WO2014037683A1 - Procédé et système pour la commande de vitesse de moteur - Google Patents

Procédé et système pour la commande de vitesse de moteur Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014037683A1
WO2014037683A1 PCT/GB2012/052165 GB2012052165W WO2014037683A1 WO 2014037683 A1 WO2014037683 A1 WO 2014037683A1 GB 2012052165 W GB2012052165 W GB 2012052165W WO 2014037683 A1 WO2014037683 A1 WO 2014037683A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
motor
speed
network
signal
counter
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2012/052165
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
James Aweya
Nayef AL SINDI
Original Assignee
Khalifa University of Science, Technology, and Research
British Telecommunications Plc
Emirates Telecommunications Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Khalifa University of Science, Technology, and Research, British Telecommunications Plc, Emirates Telecommunications Corporation filed Critical Khalifa University of Science, Technology, and Research
Priority to EP12761784.3A priority Critical patent/EP2893631A1/fr
Priority to PCT/GB2012/052165 priority patent/WO2014037683A1/fr
Priority to US13/699,810 priority patent/US9178464B2/en
Publication of WO2014037683A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014037683A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
    • H02P5/00—Arrangements specially adapted for regulating or controlling the speed or torque of two or more electric motors
    • H02P5/46—Arrangements specially adapted for regulating or controlling the speed or torque of two or more electric motors for speed regulation of two or more dynamo-electric motors in relation to one another
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
    • H02P23/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by a control method other than vector control
    • H02P23/22—Controlling the speed digitally using a reference oscillator, a speed proportional pulse rate feedback and a digital comparator
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
    • H02P5/00—Arrangements specially adapted for regulating or controlling the speed or torque of two or more electric motors
    • H02P5/74—Arrangements specially adapted for regulating or controlling the speed or torque of two or more electric motors controlling two or more ac dynamo-electric motors

