WO2014096950A2 - Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2014096950A2 WO2014096950A2 PCT/IB2013/002940 IB2013002940W WO2014096950A2 WO 2014096950 A2 WO2014096950 A2 WO 2014096950A2 IB 2013002940 W IB2013002940 W IB 2013002940W WO 2014096950 A2 WO2014096950 A2 WO 2014096950A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- user equipments
- category
- cells
- edge
- center
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W72/00—Local resource management
- H04W72/50—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
- H04W72/51—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on terminal or device properties
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W72/00—Local resource management
- H04W72/50—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
- H04W72/54—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W72/00—Local resource management
- H04W72/50—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
- H04W72/56—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on priority criteria
- H04W72/566—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on priority criteria of the information or information source or recipient
Definitions
- the field of the invention is the field of 4G LTE (Long Term Evolution) networks, and more particularly the field of 4G LTE Coordinated Multipoint (CoMP) transmission and reception technology.
- 4G LTE Long Term Evolution
- CoMP Coordinated Multipoint
- Coordinated multipoint transmission and reception aim to improve the system performance, the end user service quality and especially to achieve high data rates at the cell edges. This is achieved through a dynamic collaboration between access points at several locations to provide joint processing technology or coordinating scheduling/ coordinating beamforming technology (CS/CB).
- CS/CB coordinating scheduling/ coordinating beamforming technology
- a user equipment UE located at the edge of a cell can thereby be served by two or more access points to improve signals reception / transmission and increase throughput.
- the techniques used for coordinated multipoint are different for the uplink and downlink. This results from the fact that the base stations are connected to each others in a network, whereas the user equipment are individual elements.
- the downlink LTE CoMP requires dynamic coordination amongst several geographically separated base stations eNBs transmitting to the user equipment UE. It can be classified into two categories: (a) the joint processing schemes and (b) the Coordinated scheduling and or beamforming. a) Joint processing schemes for transmitting in the downlink
- the data information transmitted to the user equipment is transmitted simultaneously from several base stations in a CoMP collaboration set. These multiple information is coherently or not- coherently merged to improve the received signal quality and strength and to inhibit interference from transmissions that are intended for other user equipment.
- the three possible user equipment scheduling methods are the round-robin scheduling, the Max-C/I scheduling and the proportional fair scheduling.
- the proportional fairness scheduling scheme is widely used. Compared with absolutely fair round-robin scheduling which does not consider the channel state and with the Max-C/I scheduling, which ignores the fairness to maximize the throughput of the system, the proportional fairness scheduling chooses instantaneous user equipments in good condition or user equipments which have less weighted average throughput. It is not only able to take the spectral efficiency of the system into account but also the fairness between multi-user equipments.
- the proportional fair algorithm considers the spectral efficiency and fairness but unfortunately, it does not take the diversities of the different types of traffic into account.
- This scheme divides each cell's frequency band into two parts: one is the CoMP frequency zone which is reserved for cell-edge UEs employing CoMP SU-MIMO, and the other is non-CoMP frequency zone for cell-center UEs which are served by individual cell.
- the present invention proposes a method of allocating a downlink frequency band in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, this method comprising:
- said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set , said method further comprising, at each transmission time interval :
- the invention correspondingly provides a base station usable in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, said base station comprising a MAC scheduler comprising:
- said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set
- said MAC scheduler further comprising:
- the invention is applicable to the LTE downlink system with coordinated multi-point transmission with downlink QoS scheduling.
- the dynamic algorithm of downlink frequency band allocation adjusts the frequency band allocation leading to the increase of the frequency band utilization.
- the scheduling algorithm proposed in the invention fully accounts for both channel condition and traffic diversities.
- the method comprises a step of adjusting said spectrum allocation for minimizing the number of user equipments having an unrealized demanded downlink transmission rate superior to a threshold.
- This scheme dynamically adjusts the resource block allocation and utilizes the system spectrum resources effectively according to the feedback from the dissatisfaction degree of user equipments. It improves in particular the throughput of cell-edge user equipments.
- the invention hereby provides a progressive way for adaptive spectrum division maximizing a defined user equipment satisfaction indicator.
- the scheduler of the invention allocates appropriate frequency bands to the user equipments according to a user equipment's priority determined by this indicator
- a static collaboration set division is used.
- a dynamic collaboration set division can also be used.
- the category of center user equipments comprises the user equipments having a channel quality indicator CQI superior to a threshold, the category of edge user equipments comprising the user equipments having said channel quality indicator lower than said threshold.
- the percentage of frequency spectrum allocated dynamically to each category of user equipments corresponds to the percentage of user equipments in said category.
- FIG. 1 shows a base station in accordance with the invention
- FIG. 2 shows, in the form of a flow chart, the main steps of a method of frequency allocation in accordance with the invention
- FIG. 3 shows a distribution of user equipment equipment
- FIG. 5a to 5c illustrate an example of a coarse and of a fine adjustments steps in accordance with the invention.
- Figure 1 shows a base station BS in accordance with the invention.
- This base station BS comprises a MAC entity ME, which, in this specific embodiment, has the hardware architecture of a conventional computer.
- it comprises a processor 11, a read/write memory 12 of the random access memory (RAM) type, and a read-only memory 13 having recorded therein a MAC scheduler MS computer program including instructions for executing the steps of the method represented by the flow chart shown in Figure 2.
- Figure 2 represents in flow chart form the main steps of a particular embodiment of a method according to the invention.
- the method of the invention consists in clustering the cells (step E10) either statically or dynamically.
- the user equipments are then classified into center user equipments and edge user equipments (step E20).
- the system available downlink frequency bandwidth is divided according to the percentage of user equipments in each category (step E30). Then, a center user equipments scheduling in each cell and a centralized edge user equipments scheduling at the cluster level are performed in parallel (step E40). Finally, the spectrum allocation is adjusted to maximize the number of user equipments for which the demanded downlink transmission rate is realized (step E50).
- the frequency allocation method of the invention comprises a step E10 of cell clustering for determining a collaboration set.
- the method of the invention can use either a static clustering, where clustering is performed once, for examples based on field measurements and/or ray-launching simulations, or a dynamic clustering where measurements based on the received channel state information (CSI) are used to adapt clustering decisions over time.
- a static clustering where clustering is performed once, for examples based on field measurements and/or ray-launching simulations
- CSI channel state information
- Step E10 is followed by a step E20 of classifying all the user equipments UE into center user equipments (CCU) and edge user equipments (CEU), the center user equipments being the user equipments UE having a channel quality indicator (CQI) superior or equal to a predefined threshold a, and edge user equipments, the user equipments with a channel quality indicator CQI lower than said threshold, the channel quality indicator CQI being estimated using the reference signal RS.
- CCU center user equipments
- CEU channel quality indicator
- the classification step E20 is done on a per cell basis. It could be performed before step E10.
- Step E20 (or step E10 if performed before step E10) is followed by a step E30 of dividing the downlink frequency band according to the percentage of center user equipments CCU and edge user equipments
- B_EDGE B *
- the frequency band division could be different from one collaborative cluster to another but the frequency band division must be the same for all the cells in a given collaborative cluster.
- Step E30 is followed by a general step E40 of user equipment scheduling, which will be described in details.
- the cell center user equipments are served independently, the edge user equipments being jointly served by the collaborative set.
- Steps E41 and E42 relate to the center user equipment scheduling.
- Step E41 is a step of calculating a priority factor PFi for all the center user equipments in each cell.
- PFi a priority factor
- I Hi I 2 means the norm of the channel state matrix of user equipment i;
- Vj means the demanded downlink transmission rate for user equipment i;
- - R'i means the realized downlink transmission rate for user equipment i.
- ⁇ Hi ⁇ ⁇ ) for the N*M matrix H,.
- each cell sorts the center user equipments allocates the downlink Physical Resource Bloc PRB.
- Table 1 below gives an example of center user equipments sorting for the three cells CELL_1, CELL2, CELL 3 of figure 3.
- Table 1 Steps E43 and E44 relate to the edge user equipment scheduling.
- Step E43 is a step of calculating a priority factor PFi for all the edge user equipments in each cell.
- step E43 is similar to step E41 of calculating a priority factor for center user equipments.
- Hi combine means the composite channel from the Base Station defining the cluster
- (Vi - R'i) combine means the data rate realized by joint transmission.
- the edge user equipments are sorted in a centralized manner by the collaborative cluster.
- Table 2 below gives an example of edge user equipments sorting for the collaborative cluster CC_1 of figure 3.
