WO2014127338A1 - Procédé et système pour la projection optimisée dans un système de développement multidisciplinaire - Google Patents

Procédé et système pour la projection optimisée dans un système de développement multidisciplinaire Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014127338A1
WO2014127338A1 PCT/US2014/016784 US2014016784W WO2014127338A1 WO 2014127338 A1 WO2014127338 A1 WO 2014127338A1 US 2014016784 W US2014016784 W US 2014016784W WO 2014127338 A1 WO2014127338 A1 WO 2014127338A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
domain
representation
projection
translating
object representation
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2014/016784
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Oswin Noetzelmann
Rami Reuveni
Victor Robert HAMBRIDGE
Marine DUREL
Tim OERTER
Christopher Patrick PORTWAY, JR.
Dirk VIELSAECKER
Sarvananthan RAGAVAN
Andrew DYLLA
Daniela Stederoth
Original Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. filed Critical Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Publication of WO2014127338A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014127338A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/101—Collaborative creation, e.g. joint development of products or services

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to multidisciplinary engineering systems.
  • a multi-disciplinary engineering system is a system that allows engineers f om multiple disciplines to work on common or connected data. For example, a factory planner can work together with a mechanical engineer, an electrical engineer and an automation engineer to plan a new production line for a car door assembly.
  • An example of a multi-disciplinary engineering system 100 is shown in FIG. 1.
  • Data connections between the different disciplines can potentially be used to allow the system to support various functions such as notification/communication between disciplines (e.g., departments), change propagation (e.g., rule based), formalization of workflows (e.g., sign off procedures), multi-disciplinary report generation and usage of interdisciplinary common data structures.
  • disciplines e.g., departments
  • change propagation e.g., rule based
  • formalization of workflows e.g., sign off procedures
  • multi-disciplinary report generation and usage of interdisciplinary common data structures e.g., multi-disciplinary report generation and usage of interdisciplinary common data structures.
  • 3D model in the simulation domain it is also a 3D model but with kinematics
  • Some domains also have multiple representations, for example, the automation domain may need another representation of the robot which could be a logical 2D symbol for example.
  • the domain specific representations are not created all at once, but are usually created in an order dominated by the workflow of the domains. For example, early planning representations used to represent cost factors exist before any detailed mechanical or electrical design is created. In addition, representations can evolve, for example, a rough sketch of an object can provide the basis for detailed modeling.
  • the domain specific applications are only able to understand the representations of their domain, yet they benefit from knowing about other domain's representations, for example, to use pre-existing data for creating a representation.
  • the Domain Engineer takes the representation from Domain 2 and manually creates a representation for Domain 1.
  • a method for optimized projection in a multidisciplinary engineering system comprising: identifying an object representation in a first domain; and automatically projecting the object representation to a second domain, wherein the first and second domains are included in a multidisciplinary engineering system, and wherein the projecting includes translating the object representation in the first domain to the second domain.
  • the object representation in the first domain includes a multidimensional model of the object.
  • the object representation in the first domain includes a collection of data input for the object.
  • the object is represented in three-dimensions in the first domain and two-dimensions in the second domain.
  • the projection of the object is orthographic or perspective.
  • the translating includes removing details of the object.
  • the translating includes preserving an outline of the object.
  • the translating includes using meta-data of the object to determine which aspects of the object are to be projected to the second domain.
  • a system for optimized projection in a multidisciplinary engineering system comprising: a memory device for storing a program; a processor in communication with the memory device, the processor operative with the program to: identify an object representation in a first domain; and automatically project the object representation to a second domain, wherein the first and second domains are included in a
  • the projecting includes translating the object representation in the first domain to the second domain.
  • the object representation in the first domain includes a multidimensional model of the object.
  • the object representation in the first domain includes a collection of data input for the object
  • the object is represented in three-dimensions in the first domain and two-dimensions in the second domain.
  • the translating includes removing details of the object.
  • the translating includes preserving an outline of the object.
  • the translating includes using meta-data of the object to determine which aspects of the object are to be projected to the second domain.
  • a computer program product for optimized projection in a multidisciplinary engineering system comprising: a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having computer readable program code embodied therewith, the computer readable program code comprising: computer readable program code configured to perform the steps of: identifying an object representation in a first domain; and automatically projecting the object representation to a second domain, wherein the first and second domains are included in a multidisciplinary engineering system, and wherein the projecting includes translating the object representation in the first domain to the second domain.
  • the object representation in the first domain includes a multidimensional model of the object.