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and system for motor speed control. It is particularly, but not exclusively, concerned with a method and system for motor speed control over packet networks such as Ethernet and internet Protocol (IP).
  • packet networks such as Ethernet and internet Protocol (IP).
  • IP internet Protocol
  • Industrial networks play a big role in industrial automation, manufacturing, process control, and other industrial related businesses. Until recently, industrial processes and equipment would communicate with each other using one of several possible specialized open or proprietary protocols, such as Modbus, HART, Profibus, CANopen, DeviceNet,
  • FOUNDATION Fieidbus PROFINET IO, etc [1 ][2]. These are all specialized networking technologies tailored for industrial automation, manufacturing, process control.
  • a control network 1 for automation, manufacturing, process control
  • a voice network 2 for traditional voice communication
  • a data or Information Technology (IT) network 3 for normal IT networking (that is, for interconnecting computers, servers, printers, etc.).
  • the overall footprint of the networks can be very large - taking up significant physical space. As space is normally at a premium (or at least costly) for most businesses this can be an additional cost or problem .
  • many industrial networks are currently migrating from legacy industrial protocols to packet based technologies like Ethernet and IP. Ethernet has emerged as a viable alternative to the traditional industrial protocols simply because it is much cheaper, readily available, and proven to be effective for networking.
  • Ethernet is a major carrier for other networking protocols; Ethernet can pretty much carry any other protocol whether open or proprietary.
  • the benefits of adopting packet technologies like Ethernet are as follows:
  • Ethernet was initially developed as a data oriented protocol and was not designed with the inherent reai-time and loss-iess data transport capabilities found in many traditional industrial protocol.
  • Ethernet or other packet
  • Remote motor control plays a major role in automation, manufacturing, process control.
  • the present invention seeks to provide a new technique for remote control of a motor (particularly a DC motor) over a network (such as a packet network).
  • a network such as a packet network.
  • An exemplary aspect of the present invention provides a system for controlling the speed of a motor, the system including: the motor; and a phase locked loop connected to a network and arranged to receive a timing signal from that network and to control the speed of the motor according to that timing signal, wherein the phase locked loop is arranged to generate an error signal which is the difference between the timing signal received from the network and a counter signal from a counter which is incremented according to the speed of the motor, and to adjust the speed of the motor according to the error signal.
  • a further exemplary aspect of the present invention provides a system for remotely controlling the speed of the motor, the system including: a central control unit, a motor control unit and a network connecting the control units, wherein: the central control unit includes: a variable frequency transmitter, arranged to send a timing signal over the network which represents the desired speed of the motor; and the motor control unit includes: the motor; and a phase locked loop connected to a network and arranged to receive a timing signal from that network and to control the speed of the motor according to that timing signal, wherein the phase locked loop is arranged to generate an error signal which is the difference between the timing signal received from the network and an output signal of a counter which is incremented according to the speed of the motor, and to adjust the speed of the motor according to the error signal,
  • a further exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a method of remotely controlling the speed of a motor, the method including the steps of: sending, over a network, a timing signal which represents the desired speed of the motor; detecting the speed of the motor as a local oscill
  • Figure 1 shows an overview of a typical current networking configuration in an industrial company and has already been described
  • FIG. 2 shows an overview of the new networking configurations in an industrial company and has already been described
  • Figure 3 shows the general principle of motor speed control over a packet network and has already been described
  • Figure 4A shows, in schematic form, the motor speed control system according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 4B shows, in schematic form, the motor speed control system according to an embodiment of the present invention in which the speed of a DC motor is controlled;
  • Figure 5 shows, in schematic form, an embodiment of the present invention in which the speed of multiple motors is controlled and synchronised
  • Figure 6A shows the overall view of a motor speed control system according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 6B shows the principles of motor speed alignment as applied by systems or methods according to embodiments of the present invention
  • Figure 6C shows the initialisation process of a motor speed control system according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 6D shows an embodiment of the present invention in which the speeds of multiple motors are controlled using multicast messages
  • Figure 7 shows the step response of a DC motor
  • Figure 8 shows the closed loop model of a motor speed control system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 9 shows how the measures of stability referred to as the gain margin and phase margin are derived.
  • a first aspect of the present invention provides a system for controiling the speed of a motor, preferably over a packet network, by receiving timing signals and using phase-iocked loop principles to adjust the speed of the motor according to the received timing signals.
  • the motor is preferably a DC motor.
  • a first aspect of the present invention preferably provides a system for controiling the speed of a motor, the system including: the motor; and a phase locked loop connected to a network and arranged to receive a timing signal from that network and to control the speed of the /