- Figure 4 represents the result of the step E40 of user equipment scheduling applied to the distribution of Figure 3. It can be seen that all the three cells CELL_1, CELL2, CELL_3 allocate the same downlink frequency band and perform downlink CoMP joint transmission for each group of edge user equipments ⁇ UE11 ⁇ , ⁇ UE15 ⁇ and ⁇ UE12, UE14 ⁇ .
- step E40 there may be some vacant frequency bands may after step E40 is completed.
- Step E40 is followed by a step E50 of adjusting spectrum allocation based on the dissatisfaction degree of user equipment, after a sufficient number of time transmission intervals TTI.
- this step E50 consists in adjusting said spectrum allocation for minimizing the number of user equipments having an unrealized demanded downlink transmission rate ⁇ superior to a threshold y ⁇ .
- This step E50 enables to further adjust the spectrum division based on the knowledge of frequency usage and realization of user equipments' demand for data delivery.
- the user equipments fall into two categories, the category of satisfied user equipments if ⁇ ⁇ y th and the category of the dissatisfied user equipments if ⁇ > Yth., Yth being a threshold.
- Step E52 is a step of adjusting coarsely the frequency band, this step consisting in allocating vacant frequency bands to dissatisfied user equipments. More precisely, vacant non-CoMP bands are totally moved to CoMP band and then distributed to dissatisfied edge users (CEU) or vacant CoMP bands are totally moved to non-CoMP band and the distributed to dissatisfied center users.
- CEU dissatisfied edge users
- the vertical line BVB of Figure 5a represents the border between the used bands and the vacant bands within the Non CoMP band after step E40 is completed, before coarse adjustement. More precisely, VB1, VB2 and VB3 represent the vacant bands in cells CELL_1, CELL_2 and CELL_3.
- the vacant band VB1 which is the smallest band among VB1, VB23 and VB3 is moved to the CoMP zone to form a bigger one.
- Figure 5b illustrates the result of this coarse adjustment step, CELL_2 and CELL_3 having vacant bands VB2 and VB3 in their Non CoMP band.
- the whole vacant bands are allocated to either CEU or CCU in order to satisfy as many user equipments as possible.
- Step E54 is a step of adjusting finely the frequency band if:
- the step E54 consists of several iterations, in each one of which the secheduler moves N physical resource blocks PRB from one category where all users are satidifed to the other category where at least one user is not satisfied.
- Figure 5c illustrates the fine adjustment step and the result thereof.
- the step E54 of fine adjustment stops when one user equipment in the original satisfy category becomes unsatisfied, ie ⁇ > y t h, after a certain iteration.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
This method of allocating a downlink frequency band in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, this method comprises: - a step (E10) of clustering said cells for determining at least a collaborative set of cells; and - a step (E20) of classifying the user equipments in said cells in a category of center user equipments (CCU) or in a category of edge user equipments (CEU); said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set of cells, said method further comprising, at each transmission time interval : - a step (E30) of dynamically allocating to each category (CCU, CEU) part of the downlink frequency spectrum available for said system according to the number of user equipments in each category; - a step (E40) of scheduling the physical resource block allocated to said user equipments in their respective frequency band according to a priority (PFi) taking into account a channel state (Hi) and a traffic condition (Vi, R'i) of said user equipments.
Description
Title of the invention
Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission Background of the invention
The field of the invention is the field of 4G LTE (Long Term Evolution) networks, and more particularly the field of 4G LTE Coordinated Multipoint (CoMP) transmission and reception technology.
Coordinated multipoint transmission and reception aim to improve the system performance, the end user service quality and especially to achieve high data rates at the cell edges. This is achieved through a dynamic collaboration between access points at several locations to provide joint processing technology or coordinating scheduling/ coordinating beamforming technology (CS/CB).
A user equipment UE located at the edge of a cell can thereby be served by two or more access points to improve signals reception / transmission and increase throughput.
The techniques used for coordinated multipoint are different for the uplink and downlink. This results from the fact that the base stations are connected to each others in a network, whereas the user equipment are individual elements.
The downlink LTE CoMP requires dynamic coordination amongst several geographically separated base stations eNBs transmitting to the user equipment UE. It can be classified into two categories: (a) the joint processing schemes and (b) the Coordinated scheduling and or beamforming. a) Joint processing schemes for transmitting in the downlink
The data information transmitted to the user equipment is transmitted simultaneously from several base stations in a CoMP collaboration set. These multiple information is coherently or not- coherently merged to improve the received signal quality and strength and to inhibit interference from transmissions that are intended for other user equipment.
b) Coordinated scheduling and or beamforming:
Using this concept, data to single user equipment is transmitted from one base station. The scheduling decisions and beams are coordinated to control the interference that may be generated.
The three possible user equipment scheduling methods are the round-robin scheduling, the Max-C/I scheduling and the proportional fair scheduling.
The proportional fairness scheduling scheme is widely used. Compared with absolutely fair round-robin scheduling which does not consider the channel state and with the Max-C/I scheduling, which ignores the fairness to maximize the throughput of the system, the proportional fairness scheduling chooses instantaneous user equipments in good condition or user equipments which have less weighted average throughput. It is not only able to take the spectral efficiency of the system into account but also the fairness between multi-user equipments.
The proportional fair algorithm considers the spectral efficiency and fairness but unfortunately, it does not take the diversities of the different types of traffic into account.
Frequency resource division and allocation
With respect to frequency resource division and allocation in the downlink cellular network, both fixed and flexible schemes were introduced.
In "Discussion of CoMP SU-MIMO", Samsung, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56, Rl-090613, Feb. 2009, a fixed resource allocation scheme based on CoMP SU-MIMO was presented (coordinated multi-point transmission for single-user equipment multi-input multi-output).
This scheme divides each cell's frequency band into two parts: one is the CoMP frequency zone which is reserved for cell-edge UEs employing CoMP SU-MIMO, and the other is non-CoMP frequency zone for cell-center UEs which are served by individual cell.
The central frequency and bandwidth of CoMP frequency zones are the same for each cell; this spectrum division scheme is therefore fixed and static. This scheme suffers from throughput loss due to the lack of flexibility between different cells.
To improve the system performance, "Further discussion of frequency plan scheme on CoMP-SU-MIMO", Potevio, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1
Meeting #56bis, Rl-091415, Mar. 2009 and "Sub-carrier allocation combined with coordinated multi-point transmission in multi-cell OFDMA system" Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content, IEEE Press, 6-8 Nov. 2009, pp.842-846 by Xingkun Xu, Tao Qiu et al. proposed so called flexible frequency allocation plan (FFAP) schemes, where each sector in one cell has an identical CoMP frequency zone that is allocated according to the proportion of cell-edge UE in its cluster.
However, once there is a frequency zone partition, some of the resources must be assigned to a fixed transmission mode. This scheme lacks flexibility and it causes a performance loss of the system.
As a summary, the existing CoMP transmission schemes, which adopt fixed spectrum division strategies for cell-edge and cell-center user equipments, suffer from uneven distribution and low utilization of resources.
Object and summary of the invention The present invention proposes a method of allocating a downlink frequency band in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, this method comprising:
- a step of clustering said cells for determining at least a collaborative set; and
- a step of classifying the user equipments in said cells in a category of center user equipments or in a category of edge user equipments ;
said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set , said method further comprising, at each transmission time interval :
- a step of dynamically allocating to each category part of the downlink frequency spectrum available for said system according to the number of user equipments in each category ; and
- a step of scheduling the physical resource blocks allocated to said user equipments in their respective frequency band according to a priority taking into account a channel state and a traffic condition of said user equipments.
The invention correspondingly provides a base station usable in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, said base station comprising a MAC scheduler comprising:
- a module for clustering said cells for determining at least a collaborative set; and
- a module for classifying the user equipments in said cells in a category of center user equipments or in a category of edge user equipments;
said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set , said MAC scheduler further comprising:
- a module for dynamically allocating to each category, at each transmission time interval, part of the downlink frequency spectrum available for said system according to the number of user equipments in each category ; and
- a module for scheduling the physical resource block allocated to said user equipments in their respective frequency band according to a priority taking into account a channel state and a traffic condition of said user equipments.
The invention is applicable to the LTE downlink system with coordinated multi-point transmission with downlink QoS scheduling.
The dynamic algorithm of downlink frequency band allocation adjusts the frequency band allocation leading to the increase of the frequency band utilization.
Besides, the scheduling algorithm proposed in the invention fully accounts for both channel condition and traffic diversities.
In one particular embodiment of the invention, the method comprises a step of adjusting said spectrum allocation for minimizing the number of user equipments having an unrealized demanded downlink transmission rate superior to a threshold.
This scheme dynamically adjusts the resource block allocation and utilizes the system spectrum resources effectively according to the feedback from the dissatisfaction degree of user equipments. It improves in particular the throughput of cell-edge user equipments.
The invention hereby provides a progressive way for adaptive spectrum division maximizing a defined user equipment satisfaction indicator. The scheduler of the invention allocates appropriate frequency
bands to the user equipments according to a user equipment's priority determined by this indicator
After several rounds adjustment, near-optimal spectrum allocation for cell-edge and cell-center user equipments can be reached, and most user equipments can be satisfied, whatever the traffic they bear.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, a static collaboration set division is used. A dynamic collaboration set division can also be used.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, the category of center user equipments comprises the user equipments having a channel quality indicator CQI superior to a threshold, the category of edge user equipments comprising the user equipments having said channel quality indicator lower than said threshold.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, the percentage of frequency spectrum allocated dynamically to each category of user equipments corresponds to the percentage of user equipments in said category.
Brief description of the drawings
Other characteristics and advantages of the present invention appear from the following description made with reference to the accompanying drawings that show an embodiment without any limiting character. In the figures:
- Figure 1 shows a base station in accordance with the invention;
- Figure 2 shows, in the form of a flow chart, the main steps of a method of frequency allocation in accordance with the invention;
- Figure 3 shows a distribution of user equipment equipment;
- Figure 4 shows the result of scheduling applied to the distribution of Figure 3; and
- Figure 5a to 5c illustrate an example of a coarse and of a fine adjustments steps in accordance with the invention.
Detailed description of an embodiment of the invention Figure 1 shows a base station BS in accordance with the invention.
This base station BS comprises a MAC entity ME, which, in this specific
embodiment, has the hardware architecture of a conventional computer. In particular, it comprises a processor 11, a read/write memory 12 of the random access memory (RAM) type, and a read-only memory 13 having recorded therein a MAC scheduler MS computer program including instructions for executing the steps of the method represented by the flow chart shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 represents in flow chart form the main steps of a particular embodiment of a method according to the invention.
As a general overview, the method of the invention consists in clustering the cells (step E10) either statically or dynamically. The user equipments are then classified into center user equipments and edge user equipments (step E20).
At any transmission time interval TTI, the system available downlink frequency bandwidth is divided according to the percentage of user equipments in each category (step E30). Then, a center user equipments scheduling in each cell and a centralized edge user equipments scheduling at the cluster level are performed in parallel (step E40). Finally, the spectrum allocation is adjusted to maximize the number of user equipments for which the demanded downlink transmission rate is realized (step E50).
In this embodiment, the frequency allocation method of the invention comprises a step E10 of cell clustering for determining a collaboration set.
The method of the invention can use either a static clustering, where clustering is performed once, for examples based on field measurements and/or ray-launching simulations, or a dynamic clustering where measurements based on the received channel state information (CSI) are used to adapt clustering decisions over time.
Step E10 is followed by a step E20 of classifying all the user equipments UE into center user equipments (CCU) and edge user equipments (CEU), the center user equipments being the user equipments UE having a channel quality indicator (CQI) superior or equal to a predefined threshold a, and edge user equipments, the user equipments with a channel quality indicator CQI lower than said threshold, the channel quality indicator CQI being estimated using the reference signal RS.
For example, in the distribution of Figure 3, user equipment UE1- UE10 could be classified in the CCU category (center user equipments) and user equipment UE11-UE15 in the CEU category (edge user equipments).
The classification step E20 is done on a per cell basis. It could be performed before step E10.
Step E20 (or step E10 if performed before step E10) is followed by a step E30 of dividing the downlink frequency band according to the percentage of center user equipments CCU and edge user equipments
CEU.
B_EDGE = B * |CEU| / (|CCU | + |CEU|) ;
B_CENTER = B - B_EDGE,
Where:
- B means the system available frequency bandwidth;
- B_EDGE, the frequency band allocated for edge user equipments;
- B_CENTER, the frequency band allocated for center user equipments;
- |CEU|, the total number of edge user equipments; and
- |CCU|, the total number of center user equipments.
The frequency band division could be different from one collaborative cluster to another but the frequency band division must be the same for all the cells in a given collaborative cluster.
Step E30 is followed by a general step E40 of user equipment scheduling, which will be described in details.
In the invention, the cell center user equipments are served independently, the edge user equipments being jointly served by the collaborative set.
Steps E41 and E42 relate to the center user equipment scheduling.
Step E41 is a step of calculating a priority factor PFi for all the center user equipments in each cell. In this embodiment,
Where:
- PFj means the priority of user equipment i
- a means the weight of the channel state;
- b means the weight of the satisfaction of the user equipment;
- I Hi I2 means the norm of the channel state matrix of user equipment i;
- Vj means the demanded downlink transmission rate for user equipment i;
- R'i means the realized downlink transmission rate for user equipment i.
At step E42, each cell sorts the center user equipments allocates the downlink Physical Resource Bloc PRB.
Table 1 below gives an example of center user equipments sorting for the three cells CELL_1, CELL2, CELL 3 of figure 3.
Table 1 Steps E43 and E44 relate to the edge user equipment scheduling.
Step E43 is a step of calculating a priority factor PFi for all the edge user equipments in each cell. In this embodiment, step E43 is similar to step E41 of calculating a priority factor for center user equipments.
Hi combine means the composite channel from the Base Station defining the cluster; and
(Vi - R'i) combine means the data rate realized by joint transmission.
At step E44, the edge user equipments are sorted in a centralized manner by the collaborative cluster.
Table 2 below gives an example of edge user equipments sorting for the collaborative cluster CC_1 of figure 3.
Table 2
Figure 4 represents the result of the step E40 of user equipment scheduling applied to the distribution of Figure 3. It can be seen that all the three cells CELL_1, CELL2, CELL_3 allocate the same downlink frequency band and perform downlink CoMP joint transmission for each group of edge user equipments {UE11}, {UE15} and {UE12, UE14}.
In some configurations, there may be some vacant frequency bands may after step E40 is completed.
Step E40 is followed by a step E50 of adjusting spectrum allocation based on the dissatisfaction degree of user equipment, after a sufficient number of time transmission intervals TTI.
In a specific embodiment, this step E50 consists in adjusting said spectrum allocation for minimizing the number of user equipments having an unrealized demanded downlink transmission rate γ superior to a threshold y^.
This step E50 enables to further adjust the spectrum division based on the knowledge of frequency usage and realization of user equipments' demand for data delivery.
In this embodiment, we use an indicator γ representative of a dissatisfaction degree, defined as follows at step E51:
Y = Vi - R'i
According to the value of the dissatisfaction degree γ, the user equipments fall into two categories, the category of satisfied user equipments if γ < yth and the category of the dissatisfied user equipments if γ > Yth., Yth being a threshold.
Step E52 is a step of adjusting coarsely the frequency band, this step consisting in allocating vacant frequency bands to dissatisfied user equipments. More precisely, vacant non-CoMP bands are totally moved to
CoMP band and then distributed to dissatisfied edge users (CEU) or vacant CoMP bands are totally moved to non-CoMP band and the distributed to dissatisfied center users.
One example of coarse adjustment is described in reference to Figures 5a and 5b. The vertical line BVB of Figure 5a represents the border between the used bands and the vacant bands within the Non CoMP band after step E40 is completed, before coarse adjustement. More precisely, VB1, VB2 and VB3 represent the vacant bands in cells CELL_1, CELL_2 and CELL_3.
At step E52, the vacant band VB1, which is the smallest band among VB1, VB23 and VB3 is moved to the CoMP zone to form a bigger one. Figure 5b illustrates the result of this coarse adjustment step, CELL_2 and CELL_3 having vacant bands VB2 and VB3 in their Non CoMP band.
In the described embodiment, the whole vacant bands are allocated to either CEU or CCU in order to satisfy as many user equipments as possible.
Step E54 is a step of adjusting finely the frequency band if:
- No vacant bands are available
- All user equipments in a category are satisfied, i.e. their satisfaction degree γ < 7th ;
- User equipments in the other category need more frequency band, since at least one of them is dissatisfied, i.e. their satisfaction degree γ > yth ;
The step E54 consists of several iterations, in each one of which the secheduler moves N physical resource blocks PRB from one category where all users are satidifed to the other category where at least one user is not satisfied. Figure 5c illustrates the fine adjustment step and the result thereof. The step E54 of fine adjustment stops when one user equipment in the original satisfy category becomes unsatisfied, ie γ > yth, after a certain iteration.
Claims
1. A method of allocating a downlink frequency band in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, this method comprising:
- a step (E10) of clustering said cells for determining at least a collaborative set of cells; and
- a step (E20) of classifying the user equipments in said cells in a category of center user equipments (CCU) or in a category of edge user equipments (CEU);
said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set of cells, said method further comprising, at each transmission time interval :
- a step (E30) of dynamically allocating to each category (CCU, CEU) part of the downlink frequency spectrum available for said system according to the number of user equipments in each category ;
- a step (E40) of scheduling the physical resource block allocated to said user equipments in their respective frequency band according to a priority (PFi) taking into account a channel state (Hi) and a traffic condition (Vi, R'i) of said user equipments.
2. A method according to Claim 1 comprising a step (E50) of adjusting said spectrum allocation for minimizing the number of user equipments having an unrealized demanded downlink transmission rate (γ) superior to a threshold (yth).
3. A method according to Claim 1 or 2 characterized in that a static collaboration set division is used in said clustering step.
4. A method according to any one of Claims 1 to 3 characterized in that said category of center user equipments comprises the user equipments having a channel quality indicator (CQI) superior to a threshold (a), the category of edge user equipments comprising the user equipments having said channel quality indicator lower than said threshold (a).
5. A method according to any one of Claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the percentage of frequency spectrum allocated dynamically (E30) to each of said categories corresponds to the percentage of user equipments in each category.
6. A method according to any one of Claims 1 to 5 in which said priority (PFi) is defined as follows:
PFi = - b' with a + b = l
Where:
- PFj means the priority of user equipment i
- a means the weight of the channel state;
- b means the weight of the satisfaction of the user equipment;
- I Hi I2 means the channel state matrix of user equipment i;
- Vi means the demanded downlink transmission rate for user equipment i;
- R'i means the realized downlink transmission rate for user equipment i.
7. A base station usable in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, said base station comprising a scheduler comprising :
- a module for clustering said cells for determining at least a collaborative set of cells; and
- a module for classifying the user equipments in said cells in a category of center user equipments (CCU) or in a category of edge user equipments
(CEU);
said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set of cells, said scheduler further comprising :
- a module for dynamically allocating to each category (CCU, CEU) , at each transmission time interval, part of the downlink frequency spectrum available for said system according to the number of user equipments in each category ; and
- a module for scheduling the physical resource block allocated to said user equipments in their respective frequency band according to a priority (PFi) taking into account a channel state (Hi) and a traffic condition (Vi, R'i) of said user equipments.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2012/001716 WO2014094191A1 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2012-12-21 | Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission |
CNPCT/CN2012/001716 | 2012-12-21 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2014096950A2 true WO2014096950A2 (en) | 2014-06-26 |
WO2014096950A3 WO2014096950A3 (en) | 2014-08-28 |
Family
ID=50391213
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2012/001716 WO2014094191A1 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2012-12-21 | Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission |
PCT/IB2013/002940 WO2014096950A2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2013-12-16 | Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2012/001716 WO2014094191A1 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2012-12-21 | Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
WO (2) | WO2014094191A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107682870A (en) * | 2017-09-19 | 2018-02-09 | 西安电子科技大学 | Edge customer and central user division methods in LTE channelings |
CN113473623A (en) * | 2021-06-30 | 2021-10-01 | 中通服咨询设计研究院有限公司 | Frequency reuse system and method for ensuring user rate based on 5G millimeter waves |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10158463B1 (en) | 2015-03-17 | 2018-12-18 | Sprint Spectrum L.P. | Method and system for coordinated transmission with use of neighboring base station scheduling policy |
CN107454675B (en) * | 2016-05-31 | 2020-04-24 | 北京信威通信技术股份有限公司 | Resource allocation method and device of trunking communication system |