  • the object is represented in three-dimensions in the first domain and two-dimensions in the second domain.
  • the translating includes preserving an outline of the object.
  • the translating includes using meta-data to determine which aspects of the object are to be projected to the second domain and introduce visual constructs to the object in the second domain.
  • the steps further comprising adding color to the object represented in the second domain, wherein the color is indicative of information lost in the projection.
  • the object in the first domain is projected larger in the second domain than it is in the first domain or projected smaller in the second domain than it is in the first domain.
  • FIG. 1 is an example of a multidisciplinary engineering system
  • FIG. 2 is an example of traditional domain engineering
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a projection method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an implementation of a task system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a computer system in which an exemplary embodiment of the present invention may be implemented.
  • the present invention discloses a system and method that allows taking an object representation across domain borders in a controlled and automated way.
  • Several engineering domains utilize 2D plans to visualize complex data.
  • plant layout plans are used in various domains, including the automation domain.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a projection method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is an example of the use of the Optimized Projection Method between two Domains 1 (320a) and 2 (320b) within a Multi-Disciplinary Engineering System 310.
  • the object "Conveyor” 330b is represented in Domain 2 (e.g. Mechanical engineering) as a 3D model.
  • the Optimized Projection Method 340 generates, from this 3D model, a 2D symbol for the object "Conveyor” 330a, used in Domain 1 (e.g. Automation Engineering).
  • the Domain Engineer 350 can control the output of this automated generation through settings and parameters 360 (e.g. geometric lines thickness, enlargement etc.).
  • the core of the invention is a projection mechanism.
  • a projection that works for objects that are described in the source domain in three dimensions and need representation in a two dimensional form in the target domain.
  • a different form of projection is used. For example, from a two dimensional form to a different two dimensional form or from a three dimensional form to an isometric form, and so on.
  • the 3D to 2D projection can either be orthographic or perspective based on a three dimensional object that is described as a faceted body, a wire rame or a real solid with feature based description.
  • the main wireframe lines may have to be approximated, so that the wireframe can be used for projection, because it is the most useful source data.
  • the choice of a viewpoint is important in a projection, especially a perspective based projection.
  • the viewpoint defines the outline form and details visible on the projection result.
  • the exact viewpoint position is configurable, but in this method a standard is to use a center top view position for projection that intends to produce symbols for 2D layout plans.
  • a problem of a projection method is that it produces results that are very heavy in terms of number of details. And many of the details are irrelevant and need to be removed, to allow for high performance and clear identification of the object.
  • Examples for details that should be removed are lines or connected groups of lines. The following are methods to remove details based on the viewpoint chosen and can be applied in an automatic process.
  • the outline preservation is optional but if used, it can be used as an additional check before any geometric detail is removed.
  • the algorithm for the check investigates the piece of geometry in question and uses multiple measures to find out if the geometric detail is part of the outline. For that it find connections to other geometry groups and rates the possibility high, if it is close to or connected to geometries that are also rated as outline geometries.
  • the algorithm also uses a method that measures the relative distance to a (weighted) center-point of the geometry. This relative distance is compared to other geometries that can be found in the same angular direction outgoing from the center-point. A greater distance and width (relative to 90 degrees of the center-point angle) is used as an indicator for being part of the outline (versus the compared geometries in the same angular direction from the center-point).
  • meta-data exists for most objects in a multi-disciplinary engineering system.
  • This meta-data can also be used in the process of projection and geometry simplification. This is possible in all cases where a data model exists in which geometries themselves (or are connected to) objects that hold additional attributes/properties, have relationships to other objects and/or are part of an object oriented class model.
  • the projection mechanism can use configurable rules that depend on the connected meta-data to decide if a piece of geometry can be removed or needs to be preserved.
  • a rule could be that in a hierarchy of geometries, all geometries are to be preserved that have a classification of a sensor. So when a projection of a complex object with a hierarchical structure is being made, say a conveyor, then all the geometry of all sensor sub-objects that are part of the conveyor structure will be preserved. Further, the meta-data or rules in the projection process can not only decide which "aspects of an object are to be projected," but also introduce additional visual constructs, such as textual labels. Those are not necessarily part of the visual representation of the object in the first domain but can be introduced in the projection process.
  • meta-data can be used in the projection method.
  • Another way the meta-data can be utilized is to bring in additional geometries. For example, one text-geometry is added to the projection that displays a certain property value that can be found somewhere in the attached data. For example, the user configures the projection mechanism to add a display of the name and a value of the property 'Throughput" and "Speed" when doing the projection of a conveyor.
  • Another example could be that the color of a projection of a sensor is determined to be red or green, dependent on if the sensor object has established a relationship to an object of type PLC.
  • the depth information can be preserved and transformed into different information during the projection.
  • the depth information can be stored into the meta-data model, e.g., properties on objects, or it can be used to impact the projected geometry, e.g., change its color.
  • the projected parts of the upper parts could be colored brighter than the lower parts because they are closer to the viewpoint during projection (viewpoint dependent depth). It could also be possible to use viewpoint independent depth information (using absolute coordinates).
  • Another coloring mechanism can work based on geometry delineation. That means wherever a lot of geometry "clutter" is left over, the geometry elements are colored to stand out more. For example, if multiple lines are overlapping in a certain section of the geometry, these lines can be identified and colored in different colors, so that they stand out more. Scale is an important consideration when projecting anything for symbolic purposes. In many symbolic layout plans, it is useful to not be true to scale, but rather have logical representations for objects that are clearly visible and provide an easy overview of a system.
  • the projection mechanism provides a configuration option that allows for normalizing the scale of objects during projection. This means that very small objects are projected bigger than they are in the projection source and very big objects are projected smaller.
  • the scale normalization is controlled through a configurable value that indicates the maximum factor that the biggest object can vary from the smallest.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example implementation of the Optimized Projection System in the context of a Multi-Disciplinary Engineering System.
  • the different engineering applications 420a-c are connected to the Teamcenter server 430, containing the multi-disciplinary engineering system server part 440, but also hosting the data 450a-e.
  • the engineering applications 420a-c communicate with the server 430 through a network 460.
  • the Optimized Projection System 480 takes the object 3D model 470 from the NX Mechanical CAD application 420a and generates a 2D symbol 490 for the Automation Designer application 420b.
  • engineering efforts may be reduced. For example, by utilizing the novel projection mechanism, engineers can save a large portion of the time that consumes processes of abstracting a representation from one engineering domain to another.
  • the automatic process replaces the manual process that can take weeks of engineering time for tailoring domain representations for objects.
  • the plant can start production earlier.
  • errors may be reduced. Additional benefits may arise from the fact that an automatic process is less error prone than a manual abstraction step.
  • flexible projection Even though automatic in nature, the process of projection can be controlled by the aforementioned many configuration options to adopt the needs for the specific domain and object model.
  • integration with existing applications is possible.
  • aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a "circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
  • the computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium.
  • a computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory
  • a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
  • a computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof.
  • a computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
  • Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RP, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
  • Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the "C"
  • the program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server.
  • the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • Internet Service Provider for example, AT&T, MCI, Sprint, EarthLink, MSN, GTE, etc.
  • These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article or manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • the computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • a computer system 501 can comprise, inter alia, a central processing unit (CPU) 502, a memory 503 and an input/output (I/O) interface 504.
  • the computer system 501 is generally coupled through the I/O interface 504 to a display 505 and various input devices 506 such as a mouse and keyboard.
  • the support circuits can include circuits such as cache, power supplies, clock circuits, and a communications bus.
  • the memory 503 can include RAM, ROM, disk drive, tape drive, etc., or a combination thereof. Exemplary embodiments of present invention may be implemented as a routine 507 stored in memory 503 (e.g., a non-transitory
  • the computer system 501 is a general-purpose computer system that becomes a specific purpose computer system when executing the routine 507 of the present invention.
  • the computer system 501 also includes an operating system and
  • micro-instruction code The various processes and functions described herein may either be part of the micro-instruction code or part of the application program (or a combination thereof) which is executed via the operating system.
  • various other peripheral devices may be connected to the computer system 501 such as an additional data storage device and a printing device.
  • each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s).
  • the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Processing Or Creating Images (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé pour la projection optimisée dans un système de développement multidisciplinaire consistant à identifier une représentation d'objet dans un premier domaine (470) et à projeter automatiquement (480) la représentation d'objet vers un second domaine (490), les premier et second domaines étant inclus dans un système de développement multidisciplinaire, et la projection consistant en la translation de la représentation d'objet du premier domaine vers le second domaine.
PCT/US2014/016784 2013-02-18 2014-02-18 Procédé et système pour la projection optimisée dans un système de développement multidisciplinaire WO2014127338A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361765939P 2013-02-18 2013-02-18
US61/765,939 2013-02-18

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014127338A1 true WO2014127338A1 (fr) 2014-08-21

Family

ID=50277302

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2014/016784 WO2014127338A1 (fr) 2013-02-18 2014-02-18 Procédé et système pour la projection optimisée dans un système de développement multidisciplinaire

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2014127338A1 (fr)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016171663A1 (fr) * 2015-04-21 2016-10-27 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Modèles dans un système d'ingénierie pluridisciplinaire
WO2017058149A1 (fr) * 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Duplication d'objets dans un système d'ingénierie pluridisciplinaire
CN107533329A (zh) * 2015-04-21 2018-01-02 西门子公司 多学科工程系统中交叉学科数据验证检查的方法与系统
US10055811B2 (en) 2016-05-12 2018-08-21 Caterpillar Inc. System and method for generating interactive 2D projection of 3D model
CN110879936A (zh) * 2019-10-08 2020-03-13 中国第一汽车股份有限公司 一种基于TeamCenter的批量生成并输出工艺控制计划的方法

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999039291A1 (fr) * 1998-01-29 1999-08-05 Venline Ltd. Systeme de communication informatise, destine a gerer une communaute virtuelle d'ingenieurs pluridisciplinaires

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999039291A1 (fr) * 1998-01-29 1999-08-05 Venline Ltd. Systeme de communication informatise, destine a gerer une communaute virtuelle d'ingenieurs pluridisciplinaires

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
LIM T ET AL: "Decomposition of complex models for manufacturing", SHAPE MODELING APPLICATIONS, 2004. PROCEEDINGS GENOVA, ITALY 7-9 JUNE 2004, PISCATAWAY, NJ, USA,IEEE, 7 June 2004 (2004-06-07), pages 337 - 341, XP010709065, ISBN: 978-0-7695-2075-9, DOI: 10.1109/SMI.2004.1314522 *

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016171663A1 (fr) * 2015-04-21 2016-10-27 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Modèles dans un système d'ingénierie pluridisciplinaire
CN107533329A (zh) * 2015-04-21 2018-01-02 西门子公司 多学科工程系统中交叉学科数据验证检查的方法与系统
CN107533678A (zh) * 2015-04-21 2018-01-02 西门子公司 多学科工程系统中的模板
US10613522B2 (en) 2015-04-21 2020-04-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Templates in a multidisciplinary engineering system
CN107533329B (zh) * 2015-04-21 2022-05-31 西门子公司 多学科工程系统中交叉学科数据验证检查的方法与系统
US11531324B2 (en) 2015-04-21 2022-12-20 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and system for cross discipline data validation checking in a multidisciplinary engineering system
WO2017058149A1 (fr) * 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Duplication d'objets dans un système d'ingénierie pluridisciplinaire
US10055811B2 (en) 2016-05-12 2018-08-21 Caterpillar Inc. System and method for generating interactive 2D projection of 3D model
CN110879936A (zh) * 2019-10-08 2020-03-13 中国第一汽车股份有限公司 一种基于TeamCenter的批量生成并输出工艺控制计划的方法

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ghaffarianhoseini et al. Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges
US20230065286A1 (en) Cloud-enabled generation of construction metrics and documentation
EP2741157B1 (fr) Système informatisé et procédé d'analyse de fabricabilité de pièce usinée et de planification de processus
CN110176078B (zh) 一种训练集数据的标注方法及装置
US8319792B2 (en) Virtual components for CAD models
CN104573908B (zh) 管理产品的紧固件的制造生命周期
Huang et al. A flexible and effective NC machining process reuse approach for similar subparts
US20120259594A1 (en) Bim based 3-d visualization
WO2014127338A1 (fr) Procédé et système pour la projection optimisée dans un système de développement multidisciplinaire
Jayasena et al. Building information modelling for Sri Lankan construction industry
US9886529B2 (en) Methods and systems for feature recognition
CN110517357A (zh) 具有语义属性的三维图形注释
Zhou et al. Computer-aided process planning in immersive environments: A critical review
EP4416692A1 (fr) Détection automatique de zone
CN102289544B (zh) 电气控制柜参数化驱动系统
Otto et al. A framework to support 3D explicit modeling education and practice
US20070198588A1 (en) Automatic Qualification of Plant Equipment
KR101633333B1 (ko) 이기종 시스템에서의 배관 2ｄ 도면과 3ｄ 모델간 검증방법
Sommer et al. Automated generation of a digital twin of a manufacturing system by using scan and convolutional neural networks
US20110307224A1 (en) System and Method for Machine Engine Modeling
EP4046004A1 (fr) Génération d'un modèle tridimensionnel (3d) d'une implantation d'usine
WO2023028777A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil pour générer automatiquement une image étiquetée et support de stockage informatique
Hoque et al. Designing using manufacturing feature library
WO2023084300A1 (fr) Procédé et système de création d'un modèle 3d pour un jumeau numérique à partir d'un nuage de points
WO2014130417A1 (fr) Conception d'ingénierie multidisciplinaire utilisant la reconnaissance d'images

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14710087

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 14710087

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1