WO2014008608A1 - Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions and process for making same - Google Patents

Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions and process for making same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014008608A1
WO2014008608A1 PCT/CA2013/050543 CA2013050543W WO2014008608A1 WO 2014008608 A1 WO2014008608 A1 WO 2014008608A1 CA 2013050543 W CA2013050543 W CA 2013050543W WO 2014008608 A1 WO2014008608 A1 WO 2014008608A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
cells
leukocyte
pro
mir
preparation
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CA2013/050543
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Mark D. Scott
Duncheng WANG
Wendy M. TOYOFUKU
Original Assignee
Canadian Blood Services
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Canadian Blood Services filed Critical Canadian Blood Services
Priority to EP13817560.9A priority Critical patent/EP2872153B1/en
Priority to DK13817560.9T priority patent/DK2872153T3/en
Priority to CA2878726A priority patent/CA2878726C/en
Priority to US14/414,404 priority patent/US10039786B2/en
Priority to DK13889025.6T priority patent/DK3019176T3/en
Priority to PCT/CA2013/050963 priority patent/WO2015003240A1/en
Priority to CA2917567A priority patent/CA2917567A1/en
Priority to US14/904,347 priority patent/US11007221B2/en
Priority to EP13889025.6A priority patent/EP3019176B1/en
Publication of WO2014008608A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014008608A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K2239/00—Indexing codes associated with cellular immunotherapy of group A61K39/46
    • A61K2239/26—Universal/off- the- shelf cellular immunotherapy; Allogenic cells or means to avoid rejection
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K2239/00—Indexing codes associated with cellular immunotherapy of group A61K39/46
    • A61K2239/31—Indexing codes associated with cellular immunotherapy of group A61K39/46 characterized by the route of administration
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K2239/00—Indexing codes associated with cellular immunotherapy of group A61K39/46
    • A61K2239/38—Indexing codes associated with cellular immunotherapy of group A61K39/46 characterised by the dose, timing or administration schedule
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K35/00—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
    • A61K35/12—Materials from mammals; Compositions comprising non-specified tissues or cells; Compositions comprising non-embryonic stem cells; Genetically modified cells
    • A61K35/14—Blood; Artificial blood
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K39/0005—Vertebrate antigens
    • A61K39/0008—Antigens related to auto-immune diseases; Preparations to induce self-tolerance
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K39/0005—Vertebrate antigens
    • A61K39/001—Preparations to induce tolerance to non-self, e.g. prior to transplantation
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K39/46—Cellular immunotherapy
    • A61K39/461—Cellular immunotherapy characterised by the cell type used
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K39/46—Cellular immunotherapy
    • A61K39/462—Cellular immunotherapy characterized by the effect or the function of the cells
    • A61K39/4621—Cellular immunotherapy characterized by the effect or the function of the cells immunosuppressive or immunotolerising
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K39/46—Cellular immunotherapy
    • A61K39/464—Cellular immunotherapy characterised by the antigen targeted or presented
    • A61K39/4643—Vertebrate antigens
    • A61K39/46433—Antigens related to auto-immune diseases; Preparations to induce self-tolerance
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
    • A61K47/69—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the conjugate being characterised by physical or galenical forms, e.g. emulsion, particle, inclusion complex, stent or kit
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
    • A61K47/69—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the conjugate being characterised by physical or galenical forms, e.g. emulsion, particle, inclusion complex, stent or kit
    • A61K47/6901—Conjugates being cells, cell fragments, viruses, ghosts, red blood cells or viral vectors
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/0012—Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
    • A61K9/0019—Injectable compositions; Intramuscular, intravenous, arterial, subcutaneous administration; Compositions to be administered through the skin in an invasive manner
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P35/00—Antineoplastic agents
    • A61P35/02—Antineoplastic agents specific for leukemia
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P37/00—Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
    • A61P37/02—Immunomodulators
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11—DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/113—Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
    • C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
    • C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
    • C12N5/0634—Cells from the blood or the immune system
    • C12N5/0636—T lymphocytes
    • C12N5/0637—Immunosuppressive T lymphocytes, e.g. regulatory T cells or Treg
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
    • C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
    • C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
    • C12N5/0634—Cells from the blood or the immune system
    • C12N5/0636—T lymphocytes
    • C12N5/0638—Cytotoxic T lymphocytes [CTL] or lymphokine activated killer cells [LAK]
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K35/00—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
    • A61K35/12—Materials from mammals; Compositions comprising non-specified tissues or cells; Compositions comprising non-embryonic stem cells; Genetically modified cells
    • A61K2035/122—Materials from mammals; Compositions comprising non-specified tissues or cells; Compositions comprising non-embryonic stem cells; Genetically modified cells for inducing tolerance or supression of immune responses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K35/00—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
    • A61K35/12—Materials from mammals; Compositions comprising non-specified tissues or cells; Compositions comprising non-embryonic stem cells; Genetically modified cells
    • A61K2035/124—Materials from mammals; Compositions comprising non-specified tissues or cells; Compositions comprising non-embryonic stem cells; Genetically modified cells the cells being hematopoietic, bone marrow derived or blood cells
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K2039/51—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies comprising whole cells, viruses or DNA/RNA
    • A61K2039/515—Animal cells
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K2039/57—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies characterised by the type of response, e.g. Th1, Th2
    • A61K2039/577—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies characterised by the type of response, e.g. Th1, Th2 tolerising response
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K35/00—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
    • A61K47/51—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent
    • A61K47/56—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an organic macromolecular compound, e.g. an oligomeric, polymeric or dendrimeric molecule
    • A61K47/59—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an organic macromolecular compound, e.g. an oligomeric, polymeric or dendrimeric molecule obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polyureas or polyurethanes
    • A61K47/60—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an organic macromolecular compound, e.g. an oligomeric, polymeric or dendrimeric molecule obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polyureas or polyurethanes the organic macromolecular compound being a polyoxyalkylene oligomer, polymer or dendrimer, e.g. PEG, PPG, PEO or polyglycerol
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00—Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/10—Type of nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/14—Type of nucleic acid interfering N.A.
    • C12N2310/141—MicroRNAs, miRNAs
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2500/00—Specific components of cell culture medium
    • C12N2500/50—Soluble polymers, e.g. polyethyleneglycol [PEG]
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
    • C12N2501/65—MicroRNA
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2502/00—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by
    • C12N2502/11—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by blood or immune system cells
    • C12N2502/1114—T cells

Definitions

  • the invention provides pro-tolerogenic preparations capable of inducing immune tolerance or anergy.
  • the pro-tolerogenic preparations are RNase-sensitive and can be obtained by enriching the miRNA species expressed when two allogeneic leukocyte populations are contacted and at least one of the population has been modified to bear on its surface a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer capable of limiting pro-inflammatory allo-recognition.
  • Acute and chronic rejection of donor tissues and organs remains a significant clinical problem in transplantation medicine. Moreover, autoimmune diseases in which one's own immune system recognizes "self tissues as foreign can also be rejected by similar mechanisms. To minimize or prevent rejection, the administration of immunosuppressive agents is typically required. Acute and chronic rejection are primarily T lymphocyte-mediated events that require allogeneic recognition of the foreign tissue and the subsequent proliferation of allo-responsive T cells. Indeed, because of the central role of the T cell in rejection, it is the primary target of current immunosuppressive drugs (e.g. , cyclosporine A, FK506).
  • immunosuppressive drugs e.g. , cyclosporine A, FK506
  • these pharmacologic agents target either the T cell activation (e.g., cyclosporine A that inhibits IL-2 responsiveness) or the proliferation (e.g., methotrexate) of the allo-responsive T cells.
  • T cell activation e.g., cyclosporine A that inhibits IL-2 responsiveness
  • proliferation e.g., methotrexate
  • all of today's clinically approved anti-rejection drugs are beset by chronic toxicity. Consequently, significant research is underway to identify alternative means of preventing acute and chronic rejection.
  • a biomaterials approach to modulating immune responsiveness is the direct modification of the surface of donor cells (e.g. , erythrocytes, lymphocytes, and pancreatic islets) to prevent allo- recognition (Scott et al., 1997; Murad et al., 1999A; Murad et al., 1999B; Bradley et al., 2001 ; Chen et al., 2001 ; Chen et al., 2003; McCoy et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2006; Bradley et al., 2007; Sutton et al., 2010; Le et al., 2010).
  • donor cells e.g. , erythrocytes, lymphocytes, and pancreatic islets
  • the polymer modification of the surface of cells is induced by the direct grafting of low immunogenicity polymers to the cell membrane.
  • Previous studies have demonstrated that the polymer modification of the surface of erythrocytes and lymphocytes resulted in the loss of allo-recognition both in vitro and in vivo.
  • the grafted polymer exhibited both extremely low toxicity and immunogenicity.
  • an acellular preparation capable of inducing a state of anergy or immunotolerance by increasing the ratio of the level of regulatory T cells (such as Treg) to pro-inflammatory T cells (such as Th1 and Th17).
  • the acellular preparation could induce anergy or tolerance either by increasing Treg levels, decreasing pro-inflammatory T cell levels or both.
  • This preparation could be useful for treating, preventing and/or alleviating the symptoms associated to an abnormal/excessive immune condition, such as an auto-immune disease, an exacerbated response to a vaccine or a tissue/cell transplantation.
  • the present invention concern acellular preparations, enriched in at least one miRNA species obtained by contacting two allogeneic leukocyte populations, wherein one of the leukocyte population has been modified to bear on its surface a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer.
  • the two leukocyte populations are contacted in conditions preventing or limiting pro- inflammatory allo-recognition while allowing pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition.
  • the present invention provides a process for making an acellular pro- tolerogenic composition.
  • the process comprises (i) associating a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer to a cytoplasmic membrane of a first leukocyte to obtain a first modified leukocyte; (ii) contacting the first modified leukocyte with a second leukocyte under conditions to allow a pro-tolerogenic allorecognition to provide a conditioned preparation, wherein the first leukocyte is allogeneic to the second leukocyte; (iii) removing the first modified leukocyte and the second leukocyte from the conditioned preparation under conditions to inhibit RNA degradation so as to obtain a composition enriched in acellular pro-tolerogenic components; and (iv) formulating the composition of step (iii), under conditions to inhibit RNA degradation, in the acellular pro-tolerogenic preparation for administration to a subject.
  • the process further comprises covalently binding the low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer to a membrane-associated protein of the cytoplasmic membrane of the first leukocyte.
  • the low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer is a polyethylene glycol (PEG) (a methoxy polyethylene glycol (mPEG) for example).
  • the process further comprises covalently binding the mPEG by contacting the first leukocyte with methoxypoly(-ethylene glycol) succinimidyl valerate.
  • step (ii) occurs in vitro.
  • the conditioned preparation can be a supernatant of a cell culture of the first leukocyte and the second leukocyte.
  • the process further comprises preventing one of the first leukocyte or the second leukocyte from proliferating prior to step (ii).
  • step (ii) occurs in vivo and comprises administering the first modified leukocyte to a mammal having/bearing the second leukocyte.
  • the conditioned preparation can be plasma.
  • the process further comprises preventing the first leukocyte from proliferating prior to administration to the mammal.
  • step (iii) further comprises removing components having an average molecular weight of more than about 10 kDa from the conditioned preparation or filtering out components having the average molecular weight of more than about 10 kDa from the conditioned preparation.
  • step (iii) further comprises enriching the conditioned preparation in at least one miRNA species.
  • step (iv) further comprises formulating the composition for intravenous administration to the subject.
  • the first leukocyte and/or the second leukocyte is a T cell (for example a CD4- positive T cell or a CD8-positive T cell).
  • the present invention provides a pro-tolerogenic preparation obtained by the process described herein.
  • the pro-tolerogenic preparation has at least one miRNA species presented in Figure 13, at least one of the miRNA species listed any one of Tables 1A to 1 D, at least one of the miRNA species listed in any one of Tables 2A to 2D and/or at least one of the miRNA species identified in any one of Figures 12A to 12C.
  • the present invention provides a method of increasing a ratio of the level of regulatory T (Treg) cells to the level of pro-inflammatory T cells in a subject in need thereof.
  • the method comprises administering to the subject a therapeutic amount of a pro-tolerogenic preparation as described herein and/or obtained by the process described herein so as to increase the ratio in the treated subject.
  • the increased ratio between the level of Treg cells and the level of pro-inflammatory T cells is for treating, preventing and/or alleviating the symptoms associated to an auto-immune disease afflicting the subject.
  • Auto-immune diseases include, but are not limited to, type I diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, lupus, immune thrombocytopenia, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, autoimmune uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma and/or Crohn's disease.
  • the increased ratio between the level of Treg cells and the level of pro-inflammatory T cells is for preventing or limiting the rejection of transplanted cells or tissue in the subject (for example, transplanted cells or tissue which are allogeneic or xenogeneic to the subject).
  • the increased ratio between the level of Treg cells and the level of pro-inflammatory T cells is for preventing or limiting graft-versus-host disease in the treated subject.
  • the process for obtaining the pro-tolerogenic preparation can further comprise formulating the composition for administration prior to the transplantation of the cells or tissue.
  • the present invention provides a pro-tolerogenic preparation for increasing a ratio of the level of regulatory T (Treg) cells to the level of pro-inflammatory T cells in a subject.
  • the present invention also provides a pro-tolerogenic preparation for the preparation of a medicament for increasing a ratio of the level of regulatory T (Treg) cells to the level of pro-inflammatory T cells in a subject.
  • the pro-tolerogenic preparation is described herein and/or is obtained by the process described herein.
  • the pro- tolerogenic preparation is for treating, preventing and/or alleviating the symptoms associated to an auto-immune disease afflicting the subject.
  • Auto-immune diseases include, but are not limited to, type I diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, lupus, immune thrombocytopenia, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, autoimmune uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma and/or Crohn's disease.
  • the pro-tolerogenic preparation is for preventing or limiting the rejection of transplanted cells or tissue in the subject (for example, transplanted cells or tissue which are allogeneic or xenogeneic to the subject).
  • the pro-tolerogenic preparation is for preventing or limiting graft-versus-host disease in the treated subject.
  • the process for obtaining the pro-tolereogenic preparation can further comprise formulating the composition for administration prior to the transplantation of the cells or tissue.
  • Allogeneic cell A cell is considered “allogeneic” with respect to another cell if both cells are derived from the same animal species but presents sequence variation in at least one genetic locus.
  • a cell is considered “allogeneic” with respect to a subject if the cell is derived from the same animal species as the subject but presents sequence variation in at least one genetic locus when compared to the subject's respective genetic locus. Allogeneic cells induce an immune reaction (such as a rejection) when they are introduced into an immunocompetent host.
  • a first cell is considered allogeneic with respect to a second cell if the first cell is HLA-disparate (or HLA-mismatched) with the second cell.
  • allo-recognition refers to an immune response to foreign antigens (also referred to as alloantigens) from members of the same species and is caused by the difference between products of highly polymorphic genes.
  • highly polymorphic genes are those encoding the MHC complex which are most highly expressed on leukocytes though other polymorphic proteins may similarly result in immune recognition. These polymorphic products are typically recognized by T cells and other mononuclear leukocytes.
  • pro-inflammatory allo-recognition refers to an immune response associated with the expansion of pro-inflammatory T cells and/or the differentiation of naive T cells into pro-inflammatory T cells.
  • Pro-inflammatory allo-recognition in vivo mediates cell or tissue injury and/or death and loss of cell or tissue function.
  • pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition refers to an immune response associated with the expansion of Treg cells and/or the differentiation of naive T cells into Treg cells.
  • a pro- tolerogenic allo-recognition is usually considered weaker than a pro-inflammatory allo- recognition. Further, an in vivo pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition does not lead to significant cell or tissue injury and/or death nor loss of cell or tissue function.
  • the term "anergy” refers to a non-specific state of immune unresponsiveness to an antigen to which the host was previously sensitized to or unsensitized to. It can be characterized by a decrease or even an absence of lymphokine secretion by viable T cells when the T cell receptor is engaged by an antigen.
  • the term “tolerance” refers to an acquired specific failure of the immunological mechanism to respond to a given antigen, induced by exposure to the antigen. Tolerance refers to a specific non-reactivity of the immune system to a particular antigen, which is capable, under other conditions, of inducing an immune response.
  • the terms “anergy” and “tolerance” are used interchangeably since the compositions and methods presented herewith can be used to achieve both anergy and tolerance.
  • Autologous cell A cell is considered “autologous” with respect to another cell if both cells are derived from the same individual or from genetically identical twins. A cell is considered “autologous” to a subject, if the cell is derived from the subject or a genetically identical twin. Autologous cells do not induce an immune reaction (such as a rejection) when they are introduced into an immunocompetent host.
  • Immunogenic cell A first cell is considered immunogenic with respect to a second cell when it is able to induce an immune response in the latter cell.
  • the immune response is in vitro (e.g. a mixed lymphocyte reaction) or can be observed in vivo (e.g. in a subject having the second cell and having received the first cell).
  • the second cell can be located in an immunocompetent subject.
  • the immune response is a cell-based immune response in which cellular mediator can be produced.
  • the immunogenic cells are immune cells, such as white blood cells or leukocytes.
  • Immunogenic cell culture conditions A cell culture is considered to be conducted in immunogenic conditions when it allows the establishment of a pro-inflammatory immune response between two distinct and unmodified leukocytes (and, in an embodiment, allo- recognition).
  • the pro-inflammatory immune response is a cell-based immune response in which cellular mediator can be produced.
  • the cell culture conditions can be those of a mixed lymphocyte reaction (primary or secondary). When a cell culture is conducted in immunogenic conditions but with leukocytes which have been modified to prevent allo-recognition, no pro-inflammatory immune response is observed.
  • a non-inflammatory or pro-tolerogenic immune response can be observed (for example a differentiation of naive T cells to Treg cells and/or expansion of Treg cells).
  • Leukocyte As used herein, a leukocyte (also spelled leucocyte) is defined as a blood cell lacking hemoglobin and having a nucleus. Leukocytes are produced and derived from hematopoietic stem cells. Leukocytes are also referred to as white blood cells. Leukocytes include granulocytes (also known as polymorphonuclear leucocytes), e.g. neutrophils, basophils and eosoniphils. Leukocytes also include agranulocytes (or mononuclear leucocytes), e.g. lymphocytes, monocytes and macrophages.
  • granulocytes also known as polymorphonuclear leucocytes
  • Leukocytes also include agranulocytes (or mononuclear leucocytes), e.g. lymphocytes, monocytes and macrophages.
  • T cells Some of the lymphocytes, referred to as T cells (or T-cell), bear on their surface a T-cell receptor.
  • T cell are broadly divided into cells expressing CD4 on their surface (also referred to as CD4-positive cells) and cells expressing CD8 on their surface (also referred to as CD8-positive cells).
  • CD4-positive cells Some of the lymphocytes, referred to as B cells (or B-cells), bear on their surface a B-cell receptor.
  • B cells or B-cells
  • Low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer refers to a polymer which is not or is unlikely to elicit an immune response in an individual. This low- immunogenic polymer is also capable of masking an antigenic determinant of a cell and lowering or even preventing an immune response to the antigenic determinant when the antigenic determinant is introduced into a subject.
  • a “biocompatible polymer” refers to a polymer which is non-toxic when introduced into a subject.
  • Exemplary low-immunogenic biocompatible polymers includes, but are not limited to, polyethylene glycol (for example methoxypoly(ethylene glycol)), hyperbranched polyglycerol (HPG) and 2-alkyloxazoline (POZ).
  • Non-proliferative leukocyte refers to a lymphocyte which has been modified to no longer being capable of cellular proliferation (e.g. performing at least one complete division cycle). In some embodiments, this modification may be temporary and the non-proliferative properties of a leukocyte may be limited in time. For example, when a leukocyte is modified from a contact with a pharmacological agent capable of limiting its proliferation, the removal of the pharmacological agent from the cell culture can allow the leukocyte to regain its proliferative properties. In other embodiments, the modification is permanent and the modified leukocyte cannot regain its proliferative properties.
  • PBMC Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
  • Pharmaceutically effective amount or therapeutically effective amount refer to an amount (dose) of an acellular preparation effective in mediating a therapeutic benefit to a patient (for example prevention, treatment and/or alleviation of symptoms of an immune- associated disorder in which the ratio of Tregs to pro-inflammatory T cells is low when compared to sex- and age-matched healthy subjects). It is also to be understood herein that a "pharmaceutically effective amount" may be interpreted as an amount giving a desired therapeutic effect, either taken in one dose or in any dosage or route, taken alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents.
  • Prevention, treatment and alleviation of symptoms refer to the ability of the acellular preparation to limit the development, progression and/or symptomology of a immune- associated disorder associated to an abnormal/excessive immune response (for example prevention, treatment and/or alleviation of symptoms of an immune-associated disorder in which the ratio of Tregs to pro-inflammatory T cells is low when compared to sex- and age-matched healthy subject).
  • the prevention, treatment and/or alleviation of symptoms encompasses increasing the levels of Treg cells and/or decreasing the levels of proinflammatory T cells.
  • the acellular preparation is considered effective or successful for treating and/or alleviating the symptoms associated with the disorder when a reduction in the proinflammatory state (when compared to an untreated and afflicted individual) in the treated individual (previously known to be afflicted with the disorder) is observed.
  • the acellular-based preparation is considered effective or successful for preventing the disorder when a reduction in the pro-inflammatory state (when compared to an untreated and afflicted individual) in the treated individual is observed upon an immunological challenge (such as, for example, an antigenic challenge).
  • Pro-inflammatory T cells are a population of T cells capable of mediating an inflammatory reaction.
  • Pro-inflammatory T cells generally include T helper 1 (Th1 or Type 1) and T helper 17 (Th17) subsets of T cells.
  • Th1 cells partner mainly with macrophage and can produce interferon- ⁇ , tumor necrosis factor- ⁇ , IL-2 and IL-10.
  • Th1 cells promote the cellular immune response by maximizing the killing efficacy of the macrophages and the proliferation of cytotoxic CD8 + T cells.
  • Th1 cells can also promote the production of opsonizing antibodies.
  • T helper 17 cells are a subset of T helper cells capable of producing interleukin 17 (IL-17) and are thought to play a key role in autoimmune diseases and in microbial infections. Th17 cells primarily produce two main members of the IL- 17 family, IL-17A and IL-17F, which are involved in the recruitment, activation and migration of neutrophils. Th17 cells also secrete IL-21 and IL-22.
  • Regulatory T cells are also referred to as Treg and were formerly known as suppressor T cell. Regulatory T cells are a component of the immune system that suppress immune responses of other cells. Regulatory T cells usually express CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, and Foxp3. Additional regulatory T cell populations include Tr1 , Th3, CD8 + CD28 “ , CD69 + , and Qa-1 restricted T cells. Regulatory T cells actively suppress activation of the immune system and prevent pathological self-reactivity, i.e. autoimmune disease. The critical role regulatory T cells play within the immune system is evidenced by the severe autoimmune syndrome that results from a genetic deficiency in regulatory T cells.
  • the immunosuppressive cytokines TGF- ⁇ and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) have also been implicated in regulatory T cell function. Similar to other T cells, a subset of regulatory T cells can develop in the thymus and this subset is usually referred to as natural Treg (or nTreg). Another type of regulatory T cell (induced Treg or iTreg) can develop in the periphery from naive CD4 + T cells. The large majority of Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells are found within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II restricted CD4-expressing (CD4 + ) helper T cell population and express high levels of the interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain (CD25).
  • MHC major histocompatibility complex
  • CD4 + class II restricted CD4-expressing helper T cell population and express high levels of the interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain
  • regulatory T cells do not produce IL-2 and are therefore anergic at baseline.
  • An alternative way of identifying regulatory T cells is to determine the DNA methylation pattern of a portion of the foxp3 gene (TSDR, Treg-specific-demethylated region) which is found demethylated in Tregs.
  • Splenocytes This term refers to the cell population obtained from the spleen of a subject (usually a mammal such as a rodent). Splenocytes usually comprise T cell, B cell as well as antigen presenting cells.
  • Syngeneic cell A cell is considered “syngeneic" with respect to a subject (or a cell derived therefrom) if it is sufficiently identical to the subject so as to prevent an immune rejection upon transplantation. Syngeneic cells are derived from the same animal species.
  • Viable refers to the ability of a cell to complete at least one cell cycle and, ultimately proliferate. A viable cell is thus capable of proliferating.
  • non-viable or “non-proliferative” both refer to a cell which is no longer capable of completing at least one cell cycle.
  • cycle arrest refers to a cell which has been treated to halt its cell cycle progression (usually with a pharmacological agent) but which is still capable of re-entering the cell cycle (usually when the pharmacological agent is removed). Xenogeneic cell.
  • a cell is considered "xenogeneic" with respect to a subject (or a cell derived from the subject) when it is derived from a different animal species than the subject.
  • a xenogeneic cell is expected to be rejected when transplanted in an immunocompetent host.
  • Figure 1 illustrates molecular weight fractionation studies of the acellular preparations demonstrate that the majority of immunomodulatory activity (denoted by *) resides in the low ( ⁇ 10 kDa) molecular weight fraction. Results are shown as percent Treg lymphocytes in function of culture conditions (resting PBMC, MLR or mPEG-MLR) as well as weight fractionation (unfractionated media; > 10 kDa fraction; ⁇ 10 kDa fraction as indicated on the legend). Dashed line represents baseline levels.
  • Figure 2 illustrates the effects of size (MW) separation and RNase treatment on the immunomodulary effects of acellular preparations.
  • Unmodified conditioned murine plasma obtained from donor mice 5 days post splenocyte transfer
  • size fractionated- conditioned murine plasma or RNase-treated conditioned murine plasma was administered once to naive mice and Treg/Th17 levels were measured (when) in the spleen.
  • a denotes the mean value for unfractionated conditioned medium prepared from mice previously treated with unmodified allogeneic cells
  • b denotes the mean value for unfractionated conditioned medium prepared from mice previously treated with mPEG-modified allogeneic cells.
  • a denotes the mean value for unfractionated conditioned medium prepared from mice previously treated with unmodified allogeneic cells
  • b denotes the mean value for unfractionated conditioned medium prepared from mice previously treated with mPEG-modified allogeneic cells.
  • Figure 3 illustrates the size fractionated conditioned plasma on the intracellular expression of cytokines.
  • Unmodified conditioned murine plasma obtained from donor mice 5 days post saline or splenocyte transfer
  • size fractionated-conditioned murine plasma was administered once to naive mice and Treg/Th17 levels were measured (when) in the spleen.
  • * denotes p ⁇ 0.001 relative to treatment with conditioned plasma from mice treated with saline
  • # denotes p ⁇ 0.001 relative to treatment with conditioned medium derived from mice treated with unmodified allogeneic splenocytes.
  • Figure 4 illustrates the in vivo effects of the various conditioned medium and preparations derived therefrom on the intracellular expression of cytokines as well as type of CD4 + cells.
  • Conditioned plasma was obtained by administering naive mice with saline, unmmodified allogeneic splenocytes or polymer-modified allogeneic splenocytes (PEG) and recuperating plasma after 5 days.
  • miRNA miRNA
  • ⁇ untreated miRNA
  • ⁇ RNase A-treated miRNA
  • RNase A was also administered directly to some animals.
  • animals were sacrificed, their spleen was removed and CD4 + cells were characterized by flow cytometry. Results are shown for intracellular cytokine expression: IL-2 (A), INF- ⁇ (B), IL-10 (C), as well as CD4 + cell type: Treg (Foxp3 + ) (D) and Th17 (IL-17 + ) (E) CD4 + cells.
  • Figure 5 illustrates the effects of the TA1 preparations on the phosphorylation of phosphokinases of resting Jurkat cells. Results are shown as fold modulation (when compared to saline-treated Jurkat cells) for each kinase tested.
  • A On this panel, Akt is considered to be significantly increasingly phosphorylated.
  • B On this panel, PRAS40 is considered to be significantly increasingly phosphorylated.
  • C On this panel, HSP60 is considered to be significantly decreasingly phosphorylated. * denotes greater than 10-fold increase in protein phosphorylation over resting Jurkat cells. # denotes greater than 10-fold decrease in protein phosphorylation over resting Jurkat cells.
  • Figure 6 shows the in vitro effects of the murine TA1 preparation on human PBMC PBMCs.
  • Figure 7 compares the in vitro immunosuppressive effects of TA1 preparation and etanercept.
  • Results are shown as the percentage of proliferation of CD4 + splenocytes in function of treatment after 8 days (solid line) and 14 days (dashed line).
  • B) Results are shown as the percentage of proliferation of CD8 + splenocytes in function of treatment after 8 days (solid line) and 14 days (dashed line).
  • Figure 8 illustrates significant changes in the levels of Th17 and Treg lymphocytes are noted in the spleen (upper panels), brachial lymph node (middle panels) and pancreatic lymph nodes (lower panels) upon conversion of NOD mice from non-diabetic (left panels) to diabetic (right panels).
  • Th17 in the spleen, from 0.03 to 3.84%; in the brachial lymph node, from 0.01 % to 0.67%; in the pancreatic lymph node, from 0.05% to 1.05%
  • Treg in the spleen, from 16.5% to 2.0%; in the brachial lymph node from 1 1.8% to 1.8% and in the pancreatic lymph node, from 12.7% to 4.1 %) lymphocytes.
  • Tregs *, p ⁇ 0.001 from non-diabetic NOD mice.
  • Th17 ** p ⁇ 0.001 from non- diabetic NOD mice.
  • Figure 9 illustrates the effects of the TA1 preparations in NOD mice.
  • diabetes begins to occur at approximately 15 weeks. Between weeks 15 and 20, 75% of untreated mice developed hyperglycemia (i.e. diabetes) compared to 13% of TA1 -treated mice. After 30 weeks, 9 out of the 15 animals treated with TA1 were still considered normoglycemic compared to only 4 out of the 16 for untreated animals. In TA1 -treated mice developing diabetes (6 out of 15), 67% of the animals exhibited delayed onset (post 20 weeks) relative to untreated mice where 100% of the diabetic mice arose prior to 20 weeks of age. (B) The Treg/Th17 ratio in the pancreatic lymph node was determined during the weeks following treatment.
  • Figure 10 illustrates the in vivo effects of TA1 preparations on tolerogenic/anergic immune cell populations.
  • NOD mice 7 week-old were treated trice (100 ⁇ _ i.v. at days 0, 2 and 4) with either saline or the murine TA1 preparations.
  • immune populations were characterized in the spleen, the brachial lymph node, the pancreatic lymph node and, for Treg cells, the thymus.
  • light grey bars refer to saline-treated animals and dark grey bars refers to TA1 -treated animals.
  • Results are shown as the percentage of Foxp3 + (Treg) cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • Results are shown as the percentage of TGF- ⁇ * (Treg and Th2) cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • C) Results are shown as the percentage of IL-4 + (Th2 and naive) cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • D) Results are shown as the percentage of IL-10 + (Treg and Th2) cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • E Results are shown as the percentage of CD62L + (Treg) cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • results are shown as the percentage of CD152 + cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • G) Results are shown as the percentage of CD1 1 c + cells (in function of total DC cells) in function of treatment. * denotes p ⁇ 0.001 relative to saline-treated animals.
  • Figure 11 illustrates the in vivo effects of TA1 preparations on pro-inflammatory immune cell populations.
  • NOD mice 7 week-old were treated trice (100 ⁇ _ i.v. at days 0, 2 and 4) with either saline or TA1.
  • mice became diabetic (weeks 15-29) or at 30 weeks of age were sacrificed and immune populations were characterized in the spleen, the brachial lymph node, the pancreatic lymph node and, for Th17 cells, the thymus.
  • light grey bars refer to saline-treated animals and dark grey bars refers to TA1 -treated animals.
  • Results are shown as the percentage of IL-17A + (Th17) cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • Results are shown as the percentage of INF-Y + (Th1) cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • C Results are shown as the percentage of IL-2 + (Th1) cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • D Results are shown as the percentage of TNF-a + (Th1) cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • E Results are shown as the percentage of IL-12 + (Th1) cells (in function of total CD4 + cells) in function of treatment.
  • Results are shown as the percentage of NK1 .1 + cells (in function of total TCR-a/p+ cells) in function of treatment. * denotes p ⁇ 0.001 relative to saline treated animals.
  • Figure 12 provides a comparison of the miRNA populations between different MLR assays.
  • a human PBMC MLR assay (using unmodified ( control MLR) or polymer modified leukocyte (mPEG MLR)) was conducted and miRNA content was partially determined.
  • Volcano plots of comparing the miRNA population of the conditioned medium of the control MLR to the one of the supernatant of resting cells (A), comparing the miRNA population of the conditioned medium of a mPEG MLR to the one of the supernatant of resting cells (B) and comparing the miRNA population of the conditioned medium of a mPEG MLR to the one of the conditioned medium of a control MLR (C) are provided.
  • Results are provided in -Log 10 (p value) in function of Log 2 fold change. In these volcano plots, the following miRNAs have been identified with numbers:
  • Figure 13 provides a partial miRNA compositional analysis of the conditioned medium of a mPEG MLR (white bars) and of a control MLR (black bars). Results are provided, for each miRNA, as log 2 fold regulation when compared to the miRNA present in the supernatant of resting cells. White open stars denote Log 2 -fold change and black solid stars denote significant changes in volcano plot analysis.
  • Figure 14 provides a selection of the miRNA compositional analysis of the conditioned medium of a mPEG MLR (white bars) and of a control MLR (black bars). Results are provided, for each miRNA, as log 2 fold regulation when compared to the miRNA present in the supernatant of resting cells.
  • White open stars denote Log 2 -fold change and black solid stars denote significant changes and or clustergram (heatmap) determined miRNA shifts denoted in volcano plot analysis.
  • acellular preparations obtained by contacting two distinct allogeneic leukocyte populations wherein at least one of the two leukocyte populations is modified to bear on its surface a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer.
  • the two leukocyte populations are contacted under conditions so as to allow pro- tolerogenic allo-recognition (e.g. expanding of Treg cells and/or differentiation of naive cells into T reg cells) and limit pro-inflammatory allo-recognition.
  • the acellular components produced by contacting the two leukocyte populations can optionally be purified or enriched to provide a preparation enriched in miRNAs.
  • the acellular preparation can also be processed to (substantially) remove cells, cells fragments as well as secreted proteins (such as cytokines for example).
  • the contact between the two leukocyte populations can occur in vitro, ex vivo or in vivo.
  • acellular preparations induce a state of (complete or partial) immune tolerance, immuno- quiescence or anergy.
  • these acellular preparations can be useful for increasing the levels of regulatory T cells and/or decreasing the levels of pro-inflammatory T cells in subjects in need thereof.
  • the acellular preparations can be obtained by modifying a first leukocyte to bear on its surface a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer and contacting the first leukocyte with a second leukocyte (considered allogeneic with respect to the first leukocyte).
  • the contact can be made in vitro by co-culturing the first leukocyte and the second leukocyte under conditions so as to allow pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition and limit (or inhibit) pro-inflammatory allo-reocgnition.
  • the cell culture (or a portion thereof such as the supernatant of the cell culture) is recuperated and processed to substantially remove the cells it may contain to provide the acellular preparation.
  • the contact can be made in vivo by introducing the first leukocyte in a test subject bearing the second leukocyte (such as a non-human animal or mammal).
  • the first leukocyte is allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject.
  • the blood or a blood fraction (such as serum or plasma) is recuperated from the test subject and processed to substantially remove the cells it may contain to provide the acellular preparation. Since the acellular preparations can optionally be enriched in miRNAs, it is important that the cell culture and/or the blood/blood fraction be processed in conditions so as to retain the integrity of the majority of the miRNA species present, for example by substantially inhibiting RNA degradation.
  • RNA degradation As used herein, the term “substantially inhibiting RNA degradation” indicate that the conditions allow for the degradation of less than 20%, 19%, 18%, 17%, 16%, 15%, 14%, 13%, 12%, 1 1 %, 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6% or 5% of the miRNA population obtained by RNases.
  • RNases include, but are not limited endoribonucleases (e.g., RNase A, RNase H, RNase I, RNase III, RNase L, RNase P, RNase PhyM, RNase T1 , RNase T2, RNase U2, RNase V1 and/or RNase V) and exoribonucleases (e.g.
  • RNA degradation preferably limited to the mRNA fraction.
  • acellular preparations obtained from polymer-based bioengineering of allogeneic leukocytic cells provides a significant opportunity to modulate the responsiveness (i.e. , immunoquiescent versus pro-inflammatory) of the recipient's immune system.
  • the acellular preparations obtained from using polymer-modified leukocytes can be used to induce Tregs differentiation/expansion and/or attenuate Th17/1 and and pro-inflammatory cytokine upregulation to prevent or lower a proinflammatory immune response.
  • specific NK (natural killer) cell (NK1 .1) upregulation is favored in tissues exhibiting autoimmune damage.
  • NK1 .1 positive cells are reported to be important in the killing of self-reactive immune cells.
  • the acellular preparations obtained from using polymer-modified allogeneic leukocytes can be used therapeutically in various diseases (such as auto-immunity or an excessive immune response) to increase the levels Treg cells and/or decrease pro-inflammatory effector cells, to ultimately increase the ratio of regulatory T cells to pro-inflammatory T cells thereby attenuating the incidence and/or severity of the disease pathology.
  • the acellular preparations presented described herein can be obtained by contacting two distinct and allogeneic leukocyte populations (referred herein to the first leukocyte and the second leukocyte).
  • the first leukocyte is modified to bear on its surface (and, in some embodiment, to be covalently bound to) a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer.
  • the second leukocyte can also be modified to bear on its surface (and, in some embodiment, to be covalently bound to) a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer.
  • the two leukocyte populations are contacted under conditions so as to limit (and in some embodiments prevent) pro-inflammatory allo-recognition and to allow pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition.
  • polyethylene glycol particularly methoxypoly(ethylene glycol)
  • 2-alkyloxazoline POZ
  • hyperbranched polyglycerol HPG
  • the low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer can be covalently associated with the membrane-associated protein(s) of the leukocyte by creating a reactive site on the polymer (for example by deprotecting a chemical group) and contacting the polymer with the leukocyte.
  • a reactive site on the polymer for example by deprotecting a chemical group
  • contacting the polymer with the leukocyte for example, for covalently binding a methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) to the surface of a leukocyte, it is possible to incubate a methoxypoly(-ethylene glycol) succinimidyl valerate (reactive polymer) in the presence of the leukocyte.
  • the contact between the reactive polymer and the leukocyte is performed under conditions sufficient for providing a grafting density which will limit/prevent pro-inflammatory allo-recognition and allow pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition.
  • the polymer is grafted to a viable leukocyte and under conditions which will retain the viability of the leukocyte.
  • a linker, positioned between the surface of the leukocyte and the polymer, can optionally be used. Examples of such polymers and linkers are described in U.S. Patents 5,908,624; 8,007,784 and 8,067,151.
  • the low- immunogenic biocompatible polymer can be integrated within the lipid bilayer of the cytoplasmic membrane of the leukocyte by using a lipid-modified polymer.
  • the low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer be grafted at a density sufficient for limiting/preventing pro-inflammatory allo-recognition while allowing pro- tolerogenic allo-recognition of the first leukocyte by the second leukocyte.
  • the polymer is polyethylene glycol (e.g. linear) and has an average molecular weight between 2 and 40 KDa as well as any combinations thereof.
  • the average molecular weight of the PEG to be grafted is at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 or 40 kDa.
  • the average molecular weight of the PEG to be granted is no more than 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, 4, 3, or 2 kDa.
  • the grafting concentration of the polymer (per 20 x 10 6 cells) is between 1 and 10 mM (preferably between 2.5 to 10 mM). In another embodiment, the grafting concentration of the polymer (per 20 x 10 6 cells) is at least 1 , 1.5, 2, 2.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 mM. In still another embodiment, the grafting concentration of the polymer (per 20 x 10 6 cells) is no more than 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 2.5, 2, 1.5 or 1 mM.
  • pro-inflammatory allo-recognition occurs (or is prevented)
  • various techniques include, but are not limited to, a standard mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR), high molecular weight mitogen stimulation (e.g. PHA stimulation) as well as flow cytometry (Chen and Scott, 2006).
  • MLR standard mixed lymphocyte reaction
  • PHA stimulation high molecular weight mitogen stimulation
  • flow cytometry Chole and Scott, 2006
  • various techniques are known to those skilled in the art and include, but are not limited to, the assessment of the level of expansion and differentiation of Treg cells and or prevention of Th17 expansion/differentiation.
  • the polymer is selected and grafted to the modified leukocyte to provide a modified leukocyte having a pro-inflammatory/pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition substantially similar to the one observed in a mixed lymphocyte reaction between a first leukocyte modified to be grafted with 20 kDa mPEG at a density of at least 0.5 mM (and preferably 1 mM, even more preferably 2.5 mM) per 20 x 10 6 cells and incubated with a second (unmodified) allogeneic leukocyte.
  • the first leukocyte can be optionally modified to refrain from being proliferative. This modification preferably occurs prior to its introduction in a cell culture system or its administration into a test subject.
  • the leukocyte can be irradiated (e.g. ⁇ -irradiation) prior to its introduction in a cell culture system or in the test subject. Upon irradiation, the leukocyte is not considered viable (e.g. capable of proliferation).
  • polymer grafting can affect the leukocyte viability and be used to refrain the leukocyte from proliferating.
  • leukocyte can be treated with a pharmacological agent which halts cell cycle progression. Upon the administration of such pharmacological agent, the leukocyte is considered viable since it can resume cellular proliferation when the agent is removed from the cell-containing medium.
  • the second leukocyte (which can optionally be modified with the low- immunogenic and biocompatible polymer) be also optionally modified to refrain from being proliferative.
  • the leukocyte can be irradiated (e.g. ⁇ -irradiation) prior to its introduction in a cell culture system or in the test subject. Upon irradiation, the leukocyte is not considered viable (e.g. capable of proliferation).
  • polymer grafting can affect the leukocyte viability and can be used to refrain the leukocyte from proliferating.
  • leukocyte can be treated with a pharmacological agent which halts cell cycle progression.
  • the leukocyte Upon the administration of such pharmacological agent, the leukocyte is considered viable since it can resume cellular proliferation when the agent is removed from the cell-containing medium. However, when the second leukocyte is modified from being proliferative, it is important the first leukocyte with which it is being contacted remains proliferative.
  • the first leukocyte population (such as, for example a PBMCs or splenocytes) can be introduced in a cell culture system and contacted with a second leukocyte population (such as, for example a PBMCs or splenocytes) or administered to the test subject.
  • a second leukocyte population such as, for example a PBMCs or splenocytes
  • the first leukocyte population can be relatively homogenous (such as, for example, a T cell population) and introduced in a cell culture system comprising a second leukocyte (such as, for example a PBMC or splenocyte) or administered to the test subject.
  • a second leukocyte such as, for example a PBMC or splenocyte
  • the first leukocyte population can be introduced in a cell culture system comprising a second leukocyte population which can be relatively homogeneous (such as, for example, a T cell population).
  • the first leukocyte population can be relatively homogenous (such as, for example, a T cell population) and introduced in a cell culture system comprising a second leukocyte population which can be relatively homogeneous (such as, for example, a T cell population).
  • the leukocytes used can be mature leukocytes or be provided in the form of stem cells.
  • leukocytes can be obtained from isolating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from the subject.
  • PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cells
  • the PBMCs can be differentiated in vitro into dendritic (DC) or DC-like cells.
  • the leukocytes can be obtained from the spleen (e.g. splenocytes).
  • Leukocytes usually include T cells, B cells and antigen presenting cells.
  • the leukocytes are not erythrocytes since the polymer-modified erythrocytes are not capable of eliciting a pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition when administered in a test subject.
  • traces of erythrocytes in the leukocyte population used are tolerated (for example, less than about 10%, less than about 5% or less than about 1 % of the total number of cells in the preparation).
  • This "pure" cell population and “relative homogenous population” of cells can, for example, essentially consist essentially of a single cell type of T cells, B cells, antigen presenting cells (APC) or stem cells.
  • the population of cells can consist essentially of more than one cell type.
  • the population of cells can be obtained through conventional methods (for example cell sorting or magnetic beads).
  • the percentage of the cell type with respect to the total population of cells is at least 90%, at least 95% or at least 99%.
  • the relatively homogenous population of cells are expected to contain some contaminating cells, for example less than 10%, less than 5% or less than 1 % of the total population of cells.
  • the first leukocyte and/or second leukocyte can be obtained from any animals, but are preferably derived from mammals (such as, for example, humans and mice). In an embodiment, the first and/or second leukocyte can be obtained from a subject intended to be treated with the acellular preparation.
  • the first and/or second leukocyte can be expanded in vitro prior to the introduction in a cell culture system or the administration to a test subject.
  • the first and the second leukocyte are contacted under conditions to limit/prevent pro-inflammatory allo-recognition (e.g. expansion of pro-inflammatory T cells and/or differentiation of naive T cells in pro-inflammatory T cells) and allow pro-tolerogenic allo- recognition (e.g. expansion of Treg cells and/or differentiation of naive T cells in Treg cells).
  • pro-inflammatory allo-recognition e.g. expansion of pro-inflammatory T cells and/or differentiation of naive T cells in pro-inflammatory T cells
  • pro-tolerogenic allo- recognition e.g. expansion of Treg cells and/or differentiation of naive T cells in Treg cells.
  • a conditioned medium refers to physical components of a cell culture (or fraction thereof, such as the cell culture supernatant) obtained by contacting the first and the second leukocyte and having the pro-tolerogenic properties described herein.
  • the conditioned medium is obtained at least 24 hours after the initial contact between the first and the second leukocyte.
  • the conditioned medium is obtained at least 48 hours or at least 72 hours after the initial contact between the first and the second leukocyte.
  • the conditioned medium can be obtained after at least 24 hours of incubating a first leukocyte (for example grafted with a 20kDa PEG at a density of at 1 .0 mM) with a second leukocyte.
  • the concentration of each leukocyte population can be at least 1 x 10 6 cells.
  • the first leukocyte be administered to an immune competent test subject (bearing the second leukocyte) and that the blood or blood fraction be obtained at a later a time sufficient to provide a conditioned blood.
  • the test subject is a subject being immune competent and having a Treg/pro-inflammatory ratio which is substantially similar to age- and sex-matched healthy subjects.
  • the conditioned blood refers to physical components present in the blood (or fraction thereof, such as the plasma) obtained by administering the first leukocyte to the immune competent test subject and having the pro-tolerogenic properties described herein.
  • the conditioned blood may be obtained more rapidly by increasing the amount of leukocytes being administered or administering more than once (for example one, twice or thrice) the polymer-modified leukocyte.
  • the conditioned blood is obtained at least one day after the administration of the first leukocyte.
  • the conditioned blood is obtained at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 days after the administration of the first leukocyte.
  • the conditioned blood can be obtained by administering at least 5 x 10 6 polymer-modified leukocytes (for example grafted with at least 1 .0 mM of 20 kDa PEG) to the test subject (e.g. a mice) and recuperating the plasma five days later.
  • the conditioned blood can be obtained by administering at least 20 x 10 6 polymer-modified leukocytes.
  • the two leukocyte populations are considered allogeneic (and in some embodiments, xenogeneic).
  • the first leukocyte can be allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject.
  • the first leukocyte be autologous, syngeneic, allogeneic or xenogeneic to a treated subject who is going to receive the acellular preparation.
  • the first leukocyte can be allogeneic or xenogeneic to the second leukocyte.
  • the first leukocyte be autologous, syngeneic, allogeneic or xenogeneic to a treated subject who is going to receive the acellular preparation.
  • the second leukocyte be autologous, syngeneic, allogeneic or xenogeneic to a treated subject who is going to receive the acellular preparation.
  • the conditioned medium or the conditioned blood is further processed to substantially remove the cells and cellular debris that can be present.
  • This processing step can be achieved by submitting the conditioned medium or the conditioned blood to a centrifugation step and/or a filtration step. Since the majority of the immuno- modulatory effects of the acellular preparations reside in a fraction sensitive to ribonucleic acid degradation (e.g. RNase degradation), this process step should be conducted in conditions which would substantially limit or even inhibit ribonucleic acid degradation.
  • the conditioned medium or the conditioned blood is also processed (preferably after the cell/cellular debris) so as to provide an enrichment in at least one miRNA species, and preferably a plurality of miRNA species.
  • enrichment refers to the step of increasing the concentration of one or more miRNA species in the acellular preparation when compared to conditioned medium/blood.
  • enrichment refers to the step of increasing, in the acellular preparation, the concentration but not the relative abundance of the miRNA species present in the conditioned medium/blood.
  • the enrichment step can comprises substantially isolating the miRNA species from other components that may be present the conditioned medium/blood (e.g. proteins such as cytokines for example).
  • This enrichment step can be completed using various methods known to those skilled in the art, for example, chromatography, precipitation, etc. Since most of the immuno-modulatory effects of the acellular preparations reside in a fraction sensitive to ribonucleic acid degradation (e.g. RNase degradation), this process step should be conducted in conditions which would substantially limit or even inhibit ribonucleic acid degradation.
  • ribonucleic acid degradation e.g. RNase degradation
  • the conditioned medium or the conditioned blood can also be processed to substantially remove the protein components (including the cytokines) and/or the deoxyribonucleic acid components that may be present.
  • Such further purification step can be made by using proteinase (to provide a protein-free acellular preparation), DNAse (to provide a DNA-free acellular preparation), chromatography or filtration (to provide a fraction enriched in size-specific components present in the conditioned medium/blood).
  • the acellular preparation be submitted to the selective enrichment in components of the conditioned medium/blood having a relative size equal to or lower than about 10 kDa, 9 kDa, 8 kDa, 7 kDa, 6 kDa, 5 kDa, 4 kDa or 3 kDa.
  • the formulation step can comprise admixing the acellular preparation with pharmaceutically acceptable diluents, preservatives, solubilizers, emulsifiers, and/or carriers.
  • the formulations are preferably in a liquid injectable form and can include diluents of various buffer content (e.g. , Tris-HCI, acetate, phosphate), pH and ionic strength, additives such as albumin or gelatin to prevent absorption to surfaces.
  • the formulations can comprise pharmaceutically acceptable solubilizing agents (e.g. , glycerol, polyethylene glycerol), antioxidants (e.g.
  • ascorbic acid sodium metabisulfite
  • preservatives e.g. , thimerosal, benzyl alcohol, parabens
  • bulking substances or tonicity modifiers e.g. , lactose, mannitol
  • the acellular preparation can be formulated for administration with the vaccine.
  • the acellular preparation can be formulated for simultaneous administration with the vaccine by admixing the vaccine with the acellular preparation.
  • the acellular preparation can be formulated for administration prior to or after the vaccine, for example in a formulation that is physically distinct from the vaccine.
  • the acellular preparation can be formulated for administration prior to the transplantation.
  • the acellular preparations can be formulated for simultaneous administration with the transplant.
  • the acellular preparations can be formulated for administration prior to or after the transplant.
  • the acellular preparation can be included in a transplantation medium or a preservation medium destined to receive the donor cells or tissue.
  • the acellular preparation can induce anergy and/or tolerance of the immune cells or stem cells present in the cells/tissue intended to be transplanted. Characterization of the miRNA fraction of the acellular preparation
  • the miRNA fraction of the acellular preparation is associated with the majority of the pro-tolerogenic immunomodulatory effects of the conditioned medium/blood.
  • the pro-tolerogenic immunomodulatory effects of the miRNA fraction of the acellular preparation are greatly reduced (and even abolished) when the components of the conditioned blood/medium having an average molecular weight lower than about 10 kDa are removed or upon treatment with a ribonucleic acid degradation agent (such as RNase A).
  • the acellular preparation described herein does comprise a plurality (also referred to a population) of distinct miRNA species whose relative abundance differs from a control medium obtained from a control MLR (e.g. in which two allogeneic leukocyte populations are co- cultured) or a control blood obtained from administering unmodified allogeneic leukocytes to a test subject.
  • the acellular preparation described herein also comprise a plurality (also referred to as a population) of distinct miRNA species whose relative abundance differs from a conditioned medium obtained from resting cells (e.g. a single cultured leukocyte population) or a blood obtained from a naive test subject.
  • This modulation in the relative abundance of the various miRNA species of the acellular preparation is believed to be tied to the pro-tolerogenic immunomodulatory effects.
  • the increased abundance of single miRNA species, unchanged abundance of single miRNA species and/or decreased abundance of single miRNA species are believe to contribute to the pro-tolerogeneic immunomodulatory effects of the acellular preparation.
  • the relative pattern of expression of the miRNA species present when compared to the corresponding in the control conditioned medium/blood or medium from resting cells/naive blood is conserved.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species presented in Figure 13. In another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises any combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75 or 80 of the miRNA species presented in Figure 13. In still another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species presented in Figure 13.
  • Figure 13 provides the following miRNA species: hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-let-7c, hsa-let-7d-5p, hsa-let-7e-5p, hsa-let-7g-5p, hsa-miR-103a-3p, hsa- miR-105-5p, hsa-miR-125a-5p, hsa-miR-125b-5p, hsa-miR-126-3p, hsa-miR-128, hsa-miR- 130a-3p, hsa-miR-132-3p, hsa-miR-134, hsa-miR-135a-5p, hsa-miR-135b-5p, hsa-miR-138-5p, hsa-miR-142-3p, hsa-miR-142-5p, hsa-miR-143-3
  • the acellular prepration comprises at least one miRNA species whose relative abundance is increased when compared to a control medium/blood or resting cells/naive blood.
  • miRNA species are listed in Tables 1A to 1 D.
  • Table 1A miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is increased when compared to control medium/blood or medium from resting cells/naive blood as determined in Figure 13.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 1A. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 or 37 of any one of the miRNA species listed in Table 1A. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 1A.
  • Table 1 B miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is increased when compared to control medium/blood and whose relative abundance in the control medium/blood is decreased when compared the medium from resting cells/naive blood as determined in Figure 13.
  • miRNA species identified with an * show a log 2 fold regulation change or a p ⁇ 0.05 on a volcano plot.
  • miRNA species identified with a # are identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 1 B. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 of any one of the miRNA species listed in Table 1 B. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 1 B.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species listed in Table 1 B and showing a log 2 fold regulation change or a p ⁇ 0.05 on a volcano plot (e.g., hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-let-7e-5p, hsa-miR-132-3p, hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-27a- 3p, hsa-miR-27b-3p, hsa-miR-298 and/or hsa-miR-34a-5p).
  • a log 2 fold regulation change or a p ⁇ 0.05 on a volcano plot e.g., hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-let-7e-5p, hsa-miR-132-3p, hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-27a- 3p, hsa-miR-27b-3
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species listed in Table 1 B and identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12 (e.g. hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-let-7e-5p, hsa- miR-298 and/or hsa-miR-34a-5p).
  • Table 1 C miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is increased when compared to the medium/blood from resting cells/naive blood and whose relative abundance in the control blood/medium is increased when compared to the medium from resting cells/naive blood as determined in Figure 13.
  • miRNA species identified with an * show a log 2 fold regulation change or a p ⁇ 0.05 on a volcano plot.
  • miRNA species identified with a # are identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 1 C. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 29 of any one of miRNA species listed in Table 1 C. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 1 C.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species listed in Table 1 C and showing a log 2 fold regulation change or a p ⁇ 0.05 on a volcano plot (e.g. hsa-miR-135b-5p, hsa-miR-147a, hsa-miR-149-5p, hsa-miR-155-5p, hsa-miR- 206, hsa-miR-214-3p, hsa-miR-302a-3p and/or hsa-miR-9-5p).
  • a volcano plot e.g. hsa-miR-135b-5p, hsa-miR-147a, hsa-miR-149-5p, hsa-miR-155-5p, hsa-miR- 206, hsa-miR-214-3p, hsa-miR-302a-3
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species listed in Table 1 C and identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12 (e.g. hsa-miR-134 and/or hsa-miR- 574-3p).
  • Table 1 D Selection of the miRNA species from Table 1 E which show a log 2 fold regulation change or a p ⁇ 0.05 on a volcano plot.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 1 D. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 of any one of miRNA species listed in Table 1 D. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 1 D.
  • the acellular prepration comprises at least one miRNA species whose relative abundance is decreased when compared to a control medium/blood or the medium fom resting cells/naive blood.
  • miRNA species are listed in Tables 2A to 2D.
  • Table 2A miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is decreased when compared to control medium/blood or medium from resting cells/naive blood as determined in Figure 13.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 2A. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 or 46 of any one of miRNA species listed in Table 2A. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 2A.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 2B.
  • the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2 or 3 of any one of the miRNA species listed in Table 2B.
  • the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 2B.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species (or any combination thereof) listed in Table 2B and showing a log 2 fold regulation change or a p ⁇ 0.05 on a volcano plot (e.g. hsa-miR-183-5p, hsa-miR-203a and/or hsa-miR-363-3p).
  • Table 2C Selection of the miRNA species from Table 2B which show a log 2 fold regulation change or a p ⁇ 0.05 on a volcano plot.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 2C. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2 of any one of miRNA species listed in Table 2C. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 2C.
  • Table 2D miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is decreased when compared to the medium from resting cells/naive blood and whose relative abundance in the control blood/medium is decreased when compared to the medium from resting cells/naive blood in Figure 13.
  • miRNA species identified with an * show a log 2 fold regulation change or a p ⁇ 0.05 on a volcano plot.
  • miRNA species identified with a # are identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 2D. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 or 41 of any one of miRNA species listed in Table 2D. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 2D.
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species (or any combination thereof) listed in Table 2D and are identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12 (e.g. hsa-miR-125b-5p, hsa-miR-148a-3p and/or hsa-miR-196a-5p).
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one (and in an embodiment any combination of) miRNAs species from any one of Tables 1A to 1 D and at least one (and in an embodiment any combination of) miRNAs species from any one of Tables 2A to 2D.
  • the acellular preparation can comprise at least one of the miRNA species identified in the volcano plots of Figure 12.
  • the acellular preparation can comprise at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species from the following list: has-miR- 298, has-miR-34a-5p, has-miR-574-3p, has-miR-125b-5p, has-let-7a-5p, has-miR-196a-5p, has-miR-148a-3p, has-let-7e-5p and has-miR-134.
  • the acellular preparation can comprise at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species identified on Figure 12 and having a relative abundance which is increased in the acellular preparation when compared to the control medium/blood (e.g. miR-298, has-miR-34a-5p, has-miR-574-3p, has- let-7a-5p, has-miR-196a-5p, has-miR-148a-3p, has-let-7e-5p and/or has-miR-134).
  • the acellular preparation can comprise the miRNA species identified on Figure 12 and having a relative abundance which is increased in the acellular preparation and the control medium/blood when compared to the resting cells/naive blood (e.g. has-miR-125b- 5p).
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species presented on Figure 12A which exhibits at least a log 2 fold modulation in abundance (e.g. miR-302a-3p, miR214-3p, miR-147a, miR206, miR 155-5p and/or miR-9-5p).
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) of miRNA species presented on Figure 12A which exhibits at least p ⁇ 0.05 (e.g. miR214-3p, miR-147a, miR206, miR 155-5p and/or miR-9-5p).
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species presented on Figure 12B which exhibits at least a log 2 fold modulation in abundance (e.g. miR-149-5p and/or miR-214-3p). In yet still another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises the miRNA species presented on Figure 12B which exhibits at least p ⁇ 0.05 (e.g. miR-214-3p). In yet another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species presented on Figure 12C which exhibits at least a log 2 fold modulation in abundance (e.g. miR-147a, miR-183-5p, miR-9-5p and/or miR-155-5p). In yet still another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species presented on Figure 12C which exhibits at least p ⁇ 0.05 (e.g. miR-9-5p and/or miR-155- 5p).
  • the acellular preparation comprises at least one (and in an embodiment any combination of) miRNAs species from any one of Tables 1A to 1 D, at least one (and in an embodiment any combination of) miRNAs species from any one of Tables 2A to 2D and at least one (and in an embodiment any combination of) miRNA species identified in any one of the Figure 12A to 12C.
  • the present invention also provides methods and acellular preparations for increasing the ratio of the level of regulatory T cells with respect to the level of pro-inflammatory T cells.
  • the ratio can be increased either by augmenting the level of regulatory T cells in the subject or decreasing the level of pro-inflammatory T cells in the treated subject.
  • the ratio can be increased by augmenting the level of regulatory T cells in the subject and decreasing the level of pro-inflammatory T cells in the treated subject.
  • the induction of a state of anergy or immunotolerance in individuals experiencing an abnormally elevated immune reaction can be therapeutically beneficial for limiting the symptoms or pathology associated with the abnormally elevated immune reaction.
  • a partial induction of anergy or tolerance can be beneficial to prevent, treat and/or alleviate the symptoms of a disorder associated with a pro-inflammatory state (such as, for example, an auto-immune disease or an excessive immune response).
  • the acellular preparation is administered to the treated subject in a therapeutically effective amount.
  • the acellular preparation can be prepared using the conditioned blood obtained by administering a first leukocyte to a test subject.
  • the first leukocyte, allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the treated subject.
  • the acellular preparation can be prepared using the conditioned medium obtained by co-culturing a first leukocyte with a second leukocyte.
  • the first leukocyte, allogeneic or xenogeneic to the second leukocyte can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the treated subject.
  • the second leukocyte, allogeneic or xenogeneic to the first leukocyte can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the treated subject.
  • the administration of the acellular preparation induces a state of anergy or immune tolerance in the treated subject.
  • the state of anergy can persist long after the administration of the acellular preparation (as shown below, at least 270 days in mice).
  • the state of anergy does not revert back to a proinflammatory state upon a challenge with, for example, an immunogen (such as an immunogenic or allogeneic cell). Consequently, the methods and cellular preparations described herein are useful for the treatment, prevention and/or alleviation of symptoms associated with abnormal/excessive immune responses and conditions associated thereto.
  • Autoimmunity arises consequent to an animal/individual's immune system recognizing their own tissues as "non-self. Autoimmunity is largely a cell-mediated disease with T lymphocytes playing a central role in "self recognition and are, in many cases, also the effector cells.
  • the Non-Obese Diabetic (NOD) mouse is an inbred strain that exhibits the spontaneous development of a variety of autoimmune diseases including insulin dependent diabetes. It is considered to be an exemplary mouse model of autoimmunity in general.
  • the murine autoimmune diabetes develops beginning around 10 to 15 weeks of age and has been extensively used to study the mechanisms underlying autoimmune-mediated diabetes, therapeutic interventions and the effect of viral enhancers on disease pathogenesis.
  • the NOD mouse model has translated into successful clinical human trials utilizing T-cell targeting therapies for treatment of many autoimmune diseases, including T1 D.
  • T-cell targeting therapies for treatment of many autoimmune diseases, including T1 D.
  • the loss of function arising from proinflammatory allo-recognition is exemplified by the destruction of the islets of Langerhans (insulin secreting ⁇ cells) in the pancreas of the NOD mice leading to the onset of Type 1 diabetes.
  • pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition is going to confer the protection and survival of the islets of Langerhans and the inhibition of diabetes in the treated subject.
  • IVIg immune thrombocytopenia
  • etanercept (trade name ENBREL®), a soluble TNF-receptor, has also been shown to decrease the incidence of diabetes in NOD mice and has been used in small scale human trials.
  • novel approaches to increase Treg cells (and/or IL-10) while decreasing inflammatory T cell responses could be beneficial in treating autoimmune diabetes.
  • a state of anergy or immune tolerance can be considered therapeutically beneficial in subjects experiencing (or at risk of experiencing) an abnormal immune response, such as for example an auto-immune disease.
  • an auto-immune disease Individuals afflicted by auto-immune diseases have either low levels of Tregs and/or elevated levels of pro-inflammatory T cells (such as Th17 and/or Th1) when compared to age- and sex-matched healthy individuals.
  • Such auto-immune diseases include, but are not limited to, type I diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, lupus, immune thrombocytopenia, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, auto-immune uveitis, psoriasis inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma and Crohn's disease. Because it is shown herein that the acellular preparations are beneficial for increasing the ratio Tregs/pro-inflammatory T cells, it is expected that administration of the acellular preparations to afflicted subjects will alleviate symptoms associated with the auto-immune disease and/or prevent disease severity.
  • a state of anergy or tolerance can also be considered therapeutically beneficial in subjects at risk of developing an abnormally elevated/excessive immune response.
  • abnormally elevated immune response can be observed in subjects receiving a vaccine.
  • RSV respiratory syncytial virus
  • the acellular preparations are beneficial for increasing the ratio Tregs/pro-inflammatory T cells, it is expected that administration of the acellular preparations to subject having received or intended to receive a vaccine will alleviate symptoms associated with the administration of the vaccine and/or prevent the development of an excessive immune response.
  • the acellular preparation can be administered (or formulated for administration) prior to the vaccine, simultaneously with the vaccine or after the administration of the vaccine.
  • the acellular preparations can be manufactured from a conditioned medium.
  • the conditioned medium can be obtained by co- culturing a first leukocyte, being allogeneic or xenogeneic to a second leukocyte, which can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be vaccinated.
  • the second leukocyte much like the first leukocyte, can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be vaccinated.
  • the acellular preparations can also be manufactured from a conditioned blood.
  • the conditioned blood can be obtained by administered a first leukocyte, being allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject, which can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be vaccinated.
  • a first leukocyte being allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject, which can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be vaccinated.
  • the acellular preparations can be used to prevent or limit the elevated/excessive immune response (e.g. graft destruction or graft rejection).
  • the acellular preparation can be contacted with the cells/tissue to be transplanted prior to the transplantation (e.g. for example in a transplant medium or a preservation medium).
  • the acellular preparations can be manufactured from a conditioned medium.
  • the conditioned medium can be obtained by co-culturing a first leukocyte, being allogeneic or xenogeneic to a second leukocyte, which can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be treated.
  • the first leukocyte is allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the cells or tissue intended to be grafted.
  • the second leukocyte much like the first leukocyte, can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be treated.
  • the second leukocyte is allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the cells or tissue intended to be grafted.
  • the acellular preparations can also be manufactured from a conditioned blood.
  • the conditioned blood can be obtained by administering a first leukocyte, being allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject, which can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be treated.
  • the first leukocyte is allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the cells or tissue intended to be grafted.
  • the acellular preparations can also be used to prevent or limit a graft- vs.-host disease (GVHD) in a subject having received or intended to receive transplanted immune cells or stem cells.
  • GVHD graft- vs.-host disease
  • the acellular preparations can be contacted (e.g. cultured) with the cells intended to be grafted prior to transfusion in the subject (e.g. for example in a transplantation medium or preservation medium) to induce a state of anergy or tolerance in those cells.
  • the acellular preparations can be administered to the subject prior to the transfusion of immune/stem cells to induce a state of anergy or tolerance to prevent or limit GVHD.
  • the acellular preparations can be administered simultaneously with the transfused immune/stem cells to prevent or limit GVHD.
  • the acellular preparations can be administered to a subject having been transfused with immune cells or stem cells either to alleviate the symptoms associated to GVHD (when the subject experiences such symptoms) or to prevent GVHD (when the subject is at risk of experiencing such symptoms).
  • the conditioned medium can be obtained by co-culturing two allogeneic/xenogeneic leukocyte population.
  • the first leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the donor (of the immune or stem cells).
  • the first leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the recipient (intended to receive the immune or stem cells).
  • the second leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the donor.
  • the second leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the recipient.
  • the conditioned blood can be obtained by administering a first leukocyte allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject (e.g. and in an embodiment to the donor).
  • the first leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the donor.
  • the first leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the recipient.
  • the acellular preparation the acellular preparation can be administered (or formulated for administration) prior to the transplant, simultaneously with the transplant or after the transplant. ln the methods and acellular preparations described herein, it is contemplated that the acellular- based preparations be optionally administered with other therapeutic agents known to be useful for the treatment, prevention and/or alleviation of symptoms of conditions associated to an excessive/abnormal immune response, such as, for example, cortisone, IL-10, IL-1 1 and/or IL- 12.
  • PBMC Human PBMC and dendritic cell preparation. Human whole blood was collected in heparinized vacutainer blood collection tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) from healthy volunteer donors following informed consent. PBMC were isolated from diluted whole blood using FicollePaque PREMIUMTM (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp, Piscataway, NJ) as per the product instructions. The PBMC layer was washed twice with 1X Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS; without CaCI 2 and MgS0 4 ; Invitrogen by Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and resuspended in the appropriate media as needed for mixed lymphocyte reactions and flow cytometric analysis of Treg and Th17 phenotypes.
  • HBSS Hank's Balanced Salt Solution
  • MgS0 4 Invitrogen by Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA
  • Dendritic cells were prepared from isolated PBMC as described by O'Neill and Bhardwaj (O'Neill et al., 2005). Briefly, freshly isolated PBMC were overlaid on Petri dishes for 3 h in AIM V serum free culture medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Non-adherent cells were gently washed off the plate. The adherent cells (monocyte rich cells) were treated with IL-4 and GM-CSF (50 and 100 ng/mL respectively; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) in AIM V medium. Cells were again treated with IL-4 and GM-CSF on days 2 and 5.
  • DC maturation factors TNF-a, I L- 1 , IL-6; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN
  • prostaglandin E2 Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO.
  • the mature DC-like cells were harvested on day 7 and CD80, CD83, CD86 and HLA-DR expressions were determined to confirm DC maturation via flow cytometry (FACSCaliburTM Flow Cytometer, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).
  • Murine splenocyte and tissue harvesting All murine studies were done in accordance with the Canadian Council of Animal Care and the University of British Columbia Animal Care Committee guidelines and were conducted within the Centre for Disease Modeling at the University of British Columbia.
  • Murine donor cells used for the in vivo donation and in vitro studies were euthanized by C0 2 .
  • Three allogeneic strains of mice were utilized for syngeneic and allogeneic in vitro and in vivo challenge: Balb/c, H-2 d ; C57BI/6, H-2 b ; and C3H, H-2 k .
  • Murine spleens, brachial lymph nodes, and peripheral blood were collected at the indicated days.
  • Mouse spleens and brachial lymph nodes were dissected and placed into cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 1.9 mM NaH 2 P0 4 , 8.1 mM Na 2 HP0 4 , and 154 mM NaCI, pH 7.3) containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO.) and kept on ice until ready to process.
  • PBS cold phosphate buffered saline
  • BSA bovine serum albumin
  • Murine donor splenocytes were prepared from freshly harvested syngeneic or allogeneic spleens via homogenization into a cell suspension in PBS (0.2% BSA) using the frosted end of two microscope slides.
  • the resultant cell suspension was spun down at 500 x g.
  • the splenocyte pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of 1X BD Pharm LYSETM lysing buffer (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) and incubated for 1 min at room temperature. Lymph node cells were harvested via tissue homogenization as described above, washed twice and resuspended in PBS (0.2% BSA) for flow cytometric analysis of Th17, Treg and murine haplotype.
  • Recipient peripheral blood lymphocytes were prepared via lysis of the red cells (BD Pharm Lyse lysing buffer; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) at 1X concentration, followed by washing (1X) and resuspension in PBS (0.2% BSA) for flow analysis of Th17, Treg and murine haplotype.
  • mPEG modification PEGylation
  • Human PBMC and murine splenocytes were derivatized using methoxypoly(-ethylene glycol) succinimidyl valerate (mPEG- SVA; Laysan Bio Inc. Arab, AL) with a molecular weight of 20 kDa as previously described (Scott et al., 1997; Murad et al, 1999A; Chen et al. , 2003; Chen et al., 2006, Wang et al., 201 1). Grafting concentrations was 1 mM per 4 x 10 6 cells/mL.
  • donor splenocytes (5.12 x 10 6 cells per well) were co-incubated in triplicate in 96-well plates at 37°C, 5% C0 2 for 3 days. On day 3, all wells were pulsed with 3 H-thymidine and incubated for 24 h at 37°C, 5% C0 2 .
  • Cellular DNA was collected on filter mats using a Skatron cell harvester (Suffolk, U.K.) and cellular proliferation was measured by 3 H-thymidine incorporation.
  • MLR Mixed lymphocyte reaction
  • T lymphocytes populations double positive for CD3 + and CD4 + ) were measured by flow cytometry using fluorescently labeled anti-CD3 and anti-CD4 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), anti-IL-2, anti-IL-4, anti-IL-10, anti-IL-12, anti-IL-17, anti-FoxP3, anti-NK1.1 , anti-IFN- ⁇ , anti-TNF-a, anti-CD152, anti CD62L and anti-CD1 1 c monoclonal antibodies.
  • Th17 lymphocytes Human and mouse Regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg) were CD3 + /CD4 + and FoxP3 + (transcription factor) while inflammatory Th17 lymphocytes cells were CD3 + /CD4 + and IL-17 + (cytokine) as measured per the BD Treg/Th17 Phenotyping Kit (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). After the staining, the cells (1 x 10 6 cells total) were washed and resuspended in PBS (0.1 % BSA) prior to flow acquisition. Isotype controls were also used to determine background fluorescence. All samples were acquired using the FACSCaliburTM flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and CellQuest ProTM software for both acquisition and analysis.
  • mice In vivo murine studies. The following strains were used Balb/c, H-2 d ; C57BI/6, H-2 b ; and C3H, H-2 k (Chen et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2006) as well a NOD (Anderson et al., 2005). All mice (donors and recipients) were 9-1 1 weeks old. Donor splenocytes were prepared were transfused intravenously (i.v.) via the tail vein into recipient animals. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice injected with sterile saline served as control animals.
  • mice were either untreated (naive) or treated with saline, non-polymer modified allogeneic splenocytes or PEGylated allogeneic splenocytes (obtained by the procedures explained above). After five days, a cell-free conditioned plasma was obtained (from mouse blood using the mirVanaTM PARISTM kit from Ambion by Life Technologies) and transfused to another naive mouse.
  • Plasma fractionation The plasma fractionation was performed using centrifugal filter molecular cutoff devices. Millipore's Amicon® Ultra-0.5 centrifugal filter devices were used (Amicon Ultra 3k, 10K, 30K, 50K, and 100K devices).
  • the miRNA was extracted from samples (conditioned medium or plasma) using mirVanaTM PARISTM kit from Ambion® by Life Technologies according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the sample is mixed with the 2X denaturing solution provided and subjected to acid-phenol:chloroform extraction. To isolate RNA that is highly enriched for small RNA species, 100% ethanol was added to bring the samples to 25% ethanol. When this lysate/ethanol mixture was passed through a glass-fiber filter, large RNAs are immobilized, and the small RNA species are collected in the filtrate. The ethanol concentration of the filtrate was then increased to 55%, and it was passed through a second glass-fiber filter where the small RNAs become immobilized.
  • RNA is washed a few times, and eluted in a low ionic strength solution. Using this approach, an RNA fraction highly enriched in RNA species ⁇ 200 nt can be obtained. Note that the large RNA species (>200 nt) can be recovered from the first filter if necessary.
  • the murine miRNA preparations (e.g. TA1 preparations) used were extracted from the conditioned plasma obtained 5 days after mice have received mPEG allogeneic splenocytes. Extraction can occur at time points other than 5 days (e.g., 24 hours post administration) and yield similar results (data not shown). Five days was chosen as Treg levels achieved maximal levels at this point in the mice.
  • the human miRNA preparations (e.g. TA2 preparations) used were extracted from the conditioned medium of an mPEG-MLR harvested 72 hours following the initiation of the mPEG-MLR. However, miRNA harvested from human PBMC mPEG-MLR at 24 hours also yields the desired immunomodulatory effects (data not shown). To calibrate, miRNA concentration can be quantitated via a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (LifeTechnologies) and selected fluorescent dyes which emit a signal only when bound to specific target (i.e., miRNA) molecules.
  • miRNA characterization The miRNA of the conditioned medium were characterized by qPCR using the miScript miRNATM PCR Array Human Immunopathology (Qiagen) for human conditioned medium and the Mouse Immunopathology miRNA PCR ArrayTM (Qiagen) for mouse conditioned plasma/media.
  • Phosphorylation of phosphokinases Analyzing the phosphorylation state of kinases and their protein substrates allows for the characterization of the effects of conditioned plasma or media on how cells respond to allogeneic stimuli.
  • the human phospho-kinase array (R&D Systems Inc) is a rapid, sensitive tool to simultaneously detect the relative levels of phosphorylation of 43 kinase phosphorylation sites and 2 related total proteins. Each capture antibody was carefully selected using cell lysates prepared from cell lines known to express the target protein. Capture and control antibodies are spotted in duplicate on nitrocellulose membranes. Cell lysates are diluted and incubated overnight with the human phospho-kinase array.
  • Two-way human PBMC MLRs were prepared using the conditioned medium collected at 72 hours from mPEG MLR as the primary MLR.
  • the conditioned medium was fractionated with respect to its molecular weight (higher or lower than 10 kDa).
  • the fraction of the conditioned medium derived from PEGylated MLR and having a molecular weight of less than 10 kDa retained the ability to increase human Treg levels in vitro.
  • the fraction having a molecular weight higher than 10 kDa did not have the ability to increase Treg levels in vitro in the secondary MLR.
  • a conditioned cell-free plasma from untreated mouse (naive), mouse having received saline (saline), allogeneic unmodified splenocytes (allogeneic) and PEGylated allogeneic splenocytes (mPEG-allogeneic) were obtained 5 days after treatment.
  • the conditioned plasma was either left untreated (e.g. complete) or fractionated in function of the size of its components (> 100 kDa, between 30 and 100 kDa, between 10 and 30 kDa or ⁇ 10 kDa).
  • the conditioned plasma was then transfused to naive mouse.
  • the ⁇ 10 kDa fraction of the conditioned plasma from mouse having received mPEG allogeneic splenotytes retained the ability to increase Treg levels in vivo.
  • the ⁇ 10 kDa fraction of the conditioned plasma from mouse having received mPEG allogeneic splenotytes retained the ability to decrease Th17 levels in vivo.
  • the immunodulatory effect of conditioned murine plasma seems to mostly reside in the lower molecular weight fraction ( ⁇ 10 kDa).
  • This low molecular weight fraction does not include the majority of cytokines (usually encompasses in the 100-30 and the 30-10 kDa fractions) typically thought to mediate immunodulation of Tregs and pro-inflammatory leukocytes. However, the ⁇ 10 kDa fraction is suspected to contain, among its components, microRNAs (miRNAs).
  • miRNAs microRNAs
  • mice were injected with control conditioned plasma or the same plasma that had been pre-treated with RNase A, an enzyme that degrades/destroys ribonucleic acids such as miRNAs.
  • RNase A an enzyme that degrades/destroys ribonucleic acids such as miRNAs.
  • treatment with RNase A abolishes virtually all immunomodulatory activity of the conditioned medium, thereby confirming the ribonucleic acid nature of the size-fractionated conditioned plasma.
  • the size-fractionation conditioned plasma was administered to mice and its effects on the intracellular cytokine expression of CD4 + cells was examined.
  • the ⁇ 10 kDa fraction and some of the ⁇ 3 kDa fraction of the conditioned plasma from mouse having received mPEG allogeneic splenotytes increase IL-10 intracellular expression in CD4 + cells in vivo ( Figure 3A).
  • the ⁇ 10 kDa fraction and the ⁇ 3 kDa fraction of the conditioned plasma from mouse having received mPEG allogeneic splenotytes did not exhibit any increase in IL-2, TNF-a, IFN- ⁇ or IL-4 intracellular expression in CD4 + cells in vivo ( Figures 3B to 3E).
  • the ⁇ 10 kDa (and some of the > 3 kDa) fraction of the conditioned of the mPEG-allogeneic plasma when compared to the corresponding fractions of the conditioned allogeneic plasma, increased the expression of pro-tolerogenic cytokines, such as IL-10, while actively preventing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-2, TNF-a, IFN- ⁇ or IL-4. Indeed, proinflammatory cytokines in the mPEG allogeneic plasma recipients remained at levels seen in naive animals.
  • the administration of the conditioned plasma or the derived miRNA preparation from mouse having received unmodified allogeneic splenocytes caused an increase in the expression of intracellular IL-2 and INF- ⁇ in CD4 + cells.
  • the administration of the conditioned plasma or the derived miRNA preparation from mouse having received mPEG- modified allogeneic splenocytes i.e., TA1 preparation
  • TA1 preparation caused an increase in the expression of intracellular IL-10 in CD4 + cells.
  • miRNA was an active component mediating the immunological changes, RNase treatment of the conditioned plasma or of the miRNA preparation prior to administration to animals either diminished (plasma) or abolished (miRNA) the immunomodulatory effects. While conditioned plasma retained some immunomodulatory effect, it is believed that it was due to residual cytokines and/or plasma-mediated inactivation of the RNAase A enzyme.
  • the administration of the conditioned plasma or the derived miRNA preparation from mouse having received mPEG-modified allogeneic splenocytes caused an increase in the percentage of Treg (Foxp3 + ) cells in function of the total CD4 + cells.
  • the administration of the conditioned plasma or the derived miRNA preparation from mouse having received unmodified allogeneic splenocytes caused an increase in the percentage of Th17 (IL-17 + ) cells in function of the total CD4 + cells (Figure 4E).
  • CD4 + cells types were observed at least 270 days after the administration of the conditioned medium or the miRNA preparations and were diminished (plasma) or abolished (miRNA) with a preliminary RNase treatment.
  • Acellular preparations prepared from mice injected with either allogeneic or mPEG-allogeneic leukocytes exerted potent and long- lasting effects in naive recipient mice.
  • allogeneic-derived preparations yielded a pro-inflammatory state while mPEG-allogeneic-derived preparations (plasma or miRNA) yielded a immunoquiescent state.
  • Murine and human-derived miRNA preparations exert a direct effect on cell signaling.
  • Murine TA1 preparations have been incubated with Jurkat cells (1 x 10 6 cells/ml treated with 50 ⁇ of TA1/ml) and the level of phosphorylation of some of the phosphokinase has been measured after 30 minutes of incubation. As shown on Figure 5, TA1 preparations favored the phosphorylation of Akt and PRAS40 kinases while decreasing the phosphorylation of the HSP60 kinase.
  • Murine TA1 preparations were also introduced (at time 0) into a human PBMC MLR assay in order to determine their effect on human allo-recognition. As indicated on Figure 6, the presence of the murine TA1 preparations resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the percentage in leukocyte proliferation (at both 10 and 14 days) which is indicative of their pro- tolerogenic effects. This data also indicates that the TA1 preparations show significant evolutionary conservations (both sequence specific and similarity) since the murine TA1 are highly effective in a xenogeneic system (e.g. human MLR).
  • a xenogeneic system e.g. human MLR
  • the murine TA1 preparation was directly compared to a known, clinically used, pro-tolerogenic therapeutic product (etanercept; trade name ENBREL®).
  • etanercept trade name ENBREL®
  • TA1 and etanercept were introduced in a mouse MLR (using Blab/c and C57BI/6 splenocytes) and the proliferation of the splenocytes were measured.
  • TA1 more efficiently repressed CD4+ splenocyte proliferation (Figure 7A) and CD8+ splenocyte proliferation ( Figure 7B) than did etanercept.
  • This data demonstrates that the TA1 preparation induced a much more potent immunosuppressive effect than the medicinal ingredient of the drug ENBREL®.
  • the active component i.e., miRNA
  • the murine TA1 preparation proved effective both in vitro and in vivo in experimental models involving immunologically normal cells and animals
  • NOD mice a model of autoimmune disease, NOD mice were used.
  • NOD mice autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic islets begins within approximately 10-15 weeks of birth and is confirmed by elevated blood glucose measures.
  • the lymphocytes from pre-diabetic and diabetic animals has been obtained from the spleen, the brachial lymph node and the pancreatic lymph node.
  • lymphocytes have been submitted to flow cytometry using anti- IL-17A (PE) and anti-FoxP3 (Alexa 697) antibodies.
  • PE anti-IL-17A
  • Alexa 697 anti-FoxP3 antibodies.
  • significant changes in the levels of Th17 and Treg lymphocytes are noted in the spleen, brachial lymph node and pancreatic lymph nodes upon conversion of NOD mice from non-diabetic to diabetic state. These changes are characterized by dramatically increased Th17 (top numbers in each panels) and significantly decreased Treg (lower numbers in each panels) lymphocytes.
  • TA1 treatment significantly delayed the onset of diabetes with 67% of the diabetic animals occurring at greater than 20 weeks of age. In contrast, 100% of the diabetic control NOD mice arose before 20 weeks of age. Moreover, the onset of diabetes correlated with the Treg:Th17 ratio as shown in Figure 9B. A high Treg:Th17 ratio protected against, or delayed, the age of onset for overt diabetes. As shown, untreated diabetic NOD mice demonstrated lower Treg/Th17 ratios compared to diabetic TA1 -treated NOD mice. The higher Treg/Th17 ratio of the TA1 -treated mice similarly correlated with a delayed onset of diabetes in the mice that developed overt disease.
  • Treg/Th17 ratios were determined at 30 weeks of age.
  • Figure 9B very high Treg/Th17 ratio were characteristic of normoglycemic animals in both the untreated and TA1 -treated groups.
  • Figure 9C The importance of the Treg/Th17 ratio is further shown in Figure 9C in which the ratio is described in normal mouse strains (Balb/c and C57/BI6) pre-diabetic NOD mice (7 weeks of age), diabetic control and TA1 -treated NOD mice as well as normoglycemic control and TA1 -treated NOD mice.
  • a significantly higher (p ⁇ 0.0001) Treg/Th17 ratio was observed relative to diabetic mice.
  • the administration of the murine TA1 preparations to NOD mice caused a systemic and/or local increase in pro-tolerogenic leukocytes. Leukocyte populations were quantitated at time of sacrifice of the mice (weeks 15-30). Treatment at 7 weeks of age with TA1 yielded a persistent and significant increase in Treg cells in all tissues of the NOD mouse measured with the exception of the thymus ( Figure 10A). This data suggest that TA1 exerts a potent immunomodulatory effect on lymphatic organs. Tregs counter-balance/attenuate proinflammatory lymphocytes such as Th17 and Th1 cells. The administration of murine TA1 similarly caused an increase in the expression of TGF- ⁇ .
  • the TA1 preparation increased TGF- ⁇ * cells in the treated mice.
  • TGF- ⁇ counter-balance/attenuate proinflammatory lymphocytes such as Th17 and Th1 cells.
  • Exogenous TGF- ⁇ has previously been shown to prevent autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice.
  • the administration of TA1 s increased the level of expression of IL-4 + , a marker of Th2 cells (Figure 10C), further confirming its immonomodulatory effect on lymphatic organs.
  • the administration of TA1 s increased the level of expression of IL-10 + , another marker of Th2 cells (Figure 10D) as well as the percentage of CD62L + cells (Figure 10E), CD152+ cells ( Figure 10F) and CD1 1 c + cells ( Figure 10G).
  • the administration of the murine TA1 preparations to NOD mice also caused a decrease in proinflammatory Th17 cells and Th1 cells, as shown by the decrease in the percentage of IL-17A + cells (Figure 1 1 A) as well as the decrease in the percentage of INF-v + cells ( Figure 1 1 B), IL-2 + cells (Figure 1 1 C), TNF-a + cells ( Figure 1 1 D) and IL-12 + cells ( Figure 1 1 E).
  • This data suggest that the TA1 preparations prevented Th17/Th1 upregulation in the treated mice.
  • Th1 and Th17 lymphocytes mediate islet cell destruction.
  • TA1 s caused a significant increase in the level of NK cells (as measured by the expression of NK1.1 + cells on Figure 1 1 F) in the pancreas, but not in other tissues. It is believed that the differentially induced NK cells in the pancreas destroys autoreactive (i.e. inflammatory) cells providing an additional immunomodulatory mechanism resulting in decreased diabetes.
  • the miRNA of conditioned medium collected at 72 hours from resting human PBMC, a human control MLR (using two HLA disparate PBMC populations), and a mPEG MLR (using the same two allogeneic PBMC populations wherein one population is modified with a polymer, e.g. mPEG) (this human miRNA preparation is herewith referred to as TA2) and compared via qPCR analysis.
  • TA2 this human miRNA preparation is herewith referred to as TA2
  • the combined average of the resting Donor A and resting Donor B i.e., resting AB
  • resting AB resting Donor B
  • TA2 is compared, using a volcano plot analysis, with the miRNA population of the supernatant of resting cells, at least one miRNA is differentially expressed (e.g. increased) by statistical significance (p ⁇ 0.05 for miR-214-3p) and at least one miRNA is modulated by at least a log 2 fold (e.g. miR-149-5p).
  • a direct comparison of mPEG-MLR (e.g. TA2) to the control MLR as shown in Figure 12C demonstrates that at least two miRNAs are differentially expressed by volcano statistical significance (p ⁇ 0.01 for miR-155-5p and p ⁇ 0.05 for miR-9-5p) and at least two miRNAs are modulated by at least a log 2 (e.g. miR-183-5p and mir-147a).
  • miRNA species identified with 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 showed increased abundance in the mPEG MLR relative to the control MLR.
  • the miRNA species identified with 4 has a relative abundance similar in both the control MLR and mPEG-MLR and elevated relative to resting cells.
  • FIG. 13 provides a summary of the fold regulation of the purified miRNA preparations differentially expressed in the conditioned medium of a control MLR and a mPEG MLR (TA2) when compared to the conditioned medium of resting cells.
  • Figure 14 provides a subset of the miRNAs presented in Figure 13 and exhibiting at least a log 2 fold modulation when compared to resting cells. As indicated in Figure 14, a subpopulation of miRNAs are decreased in the conditioned medium from the mPEG MLR and increased in the conditioned medium from the control MLR (miR-183-5p, miR-203a, miR363- 3p).
  • Another subpopulation of miRNAs are increased in the conditioned medium from the mPEG MLR and decreased in the conditioned medium from the control MLR (miR-21-5p, miR-27a-3p, miR 27b-3p, miR-298, miR-34a-5p, let-7a-5p, let-7e-5p, miR-132-3p).
  • McCoy LL Scott MD. Broad spectrum antiviral prophylaxis: inhibition of viral infection by polymer grafting with methoxypoly(ethylene glycol). In: PF T, editor. Antiviral drug discovery for emerging diseases and bioterrorism threats. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons; 2005. p. 379-95.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Transplantation (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Dermatology (AREA)
  • Rheumatology (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

This invention relates to pro-tolerogenic preparations capable of increasing the level of regulatory T cells (Treg) and/or decreasing the level of pro-inflammatory T cells (Th17) to induce anergy or immune tolerance. The pro-tolerogenic preparation is enriched in at least one species of miRNAs and is obtained by contacting two allogeneic leukocyte populations wherein at least one of the two populations is modified with a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer. Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions, process for making such composition as well as therapeutic uses of such compositions are also provided.

Description

ACELLULAR PRO-TOLEROGENIC COMPOSITIONS AND PROCESS FOR
MAKING SAME
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims priority from CA patent application 2782942, U.S. provisional patent application 61/670636 and U.S. provisional patent application 61/670694 all filed on July 12, 2012. Their content is incorporated herewith in their entirety.
TECHNOLOGICAL FIELD
The invention provides pro-tolerogenic preparations capable of inducing immune tolerance or anergy. The pro-tolerogenic preparations are RNase-sensitive and can be obtained by enriching the miRNA species expressed when two allogeneic leukocyte populations are contacted and at least one of the population has been modified to bear on its surface a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer capable of limiting pro-inflammatory allo-recognition.
BACKGROUND
Acute and chronic rejection of donor tissues and organs remains a significant clinical problem in transplantation medicine. Moreover, autoimmune diseases in which one's own immune system recognizes "self tissues as foreign can also be rejected by similar mechanisms. To minimize or prevent rejection, the administration of immunosuppressive agents is typically required. Acute and chronic rejection are primarily T lymphocyte-mediated events that require allogeneic recognition of the foreign tissue and the subsequent proliferation of allo-responsive T cells. Indeed, because of the central role of the T cell in rejection, it is the primary target of current immunosuppressive drugs (e.g. , cyclosporine A, FK506). In general, these pharmacologic agents target either the T cell activation (e.g., cyclosporine A that inhibits IL-2 responsiveness) or the proliferation (e.g., methotrexate) of the allo-responsive T cells. However all of today's clinically approved anti-rejection drugs are beset by chronic toxicity. Consequently, significant research is underway to identify alternative means of preventing acute and chronic rejection.
A biomaterials approach to modulating immune responsiveness is the direct modification of the surface of donor cells (e.g. , erythrocytes, lymphocytes, and pancreatic islets) to prevent allo- recognition (Scott et al., 1997; Murad et al., 1999A; Murad et al., 1999B; Bradley et al., 2001 ; Chen et al., 2001 ; Chen et al., 2003; McCoy et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2006; Bradley et al., 2007; Sutton et al., 2010; Le et al., 2010). The polymer modification of the surface of cells is induced by the direct grafting of low immunogenicity polymers to the cell membrane. Previous studies have demonstrated that the polymer modification of the surface of erythrocytes and lymphocytes resulted in the loss of allo-recognition both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, in contrast to pharmacologic agents, the grafted polymer exhibited both extremely low toxicity and immunogenicity.
It would be highly desirable to be provided with an acellular preparation capable of inducing a state of anergy or immunotolerance by increasing the ratio of the level of regulatory T cells (such as Treg) to pro-inflammatory T cells (such as Th1 and Th17). The acellular preparation could induce anergy or tolerance either by increasing Treg levels, decreasing pro-inflammatory T cell levels or both. This preparation could be useful for treating, preventing and/or alleviating the symptoms associated to an abnormal/excessive immune condition, such as an auto-immune disease, an exacerbated response to a vaccine or a tissue/cell transplantation.
BRIEF SUMMARY
The present invention concern acellular preparations, enriched in at least one miRNA species obtained by contacting two allogeneic leukocyte populations, wherein one of the leukocyte population has been modified to bear on its surface a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer. The two leukocyte populations are contacted in conditions preventing or limiting pro- inflammatory allo-recognition while allowing pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition.
According to a first aspect, the present invention provides a process for making an acellular pro- tolerogenic composition. Broadly, the process comprises (i) associating a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer to a cytoplasmic membrane of a first leukocyte to obtain a first modified leukocyte; (ii) contacting the first modified leukocyte with a second leukocyte under conditions to allow a pro-tolerogenic allorecognition to provide a conditioned preparation, wherein the first leukocyte is allogeneic to the second leukocyte; (iii) removing the first modified leukocyte and the second leukocyte from the conditioned preparation under conditions to inhibit RNA degradation so as to obtain a composition enriched in acellular pro-tolerogenic components; and (iv) formulating the composition of step (iii), under conditions to inhibit RNA degradation, in the acellular pro-tolerogenic preparation for administration to a subject. In an embodiment, the process further comprises covalently binding the low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer to a membrane-associated protein of the cytoplasmic membrane of the first leukocyte. In another embodiment, the low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer is a polyethylene glycol (PEG) (a methoxy polyethylene glycol (mPEG) for example). In still another embodiment, the process further comprises covalently binding the mPEG by contacting the first leukocyte with methoxypoly(-ethylene glycol) succinimidyl valerate. In an embodiment, step (ii) occurs in vitro. In such embodiment, the conditioned preparation can be a supernatant of a cell culture of the first leukocyte and the second leukocyte. In a further embodiment, the process further comprises preventing one of the first leukocyte or the second leukocyte from proliferating prior to step (ii). In another embodiment, step (ii) occurs in vivo and comprises administering the first modified leukocyte to a mammal having/bearing the second leukocyte. In such embodiment, the conditioned preparation can be plasma. In yet another embodiment, the process further comprises preventing the first leukocyte from proliferating prior to administration to the mammal. In an embodiment, step (iii) further comprises removing components having an average molecular weight of more than about 10 kDa from the conditioned preparation or filtering out components having the average molecular weight of more than about 10 kDa from the conditioned preparation. In still another embodiment, step (iii) further comprises enriching the conditioned preparation in at least one miRNA species. In yet another embodiment, step (iv) further comprises formulating the composition for intravenous administration to the subject. In an embodiment, the first leukocyte and/or the second leukocyte is a T cell (for example a CD4- positive T cell or a CD8-positive T cell).
According to a second aspect, the present invention provides a pro-tolerogenic preparation obtained by the process described herein. In an embodiment, the pro-tolerogenic preparation has at least one miRNA species presented in Figure 13, at least one of the miRNA species listed any one of Tables 1A to 1 D, at least one of the miRNA species listed in any one of Tables 2A to 2D and/or at least one of the miRNA species identified in any one of Figures 12A to 12C.
According to a third aspect, the present invention provides a method of increasing a ratio of the level of regulatory T (Treg) cells to the level of pro-inflammatory T cells in a subject in need thereof. Broadly, the method comprises administering to the subject a therapeutic amount of a pro-tolerogenic preparation as described herein and/or obtained by the process described herein so as to increase the ratio in the treated subject. In an embodiment, the increased ratio between the level of Treg cells and the level of pro-inflammatory T cells is for treating, preventing and/or alleviating the symptoms associated to an auto-immune disease afflicting the subject. Auto-immune diseases include, but are not limited to, type I diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, lupus, immune thrombocytopenia, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, autoimmune uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma and/or Crohn's disease. In another embodiment, the increased ratio between the level of Treg cells and the level of pro-inflammatory T cells is for preventing or limiting the rejection of transplanted cells or tissue in the subject (for example, transplanted cells or tissue which are allogeneic or xenogeneic to the subject). In still another embodiment, the increased ratio between the level of Treg cells and the level of pro-inflammatory T cells is for preventing or limiting graft-versus-host disease in the treated subject. In another embodiment, the process for obtaining the pro-tolerogenic preparation can further comprise formulating the composition for administration prior to the transplantation of the cells or tissue.
According to a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a pro-tolerogenic preparation for increasing a ratio of the level of regulatory T (Treg) cells to the level of pro-inflammatory T cells in a subject. The present invention also provides a pro-tolerogenic preparation for the preparation of a medicament for increasing a ratio of the level of regulatory T (Treg) cells to the level of pro-inflammatory T cells in a subject. The pro-tolerogenic preparation is described herein and/or is obtained by the process described herein. In an embodiment, the pro- tolerogenic preparation is for treating, preventing and/or alleviating the symptoms associated to an auto-immune disease afflicting the subject. Auto-immune diseases include, but are not limited to, type I diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, lupus, immune thrombocytopenia, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, autoimmune uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma and/or Crohn's disease. In another embodiment, the pro-tolerogenic preparation is for preventing or limiting the rejection of transplanted cells or tissue in the subject (for example, transplanted cells or tissue which are allogeneic or xenogeneic to the subject). In still another embodiment, the pro-tolerogenic preparation is for preventing or limiting graft-versus-host disease in the treated subject. In another embodiment, the process for obtaining the pro-tolereogenic preparation can further comprise formulating the composition for administration prior to the transplantation of the cells or tissue.
Throughout this text, various terms are used according to their plain definition in the art. However, for purposes of clarity, some specific terms are defined below.
Allogeneic cell. A cell is considered "allogeneic" with respect to another cell if both cells are derived from the same animal species but presents sequence variation in at least one genetic locus. A cell is considered "allogeneic" with respect to a subject if the cell is derived from the same animal species as the subject but presents sequence variation in at least one genetic locus when compared to the subject's respective genetic locus. Allogeneic cells induce an immune reaction (such as a rejection) when they are introduced into an immunocompetent host. In an embodiment, a first cell is considered allogeneic with respect to a second cell if the first cell is HLA-disparate (or HLA-mismatched) with the second cell.
Allo-recognition. As it is known in the art, the term "allo-recognition" (also spelled allorecognition) refers to an immune response to foreign antigens (also referred to as alloantigens) from members of the same species and is caused by the difference between products of highly polymorphic genes. Among the most highly polymorphic genes are those encoding the MHC complex which are most highly expressed on leukocytes though other polymorphic proteins may similarly result in immune recognition. These polymorphic products are typically recognized by T cells and other mononuclear leukocytes. In the context of the present invention, the term "pro-inflammatory allo-recognition" refers to an immune response associated with the expansion of pro-inflammatory T cells and/or the differentiation of naive T cells into pro-inflammatory T cells. Pro-inflammatory allo-recognition in vivo mediates cell or tissue injury and/or death and loss of cell or tissue function. Still in the context of the present invention, the term "pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition" refers to an immune response associated with the expansion of Treg cells and/or the differentiation of naive T cells into Treg cells. A pro- tolerogenic allo-recognition is usually considered weaker than a pro-inflammatory allo- recognition. Further, an in vivo pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition does not lead to significant cell or tissue injury and/or death nor loss of cell or tissue function.
Anergy and Tolerance. In the present context, the term "anergy" refers to a non-specific state of immune unresponsiveness to an antigen to which the host was previously sensitized to or unsensitized to. It can be characterized by a decrease or even an absence of lymphokine secretion by viable T cells when the T cell receptor is engaged by an antigen. In the present context, the term "tolerance" refers to an acquired specific failure of the immunological mechanism to respond to a given antigen, induced by exposure to the antigen. Tolerance refers to a specific non-reactivity of the immune system to a particular antigen, which is capable, under other conditions, of inducing an immune response. However, in the present context, the terms "anergy" and "tolerance" are used interchangeably since the compositions and methods presented herewith can be used to achieve both anergy and tolerance.
Autologous cell. A cell is considered "autologous" with respect to another cell if both cells are derived from the same individual or from genetically identical twins. A cell is considered "autologous" to a subject, if the cell is derived from the subject or a genetically identical twin. Autologous cells do not induce an immune reaction (such as a rejection) when they are introduced into an immunocompetent host.
Immunogenic cell. A first cell is considered immunogenic with respect to a second cell when it is able to induce an immune response in the latter cell. In some embodiment, the immune response is in vitro (e.g. a mixed lymphocyte reaction) or can be observed in vivo (e.g. in a subject having the second cell and having received the first cell). The second cell can be located in an immunocompetent subject. Preferably, the immune response is a cell-based immune response in which cellular mediator can be produced. In the context of this invention, the immunogenic cells are immune cells, such as white blood cells or leukocytes.
Immunogenic cell culture conditions. A cell culture is considered to be conducted in immunogenic conditions when it allows the establishment of a pro-inflammatory immune response between two distinct and unmodified leukocytes (and, in an embodiment, allo- recognition). Preferably, the pro-inflammatory immune response is a cell-based immune response in which cellular mediator can be produced. For example, the cell culture conditions can be those of a mixed lymphocyte reaction (primary or secondary). When a cell culture is conducted in immunogenic conditions but with leukocytes which have been modified to prevent allo-recognition, no pro-inflammatory immune response is observed. However, when a cell culture is conducted in immunogenic conditions but with leukocytes which have been modified to prevent pro-inflammatory allo-recognition, a non-inflammatory or pro-tolerogenic immune response can be observed (for example a differentiation of naive T cells to Treg cells and/or expansion of Treg cells).
Leukocyte. As used herein, a leukocyte (also spelled leucocyte) is defined as a blood cell lacking hemoglobin and having a nucleus. Leukocytes are produced and derived from hematopoietic stem cells. Leukocytes are also referred to as white blood cells. Leukocytes include granulocytes (also known as polymorphonuclear leucocytes), e.g. neutrophils, basophils and eosoniphils. Leukocytes also include agranulocytes (or mononuclear leucocytes), e.g. lymphocytes, monocytes and macrophages. Some of the lymphocytes, referred to as T cells (or T-cell), bear on their surface a T-cell receptor. T cell are broadly divided into cells expressing CD4 on their surface (also referred to as CD4-positive cells) and cells expressing CD8 on their surface (also referred to as CD8-positive cells). Some of the lymphocytes, referred to as B cells (or B-cells), bear on their surface a B-cell receptor.
Low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer. As used herein, a "low-immunogenic polymer" refers to a polymer which is not or is unlikely to elicit an immune response in an individual. This low- immunogenic polymer is also capable of masking an antigenic determinant of a cell and lowering or even preventing an immune response to the antigenic determinant when the antigenic determinant is introduced into a subject. A "biocompatible polymer" refers to a polymer which is non-toxic when introduced into a subject. Exemplary low-immunogenic biocompatible polymers includes, but are not limited to, polyethylene glycol (for example methoxypoly(ethylene glycol)), hyperbranched polyglycerol (HPG) and 2-alkyloxazoline (POZ).
Non-proliferative leukocyte. As used herein, the term "non-proliferative leukocyte" refers to a lymphocyte which has been modified to no longer being capable of cellular proliferation (e.g. performing at least one complete division cycle). In some embodiments, this modification may be temporary and the non-proliferative properties of a leukocyte may be limited in time. For example, when a leukocyte is modified from a contact with a pharmacological agent capable of limiting its proliferation, the removal of the pharmacological agent from the cell culture can allow the leukocyte to regain its proliferative properties. In other embodiments, the modification is permanent and the modified leukocyte cannot regain its proliferative properties. For example, when a leukocyte is irradiated, it is not possible for it to regain its proliferative properties. In the context of the present application, the expressions "non-proliferative leukocyte" or "leukocyte limited from proliferating" are used interchangeably. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). This term refers to the cell population recuperated/derived from the peripheral blood of a subject (usually a mammal such as a human). PBMC usually contains T cells, B cells and antigen presenting cells.
Pharmaceutically effective amount or therapeutically effective amount. These expressions refer to an amount (dose) of an acellular preparation effective in mediating a therapeutic benefit to a patient (for example prevention, treatment and/or alleviation of symptoms of an immune- associated disorder in which the ratio of Tregs to pro-inflammatory T cells is low when compared to sex- and age-matched healthy subjects). It is also to be understood herein that a "pharmaceutically effective amount" may be interpreted as an amount giving a desired therapeutic effect, either taken in one dose or in any dosage or route, taken alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents.
Prevention, treatment and alleviation of symptoms. These expressions refer to the ability of the acellular preparation to limit the development, progression and/or symptomology of a immune- associated disorder associated to an abnormal/excessive immune response (for example prevention, treatment and/or alleviation of symptoms of an immune-associated disorder in which the ratio of Tregs to pro-inflammatory T cells is low when compared to sex- and age-matched healthy subject). Broadly, the prevention, treatment and/or alleviation of symptoms encompasses increasing the levels of Treg cells and/or decreasing the levels of proinflammatory T cells. The acellular preparation is considered effective or successful for treating and/or alleviating the symptoms associated with the disorder when a reduction in the proinflammatory state (when compared to an untreated and afflicted individual) in the treated individual (previously known to be afflicted with the disorder) is observed. The acellular-based preparation is considered effective or successful for preventing the disorder when a reduction in the pro-inflammatory state (when compared to an untreated and afflicted individual) in the treated individual is observed upon an immunological challenge (such as, for example, an antigenic challenge).
Pro-inflammatory T cells. In the present context, pro-inflammatory T cells are a population of T cells capable of mediating an inflammatory reaction. Pro-inflammatory T cells generally include T helper 1 (Th1 or Type 1) and T helper 17 (Th17) subsets of T cells. Th1 cells partner mainly with macrophage and can produce interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-β, IL-2 and IL-10. Th1 cells promote the cellular immune response by maximizing the killing efficacy of the macrophages and the proliferation of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Th1 cells can also promote the production of opsonizing antibodies. T helper 17 cells (Th17) are a subset of T helper cells capable of producing interleukin 17 (IL-17) and are thought to play a key role in autoimmune diseases and in microbial infections. Th17 cells primarily produce two main members of the IL- 17 family, IL-17A and IL-17F, which are involved in the recruitment, activation and migration of neutrophils. Th17 cells also secrete IL-21 and IL-22.
Regulatory T cells. Regulatory T cells are also referred to as Treg and were formerly known as suppressor T cell. Regulatory T cells are a component of the immune system that suppress immune responses of other cells. Regulatory T cells usually express CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, and Foxp3. Additional regulatory T cell populations include Tr1 , Th3, CD8+CD28", CD69+, and Qa-1 restricted T cells. Regulatory T cells actively suppress activation of the immune system and prevent pathological self-reactivity, i.e. autoimmune disease. The critical role regulatory T cells play within the immune system is evidenced by the severe autoimmune syndrome that results from a genetic deficiency in regulatory T cells. The immunosuppressive cytokines TGF-β and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) have also been implicated in regulatory T cell function. Similar to other T cells, a subset of regulatory T cells can develop in the thymus and this subset is usually referred to as natural Treg (or nTreg). Another type of regulatory T cell (induced Treg or iTreg) can develop in the periphery from naive CD4+ T cells. The large majority of Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells are found within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II restricted CD4-expressing (CD4+) helper T cell population and express high levels of the interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain (CD25). In addition to the Foxp3-expressing CD4+CD25+, there also appears to be a minor population of MHC class I restricted CD8+ Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells. Unlike conventional T cells, regulatory T cells do not produce IL-2 and are therefore anergic at baseline. An alternative way of identifying regulatory T cells is to determine the DNA methylation pattern of a portion of the foxp3 gene (TSDR, Treg-specific-demethylated region) which is found demethylated in Tregs.
Splenocytes. This term refers to the cell population obtained from the spleen of a subject (usually a mammal such as a rodent). Splenocytes usually comprise T cell, B cell as well as antigen presenting cells.
Syngeneic cell. A cell is considered "syngeneic" with respect to a subject (or a cell derived therefrom) if it is sufficiently identical to the subject so as to prevent an immune rejection upon transplantation. Syngeneic cells are derived from the same animal species.
Viable. In the present context, the term "viable" refers to the ability of a cell to complete at least one cell cycle and, ultimately proliferate. A viable cell is thus capable of proliferating. By opposition, the term "non-viable" or "non-proliferative" both refer to a cell which is no longer capable of completing at least one cell cycle. By comparison, the term "cycle arrest" refers to a cell which has been treated to halt its cell cycle progression (usually with a pharmacological agent) but which is still capable of re-entering the cell cycle (usually when the pharmacological agent is removed). Xenogeneic cell. A cell is considered "xenogeneic" with respect to a subject (or a cell derived from the subject) when it is derived from a different animal species than the subject. A xenogeneic cell is expected to be rejected when transplanted in an immunocompetent host.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Having thus generally described the nature of the invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, showing by way of illustration, a preferred embodiment thereof.
Figure 1 illustrates molecular weight fractionation studies of the acellular preparations demonstrate that the majority of immunomodulatory activity (denoted by *) resides in the low (< 10 kDa) molecular weight fraction. Results are shown as percent Treg lymphocytes in function of culture conditions (resting PBMC, MLR or mPEG-MLR) as well as weight fractionation (unfractionated media; > 10 kDa fraction; < 10 kDa fraction as indicated on the legend). Dashed line represents baseline levels.
Figure 2 illustrates the effects of size (MW) separation and RNase treatment on the immunomodulary effects of acellular preparations. Unmodified conditioned murine plasma (obtained from donor mice 5 days post splenocyte transfer), size fractionated- conditioned murine plasma or RNase-treated conditioned murine plasma was administered once to naive mice and Treg/Th17 levels were measured (when) in the spleen. (A) Results are shown as the percentage of Treg cells (in function of CD4+ cells) in function of type of conditioned medium (white bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administering saline, hatched bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administering unmodified allogeneic splenocytes, grey bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administering polymer modified allogeneic splenocytes) and size fractionation (non-fractioned or complete conditioned serum, fraction > 100 kDa, fraction between 30 and 100 kDa, fraction between 10 and 30 kDa, fraction < 10 kDa). a denotes the mean value for unfractionated conditioned medium prepared from mice previously treated with unmodified allogeneic cells, b denotes the mean value for unfractionated conditioned medium prepared from mice previously treated with mPEG-modified allogeneic cells. (B) Results are shown as the percentage of Th17 cells (in function of CD4+ cells) in function of type of conditioned medium (white bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administering saline, hatched bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administering unmodified allogeneic splenocytes, grey bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administering polymer modified allogeneic splenocytes) and size fractionation (non-fractioned or complete conditioned serum, fraction > 100 kDa, fraction between 30 and 100 kDa, fraction between 10 and 30 kDa, fraction < 10 kDa). a denotes the mean value for unfractionated conditioned medium prepared from mice previously treated with unmodified allogeneic cells, b denotes the mean value for unfractionated conditioned medium prepared from mice previously treated with mPEG-modified allogeneic cells. (C) Results are shown as the percentage of Treg cells (in function of CD4+ cells, left panel) or Th17 cells (in function of CD4+ cells, right panel) in function of type of treatment (white bars = N = naive untreated animals; grey bars = AC = unmodified allogeneic cells; diagonal hatch bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administered unmodified splenocytes treated (allo-plasma (+)) or not (allo-plasma (-)) with RNase; horizontal hatch bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administering polymer modified splenocytes treated (mPEG- allo-plasma (+)) or not (mPEG-allo-plasma (-)) with RNase).
Figure 3 illustrates the size fractionated conditioned plasma on the intracellular expression of cytokines. Unmodified conditioned murine plasma (obtained from donor mice 5 days post saline or splenocyte transfer), size fractionated-conditioned murine plasma was administered once to naive mice and Treg/Th17 levels were measured (when) in the spleen. Results are shown as the percentage intracellular cytokine positive CD4+ cells in function of type of conditioned medium (white bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administering saline, hatched bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administering unmodified allogeneic splenocytes, grey bars = conditioned plasma obtained from administering polymer modified allogeneic splenocytes) and size fractionation (non-fractioned or complete conditioned serum, fraction > 100 kDa, fraction between 30 and 100 kDa, fraction between 10 and 30 kDa, fraction < 10 kDa) for (A) IL-10, (B) IL-2, (C) IFN-Y, (D) TNF-a and (E) IL-4. * denotes p<0.001 relative to treatment with conditioned plasma from mice treated with saline, # denotes p<0.001 relative to treatment with conditioned medium derived from mice treated with unmodified allogeneic splenocytes.
Figure 4 illustrates the in vivo effects of the various conditioned medium and preparations derived therefrom on the intracellular expression of cytokines as well as type of CD4+ cells. Conditioned plasma was obtained by administering naive mice with saline, unmmodified allogeneic splenocytes or polymer-modified allogeneic splenocytes (PEG) and recuperating plasma after 5 days. The obtained plasma was either administered directly (· = untreated) or optionally treated with RNaseA (o = conditioned plasma, ■ = miRNA enriched fraction of conditioned plasma) and/or further purified so as to retain and enrich the < 10 kDa fraction (e.g. miRNA) (■ = untreated miRNA, □ = RNase A-treated miRNA) prior to administration. As a control, RNase A was also administered directly to some animals. After 30, 60, 120, 180, 270 days, animals were sacrificed, their spleen was removed and CD4+ cells were characterized by flow cytometry. Results are shown for intracellular cytokine expression: IL-2 (A), INF-γ (B), IL-10 (C), as well as CD4+ cell type: Treg (Foxp3+) (D) and Th17 (IL-17+) (E) CD4+ cells.
Figure 5 illustrates the effects of the TA1 preparations on the phosphorylation of phosphokinases of resting Jurkat cells. Results are shown as fold modulation (when compared to saline-treated Jurkat cells) for each kinase tested. (A) On this panel, Akt is considered to be significantly increasingly phosphorylated. (B) On this panel, PRAS40 is considered to be significantly increasingly phosphorylated. (C) On this panel, HSP60 is considered to be significantly decreasingly phosphorylated. * denotes greater than 10-fold increase in protein phosphorylation over resting Jurkat cells. # denotes greater than 10-fold decrease in protein phosphorylation over resting Jurkat cells.
Figure 6 shows the in vitro effects of the murine TA1 preparation on human PBMC PBMCs. Murine TA1 preparation (either 25 μΙ_, 50 μΙ_, 100 μΙ_ or 200 μΙ_) was included in a human PBMC MLR assay and cellular proliferation was measured. Results are shown as percent in proliferation (CD3+CD4+ cells) in function of conditions (Rest = resting MLR, MLR = conventional MLR without TA1 , Murine TA-1 = MLR with TA1) and TA1 concentration (in μί) after 10 days (A) or 14 days (B). * denotes p<0.001 relative to MLR value and ø denotes the concentration of the TA1 preparation used in the in vivo mouse study.
Figure 7 compares the in vitro immunosuppressive effects of TA1 preparation and etanercept. A mixed lymphocyte reaction using Balb/c and C57BI/6 splenocytes was conducted in the absence (■ = control MLR,□ = control MLR with sham TA1) or the presence of etanercept (o , x axis provides concentration in ng/mL used) or the TA1 composition (·, x axis provides concentration in [ L/mL used). (A) Results are shown as the percentage of proliferation of CD4+ splenocytes in function of treatment after 8 days (solid line) and 14 days (dashed line). (B) Results are shown as the percentage of proliferation of CD8+ splenocytes in function of treatment after 8 days (solid line) and 14 days (dashed line).
Figure 8 illustrates significant changes in the levels of Th17 and Treg lymphocytes are noted in the spleen (upper panels), brachial lymph node (middle panels) and pancreatic lymph nodes (lower panels) upon conversion of NOD mice from non-diabetic (left panels) to diabetic (right panels). These changes are characterized by dramatically increased Th17 (in the spleen, from 0.03 to 3.84%; in the brachial lymph node, from 0.01 % to 0.67%; in the pancreatic lymph node, from 0.05% to 1.05%) and significantly decreased Treg (in the spleen, from 16.5% to 2.0%; in the brachial lymph node from 1 1.8% to 1.8% and in the pancreatic lymph node, from 12.7% to 4.1 %) lymphocytes. Tregs: *, p <0.001 from non-diabetic NOD mice. Th17: ** p<0.001 from non- diabetic NOD mice.
Figure 9 illustrates the effects of the TA1 preparations in NOD mice. TA1 acellular preparation was manufactured from mice treated with mPEG-modified allogeneic splenocytes five (5) days post treatment. The purified miRNA composition was administered thrice (100 μΙ per i.v. injection at days 0, 2 and 4) to 7 week-old NOD mice (n=15). Control mice (n=16; untreated) were injected with 100 μΙ of saline. (A) The glycaemia of the animals were determined during the weeks following the treatment. Results are shown as the percentage of normoglycemic animals in function of age (in weeks) and treatment (dashed line = TA1 -treated, solid line = na'ive untreated animals). In this model, diabetes begins to occur at approximately 15 weeks. Between weeks 15 and 20, 75% of untreated mice developed hyperglycemia (i.e. diabetes) compared to 13% of TA1 -treated mice. After 30 weeks, 9 out of the 15 animals treated with TA1 were still considered normoglycemic compared to only 4 out of the 16 for untreated animals. In TA1 -treated mice developing diabetes (6 out of 15), 67% of the animals exhibited delayed onset (post 20 weeks) relative to untreated mice where 100% of the diabetic mice arose prior to 20 weeks of age. (B) The Treg/Th17 ratio in the pancreatic lymph node was determined during the weeks following treatment. Results are shown as the log in Treg/Th17 ratio in function of age (weeks) in mice developing diabetes (open circles/dashed line = untreated mice; closed circles/solid = TA1 -treated mice). At 30 weeks of age, all surviving mice were sacrificed and the Treg/Th17 ration was determined (open star = untreated mice ± range; closed star=TA1 -treated mice ± range). (C) The Treg/Th17 ratio in the pancreatic lymph note was determined in healthy 20-week old Balb/c (198) and C57BI/6 (91.5), 7-week old NOD (103), diabetic NOD (control animals (4.7) and TA1 -treated (70) animals) as well as 30-week old non-diabetic NOD mice (control animals (286) and TA1-treated animals (255).
Figure 10 illustrates the in vivo effects of TA1 preparations on tolerogenic/anergic immune cell populations. NOD mice (7 week-old) were treated trice (100 μΙ_ i.v. at days 0, 2 and 4) with either saline or the murine TA1 preparations. As mice became diabetic or at 30 weeks of age, immune populations were characterized in the spleen, the brachial lymph node, the pancreatic lymph node and, for Treg cells, the thymus. In this figure, light grey bars refer to saline-treated animals and dark grey bars refers to TA1 -treated animals. (A) Results are shown as the percentage of Foxp3+ (Treg) cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (B) Results are shown as the percentage of TGF-β* (Treg and Th2) cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (C) Results are shown as the percentage of IL-4+ (Th2 and naive) cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (D) Results are shown as the percentage of IL-10+ (Treg and Th2) cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (E) Results are shown as the percentage of CD62L+ (Treg) cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (F) Results are shown as the percentage of CD152+ cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (G) Results are shown as the percentage of CD1 1 c+ cells (in function of total DC cells) in function of treatment. * denotes p< 0.001 relative to saline-treated animals.
Figure 11 illustrates the in vivo effects of TA1 preparations on pro-inflammatory immune cell populations. NOD mice (7 week-old) were treated trice (100 μΙ_ i.v. at days 0, 2 and 4) with either saline or TA1. As mice became diabetic (weeks 15-29) or at 30 weeks of age were sacrificed and immune populations were characterized in the spleen, the brachial lymph node, the pancreatic lymph node and, for Th17 cells, the thymus. In this figure, light grey bars refer to saline-treated animals and dark grey bars refers to TA1 -treated animals. (A) Results are shown as the percentage of IL-17A+ (Th17) cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (B) Results are shown as the percentage of INF-Y+ (Th1) cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (C) Results are shown as the percentage of IL-2+ (Th1) cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (D) Results are shown as the percentage of TNF-a+ (Th1) cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (E) Results are shown as the percentage of IL-12+ (Th1) cells (in function of total CD4+ cells) in function of treatment. (F) Results are shown as the percentage of NK1 .1 + cells (in function of total TCR-a/p+ cells) in function of treatment. * denotes p< 0.001 relative to saline treated animals.
Figure 12 provides a comparison of the miRNA populations between different MLR assays. A human PBMC MLR assay (using unmodified ( control MLR) or polymer modified leukocyte (mPEG MLR)) was conducted and miRNA content was partially determined. Volcano plots of comparing the miRNA population of the conditioned medium of the control MLR to the one of the supernatant of resting cells (A), comparing the miRNA population of the conditioned medium of a mPEG MLR to the one of the supernatant of resting cells (B) and comparing the miRNA population of the conditioned medium of a mPEG MLR to the one of the conditioned medium of a control MLR (C) are provided. Results are provided in -Log10 (p value) in function of Log2 fold change. In these volcano plots, the following miRNAs have been identified with numbers:
1 has-miR-298
2 has-miR-34a-5p
3 has-miR-574-3p
4 has-miR-125b-5p
5 has-let-7a-5p
6 has-miR-196a-5p
7 has-miR-148a-3p
8 has-let-7e-5p
9 has-miR-134
Figure 13 provides a partial miRNA compositional analysis of the conditioned medium of a mPEG MLR (white bars) and of a control MLR (black bars). Results are provided, for each miRNA, as log2 fold regulation when compared to the miRNA present in the supernatant of resting cells. White open stars denote Log2-fold change and black solid stars denote significant changes in volcano plot analysis. Figure 14 provides a selection of the miRNA compositional analysis of the conditioned medium of a mPEG MLR (white bars) and of a control MLR (black bars). Results are provided, for each miRNA, as log2 fold regulation when compared to the miRNA present in the supernatant of resting cells. White open stars denote Log2-fold change and black solid stars denote significant changes and or clustergram (heatmap) determined miRNA shifts denoted in volcano plot analysis.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In accordance with the present invention, there are provided acellular preparations obtained by contacting two distinct allogeneic leukocyte populations wherein at least one of the two leukocyte populations is modified to bear on its surface a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer. The two leukocyte populations are contacted under conditions so as to allow pro- tolerogenic allo-recognition (e.g. expanding of Treg cells and/or differentiation of naive cells into T reg cells) and limit pro-inflammatory allo-recognition. The acellular components produced by contacting the two leukocyte populations can optionally be purified or enriched to provide a preparation enriched in miRNAs. In embodiments, the acellular preparation can also be processed to (substantially) remove cells, cells fragments as well as secreted proteins (such as cytokines for example). The contact between the two leukocyte populations can occur in vitro, ex vivo or in vivo.
These acellular preparations induce a state of (complete or partial) immune tolerance, immuno- quiescence or anergy. As such these acellular preparations can be useful for increasing the levels of regulatory T cells and/or decreasing the levels of pro-inflammatory T cells in subjects in need thereof.
The acellular preparations can be obtained by modifying a first leukocyte to bear on its surface a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer and contacting the first leukocyte with a second leukocyte (considered allogeneic with respect to the first leukocyte). The contact can be made in vitro by co-culturing the first leukocyte and the second leukocyte under conditions so as to allow pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition and limit (or inhibit) pro-inflammatory allo-reocgnition. In such embodiment, the cell culture (or a portion thereof such as the supernatant of the cell culture) is recuperated and processed to substantially remove the cells it may contain to provide the acellular preparation. Alternatively, the contact can be made in vivo by introducing the first leukocyte in a test subject bearing the second leukocyte (such as a non-human animal or mammal). The first leukocyte is allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject. In such embodiment, the blood or a blood fraction (such as serum or plasma) is recuperated from the test subject and processed to substantially remove the cells it may contain to provide the acellular preparation. Since the acellular preparations can optionally be enriched in miRNAs, it is important that the cell culture and/or the blood/blood fraction be processed in conditions so as to retain the integrity of the majority of the miRNA species present, for example by substantially inhibiting RNA degradation. As used herein, the term "substantially inhibiting RNA degradation" indicate that the conditions allow for the degradation of less than 20%, 19%, 18%, 17%, 16%, 15%, 14%, 13%, 12%, 1 1 %, 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6% or 5% of the miRNA population obtained by RNases. RNases include, but are not limited endoribonucleases (e.g., RNase A, RNase H, RNase I, RNase III, RNase L, RNase P, RNase PhyM, RNase T1 , RNase T2, RNase U2, RNase V1 and/or RNase V) and exoribonucleases (e.g. polynucleotide pPhosphorylase (PNPase), RNase PH, RNase II, RNase R, RNase D, RNase T, Oligoribonuclease, Exoribonuclease I and/or Exoribonuclease II). Since it is known in the art that miRNAs are, in general, more resistance towards degradation than messenger RNAs, the conditions for obtaining and processing the cell culture/blood can allow for some RNA degradation, preferably limited to the mRNA fraction.
As it will be shown below, acellular preparations obtained from polymer-based bioengineering of allogeneic leukocytic cells provides a significant opportunity to modulate the responsiveness (i.e. , immunoquiescent versus pro-inflammatory) of the recipient's immune system. Without wishing to be bound to theory, it is hypothesized that the acellular preparations obtained from using polymer-modified leukocytes can be used to induce Tregs differentiation/expansion and/or attenuate Th17/1 and and pro-inflammatory cytokine upregulation to prevent or lower a proinflammatory immune response. Moreover, specific NK (natural killer) cell (NK1 .1) upregulation is favored in tissues exhibiting autoimmune damage. NK1 .1 positive cells are reported to be important in the killing of self-reactive immune cells. Moreover, it is proposed that the acellular preparations obtained from using polymer-modified allogeneic leukocytes can be used therapeutically in various diseases (such as auto-immunity or an excessive immune response) to increase the levels Treg cells and/or decrease pro-inflammatory effector cells, to ultimately increase the ratio of regulatory T cells to pro-inflammatory T cells thereby attenuating the incidence and/or severity of the disease pathology.
Processes for obtaining acellular preparations
The acellular preparations presented described herein can be obtained by contacting two distinct and allogeneic leukocyte populations (referred herein to the first leukocyte and the second leukocyte). The first leukocyte is modified to bear on its surface (and, in some embodiment, to be covalently bound to) a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer. Optionally, the second leukocyte can also be modified to bear on its surface (and, in some embodiment, to be covalently bound to) a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer. The two leukocyte populations are contacted under conditions so as to limit (and in some embodiments prevent) pro-inflammatory allo-recognition and to allow pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition.
It is important that the polymer used exhibits both low-immunogenicity and biocompatibility once introduced into a cell culture system or administered to the test subject. Polyethylene glycol (particularly methoxypoly(ethylene glycol)), 2-alkyloxazoline (POZ) and hyperbranched polyglycerol (HPG) are exemplary polymers which all exhibit low immunogenicity and biocompatibility and can be successfully used to modify the first leukocyte (and optionally the second leukocyte). In some embodiments, it is preferable to use a single type of polymer to modify the surface of leukocytes. In other embodiments, it is possible to use at least two distinct types of polymers to modify the surface of the leukocyte.
In an embodiment, the low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer can be covalently associated with the membrane-associated protein(s) of the leukocyte by creating a reactive site on the polymer (for example by deprotecting a chemical group) and contacting the polymer with the leukocyte. For example, for covalently binding a methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) to the surface of a leukocyte, it is possible to incubate a methoxypoly(-ethylene glycol) succinimidyl valerate (reactive polymer) in the presence of the leukocyte. The contact between the reactive polymer and the leukocyte is performed under conditions sufficient for providing a grafting density which will limit/prevent pro-inflammatory allo-recognition and allow pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition. In an embodiment, the polymer is grafted to a viable leukocyte and under conditions which will retain the viability of the leukocyte. A linker, positioned between the surface of the leukocyte and the polymer, can optionally be used. Examples of such polymers and linkers are described in U.S. Patents 5,908,624; 8,007,784 and 8,067,151. In another embodiment, the low- immunogenic biocompatible polymer can be integrated within the lipid bilayer of the cytoplasmic membrane of the leukocyte by using a lipid-modified polymer.
As indicated above, it is important that the low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer be grafted at a density sufficient for limiting/preventing pro-inflammatory allo-recognition while allowing pro- tolerogenic allo-recognition of the first leukocyte by the second leukocyte. In an embodiment, the polymer is polyethylene glycol (e.g. linear) and has an average molecular weight between 2 and 40 KDa as well as any combinations thereof. In a further embodiment, the average molecular weight of the PEG to be grafted is at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 or 40 kDa. In another embodiment, the average molecular weight of the PEG to be granted is no more than 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, 4, 3, or 2 kDa. In still another embodiment, the grafting concentration of the polymer (per 20 x 106 cells) is between 1 and 10 mM (preferably between 2.5 to 10 mM). In another embodiment, the grafting concentration of the polymer (per 20 x 106 cells) is at least 1 , 1.5, 2, 2.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 mM. In still another embodiment, the grafting concentration of the polymer (per 20 x 106 cells) is no more than 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 2.5, 2, 1.5 or 1 mM. In order to determine if pro-inflammatory allo-recognition occurs (or is prevented), various techniques are known to those skilled in the art and include, but are not limited to, a standard mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR), high molecular weight mitogen stimulation (e.g. PHA stimulation) as well as flow cytometry (Chen and Scott, 2006). In order to determine if a pro- tolerogenic allo-recognition occurs (or is prevented), various techniques are known to those skilled in the art and include, but are not limited to, the assessment of the level of expansion and differentiation of Treg cells and or prevention of Th17 expansion/differentiation. In an embodiment, the polymer is selected and grafted to the modified leukocyte to provide a modified leukocyte having a pro-inflammatory/pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition substantially similar to the one observed in a mixed lymphocyte reaction between a first leukocyte modified to be grafted with 20 kDa mPEG at a density of at least 0.5 mM (and preferably 1 mM, even more preferably 2.5 mM) per 20 x 106 cells and incubated with a second (unmodified) allogeneic leukocyte.
Before or after being modified with a low-immunogenic and biocompatible polymer, the first leukocyte can be optionally modified to refrain from being proliferative. This modification preferably occurs prior to its introduction in a cell culture system or its administration into a test subject. For example, the leukocyte can be irradiated (e.g. γ-irradiation) prior to its introduction in a cell culture system or in the test subject. Upon irradiation, the leukocyte is not considered viable (e.g. capable of proliferation). In an embodiment, polymer grafting can affect the leukocyte viability and be used to refrain the leukocyte from proliferating. Alternatively, leukocyte can be treated with a pharmacological agent which halts cell cycle progression. Upon the administration of such pharmacological agent, the leukocyte is considered viable since it can resume cellular proliferation when the agent is removed from the cell-containing medium.
It is also contemplated that the second leukocyte (which can optionally be modified with the low- immunogenic and biocompatible polymer) be also optionally modified to refrain from being proliferative. For example, the leukocyte can be irradiated (e.g. γ-irradiation) prior to its introduction in a cell culture system or in the test subject. Upon irradiation, the leukocyte is not considered viable (e.g. capable of proliferation). In an embodiment, polymer grafting can affect the leukocyte viability and can be used to refrain the leukocyte from proliferating. Alternatively, leukocyte can be treated with a pharmacological agent which halts cell cycle progression. Upon the administration of such pharmacological agent, the leukocyte is considered viable since it can resume cellular proliferation when the agent is removed from the cell-containing medium. However, when the second leukocyte is modified from being proliferative, it is important the first leukocyte with which it is being contacted remains proliferative.
In order to generate the acellular preparation, it is not necessary to provide homogeneous leukocyte populations. For example, the first leukocyte population (such as, for example a PBMCs or splenocytes) can be introduced in a cell culture system and contacted with a second leukocyte population (such as, for example a PBMCs or splenocytes) or administered to the test subject. However, in some embodiments, it is possible to provide and contact a more homogeneous leukocyte populations. For example, the first leukocyte population can be relatively homogenous (such as, for example, a T cell population) and introduced in a cell culture system comprising a second leukocyte (such as, for example a PBMC or splenocyte) or administered to the test subject. In another example, the first leukocyte population (such as, for example a PBMC or splenocyte) can be introduced in a cell culture system comprising a second leukocyte population which can be relatively homogeneous (such as, for example, a T cell population). In a further example, the first leukocyte population can be relatively homogenous (such as, for example, a T cell population) and introduced in a cell culture system comprising a second leukocyte population which can be relatively homogeneous (such as, for example, a T cell population).
To provide the acellular preparations described herewith, the leukocytes used can be mature leukocytes or be provided in the form of stem cells. For example, leukocytes can be obtained from isolating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from the subject. Optionally, the PBMCs can be differentiated in vitro into dendritic (DC) or DC-like cells. Alternatively, the leukocytes can be obtained from the spleen (e.g. splenocytes). Leukocytes usually include T cells, B cells and antigen presenting cells. For providing the acellular preparations, the leukocytes are not erythrocytes since the polymer-modified erythrocytes are not capable of eliciting a pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition when administered in a test subject. However, traces of erythrocytes in the leukocyte population used are tolerated (for example, less than about 10%, less than about 5% or less than about 1 % of the total number of cells in the preparation).
Even though it is not necessary to further purify the leukocytes to provide the acellular preparations, it is possible to use a pure cell population or a relatively homogenous population of cells as leukocytes. This "pure" cell population and "relative homogenous population" of cells can, for example, essentially consist essentially of a single cell type of T cells, B cells, antigen presenting cells (APC) or stem cells. Alternatively, the population of cells can consist essentially of more than one cell type. The population of cells can be obtained through conventional methods (for example cell sorting or magnetic beads). In an embodiment, when the population of cells consist of a single cell type (for example, T cells), the percentage of the cell type with respect to the total population of cells is at least 90%, at least 95% or at least 99%. The relatively homogenous population of cells are expected to contain some contaminating cells, for example less than 10%, less than 5% or less than 1 % of the total population of cells.
The first leukocyte and/or second leukocyte can be obtained from any animals, but are preferably derived from mammals (such as, for example, humans and mice). In an embodiment, the first and/or second leukocyte can be obtained from a subject intended to be treated with the acellular preparation.
The first and/or second leukocyte can be expanded in vitro prior to the introduction in a cell culture system or the administration to a test subject.
As indicated above, the first and the second leukocyte are contacted under conditions to limit/prevent pro-inflammatory allo-recognition (e.g. expansion of pro-inflammatory T cells and/or differentiation of naive T cells in pro-inflammatory T cells) and allow pro-tolerogenic allo- recognition (e.g. expansion of Treg cells and/or differentiation of naive T cells in Treg cells). When the contact occurs in vitro, it is important that the first leukocyte and the second leukocyte be cultured under conditions allowing physical contact between the two leukocyte populations and for a time sufficient to provide a conditioned medium. As used herein, a conditioned medium refers to physical components of a cell culture (or fraction thereof, such as the cell culture supernatant) obtained by contacting the first and the second leukocyte and having the pro-tolerogenic properties described herein. Usually, the conditioned medium is obtained at least 24 hours after the initial contact between the first and the second leukocyte. In some embodiment, the conditioned medium is obtained at least 48 hours or at least 72 hours after the initial contact between the first and the second leukocyte. In an embodiment, the conditioned medium can be obtained after at least 24 hours of incubating a first leukocyte (for example grafted with a 20kDa PEG at a density of at 1 .0 mM) with a second leukocyte. When the incubation takes place in a 24-well plate, the concentration of each leukocyte population can be at least 1 x 106 cells.
When the contact occurs in vivo, it is important that the first leukocyte be administered to an immune competent test subject (bearing the second leukocyte) and that the blood or blood fraction be obtained at a later a time sufficient to provide a conditioned blood. The test subject is a subject being immune competent and having a Treg/pro-inflammatory ratio which is substantially similar to age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. As used herein, the conditioned blood refers to physical components present in the blood (or fraction thereof, such as the plasma) obtained by administering the first leukocyte to the immune competent test subject and having the pro-tolerogenic properties described herein. It is recognized by those skilled in the art that the conditioned blood may be obtained more rapidly by increasing the amount of leukocytes being administered or administering more than once (for example one, twice or thrice) the polymer-modified leukocyte. Usually, the conditioned blood is obtained at least one day after the administration of the first leukocyte. In some embodiment, the conditioned blood is obtained at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 days after the administration of the first leukocyte. In an embodiment, the conditioned blood can be obtained by administering at least 5 x 106 polymer-modified leukocytes (for example grafted with at least 1 .0 mM of 20 kDa PEG) to the test subject (e.g. a mice) and recuperating the plasma five days later. In some embodiments, the conditioned blood can be obtained by administering at least 20 x 106 polymer-modified leukocytes.
As indicated herein, the two leukocyte populations are considered allogeneic (and in some embodiments, xenogeneic). When the acellular preparation is obtained in vivo by, for example, obtaining a conditioned blood/blood fraction by administering the first leukocyte to the test subject, the first leukocyte can be allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject. In such embodiment, it is also contemplated that the first leukocyte be autologous, syngeneic, allogeneic or xenogeneic to a treated subject who is going to receive the acellular preparation. When the acellular preparation is obtained in vitro by, for example, obtaining a conditioned medium by co-culturing the first leukocyte with the second leukocyte, the first leukocyte can be allogeneic or xenogeneic to the second leukocyte. In such embodiment, it is also contemplated that the first leukocyte be autologous, syngeneic, allogeneic or xenogeneic to a treated subject who is going to receive the acellular preparation. In addition, it is also contemplated that the second leukocyte be autologous, syngeneic, allogeneic or xenogeneic to a treated subject who is going to receive the acellular preparation.
Once the conditioned medium or the conditioned blood has been obtained it is further processed to substantially remove the cells and cellular debris that can be present. This processing step can be achieved by submitting the conditioned medium or the conditioned blood to a centrifugation step and/or a filtration step. Since the majority of the immuno- modulatory effects of the acellular preparations reside in a fraction sensitive to ribonucleic acid degradation (e.g. RNase degradation), this process step should be conducted in conditions which would substantially limit or even inhibit ribonucleic acid degradation.
The conditioned medium or the conditioned blood is also processed (preferably after the cell/cellular debris) so as to provide an enrichment in at least one miRNA species, and preferably a plurality of miRNA species. As used in the context of this invention, the term "enrichment" refers to the step of increasing the concentration of one or more miRNA species in the acellular preparation when compared to conditioned medium/blood. In an embodiment, the term enrichment refers to the step of increasing, in the acellular preparation, the concentration but not the relative abundance of the miRNA species present in the conditioned medium/blood. In still another embodiment, the enrichment step can comprises substantially isolating the miRNA species from other components that may be present the conditioned medium/blood (e.g. proteins such as cytokines for example). This enrichment step can be completed using various methods known to those skilled in the art, for example, chromatography, precipitation, etc. Since most of the immuno-modulatory effects of the acellular preparations reside in a fraction sensitive to ribonucleic acid degradation (e.g. RNase degradation), this process step should be conducted in conditions which would substantially limit or even inhibit ribonucleic acid degradation.
The conditioned medium or the conditioned blood can also be processed to substantially remove the protein components (including the cytokines) and/or the deoxyribonucleic acid components that may be present. Such further purification step can be made by using proteinase (to provide a protein-free acellular preparation), DNAse (to provide a DNA-free acellular preparation), chromatography or filtration (to provide a fraction enriched in size-specific components present in the conditioned medium/blood).
In some embodiments, it is also contemplated that the acellular preparation be submitted to the selective enrichment in components of the conditioned medium/blood having a relative size equal to or lower than about 10 kDa, 9 kDa, 8 kDa, 7 kDa, 6 kDa, 5 kDa, 4 kDa or 3 kDa.
Once the acellular preparation has been obtained, it can be formulated for administration to the subject. The formulation step can comprise admixing the acellular preparation with pharmaceutically acceptable diluents, preservatives, solubilizers, emulsifiers, and/or carriers. The formulations are preferably in a liquid injectable form and can include diluents of various buffer content (e.g. , Tris-HCI, acetate, phosphate), pH and ionic strength, additives such as albumin or gelatin to prevent absorption to surfaces. The formulations can comprise pharmaceutically acceptable solubilizing agents (e.g. , glycerol, polyethylene glycerol), antioxidants (e.g. , ascorbic acid, sodium metabisulfite), preservatives (e.g. , thimerosal, benzyl alcohol, parabens), bulking substances or tonicity modifiers (e.g. , lactose, mannitol).
In addition, if the acellular preparation is destined to be used to prevent an excessive immune reaction triggered by a vaccine, it can be formulated for administration with the vaccine. The acellular preparation can be formulated for simultaneous administration with the vaccine by admixing the vaccine with the acellular preparation. Alternatively, the acellular preparation can be formulated for administration prior to or after the vaccine, for example in a formulation that is physically distinct from the vaccine.
Further, if the acellular preparation is destined to be used to prevent or limit an excessive immune reaction triggered by a transplant, it can be formulated for administration prior to the transplantation. The acellular preparations can be formulated for simultaneous administration with the transplant. Alternatively, the acellular preparations can be formulated for administration prior to or after the transplant. In an embodiment, the acellular preparation can be included in a transplantation medium or a preservation medium destined to receive the donor cells or tissue. In such embodiment, the acellular preparation can induce anergy and/or tolerance of the immune cells or stem cells present in the cells/tissue intended to be transplanted. Characterization of the miRNA fraction of the acellular preparation
As shown herein, the miRNA fraction of the acellular preparation is associated with the majority of the pro-tolerogenic immunomodulatory effects of the conditioned medium/blood. As also shown herein, the pro-tolerogenic immunomodulatory effects of the miRNA fraction of the acellular preparation are greatly reduced (and even abolished) when the components of the conditioned blood/medium having an average molecular weight lower than about 10 kDa are removed or upon treatment with a ribonucleic acid degradation agent (such as RNase A).
The acellular preparation described herein does comprise a plurality (also referred to a population) of distinct miRNA species whose relative abundance differs from a control medium obtained from a control MLR (e.g. in which two allogeneic leukocyte populations are co- cultured) or a control blood obtained from administering unmodified allogeneic leukocytes to a test subject. The acellular preparation described herein also comprise a plurality (also referred to as a population) of distinct miRNA species whose relative abundance differs from a conditioned medium obtained from resting cells (e.g. a single cultured leukocyte population) or a blood obtained from a naive test subject. This modulation in the relative abundance of the various miRNA species of the acellular preparation is believed to be tied to the pro-tolerogenic immunomodulatory effects. The increased abundance of single miRNA species, unchanged abundance of single miRNA species and/or decreased abundance of single miRNA species are believe to contribute to the pro-tolerogeneic immunomodulatory effects of the acellular preparation. In an embodiment, in the acellular preparation, the relative pattern of expression of the miRNA species present when compared to the corresponding in the control conditioned medium/blood or medium from resting cells/naive blood is conserved.
In an embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species presented in Figure 13. In another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises any combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75 or 80 of the miRNA species presented in Figure 13. In still another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species presented in Figure 13. Figure 13 provides the following miRNA species: hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-let-7c, hsa-let-7d-5p, hsa-let-7e-5p, hsa-let-7g-5p, hsa-miR-103a-3p, hsa- miR-105-5p, hsa-miR-125a-5p, hsa-miR-125b-5p, hsa-miR-126-3p, hsa-miR-128, hsa-miR- 130a-3p, hsa-miR-132-3p, hsa-miR-134, hsa-miR-135a-5p, hsa-miR-135b-5p, hsa-miR-138-5p, hsa-miR-142-3p, hsa-miR-142-5p, hsa-miR-143-3p, hsa-miR-145-5p, hsa-miR-146a-5p, hsa- miR-147a, hsa-miR-148a-3p, hsa-miR-149-5p, hsa-miR-150-5p, hsa-miR-152, hsa-miR-155-5p, hsa-miR-15a-5p, hsa-miR-15b-5p, hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-17-5p, hsa-miR-181 a-5p, hsa-miR- 182-5p, hsa-miR-183-5p, hsa-miR-184, hsa-miR-185-5p, hsa-miR-186-5p, hsa-miR-187-3p, hsa-miR-18a-5p, hsa-miR-18b-5p, hsa-miR-191-5p, hsa-miR-194-5p, hsa-miR-195-5p, hsa- miR-196a-5p, hsa-miR-19a-3p, hsa-miR-19b-3p, hsa-miR-200a-3p, hsa-miR-203a, hsa-miR- 205-5p, hsa-miR-206, hsa-miR-20a-5p, hsa-miR-20b-5p, hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-210, hsa- miR-214-3p, hsa-miR-223-3p, hsa-miR-23b-3p, hsa-miR-26a-5p, hsa-miR-26b-5p, hsa-miR- 27a-3p, hsa-miR-27b-3p, hsa-miR-298, hsa-miR-299-3p, hsa-miR-29b-3p, hsa-miR-29c-3p, hsa-miR-302a-3p, hsa-miR-30b-5p, hsa-miR-30c-5p, hsa-miR-30e-5p, hsa-miR-31-5p, hsa- miR-325, hsa-miR-335-5p, hsa-miR-34a-5p, hsa-miR-363-3p, hsa-miR-379-5p, hsa-miR-383, hsa-miR-409-3p, hsa-miR-451 a, hsa-miR-493-3p, hsa-miR-574-3p, hsa-miR-9-5p, hsa-miR-98- 5p and hsa-miR-99b-5p.
In another embodiment, the acellular prepration comprises at least one miRNA species whose relative abundance is increased when compared to a control medium/blood or resting cells/naive blood. Such miRNA species are listed in Tables 1A to 1 D.
Table 1A. miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is increased when compared to control medium/blood or medium from resting cells/naive blood as determined in Figure 13.
Figure imgf000024_0001
Figure imgf000025_0001
sa-m - - p
In a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 1A. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 or 37 of any one of the miRNA species listed in Table 1A. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 1A.
Table 1 B. miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is increased when compared to control medium/blood and whose relative abundance in the control medium/blood is decreased when compared the medium from resting cells/naive blood as determined in Figure 13. miRNA species identified with an * show a log2 fold regulation change or a p<0.05 on a volcano plot. miRNA species identified with a # are identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12.
Figure imgf000025_0002
sa-m - a- p
In a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 1 B. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 of any one of the miRNA species listed in Table 1 B. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 1 B.
In an embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species listed in Table 1 B and showing a log2 fold regulation change or a p<0.05 on a volcano plot (e.g., hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-let-7e-5p, hsa-miR-132-3p, hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-27a- 3p, hsa-miR-27b-3p, hsa-miR-298 and/or hsa-miR-34a-5p). In still another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species listed in Table 1 B and identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12 (e.g. hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-let-7e-5p, hsa- miR-298 and/or hsa-miR-34a-5p). Table 1 C. miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is increased when compared to the medium/blood from resting cells/naive blood and whose relative abundance in the control blood/medium is increased when compared to the medium from resting cells/naive blood as determined in Figure 13. miRNA species identified with an * show a log2 fold regulation change or a p<0.05 on a volcano plot. miRNA species identified with a # are identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12.
Figure imgf000026_0001
In a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 1 C. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 29 of any one of miRNA species listed in Table 1 C. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 1 C.
In an embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species listed in Table 1 C and showing a log2 fold regulation change or a p<0.05 on a volcano plot (e.g. hsa-miR-135b-5p, hsa-miR-147a, hsa-miR-149-5p, hsa-miR-155-5p, hsa-miR- 206, hsa-miR-214-3p, hsa-miR-302a-3p and/or hsa-miR-9-5p). In still another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species listed in Table 1 C and identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12 (e.g. hsa-miR-134 and/or hsa-miR- 574-3p).
Table 1 D. Selection of the miRNA species from Table 1 E which show a log2 fold regulation change or a p<0.05 on a volcano plot.
Figure imgf000027_0001
sa-m - - p
In a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 1 D. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 of any one of miRNA species listed in Table 1 D. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 1 D.
In another embodiment, the acellular prepration comprises at least one miRNA species whose relative abundance is decreased when compared to a control medium/blood or the medium fom resting cells/naive blood. Such miRNA species are listed in Tables 2A to 2D.
Table 2A. miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is decreased when compared to control medium/blood or medium from resting cells/naive blood as determined in Figure 13.
Figure imgf000027_0002
Figure imgf000028_0001
In a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 2A. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 or 46 of any one of miRNA species listed in Table 2A. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 2A.
Table 2B. miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is decreased when compared to control medium/blood and whose relative abundance in the control medium/blood is increased when compared the medium from resting cells/naive blood as determined in Figure 13. miRNA species identified with an * show a log2 fold regulation change or a p<0.05 on a volcano plot.
Figure imgf000028_0002
ln a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 2B. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2 or 3 of any one of the miRNA species listed in Table 2B. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 2B.
In an embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species (or any combination thereof) listed in Table 2B and showing a log2 fold regulation change or a p<0.05 on a volcano plot (e.g. hsa-miR-183-5p, hsa-miR-203a and/or hsa-miR-363-3p).
Table 2C. Selection of the miRNA species from Table 2B which show a log2 fold regulation change or a p<0.05 on a volcano plot.
Figure imgf000029_0001
In a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 2C. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2 of any one of miRNA species listed in Table 2C. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 2C.
Table 2D. miRNA species whose relative abundance in the acellular preparation is decreased when compared to the medium from resting cells/naive blood and whose relative abundance in the control blood/medium is decreased when compared to the medium from resting cells/naive blood in Figure 13. miRNA species identified with an * show a log2 fold regulation change or a p<0.05 on a volcano plot. miRNA species identified with a # are identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12.
Figure imgf000029_0002
Figure imgf000030_0001
In a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species listed Table 2D. In still a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises a combination of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 or 41 of any one of miRNA species listed in Table 2D. In yet a further embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises all the miRNA species listed in Table 2D.
In an embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one miRNA species (or any combination thereof) listed in Table 2D and are identified on the volcano plots of Figure 12 (e.g. hsa-miR-125b-5p, hsa-miR-148a-3p and/or hsa-miR-196a-5p).
It is contemplated that the acellular preparation comprises at least one (and in an embodiment any combination of) miRNAs species from any one of Tables 1A to 1 D and at least one (and in an embodiment any combination of) miRNAs species from any one of Tables 2A to 2D.
In yet another embodiment, the acellular preparation can comprise at least one of the miRNA species identified in the volcano plots of Figure 12. For example, the acellular preparation can comprise at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species from the following list: has-miR- 298, has-miR-34a-5p, has-miR-574-3p, has-miR-125b-5p, has-let-7a-5p, has-miR-196a-5p, has-miR-148a-3p, has-let-7e-5p and has-miR-134. In still another embodiment, the acellular preparation can comprise at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species identified on Figure 12 and having a relative abundance which is increased in the acellular preparation when compared to the control medium/blood (e.g. miR-298, has-miR-34a-5p, has-miR-574-3p, has- let-7a-5p, has-miR-196a-5p, has-miR-148a-3p, has-let-7e-5p and/or has-miR-134). In still another embodiment, the acellular preparation can comprise the miRNA species identified on Figure 12 and having a relative abundance which is increased in the acellular preparation and the control medium/blood when compared to the resting cells/naive blood (e.g. has-miR-125b- 5p).
In yet another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species presented on Figure 12A which exhibits at least a log2 fold modulation in abundance (e.g. miR-302a-3p, miR214-3p, miR-147a, miR206, miR 155-5p and/or miR-9-5p). In yet still another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) of miRNA species presented on Figure 12A which exhibits at least p<0.05 (e.g. miR214-3p, miR-147a, miR206, miR 155-5p and/or miR-9-5p). In yet another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species presented on Figure 12B which exhibits at least a log2 fold modulation in abundance (e.g. miR-149-5p and/or miR-214-3p). In yet still another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises the miRNA species presented on Figure 12B which exhibits at least p<0.05 (e.g. miR-214-3p). In yet another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species presented on Figure 12C which exhibits at least a log2 fold modulation in abundance (e.g. miR-147a, miR-183-5p, miR-9-5p and/or miR-155-5p). In yet still another embodiment, the acellular preparation comprises at least one (or any combination of) miRNA species presented on Figure 12C which exhibits at least p<0.05 (e.g. miR-9-5p and/or miR-155- 5p).
It is contemplated that the acellular preparation comprises at least one (and in an embodiment any combination of) miRNAs species from any one of Tables 1A to 1 D, at least one (and in an embodiment any combination of) miRNAs species from any one of Tables 2A to 2D and at least one (and in an embodiment any combination of) miRNA species identified in any one of the Figure 12A to 12C.
Methods for modulating the Treg/pro-inflammatory T cells ratio
The present invention also provides methods and acellular preparations for increasing the ratio of the level of regulatory T cells with respect to the level of pro-inflammatory T cells. In the present invention, the ratio can be increased either by augmenting the level of regulatory T cells in the subject or decreasing the level of pro-inflammatory T cells in the treated subject. Alternatively, the ratio can be increased by augmenting the level of regulatory T cells in the subject and decreasing the level of pro-inflammatory T cells in the treated subject. When the Treg/pro-inflammatory T cells ratio is increased in the treated subject, it is considered that a state of anergy and/or of increased tolerance is induced or present in the treated subject. The induction of a state of anergy or immunotolerance in individuals experiencing an abnormally elevated immune reaction can be therapeutically beneficial for limiting the symptoms or pathology associated with the abnormally elevated immune reaction. In some embodiments, it is not necessary to induce a state of complete anergy or tolerance, a partial induction of anergy or tolerance can be beneficial to prevent, treat and/or alleviate the symptoms of a disorder associated with a pro-inflammatory state (such as, for example, an auto-immune disease or an excessive immune response).
In order to increase the Treg/pro-inflammatory T cells ratio, the acellular preparation is administered to the treated subject in a therapeutically effective amount. In a first embodiment, the acellular preparation can be prepared using the conditioned blood obtained by administering a first leukocyte to a test subject. In such embodiment, the first leukocyte, allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject, can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the treated subject. In a second embodiment, the acellular preparation can be prepared using the conditioned medium obtained by co-culturing a first leukocyte with a second leukocyte. In such embodiment, the first leukocyte, allogeneic or xenogeneic to the second leukocyte, can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the treated subject. In addition, the second leukocyte, allogeneic or xenogeneic to the first leukocyte, can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the treated subject.
As shown herein, the administration of the acellular preparation induces a state of anergy or immune tolerance in the treated subject. In some embodiments, the state of anergy can persist long after the administration of the acellular preparation (as shown below, at least 270 days in mice). In an optional embodiment, the state of anergy does not revert back to a proinflammatory state upon a challenge with, for example, an immunogen (such as an immunogenic or allogeneic cell). Consequently, the methods and cellular preparations described herein are useful for the treatment, prevention and/or alleviation of symptoms associated with abnormal/excessive immune responses and conditions associated thereto.
Autoimmunity arises consequent to an animal/individual's immune system recognizing their own tissues as "non-self. Autoimmunity is largely a cell-mediated disease with T lymphocytes playing a central role in "self recognition and are, in many cases, also the effector cells. The Non-Obese Diabetic (NOD) mouse is an inbred strain that exhibits the spontaneous development of a variety of autoimmune diseases including insulin dependent diabetes. It is considered to be an exemplary mouse model of autoimmunity in general. The murine autoimmune diabetes develops beginning around 10 to 15 weeks of age and has been extensively used to study the mechanisms underlying autoimmune-mediated diabetes, therapeutic interventions and the effect of viral enhancers on disease pathogenesis. Diabetes develops in NOD mice as a result of insulitis, a leukocytic infiltrate of the pancreatic islets. This can be exacerbated if mice are exposed to killed mycobacterium or other agents (Coxsackie virus for example). Multiple studies have established that the pathogenesis of diabetes in the NOD mouse is very similar to that observed in human type I diabetes (T1 D) in that it is characterized by the breakdown of multiple tolerance pathways and development of severe insulitis of the islets prior to β-cell destruction. Moreover, T cells (including Th1 , Th17 and Tregs) have been identified as key mediators of the autoimmune disease process though other cells (NK cells, B-cells, DC and macrophages) are also observed. Indeed, the NOD mouse model has translated into successful clinical human trials utilizing T-cell targeting therapies for treatment of many autoimmune diseases, including T1 D. The loss of function arising from proinflammatory allo-recognition is exemplified by the destruction of the islets of Langerhans (insulin secreting β cells) in the pancreas of the NOD mice leading to the onset of Type 1 diabetes. In the context of type I diabetes, pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition is going to confer the protection and survival of the islets of Langerhans and the inhibition of diabetes in the treated subject.
Current treatment of most autoimmune diseases is problematic since it focuses on addressing disease symptoms, not causation. Typically, treatment for chronic autoimmune disease is via systemic steroid (e.g. , dexamethasone) administration to induce a general immunosuppression and to act as an anti-inflammatory agent. It is believed that one mechanism of this immunosuppression may be the induction of Treg cells. In addition to steroids, the administration of IVIg (pooled, polyvalent, IgG purified from the plasma of >1 000 blood donors) can also effectively treat some autoimmune diseases including immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Interestingly, the onset of diabetes in NOD mice can also be delayed, but not fully blocked by administration of IVIg and this may correlate with induction of Tregs (and/or IL-10). Moreover etanercept (trade name ENBREL®), a soluble TNF-receptor, has also been shown to decrease the incidence of diabetes in NOD mice and has been used in small scale human trials. Hence, novel approaches to increase Treg cells (and/or IL-10) while decreasing inflammatory T cell responses (e.g. , Th17, NK cells) could be beneficial in treating autoimmune diabetes.
A state of anergy or immune tolerance can be considered therapeutically beneficial in subjects experiencing (or at risk of experiencing) an abnormal immune response, such as for example an auto-immune disease. Individuals afflicted by auto-immune diseases have either low levels of Tregs and/or elevated levels of pro-inflammatory T cells (such as Th17 and/or Th1) when compared to age- and sex-matched healthy individuals. Such auto-immune diseases include, but are not limited to, type I diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, lupus, immune thrombocytopenia, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, auto-immune uveitis, psoriasis inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma and Crohn's disease. Because it is shown herein that the acellular preparations are beneficial for increasing the ratio Tregs/pro-inflammatory T cells, it is expected that administration of the acellular preparations to afflicted subjects will alleviate symptoms associated with the auto-immune disease and/or prevent disease severity.
A state of anergy or tolerance can also be considered therapeutically beneficial in subjects at risk of developing an abnormally elevated/excessive immune response. Such abnormally elevated immune response can be observed in subjects receiving a vaccine. For example, it has been shown that subjects receiving a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine develop an excessive immune response. Because it is shown herein that the acellular preparations are beneficial for increasing the ratio Tregs/pro-inflammatory T cells, it is expected that administration of the acellular preparations to subject having received or intended to receive a vaccine will alleviate symptoms associated with the administration of the vaccine and/or prevent the development of an excessive immune response. In such embodiment, the acellular preparation can be administered (or formulated for administration) prior to the vaccine, simultaneously with the vaccine or after the administration of the vaccine. When used to prevent or limit excessive immune response to a vaccine, the acellular preparations can be manufactured from a conditioned medium. The conditioned medium can be obtained by co- culturing a first leukocyte, being allogeneic or xenogeneic to a second leukocyte, which can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be vaccinated. The second leukocyte, much like the first leukocyte, can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be vaccinated. When used to prevent or limit an excessive immune response to a vaccine, the acellular preparations can also be manufactured from a conditioned blood. The conditioned blood can be obtained by administered a first leukocyte, being allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject, which can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be vaccinated.
Such abnormally elevated immune response can also be observed in subjects having received a transplant (cells or tissues). In these instances, the acellular preparations can be used to prevent or limit the elevated/excessive immune response (e.g. graft destruction or graft rejection). In an embodiment, the acellular preparation can be contacted with the cells/tissue to be transplanted prior to the transplantation (e.g. for example in a transplant medium or a preservation medium). When used to prevent or limit graft destruction or graft rejection, the acellular preparations can be manufactured from a conditioned medium. The conditioned medium can be obtained by co-culturing a first leukocyte, being allogeneic or xenogeneic to a second leukocyte, which can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be treated. Alternatively, the first leukocyte is allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the cells or tissue intended to be grafted. The second leukocyte, much like the first leukocyte, can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be treated. Alternatively, the second leukocyte is allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the cells or tissue intended to be grafted. When used to prevent or limit graft destruction or graft rejection, the acellular preparations can also be manufactured from a conditioned blood. The conditioned blood can be obtained by administering a first leukocyte, being allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject, which can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the subject to be treated. Alternatively, the first leukocyte is allogeneic, xenogeneic, autologous or syngeneic to the cells or tissue intended to be grafted.
Alternatively or optionally, the acellular preparations can also be used to prevent or limit a graft- vs.-host disease (GVHD) in a subject having received or intended to receive transplanted immune cells or stem cells. In an embodiment, the acellular preparations can be contacted (e.g. cultured) with the cells intended to be grafted prior to transfusion in the subject (e.g. for example in a transplantation medium or preservation medium) to induce a state of anergy or tolerance in those cells. In another embodiment, the acellular preparations can be administered to the subject prior to the transfusion of immune/stem cells to induce a state of anergy or tolerance to prevent or limit GVHD. In still another embodiment, the acellular preparations can be administered simultaneously with the transfused immune/stem cells to prevent or limit GVHD. In yet another embodiment, the acellular preparations can be administered to a subject having been transfused with immune cells or stem cells either to alleviate the symptoms associated to GVHD (when the subject experiences such symptoms) or to prevent GVHD (when the subject is at risk of experiencing such symptoms).
For the treatment of GVHD, the conditioned medium can be obtained by co-culturing two allogeneic/xenogeneic leukocyte population. In an embodiment, the first leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the donor (of the immune or stem cells). In another embodiment, the first leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the recipient (intended to receive the immune or stem cells). In still another embodiment, the second leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the donor. In yet another embodiment, the second leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the recipient. For the treatment of GVHD, the conditioned blood can be obtained by administering a first leukocyte allogeneic or xenogeneic to the test subject (e.g. and in an embodiment to the donor). In an embodiment, the first leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the donor. In another embodiment, the first leukocyte population can be allogeneic, xenogeneic, syngeneic to or derived from the recipient.
The acellular preparation the acellular preparation can be administered (or formulated for administration) prior to the transplant, simultaneously with the transplant or after the transplant. ln the methods and acellular preparations described herein, it is contemplated that the acellular- based preparations be optionally administered with other therapeutic agents known to be useful for the treatment, prevention and/or alleviation of symptoms of conditions associated to an excessive/abnormal immune response, such as, for example, cortisone, IL-10, IL-1 1 and/or IL- 12.
The present invention will be more readily understood by referring to the following examples which are given to illustrate the invention rather than to limit its scope.
EXAMPLE I - MATERIAL AND METHODS
Human PBMC and dendritic cell preparation. Human whole blood was collected in heparinized vacutainer blood collection tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) from healthy volunteer donors following informed consent. PBMC were isolated from diluted whole blood using FicollePaque PREMIUM™ (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp, Piscataway, NJ) as per the product instructions. The PBMC layer was washed twice with 1X Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS; without CaCI2 and MgS04; Invitrogen by Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and resuspended in the appropriate media as needed for mixed lymphocyte reactions and flow cytometric analysis of Treg and Th17 phenotypes. Dendritic cells (DC) were prepared from isolated PBMC as described by O'Neill and Bhardwaj (O'Neill et al., 2005). Briefly, freshly isolated PBMC were overlaid on Petri dishes for 3 h in AIM V serum free culture medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Non-adherent cells were gently washed off the plate. The adherent cells (monocyte rich cells) were treated with IL-4 and GM-CSF (50 and 100 ng/mL respectively; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) in AIM V medium. Cells were again treated with IL-4 and GM-CSF on days 2 and 5. On day 6, cells were centrifuged and resuspended in fresh media supplemented with DC maturation factors (TNF-a, I L- 1 , IL-6; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and prostaglandin E2 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The mature DC-like cells were harvested on day 7 and CD80, CD83, CD86 and HLA-DR expressions were determined to confirm DC maturation via flow cytometry (FACSCalibur™ Flow Cytometer, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).
Murine splenocyte and tissue harvesting. All murine studies were done in accordance with the Canadian Council of Animal Care and the University of British Columbia Animal Care Committee guidelines and were conducted within the Centre for Disease Modeling at the University of British Columbia. Murine donor cells used for the in vivo donation and in vitro studies were euthanized by C02. Three allogeneic strains of mice were utilized for syngeneic and allogeneic in vitro and in vivo challenge: Balb/c, H-2d; C57BI/6, H-2b; and C3H, H-2k. Murine spleens, brachial lymph nodes, and peripheral blood were collected at the indicated days. Mouse spleens and brachial lymph nodes were dissected and placed into cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 1.9 mM NaH2P04, 8.1 mM Na2HP04, and 154 mM NaCI, pH 7.3) containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO.) and kept on ice until ready to process. Whole blood was collected in heparinized tubes via cardiac puncture. Murine donor splenocytes were prepared from freshly harvested syngeneic or allogeneic spleens via homogenization into a cell suspension in PBS (0.2% BSA) using the frosted end of two microscope slides. The resultant cell suspension was spun down at 500 x g. The splenocyte pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of 1X BD Pharm LYSE™ lysing buffer (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) and incubated for 1 min at room temperature. Lymph node cells were harvested via tissue homogenization as described above, washed twice and resuspended in PBS (0.2% BSA) for flow cytometric analysis of Th17, Treg and murine haplotype. Recipient peripheral blood lymphocytes were prepared via lysis of the red cells (BD Pharm Lyse lysing buffer; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) at 1X concentration, followed by washing (1X) and resuspension in PBS (0.2% BSA) for flow analysis of Th17, Treg and murine haplotype.
mPEG modification (PEGylation) of PBMCs and splenocytes. Human PBMC and murine splenocytes were derivatized using methoxypoly(-ethylene glycol) succinimidyl valerate (mPEG- SVA; Laysan Bio Inc. Arab, AL) with a molecular weight of 20 kDa as previously described (Scott et al., 1997; Murad et al, 1999A; Chen et al. , 2003; Chen et al., 2006, Wang et al., 201 1). Grafting concentrations was 1 mM per 4 x 106 cells/mL. Cells were incubated with the activated mPEG for 60 min at room temperature in isotonic alkaline phosphate buffer (50 mM K2HP04 and 105 mM NaCI; pH 8.0), then washed twice with 25 mM HEPES/RPMI 1640 containing 0.01 % human albumin. Murine splenocytes used for in vivo studies were resuspended in sterile saline at a final cell density of 2.0 x 108 cells/ml for intravenous (i.v.) injection.
In vitro and in vivo cell proliferation. Cell proliferation (both in vitro and in vivo) was assessed via flow cytometry using the CELLTRACE™ CFSE (Carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester) Cell Proliferation Kit (Invitrogen by Life Technologies e Molecular probes, Carlsbad, CA). Human and murine cells labeling was done according to the product insert at a final concentration of 2.5 mM CFSE per 2 x 106 cells total. Donor and recipient cell proliferation was differentially determined by haplotype analysis. In some experiments, cell proliferation was measured by 3H-thymidine incorporation. In these experiments, donor splenocytes (5.12 x 106 cells per well) were co-incubated in triplicate in 96-well plates at 37°C, 5% C02 for 3 days. On day 3, all wells were pulsed with 3H-thymidine and incubated for 24 h at 37°C, 5% C02. Cellular DNA was collected on filter mats using a Skatron cell harvester (Suffolk, U.K.) and cellular proliferation was measured by 3H-thymidine incorporation.
Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) - control and conditioned medium. The immunodulatory effects of the various preparations were assayed using a MLR (Murad et al, 1999A; Chen et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2006; Wang et al., 201 1). For the human MLRs, PBMC from two MHC- disparate human donors were labeled with CFSE. For mice MLR, splenocytes from two H-2- disparate mice (Balb/c and C57BI/6) were labeled with CFSE. Each MLR reaction well contained a total of 1 x 106 cells (single donor for resting or mitogen stimulation or equal numbers for disparate donors for MLR). Cells were plated in multiwell flat-bottom 24-well tissue culture plates (BD Biosciences, Discovery Labware, Bedford, MA). PBMC proliferation, cytokine secretion, as well as Treg and Th17 phenotyping was done. For flow cytometric analysis, the harvested cells were resuspended in PBS (0.1 % BSA).
Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. The T lymphocytes populations (double positive for CD3+ and CD4+) were measured by flow cytometry using fluorescently labeled anti-CD3 and anti-CD4 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), anti-IL-2, anti-IL-4, anti-IL-10, anti-IL-12, anti-IL-17, anti-FoxP3, anti-NK1.1 , anti-IFN-γ, anti-TNF-a, anti-CD152, anti CD62L and anti-CD1 1 c monoclonal antibodies. Human and mouse Regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg) were CD3+/CD4+ and FoxP3+ (transcription factor) while inflammatory Th17 lymphocytes cells were CD3+/CD4+ and IL-17+ (cytokine) as measured per the BD Treg/Th17 Phenotyping Kit (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). After the staining, the cells (1 x 106 cells total) were washed and resuspended in PBS (0.1 % BSA) prior to flow acquisition. Isotype controls were also used to determine background fluorescence. All samples were acquired using the FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and CellQuest Pro™ software for both acquisition and analysis.
In vivo murine studies. The following strains were used Balb/c, H-2d; C57BI/6, H-2b; and C3H, H-2k (Chen et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2006) as well a NOD (Anderson et al., 2005). All mice (donors and recipients) were 9-1 1 weeks old. Donor splenocytes were prepared were transfused intravenously (i.v.) via the tail vein into recipient animals. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice injected with sterile saline served as control animals. Animals were euthanized by C02 at predetermined intervals at which time blood, brachial lymph nodes and spleen were collected and processed for Th17/Treg phenotyping analysis and splenocyte proliferation studies by flow cytometry.
Conditioned plasma. Mouse were either untreated (naive) or treated with saline, non-polymer modified allogeneic splenocytes or PEGylated allogeneic splenocytes (obtained by the procedures explained above). After five days, a cell-free conditioned plasma was obtained (from mouse blood using the mirVana™ PARIS™ kit from Ambion by Life Technologies) and transfused to another naive mouse.
Plasma fractionation. The plasma fractionation was performed using centrifugal filter molecular cutoff devices. Millipore's Amicon® Ultra-0.5 centrifugal filter devices were used (Amicon Ultra 3k, 10K, 30K, 50K, and 100K devices).
miRNA extraction. The miRNA was extracted from samples (conditioned medium or plasma) using mirVana™ PARIS™ kit from Ambion® by Life Technologies according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the sample is mixed with the 2X denaturing solution provided and subjected to acid-phenol:chloroform extraction. To isolate RNA that is highly enriched for small RNA species, 100% ethanol was added to bring the samples to 25% ethanol. When this lysate/ethanol mixture was passed through a glass-fiber filter, large RNAs are immobilized, and the small RNA species are collected in the filtrate. The ethanol concentration of the filtrate was then increased to 55%, and it was passed through a second glass-fiber filter where the small RNAs become immobilized. This RNA is washed a few times, and eluted in a low ionic strength solution. Using this approach, an RNA fraction highly enriched in RNA species <200 nt can be obtained. Note that the large RNA species (>200 nt) can be recovered from the first filter if necessary.
TA preparations. The murine miRNA preparations (e.g. TA1 preparations) used were extracted from the conditioned plasma obtained 5 days after mice have received mPEG allogeneic splenocytes. Extraction can occur at time points other than 5 days (e.g., 24 hours post administration) and yield similar results (data not shown). Five days was chosen as Treg levels achieved maximal levels at this point in the mice. The human miRNA preparations (e.g. TA2 preparations) used were extracted from the conditioned medium of an mPEG-MLR harvested 72 hours following the initiation of the mPEG-MLR. However, miRNA harvested from human PBMC mPEG-MLR at 24 hours also yields the desired immunomodulatory effects (data not shown). To calibrate, miRNA concentration can be quantitated via a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (LifeTechnologies) and selected fluorescent dyes which emit a signal only when bound to specific target (i.e., miRNA) molecules.
miRNA characterization. The miRNA of the conditioned medium were characterized by qPCR using the miScript miRNA™ PCR Array Human Immunopathology (Qiagen) for human conditioned medium and the Mouse Immunopathology miRNA PCR Array™ (Qiagen) for mouse conditioned plasma/media.
RNase treatment. Murine plasma was pooled and for each individual mouse. For each 500 μΙ_ of murine plasma (or the <10 kDa plasma fraction), 50 ng RNase (RNase A, 20 mg/mL stock, Life Technologies (In Vitrogen)) was added. Then samples were incubated for 10 minutes at 37°C to degrade the nucleic acids. The control plasma (or < 10 kDa fraction) without RNAase A treatment was incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The RNase treated plasma (100 μΙ per mouse) was injected (i.v.) into mice (n = 5). RNase A alone (10 ng/mouse) was used for the control mice to insure that the RNase A was not toxic and this trace amount of RNase did not have an in vivo immunomodulatory effects.
Phosphorylation of phosphokinases. Analyzing the phosphorylation state of kinases and their protein substrates allows for the characterization of the effects of conditioned plasma or media on how cells respond to allogeneic stimuli. The human phospho-kinase array (R&D Systems Inc) is a rapid, sensitive tool to simultaneously detect the relative levels of phosphorylation of 43 kinase phosphorylation sites and 2 related total proteins. Each capture antibody was carefully selected using cell lysates prepared from cell lines known to express the target protein. Capture and control antibodies are spotted in duplicate on nitrocellulose membranes. Cell lysates are diluted and incubated overnight with the human phospho-kinase array. The array is washed to remove unbound proteins followed by incubation with a cocktail of biotinylated detection antibodies. Streptavidin-HRP and chemiluminescent detection reagents are applied and a signal is produced at each capture spot corresponding to the amount of phosphorylated protein bound. Statistical analysis. Data analysis for flow analysis was conducted using SPSS™ (v12) statistical software (Statistical Products and Services Solutions, Chicago, IL, USA). For significance, a minimum p value of <0.05 was used. For comparison of three or more means, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. When significant differences were found, a post-hoc Tukey test was used for pair-wise comparison of means. When only two means were compared, student-t tests were performed.
EXAMPLE II -IN VITRO AND IN VIVO IMMUNOMODULATION OF SIZE-FRACTIONATED
ACELLULAR PREPARATIONS
Two-way human PBMC MLRs were prepared using the conditioned medium collected at 72 hours from mPEG MLR as the primary MLR. The conditioned medium was fractionated with respect to its molecular weight (higher or lower than 10 kDa). As shown on Figure 1 , the fraction of the conditioned medium derived from PEGylated MLR and having a molecular weight of less than 10 kDa retained the ability to increase human Treg levels in vitro. As also shown in Figure 1 , the fraction having a molecular weight higher than 10 kDa did not have the ability to increase Treg levels in vitro in the secondary MLR.
A conditioned cell-free plasma from untreated mouse (naive), mouse having received saline (saline), allogeneic unmodified splenocytes (allogeneic) and PEGylated allogeneic splenocytes (mPEG-allogeneic) were obtained 5 days after treatment. The conditioned plasma was either left untreated (e.g. complete) or fractionated in function of the size of its components (> 100 kDa, between 30 and 100 kDa, between 10 and 30 kDa or < 10 kDa). The conditioned plasma was then transfused to naive mouse.
As shown on Figure 2A, the < 10 kDa fraction of the conditioned plasma from mouse having received mPEG allogeneic splenotytes retained the ability to increase Treg levels in vivo. As shown on Figure 2B, the < 10 kDa fraction of the conditioned plasma from mouse having received mPEG allogeneic splenotytes retained the ability to decrease Th17 levels in vivo. The immunodulatory effect of conditioned murine plasma seems to mostly reside in the lower molecular weight fraction (< 10 kDa). This low molecular weight fraction does not include the majority of cytokines (usually encompasses in the 100-30 and the 30-10 kDa fractions) typically thought to mediate immunodulation of Tregs and pro-inflammatory leukocytes. However, the < 10 kDa fraction is suspected to contain, among its components, microRNAs (miRNAs).
To determine if the miRNAs in the conditioned plasma mediated the immunomodulatory effects observed with the conditioned plasma, mice were injected with control conditioned plasma or the same plasma that had been pre-treated with RNase A, an enzyme that degrades/destroys ribonucleic acids such as miRNAs. As noted in Figure 2C, treatment with RNase A abolishes virtually all immunomodulatory activity of the conditioned medium, thereby confirming the ribonucleic acid nature of the size-fractionated conditioned plasma.
The size-fractionation conditioned plasma was administered to mice and its effects on the intracellular cytokine expression of CD4+ cells was examined. As shown on Figure 3, the < 10 kDa fraction and some of the < 3 kDa fraction of the conditioned plasma from mouse having received mPEG allogeneic splenotytes increase IL-10 intracellular expression in CD4+ cells in vivo (Figure 3A). However, the < 10 kDa fraction and the < 3 kDa fraction of the conditioned plasma from mouse having received mPEG allogeneic splenotytes did not exhibit any increase in IL-2, TNF-a, IFN-γ or IL-4 intracellular expression in CD4+ cells in vivo (Figures 3B to 3E). The < 10 kDa (and some of the > 3 kDa) fraction of the conditioned of the mPEG-allogeneic plasma, when compared to the corresponding fractions of the conditioned allogeneic plasma, increased the expression of pro-tolerogenic cytokines, such as IL-10, while actively preventing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-2, TNF-a, IFN-γ or IL-4. Indeed, proinflammatory cytokines in the mPEG allogeneic plasma recipients remained at levels seen in naive animals.
EXAMPLE III - IN VITRO AND IN VIVO IMMUNE MODULATION BY miRNA-ENRICHED
ACELLULAR PREPARATIONS
The conditioned plasma or the miRNA preparation (100 μί) obtained from the conditioned plasma (of mice having received saline, unmodified allogeneic splenocytes or polymer-modified allogeneic splenocytes) were administered intravenously to 7-8 week-old mice thrice (at days 0, 2 and 4). Cohorts (n = 4) of mice were sacrificed at days 30, 60, 120, 180 and 270. Spleens were removed and CD4+ cells were stained for intracellular expression of IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, INF-γ and TNF-a. Splenic Treg and Th17 populations were also measured. As shown on Figures 4A- C, the administration of the conditioned plasma or the derived miRNA preparation from mouse having received unmodified allogeneic splenocytes caused an increase in the expression of intracellular IL-2 and INF-γ in CD4+ cells. On the other hand, the administration of the conditioned plasma or the derived miRNA preparation from mouse having received mPEG- modified allogeneic splenocytes (i.e., TA1 preparation) caused an increase in the expression of intracellular IL-10 in CD4+ cells. These modulations in expression were observed until at least 270 days after the administration of the conditioned medium or the miRNA preparation. This data suggests that miRNA was an active component mediating the immunological changes, RNase treatment of the conditioned plasma or of the miRNA preparation prior to administration to animals either diminished (plasma) or abolished (miRNA) the immunomodulatory effects. While conditioned plasma retained some immunomodulatory effect, it is believed that it was due to residual cytokines and/or plasma-mediated inactivation of the RNAase A enzyme.
As also shown on Figure 4D, the administration of the conditioned plasma or the derived miRNA preparation from mouse having received mPEG-modified allogeneic splenocytes (i.e., TA1 preparation) caused an increase in the percentage of Treg (Foxp3+) cells in function of the total CD4+ cells. On the other hand, the administration of the conditioned plasma or the derived miRNA preparation from mouse having received unmodified allogeneic splenocytes caused an increase in the percentage of Th17 (IL-17+) cells in function of the total CD4+ cells (Figure 4E). These modulations in CD4+ cells types were observed at least 270 days after the administration of the conditioned medium or the miRNA preparations and were diminished (plasma) or abolished (miRNA) with a preliminary RNase treatment. Acellular preparations prepared from mice injected with either allogeneic or mPEG-allogeneic leukocytes exerted potent and long- lasting effects in naive recipient mice. In aggregate, allogeneic-derived preparations (plasma or miRNA) yielded a pro-inflammatory state while mPEG-allogeneic-derived preparations (plasma or miRNA) yielded a immunoquiescent state.
Murine and human-derived miRNA preparations exert a direct effect on cell signaling. Murine TA1 preparations have been incubated with Jurkat cells (1 x 106 cells/ml treated with 50 μΙ of TA1/ml) and the level of phosphorylation of some of the phosphokinase has been measured after 30 minutes of incubation. As shown on Figure 5, TA1 preparations favored the phosphorylation of Akt and PRAS40 kinases while decreasing the phosphorylation of the HSP60 kinase.
Murine TA1 preparations were also introduced (at time 0) into a human PBMC MLR assay in order to determine their effect on human allo-recognition. As indicated on Figure 6, the presence of the murine TA1 preparations resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the percentage in leukocyte proliferation (at both 10 and 14 days) which is indicative of their pro- tolerogenic effects. This data also indicates that the TA1 preparations show significant evolutionary conservations (both sequence specific and similarity) since the murine TA1 are highly effective in a xenogeneic system (e.g. human MLR). To compare the therapeutic efficacy of the manufactured miRNA preparations, the murine TA1 preparation was directly compared to a known, clinically used, pro-tolerogenic therapeutic product (etanercept; trade name ENBREL®). TA1 and etanercept were introduced in a mouse MLR (using Blab/c and C57BI/6 splenocytes) and the proliferation of the splenocytes were measured. As shown in Figure 7, TA1 more efficiently repressed CD4+ splenocyte proliferation (Figure 7A) and CD8+ splenocyte proliferation (Figure 7B) than did etanercept. This data demonstrates that the TA1 preparation induced a much more potent immunosuppressive effect than the medicinal ingredient of the drug ENBREL®. While dosing of CBS-TA1 is expressed in μΙ/ml, the active component (i.e., miRNA) within the TA1 preparation is in the pg-ng range. While the murine TA1 preparation proved effective both in vitro and in vivo in experimental models involving immunologically normal cells and animals, to test the effectiveness of the TA1 preparation, a model of autoimmune disease, NOD mice were used. In the NOD mice, autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic islets begins within approximately 10-15 weeks of birth and is confirmed by elevated blood glucose measures. The lymphocytes from pre-diabetic and diabetic animals has been obtained from the spleen, the brachial lymph node and the pancreatic lymph node. These lymphocytes have been submitted to flow cytometry using anti- IL-17A (PE) and anti-FoxP3 (Alexa 697) antibodies. As shown in Figure 8, significant changes in the levels of Th17 and Treg lymphocytes are noted in the spleen, brachial lymph node and pancreatic lymph nodes upon conversion of NOD mice from non-diabetic to diabetic state. These changes are characterized by dramatically increased Th17 (top numbers in each panels) and significantly decreased Treg (lower numbers in each panels) lymphocytes.
Murine TA1 preparations were obtained from normal Balb/c or C57BI/6 mice and 100 μί was administered intravenously once to 10 week-old NOD mice (n = 5). Naive NOD mice were used for comparison. The administration of TA1 caused a shift in immune modulation at day 5 post treatment towards immune tolerance by decreasing the circulating blood levels of proinflammatory Th17 cells by over 50% (0.17% versus 0.38% for untreated NOD mice).
As shown in Figure 9A, the administration of the murine TA1 preparations (3 times 100 μΙ i.v. injections each 2 days apart) to 7 week-old NOD mice NOD mice yielded significant protection against progression to diabetes. Results are shown as the percentage of normoglycemic animals in function of age (in weeks) and treatment (dashed line = TA1 , solid line = naive NOD mice). In this model, diabetes begins to occur at approximately 15 weeks. Between weeks 15 and 20, 75% of untreated mice developed hyperglycemia (i.e. diabetes) compared to 13% of TA1 -treated mice. After 30 weeks, 9 out of the 15 animals treated with TA1 remained normoglycemic compared to only 4 out of the 16 for untreated animals. Even in the TA1 -treated mice that developed diabetes (6 out of 15), TA1 treatment significantly delayed the onset of diabetes with 67% of the diabetic animals occurring at greater than 20 weeks of age. In contrast, 100% of the diabetic control NOD mice arose before 20 weeks of age. Moreover, the onset of diabetes correlated with the Treg:Th17 ratio as shown in Figure 9B. A high Treg:Th17 ratio protected against, or delayed, the age of onset for overt diabetes. As shown, untreated diabetic NOD mice demonstrated lower Treg/Th17 ratios compared to diabetic TA1 -treated NOD mice. The higher Treg/Th17 ratio of the TA1 -treated mice similarly correlated with a delayed onset of diabetes in the mice that developed overt disease. At 30 weeks of age, all survivor (i.e. normoglycemic) mice were sacrificed and their Treg/Th17 ratios determined As shown in Figure 9B, very high Treg/Th17 ratio were characteristic of normoglycemic animals in both the untreated and TA1 -treated groups. The importance of the Treg/Th17 ratio is further shown in Figure 9C in which the ratio is described in normal mouse strains (Balb/c and C57/BI6) pre-diabetic NOD mice (7 weeks of age), diabetic control and TA1 -treated NOD mice as well as normoglycemic control and TA1 -treated NOD mice. As shown by the normoglycemic animals, a significantly higher (p<0.0001) Treg/Th17 ratio was observed relative to diabetic mice.
The administration of the murine TA1 preparations to NOD mice caused a systemic and/or local increase in pro-tolerogenic leukocytes. Leukocyte populations were quantitated at time of sacrifice of the mice (weeks 15-30). Treatment at 7 weeks of age with TA1 yielded a persistent and significant increase in Treg cells in all tissues of the NOD mouse measured with the exception of the thymus (Figure 10A). This data suggest that TA1 exerts a potent immunomodulatory effect on lymphatic organs. Tregs counter-balance/attenuate proinflammatory lymphocytes such as Th17 and Th1 cells. The administration of murine TA1 similarly caused an increase in the expression of TGF-β. As shown in Figure 10B, the TA1 preparation increased TGF-β* cells in the treated mice. TGF-β counter-balance/attenuate proinflammatory lymphocytes such as Th17 and Th1 cells. Exogenous TGF-β has previously been shown to prevent autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice. The administration of TA1 s increased the level of expression of IL-4+, a marker of Th2 cells (Figure 10C), further confirming its immonomodulatory effect on lymphatic organs. The administration of TA1 s increased the level of expression of IL-10+, another marker of Th2 cells (Figure 10D) as well as the percentage of CD62L+ cells (Figure 10E), CD152+ cells (Figure 10F) and CD1 1 c+ cells (Figure 10G). This modulation was however more pronounced in the pancreas of the treated animals. Moreover, histopathological analysis demonstrated that TA1 treatment prevented/diminished leukocyte infiltration and destruction of the pancreatic islets (data not shown). While >95% of islets examined from untreated NOD mice (both diabetic and 30 week old non-diabetic) exhibited overt insulitis (60%) or perinsulitis (40%), less than 10% of islets from the non-diabetic 30 week old TA1 mice exhibited overt insulitis while ~60 percent of islets were completely normal. In TA1-treated mice that became diabetic, approximately 35% of islets were normal in appearance while 25% demonstrated overt insulitis, with the remained of mice exhibiting varying degrees of peri-insultis.
The administration of the murine TA1 preparations to NOD mice also caused a decrease in proinflammatory Th17 cells and Th1 cells, as shown by the decrease in the percentage of IL-17A+ cells (Figure 1 1 A) as well as the decrease in the percentage of INF-v+ cells (Figure 1 1 B), IL-2+ cells (Figure 1 1 C), TNF-a+ cells (Figure 1 1 D) and IL-12+ cells (Figure 1 1 E). This data suggest that the TA1 preparations prevented Th17/Th1 upregulation in the treated mice. As it is know in the art, Th1 and Th17 lymphocytes mediate islet cell destruction. Interestingly, the administration of TA1 s caused a significant increase in the level of NK cells (as measured by the expression of NK1.1 + cells on Figure 1 1 F) in the pancreas, but not in other tissues. It is believed that the differentially induced NK cells in the pancreas destroys autoreactive (i.e. inflammatory) cells providing an additional immunomodulatory mechanism resulting in decreased diabetes.
Further, it has been shown are that the administration of TA1 s increases B10+ (B regulatory) cells and tolerogeneic DC cell levels while decreasing APC associated with inflammation (data not shown) further confirming the pro-tolerogenic effects of TA1 s.
EXAMPLE IV - miRNA CHARACTERIZATION OF ACELLULAR PROTOLEROGENIC
PREPARATIONS
In order to characterize the constituents of the miRNA preparations, the miRNA of conditioned medium collected at 72 hours from resting human PBMC, a human control MLR (using two HLA disparate PBMC populations), and a mPEG MLR (using the same two allogeneic PBMC populations wherein one population is modified with a polymer, e.g. mPEG) (this human miRNA preparation is herewith referred to as TA2) and compared via qPCR analysis. The combined average of the resting Donor A and resting Donor B (i.e., resting AB) were used, unless otherwise noted, for baseline in all analyses.
As shown in Figure 12A, when the miRNA population from the conditioned medium from a control MLR is compared to the miRNA population of the supernatant of resting cells, using a volcano plot analysis, at least five different miRNAs are differentially expressed (e.g. increased) by statistical significance (p < 0.01 for miR-9-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-206, miR-147a and p < 0.05 for miR-214-3p) and at least one miRNA is modulated by at least a log2 (e.g.miR-302a-3p). In contrast, as shown in Figure 12B, when the miRNA population from the conditioned medium from a mPEG MLR (e.g. TA2) is compared, using a volcano plot analysis, with the miRNA population of the supernatant of resting cells, at least one miRNA is differentially expressed (e.g. increased) by statistical significance (p < 0.05 for miR-214-3p) and at least one miRNA is modulated by at least a log2 fold (e.g. miR-149-5p). A direct comparison of mPEG-MLR (e.g. TA2) to the control MLR as shown in Figure 12C, demonstrates that at least two miRNAs are differentially expressed by volcano statistical significance (p < 0.01 for miR-155-5p and p < 0.05 for miR-9-5p) and at least two miRNAs are modulated by at least a log2 (e.g. miR-183-5p and mir-147a).
On Figure 12, nine miRNA species were identified. These miRNA species were selected because they were considered to be differentially expressed as determined by clustergram analysis between the control MLR and mPEG-MLR. The miRNA species identified with 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 showed increased abundance in the mPEG MLR relative to the control MLR. The miRNA species identified with 4 has a relative abundance similar in both the control MLR and mPEG-MLR and elevated relative to resting cells.
Further characterization of the miRNA population of the conditioned medium of the control MLR and mPEG MLR is provided in fold change analysis. Figure 13 provides a summary of the fold regulation of the purified miRNA preparations differentially expressed in the conditioned medium of a control MLR and a mPEG MLR (TA2) when compared to the conditioned medium of resting cells. Figure 14 provides a subset of the miRNAs presented in Figure 13 and exhibiting at least a log2 fold modulation when compared to resting cells. As indicated in Figure 14, a subpopulation of miRNAs are decreased in the conditioned medium from the mPEG MLR and increased in the conditioned medium from the control MLR (miR-183-5p, miR-203a, miR363- 3p). As also indicated in Figure 14, another subpopulation of miRNAs are increased in the conditioned medium from the mPEG MLR and decreased in the conditioned medium from the control MLR (miR-21-5p, miR-27a-3p, miR 27b-3p, miR-298, miR-34a-5p, let-7a-5p, let-7e-5p, miR-132-3p).
References
Anderson MS, Bluestone JA. The NOD mouse: a model of immune dysregulation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:447-85.
Bradley AJ, Test ST, Murad KL, Mitsuyoshi J, Scott MD. Interactions of IgM ABO antibodies and complement with methoxy-PEG-modified human RBCs. Transfusion 2001 ;41 :1225-33.
Bradley AJ, Scott MD. Immune complex binding by immunocamouflaged [poly(ethylene glycol)- grafted] erythrocytes. Am J Hematol 2007;82:970-5.
Chen AM, Scott MD. Current and future applications of immunological attenuation via pegylation of cells and tissue. BioDrugs 2001 ;15:833-47.
Chen AM, Scott MD. Immunocamouflage: prevention of transfusion-induced graft-versus-host disease via polymer grafting of donor cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:626-36. Chen AM, Scott MD. Comparative analysis of polymer and linker chemistries on the efficacy of immunocamouflage of murine leukocytes. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 2006;34:305-22.
Le Y, Scott MD. Immunocamouflage: the biophysical basis of immunoprotection by grafted methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) [mpeg]. Acta Biomater 2010; 6:2631-41.
McCoy LL, Scott MD. Broad spectrum antiviral prophylaxis: inhibition of viral infection by polymer grafting with methoxypoly(ethylene glycol). In: PF T, editor. Antiviral drug discovery for emerging diseases and bioterrorism threats. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons; 2005. p. 379-95.
Murad KL, Gosselin EJ, Eaton JW, Scott MD. Stealth cells: prevention of major histocompatibility complex class ll-mediated T-cell activation by cell surface modification. Blood 1999A; 94:2135-41.
Murad KL, Mahany KL, Brugnara C, Kuypers FA, Eaton JW, Scott MD. Structural and functional consequences of antigenic modulation of red blood cells with methoxypoly(ethylene glycol). Blood 1999B;93:2121-7.
O'Neill DW, Bhardwaj N. Differentiation of peripheral blood monocytes into dendritic cells. Curr Protoc Immunol; 2005. Chapter 22: Unit 22F.4.
Scott MD, Murad KL, Koumpouras F, Talbot M, Eaton JW. Chemical camouflage of antigenic determinants: stealth erythrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:7566-71.
Sutton TC, Scott MD. The effect of grafted methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) chain length on the inhibition of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection and proliferation. Biomaterials 2010;31 :4223-30.
Wang D, Toyofuku WM, Chen AM, Scott MD. Induction of immunotolerance via mPEG grafting to allogeneic leukocytes. Biomaterials. 201 1 Dec;32(35):9494-503.
While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications and this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth, and as follows in the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A process for making an acellular pro-tolerogenic preparation, said process comprising:
(i) associating a low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer to a cytoplasmic membrane of a first leukocyte to obtain a first modified leukocyte;
(ii) contacting the first modified leukocyte with a second leukocyte under conditions to allow a pro-tolerogenic allo-recognition to provide a conditioned preparation, wherein the first leukocyte is allogeneic to the second leukocyte;
(iii) removing the first modified leukocyte and the second leukocyte from the conditioned preparation under conditions to inhibit RNA degradation so as to obtain a composition enriched in acellular pro-tolerogenic components; and
(iv) formulating the composition of step (iii), under conditions to inhibit RNA degradation, in the acellular pro-tolerogenic preparation for administration to a subject.
2. The process of claim 1 , further comprising covalently binding the low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer to a membrane-associated protein of the cytoplasmic membrane of the first leukocyte.
3. The process of claim 1 or 2, wherein the low-immunogenic biocompatible polymer is a polyethylene glycol (PEG).
4. The process of claim 3, wherein the polyethylene glycol is a methoxy polyethylene glycol (mPEG).
5. The process of claim 4, further comprising covalently binding the mPEG by contacting the first leukocyte with methoxypoly(-ethylene glycol) succinimidyl valerate.
6. The process of any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein step (ii) occurs in vitro.
7. The process of claim 6, wherein the conditioned preparation is a supernatant of a cell culture of the first leukocyte and the second leukocyte.
8. The process of claim 6 or 7, further comprising preventing one of the first leukocyte or the second leukocyte from proliferating prior to step (ii).
9. The process of any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein step (ii) occurs in vivo and comprises administering the first modified leukocyte to a mammal having the second leukocyte.
10. The process of claim 9, wherein the conditioned preparation is plasma.
1 1. The process of claim 9 or 10, further comprising preventing the first leukocyte from proliferating prior to administration to the mammal.
12. The process of any one of claims 1 to 1 1 , wherein step (iii) further comprises removing components having an average molecular weight of more than about 10 kDa from the conditioned preparation.
13. The process of claim 12, wherein step (iii) further comprises filtering out components having the average molecular weight of more than about 10 kDa from the conditioned preparation.
14. The process of any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein step (iii) further comprises enriching the conditioned preparation in at least one miRNA species.
15. The process of any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein step (iv) further comprises formulating the composition for intravenous administration to the subject.
16. The process of any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein the first leukocyte and/or the second leukocyte is a T cell.
17. The process of claim 16, wherein the T cell is a CD4-positive T cell.
18. The process of claim 16, wherein the T cell is a CD8-positive T cell.
19. A pro-tolerogenic preparation obtained by the process of any one of claims 1 to 18.
20. The pro-tolerogenic preparation of claim 19 having at least one miRNA species presented in Figure 13.
21. The pro-tolerogenic preparation of claim 20 having at least one of the miRNA species listed any one of Tables 1A to 1 D.
22. The pro-tolerogenic preparation of claim 20 or 21 having at least one of the miRNA species listed in any one of Tables 2A to 2D.
23. The pro-tolerogenic preparation of any one of claims 20 to 22 having at least one of the miRNA species identified in any one of Figures 12A to 12C.
PCT/CA2013/050543 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions and process for making same WO2014008608A1 (en)

Priority Applications (9)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13817560.9A EP2872153B1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions and process for making same
DK13817560.9T DK2872153T3 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 ACCELLULAR PRO-TOLEROGENIC COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
CA2878726A CA2878726C (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions and process for making same
US14/414,404 US10039786B2 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions and process for making same
DK13889025.6T DK3019176T3 (en) 2013-07-12 2013-12-13 APPLICATION OF ACELLULAR PRO-INFLAMMATORY COMPOSITIONS AND PROCEDURES FOR PREPARING THEM
PCT/CA2013/050963 WO2015003240A1 (en) 2013-07-12 2013-12-13 Acellular pro-inflammatory compositions, process for making same and methods of using same
CA2917567A CA2917567A1 (en) 2013-07-12 2013-12-13 Acellular pro-inflammatory compositions, process for making same and methods of using same
US14/904,347 US11007221B2 (en) 2013-07-12 2013-12-13 Acellular pro-inflammatory compositions, process for making same and methods of using same
EP13889025.6A EP3019176B1 (en) 2013-07-12 2013-12-13 Use of acellular pro-inflammatory compositions and process for making same

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261670636P 2012-07-12 2012-07-12
US201261670694P 2012-07-12 2012-07-12
US61/670,694 2012-07-12
US61/670,636 2012-07-12
CA2782942 2012-07-12
CA2782942A CA2782942C (en) 2012-07-12 2012-07-12 Method for inducing immune tolerance using polymer-modified antigenic leukocytes

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2013/050546 Continuation WO2014008611A1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Method for inducing immune stimulation using non-proliferative allogeneic leukocytes

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014008608A1 true WO2014008608A1 (en) 2014-01-16

Family

ID=49914159

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2013/050544 WO2014008609A1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions for the treatment/prevention of auto-immune diseases
PCT/CA2013/050543 WO2014008608A1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions and process for making same
PCT/CA2013/050546 WO2014008611A1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Method for inducing immune stimulation using non-proliferative allogeneic leukocytes
PCT/CA2013/050547 WO2014008612A1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Method for inducing immune tolerance using non-proliferative polymer-modified allogeneic leukocytes
PCT/CA2013/050545 WO2014008610A1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions for treatment/prevention of graft rejection

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2013/050544 WO2014008609A1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions for the treatment/prevention of auto-immune diseases

Family Applications After (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2013/050546 WO2014008611A1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Method for inducing immune stimulation using non-proliferative allogeneic leukocytes
PCT/CA2013/050547 WO2014008612A1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Method for inducing immune tolerance using non-proliferative polymer-modified allogeneic leukocytes
PCT/CA2013/050545 WO2014008610A1 (en) 2012-07-12 2013-07-12 Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions for treatment/prevention of graft rejection

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (6) US10039786B2 (en)
EP (5) EP2872150A4 (en)
CA (6) CA2782942C (en)
DK (3) DK2872153T3 (en)
WO (5) WO2014008609A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016004538A1 (en) 2014-07-10 2016-01-14 Canadian Blood Services Combination therapy of a cellular pro-tolerogenic and pro-inflammatory preparations for modulating the immune system
EP3019176A4 (en) * 2013-07-12 2017-03-15 Canadian Blood Services Acellular pro-inflammatory compositions, process for making same and methods of using same
US10039786B2 (en) 2012-07-12 2018-08-07 Canadian Blood Services Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions and process for making same

Families Citing this family (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11272979B2 (en) 2008-04-29 2022-03-15 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. System and method for estimating tissue heating of a target ablation zone for electrical-energy based therapies
US10238447B2 (en) 2008-04-29 2019-03-26 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. System and method for ablating a tissue site by electroporation with real-time monitoring of treatment progress
US11254926B2 (en) 2008-04-29 2022-02-22 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Devices and methods for high frequency electroporation
US8992517B2 (en) 2008-04-29 2015-03-31 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties Inc. Irreversible electroporation to treat aberrant cell masses
US9283051B2 (en) 2008-04-29 2016-03-15 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. System and method for estimating a treatment volume for administering electrical-energy based therapies
US10702326B2 (en) 2011-07-15 2020-07-07 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Device and method for electroporation based treatment of stenosis of a tubular body part
US10245098B2 (en) 2008-04-29 2019-04-02 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Acute blood-brain barrier disruption using electrical energy based therapy
US9198733B2 (en) 2008-04-29 2015-12-01 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Treatment planning for electroporation-based therapies
US9867652B2 (en) 2008-04-29 2018-01-16 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Irreversible electroporation using tissue vasculature to treat aberrant cell masses or create tissue scaffolds
US11382681B2 (en) 2009-04-09 2022-07-12 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Device and methods for delivery of high frequency electrical pulses for non-thermal ablation
US11638603B2 (en) 2009-04-09 2023-05-02 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Selective modulation of intracellular effects of cells using pulsed electric fields
US8903488B2 (en) 2009-05-28 2014-12-02 Angiodynamics, Inc. System and method for synchronizing energy delivery to the cardiac rhythm
US9895189B2 (en) 2009-06-19 2018-02-20 Angiodynamics, Inc. Methods of sterilization and treating infection using irreversible electroporation
US9700368B2 (en) 2010-10-13 2017-07-11 Angiodynamics, Inc. System and method for electrically ablating tissue of a patient
US9078665B2 (en) 2011-09-28 2015-07-14 Angiodynamics, Inc. Multiple treatment zone ablation probe
US9414881B2 (en) 2012-02-08 2016-08-16 Angiodynamics, Inc. System and method for increasing a target zone for electrical ablation
WO2015157678A2 (en) * 2014-04-10 2015-10-15 The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Use of micro-ribonucleic acid (mirna) to diagnose transplant rejection and tolerance of immunosuppression therapy
CN112807074A (en) 2014-05-12 2021-05-18 弗吉尼亚暨州立大学知识产权公司 Electroporation system
US12114911B2 (en) 2014-08-28 2024-10-15 Angiodynamics, Inc. System and method for ablating a tissue site by electroporation with real-time pulse monitoring
US10694972B2 (en) 2014-12-15 2020-06-30 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Devices, systems, and methods for real-time monitoring of electrophysical effects during tissue treatment
US10905492B2 (en) 2016-11-17 2021-02-02 Angiodynamics, Inc. Techniques for irreversible electroporation using a single-pole tine-style internal device communicating with an external surface electrode
US11607537B2 (en) 2017-12-05 2023-03-21 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Method for treating neurological disorders, including tumors, with electroporation
US11311329B2 (en) 2018-03-13 2022-04-26 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Treatment planning for immunotherapy based treatments using non-thermal ablation techniques
WO2020061192A1 (en) * 2018-09-18 2020-03-26 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Treatment planning system for immunotherapy enhancement via non-thermal ablation
US11925405B2 (en) 2018-03-13 2024-03-12 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Treatment planning system for immunotherapy enhancement via non-thermal ablation
CN108642175B (en) * 2018-08-17 2022-05-17 广西医科大学第一附属医院 Early embryo diapause villus tissue miRNAs biomarker and detection method of expression quantity thereof
US11950835B2 (en) 2019-06-28 2024-04-09 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Cycled pulsing to mitigate thermal damage for multi-electrode irreversible electroporation therapy

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5908624A (en) 1996-06-27 1999-06-01 Albany Medical College Antigenic modulation of cells
WO2009106477A1 (en) * 2008-02-27 2009-09-03 Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg Microrna (mirna) and down-stream targets for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes
US8007784B1 (en) 1996-06-27 2011-08-30 Albany Medical College Antigenic modulation of cells
US8067151B2 (en) 2007-02-09 2011-11-29 Canadian Blood Services Cold storage of pegylated platelets at about or below 0° C.
US20120093936A1 (en) * 2009-04-07 2012-04-19 Velin-Pharma A/S Method and device for treatment of conditions associated with inflammation or undesirable activation of the immune system

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6277635B1 (en) * 1992-03-04 2001-08-21 Schering Corporation Use of interleukin-10 to produce a population of suppressor cells
EP0901521B1 (en) 1996-02-01 2005-11-02 Biomedical Frontiers, Inc. Antigenic modulation of cells
DK0972519T3 (en) 1997-03-07 2006-11-27 Jimro Co Ltd Immune tolerance-inducing
EP1241249A1 (en) 2001-03-12 2002-09-18 Gerold Schuler CD4+CD25+regulatory T cells from human blood
US7651855B2 (en) 2003-04-17 2010-01-26 The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Regulatory T cells and their use in immunotherapy and suppression of autoimmune responses
US7435592B2 (en) * 2003-05-13 2008-10-14 Immunovative Therapies, Ltd. Compositions for allogeneic cell therapy
US20070009497A1 (en) 2004-03-10 2007-01-11 Steinman Ralph M Dendritic cell expanded T suppressor cells and methods of use thereof
ES2564789T3 (en) * 2004-09-15 2016-03-29 The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Methods for isolation and expansion of regulatory blood cells derived from cord blood
CA2649290C (en) 2006-04-13 2017-04-04 Immunovative Therapies, Ltd. Allogeneic cell therapy for treatment of opportunistic infection
CN102597222B (en) 2009-10-27 2015-07-15 因缪尼卡姆股份公司 Method for proliferation of antigen-specific T cells
US9248144B2 (en) 2010-11-11 2016-02-02 University Of Miami Compositions, kits and methods for treatment of cardiovascular, immunological and inflammatory diseases
EP2753362A4 (en) 2011-09-08 2015-04-15 Univ Florida Materials and methods for modulating immune responses
CA2782942C (en) 2012-07-12 2019-08-27 Canadian Blood Services Method for inducing immune tolerance using polymer-modified antigenic leukocytes
WO2015003240A1 (en) 2013-07-12 2015-01-15 Canadian Blood Services Acellular pro-inflammatory compositions, process for making same and methods of using same

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5908624A (en) 1996-06-27 1999-06-01 Albany Medical College Antigenic modulation of cells
US8007784B1 (en) 1996-06-27 2011-08-30 Albany Medical College Antigenic modulation of cells
US8067151B2 (en) 2007-02-09 2011-11-29 Canadian Blood Services Cold storage of pegylated platelets at about or below 0° C.
WO2009106477A1 (en) * 2008-02-27 2009-09-03 Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg Microrna (mirna) and down-stream targets for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes
US20120093936A1 (en) * 2009-04-07 2012-04-19 Velin-Pharma A/S Method and device for treatment of conditions associated with inflammation or undesirable activation of the immune system

Non-Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ANDERSON MS; BLUESTONE JA: "The NOD mouse: a model of immune dysregulation", ANNU REV IMMUNOL., vol. 23, 2005, pages 447 - 85, XP055051268, DOI: doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115643
BRADLEY AJ; SCOTT MD: "Immune complex binding by immunocamouflaged [poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted] erythrocytes", AM J HEMATOL, vol. 82, 2007, pages 970 - 5
BRADLEY AJ; TEST ST; MURAD KL; MITSUYOSHI J; SCOTT MD: "Interactions of IgM ABO antibodies and complement with methoxy-PEG-modified human RBCs", TRANSFUSION, vol. 41, 2001, pages 1225 - 33
CHEN AM; SCOTT MD: "Comparative analysis of polymer and linker chemistries on the efficacy of immunocamouflage of murine leukocytes", ARTIF CELLS BLOOD SUBSTIT IMMOBIL BIOTECHNOL, vol. 34, 2006, pages 305 - 22, XP008176144, DOI: doi:10.1080/10731190600683845
CHEN AM; SCOTT MD: "Current and future applications of immunological attenuation via pegylation of cells and tissue", BIODRUGS, vol. 15, 2001, pages 833 - 47
CHEN AM; SCOTT MD: "Immunocamouflage: prevention of transfusion-induced graft-versus-host disease via polymer grafting of donor cells", J BIOMED MATER RES A, vol. 67, 2003, pages 626 - 36
LE Y; SCOTT MD: "Immunocamouflage: the biophysical basis of immunoprotection by grafted methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) [mpeg", ACTA BIOMATER, vol. 6, 2010, pages 2631 - 41, XP027052694
MCCOY LL; SCOTT MD: "Antiviral drug discovery for emerging diseases and bioterrorism threats", 2005, WILEY & SONS, article "Broad spectrum antiviral prophylaxis: inhibition of viral infection by polymer grafting with methoxypoly(ethylene glycol", pages: 379 - 95
MURAD KL; GOSSELIN EJ; EATON JW; SCOTT MD: "Stealth cells: prevention of major histocompatibility complex class II-mediated T-cell activation by cell surface modification", BLOOD, vol. 94, 1999, pages 2135 - 41
MURAD KL; MAHANY KL; BRUGNARA C; KUYPERS FA; EATON JW; SCOTT MD: "Structural and functional consequences of antigenic modulation of red blood cells with methoxypoly(ethylene glycol", BLOOD, vol. 93, 1999, pages 2121 - 7
O'CONNELL, RM ET AL.: "MicroRNA-155 promotes autoimmune inflammation by enhancing inflammatory T cell development.", IMMUNITY., vol. 33, 29 October 2010 (2010-10-29), pages 607 - 619, XP055081715 *
O'NEILL DW; BHARDWAJ N: "Curr Protoc Immunol", 2005, article "Differentiation of peripheral blood monocytes into dendritic cells"
SCOTT MD; MURAD KL; KOUMPOURAS F; TALBOT M; EATON JW: "Chemical camouflage of antigenic determinants: stealth erythrocytes", PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A, vol. 94, 1997, pages 7566 - 71
See also references of EP2872153A4
STAHL, HF ET AL.: "miR-155 inhibition sensitizes CD4+ Th cells for TREG mediated suppression.", PLOS ONE., vol. 4, 24 September 2009 (2009-09-24), pages E7158, XP055185317 *
SUTTON TC; SCOTT MD: "The effect of grafted methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) chain length on the inhibition of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection and proliferation", BIOMATERIALS, vol. 31, 2010, pages 4223 - 30, XP026947599, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.095
WANG D; TOYOFUKU WM; CHEN AM; SCOTT MD: "Induction of immunotolerance via mPEG grafting to allogeneic leukocytes", BIOMATERIALS, vol. 32, no. 35, December 2011 (2011-12-01), pages 9494 - 503, XP028308470, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.061
WANG, D ET AL.: "Induction of immunotolerance via mPEG grafting to allogeneic leukocytes.", BIOMATERIALS, vol. 32, December 2011 (2011-12-01), pages 9494 - 9503, XP028308470 *

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10039786B2 (en) 2012-07-12 2018-08-07 Canadian Blood Services Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions and process for making same
US10039788B2 (en) 2012-07-12 2018-08-07 Canadian Blood Services Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions for treatment/prevention of graft rejection
US10039787B2 (en) 2012-07-12 2018-08-07 Canadian Blood Services Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions for the treatment/prevention of auto-immune diseases
US10188681B2 (en) 2012-07-12 2019-01-29 Canadian Blood Services Method for inducing immune tolerance using non-proliferative polymer-modified allogeneic leukocytes
EP3019176A4 (en) * 2013-07-12 2017-03-15 Canadian Blood Services Acellular pro-inflammatory compositions, process for making same and methods of using same
US11007221B2 (en) 2013-07-12 2021-05-18 Canadian Blood Services Acellular pro-inflammatory compositions, process for making same and methods of using same
WO2016004538A1 (en) 2014-07-10 2016-01-14 Canadian Blood Services Combination therapy of a cellular pro-tolerogenic and pro-inflammatory preparations for modulating the immune system
US10561685B2 (en) 2014-07-10 2020-02-18 Canadian Bllood Services Combination therapy of acellular pro-tolerogenic and pro-inflammatory preparations for modulating the immune system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2878741A1 (en) 2014-01-16
CA2878726A1 (en) 2014-01-16
WO2014008612A1 (en) 2014-01-16
US20150164948A1 (en) 2015-06-18
CA2782942C (en) 2019-08-27
EP2872150A4 (en) 2016-03-16
US10039786B2 (en) 2018-08-07
EP2872151A4 (en) 2016-04-13
CA2878604A1 (en) 2014-01-16
EP2872153B1 (en) 2019-02-27
EP2872153A4 (en) 2016-04-13
WO2014008609A1 (en) 2014-01-16
CA2878610A1 (en) 2014-01-16
EP2872153A1 (en) 2015-05-20
US20150174168A1 (en) 2015-06-25
CA2878741C (en) 2021-10-19
US20150196597A1 (en) 2015-07-16
EP2872151B1 (en) 2019-09-04
US10039788B2 (en) 2018-08-07
CA2878746C (en) 2021-10-19
US20150209387A1 (en) 2015-07-30
WO2014008611A1 (en) 2014-01-16
CA2878746A1 (en) 2014-01-16
EP2872152A4 (en) 2016-04-13
CA2782942A1 (en) 2014-01-12
EP2872151A1 (en) 2015-05-20
US20140017218A1 (en) 2014-01-16
US20150202229A1 (en) 2015-07-23
WO2014008610A1 (en) 2014-01-16
EP2872150A1 (en) 2015-05-20
US9498496B2 (en) 2016-11-22
EP2872149A1 (en) 2015-05-20
EP2872152B1 (en) 2019-09-04
DK2872152T3 (en) 2019-12-02
US10188681B2 (en) 2019-01-29
CA2878726C (en) 2021-11-23
US10039787B2 (en) 2018-08-07
DK2872151T3 (en) 2019-12-02
DK2872153T3 (en) 2019-05-20
EP2872149A4 (en) 2016-04-06
EP2872152A1 (en) 2015-05-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2872151B1 (en) Acellular pro-tolerogenic compositions for the treatment/prevention of auto-immune diseases
Wang et al. Induction of immunotolerance via mPEG grafting to allogeneic leukocytes
US11007221B2 (en) Acellular pro-inflammatory compositions, process for making same and methods of using same
US20200147133A1 (en) Combination Therapy of Acellular Pro-Tolerogenic and Pro-Inflammatory Preparations for Modulating the Immune System
EP3607054A1 (en) Cellular populations and uses therefor
CA2917567A1 (en) Acellular pro-inflammatory compositions, process for making same and methods of using same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 13817560

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2878726

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 14414404

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2013817560

Country of ref document: EP