CN110677175B (en) * | 2019-09-23 | 2023-04-14 | 浙江理工大学 | Sub-channel scheduling and power distribution joint optimization method |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102098737B (en) * | 2009-12-11 | 2014-02-26 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Cell priority level based cooperation scheduling method and system |
WO2012093742A1 (en) * | 2011-01-04 | 2012-07-12 | Pantech Co.,Ltd. | Terminal and base station, method thereof in wireless communication system |
KR101752921B1 (en) * | 2011-01-12 | 2017-07-03 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Multi-cell cooperative transmission method and apparatus |
US9100985B2 (en) * | 2011-02-15 | 2015-08-04 | Htc Corporation | Coordinated multi-point communications system and methods for controlling coordinated multi-point transmission and reception |
US8478190B2 (en) * | 2011-05-02 | 2013-07-02 | Motorola Mobility Llc | Multi-cell coordinated transmissions in wireless communication network |
-
2012
- 2012-12-21 WO PCT/CN2012/001716 patent/WO2014094191A1/en active Application Filing
-
2013
- 2013-12-16 WO PCT/IB2013/002940 patent/WO2014096950A2/en active Application Filing
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
"Discussion of CoMP SU-MIMO", 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 MEETING #56, February 2009 (2009-02-01) |
"Further discussion of frequency plan scheme on CoMP-SU-MIMO", 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 MEETING #56BIS, March 2009 (2009-03-01) |
XINGKUN XU; TAO QIU: "Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content", 6 November 2009, IEEE PRESS, article "Sub-carrier allocation combined with coordinated multi-point transmission in multi-cell OFDMA system", pages: 842 - 846 |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107682870A (en) * | 2017-09-19 | 2018-02-09 | 西安电子科技大学 | Edge customer and central user division methods in LTE channelings |
CN107682870B (en) * | 2017-09-19 | 2019-11-26 | 西安电子科技大学 | Edge customer and central user division methods in LTE channeling |
CN113473623A (en) * | 2021-06-30 | 2021-10-01 | 中通服咨询设计研究院有限公司 | Frequency reuse system and method for ensuring user rate based on 5G millimeter waves |
CN113473623B (en) * | 2021-06-30 | 2023-12-15 | 中通服咨询设计研究院有限公司 | Frequency multiplexing system and method for ensuring user rate based on 5G millimeter waves |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2014094191A1 (en) | 2014-06-26 |
WO2014096950A3 (en) | 2014-08-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11489559B2 (en) | Scheduling multi-user MIMO transmissions in fixed wireless access systems | |
JP5436237B2 (en) | Method for allocating resources in an OFDMA network | |
US8078185B2 (en) | User group-based adaptive soft frequency reuse method to mitigate downlink interference for wireless cellular networks | |
KR101229322B1 (en) | Interference coordination method and access network device | |
US20120224541A1 (en) | Clustering method of mobile communication and remote radio head thereof | |
US9253788B2 (en) | Resource allocation method and apparatus of base station in wireless communication system | |
US8964867B2 (en) | LTE scheduling | |
US8638746B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for the joint design and operation of scheduling and transmission for downlink multi-user MIMO with reciprocity-based training | |
US10123326B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for resource allocation and for scheduling cellular and coordinated multipoint transmissions in heterogeneous wireless networks | |
Kalil et al. | Efficient low-complexity scheduler for wireless resource virtualization | |
WO2017101458A1 (en) | Resource allocation realization method and system, and centralized controller and base station | |
WO2014096950A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission | |
Boccardi et al. | Network MIMO with reduced backhaul requirements by MAC coordination | |
Yildiz et al. | A novel mobility aware downlink scheduling algorithm for LTE-A networks | |
CN105517178B (en) | A kind of dispatching method of adjustable low complex degree wireless resource scheduling device | |
Ghaleb et al. | QoS-aware joint uplink-downlink scheduling in FDD LTE-Advanced with carrier aggregation | |
Falconetti et al. | Codebook based inter-cell interference coordination for LTE | |
Chayon et al. | Downlink Radio Resource Management Through CoMP and Carrier Aggregation for LTE-Advanced Network | |
Özbek et al. | Feedback strategies for multicell systems | |
Klockar et al. | User-centric pre-selection and scheduling for coordinated multipoint systems | |
Martin-Sacristan et al. | Time-frequency coupled proportional fair scheduler with multicarrier awareness for LTE downlink | |
Ghaleb et al. | On the extension of traditional resource allocation algorithms in LTE-A to joint UL-DL scheduling with FDD carrier aggregation | |
Basilashvili et al. | Customized packet scheduling algorithm for LTE network | |
Perpiñá | CoMP technology in 5G networks: Modelling and assessment with ATOLL | |
Avramova et al. | Evaluation of a cross layer scheduling algorithm for LTE downlink |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 13843036 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 13843036 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |