voltage power supply system comprises a transmission grid of power lines for distributing power over long distances.
  • Medium to low voltage power supply systems comprise a distribution grid to distribute power to consumers.
  • Power generation units, such as solar farms or wind farms can also be connected to the distribution grid.
  • the transmission network of the high voltage power supply system transports electrical power over long distances.
  • the electrical power Upon arrival at a substation the electrical power can be stepped down from a transmission voltage level to a distribution voltage level. Further, upon arrival at a service location, the electrical power can be stepped down again from the distribution voltage level to a required ser ⁇ vice voltage.
  • an optimal power generation assignment to different power generation units satisfying the power demand within the system is desired. As the supply and demand uncertainty increases due to the integration of variable gen ⁇ eration resources such as wind power or solar energy, unit commitment becomes an even more important task in electric power system operations.
  • Unit commitment is a task performed by system operators in a deregulated power supply system and has the objective to find a unit commitment schedule that minimizes the commitment and dispatch requirements of meeting a forecasted system load, taking into account various physi ⁇ cal, intertemporal constraints for generating resources, power transmission as well as system reliability require- ments.
  • the method of the present invention takes in addition load/generation step robustness constraints explicitly into account.
  • the task of unit commitment is performed by a control unit executing a unit commitment algorithm taking into account the physics of the power supply grid incorporat- ing power flow equations as constraints. These power flow constraints guarantee that the assigned power generation leads to a power supply system with a locally stable equilib ⁇ rium.
  • the power supply system can show a predetermined preferred behaviour.
  • This lo- cally stable equilibrium forms an operating point of the power supply system.
  • power supply system states of the power supply system eventually do converge to this locally stable equilibrium, i.e. how much the current power supply system behaviour may be different from a preferred behaviour such that this preferred behaviour is eventually achieved or reached.
  • This region around the equilibrium i.e. the behaviour from where the power supply system behaviour eventually reaches the preferred behaviour is also called the region of attraction.
  • a large generation step can be a result of fluctuating power generation of renewable energy resources like wind and solar power.
  • the load step can occur when a load connected to the power supply system is switched on or off.
  • a wind farm having a plurality of wind power generation units can also lead to load steps, for instance if the wind driving the blades of the power generation units diminishes briskly. If the load or generation steps are large they do heavily influence the equilibrium of the power supply system, i.e. the preferred behaviour of the power supply system.
  • the invention provides, according to a first aspect, a power supply system comprising a plurality of power generation units connected to each other via power lines and comprising at least one central control unit adapted to ad- just an active power generated by each power generation unit before occurrence of at least one load step and/or generation step within said power supply system to provide an admissible transition from a stable pre-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system to a stable post- load/generation step operating point of said power supply system.
  • the power genera ⁇ tion units form nodes of a power supply network which comprises power lines connecting the power generation units and a plurality of loads.
  • the power generation unit of a node comprises a synchronous gen ⁇ erator having an associated reference power, damping and in- ertia.
  • phase dynamics of each generator follow the differential equations:
  • M i is the inertia of said power generator at node i
  • p iL is a load at node i
  • b is the susceptance of a power line connecting said node with a neighboring node j of said power supply network, u t , are voltages at node i and its neighboring node j con ⁇ nected via said power line,
  • ⁇ ' ; , ⁇ J are phase angles at node i and its neighboring node j connected via said power line.
  • a bound of the maximum distance between the phase difference at the stable pre-load/generation step operating point before occurrence of the load/generation step and the phase difference 6 ⁇ ° (2) at the stable post-load/generation step oper ⁇ ating point after occurrence of the load/generation step is given by:
  • is the difference between ⁇ and ⁇
  • B T is an incidence matrix of the network topology of said power supply network
  • Laplacian matrix L B-diag(a ij )-B T ,
  • the admissible transition from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system is achieved if the following condition is fulfilled:
  • D. is the damping of said power generator at node i
  • M i is the inertia of said power generator at node i
  • B T is the incidence matrix of the network topology of said power supply network
  • i) is a pseudo-inverse of said power supply network' s
  • a ra ⁇ tio between a resistance and a reactance of a power line of said power supply system is close to zero.
  • the power supply network is a high voltage power supply network with a voltage level of at least 20kVolts.
  • the central control unit adjusts an active power generated by each power generation unit of said power supply system by controlling said power generation unit via a control data network or via power line communication.
  • a method for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units in a power supply system wherein an active power generated by each power generation unit of said power supply system is adjusted before occur- rence of at least one load/generation step within said power supply system to provide an admissible transition from a sta ⁇ ble pre-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system to a stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system.
  • the admissible transi ⁇ tion from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point is such that a power system blackout of said power supply system is avoided.
  • the ad ⁇ justment of the active power generated by each power genera ⁇ tion unit is performed periodically.
  • the adjustment of the active power generated by each power generation unit is performed in re ⁇ sponse to a monitored event within said power supply system.
  • the invention further provides, according to a third aspect, a control unit of a power supply system wherein said control unit is adapted to adjust an active power of power generation units before occurrence of at least one load/generation step within said power supply system to provide an admissible transition from a stable pre-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system to a stable post- load/generation step operating point of said power supply system.
  • the admissible transi ⁇ tion from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system is achieved if following condition is fulfilled: n / An. n ⁇ ⁇ ⁇
  • D. is the damping of said power generator at node i
  • M i is the inertia of said power generator at node i
  • B T is the incidence matrix of the network topology of said power supply network
  • is a pseudo-inverse of said power supply network's
  • Laplacian matrix L Bdiag(a ij )B T , wherein p is the vector of of normal-
  • Fig. 1 shows a diagram for illustrating a possible embodi- ment of a power supply system employing a method and apparatus for a load step robust unit commit ⁇ ment of power generation units according to the present invention.
  • the invention relates to a power supply system PSS comprising a plurality of power generation units PGU connected to each other via power lines of said power supply system.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates an exemplary implementation of a power supply system PSS having a plurality of power generation units PGU connected to each other via power lines.
  • the power supply system PSS shown in Fig. 1 comprises an electrical power supply grid for delivering elec ⁇ tricity from electrical suppliers to electrical consumers.
  • the power supply system comprises a transmission grid TG to which at least one distribution grid DG is connected.
  • the transmission grid TG is adapted to transport electrical power over longer dis ⁇ tances.
  • the transported electri- cal power can be stepped down from a transmission voltage level to a distribution voltage level.
  • An example for power generation units connected to the high voltage transmission grid TG are nuclear power plants NPP, hydroelectric power plants HEPP, medium-sized power plants MSPP, industrial power plants IPP, and coal power plants CPP as shown in Fig. 1.
  • Examples for power generation units PGU connected to the distribution grid DG can be city power plants CPP, solar farms SF as well as wind farms WF as shown in Fig. 1.
  • the transmission grid can comprise an extra high voltage transmission grid, for in- stance in a range of 265 to 275kV connected to a high-voltage power supply grid having a voltage level of HOkV and more.
  • the distribution grid DG can comprise a lower voltage level of for instance 50kV.
  • the distribution grid DG can comprise a city network and rural networks as well as single houses such as farms connected to the distribution grid DG as shown in Fig. 1.
  • industrial customers can be connected to the distribution grid.
  • At least one control unit CU can be provided which is adapted to adjust an active power gener ⁇ ated by each or at least by some power generation units PGU before occurrence of at least one load step and/or generation step within said power supply system PSS to provide an admis- sible transition from a stable pre-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system PSS to a stable post- load/generation step operating point of said power supply system PSS.
  • the control unit CU can be provided by a central control unit or formed by distributed control entities commu- nicating with each other by peer to peer mechanism.
  • the power generation units PGU form nodes of a power supply network which comprises power lines connecting the power gen- eration units and a plurality of loads L.
  • the loads L can be formed by factories connected to the transmission grid TG and/or to the distribution grid DG.
  • the loads L can be formed by consumers of the city or rural network connected to the distribution grid DG.
  • a method for a load step robust unit commitment of power gen ⁇ eration units in a power supply system PSS as shown in Fig. 1 is provided.
  • an active power gener ⁇ ated by each power generation unit PGU of the power supply system PSS is adjusted before occurrence of at least one load step and/or generation step within said power supply system to provide an admissible transition from a stable pre- load/generation step operating point of said power supply system to a stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system.
  • the method can be performed in a possible embodiment by a program executed by a processor of said control unit CU.
  • the control unit CU performs the task of unit commitment in the distributed power supply system PSS to calculate a unit commitment schedule that minimizes the commitment and dispatch requirements meeting a system load by taking into account various physical constraints of the gen ⁇ erating resources, i.e. power generation units PGU, power transmission as well as power supply system reliability re ⁇ quirements.
  • the control unit CU performs an adjustment of the active power generated by the power generation units if a load step or a generation step occurs in the power supply system PSS.
  • a load step can for instance occur when a load L such as a factory or a rural or city network connected to the power supply system PSS is switched on or off.
  • a generation step can occur when a power generation unit PGU such as a wind farm does no longer supply electrical power because there is no more wind.
  • a power generation unit PGU such as a wind farm does no longer supply electrical power because there is no more wind.
  • the control unit CU can set an operation point for a first power generation unit PGU1 to generate 10 Megawatt of electrical power, a second power generation unit PGU2 can generate 250 Megawatt, a third power generation unit PGU3 can generate power of 300 Megawatt etc.
  • This setting of the operation points of the different power generation units PGUs is performed in advance before a load or generation step Ap occurs in the power supply system PSS and is done in such a way that an admissible transition from the pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point is achieved.
  • the admissible transition from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point of the power supply system is achieved if the following condition is satisfied:
  • a.. b.. - u 1 . - uJ. with by being the susceptance of a power line connecting node i with a neighboring node j of said power supply network, u, u, being voltages at node i and its neighboring node j con- nected via said power line,
  • B T is the incidence matrix of the network topology of said power supply network
  • a general power grid or power supply system PSS can comprise synchronous generators and inverters as sources, asynchronous machines, rectifiers and passive loads as sinks, and purely inductive lines.
  • a simplified model for frequency stability analysis of this power supply grid is given by
  • f 0 50Hz
  • the set of neigh ⁇ bors of node i is N i .
  • p iL is the load at bus i
  • b y is the susceptance of the power line
  • u t ,Uj are the round ⁇ ed mean square (rms) values of the voltage at nodes i ,j .
  • This system can be transformed in a rotating frame where the rotation frequency is the steady state frequency ⁇ 0 + ⁇ ⁇ .
  • ⁇ ⁇ denotes the steady state frequency deviation from the nominal frequency f 0 .
  • the sum of in-flowing and out-flowing power of the power supply grid is zero, i.e.
  • ⁇ ⁇ — ⁇ TM denotes the constant steady state deviation be ⁇ tween ⁇ and 0j .
  • MA+DA PI (D,p 0 ) - ⁇ a, sin(# -#.) , (5)
  • phase differences of power generators that are not connected need not be bounded by arcsin( B 1 " L) p ) , i.e. ⁇ arcsin(
  • the equilibrium phase differences is denoted before and after the load step as 6 ⁇ (1) and 6 ⁇ (2) , respectively.
  • the distance between the equilibria 2) ⁇ > (i) is related to the load step Ap .
  • a locally asymptotically stable equilibrium exists after the load step if ⁇ ⁇ ( ⁇ + ⁇ ) ⁇ 1 and the equilibrium satisfies
  • the fulfilment of this condition can be calculated by a proc- essor or calculation unit of the control unit CU.
  • the power supply network is a high voltage power supply network having a voltage level of at least 20kVolts.
  • the control unit CU can be formed by a central control unit which adjusts an active power gen ⁇ erated by each or at least most power generation units PGU by controlling said power generation unit via a control data network or via power line communication PLC.
  • the adjusting of the active power generated by each power generation unit PGU is performed by the control unit CU periodically, for instance every day or every hour.
  • the adjustment of the active power generated by the power generation units PGU is per ⁇ formed in response to a monitored event within said power supply system PSS.
  • the following conditions (13) ensure that, after the load/generation step Ap , the dynamical system (1) has an asymptotically stable equilibrium and that the initial condition (12) lies inside the region of attraction of this equilibrium.
  • the power supply system PSS eventually shows a transition from the equilibrium before the load step to the equilibrium after the load step.
  • Condition (13c) and (13b) ensure that the equilibria before and after the load/generation step are lo ⁇ cally asymptotically stable and that the steady state phase differences before and after the load step are bounded by ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ .
  • Condition (13c) guarantees that the power supply system PSS evolves from one equilibrium to the other.
  • Condition (13) can be used to calculate a load/generation step robust unit commitment. Unit commitment usually opti ⁇ mizes the power generation with respect to the generation effort. Therefore, a cost or effort function C(p) can be de ⁇ fined as
  • condition (13) one can extend this to a
  • (16e) where (16a) achieves the minimization of the generation ef ⁇ fort, (16b) guarantees the matching between generated and consumed power with design parameter ⁇ , (16c) and (16d) guarantee bounded steady state phase differences before and after the load/generation step with the design parameter ⁇ ⁇ , and (16e) ensures a stable and reliable transient between the equilibria before and after the load/generation step Ap for all possible load/generation steps in a predefined set P , which is again an optimization parameter.
  • a set of admissible load/generation steps P can be defined or loaded.
  • the calculated solution is ⁇ *>0. If no solution exists, is looped back to the first step SI and a smaller set of missible load/generation steps P is defined. In a third step S3
  • the solution is p 0 . If no solution exists, it is looped back to step SI and a smaller set of admissible load/generation steps P is loaded.
  • the admissible load/generation step set P is a polytop
  • the infinitely many constraints in (17) and (19d) can replaced by the corresponding constraints of the corner points of the polytope.
  • (18) can be solved efficiently using convex optimization techniques.
  • the optimization problem (19) can also be solved efficiently using a convex optimization performed by a calculation entity of the control unit.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

A power supply system comprising a plurality of power generation units connected to each other via power lines and comprising at least one control unit adapted to adjust an active power generated by each power generation unit before occurrence of at least one load step and/or generation step within said power supply system to provide an admissible transition from a stable pre-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system to a stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system.

Description

Description
Method and apparatus for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units in a power supply system
The invention relates to a method and apparatus for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units in a power supply system and in particular to a high voltage power supply system.
An electrical power supply system or electrical grid is a network for delivering electricity or current from suppliers to consumers. A power supply system comprises power genera¬ tion units that produce electrical power and power transmis- sion lines that transport the generated electrical power from the power generation units to loads. There are different kinds of power generation units and loads. For instance, power generation units can comprise as a high voltage power supply system hydroelectric plants, nuclear plants, coal plants as well as medium-sized power plants. A high voltage power supply system comprises a transmission grid of power lines for distributing power over long distances. Medium to low voltage power supply systems comprise a distribution grid to distribute power to consumers. Power generation units, such as solar farms or wind farms, can also be connected to the distribution grid. The transmission network of the high voltage power supply system transports electrical power over long distances. Upon arrival at a substation the electrical power can be stepped down from a transmission voltage level to a distribution voltage level. Further, upon arrival at a service location, the electrical power can be stepped down again from the distribution voltage level to a required ser¬ vice voltage. In a power supply system, an optimal power generation assignment to different power generation units satisfying the power demand within the system is desired. As the supply and demand uncertainty increases due to the integration of variable gen¬ eration resources such as wind power or solar energy, unit commitment becomes an even more important task in electric power system operations. Unit commitment is a task performed by system operators in a deregulated power supply system and has the objective to find a unit commitment schedule that minimizes the commitment and dispatch requirements of meeting a forecasted system load, taking into account various physi¬ cal, intertemporal constraints for generating resources, power transmission as well as system reliability require- ments. The method of the present invention takes in addition load/generation step robustness constraints explicitly into account. Usually, the task of unit commitment is performed by a control unit executing a unit commitment algorithm taking into account the physics of the power supply grid incorporat- ing power flow equations as constraints. These power flow constraints guarantee that the assigned power generation leads to a power supply system with a locally stable equilib¬ rium. With the locally stable equilibrium, the power supply system can show a predetermined preferred behaviour. This lo- cally stable equilibrium forms an operating point of the power supply system. However, it is not clear which power supply system states of the power supply system eventually do converge to this locally stable equilibrium, i.e. how much the current power supply system behaviour may be different from a preferred behaviour such that this preferred behaviour is eventually achieved or reached. This region around the equilibrium, i.e. the behaviour from where the power supply system behaviour eventually reaches the preferred behaviour is also called the region of attraction.
The determination of this region of attraction is important for the power supply system control, especially if the power supply system is affected by a large load or generation step. A large generation step can be a result of fluctuating power generation of renewable energy resources like wind and solar power. The load step can occur when a load connected to the power supply system is switched on or off. A wind farm having a plurality of wind power generation units can also lead to load steps, for instance if the wind driving the blades of the power generation units diminishes briskly. If the load or generation steps are large they do heavily influence the equilibrium of the power supply system, i.e. the preferred behaviour of the power supply system.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to pro¬ vide a method and apparatus for a load step robust unit com- mitment of the power generation units within the power supply system.
This object is achieved by a power supply system comprising the features of claim 1.
Accordingly, the invention provides, according to a first aspect, a power supply system comprising a plurality of power generation units connected to each other via power lines and comprising at least one central control unit adapted to ad- just an active power generated by each power generation unit before occurrence of at least one load step and/or generation step within said power supply system to provide an admissible transition from a stable pre-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system to a stable post- load/generation step operating point of said power supply system. In a possible embodiment of the power supply system according to a first aspect of the present invention, the power genera¬ tion units form nodes of a power supply network which comprises power lines connecting the power generation units and a plurality of loads.
In a further possible embodiment of the power supply system according to the first aspect of the present invention, the power generation unit of a node comprises a synchronous gen¬ erator having an associated reference power, damping and in- ertia.
In a further possible embodiment of the power supply system according to the first aspect of the present invention, for each node of said power supply network, the phase dynamics of each generator follow the differential equations:
Mfi + Dfi = pi0 - PiL -∑bijUiUj sm(§ ,-¾)
Vi = {l ...«} wherein pi0 is the reference power of the power generator of node i,
Z . is the damping of said power generator at node i,
Mi is the inertia of said power generator at node i,
piL is a load at node i,
b;; is the susceptance of a power line connecting said node with a neighboring node j of said power supply network, ut, are voltages at node i and its neighboring node j con¬ nected via said power line,
θ ';, ΘJ are phase angles at node i and its neighboring node j connected via said power line.
In a further possible embodiment of the power supply system according to the first aspect of the present invention, a bound of the maximum distance between the phase difference at the stable pre-load/generation step operating point before occurrence of the load/generation step and the phase difference 6^°(2) at the stable post-load/generation step oper¬ ating point after occurrence of the load/generation step is given by:
max ΑΘ <
Figure imgf000006_0001
wherein Αθ is the difference between θ and θ , wherein BT is an incidence matrix of the network topology of said power supply network,
Z.is a pseudo-inverse of the power supply network's
Laplacian matrix L = B-diag(aij)-BT ,
wherein a,; = b;; -u;-uJ; ,
∑N
wnerem p is ne vector or p; u,p0) = pi0 - u{ ——, of normal- A- ized reference powers of each generator with Pi0=Pi0-piL where pj0 is the reference power of the power generator of node i and piL is a load at node i, and where D. is the damping of said power generator at node i, wherein Ap is the load/generation step occurring in the power supply system and
wherein 8 is the set of all generator pairs (i,j) that are connected by a power line.
In a further possible embodiment of the power supply system according to the first aspect of the present invention, the admissible transition from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system is achieved if the following condition is fulfilled:
Figure imgf000007_0001
' '' u=l 2 1 - max ψ1 L"p\l > ^(ρ + P)\l } < 2 [
Figure imgf000007_0002
wherein D. is the damping of said power generator at node i, Mi is the inertia of said power generator at node i,
a!; = b!; - U; - U; with
b;; being the susceptance of a power line connecting node i with a neighboring node j of said power supply network, ui Uj being voltages at node i and its neighboring node j con¬ nected via said power line,
wherein BT is the incidence matrix of the network topology of said power supply network,
i) is a pseudo-inverse of said power supply network' s
Laplacian matrix L = Bdiag(aij)BT , wherein p is the vector of pi(D, p0) = pi0 - Di of normal-
Figure imgf000008_0001
ized reference powers of each generator with Pi0 = Pi0 - piL where pj0 is the reference power of the power generator of node i and pjL is a load at node i, and where Z) is the damping of said power generator at node i,
wherein Ap is the load step occurring in said power supply system and 9 is a set of all expected load steps and
a being min,, a;; In a further possible embodiment of the power supply system according to the first aspect of the present invention, a ra¬ tio between a resistance and a reactance of a power line of said power supply system is close to zero. In a further possible embodiment of the power supply system according to the first aspect of the present invention, the power supply network is a high voltage power supply network with a voltage level of at least 20kVolts. In a further possible embodiment of the power supply system according to the first aspect of the present invention, the central control unit adjusts an active power generated by each power generation unit of said power supply system by controlling said power generation unit via a control data network or via power line communication.
According to a further second aspect of the present inven¬ tion, a method for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units in a power supply system is provided, wherein an active power generated by each power generation unit of said power supply system is adjusted before occur- rence of at least one load/generation step within said power supply system to provide an admissible transition from a sta¬ ble pre-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system to a stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system.
In a possible embodiment of the method according to the sec¬ ond aspect of the present invention, the admissible transi¬ tion from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point is such that a power system blackout of said power supply system is avoided.
In a still further possible embodiment of the method accord- ing to the second aspect of the present invention, the ad¬ justment of the active power generated by each power genera¬ tion unit is performed periodically.
In a further possible embodiment of the method according to the present invention, the adjustment of the active power generated by each power generation unit is performed in re¬ sponse to a monitored event within said power supply system.
The invention further provides, according to a third aspect, a control unit of a power supply system wherein said control unit is adapted to adjust an active power of power generation units before occurrence of at least one load/generation step within said power supply system to provide an admissible transition from a stable pre-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system to a stable post- load/generation step operating point of said power supply system. In a possible embodiment of the control unit according to the third aspect of the present invention, the admissible transi¬ tion from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system is achieved if following condition is fulfilled: n / An. n ΒτϋΑρ
(∑ X 2 +2(∑a,)arcsin2
i =l 2
2Λ/1-η αχ{| ?ΓΖ ΐΓ ΛΒ117(p + Ap }
≤ 2a[ ) ] , VAp e P
Figure imgf000010_0001
wherein D. is the damping of said power generator at node i, Mi is the inertia of said power generator at node i,
a,.. = h; -U;-u,. with
b;; being the susceptance of a power line connecting node i with a neighboring node j of said power supply network,
U- u■ being voltages at node i and its neighboring node j con- nected via said power line,
wherein BT is the incidence matrix of the network topology of said power supply network,
ύ is a pseudo-inverse of said power supply network's
Laplacian matrix L = Bdiag(aij)BT , wherein p is the vector of of normal-
Figure imgf000010_0002
ized reference powers of each generator with Pi0 = Pi0 -piL where pj0 is the reference power of the power generator of node i and pjL is a load at node i, and where Z . is the damping of said power generator at node i, wherein Ap is the load step occurring in said power supply system and 9 is a set of all expected load steps and
a being min.. a;; . In the following, possible embodiments of different aspects of the present invention are described in more detail with reference to the enclosed figure.
Fig. 1 shows a diagram for illustrating a possible embodi- ment of a power supply system employing a method and apparatus for a load step robust unit commit¬ ment of power generation units according to the present invention. In the following, different aspects of the present invention are described with reference to Fig. 1. The invention relates to a power supply system PSS comprising a plurality of power generation units PGU connected to each other via power lines of said power supply system. Fig. 1 illustrates an exemplary implementation of a power supply system PSS having a plurality of power generation units PGU connected to each other via power lines. The power supply system PSS shown in Fig. 1 comprises an electrical power supply grid for delivering elec¬ tricity from electrical suppliers to electrical consumers. In the exemplary implementation shown in Fig. 1, the power supply system comprises a transmission grid TG to which at least one distribution grid DG is connected. The transmission grid TG is adapted to transport electrical power over longer dis¬ tances. On arrival of a substation, the transported electri- cal power can be stepped down from a transmission voltage level to a distribution voltage level. There can be power generation units PGU connected to the transmission TG and power generation units PGU connected to the distribution grid DG as illustrated in Fig. 1. An example for power generation units connected to the high voltage transmission grid TG are nuclear power plants NPP, hydroelectric power plants HEPP, medium-sized power plants MSPP, industrial power plants IPP, and coal power plants CPP as shown in Fig. 1. Examples for power generation units PGU connected to the distribution grid DG can be city power plants CPP, solar farms SF as well as wind farms WF as shown in Fig. 1. The transmission grid can comprise an extra high voltage transmission grid, for in- stance in a range of 265 to 275kV connected to a high-voltage power supply grid having a voltage level of HOkV and more. The distribution grid DG can comprise a lower voltage level of for instance 50kV. The distribution grid DG can comprise a city network and rural networks as well as single houses such as farms connected to the distribution grid DG as shown in Fig. 1. Moreover, industrial customers can be connected to the distribution grid.
In the power supply system PSS comprising a plurality of power generation units PGU, at least one control unit CU can be provided which is adapted to adjust an active power gener¬ ated by each or at least by some power generation units PGU before occurrence of at least one load step and/or generation step within said power supply system PSS to provide an admis- sible transition from a stable pre-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system PSS to a stable post- load/generation step operating point of said power supply system PSS. The control unit CU can be provided by a central control unit or formed by distributed control entities commu- nicating with each other by peer to peer mechanism.
The power generation units PGU form nodes of a power supply network which comprises power lines connecting the power gen- eration units and a plurality of loads L. The loads L can be formed by factories connected to the transmission grid TG and/or to the distribution grid DG. Moreover, the loads L can be formed by consumers of the city or rural network connected to the distribution grid DG.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, a method for a load step robust unit commitment of power gen¬ eration units in a power supply system PSS as shown in Fig. 1 is provided. According to the method, an active power gener¬ ated by each power generation unit PGU of the power supply system PSS is adjusted before occurrence of at least one load step and/or generation step within said power supply system to provide an admissible transition from a stable pre- load/generation step operating point of said power supply system to a stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system. The method can be performed in a possible embodiment by a program executed by a processor of said control unit CU. The control unit CU performs the task of unit commitment in the distributed power supply system PSS to calculate a unit commitment schedule that minimizes the commitment and dispatch requirements meeting a system load by taking into account various physical constraints of the gen¬ erating resources, i.e. power generation units PGU, power transmission as well as power supply system reliability re¬ quirements. The control unit CU performs an adjustment of the active power generated by the power generation units if a load step or a generation step occurs in the power supply system PSS. A load step can for instance occur when a load L such as a factory or a rural or city network connected to the power supply system PSS is switched on or off. A generation step can occur when a power generation unit PGU such as a wind farm does no longer supply electrical power because there is no more wind. With the method and apparatus accord¬ ing to the present invention, it is possible to provide an admissible transition from a stable operating point before a load or generation step happens to a stable operating point after occurrence of the load or generation step. This is achieved by adjusting the active power generated by each power generation unit PGU in advance before the load or gen¬ eration step happens. For instance, the control unit CU can set an operation point for a first power generation unit PGU1 to generate 10 Megawatt of electrical power, a second power generation unit PGU2 can generate 250 Megawatt, a third power generation unit PGU3 can generate power of 300 Megawatt etc. This setting of the operation points of the different power generation units PGUs is performed in advance before a load or generation step Ap occurs in the power supply system PSS and is done in such a way that an admissible transition from the pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point is achieved. The admissible transition from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point of the power supply system is achieved if the following condition is satisfied:
Ap } ) ] , VAp e P
Figure imgf000014_0001
wherein Z). is the damping of said power generator at node i, Ml is the inertia of said power generator at node i,
a.. = b.. - u1. - uJ. with by being the susceptance of a power line connecting node i with a neighboring node j of said power supply network, u, u, being voltages at node i and its neighboring node j con- nected via said power line,
wherein BT is the incidence matrix of the network topology of said power supply network,
ΰ is a pseudo-inverse of said power supply network' s Lapla- cian matrix L = Bdiagaij)BT , wherein p is the vector of p; (D,p0) = pi0—Di of normal-
Figure imgf000015_0001
ized reference powers of each generator with Pio
Figure imgf000015_0002
where pi0 is the reference power of the power generator of node i and piL is a load at node i, and where D. is the damping of said power generator at node i,
wherein Ap is the load step occurring in said power supply system and 9 is a set of all expected load steps and
a being min,.. a;;
A general power grid or power supply system PSS can comprise synchronous generators and inverters as sources, asynchronous machines, rectifiers and passive loads as sinks, and purely inductive lines. A simplified model for frequency stability analysis of this power supply grid is given by
Figure imgf000015_0003
for i e N = {\,...,n} , where pi0,Di > 0, .≥ 0 , are the reference power as well as the damping and the inertia of the synchronous generators at node i . The voltage phase angle θ; of generator i is described in a coordinate frame rotating with the nomi¬ nal grid frequency, e.g. f0 = 50Hz
Figure imgf000016_0001
The set of neigh¬ bors of node i is Ni .Moreover, piL is the load at bus i, by, is the susceptance of the power line, and ut,Uj are the round¬ ed mean square (rms) values of the voltage at nodes i ,j . For ease of notation, one can define pi0 = pi0 - piL and aij=bijuiuj.
This system can be transformed in a rotating frame where the rotation frequency is the steady state frequency ω0 + ω .
Thereby, ω denotes the steady state frequency deviation from the nominal frequency f0. In steady state, the sum of in-flowing and out-flowing power of the power supply grid is zero, i.e.
N
∑∑biJuiuJsm(§:-e;) = 0, (2)
where θ—θ denotes the constant steady state deviation be¬ tween Θ and 0j .
Therefore, one has
Figure imgf000016_0002
from where one gets
(4)
Figure imgf000016_0003
The transformation in a rotating frame is θ; = - cot, = - co , and. /¾ = 6? and one obtains:
MA+DA = PI(D,p0) -∑a, sin(# -#.) , (5)
where
YN LP.0
Pi(D,Po) = pi0 - Di '° , (6)
depends on the dampings D = vec(Dj) and reference powers p0 = vec(pi0) . For ease of notation, one can write pi when the argument D, p0 is not important. Note that
Figure imgf000017_0001
= Q for all D and p0 .
The steady state is reached when all the generators rotate with the same frequency ω0 + ω , retaining constant phase differences θ (1)
Figure imgf000017_0002
= e;(X) , Vie{l,...,/i} if the power supply system PSS is asymptotically stable. The superscript is used to distinguish this equilibrium from another one defined later on. The equilibrium phase differences 0 m,i e N satisfy
Figure imgf000017_0003
for all IGN. This can be written in compact form as
p = B diagiay ) sm(BT0∞(l) ) , ( 8 ) where BT is the incidence matrix of the network topology, p = vec(pi ) , and θ∞{1) = vec(0 m) , respectively. A locally asymp¬ totically stable equilibrium < 1 and the equilibrium satisfies max|#. (1)|≤arcsin(||5 LT/?|| (9)
Thereby, L is the pseudo-inverse of the network' s Laplacian matrix L = B diag(ajJ)BT . Note that phase differences of power generators that are not connected need not be bounded by arcsin( B1 " L) p ) , i.e. < arcsin(||i?rL/?|| ) is not required for any
Figure imgf000018_0001
Now, when considering stepwise load and generation variations, these variations can be due to load changes or power drops in renewable energy sources, e.g. photovoltaic or wind power. These variations result in changes in pjL or pj0 , re¬ spectively, in Equation (1), or in pi in equation (5), see (6). Hence, a load/generation step is expressed as p + Ap .
The equilibrium phase differences is denoted before and after the load step as 6^(1) and 6^(2) , respectively. The distance between the equilibria 2) ΘΙ >(i) is related to the load step Ap . A locally asymptotically stable equilibrium exists after the load step if Βτ (ρ + Αρ) ≤1 and the equilibrium satisfies
Figure imgf000019_0001
Moreover, one can derive the following bound on the distance between the equilibria
BTI Ap
max ΑΘ; < 2 arcsin( (11)
2J1 - maxilla J' ,
Figure imgf000019_0002
+ Apf }
The fulfilment of this condition can be calculated by a proc- essor or calculation unit of the control unit CU.
In a preferred embodiment of the power supply system PSS ac¬ cording to the present invention, a ratio between a reactance and an impedance of a power line within said power supply system PSS is close to zero. Accordingly, in a possible em- bodiment, the power supply network is a high voltage power supply network having a voltage level of at least 20kVolts. In a possible embodiment, the control unit CU can be formed by a central control unit which adjusts an active power gen¬ erated by each or at least most power generation units PGU by controlling said power generation unit via a control data network or via power line communication PLC. In a possible embodiment, the adjusting of the active power generated by each power generation unit PGU is performed by the control unit CU periodically, for instance every day or every hour. In an alternative embodiment, the adjustment of the active power generated by the power generation units PGU is per¬ formed in response to a monitored event within said power supply system PSS. Now, conditions for load/generations step robustness are pro¬ vided. The case that the system (1) is in a steady state be¬ fore the load generation step is considered, i.e.
<¾(0) = <¾ <¾ (0) = 0 . (12)
The load/generation step occurs at time t = 0, i.e. (12) is the initial condition of the dynamical system (1) with pi0 replaced by pi0 + Api0 . The following conditions (13) ensure that, after the load/generation step Ap , the dynamical system (1) has an asymptotically stable equilibrium and that the initial condition (12) lies inside the region of attraction of this equilibrium. In other words, the power supply system PSS eventually shows a transition from the equilibrium before the load step to the equilibrium after the load step.
Βτΰρ
Figure imgf000020_0001
i =\ -max{ ?^V ,W V (p + M }
< 2q[M - + Ap)\\ ) ] , (13c;
Figure imgf000020_0002
where a = va ;i a;i . Conditions (13c) and (13b) ensure that the equilibria before and after the load/generation step are lo¬ cally asymptotically stable and that the steady state phase differences before and after the load step are bounded by γ < \ . Condition (13c) guarantees that the power supply system PSS evolves from one equilibrium to the other. Condition (13) can be used to calculate a load/generation step robust unit commitment. Unit commitment usually opti¬ mizes the power generation with respect to the generation effort. Therefore, a cost or effort function C(p) can be de¬ fined as
C(p) =∑c1(p10) , (14)
where c^p^) is the effort of generating power p10 at genera¬ tor i . In order to guarantee power production according to the power consumption, an inequality constraint can be added
Figure imgf000021_0001
for some ε > 0. Note that the mismatch between generation and consumption, i.e. J¾0 + piL , directly influences the steady state frequency deviation co . Therefore, ε should be small.
Using condition (13), one can extend this to a
load/generation step robust unit commitment:
(16a)
Figure imgf000021_0002
< arccosiW>TT†i/p + Ap) ) ] , VAp
Figure imgf000022_0001
e P
(16e) where (16a) achieves the minimization of the generation ef¬ fort, (16b) guarantees the matching between generated and consumed power with design parameter ε, (16c) and (16d) guarantee bounded steady state phase differences before and after the load/generation step with the design parameter γ <\ , and (16e) ensures a stable and reliable transient between the equilibria before and after the load/generation step Ap for all possible load/generation steps in a predefined set P , which is again an optimization parameter.
The optimization problem (16) is quite complex because of the nonlinear constraint (16e). This constraint can be simplified by using (16c) and (16d) leading to the following more conservative constraint:
Figure imgf000022_0002
< 2α[Λ/ΐ - γ2 - γ arccosO )] , \/Δρ e Ρ (17)
because -/l - χ2 - χ arccos(/} ) is decreasing for ^ £ (0,1) .
The optimization problem (16) with (17) can be solved as fol lows for given ci , piL, s,B,aij Mi, Di :
In a first step SI a set of admissible load/generation steps P can be defined or loaded.
In a second step S2
Figure imgf000023_0001
s.t. (17) holds (18b) is calculated by a processor.
The calculated solution is γ*>0. If no solution exists, is looped back to the first step SI and a smaller set of missible load/generation steps P is defined. In a third step S3
Figure imgf000023_0002
Βτϋρ (19c) +Ap)\\ <γ* , VApsP (19d)
Figure imgf000023_0003
is calculated by the calculation unit or processor.
The solution is p0 . If no solution exists, it is looped back to step SI and a smaller set of admissible load/generation steps P is loaded.
If the admissible load/generation step set P is a polytop then the infinitely many constraints in (17) and (19d) can replaced by the corresponding constraints of the corner points of the polytope. In this case, (18) can be solved efficiently using convex optimization techniques. If, moreover, the effort functions ci are convex, then the optimization problem (19) can also be solved efficiently using a convex optimization performed by a calculation entity of the control unit.

Claims

Claims
A power supply system (PSS) comprising a plurality of power generation units (PGU) connected to each other via power lines and comprising
at least one control unit (CU) adapted to adjust an ac¬ tive power generated by each power generation unit (PGU) before occurrence of at least one load step and/or gen¬ eration step within said power supply system (PSS) to provide an admissible transition from a stable pre¬ load/generation step operating point of said power supply system (PSS) to a stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system (PSS) .
The power supply system according to claim 1, wherein said power generation units (PGU) form nodes of a power supply network which comprises power lines connecting the power generation units (PGU) and a plurality of loads.
The power supply system according to claim 1, wherein the power generation unit (PGU) of a node comprises a syn¬ chronous generator having an associated reference power, damping and inertia.
The power supply system according to claim 1, wherein for each node of said power supply network (PSS) , the phase dynamics of each generator follow the differential equa¬ tions :
Mfi + Dfi = pi0 - PiL -∑b,uiUj sin(# -¾ ) , wherein pi0 is the reference power of the power generator of said node i,
piL is a load at node i,
Z. is the damping of said power generator at node i, Mi is the inertia of said power generator at node i, b;; is the susceptance of a power line connecting said node i with a neighboring node j of said power supply network,
ut, Uj are voltages at node i and its neighboring node j connected to each other via said power line,
θ ';, ΘJ are phase angles at node i and its neighboring node j connected to each other via said power line.
The power supply system according to claim 4, wherein a bound of the maximum distance of ( θ ) between the phase difference ( ) at the stable pre-load step operating point before occurrence of the load step ( Ap ) and the phase difference ( 6^°(2) ) at the stable post-load step op¬ erating point after occurrence of the load step ( Ap ) is given by:
BT ΰ Ap
max ΑΘ; < 2 arcsin(-
2J1 - max{||5rZp|rW U(p + ApW }
wherein ΑΘ- is the difference between θ and θ , wherein BT is an incidence matrix of the network topology of said power supply system,
ϋ is a pseudo-inverse of the power supply network' s Laplacian matrix L = B diagia^B1 , wherein a;; = b;; u; ,u;, wherein p is the vector of p;{D,p0) = pi0 - Di r- malized reference powers of each generator wi
Figure imgf000027_0001
where pj0 is the reference power of the power generator of node i and pjL is a load at node i, and where Z) is the damp¬ ing of said power generator at node i,
wherein Ap is the load step occurring in said power supply system and
wherein 8 is the set of all generator pairs (i,j) that are connected by a power line.
The power supply system according to claim 5, wherein the admissible transition from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system is achieved if the following condition is satisfied:
Figure imgf000027_0002
< + Ap)\\ arccos(|5'V(p + Ap)\\ ) ] , VAp e P
Figure imgf000027_0003
wherein D. is the damping of said power generator at node i,
Mi is the inertia of said power generator at node i, a;; = b;; - U; - U; with
b;; being the susceptance of a power line connecting node i with a neighboring node j of said power supply system, ui Uj being voltages at node i and its neighboring node j connected via said power line,
wherein BT is the incidence matrix of the network topol¬ ogy of said power supply system,
ϋ is a pseudo-inverse of said power supply network' s Laplacian matrix L = Bdiag{ai])BT , wii(d.L(d±ii p ±t> Liie veuLUi u i of nor-
Figure imgf000028_0001
malized reference powers of each generator with
where pm is the reference power of the power generator of node i and piL is a load at node i, and where D. is the damping of said power generator at node i,
wherein Ap is the load step occurring in said power supply system and 9 is a set of all expected load steps and a being min,.. a;;
The power supply system according to claim 1, wherein a ratio between a resistance and a reactance of a power line within said power supply system (PSS) is close to zero .
The power supply system according to claim 7, wherein said power supply system (PSS) comprises a high voltage power supply network with a voltage level of at least 20kVolts .
9. The power supply system according to claim 1, wherein said control unit (CU) adjusts an active power generated by each power generation unit (PGU) by controlling said power generation unit (PGU) via a control data network or via power line communication.
10. A method for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units (PGU) in a power supply system (PSS) , wherein an active power generated by each power genera¬ tion unit (PGU) of said power supply system (PSS) is ad¬ justed before occurrence of at least one load step and/or generation step within said power supply system (PSS) to provide an admissible transition from a stable pre¬ load/generation step operating point of said power supply system (PSS) to a stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system (PSS) . 11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the admissible transition from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point is such that it avoids a power system blackout of said power supply system (PSS) .
12. The method according to claim 10, wherein the adjusting of the active power generated by each power generation unit (PGU) is performed periodically or in response to a monitored event within said power supply system (PSS) .
13. A control unit of a power supply system,
said control unit (CU) being adapted to adjust an active power of power generation units (PGU) before occurrence of at least one load step and/or generation step within said power supply system (PSS) to provide an admissible transition from a stable pre-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system (PSS) to a stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system (PSS) .
The control unit according to claim 13, wherein the admissible transition from the stable pre-load/generation step operating point to the stable post-load/generation step operating point of said power supply system (PSS) is achieved if the following condition is satisfied:
Figure imgf000030_0001
p e P
wherein D. is the damping of said power generator at node i,
Mi is the inertia of said power generator at node i,
Figure imgf000030_0002
b y„ being the susceptance of a power line connecting node i with a neighboring node j of said power supply network, ui Uj being voltages at node i and its neighboring node j connected via said power line,
wherein BT is the incidence matrix of the network topology of said power supply system,
ϋ is a pseudo-inverse of said power supply network' s Laplacian matrix L = Bdiag{aIJ )BT , wherein p is the vector of p; (D,p0) = pi0 of nor-
Figure imgf000030_0003
malized reference powers of each generator with pi0 = pi0 -piL where pj0 is the reference power of the power generator of node i and piL is a load at node i, and where D. is the damp¬ ing of said power generator at node i,
wherein Ap is the load step occurring in said power supply system and 9 is a set of all expected load steps and a being min,.. a„ .
PCT/EP2013/060865 2013-03-28 2013-05-27 Method and apparatus for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units in a power supply system WO2014154305A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13161518.9 2013-03-28
EP13161518 2013-03-28

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014154305A1 true WO2014154305A1 (en) 2014-10-02

Family

ID=48045284

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2013/060865 WO2014154305A1 (en) 2013-03-28 2013-05-27 Method and apparatus for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units in a power supply system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2014154305A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104767225A (en) * 2015-03-11 2015-07-08 国家电网公司 Calculation method for generator set output in electric system recovery
CN104951614A (en) * 2015-06-30 2015-09-30 国家电网公司 EV-charging-controllability considered unit combination model and modeling method
CN106452238A (en) * 2016-10-10 2017-02-22 国家电网公司 Parameter setting method of Siemens PSS3B model
CN108054767A (en) * 2017-12-08 2018-05-18 囯网河北省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 Consider the PSS parameter setting method of multi-operating condition dynamic stability demand
US10418822B2 (en) 2017-02-14 2019-09-17 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Energy production and frequency regulation Co-optimization for power generation systems
CN110808595A (en) * 2019-11-20 2020-02-18 国家电网公司华中分部 Method for coordinately optimizing transient stability and dynamic stability of excitation gain

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5483462A (en) * 1990-05-07 1996-01-09 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. On-line method for determining power system transient stability
US20030200010A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2003-10-23 Hsiao-Dong Chiang Method and system for on-line dynamical screening of electric power system
EP1418477A1 (en) * 2002-11-06 2004-05-12 Abb Research Ltd. Method for controlling an electric power transmission network
US20110022240A1 (en) * 2009-07-23 2011-01-27 Athula Dayanarth Rajapaske Rotor Angle Stability Prediction Using Post Disturbance Voltage Trajectories

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5483462A (en) * 1990-05-07 1996-01-09 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. On-line method for determining power system transient stability
US20030200010A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2003-10-23 Hsiao-Dong Chiang Method and system for on-line dynamical screening of electric power system
EP1418477A1 (en) * 2002-11-06 2004-05-12 Abb Research Ltd. Method for controlling an electric power transmission network
US20110022240A1 (en) * 2009-07-23 2011-01-27 Athula Dayanarth Rajapaske Rotor Angle Stability Prediction Using Post Disturbance Voltage Trajectories

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104767225A (en) * 2015-03-11 2015-07-08 国家电网公司 Calculation method for generator set output in electric system recovery
CN104951614A (en) * 2015-06-30 2015-09-30 国家电网公司 EV-charging-controllability considered unit combination model and modeling method
CN106452238A (en) * 2016-10-10 2017-02-22 国家电网公司 Parameter setting method of Siemens PSS3B model
CN106452238B (en) * 2016-10-10 2018-08-10 国家电网公司 A kind of Siemens PSS3B model parameter setting methods
US10418822B2 (en) 2017-02-14 2019-09-17 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Energy production and frequency regulation Co-optimization for power generation systems
CN108054767A (en) * 2017-12-08 2018-05-18 囯网河北省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 Consider the PSS parameter setting method of multi-operating condition dynamic stability demand
CN108054767B (en) * 2017-12-08 2019-11-22 囯网河北省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 Consider the PSS parameter setting method of multi-operating condition dynamic stability demand
CN110808595A (en) * 2019-11-20 2020-02-18 国家电网公司华中分部 Method for coordinately optimizing transient stability and dynamic stability of excitation gain

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Cheng et al. To centralize or to distribute: That is the question: A comparison of advanced microgrid management systems
Zhou et al. Optimal consensus-based distributed control strategy for coordinated operation of networked microgrids
Yang et al. Adaptive reactive power control of PV power plants for improved power transfer capability under ultra-weak grid conditions
Dam et al. A power distributed control method for proportional load power sharing and bus voltage restoration in a DC microgrid
Wang et al. Two-level distributed volt/var control using aggregated PV inverters in distribution networks
Yang et al. Power control flexibilities for grid‐connected multi‐functional photovoltaic inverters
Golsorkhi et al. A distributed control framework for integrated photovoltaic-battery-based islanded microgrids
Xiao et al. Multi-level energy management system for real-time scheduling of DC microgrids with multiple slack terminals
KR101689315B1 (en) System and method for controlling in multi-frequency microgrid
Chen et al. Multiagent-based reactive power sharing and control model for islanded microgrids
EP3472908A1 (en) An energy management system and method for grid-connected and islanded micro-energy generation
WO2014154305A1 (en) Method and apparatus for a load step robust unit commitment of power generation units in a power supply system
Ku et al. Coordination of PV inverters to mitigate voltage violation for load transfer between distribution feeders with high penetration of PV installation
US20140265567A1 (en) Power clipping method and system
Tuckey et al. Decentralized control of a microgrid
Satish et al. Control of microgrid—A review
Meegahapola et al. Synchronous islanded operation of an inverter interfaced renewable rich microgrid using synchrophasors
Mohd et al. Supervisory control and energy management of an inverter-based modular smart grid
Nguyen et al. Leader-following diffusion-based reactive power coordination and voltage control of offshore wind farm
US10411469B2 (en) Reactive power control integrated with renewable energy power invertor
Aluko et al. A review of the control system roles in Integrating renewable energy into the national grid
Mai et al. Consensus-based distributed control for overvoltage mitigation in LV microgrids
Josep et al. Hierarchical control of power plants with microgrid operation
Hertem et al. Power system operations with HVDC grids
Xavier et al. Smart inverters in LV networks: a review of international codes and standards, and opportunities for South Africa

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 13729618

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 13729618

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1