  • phase locked loop is arranged to generate an error signal which is the difference between the timing signal received from the network and a counter signal from a counter which is incremented according to the speed of the motor, and to adjust the speed of the motor according to the error signal.
  • the motor control system of this aspect has particular application where the network is a packet network, such as an Ethernet network.
  • the speed of the motor can be accurately controlled according to the received timing signals, even if those signals are subject to data loss (e.g. packet loss) or delay.
  • data loss e.g. packet loss
  • the phase locked loop includes: a speed encoder arranged to detect the speed of the motor and convert it to a sequence of pulses encoding the speed of the motor; a local counter which is incremented by pulses from the speed encoder and is arranged to output the counter signal; a receiver connected to the network and arranged to receive a timing signal from the network; a phase detector arranged to determine the error signal based on the difference between said counter signal and said timing signal.
  • phase locked loop resembles that of known PLLs with the voltage- controlled oscillator being replaced by the motor and speed encoder combination.
  • the phase locked loop further includes a loop filter arranged to remove possible noise and/or jitter in the error signal and therefore prevent erroneous adjustment of the speed of the motor.
  • the phase locked loop further includes an amplifier which amplifies the error signal before passing it to the motor.
  • the timing signal is a sequence of timestamps.
  • the timestamps may be conveyed using a protocol such as the IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP).
  • PTP Precision Time Protocol
  • the timestamps could be carried using the PTP Sync and FolIowJJp messages.
  • a preferred configuration of the speed encoder is an optical tachometer, in particular a fork- shaped optocoupier in which the light beam is chopped by a sector disk, thereby producing a known number of pulses for each rotation of the motor shaft.
  • Embodiments of this first aspect may include some, ail or none of the above described optional or preferred features.
  • a second aspect of the present invention provides a system for remotely controlling the speed of a motor, preferably over a packet network, by sending timing signals 5 from a central control unit to a motor control unit which uses phase-locked loop principles to adjust the speed of the motor according to the received timing signals.
  • a second aspect of the present invention preferably provides a system for remotely controlling the speed of the motor, the system including: a central control unit, a motor control unit and a network connecting the control units, wherein: the central control unit i o includes: a variable frequency transmitter, arranged to send a timing signal over the network which represents the desired speed of the motor; and the motor control unit includes: the motor; and a phase locked loop connected to a network and arranged to receive a timing signal from that network and to control the speed of the motor according to that timing signal, wherein the phase locked loop is arranged to generate an error signal which is the difference is between the timing signal received from the network and an output signal of a counter which is incremented according to the speed of the motor, and to adjust the speed of the motor according to the error signal.
  • the motor control system of this aspect has particular application where the network is a packet network, such as an Ethernet network.
  • the phase locked loop includes: a speed encoder arranged to detect the speed of the motor and convert it to a sequence of pulses encoding the speed of the motor; a local counter arranged to output a counter signal which is incremented by pulses from the speed encoder; a receiver connected to a network and arranged to receive a timing signal from that network; and a phase detector arranged to determine the error signal based on the
  • the phase locked loop further includes a loop filter arranged to remove possible noise and/or jitter in the error signal and therefore prevent erroneous adjustment of the speed of the motor.
  • the phase locked loop further includes an amplifier which amplifies the error signal so before passing it to the motor.
  • the timing signal is a sequence of timestamps.
  • the timestamps may be conveyed using a protocol such as the IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP).
  • PTP Precision Time Protocol
  • the timestamps could be carried using the PTP Sync and follow . Jjp messages.
  • a preferred configuration of the speed encoder is an optical tachometer, in particular a fork- shaped optocoupier in which the light beam is chopped by a sector disk, thereby producing a known number of pulses for each rotation of the motor shaft.
  • the central control unit sends timing signals to each of said plurality of motor control units so as to cause the motors of the motor control units to operate in synchronisation with each other.
  • synchronization does not necessarily mean that each motor rotates at the same speed, but that the relative speeds of the motors are maintained in a predetermined relationship.
  • the proposed PLL technique can be used to provide real-time control with individual nodes synchronized to the same level of accuracy.
  • timing signals are multicast from a common clock source (e.g. in the central control unit) to each of said plurality of motor control units.
  • a preferred configuration of the central control unit includes: an oscillator generating a variable frequency pulsed signal; and a speed counter which counts the pulses from the oscillator, wherein the timing signals are samples of the output of the speed counter.
  • the output of the counter represents the transmitter speed signal and is incremented by a fixed amount at each pulse.
  • Samples of the transmitter speed signal thus generated may be communicated to the motor control unit as the timing signa!s/timestamps.
  • Embodiments of this second aspect may include some, all or none of the above described optional or preferred features.
  • a third aspect of the present invention provides a method of controlling the speed of a motor, preferably over a packet network, by sending timing signals over a network and using phase-locked loop principles to adjust the speed of the motor according to the received timing signals.
  • the motor is preferably a DC motor.
  • a third aspect of the present invention preferably provides a method of remotely controlling the speed of a motor, the method including the steps of: sending, over a network, 5 a timing signal which represents the desired speed of the motor; detecting the speed of the motor as a local oscillator signal; receiving said timing signal; comparing the phase of said timing signal and said oscillator signal to generate an error signal ; and adjusting the speed of the motor according to the error signal.
  • the method includes the steps i o of sending timing signals over said network to each of said plurality of motors so as to cause the motors to operate in synchronisation with each other.
  • synchronization does not s necessarily mean that each motor rotates at the same speed, but that the relative speeds of the motors are maintained in a predetermined relationship.
  • the proposed PLL technique can be used to provide real-time control with individual nodes synchronized to the same level of accuracy.
  • the timing signals are multicast from a common clock 20 source (e.g. in the central control unit) to each of said plurality of motor control units.
  • said motor on start-up, said motor is initially free-running, and the method further comprises the steps of: receiving the first timing signal from the network and using it to initialise a local counter which counts pulses of the local oscillator signal, and starting the steps of detecting, receiving, comparing and adjusting after receipt of said first 25 timing signal.
  • Embodiments of this third aspect may include some, all or none of the above described optional or preferred features.
  • the method of the third aspect is preferably, but not necessarily, used to control a system according to the above first or second aspect, including some, all or none of the optional or so preferred features of those aspects.
  • PLLs have been applied to many applications from communications systems, consumer electronics, military hardware, computer clocks, to wireless systems.
  • the use of PLLs techniques for motor speed control is not new.
  • PLL techniques for remote motor speed control over packet networks is new.
  • the techniques employed in the embodiments of the invention described below are inspired by phase-locked loop (PLL) principles. Below the detail architecture of speed control systems according to embodiments of the invention are described, and design details for computing the parameters of the various elements of the motor speed control system are set out. in a speed control system of an embodiment of the present invention, as shown
  • timestamps 42 from a variable speed reference convey speed setpoints to a motor 44 which forms part of a closed-loop system 40.
  • the assembly of the motor 44 and the speed encoder 46 is analogous to a PLL.
  • the timestamps can be conveyed using a protocol such as the IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP) [3][4][5j.
  • PTP Precision Time Protocol
  • the timestamps could be carried via the PTP Sync and Follow Up messages.
  • the closed-loop system 40 of this embodiment includes an encoder counter 47, a phase detector 41 arranged to measure the phase difference between the output of the encoder counter 47 and the arriving timestamps 42, a loop filter 43 and a power amplifier 49.
  • Figure 4b shows an alternative implementation according to an embodiment of the present invention in which the phase detector and loop filter of the embodiment shown in Figure 4a are implemented in a processor 47 and a digitai-to-analog converter (DAC) 48 is used to convert the digital output signal of the loop filter to an analog format so that it can be amplified by the power amplifier 49.
  • the lower part of Figure 4b shows the component parts of the DAC 48, which are a pulse-width modulator (PWM) 48a and a low pass filter 48b.
  • PWM pulse-width modulator
  • Manufacturing systems in applications like paper manufacturing, food/beverage packaging, and semiconductor processing often require high-speed motion/motor synchronization to maintain product quality at high throughput rates.
  • the systems and methods according to the present invention can be used to provide real-time control with individual nodes synchronized to the same level of accuracy.
  • This multiple motor control scenario is illustrated in Figure 5 and requires the multicasting of timestamps (from a common clock source 52) over the packet network 56 to ail the motors 54 under control.
  • the setpoint for the motor is supplied by arriving timestamps 82 from a speed-mapped variable frequency source 60.
  • the shaft speed of the motor 64 is measured with a tachometer 66 with its output proportional to the motor speed. Any deviation of the actual speed from the setpoint is amplified by the power amplifier (amp) whose output drives the motor.
  • the gain of the power amp is usually high but finite.
  • the system to be controlled includes a motor-tachometer combination where the tachometer measures the speed of the motor.
  • the tachometer signai could be generated by a fork-shaped optocoup!er in which a light beam is chopped by a sector disk.
  • the sector disk of the tachometer has K z teeth. If the motor has speed ⁇ (rad/s), then the speed of the tachometer signai ⁇ ⁇ (r) is equal to the speed ⁇ multiplied by K z , that is, oj m (0 - ⁇ ( ⁇ ) ⁇ ⁇ .
  • This motor speed to tachometer speed mapping can be used to calibrate a variable frequency source (the speed reference generator) which can be used to generate a speed setpoint or reference for the control of the motor at a remote location over the packet network.
  • a speed-mapped variable frequency transmitter 60 periodically sends timestamps 62 over a packet network 65 to the motor speed control system to enable it synchronize its speed (registered by the local encoder plus counter) to the transmitter's frequency.
  • the transmitter 60 consists essentially of an oscillator 60a capable of generating a variable frequency signal and a speed counter 60b.
  • the oscillator 60a issues periodic pulses that constitute the input to the speed (timestamp) counter 60b.
  • the output of the counter represents the transmitter speed signai and is incremented by a fixed amount at each pulse.
  • Samples of transmitter speed signals are communicated to the receiver as timestamps 62.
  • the motor speed control system uses the timestamps 62 (which constitute the reference signal and carry the setpoint or shaft speed) and its local encoder counter 67 output to generate a control signal that allows it to lock onto the speed-mapped transmitter speed signal.
  • the motor speed control system has four main components: a phase detector 61 , a 5 loop filter 63, a motor 64 and speed encoder 66 (tachometer) set, and a local encoder
  • the phase detector 61 computes an error signal as the difference between the reference signal from the timestamps 62 and the output signal of the local encoder counter 67.
  • the error signal is passed on to the loop filter 63 which is responsible for eliminating possible jitter and noise in the input signal.
  • the filtered error is t o then amplified in power amp 68 and passed as input to the motor 64.
  • the electric motor 64 is steered to operate at a speed which is determined by the amplified output signal of the loop filter 63.
  • This speed control technique also allows multiple motors, for example in a broadcast or point-to-multipoint communication scenario, to synchronize their speeds to the transmitter as shown in Figure 6d.
  • T(n) denote the time base (e.g., in pulse ticks) of the transmitter speed counter and R(n) the time base of the encoder counter of the motor speed control system.
  • speed of the motor 64 in turn drives the encoder counter 67. After a while the error term is expected to converge to zero which means the speed of the motor 64 has been locked to the incoming time base, i.e., time base of the speed-mapped variable frequency transmitter 60.
  • the entire motor control system is accordingly a PLL in which the normal voltage controlled so oscillator (VCO) is replaced by a combination of a motor and speed encoder (such as an optical tachometer).
  • VCO voltage controlled so oscillator
  • the tachometer signal could be generated b a fork-shaped optocoupler in which the light beam is chopped by a sector disk.
  • the optocoupler is usually fabricated from a light-emitting diode (LED) and a silicon phototransistor.
  • the tachometer signal could be generated by a gear with K z teeth coupled to the motor shaft and a gear tooth sensor that can detect the motion of the gear with its discontinuous surface.
  • the gear tooth sensor generates a digital pulse signal for each contact with a tooth on the gear.
  • the tachometer can be provided as a rotating ring magnet with K 2 North/South magnetic fields where a sensor generates a digital pulse signal for each contact with a North (or South) field.
  • the signal generated by the optocoupler is a frequency proportional to the speed of the motor. Because the phase detector compares not only the frequencies ref and ⁇ 3 ⁇ 4 of the reference and the tachometer signals but also their phases, the system settles at zero velocity error.
  • the transfer functions of all the components in Figure 4 or Figure 6 must be known.
  • the transfer functions of the phase detector and loop filter are usually known.
  • the transfer function of the motor-tachometer combination can be determined as follows.
  • phase angle ⁇ of the motor is the time integral of the angular speed ⁇ . Therefore, we can express the Laplace transform ($) of the phase angle of the motor ⁇ ( ⁇ ) as
  • Figure 8 shows the closed-loop model of the motor speed control system.
  • the power amplifier is supposed to be a zero-order gain block with proportional gain K a .
  • the poies of this amplifier normally can be neglected because they are at much higher frequencies than the poies of the motor.
  • Performance specifications are constraints put on the system response characteristics. They may be s stated in any number of ways. Generally, they take two forms: 1 ) Frequency-domain specifications (i.e., pertinent quantifies expressed as functions of frequency), and 2) Time- domain specifications (in terms of time response).
  • the desired system characteristics may be prescribed in either or both of the above forms, in general, they specify three important properties of dynamic systems: 1 ) Speed of response, 2) Relative stability, and 3) System
  • K 0I G 0L (s) the open-loop transfer function of the PLL.
  • Gain and phase margins are measures of stability for a feedback system, though often times only phase margin is used rather than both : ® Gain Margin (GM): GM is a measure of relative stability and is defined as the magnitude of the reciprocal of the open-loop transfer function, evaluated at the frequency ⁇ 3 ⁇ 4 0 heard at which the phase angle is - 180° ( Figure 9). That is,
  • Phase Margin (PM) PM, ⁇ ⁇ , a measure of relative stability and is defined as 180° plus the phase angle ⁇ ⁇ of the open-!oop transfer function at unity gain (i.e., 0 dB gain) . That is,
  • phase margin 60 ° is highly desirable in feedback amplifier design as a tradeoff between loop stability and settling time in the transient response.
  • minimum acceptable phase margin is 45°.
  • the output of a low-pass filter driven by a ramp is another ramp with the same slope, offset from the input by a constant.
  • Designing the third-order loop The design steps are as follows
  • Step 1 Design pre-specification: Specify the phase margin ⁇ for the loop, e.g.,
  • Step 3 Then compute the time constant ⁇ using Eq. (A.22):
  • Step 5 Verify the performance of the loop using the computed parameters, and if not satisfactory repeat process from Step 1 to 4.
  • phase detector and the loop filter can be implemented in the digital domain with sampling interval ⁇ / .
  • the phase of the loop is determined from
  • phase margin of the system is arctan ⁇ 2 - arctan a>T m + ⁇
  • computer system includes the hardware, software and data storage devices for embodying a system or carrying out a method according to the above described
  • a computer system may comprise a central processing unit (CPU), input means, output means and data storage.
  • the data storage may comprise RAM, disk drives or other computer readable media.
  • the computer system may include a plurality of computing devices connected b a network and able to communicate with each other over that network.
  • the methods of the above embodiments may be provided as one or more computer programs or as computer program products or computer readable media carrying a computer program which is arranged, when run on a computer, to perform the method(s) described above.
  • computer readable media includes, without limitation, any medium or media which can be read and accessed directly by a computer or computer system.
  • the media can include, but are not limited to, magnetic storage media such as floppy discs, hard disc storage media and magnetic tape; optical storage media such as optical discs or CD-ROMs; electrical storage media such as memory, including RAM, ROM and flash memory; and hybrids and combinations of the above such as magnetic/optical storage media.

Abstract

La présente invention porte sur des procédés et des dispositifs pour la commande de vitesse de moteur. L'invention trouve une application particulière dans la commande de moteurs par des réseaux de paquets. Dans des modes de réalisation de l'invention, on utilise des principes de boucle à phase asservie pour commander à distance la vitesse d'un moteur électrique par un réseau de paquets. Le point de consigne pour le moteur est fourni par des estampilles temporelles arrivantes issues d'une source à fréquence variable à mappage de vitesse. La vitesse d'arbre du moteur est mesurée avec un tachymètre, dont la sortie est proportionnelle à la vitesse du moteur. Tout écart entre la vitesse réelle et le point de consigne est amplifié par l'amplificateur de puissance, dont la sortie alimente le moteur. La commande de vitesse par réseaux de paquets permet une commande plus lisse d'un processus, une commande de l'accélération, différentes vitesses de fonctionnement pour chaque recette de processus, la compensation des variables de processus changeantes, le fonctionnement lent pour la configuration, des ajustements de la cadence de production, le positionnement précis et le couple ou la tension de commande d'un système.
PCT/GB2012/052165 2012-09-04 2012-09-04 Procédé et système pour la commande de vitesse de moteur WO2014037683A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12761784.3A EP2893631A1 (fr) 2012-09-04 2012-09-04 Procédé et système pour la commande de vitesse de moteur
PCT/GB2012/052165 WO2014037683A1 (fr) 2012-09-04 2012-09-04 Procédé et système pour la commande de vitesse de moteur
US13/699,810 US9178464B2 (en) 2012-09-04 2012-09-04 Method and system for motor speed control

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/GB2012/052165 WO2014037683A1 (fr) 2012-09-04 2012-09-04 Procédé et système pour la commande de vitesse de moteur

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014037683A1 true WO2014037683A1 (fr) 2014-03-13

Family

ID=46881090

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2012/052165 WO2014037683A1 (fr) 2012-09-04 2012-09-04 Procédé et système pour la commande de vitesse de moteur

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US9178464B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2893631A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2014037683A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8941424B2 (en) * 2013-06-27 2015-01-27 Microsemi Semiconductor Ulc Digital phase locked loop with reduced convergence time
US20190007726A1 (en) * 2017-06-30 2019-01-03 Intel Corporation Audio, video, and actuation (a/v/a) synchronization for mixed reality
CN109164754B (zh) * 2018-08-06 2021-01-15 大族激光科技产业集团股份有限公司 一种伺服驱动器位置命令的平滑方法及其控制装置
CN111010058A (zh) * 2019-11-29 2020-04-14 北京特种机械研究所 一种基于pi和锁相环的硬盘电机稳速控制方法
CN112751517B (zh) * 2020-12-30 2022-12-30 深圳大学 电机控制系统及方法

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0030302A2 (fr) * 1979-12-06 1981-06-17 International Business Machines Corporation Système d'asservissement pour la régulation de l'accélération et la décélération d'un moteur d'entraînement
EP0239655A1 (fr) * 1986-04-01 1987-10-07 Océ-Nederland B.V. Régulateur électronique proportionnel et intégral de construction digitale
WO2002003526A2 (fr) * 2000-07-05 2002-01-10 Linak A/S Dispositif de commande destine a au moins deux moteurs a courant continu, et plus particulierement verins de reglage pour mobilier
US7162510B2 (en) 1998-03-16 2007-01-09 Schneider Automation Inc. Communication system for a control system over Ethernet and IP networks
WO2008151995A1 (fr) * 2007-06-12 2008-12-18 Thomson Licensing Contrôle de phase d'un signal de synchronisation dans un réseau à commutation de paquets
US7882197B2 (en) 1996-08-20 2011-02-01 Invensys Systems, Inc. Control system methods that transfer control apparatus information over IP networks in web page-less transfers

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3586221A (en) * 1969-08-28 1971-06-22 Air Reduction Torque control of multiple motors for uniform feed of welding wire
US3646417A (en) * 1971-03-25 1972-02-29 Ibm Digital speed servomechanism
US4153863A (en) * 1977-04-20 1979-05-08 Colt Industries Operating Corp. (Pratt & Whitney Machine Tool Division) DC Motor controller
KR101702440B1 (ko) * 2010-07-08 2017-02-06 에스프린팅솔루션 주식회사 화상형성장치, 모터 제어 장치 및 그 모터 제어 방법

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0030302A2 (fr) * 1979-12-06 1981-06-17 International Business Machines Corporation Système d'asservissement pour la régulation de l'accélération et la décélération d'un moteur d'entraînement
EP0239655A1 (fr) * 1986-04-01 1987-10-07 Océ-Nederland B.V. Régulateur électronique proportionnel et intégral de construction digitale
US7882197B2 (en) 1996-08-20 2011-02-01 Invensys Systems, Inc. Control system methods that transfer control apparatus information over IP networks in web page-less transfers
US7162510B2 (en) 1998-03-16 2007-01-09 Schneider Automation Inc. Communication system for a control system over Ethernet and IP networks
WO2002003526A2 (fr) * 2000-07-05 2002-01-10 Linak A/S Dispositif de commande destine a au moins deux moteurs a courant continu, et plus particulierement verins de reglage pour mobilier
WO2008151995A1 (fr) * 2007-06-12 2008-12-18 Thomson Licensing Contrôle de phase d'un signal de synchronisation dans un réseau à commutation de paquets

Non-Patent Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems", IEEE, pages 1588 - 2002
"IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems", IEEE, pages 1588 - 2008
F.-L. LIAN; J. R. MOYNE; D.M. TILBURY: "Performance evaluation of control networks: Ethernet, ControlNet and DeviceNet", IEEE CONTROL SYST. MAG., vol. 21, February 2001 (2001-02-01), pages 66 - 83, XP011084222, DOI: doi:10.1109/37.898793
G. F. FRANKLIN; J. D. POWELL; A. EMAMI-NAEINI: "Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems", 1994, ADDISON-WESLEY READING
G. KAPLAN: "Ethernet's winning ways", IEEE SPECTRUM, vol. 38, January 2001 (2001-01-01), pages 113 - 115
G.C. WALSH; H. YE; L.G. BUSHNELL: "Stability analysis of networked control systems", IEEE TRANS. CONTR. SYST. TECHNOL., vol. 10, May 2002 (2002-05-01), pages 438 - 446, XP011071693
H. WENSHAN; L. GUO-PING; D. REES: "Netwokred predictive control over the internet using round-trip delay measurement", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, vol. 57, no. 10, October 2008 (2008-10-01), pages 2231 - 2241, XP011226023, DOI: doi:10.1109/TIM.2008.919978
J. B. ENCINAS: "Phase Locked Loops", 1993, CHAPMAN & HALL
J. J. DISTEFANO, III; A. R. STUBERRUD; I. J. WILLIAMS, THEORY AND PROBLEMS OF FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS, 1990
JOHN C. EIDSON: "Measurement, Control and Communication Using IEEE", April 2006, SPRINGER, pages: 1588
K. MATSUO; T. MIURA; T. TANIGUCHI: "A speed control method of small DC motor through IP network considering packet loss", TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING JAPAN, vol. 2, no. 6, November 2007 (2007-11-01), pages 657 - 659
K.C. LEE; S. LEE; M.H. LEE: "Remote fuzzy logic control of networked control system via Profibus-DP", IEEE TRANS. INDUSTR. ELECTRON., vol. 50, August 2003 (2003-08-01), pages 784 - 792, XP011098994, DOI: doi:10.1109/TIE.2003.814761
L. M. THOMPSON: "Industrial Data Communications", October 2007
M. DREW; L. XIANGHENG; A. GOLDSMITH; K. HEDRICK: "Networked control system design over a Wireless LAN", PROC. IEEE CONF. ON DECISION AND CONTROL, January 2006 (2006-01-01), pages 6704 - 7709
PERRY S. MARSHALL; JOHN S. RINAIDI: "Industrial Ethernet", January 2005
S. H. HONG: "Scheduling algorithm of data sampling times ni the integrated communication and control systems", IEEE TRANS. CONTR. SYST. TECHNOL., vol. 3, June 1995 (1995-06-01), pages 225 - 230, XP000507268, DOI: doi:10.1109/87.388131
U. L. ROHDE: "Digital PLL Frequency Synthesizers: Theory and Design", 1983, PRENTICE-HALL
W. F. EGAN: "Phase-Lock Basics", 1998, JOHN WILEY
Y. TIPSUWAN; M.-Y. CHOW: "Control methodologies in networked control systems", CONTR. ENG. PRACTICE, vol. 11, no. 10, 2003, pages 1099 - 1111
Y. TIPSUWAN; M.-Y. CHOW: "On the gain scheduling for networked PI controller over IP network", IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, vol. 9, no. 3, September 2004 (2004-09-01), pages 491 - 498, XP011118946, DOI: doi:10.1109/TMECH.2004.834645

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9178464B2 (en) 2015-11-03
US20140070734A1 (en) 2014-03-13
EP2893631A1 (fr) 2015-07-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9178464B2 (en) Method and system for motor speed control
EP2740228B1 (fr) Procédé et système de synchronisation de fréquence
US8467418B2 (en) Differential timing transfer over synchronous ethernet using digital frequency generators and control word signaling
JP5701420B2 (ja) パケットネットワークを介した時間同期のためのタイミングシステム及び方法
US7643595B2 (en) Method and apparatus for synchronizing clock timing between network elements
US20060056560A1 (en) Method and apparatus for synchronizing internal state of frequency generators on a communications network
CN103427750B (zh) 用于电动致动器的电流控制
US11669476B2 (en) Systems and methods for communication and/or control of scalable, modular network nodes
Vázquez-Gutiérrez et al. Small-signal modeling of the incremental optical encoder for motor control
US9876597B2 (en) Method for the clock synchronization of a plurality of modules
CN102801487A (zh) 用于控制频率同步的方法和设备
CN104243129A (zh) 接收器、计算时间差的方法以及程序
Nguyen et al. Sensorless control of DFIG wind turbine systems based on SOGI and rotor position correction
Li et al. Sliding mode predictive tracking control for DC permanent magnet motor in NCSs with random delay and packet dropouts
EP2509251B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de contrôle de synchronisation de fréquence
Abdelrahem et al. Finite-set MRAS observer for encoderless control of PMSGs in wind turbine applications
Verkroost et al. Multi‐agent control in modular motor drives by means of gossip consensus
Vazquez Gutierrez et al. Small-signal modeling of the incremental optical encoder for motor
Piggin Developments in real-time control with EtherNet
Sarjaš et al. Event-triggered sliding mode control for constrained networked control systems
US20090091480A1 (en) High-frequency module for performing effective phase compensation of clock for input digital signal
Spera Motion control and real-time systems: an approach to trajectory rebuilding in non-deterministic networks
Aweya et al. Clock synchronization for packet networks using a weighted least‐squares error filtering technique and enabling circuit emulation service
ZHOU et al. System modeling of a clock synchronization method for power packet dispatching
Yi et al. Design of Frequency Adjustment Algorithm for Time Synchronization of Substation Automation System According to IEC 61850 Standard

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 13699810

Country of ref document: US

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12761784

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE